benefits of root cause problem solving

• Business Essentials
• Leadership & Management
• Credential of Leadership, Impact, and Management in Business (CLIMB)
• Entrepreneurship & Innovation
• Digital Transformation
• Finance & Accounting
• Business in Society
• For Organizations
• Support Portal
• Media Coverage
• Founding Donors
• Leadership Team

• Harvard Business School →
• HBS Online →
• Business Insights →

Business Insights

Harvard Business School Online's Business Insights Blog provides the career insights you need to achieve your goals and gain confidence in your business skills.

• Career Development
• Communication
• Decision-Making
• Earning Your MBA
• Negotiation
• News & Events
• Productivity
• Staff Spotlight
• Student Profiles
• Work-Life Balance
• AI Essentials for Business
• Alternative Investments
• Business Analytics
• Business Strategy
• Business and Climate Change
• Design Thinking and Innovation
• Digital Marketing Strategy
• Disruptive Strategy
• Economics for Managers
• Entrepreneurship Essentials
• Financial Accounting
• Global Business
• Launching Tech Ventures
• Leadership Principles
• Leadership, Ethics, and Corporate Accountability
• Leading Change and Organizational Renewal
• Leading with Finance
• Management Essentials
• Negotiation Mastery
• Organizational Leadership
• Power and Influence for Positive Impact
• Strategy Execution
• Sustainable Business Strategy
• Sustainable Investing
• Winning with Digital Platforms

Root Cause Analysis: What It Is & How to Perform One

• 07 Mar 2023

The problems that affect a company’s success don’t always result from not understanding how to solve them. In many cases, their root causes aren’t easily identified. That’s why root cause analysis is vital to organizational leadership .

According to research described in the Harvard Business Review , 85 percent of executives believe their organizations are bad at diagnosing problems, and 87 percent think that flaw carries significant costs. As a result, more businesses seek organizational leaders who avoid costly mistakes.

If you’re a leader who wants to problem-solve effectively, here’s an overview of root cause analysis and why it’s important in organizational leadership.

Access your free e-book today.

What Is Root Cause Analysis?

According to the online course Organizational Leadership —taught by Harvard Business School professors Joshua Margolis and Anthony Mayo— root cause analysis is the process of articulating problems’ causes to suggest specific solutions.

“Leaders must perform as beacons,” Margolis says in the course. “Namely, scanning and analyzing the landscape around the organization and identifying current and emerging trends, pressures, threats, and opportunities.”

By working with others to understand a problem’s root cause, you can generate a solution. If you’re interested in performing a root cause analysis for your organization, here are eight steps you must take.

8 Essential Steps of an Organizational Root Cause Analysis

1. identify performance or opportunity gaps.

The first step in a root cause analysis is identifying the most important performance or opportunity gaps facing your team, department, or organization. Performance gaps are the ways in which your organization falls short or fails to deliver on its capabilities; opportunity gaps reflect something new or innovative it can do to create value.

Finding those gaps requires leveraging the “leader as beacon” form of leadership.

“Leaders are called upon to illuminate what's going on outside and around the organization,” Margolis says in Organizational Leadership , “identifying both challenges and opportunities and how they inform the organization's future direction.”

Without those insights, you can’t reap the benefits an effective root cause analysis can produce because external forces—including industry trends, competitors, and the economy—can affect your company’s long-term success.

2. Create an Organizational Challenge Statement

The next step is writing an organizational challenge statement explaining what the gap is and why it’s important. The statement should be three to four sentences and encapsulate the challenge’s essence.

It’s crucial to explain where your organization falls short, what problems that poses, and why it matters. Describe the gap and why you must urgently address it.

A critical responsibility is deciding which gap requires the most attention, then focusing your analysis on it. Concentrating on too many problems at once can dilute positive results.

To prioritize issues, consider which are the most time-sensitive and mission-critical, followed by which can make stakeholders happy.

3. Analyze Findings with Colleagues

It's essential to work with colleagues to gain different perspectives on a problem and its root causes. This involves understanding the problem, gathering information, and developing a comprehensive analysis.

While this can be challenging when you’re a new organizational leader, using the double helix of leadership —the coevolutionary process of executing organizational leadership's responsibilities while developing the capabilities to perform them—can help foster collaboration.

Research shows diverse ideas improve high-level decision-making, which is why you should connect with colleagues with different opinions and expertise to enhance your root cause analysis’s outcome.

4. Formulate Value-Creating Activities

Next, determine what your company must do to address your organizational challenge statement. Establish three to five value-creating activities for your team, department, or organization to close the performance or opportunity gap you’ve identified.

This requires communicating organizational direction —a clear and compelling path forward that ensures stakeholders know and work toward the same goal.

“Setting direction is typically a reciprocal process,” Margolis says in Organizational Leadership . “You don't sit down and decide your direction, nor do you input your analysis of the external context into a formula and solve for a direction. Rather, setting direction is a back-and-forth process; you move between the value you'd like to create for customers, employees, investors, and your grasp of the context.”

5. Identify Necessary Behavior Changes

Once you’ve outlined activities that can provide value to your company, identify the behavior changes needed to address your organizational challenge statement.

“Your detective work throughout your root cause analysis exposes uncomfortable realities about employee competencies, organizational inefficiencies, departmental infighting, and unclear direction from leadership at multiple levels of the company,” Mayo says in Organizational Leadership .

Factors that can affect your company’s long-term success include:

• Ineffective communication skills
• Resistance to change
• Problematic workplace stereotypes

Not all root cause analyses reveal behaviors that must be eliminated. Sometimes you can identify behaviors to enhance or foster internally, such as:

• Collaboration
• Innovative thinking
• Creative problem-solving

6. Implement Behavior Changes

Although behaviors might be easy to pinpoint, putting them into practice can be challenging.

To ensure you implement the right changes, gauge whether they’ll have a positive or negative impact. According to Organizational Leadership , you should consider the following factors:

• Motivation: Do the people at your organization have a personal desire for and commitment to change?
• Competence: Do they have the skills and know-how to implement change effectively?
• Coordination: Are they willing to work collaboratively to enact change?

Based on your answers, decide what behavior changes are plausible for your root cause analysis.

7. Map Root Causes

The next step in your analysis is mapping the root causes you’ve identified to the components of organizational alignment. Doing so helps you determine which components to adjust or change to implement employee behavior changes successfully.

Three root cause categories unrelated to behavior changes are:

• Systems and structures: The formal organization component, including talent management, product development, and budget and accountability systems
• People: Individuals’ profiles and the workforce’s overall composition, including employees’ skills, experience, values, and attitudes
• Culture: The informal, intangible part of your organization, including the norms, values, attitudes, beliefs, preferences, common practices, and habits of its employees

8. Create an Action Plan

Using your findings from the previous steps, create an action plan for addressing your organizational problem’s root cause and consider your role in it.

To make the action plan achievable, ensure you:

• Identify the problem’s root cause
• Create measurable results
• Ensure clear communication among your team

“One useful way to assess your potential impact on the challenge is to understand your locus of control,” Mayo says in Organizational Leadership , “or the extent to which you can personally drive the needed change or improvement.”

The best way to illustrate your control is by using three concentric circles: the innermost circle being full control of resources, the middle circle representing your ability to influence but not control, and the outermost circle alluding to shifts outside both your influence and control.

Consider these circles when implementing your action plan to ensure your goals don’t overreach.

The Importance of Root Cause Analysis in Organizational Leadership

Root cause analysis is a critical organizational leadership skill for effectively addressing problems and driving change. It helps you understand shifting conditions around your company and confirm that your efforts are relevant and sustainable.

As a leader, you must not only effect change but understand why it’s needed. Taking an online course, such as Organizational Leadership , can enable you to gain that knowledge.

Using root cause analysis, you can identify the issues behind your organization’s problems, develop a plan to address them, and make impactful changes.

Are you preparing to transition to a new leadership role? Enroll in our online certificate course Organizational Leadership —one of our leadership and management courses —and learn how to perform an effective root cause analysis to ensure your company’s long-term success. To learn more about what it takes to be an effective leader, download our free leadership e-book .

About the Author

Root cause analysis (RCA) is the quality management process by which an organization searches for the root of a problem, issue or incident after it occurs.

Issues and mishaps are inevitable in any organization, even in the best of circumstances. While it could be tempting to simply address symptoms of the problem as they materialize, addressing symptoms is an inherently reactive process that all but guarantees a recurring—and often worsening—series of problems.

Ethical, proactive, well-run companies and organizations with a reactive approach will both encounter problems, but the former will experience fewer and recover faster because they prioritize root cause analyses.     

Root cause analysis helps organizations decipher the root cause of the problem, identify the appropriate corrective actions and develop a plan to prevent future occurrences. It aims to implement solutions to the underlying problem for more efficient operations overall.

Learn how next-generation detection devices shift asset management services from routine maintenance regimes to predictive, AI-powered processes.

Delve into our exclusive guide to the EU's CSRD

Organizations perform root cause analyses when a problem arises or an incident occurs, but there are any number of issues that need an RCA. Triggers for a root cause analysis fall into three broad categories.

When real-world materials or equipment fails in some way (for example, a desktop computer stops working or a component from a third-party vendor delivers substandard performance).

When people make mistakes or fail to complete required tasks (for example, an employee fails to perform regular maintenance on a piece of equipment, causing it to break down).

A breakdown in a system, process or policy people use to make decisions (for example, a company fails to train team members on cybersecurity protocols, leaving the company vulnerable to cyberattacks ).

Organizations can conduct root cause analyses for a range or reasons, from commonplace email service disruptions to catastrophic equipment failures. Regardless of the nature or scope of the issue, performing root cause analysis should include the same fundamental steps.

If you have decided to conduct a root cause analysis, your department or organization is likely experiencing some acute issue, or at least looking to make substantive improvements to a particular process. Therefore, the first step of the root cause analysis process should be identifying and defining the problem that you want to address. Without a clearly defined problem, it is impossible to correctly identify the root causes.

When the department has a clear idea of the problem, it’s time to draft a problem statement spelling out the issue for everyone who will help with the RCA.

Once the issue is identified and clearly articulated to all involved parties, leadership should create a project charter, which will assemble a team to complete the analysis. The team should include a facilitator to lead the team through the analysis and any team members with either personal or professional knowledge of the systems, processes and incidents that you will investigate.

Data collection is the foundation of the problem-solving process. It is vital, at this stage, to find every piece of information that can help you identify contributing factors and ultimately the root causes of the issue. This can include collecting photographs and incident reports, conducting interviews with affected parties and reviewing existing policies and procedures. Some questions that you may want to ask during data collection:

• When did the problem start and how long has it been going on?
• What symptoms has the team observed?
• What documentation does the organization or department must prove that an issue exists?
• How will the issue affect employees and other stakeholders?
• Who is harmed or otherwise affected by the existence of this problem?

This is the most important step in the RCA process. At this point, the team has collected all necessary information and starts to brainstorm for causal factors. Effective root cause analyses require openness to all potential underlying causes of an issue, so everyone on the RCA team should enter the brainstorming stage with an open mind. Avoid attempts to determine root causes until every possibility is identified and vetted; starting the incident investigation process with preconceived notions may bias the results and make it more difficult to determine the real root cause.

Once the RCA team has an exhaustive list of possible causes and contributing factors, it is time to determine the root causes of the issue. Analyze every possible cause and examine the actual impact of each one to figure out which possibilities are the most problematic, which ones have similarities and which ones can be altogether eliminated. Be prepared for the possibility that there are multiple root causes to the issue.

After the team narrows the list of possibilities, rank the remaining potential root causes by their impact and the likelihood they are the root cause of the problem. Leadership will examine and analyze each possibility and collaborate with the RCA team to determine the actual root causes.

Once the team settles on root causes and has laid out all the details of the issue, they must start brainstorming solutions. The solution should directly address the root causes, with consideration for the logistics of executing the solution and any potential obstacles the team may encounter along the way. These elements will comprise the action plan that will help the team address the current problem and prevent recurrences.

While all RCAs will include the same basic steps, there are myriad root cause analysis methods that can help an organization collect data efficiently and effectively. Typically, a company will select a method and use root cause analysis tools, such as analysis templates and software, to complete the process.

The 5 Whys approach is rooted in the idea that asking five “Why?” questions can get you to the root cause of anything. 5 Whys implores problem solvers to avoid assumptions and continue to ask “why” until they identify the root cause of a problem. In the case of a formalized organizational root cause analysis, a team may only need to ask three whys to find the root cause, but they may also need to ask 50 or 60. The purpose of 5 Whys is to push the team to ask as many questions as is necessary to find the correct answers.

A failure mode and effects analysis is one of the most rigorous approaches to root cause analysis. Similar to a risk analysis, FMEA identifies every possibility for system/process failure and examines the potential impact of each hypothetical failure. The organization then addresses every root cause that is likely to result in failure.

Pareto charts combine the features of bar charts and line charts to understand the frequency of the organization’s most common root causes. The chart displays root causes in descending order of frequency, starting with the most common and probable. The team then addresses the root cause whose solution provides the most significant benefit to the organization.

An impact analysis allows an organization to assess both the positive and negative potential impacts of each possible root cause.

Change analyses are helpful in situations where a system or process’s performance changed significantly. When conducting this type of RCA, the department looks at how the circumstances surrounding the issue or incident have changed over time. Examining changes in personal, information, infrastructure, or data, among other factors, can help the organization understand which factors caused the change in performance.

An event analysis is commonly used to identify the cause of major, single-event problem, like an oil spill or building collapse. Event analyses rely on quick (but thorough) evidence-gathering processes to recreate the sequence of events that that led to the incident. Once the timeline is established, the organization can more easily identify the causal and contributing factors.

Also known as a causal factor analysis, a causal factor tree analysis allows an organization to record and visually display—using a causal factor tree—every decision, event or action that led to a particular problem.

An Ishikawa diagram (or Fishbone diagram) is a cause-and-effect style diagram that visualizes the circumstances surrounding a problem. The diagram resembles a fish skeleton, with a long list of causes grouped into related subcategories.

DMAIC is an acronym for the Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control process. This data-driven process improvement methodology serves as a part of an organization’s Six Sigma practices.

This RCA methodology proposes finding the root cause of an issue by moving through a four-step problem solving process. The process starts with situation analysis and continues with problem analysis and solution analysis, concluding with potential problem analysis.

An FTA allows an organization to visually map potential causal relationships and identify root causes using boolean logic.

Barrier analyses are based on the idea that proper barriers can prevent problems and incidents. This type of RCA, often used in risk management, examines how the absence of appropriate barriers led to an issue and makes suggestions for installing barriers that prevent the issue from reoccurring.

Companies that use the RCA process want to put an end to “firefighting” and treating the symptoms of a problem. Instead, they want to optimize business operations, reduce risk and provide a better customer experience. Investing in the root cause analysis process provides a framework for better overall decision-making and allows an organization to benefit from:

Continuous improvement : Root cause analysis is an iterative process, seeking not only to address acute issues, but also to improve the entire system over time, starting with the underlying cause. The iterative nature of root cause analysis empowers organizations to prioritize continuous process improvement.

Increased productivity : Preventing downtime, delays, worker attrition and other production issues within an organization saves employees time, freeing up bandwidth to focus on other critical tasks.

Reduced costs : When equipment breaks down or software bugs cause delays, organizations lose money and workers get frustrated. Root cause analysis helps eliminate the cost of continually fixing a recurring issue, resulting in a more financially efficient operation overall.

Better defect detection : When companies fail to address underlying issues, they can inadvertently affect the quality of the end product. Addressing persistent problems before they snowball protects the organization from revenue and reputational losses that are associated with product defects down the line.

Reduced risks : Improving business processes and systems keeps equipment running safely and helps workers avoid safety hazards in the workplace.

