21st century skills in education research

Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills

Life in the 21st century requires people to be prepared to fill a variety of roles—as workers, parents, citizens, and consumers—in which they will need to apply their knowledge and skills effectively to rapidly changing situations. Recognizing this need, business, political, and educational leaders are increasingly asking schools to teach students the competencies they will need to navigate a changing world—skills such as problem solving, critical thinking, and collaboration. Such skills are often referred to as “21st century skills,” “soft skills,” or “deeper learning.”

Publications

Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century

Americans have long recognized that investments in public education contribute to the common good, enhancing national prosperity and supporting stable families, neighborhoods, and communities. Education is even more critical today, in the face of economic, environmental, and social challenges. Today's children can meet future challenges if their schooling and informal learning activities prepare them for adult roles as citizens, employees, managers, parents, volunteers, and entrepreneurs. To achieve their full potential as adults, young people need to develop a range of skills and knowledge that facilitate mastery and application of English, mathematics, and other school subjects. At the same time, business and political leaders are increasingly asking schools to develop skills such as problem solving, critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and self-management - often referred to as "21st century skills."

Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century describes this important set of key skills that increase deeper learning, college and career readiness, student-centered learning, and higher order thinking. These labels include both cognitive and non-cognitive skills- such as critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration, effective communication, motivation, persistence, and learning to learn. 21st century skills also include creativity, innovation, and ethics that are important to later success and may be developed in formal or informal learning environments.

This report also describes how these skills relate to each other and to more traditional academic skills and content in the key disciplines of reading, mathematics, and science. Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century summarizes the findings of the research that investigates the importance of such skills to success in education, work, and other areas of adult responsibility and that demonstrates the importance of developing these skills in K-16 education. In this report, features related to learning these skills are identified, which include teacher professional development, curriculum, assessment, after-school and out-of-school programs, and informal learning centers such as exhibits and museums.

Read Full Description

Press Release
Education for Life and Work: Guide for Practitioners
Policy Highlights
Report Brief

Description

An ad hoc committee will review and synthesize current research on the nature of deeper learning and 21st century skills and will address the following:

Define the set of key skills that are referenced by the labels “deeper learning,” “21st century skills,” “college and career readiness,” “student centered learning,” “next generation learning,” “new basic skills,” and “higher order thinking.” These labels are typically used to include both cognitive and non cognitive skills - such as critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration, effective communication, motivation, persistence, and learning to learn that can be demonstrated within core academic content areas and that are important to success in education, work, and other areas of adult responsibility. The labels are also sometimes used to include other important capacities - such as creativity, innovation, and ethics - that are important to later success and may also be developed in formal or informal learning environments.
Describe how these skills relate to each other and to more traditional academic skills and content in the key disciplines of reading, mathematics, and science. In particular, consider these skills in the context of the work of the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers in specifying Common Core State Standards for English language arts and mathematics, and the work of the NRC in specifying a Conceptual Framework for New Science Education Standards.
Summarize the findings of the research that investigates the importance of such skills to success in education, work, and other areas of adult responsibility and that demonstrates the importance of developing these skills in K-16 education.
Summarize what is known - and what research is needed - about how these skills can be learned, taught, and assessed. This summary should include both the cognitive foundations of these skills in learning theory and research about effective approaches to teaching and learning these skills, including approaches using digital media.
Identify features of educational interventions that research suggests could be used as indicators that an intervention is likely to develop the key skills in a substantial and meaningful way. In particular, for learning in formal school-based environments, identify features related to learning these skills in educational interventions in a) teacher professional development, b) curriculum, and c) assessment For learning in informal environments, identify features related to learning these skills in educational interventions in d) after-school and out-of-school programs and e) exhibits, museums, and other informal learning centers. For learning in both formal and informal environments, identify features related to learning these skills in education interventions in f) digital media.

The conclusions and recommendations of the report will provide a common foundation for further research and policy work that seeks to improve the way these skills are developed in K-16 education. The primary messages from the report will be distilled into a short report brief that could be broadly disseminated.

Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education
Board on Testing and Assessment

Center for Education

Consensus Study

Contact the Public Access Records Office to make an inquiry, request a list of the public access file materials, or obtain a copy of the materials found in the file.

Past Events

Multiday Event | September 13-14, 2011

[Closed] Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills Third Committee Meeting

Multiday Event | June 16-17, 2011

[Closed] Second Committee Meeting

Multiday Event | March 26-27, 2011

[Closed] Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills

Responsible Staff Officers

Margaret Hilton

Additional Project Staff

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

View all journals
Explore content
About the journal
Publish with us
Sign up for alerts
Published: 09 May 2022

Teaching of 21st century skills needs to be informed by psychological research

Samuel Greiff ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2900-3734 1 &
Francesca Borgonovi ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6759-4515 2

Nature Reviews Psychology volume 1 , pages 314–315 ( 2022 ) Cite this article

278 Accesses

4 Citations

3 Altmetric

Metrics details

Problem solving
Science, technology and society

The technological advancements and globalization of the 21st century require a broad set of skills beyond traditional subjects such as mathematics, reading, and science. Research in psychological science should inform best practice and evidence-based recommendations for teaching these skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Behavioral patterns in collaborative problem solving: a latent profile analysis based on response times and actions in PISA 2015

, Florian Krieger
… Samuel Greiff

Large-scale Assessments in Education Open Access 13 November 2023

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

55,14 € per year

only 4,60 € per issue

Buy this article

Purchase on Springer Link
Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Frank, M. R. et al. Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116 , 6531–6539 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

OECD. Skills Outlook 2021: Learning for Life (OECD Publishing, 2021).

OECD. PISA 2015 Results: Collaborative Problem Solving (OECD Publishing, 2017).

Autor, D. H. Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the “other 99 percent”. Science 344 , 843–851 (2014).

Hattie, J. A. C. & Donoghue, G. M. Learning strategies: a synthesis and conceptual model. NPJ Sci. Learn. 1 , 16013 (2016).

Sonnleitner, P., Brunner, M., Keller, U. & Martin, R. Differential relations between facets of complex problem solving and students’ immigration background. J. Edu. Psy. 106 , 681–695 (2014).

Graesser, A. C., Sabatini, J. P. & Li, H. Educational psychology is evolving to accommodate technology, multiple disciplines, and twenty-first century skills. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 73 , 547–574 (2022).

National Academy of Sciences. Investigating the Influence of Standards. A Framework for Research in Mathematics , Science and Technology Education (National Academies Press, 2022).

Markovitz, D. The Meritocracy Trap: How America’s Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite (Penguin, 2020).

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

Samuel Greiff

Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK

Francesca Borgonovi

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Greiff .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Greiff, S., Borgonovi, F. Teaching of 21st century skills needs to be informed by psychological research. Nat Rev Psychol 1 , 314–315 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00064-w

Download citation

Published : 09 May 2022

Issue Date : June 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00064-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

Florian Krieger

Large-scale Assessments in Education (2023)

Quick links

Explore articles by subject
Guide to authors
Editorial policies

Open access
Published: 25 November 2019

Developing student 21 st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools

Stephanie M. Stehle ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4017-186X 1 &
Erin E. Peters-Burton 1

International Journal of STEM Education volume 6 , Article number: 39 ( 2019 ) Cite this article

124k Accesses

100 Citations

Metrics details

There is a need to arm students with noncognitive, or 21 st Century, skills to prepare them for a more STEM-based job market. As STEM schools are created in a response to this call to action, research is needed to better understand how exemplary STEM schools successfully accomplish this goal. This conversion mixed method study analyzed student work samples and teacher lesson plans from seven exemplary inclusive STEM high schools to better understand at what level teachers at these schools are engaging and developing student 21 st Century skills.

We found of the 67 lesson plans collected at the inclusive STEM high schools, 50 included instruction on 21 st Century skills. Most of these lesson plans designed instruction for 21 st Century skills at an introductory level. Few lesson plans encouraged multiple 21 st Century skills and addressed higher levels of those skills. Although there was not a significant difference between levels of 21 st Century skills by grade level, there was an overall trend of higher levels of 21 st Century skills demonstrated in lesson plans designed for grades 11 and 12. We also found that lesson plans that lasted three or more days had higher levels of 21 st Century skills.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that inclusive STEM high schools provide environments that support the development of 21 st Century skills. Yet, more can be done in the area of teacher professional development to improve instruction of high levels of 21 st Century skills.

Introduction

School-aged students in the USA are underperforming, particularly in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects. National Assessment of Educational Progress (U.S. Department of Education, 2015a ) scores show that in science, only 34% of 8th graders are performing at or above proficiency and 12th grade students at or above proficient US students drop to 22%. Similarly, mathematics scores show 33% of 8th graders and 22% of 12th graders were at or above proficiency (U.S. Department of Education, 2015a ). Additionally, the US mathematics scores for the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) for 2015 were lower than the scores for 2009 and 2012 (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; OECD, 2018 ). US students not only underachieve in mathematics and science, but are also not engaging successfully in engineering and technology. At the secondary level, there are relatively few students in the USA that take engineering (2%) and computer science (5.7%) (National Science Board, 2016 ). The NAEP technology and engineering literacy (TEL) assessment found that for technology and engineering literacy, only 43% of 8th graders were at or above the proficiency level (U.S. Department of Education, 2015b ). This consistent trend of underperformance has focused many national, state, and local efforts to improve student experiences in integrated STEM subjects (cf. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, 2010 ; Texas Education Association ( n.d. ) for school-aged students and beyond.

The efforts for improvement in STEM teaching in K-12 environments have yielded a slight increase in the enrollment of STEM majors recently (National Science Board, 2016 ). However, roughly half of students who declare a STEM major when entering college either switch majors or drop out of college (National Science Board, 2016 ). One approach to helping students persist in undergraduate education is a stronger foundation in content knowledge, academic skills, and noncognitive skills (Farrington et al., 2012 ). Academic skills, including analysis and problem solving skills, allow students to engage with content knowledge at higher levels of cognition. Noncognitive skills, including study skills, time management, and self-management, assist students in optimizing their ability to gain content knowledge and use their academic skills to solve problems. Students who possess these skills have high-quality academic behaviors, characterized by a pursuit of academic goals despite any setbacks (Farrington et al., 2012 ).

Because academic skills, noncognitive skills, and content knowledge have fluid definitions and may not be directly observable, for the purposes of this study we used 21 st Century skills consisting of knowledge construction, real-world problem solving, skilled communication, collaboration, use of information and communication technology for learning, and self-regulation (Partnership for 21 st Century Learning, 2016 ). Graduates who possess 21 st Century skills are sought out by employers (National Research Council, 2013 ). In the environment of rapid advancements in technology and globalization, employees need to be flexible and perpetual learners in order to keep up with new developments (Bybee, 2013 ; Johnson, Peters-Burton, & Moore, 2016 ). There is a need to ensure that students who graduate the K-12 system are adept in 21 st Century skills so that they can be successful in this new workforce landscape (Bybee, 2013 ).

Not only do 21 st Century skills help students be successful in all areas of formal school, these skills are also necessary for a person to adapt and thrive in an ever changing world (Partnership for 21 st Century Learning, 2016 ). One movement embracing the need for the development of student 21 st Century skills is the proliferation of inclusive STEM high schools (ISHSs), schools that serve all students regardless of prior academic achievement (LaForce et al., 2016 ; Lynch et al., 2018 ). ISHSs promote student research experiences by using inquiry-based curricular models to scaffold independent learning and encourage personal responsibility (Tofel-Grehl & Callahan, 2014 ). The goal for ISHSs to facilitate this type of student-centered learning is to build students’ 21 st Century skills such as adaptability, communication, problem solving, critical thinking, collaboration, and self-management (Bybee, 2013 ; Johnson et al., 2016 ; LaForce et al., 2016 ). Although there has been some evidence that not all ISHSs are advantageous in offering STEM opportunities (Eisenhart et al., 2015 ), there is an accumulation of evidence that ISHSs can increase college and career readiness for students from groups who are typically underrepresented in STEM careers (Erdogan & Stuessy, 2015 ; Means, Wang, Viki, Peters, & Lynch, 2016 ). As the number of inclusive STEM schools continue to increase across the USA, there is a need to understand the ways these schools successfully engage students in 21 st Century skills. The purpose of this paper is to systematically analyze teacher-constructed lessons and student work from seven exemplar ISHSs in order to better understand how teachers are engaging and developing student 21 st Century skills.

