data gathering in thesis example

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Methodology
• Data Collection Methods | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples

Data Collection Methods | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples

Published on 4 May 2022 by Pritha Bhandari .

Data collection is a systematic process of gathering observations or measurements. Whether you are performing research for business, governmental, or academic purposes, data collection allows you to gain first-hand knowledge and original insights into your research problem .

While methods and aims may differ between fields, the overall process of data collection remains largely the same. Before you begin collecting data, you need to consider:

• The  aim of the research
• The type of data that you will collect
• The methods and procedures you will use to collect, store, and process the data

To collect high-quality data that is relevant to your purposes, follow these four steps.

Table of contents

Step 1: define the aim of your research, step 2: choose your data collection method, step 3: plan your data collection procedures, step 4: collect the data, frequently asked questions about data collection.

Before you start the process of data collection, you need to identify exactly what you want to achieve. You can start by writing a problem statement : what is the practical or scientific issue that you want to address, and why does it matter?

Next, formulate one or more research questions that precisely define what you want to find out. Depending on your research questions, you might need to collect quantitative or qualitative data :

• Quantitative data is expressed in numbers and graphs and is analysed through statistical methods .
• Qualitative data is expressed in words and analysed through interpretations and categorisations.

If your aim is to test a hypothesis , measure something precisely, or gain large-scale statistical insights, collect quantitative data. If your aim is to explore ideas, understand experiences, or gain detailed insights into a specific context, collect qualitative data.

If you have several aims, you can use a mixed methods approach that collects both types of data.

• Your first aim is to assess whether there are significant differences in perceptions of managers across different departments and office locations.
• Your second aim is to gather meaningful feedback from employees to explore new ideas for how managers can improve.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Based on the data you want to collect, decide which method is best suited for your research.

• Experimental research is primarily a quantitative method.
• Interviews , focus groups , and ethnographies are qualitative methods.
• Surveys , observations, archival research, and secondary data collection can be quantitative or qualitative methods.

Carefully consider what method you will use to gather data that helps you directly answer your research questions.

When you know which method(s) you are using, you need to plan exactly how you will implement them. What procedures will you follow to make accurate observations or measurements of the variables you are interested in?

For instance, if you’re conducting surveys or interviews, decide what form the questions will take; if you’re conducting an experiment, make decisions about your experimental design .

Operationalisation

Sometimes your variables can be measured directly: for example, you can collect data on the average age of employees simply by asking for dates of birth. However, often you’ll be interested in collecting data on more abstract concepts or variables that can’t be directly observed.

Operationalisation means turning abstract conceptual ideas into measurable observations. When planning how you will collect data, you need to translate the conceptual definition of what you want to study into the operational definition of what you will actually measure.

• You ask managers to rate their own leadership skills on 5-point scales assessing the ability to delegate, decisiveness, and dependability.
• You ask their direct employees to provide anonymous feedback on the managers regarding the same topics.

You may need to develop a sampling plan to obtain data systematically. This involves defining a population , the group you want to draw conclusions about, and a sample, the group you will actually collect data from.

Your sampling method will determine how you recruit participants or obtain measurements for your study. To decide on a sampling method you will need to consider factors like the required sample size, accessibility of the sample, and time frame of the data collection.

Standardising procedures

If multiple researchers are involved, write a detailed manual to standardise data collection procedures in your study.

This means laying out specific step-by-step instructions so that everyone in your research team collects data in a consistent way – for example, by conducting experiments under the same conditions and using objective criteria to record and categorise observations.

This helps ensure the reliability of your data, and you can also use it to replicate the study in the future.

Creating a data management plan

Before beginning data collection, you should also decide how you will organise and store your data.

• If you are collecting data from people, you will likely need to anonymise and safeguard the data to prevent leaks of sensitive information (e.g. names or identity numbers).
• If you are collecting data via interviews or pencil-and-paper formats, you will need to perform transcriptions or data entry in systematic ways to minimise distortion.
• You can prevent loss of data by having an organisation system that is routinely backed up.

Finally, you can implement your chosen methods to measure or observe the variables you are interested in.

The closed-ended questions ask participants to rate their manager’s leadership skills on scales from 1 to 5. The data produced is numerical and can be statistically analysed for averages and patterns.

To ensure that high-quality data is recorded in a systematic way, here are some best practices:

• Record all relevant information as and when you obtain data. For example, note down whether or how lab equipment is recalibrated during an experimental study.
• Double-check manual data entry for errors.
• If you collect quantitative data, you can assess the reliability and validity to get an indication of your data quality.

Data collection is the systematic process by which observations or measurements are gathered in research. It is used in many different contexts by academics, governments, businesses, and other organisations.

When conducting research, collecting original data has significant advantages:

• You can tailor data collection to your specific research aims (e.g., understanding the needs of your consumers or user testing your website).
• You can control and standardise the process for high reliability and validity (e.g., choosing appropriate measurements and sampling methods ).

However, there are also some drawbacks: data collection can be time-consuming, labour-intensive, and expensive. In some cases, it’s more efficient to use secondary data that has already been collected by someone else, but the data might be less reliable.

Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.

Quantitative methods allow you to test a hypothesis by systematically collecting and analysing data, while qualitative methods allow you to explore ideas and experiences in depth.

Reliability and validity are both about how well a method measures something:

• Reliability refers to the  consistency of a measure (whether the results can be reproduced under the same conditions).
• Validity   refers to the  accuracy of a measure (whether the results really do represent what they are supposed to measure).

If you are doing experimental research , you also have to consider the internal and external validity of your experiment.

In mixed methods research , you use both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods to answer your research question .

Operationalisation means turning abstract conceptual ideas into measurable observations.

For example, the concept of social anxiety isn’t directly observable, but it can be operationally defined in terms of self-rating scores, behavioural avoidance of crowded places, or physical anxiety symptoms in social situations.

Before collecting data , it’s important to consider how you will operationalise the variables that you want to measure.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

Bhandari, P. (2022, May 04). Data Collection Methods | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 10 June 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/data-collection-guide/

Is this article helpful?

Pritha Bhandari

Other students also liked, qualitative vs quantitative research | examples & methods, triangulation in research | guide, types, examples, what is a conceptual framework | tips & examples.

Reference management. Clean and simple.

How to collect data for your thesis

Collecting theoretical data

Search for theses on your topic, use content-sharing platforms, collecting empirical data, qualitative vs. quantitative data, frequently asked questions about gathering data for your thesis, related articles.

After choosing a topic for your thesis , you’ll need to start gathering data. In this article, we focus on how to effectively collect theoretical and empirical data.

Empirical data : unique research that may be quantitative, qualitative, or mixed.

Theoretical data : secondary, scholarly sources like books and journal articles that provide theoretical context for your research.

Thesis : the culminating, multi-chapter project for a bachelor’s, master’s, or doctoral degree.

Qualitative data : info that cannot be measured, like observations and interviews .

Quantitative data : info that can be measured and written with numbers.

At this point in your academic life, you are already acquainted with the ways of finding potential references. Some obvious sources of theoretical material are:

• edited volumes
• conference proceedings
• online databases like Google Scholar , ERIC , or Scopus

You can also take a look at the top list of academic search engines .

Looking at other theses on your topic can help you see what approaches have been taken and what aspects other writers have focused on. Pay close attention to the list of references and follow the bread-crumbs back to the original theories and specialized authors.

Another method for gathering theoretical data is to read through content-sharing platforms. Many people share their papers and writings on these sites. You can either hunt sources, get some inspiration for your own work or even learn new angles of your topic. 

Some popular content sharing sites are:

With these sites, you have to check the credibility of the sources. You can usually rely on the content, but we recommend double-checking just to be sure. Take a look at our guide on what are credible sources?

The more you know, the better. The guide, " How to undertake a literature search and review for dissertations and final year projects ," will give you all the tools needed for finding literature .

In order to successfully collect empirical data, you have to choose first what type of data you want as an outcome. There are essentially two options, qualitative or quantitative data. Many people mistake one term with the other, so it’s important to understand the differences between qualitative and quantitative research .

Boiled down, qualitative data means words and quantitative means numbers. Both types are considered primary sources . Whichever one adapts best to your research will define the type of methodology to carry out, so choose wisely.

In the end, having in mind what type of outcome you intend and how much time you count on will lead you to choose the best type of empirical data for your research. For a detailed description of each methodology type mentioned above, read more about collecting data .

Once you gather enough theoretical and empirical data, you will need to start writing. But before the actual writing part, you have to structure your thesis to avoid getting lost in the sea of information. Take a look at our guide on how to structure your thesis for some tips and tricks.

The key to knowing what type of data you should collect for your thesis is knowing in advance the type of outcome you intend to have, and the amount of time you count with.

Some obvious sources of theoretical material are journals, libraries and online databases like Google Scholar , ERIC or Scopus , or take a look at the top list of academic search engines . You can also search for theses on your topic or read content sharing platforms, like Medium , Issuu , or Slideshare .

To gather empirical data, you have to choose first what type of data you want. There are two options, qualitative or quantitative data. You can gather data through observations, interviews, focus groups, or with surveys, tests, and existing databases.

Qualitative data means words, information that cannot be measured. It may involve multimedia material or non-textual data. This type of data claims to be detailed, nuanced and contextual.

Quantitative data means numbers, information that can be measured and written with numbers. This type of data claims to be credible, scientific and exact.

• Privacy Policy

Home » Data Collection – Methods Types and Examples

Data Collection – Methods Types and Examples

Table of Contents

Data Collection

Definition:

Data collection is the process of gathering and collecting information from various sources to analyze and make informed decisions based on the data collected. This can involve various methods, such as surveys, interviews, experiments, and observation.

In order for data collection to be effective, it is important to have a clear understanding of what data is needed and what the purpose of the data collection is. This can involve identifying the population or sample being studied, determining the variables to be measured, and selecting appropriate methods for collecting and recording data.

Types of Data Collection

Types of Data Collection are as follows:

Primary Data Collection

Primary data collection is the process of gathering original and firsthand information directly from the source or target population. This type of data collection involves collecting data that has not been previously gathered, recorded, or published. Primary data can be collected through various methods such as surveys, interviews, observations, experiments, and focus groups. The data collected is usually specific to the research question or objective and can provide valuable insights that cannot be obtained from secondary data sources. Primary data collection is often used in market research, social research, and scientific research.

Secondary Data Collection

Secondary data collection is the process of gathering information from existing sources that have already been collected and analyzed by someone else, rather than conducting new research to collect primary data. Secondary data can be collected from various sources, such as published reports, books, journals, newspapers, websites, government publications, and other documents.

Qualitative Data Collection

Qualitative data collection is used to gather non-numerical data such as opinions, experiences, perceptions, and feelings, through techniques such as interviews, focus groups, observations, and document analysis. It seeks to understand the deeper meaning and context of a phenomenon or situation and is often used in social sciences, psychology, and humanities. Qualitative data collection methods allow for a more in-depth and holistic exploration of research questions and can provide rich and nuanced insights into human behavior and experiences.

Quantitative Data Collection

Quantitative data collection is a used to gather numerical data that can be analyzed using statistical methods. This data is typically collected through surveys, experiments, and other structured data collection methods. Quantitative data collection seeks to quantify and measure variables, such as behaviors, attitudes, and opinions, in a systematic and objective way. This data is often used to test hypotheses, identify patterns, and establish correlations between variables. Quantitative data collection methods allow for precise measurement and generalization of findings to a larger population. It is commonly used in fields such as economics, psychology, and natural sciences.

Data Collection Methods

Data Collection Methods are as follows:

Surveys involve asking questions to a sample of individuals or organizations to collect data. Surveys can be conducted in person, over the phone, or online.

Interviews involve a one-on-one conversation between the interviewer and the respondent. Interviews can be structured or unstructured and can be conducted in person or over the phone.

Focus Groups

Focus groups are group discussions that are moderated by a facilitator. Focus groups are used to collect qualitative data on a specific topic.

Observation

Observation involves watching and recording the behavior of people, objects, or events in their natural setting. Observation can be done overtly or covertly, depending on the research question.

Experiments

Experiments involve manipulating one or more variables and observing the effect on another variable. Experiments are commonly used in scientific research.

Case Studies

Case studies involve in-depth analysis of a single individual, organization, or event. Case studies are used to gain detailed information about a specific phenomenon.

Secondary Data Analysis

Secondary data analysis involves using existing data that was collected for another purpose. Secondary data can come from various sources, such as government agencies, academic institutions, or private companies.

How to Collect Data

The following are some steps to consider when collecting data:

• Define the objective : Before you start collecting data, you need to define the objective of the study. This will help you determine what data you need to collect and how to collect it.
• Identify the data sources : Identify the sources of data that will help you achieve your objective. These sources can be primary sources, such as surveys, interviews, and observations, or secondary sources, such as books, articles, and databases.
• Determine the data collection method : Once you have identified the data sources, you need to determine the data collection method. This could be through online surveys, phone interviews, or face-to-face meetings.
• Develop a data collection plan : Develop a plan that outlines the steps you will take to collect the data. This plan should include the timeline, the tools and equipment needed, and the personnel involved.
• Test the data collection process: Before you start collecting data, test the data collection process to ensure that it is effective and efficient.
• Collect the data: Collect the data according to the plan you developed in step 4. Make sure you record the data accurately and consistently.
• Analyze the data: Once you have collected the data, analyze it to draw conclusions and make recommendations.
• Report the findings: Report the findings of your data analysis to the relevant stakeholders. This could be in the form of a report, a presentation, or a publication.
• Monitor and evaluate the data collection process: After the data collection process is complete, monitor and evaluate the process to identify areas for improvement in future data collection efforts.
• Ensure data quality: Ensure that the collected data is of high quality and free from errors. This can be achieved by validating the data for accuracy, completeness, and consistency.
• Maintain data security: Ensure that the collected data is secure and protected from unauthorized access or disclosure. This can be achieved by implementing data security protocols and using secure storage and transmission methods.
• Follow ethical considerations: Follow ethical considerations when collecting data, such as obtaining informed consent from participants, protecting their privacy and confidentiality, and ensuring that the research does not cause harm to participants.
• Use appropriate data analysis methods : Use appropriate data analysis methods based on the type of data collected and the research objectives. This could include statistical analysis, qualitative analysis, or a combination of both.
• Record and store data properly: Record and store the collected data properly, in a structured and organized format. This will make it easier to retrieve and use the data in future research or analysis.
• Collaborate with other stakeholders : Collaborate with other stakeholders, such as colleagues, experts, or community members, to ensure that the data collected is relevant and useful for the intended purpose.

Applications of Data Collection

Data collection methods are widely used in different fields, including social sciences, healthcare, business, education, and more. Here are some examples of how data collection methods are used in different fields:

• Social sciences : Social scientists often use surveys, questionnaires, and interviews to collect data from individuals or groups. They may also use observation to collect data on social behaviors and interactions. This data is often used to study topics such as human behavior, attitudes, and beliefs.
• Healthcare : Data collection methods are used in healthcare to monitor patient health and track treatment outcomes. Electronic health records and medical charts are commonly used to collect data on patients’ medical history, diagnoses, and treatments. Researchers may also use clinical trials and surveys to collect data on the effectiveness of different treatments.
• Business : Businesses use data collection methods to gather information on consumer behavior, market trends, and competitor activity. They may collect data through customer surveys, sales reports, and market research studies. This data is used to inform business decisions, develop marketing strategies, and improve products and services.
• Education : In education, data collection methods are used to assess student performance and measure the effectiveness of teaching methods. Standardized tests, quizzes, and exams are commonly used to collect data on student learning outcomes. Teachers may also use classroom observation and student feedback to gather data on teaching effectiveness.
• Agriculture : Farmers use data collection methods to monitor crop growth and health. Sensors and remote sensing technology can be used to collect data on soil moisture, temperature, and nutrient levels. This data is used to optimize crop yields and minimize waste.
• Environmental sciences : Environmental scientists use data collection methods to monitor air and water quality, track climate patterns, and measure the impact of human activity on the environment. They may use sensors, satellite imagery, and laboratory analysis to collect data on environmental factors.
• Transportation : Transportation companies use data collection methods to track vehicle performance, optimize routes, and improve safety. GPS systems, on-board sensors, and other tracking technologies are used to collect data on vehicle speed, fuel consumption, and driver behavior.

Examples of Data Collection

Examples of Data Collection are as follows:

• Traffic Monitoring: Cities collect real-time data on traffic patterns and congestion through sensors on roads and cameras at intersections. This information can be used to optimize traffic flow and improve safety.
• Social Media Monitoring : Companies can collect real-time data on social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook to monitor their brand reputation, track customer sentiment, and respond to customer inquiries and complaints in real-time.
• Weather Monitoring: Weather agencies collect real-time data on temperature, humidity, air pressure, and precipitation through weather stations and satellites. This information is used to provide accurate weather forecasts and warnings.
• Stock Market Monitoring : Financial institutions collect real-time data on stock prices, trading volumes, and other market indicators to make informed investment decisions and respond to market fluctuations in real-time.
• Health Monitoring : Medical devices such as wearable fitness trackers and smartwatches can collect real-time data on a person’s heart rate, blood pressure, and other vital signs. This information can be used to monitor health conditions and detect early warning signs of health issues.