Intelligent asset management, monitoring, predictive maintenance and reliability in a single platform.

Enhance your application performance monitoring to provide the context you need to resolve incidents faster.

IBM research proposes an approach to detect abnormality and analyzes root causes using Spark log files.

Learn how IBM Instana provides precision hybrid cloud observability, metrics, traces and logs.

Downer and IBM are using smart preventative maintenance to keep passengers on Australia's light and heavy rail systems moving safely, reliably, comfortably and more sustainably.

Unlock the full potential of your enterprise assets with IBM Maximo Application Suite by unifying maintenance, inspection and reliability systems into one platform. It’s an integrated cloud-based solution that harnesses the power of AI, IoT and advanced analytics to maximize asset performance, extend asset lifecycles, minimize operational costs and reduce downtime.

tableau.com is not available in your region.

• Quality Management

Home » Free Resources » »

What is Root Cause Analysis? Process, Example & Everything You Need to Know

• Written by Contributing Writer
• Updated on March 7, 2023

Root cause analysis (RCA) is a problem-solving methodology used to identify the underlying cause of a problem, incident, or adverse event. Simply put, it is pinpointing the root of the problem to solve and prevent it from happening again.

When faced with a problem, we usually try to get to the bottom of it. For example, in the unfortunate event that we break our bones, we would be in immense pain. We might take measures to control the pain and blood loss. But our efforts don’t stop at simply having a painkiller and applying a bandage. We rush to the ER as soon as possible, get the necessary treatment to mend the broken bones, and make sure we are careful not to have such an accident.

What we did here is we analyzed the problem: the pain and took steps to fix the root cause, which is the broken bones. Here the pain is the symptom, and the fractured bone is the root cause.

Now that we are familiar with what it stands for let us dive deep into root cause analysis, or RCA, which is the systematic approach employed in various industries like healthcare, manufacturing, governmental organizations, aviation, etc. We also examine its definition, history, benefits, approaches, process, principles, tips, and how to learn more .

Defining RCA Analysis

Root cause analysis is a problem-solving process that seeks to identify the underlying cause of a problem or issue. It’s a systematic approach that goes beyond just identifying symptoms and aims to uncover the root cause of the problem. The objective is to prevent future occurrences of the situation by addressing its root cause.

RCA analysis involves collecting and analyzing data to identify a problem’s underlying cause. The process typically consists of a team of experts who use various tools and techniques to gather and analyze data. Once the root cause has been identified, the team develops a plan to address the root cause and prevent future occurrences of the problem.

Also Read: What Is Process Capability and Why It’s More Interesting Than It Sounds

History of Root Cause Analysis

The origins of root cause analysis can be traced back to the late 19th century when it was used in the manufacturing industry to improve production processes. In the 20th century, it was further developed and applied to a broader range of industries, including healthcare and aviation.

In the 1950s when manufacturers started to use it to understand industrial events. The primary goal of RCA is to determine the fundamental cause of a problem, which is referred to as the “root cause.”

One of the earliest adopters of RCA was Toyota, who employed the “5 whys” method, where the investigation of a breakdown or undesired event is conducted by asking “why” at least five times. This approach forces quality personnel to delve deeper and understand the underlying causes, layer by layer. Today, RCA is widely used in various industries to identify and eliminate problems, improve processes, and prevent recurrence.

RCA was first used in the healthcare industry to address adverse events and improve patient safety. The Institute of Healthcare Improvement (IHI) developed the RCA process in the late 1980s, and it quickly became a standard tool for improving patient safety and quality of care.

The Joint Commission, a US-based nonprofit that accredits healthcare organizations and programs, requires a root cause analysis (RCA) to be conducted whenever an accredited hospital experiences a specific type of adverse event. These are known as “sentinel” incidents, as they reveal a dangerous flaw in the care provided and prompt an immediate investigation and response.

RCA was developed in response to the growing number of plane crashes and incidents in the aviation industry. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) was established in 1967. It has since been using RCA to investigate plane crashes and incidents to identify their root causes and prevent future occurrences.

Benefits of Root Cause Analysis

Before we go to explore how various industries and organizations benefit from implementing RCA, let us discuss the primary goals of root cause analysis.

The three main goals of RCA are:

• Identifying the root cause: The first goal is to discover the primary source of the problem or event. This is essential to understand the underlying causes and find practical solutions.
• Understanding the issues: The second goal of RCA is to fully comprehend the nature of the issues and develop a plan to fix, compensate, or learn from them. This requires a comprehensive analysis of the root cause and the factors contributing to it.
• Applying learnings: The third goal of RCA is to use the information gained from the analysis to prevent similar problems from occurring in the future. This includes making systemic changes to processes and systems and implementing measures to mitigate the risk of future adverse events.

Root cause analysis offers numerous benefits to organizations and industries. Some of the key benefits include:

• Improving quality: RCA helps organizations identify the root cause of problems and implement solutions to prevent future occurrences, improving quality and efficiency.
• Reducing risk: Organizations can reduce the risk of future incidents and adverse events by identifying the root cause of the problem and hence improving overall safety and security.
• Enhancing customer satisfaction: Organizations can better manage their product issues by addressing the root cause of problems. Thus organizations can improve customer satisfaction and trust.
• Improving organizational learning : RCA provides organizations with a systematic process for learning from problems and incidents, enabling them to improve their processes and procedures continuously.
• Increasing efficiency and productivity: Organizations can improve their processes and procedures by addressing the root cause of problems, leading to increased efficiency and productivity.

Also Read: Demystifying the Theory of Constraints

Top Approaches of Root Cause Analysis

There are several approaches to root cause analysis, each with its unique methodology and tools. Let’s discuss some of the most commonly-used types of root cause analysis.

The 5 Whys Root Cause Analysis

The 5 Whys root cause analysis approach is beneficial for solving simple problems or identifying root causes in a short amount of time. This simple yet effective approach involves asking “why” questions to identify the root cause of a problem. The process is repeated until the root cause is identified. For example, in a service industry setting, in case of a complaint, by asking “why” five times, the team could drill down layer by layer to understand the underlying causes of the problem, such as poor communication, inadequate training, or poor service quality.

Fishbone Diagram

The Fishbone Diagram is a visual tool that helps teams identify potential root causes of a problem. It is called so because it resembles a fishbone. The fishbone diagram organizes and categorizes possible causes, making it easier to identify the root cause. For example, a fishbone diagram could be used in a manufacturing setting to categorize and analyze the various factors contributing to a machine breakdown, such as equipment design, operator error, or poor maintenance.

Pareto Analysis

The Pareto Analysis approach uses statistical analysis to identify the most significant root causes of a problem. The Pareto principle states that 80 percent of issues are caused by 20 percent of root causes. Pareto analysis helps teams focus on the most critical root causes, reducing the time and resources required to address the problem. For example, in a healthcare setting, a Pareto analysis could determine that 20 percent of patient falls are caused by 80 percent of the root causes, such as slippery floors, poor lighting, or lack of staff supervision.

Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)

This type of root cause analysis is a graphical representation of the relationships between different system components and how they contribute to a problem or failure. FTA helps teams understand the interdependencies between various components and identify the root cause of a problem. For example, in an aviation setting, an FTA could be used to analyze the interdependencies between different components of a plane, such as the engines, fuel system, and control surfaces, and to identify the root cause of a crash.

Conducting Root Cause Analysis: Process

We can break the process of conducting RCA into the following steps:

• Define the problem: The first step is clearly defining the problem and understanding what needs to be addressed.
• Gather data: Once the problem is defined, the next step is to gather data. This involves collecting information about the problem, including date, time, and location, as well as any relevant documentation, reports, or other information.
• Form a team: The next step is forming a team of experts responsible for conducting the RCA. The team should include individuals with expertise in the problem area, as well as representatives from different departments or parts of the organization.
• Use a root cause analysis tool: The team should use a root cause analysis tool, such as a fishbone diagram, Pareto analysis, or fault tree analysis, to help identify potential root causes.
• Identify root causes: Once potential root causes have been identified, the team should use the data and information collected to validate and verify the root causes.
• Develop solutions: Once the root cause has been identified, the team should develop solutions to address the root cause and prevent future occurrences of the problem.
• Implement solutions: The final step is to implement the solutions and monitor their effectiveness to ensure that the problem has been fully resolved.

Also Read: Value Stream Mapping in Six Sigma

Root Cause Analysis Principles

Conducting RCA involves following several fundamental principles:

• Root cause focus: Root cause analysis focuses on discovering and correcting the root causes of a problem rather than just treating the symptoms.
• Short-term relief: While focusing on root causes is essential, it’s also important to provide short-term relief for the symptoms.
• Multiple root causes : Multiple root causes can contribute to a problem, so it’s important to identify all of them.
• No blame: The focus should be on understanding how and why a problem occurred rather than who was responsible.
• Evidence-based: Root cause claims should be supported by concrete cause-and-effect evidence.
• Actionable information: The results of the analysis should provide enough information to inform a corrective course of action.
• Future prevention: Consideration should be given to how the root cause can be prevented from recurring.

Tips for Root Cause Analysis

• Start with a clear definition of the problem: It is essential to have a crystal-clear understanding of the problem before starting the RCA process. This will help ensure that the team is focused on addressing the right issue and that the root cause is accurately identified.
• Gather all relevant data: Data is essential for a successful RCA. The team should gather as much relevant data as possible, including the date, time, and location of the problem, as well as all pertinent documentation, reports, or other information.
• Involve experts from different areas: Involving experts from different areas of the organization, such as operations, maintenance, and engineering, will help ensure that the root cause is accurately identified and that all potential root causes are considered.
• Use multiple tools and techniques: Different RCA tools and techniques, such as fishbone diagrams, Pareto analysis, and fault tree analysis, can provide different perspectives and insights into the root cause of a problem. The team should consider using multiple tools and techniques to ensure they completely understand the problem.
• Be thorough and systematic: RCA should be approached systematically, using a structured process and methodology to identify root causes. The team should be detailed and methodical in their approach to ensure that all potential root causes are considered and that the root cause is accurately identified.
• Focus on prevention: The goal of RCA is not just to identify the root cause of a problem but to prevent future occurrences. The team should focus on developing solutions that will prevent the problem from happening again in the future.

Also Read: Demystifying Kaizen Lean Six Sigma

Master Root Cause Analysis Skills to Become a Lean Six Sigma Expert

For a Lean Six Sigma expert, the ability to identify the underlying causes of problems and develop effective solutions for improving processes and outcomes is a prized skill. As such, you need to understand and know how to perform root cause analysis.

If you’re interested in becoming a Lean Six Sigma expert, an online Lean Six Sigma certification can provide you with the knowledge, skills, and tools you need to succeed in this role.

An online bootcamp like the one delivered by Simplilearn, in collaboration with the University of Massachusetts, covers the core concepts of Lean Six Sigma, including problem-solving methodologies, process improvement techniques, and statistical analysis tools. This IASSC-accredited program teaches how to identify and eliminate waste, reduce defects, and improve process efficiency across various industries.

With business mentoring from industry experts from KPMG, you’ll be able to tackle real-world business problems confidently. This fast-track program is perfect for quality professionals, business analysts, and executives looking to carve successful careers.

Ready to start your journey toward becoming a master in quality management? Enroll today!

You might also like to read:

Ultimate Guide to Six Sigma Control Charts

DMADV: Everything You Need to Know

Describing a SIPOC Diagram: Everything You Should Know About It

Process Mapping in Six Sigma: Here’s All You Need to Know

How to Use the DMAIC Model?

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended Articles

What Is Lean Management? Principles & Everything You Need to Know

Discover the essence of lean management – a powerful approach to streamline processes and maximize efficiency. Explore its principles and benefits in our comprehensive guide.

What is Process Mapping in Six Sigma? Here’s Everything You Need to Know

Demystifying Process Mapping in Six Sigma: Learn to optimize workflows and enhance quality. Dive into this essential quality management tool.

Six Sigma Black Belt Salaries in 2024: Everything You Need to Know!

Get to know about salaries and factors affecting six sigma black belt salary and the skills required to have an incremental effect on your pay scale.

A Guide to Failure Mode and Effects Analysis

Explore Failure Mode and Effects Analysis with our easy-to-understand guide. Learn what it is, why it’s useful, how to use it, and its key applications.

A Guide to Design of Experiments in Six Sigma

In today’s hypercompetitive world, organizations must streamline their operations and workflows to stay ahead of the game. Lean Six Sigma and the design of experiments are methodologies that can help them do this. Learn more in this article.

A Guide to Six Sigma Projects

Originally developed for manufacturing processes, the Six Sigma methodology is now leveraged by companies in nearly all industries. In this article, we will share information about successful Six Sigma projects, methods, and more.

Lean Six Sigma Certification

Learning Format

Online Bootcamp

Program benefits.

• Green and Black Belt exam training material included
• Aligned with IASSC-Lean Six Sigma
• Masterclasses from top faculty of UMass Amherst
• UMass Amherst Alumni Association membership

Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Methods for Effective Problem Solving

By Status.net Editorial Team on May 8, 2023 — 7 minutes to read

Imagine facing a problem in your organization that keeps recurring despite your best efforts to solve it. You might be addressing the symptoms, but not the underlying cause. This is where root cause analysis (RCA) comes into play. RCA is a systematic approach to identifying the root cause of problems or events, understanding how to fix or compensate for them, and applying the knowledge gained to prevent future issues or replicate successes. In this comprehensive guide to root cause analysis, you’ll learn various methods and techniques for conducting an RCA. You’ll understand how to gather and manage evidence, investigate the people, processes, and systems involved, and determine the key factors leading to the problem or event.

Whether you’re a project manager, a team leader, or simply someone looking to improve your problem-solving skills, this guide will help you grasp the fundamentals of RCA and apply them effectively in your work. As you delve deeper into the world of Root Cause Analysis, you’ll discover how it can turn challenges into opportunities for growth and pave the way for a more efficient and successful future.

Related: 3 Root Cause Analysis Templates (and Examples)

5 Whys: How to Uncover Root Causes [Examples]

Root Cause Analysis Fundamentals

Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a systematic approach to identify the underlying cause of a problem. By focusing on the root cause, you can effectively address the issue and prevent recurrence. Generally, RCA is used to investigate incidents, eliminate defects, and enhance systems or processes.

RCA aims to achieve the following objectives:

• Determine the root cause of a problem or issue, not just its symptoms.
• Identify and implement solutions that address the root cause and prevent its recurrence.
• Improve understanding of the systems, processes, or components involved to avoid similar issues in the future.
• Foster a proactive and continuous improvement mindset within your organization.

When conducting RCA, maintain an open mind and avoid making assumptions. Utilize critical thinking and involve team members from various disciplines to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the problem.

The RCA Process

Problem identification.

To effectively utilize Root Cause Analysis (RCA), first identify the problem at hand. Determine the specific issue, incident, or failure that needs to be investigated. Clearly define the problem and its impact on your organization’s operations in order to establish a focused and valuable analysis.

Data Collection

Gather relevant data about the problem, including when and where it occurred, who was involved, what processes and systems were affected, and any other important context. Be thorough and systematic in your data collection, and make use of any available documentation, interviews, or observations to build a comprehensive understanding.

Cause Identification

Analyze the collected data to pinpoint potential causes of the problem. This could start with brainstorming and then using tools such as cause-and-effect diagrams or the “5 Whys” technique to delve deeper into the issue. Determine the causes that are most likely to have contributed to the problem and classify them as either root causes or contributing factors.

Solution Implementation

Once you have identified the root cause(s) of the problem, develop and execute an action plan to address the issue. Design solutions that specifically target the root cause(s) to eliminate them from your processes, rather than simply addressing the symptoms of the problem. Implement the appropriate changes to your processes or systems and ensure that all stakeholders are aware of these changes.

