difference between case study and phenomenological research

Home » Education » Difference Between Case Study and Phenomenology

Difference Between Case Study and Phenomenology

Main difference – case study vs phenomenology.

Case study and phenomenology are two terms that are often used in the field of social science s and research. Both these terms refer to types of research methods ; however, phenomenology is also a concept in philosophical studies. As a research methodology, the main difference between case study and phenomenology is that case study is an in-depth and detailed investigation of the development of a single event, situation, or an individual over a period of time whereas phenomenology is a study that is designed to understand the subjective, lived experiences and perspectives of participants.

In this article, we will be discussing,

     1. What is a Case Study           – Definition, Use, Data Collection, Limitations      2. What is Phenomenology           – Definition, Use, Data Collection, Limitations      3. What is the difference between Case Study and Phenomenology

What is a Case Study

A case study is defined as “an empirical inquiry that investigates a contemporary phenomenon within its real-life context; when the boundaries between phenomenon and context are not clearly evident; and in which multiple sources of evidence are used” (Yin,1984).  In simple terms, it is an in-depth and detailed investigation of the development of a single event, situation, or an individual over a period of time. Case studies are often used to explore and unearth complex issues such as social issues, medical conditions, etc. Many researchers use case study method to explore social issues like prostitution, drug addiction, unemployment, and poverty. Case studies can be qualitative and/or quantitative in nature.

A case study commences with identifying and defining the research problem; then the researcher has to select the cases and decide techniques for data collection and analysis. This is followed by collecting data in the field and evaluating and analyzing the data. The final step in a case study involves preparing the research report.  Data collection methods in a case study involve observations, questionnaires, interviews, analysis of recorded data, etc. A successful case study is always context-sensitive, holistic, systematic, layered and comprehensive.

Case studies are sometimes classified into three categories known as exploratory, descriptive and explanatory case studies. Ethnographies are also considered as a type of case studies.

Although case studies offer detailed and in-depth information about a particular phenomenon, it is difficult to use this information to form generalization since they only focus on a single phenomenon.

Figure 1: Questionnaires can be used to collect data for case studies.

What is Phenomenology

Phenomenology is both a philosophy and a research method. As a philosophical study, phenomenology refers to the study of the structures of experience and consciousness. In the field of research, it refers to a study that is designed to understand the subjective, lived experiences and perspectives of participants. Phenomenology is based on the principle that a single experience can be interpreted in multiple ways and that reality consists of each participant’s interpretation of the said experience. Thus, phenomenology provides information about unique individual experiences, offering a rich and complete description of human experiences and meanings.

Data is collected in phenomenology through long and intensive, semi-structured or unstructured personal interviews. The researcher may also have to conduct several interview sessions with each participant since phenomenology relies heavily on interviews. However, the information gathered through these interviews may also depend on the interviewing skills of the researcher and the articulate skills of the participants. This is a limitation of this method.

Figure 2: Phenomenology often involves long personal interviews.

Case Study: Case study is an in-depth and detailed investigation of the development of a single event, situation, or an individual over a period of time.

Phenomenology: Phenomenology is a study that is designed to understand the subjective, lived experiences and perspectives of participants.

Data Collection

Case Study: Data collection methods include observations, interviews, questionnaires, etc.

Phenomenology: Interviews are the main method of data collection.

Case Study: Case studies focus on a single incident, event, organization, or an individual.

Phenomenology: Phenomenology focus on various individuals and their experiences.

Limitations

Case Study: The information obtained from a case study cannot be used to make generalizations.

Phenomenology: Information relies heavily on the interviewing skills of the researcher and the articulate skills of the participants.

Reference: 1. Yin, Robert. “Case study research. Beverly Hills.” (1984).

Image Courtesy: 1. “5 Candidates reading a questionnaire Photo Tony Ntumba MONUSCO” by MONUSCO Photos (CC BY-SA 2.0) via Flickr 2. “1702648” (Public Domain) via Pixabay

About the Author: Hasa

Hasanthi is a seasoned content writer and editor with over 8 years of experience. Armed with a BA degree in English and a knack for digital marketing, she explores her passions for literature, history, culture, and food through her engaging and informative writing.

​You May Also Like These

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Case Study vs. Phenomenology

What's the difference.