Purpose of Data Collection

The purpose of data collection can vary depending on the context and goals of the study, but generally, it serves to:

• Provide information: Data collection provides information about a particular phenomenon or behavior that can be used to better understand it.
• Measure progress : Data collection can be used to measure the effectiveness of interventions or programs designed to address a particular issue or problem.
• Support decision-making : Data collection provides decision-makers with evidence-based information that can be used to inform policies, strategies, and actions.
• Identify trends : Data collection can help identify trends and patterns over time that may indicate changes in behaviors or outcomes.
• Monitor and evaluate : Data collection can be used to monitor and evaluate the implementation and impact of policies, programs, and initiatives.

When to use Data Collection

Data collection is used when there is a need to gather information or data on a specific topic or phenomenon. It is typically used in research, evaluation, and monitoring and is important for making informed decisions and improving outcomes.

Data collection is particularly useful in the following scenarios:

• Research : When conducting research, data collection is used to gather information on variables of interest to answer research questions and test hypotheses.
• Evaluation : Data collection is used in program evaluation to assess the effectiveness of programs or interventions, and to identify areas for improvement.
• Monitoring : Data collection is used in monitoring to track progress towards achieving goals or targets, and to identify any areas that require attention.
• Decision-making: Data collection is used to provide decision-makers with information that can be used to inform policies, strategies, and actions.
• Quality improvement : Data collection is used in quality improvement efforts to identify areas where improvements can be made and to measure progress towards achieving goals.

Characteristics of Data Collection

Data collection can be characterized by several important characteristics that help to ensure the quality and accuracy of the data gathered. These characteristics include:

• Validity : Validity refers to the accuracy and relevance of the data collected in relation to the research question or objective.
• Reliability : Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of the data collection process, ensuring that the results obtained are consistent over time and across different contexts.
• Objectivity : Objectivity refers to the impartiality of the data collection process, ensuring that the data collected is not influenced by the biases or personal opinions of the data collector.
• Precision : Precision refers to the degree of accuracy and detail in the data collected, ensuring that the data is specific and accurate enough to answer the research question or objective.
• Timeliness : Timeliness refers to the efficiency and speed with which the data is collected, ensuring that the data is collected in a timely manner to meet the needs of the research or evaluation.
• Ethical considerations : Ethical considerations refer to the ethical principles that must be followed when collecting data, such as ensuring confidentiality and obtaining informed consent from participants.

Advantages of Data Collection

There are several advantages of data collection that make it an important process in research, evaluation, and monitoring. These advantages include:

• Better decision-making : Data collection provides decision-makers with evidence-based information that can be used to inform policies, strategies, and actions, leading to better decision-making.
• Improved understanding: Data collection helps to improve our understanding of a particular phenomenon or behavior by providing empirical evidence that can be analyzed and interpreted.
• Evaluation of interventions: Data collection is essential in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions or programs designed to address a particular issue or problem.
• Identifying trends and patterns: Data collection can help identify trends and patterns over time that may indicate changes in behaviors or outcomes.
• Increased accountability: Data collection increases accountability by providing evidence that can be used to monitor and evaluate the implementation and impact of policies, programs, and initiatives.
• Validation of theories: Data collection can be used to test hypotheses and validate theories, leading to a better understanding of the phenomenon being studied.
• Improved quality: Data collection is used in quality improvement efforts to identify areas where improvements can be made and to measure progress towards achieving goals.

Limitations of Data Collection

While data collection has several advantages, it also has some limitations that must be considered. These limitations include:

• Bias : Data collection can be influenced by the biases and personal opinions of the data collector, which can lead to inaccurate or misleading results.
• Sampling bias : Data collection may not be representative of the entire population, resulting in sampling bias and inaccurate results.
• Cost : Data collection can be expensive and time-consuming, particularly for large-scale studies.
• Limited scope: Data collection is limited to the variables being measured, which may not capture the entire picture or context of the phenomenon being studied.
• Ethical considerations : Data collection must follow ethical principles to protect the rights and confidentiality of the participants, which can limit the type of data that can be collected.
• Data quality issues: Data collection may result in data quality issues such as missing or incomplete data, measurement errors, and inconsistencies.
• Limited generalizability : Data collection may not be generalizable to other contexts or populations, limiting the generalizability of the findings.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Research Gap – Types, Examples and How to...

Background of The Study – Examples and Writing...

Research Process – Steps, Examples and Tips

Problem Statement – Writing Guide, Examples and...

Dissertation – Format, Example and Template

Tables in Research Paper – Types, Creating Guide...

How to write a PhD in a hundred steps (or more)

A workingmumscholar's journey through her phd and beyond, developing well-constructed data gathering tools, or methods, for your study.

I spent the better part of last week working with emerging researchers who are at the stage of their PhD work where they are either working out what data they will need and how to get it, or sitting with all their data and working out how to make sense of it. So, we are talking theory, literature, methodology, analysis, meaning making, and also planning. In this post I want to focus on planning your data gathering phase, specifically developing ‘instruments’ , such as questionnaires, interview schedules and so on.

Whether your proposed study is quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods,  you will need some kind of data to base your thesis argument on. Examples may include data gathered from documents in the media, in archives, or from official sources; interviews and/or focus groups; statistical datasets; or surveys. Whatever data your research question tells you to generate, so as to find an answer, you need to think very carefully about how your  theory and literature can be drawn into developing the instruments you will use to generate or gather this data .

In a lot of the postgraduate writing I have read and given feedback on, there are two main trends I have noticed in the development of research methods . The first is what I considered ‘too much theory’, and the other ‘not quite enough’. In the first instance, this is seen in researchers putting technical or conceptual terms into their interview questions, and actually asking the research questions in the survey form or interview schedule. For example: ‘Do you think that X political party believes in principle of non-racialism?’ Firstly, this was the overall research question, more or less. Secondly, this researcher wanted to interview students on campus, and needed to seriously think about whether this question would yield any useful data  – would her participants know what she meant by ‘the principle of non-racialism’ as she understood it theoretically, or even have the relevant contextual knowledge? Let’s unpack this a bit, before moving on to trend #2.

The first issue here is that you are not a reporter, you are a researcher. This means you are theorising and abstracting from your data to find an answer that has significance beyond your case study or examples. Y our research questions are thus developed out of a deep engagement with relevant research and theory in your field that enables you to see both the ‘bigger picture’ as well as your specific piece of it. If you ask people to answer your research question, without a shared understanding of the technical/conceptual/theoretical terms and their meanings, you may well end up conflating their versions of these with your own, reporting on what they say as being a kind of ‘truth’, rather than trying to elicit, through theorising, valid, robust and substantiated answers to your research questions, using their input.

This connects to the second issue: it is your job to answer your research question, and it is your participants’ job to tell you what they know about relevant or related issues that reference your research question. For example, if you want to know what kinds of knowledge need to be part of an inclusive curriculum, you don’t ask this exact question in interviews with lecturers. Rather, you need to try and find out the answer by asking them to share their curriculum design process with you, talk you through how they decide what to include and exclude, ask them about their views on student learning, and university culture, and the role of the curriculum, and knowledge, in education. This rich data will give you far more with which to find an answer to that question than asking it right out could. You ask around your research questions, using theory and literature to help you devise sensible, accessible and research-relevant questions . This also goes for criteria for selecting and collating documents to research, should you be doing a study that does not involve people directly.

The second trend is ‘not enough theory’. This tends to take the form of having theory that indicates a certain approach to generating data, yet  not using or evidencing this theory in your research instruments.   For example structuralist theories would require you finding out what kinds of structures lie beneath the surface of everyday life and events, and also perhaps how they shape people, events and so on. An example of disconnected interview questions could be asking people whether they enjoy working in their university, and whether there are any issues they feel could be addressed and why, and what their ideal job conditions would be, etc., rather than using the theoretical insights to focus, for example, on how they experience doing research and teaching, and what kinds of support they get from their department, and what kinds of support they feel they need and where that does and should come from, etc. You need to come back to using the theory to make sense of your data, through analysis , so you need to ensure that you use the theory to help you create clear, unambiguous, focused questions that will get your participants, or documents, talking to you about what matters to your study. Disconnecting the research instruments from your theory, and from the point of the research, may lead to a frustrating analysis process where the data will be too ‘thin’ or off point to really enable a rich analysis.

Data gathering tools, or methods for getting the data you need to answer your research questions, is a crucial part of a postgraduate research study. Our data gives us a slice of the bigger research body we are connecting our study to, and enables us to say something about a larger phenomenon or set of meanings that can push collective knowledge forward, or challenge existing knowledge. This is where we make a significant part of our overall contribution to knowledge, so it is really important to see these instruments, or methods, not as technical or arbitrary requirements for some ethics committee. Rather, we need to conceptualise them as tools for putting our methodology into action, informed and guided by both the literature our study is situated within as well as what counts as our theoretical or principled knowledge . Taking the time to do this step well will ensure that your golden thread is more clearly pulled through the earlier sections of your argument, through your data and into your analysis and findings.

Share this:

One comment.

[…] opt for semi-structured interviews. This enables them to have a set series of questions, hopefully well connected to their theory and literature, but also to create space for participants, or interviewees, to add views and insights that may not […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

• Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
• Subscribe Subscribed
• Copy shortlink
• Report this content
• View post in Reader
• Manage subscriptions
• Collapse this bar

What Data Gathering Strategies Should I Use?

• First Online: 28 June 2019

Cite this chapter

• Ray Cooksey 3 &
• Gael McDonald 4  

1936 Accesses

1 Citations

In this chapter, we review many of the data gathering strategies that can be used by postgraduates in social and behavioural research. We explore three major domains of data gathering strategies: strategies for connecting with people (encompassing interaction-based and observation-based strategies), exploring people’s handiworks (encompassing participant-centred and artefact-based strategies) and structuring people’s experiences (encompassing data-shaping and experience-focused strategies). In light of our pluralist perspective, we consider each data gathering strategy, not only as a distinct and self-contained strategy (which may encompass a range of more specific data gathering approaches), but also as part of a larger more interconnected and dynamic toolkit. Our goal is to highlight some key considerations and issues associated with each strategy that might be relevant to your decision making about which might be appropriate for you to use as part of your research journey, given your research frame, pattern(s) of guiding assumptions, contextualisations, positionings, research questions/hypotheses, scoping and shaping considerations and MU configuration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 5 (4), 373–395.

Article   Google Scholar  

Anderson, V. (1997). Systems thinking basics: From concepts to causal loops . Cambridge, MA: Pegasus Communications.

Google Scholar  

Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research . London: Sage Publications.

Book   Google Scholar  

Athanasou, J. A. (1997). Introduction to educational testing . Wentworth Falls, NSW: Social Science Press.

Axelrod, R. (2007). Simulation in the social sciences. In J.-P. Rennard (Ed.), Handbook of research on nature inspired computing for economy and management (pp. 90–100). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.

Babbie, E. (2011). The basics of social research (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Banks, M. (2007). Using visual data in qualitative research . London: Sage Publications.

Barbour, R. (2007). Doing focus groups . London: Sage Publications.

Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines . Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Bechtel, R. B. (1967). Hodometer research in architecture. Milieu, 2 , 1–9.

Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (Eds.). (2014). Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bickel, R. (2007). Multilevel analysis for applied research . New York: The Guilford Press.

Boddy, C. (2005). Projective techniques in market research: Valueless subjectivity or insightful reality? A look at the evidence for the usefulness, reliability and validity of projective techniques in market research. International Journal of Market Research, 47 (3), 239–254.

Boje, D. M. (1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (1), 106–126.

Bond, D., & Ramsey, E. (2007). Going beyond the fence: Using projective techniques as survey tools to meet the challenges of bounded rationality. In Proceedings of the 2007 Association for Survey Computing Meeting, The Challenges of a Changing World: Developments in the Survey Process , Southampton, UK (pp. 259–270).

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Boslaugh, S. (2007). Secondary data sources for public health: A practical guide . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2), 27–40.

Bowerman, B. L., O’Connell, R. T., & Koehler, A. B. (2005). Forecasting, time series, and regression: An applied approach (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H., & Matthews, G. (Eds.). (2015). Measures of personality and social psychological constructs . Amsterdam: Academic Press.

Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15 (5), 662–679.

Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002). Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: A worked example. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7 (4), 209–215.

Brown, R. V. (2005). Rational choice and judgment: Decision analysis for the decider . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2004). Constructing variables. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 17–34). London: Sage Publications.

Buzan, T. (2003). The mind map book (Rev ed.). London: BBC Books.

Buzan, T. (2018). Mind map mastery . London: Watkins.

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Campbell, R., Pound, P., Morgan, M., Daker-White, G., Britten, N., Pill, R., et al. (2011). Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technology Assessment, 15 (43).

Canter, D., Brown, J., & Groat, L. (1985). A multiple sorting procedure for studying conceptual systems. In M. Brenner, J. Brown, & D. Canter (Eds.), The research interview: Uses and approaches (pp. 79–114). London: Academic Press.

Carmichael, G. A. (2016). Fundamentals of demographic analysis: Concepts, measures and methods . Switzerland: Springer.

Carsey, T. M., & Harden, J. J. (2013). Monte Carlo simulation and resampling methods for the social sciences . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Cassell, C., & Walsh, S. (2004). Repertory grids. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 61–72). London: Sage Publications.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Catterall, M., & Ibbotson, P. (2000). Using projective techniques in education research. British Educational Research Journal, 26 (2), 245–256.

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Chang, H. (2016). Autoethnography as method . London: Routledge.

Chase, S. E. (2005). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 651–679). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Checkel, J. T. (2008). Process Tracing. In A. Klotz & D. Prakash (Eds.), Qualitative methods in international relations (Research Methods Series) (pp. 114–127). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action: A short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers and students . Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Chell, E. (2004). Critical incident technique. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 45–60). London: Sage Publications.

Chi, M. T. (2006). Laboratory methods for assessing experts’ and novices’ knowledge. In A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 167–184). Cambridge. MA: Cambridge University Press.

Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Chilisa, B., & Tsheko, G. N. (2014). Mixed methods in indigenous research: Building relationships for sustainable intervention outcomes. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8 (3), 222–233.

Chrzanowska, J. (2002). Interviewing groups and individuals in qualitative marketing research . London: Sage Publications.

Clandinin, D. J. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental designs (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Cohen, I. G., Amarasingham, R., Shah, A., Xie, B., & Lo, B. (2014). The legal and ethical concerns that arise from using complex predictive analytics in health care. Health Affairs, 33 (7), 1139–1147.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2009). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students . London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings . Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Peracchio, L. (1990). Quasi-experimentation. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 491–576). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press Inc.

Cooksey, R. W. (1996). Judgment analysis: Theory, methods, and applications . San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Cooksey, R. W. (2000). Mapping the texture of managerial decision making: A complex dynamic decision perspective. Emergence: A Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management, 2 (2), 102–122.

Cooksey, R. W. (2014). Illustrating statistical procedures: Finding meaning in quantitative data (2nd ed.). Prahran, VIC: Tilde University Press.

Cooksey, R. W., Freebody, P., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2007). Assessment as judgment-in-context: Analyzing how teachers evaluate students’ writing. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13 (5), 401–434.

Cooksey, R. W., & Loomis, R. J. (1979). Visitor locomotor exploration of a museum gallery . Paper presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Las Vegas, NV.

Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis . New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Corti, L., Thompson, P., & Fink, J. (2004). Preserving, sharing and reusing data from qualitative research: Methods and strategies. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 288–300). London: Sage Publications.

Cowton, C. J. (1998). The use of secondary data in business ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 423–434.

Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Dick, P. (2004). Discourse analysis. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 203–213). London: Sage Publications.

Duncan, M. (2004). Autoethnography: Critical appreciation of an emerging art. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3 (4), 28–39.

Durlak, J. A. (1995). Understanding meta-analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistic (pp. 319–352). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (2002). A mapping framework for strategy making. In A. Huff & M. Jenkins (Eds.), Mapping strategic knowledge (pp. 173–195). London: Sage Publications.

Edmunds, H. (1999). The focus group research handbook . Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.

Elliott, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches . London: Sage Publications.

Elliott, H. (1997). The use of diaries in sociological research on health experience. Sociological Research Online , 2 (2). Retrieved August 11, 2018, form http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/2/7.html .

Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Enders, W. (2014). Applied econometric time series (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Eppler, M. J. (2006). A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Information Visualization, 5, 202–210.

Ericsson, K. A. (2003). Valid and non-reactive verbalization of thoughts during performance of tasks: Towards a solution to the central problems of introspection as a source of scientific data. In A. Jack & A. Roepstorff (Eds.), Trusting the subject: The use of introspective evidence in cognitive science (Vol. 1, pp. 1–18). Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data (Rev ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Evans, W. (2015). Test wiseness: An examination of cue-using strategies. The Journal of Experimental Education, 52 (3), 141–144.

Farrington, D. P., & Knight, B. J. (1979). Two non-reactive field experiments on stealing from a ‘lost’ letter. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18 (3), 277–284.

Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Smyth, P. (1996). From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI magazine, 17 (3), 37.

Fielding, N. G., Lee, R. M., & Blank, G. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage handbook of online research methods . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Finch, H., & Lewis, J. (2003). Focus groups. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 170–198). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51 (4), 327–358.

Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Fogarty, G. (2008). Principles and applications of education and psychological testing. In J. A. Athanasou (Ed.), Adult educational psychology (pp. 351–384). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Fothergill, S., Loft, S., & Neal, A. (2009). ATC-lab advanced: An air traffic control simulator with realism and control. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 41 (1), 118–127.

Frazer, L., & Lawley, M. (2000). Questionnaire design & administration . Milton, QLD: Wiley.