Follow-up and Monitoring

After implementing the solutions, monitor the results to ensure they are effective in addressing the root cause(s) and preventing the problem from reoccurring. Collect and analyze data regularly to evaluate the impact of the implemented solutions on your organization’s performance. Adjust and refine the solutions if necessary, and maintain ongoing vigilance in order to identify any future problems that may arise from the same root cause(s).

RCA Techniques

The 5 Whys technique is a straightforward method for identifying the root cause of a problem. To employ this approach, you simply ask “why” five times, with each question delving deeper into the issue. The process helps trace the problem to its origin by examining each level of cause and effect. Here’s an example:

• Why did the machine stop working?
• Why did the fuse blow?
• Why did the motor overheat?
• Why was there insufficient lubrication on the motor?
• Why was the lubrication schedule not followed?

In this case, the root cause is the failure to adhere to the lubrication schedule.

Learn more: 5 Whys: How to Uncover Root Causes [Examples]

Fishbone Diagram

The Fishbone Diagram, also known as the Ishikawa Diagram or cause-and-effect diagram, is a visual tool that helps you organize and sort potential root causes. To create a Fishbone Diagram:

• Write down the problem statement at the head of the fishbone structure.
• Identify major categories of causes, such as people, process, equipment, and environment. Draw lines connecting them to the problem statement.
• Assign specific causes under each category and draw smaller lines connecting them to the respective major categories.
• Analyze the diagram to find trends, patterns, or potential areas of focus.

By organizing information in this way, you can better assess the causes and identify the root cause of the problem.

Learn more: Fishbone Diagram (Components, Factors, Examples) and Ishikawa Diagram: Examples and Applications

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a systematic approach to identify potential failures and evaluate the consequences. FMEA processes typically involve these steps:

• Identify potential failure modes, which are the ways something could go wrong.
• Determine the potential effects of each failure mode, and how it could impact the overall system or process.
• Assign a risk priority number (RPN) to each failure mode, considering factors such as likelihood, severity, and detectability.
• Develop actions and strategies to mitigate high-risk failure modes.

By using FMEA, you can proactively address possible issues before they escalate, and maintain a more reliable process or system.

Barrier Analysis

Barrier Analysis focuses on preventing problems by examining the barriers in place to control risks. The objective is to identify vulnerabilities in these barriers and develop strategies for improvement. The steps of Barrier Analysis include:

• Identify hazards and risks associated with your system or process.
• Define the barriers in place that protect against these hazards.
• Evaluate the effectiveness, strength, and reliability of each barrier.
• Identify gaps or weaknesses in the barriers.
• Develop and implement improvements to strengthen the barriers.

This method provides a clear understanding of how existing safety measures perform and how they can be improved to better protect against potential issues.

See also: 3 Root Cause Analysis Templates (and Examples)

What is Poka-Yoke? [Examples, Principles, Methods]

Benefits of Root Cause Analysis

Quality improvement.

Root cause analysis can significantly enhance the quality of your products or services. By systematically identifying the root causes of issues and implementing corrective actions, you’ll prevent recurring problems and reduce the number of defects. In turn, this will help you maintain customer satisfaction, reduce costs associated with rework or returns, and improve your reputation in the market.

Risk Reduction

Reducing risk is another advantage of root cause analysis. When you identify the underlying causes of problems, you can take necessary measures to eliminate or mitigate those risks. This proactive approach can protect your business from potential losses or disruptions, such as regulatory penalties, customer dissatisfaction, or harm to employees or the environment. By addressing the sources of risk, you can maintain a safer and more profitable business.

Process Optimization

Root cause analysis supports continuous improvement by highlighting inefficiencies and areas for optimization in your operations. By examining your processes beyond the symptoms of a specific issue, you can uncover opportunities to streamline workflows, reduce waste or downtime, and better utilize resources. Implementing these improvements not only resolves the immediate problem but also enhances overall productivity and efficiency in your organization.

To attain the benefits of root cause analysis, apply it consistently and rigorously. Ensure that you involve relevant stakeholders, gather necessary data, and employ a systematic approach to identifying and addressing root causes.

Challenges of Root Cause Analysis

Common pitfalls.

When conducting Root Cause Analysis (RCA), you might face common pitfalls that can reduce the effectiveness of your investigation. Some of these pitfalls include:

• Rushing the process : It is important to allocate appropriate time and resources to conduct a thorough RCA.
• Overlooking small details : Make sure to pay attention to all possible contributing factors when investigating a problem. Small details can often hold the key to the root cause.
• Focusing on blame : RCA should focus on identifying systemic issues and providing solutions rather than blaming individuals or departments.

Addressing Human Factors

Human factors play a critical role in many problems. When conducting RCA, it is crucial to consider the human factors that may have contributed to the issue. Here are some tips to help you address human factors in your RCA:

• Consider psychological factors : Assess the mental state of the people involved in the incident, including their level of stress, fatigue, and emotions.
• Evaluate communication and collaboration : Analyze how effectively teams were communicating and working together at the time of the incident.
• Assess training and competency : Determine if the people involved had the appropriate training and knowledge to handle the situation.

Keep a neutral and non-blaming tone while assessing human factors. The aim is to uncover systemic issues that can be improved upon.

Fishbone Diagram (Components, Factors, Examples)

Ishikawa Diagram: Examples and Applications

• Advantages of SWOT Analysis (6 Benefits and 4 Limitations)
• Top Problem Solving Skills for Today's Job Market
• What is Problem Solving? (Steps, Techniques, Examples)

The Search AI Company

Build tailored experiences with Elastic.

Scale your business with Elastic Partners

• Find a partner
• Become a partner

Search and analytics, data ingestion, and visualization – all at your fingertips.

• Elasticsearch
• Integrations

By developers, for developers

• Try the world's most used vector database
• Scale with the low-latency Search Lake AI
• Join our community

Elastic Cloud

Unlock the power of real-time insights with Elastic on your preferred cloud provider.

• Elastic Cloud Serverless
• Elastic Cloud Serverless pricing
• Search AI Lake

Generative AI

Prototype and integrate with LLMs faster using search AI.

• Elastic AI Assistant
• Generative AI blogs
• Search Labs tutorials
• Elastic Community

Discover a world of AI possibilities — built with the power of search.

• Vector search
• Search applications
• Website search
• Workplace search
• Customer support
• Search Labs

Protect, investigate, and respond to cyber threats with AI-driven security analytics.

• Attack Discovery: AI for the SOC
• Security Labs
• Observability

Unify app and infrastructure visibility to proactively resolve issues.

• Log monitoring and analytics
• OpenTelemetry
• Application performance monitoring
• Infrastructure monitoring
• Synthetic monitoring
• Real user monitoring
• Universal Profiling
• Observability Labs

By solution

See how customers search, solve, and succeed — all on one Search AI Platform.

Exceed customer expectations and go to market faster.

• Public sector
• Financial services
• Telecommunications
• Manufacturing

Customer spotlight

Cisco saves 5,000 support engineer hours per month

RWE unifies thousands of data sources into an observability platform

Stay at the forefront of innovation with technical tips from the experts.

Code with other developers to create a better Elastic, together.

• Documentation

Unleash the possibilities of your data and grow your skill set.

• Getting started
• Elastic resources
• Consulting services
• Trainings & certifications

Keep informed about the latest tech and news from Elastic.

Have questions?

• Contact sales
• Get support

What is root cause analysis (RCA) in software development?

Root cause analysis definition.

Root cause analysis (RCA) is a proven troubleshooting technique used by software development teams to identify and resolve problems at their core, rather than attempting to treat symptoms. Root cause analysis is a structured, step-by-step process designed to seek out primary, underlying causes by gathering and analyzing relevant data and testing solutions that address them.

Why is root cause analysis important?

Root cause analysis is essential in software development because the systematic approach allows teams to troubleshoot more efficiently and develop long-term solutions that prevent issues from recurring. By addressing the root causes of errors and defects, developers can ensure their systems are stable, reliable, and efficient, reducing costly downtime and speeding up the development process. RCA also helps developers prioritize issues based on their impact and severity, empowering them to tackle the most critical problems first.

How to conduct a root cause analysis

Applied as a problem-solving method across industries and disciplines— from science and engineering to manufacturing and healthcare— root cause analysis requires following a specific series of steps to isolate and understand the fundamental factors contributing to a flaw or failure in a system. The steps involved in conducting root cause analysis in software development follow the same universal RCA principles:

• Step 1: Define the problem and set up alerts (if possible) The first step in RCA is to define the problem and make sure it’s clearly understood. This could include setting up alerts to monitor for potential issues like abnormal application behavior, system performance degradation, or security incidents.
• Step 2: Gather and analyze data to determine potential causal factors Once the problem has been defined, the next step is to gather and analyze data. This may include reviewing system logs, application performance metrics, user feedback, and other relevant data sources. The data evaluation should lead to a list of potential causal factors that could be contributing to the problem.
• Step 3: Determine root causes Once the data analysis in Step 2 is complete, use one of several RCA methods to analyze the data and potential causal factors to discover the actual root cause (or causes) of the problem. The root cause analysis should suggest corrective actions.
• Step 4: Implement solutions and document actions After the root cause has been identified, the last step is implementing solutions to address the problem. This may include changes to code, configuration settings, or any number of system adjustments. It’s important to document all actions taken to address the problem to ensure they’re effective and can be repeated if necessary.

Methods and techniques for root cause analysis outside of the software world

There are many useful tools developed to aid in achieving effective RCA. When brainstorming and analyzing potential causes, these methods allow you to visualize and organize information into a usable framework for solving problems. Popular techniques for root cause analysis include:

• 5 Whys The 5 Whys is a problem-solving strategy that helps get to root causes by iterating on “Why” questions until the immediate causes of a problem are identified. When teams ask" why" multiple times, with each question leading logically to the next, it encourages critical thinking and deeper digging, helping to prevent superficial or surface-level solutions.
• Pareto chart A Pareto Chart is a combination bar chart and line chart that maps out the frequency of the most common root causes of problems, starting with the most probable. Based on the Pareto principle, which states that 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes, the chart lists causes in order of importance and shows the cumulative impact of each, helping teams prioritize the causes that have the most significant impact on the problem.
• Scatter plot diagram A scatter plot diagram uses dots to help teams identify patterns in data that could be contributing to a problem. Plotting two numeric variables on a graph makes it easier to find any correlation between them. The technique can help you quickly identify any significant relationships between variables and identify outliers, which could be the potential causes you're looking for.
• Fishbone diagram Resembling a fish skeleton, this visual tool provides a graphic representation of the factors that could be contributing to a problem, with the head representing the issue and the bones representing the categories of potential causes. It is particularly effective at fostering collaboration among teams and can help lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the problem.
• Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FMEA is a structured, empirical approach that helps to identify potential failures and their effects. It is a systematic method that involves identifying potential failure modes, evaluating their severity, and determining the likelihood of occurrence and detection — then ranking them by their potential risk score. It can help teams focus on the most important issues to tackle first and also help prevent problems before they occur.

Root cause analysis tools for software developers

In the software world, RCA can expose root problems deep in the code. But the use of cloud-native technologies and the complexity of today's modern applications make it increasingly difficult to determine the root cause of issues. Teams can use observability and security tools to achieve powerful RCA results, for example:

Observability Observability provides real-time insight into software performance and behavior through data collection and analysis, allowing you to identify issues and gain visibility into root causes by monitoring metrics, logs, and traces, and through AIOps and observability tools like:

• Machine learning and AIOps Search, visualization, and machine learning can help identify anomalies and surface the root cause of an issue. This can help you make informed decisions and take corrective action quickly.
• Distributed tracing Tracking and analyzing the flow of requests through complex distributed systems with distributed tracing provides insight into the interactions between components and services, which can help identify bottlenecks and other issues that could be causing problems.
• Log pattern analysis Analyzing log patterns and trends generated by applications and infrastructure to identify the root cause of a problem—as well as detect anomalies, errors, and other issues that could be impacting software performance.
• Service dependency mapping By identifying the relationships and dependencies between different components in a system, you can automatically map service dependencies that might be causing issues and understand how changes in one component impact the rest of the system.
• Latency and error correlations Analyzing data related to latency and error rates to identify correlations between the two, you can spot patterns and relationships between errors and performance issues that can help pinpoint root causes.

Security Analyzing security-related data to identify vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the system is an important aspect of root cause analysis. It can help prevent security breaches and other issues that could impact software performance.

• Unsupervised anomaly detection provides an additional layer of defense Comprehensive security requires multiple layers of threat protection. Unsupervised machine learning identifies deviations from normal activity in your data, without having to specify what's abnormal, and can catch attacks that standard approaches to threat hunting are likely to miss.
• Investigating threats and exploring correlations Analyzing security data related to detected events helps determine whether they represent actual threats, or can be ignored. Security analysts recognize malicious activity by looking at patterns in sessions, event timelines, and diagnostic information from hosts.

Common mistakes to avoid with root cause analysis

Root cause analysis can be incredibly effective for identifying and resolving problems, but there are several common mistakes teams should be aware of:

• Lack of data validation: Failing to validate the data used in your analysis can lead to incorrect conclusions and ineffective solutions.
• Selecting solutions as causes: Issues like lack of training and support or budget constraints are rarely the root cause of a problem. They're far more often the solutions. It's critical to dive deeper to trace a problem to its origins.
• Need to find one cause: There can be many contributing factors that lead to a problem, and it's important to identify all of them, rather than landing on one that's convenient.
• Not involving the right people: Valid, truly effective RCA requires input from all relevant stakeholders, including software developers, testers, and business analysts.

Benefits of root cause analysis

The benefits of root cause analysis in software development are enhanced troubleshooting, reduced costs, and greater efficiency — all of which lead to a better product and a happier customer. Root cause analysis is a critical component of software development, helping teams identify the origins of fundamental errors and how to fix them. RCA also allows teams to stop problems from happening again.

• Helps to prevent problems from recurring: RCA enables teams to implement solutions that address root causes rather than just symptoms. By preventing problems from recurring, teams can save time, reduce costs, and improve the overall quality of their software. For example, a software team may notice that a particular feature of an application is consistently crashing. By performing RCA, they might discover the issue stems from a particular set of user inputs that aren’t being handled properly. With this information, they can implement a correct solution that stops the issue in its tracks.
• Improves process efficiency: By identifying root causes, teams can optimize their processes to prevent similar issues from occurring, leading to increased efficiency, reduced downtime, and a more streamlined development process. If a dev team finds their continuous integration pipeline repeatedly failing due to issues with their test suite, they can perform RCA to find out if the problem is slow-running tests causing the pipeline to time out. Now they can optimize their test suite to avoid similar problems in the future.
• Prevents customer dissatisfaction: Root cause analysis helps teams address issues that could impact customer satisfaction. If, for example, a team receives user complaints about a feature being too slow to load, they might use RCA to determine that the issue is a poorly optimized database query. By implementing solutions to prevent that problem from recurring, like optimizing the query to improve performance, they can deliver a more positive user experience. When software consistently meets customer expectations, it goes a long way in building trust and loyalty, which can ultimately lead to increased revenue and long-term growth.

Tips for performing root cause analysis

• Pull information from multiple sources, and understand your data When performing root cause analysis, data quality, visibility, and comprehension are paramount. Elastic offers a solution that consolidates all your data in one system. You get data visualization in Kibana and interactive tools that allow you to dig deep into observability issues and investigate security incidents.
• Get multiple eyes on the data and the problem by working with a team Elastic features extended support for personalized collaboration in Kibana and O11y, helping you streamline workflows and facilitate escalations with your team.
• Take notes Elastic offers streamlined alerts and case management , allowing you to reach insights faster with richer context for your data and visualizations, including sourcing annotations dynamically from Elasticsearch queries in Kibana. For query-based annotations, you also have the ability to manually annotate Kibana Lens visualization with notes.