Specifically, this study looked at the extent to which teachers at these exemplar ISHSs ask students to practice the 21 st Century skills and at the level of student performance of the following categories: (a) knowledge construction, (b) real-world problem solving, (c) skilled communication, (d) collaboration, (e) use of information and communication technology (ICT) for learning, and (f) self-regulation (SRI International, n.d. -a; SRI International, n.d. -b). An examination of the lesson plans and student work products at exemplar ISHSs provides insight into effective development of student 21 st Century skills in a variety of contexts.

Conceptual framework

In an attempt to clearly define the skills, content knowledge and literacies that students would need to be successful in their future endeavors, the Partnership for 21 st Century Learning (P21; 2016) created a framework that includes (a) life and career skills; (b) learning and innovation skills; (c) information, media, and technology skills; and (d) key subjects (Partnership for 21 st Century Learning, 2016 ). The first three parts of the framework, (a) life and career skills, (b) learning and innovation skills, and (c) information, media, and technology skills, describe proficiencies or literacies students should develop and can be integrated and developed in any academic lesson. The fourth piece, key subjects, suggests 21 st Century interdisciplinary themes or content to engage students in authentic study (Partnership for 21 st Century Learning, 2016 ).

Due to the need to build 21 st Century skills, this study focused on the teaching and learning of (a) learning and innovation skills; (b) information, media, and technology skills; and (c) life and career skills at exemplar ISHSs. In order to operationalize and measure the three categories, we searched for instruments that measured the learning of 21 st Century skills. Microsoft, in collaboration with SRI Education, developed two rubrics that are designed to assess the extent to which 21 st Century skills are present in lessons and the extent to which students demonstrate the skills from these lessons (SRI International, n.d. -a; SRI International, n.d. -b). The 21 st Century Learning Design Learning Activity Rubric examined the proficiency of teacher lesson plans for the development of 21 st Century skills while the 21 st Century Learning Design Student Work Rubric examined the level of competency for each 21 st Century skill. Although the rubrics did not align exactly with the P21 Framework, we felt that there was enough alignment with the categories that the rubrics would be useful in measuring the extent to which lessons in ISHSs taught 21 st Century skills and the extent to which students demonstrated these skills. The rubrics had the same categories for lesson assessment and student work assessment: (a) knowledge construction, (b) real-world problem solving, (c) skilled communication, (d) collaboration, (e) use of ICT for learning, and (f) self-regulation in teacher lesson plans and student work samples (SRI International, n.d. -a; SRI International, n.d. -b). Table 1 shows how the categories assessed in the two rubrics align with the categories in the P21 Framework. Further, as we reviewed the literature on these categories, a model of their relationship emerged. Our literature review discusses the individual categories followed by the conceptual model of how these categories work together in 21 st Century skill development.

Knowledge construction

Knowledge construction occurs when students create new knowledge themselves rather than reproducing or consuming information (Prettyman, Ward, Jauk, & Awad, 2012 ; Shear, Novais, Means, Gallagher, & Langworthy, 2010 ). When students participate in knowledge construction rather than reproduction, they build a deeper understanding of the content. Learning environments that are designed for knowledge construction promote self-regulated and self-directed learners as well as building grit (Carpenter & Pease, 2013 ).

Although knowledge construction helps students to build deep understandings and skills to be self-directed and resilient learners, many students are unfamiliar with this approach to learning and frequently need scaffolding to take on joint responsibility of learning (Carpenter & Pease, 2013 ; Peters, 2010 ). When transitioning to a more student-centered learning environment that supports knowledge construction, the teacher becomes more of a facilitator rather than a lecturer (McCabe & O’Connor, 2014 ). A student-centered learning environment encourages students to shift from a paradigm of expecting one convergent answer and toward deeper meaning-making when learning (Peters, 2010 ). Knowledge construction anchors the development of 21 st Century skills because students need to be able to have background knowledge in order to perform the skills in an authentic context.

Real-world problem solving

Sometimes called project-based learning (Warin, Talbi, Kolski, & Hoogstoel, 2016 ), real-world problem solving is characterized by students working to solve problems that have no current solution and where the students can implement their own approach (Shear et al., 2010 ). When solving a real-world problem, students work to identify the problem, propose a solution for a specific client, test the solution, and share their ideas (Prettyman et al., 2012 ; Warin et al., 2016 ). The design aspect of the process encourages students to be creative and learn from failures (Carroll, 2015 ). When using real-world problem solving, students develop knowledge in a meaningful way (White & Frederiksen, 1998 ), must regulate their cognition and behavior in a way to reach their goals (Brown, Bransford, Ferrara, & Campione, 1983 ; Flavell, 1987 ), and gain experience defending their choices through evidence and effective communication skills (Voss & Post, 1988 ).

Teachers can develop real-world problem solving skills in their students by modeling inquiry after research actual scientist are involved in, using databases with real-life data, and evaluating evidence from current events (Chinn & Malhortra, 2002 ). Designing real-world problem scenarios for the classroom provide a framework by which students can engage in 21 st Century learning and can help to encourage a more positive attitude towards STEM careers (Williams & Mangan, 2016 ). Together, knowledge construction and real-world problem solving create the foundation from which students can engage in self-regulation, collaboration, and communication.

Self-regulation

Self-regulation is a key 21 st Century skill for independent learners. Students who are self-regulated plan their approach to problem solving, monitor their progress, and reflect on their work given feedback (Shear et al., 2010 ; Zimmerman, 2000 ). During the self-regulation process, a student motivates himself or herself to control impulses in order to efficiently solve problems (Carpenter & Pease, 2013 ; English & Kitsantas, 2013 ). Fortunately, these skills are teachable; however, students need time to accomplish regulatory tasks and guidance for the key processes of reflection and revision (Zimmerman, 2000 ). Therefore, long-term projects give a more appropriate time frame than short-term projects to hone these regulatory skills.

Students have different levels of self-regulation (English & Kitsantas, 2013 ) and teachers may need to integrate strategies and ways of monitoring students into lessons (Bell & Pape, 2014 ; English & Kitsantas, 2013 ). Incorporating self-regulated learning strategies helps students to stay engaged and deal with any adversity that may come up in the process (Boekaerts, 2016 ; Peters & Kitsantas, 2010 ). A tangible way teachers can support student self-regulation is by using Zimmerman’s ( 1998 ) four-stage model of self-regulated learning support: modeling, emulation, self-control, and self-regulation (Peters, 2010 ). First, teachers explicitly model the target learning strategy that the student should acquire, pointing out key processes (modeling). Second, teachers can provide students with verbal or written support for the key processes of the learning strategy while the student attempts to emulate the modeling from the teacher (emulation). Once students can roughly emulate the learning strategy, the teacher can fade support and have the student try to do the learning strategy on their own (self-control). After students attempt it on their own, the teacher provides feedback to the student to help them improve their attempted learning strategy (self-regulation). When a student can successfully perform the learning strategy on their own, they have become self-regulated in that aspect of their learning. Students who have mastered self-regulated learning have the ability to be proactive in knowledge building and in problem solving, which are characteristics that STEM industry employers value.

Collaboration

Collaboration occurs when students take on roles and interact with one another in groups while working to produce a product (Shear et al., 2010 ). Collaborative interactions include taking on leadership roles, making decisions, building trust, communicating, reflecting, and managing conflicts (Carpenter & Pease, 2013 ). Students who collaborate solve problems at higher levels than students who work individually because students respond to feedback and questions to create solutions that better fit the problem (Care, Scoular, & Griffin, 2016 ). Collaboration is an important skill to enhance knowledge building and problem solving. Conversations among peers can support student self-regulated learning through modeling of verbalized thinking.

Skilled communication

“Even the most brilliant scientific discovery, if not communicated widely and accurately, is of little value” (McNutt, 2013 , p. 13). For the purpose of this paper, skilled communication is defined as types of communication used to present or explain information, not discourse communication. Skilled communicators present their ideas and demonstrate how they use relevant evidence (Shear et al., 2010 ). An important part of being able to communicate successfully is the ability to connect a product to the needs of a specific audience or client (Warin et al., 2016 ). In doing so, the students need to take into account both the media they are using and the ideas they are communicating so that it is appropriate for the audience (Claro et al., 2012 ; van Laar, van Deursen, van Dijk, & de Haan, 2017 ). Like collaboration, skilled communication is a necessary process to successfully employ knowledge construction and real-world problem solving.

Use of information and communication technology for learning

When students use information and communication technology (ICT) for learning, they are designing, creating, representing, evaluating, or improving a product, not merely demonstrating their knowledge (Koh, Chai, Benjamin, & Hong, 2015 ). In doing so, they need to choose how and when to use the ICT as well as know how to recognize credible online resources (Shear et al., 2010 ). The effective use of ICT requires self-regulation in order to use these tools independently and to keep up with technological advances. Given the continuous advancements in technology, it is essential that students know how to manage and communicate information in order to solve problems (Ainley, Fraillon, Schulz, & Gebhardt, 2016 ).

Conceptual Model of 21 st Century Skills

The six 21 st Century skills presented above are critical for students to develop to prepare for both college (National Science Board, 2016 ) and the future employment (Bybee, 2013 ; Johnson et al., 2016 ). Twenty-first century skills do not exists in isolation. By building one skill, others are reinforced. For example, knowledge construction and real-world problem solving can be enhanced by self-regulation. Likewise, collaboration requires skilled communication to build knowledge and solve problems. These skills coalesce to build the necessary toolkit for students who can learn on their own. Figure 1 shows a working hypothesis of how these six skills, (a) knowledge construction, (b) real-world problem solving, (c) skilled communication, (d) collaboration, (e) use of ICT for learning, and (f) self-regulation, interact to foster lifelong learning for student.

Working hypothesis of how 21 st Century skills work together to build a 21 st Century student

Knowledge construction and real-world problem solving are the keystones of the model and typically represent the two main goals of student-centered lessons. Knowledge construction is the conceptual formation while real-world problem solving represents the process skills that students are expected to develop. Knowledge construction and real-world problem solving feed each other in a circular fashion. Knowledge construction is built through the inquiry process of real-world problem solving. At the same time, real-world problem solving requires new knowledge to be constructed in order to solve the problem at hand. The connection between knowledge construction and real work problem solving is mediated by collaboration and communication.

While communication and collaboration allow a student to work with others to build their conceptual knowledge and work toward a solution to their real-world problem, self-regulation is an internal process that occurs simultaneously. The student’s self-regulation guides the student’s individual connections, reflections, and revisions between knowledge construction and real-world problem solving.

Information and communication technology provides tools for the students to facilitate communication and collaboration as well as other 21 st Century skills. ICT helps to simplify and assist the communication and collaboration for groups of students. ICT can help streamline the process of analysis and record keeping as well as facilitating the sharing ideas with others. It allows students to more easily document their progress and express their ideas for later reflection. Although ICT is not directly connected with other elements in the model, the use of ICT allows for the learning process to be more efficient.

The six 21 st Century skills addressed in this study, (a) knowledge construction, (b) real-world problem solving, (c) skilled communication, (d) collaboration, (e) use of ICT for learning, and (f) self-regulation, are important facets of STEM education. This study documented the extent to which each of the 21 st Century skills were present in both lesson plans and in student work at seven exemplar ISHSs. Given that the schools in the study were highly regarded, understanding the structure and student outcomes of lessons could provide a model for teachers and teacher educators. With that in mind, the study was driven by the following research questions:

To what extent do teacher lesson plans at exemplar ISHSs exhibit 21 st Century learning practices as measured by the 21 st Century Learning Design Learning Activity and Student Work Rubrics?

Do teacher lesson plans and student work samples from exemplar ISHSs show differences in rubric scores by grade level?