Case study and phenomenology are both research methods used in social sciences to gain a deeper understanding of a particular phenomenon. However, they differ in their approach and focus. Case study involves an in-depth analysis of a specific case or individual, aiming to provide a detailed description and explanation of the phenomenon under investigation. It often involves collecting and analyzing various types of data, such as interviews, observations, and documents. On the other hand, phenomenology focuses on understanding the lived experiences and subjective perspectives of individuals. It aims to uncover the essence and meaning of a phenomenon by exploring the thoughts, feelings, and perceptions of those involved. Phenomenology often involves interviews and reflective analysis to gain insights into the subjective experiences of individuals. Overall, while case study emphasizes detailed analysis of a specific case, phenomenology focuses on understanding the subjective experiences and meanings associated with a phenomenon.

Further Detail

Introduction.

Research methodologies play a crucial role in understanding and exploring various phenomena in different fields. Two commonly used methodologies are case study and phenomenology. While both approaches aim to gain insights and generate knowledge, they differ in their focus, data collection methods, and analysis techniques. In this article, we will compare the attributes of case study and phenomenology, highlighting their similarities and differences.

Case study is a research method that involves an in-depth investigation of a particular individual, group, or phenomenon within its real-life context. It aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject under study by examining multiple variables and their interrelationships. Case studies often utilize a combination of qualitative and quantitative data, including interviews, observations, documents, and archival records.

One of the key strengths of case study research is its ability to provide rich and detailed descriptions of complex phenomena. By focusing on a specific case, researchers can explore the intricacies and nuances that may not be captured by broader research designs. Case studies also allow for the examination of rare or unique cases, providing valuable insights that can contribute to theory development or inform practical applications.

However, case studies also have limitations. Due to their in-depth nature, they may be time-consuming and resource-intensive. Generalizability can be a concern, as findings from a single case may not be applicable to other contexts or populations. Additionally, the subjective interpretation of data by the researcher can introduce bias, potentially impacting the validity and reliability of the study.

Phenomenology

Phenomenology is a qualitative research approach that focuses on understanding the lived experiences of individuals and the meanings they attribute to those experiences. It aims to explore the essence and structure of a phenomenon as it is perceived by the participants. Phenomenological research often involves in-depth interviews, participant observations, and analysis of personal narratives or texts.

One of the main strengths of phenomenology is its emphasis on capturing the subjective experiences of individuals. By delving into the lived experiences, emotions, and perspectives of participants, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the phenomenon under investigation. Phenomenology also allows for the exploration of complex and abstract concepts, shedding light on the underlying meanings and motivations.

However, phenomenology also has its limitations. The findings may be highly subjective and context-dependent, limiting their generalizability. The researcher's interpretation and biases can influence the analysis and findings. Additionally, the process of phenomenological analysis can be time-consuming and require significant expertise in qualitative research methods.

While case study and phenomenology differ in their focus and approach, they share some commonalities. Both methodologies involve an in-depth exploration of a particular subject, aiming to gain a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon under study. They both utilize qualitative data collection methods, such as interviews and observations, to gather rich and detailed information.

However, there are also notable differences between case study and phenomenology. Case study research often examines multiple variables and their interrelationships, while phenomenology focuses on the subjective experiences and meanings attributed by individuals. Case studies aim to provide a holistic view of a complex phenomenon within its real-life context, whereas phenomenology aims to uncover the essence and structure of a phenomenon as it is perceived by the participants.

Another difference lies in the analysis techniques employed. In case study research, data analysis often involves a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, allowing for a comprehensive examination of the subject. Phenomenological analysis, on the other hand, focuses on identifying themes, patterns, and structures within the qualitative data, aiming to uncover the underlying meanings and essences.

Furthermore, case studies are often used in applied fields, such as psychology, business, and education, where practical implications and real-life contexts are of particular interest. Phenomenology, on the other hand, is commonly employed in fields such as sociology, anthropology, and philosophy, where understanding subjective experiences and exploring abstract concepts are central to the research objectives.

Case study and phenomenology are two distinct research methodologies that offer valuable insights into various phenomena. While case study research provides a comprehensive understanding of complex phenomena within their real-life contexts, phenomenology focuses on exploring the subjective experiences and meanings attributed by individuals. Both approaches have their strengths and limitations, and the choice between them depends on the research objectives, the nature of the phenomenon under study, and the available resources. By understanding the attributes of case study and phenomenology, researchers can make informed decisions about the most appropriate methodology to employ in their studies.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.