Root cause analysis with Elastic

The Elasticsearch Platform and its built-in solutions — Elastic Enterprise Search , Elastic Observability , and Elastic Security — act collectively as a jet engine for facilitating root cause analysis. As the most widely deployed solution for transforming metrics, logs, and traces into actionable IT insights — Elastic Observability enables you to unify observability across your entire digital ecosystem. Further, analysts recognized Elastic Security as a leader in security analytics and SIEM.

Specifically, the following capabilities accelerate root cause analysis in its various phases:

• Ingest your data with Elastic Agent and hundreds of integrations .
• Receive automated notifications of potential issues using pre-configured alerts and anomaly detection, effectively putting your monitoring on "auto pilot"
• Apply machine learning and AIOps to process large data sets at scale, with interactive features tailor-made to facilitate RCA for observability, including APM correlations and Explain log rate spikes , and for security investigations with features like Session View , Event timeline , and query hosts for diagnostic information using Osquery .
• Determine causal factors using guided journeys and collaborate on root cause and appropriate solutions to fix and prevent the problems using Elastic case management .

To help your team get the most out of root cause analysis, start a free trial and discover what Elastic can do for you.

Root cause analysis resources

• Root cause analysis for logs
• Automate anomaly detection and accelerate root cause analysis with AIOps
• Why you need AIOps as part of your observability strategy
• Elastic Security for SIEM & security analytics
• Elastic Security for automated threat protection
• Accelerate security investigations with machine learning and interactive root cause analysis in Elastic
• Apply Elastic to root cause analysis in manufacturing
• Predictive maintenance in industrial IoT

Advisory boards aren’t only for executives. Join the LogRocket Content Advisory Board today →

• Product Management
• Solve User-Reported Issues
• Find Issues Faster
• Optimize Conversion and Adoption

Better problem solving with root cause analysis (with template)

If you walk into your kitchen to find your favorite vase smashed on the floor, it might be safe to assume that the grinning cat nearby was the root cause of this problem. If only it was this simple in business and we could just say “the cat did it.” Product problems are often much more complex and connected to a variety of root causes.

If you think of a weed, the surface is only the problem you can immediately see. However, if you cut the weed from the ground level, it’s likely to grow back from the root. This is just like fixing product problems with a band-aid with little to no investigation of a root cause — it’s likely to return.

These types of problems need a more thorough root cause analysis (RCA) to determine how, and why the problem happened, and how to prevent it in the future.

What is root cause analysis?

Root cause analysis is a tool you can utilize when determining the true cause of a problem. You might have assumptions about what the cause of a problem might be or experience biases towards one as the main cause.

Performing a root cause analysis can help you determine what the underlying causes of a problem are to help address a more impactful and valuable solution:

What are the 4 steps in a root cause analysis?

When you’re trying to uncover the roots of a problem, it can be daunting to figure out where to start. The process to conduct a root cause analysis can be broken down into a few easy steps:

• Define the problem
• Identify and map the problem causes
• Identify the evidence that supports your causes
• Create a root cause analysis report and set up your action plan

1. Define the problem

A clear definition of the problem is the first step. Sometimes problems are easy to identify, like a broken link. More often, problems can be abstract and need clarification, like a decrease in overall purchases through a site or an increase in bugs reported.

Here are some more examples of problems:

• A 20 percent drop in customer purchases placed from the shopping cart page from the previous week
• 60 percent of customers on hold end up dropping their call and, as a result, the company has experienced a decrease in NPS scores
• A 40 percent increase of customer reported issues with using the folders feature in a CRM
• A 15 percent decrease in user engagement with a core feature on a social media site

It’s also critical to understand how to define a problem:

2. Identify and map the problem causes

Using tools like a fishbone analysis and the Five Whys framework can help you put together causes and start to categorize themes of the problem. When going through a Five Whys diagram, try to come up with a few alternate pathways and you might notice overlapping areas.

Each example of a Five Whys diagram is accurate, but only looking at one cause can prevent you from understanding the fuller picture. For example, there was more than one reason why the Fyre Festival failed and it’s important to identify overlapping themes to avoid leaning on only one cause:

In a product example, there might be numerous reasons why session times have decreased, or user reported bugs are up.

After evaluating the size, impact, general cause themes, and urgency of the problem, you’ll have a better understanding of how much effort will be needed for the analysis. The larger the problem on the surface, the more underlying causes you might find. Even simple problems can sometimes have numerous causes to consider and you need to determine how in-depth you need to dig to “unroot” the causes.

It’s also critical to check all your bases. Once you have evaluated and categorized the different potential causes to a problem, use the following as a checklist to ensure you’re covering all areas of where and how this problem happened. Be sure to identify any changes or recent events that might have occurred that could have impacted the problem.

• Demographics : is the problem happening to one specific demographic? Only happening to iPhone users? Users in a specific location?
• Time specific : when did the problem happen? Is it continuing to happen? Did the problem only occur during a specific time? You might discover that the problem is related to a time-specific cause, like a release or outage
• User journey : did anything change within the user journey? Map the workflow to determine if any new developments have occurred
• External factors : is this an issue with a third party integration? Did a competitor launch a successful new feature that might be taking business from you? Some of these external factors could be out of your control, but important to recognize
• Internal factors : how many feature releases happened during this time frame? Was there any product downtime or maintenance at that time?

3. Identify the evidence that supports your causes

Collecting evidence is a key part of a root cause analysis. Without evidence, your problem causes are based on assumptions and potentially harmful biases.

Start evaluating any data you might have available. Using session replay tools like LogRocket can help you collect evidence of the problem. Here are a couple of examples of the type of data that can be used to collect evidence:

• User count — number of users impacted by the problem
• Usage — daily, weekly, or monthly active users and a decrease or increase in session time
• Decrease or increase in events — for example, a decrease in users selecting the Add to cart button from a page or an increase in error pages
• Error tracking and user frustration — tools like LogRocket can help track where things are going wrong in your product and surface critical issues
• Qualitative evidence — run user interviews or user-submitted feedback with tools like Loom. Are multiple users running into the same roadblock? Are you seeing the same complaint from multiple users in feedback tickets?

4. Create a root cause analysis report and set up your action plan

Collect your evidence and root cause evaluation into an RCA template. Once you have your causes identified and your discovery efforts into one root cause analysis report, you can start creating a plan to address the problem and prevent it from happening in the future.

Over 200k developers and product managers use LogRocket to create better digital experiences

Collaborate with a team to brainstorm solutions and discuss which options might address multiple causes. Evaluate if you need both a short-term and long-term solution, depending on the level of effort and urgency required. As part of your analysis report, discuss how you can avoid this problem again in the future and any other risk mitigation plans.

Root cause analysis template

You can use this root cause analysis template on Google Sheets to organization your investigation, collect your evidence, and share with your team to determine next step solutions:

Root cause analysis example

Below is an RCA for Company B, a tax preparation product that experienced an increase in dropped customer calls.

Company B experienced an increase of 60 percent of customers on hold that ended up dropping their call. They also experienced an increase in NPS dissatisfaction and have concerns about losing customers.

After going through a root cause analysis, they discovered an 80 percent increase in user calls during tax season. This increase of call volume indicated much longer wait times to speak to a live agent.

After investigating some of the customer call reasons, they discovered that numerous customers had simple questions that could be answered quickly without too much support.

Company B gathered call logs that confirmed their suspicions. They brought the logs together that demonstrated the simplicity of repeated questions and gathered records of customers that dropped off after a certain amount of time on the phone.

Company B implemented a conversational AI chatbot that could answer generic questions and direct more complex questions to a live agent. Further, they implemented tooltips throughout the tax process flow to help users that appeared to be stuck.

Through the RCA process, you might discover that some parts of the user’s experience are confusing and create a plan to address minor UI challenges.

These solutions helped Company B improve their accessibility and scalability needs during an increase in call volume, without having to add more employee support. Going forward, Company B can plan to monitor call times and continuously evaluate customer service topics to determine where users might need further support and guidance in the future:

Common mistakes to avoid

There are a number of easy-to-fall-into traps when performing root cause analysis, including:

• Don’t rely on assumptions when determining root causes. Use evidence to support to disprove a cause
• Don’t limit your investigation. Go beyond one Five Why framework and be sure to exhaust all possibilities to avoid leaning on the first cause
• Don’t rely on the first idea — come up with multiple solutions to solve a problem
• Don’t work alone. Collaborating with a team will help you come up with a variety of potential solutions or new opportunities
• Don’t think this is a one-time thing. Prepare for the future and discuss risk management and mitigation if you expect this problem to happen again, especially with issues that might be related to factors out of your control. What’s the worst that can happen, and what can we do about it to make sure the problem is addressed quickly with minimal interruption?

Final thoughts

A root cause analysis can be a great tool to help you uncover the true causes of a problem and reduce any reliance on assumptions or biases. With the right investigation and evidence collection, you can learn more about how and why a problem happened and identify causes below the surface.

RCA can ensure your solutions address the root problem and help you better plan for the future.

Featured image source: IconScout

LogRocket generates product insights that lead to meaningful action

Get your teams on the same page — try LogRocket today.

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• #product strategy

Stop guessing about your digital experience with LogRocket

Recent posts:.

Crafting a successful product launch strategy: Key tips and steps

A launch strategy builds anticipation, maximizes initial sales, and establishes a strong market presence early on.

Leader Spotlight: Having a bias for action, with Anish Chadda

Anish Chadda discusses the importance of having a “bias for action” — iterating quickly instead of focusing on creating a perfect prototype.

DSDM: The dynamic systems development method

The dynamic system development method (DSDM) was first released in 1994 as a software development method to provide some discipline to RAD.

Leader Spotlight: Enabling a vision-led product mindset, with David Krell

David Krell, VP of Product at Going, talks about the fallacy that PMs have to be in a position of authority to do vision-led work.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Root Cause Analysis: A Complete Guide With Examples (2023)

Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is not just a structured method of problem-solving; it's a vital component of organisational leadership. The goal of RCA is to fully understand what caused an issue, allowing for effective corrective actions.

One of the first steps in a successful RCA is identifying performance or opportunity gaps within an organisation. These gaps reflect ways in which an organisation falls short or fails to deliver on its capabilities. RCA helps in pinpointing these gaps, thereby allowing for more targeted solutions.

This article will take you through the benefits of RCA and the three basic types of root causes behind workplace incidents. We’ll then explore the two popular methodologies for RCA and how you can use the RCA methodology to identify them. 

Finally, we’ll share tools and best practices to help you implement a robust RCA framework so you can develop a comprehensive problem-solving process for safety and risk management in your organisation.

Read on to discover how RCA can revolutionise your approach to problem-solving and risk management.

The benefits of Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

Without a structured RCA framework for resolving incidents, organisations risk implementing superficial quick fixes that may address some of the symptoms but not the core problems.

An effective RCA methodology helps an organisation's Health & Safety (H&S) team to identify the root causes of a reported incident in the workplace, which is essential to assign effective preventive or corrective actions . Implementing this framework have many benefits:

• Save time, money, and resources because they can identify and invest in the right preventive and corrective actions.
• Prevent the incident from recurring because they can correct the factors causing the issues.
• Prevent more damage or injury caused by a recurring incident.
• Prevent more downtime caused by a recurring incident.
• Boost productivity because they don’t have to revisit the same incident and spend extra time trying to solve the underlying issues.

The three basic types of root cause

There are three fundamental types of root causes:

• Environmental root cause These are causes related to external factors such as moisture levels, weather, or geography.
• Individual root cause These are causes related to an individual’s behaviour, personal choices, ability, or circumstance.
• Organisational root cause These are causes involving internal organisational structure or processes.

The two popular RCA frameworks

A study by Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings identified two popular RCA frameworks. We will cover each one with an example.

#1: The "5 Whys" Method

This is perhaps the most popular RCA technique because of its simplicity. The method is to ask why something happened at least five times. Here’s an example of how it works.

Incident: A construction worker fell and broke his arm.

• “Ask Why” #1: Why did he fall? Answer: He tripped on a wire
• “Ask Why” #2: Why was the wire on the ground? Answer: It was an extension wire needed to supply power to a tool on the other side.
• “Ask Why” #3: Why was the wire pulled across a thoroughfare? Answer: There was no power socket on the other side.  
• “Ask Why” #4: Why is there only one power socket in that area? Answer: There aren’t enough portable generators on the site.
• “Ask Why” #5: Why aren’t enough portable generators on the site? Answer: The application requesting the budget to rent a few more portable generators is pending approval.

Using this RCA technique, we’ve identified the actual root cause to be an organisational root cause. The solution for the organisation is to improve the process of approving budgets. 

Speeding up the process of approving budgets doesn’t just help prevent future similar incidents. It may also bring the added benefit of improving productivity when construction workers can quickly get what they need to perform their tasks.

Without using this RCA technique, one could have soon concluded that it was solely an environmental or individual root cause. Any corrective actions in these areas are likely to be ineffective or short-term.

#2: Causal Tree

A causal tree is used to evaluate other possible causes that contributed to the incident. This can help organisations identify other possible preventive or corrective actions. Here’s an example of how a causal tree could look like for the same incident example above:

Organisations can explore other possible root causes that need addressing using a causal tree. This RCA methodology is beneficial for identifying root causes across environmental, individual, and organisational categories. Another advantage of using the causal tree framework is that it allows organisations to implement short-term solutions to prevent incidents while they take more time to find answers to more prominent issues. For example, the construction company can implement the short-term solution of placing warning signs in front of extended wires on the ground. Meanwhile, the organisation will look into solving the other root causes identified, such as improving the budget approval process and hazard reporting training.

Common Mistakes to Avoid in Root Cause Analysis

Root Cause Analysis (RCA) can be highly effective in addressing workplace safety issues when done correctly. 

However, there are some common mistakes that organisations make when conducting RCA.

Mistake #1: Jumping to conclusions

One of the most common mistakes is jumping to conclusions without thoroughly examining the available information. This often leads to implementing quick fixes that do not address the root cause of the problem.

Tip: Ensure that you take the time to gather all relevant information and systematically work through the RCA process to identify the underlying cause.

Mistake #2: Focusing only on individual errors

Another mistake is solely blaming individuals for incidents without considering the broader organisational context. This can lead to a culture of blame and an unwillingness to report incidents in the future.

Tip: While it is essential to consider individual factors, also examine organisational root causes and environmental factors that may have contributed to the incident. This will help to create a more comprehensive understanding of the issue and lead to more effective solutions.

Mistake #3: Neglecting to involve the right people

One common mistake organisations make is neglecting to involve the right people in the RCA process. A successful RCA requires input from various stakeholders, including employees directly involved in the incident, supervisors, and management. Collaborative analysis helps in collecting a variety of viewpoints and promotes a sense of collective accountability for workplace safety.

Tip: Involving all pertinent stakeholders in the RCA process is crucial, as it aids in collecting a variety of viewpoints and promotes a sense of collective accountability for workplace safety.

Mistake #4: Inadequate documentation

Poor documentation of the RCA process and its outcomes can lead to a lack of accountability and hinder the implementation of corrective actions.

Tip: Document every step of the RCA process, including the incident description, investigation, root cause identification, and proposed corrective actions. This will help ensure that all stakeholders are aware of their responsibilities and can track the progress of the implemented solutions.

Mistake #5: Failing to follow up on corrective actions

Implementing corrective actions is only one part of the RCA process. Organisations sometimes fail to follow up on these actions, which can lead to a recurrence of the incident or issue.

Tip: Establish a system to monitor the progress of corrective actions and evaluate their effectiveness. Regularly review the implemented solutions and make any necessary adjustments to ensure that the root cause is fully addressed and the risk of recurrence is minimised.