Frumkin, N. (2015). Guide to economic indicators (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

Gabriel, Y., & Griffiths, D. S. (2004). Stories in organizational research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 114–126). London: Sage Publications.

Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication . New York: New York University Press.

Gamst, G. C., Liang, C. T. H., & Der-Karabetian, A. (2011). Handbook of multicultural measures . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35 (2), 137–144.

Gilbert, N. (2008). Agent-based models . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Gilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. G. (2005). Simulation for the social scientist (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill International.

Gillham, B. (2005). Research interviewing: The range of techniques . Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.

Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Glass, G. V., Willson, V. L., & Gottman, J. M. (2008). Design and analysis of time-series experiments . Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Goodwin, J. (Ed.). (2012a). Sage secondary data analysis: Volume 1: Using secondary sources and secondary analysis . London: Sage Publications.

Goodwin, J. (Ed.). (2012b). Sage secondary data analysis: Volume 2: Quantitative approaches to secondary analysis . London: Sage Publications.

Goodwin, J. (Ed.). (2012c). Sage secondary data analysis: Volume 3: Qualitative data and research in secondary analysis . London: Sage Publications.

Goodwin, J. (Ed.). (2012d). Sage secondary data analysis: Volume 4: Ethical, methodological and practical issues in secondary analysis . London: Sage Publications.

Graco, W. J. (2001). Research into identification and classification of patterns of non-compliance in data using a doctor-shopper sample . Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Marketing and Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

Gray, D. E. (2014). Doing research in the real world (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political analysis, 21 (3), 267–297.

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Guillemin, M. (2004,). Understanding illness: Using drawings as a research method. Qualitative Health Research , 14 (2), 272–289.

Gupta, V., & Lehal, G. S. (2009). A survey of text mining techniques and applications. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 1 (1), 60–76.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (SEM) . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Han, J., Kamber, M., & Pei, J. (2012). Data mining: Concepts and techniques (3rd ed.). Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Hand, D. J. (2004). Measurement theory and practice: The world through quantification . New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Hancock, G. R. (2004). Experimental, quasi-experimental and nonexperimental design with latent variables. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 317–334). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Haladyna, T. M. (2004). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

Hamm, R. M. (1988). Moment-by-moment variation in experts’ analytic and intuitive cognitive activity. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18 (5), 757–776.

Hammond, K. R., Frederick, E., Robillard, N., & Victor, D. (1989). Application of cognitive theory to the student-teacher dialogue. In D. A. Evans & V. L. Patel (Eds.), Cognitive science in medicine. Biomedical modeling . Cambridge, MA: M1T Press (pp. 173–210).

Hammond, K. R., & Stewart, T. R. (2001). The essential Brunswik: Beginnings, explications, applications . New York: Oxford University Press.

Hammond, K. R., & Wascoe, N. E. (1980). Realizations of Brunswik’s representative design . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Harper, D. (2005). What’s new visually? In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 747–763). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology . Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Hinds, P. S., Vogel, R. J., & Clarke-Steffen, L. (1997). The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qualitative Health Research, 7 (3), 408–424.

Hine, D. W., Montiel, C. J., Cooksey, R. W., & Lewko, J. (2005). Mental models of poverty in developing nations: A Canada-Philippines contrast. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36 (3), 283–303.

Hine, D. W., Gifford, R., Heath, Y., Cooksey, R., & Quain, P. (2009). A cue utilization approach for investigating harvest decisions in commons dilemmas. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39 (3), 564–588.

Hodson, R. (1999). Analyzing documentary accounts . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Hofferth, S. L. (2005). Secondary data analysis in family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67 (4), 891–907.

Hughes, J. & Goodwin, J. (Eds). (2014a). Documentary & archival research: Volume 1: Human documents – Perspectives and approaches . London: Sage Publications.

Hughes, J. & Goodwin, J. (Eds). (2014b). Documentary & archival research: Volume 3: Human documents in social research . London: Sage Publications.

Hughes, J. & Goodwin, J. (Eds). (2014c). Documentary & archival research: Volume 4: Archival research . London: Sage Publications.

Hyland, M. (1981). Introduction to theoretical psychology . London: Macmillan Press.

Irwin, S. (2013). Qualitative secondary data analysis: Ethics, epistemology and context. Progress in Development Studies, 13 (4), 295–306.

Jasper, J. D., & Shapiro, J. (2002). MouseTrace: A better mousetrap for catching decision processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34 (3), 364–374.

Johnson, B. (2001). Towards a new classification of nonexperimental quantitative research. Educational Researcher, 30 (2), 3–13.

Jones, S. H. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 763–791). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Jorgensen, D. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human studies . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Kane, M., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kamberelis, G., Dimitriadis, G., & Welker, A. (2018). Focus group research and/in figured worlds. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 692–716). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Kaptchuk, T. J. (2001). The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: Gold standard or golden calf? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54 (6), 541–549.

Keeves, J. P. (1997). Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

Kellehear, A. (1993). The unobtrusive observer: A guide to methods . St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Ker, J. S., Hesketh, E. A., Anderson, F., & Johnston, D. A. (2006). Can a ward simulation exercise achieve the realism that reflects the complexity of everyday practice junior doctors encounter? Medical Teacher, 28 (4), 330–334.

King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of data. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 256–270). London: Sage Publications.

Kirk, R. E. (2013). Experimental design: Procedures for behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. (2004). Meta-analysis. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 281–300). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts . Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Kovach, M. (2018). Doing indigenous methodologies: A letter to a research class. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 214–234). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Krippendorf, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kumar, L., & Bhatia, P. K. (2013). Text mining: concepts, process and applications. Journal of Global Research in Computer Science, 4 (3), 36–39.

Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews . London: Sage Publications.

L’Eplattenier, B. E. (2009). An argument for archival research methods: thinking beyond methodology. College English, 72 (1), 67–79.

Lamprianou, I. (2008). Introduction to psychometrics: The case of Rasch models. In J. A. Athanasou (Ed.), Adult educational psychology (pp. 385–418). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Lane, D. C. (1995). On a resurgence of management simulations and games. Journal of the Operations Research Society, 46 (5), 604–625.

Lane, S., Raymond, M. R., & Haladyna, T. M. (2015). Handbook of test development (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Laukkanen, M. (1998). Conducting causal mapping research: Opportunities and challenges. In C. Eden & J. Spender (Eds.), Managerial and organizational cognition: Theory, methods and research (pp. 168–191). London: Sage Publications.

Lee, A. T. (2005). Flight simulation: virtual environments in aviation . London: Routledge.

Legard, R., Keegan, J., & Ward, K. (2003). In-depth interviews. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 138–169). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Louviere, J. J. (1988). Analyzing decision making: Metric conjoint analysis . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Maani, K. E., & Cavana, R. Y. (2007). Systems thinking, systems dynamics: Managing change and complexity (2nd ed.). North Shore, NZ: Pearson Education New Zealand.

Malhotra, N. K., Hall, J., Shaw, M. & Oppenheim, P. P. (2008). Essentials of marketing research: An applied approach (2nd Ed.). French’s Forest, NSW: Pearson Education.

Margolis, E., & Pauwels, L. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of visual research methods . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Margolis, E., & Zunjarwad, R. (2018). Visual research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 600–626). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17 (2), 13–17.

McAuley, J. (2004). Hermeneutic understanding. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 192–202). London: Sage Publications.

McDonald, S., Daniels, K., & Harris, C. (2004). Cognitive mapping in organizational research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 73–85). London: Sage Publications.

Meier, P. S. (2007). Mind-mapping: A tool for eliciting and representing knowledge held by diverse informants. Social Research Update, 52, 1–4.

Mennecke, B., Roche, E., Bray, D., Konsynski, B., Lester, J., Rowe, M., et al. (2008). Second Life and other virtual worlds: A roadmap for research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 22 (Article 20), 371–388. Retrieved August 11, 2018, from https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=scm_pubs .

Meyer, B. D. (1995). Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13 (2), 151–161.

Miller, J. H., & Page, S. E. (2007). Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to computational models of social life . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Milligan, G. W. (1981). A Monte Carlo study of thirty internal criterion measures for cluster analysis. Psychometrika, 46 (2), 187–199.

Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., & Hays, T. (2008). In-depth interviewing: Principles, techniques, analysis . Sydney: Pearson Education.

Montgomery, P., & Bailey, P. H. (2007). Field notes and theoretical memos in grounded theory. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 29 (1), 65–79.

Mooney, C. Z. (1997). Monte Carlo simulation . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Muchiri, M. (2006). Transformational leader behaviours, social processes of leadership and substitutes for leadership as predictors of employee commitment, efficacy, citizenship behaviours and performance outcomes . Unpublished PhD thesis, New England Business School, University of New England.

Murdock, S. H., Kelley, C., Jordan, J., Pecotte, B., & Luedke, A. (2016). Demographics: A guide to methods and data sources for media, business, and government . London: Routledge.

Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies (Vol. 11). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

North, M. (2012). Data mining for the masses . Athens: Global Text Project. Retrieved August 11, 2018, from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/39657706/North_-_Data_Mining_for_the_Masses_-_2012.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1533962896&Signature=3h603Aq1BUPPSz2Svg0lC9RvwU0%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DData_Mining.pdf .

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

O’Cass, A. (1998). Reconceptualising and reconstructing consumer involvement: modelling involvement in a nomological network of relevant constructs: Casting the net wider or just fishing around . Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Marketing and Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

Olaru, D., Purchase, S., & Denize, S. (2009). Using docking/replication to verify and validate computational models. In Proceedings of the 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress , Cairns, Queensland (pp. 4432–4438). Retrieved August 11, 2018, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0edc/80bb4313dab4a0e0ee94a508a5a2883d4ebd.pdf .

Omodei, M. M., & Wearing, A. J. (1995). The Fire Chief microworld generating program: An illustration of computer-simulated microworlds as an experimental paradigm for studying complex decision-making behavior. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27 (3), 303–316.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. (2010). Innovative data collection strategies in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 15 (3), 696–726.

Ortlipp, M. (2008). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report, 13 (4), 695–705.

Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C., & Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Phellas, C. N., Bloch, A., & Seale, C. (2012). Structured methods: interviews, questionnaires and observation. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture (3rd ed., pp. 181–205). London: Sage Publications.

Pidd, M. (2009). Tools for thinking: Modelling in management science (3rd ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Pierce, C. A., & Aguinis, H. (1997). Using virtual reality technology in organizational behavior research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18 (5), 407–410.

Pink, S. (2013). Doing visual ethnography . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Place, U. T. (1992). The role of the ethnomethodological experiment in the empirical investigation of social norms and its application to conceptual analysis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 22 (4), 461–474.

Plowright, D. (2011). Using mixed methods: Frameworks for an integrated methodology . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Prasad, A. (2002). The contest over meaning: Hermeneutics as an interpretive methodology for understanding texts. Organizational Research Methods, 5 (1), 12–33.

Proctor, T. (2010). Creative problem solving for managers (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2013). Data science and its relationship to big data and data-driven decision making. Big Data, 1 (1), 51–59.

Punch, K. (2003). Survey research: The basics . London: Sage Publications.

Railsback, S. F., & Grimm, V. (2012). Agent-based and individual-based modeling: A practical introduction . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Rapley, T. (2007). Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis . London: Sage Publications.

Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., Willson, V. L., & Willson, V. (2010). Measurement and assessment in education (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education International.

Richmond, B. (2004). An introduction to systems thinking: STELLA software . Lebanon, OH: IEEE Systems.

Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.). (1991). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes . San Diego: Academic Press.

Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Ross, G. (2001). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials . London: Sage Publications.

Rowlinson, M. (2004). Historical analysis of company documents. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 301–311). London: Sage Publications.

Rymaszewski, M., Au, W. J., Wallace, M., Winters, C., Ondrejka, C., & Batstone-Cunningham, B. (2007). Second life: The official guide . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Sandall, J. L. (2006). Navigating pathways through complex systems of interacting problems: Strategic management of native vegetation policy . Unpublished PhD thesis, New England Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., & Emden, C. (1997). Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20 (4), 365–371.

Samra-Fredericks, D. (2004). Talk-in-interaction/conversation analysis. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 214–227). London: Sage Publications.

Sapsford, R. (2007). Survey research (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Schembri, S., & Boyle, M. V. (2013). Visual ethnography: Achieving rigorous and authentic interpretations. Journal of Business Research, 66 (9), 1251–1254.

Schkade, D. A., & Payne, J. W. (1994). How people respond to contingent valuation questions: A verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26 (1), 88–109.

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Schmitt, R. (2005). Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 10 (2), 358–394.

Schreiber, R., Crooks, D., & Stern, P. N. (1997). Qualitative meta-analysis. In J. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue (pp. 311–326). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (2nd ed.). Boston: Cengage.

Shum, D., O’Gorman, J., Creed, P., & Myors, B. (2017). Psychological testing and assessment ebook (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., & Smith, B. (1994). The fifth discipline field book . London: Nicholas Brealey.

Shiratori, R., Arai, K., & Kato, F. (2005). Gaming, simulations and society: Research scope and perspective . Tokyo: Springer.

Sloan, L., & Quan-Haase, A. (Eds.). (2017). The Sage handbook of social media research methods . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Small, S. D., Wuerz, R. C., Simon, R., Shapiro, N., Conn, A., & Setnik, G. (1999). Demonstration of high-fidelity simulation team training for emergency medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine, 6 (4), 312–323.

Smith, A. E., & Humphreys, M. S. (2006). Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behavior Research Methods, 38 (2), 262–279.

Smith, E. (2008). Pitfalls and promises: The use of secondary data analysis in educational research. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56 (3), 323–339.

Smith, M. (2007). Research methods in accounting . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8 (1), 23–44.

Stengel, D. N., & Chaffe-Stengel, P. (2012). Working with economic indicators: Interpretation and sources . New York: Business Expert Press.

Sterman, J. S. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world . New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Stewart, D., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Stiles, D. (2004,). Pictorial representation. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 127–140). London: Sage Publications.

Stuart, E. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2008). Best practice in quasi-experimental designs: Matching methods for causal inference. In J. W. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 155–176). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Sue, V. M., & Ritter, L. A. (2012). Conducting online surveys (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11 (2), 63–75.

Symon, G. (2004). Qualitative research diaries. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 98–113). London: Sage Publications.

Taber, C. S., & Timpone, R. J. (1996). Computational modeling . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Tansey, O. (2007). Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling. PS: Political Science & Politics , 40 (4), 765–772.

Thornton III, G. C., & Kedharnath, U. (2013). Work sample tests. In K. F. Geisinger et al. (Eds.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 1. Test theory and testing and assessment in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 533–550). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Trenor, J. M., Miller, M. K., & Gipson, K. G. (2011). Utilization of a think-aloud protocol to cognitively validate a survey instrument identifying social capital resources of engineering undergraduates. In Electronic Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition , Vancouver, CA (pp. 22.1656.1–22.1656.15). Retrieved August 11, 2018, from https://peer.asee.org/utilization-of-a-think-aloud-protocol-to-cognitively-validate-a-survey-instrument-identifying-social-capital-resources-of-engineering-undergraduates .

van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical approach to modeling cognitive processes . London: Academic Press.

Veal, A. J. (2005). Business research methods: A managerial approach (2nd ed.). French’s Forest, NSW: Pearson Education.

Walker, S. J. (2014). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. International Journal of Advertising, 33 (1), 181–183.

Walsh, J. J. (1997). Projective testing techniques. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology and measurement: An international handbook (2nd ed., pp. 954–958). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

Walsh, S., & Clegg, C. (2004). Soft systems analysis: Reflections and update. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 334–348). London: Sage Publications.

Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50 (2), 204–211.

Waddington, D. (2004). Participant observation. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 154–164). London: Sage Publications.

Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (2000). Unobtrusive measures (Rev ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Webster, J. G. (2015). The physiological measurement handbook . Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Wilcox, R. R. (1997). Simulation as a research technique. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology and measurement: An international handbook (2nd ed., pp. 150–154). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo . Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Retrieved August 11, 2018, from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/ .

Wilensky, U. (2003). NetLogo Traffic Grid model . Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Retrieved August 11, 2018, from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/TrafficGrid .

Williams, J. H. (2014). Defining and measuring nature: The make of all things . San Raphael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.

Wybo, J. L. (2008). The role of simulation exercises in the assessment of robustness and resilience of private or public organizations. In H. J. Pasman & I. A Kirillov (Eds.), Resilience of cities to terrorist and other threats (pp. 491–507). Dordrecht: Springer.

Yamarone, R. (2017). The economic indicator handbook: How to evaluate economic trends to maximize profits and minimize losses . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish . New York: The Guilford Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia

Ray Cooksey

RMIT University Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Gael McDonald

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ray Cooksey .

Appendix: Clarifying Experimental/Quasi-experimental Design Jargon

These contrasting concepts provide insights into the way that researchers, who implement the Manipulative experience-focused strategy under the positivist pattern of guiding assumptions, talk or write about certain features of their research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cooksey, R., McDonald, G. (2019). What Data Gathering Strategies Should I Use?. In: Surviving and Thriving in Postgraduate Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7747-1_14

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7747-1_14

Published : 28 June 2019

Publisher Name : Springer, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-13-7746-4

Online ISBN : 978-981-13-7747-1

eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer
• QuestionPro

• Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case NPS+ Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
• Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center

Home Market Research

Data Collection: What It Is, Methods & Tools + Examples

Let’s face it, no one wants to make decisions based on guesswork or gut feelings. The most important objective of data collection is to ensure that the data gathered is reliable and packed to the brim with juicy insights that can be analyzed and turned into data-driven decisions. There’s nothing better than good statistical analysis .