Case Study vs. Phenomenology: What's the Difference?

Key Differences

Comparison chart, data collection, application, depth vs. breadth, case study and phenomenology definitions, phenomenology, which method is broader: case study or phenomenology, is a case study the same as phenomenology, how many cases are typically studied in a case study research, are both methods qualitative in nature, what's the main goal of phenomenology, who coined the term "case study", can a case study be part of phenomenological research, which method is older: case study or phenomenology, how is phenomenology different from existentialism, can the results of a case study be generalized, can both case study and phenomenology be combined in a single research, is phenomenology only used in psychology, can a case study be quantitative, can a case study be experimental, is phenomenology only about negative experiences, what kind of data does phenomenology rely on, is phenomenology subjective, which method is more suitable for large-scale studies: case study or phenomenology, how long does a case study typically last, who is a key figure in the development of phenomenology.

Trending Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

New Comparisons

• Organizations
• Planning & Activities
• Product & Services
• Structure & Systems
• Career & Education
• Entertainment
• Fashion & Beauty
• Political Institutions
• SmartPhones
• Protocols & Formats
• Communication
• Web Applications
• Household Equipments
• Career and Certifications
• Diet & Fitness
• Mathematics & Statistics
• Processed Foods
• Vegetables & Fruits

Difference Between Case Study and Phenomenology

• Categorized under Miscellaneous | Difference Between Case Study and Phenomenology

Both case study and phenomenology are involved with research processes. They are also concerned with in-depth investigations of their respective subjects. Regarding their distinctions, a case study is a research method while phenomenology is a methodology as well as a philosophical movement. More of their differences are discussed below. 

What is a Case Study?

A case study is an in-depth investigation of an individual, group, institution, or event. It is a research method which examines a particular case in detail and answers the questions “why”, “how”, and “what”. Researchers who utilize this method may employ interviews, observations, document analysis, psychological testing, and other pertinent techniques in gathering information. The case-study method is believed to be first introduced by Frederic Le Play, a French engineer, sociologist, and economist, in 1829. Le Play had a comprehensive study on family budgeting (2017, Sclafani).  

The following are the different types of case studies: 

• Explanatory 

This type focuses on an explanation for a phenomenon or research question. It answers the questions “how” and “why”.  

• Exploratory 

This often leads to a large-scale research since it aims to prove that further investigation is essential. Exploratory case studies answer the questions “what” and “how”. 

• Comparative

This type focuses on the comparison of cases and answers questions such as, “How are cases different?” and “How are the cases alike?”. 

This type uses data from various studies to frame the new study. It uses past research to find more information without spending more money and time. 

This type focuses on a more comprehensive understanding of a very specific case. Intrinsic case studies aim to answer the questions “what”, “how”, and “why”. 

• Instrumental

This type aims to help refine a theory or generate more insights. Instrumental case studies play supportive roles.

What is Phenomenology?

“Phenomenology” came from the Ancient Greek word, “phainómenon” which means “thing appearing to view”. It is the study of conscious experiences from the first-person point of view (Gallagher, 2012). As a methodology, it is generally a qualitative approach which centers on the collection of research participants’ descriptions of their lived experiences. 

It is also a philosophical movement founded by Edmund Husserl, a German philosopher, in the early 20 th century. Phenomenology is based on the principle that a certain experience can be perceived in various ways, that an individual’s reality is different from another’s. For instance, you and your friend watched the same movie at the same time and place; however, the feelings and thoughts that you have experienced during the film are generally more positive than those of your friend’s. 

 There are two main approaches to phenomenology (Sloan, & Bowe, 2014): 

• Descriptive Phenomenology 

This is also known as transcendental phenomenology and was developed by Husserl. In this approach, the observer takes a global view of the phenomena. Its focus is on what is being experienced and on how it is being experienced. 

• Interpretive Phenomenology

This is also known as hermeneutic phenomenology or existential phenomenology; this was developed by Martin Heidegger, Husserl’s student, and later his academic assistant.  In this approach, the observer is one with the phenomena and is involved in interpreting meanings. As compared to descriptive phenomenology, interpretive phenomenology is more complex as it takes time and interaction with the environment into consideration. 