How to implement a robust RCA framework 

To enhance workplace safety, it is crucial to establish a strong RCA framework within your organisation.

These are the following steps to implement such a framework:

• Train the H&S team on how to use the different types of RCA frameworks.
• Make it easy for employees to report incidents and other events like near misses.
• Update the new employee training, health and safety training, and SOP guides on submitting incident reports and conducting RCA.
• Conduct regular health and safety training sessions.
• Creating an action plan: outline the steps to be taken, the stakeholders involved, and the timeline for implementation

The importance of high-quality incident and hazard reports 

The effectiveness of any Root Cause Analysis (RCA) relies heavily on the input data's accuracy and quality. Therefore, it is imperative to have a reliable incident reporting system in place to ensure the provision of high-quality input data.

Here are the characteristics of a high-quality incident report:

• Records the incident's time, date, and location.
• Is honest, clear, and concise.
• Provides accurate information that doesn’t leave out important facts.
• Provide as much context as possible.
• It is written in a first-person, objective observation of what happened, not what they think might have happened.

To write an accurate incident report, employees should be encouraged to start writing the report as soon as possible. 

Delaying writing the report can lead to inaccurate reports or reports without enough detail because the memory gets fuzzy. Whenever possible or relevant, employees should also attach photos for additional context.

To help you navigate the complexities of incident reporting, we strongly recommend downloading our free checklist and comprehensive guide .

Best practices to improve incident reporting and RCA

One of the best practices to improve the quality of incident reports is digitalising the incident reporting process. 

Here’s an example of how Vatix’s incident reporting systems can improve the quality of workplace incident reports and RCA.

• Higher quality incident reports Our mobile platform makes it easy for employees to report an incident from anywhere without the friction of filling out and submitting a paper form. Facilitating on-the-spot reporting for employees minimises the likelihood of postponing or neglecting to report incidents or other events. Faster reporting of incidents also improves the quality of the report. Employees are more likely to record details with better descriptions and upload photos directly from their mobile devices, improving the data needed for an effective RCA.
• Customise incident types to an organisation’s specific needs Our incident reporting software allows organisations to customise the types of incidents employees can report. These templates eliminate the need to print out, distribute, and file multiple forms.
• Easily customise the incident reporting template to capture relevant information. With our incident reporting software, organisations can customise the incident reporting forms to ensure employees submit all required and relevant information. 
• Real-time reporting and location tracking for faster response Paper-based incident reporting causes a lot of delays and it can take hours before supervisors or managers can view the incident reports. With real-time mobile incident reporting, employees can submit incidents on-the-spot and the H&S team will be alerted with a location so they can respond to the incident within minutes. In some cases, faster response time with location tagging can be the difference between life and death.
• Easy to get more context at a glance Unlike manual paper-and-pen incident reporting forms, employees can easily add photographs to the incident report directly from their mobile. The incident reporting app also logs the location and provides visual maps for additional context at a glance.

Improve workplace health & safety processes

By combining mobile incident reporting with an effective RCA strategy, organisations can respond to incidents faster and more effectively to create a positive safety culture, leading to increased productivity and decreased risk of accidents and injuries. Talk to our sales here to learn more about how you can customise our mobile incident reporting software to fit your business and improve workplace safety.

Related Articles

Subscribe to our newsletter, subscribe to our newsletter.

Solve issues faster with the root cause analysis process

Lucid Content

Reading time: about 4 min

If you’ve ever spent a summer pulling weeds out of your backyard, you know that you have to pull out the entire weed‚ from the roots, or else it’s bound to come back.

Similarly, when a problem occurs within your company, the issue is bound to continue if you don’t identify and eliminate its cause. Figuring out what disrupts production and taking steps to correct the problem is the basis of any root cause analysis. And if you’ve never performed root cause analysis before, you’re in luck—we’ll walk you through the benefits and different methods you can use.

What is root cause analysis?

Root cause analysis refers to any problem-solving method used to trace an issue back to its origin. You’ll discover what happened, how it happened, why it happened, and what steps are needed to prevent similar issues. Similar to removing weeds from a garden, a root cause analysis isolates and removes the source of a problem.

Benefits of root cause analysis

Inefficient processes waste time, money, and other resources. Temporary fixes only mask the problem or delay the effects until later. Using a root cause analysis, organizations identify the source of a problem and implement permanent and lasting solutions to prevent future issues.

When to use a root cause analysis

Root cause analysis is especially useful in repeated situations or processes, like assembly lines. However, you can use a root cause analysis in any number of situations, before or after an issue arises, including:

• Everyday accidents
• Medical mistakes
• Manufacturing errors
• Human error
• Risk analysis

Root cause analysis process

Ready to get started? Follow these steps to perform root cause analysis and resolve any problem at your company.

1. Define the problem

Clearly identify what you see as problematic events and list out the specific symptoms of the issues. The first step in the root cause analysis process is understanding the problem or problems your organization faces.

2. Collect data

How long have these issues been going on? What are the signs of proof of these problems or issues? What type of impact has the issued caused? Are the impacts measurable, i.e. loss of time, productivity, inventory, etc.?

Go directly to the source to collect the most accurate data. Involve everyone who has been impacted by the issue in the data collection phase to gain as much insight as possible.

3. Identify possible causal factors

Was there a series or sequence of events that led to the problem or allowed the problem to occur? Are there additional problems that stem from this? Try one of these methods to identify possible causal factors.

Cause-and-effect diagrams

Also known as a fishbone diagram , a cause-and-effect diagram helps you examine potential causes by category. For example, manufacturing industries label the diagram branches with the six M’s (machines, methods, materials, measurements, Mother Nature, manpower) and think of causal factors within each category. These diagrams encourage you to explore all possible causes of a problem instead of stopping at the most obvious conclusion.

This method encourages you to keep going deeper as you examine an issue. Ask “Why?” at least five times until you’ve reached the catalyst. Check out our 5 Whys template to begin your own analysis.

Similar to the 5 Whys, this technique asks users to break complex problems down into smaller, detailed parts. Write down the main problem, and next to it, write down factors contributing to the problem or questions that the problem raises. Repeat the process to drill down to the root cause.

Causal tree

A tree diagram lays out the actions or events that led to the failure or problem.

4. Pinpoint root causes

Look over your list of potential causal factors, and determine the real reason this problem or issue occurred in the first place. Dig deep to examine each level of cause and effect and the events that led to the unfavorable outcomes.

5. Implement solutions

Ask yourself what you can do to prevent the issue from occurring again. What solutions are necessary? Who will be responsible for the solution and its implementation? Are there any risks associated with implementing the chosen solution?

Rely on the information you gathered through your cause-and-effect diagram to identify what changes need to be made. Use an impact analysis to understand the positive and negative consequences of your solution.

Root cause analysis can be used to assess potential future risk or an incident that has already occurred. Lucidchart can help you dissect and identify symptoms of a problem, actual root causes, and possible solutions.

About Lucidchart

Lucidchart, a cloud-based intelligent diagramming application, is a core component of Lucid Software's Visual Collaboration Suite. This intuitive, cloud-based solution empowers teams to collaborate in real-time to build flowcharts, mockups, UML diagrams, customer journey maps, and more. Lucidchart propels teams forward to build the future faster. Lucid is proud to serve top businesses around the world, including customers such as Google, GE, and NBC Universal, and 99% of the Fortune 500. Lucid partners with industry leaders, including Google, Atlassian, and Microsoft. Since its founding, Lucid has received numerous awards for its products, business, and workplace culture. For more information, visit lucidchart.com.

Related articles

Define your business with a strategy mapping template.

Learn how you can use a strategy map to turn your organization’s mission and vision into actionable objectives. Includes a free template!

What is gap analysis? 4 steps and examples to use

A strong gap analysis process allows professionals to determine where their businesses are—and where they want it to be. To perform a gap analysis, follow these four simple steps.

Bring your bright ideas to life.

or continue with

Root Cause Analysis: Principles and Benefits

Enhancing problem solving with root cause analysis: a guide to mastering rca on coursera by luca berton.

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving business landscape, the ability to identify and address underlying issues that impact operations and productivity is crucial. Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a systematic process designed to pinpoint the fundamental causes of issues, ensuring they are effectively addressed to prevent recurrence. The new course on Coursera, “Root Cause Analysis: Principles and Benefits,” led by Luca Berton, offers a comprehensive dive into this critical thinking methodology, providing learners with the tools necessary to enhance their problem-solving capabilities.

Direct Link: https://imp.i384100.net/5grP5L

What is Root Cause Analysis?

Root Cause Analysis is a method used by organizations to solve problems or prevent them from happening by addressing the root causes, rather than simply tackling the symptomatic outcomes. This approach not only helps in solving the immediate problem but also prevents similar issues from arising in the future. RCA can be applied across various industries and sectors, making it an invaluable skill for professionals aiming to improve their expertise in quality assurance, project management, and operational efficiency.

Course Overview

The Coursera course, taught in English, is structured for beginners and does not require prior expertise, although a basic understanding of business processes may be beneficial. This course is designed to be completed in just one hour, with a flexible schedule that allows learners to progress at their own pace.

Learning Objectives

Participants in this course will:

• Define and understand the importance of Root Cause Analysis in problem-solving.
• Apply RCA tools and techniques such as the 5 Whys and Fishbone Diagram to identify root causes.
• Develop skills to formulate and implement corrective actions.
• Integrate RCA into organizational processes to foster continuous improvement and operational excellence.

Why This Course is Beneficial

For individuals, mastering RCA can lead to significant career advancement, particularly in roles that require critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Businesses benefit from having employees who can apply RCA, leading to more efficient operations and reduced costs due to fewer recurring issues. Universities can incorporate this training into their curricula to enhance the analytical skills of their students, while government agencies can use RCA to improve their service delivery and operational effectiveness.

Course Features

• 12 Video Lectures: Covering topics from the basics of RCA to advanced applications in real-world scenarios.
• Interactive Assignments: Allowing learners to practice the techniques discussed in the videos.
• Discussion Prompts: To foster a deeper understanding and application of RCA in various contexts.
• Certification: Participants earn a Coursera certificate upon completion, which is a valuable addition to any professional profile.

“Root Cause Analysis: Principles and Benefits” on Coursera is more than just a course; it is a stepping stone towards excellence in professional and organizational development. Whether you are looking to enhance your problem-solving skills, aiming to improve your organization’s efficiency, or simply curious about RCA, this course offers valuable insights and practical tools that can be immediately applied in various professional settings. Enroll today and begin your journey to becoming an expert in identifying and solving core business problems efficiently and effectively.

Learn the Ansible automation technology with some real-life examples in my Learn Ansible automation in 250+ examples & practical lessons

My book Ansible By Examples : 200+ Automation Examples For Linux and Windows System Administrator and DevOps

Want to keep this project going? Please donate

Patreon Buy me a Pizza

Subscribe not to miss any new releases

Try adjusting your search query

• Join Mind Tools

Root Cause Analysis

Tracing a problem to its origins.

In medicine, it's easy to understand the difference between treating the symptoms and curing the condition. A broken wrist, for example, really hurts! But painkillers will only take away the symptoms; you'll need a different treatment to help your bones heal properly.

But what do you do when you have a problem at work? Do you jump straight in and treat the symptoms, or do you stop to consider whether there's actually a deeper problem that needs your attention? If you only fix the symptoms – what you see on the surface – the problem will almost certainly return, and need fixing over and over again.

However, if you look deeper to figure out what's causing the problem, you can fix the underlying systems and processes so that it goes away for good.

What Is Root Cause Analysis?

Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a popular and often-used technique that helps people answer the question of why the problem occurred in the first place. It seeks to identify the origin of a problem using a specific set of steps, with associated tools, to find the primary cause of the problem, so that you can:

• Determine what happened.
• Determine why it happened.
• Figure out what to do to reduce the likelihood that it will happen again.

RCA assumes that systems and events are interrelated. An action in one area triggers an action in another, and another, and so on. By tracing back these actions, you can discover where the problem started and how it grew into the symptom you're now facing.

You'll usually find three basic types of cause:

• Physical causes – Tangible, material items failed in some way (for example, a car's brakes stopped working).
• Human causes – People did something wrong, or did not do something that was needed. Human causes typically lead to physical causes (for example, no one filled the brake fluid, which led to the brakes failing).
• Organizational causes – A system, process, or policy that people use to make decisions or do their work is faulty (for example, no one person was responsible for vehicle maintenance, and everyone assumed someone else had filled the brake fluid).

RCA looks at all three types of causes. It involves investigating the patterns of negative effects, finding hidden flaws in the system, and discovering specific actions that contributed to the problem. This often means that RCA reveals more than one root cause.

You can apply RCA to almost any situation. Determining how far to go in your investigation requires good judgment and common sense. Theoretically, you could continue to trace the root causes back to the Stone Age, but the effort would serve no useful purpose. Be careful to understand when you've found a significant cause that can, in fact, be changed.

To learn more about Root Cause Analysis, watch this video   .

The Root Cause Analysis Process

RCA has five identifiable steps.

Step One: Define the Problem

• What do you see happening?
• What are the specific symptoms?

Step Two: Collect Data

• What proof do you have that the problem exists?
• How long has the problem existed?
• What is the impact of the problem?

You need to analyze a situation fully before you can move on to look at factors that contributed to the problem. To maximize the effectiveness of your RCA, get together everyone – experts and front line staff – who understands the situation. People who are most familiar with the problem can help lead you to a better understanding of the issues.

Finding This Article Useful?

You can learn another 44 problem-solving skills, like this, by joining the Mind Tools Club.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Receive new career skills every week, plus get our latest offers and a free downloadable Personal Development Plan workbook.

A helpful tool at this stage is CATWOE   . With this process, you look at the same situation from different perspectives: the Customers, the people (Actors) who implement the solutions, the Transformation process that's affected, the World view, the process Owner, and Environmental constraints.

Step Three: Identify Possible Causal Factors

• What sequence of events leads to the problem?
• What conditions allow the problem to occur?
• What other problems surround the occurrence of the central problem?

During this stage, identify as many causal factors as possible. Too often, people identify one or two factors and then stop, but that's not sufficient. With RCA, you don't want to simply treat the most obvious causes – you want to dig deeper.

Use these tools to help identify causal factors:

• Appreciation   – Use the facts and ask "So what?" to determine all the possible consequences of a fact.
• 5 Whys   – Ask "Why?" until you get to the root of the problem.
• Drill Down   – Break down a problem into small, detailed parts to better understand the big picture.
• Cause and Effect Diagrams   – Create a chart of all of the possible causal factors, to see where the trouble may have begun.

Step Four: Identify the Root Cause(s)

• Why does the causal factor exist?
• What is the real reason the problem occurred?

Use the same tools you used to identify the causal factors (in Step Three) to look at the roots of each factor. These tools are designed to encourage you to dig deeper at each level of cause and effect.

Step Five: Recommend and Implement Solutions

• What can you do to prevent the problem from happening again?
• How will the solution be implemented?
• Who will be responsible for it?
• What are the risks of implementing the solution?

Analyze your cause-and-effect process, and identify the changes needed for various systems. It's also important that you plan ahead to predict the effects of your solution. This way, you can spot potential failures before they happen.

One way of doing this is to use Failure Mode and Effects Analysis   (FMEA). This tool builds on the idea of risk analysis to identify points where a solution could fail. FMEA is also a great system to implement across your organization; the more systems and processes that use FMEA at the start, the less likely you are to have problems that need RCA in the future.

Impact Analysis   is another useful tool here. This helps you explore possible positive and negative consequences of a change on different parts of a system or organization.

Another great strategy to adopt is Kaizen   , or continuous improvement. This is the idea that continual small changes create better systems overall. Kaizen also emphasizes that the people closest to a process should identify places for improvement. Again, with Kaizen alive and well in your company, the root causes of problems can be identified and resolved quickly and effectively.