During the analysis of these questions, a third research question emerged regarding the duration of lessons. The question and rationale can be found in the data analysis section.

This study is part of a larger multiple instrumental case study of eight exemplar ISHSs. The larger study (Opportunity Structures for Preparation and Inspiration in STEM; OSPrI) examined the common features of successful ISHSs (Lynch et al., 2018 ; Lynch, Peters-Burton, & Ford, 2014 ). OSPrI identified 14 critical components (CC; Table 2 ) that successful ISHSs possess (Behrend et al., 2016 ; Lynch et al., 2015 ; Lynch, Means, Behrend, & Peters-Burton, 2011 ; Peters-Burton, Lynch, Behrend, & Means, 2014 ). Three of the 14 critical components involve the application of 21 st Century skills in the classroom. This study addresses these three critical components: (a) CC1: STEM focused curriculum for all, (b) CC2: reform instructional strategies and project-based learning, and (c) CC3: integrated, innovative technology use.

Cross-case analysis of the eight schools found similarities in how the schools addressed two specific critical components: CC1: college-prep, STEM focused curriculum for all and CC2: reform instructional strategies and project-based learning. From these two critical components, curriculum and instruction, four themes emerged: (a) classroom-related STEM opportunities, (b) cross-cutting school level STEM learning opportunities, (c) school-wide design for STEM opportunities, and (d) responsive design (Peters-Burton, House, Han, & Lynch, 2018 ). The theme of classroom-related STEM opportunities was characterized by the expectation that teachers act as designers of the curriculum and look beyond the typical textbook for resources. While designing the curriculum, teachers took a mastery learning approach and provided students multiple opportunities to master the material. Through the use of collaborative group projects, summative projects, culminating projects, and interdisciplinary studies, the schools demonstrated a cross-cutting school level approach to the STEM learning. School-wide STEM opportunities included a rigorous curriculum, incorporating engineering classes and/or engineering design thinking, emphasizing connections between the curriculum and real-world examples, as well as building strong collaboration between teachers. Finally, these ISHSs had systems such as data-driven decision making and supports for incoming ninth graders built into their schools as a responsive design. In summary, these schools worked to improve students’ 21 st Century skill such as collaboration, problem solving, information and media literacy, and self-directed learning (Lynch et al., 2018 ).

Research design

This study was designed as a conversion mixed methods approach (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2003 ) in that qualitative data were transformed into quantitative data using established rubrics. Document analysis was used as a tool to identify occasions of evidence within lessons plans and student work products related to the identified 21 st Century skills (Krippendorff, 2012 ). In this conversion approach, the 21 st Century skill demonstrated qualitatively in the documents was scored using the rubrics, ergo integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in the analysis.

Participating schools

The eight exemplar ISHSs for this study came from the same quintain as used by the OSPrI project (Lynch et al., 2018 ). Because this origin project was a cross-case analysis and the IRB did not allow for school to school comparison, the data collected from individual schools was aggregated as one data source. Protocol for inclusion in the OSPrI study was that the school had no academic admission requirements, self-identified as a STEM school, was in operation for grades 9 through 12, and intentionally recruited students typically underrepresented in STEM. For more information on the demographics of the schools and the selection process, see Lynch et al., 2018 . Of the eight schools that were in the original OSPrI project, seven provided teacher lesson plans and/or student work samples during the school visit. All schools have given permission to use their actual names. The sample size from each school was inconsistent, therefore, we treated the data set as one combined group that included all seven schools.

Data sources

Student work samples and teacher lesson plans were collected during OSPrI site visits to the seven schools, which were each visited once between 2012 and 2014. Researchers requested paper copies of typical lesson plans and student work that resulted in an average performance from the lesson plan that was observed at all eight ISHSs during the site visits. Because this was a convenience sample, not all teachers submitted lesson plans, and only a few teachers submitted the student work products related to those lessons. Unfortunately, few parents consented to release student work products. As a result, 67 teacher lesson plans and 29 student work samples were collected from seven of the eight schools. We decided to keep the student work products in the descriptive portion of the analysis, but not the inferential analysis in the study because this is a unique opportunity to gain even a small insight into student work from STEM schools that were considered exemplary and served students who are typically underrepresented in STEM. Table 3 describes the content matter and grade level(s) associated collected teacher lesson plan and corresponding student work product.

Each teacher lesson plan was analyzed using the 21 st Century Learning Design (21CLD) Learning Activity Rubric and each student work product was analyzed using the 21 st Century Learning Design Student Work Rubric (SRI International, n.d.-a; SRI International, n.d.-b). These instruments were found to be valid and reliable for use in high school classrooms, and Shear et al., 2010 reports the details of the development and validation of the rubrics. Although the student work products were related to the teacher lesson plans, they were analyzed independently according to the protocol of the 21CLD rubrics. The 21CLD Activity Rubric and the 21CLD Student Work Rubric were designed by Microsoft Partner’s in Learning with a collaboration between ITL Research and SRI International (SRI International, n.d.-a; SRI International, n.d.-b). These two 21CLD rubrics were the result of a multi-year project synthesizing research-based practices that promote 21 st Century skills (Shear et al., 2010 ). The rubrics, each 44-pages in length, are available online for public use ( https://education.microsoft.com/GetTrained/ITL-Research ). The 21CLD rubrics assess teacher lesson plans or student work products on six metrics aligned with 21 st Century skills: (a) knowledge construction, (b) real-world problem solving, (c) skilled communication, (d) collaboration, (e) use of ICT for learning, and (f) self-regulation (SRI International, n.d.-a; SRI International, n.d.-b). Collaboration, knowledge construction, and use of ICT score ratings range from one to five while real-world problem solving, self-regulation, and skilled communication score ratings range from one to four.

Data analysis

The teacher lessons and student work samples were assessed on (a) knowledge construction, (b) real-world problem solving, (c) skilled communication, (d) collaboration, (e) use of ICT for learning, and (f) self-regulation using the 21CLD Learning Activity and the 21CLD Student Work Rubrics respectively. Examples of excerpts from teacher lesson plans and student work products for each category can be found in Table 4 . Two raters were used to establish interrater reliability. Both raters have a background as secondary science teachers and were trained on the use of the rubric. One rater has a terminal degree in education and the other rater is a doctoral student in education. The two raters met and discussed the rubric scores until the interrater reliability was 100%. Once consensus scores were established, tests for assumptions, descriptive, and inferential statistics were run.

During the analysis of research questions one and two, unique trends of short-term and long-term lesson plans were noted. From this, a third research question emerged from the analysis:

Are there differences in the 21 CLD Learning Activity scores of short-term lessons and long-term lessons?

The 21CLD Learning Activity and the 21CLD Student Work Rubrics required a lesson to be long-term order to assess self-regulation. The rubric defined long-term as “if students work on it for a substantive period of time” (SRI International, n.d.-a, p. 32). From our reading of the lesson plans, lessons that were scheduled for three or more days met the criterion of a substantive period of time, while lesson that were scheduled for 1 or 2 days did not meet this criterion. For the purposes of this study, we decided to refine the definition of long-term to be a lesson lasting three or more class periods and a short-term lesson lasting less than three class periods. The analyses for all research questions separated lessons into long-term and short-term in order to clarify the category of self-regulation.

The data were checked for normality, skewness, and outliers; only the teacher lesson plans met all assumptions for an ANOVA (comparison of grade levels) and t test (long-term versus short-term). Due to the small number of student work samples collected (see Table 6 ), the data related to student work did not meet the assumptions needed to run a t test therefore was not included in this analysis.

Overall rubric scores

To answer the first research question, a descriptive analysis was run for each of the six categories on the rubric and the total score (found in Tables 5 and 6 ). The average score for all teacher lesson plans was less than 2 for all six categories (out of a total of 4 or 5). Likewise, overall student work sample averages scored below 2 except on the category of Knowledge Construction. Table 6 also shows the median score for long-term student work sample categories to better describe central tendencies of the data. Figure 2 shows the distribution of total rubric scores for all teacher lesson plans. Seventeen of the 67 lessons scored a 6, the lowest possible score. Only 16 of the 67 lessons scored higher than 13 points, half of the total possible points. Out of those 16 scoring over 50%, only three lessons scored 20 points or more out of the possible 27.

Distribution of total 21CLD rubric scores for all lessons

Figure 3 illustrates the quantity of 21 st Century skills found in each lesson. Nearly 75% of the teacher lesson plans included at least one 21 st Century skill in the lesson and 67% addressed two or more 21 st Century skills. Although most of the lessons at the ISHSs introduced multiple 21 st Century skills, the overall scores for the quality were low.

Distribution of number of 21 st Century skills addressed in a lesson

21 st Century learning by grade

To answer the second research question, an ANOVA was conducted to compare lesson scores by grade level. There were no statistically significant differences between grade level scores for the total rubric score. Data were separated into short-term and long-term lessons by rubric category. There were no significant differences in short-term lessons by grade level (Fig. 4 ). However, there were significant differences across grades for long-term lessons. Total rubric score for grade 12 lessons were significantly higher than grade 9 ( p = 0.023) and grade 11 ( p = 0.032). Difference in total rubric scores for grade 12 lessons were approaching significance with grade 10 ( p = 0.063). As seen in Fig. 5 , category scores for long-term learning activities have small differences in 9th, 10th, and 11th grades but peaks noticeably in 12th grade. The exception to this trend is use of ICT which peaks in 11th grade.

The average rubric metric scores for short-term lessons, sorted by grade level for the lesson

The average rubric metric scores for long-term lessons, sorted by grade level for the lesson

Long-term versus short-term assignments

To answer the second research question, a t test with Bonferroni correction was performed to compare long-term and short-term lessons for each of the categories. A statistically significant difference was found between short-term ( N = 35) and long-term ( N = 32) lessons on total score, knowledge construction, use of ICT, self-regulation, and skilled communication (Table 7 ). The effect sizes for these categories as calculated by Hedges g (Lakens, 2013 ) were all above 0.8 indicated large effect size (Table 7 ). In all of those categories, long-term lessons scored higher than short-term lessons (Table 5 ). The category of real-world problem solving was approaching statistical significance with the t-score not showing significance [ t = − 2.67, p = .001] but a statistically significant confidence interval [− 1.23, 0.003] and a medium effect size (Table 7 ).

21 st Century skills

Overall, the teacher lesson plans collected at the ISHSs showed evidence of addressing 21 st Century skills. Nearly 75% of the lessons included at least one 21 st Century skill with 67% addressing two or more. Although the majority of lessons addressed multiple 21 st Century skills, the rubric scores for these lessons were low because they addressed these skills at a minimal level. For example, a minimal level of collaboration would be instructions to form a group. A high level of collaboration would include defining roles, explicit instructions on how to share responsibility, and evidence of interdependence. Only five lessons showed evidence of multiple 21 st Century skills implemented at the highest level, as measured by the 21CLD Learning Activity Rubric.

While assessing the lesson plans, we noted that more explicit instructions in the teacher lesson plans would have resulted in higher rubric scores. Placing students in groups, structuring peer feedback, and having students design a final project for a particular audience are three small changes not seen frequently in the lesson plans that are articulated in the Lesson Plan rubrics to encourage multiple 21 st Century skills. When students work in groups, they improve their collaboration and communication skills while constructing knowledge and solving problems (Care et al., 2016 ; Shear et al., 2010 ). When teachers incorporate peer feedback into their lesson, students engage in collaboration. Peer feedback also gives students the opportunity to revise their work based on feedback, increasing self-regulation (Shear et al., 2010 ; Zimmerman, 2000 ). When students design their final project for a specific target audience, rather than simply displaying their knowledge for the teacher, they work on their skilled communication processes (Claro et al., 2012 ; van Laar et al., 2017 ; Warin et al., 2016 ). In summary, placing students in groups, structuring peer feedback, and having students design a final project for a particular audience provides opportunities for students to practice 21 st Century skills.