Difference between Case Study and Phenomenology

Definition .

A case study is an in-depth investigation of an individual, group, institution, or event. It is a research method which examines a particular case in detail and answers the questions “why”, “how”, and “what”. In comparison, “phenomenology” came from the Ancient Greek word, “phainómenon” which means “thing appearing to view”. It is the study of conscious experiences from the first-person point of view. It is also a philosophical movement based on the principle that a certain experience can be perceived in various ways.

The case-study method is believed to be first introduced by Frederic Le Play, a French engineer, sociologist, and economist, in 1829. Le Play had a comprehensive study on family budgeting. On the other hand, descriptive phenomenology, also known as transcendental phenomenology, was founded by Edmund Husserl, a German philosopher, in the early 20 th century. Consequently, interpretive phenomenology, hermeneutic phenomenology, or existential phenomenology was developed by Martin Heidegger, Husserl’s student, and later his academic assistant.  

Types or Approaches 

The types of case studies include explanatory, exploratory, comparative, collective, intrinsic, and instrumental. In comparison, the two main approaches to phenomenology are descriptive phenomenology and interpretive phenomenology. 

Data Collection Methods

Researchers who conduct case studies may employ interviews, observations, document analysis, psychological testing, and other pertinent techniques in gathering information. As for the phenomenological approach, the main data gathering technic is interviews. 

Research Population 

Case studies focus on an individual, a group, an institution, or an event while phenomenology research looks into the lived experiences of several individuals.   

Case Study vs Phenomenology

Summary 

• A case study is an in-depth investigation of an individual, group, institution, or event.
• Phenomenology is the study of conscious experiences from the first-person point of view.
• The case-study method is believed to be first introduced by Le Play while descriptive phenomenology was founded by Husserl. 
• Researchers who conduct case studies may employ interviews, observations, document analysis, and psychological testing while those who conduct phenomenological research mainly use interviews. 
• Case studies generally focus on an individual or group while phenomenological research delves into the experiences of several individuals. 
• Recent Posts
• Difference Between Hematoma and Melanoma - February 9, 2023
• Difference Between Bruising and Necrosis - February 8, 2023
• Difference Between Brain Hematoma and Brain Hemorrhage - February 8, 2023

Sharing is caring!

• Pinterest 4

Search DifferenceBetween.net :

• Difference Between Qualitative and Quantitative
• Difference Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research
• Difference Between How and Why
• Difference Between Science and Philosophy
• Difference Between Anthropology and History

Cite APA 7 Brown, g. (2020, July 14). Difference Between Case Study and Phenomenology. Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects. http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/difference-between-case-study-and-phenomenology/. MLA 8 Brown, gene. "Difference Between Case Study and Phenomenology." Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects, 14 July, 2020, http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/difference-between-case-study-and-phenomenology/.

Leave a Response

Name ( required )

Email ( required )

Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail

References :

Advertisments, more in 'miscellaneous'.

• Difference Between an Arbitrator and a Mediator
• Difference Between Cellulite and Stretch Marks
• Difference Between Taliban and Al Qaeda
• Difference Between Kung Fu and Karate
• Difference Between Expression and Equation

Top Difference Betweens

Get new comparisons in your inbox:, most emailed comparisons, editor's picks.

• Difference Between MAC and IP Address
• Difference Between Platinum and White Gold
• Difference Between Civil and Criminal Law
• Difference Between GRE and GMAT
• Difference Between Immigrants and Refugees
• Difference Between DNS and DHCP
• Difference Between Computer Engineering and Computer Science
• Difference Between Men and Women
• Difference Between Book value and Market value
• Difference Between Red and White wine
• Difference Between Depreciation and Amortization
• Difference Between Bank and Credit Union
• Difference Between White Eggs and Brown Eggs

All about higher education & research

Marked Similarities and Key Differences between Case Study and Phenomenological Research Design

Case study and phenomenological research design share commonalities as qualitative research methods. Both approaches seek to provide in-depth insights into the complexities of human experiences and phenomena. They emphasize a qualitative nature, prioritizing rich, detailed exploration through methods like interviews, observations, and document analysis. Additionally, both approaches acknowledge the importance of context in understanding the subject matter and often involve flexible research designs that adapt to evolving insights. Moreover, they share a participant-centered focus, valuing the perspectives and experiences of those involved. In terms of analysis, both methodologies often employ inductive approaches, deriving themes and patterns from the collected data rather than imposing pre-existing theories.