Root Cause Analysis is a useful process for understanding and solving a problem.

Figure out what negative events are occurring. Then, look at the complex systems around those problems, and identify key points of failure. Finally, determine solutions to address those key points, or root causes.

You can use many tools to support your RCA process. Cause and Effect Diagrams   and 5 Whys   are integral to the process itself, while FMEA   and Kaizen   help minimize the need for RCA in the future.

As an analytical tool, RCA is an essential way to perform a comprehensive, system-wide review of significant problems as well as the events and factors leading to them.

Click on the button below to download a template that will help you log problems, likely root causes and potential solutions. Thanks to Mind Tools Club member weeze for providing the basis for this.

Download Worksheet

This site teaches you the skills you need for a happy and successful career; and this is just one of many tools and resources that you'll find here at Mind Tools. Subscribe to our free newsletter , or join the Mind Tools Club and really supercharge your career!

Rate this resource

The Mind Tools Club gives you exclusive tips and tools to boost your career - plus a friendly community and support from our career coaches! 

Comments (58)

• Over a month ago Michele wrote Hi Kwasi, You are most welcome. Completing a root cause analysis ensures that you identify the core issue to any problem. Michele Mind Tools Team
• Over a month ago Kwasi wrote This is a good start for my career. As it provides profound details of training for a successful career. Thanks for the opportunity.
• Over a month ago minhserge wrote The content of this article is very more so it 's not easy to follow well

Please wait...

• Professional Scrum Product Owner (PSPO)
• SAFe for Government
• Professional Scrum Master (PSM)
• Certified ScrumMaster
• PMI-ACP Exam Prep
• Leading SAFe® 6.0 Certification
• SAFe Scrum Master
• Certified Scrum Product Owner (CSPO)
• SAFe for Teams
• Agile Scrum Foundation
• AgilePM Foundation and Practitioner Certification
• Agile Scrum Master (ASM)
• Kanban Training
• Scrum Fundamentals
• PMP Certification
• Project Management Fundamentals
• CAPM Exam Prep
• Change Management Foundation and Practitioner Certification
• PRINCE2 Foundation & Practitioner Certification (7th Edition)
• PRINCE2 Agile Foundation & Practitioner Certification
• Business Analysis Foundation and Practitioner Certification
• Microsoft Project Training
• JIRA Certification Training
• Lean Project Management
• ITIL 4 Foundation
• VeriSM™ Foundation
• SIAM Foundation
• SIAM Professional
• 7 QC Tools Training
• Minitab Essentials
• Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt
• Six Sigma Awareness
• Lean Six Sigma Green Belt
• Design for Six Sigma
• Lean Six Sigma Black Belt
• Lean Fundamentals
• Value Stream Mapping
• Quality by Design
• Quality Function Deployment
• BPM and Six Sigma
• RCA through Six Sigma
• DevOps Foundation
• DevOps Master
• DevOps Professional
• Continuous Delivery Architecture
• COBIT 5 Certification
• Corporate Group Training
• 1-to-1 Training
• Join as a Trainer

• Top Blogs on Quality Management

Root Cause Analysis Explained With Examples

In today’s competitive business environment, it is imperative that enterprises ensure their products/services are of the highest quality. Also, customer satisfaction is a critical metric to retain and grow customer relationships. In this article, we will explore what root cause analysis is, how to plan for it, and different techniques and methods involved with the help of an example.

What is Root Cause Analysis (RCA)?

Root Cause Analysis ( RCA) is a systematic concept that involves a set of problem-solving approaches used to determine the underlying cause of an issue of non-compliance or consistency. Examination of the root cause is the method of recognizing, explaining, and solving a problem. The root cause of a non-conformance, flaw, or malfunction has often been defined as an underlying or fundamental explanation. Also, the word “root cause” can often be applied to as the particular point in the causal chain where the implementation of disciplinary action or intervention will avoid non-conformance.

Using root cause analysis to evaluate concerns or incidents should help you achieve the primary objective of: 

• What did happen?
• How it did happen?
• Why does it go bad?
• Activities for stopping the recurrence of the problems

In the end, the study of the root cause comes down to three priorities. The first goal is to find the root cause of a problem or occurrence, just as the name implies. The second aim is to consider how to cure, reward, or benefit from root cause problems. The third and most significant purpose is to apply what you understand from the study to eliminate potential problems.

Why Perform Root Cause Analysis?

Repetitive issues in the processing are a cause of pollution. Waste in the form of downtime on computers, product rework, increased scrap, and time and money spent “fixing” the problem. Many times we may assume the problem is fixed, but in fact, we only addressed the symptom which was the first level of the problem and not the root cause itself. RCA methods and tools are not limited to manufacturing process problems only. Many industries are applying RCA techniques in various situations and are using this structured approach to problem-solving. Some examples of where RCA is being used include, but are not limited to: A Root Cause Analysis, done correctly, will recognize breakdowns in the procedures or structures that have led to the non-conformance and decide how to keep it from occurring again. An RCA is conducted to assess what happened, why it happened, and then determine what needs to be strengthened or modified. Repeat issues may be solved by careful use of the RCA.

Processes in the Workplace 

• Problems of quality management 
• Analyzing risk accidents 
• Security-related circumstances or an overview of injuries 
• Analyzing deficiencies in infrastructure and maintenance 
• Shift management practices or quality development 
• Computer or Software Analysis

How Do You Plan for a Root Cause Analysis?

It’s necessary to spend time planning for a root cause review by conducting the initial research, finding the required workers, and forecasting concerns that may occur during the RCA conference. A typical example of a puzzle maker planning for an RCA is. Even the most skilled puzzle maker, who could know tips and tricks for significant puzzle building, can not be useful if a piece of the puzzle is missing or there is no space for puzzle creation.

Similarly, if crucial information is lacking, staff members are unavailable, or the buildings are inefficient, staff can’t complete a root cause study. So make sure you gather documentation, identify key team members, and plan for the unexpected before you meet with the RCA.

Change Analysis/Event Analysis

Another valuable way of evaluating root cause behavior is to analyze the developments leading up to a case closely. 

This approach is beneficial because there is a wide range of plausible triggers. Rather than looking at the exact day or hour when something went wrong, we’re looking for a more extended period and having a broader perspective.

1. Next, we will mention any possible trigger that contributes to a case. It can be for better or worse or positive any time a transition has happened.

Example : Let’s presume the case we’re going to be studying is an uncharacteristically good New York City shopping day, and we wanted to know why it was so amazing so we could try and reproduce it. First, for each of the main clients, each case, and every potentially related shift, we will list every contact point.

2. Second, we will categorize any transition or occurrence by how much impact we exercised on it. We may identify as Internal / External, Owned / Unknown, or anything similar.

Example : In our fantastic sales day scenario, we’d start working out stuff like “Sales representative launched new slide deck on social effects” (Internal) and other activities like “Last day of the quarter” (External) or “First day of spring” (External).

3. Thirdly, we will go case by case to determine whether or not the occurrence was an unrelated factor, a combined factor, a contributing factor, or a possible root cause. This is where the majority of the research exists, and it is here where such methods such as the 5 WHYs of root cause analysis can be practiced.

Example : In evaluation, we discover that an unexpected aspect was our fancy new Advertising Slide Deck. Still, a contributing factor was the fact that it was quarter-end. One part, though, was established as the possible root cause: the area’s Sales Lead moved to a new apartment with a shorter commute, ensuring she began to meet with customers 10 minutes earlier in the last week of the quarter.

4. Fourthly, we are trying to see if the root cause can be repeated or remedied. 

Example : While not everybody may relocate to a new location, the company determines that if Sales Reps turn up an additional 10 minutes early to consumer meetings in a quarter’s final week, they will be able to duplicate the root cause performance.

To learn more about identifying root causes that are causing issues and to find optimal solutions to your problems, consider pursuing quality management certification courses from Invensis Learning today! 

Some of the popular quality management certification courses that individuals and enterprise teams can take up are:

Six Sigma Green Belt

Black Belt Six Sigma

Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt Certification Training

Lean Fundamentals Training

RCA through Six Sigma Training

RELATED ARTICLES MORE FROM AUTHOR

What is Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ)?

Top 6 Quality Management Trends to Follow in 2024

What is the Plan Do Check Act (PDCA) Cycle?

Leave a reply.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• 14,522 Likes
• 444 Followers
• 96,800 Subscribers
• 2,170 Followers

Related Articles

Mind Mapping in Project Management: How to Use It?

An Overview of IT Service Management and ITSM Frameworks

Best Project Management Tools for Project Managers – 2024

Top DevSecOps Certifications

6 Challenges Faced by Project Managers

Popular posts.

The Project Management Life Cycle Explained

Roles and Responsibilities of a Quality Control Inspector

7 Cs of Effective Communication with Example

Top 5 Factors for Project Success

Quality Analyst Job Role and Responsibilities- Explained!

Suggested posts.

• 7 Cs of Effective Communication with Examples
• Project Management Lifecycle
• Project Success Factors
• Quality Control Inspector Job Description
• Risk Management Examples
• QA Manager Job Description
• Quality Management Team Roles and Responsibilities
• Risk Management Tools & Techniques
• Quality Analyst Job Description
• What is Business Value
• Who are Project Stakeholders
• Importance of Project Management
• What is Project Management
• Project Management Skills
• Project Manager Job Description
• Agile Project Manager Interview Questions
• Risk and Compliance Manager Job Description
• Risk Management Process
• Project Scope Management
• Healthcare Project Manager Job Description
• Six Sigma Project Examples
• Risk Analysis Methods
• ITIL Service Lifecycle
• Risk Manager Job Description

POPULAR CATEGORIES

• Best Project Management Blogs 265
• Top Agile Blog Posts 158
• Top Blogs on Quality Management 126
• Latest IT Service Management Blogs 108
• Trending Articles on DevOps 65
• Popular Blogs on IT Security and Governance 55
• Top Blogs on Professional Development 33
• Top Infographics Collection 8

Download E-book Blog

Thank You for submitting your enquiry. One of our training consultants will get in touch with you shortly.

50+ Training and Certification Programs - Upskill Today Learn more about our training programs.

• RCA 101 – 5-Why Analysis (Free Training)
• RCA 201 – Basic Failure Analysis
• RCA 301 – PROACT® RCA Certification
• RCA 401 – RCA Train The Trainer
• Other Trainings
• 5 Whys Root Cause Analysis Template
• RCA Template
• Chronic Failure Calculator

Root Cause Analysis with 5 Whys Technique (With Examples)

By Sebastian Traeger

Updated: April 23, 2024

Reading Time: 7 minutes

What Is the 5 Whys Technique?

Example of the 5 whys technique, how to conduct a 5 whys analysis in 5 steps, when to use a 5 whys analysis, using 5 whys template, tips for mastering the 5 whys technique, frequently asked questions about 5 whys.

With over two decades in business – spanning strategy consulting, tech startups and executive leadership – I am committed to helping your organization thrive.

At Reliability, we’re on a mission to help enhance strategic decision-making and operational excellence through the power of Root Cause Analysis, and I hope this article will be helpful! 

Our goal is to help you better understand 5 whys techniques by offering insights and practical tips based on years of experience. Whether you’re new to doing RCAs or a seasoned pro, we trust this will be useful in your journey towards working hard and working smart.

The 5 Whys Technique is like peeling an onion – it helps you uncover the underlying reasons behind a problem, layer by layer. By repeatedly asking “why” at least five times, this method digs deep to reveal the root cause of an issue. It’s a simple yet powerful problem-solving approach that aims to get to the heart of the matter rather than just addressing surface-level symptoms.

5 Whys Technique: A method that involves iteratively asking “why” five times to unveil the fundamental cause of a problem.

In essence, the 5 Whys Technique is not just about fixing what’s broken on the surface; it’s about understanding and addressing the deeper issues that lead to problems in the first place.

The 5 Whys Technique is like a detective, uncovering the truth behind recurring problems. Let’s take a look at how this method works in two different scenarios.

Case Study: Manufacturing Defects

Imagine a company that keeps encountering the same manufacturing defects despite various attempts to fix them. By using the 5 Whys Technique, they discovered that the defects were not caused by faulty machinery, as previously assumed, but rather by human error due to unclear operating instructions. This realization led to improved training procedures and clear work guidelines, ultimately eliminating the defects.

Application in Service Industry

Now, consider a service industry struggling with frequent customer complaints and service failures. Through the 5 Whys Technique, it was revealed that these issues stemmed from inadequate staffing levels during peak hours. By addressing this root cause, such as hiring additional staff or adjusting schedules, the service quality can significantly improve, leading to higher customer satisfaction.

These examples illustrate how the 5 Whys Technique can be applied across different sectors to identify and address underlying issues effectively.

Step 1: Identify the Problem

Before diving into a 5 Whys analysis, it’s crucial to clearly identify the problem or issue at hand . This step sets the stage for the entire process and ensures that the focus remains on addressing the right concern. Take the time to gather relevant data, observe patterns, and consult with team members or stakeholders to gain a comprehensive understanding of the problem.

Step 2: Ask ‘Why’ Five Times

Once the problem is clearly defined, it’s time to start peeling back the layers. The process involves asking “why” five times, not necessarily limited to five questions but enough to delve deeper into the underlying causes of the problem . Each “why” serves as a gateway to uncovering additional factors contributing to the issue. This iterative approach helps in identifying not just one cause, but multiple interconnected elements that may be at play.

By consistently probing deeper with each “why,” you can reveal hidden complexities and nuances that may have been overlooked initially. This method allows for a more thorough understanding of the situation, paving the way for effective solutions that address root causes rather than surface-level symptoms.

This structured approach encourages critical thinking and enables teams to move beyond quick fixes towards sustainable improvements.

The 5 Whys Technique is a versatile problem-solving approach that can be applied in various scenarios to uncover root causes and drive continuous improvement. Here are two key situations where the 5 Whys Analysis can be particularly beneficial:

Recurring Issues

• The 5 Whys Technique is especially useful when dealing with recurring issues. Whether it’s a manufacturing defect that keeps resurfacing or a persistent customer complaint in the service industry, this method helps identify the underlying reasons behind these repetitive problems. By repeatedly asking “why,” it becomes possible to trace the issue back to its root cause, allowing for targeted solutions that prevent reoccurrence.

Process Improvement

• Organizations constantly strive to enhance their processes and workflows for increased efficiency and quality. When seeking to improve existing procedures, the 5 Whys Technique serves as a valuable tool. By systematically analyzing the factors contributing to inefficiencies or bottlenecks, teams can gain insights into how processes can be optimized at their core. This method enables organizations to make informed decisions about process improvements based on a deep understanding of the underlying issues.

In both cases, the 5 Whys Analysis offers a structured yet flexible approach to delve into complex problems, making it an indispensable tool for driving meaningful change and progress within organizations.

When it comes to conducting a 5 Whys analysis, utilizing a structured template can greatly facilitate the process and ensure a comprehensive investigation into the root cause identification. Using RCA software such as EasyRCA can benefit the team by streamlining your 5-why process. Here’s how organizations can benefit from using a template:

Benefits of Using a Template

• Streamlined Process: A well-designed 5 Whys template provides a clear framework for conducting the analysis, guiding teams through the iterative questioning process. This streamlines the investigation, making it easier to navigate and ensuring that no crucial aspects are overlooked.
• Thorough Investigation: By following a predefined template, teams are prompted to explore various facets of the problem systematically. This ensures that all relevant factors are considered, leading to a more thorough and insightful investigation into the underlying causes.
• Consistent Approach: Templates offer a standardized approach to conducting 5 Whys analyses within an organization. This consistency promotes uniformity in problem-solving methods across different teams or departments, enhancing overall efficiency and effectiveness.