When lessons addressed more than one 21 st Century skill, they usually demonstrated the use of collaboration or communication in real-world problem solving and knowledge construction (Care et al., 2016 ; Carpenter & Pease, 2013 ). Thirty-three lesson plans in which real-world problem solving or knowledge construction was evident, 31 showed evidence of collaboration or communication. Similarly, 13 of the 18 student work samples showed evidence of collaboration or communication when real-world problem solving or knowledge construction was practiced. The results from the indirect measures of the rubric build support for a conceptual model connecting the components of 21 st Century skills (Fig. 1 ). There was some evidence demonstrating the support that collaboration and communication have for knowledge construction and real-world problem solving.

The findings of this study point to the likelihood of self-regulation being connected to other 21 st Century skills. Each time self-regulation was present in a teacher lesson plan, there was evidence of at least one other 21 st Century skill in that lesson. Seventeen of the 23 lesson plans addressing self-regulation included at least three other 21 st Century skills, showing evidence that self-regulation is a skill that is related to knowledge construction and real-world problem solving. Our findings reflect the findings of other researchers, in that self-regulation guides the students’ individual connections, reflections, and revisions between knowledge construction and real-world problem solving (Brown et al., 1983 ; Carpenter & Pease, 2013 ; Flavell, 1987 ; Shear et al., 2010 ).

Evidence from the lessons showed that there was no consistent connection to the use of ICT and the presence of the other 21 st Century skills. ICT was seen in both low-scoring lessons as the sole 21 st Century skill, as well as in high-scoring lessons in tandem with multiple other 21 st Century skills. As in our model, technology is a tool to help facilitate but is not necessary in the development of the other 21 st Century skills (Koh et al., 2015 ; Shear et al., 2010 ). After examining the data, our model remained unchanged for all 21 st Century skills and their relationship to each other.

Grade level differences

Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in the total 21CLD scores across grade levels. This is consistent with the missions of the ISHSs in this study to shift responsibility for learning to the students by weaving 21 st Century skills throughout high school grade levels (Lynch et al., 2017 ). When looking at trends in long-term projects, there was a jump in total 21CLD score for 12th grade. Again, this aligns with the participating schools’ goals of creating an environment where students have a more independent learning experience during their senior year internships, college classes, and specialized programs CC1 (Lynch et al., 2018 ). This is consistent with the goal of many of the schools to have the students work independently during their senior year either by taking college classes, completing an internship, or taking a career specific set of classes.

Short-term vs. long-term lessons

The data showed that long-term lesson planning had significantly higher scores on the rubric as compared to the short-termed lessons. This difference is consistent with the literature regarding the need for students to have time to develop and practice skills (Lynch et al., 2017 ; NGSS Lead States, 2013 ). The extended time allows students to monitor and reflect on their progress while working toward self-regulation of the skill (Carpenter & Pease, 2013 ; English & Kitsantas, 2013 ). To truly become self-regulated, students need repeated supported attempts to be able to do it on their own (Zimmerman, 2000 ).

Although not significant, collaboration was the only rubric metric where the short-term lessons averaged a higher collaboration score than the long-term lessons. Evidence from the lessons show students worked in pairs or groups, but infrequently shared responsibility, made decisions together, or worked interdependently. This leads to the possibility that incorporating the higher levels of collaborations is difficult, even in long-term projects. In addition, evaluating the higher levels of collaboration is difficult to make based solely on documents. Observations would be required to evaluate how the students within the group were interacting with one another.

Limitations

Because this study used data collected as part of a larger study, there were several limitations. The work collected is a snapshot of the work students were doing at the time of the observation and does not allow for a clear longitudinal look at student growth over time. As stated before, the small student work sample limited what we were able to do with the analysis.

By only analyzing paper copies of the student work, it was not possible to determine a true collaboration score for many of the projects. Higher levels of collaboration such as sharing responsibility, making decisions together, and working interdependently require observation or more detailed notes from the students or teachers. Some lessons may have scored higher in the metric of collaboration had the student interactions been observed or noted.

This study confirmed the presence of all identified 21 st Century skills in the lesson plans at the selected exemplar ISHSs serving underrepresented students in STEM: (a) knowledge construction, (b) real-world problem solving, (c) skilled communication, (d) collaboration, (e) use of information and communication technology (ICT) for learning, and (f) self-regulation. In light of the patterns that emerged from the rubrics, we posit that in the lesson plans communication and collaboration are the core 21st Century skills that facilitate knowledge construction and real-world problem solving, while student self-regulation creates efficiencies resulting in improved knowledge construction and real-world problem solving. We also saw in the lesson plans that ICT provides tools to support communication and reflection which leads to knowledge construction and real-world problem solving. To further develop knowledge about how 21 st Century skills addressed in lesson plans help to support student work, our model can be a hypothesized starting point to investigate interactions.

While teachers were successful at including 21 st Century skills into lessons, very few lessons practiced higher levels of those skills. This could be an indication that high levels of 21 st Century skills are difficult to teach explicitly at the high school level. Future studies may investigate why teachers are not frequently incorporating higher level 21 st Century skills into their lessons to answer questions as to whether teachers feel that (a) they need more training on incorporating 21 st Century skills, (b) students need more practice and scaffolding to build up to higher levels of 21 st Century skills, or (c) they need more time for long-term projects to work on the higher level skills.

The use of the 21CLD rubric is a tangible way for teachers to self-assess the level of 21 st Century skills in their lessons. Self-evaluation helps encourage reflection, promote professional growth, and recommendations for new aspects of lessons (Akram & Zepeda, 2015 ; Peterson & Comeaux, 1990 ). This can also help teachers make the instructions for the development of 21 st Century skills more explicit in their lesson. In conducting a self-evaluation, teachers may realize that they do not have a deep understanding of the characteristics of 21 st Century skills. If teachers are new to incorporating these skills into their lessons, the teachers may need time to learn the skills themselves before they can incorporate them into their lessons (Yoon et al., 2015 ). Further studies may examine how teachers use the 21CLD rubric to improve their lesson.

Students need time to grapple with and learn new skills (Lynch et al., 2017 ; NGSS Lead States, 2013 ). While we were able to see evidence of higher rubric scores for 21 st Century skills for 12th grade students in the lesson plans, due to the convenience sampling of lesson plans and student work samples, we were not able to look at how students’ 21 st Century skills were built over time. There is a desire to better understand how ISHSs successfully develop these skills. This includes how schools incorporate and build the 21 st Century skills (a) within multiple lessons in one course, (b) across multiple classes over the course of a school year, and (c) throughout the students’ entire high school sequence. Future research may look at a longitudinal study that follows one student’s work over an entire school year to see how the 21CLD scores change. In addition, future studies may also look at how the short-term projects build the skills needed for the students to incorporate higher levels of 21 st Century skills in long-term projects.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

21 st Century Learning Design

Critical component

Information and communication technology

Inclusive STEM high school

National Assessment of Educational Progress

Next-generation science standards

Opportunity Structures for Preparation and Inspiration in STEM

Partnership for 21 st Century Learning

Programme for International Student Assessment

Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics

Technology and engineering literacy

Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Schulz, W., & Gebhardt, E. (2016). Conceptualizing and measuring computer and information literacy in cross-national contexts. Applied Measurement in Education, 29 , 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209205 .

Article Google Scholar

Akram, M., & Zepeda, S. J. (2015). Development and validation of a teacher self-assessment instrument. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 9 (2), 134–148.

Google Scholar

Behrend, T. S., Peters-Burton, E. E., Hudson, C., Matray, S., Ford, M., & Lynch, S. J. (2016). STEM High School Inventory. [Measurement instrument]. Retrieved from https://ospri.research.gwu.edu/sites/ospri.research.gwu.edu/files/downloads/CC%20Inventory_FINAL.pdf .

Bell, C. V., & Pape, S. J. (2014). Scaffolding the development of self-regulated learning in mathematics classrooms. Middle School Journal, 45 (4), 23–32.

Boekaerts, M. (2016). Engagement as an inherent aspect of the learning process. Learning and Instruction, 43 , 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.001 .

Brown, A. L., Bransford, J., Ferrara, R., & Campione, J. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In P. H. Musen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. III, pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley.

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education . Arlington: NSTA press.

Care, E., Scoular, C., & Griffin, P. (2016). Assessment of collaborative problem solving in education environments. Applied Measurement in Education, 29 , 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209204 .

Carpenter, J. P., & Pease, J. S. (2013). Preparing students to take responsibility for learning: The role of non-curricular learning strategies. Journal of Curriculum & Instruction, 7 (2), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.2013.v7n2p38-55 .

Carroll, M. (2015). Stretch, dream, and do—A 21 st century design thinking & STEM journey. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 1 (1), 59–70.

Chinn, C. A., & Malhortra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86 , 175–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001 .

Claro, M., Preiss, D. D., San Martin, E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J. E., Valenzuela, S., Cortes, F., & Nussbaun, M. (2012). Assessment of 21 st century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students. Computers & Education, 59 , 1042–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.004 .

Eisenhart, M., Weis, L., Allen, C. D., Cipollone, K., Stich, A., & Dominguez, R. (2015). High school opportunities for STEM: Comparing inclusive STEM-focused and comprehensive high schools in two US cities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52 (6), 763–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21213 .

English, M. C., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). Supporting student self-regulated learning in problem- and project based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7 (2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1339 .

Erdogan, N., & Stuessy, C. (2015). Examining the role of inclusive STEM schools in the college and career readiness of students in the United States: A multi-group analysis on the outcome of student achievement. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15 (6), 1517–1529. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.1.0072 .

Farrington, C. A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T. S., Johnson, D. W., & Beechum, N. O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners. The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review . Chicago: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.

Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. Weinert & U. R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Moore, T. J. (Eds.). (2016). STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education . New York: Routledge.

Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Benjamin, W., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and design thinking: A framework to support ICT lesson design for 21st century learning. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.), 24 (3), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0237-2 .

Krippendorff, K. H. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc..

LaForce, M., Noble, E., King, H., Century, J., Blackwell, C., Holt, S., Ibrahim, A., & Loo, S. (2016). The eight essential elements of inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 3 (21), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0054-z .

Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4 , 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 .

Lynch, S. J., House, A., Peters-Burton, E., Behrend, T., Means, B., Ford, M., Spillane, N., Matray, S., Moore, I., Coyne, C., Williams, C., & Corn, J. (2015). A Logic model that describes and explains eight exemplary STEM-focused high schools with diverse student populations . Washington DC: George Washington University OSPrI Project Retrieved from http://ospri.research.gwu.edu .

Lynch, S. J., Means, B., Behrend, T., & Peters-Burton, E. (2011). Multiple instrumental case studies of inclusive STEM-focused high schools: Opportunity Structures for Preparation and Inspiration (OSPrI). Retrieved from http://ospri.research.gwu.edu

Lynch, S. J., Peters-Burton, E. E., Behrend, T., House, A., Ford, M., Spillane, N., Matray, S., Han, E., & Means, B. (2018). Understanding inclusive STEM high schools as opportunity structures for underrepresented students: Critical components. Journal of Research in Science Teaching., 55 (5), 712–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21437 .

Lynch, S. J., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Ford, M. (2014). Building STEM opportunities for all. Educational Leadership, 72 (4), 54–60.

Lynch, S. J., Spillane, N., House, A., Peters-Burton, E., Behrend, T., Ross, K. M., & Han, E. M. (2017). A policy-relevant instrument case study of an inclusive STEM-focused high school: Manor New Tech High. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5 (1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.75656 .

McCabe, A., & O’Connor, U. (2014). Student-centered learning: The role and responsibility of the lecturer. Teacher in Higher Education, 19 (4), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860111 .

McNutt, M. (2013). Improving scientific communication. Science, 342 , 13. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246449 .

Means, B., Wang, H., Viki, Y., Peters, V. L., & Lynch, S. J. (2016). STEM-focused high schools as a strategy for enhancing readiness for postsecondary STEM programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53 (5), 709–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21313 .

National Research Council. (2013). Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing? Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13509 .

Book Google Scholar

National Science Board. (2016). Science and engineering indicators 2016. (NSB-2016-1) . Arlington: National Science Foundation.

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states . Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). PISA 2015 results in focus. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf

Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2016). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework .

Peters, E. E. (2010). Shifting to a student-centered science classroom: An exploration of teacher and student changes in perceptions and practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21 (3), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9178-z .

Peters, E. E., & Kitsantas, A. (2010). The effect of nature of science metacognitive prompts on science students’ content and nature of science knowledge, metacognition, and self-regulatory efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 110 , 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00050.x .

Peters-Burton, E. E., House, A., Han, E., & Lynch, S. (2018). Curriculum and instruction at inclusive STEM high schools. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 4 (2), 193–212.

Peters-Burton, E. E., Lynch, S. J., Behrend, T. S., & Means, B. B. (2014). Inclusive STEM high school design: 10 critical components. Theory into Practice, 53 (1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.862125 .

Peterson, P. L., & Comeaux, M. A. (1990). Evaluating the systems: Teachers’ perspectives on teacher evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12 (1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737012001003 .

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2010). Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) for America’s future . Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.

Prettyman, S. S., Ward, C. L., Jauk, D., & Awad, G. (2012). 21st century learners: Voices of students in a one-to-one STEM environment. Journal of Applied Learning Technology, 2 (4), 6–15.

Shear, L., Novais, G., Means, B., Gallagher, L., & Langworthy, M. (2010). ITL research design . Menlo Park: SRI International Retrieved from https://www.sri.com/sites/default/files/publications/itl_research_design_15_nov_2010.pdf .

SRI International. (n.d.-a). 21CLD learning activity rubrics. Retrieved from https://education.microsoft.com/GetTrained/ITL-Research

SRI International. (n.d.-b). 21CLD student work rubrics. Retrieved from https://education.microsoft.com/GetTrained/ITL-Research

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research . Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Texas Education Association (n.d.). Texas science, technology, engineering and mathematics initiative (T-STEM). Retrieved from https://tea.texas.gov/T-STEM/

Tofel-Grehl, C., & Callahan, C. M. (2014). STEM high school communities: Common and differing features. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25 (3), 237–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X14539156 .

U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2015a). The nation’s report card: 2015 mathematics and reading assessments. (NCES No. 2015136). Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2015/#?grade=4

U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2015b). The nation’s report card: Technology and engineering literacy. (NCES No. 2016119). Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/tel_2014/

van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21 st -century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 77 , 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010 .

Voss, J. F., & Post, T. A. (1988). On the solving of ill-structured problems. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 261–285). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Warin, B., Talbi, O., Kolski, C., & Hoogstoel, F. (2016). Multi-role project (MRP): A new project-based learning method for STEM. IEEE Transactions on Education, 59 (2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2015.2462809 .

White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16 (1), 3–18.

Williams, P. J., & Mangan, J. (2016). The effectiveness of using young professionals to influence STEM career choices of secondary school students. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 2 (1), 2–18.

Yoon, S. A., Anderson, E., Koehler-Yom, J., Klopfer, E., Sheldon, J., Wendel, D., Schoenfeld, I., Scheintaub, H., Oztok, M., & Evans, C. (2015). Designing curriculum and instruction for computer-supported complex systems teaching and learning in high school science classrooms. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 1 (1), 4–14.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1–19). New York: The Guilford Press.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego: Academic Press.

Chapter Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgments

Publication of this article was funded in part by the George Mason University Libraries Open Access Publishing Fund.

This work was conducted by the OSPrI research project, with Sharon Lynch, Tara Behrend, Erin Peters-Burton, and Barbara Means as principal investigators. Funding for OSPrI was provided by the National Science Foundation (DRL 1118851). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of endorsement of the funding agency.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

George Mason University, Fairfax, USA

Stephanie M. Stehle & Erin E. Peters-Burton

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Both authors contributed equally to this manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie M. Stehle .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Stehle, S.M., Peters-Burton, E.E. Developing student 21 st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. IJ STEM Ed 6 , 39 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1

Download citation

Received : 21 December 2018

Accepted : 04 October 2019

Published : 25 November 2019

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

STEM schools

21st century skills in education research

Our Program Divisions
Our Three Academies
Government Affairs
Statement on Diversity and Inclusion
Our Study Process
Conflict of Interest Policies and Procedures
Project Comments and Information
Read Our Expert Reports and Published Proceedings
Explore PNAS, the Flagship Scientific Journal of NAS
Access Transportation Research Board Publications
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Economic Recovery
Fellowships and Grants
Publications by Division
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education
Division on Earth and Life Studies
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences
Gulf Research Program
Health and Medicine Division
Policy and Global Affairs Division
Transportation Research Board
National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Engineering
National Academy of Medicine
Publications by Topic
Agriculture
Behavioral and Social Sciences
Biography and Autobiography
Biology and Life Sciences
Computers and Information Technology
Conflict and Security Issues
Earth Sciences
Energy and Energy Conservation
Engineering and Technology
Environment and Environmental Studies
Food and Nutrition
Health and Medicine
Industry and Labor
Math, Chemistry, and Physics
Policy for Science and Technology
Space and Aeronautics
Surveys and Statistics
Transportation and Infrastructure
Searchable Collections
New Releases

VIEW LARGER COVER

Education for Life and Work

Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century.

RESOURCES AT A GLANCE

Press Release
Policy Highlights
Report Brief
Education for Life and Work: Guide for Practitioners
↓ Scroll Down for More Resources
Education — Education Research and Theory
Education — K-12 Education

Suggested Citation

National Research Council. 2012. Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century . Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13398. Import this citation to: Bibtex EndNote Reference Manager

Publication Info

Paperback: 978-0-309-25649-0
Ebook: 978-0-309-25652-0

What is skim?

The Chapter Skim search tool presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter. You may select key terms to highlight them within pages of each chapter.

Education for Life and Work: Guide for Practitioners Read Description: A booklet that summarizes the key information in the report and describes effective teaching approaches.

Copyright Information

The National Academies Press (NAP) has partnered with Copyright Clearance Center's Marketplace service to offer you a variety of options for reusing NAP content. Through Marketplace, you may request permission to reprint NAP content in another publication, course pack, secure website, or other media. Marketplace allows you to instantly obtain permission, pay related fees, and print a license directly from the NAP website. The complete terms and conditions of your reuse license can be found in the license agreement that will be made available to you during the online order process. To request permission through Marketplace you are required to create an account by filling out a simple online form. The following list describes license reuses offered by the NAP through Marketplace:

Republish text, tables, figures, or images in print
Post on a secure Intranet/Extranet website
Use in a PowerPoint Presentation
Distribute via CD-ROM

Click here to obtain permission for the above reuses. If you have questions or comments concerning the Marketplace service, please contact:

Marketplace Support International +1.978.646.2600 US Toll Free +1.855.239.3415 E-mail: [email protected] marketplace.copyright.com

To request permission to distribute a PDF, please contact our Customer Service Department at [email protected] .

What is a prepublication?

An uncorrected copy, or prepublication, is an uncorrected proof of the book. We publish prepublications to facilitate timely access to the committee's findings.

What happens when I pre-order?

The final version of this book has not been published yet. You can pre-order a copy of the book and we will send it to you when it becomes available. We will not charge you for the book until it ships. Pricing for a pre-ordered book is estimated and subject to change. All backorders will be released at the final established price. As a courtesy, if the price increases by more than $3.00 we will notify you. If the price decreases, we will simply charge the lower price. Applicable discounts will be extended.

Downloading and Using eBooks from NAP

What is an ebook.

An ebook is one of two file formats that are intended to be used with e-reader devices and apps such as Amazon Kindle or Apple iBooks.

Why is an eBook better than a PDF?

A PDF is a digital representation of the print book, so while it can be loaded into most e-reader programs, it doesn't allow for resizable text or advanced, interactive functionality. The eBook is optimized for e-reader devices and apps, which means that it offers a much better digital reading experience than a PDF, including resizable text and interactive features (when available).

Where do I get eBook files?

eBook files are now available for a large number of reports on the NAP.edu website. If an eBook is available, you'll see the option to purchase it on the book page.

View more FAQ's about Ebooks

Types of Publications

Consensus Study Report: Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.

Toward an understanding of 21st-century skills: From a systematic review

Published: 27 October 2021
Volume 23 , pages 275–294, ( 2023 )

Cite this article

Dandan Chen ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4020-3422 1

1882 Accesses

7 Citations

12 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

The first two decades of the twenty-first century witnessed the blossoming of frameworks to conceptualize “21st-century skills” both in school and career. However, there is still a lack of consensus about what we are talking about when using the term “21st-century skills,” as the existing frameworks on “21st-century skills” are different from each other. Drawing upon 471 existing sources published in 2000–2017 regarding “21st-century skills,” identified from six research databases, this study was intended to answer the following research question via a systematic review: What skills had been considered as “21st-century skills” in the existing educational research literature? Seven categories or domains of knowledge and skills emerged when investigating this literature. Implications and future research directions about how adaptive learning and adaptive testing in the new century can empower educational and vocational guidance were briefly discussed at the end of this paper.

Vers une compréhension des compétences du 21ème siècle: A partir d'une revue systématique

Les deux premières décennies du 21ème siècle ont vu fleurir des cadres pour conceptualiser les "compétences du 21ème siècle", tant à l'école que dans la carrière. Cependant, il n'y a toujours pas de consensus sur ce dont nous parlons lorsque nous utilisons le terme " compétences du XXIe siècle ", car les cadres existants sur les " compétences du XXIe siècle " sont différents les uns des autres. S'appuyant sur 471 sources existantes publiées entre 2000 et 2017 concernant les "compétences du XXIe siècle", identifiées à partir de six bases de données de recherche, cette étude visait à répondre à la question de recherche suivante par le biais d’une revue systématique: Quelles compétences ont été considérées comme des " compétences du XXIe siècle " dans la littérature de recherche en matière d’éducation existante ? Sept catégories ou domaines de connaissances et de compétences ont émergé lors de l’analyse de la littérature. Les implications et les futures directions de recherche sur la manière dont l'apprentissage adaptatif et les tests adaptatifs de ce nouveau siècle peuvent renforcer l'orientation scolaire et professionnelle ont été brièvement discutées à la fin de cet article.

Zusammenfassung

Zum Verständnis der Fähigkeiten des 21. Jahrhunderts: Aus einer systematischen Übersicht

In den ersten beiden Jahrzehnten des 21. Jahrhunderts belegen die Entwicklung zahlreiche Rahmenkonzepte für die Konzeptualisierung der "Kompetenzen des 21. Jahrhunderts “. Es besteht jedoch immer noch kein Konsens darüber, worüber wir sprechen, wenn wir den Begriff "Fähigkeiten des 21. Jahrhunderts" verwenden, da sich die bestehenden Rahmenwerke für "Fähigkeiten des 21. Jahrhunderts" voneinander unterscheiden. Die vorliegende Studie stützt sich auf 471 Quellen, die im Zeitraum 2000–2017 zum Thema "Fähigkeiten des 21. Jahrhunderts" veröffentlicht wurden und aus sechs Forschungsdatenbanken stammen: Welche Fähigkeiten wurden in der bestehenden Bildungsforschungsliteratur als "21st-century skills" betrachtet? Bei der Untersuchung dieser Literatur wurden sieben Kategorien oder Bereiche von Wissen und Fähigkeiten ermittelt. Implikationen und zukünftige Forschungsrichtungen darüber, wie adaptives Lernen und adaptives Testen im neuen Jahrhundert die Bildungs- und Berufsberatung unterstützen können, werden am Ende dieses Papiers kurz diskutiert.