Despite these similarities, key distinctions exist between case study and phenomenological research design. The primary focus of case studies is on a specific instance or bounded system, aiming for a holistic understanding within its real-life context. In contrast, phenomenological research design centers on uncovering the essence of lived experiences, exploring how individuals interpret and make sense of their encounters. The unit of analysis differs, with case studies examining a case itself (individual, group, organization), while phenomenological research focuses on the lived experiences of individuals.

Generalization is not the primary goal for either, but case studies may contribute to theory development, whereas phenomenological research is more inclined towards describing experiences rather than theory building. The role of the researcher also varies, with case study researchers often actively engaging with the case, while phenomenological researchers adopt a more neutral stance, bracketing preconceptions to facilitate a direct exploration of participants’ experiences.

These differences underscore the importance of choosing the most appropriate approach based on the specific research objectives and questions at hand. In this blog post, we highlight some of the noticeable similarities and stark differences between case study and phenomenological research design. But first of all, let us discuss the similarities between the two research designs.

Similarities between Case Study and Phenomenological Research Design

  While case study and phenomenological research design have distinct characteristics, there are some very profound similarities between the two qualitative research approaches:

• Qualitative nature:
• Both case study and phenomenological research are qualitative research designs. They aim to explore and understand the complexities of human experiences and phenomena in depth.
• In-depth exploration:
• Both methods involve an in-depth exploration of the subject matter. Whether it’s a specific case or the lived experiences of individuals, researchers using these approaches seek to uncover rich, detailed information.
• Emphasis on context:
• Both approaches acknowledge the importance of context in understanding the phenomenon under investigation. Case studies often examine a case within its real-life context, while phenomenological research explores the subjective experiences within the context in which they occur.
• Flexible research design:
• Both case study and phenomenological research design allow for flexibility in their research design. Researchers have the freedom to adapt their methods and data collection techniques based on the evolving understanding of the phenomenon.
• Holistic approach:
• Both approaches often take a holistic perspective. Case studies aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the entire case, considering various aspects and relationships. Phenomenological research seeks to capture the essence of the lived experience as a whole.
• Use of qualitative data collection methods:
• Both methodologies typically rely on qualitative data collection methods, such as interviews, observations, and document analysis. These methods allow researchers to gather rich, detailed information directly from participants.
• Participant-centered:
• Both approaches prioritize the experiences and perspectives of participants. Whether studying a case or exploring lived experiences, the goal is to capture the participant’s viewpoint and make sense of their unique context.
• Inductive analysis:
• Both case study and phenomenological research often involve inductive analysis. Researchers aim to derive themes, patterns, and insights from the data rather than imposing pre-existing theories or frameworks.
• Rich descriptions:
• Both methodologies value the production of rich, detailed descriptions. Whether describing the intricacies of a case or the nuances of individual experiences, researchers aim to provide a thorough account of the subject of study.
• Subjectivity of Researcher:
• Both methods recognize the subjectivity of the researcher and the influence they may have on the research process. Researchers in both case study and phenomenological research design often engage in reflexivity to acknowledge and address their own biases.

While these similarities exist, it’s essential to recognize the differences as well, as they shape the specific goals, methods, and outcomes of each approach. Researchers should carefully consider their research questions and objectives when choosing between case study and phenomenological research design. In the next section of the write-up, we discuss key differences between case study and phenomenological research design

Key differences between Case Study and Phenomenological Research Design

Case study and phenomenological research design are two distinct qualitative research approaches, each with its own set of characteristics and purposes. Here are the key differences between them:

• Focus and purpose:
• Focuses on a particular instance or a bounded system (the “case”).
• Aims to provide an in-depth understanding of a specific phenomenon, often within its real-life context.
• Emphasizes a holistic approach to exploring the complexities of a case.
• Focuses on understanding and describing the essence of lived experiences.
• Aims to explore how individuals make sense of and interpret their experiences.
• Emphasizes the subjective nature of the phenomenon under investigation.
• Nature of data:
• Involves a rich and detailed description of the case, including various sources of data such as interviews, observations, documents, and artifacts.
• Seeks to capture the complexity and uniqueness of the case.
• Involves gathering in-depth descriptions of participants’ experiences through methods like interviews and sometimes participant observations.
• Focuses on the meanings individuals attribute to their experiences.
• Unit of analysis:
• The unit of analysis is the case itself, which could be an individual, a group, an organization, or a community.
• The unit of analysis is the lived experience of individuals who have directly encountered the phenomenon being studied.
• Generalization:
• Generalization is typically not the primary goal; instead, the emphasis is on providing detailed insights into a specific case.
• Generalization is often not the main objective, as phenomenological research aims to explore the depth and richness of individual experiences rather than making broad generalizations.
• Analysis approach:
• Analysis often involves pattern recognition, exploring relationships between different elements within the case, and deriving meaningful insights.
• Analysis is focused on identifying and describing the essential themes and structures that characterize the lived experiences of participants.
• Theory development:
• May contribute to theory development, especially when patterns and relationships observed in the case have broader implications. However, it is not the sole and prime aim of the research endeavour
• Emphasizes the description of experiences rather than theory development. However, findings can inform or contribute to existing theories.
• Role of Researcher:
• The researcher often plays an active role, engaging with the case and collecting multiple forms of data.
• The researcher aims for a more neutral stance, trying to bracket their preconceptions to allow for a more direct exploration of participants’ experiences.

Conclusion:

In summary, while both case study and phenomenological research are qualitative approaches that delve into the richness of human experiences, they differ in their focus, purpose, unit of analysis, and the nature of data they collect and analyze. The choice between the two depends on the research question, objectives, and the nature of the phenomenon under investigation.

Dr Syed Hafeez Ahmad

You Might Also Like

Historical Research Design: A step-by-step guide on how to develop it?

How to complete your Ph.D. quickly?

How to undertake a Case Study Research: Explained with practical examples.

Uncovering the Past: 04 Practical Examples of Historical Research Design

Choosing the Right Research Philosophy for Grounded Theory Research Design

Does the grounded theory research study need a theoretical framework?

What do you think cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

No Comments Yet.

Recent Posts

Lost islamic history: reclaiming muslim civilization from the past, philanthropy in higher education in pakistan: learning to donate, how to overcome inordinate delays in recruitment and selection in universities in pakistan, appointment of new vice chancellors: demands urgent attention of the government in pakistan.

• How the graduates, medical professionals and healthcare system in Pakistan shall be benefited from PM&DC accreditation by the WFME?

Recent Comments

• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2021
• November 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• Academic Integrity
• Academic Leadership
• Book Review
• Critical Thinking
• Data Analysis
• Enterprising skillset
• Ethnography
• Grounded Theory
• Historical Research
• Innovations
• Leadership Theories
• Medical Education
• Personalities
• Phenomenology
• Public Policy
• Public Sector
• Research Proposal
• Universities Governance
• University-Industry Collaboration
• Work from Home

About Author

Hi, my name is Dr. Hafeez

I am a research blogger, YouTuber and content writer. This blog is aimed at sharing my knowledge, experience and insight with the academics, research scholars and policy makers about universities' governance and changing dynamics of higher education landscape in Pakistan.

From John W. Creswell \(2016\). 30 Essential Skills for the Qualitative Researcher \ . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Narrative Inquiry, Phenomenology, and Grounded Theory in Qualitative Research

• First Online: 27 October 2022

Cite this chapter

• Rabiul Islam 4 &
• Md. Sayeed Akhter 5  

2728 Accesses

Narrative inquiry, phenomenology, and grounded theory are the basic types of qualitative research. This chapter discusses the three major types of qualitative research—narrative inquiry, phenomenology, and grounded theory. Firstly, this chapter briefly discusses the issue of qualitative research and types. Secondly, it offers a conceptual understanding of narrative inquiry, phenomenology, and grounded theory including their basic characteristics. Finally, the chapter provides an outline of how these three types of qualitative research are applied in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Aspers, P. (2009). Empirical phenomenology: A qualitative research approach (The Cologne Seminars). Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 9 (2), 1–12.

Article   Google Scholar  

Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide . Sage.

Google Scholar  

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis . Thousand Oaks.

Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Medicine, 7 , 1–8.

Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research . Jossey-Bass.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory . Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions . Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative research . Pearson Education Inc.

Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3 (1), 42–55.

Husserl, E. (1970). Logical investigations (Vol. 1). Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

Josselson, R. (2010). Narrative research. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (Vol. 1). Sage.

Lester, S. (1999). An introduction to phenomenological research . Stan Lester Developments.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation . Jossey-Bass.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach . Cambridge University Press.

Book   Google Scholar  

Padilla-Díaz, M. (2015). Phenomenology in educational qualitative research: Philosophy as science or philosophical science. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 1 (2), 101–110.

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice . Sage publications.

Rassi, F., & Shahabi, Z. (2015). Husserl’s phenomenology and two terms of Noema and Noesis. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 53 , 29–34.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom . Oxford University Press.

Sloan, A., & Bowe, B. (2014). Phenomenology and hermeneutic phenomenology: The philosophy, the methodologies, and using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate lecturers’ experiences of curriculum design. Quality & Quantity, 48 (3), 1291–1303.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Social Work, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh and Macquarie School of Social Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

Rabiul Islam

Department of Social Work, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh

Md. Sayeed Akhter

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rabiul Islam .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Centre for Family and Child Studies, Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

M. Rezaul Islam

Department of Development Studies, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Niaz Ahmed Khan

Department of Social Work, School of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

Rajendra Baikady

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Islam, R., Sayeed Akhter, M. (2022). Narrative Inquiry, Phenomenology, and Grounded Theory in Qualitative Research. In: Islam, M.R., Khan, N.A., Baikady, R. (eds) Principles of Social Research Methodology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_8

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_8

Published : 27 October 2022

Publisher Name : Springer, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-19-5219-7

Online ISBN : 978-981-19-5441-2

eBook Packages : Social Sciences

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Differentiating between descriptive and interpretive phenomenological research approaches

Affiliations.

• 1 Sultan Qaboos University College of Nursing, Muscat, Oman.
• 2 University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
• PMID: 26168810
• DOI: 10.7748/nr.22.6.22.e1344

Aim: To provide insight into how descriptive and interpretive phenomenological research approaches can guide nurse researchers during the generation and application of knowledge.

Background: Phenomenology is a discipline that investigates people's experiences to reveal what lies 'hidden' in them. It has become a major philosophy and research method in the humanities, human sciences and arts. Phenomenology has transitioned from descriptive phenomenology, which emphasises the 'pure' description of people's experiences, to the 'interpretation' of such experiences, as in hermeneutic phenomenology. However, nurse researchers are still challenged by the epistemological and methodological tenets of these two methods.

Data sources: The data came from relevant online databases and research books.

Review methods: A review of selected peer-reviewed research and discussion papers published between January 1990 and December 2013 was conducted using CINAHL, Science Direct, PubMed and Google Scholar databases. In addition, selected textbooks that addressed phenomenology as a philosophy and as a research methodology were used.

Discussion: Evidence from the literature indicates that most studies following the 'descriptive approach' to research are used to illuminate poorly understood aspects of experiences. In contrast, the 'interpretive/hermeneutic approach' is used to examine contextual features of an experience in relation to other influences such as culture, gender, employment or wellbeing of people or groups experiencing the phenomenon. This allows investigators to arrive at a deeper understanding of the experience, so that caregivers can derive requisite knowledge needed to address such clients' needs.

Conclusion: Novice nurse researchers should endeavour to understand phenomenology both as a philosophy and research method. This is vitally important because in-depth understanding of phenomenology ensures that the most appropriate method is chosen to implement a study and to generate knowledge for nursing practice.

Implications for research/practice: This paper adds to the current debate on why it is important for nurse researchers to clearly understand phenomenology as a philosophy and research method before embarking on a study. The paper guides novice researchers on key methodological decisions they need to make when using descriptive or interpretive phenomenological research approaches.

Keywords: Nursing research; descriptive phenomenology; interpretive phenomenology; novice researchers; qualitative research; research methodology.

Publication types

• Comparative Study
• Data Collection / methods*
• Nursing Methodology Research
• Nursing Research / methods*
• Peer Review, Research
• Qualitative Research
• Research Design*