LEARN ABOUT: Level of Analysis

Collecting high-quality data is essential for conducting market research, analyzing user behavior, or just trying to get a handle on business operations. With the right approach and a few handy tools, gathering reliable and informative data.

So, let’s get ready to collect some data because when it comes to data collection, it’s all about the details.

Content Index

What is Data Collection?

Data collection methods, data collection examples, reasons to conduct online research and data collection, conducting customer surveys for data collection to multiply sales, steps to effectively conduct an online survey for data collection, survey design for data collection.

Data collection is the procedure of collecting, measuring, and analyzing accurate insights for research using standard validated techniques.

Put simply, data collection is the process of gathering information for a specific purpose. It can be used to answer research questions, make informed business decisions, or improve products and services.

To collect data, we must first identify what information we need and how we will collect it. We can also evaluate a hypothesis based on collected data. In most cases, data collection is the primary and most important step for research. The approach to data collection is different for different fields of study, depending on the required information.

LEARN ABOUT: Action Research

There are many ways to collect information when doing research. The data collection methods that the researcher chooses will depend on the research question posed. Some data collection methods include surveys, interviews, tests, physiological evaluations, observations, reviews of existing records, and biological samples. Let’s explore them.

LEARN ABOUT: Best Data Collection Tools

Phone vs. Online vs. In-Person Interviews

Essentially there are four choices for data collection – in-person interviews, mail, phone, and online. There are pros and cons to each of these modes.

• Pros: In-depth and a high degree of confidence in the data
• Cons: Time-consuming, expensive, and can be dismissed as anecdotal
• Pros: Can reach anyone and everyone – no barrier
• Cons: Expensive, data collection errors, lag time
• Pros: High degree of confidence in the data collected, reach almost anyone
• Cons: Expensive, cannot self-administer, need to hire an agency
• Pros: Cheap, can self-administer, very low probability of data errors
• Cons: Not all your customers might have an email address/be on the internet, customers may be wary of divulging information online.

In-person interviews always are better, but the big drawback is the trap you might fall into if you don’t do them regularly. It is expensive to regularly conduct interviews and not conducting enough interviews might give you false positives. Validating your research is almost as important as designing and conducting it.

We’ve seen many instances where after the research is conducted – if the results do not match up with the “gut-feel” of upper management, it has been dismissed off as anecdotal and a “one-time” phenomenon. To avoid such traps, we strongly recommend that data-collection be done on an “ongoing and regular” basis.

LEARN ABOUT: Research Process Steps

This will help you compare and analyze the change in perceptions according to marketing for your products/services. The other issue here is sample size. To be confident with your research, you must interview enough people to weed out the fringe elements.

A couple of years ago there was a lot of discussion about online surveys and their statistical analysis plan . The fact that not every customer had internet connectivity was one of the main concerns.

LEARN ABOUT:   Statistical Analysis Methods

Although some of the discussions are still valid, the reach of the internet as a means of communication has become vital in the majority of customer interactions. According to the US Census Bureau, the number of households with computers has doubled between 1997 and 2001.

Learn more: Quantitative Market Research

In 2001 nearly 50% of households had a computer. Nearly 55% of all households with an income of more than 35,000 have internet access, which jumps to 70% for households with an annual income of 50,000. This data is from the US Census Bureau for 2001.

There are primarily three modes of data collection that can be employed to gather feedback – Mail, Phone, and Online. The method actually used for data collection is really a cost-benefit analysis. There is no slam-dunk solution but you can use the table below to understand the risks and advantages associated with each of the mediums:

Keep in mind, the reach here is defined as “All U.S. Households.” In most cases, you need to look at how many of your customers are online and determine. If all your customers have email addresses, you have a 100% reach of your customers.

Another important thing to keep in mind is the ever-increasing dominance of cellular phones over landline phones. United States FCC rules prevent automated dialing and calling cellular phone numbers and there is a noticeable trend towards people having cellular phones as the only voice communication device.

This introduces the inability to reach cellular phone customers who are dropping home phone lines in favor of going entirely wireless. Even if automated dialing is not used, another FCC rule prohibits from phoning anyone who would have to pay for the call.

Learn more: Qualitative Market Research

Multi-Mode Surveys

Surveys, where the data is collected via different modes (online, paper, phone etc.), is also another way of going. It is fairly straightforward and easy to have an online survey and have data-entry operators to enter in data (from the phone as well as paper surveys) into the system. The same system can also be used to collect data directly from the respondents.

Learn more: Survey Research

Data collection is an important aspect of research. Let’s consider an example of a mobile manufacturer, company X, which is launching a new product variant. To conduct research about features, price range, target market, competitor analysis, etc. data has to be collected from appropriate sources.

The marketing team can conduct various data collection activities such as online surveys or focus groups .

The survey should have all the right questions about features and pricing, such as “What are the top 3 features expected from an upcoming product?” or “How much are your likely to spend on this product?” or “Which competitors provide similar products?” etc.

For conducting a focus group, the marketing team should decide the participants and the mediator. The topic of discussion and objective behind conducting a focus group should be clarified beforehand to conduct a conclusive discussion.

Data collection methods are chosen depending on the available resources. For example, conducting questionnaires and surveys would require the least resources, while focus groups require moderately high resources.

Feedback is a vital part of any organization’s growth. Whether you conduct regular focus groups to elicit information from key players or, your account manager calls up all your marquee  accounts to find out how things are going – essentially they are all processes to find out from your customers’ eyes – How are we doing? What can we do better?

Online surveys are just another medium to collect feedback from your customers , employees and anyone your business interacts with. With the advent of Do-It-Yourself tools for online surveys, data collection on the internet has become really easy, cheap and effective.

Learn more:  Online Research

It is a well-established marketing fact that acquiring a new customer is 10 times more difficult and expensive than retaining an existing one. This is one of the fundamental driving forces behind the extensive adoption and interest in CRM and related customer retention tactics.

In a research study conducted by Rice University Professor Dr. Paul Dholakia and Dr. Vicki Morwitz, published in Harvard Business Review, the experiment inferred that the simple fact of asking customers how an organization was performing by itself to deliver results proved to be an effective customer retention strategy.

In the research study, conducted over the course of a year, one set of customers were sent out a satisfaction and opinion survey and the other set was not surveyed. In the next one year, the group that took the survey saw twice the number of people continuing and renewing their loyalty towards the organization data .

Learn more: Research Design

The research study provided a couple of interesting reasons on the basis of consumer psychology, behind this phenomenon:

• Satisfaction surveys boost the customers’ desire to be coddled and induce positive feelings. This crops from a section of the human psychology that intends to “appreciate” a product or service they already like or prefer. The survey feedback collection method is solely a medium to convey this. The survey is a vehicle to “interact” with the company and reinforces the customer’s commitment to the company.
• Surveys may increase awareness of auxiliary products and services. Surveys can be considered modes of both inbound as well as outbound communication. Surveys are generally considered to be a data collection and analysis source. Most people are unaware of the fact that consumer surveys can also serve as a medium for distributing data. It is important to note a few caveats here.
• In most countries, including the US, “selling under the guise of research” is illegal. b. However, we all know that information is distributed while collecting information. c. Other disclaimers may be included in the survey to ensure users are aware of this fact. For example: “We will collect your opinion and inform you about products and services that have come online in the last year…”
• Induced Judgments:  The entire procedure of asking people for their feedback can prompt them to build an opinion on something they otherwise would not have thought about. This is a very underlying yet powerful argument that can be compared to the “Product Placement” strategy currently used for marketing products in mass media like movies and television shows. One example is the extensive and exclusive use of the “mini-Cooper” in the blockbuster movie “Italian Job.” This strategy is questionable and should be used with great caution.

Surveys should be considered as a critical tool in the customer journey dialog. The best thing about surveys is its ability to carry “bi-directional” information. The research conducted by Paul Dholakia and Vicki Morwitz shows that surveys not only get you the information that is critical for your business, but also enhances and builds upon the established relationship you have with your customers.

Recent technological advances have made it incredibly easy to conduct real-time surveys and  opinion polls . Online tools make it easy to frame questions and answers and create surveys on the Web. Distributing surveys via email, website links or even integration with online CRM tools like Salesforce.com have made online surveying a quick-win solution.

So, you’ve decided to conduct an online survey. There are a few questions in your mind that you would like answered, and you are looking for a fast and inexpensive way to find out more about your customers, clients, etc.

First and foremost thing you need to decide what the smart objectives of the study are. Ensure that you can phrase these objectives as questions or measurements. If you can’t, you are better off looking at other data sources like focus groups and other qualitative methods . The data collected via online surveys is dominantly quantitative in nature.

Review the basic objectives of the study. What are you trying to discover? What actions do you  want to take as a result of the survey? –  Answers to these questions help in validating collected data. Online surveys are just one way of collecting and quantifying data .

Learn more: Qualitative Data & Qualitative Data Collection Methods

• Visualize all of the relevant information items you would like to have. What will the output survey research report look like? What charts and graphs will be prepared? What information do you need to be assured that action is warranted?
• Assign ranks to each topic (1 and 2) according to their priority, including the most important topics first. Revisit these items again to ensure that the objectives, topics, and information you need are appropriate. Remember, you can’t solve the research problem if you ask the wrong questions.
• How easy or difficult is it for the respondent to provide information on each topic? If it is difficult, is there an alternative medium to gain insights by asking a different question? This is probably the most important step. Online surveys have to be Precise, Clear and Concise. Due to the nature of the internet and the fluctuations involved, if your questions are too difficult to understand, the survey dropout rate will be high.
• Create a sequence for the topics that are unbiased. Make sure that the questions asked first do not bias the results of the next questions. Sometimes providing too much information, or disclosing purpose of the study can create bias. Once you have a series of decided topics, you can have a basic structure of a survey. It is always advisable to add an “Introductory” paragraph before the survey to explain the project objective and what is expected of the respondent. It is also sensible to have a “Thank You” text as well as information about where to find the results of the survey when they are published.
• Page Breaks – The attention span of respondents can be very low when it comes to a long scrolling survey. Add page breaks as wherever possible. Having said that, a single question per page can also hamper response rates as it increases the time to complete the survey as well as increases the chances for dropouts.
• Branching – Create smart and effective surveys with the implementation of branching wherever required. Eliminate the use of text such as, “If you answered No to Q1 then Answer Q4” – this leads to annoyance amongst respondents which result in increase survey dropout rates. Design online surveys using the branching logic so that appropriate questions are automatically routed based on previous responses.
• Write the questions . Initially, write a significant number of survey questions out of which you can use the one which is best suited for the survey. Divide the survey into sections so that respondents do not get confused seeing a long list of questions.
• Sequence the questions so that they are unbiased.
• Repeat all of the steps above to find any major holes. Are the questions really answered? Have someone review it for you.
• Time the length of the survey. A survey should take less than five minutes. At three to four research questions per minute, you are limited to about 15 questions. One open end text question counts for three multiple choice questions. Most online software tools will record the time taken for the respondents to answer questions.
• Include a few open-ended survey questions that support your survey object. This will be a type of feedback survey.
• Send an email to the project survey to your test group and then email the feedback survey afterward.
• This way, you can have your test group provide their opinion about the functionality as well as usability of your project survey by using the feedback survey.
• Make changes to your questionnaire based on the received feedback.
• Send the survey out to all your respondents!

Online surveys have, over the course of time, evolved into an effective alternative to expensive mail or telephone surveys. However, you must be aware of a few conditions that need to be met for online surveys. If you are trying to survey a sample representing the target population, please remember that not everyone is online.

Moreover, not everyone is receptive to an online survey also. Generally, the demographic segmentation of younger individuals is inclined toward responding to an online survey.

Learn More: Examples of Qualitarive Data in Education

Good survey design is crucial for accurate data collection. From question-wording to response options, let’s explore how to create effective surveys that yield valuable insights with our tips to survey design.

• Writing Great Questions for data collection

Writing great questions can be considered an art. Art always requires a significant amount of hard work, practice, and help from others.

The questions in a survey need to be clear, concise, and unbiased. A poorly worded question or a question with leading language can result in inaccurate or irrelevant responses, ultimately impacting the data’s validity.

Moreover, the questions should be relevant and specific to the research objectives. Questions that are irrelevant or do not capture the necessary information can lead to incomplete or inconsistent responses too.

• Avoid loaded or leading words or questions

A small change in content can produce effective results. Words such as could , should and might are all used for almost the same purpose, but may produce a 20% difference in agreement to a question. For example, “The management could.. should.. might.. have shut the factory”.

Intense words such as – prohibit or action, representing control or action, produce similar results. For example,  “Do you believe Donald Trump should prohibit insurance companies from raising rates?”.

Sometimes the content is just biased. For instance, “You wouldn’t want to go to Rudolpho’s Restaurant for the organization’s annual party, would you?”

• Misplaced questions

Questions should always reference the intended context, and questions placed out of order or without its requirement should be avoided. Generally, a funnel approach should be implemented – generic questions should be included in the initial section of the questionnaire as a warm-up and specific ones should follow. Toward the end, demographic or geographic questions should be included.

• Mutually non-overlapping response categories

Multiple-choice answers should be mutually unique to provide distinct choices. Overlapping answer options frustrate the respondent and make interpretation difficult at best. Also, the questions should always be precise.

For example: “Do you like water juice?”

This question is vague. In which terms is the liking for orange juice is to be rated? – Sweetness, texture, price, nutrition etc.

• Avoid the use of confusing/unfamiliar words

Asking about industry-related terms such as caloric content, bits, bytes, MBS , as well as other terms and acronyms can confuse respondents . Ensure that the audience understands your language level, terminology, and, above all, the question you ask.

• Non-directed questions give respondents excessive leeway

In survey design for data collection, non-directed questions can give respondents excessive leeway, which can lead to vague and unreliable data. These types of questions are also known as open-ended questions, and they do not provide any structure for the respondent to follow.

For instance, a non-directed question like “ What suggestions do you have for improving our shoes?” can elicit a wide range of answers, some of which may not be relevant to the research objectives. Some respondents may give short answers, while others may provide lengthy and detailed responses, making comparing and analyzing the data challenging.

To avoid these issues, it’s essential to ask direct questions that are specific and have a clear structure. Closed-ended questions, for example, offer structured response options and can be easier to analyze as they provide a quantitative measure of respondents’ opinions.

• Never force questions

There will always be certain questions that cross certain privacy rules. Since privacy is an important issue for most people, these questions should either be eliminated from the survey or not be kept as mandatory. Survey questions about income, family income, status, religious and political beliefs, etc., should always be avoided as they are considered to be intruding, and respondents can choose not to answer them.

• Unbalanced answer options in scales

Unbalanced answer options in scales such as Likert Scale and Semantic Scale may be appropriate for some situations and biased in others. When analyzing a pattern in eating habits, a study used a quantity scale that made obese people appear in the middle of the scale with the polar ends reflecting a state where people starve and an irrational amount to consume. There are cases where we usually do not expect poor service, such as hospitals.

• Questions that cover two points

In survey design for data collection, questions that cover two points can be problematic for several reasons. These types of questions are often called “double-barreled” questions and can cause confusion for respondents, leading to inaccurate or irrelevant data.

For instance, a question like “Do you like the food and the service at the restaurant?” covers two points, the food and the service, and it assumes that the respondent has the same opinion about both. If the respondent only liked the food, their opinion of the service could affect their answer.

It’s important to ask one question at a time to avoid confusion and ensure that the respondent’s answer is focused and accurate. This also applies to questions with multiple concepts or ideas. In these cases, it’s best to break down the question into multiple questions that address each concept or idea separately.

• Dichotomous questions

Dichotomous questions are used in case you want a distinct answer, such as: Yes/No or Male/Female . For example, the question “Do you think this candidate will win the election?” can be Yes or No.

• Avoid the use of long questions

The use of long questions will definitely increase the time taken for completion, which will generally lead to an increase in the survey dropout rate. Multiple-choice questions are the longest and most complex, and open-ended questions are the shortest and easiest to answer.

Data collection is an essential part of the research process, whether you’re conducting scientific experiments, market research, or surveys. The methods and tools used for data collection will vary depending on the research type, the sample size required, and the resources available.

Several data collection methods include surveys, observations, interviews, and focus groups. We learn each method has advantages and disadvantages, and choosing the one that best suits the research goals is important.

With the rise of technology, many tools are now available to facilitate data collection, including online survey software and data visualization tools. These tools can help researchers collect, store, and analyze data more efficiently, providing greater results and accuracy.

By understanding the various methods and tools available for data collection, we can develop a solid foundation for conducting research. With these research skills , we can make informed decisions, solve problems, and contribute to advancing our understanding of the world around us.

Analyze your survey data to gauge in-depth market drivers, including competitive intelligence, purchasing behavior, and price sensitivity, with QuestionPro.

You will obtain accurate insights with various techniques, including conjoint analysis, MaxDiff analysis, sentiment analysis, TURF analysis, heatmap analysis, etc. Export quality data to external in-depth analysis tools such as SPSS and R Software, and integrate your research with external business applications. Everything you need for your data collection. Start today for free!

LEARN MORE         FREE TRIAL

MORE LIKE THIS

Exploring Types of Correlation for Patterns and Relationship 

Jun 10, 2024

Life@QuestionPro: The Journey of Kristie Lawrence

Jun 7, 2024

How Can I Help You? — Tuesday CX Thoughts

Jun 5, 2024

Why Multilingual 360 Feedback Surveys Provide Better Insights

Jun 3, 2024

Other categories

• Academic Research
• Artificial Intelligence
• Assessments
• Brand Awareness
• Case Studies
• Communities
• Consumer Insights
• Customer effort score
• Customer Engagement
• Customer Experience
• Customer Loyalty
• Customer Research
• Customer Satisfaction
• Employee Benefits
• Employee Engagement
• Employee Retention
• Friday Five
• General Data Protection Regulation
• Insights Hub
• Life@QuestionPro
• Market Research
• Mobile diaries
• Mobile Surveys
• New Features
• Online Communities
• Question Types
• Questionnaire
• QuestionPro Products
• Release Notes
• Research Tools and Apps
• Revenue at Risk
• Survey Templates
• Training Tips
• Uncategorized
• Video Learning Series
• What’s Coming Up
• Workforce Intelligence

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

4 Gathering and Analyzing Qualitative Data

Gathering and analyzing qualitative data.

As the role of clinician researchers expands beyond the bedside, it is important to consider the possibilities of inquiry beyond the quantitative approach. In contrast to the quantitative approach, qualitative methodology is highly inductive and relies on the background and interpretation of the researcher to derive meaning from the gathering and analytic processes central to qualitative inquiry.

Chapter 4: Learning Objectives

As you explore the research opportunities central to your interests to consider whether qualitative component would enrich your work, you’ll be able to:

• Define what qualitative research is
• Compare qualitative and quantitative approaches
• Describe the process of creating themes from recurring ideas gleaned from narrative interviews

What Is Qualitative Research?

Quantitative researchers typically start with a focused research question or hypothesis, collect a small amount of numerical data from a large number of individuals, describe the resulting data using statistical techniques, and draw general conclusions about some large population. Although this method is by far the most common approach to conducting empirical research in fields such as respiratory care and other clinical fields, there is an important alternative called qualitative research. Qualitative research originated in the disciplines of anthropology and sociology but is now used to study psychological topics as well. Qualitative researchers generally begin with a less focused research question, collect large amounts of relatively “unfiltered” data from a relatively small number of individuals, and describe their data using nonstatistical techniques, such as grounded theory, thematic analysis, critical discourse analysis, or interpretative phenomenological analysis. They are usually less concerned with drawing general conclusions about human behavior than with understanding in detail the experience of their research participants.

Consider, for example, a study by researcher Per Lindqvist and his colleagues, who wanted to learn how the families of teenage suicide victims cope with their loss (Lindqvist, Johansson, & Karlsson, 2008). They did not have a specific research question or hypothesis, such as, What percentage of family members join suicide support groups? Instead, they wanted to understand the variety of reactions that families had, with a focus on what it is like from their perspectives. To address this question, they interviewed the families of 10 teenage suicide victims in their homes in rural Sweden. The interviews were relatively unstructured, beginning with a general request for the families to talk about the victim and ending with an invitation to talk about anything else that they wanted to tell the interviewer. One of the most important themes that emerged from these interviews was that even as life returned to “normal,” the families continued to struggle with the question of why their loved one committed suicide. This struggle appeared to be especially difficult for families in which the suicide was most unexpected.

The Purpose of Qualitative Research

The strength of quantitative research is its ability to provide precise answers to specific research questions and to draw general conclusions about human behavior. This method is how we know that people have a strong tendency to obey authority figures, for example, and that female undergraduate students are not substantially more talkative than male undergraduate students. But while quantitative research is good at providing precise answers to specific research questions, it is not nearly as good at generating novel and interesting research questions. Likewise, while quantitative research is good at drawing general conclusions about human behavior, it is not nearly as good at providing detailed descriptions of the behavior of particular groups in particular situations. And quantitative research is not very good at communicating what it is actually like to be a member of a particular group in a particular situation.

But the relative weaknesses of quantitative research are the relative strengths of qualitative research. Qualitative research can help researchers to generate new and interesting research questions and hypotheses. The research of Lindqvist and colleagues, for example, suggests that there may be a general relationship between how unexpected a suicide is and how consumed the family is with trying to understand why the teen committed suicide. This relationship can now be explored using quantitative research. But it is unclear whether this question would have arisen at all without the researchers sitting down with the families and listening to what they themselves wanted to say about their experience. Qualitative research can also provide rich and detailed descriptions of human behavior in the real-world contexts in which it occurs. Among qualitative researchers, this depth is often referred to as “thick description” (Geertz, 1973) .

Similarly, qualitative research can convey a sense of what it is actually like to be a member of a particular group or in a particular situation—what qualitative researchers often refer to as the “lived experience” of the research participants. Lindqvist and colleagues, for example, describe how all the families spontaneously offered to show the interviewer the victim’s bedroom or the place where the suicide occurred—revealing the importance of these physical locations to the families. It seems unlikely that a quantitative study would have discovered this detail. The table below lists some contrasts between qualitative and quantitative research

Data Collection and Analysis in Qualitative Research

Data collection approaches in qualitative research are quite varied and can involve naturalistic observation, participant observation, archival data, artwork, and many other things. But one of the most common approaches, especially for psychological research, is to conduct interviews. Interviews in qualitative research can be unstructured—consisting of a small number of general questions or prompts that allow participants to talk about what is of interest to them—or structured, where there is a strict script that the interviewer does not deviate from. Most interviews are in between the two and are called semi-structured interviews, where the researcher has a few consistent questions and can follow up by asking more detailed questions about the topics that come up. Such interviews can be lengthy and detailed, but they are usually conducted with a relatively small sample. The unstructured interview was the approach used by Lindqvist and colleagues in their research on the families of suicide victims because the researchers were aware that how much was disclosed about such a sensitive topic should be led by the families, not by the researchers.

Another approach used in qualitative research involves small groups of people who participate together in interviews focused on a particular topic or issue, known as focus groups. The interaction among participants in a focus group can sometimes bring out more information than can be learned in a one- on-one interview. The use of focus groups has become a standard technique in business and industry among those who want to understand consumer tastes and preferences. The content of all focus group interviews is usually recorded and transcribed to facilitate later analyses. However, we know from social psychology that group dynamics are often at play in any group, including focus groups, and it is useful to be aware of those possibilities. For example, the desire to be liked by others can lead participants to provide inaccurate answers that they believe will be perceived favorably by the other participants. The same may be said for personality characteristics. For example, highly extraverted participants can sometimes dominate discussions within focus groups.

Data Analysis in Qualitative Research

Although quantitative and qualitative research generally differ along several important dimensions (e.g., the specificity of the research question, the type of data collected), it is the method of data analysis that distinguishes them more clearly than anything else. To illustrate this idea, imagine a team of researchers that conducts a series of unstructured interviews with people recovering from alcohol use disorder to learn about the role of their religious faith in their recovery. Although this project sounds like qualitative research, imagine further that once they collect the data, they code the data in terms of how often each participant mentions God (or a “higher power”), and they then use descriptive and inferential statistics to find out whether those who mention God more often are more successful in abstaining from alcohol. Now it sounds like quantitative research. In other words, the quantitative-qualitative distinction depends more on what researchers do with the data they have collected than with why or how they collected the data.

But what does qualitative data analysis look like? Just as there are many ways to collect data in qualitative research, there are many ways to analyze data. Here we focus on one general approach called grounded theory (Glaser & Strauss, 1967) . This approach was developed within the field of sociology in the 1960s and has gradually gained popularity in psychology. Remember that in quantitative research, it is typical for the researcher to start with a theory, derive a hypothesis from that theory, and then collect data to test that specific hypothesis. In qualitative research using grounded theory, researchers start with the data and develop a theory or an interpretation that is “grounded in” those data. They do this analysis in stages. First, they identify ideas that are repeated throughout the data. Then they organize these ideas into a smaller number of broader themes. Finally, they write a theoretical narrative—an interpretation of the data in terms of the themes that they have identified. This theoretical narrative focuses on the subjective experience of the participants and is usually supported by many direct quotations from the participants themselves.

As an example, consider a study by researchers Laura Abrams and Laura Curran, who used the grounded theory approach to study the experience of postpartum depression symptoms among low-income mothers (Abrams & Curran, 2009) . Their data were the result of unstructured interviews with 19 participants. The table below hows the five broad themes the researchers identified and the more specific repeating ideas that made up each of those themes. In their research report, they provide numerous quotations from their participants, such as this one from “Destiny:”

“Well, just recently my apartment was broken into and the fact that his Medicaid for some reason was cancelled so a lot of things was happening within the last two weeks all at one time. So that in itself I don’t want to say almost drove me mad but it put me in a funk….Like I really was depressed. (p. 357)”

Their theoretical narrative focused on the participants’ experience of their symptoms, not as an abstract “affective disorder” but as closely tied to the daily struggle of raising children alone under often difficult circumstances. The table below illustrates the process of creating themes from repeating ideas in the qualitative research gathering and analysis process.

Given their differences, it may come as no surprise that quantitative and qualitative research do not coexist in complete harmony. Some quantitative researchers criticize qualitative methods on the grounds that they lack objectivity, are difficult to evaluate in terms of reliability and validity, and do not allow generalization to people or situations other than those actually studied. At the same time, some qualitative researchers criticize quantitative methods on the grounds that they overlook the richness of human behavior and experience and instead answer simple questions about easily quantifiable variables.

In general, however, qualitative researchers are well aware of the issues of objectivity, reliability, validity, and generalizability. In fact, they have developed a number of frameworks for addressing these issues (which are beyond the scope of our discussion). And in general, quantitative researchers are well aware of the issue of oversimplification. They do not believe that all human behavior and experience can be adequately described in terms of a small number of variables and the statistical relationships among them. Instead, they use simplification as a strategy for uncovering general principles of human behavior.

Many researchers from both the quantitative and qualitative camps now agree that the two approaches can and should be combined into what has come to be called mixed-methods research (Todd, Nerlich, McKeown, & Clarke, 2004). In fact, the studies by Lindqvist and colleagues and by Abrams and Curran both combined quantitative and qualitative approaches. One approach to combining quantitative and qualitative research is to use qualitative research for hypothesis generation and quantitative research for hypothesis testing. Again, while a qualitative study might suggest that families who experience an unexpected suicide have more difficulty resolving the question of why, a well-designed quantitative study could test a hypothesis by measuring these specific variables in a large sample. A second approach to combining quantitative and qualitative research is referred to as triangulation. The idea is to use both quantitative and qualitative methods simultaneously to study the same general questions and to compare the results. If the results of the quantitative and qualitative methods converge on the same general conclusion, they reinforce and enrich each other. If the results diverge, then they suggest an interesting new question: Why do the results diverge and how can they be reconciled?

Using qualitative research can often help clarify quantitative results via triangulation. Trenor, Yu, Waight, Zerda, and Sha (2008) investigated the experience of female engineering students at a university. In the first phase, female engineering students were asked to complete a survey, where they rated a number of their perceptions, including their sense of belonging. Their results were compared across the student ethnicities, and statistically, the various ethnic groups showed no differences in their ratings of their sense of belonging.

One might look at that result and conclude that ethnicity does not have anything to do with one’s sense of belonging. However, in the second phase, the authors also conducted interviews with the students, and in those interviews, many minority students reported how the diversity of cultures at the university enhanced their sense of belonging. Without the qualitative component, we might have drawn the wrong conclusion about the quantitative results.

This example shows how qualitative and quantitative research work together to help us understand human behavior. Some researchers have characterized qualitative research as best for identifying behaviors or the phenomenon whereas quantitative research is best for understanding meaning or identifying the mechanism. However, Bryman (2012) argues for breaking down the divide between these arbitrarily different ways of investigating the same questions.

Key Takeaways

• The qualitative approach is centered on an inductive method of reasoning
• The qualitative approach focuses on understanding phenomenon through the perspective of those experiencing it
• Researchers search for recurring topics and group themes to build upon theory to explain findings
• A mixed methods approach uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to explain different aspects of a phenomenon, processes, or practice
• This chapter can be attributed to Research Methods in Psychology by Rajiv S. Jhangiani, I-Chant A. Chiang, Carrie Cuttler, & Dana C. Leighton is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. This adaptation constitutes the fourth edition of this textbook, and builds upon the second Canadian edition by Rajiv S. Jhangiani (Kwantlen Polytechnic University) and I-Chant A. Chiang (Quest University Canada), the second American edition by Dana C. Leighton (Texas A&M University-Texarkana), and the third American edition by Carrie Cuttler (Washington State University) and feedback from several peer reviewers coordinated by the Rebus Community. This edition is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. ↵

Gathering and Analyzing Qualitative Data Copyright © by megankoster is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

• 7 Data Collection Methods & Tools For Research

• Data Collection

The underlying need for Data collection is to capture quality evidence that seeks to answer all the questions that have been posed. Through data collection businesses or management can deduce quality information that is a prerequisite for making informed decisions.

To improve the quality of information, it is expedient that data is collected so that you can draw inferences and make informed decisions on what is considered factual.

At the end of this article, you would understand why picking the best data collection method is necessary for achieving your set objective. 

Sign up on Formplus Builder to create your preferred online surveys or questionnaire for data collection. You don’t need to be tech-savvy! Start creating quality questionnaires with Formplus.

What is Data Collection?

Data collection is a methodical process of gathering and analyzing specific information to proffer solutions to relevant questions and evaluate the results. It focuses on finding out all there is to a particular subject matter. Data is collected to be further subjected to hypothesis testing which seeks to explain a phenomenon.

Hypothesis testing eliminates assumptions while making a proposition from the basis of reason.

For collectors of data, there is a range of outcomes for which the data is collected. But the key purpose for which data is collected is to put a researcher in a vantage position to make predictions about future probabilities and trends.

The core forms in which data can be collected are primary and secondary data. While the former is collected by a researcher through first-hand sources, the latter is collected by an individual other than the user. 

Types of Data Collection 

Before broaching the subject of the various types of data collection. It is pertinent to note that data collection in itself falls under two broad categories; Primary data collection and secondary data collection.

Primary Data Collection

Primary data collection by definition is the gathering of raw data collected at the source. It is a process of collecting the original data collected by a researcher for a specific research purpose. It could be further analyzed into two segments; qualitative research and quantitative data collection methods. 

• Qualitative Research Method 

The qualitative research methods of data collection do not involve the collection of data that involves numbers or a need to be deduced through a mathematical calculation, rather it is based on the non-quantifiable elements like the feeling or emotion of the researcher. An example of such a method is an open-ended questionnaire.

• Quantitative Method

Quantitative methods are presented in numbers and require a mathematical calculation to deduce. An example would be the use of a questionnaire with close-ended questions to arrive at figures to be calculated Mathematically. Also, methods of correlation and regression, mean, mode and median.

Read Also: 15 Reasons to Choose Quantitative over Qualitative Research

Secondary Data Collection

Secondary data collection, on the other hand, is referred to as the gathering of second-hand data collected by an individual who is not the original user. It is the process of collecting data that is already existing, be it already published books, journals, and/or online portals. In terms of ease, it is much less expensive and easier to collect.

Your choice between Primary data collection and secondary data collection depends on the nature, scope, and area of your research as well as its aims and objectives. 

Importance of Data Collection

There are a bunch of underlying reasons for collecting data, especially for a researcher. Walking you through them, here are a few reasons; 

• Integrity of the Research

A key reason for collecting data, be it through quantitative or qualitative methods is to ensure that the integrity of the research question is indeed maintained.

• Reduce the likelihood of errors

The correct use of appropriate data collection of methods reduces the likelihood of errors consistent with the results. 

• Decision Making

To minimize the risk of errors in decision-making, it is important that accurate data is collected so that the researcher doesn’t make uninformed decisions. 

• Save Cost and Time

Data collection saves the researcher time and funds that would otherwise be misspent without a deeper understanding of the topic or subject matter.

• To support a need for a new idea, change, and/or innovation

To prove the need for a change in the norm or the introduction of new information that will be widely accepted, it is important to collect data as evidence to support these claims.

What is a Data Collection Tool?

Data collection tools refer to the devices/instruments used to collect data, such as a paper questionnaire or computer-assisted interviewing system. Case Studies, Checklists, Interviews, Observation sometimes, and Surveys or Questionnaires are all tools used to collect data.

It is important to decide on the tools for data collection because research is carried out in different ways and for different purposes. The objective behind data collection is to capture quality evidence that allows analysis to lead to the formulation of convincing and credible answers to the posed questions.

The objective behind data collection is to capture quality evidence that allows analysis to lead to the formulation of convincing and credible answers to the questions that have been posed – Click to Tweet

The Formplus online data collection tool is perfect for gathering primary data, i.e. raw data collected from the source. You can easily get data with at least three data collection methods with our online and offline data-gathering tool. I.e Online Questionnaires , Focus Groups, and Reporting. 

In our previous articles, we’ve explained why quantitative research methods are more effective than qualitative methods . However, with the Formplus data collection tool, you can gather all types of primary data for academic, opinion or product research.

Top Data Collection Methods and Tools for Academic, Opinion, or Product Research

The following are the top 7 data collection methods for Academic, Opinion-based, or product research. Also discussed in detail are the nature, pros, and cons of each one. At the end of this segment, you will be best informed about which method best suits your research. 

An interview is a face-to-face conversation between two individuals with the sole purpose of collecting relevant information to satisfy a research purpose. Interviews are of different types namely; Structured, Semi-structured , and unstructured with each having a slight variation from the other.

Use this interview consent form template to let an interviewee give you consent to use data gotten from your interviews for investigative research purposes.

• Structured Interviews – Simply put, it is a verbally administered questionnaire. In terms of depth, it is surface level and is usually completed within a short period. For speed and efficiency, it is highly recommendable, but it lacks depth.
• Semi-structured Interviews – In this method, there subsist several key questions which cover the scope of the areas to be explored. It allows a little more leeway for the researcher to explore the subject matter.
• Unstructured Interviews – It is an in-depth interview that allows the researcher to collect a wide range of information with a purpose. An advantage of this method is the freedom it gives a researcher to combine structure with flexibility even though it is more time-consuming.
• In-depth information
• Freedom of flexibility
• Accurate data.
• Time-consuming
• Expensive to collect.

What are The Best Data Collection Tools for Interviews? 

For collecting data through interviews, here are a few tools you can use to easily collect data.

• Audio Recorder

An audio recorder is used for recording sound on disc, tape, or film. Audio information can meet the needs of a wide range of people, as well as provide alternatives to print data collection tools.

• Digital Camera

An advantage of a digital camera is that it can be used for transmitting those images to a monitor screen when the need arises.

A camcorder is used for collecting data through interviews. It provides a combination of both an audio recorder and a video camera. The data provided is qualitative in nature and allows the respondents to answer questions asked exhaustively. If you need to collect sensitive information during an interview, a camcorder might not work for you as you would need to maintain your subject’s privacy.

Want to conduct an interview for qualitative data research or a special report? Use this online interview consent form template to allow the interviewee to give their consent before you use the interview data for research or report. With premium features like e-signature, upload fields, form security, etc., Formplus Builder is the perfect tool to create your preferred online consent forms without coding experience. 

• QUESTIONNAIRES

This is the process of collecting data through an instrument consisting of a series of questions and prompts to receive a response from the individuals it is administered to. Questionnaires are designed to collect data from a group. 

For clarity, it is important to note that a questionnaire isn’t a survey, rather it forms a part of it. A survey is a process of data gathering involving a variety of data collection methods, including a questionnaire.

On a questionnaire, there are three kinds of questions used. They are; fixed-alternative, scale, and open-ended. With each of the questions tailored to the nature and scope of the research.

• Can be administered in large numbers and is cost-effective.
• It can be used to compare and contrast previous research to measure change.
• Easy to visualize and analyze.
• Questionnaires offer actionable data.
• Respondent identity is protected.
• Questionnaires can cover all areas of a topic.
• Relatively inexpensive.
• Answers may be dishonest or the respondents lose interest midway.
• Questionnaires can’t produce qualitative data.
• Questions might be left unanswered.
• Respondents may have a hidden agenda.
• Not all questions can be analyzed easily.

What are the Best Data Collection Tools for Questionnaires? 

• Formplus Online Questionnaire

Formplus lets you create powerful forms to help you collect the information you need. Formplus helps you create the online forms that you like. The Formplus online questionnaire form template to get actionable trends and measurable responses. Conduct research, optimize knowledge of your brand or just get to know an audience with this form template. The form template is fast, free and fully customizable.

• Paper Questionnaire

A paper questionnaire is a data collection tool consisting of a series of questions and/or prompts for the purpose of gathering information from respondents. Mostly designed for statistical analysis of the responses, they can also be used as a form of data collection.

By definition, data reporting is the process of gathering and submitting data to be further subjected to analysis. The key aspect of data reporting is reporting accurate data because inaccurate data reporting leads to uninformed decision-making.

• Informed decision-making.
• Easily accessible.
• Self-reported answers may be exaggerated.
• The results may be affected by bias.
• Respondents may be too shy to give out all the details.
• Inaccurate reports will lead to uninformed decisions.

What are the Best Data Collection Tools for Reporting?

Reporting tools enable you to extract and present data in charts, tables, and other visualizations so users can find useful information. You could source data for reporting from Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) reports, newspapers, website articles, and hospital records.

• NGO Reports

Contained in NGO report is an in-depth and comprehensive report on the activities carried out by the NGO, covering areas such as business and human rights. The information contained in these reports is research-specific and forms an acceptable academic base for collecting data. NGOs often focus on development projects which are organized to promote particular causes.

Newspaper data are relatively easy to collect and are sometimes the only continuously available source of event data. Even though there is a problem of bias in newspaper data, it is still a valid tool in collecting data for Reporting.

• Website Articles

Gathering and using data contained in website articles is also another tool for data collection. Collecting data from web articles is a quicker and less expensive data collection Two major disadvantages of using this data reporting method are biases inherent in the data collection process and possible security/confidentiality concerns.

• Hospital Care records

Health care involves a diverse set of public and private data collection systems, including health surveys, administrative enrollment and billing records, and medical records, used by various entities, including hospitals, CHCs, physicians, and health plans. The data provided is clear, unbiased and accurate, but must be obtained under legal means as medical data is kept with the strictest regulations.

• EXISTING DATA

This is the introduction of new investigative questions in addition to/other than the ones originally used when the data was initially gathered. It involves adding measurement to a study or research. An example would be sourcing data from an archive.

• Accuracy is very high.
• Easily accessible information.
• Problems with evaluation.
• Difficulty in understanding.

What are the Best Data Collection Tools for Existing Data?

The concept of Existing data means that data is collected from existing sources to investigate research questions other than those for which the data were originally gathered. Tools to collect existing data include: 

• Research Journals – Unlike newspapers and magazines, research journals are intended for an academic or technical audience, not general readers. A journal is a scholarly publication containing articles written by researchers, professors, and other experts.
• Surveys – A survey is a data collection tool for gathering information from a sample population, with the intention of generalizing the results to a larger population. Surveys have a variety of purposes and can be carried out in many ways depending on the objectives to be achieved.
• OBSERVATION

This is a data collection method by which information on a phenomenon is gathered through observation. The nature of the observation could be accomplished either as a complete observer, an observer as a participant, a participant as an observer, or as a complete participant. This method is a key base for formulating a hypothesis.

• Easy to administer.
• There subsists a greater accuracy with results.
• It is a universally accepted practice.
• It diffuses the situation of the unwillingness of respondents to administer a report.
• It is appropriate for certain situations.
• Some phenomena aren’t open to observation.
• It cannot be relied upon.
• Bias may arise.
• It is expensive to administer.
• Its validity cannot be predicted accurately.

What are the Best Data Collection Tools for Observation?

Observation involves the active acquisition of information from a primary source. Observation can also involve the perception and recording of data via the use of scientific instruments. The best tools for Observation are:

• Checklists – state-specific criteria, that allow users to gather information and make judgments about what they should know in relation to the outcomes. They offer systematic ways of collecting data about specific behaviors, knowledge, and skills.
• Direct observation – This is an observational study method of collecting evaluative information. The evaluator watches the subject in his or her usual environment without altering that environment.

FOCUS GROUPS

The opposite of quantitative research which involves numerical-based data, this data collection method focuses more on qualitative research. It falls under the primary category of data based on the feelings and opinions of the respondents. This research involves asking open-ended questions to a group of individuals usually ranging from 6-10 people, to provide feedback.

• Information obtained is usually very detailed.
• Cost-effective when compared to one-on-one interviews.
• It reflects speed and efficiency in the supply of results.
• Lacking depth in covering the nitty-gritty of a subject matter.
• Bias might still be evident.
• Requires interviewer training
• The researcher has very little control over the outcome.
• A few vocal voices can drown out the rest.
• Difficulty in assembling an all-inclusive group.

What are the Best Data Collection Tools for Focus Groups?

A focus group is a data collection method that is tightly facilitated and structured around a set of questions. The purpose of the meeting is to extract from the participants’ detailed responses to these questions. The best tools for tackling Focus groups are: 

• Two-Way – One group watches another group answer the questions posed by the moderator. After listening to what the other group has to offer, the group that listens is able to facilitate more discussion and could potentially draw different conclusions .
• Dueling-Moderator – There are two moderators who play the devil’s advocate. The main positive of the dueling-moderator focus group is to facilitate new ideas by introducing new ways of thinking and varying viewpoints.
• COMBINATION RESEARCH

This method of data collection encompasses the use of innovative methods to enhance participation in both individuals and groups. Also under the primary category, it is a combination of Interviews and Focus Groups while collecting qualitative data . This method is key when addressing sensitive subjects. 

• Encourage participants to give responses.
• It stimulates a deeper connection between participants.
• The relative anonymity of respondents increases participation.
• It improves the richness of the data collected.
• It costs the most out of all the top 7.
• It’s the most time-consuming.

What are the Best Data Collection Tools for Combination Research? 

The Combination Research method involves two or more data collection methods, for instance, interviews as well as questionnaires or a combination of semi-structured telephone interviews and focus groups. The best tools for combination research are: 

• Online Survey –  The two tools combined here are online interviews and the use of questionnaires. This is a questionnaire that the target audience can complete over the Internet. It is timely, effective, and efficient. Especially since the data to be collected is quantitative in nature.
• Dual-Moderator – The two tools combined here are focus groups and structured questionnaires. The structured questionnaires give a direction as to where the research is headed while two moderators take charge of the proceedings. Whilst one ensures the focus group session progresses smoothly, the other makes sure that the topics in question are all covered. Dual-moderator focus groups typically result in a more productive session and essentially lead to an optimum collection of data.

Why Formplus is the Best Data Collection Tool

• Vast Options for Form Customization 

With Formplus, you can create your unique survey form. With options to change themes, font color, font, font type, layout, width, and more, you can create an attractive survey form. The builder also gives you as many features as possible to choose from and you do not need to be a graphic designer to create a form.

• Extensive Analytics

Form Analytics, a feature in formplus helps you view the number of respondents, unique visits, total visits, abandonment rate, and average time spent before submission. This tool eliminates the need for a manual calculation of the received data and/or responses as well as the conversion rate for your poll.

• Embed Survey Form on Your Website

Copy the link to your form and embed it as an iframe which will automatically load as your website loads, or as a popup that opens once the respondent clicks on the link. Embed the link on your Twitter page to give instant access to your followers.

• Geolocation Support

The geolocation feature on Formplus lets you ascertain where individual responses are coming. It utilises Google Maps to pinpoint the longitude and latitude of the respondent, to the nearest accuracy, along with the responses.

• Multi-Select feature

This feature helps to conserve horizontal space as it allows you to put multiple options in one field. This translates to including more information on the survey form. 

Read Also: 10 Reasons to Use Formplus for Online Data Collection

How to Use Formplus to collect online data in 7 simple steps. 

• Register or sign up on Formplus builder : Start creating your preferred questionnaire or survey by signing up with either your Google, Facebook, or Email account.

Formplus gives you a free plan with basic features you can use to collect online data. Pricing plans with vast features starts at $20 monthly, with reasonable discounts for Education and Non-Profit Organizations. 

2. Input your survey title and use the form builder choice options to start creating your surveys. 

Use the choice option fields like single select, multiple select, checkbox, radio, and image choices to create your preferred multi-choice surveys online.

3. Do you want customers to rate any of your products or services delivery? 

Use the rating to allow survey respondents rate your products or services. This is an ideal quantitative research method of collecting data. 

4. Beautify your online questionnaire with Formplus Customisation features.

• Change the theme color
• Add your brand’s logo and image to the forms
• Change the form width and layout
• Edit the submission button if you want
• Change text font color and sizes
• Do you have already made custom CSS to beautify your questionnaire? If yes, just copy and paste it to the CSS option.

5. Edit your survey questionnaire settings for your specific needs

Choose where you choose to store your files and responses. Select a submission deadline, choose a timezone, limit respondents’ responses, enable Captcha to prevent spam, and collect location data of customers.

Set an introductory message to respondents before they begin the survey, toggle the “start button” post final submission message or redirect respondents to another page when they submit their questionnaires. 

Change the Email Notifications inventory and initiate an autoresponder message to all your survey questionnaire respondents. You can also transfer your forms to other users who can become form administrators.

6. Share links to your survey questionnaire page with customers.

There’s an option to copy and share the link as “Popup” or “Embed code” The data collection tool automatically creates a QR Code for Survey Questionnaire which you can download and share as appropriate. 

Congratulations if you’ve made it to this stage. You can start sharing the link to your survey questionnaire with your customers.

7. View your Responses to the Survey Questionnaire

Toggle with the presentation of your summary from the options. Whether as a single, table or cards.

8. Allow Formplus Analytics to interpret your Survey Questionnaire Data

  With online form builder analytics, a business can determine;

• The number of times the survey questionnaire was filled
• The number of customers reached
• Abandonment Rate: The rate at which customers exit the form without submitting it.
• Conversion Rate: The percentage of customers who completed the online form
• Average time spent per visit
• Location of customers/respondents.
• The type of device used by the customer to complete the survey questionnaire.

7 Tips to Create The Best Surveys For Data Collections

•  Define the goal of your survey – Once the goal of your survey is outlined, it will aid in deciding which questions are the top priority. A clear attainable goal would, for example, mirror a clear reason as to why something is happening. e.g. “The goal of this survey is to understand why Employees are leaving an establishment.”
• Use close-ended clearly defined questions – Avoid open-ended questions and ensure you’re not suggesting your preferred answer to the respondent. If possible offer a range of answers with choice options and ratings.
• Survey outlook should be attractive and Inviting – An attractive-looking survey encourages a higher number of recipients to respond to the survey. Check out Formplus Builder for colorful options to integrate into your survey design. You could use images and videos to keep participants glued to their screens.
•   Assure Respondents about the safety of their data – You want your respondents to be assured whilst disclosing details of their personal information to you. It’s your duty to inform the respondents that the data they provide is confidential and only collected for the purpose of research.
• Ensure your survey can be completed in record time – Ideally, in a typical survey, users should be able to respond in 100 seconds. It is pertinent to note that they, the respondents, are doing you a favor. Don’t stress them. Be brief and get straight to the point.
• Do a trial survey – Preview your survey before sending out your surveys to the intended respondents. Make a trial version which you’ll send to a few individuals. Based on their responses, you can draw inferences and decide whether or not your survey is ready for the big time.
• Attach a reward upon completion for users – Give your respondents something to look forward to at the end of the survey. Think of it as a penny for their troubles. It could well be the encouragement they need to not abandon the survey midway.

Try out Formplus today . You can start making your own surveys with the Formplus online survey builder. By applying these tips, you will definitely get the most out of your online surveys.

Top Survey Templates For Data Collection 

• Customer Satisfaction Survey Template 

On the template, you can collect data to measure customer satisfaction over key areas like the commodity purchase and the level of service they received. It also gives insight as to which products the customer enjoyed, how often they buy such a product, and whether or not the customer is likely to recommend the product to a friend or acquaintance. 

• Demographic Survey Template

With this template, you would be able to measure, with accuracy, the ratio of male to female, age range, and the number of unemployed persons in a particular country as well as obtain their personal details such as names and addresses.

Respondents are also able to state their religious and political views about the country under review.

• Feedback Form Template

Contained in the template for the online feedback form is the details of a product and/or service used. Identifying this product or service and documenting how long the customer has used them.

The overall satisfaction is measured as well as the delivery of the services. The likelihood that the customer also recommends said product is also measured.

• Online Questionnaire Template

The online questionnaire template houses the respondent’s data as well as educational qualifications to collect information to be used for academic research.

Respondents can also provide their gender, race, and field of study as well as present living conditions as prerequisite data for the research study.

• Student Data Sheet Form Template 

The template is a data sheet containing all the relevant information of a student. The student’s name, home address, guardian’s name, record of attendance as well as performance in school is well represented on this template. This is a perfect data collection method to deploy for a school or an education organization.

Also included is a record for interaction with others as well as a space for a short comment on the overall performance and attitude of the student. 

• Interview Consent Form Template

This online interview consent form template allows the interviewee to sign off their consent to use the interview data for research or report to journalists. With premium features like short text fields, upload, e-signature, etc., Formplus Builder is the perfect tool to create your preferred online consent forms without coding experience.

What is the Best Data Collection Method for Qualitative Data?

Answer: Combination Research

The best data collection method for a researcher for gathering qualitative data which generally is data relying on the feelings, opinions, and beliefs of the respondents would be Combination Research.

The reason why combination research is the best fit is that it encompasses the attributes of Interviews and Focus Groups. It is also useful when gathering data that is sensitive in nature. It can be described as an all-purpose quantitative data collection method.

Above all, combination research improves the richness of data collected when compared with other data collection methods for qualitative data.

What is the Best Data Collection Method for Quantitative Research Data?

Ans: Questionnaire

The best data collection method a researcher can employ in gathering quantitative data which takes into consideration data that can be represented in numbers and figures that can be deduced mathematically is the Questionnaire.

These can be administered to a large number of respondents while saving costs. For quantitative data that may be bulky or voluminous in nature, the use of a Questionnaire makes such data easy to visualize and analyze.

Another key advantage of the Questionnaire is that it can be used to compare and contrast previous research work done to measure changes.

Technology-Enabled Data Collection Methods

There are so many diverse methods available now in the world because technology has revolutionized the way data is being collected. It has provided efficient and innovative methods that anyone, especially researchers and organizations. Below are some technology-enabled data collection methods:

• Online Surveys: Online surveys have gained popularity due to their ease of use and wide reach. You can distribute them through email, social media, or embed them on websites. Online surveys allow you to quickly complete data collection, automated data capture, and real-time analysis. Online surveys also offer features like skip logic, validation checks, and multimedia integration.
• Mobile Surveys: With the widespread use of smartphones, mobile surveys’ popularity is also on the rise. Mobile surveys leverage the capabilities of mobile devices, and this allows respondents to participate at their convenience. This includes multimedia elements, location-based information, and real-time feedback. Mobile surveys are the best for capturing in-the-moment experiences or opinions.
• Social Media Listening: Social media platforms are a good source of unstructured data that you can analyze to gain insights into customer sentiment and trends. Social media listening involves monitoring and analyzing social media conversations, mentions, and hashtags to understand public opinion, identify emerging topics, and assess brand reputation.
• Wearable Devices and Sensors: You can embed wearable devices, such as fitness trackers or smartwatches, and sensors in everyday objects to capture continuous data on various physiological and environmental variables. This data can provide you with insights into health behaviors, activity patterns, sleep quality, and environmental conditions, among others.
• Big Data Analytics: Big data analytics leverages large volumes of structured and unstructured data from various sources, such as transaction records, social media, and internet browsing. Advanced analytics techniques, like machine learning and natural language processing, can extract meaningful insights and patterns from this data, enabling organizations to make data-driven decisions.

Read Also: How Technology is Revolutionizing Data Collection

Faulty Data Collection Practices – Common Mistakes & Sources of Error

While technology-enabled data collection methods offer numerous advantages, there are some pitfalls and sources of error that you should be aware of. Here are some common mistakes and sources of error in data collection:

• Population Specification Error: Population specification error occurs when the target population is not clearly defined or misidentified. This error leads to a mismatch between the research objectives and the actual population being studied, resulting in biased or inaccurate findings.
• Sample Frame Error: Sample frame error occurs when the sampling frame, the list or source from which the sample is drawn, does not adequately represent the target population. This error can introduce selection bias and affect the generalizability of the findings.
• Selection Error: Selection error occurs when the process of selecting participants or units for the study introduces bias. It can happen due to nonrandom sampling methods, inadequate sampling techniques, or self-selection bias. Selection error compromises the representativeness of the sample and affects the validity of the results.
• Nonresponse Error: Nonresponse error occurs when selected participants choose not to participate or fail to respond to the data collection effort. Nonresponse bias can result in an unrepresentative sample if those who choose not to respond differ systematically from those who do respond. Efforts should be made to mitigate nonresponse and encourage participation to minimize this error.
• Measurement Error: Measurement error arises from inaccuracies or inconsistencies in the measurement process. It can happen due to poorly designed survey instruments, ambiguous questions, respondent bias, or errors in data entry or coding. Measurement errors can lead to distorted or unreliable data, affecting the validity and reliability of the findings.

In order to mitigate these errors and ensure high-quality data collection, you should carefully plan your data collection procedures, and validate measurement tools. You should also use appropriate sampling techniques, employ randomization where possible, and minimize nonresponse through effective communication and incentives. Ensure you conduct regular checks and implement validation processes, and data cleaning procedures to identify and rectify errors during data analysis.

Best Practices for Data Collection

• Clearly Define Objectives: Clearly define the research objectives and questions to guide the data collection process. This helps ensure that the collected data aligns with the research goals and provides relevant insights.
• Plan Ahead: Develop a detailed data collection plan that includes the timeline, resources needed, and specific procedures to follow. This helps maintain consistency and efficiency throughout the data collection process.
• Choose the Right Method: Select data collection methods that are appropriate for the research objectives and target population. Consider factors such as feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to capture the required data accurately.
• Pilot Test : Before full-scale data collection, conduct a pilot test to identify any issues with the data collection instruments or procedures. This allows for refinement and improvement before data collection with the actual sample.
• Train Data Collectors: If data collection involves human interaction, ensure that data collectors are properly trained on the data collection protocols, instruments, and ethical considerations. Consistent training helps minimize errors and maintain data quality.
• Maintain Consistency: Follow standardized procedures throughout the data collection process to ensure consistency across data collectors and time. This includes using consistent measurement scales, instructions, and data recording methods.
• Minimize Bias: Be aware of potential sources of bias in data collection and take steps to minimize their impact. Use randomization techniques, employ diverse data collectors, and implement strategies to mitigate response biases.
• Ensure Data Quality: Implement quality control measures to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and reliability of the collected data. Conduct regular checks for data entry errors, inconsistencies, and missing values.
• Maintain Data Confidentiality: Protect the privacy and confidentiality of participants’ data by implementing appropriate security measures. Ensure compliance with data protection regulations and obtain informed consent from participants.
• Document the Process: Keep detailed documentation of the data collection process, including any deviations from the original plan, challenges encountered, and decisions made. This documentation facilitates transparency, replicability, and future analysis.

FAQs about Data Collection

• What are secondary sources of data collection? Secondary sources of data collection are defined as the data that has been previously gathered and is available for your use as a researcher. These sources can include published research papers, government reports, statistical databases, and other existing datasets.
• What are the primary sources of data collection? Primary sources of data collection involve collecting data directly from the original source also known as the firsthand sources. You can do this through surveys, interviews, observations, experiments, or other direct interactions with individuals or subjects of study.
• How many types of data are there? There are two main types of data: qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative data is non-numeric and it includes information in the form of words, images, or descriptions. Quantitative data, on the other hand, is numeric and you can measure and analyze it statistically.

Sign up on Formplus Builder to create your preferred online surveys or questionnaire for data collection. You don’t need to be tech-savvy!

Connect to Formplus, Get Started Now - It's Free!

• academic research
• Data collection method
• data collection techniques
• data collection tool
• data collection tools
• field data collection
• online data collection tool
• product research
• qualitative research data
• quantitative research data
• scientific research
• busayo.longe

You may also like:

Data Collection Plan: Definition + Steps to Do It

Introduction A data collection plan is a way to get specific information on your audience. You can use it to better understand what they...

Data Collection Sheet: Types + [Template Examples]

Simple guide on data collection sheet. Types, tools, and template examples.

How Technology is Revolutionizing Data Collection

As global industrialization continues to transform, it is becoming evident that there is a ubiquity of large datasets driven by the need...

User Research: Definition, Methods, Tools and Guide

In this article, you’ll learn to provide value to your target market with user research. As a bonus, we’ve added user research tools and...

Formplus - For Seamless Data Collection

Collect data the right way with a versatile data collection tool. try formplus and transform your work productivity today..

Community Blog

Keep up-to-date on postgraduate related issues with our quick reads written by students, postdocs, professors and industry leaders.

Statistical Treatment of Data – Explained & Example

• By DiscoverPhDs
• September 8, 2020

‘Statistical treatment’ is when you apply a statistical method to a data set to draw meaning from it. Statistical treatment can be either descriptive statistics, which describes the relationship between variables in a population, or inferential statistics, which tests a hypothesis by making inferences from the collected data.

Introduction to Statistical Treatment in Research

Every research student, regardless of whether they are a biologist, computer scientist or psychologist, must have a basic understanding of statistical treatment if their study is to be reliable.

This is because designing experiments and collecting data are only a small part of conducting research. The other components, which are often not so well understood by new researchers, are the analysis, interpretation and presentation of the data. This is just as important, if not more important, as this is where meaning is extracted from the study .

What is Statistical Treatment of Data?

Statistical treatment of data is when you apply some form of statistical method to a data set to transform it from a group of meaningless numbers into meaningful output.

Statistical treatment of data involves the use of statistical methods such as:

• regression,
• conditional probability,
• standard deviation and
• distribution range.

These statistical methods allow us to investigate the statistical relationships between the data and identify possible errors in the study.

In addition to being able to identify trends, statistical treatment also allows us to organise and process our data in the first place. This is because when carrying out statistical analysis of our data, it is generally more useful to draw several conclusions for each subgroup within our population than to draw a single, more general conclusion for the whole population. However, to do this, we need to be able to classify the population into different subgroups so that we can later break down our data in the same way before analysing it.

Statistical Treatment Example – Quantitative Research

For a statistical treatment of data example, consider a medical study that is investigating the effect of a drug on the human population. As the drug can affect different people in different ways based on parameters such as gender, age and race, the researchers would want to group the data into different subgroups based on these parameters to determine how each one affects the effectiveness of the drug. Categorising the data in this way is an example of performing basic statistical treatment.

Type of Errors

A fundamental part of statistical treatment is using statistical methods to identify possible outliers and errors. No matter how careful we are, all experiments are subject to inaccuracies resulting from two types of errors: systematic errors and random errors.

Systematic errors are errors associated with either the equipment being used to collect the data or with the method in which they are used. Random errors are errors that occur unknowingly or unpredictably in the experimental configuration, such as internal deformations within specimens or small voltage fluctuations in measurement testing instruments.

These experimental errors, in turn, can lead to two types of conclusion errors: type I errors and type II errors . A type I error is a false positive which occurs when a researcher rejects a true null hypothesis. On the other hand, a type II error is a false negative which occurs when a researcher fails to reject a false null hypothesis.

There’s no doubt about it – writing can be difficult. Whether you’re writing the first sentence of a paper or a grant proposal, it’s easy

Stay up to date with current information being provided by the UK Government and Universities about the impact of the global pandemic on PhD research studies.

Is it really possible to do a PhD while working? The answer is ‘yes’, but it comes with several ‘buts’. Read our post to find out if it’s for you.

Join thousands of other students and stay up to date with the latest PhD programmes, funding opportunities and advice.

Browse PhDs Now

The title page of your dissertation or thesis conveys all the essential details about your project. This guide helps you format it in the correct way.

This post gives you the best questions to ask at a PhD interview, to help you work out if your potential supervisor and lab is a good fit for you.

Dr Williams gained her PhD in Chemical Engineering at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York in 2020. She is now a Presidential Postdoctoral Fellow at Cornell University, researching simplifying vaccine manufacturing in low-income countries.

Elpida is about to start her third year of PhD research at the University of Leicester. Her research focuses on preventing type 2 diabetes in women who had gestational diabetes, and she an active STEM Ambassador.

Join Thousands of Students

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• Types of Interviews in Research | Guide & Examples

Types of Interviews in Research | Guide & Examples

Published on March 10, 2022 by Tegan George . Revised on June 22, 2023.

An interview is a qualitative research method that relies on asking questions in order to collect data . Interviews involve two or more people, one of whom is the interviewer asking the questions.

There are several types of interviews, often differentiated by their level of structure.

• Structured interviews have predetermined questions asked in a predetermined order.
• Unstructured interviews are more free-flowing.
• Semi-structured interviews fall in between.

Interviews are commonly used in market research, social science, and ethnographic research .

Table of contents

What is a structured interview, what is a semi-structured interview, what is an unstructured interview, what is a focus group, examples of interview questions, advantages and disadvantages of interviews, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about types of interviews.

Structured interviews have predetermined questions in a set order. They are often closed-ended, featuring dichotomous (yes/no) or multiple-choice questions. While open-ended structured interviews exist, they are much less common. The types of questions asked make structured interviews a predominantly quantitative tool.

Asking set questions in a set order can help you see patterns among responses, and it allows you to easily compare responses between participants while keeping other factors constant. This can mitigate   research biases and lead to higher reliability and validity. However, structured interviews can be overly formal, as well as limited in scope and flexibility.

• You feel very comfortable with your topic. This will help you formulate your questions most effectively.
• You have limited time or resources. Structured interviews are a bit more straightforward to analyze because of their closed-ended nature, and can be a doable undertaking for an individual.
• Your research question depends on holding environmental conditions between participants constant.

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

Semi-structured interviews are a blend of structured and unstructured interviews. While the interviewer has a general plan for what they want to ask, the questions do not have to follow a particular phrasing or order.

Semi-structured interviews are often open-ended, allowing for flexibility, but follow a predetermined thematic framework, giving a sense of order. For this reason, they are often considered “the best of both worlds.”

However, if the questions differ substantially between participants, it can be challenging to look for patterns, lessening the generalizability and validity of your results.

• You have prior interview experience. It’s easier than you think to accidentally ask a leading question when coming up with questions on the fly. Overall, spontaneous questions are much more difficult than they may seem.
• Your research question is exploratory in nature. The answers you receive can help guide your future research.

An unstructured interview is the most flexible type of interview. The questions and the order in which they are asked are not set. Instead, the interview can proceed more spontaneously, based on the participant’s previous answers.

Unstructured interviews are by definition open-ended. This flexibility can help you gather detailed information on your topic, while still allowing you to observe patterns between participants.

However, so much flexibility means that they can be very challenging to conduct properly. You must be very careful not to ask leading questions, as biased responses can lead to lower reliability or even invalidate your research.

• You have a solid background in your research topic and have conducted interviews before.
• Your research question is exploratory in nature, and you are seeking descriptive data that will deepen and contextualize your initial hypotheses.
• Your research necessitates forming a deeper connection with your participants, encouraging them to feel comfortable revealing their true opinions and emotions.

A focus group brings together a group of participants to answer questions on a topic of interest in a moderated setting. Focus groups are qualitative in nature and often study the group’s dynamic and body language in addition to their answers. Responses can guide future research on consumer products and services, human behavior, or controversial topics.

Focus groups can provide more nuanced and unfiltered feedback than individual interviews and are easier to organize than experiments or large surveys . However, their small size leads to low external validity and the temptation as a researcher to “cherry-pick” responses that fit your hypotheses.

• Your research focuses on the dynamics of group discussion or real-time responses to your topic.
• Your questions are complex and rooted in feelings, opinions, and perceptions that cannot be answered with a “yes” or “no.”
• Your topic is exploratory in nature, and you are seeking information that will help you uncover new questions or future research ideas.

Depending on the type of interview you are conducting, your questions will differ in style, phrasing, and intention. Structured interview questions are set and precise, while the other types of interviews allow for more open-endedness and flexibility.

Here are some examples.

• Semi-structured
• Unstructured
• Focus group
• Do you like dogs? Yes/No
• Do you associate dogs with feeling: happy; somewhat happy; neutral; somewhat unhappy; unhappy
• If yes, name one attribute of dogs that you like.
• If no, name one attribute of dogs that you don’t like.
• What feelings do dogs bring out in you?
• When you think more deeply about this, what experiences would you say your feelings are rooted in?

Interviews are a great research tool. They allow you to gather rich information and draw more detailed conclusions than other research methods, taking into consideration nonverbal cues, off-the-cuff reactions, and emotional responses.

However, they can also be time-consuming and deceptively challenging to conduct properly. Smaller sample sizes can cause their validity and reliability to suffer, and there is an inherent risk of interviewer effect arising from accidentally leading questions.

Here are some advantages and disadvantages of each type of interview that can help you decide if you’d like to utilize this research method.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Student’s  t -distribution
• Normal distribution
• Null and Alternative Hypotheses
• Chi square tests
• Confidence interval
• Quartiles & Quantiles
• Cluster sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Data cleansing
• Reproducibility vs Replicability
• Peer review
• Prospective cohort study

Research bias

• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Placebo effect
• Hawthorne effect
• Hindsight bias
• Affect heuristic
• Social desirability bias

The four most common types of interviews are:

• Structured interviews : The questions are predetermined in both topic and order. 
• Semi-structured interviews : A few questions are predetermined, but other questions aren’t planned.
• Unstructured interviews : None of the questions are predetermined.
• Focus group interviews : The questions are presented to a group instead of one individual.

The interviewer effect is a type of bias that emerges when a characteristic of an interviewer (race, age, gender identity, etc.) influences the responses given by the interviewee.

There is a risk of an interviewer effect in all types of interviews , but it can be mitigated by writing really high-quality interview questions.

Social desirability bias is the tendency for interview participants to give responses that will be viewed favorably by the interviewer or other participants. It occurs in all types of interviews and surveys , but is most common in semi-structured interviews , unstructured interviews , and focus groups .

Social desirability bias can be mitigated by ensuring participants feel at ease and comfortable sharing their views. Make sure to pay attention to your own body language and any physical or verbal cues, such as nodding or widening your eyes.

This type of bias can also occur in observations if the participants know they’re being observed. They might alter their behavior accordingly.

A focus group is a research method that brings together a small group of people to answer questions in a moderated setting. The group is chosen due to predefined demographic traits, and the questions are designed to shed light on a topic of interest. It is one of 4 types of interviews .

Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.

Quantitative methods allow you to systematically measure variables and test hypotheses . Qualitative methods allow you to explore concepts and experiences in more detail.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

George, T. (2023, June 22). Types of Interviews in Research | Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved June 10, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/interviews-research/

Is this article helpful?

Tegan George

Other students also liked, unstructured interview | definition, guide & examples, structured interview | definition, guide & examples, semi-structured interview | definition, guide & examples, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

• About English Wizard Online
• Parts of Speech, Phrases, Sentences
• Spelling/ Vocabulary
• Research/ Thesis Writing
• Lesson Plans
• Worksheets, eBooks, Workbooks, Printables
• Poems (Text and Video)
• Speech/ Pronunciation Lessons
• Classroom Ideas/ Materials
• Teacher's Comments
• Creative and Technical Writing
• Teaching Articles/ Teaching Strategies
• Essays/ Book and Movie Reviews
• Yearbook/ Student Publication/ Magazine/ Newsletter

Sample Methods of Research and Procedure in Chapter 3 (Thesis Writing)

No comments:

Post a comment.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Research Instruments & Data Gathering Procedure

The instrument used was a researcher-made questionnaire checklist to gather the needed data for the respondent's profile. The draft of the questionnaire was drawn out based on the researcher's previous studies, readings, published and unpublished thesis relevant to the study and also professional literature. In the preparation of the instrument, the requirements in the designing of good data collection instrument were considered. For instance, statement describing the situation or issues pertaining was toned down to accommodate the knowledge preparedness of the respondents. Open-ended options were provided to accommodate to free formatted views related to the topics or issues. In this way, the instrument is authorized to obtain valid responses of the respondents. Preference for the use of the structured questionnaire is premised on several research assumptions such as cost if being a least expensive means of gathering data, avoidance of personal bias and less pressure for immediate response and giving the respondents a feeling of anonymity. In the end, it encourages open responses to sensitive issues at hand. In addition, the instrument will be validated by the professor before it laid hand on the study. As for the data gathering, the first step before going to the testing proper is to make a request letter. Upon approval, the researcher retrieves the request letter. The principal, as well as class advisers and other faculty members were selected in the administration. In administering the questionnaire, the researcher was use the time allotted for vacant to avoid distraction of class discussions. The respondents will be given enough time to answer the questions. After data gathering, the researcher now collected it for tallying the scores and to apply the statistical treatment to be used with the study.

Related Papers

Satyajit Behera

Measurement and Data Collection. Primary data, Secondary data, Design of questionnaire ; Sampling fundamentals and sample designs. Measurement and Scaling Techniques, Data Processing

Edwin Kubai

Kubai Edwin

This paper primarily focuses explicitly on two terms namely; reliability and validity as used in the field of educational research. When conducting any educational study it is worth noting that designing and measuring the research instruments is very essential especially to novice researchers. The data collection tools (research instruments) should be designed in such a way that they would be able to accurately measure the intended construct under investigation and ensure the meaningfulness of the study findings. This would greatly enhance the believability and trustworthiness of the research findings especially if the study is repeated by different investigators under the same conditions or with different research instruments measuring the same construct. It is absolutely true to note that reliability and validity are two terms used in any investigation of which novice researchers find them difficult to differentiate them. They find difficult on how accurately to explain to the audience if their research instruments meet the minimum threshold for reliability and validity conditions. It has been noted with concern that most novice researchers fail to clarify how reliability and validity was achieved in their respective studies due to lack of sufficient knowledge about the concept or some fail completely to mention about it in their research methodology. This paper attempts to clarify issues related to reliability and validity of research instruments to ensure tranquility and transferability of research findings. The next section defines validity and reliability concepts as used in designing research instruments

Lucia Winingsih

Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità

Chiara de Waure

This article describes methodological issues of the "Sportello Salute Giovani" project ("Youth Health Information Desk"), a multicenter study aimed at assessing the health status and attitudes and behaviours of university students in Italy. The questionnaire used to carry out the study was adapted from the Italian health behaviours in school-aged children (HBSC) project and consisted of 93 items addressing: demographics; nutritional habits and status; physical activity; lifestyles; reproductive and preconception health; health and satisfaction of life; attitudes and behaviours toward academic study and new technologies. The questionnaire was administered to a pool of 12 000 students from 18 to 30 years of age who voluntary decided to participate during classes held at different Italian faculties or at the three "Sportello Salute Giovani" centers which were established in the three sites of the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Catholic University of...

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

francesca pierri

André Pereira

APTISI Transactions on Management

APTISI Transactions on Management , George Iwan

Writing can mean lowering or describing graphic symbols that describe a language understood by someone. For a researcher, management of research preparation is a very important step because this step greatly determines the success or failure of all research activities. Before a person starts with research activities, he must make a written plan commonly referred to as the management of research data collection. In the process of collecting research data, of course we can do the management of questionnaires as well as the preparation of interview guidelines to disseminate and obtain accurate information. With the arrangement of planning and conducting interviews: the ethics of conducting interviews, the advantages and disadvantages of interviews, the formulation of interview questions, the schedule of interviews, group and focus group interviews, interviews using recording devices, and interview bias. making a questionnaire must be designed with very good management by giving to the information needed, in accordance with the problem and all that does not cause problems at the stage of analysis and interpretation.

Leann Delos Reyes

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

mohan dissanayaka

Burcu Akhun

International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS)

Srinivas Publication , Sreeramana Aithal

Dhea Savella Segui

Ebenezer Consultan

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Reimagining the nursing workload: Finding time to close the workforce gap

US healthcare organizations continue to grapple with the impacts of the nursing shortage—scaling back of health services, increasing staff burnout and mental-health challenges, and rising labor costs. While several health systems have had some success in rebuilding their nursing workforces   in recent months, estimates still suggest a potential shortage of 200,000 to 450,000 nurses in the United States, with acute-care settings likely to be most affected. 1 Gretchen Berlin, Meredith Lapointe, Mhoire Murphy, and Joanna Wexler, “ Assessing the lingering impact of COVID-19 on the nursing workforce ,” McKinsey, May 11, 2022. Identifying opportunities to close this gap remains a priority in the healthcare industry. This article highlights research conducted by McKinsey in collaboration with the ANA Enterprise on how nurses are actually spending their time during their shifts and how they would ideally distribute their time if given the chance. The research findings underpin insights that can help organizations identify new approaches to address the nursing shortage and create more sustainable and meaningful careers for nurses.

Over the past three years, McKinsey has been reporting on trends within the nursing workforce , collecting longitudinal data on nurses’ self-reported likelihood to leave their jobs and factors driving nurses’ intent to leave. 2 “ Nursing in 2023: How hospitals are confronting shortages ,” McKinsey, May 5, 2023. As of March 2023, 45 percent of inpatient nurses (who make up about 2.0 million of the 4.2 million nurses in the United States 3 Nursing fact sheet, American Association of Colleges of Nursing, updated September 2022. ) reported they are likely to leave their role in the next six months. Among those who reported an intent to leave, the top two reasons cited were not feeling valued by their organization and not having a manageable workload. In fact, nurses have consistently reported increasing workload burden as a main factor behind their intent to leave.

About the research

We conducted a survey of 310 registered nurses across the United States from February 8 to March 22, 2023. Our goal was to understand nurses’ perception of time spent throughout the course of a shift and to identify existing and desired resources to help nurses provide high-quality care. Our sample focused on nurses in roles that predominantly provide direct patient care in the intensive-care unit, step-down, general medical surgical, or emergency department settings. Insights were weighted by length of shift (the minimum shift time included was six hours).

For questions related to intent to leave nursing, all nurses from any care setting (including home care and long-term care facilities) were included. Our survey questions on intent to leave have been kept consistent to collect longitudinal data on nurses’ intent. Our last survey, of 368 frontline direct-care nurses, was conducted in September 2022.

In our new survey, nurses provided a breakdown of the average time spent during a typical shift across 69 activities (see sidebar “About the research”). They also reported their views on the ideal amount of time they would like to spend on these same activities. In looking at ways to redesign care activities, we found the potential to free up to 15 percent of nurses’ time through tech enablement, or automation, and improved delegation of tasks (Exhibit 1). Leveraging delegation and tech enablement could reduce and redistribute activities that nurses report being predominantly responsible for. The subsequent reduction in time savings could improve nursing workload and their ability to manage more complex patients. When we translate the net amount of time freed up to the projected amount of nursing time needed, we estimate the potential to close the workforce gap by up to 300,000 nurses.

Nurses report a desire to spend more time with their patients, coach fellow nurses, and participate in professional-growth activities

In our survey, we explored where nurses wanted to spend more of their time (Exhibit 2). The responses fall into the following three categories.

Direct patient care

Nurses report spending the majority of their shift—54 percent, or about seven hours of a 12-hour shift—providing direct patient care and creating personal connections with patients (direct patient care includes patient education, medication administration, and support of daily-living activities). The survey reveals that nurses wish to spend even more time in these activities.

Spending sufficient time on patient-care activities promotes both nursing satisfaction and quality of patient care. 4 Terry L. Jones, Patti Hamilton, and Nicole Murry, “Unfinished nursing care, missed care, and implicitly rationed care: State of the science review,” International Journal of Nursing Studies , June 2015, Volume 52, Issue 6. Furthermore, rushing care and not having sufficient time to meet patients’ needs can contribute to moral distress and burnout.

Teaching and training for new nurses and peers

Nurses report spending on average about 2 percent of their shift teaching peers and students (excluding shifts when nurses are in a dedicated teaching or “precepting” role), an activity they say they want to spend double the amount of time on. Peer-to-peer teaching is an important component of building workplace cohesiveness, improving patient outcomes, and preparing new generations of nurses. In our survey, nurses report that they often lack the time to engage in coaching new nurses. As a result, important informal teaching, which is critical to build confidence and to support skill development for newer nurses, is often missed.

Involvement in professional-growth activities

Similar to educating other nurses, nurses report wanting to spend more than double the amount of time on growth and development activities (about 7 percent of an ideal shift). These activities include participating in shared governance, reviewing and reading work emails, and completing annual requirements and continuing education hours.

Freeing up nursing time to support organizational initiatives and further professional development may contribute to a nursing staff that is more engaged, feels valued, and has a strong connection to their departments.

Nurses desire to spend less time on documentation, hunting and gathering, and administrative and support tasks

Charting and documentation.

Documentation continues to greatly contribute to nurses’ workloads, making up 15 percent of a nurse’s shift. The most time-consuming documentation tasks are head-to-toe assessments, admissions intakes, and vitals charting, which account for the majority of documenting time (70 percent). Nurses say that ideally, documenting should make up only about 13 percent of their shift. But without realistic and effective alternatives (for example, nursing scribes, device integration, reduction in documentation requirements, and AI to aid with documentation), it is unlikely that nurses’ documentation burden can be fully alleviated.

Hunting and gathering

For nurses, hunting and gathering means searching for individuals, equipment, supplies, medications, or information. Nurses report that they spend about 6 percent of a 12-hour shift on hunting and gathering—tasks they would spend approximately 3 percent of their shift on in an ideal shift.

Activities best delegated to support staff

Nurses report spending nearly 5 percent of their shift on tasks that do not use the fullest extent of their license and training. For example, they say they spend nearly an hour on nutrition and daily-living activities, such as toileting, bathing, and providing meals and water. In an ideal shift, nurses say they would spend about 3 percent of their time on these activities.

Redesigning care models: Adjusting how nurses spend their time

As we consider how to alleviate nursing workforce challenges, one area of intervention could be evaluating how current care models can be redesigned to better align nursing time to what has the most impact on patient care. Performing below-top-of-license or non-value-adding activities can create inefficiencies that lead to higher healthcare costs and nurse dissatisfaction. Rigorously evaluating whether tasks can be improved with technology or delegated to allow nurses to spend time on activities they find more valuable could help to reduce the time pressures felt by nurses. 5 “National guidelines for nursing delegation,” a joint statement by the NCSBN and American Nurses Association, April 1, 2019. In our analysis, we reviewed the activities nurses say they would ideally spend less time on and considered whether delegation and tech enablement of such tasks could free up nurses’ time.

Based on our analysis, we estimate that full or partial delegation of activities to roles including technicians, nursing assistants, patient-care technicians, food services, ancillary services, and other support staff, could reduce net nursing time by 5 to 10 percent during a 12-hour shift (Exhibit 3).

While nurses report wanting to spend more time overall on direct patient care, there are specific tasks that could be delegated both vertically and horizontally to ensure that the work nurses perform is at the top of their license and promotes professional satisfaction. Appropriate delegation requires training support staff and upskilling where appropriate, as well as evaluating systemwide resources that can be used where needed. For example, within direct patient care, nearly an hour could potentially be freed up by delegating tasks such as patient ambulation, drawing labs and starting IVs, transferring patients, and supporting patient procedures.

Full or partial delegation of activities to roles such as technicians and other support staff could reduce net nursing time by 5 to 10 percent during a 12-hour shift.

Tasks that are evaluated for redistribution to other clinical and non-clinical staff can also be considered as part of broader care-model redesign. Upskilling support staff across clinical and nonclinical roles can often result in overall better use of resources already in place across a health system.

Tech enablement

Based on our assessment, we estimate that a net 10 to 20 percent of time spent during a 12-hour shift is spent on activities that could be optimized through tech enablement. Investing in digital approaches that automate tasks (either completely or partially), rather than simply redistributing workload, could potentially free up valuable time for nurses (Exhibit 4).

Examples of tech enablement and delegation in practice

To determine the amount of time that could potentially be freed up over the course of a nurse’s shift, we used estimations based on best-in-class care delivery models from practice, innovative emerging technology from industry, and how easy it would be for health systems to implement the intervention (for example, cost and technological requirements).

Tech-enablement

• Robotic automatic-guided vehicles (AGVs) deliver equipment, food, and supplies throughout a hospital. 1 “Robots help nurses get the job done–with smiles and beeps,” Cedars Sinai, November 29, 2021.
• Robotic pill-picker machines select and deliver medicines throughout a hospital. 2 Jay Kiew, “The digital surgery: Humber River Hospital reinvents itself with AI & robotics,” Change Leadership, June 16, 2018.
• Virtual nurses monitor patients remotely, working alongside a bedside-care team comprising a bedside RN, bedside licensed vocational nurse, and virtual RN. 3 Giles Bruce, “Trinity Health plans to institute virtual nurses across its 88 hospitals in 26 states,” Becker’s Health IT, January 13, 2023.
• Ambient intelligence (that is, passive, contactless sensors embedded in a clinical setting to recognize movement or speech) reduces documentation workload and can continuously monitor patients. 4 Albert Haque, Arnold Milstein, and Li Fei-Fei, “Illuminating the dark spaces of healthcare with ambient intelligence,” Nature , September 9, 2020.
• Centralized training for roles such as transporters that can then be utilized in all areas of the hospital.
• Upskilling employees and modifying staffing models allow nurses to work in units where they are needed most (for example, non-critical-care nurses in critical-care departments).

For example, nurses spend 3 percent of their shifts on patient turning and repositioning. This task could be optimized through innovative “smart” hospital-bed technology, including bed-exit alarms, advanced therapy for redistributing pressure, integrated scales and measurements, and remote information on patient conditions. Voice-automated devices and smart beds can also equip patients with control and autonomy over their rooms and preferences (for example, shades, television, and lighting) without nurse intervention (see sidebar “Examples of tech enablement and delegation in practice”).

These interventions, however, can be costly and may not be appropriate solutions in every system. Healthcare organizations will need to assess the specific needs of nurses and patients to determine which interventions will have the most impact.

Healthcare organizations could also consider continuously evaluating the digital approaches they have implemented to ensure that the technology itself does not create redundancies or rework, introduce delays, or adversely increase workload. For example, 37 percent of nurses report that they do not have access to vital signs or telemetry machines that are integrated with electronic medical records for automatic documentation. This could explain why nurses say they could spend less time—about 30 percent less—documenting vital signs. Technology like scanners and automated vitals machines have been an effective way to streamline documentation. But nurses still report spending nearly 10 percent of their shift scanning medications into the patient record, documenting vitals and completed patient education, and drafting progress notes.

Nurse time saved through care-model changes and innovations can benefit patients and nurses—and contribute to building sustainable careers in healthcare

The impact of care-model redesign could range from improving workload sustainability to addressing a substantial portion of the projected 200,000 to 450,000 nursing gap. Our analysis finds a potential net time savings of 15 to 30 percent of a 12-hour shift, based on estimating the possible range of time reduced through delegation 6 “ANAs principles for delegation,” American Nurses Association, 2012. or tech enablement. 7 Mari Kangasniemi, Suyen Karki, Noriyo Colley, and Ari Voutilainen, “The use of robots and other automated devices in nurses' work: An integrative review,” International Journal of Nursing Practice , August 2019, Volume 25, Issue 4.

In our conservative estimate, there would be no additional opportunity to alleviate the potential nursing shortage, as health systems would reallocate the saved time to their current nursing staff for activities they say they would spend more time on, including time with patients, teaching peers, and investing in their growth and development (Exhibit 5). However, this reallocation of time could improve the sustainability of nursing careers in acute-care practice.

In our optimistic estimate, after reallocating time back to nurses, health systems could free up a 15 percent net time savings, which could translate to closing the nursing workforce gap by up to 300,000 inpatient nurses. Achieving this may require health systems to invest heavily in technology, change management, and workflow redesign.

Realizing these changes will require bold departures from healthcare organizations’ current state of processes. It will be critical for hospitals to bring both discipline and creativity to redesigning care delivery in order to effectively scale change and see meaningful time savings. Close collaboration beyond nursing is also paramount to ensure alignment across the care team and hospital functions including administration, IT, informatics, facilities, and operations. A comprehensive evaluation of redesign requirements can enable health systems to understand what is limiting care-model change (for example, policies, skill development, education). Investment in education and additional onboarding may be needed to upskill and train staff on expectations as work is shifted across roles. Partnering with tech companies and industry vendors in areas such as electronic-health-record platforms can accelerate innovation and implementation to build off existing tools and reduce implementation risks. Although the idea of change may be daunting, incorporating innovations in healthcare delivery could be a strategy for building a sustainable workload that could attract and retain nursing talent by allowing them to do more of what matters to them most: taking care of patients and one another.

Gretchen Berlin, RN , is a senior partner in McKinsey’s Washington, DC, office; Ani Bilazarian, RN , is a consultant in the New York office; Joyce Chang, RN , is an associate partner in the Bay Area office; and Stephanie Hammer, RN , is a consultant in the Denver office.

The authors wish to thank Katie Boston-Leary, RN, and the ANA Enterprise for their contributions to this article. The authors also wish to acknowledge and thank the entire healthcare workforce, including all of those on the front line.

Explore a career with us

Related articles.

Nursing in 2023: How hospitals are confronting shortages

Surveyed nurses consider leaving direct patient care at elevated rates

Nurses and the Great Attrition