Para entender las habilidades del 21º siglo: De una revisión sistemática

Las dos primeras décadas del siglo XXI han sido testigo del florecimiento de modelos para conceptualizar las "competencias del siglo XXI" tanto en la escuela como en la profesión. Sin embargo, sigue habiendo una falta de consenso sobre de qué estamos hablando cuando utilizamos el término "habilidades del siglo XXI", ya que los marcos existentes sobre las "habilidades del siglo XXI" son diferentes entre sí. A partir de 471 fuentes existentes publicadas entre 2000 y 2017 en relación con las "competencias del siglo XXI", identificadas a partir de seis bases de datos de investigación, este estudio pretendía responder a la siguiente pregunta de investigación mediante una revisión sistemática: ¿Qué habilidades han sido consideradas como "habilidades del siglo XXI" en la literatura de investigación educativa existente? Al investigar esta literatura surgieron siete categorías o dominios de conocimientos y habilidades. Al final de este trabajo se discutieron brevemente las implicaciones y las futuras direcciones de investigación sobre cómo el aprendizaje adaptativo y las pruebas adaptativas del nuevo siglo pueden potenciar la orientación educativa y profesional.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Introducing Assessment Tools for 21st Century Skills in Finland

Twenty-First Century Skills: From Theory to Action

Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools

Data availability.

Interim files for data documentation purposes are available upon request.

Code availability

Software codes or custom codes do not apply to this article.

American Association of Colleges and Universities. (2007). College learning for the new global century . AACU.

Balistreri, S., Giacomo, F., Noisette, I., & Ptak, T. (2012). Global education: Connections, concepts, and careers . College Board. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED562681.pdf .

Battelle for Kids. (2019). Framework for 21st century learning . http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf .

Bell-Rose, S., & Desai, V. (n.d.). Educating leaders for a global society . http://asiasociety.org/files/GSF_EducatingLeaders.pdf .

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Hermna, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, E. Care, & B. McGaw (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer.

Chapter Google Scholar

Bujang, M. A., & Baharum, N. (2017). Guidelines of the minimum sample size requirements for Cohen’s Kappa. Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health, 14 (2), 1–10.

Google Scholar

Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research . The Guilford Press.

Care, E. (2018). Twenty-first century skills: From theory to action. In E. Care, P. Griffin, & M. Wilson (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Research and applications (pp. 3–17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6 .

Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq . (2006). https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ224/PLAW-115publ224.pdf .

CASEL. (n.d.). CASEL’s widely used framework identifies five core competencies . https://casel.org/what-is-sel-4/ .

Chen, D., & Zhang, J. (2020). A review of “A course in item response theory and modeling with Stata” by Raykov and Marcoulides. Psychometrika , 85 (3), 837–840.

Article Google Scholar

Davis, A. (2016). Preparation for a global economy: 21st century career-readiness and academic-citizenship skills for African-American workforce entrants [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Southern California.

Dede, C. (2007). Transforming education for the 21st century: New pedagogies that help all students attain sophisticated learning outcomes . NCSU Friday Institute. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.462.7531&rep=rep1&type=pdf .

Dede, C. (2009). Comparing frameworks for “21st century skills.” In J. Bellance & R. Brands (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 51–75). Solution Tree Press.

Department of Education, Skills and Employment. (n.d.). Links to 21st century learning . https://www.education.gov.au/national-stem-education-resources-toolkit/links-21st-century-learning .

Ee, J. (2014). Modifying Defining Issues Test (DIT) as a tool for assessing secondary students’ social-emotional competencies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15 , 247–256.

Fang, J., Guo, Q., Chang, H., Yang, M., Zhao, W., & Qin, Y. (2019, September 17–18). Knowledge recommendation based on item response theory . Paper presentation. International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grids, Guangzhou, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/SKG49510.2019.00008 .

Fink, K., & Geller, K. (2016). Integrating Common Core and character education: Why it is essential and how it can be done. Journal of Character Education, 12 (1), 55–68.

Gardner, H. (2010). Five minds for the future. In J. A. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 33–49). Solution Tree.

Gokool-Ramdoo, S., & Rumjaun, A. (2017). Education for sustainable development: Connecting the dots for sustainability. Journal of Learning for Development, 4 (1), 72–89.

Gordon, J., Halasz, G., Krawczyk, M., Leney, T., Michel, A., Pepper, D., Putkiewicz, E., & Wiśniewski, J. (2009). Key competences in Europe: Opening doors for lifelong learners across the school curriculum and teacher education . Center for Social and Economic Research. https://case-research.eu/upload/publikacja_plik/27191519_CNR_87_final.pdf .

Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning . Corwin.

Hillman, N. (2012). Learning 21st century skills: Implementation of programs and practices [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Southern California.

Jimenez, L. (2020, May 18). Building a strong middle class through career pathways programs: Case studies of Germany, Singapore, and Switzerland . Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education-k-12/reports/2020/05/18/485130/building-strong-middle-class-career-pathways-programs/ .

Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. (2013). What knowledge is of most worth: Teacher knowledge for 21st century learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29 (4), 127–140.

Li, X., Xu, H., Zhang, J., & Chang, H. (2021). Optimal hierarchical learning path design with reinforcement learning. Applied Psychological Measurement , 45 (1), 54–70.

Li, X., Zhang, J., & Chang, H. (2020). Look-ahead content balancing method in variable length computerized classification testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 73 (1), 88–108.

Liberati, A., Altman, D., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P., Ioannidis, J., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6 (7), 1–34.

Linacre, J. M. (2000). Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. In U. Kang, E. Jean, & J. M. Linacre (Eds.), Development of computerized middle school achievement tests (pp. 3–58). MESA Psychometric Laboratory, University of Chicago.

Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis . Oxford University Press.

Book Google Scholar

McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22 (3), 276–282.

Metiri Group. (2003). enGauge 21st century skills: For 21st century learners . https://www.cwasd.k12.wi.us/highschl/newsfile1062_1.pdf .

Mishra, P., & Kereluik, K. (2011, March 7–11). What 21st century learning? A review and synthesis . Paper presentation. Annual Conference of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Nashville. https://www.academia.edu/3620627/What_21st_Century_Learning_A_review_and_a_synthesis .

Morse, J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5 (2), 147–149.

Mrabet, H., & Moussa, A. (2021). IoT-school guidance: A holistic approach to vocational self-awareness & career path. Education and Information Technologies , 26 , 5439–5456.

National Board of Education. (2014). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2014 [Finnish national core curriculum for basic education]. https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/perusopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf .

Omohundro, T. (2015). First-year secondary teachers' perceptions of their preparedness to integrate 21st century skills into the technology-rich classroom [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Virginia Commonwealth University.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary . OECD.

Ormrod, J. E. (2012). Human learning (6th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Ravitz, J. (2014). A survey for measuring 21st century teaching and learning . https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2246.6647 .

Reimers, F. (2010). Educating for global competency. In J. E. Cohen & M. B. Malin (Eds.), International perspectives on the goals of universal basic and secondary education (pp. 183–202). American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Saavedra, A. R. S., & Opfer, V. D. (2012a). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching . Phi Delta Kappan, 94 (2), 8–13.

Saavedra, A. R. S., & Opfer, V. D. (2012b). Teaching and learning 21st century skills: Lessons from the learning sciences . https://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2012/Saavedra12.pdf .

Sahin, M., Akbasli, S., & Yelken, T. Y. (2010). Key competences for lifelong learning: The case of prospective teachers. Educational Research and Review, 5 (10), 545–556.

Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ , 349 (g7647), 1–25.

Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act, 20 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq . (2018). https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ224/PLAW-115publ224.pdf .

Thomas, J., O’Mara-Eves, A., Harden, A., & Newman, M. (2017). Synthesis methods for combining and configuring textual or mixed methods data. In D. Gough, S. Oliver, & J. Thomas (Eds.), An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed., pp. 181–210). SAGE, London.

U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 national education technology plan update . https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf .

U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). National education technology plan . Office of Educational Technology. https://tech.ed.gov/netp/ .

Uduigwome, G. (2012). Twenty-first century skills and school programs: Implementation at a suburban elementary school [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Southern California.

von Davier, A., Deonovic, B., Yudelson, M., Polyak, S., & Woo, A. (2019). Computational psychometrics approach to holistic learning and assessment systems. Frontiers in Education, 4 (69), 1–12.

Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29 (5), 403–413.

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21stcentury competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44 (3), 299–321.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Drs. Esther Care, Alvin Vista and Helyn Kim at the Brookings Institution for a summer internship in 2018 that inspired the writing of this article and the ensuing pursuit of research in adaptive assessment. Also, the author thanks the participants at the annual conference of the National Council on Measurement in Education in 2019 for their constructive feedback on an earlier version of this article, Dr. Aarti Bellara from the University of Connecticut that supported this study, in addition to editors and anonymous reviewers of this journal whose comments helped improve this article tremendously. This work is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant DGE-1747486. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

The author disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, conference presentation, and/or publication of this article: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant DGE-1747486. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Educational Psychology, College of Education, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign, 1310 S 6th St, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA

Dandan Chen

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dandan Chen .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Chen, D. Toward an understanding of 21st-century skills: From a systematic review. Int J Educ Vocat Guidance 23 , 275–294 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-021-09511-1

Download citation

Received : 27 May 2020

Accepted : 02 October 2021

Published : 27 October 2021

Issue Date : July 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-021-09511-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

21st-century skills
Systematic review
Adaptive learning
Find a journal
Publish with us
Track your research

Utility Menu

21st Century Education

At GEII we look at education for the 21 st century in the following ways:

See 21st Century Education in Action

Competencies in the Intrapersonal Domain

1) Intellectual Openness, including:

Flexibility, adaptability, artistic and cultural appreciation, personal and social responsibility, cultural awareness and competence, appreciation for diversity, adaptability, continuous learning, intellectual interest and curiosity

2) Work Ethic & Conscientiousness, including:

a. Initiative, self-direction, responsibility, perseverance, grit; productivity, type 1 self-regulation (metacognitive skills, including forethought, performance, and self-reflection), professionalism/ ethics; integrity; citizenship, career orientation

b. Positive Core Self-Evaluation, including: i. Type 2 self-regulation (self-monitoring, self-evaluation, self-reinforcement), physical and psychological health

For more about this domain, please see National Research Council. Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century . Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012. doi:10.17226/13398 .

Competencies in the Interpersonal Domain

1) Teamwork & Collaboration, including:

Communication, collaboration, teamwork, cooperation, coordination, interpersonal skills, empathy/perspective taking, trust, service orientation, conflict resolution, negotiation

2) Leadership, including:

Leadership, responsibility, assertive communication, self-presentation, social influence with others

Competencies in the Cognitive Domain

1) Cognitive Processes & Strategies, including:

Critical thinking, problem solving, analysis, reasoning and argumentation, interpretation, decision making, adaptive learning, and executive function

2) Knowledge, including:

Information literacy, including research using evidence and recognizing bias in sources; information and communication technology literacy, oral and written communication, active listening

3) Creativity, including:

Creativity and innovation

Values and Attitudes

The values and attitudes cultivated in participants by each program will vary by country, region, philosophies, and other social and cultural factors. However, as values and attitudes are central to developing a person’s character and shaping the beliefs, attitudes, decisions and actions of a person, we felt it was important to ask each organization included on our website to explicitly name the particular values and attitudes they seek to nurture in their program participants.

There are many sources about what kind of values, and we note that they vary according to different contexts. One document might be a helpful resource among many is the following by Margaret Sinclair titled, “ Learning to Live Together: Building Skills, Values, and Attitudes for the 21st Century ” published in 2005 by the International Bureau of Education:

Active, Engaging, and Empowering Pedagogy

21st Century pedagogy includes a focus on active, engaging, and empowering learning. Personalization, participation, and learning through authentic real-world contexts, solving problems creatively, developing projects from the beginning to the end, working collaboratively with peers and mentors, with a focus on developing metacognitive abilities, adapting and applying new knowledge while integrating it into existing conceptual frameworks are all examples of powerful pedagogy.

For more on this topic, please see this working paper from UNESCO (December, 2015) by Cynthia Luna Scott, titled, “ What Kind of Pedagogies for the 21st Century? ” among many others:

Who is doing it?
How are they selected?