Customizing the Template

Organizations have the flexibility to customize 5 Whys templates according to their specific needs and industry requirements. This adaptability allows for tailoring the template to address unique challenges and incorporate industry-specific considerations. Customization may include:

• Adding Industry-Specific Prompts: Tailoring the template by incorporating prompts or questions relevant to particular industries or types of issues being analyzed.
• Incorporating Visual Aids: Enhancing the template with visual aids such as flow charts or diagrams can help teams better understand and communicate complex causal relationships.
• Iterative Refinement: Regularly reviewing and refining the template based on feedback and evolving organizational needs ensures that it remains aligned with current processes and challenges.

Customizing the template empowers organizations to harness the full potential of the 5 Whys Technique in addressing diverse problems while aligning with their unique operational contexts.

Encouraging Open Communication

In mastering the 5 Whys Technique as a problem-solving method, creating an environment that fosters open communication is paramount. When team members feel comfortable expressing their perspectives and insights, it leads to a more comprehensive exploration of the underlying causes of a problem. Encouraging open communication allows for diverse viewpoints to be considered, providing a holistic understanding of the issue at hand.

By promoting an atmosphere where individuals are empowered to voice their observations and concerns, the 5 Whys analysis can benefit from a rich tapestry of ideas and experiences. This inclusive approach not only enhances the depth of the analysis but also cultivates a sense of ownership and collective responsibility for addressing root causes within the team or organization.

Continuous Improvement Mindset

A key aspect of mastering the 5 Whys Technique is embracing a continuous improvement mindset. Rather than viewing problems as isolated incidents, this approach encourages teams to see them as opportunities for growth and development. By instilling a culture of continuous improvement, organizations can leverage the insights gained from 5 Whys analyzes to drive positive change across various aspects of their operations.

Fostering a mindset focused on continuous improvement entails actively seeking feedback, evaluating processes, and implementing iterative enhancements based on the findings. It involves an ongoing commitment to learning from past experiences and leveraging that knowledge to proactively address potential issues before they escalate. Embracing this mindset ensures that the 5 Whys Technique becomes ingrained in the organizational ethos, leading to sustained progress and resilience in problem-solving efforts.

As we wrap up our exploration of the 5 Whys Technique, let’s address some common questions that may arise regarding this powerful problem-solving method.

What is the primary goal of the 5 Whys Technique?

The primary goal of the 5 Whys Technique is to uncover the root cause of a problem by iteratively asking “why” at least five times. This approach aims to move beyond surface-level symptoms and address the underlying issues that lead to recurring problems.

Is the 5 Whys Technique limited to specific industries or sectors?

No, the 5 Whys Technique is versatile and can be applied across various industries and sectors. Whether it’s manufacturing, healthcare, service, or technology, this method offers a structured yet flexible approach to identifying root causes and driving continuous improvement.

How does the 5 Whys Technique contribute to continuous improvement?

By delving into the fundamental reasons behind problems, the 5 Whys Technique provides organizations with valuable insights for driving continuous improvement. It not only helps in resolving immediate issues but also fosters a culture of ongoing enhancement and development within an organization.

Can the 5 Whys Technique be used for complex problems with multiple contributing factors?

Yes, while initially designed as a simple and straightforward method, the 5 Whys Technique can certainly be applied to complex problems with multiple interconnected factors. By systematically probing deeper into each layer of causality, this technique enables a comprehensive understanding of intricate issues.

I hope you found this guide to 5 whys technique insightful and actionable! Stay tuned for more thought-provoking articles as we continue to share our knowledge. Success is rooted in a thorough understanding and consistent application, and we hope this article was a step in unlocking the full potential of Root Cause Analysis for your organization.

Reliability runs initiatives such as an online learning center focused on the proprietary PROACT® RCA methodology and EasyRCA.com software. For additional resources, visit Reliability Resources .

• Root Cause Analysis /

Recent Posts

5 Root Cause Analysis Examples That Shed Light on Complex Issues

What Is Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)? Definition & Examples

Guide to Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

Root Cause Analysis Software

Our RCA software mobilizes your team to complete standardized RCA’s while giving you the enterprise-wide data you need to increase asset performance and keep your team safe.

Root Cause Analysis Training

[email protected]

Tel: 1 (800) 457-0645

Share article with friends:

How it works

For Business

Join Mind Tools

Article • 11 min read

Getting to the Root of a Problem Quickly

By the Mind Tools Content Team

5 Whys Root-Cause Analysis

Have you ever had a problem that refused to go away? No matter what you did, sooner or later it would return, perhaps in another form.

Stubborn or recurrent problems are often symptoms of deeper issues. "Quick fixes" may seem convenient, but they often solve only the surface issues and waste resources that could otherwise be used to tackle the real cause.

In this article and in the video, below, we look at the 5 Whys technique (sometimes known as 5Y). This is a simple but powerful tool for cutting quickly through the outward symptoms of a problem to reveal its underlying causes – so that you can deal with it once and for all.

Origins of the 5 Whys Technique

Sakichi Toyoda, the Japanese industrialist, inventor, and founder of Toyota Industries, developed the 5 Whys technique in the 1930s. It became popular in the 1970s, and Toyota still uses it to solve problems today.

Toyota has a "go and see" philosophy. This means that its decision making is based on an in-depth understanding of what's actually happening on the shop floor , rather than on what someone in a boardroom thinks might be happening.

The 5 Whys technique is true to this tradition, and it is most effective when the answers come from people who have hands-on experience of the process or problem in question.

The method is remarkably simple: when a problem occurs, you drill down to its root cause by asking "Why?" five times. Then, when a counter-measure becomes apparent, you follow it through to prevent the issue from recurring.

The 5 Whys uses "counter-measures," rather than "solutions." A counter-measure is an action or set of actions that seeks to prevent the problem from arising again, while a solution may just seek to deal with the symptom. As such, counter-measures are more robust, and will more likely prevent the problem from recurring.

When to Use a 5 Whys Analysis

You can use 5 Whys for troubleshooting, quality improvement, and problem solving, but it is most effective when used to resolve simple or moderately difficult problems.

It may not be suitable if you need to tackle a complex or critical problem. This is because 5 Whys can lead you to pursue a single track, or a limited number of tracks, of inquiry when, in fact, there could be multiple causes. In cases like these, a wider-ranging method such as Cause and Effect Analysis or Failure Mode and Effects Analysis may b e more effective.

This simple 5 Whys technique, however, can often direct you quickly to the root cause of a problem. So, whenever a system or process isn't working properly, give it a try before you embark on a more in-depth approach – and certainly before you attempt to develop a solution.

The tool's simplicity gives it great flexibility, too, and 5 Whys combines well with other methods and techniques, such as Root Cause Analysis . It is often associated with Lean Manufacturing , where it is used to identify and eliminate wasteful practices. It is also used in the analysis phase of the Six Sigma quality improvement methodology.

How to Use the 5 Whys

The model follows a very simple seven-step process: [1]

1. Assemble a Team

Gather together people who are familiar with the specifics of the problem, and with the process that you're trying to fix. Include someone to act as a facilitator , who can keep the team focused on identifying effective counter-measures.

2. Define the Problem

If you can, observe the problem in action. Discuss it with your team and write a brief, clear problem statement that you all agree on. For example, "Team A isn't meeting its response time targets" or "Software release B resulted in too many rollback failures."

Then, write your statement on a whiteboard or sticky note, leaving enough space around it to add your answers to the repeated question, "Why?"

3. Ask the First "Why?"

Ask your team why the problem is occurring. (For example, "Why isn't Team A meeting its response time targets?")

Asking "Why?" sounds simple, but answering it requires serious thought. Search for answers that are grounded in fact: they must be accounts of things that have actually happened, not guesses at what might have happened.

This prevents 5 Whys from becoming just a process of deductive reasoning, which can generate a large number of possible causes and, sometimes, create more confusion as you chase down hypothetical problems.

Your team members may come up with one obvious reason why, or several plausible ones. Record their answers as succinct phrases, rather than as single words or lengthy statements, and write them below (or beside) your problem statement. For example, saying "volume of calls is too high" is better than a vague "overloaded."

4. Ask "Why?" Four More Times

For each of the answers that you generated in Step 3, ask four further "whys" in succession. Each time, frame the question in response to the answer you've just recorded.

What Is a 5 Whys Template?

The diagram, below, shows an example of 5 Whys in action, following a single lane of inquiry.

Figure 1: 5 Whys Example (Single Lane)

The 5 Whys method also allows you to follow multiple lanes of inquiry. An example of this is shown in Figure 2, below.

In our example, asking "Why was the delivery late?" produces a second answer (Reason 2). Asking "Why?" for that answer reveals a single reason (Reason 1), which you can address with a counter-measure.

Similarly, asking "Why did the job take longer than expected?" has a second answer (Reason 2), and asking "Why?" at this point reveals a single reason (Reason 1). Another "Why?" here identifies two possibilities (Reasons 1 and 2) before a possible counter-measure becomes evident.

There is also a second reason for "Why we ran out of printer ink" (Reason 2), and a single answer for the next "Why?" (Reason 1), which can then be addressed with a counter-measure.

Figure 2: 5 Whys Example (Multiple Lanes)

Step 5. Know When to Stop

You'll know that you've revealed the root cause of the problem when asking "why" produces no more useful responses, and you can go no further. An appropriate counter-measure or process change should then become evident. (As we said earlier, if you're not sure that you've uncovered the real root cause, consider using a more in-depth problem-solving technique like Cause and Effect Analysis , Root-Cause Analysis , or FMEA .)

If you identified more than one reason in Step 3, repeat this process for each of the different branches of your analysis until you reach a root cause for each one.

6. Address the Root Cause(s)

Now that you've identified at least one root cause, you need to discuss and agree on the counter-measures that will prevent the problem from recurring.

7. Monitor Your Measures

Keep a close watch on how effectively your counter-measures eliminate or minimize the initial problem. You may need to amend them, or replace them entirely. If this happens, it's a good idea to repeat the 5 Whys process to ensure that you've identified the correct root cause.

Appreciation

A similar question-based approach known as "appreciation" can help you to uncover factors in a situation that you might otherwise miss.

It was originally developed by the military to assist commanders in gaining a comprehensive understanding of any fact, problem or situation. But you can also apply it in the workplace.

Starting with a fact, you first ask the question, "So what?" – in other words, what are the implications of that fact? Why is this fact important?

You then continue asking that question until you've drawn all possible conclusions from it.

The major difference between this and the 5 Whys technique is that appreciation is often used to get the most information out of a simple fact or statement, while 5 Whys is designed to drill down to the root of a problem.

Tips for Using the 5 Whys Technique

• Try to move quickly from one question to the next. That way, you'll have the full picture before you jump to any conclusions.
• The "5" in 5 Whys is really just a " rule of thumb ." In some cases, you may need to ask "Why?" a few more times before you get to the root of the problem. In other cases, you may reach this point before you ask your fifth "Why?" If you do, make sure that you haven't stopped too soon, and that you're not simply accepting "knee-jerk" responses.
• Know when to stop! The important point is to stop asking "Why?" when you stop producing useful responses.

Frequently Asked Questions About 5 Whys

1. what is the 5 whys technique.

The 5 Whys Technique is a problem-solving method involving repeatedly asking "why?" It's a way of quickly getting to the root cause of a situation.

2. Who Invented 5 Whys?

The 5 Whys technique was invented in the 1930s by Sakichi Toyoda, the Japanese industrialist, inventor, and founder of Toyota Industries.

5 Whys Infographic

See our infographic on the 5 Whys and use it to get to the root of your problems!

Bear in mind that appreciation can restrict you to one line of thinking. For instance, once you've answered your first "So what?" question, you might follow a single line of inquiry to its conclusion. To avoid this, repeat the appreciation process several times over to make sure that you've covered all bases.

The 5 Whys strategy is a simple, effective tool for uncovering the root of a problem. You can use it in troubleshooting, problem-solving, and quality-improvement initiatives.

Start with a problem and ask why it is occurring. Make sure that your answer is grounded in fact, and then ask the question again. Continue the process until you reach the root cause of the problem, and you can identify a counter-measure that will prevent it from recurring.

Bear in mind that this questioning process is best suited to simple or moderately difficult problems. Complex problems may benefit from a more detailed approach, although using 5 Whys will still give you useful insights.

[1] Pojasek, R. (2000). 'Asking "Why?" Five Times,' Environmental Quality Management , Volume 10, Issue 1, 79–84. Available here . [Accessed July 1, 2022.]

You've accessed 1 of your 2 free resources.

Get unlimited access

Discover more content

Root cause analysis.

Tracing a Problem to Its Origins

Using Root Cause Analysis

Find the Root of Your Problems

Add comment

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment!

Get 30% off your first year of Mind Tools

Great teams begin with empowered leaders. Our tools and resources offer the support to let you flourish into leadership. Join today!

Sign-up to our newsletter

Subscribing to the Mind Tools newsletter will keep you up-to-date with our latest updates and newest resources.

Subscribe now

Business Skills

Personal Development

Leadership and Management

Member Extras

Most Popular

Latest Updates

How to Write a Compelling Cover Letter

How to Use the Inverted-U Model

Mind Tools Store

About Mind Tools Content

Discover something new today

Communicating change.

Effectively Communicate a Change Process for Maximum Success and Minimum Resistance

How to Guides

Getting Things Done When You Are Not in Charge

Geoffrey M Bellman

Book Insights

How Emotionally Intelligent Are You?

Boosting Your People Skills

Self-Assessment

What's Your Leadership Style?

Learn About the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Way You Like to Lead

Recommended for you

Managing in a matrix organization.

Collaborating with Other Managers

Business Operations and Process Management

Strategy Tools

Customer Service

Business Ethics and Values

Handling Information and Data

Project Management

Knowledge Management

Self-Development and Goal Setting

Time Management

Presentation Skills

Learning Skills

Career Skills

Communication Skills

Negotiation, Persuasion and Influence

Working With Others

Difficult Conversations

Creativity Tools

Self-Management

Work-Life Balance

Stress Management and Wellbeing

Coaching and Mentoring

Change Management

Team Management

Managing Conflict

Delegation and Empowerment

Performance Management

Leadership Skills

Developing Your Team

Talent Management

Problem Solving

Decision Making

Member Podcast

Benefits of Root Cause Analysis

Clearer thinking, better planning, effective goal-setting, improved communication and swifter fault-resolution. what can sologic rca deliver for you.

The 5 Whys strategy involves looking at any problem and asking: “Why?” and “What caused this problem?” Very often, the answer to the first “why” will prompt another “why” and the answer to the second “why” will prompt another and so on; hence the name the 5 Whys strategy.

The 5 Whys exercise is vastly improved when applied by a team and there are five basic steps to conducting it:

• Write down the specific problem. Writing the issue helps you formalize the problem and describe it completely. It also helps a team focus on the same problem.
• Ask “Why” the problem happens and write the answer down below the problem.
• If the answer you just provided doesn’t identify the root cause of the problem that you wrote down in Step 1, ask “Why” again and write that answer down.
• Loopback to step 3 until the team is in agreement that the problem’s root cause is identified. Again, this may take fewer or more times than five Whys.
• After settling on the most probable root cause of the problem and obtaining confirmation of the logic behind the analysis, develop appropriate corrective actions to remove the root cause from the system.

Edit this Diagram

5 Whys Example

The vehicle will not start. (The problem)

• Why? – The battery is dead. (First why)
• Why? – The alternator is not functioning. (Second why)
• Why? – The alternator belt has broken. (Third why)
• Why? – The alternator belt was well beyond its useful service life and not replaced. (Fourth why)
• Why? – The vehicle was not maintained according to the recommended service schedule. (Fifth why, a root cause)

Note: A 5 Whys analysis sometime could be taken further to a sixth, seventh, or higher level, but five iterations of asking why are generally sufficient to get to a root cause.

5-Whys Criticisms

Here are each of the criticisms as listed on the Wikipedia:

• Stopping at symptoms, not the root cause
• Limited by the investigator’s knowledge.
• Not asking the right Why questions.
• Not repeatable – Different people build different 5 Whys.
• The tendency to isolate a single root cause

©2024 by Visual Paradigm. All rights reserved.

• Terms of Service
• Privacy Policy
• Security Overview

Lean Six Sigma Training Certification

• Facebook Instagram Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
• (877) 497-4462

Is/Is Not Analysis: A Powerful Problem-Solving Technique for Peak Performance

May 15th, 2024

Businesses face all kinds of hurdles slowing progress and threatening success. From grindingly slow workflows to quality glitches, these problems spread damage far if left unaddressed.

But with the right problem-solving styles, companies can pinpoint what’s causing trouble and implement fixes well.

One such method earning its stripes across industries everywhere is “Is/Is Not Analysis”.

It provides a methodical way for teams to sharply define issues while excluding what they’re not.

Doing so eliminates vagueness, prevents scope creep, and guarantees efforts target the actual problem.

Whether handling complex engineering puzzles or streamlining company processes, Is/Is Not Analysis has time and again proven hugely useful in my problem-crushing toolkit.

Key Highlights

• A thorough understanding of what the Is/Is Not Analysis is and how it fits into the broader problem-solving framework.
• The numerous benefits of using this technique, such as enhanced focus and clarity, improved team alignment, effective scope management, better communication, and robust decision-making.
• A step-by-step guide on how to conduct an “Is/Is Not Analysis”, from describing the problem to formulating a concise problem statement.
• Insights into the wide-ranging applications of this analysis across various domains.
• An example demonstrating the application of the Is/Is Not Analysis in a manufacturing context, addressing the issue of machine downtime, and highlighting the process of comparative analysis and problem statement formulation.
• Industry-specific terminology, technical insights, and best practices drawn from my extensive experience working with Lean Six Sigma methodologies.

What is an Is/Is Not Analysis?

The Is/Is Not Analysis is a powerful problem-solving technique that brings clarity and focus to complex situations.

This method is an invaluable asset in my toolkit, enabling me to tackle intricate challenges across a wide range of industries and domains.

Problem-solving technique

The Is/Is Not Analysis is a systematic approach that guides teams through the process of precisely defining the scope of a problem.

Breaking down the issue into two distinct components – what the problem “is” and what it “is not” – allows you to isolate the core elements that require attention while filtering out extraneous factors that may distract or derail your efforts.

Scope definition with Is/Is Not Analysis

One of the primary benefits of this analysis is its ability to establish clear boundaries and parameters around the problem at hand.

By explicitly stating what falls within the scope of the issue and what lies outside of it, you can prevent scope creep and ensure that your team remains focused on the most relevant aspects.

This not only streamlines the problem-solving process but also optimizes the allocation of resources, directing them toward the areas that truly matter.

Structured problem-solving approach

The Is/Is Not Analysis is a structured and systematic approach that follows a well-defined set of steps. It begins with a detailed description of the problem, followed by the identification of what the problem “is” and what it “is not”.

This process involves gathering data, analyzing information, and leveraging templates to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the situation.

This problem-solving technique seamlessly integrates into the widely adopted DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) methodology, which is a cornerstone of Lean Six Sigma practices.

The Is/Is Not Analysis plays a crucial role in the “ Define ” phase, where it helps teams precisely articulate the problem they are addressing, setting the stage for subsequent phases of measurement, analysis, improvement, and control.

Is vs. Is Not Matrix

To facilitate the analysis, a commonly used tool is the “Is vs. Is Not” matrix, which is a tabular representation that contrasts the elements that fall within the scope of the problem (“Is”) with those that do not (“Is Not”).

This visual aid not only enhances understanding but also serves as a reference point throughout the problem-solving journey, ensuring that the team remains aligned and focused on the defined objectives.

Benefits of Using an Is/Is Not Analysis

The Is/Is Not Analysis can have on problem-solving endeavors.

This versatile technique offers a multitude of benefits that not only enhance the effectiveness of the problem-solving process but also foster a more collaborative and efficient team dynamic.

Focus and clarity

One of the primary advantages of the Is/Is Not Analysis is its ability to bring laser-sharp focus and clarity to even the most complex challenges.

By meticulously delineating what the problem is and what it is not, this approach eliminates ambiguity and ensures that all team members are operating with a shared understanding of the issue at hand.

This shared clarity of purpose is a powerful catalyst for efficient and targeted problem-solving efforts.

Team alignment

In my experience, one of the biggest hurdles in tackling complex problems is achieving true alignment among team members.

The Is/Is Not Analysis serves as a unifying force, fostering a collaborative environment where everyone is working towards the same clearly defined objectives.

Scope management

Effective scope management is crucial in any problem-solving endeavor, as it prevents resources from being diluted across irrelevant areas.

The Is/Is Not Analysis excels in this regard, as it establishes precise boundaries around the problem, delineating what aspects fall within the scope and what lies outside of it.

Communication enhancement

Clear and effective communication is the lifeblood of any successful problem-solving initiative. By providing a structured framework for defining the problem, the Is/Is Not Analysis enhances communication within the team and across stakeholder groups.

The visual representation of the problem’s scope, often through the use of matrices or templates, facilitates a common understanding and streamlines the dissemination of information, ensuring that everyone is working towards the same goals.

Problem definition

At the heart of the Is/Is Not Analysis lies a robust problem definition process.

By breaking down complex issues into manageable components and identifying the specific characteristics and boundaries of the problem, this technique lays a solid foundation for comprehensive problem-solving efforts.

A well-defined problem statement is a critical first step towards finding effective solutions.

Boundary setting

In addition to defining the problem’s scope, the Is/Is Not Analysis also plays a crucial role in setting boundaries for the problem-solving effort.

By explicitly stating what falls outside the scope of the issue, this technique helps teams avoid getting sidetracked by tangential or irrelevant factors, ensuring that their focus remains unwavering on the core problem at hand.

Risk identification

Another valuable benefit of the Is/Is Not Analysis is its ability to identify potential risks or areas that might otherwise be overlooked.

This proactive approach allows for the development of effective risk mitigation strategies, enhancing the overall success of the initiative.

Decision-making

Informed decision-making is a critical component of any successful problem-solving effort. The Is/Is Not Analysis supports this process by providing a clear and comprehensive picture of the situation.

By understanding what is within the scope and what lies outside of it, teams can make well-informed decisions regarding resource allocation, action prioritization, and appropriate solutions.

Continuous improvement

The Is/Is Not Analysis is not a one-time exercise but rather a continuous improvement tool. As teams gain insights and lessons learned throughout the problem-solving journey, they can refine and update their understanding of what the problem “is” and “is not”.

This iterative process allows for ongoing optimization and ensures that solutions remain relevant and effective over time.

Documentation

Finally, the Is/Is Not Analysis provides a documented record of the problem’s scope and boundaries. 

This documentation serves as a valuable reference not only for the current problem-solving initiative but also for future projects or audits.

It ensures that the rationale behind decisions and the parameters of the problem are captured, facilitating knowledge transfer and enabling continuous learning within the organization.

How to Conduct an Is/Is Not Analysis

While the specifics may vary depending on the nature of the problem and the industry, there is a well-established framework that has proven effective time and time again.

Describe the problem

The first step in any successful Is/Is Not Analysis is to provide a detailed description of the problem at hand. This involves more than simply stating what the issue is; it requires a comprehensive understanding of the symptoms, consequences, and impact of the problem.

During this stage, it is crucial to gather as much relevant data and information as possible, ensuring that the problem is thoroughly documented and free from assumptions or proposed solutions.

Identify the “Is”

With a clear understanding of the problem in place, the next step is to identify what the problem “is”.

This involves documenting the specific characteristics, actions, behaviors, or outcomes that are considered problematic.

Template-based analysis with Is/Is Not Analysis

To facilitate this process, I often recommend the use of templates or matrices that allow teams to visually organize and contrast the “Is” and “Is Not” elements.

One popular approach is the “Is vs. Is Not” matrix, which provides a tabular representation that delineates the problem’s scope.

These templates enhance understanding and serve as a reference point throughout the analysis, ensuring consistency and alignment among team members.

Identify the “Is Not”

Once the “Is” elements have been defined, it is equally important to identify what the problem “is not”.

This step involves considering what one would expect to happen in the absence of the problem, as well as determining the locations, timeframes, and conditions where the issue does not occur.

Compare and contrast

With the “Is” and “Is Not” elements clearly defined, the next step is to compare and contrast the information collected.

This comparative analysis can reveal patterns, inconsistencies, or discrepancies that may point to potential root causes or contributing factors. It is during this stage that the true value of the Is/Is Not Analysis becomes apparent, as teams can begin to pinpoint the areas that require the most attention.

Data analysis with Is/Is Not Analysis

Throughout the Is/Is Not Analysis process, data plays a crucial role in informing and guiding the team’s efforts.

Narrow down the scope

Armed with the insights gained from the comparative analysis and data analysis, teams can begin to narrow down the scope of the problem.

This may involve discarding certain aspects that are not central to the issue or focusing on areas that have the most significant impact.

The goal is to create a refined view of the problem that can be effectively addressed through targeted solutions.

Formulate the problem statement with Is/Is Not Analysis

The culmination of the Is/Is Not Analysis process is the formulation of a concise and well-defined problem statement. This statement should incorporate all relevant “Is” and “Is Not” factors while being specific, measurable, and verifiable.

A clear problem statement sets the boundaries for what will (and will not) be addressed in the subsequent problem-solving efforts, ensuring that teams remain focused and on track throughout the journey.

Applications of Is/Is Not Analysis

This versatile technique has proven its value time and again, transcending boundaries and demonstrating its applicability in numerous contexts.

Project management

The Is/Is Not Analysis is an invaluable tool in the realm of project management .

By clearly defining the scope of a project and delineating what tasks and objectives are included (and excluded), this technique ensures that resources are allocated effectively and that efforts remain focused on the most critical elements.

Whether managing large-scale initiatives or smaller-scale endeavors, the Is/Is Not Analysis provides a structured framework for aligning stakeholders, setting boundaries, and mitigating the risk of scope creep.

Business analysis

In the dynamic world of business, organizations often face complex challenges that require a deep understanding of the underlying issues.

The Is/Is Not Analysis is a powerful ally in this regard, enabling business analysts to define precisely the scope of a problem or opportunity.

Product development with Is/Is Not Analysis

Whether developing tangible products or crafting innovative services, the Is/Is Not Analysis can play a crucial role in defining requirements and setting boundaries.

Quality management

By defining what constitutes quality (and what does not), this technique provides a solid foundation for developing effective quality control processes and procedures.

Whether assessing the quality of a product, service, or process, the Is/Is Not Analysis ensures that efforts are targeted and that resources are allocated appropriately, ultimately driving continuous improvement and customer satisfaction.

Requirements gathering

Effective requirements gathering is critical to the success of any project or initiative, and the Is/Is Not Analysis is an invaluable tool in this regard.

Root cause analysis and Is/Is Not Analysis

When faced with complex problems, identifying the root cause is often the most challenging and critical step.

The Is/Is Not Analysis provides a structured approach to unraveling these intricacies, by systematically separating the core issues from peripheral factors.

Environmental impact assessment

Companies must carefully consider the potential impact of their operations and projects on the natural world.

The Is/Is Not Analysis can be a powerful tool in this regard, enabling teams to clearly define the scope of an environmental assessment and delineate what factors should be considered.

Conflict resolution

Conflicts, whether interpersonal or organizational, often stem from a lack of clear understanding and alignment.

The Is/Is Not Analysis can be a valuable asset in resolving such conflicts by providing a structured framework for defining the issues at hand and separating them from extraneous factors.

By clarifying what the conflict “is” and what it “is not”, teams can focus their efforts on addressing the core points of contention, facilitating effective communication, and paving the way for resolution.

Goal setting with Is/Is Not Analysis

Whether setting personal or organizational goals, the Is/Is Not Analysis can be a powerful tool for ensuring clarity and focus.

Defining what goals should be pursued (and what should be excluded), individuals and teams can align their efforts and allocate resources effectively.

Personal development

Beyond its applications in professional settings, the Is/Is Not Analysis can also be a valuable tool for personal growth and development.

This structured approach can help individuals prioritize their efforts, overcome obstacles, and achieve their desired outcomes more effectively.

Lean Six Sigma

This technique aligns perfectly with the core tenets of these philosophies, such as continuous improvement, waste elimination , and data-driven decision-making .

An Example of Is/Is Not Analysis for Machine Downtime

To illustrate the practical application of the “Is/Is Not Analysis”, let us consider a real-world example from the manufacturing sector.

In this scenario, a company is grappling with the issue of unexpected machine downtime, which is negatively impacting productivity and delivery times.

Problem description

The initial step in the Is/Is Not Analysis is to provide a detailed description of the problem. In this case, the issue is unscheduled machine downtime, which results in machines stopping unexpectedly and requiring maintenance.

This downtime is reported to occur specifically on Line 1, which handles a portion of the production process.

“Is” analysis

Next, the team identifies the “Is” elements of the problem. They note that the machine downtime is occurring on Line 1, particularly during the third shift (11 PM to 7 AM).

“Is Not” analysis

In contrast, the team observes that the downtime is not occurring on Lines 2 and 3, indicating that the issue may be isolated to factors unique to Line 1, such as equipment, personnel, or processes.

Comparative analysis

By comparing and contrasting the “Is” and “Is Not” elements, the team can start to pinpoint potential root causes.

For instance, the fact that the issue is specific to Product A and not Products B or C could indicate that the problem is related to the machinery’s configuration, the complexity of Product A, or the raw materials used.

Problem statement formulation

Armed with these insights, the team can formulate a concise and well-defined problem statement:

During the third shift, Line 1 experiences an increase in machine downtime, specifically when running Product A, leading to production delays.

This issue does not occur during the first or second shifts, nor does it affect Lines 2 and 3 when running Products B or C”.

Next steps: Root cause analysis

With a clear problem statement in place, the team can now proceed to a focused root cause analysis, investigating potential factors such as:

• Specific differences in the setup for Product A versus Products B and C
• Environmental and operational conditions of Line 1 during the third shift
• Training, expertise, and fatigue levels of third-shift staff compared to other shifts

Is/Is Not Analysis has proven its worth across countless industries and uses. Whether handling complex engineering puzzles, smoothing company workflows, or fueling constant upgrades, it provides an organized style framing issues while distinguishing main problems from extra factors.

As you start leveraging “Is/Is Not Analysis”, remember to embrace an organized, fact-based method. Foster teamwork and agreement between all involved. Also, stay committed to constant learning and perfecting your approach.

With determination and truly grasping this mighty technique, you too can break into new levels of problem-solving success. You’ll power transformative change within your work or personal goals.

My hope is you feel equipped to maximize every tool in your toolkit. With Is/Is Not Analysis helping sharpen your problem-solving focus, countless opportunities now come clearly into view. Take what you’ve learned and change the game!

SixSigma.us offers both Live Virtual classes as well as Online Self-Paced training. Most option includes access to the same great Master Black Belt instructors that teach our World Class in-person sessions. Sign-up today!

Virtual Classroom Training Programs Self-Paced Online Training Programs

SixSigma.us Accreditation & Affiliations

Monthly Management Tips

• Be the first one to receive the latest updates and information from 6Sigma
• Get curated resources from industry-experts
• Gain an edge with complete guides and other exclusive materials
• Become a part of one of the largest Six Sigma community
• Unlock your path to become a Six Sigma professional

" * " indicates required fields