21st Century Skills for Teachers: The Key to Becoming Dynamic Educators »

21st Century Skills for Teachers: The Key to Becoming Dynamic Educators

In this ever-changing world, the educational system has changed exponentially. Teaching has always been a dynamic and impactful profession. Still, the need of the hour is often beyond the professional skills of a teacher and demands several skills they must develop. The evolving teaching-learning process has evolved beyond the confines of a classroom. The job market now needs highly skilled and holistically developed individuals in the workforce, and the future of your students depends on how you make them develop as a whole and what additional skills and values you help them inculcate. In the 21st century, skills for teachers go beyond simple sharing of knowledge, and extend to each portion of the child’s development, and as their mentors and guardians, it is our responsibility as educators to help them achieve greater heights.

The teaching profession requires constant upskilling, learning, and re-learning of concepts so that we can keep the learning process more dynamic. Hence, it is integral that we develop some additional skill sets to amplify and bolster the support and guidance we give our students. In this article, we shall explore some 21st-century skills in education that are integral for teachers to adopt and their significance in the teaching-learning process.

21st Century Skills for Teachers

So, what are 21st-century skills? Why are they important? These modern skills essentially help make the learning environment more engaging, interactive, and dynamic and help foster the development of higher-order thinking skills and analytical prowess in students. They, in turn, help prepare students for the global job market and help them develop the necessary skills to be a part of a competitive and skilled workforce. They also aid in effective classroom management.

These holistic skills can be divided into 3 broad categories, namely learning skills, literacy skills, and life skills . When teachers integrate these skills, they can effectively disseminate information and values related to them to their students, and cater to their growth in a positive direction.

Learning Skills

Learning skills generally involve all the higher-order thinking skills that are necessary for being part of a global workforce, where adaptability to situations and thinking on your toes are key aspects to emphasise. Learning skills are made up of a few components, also known as the 4C’s of development, which are listed below.

Critical Thinking

Collaboration, communication, how to aid the development of learning skills, literacy skills.

Literacy skills simply refer to abilities that will help students discern between factual, accurate data, interpret and absorb it, segregate misinformation from true reality, and effectively disseminate that information. Literacy skills have three components, which are listed below.

Information Literacy

Media literacy, being tech-savvy, how to aid the development of literacy skills, life skills.

One of the most necessary 21st-century skills for teachers to learn and inculcate in their students is life skills. Life skills are soft skills, and other intangible qualities that help aid the development of a student as a whole, and enrich their life so that they grow up to become well-adjusted and successful adults. Some essential life skills necessary in the 21st century, also known by the acronym FLIPS, are listed below.

Flexibility

Productivity, social skills, how to aid the development of life skills, importance of 21st-century skills for teachers.

The significance of these 21st-century skills is manifold, as teachers need to be creative and constantly keep learning new concepts and developing new abilities to bolster the development of their wards. These skills are integral because:

Helping students develop new skills also motivates and pushes teachers to adapt to an ever-changing educational landscape, which makes them better educators.
Teachers can add more value to simple academic lessons and promote the development of adaptive skills and higher-order thinking skills in learners.
Inculcating these skills into lesson plans can help create a more interactive and fun learning environment. This will help students retain these skills in their long-term memory and place more value on their learning experience.
Integrating these skills can help teachers become more effective classroom managers. It will also promote the students’ learning by example. Once they inculcate and absorb such qualities, it leads to a more collaborative and supportive teaching-learning environment.

Integrating 21st-century skills in education can help amplify learning, make it more holistic and inclusive, and add value to the lives of educators and learners simultaneously.

Last Updated on May 23, 2024

More Recent Blogs

9 Teacher Goals for Personal and Professional Growth

What are your main goals as a teacher? For many educators, the first goal is […]

Classroom characters: Common types of students in every...

Every class is like a mix of different people, each with their strengths and weaknesses. […]

A Teacher’s Guide to Setting an Exam Question...

Crafting a good question paper is like putting together a puzzle – you need the […]

Found the blog insightful?

Get such ed tech insights delivered weekly to your inbox, for free. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Teaching App
Live Classes
Learning App
School Solutions
STAR Program
NCERT Solutions for Class 12
NCERT Solutions for Class 11
Solved Board Paper CBSE
Solved Board Paper ICSE
CBSE Class 12
CBSE Class 11
CBSE Class 10
ICSE Class 12
Sample Paper CBSE
Exam Weightage CBSE
CBSE Class 12 Solution
Terms of Use

Kemampuan Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar Untuk Mengembangkan Perangkat Pembelajaran Menggunakan TPACK

Naomi Dias Laksita Dewi University of Jember
Vivi Darmayanti Universitas Jember
Moh Badrus Sholeh Arif Universitas Jember

The utilization of information and communication technology is crucial, not only in classrooms, but also in all aspects of life. The 21st-century learning acknowledges the necessity for students to have the knowledge and skills to succeed in a technology-driven global society. In the context of elementary education, the role of educators in designing learning experiences that meet students' needs is paramount. Developing teaching skills, particularly within the framework of TPACK, is key to creating effective and meaningful learning experiences for students. Colleges should pay attention to developing the skills of prospective teachers to design appropriate learning tools using TPACK. Therefore, this research aims to analyze the skills of elementary school teacher candidates in developing learning tools at the elementary school level. This is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach, conducted at the University of Jember with 42 students from the Elementary School Teacher Education program who have completed the Elementary School Learning Planning course. Data were obtained from the assessment of learning tool preparation through Teaching Modules or Lesson Plans developed by the students. The results of the students' development show that their CK, PK, TK, and TCK are good. Their PCK and TPK fall within the category of fairly good. Developing TPACK is an important skill that will equip prospective teachers to prepare themselves as quality educators. The analysis of TPACK domain knowledge data falls within the moderate category, indicating that student teacher candidates already possess knowledge of how to integrate technology, content, and pedagogy in teaching.

Absari, N., Priyanto, P., & Muslikhin, M. (2020). The Effectiveness of Technology, Pedagogy and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 26(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v26i1.24012

Agustina, P., Putri Kus Sundari, P., & Eri Ardani, D. (2016). Kemampuan Mahasiswa Calon Guru Biologi dalam Merancang Pembelajaran Berbasis Praktikum: Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UMS Biology Pre-Service Teacher’s Ability in Designing Practice Based Learning: Case Study in Biology Education Students. Biologi, Sains, Lingkungan, Dan Pembelajarannya, 13(1), 536–540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1144050

Anugrahana, A. (2018). Persiapan Guru Sekolah Dasar yang Profesional dalam Menghadapi Generasi Digital. Prosiding Seminar Nasional FKIP 2018, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.24071/snfkip.2018.02

Baser, D., Kopcha, T. J., & Ozden, M. Y. (2016). Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) assessment for preservice teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1047456

Dhawati, D. A. A., & Hariyatmi, H. (2017). Kemampuan Technological Knowledge (TK) Calon Guru Biologi FKIP UMS. Prosiding SNPBS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi Dan Saintek) Ke-2.

Donovan, L., & Green, T. (2014). Creating 21st century teaching and learning environment. Shell Education.

Ediyani, M., Hayati, U., Salwa, S., Samsul, S., Nursiah, N., & Fauzi, M. B. (2020). Study on Development of Learning Media. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 1336–1342. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.989

Fathonah, A. N. (2017). Pengaruh Penerapan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Financial Distress. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 1(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/ . https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v1i2.9989

Feriyanto, F. (2022). Strategi Penguatan Literasi Numerasi Matematika Bagi Peserta Didik Pada Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Jurnal Gammath, 7(2).

Gala, A., Hafid, A., & FIP Univrsitas Negeri Makassar, P. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Guru Dalam Merancang Pembelajaran Tematik di Kelas Tinggi SDN 71 Maccini Kabupaten Soppeng. JIKAP PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kependidikan, 5(3).

Guerriero, S. (2014). Teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and the teaching profession. Paris:.

Haris, A. (2019). Hubungan Penguasaan Materi Mengajar Guru Dengan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Di MTSN Kadur Kecamatan Kadur Kabupaten Pamekasan Tahun 2018. 6(1).

Hidayat, A. (2019). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Instrument For Indonesia Science Pre-Service Teacher: Framework, Indicators, And Items Development. Unnes Science Education Journal , 8(2). http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/usej

Hoesny, M. U., Darmayanti, R., & Malang, P. N. (2021). Permasalahan dan Solusi Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi dan Kualitas Guru: Sebuah Kajian Pustaka.

Khoiri, N., Huda, C., & Susilawati. (2017). Deskripsi Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (Tpack) Pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika. Deskripsi Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (Tpack) Pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241616400

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? The Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24636917

Listiawan, T., & Baskoro, W. W. (2015). Analisis Technological Content Knowledge ( TCK ) Calon Guru Matematika Dalam Menggunakan Perangkat Lunak Geometri Dinamis. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 827–834. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4443.3522

Lyublinskaya, I., & Kaplon-Schilis, A. (2022). Analysis of Differences in the Levels of TPACK: Unpacking Performance Indicators in the TPACK Levels Rubric. Education Sciences, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020079

Mahrunnisya, D. (2023). JUPENJI: Jurnal Pendidikan Jompa Indonesia 101 Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional. 2(1). https://jurnal.jomparnd.com/index.php/jupenji

Miles, M. B., & A.M. Huberman. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis (R. Holland, Ed.). Sage Producation.

Mukarramah, Gani, A., & Winarni, S. (2021). Analisis Kesesuaian Perangkat Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran dengan Tuntutan Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 5(3), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v5i3.21934

Mulyanto, T. N. H. P., & Yoenanto, N. H. (2023). Kesiapan Guru Menuju Digitalisasi Pendidikan di Era Merdeka Belajar Ditinjau dari Komponen TPACK.

National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.

Pereira, R. Q., & Nganga, C. (2020). TPACK and Business Education: a Review of Literature (2008-2017). Revista de Informação Contábil, 14(0), 020001–020001. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34629/ric.v14i0.e-020001

Pertiwi, D. P., Kumala, F. N., & Iswahyudi, D. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Teknologi Guru Sd. Rainstek Jurnal Terapan Sains Dan Teknologi, 3(3), 241–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21067/jtst.v3i3.6038

Putri, M. P., & Wahyuningsih, E. (2021). Efektivitas Perangkat Pembelajaran Ipa Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Smp Pada Materi Pokok Listrik Statis The Effectiveness Of Science Learning Devices To Train Critical Thinking Skills Of Junior High School Students In Static Electricity Materials. In Journal of Banua Science Education E (Vol. 1, Issue 2).

Rahmadi, I. F., Hayati, E., & Nursyifa, A. (2020). Comparing Pre-service Civic Education Teachers’ TPACK Confidence Across Course Modes. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 5(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.05.02.7

Rahmayani, F., & Istiyono, E. (2022). Affective Assesment Instrument to Assess Student Attitudes Towards Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(4), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i4.47681

Rauf, R., Indrayani, Hambali, A., & Ibandong, M. (2023). Pelatihan Penyusunan Alur Tujuan Pembelajaran dalam Rangka Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Yayasan Kemala Bhayangkari Makassar. INOVASI : Jurnal Hasil Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(2).

Riswakhyuningsih, T. (2022). Pengembangan Alur Tujuan Pembelajaran (ATP) Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) Kelas VII SMP (Vol. 7, Issue 1).

Rukmana, D., & Handayani, S. L. (2021). Exploring the profiles of pre-service teachers technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) on earth and space science offline and online course. Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 11(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v11i1.7882

Saifullah, Putra, I., & Heriani. (2023). Pengaruh Kompetensi Pedagogik, Kompetensi Profesional, Kompetensi Sosial Dan Kompetensi Kepribadian Guru Terhadap Kinerja Guru Sman Se-Kota Bima. Inovasi P-ISSN 2356-2005 Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Manajemen, 10(1), 58–70.

Sapriyah. (2019). Media Pembelajaran Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. 2(1), 470–477.

Saragih, M. J., Putri, K., Dirgantoro, S., Marthaulina, M., Siahaan, L., Harapan, U. P., & Timor, U. (2021). Membangun Pemahaman Mahasiswa Calon Guru Akan Interaksi Dalam Pembelajaran Melalui Program Pengalaman Lapangan-1 Di Sekolah Building.

Sefriani, R., Radyuli, P., & Sepriana, R. (2021). Design and Development Based Learning Media Application Using Mobile App Inventor. International Journal of Educational Development and Innovation, 1, 2797–7528. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijedi.v1i1.22162

Seprianto, S. (2020). Hubungan Pemahaman Konsep Dasar Kimia dengan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa. KATALIS: Jurnal Penelitian Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia, 3(1).

Sukaesih, S., Ridlo, S., & Saptono, S. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Technological Pedagogical And Content Knowledge (TPACK) Calon Guru Pada Mata Kuliah Pp Bio. Prosiding SNPS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains).

Supriyadi, Bahri, S., & Waremra, R. S. (2018). Kemampuan Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Mahasiswa Pada Matakuliah Strategi Belajar Mengajar Fisika. Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan, 8(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21067/jip.v8i2.2632

Surahman, E., Ulfa, S., Husna, A., Ramdiana, H., Zufar At Thaariq, Z., Bagas Setiawan, A., Syifa, M., & Qolbi, ul. (2020). PELATIHAN MICRO LEARNING OBJECT BERBASIS TPACK BAGI GURU-GURU SMA DI GARUT. Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(1), 1–14.

Swan, K., & Hofer, M. (2011). In Search of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Teachers’ Initial Foray into Podcasting in Economics (Vol. 44, Issue 1).

Ulfa, M., & Purnamaningsih, R. (2022). Innovation of Learning Media Through Information And Communication Technology In The Revolution Era 4.0 (Vol. 5, Issue 4).

Widyasti, N., Wiratma, I., & Muderawan, I. (2020). Uji Validasi Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 79–85.

Yurinda, B., & Widyasari, N. (2022). Analisis Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Guru Profesional dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.8.1.47-60

How to Cite

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .

sidebar_menu

Editorial Team
Peer Reviewers
Focus and Scope
Author Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Publishing System

Make a Submission

citation_statistic

visitor_statistics

IMAGES

A Comprehensive Guide to 21st Century Skills
What Are 21st Century Skills? (2022)
21st Century Skills: what students need to succeed in today’s society
21st Century Skills (Partnership for 21 st Century Skills and other
Ten 21st-century Skills Every Student Needs
EducSpiration: What are the 21st Century Skills that are needed to

VIDEO

21st Century Education Example
21st Century Educators Workshop on IBM SkillsBuild and Emerging Technologies
Assessment of life skills and 21st century skills in schools || 21वीं सदी के कौशलों का आंकलन
Propositions Project: 21st Century Skills
Short
PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION

COMMENTS

Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st
The 21st-century skillset is generally understood to encompass a range of competencies, including critical thinking, problem solving, creativity, meta-cognition, communication, digital and technological literacy, civic responsibility, and global awareness (for a review of frameworks, see Dede, 2010).And nowhere is the development of such competencies more important than in developing country ...
Full article: Developing 21st century teaching skills: A case study of
2.1. Project-based learning. Project-Based Learning (PBL) prepares students for academic, personal, and career success and readies young people to rise to the challenges of their lives and the world they will inherit (PBL Works, Citation 2019).This study applies the following definition: PBL is a teaching method in which students gain knowledge and skills by working for an extended period of ...
(PDF) Toward an understanding of 21st-century skills ...
Dra wing upon 471 existing sources published in 2000-2017. regarding "21st-century skills," identiﬁed from six research databases, this study. was intended to answer the follo wing ...
21st CENTURY LEARNING SKILLS IN EDUCATION AND EMPLOYABILITY
CENTURY LEARNING SKILLS IN EDUCATION AND EMPLOYABILITY William Xavier Toro The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to research a diverse school in Westchester County, New York to analyze whether it is aligned to 21. st. century practices. This study used both qualitative and quantitative data from focus-group interviews, surveys and non-
PDF 21st Century Knowledge and Skills in Educator Preparation
Education and the Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21). Funding for the project was generously provided by Blackboard, ETS, Intel, National Education Association, ... 21st century education and learning strategies. 8. Educator preparation programs will be at the forefront of research and evaluation of 21st century education. CORE ...
Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills
Recognizing this need, business, political, and educational leaders are increasingly asking schools to teach students the competencies they will need to navigate a changing world—skills such as problem solving, critical thinking, and collaboration. Such skills are often referred to as "21st century skills," "soft skills," or "deeper ...
Assessing 21st Century Skills: Integrating Research Findings
This paper synthesizes research evidence pertaining to several so-called 21st century skills: critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, metacognition, and motivation. We provide a rationale for focusing on these five skills and explain their importance as educational outcomes. We then summarize peer-reviewed research published in education and psychology in order to answer several ...
Teaching, learning and assessing 21st century skills
This chapter draws upon the report Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century (Pellegrino and Hilton, 2012) to address questions about why the terms labelled "deeper learning" and "21st century skills" have achieved prominence in the thinking and actions of multiple stakeholder groups and what we know from research to help us think ...
Teaching of 21st century skills needs to be informed by ...
Psychological research focused on assessment and evaluation is critical for ensuring that 21st century skills are integrated into educational improvement efforts as well as school-level and system ...
21st Century Skills
The World Economic Forum's report a New Vision for Education: Unlocking the Potential of Technology highlighted the growing deficit in 21CS development in our youth and included strategies focused on addressing this gap through technology. Sixteen skills were identified for student success in the 21st century and emphasized the need for "lifelong learning" (World Economic Forum, 2015, p. 3).
1. 21st Century competencies: Challenges in education and assessment
Before going further, it is useful to establish what exactly the term "21st Century competencies" means. There is a diversity of terminologies employed interchangeably within this relatively crowded space: "21st Century skills/competencies", "soft skills", "interdisciplinary skills" and "transferable skills", to name just a few.
Tracing research trends of 21st-century learning skills
Recently, learning technologies have become a pivotal constituent of teaching-learning processes. Contemporary studies indicate that in order to effectively utilize these technologies, instructors and learners alike must master a range of cognitive and socio-emotional competencies, commonly termed "digital literacy competencies" or "21 st century skills."
Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive
There is a need to arm students with noncognitive, or 21st Century, skills to prepare them for a more STEM-based job market. As STEM schools are created in a response to this call to action, research is needed to better understand how exemplary STEM schools successfully accomplish this goal. This conversion mixed method study analyzed student work samples and teacher lesson plans from seven ...
Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century
At the same time, business and political leaders are increasingly asking schools to develop skills such as problem solving, critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and self-management - often referred to as "21st century skills." Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century describes ...
Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st
The development of competencies known as 21st-century skills are garnering increasing attention as a means of improving teacher instructional quality. However, a key challenge in bringing about des...
Twenty-First Century Skills: From Theory to Action
The Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (ATC21S; Griffin et al. 2012) initiative was stimulated by a coalition of global commercial organisations and engaged in by six countries in its research phase.Reflecting concerns about generating future workforces with the "21st century" skills that their workplaces required, Kozma discussed an aspiration for education reform which was ...
Toward an understanding of 21st-century skills: From a ...
The first two decades of the twenty-first century witnessed the blossoming of frameworks to conceptualize "21st-century skills" both in school and career. However, there is still a lack of consensus about what we are talking about when using the term "21st-century skills," as the existing frameworks on "21st-century skills" are different from each other. Drawing upon 471 existing ...
Introduction to 21st century skills and education
PDF | Please cite as: Erdem, C. (2019). Introduction to 21st century skills and education. In C. Erdem, H. Bagcı and M. Kocyigit (Eds) 21st centrury... | Find, read and cite all the research you ...
PDF 21st Century Skills, Education & Competitiveness
21st century. The Partnership encourages schools, districts and states to advocate for the infusion of 21st century skills into education and provides tools and resources to help facilitate and drive change. 21st Century Skills, 1 Education & Competiveness Why We Need to Act Now 2 What We Need to Do Now 10 A Shared Vision of a 12 21st Century ...
21st Century Education
21st Century pedagogy includes a focus on active, engaging, and empowering learning. Personalization, participation, and learning through authentic real-world contexts, solving problems creatively, developing projects from the beginning to the end, working collaboratively with peers and mentors, with a focus on developing metacognitive ...
PDF The integration of 21st century skills into education: an evaluation
It is a promising development that, within the scope of Industry 4.0, which is reached thanks to developing industry and technologies, and Education 4.0 which runs parallel with this, the Ministry of National Education has started to plan, and in fact take actions to build 21st Century Skills within its curriculum.
Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for
While the importance of these skills to fulfill the demands for workers in the 21st century has been well established, research has identified that comprehensive knowledge about skill assessment is lacking (Voogt & Roblin, 2012).Although various components of digital skills have been described in theory (e.g., Claro et al., 2012; Jara et al., 2015; Siddiq et al., 2017; Van Deursen et al., 2016 ...
21st century skills
In a paper titled "Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century" produced by the National Research Council of National Academies, the National Research defines 21st century skills, describes how the skills relate to each other and summaries the evidence regarding these skills.
ED637184
This study was guided by Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and the Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Sixteen participants provided in-depth responses to open ended interview questions related to the study's two research questions. The first research question was; how do K-2 teachers describe their use of technology resources?
Education skills for digital age toward sustainable development
HEIs could use the proposed set of educational skills for digital age to be inculcated within the curricular of business education sector, at policymaking level HEIs may revisit their current strategies and include different policies and procedures to assess the impact of integrating key educational skills for digital age skills toward ...
3 Most Important 21st Century Skills for Teachers
In this article, we shall explore some 21st-century skills in education that are integral for teachers to adopt and their significance in the teaching-learning process. 21st Century Skills for Teachers. ... learn how to research for projects from online sources realistically, make interactive presentations, use new software, and develop new ...
Kemampuan Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar Untuk Mengembangkan Perangkat
The 21st-century learning acknowledges the necessity for students to have the knowledge and skills to succeed in a technology-driven global society. In the context of elementary education, the role of educators in designing learning experiences that meet students' needs is paramount. ... this research aims to analyze the skills of elementary ...
In for the long ride? Law and technology education in the UK and its
2. Preparing law graduates for the 21st century. From the perspective of law schools, and beyond the important societal role of law graduates as stewards of responsible technology, Footnote 12 there are three distinct motivations behind offering fundamental technological literacy to law graduates: preparing them for a career in the responsible technology job market, preparing them for a career ...
Digital Savvy: Building Digital Intelligence in 21st Century Education
This research aims to analyze and synthesize the results of recent studies on digital intelligence implementation strategies in the school environment and the challenges faced. By using the literature research method in accordance with the theory of the research context. ... (2023). Computer Science Education and 21st Century Skills for the New ...

Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills

Publications

Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century

Description

Past Events

Teaching of 21st century skills needs to be informed by psychological research

Relevant articles

Behavioral patterns in collaborative problem solving: a latent profile analysis based on response times and actions in PISA 2015

Access options

Author information

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Rights and permissions

About this article

Share this article

This article is cited by

Quick links

Developing student 21 st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools

Conclusions

Introduction

Conceptual framework

Use of information and communication technology for learning

Conceptual Model of 21 st Century Skills

Research design

Participating schools

Data sources

Data analysis

Overall rubric scores

21 st Century learning by grade

Long-term versus short-term assignments

Grade level differences

Short-term vs. long-term lessons

Limitations

Availability of data and materials

Abbreviations

Acknowledgments

Author information

Contributions

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Additional information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Share this article

Education for Life and Work

RESOURCES AT A GLANCE

Suggested Citation

Publication Info

What is skim?

Copyright Information

What is a prepublication?

What happens when I pre-order?

Downloading and Using eBooks from NAP

Why is an eBook better than a PDF?

Where do I get eBook files?

Types of Publications

Toward an understanding of 21st-century skills: From a systematic review

Cite this article

Zusammenfassung

Access this article

Similar content being viewed by others

Introducing Assessment Tools for 21st Century Skills in Finland

Twenty-First Century Skills: From Theory to Action

Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools

Code availability

Acknowledgements

Author information

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Additional information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Share this article

21st Century Education

Competencies in the Intrapersonal Domain

1) Intellectual Openness, including:

2) Work Ethic & Conscientiousness, including:

Competencies in the Interpersonal Domain

1) Teamwork & Collaboration, including:

2) Leadership, including: