By Robert Farley , D'Angelo Gore and Eugene Kiely
Posted on August 8, 2024 | Updated on August 12, 2024 | Corrected on August 9, 2024
Este artículo estará disponible en español en El Tiempo Latino .
In introducing her pick for vice presidential running mate, Kamala Harris has prominently touted Tim Walz’s 24 years of service in the Army National Guard. Now, however, GOP vice presidential nominee JD Vance and the Trump campaign are attacking Walz on his military record, accusing the Minnesota governor of “stolen valor.”
We’ll sort through the facts surrounding the three main attacks on Walz’s military record and let readers decide their merit. The claims include:
A native of West Point, Nebraska, Walz joined the Nebraska Army National Guard in April 1981, two days after his 17th birthday. When Walz and his wife moved to Minnesota in 1996, he transferred to the Minnesota National Guard, where he served in 1st Battalion, 125th Field Artillery.
“While serving in Minnesota, his military occupational specialties were 13B – a cannon crewmember who operates and maintains cannons and 13Z -field artillery senior sergeant,” according to a statement released by Army Lt. Col. Kristen Augé, the Minnesota National Guard’s state public affairs officer.
According to MPR News , Walz suffered some hearing impairment related to exposure to cannon booms during training over the years, and he underwent some corrective surgery to address it.
On Aug. 3, 2003, “Walz mobilized with the Minnesota National Guard’s 1st Battalion, 125th Field Artillery … to support Operation Enduring Freedom. The battalion supported security missions at various locations in Europe and Turkey. Governor Walz was stationed at Vicenza, Italy, during his deployment,” Augé stated. The deployment lasted about eight months.
“For 24 years I proudly wore the uniform of this nation,” Walz said at a rally in Philadelphia where he was announced as Harris’ running mate on Aug. 6. “The National Guard gave me purpose. It gave me the strength of a shared commitment to something greater than ourselves.”
In recent years, however, several of his fellow guard members have taken issue with the timing of Walz’s retirement from the National Guard in May 2005, claiming he left to avoid a deployment to Iraq.
Vance, who served a four-year active duty enlistment in the Marine Corps as a combat correspondent, serving in Iraq for six months in 2005, advanced that argument at a campaign event on Aug. 7.
“When the United States of America asked me to go to Iraq to serve my country, I did it,” Vance said. “When Tim Walz was asked by his country to go to Iraq, you know what he did? He dropped out of the Army and allowed his unit to go without him, a fact that he’s been criticized for aggressively by a lot of the people that he served with. I think it’s shameful to prepare your unit to go to Iraq, to make a promise that you’re going to follow through and then to drop out right before you actually have to go.”
In early 2005, Walz, then a high school geography teacher and football coach at Mankato West High School, decided to run for public office. In a 2009 interview Walz provided as part of the Library of Congress’ veterans oral history project, Walz said he made the decision to retire from the National Guard to “focus full time” on a run for the U.S. House of Representatives for Minnesota’s 1st Congressional District (which he ultimately won in 2006). Walz said he was “really concerned” about trying to seek public office and serve in the National Guard at the same time without running afoul of the Hatch Act , which limits political speech by federal employees, including members of the National Guard.
Federal Election Commission records show that Walz filed to run for Congress on Feb. 10, 2005.
On March 20, 2005, Walz’s campaign put out a press release titled “Walz Still Planning to Run for Congress Despite Possible Call to Duty in Iraq.”
Three days prior, the release said, “the National Guard Public Affairs Office announced a possible partial mobilization of roughly 2,000 troops from the Minnesota National Guard. … The announcement from the National Guard PAO specified that all or a portion of Walz’s battalion could be mobilized to serve in Iraq within the next two years.”
According to the release, “When asked about his possible deployment to Iraq Walz said, ‘I do not yet know if my artillery unit will be part of this mobilization and I am unable to comment further on specifics of the deployment.’ Although his tour of duty in Iraq might coincide with his campaign for Minnesota’s 1st Congressional seat, Walz is determined to stay in the race. ‘As Command Sergeant Major I have a responsibility not only to ready my battalion for Iraq, but also to serve if called on. I am dedicated to serving my country to the best of my ability, whether that is in Washington DC or in Iraq.'”
On March 23, 2005, the Pipestone County Star reported, “Detachments of the Minnesota National Guard have been ‘alerted’ of possible deployment to Iraq in mid-to-late 2006.”
“Major Kevin Olson of the Minnesota National Guard said a brigade-sized contingent of soldiers could be expected to be called to Iraq, but he was not, at this time, aware of which batteries would be called,” the story said. “All soldiers in the First Brigade combat team of the 34th Division, Minnesota National Guard, could be eligible for call-up. ‘We don’t know yet what the force is like’ he said. ‘It’s too early to speculate, if the (soldiers) do go.’
“He added: ‘We will have a major announcement if and when the alert order moves ahead.’”
ABC News spoke to Joseph Eustice, a retired command sergeant major who served with Walz, and he told the news organization this week that “he remembers Walz struggling with the timing of wanting to serve as a lawmaker but also avoiding asking for a deferment so he could do so.”
“He had a window of time,” Eustice told ABC News. “He had to decide. And in his deciding, we were not on notice to be deployed. There were rumors. There were lots of rumors, and we didn’t know where we were going until it was later that, early summer, I believe.”
Al Bonnifield, who served under Walz, also recalled Walz agonizing over the decision.
“It was a very long conversation behind closed doors,” Bonnifield told the Washington Post this week. “He was trying to decide where he could do better for soldiers, for veterans, for the country. He weighed that for a long time.”
In 2018, Bonnifield told MPR News that Walz worried in early 2005, “Would the soldier look down on him because he didn’t go with us? Would the common soldier say, ‘Hey, he didn’t go with us, he’s trying to skip out on a deployment?’ And he wasn’t. He talked with us for quite a while on that subject. He weighed that decision to run for Congress very heavy. He loved the military, he loved the guard, he loved the soldiers he worked with.”
But not all of Walz’s fellow Guard members felt that way.
In a paid letter to the West Central Tribune in Minnesota in November 2018, Thomas Behrends and Paul Herr — both retired command sergeants major in the Minnesota National Guard — wrote, “On May 16th, 2005 he [Walz] quit, leaving the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion and its Soldiers hanging; without its senior Non-Commissioned Officer, as the battalion prepared for war. His excuse to other leaders was that he needed to retire in order to run for congress. Which is false, according to a Department of Defense Directive, he could have run and requested permission from the Secretary of Defense before entering active duty; as many reservists have.”
“For Tim Walz to abandon his fellow soldiers and quit when they needed experienced leadership most is disheartening,” they wrote. “When the nation called, he quit.”
Walz retired on May 16, 2005. Walz’s brigade received alert orders for mobilization on July 14, 2005, according to the National Guard and MPR News . The official mobilization report came the following month, and the unit mobilized and trained through the fall. It was finally deployed to Iraq in the spring of 2006.
The unit was originally scheduled to return in February 2007, but its tour was extended four months as part of President George W. Bush’s “surge” strategy , the National Guard reported. In all, the soldiers were mobilized for 22 months.
Responding to Vance’s claim that Walz retired to avoid deploying to Iraq, the Harris-Walz campaign released a statement saying, “After 24 years of military service, Governor Walz retired in 2005 and ran for Congress, where he was a tireless advocate for our men and women in uniform – and as Vice President of the United States he will continue to be a relentless champion for our veterans and military families.”
Vance also called Walz “dishonest” for a claim that Walz made in 2018 while speaking to a group about gun control.
“He made this interesting comment that the Kamala Harris campaign put out there,” Vance said, referring to a video of Walz that the Harris campaign posted to X on Aug. 6. “He said, ‘We shouldn’t allow weapons that I used in war to be on America’s streets.’ Well, I wonder, Tim Walz, when were you ever in war? What was this weapon that you carried into war given that you abandoned your unit right before they went to Iraq and he has not spent a day in a combat zone.”
In the video , Walz, who was campaigning for governor at the time, talked about pushing back on the National Rifle Association and said: “I spent 25 years in the Army and I hunt. … I’ve been voting for common sense legislation that protects the Second Amendment, but we can do background checks. We can do [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] research. We can make sure we don’t have reciprocal carry among states. And we can make sure that those weapons of war that I carried in war, is the only place where those weapons are at.”
But, as Vance indicated, there is no evidence that Walz carried a weapon “in war.”
Update, Aug. 12: In an Aug. 10 statement to CNN, the Harris campaign told CNN that Walz “misspoke.”
“In making the case for why weapons of war should never be on our streets or in our classrooms, the Governor misspoke,” campaign spokesperson Lauren Hitt said in the statement. “He did handle weapons of war and believes strongly that only military members trained to carry those deadly weapons should have access to them.”
As we said, Augé, in her statement, said Walz’s battalion deployed “to support Operation Enduring Freedom” on Aug. 3, 2003, and “supported security missions at various locations in Europe and Turkey.” During his deployment, Walz was stationed in Vicenza, Italy, and he returned to Minnesota in April 2004, Augé said. There was no mention of Walz serving in Afghanistan, Iraq or another combat zone.
In the 2009 interview for the veterans history project, Walz said he and members of his battalion initially thought they would “shoot artillery in Afghanistan,” as they had trained to do. That didn’t happen, he said, explaining that his group ended up helping with security and training while stationed at an Army base in Vicenza.
“I think in the beginning, many of my troops were disappointed,” Walz said in the interview. “I think they felt a little guilty, many of them, that they weren’t in the fight up front as this was happening.”
In an Aug. 8 statement addressing his claim about carrying weapons “in war,” the Harris campaign noted that Walz, whose military occupational specialties included field artillery senior sergeant, “fired and trained others to use weapons of war innumerable times” in his 24 years of service.
The Republican National Committee has criticized Walz for saying “in campaign materials that he is a former ‘Command Sergeant Major’ in the Army National Guard despite not completing the requirements to hold the rank into retirement.”
Walz’s biography on the Harris campaign website correctly says that the governor “served for 24 years” in the National Guard, “rising to the rank of Command Sergeant Major.”
Walz’s official biography on the Minnesota state website goes further, referring to the governor as “Command Sergeant Major Walz.”
“After 24 years in the Army National Guard, Command Sergeant Major Walz retired from the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion in 2005,” the state website says.
Walz did serve as command sergeant major , but Walz did not complete the requirements to retire with the rank of command sergeant, Augé told us in an email.
“He held multiple positions within field artillery such as firing battery chief, operations sergeant, first sergeant, and culminated his career serving as the command sergeant major for the battalion,” Augé said. “He retired as a master sergeant in 2005 for benefit purposes because he did not complete additional coursework at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy.”
This isn’t the first time that Walz’s National Guard rank has come up in a campaign.
In their 2018 paid letter to the West Central Tribune, when Walz was running for governor, the two Minnesota National Guard retired command sergeants major who criticized Walz for retiring before the Iraq deployment also wrote: “Yes, he served at that rank, but was never qualified at that rank, and will receive retirement benefits at one rank below. You be the judge.”
Correction, Aug. 9: We mistakenly said a 2007 “surge” strategy in Iraq occurred under President Barack Obama. It was President George W. Bush.
Editor’s note: In the interest of full disclosure, Harris campaign spokesperson Lauren Hitt was an undergraduate intern at FactCheck.org from 2010 to 2011.
Editor’s note: FactCheck.org does not accept advertising. We rely on grants and individual donations from people like you. Please consider a donation. Credit card donations may be made through our “Donate” page . If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, 202 S. 36th St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
The last word, lawrence: 'stupidest' candidate trump did not answer reporters' questions.
Donald Trump rambled and lied for over an hour without any follow up questions or fact-checking. MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell says that while he hopes Vice President Harris answers questions from reporters, after the press conference that Donald Trump turned into a “charade,” Vice President Harris has “absolutely no greater obligation to do so because of what Donald Trump pretended to do today.” Aug. 9, 2024
Putin won't surrender his war aims, says former ambassador to russia.
280 other terms for states that - words and phrases with similar meaning.
Over the past decade, the U.S. military has implemented policies to promote gender equality, notably lifting the ban on women in combat roles in 2013 and opening all military jobs to women by 2016. Yet, even as U.S. military policy reforms during the “War on Terror” appear to reflect greater equality, violent patterns of abuse and misogyny continued within military workplaces.
This author of this report found that sexual assault prevalence in the military is likely two to four times higher than official government estimations. Based on a comparison of available data collected by the U.S. Department of Defense to independent data, the research estimates there were 75,569 cases of sexual assault in 2021 and 73,695 cases in 2023. On average, over the course of the war in Afghanistan, 24 percent of active-duty women and 1.9 percent of active-duty men experienced sexual assault. The report highlights how experiences of gender inequality are most pronounced for women of color, who experience intersecting forms of racism and sexism and are one of the fastest-growing populations within the military. Independent data also confirm queer and trans service members’ disproportionately greater risk for sexual assault.
The report notes that during the post-9/11 wars, the prioritization of force readiness above all else allowed the problem of sexual assault to fester, papering over internal violence and gender inequalities within military institutions.
READ FULL PAPER >
Executive Summary >
Ex-university of kentucky student who used n-word over 200 times in horrifying caught-on-camera attack pleads guilty.
The ex-University of Kentucky student caught on viral video attacking a black student while firing off an arsenal of racist slurs — including the N-word more than 200 times — has pleaded guilty to assault charges, according to a report.
Sophia Rosing, 23, pleaded guilty to four counts of fourth-degree assault, one count of disorderly conduct, and one count of public intoxication in Fayette County Circuit Court on Monday, her attorney, Fred Peters, told the Lexington Herald-Leader on Monday.
The guilty plea came after a mediation in which, Peters said, “A lot of things got said, apologies were made and we worked it out.”
“Her life has been on hold for the past 18 to 20 months,” the attorney told the outlet. “She has had a lot of time to think about what she has done, and she wrote a nice letter of apology.”
Rosing had allegedly kicked, punched and bitten 19-year-old student worker Kylah Spring while repeatedly calling her the N-word in a drunken tirade at a campus residence hall on Nov. 6, 2022.
Spring had previously said she tried to check on Rosing, who appeared drunk and in need of assistance, but was instead attacked by the student and pelted with disgusting vitriol, she explained in a TikTok video of the encounter.
“The girl starts saying things like ‘Do my chores,’ ‘It’s not my fault that you’re black,’ ‘It’s not my fault that you’re ugly,’ and at this point, she’s like singing the N-word,” Spring said following the assault.
The former UK student continued her appalling behavior when police arrived and placed her in handcuffs, when she allegedly kicked and bit the arresting officer during the drunken rampage.
Following her arrest, a judge set her bond at $10,000, which she posted. She was released the following day.
The late-night assault was captured on video and posted online, where it went viral and sparked outrage, prompting students at the university to hold a “March Against Racism” rally on campus.
The intoxicated Rosing was heard saying the N-word more than 200 times during the 10-minute video, the Lexington Herald-Leader reported.
The University of Kentucky permanently banned Rosing from campus following the racist attack.
In February 2023, Rosing was indicted by a Fayette County grand jury on all six charges she initially faced — including assault and felony assault of a police officer. She pleaded not guilty.
Since the indictment, Rosing’s case has been passed on the docket five times, and during that time, both parties attempted to reach a resolution, Peters told the outlet.
Peters told the outlet that the former business and marketing major faces 12 months in jail, 100 hours of community service and a $25 fine following her guilty plea.
She is set to be sentenced on Oct. 17.
Following Monday’s hearing, Spring, who was in attendance for the guilty plea, spoke with LEX 18 and revealed that she and Rosing had an opportunity to talk during the mediation.
“I told her that she didn’t break my spirit,” Spring told the outlet.
“That was one of the things I said the first time I ever spoke about what happened and that rings true today.”
Peters also told the outlet that his client was “extremely remorseful,” and “She read a very heartfelt apology to Kylah during our mediation.”
Spring, however, wasn’t buying it.
“I feel that a person that is remorseful takes actions that are moving towards proving they are remorseful,” Spring told LEX 18 . “Not just words.”
Spring claimed that Rosing did not mention the racial slurs she used against her during the hearing, which she said may still take her “a bit of maturing and unpacking” to come to terms with.
“I think her admitting at least a piece of what she’s done — admitting the things she said and being able to own up to them, I think it’s going to follow behind,” Spring told the outlet.
“Seeing yourself act in that light is not an easy thing to see, I imagine, so I guess there’s still a bit of maturing and unpacking she needs to do with that. So I’ll give her the space to do that.”
Nevertheless, Spring said she has forgiven Rosing and was raised to “not hold grudges.”
“I forgive her more so for myself,” Spring explained.
“I was raised not to hold grudges, I was raised that we give people forgiveness because God forgave us. It’s a hard thing for me to come to terms with, but in the end, I want to live a life where people can say I was a kind and forgiving person.”
Advertisement
A title page is required for all APA Style papers. There are both student and professional versions of the title page. Students should use the student version of the title page unless their instructor or institution has requested they use the professional version. APA provides a student title page guide (PDF, 199KB) to assist students in creating their title pages.
The student title page includes the paper title, author names (the byline), author affiliation, course number and name for which the paper is being submitted, instructor name, assignment due date, and page number, as shown in this example.
Title page setup is covered in the seventh edition APA Style manuals in the Publication Manual Section 2.3 and the Concise Guide Section 1.6
Student papers do not include a running head unless requested by the instructor or institution.
Follow the guidelines described next to format each element of the student title page.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Paper title | Place the title three to four lines down from the top of the title page. Center it and type it in bold font. Capitalize of the title. Place the main title and any subtitle on separate double-spaced lines if desired. There is no maximum length for titles; however, keep titles focused and include key terms. |
|
Author names | Place one double-spaced blank line between the paper title and the author names. Center author names on their own line. If there are two authors, use the word “and” between authors; if there are three or more authors, place a comma between author names and use the word “and” before the final author name. | Cecily J. Sinclair and Adam Gonzaga |
Author affiliation | For a student paper, the affiliation is the institution where the student attends school. Include both the name of any department and the name of the college, university, or other institution, separated by a comma. Center the affiliation on the next double-spaced line after the author name(s). | Department of Psychology, University of Georgia |
Course number and name | Provide the course number as shown on instructional materials, followed by a colon and the course name. Center the course number and name on the next double-spaced line after the author affiliation. | PSY 201: Introduction to Psychology |
Instructor name | Provide the name of the instructor for the course using the format shown on instructional materials. Center the instructor name on the next double-spaced line after the course number and name. | Dr. Rowan J. Estes |
Assignment due date | Provide the due date for the assignment. Center the due date on the next double-spaced line after the instructor name. Use the date format commonly used in your country. | October 18, 2020 |
| Use the page number 1 on the title page. Use the automatic page-numbering function of your word processing program to insert page numbers in the top right corner of the page header. | 1 |
The professional title page includes the paper title, author names (the byline), author affiliation(s), author note, running head, and page number, as shown in the following example.
Follow the guidelines described next to format each element of the professional title page.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Paper title | Place the title three to four lines down from the top of the title page. Center it and type it in bold font. Capitalize of the title. Place the main title and any subtitle on separate double-spaced lines if desired. There is no maximum length for titles; however, keep titles focused and include key terms. |
|
Author names
| Place one double-spaced blank line between the paper title and the author names. Center author names on their own line. If there are two authors, use the word “and” between authors; if there are three or more authors, place a comma between author names and use the word “and” before the final author name. | Francesca Humboldt |
When different authors have different affiliations, use superscript numerals after author names to connect the names to the appropriate affiliation(s). If all authors have the same affiliation, superscript numerals are not used (see Section 2.3 of the for more on how to set up bylines and affiliations). | Tracy Reuter , Arielle Borovsky , and Casey Lew-Williams | |
Author affiliation
| For a professional paper, the affiliation is the institution at which the research was conducted. Include both the name of any department and the name of the college, university, or other institution, separated by a comma. Center the affiliation on the next double-spaced line after the author names; when there are multiple affiliations, center each affiliation on its own line.
| Department of Nursing, Morrigan University |
When different authors have different affiliations, use superscript numerals before affiliations to connect the affiliations to the appropriate author(s). Do not use superscript numerals if all authors share the same affiliations (see Section 2.3 of the for more). | Department of Psychology, Princeton University | |
Author note | Place the author note in the bottom half of the title page. Center and bold the label “Author Note.” Align the paragraphs of the author note to the left. For further information on the contents of the author note, see Section 2.7 of the . | n/a |
| The running head appears in all-capital letters in the page header of all pages, including the title page. Align the running head to the left margin. Do not use the label “Running head:” before the running head. | Prediction errors support children’s word learning |
| Use the page number 1 on the title page. Use the automatic page-numbering function of your word processing program to insert page numbers in the top right corner of the page header. | 1 |
IEEE ICRA@40
IEEE Xplore Digital Library
IEEE Standards
Icra@40 • 40th anniversary of the ieee conference on robotics and automation.
September 23-26, 2024 • Rotterdam, Netherlands
Join us at ICRA@40 for a special commemorative edition marking the 40th anniversary of the ICRA Conference, honoring four decades of groundbreaking research and innovation in robotics and automation.
ICRA@40 is a four-day SINGLE-TRACK conference featuring plenary sessions, distinguished talks and debate panels to explore the past and envision the future with the most renowned academics and industry experts in robotics and automation.
Enjoy ICRA@40 industry-focused day , dedicated to unveiling cutting-edge advancements and technological breakthroughs, stimulating panels, a bustling job fair and vibrant startup showcases.
CFP for Late-Breaking Abstracts and Videos
We are seeking the submission of extended abstracts with new ideas that highlight innovative concepts, open-ended themes, and novel directions as well as videos that showcase novel results or summarise the achievements in the last 40 years in the field of robotics and automation. The emphasis should be on real robotics and automation systems.
We encourage submissions from all areas of robotics and automation.
We received 509 contributions: 295 Extended Abstracts, 49 Video Submissions, and 165 papers transferred from IEEE RAS journals (RAL, TRO, RAM, TASE). All submissions were screened by the organization committee. We encourage authors of extended abstracts to leverage the opportunity to discuss their work at ICRA@40 to further develop their extended abstracts into full-fledged submissions to RAS journals and conferences.
Please prepare the final version of your contribution and upload it via your PaperPlaza account at http://ras.papercept.net .
The final version of your contribution must be in pdf and must follow the ICRA double-column format. Templates are available at the IEEE RAS PaperPlaza Conference/Journal Management System ( https://ras.papercept.net/conferences/support/support.php ).
Make sure to follow the guidelines:
• Extended Abstract : 2 pages plus 1 page for references and a video of max 20MB
• Stand-alone Video : 1-4 minutes, maximum 50 MB and 1 page description in pdf
• Accepted Journal papers : please upload the final version of your accepted paper
In addition, you will also have to upload a 1 page Digest PowerPoint using the template provided below along with the final version of your paper.
July 31, 2024, types of submission .
Submissions for ICRA@40 have two types
1. Accepted Journal Papers
Papers accepted for publication in the IEEE Transactions on Robotics (T-RO), the IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (RA-L), the IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine (RAM) and IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering (T-ASE) will be given the possibility to present at ICRA@40.
2. Extended Abstracts
We welcome extended abstracts of up to 2 pages plus 1 page for references that describe novel results or research directions. Accepted contributions will be presented as posters and allocated a slot in the poster sessions (Refer to the programme). Accepted extended abstracts will be made available online but will not be published in IEEE Xplore. All submissions must be in pdf and must follow the ICRA double column format. Templates are available at the IEEE RAS PaperPlaza Conference/Journal Management System .
Accompanying videos may be submitted, with submission guidelines:
A video that was NOT submitted with the initial submission of an extended abstract will NOT be accepted at a later date.
• File size: up to 20MB • Format (only one of the following should be used): mpeg, mp4, mpg • Maximum duration: 180 sec. • Minimum height: 480 • Minimum frame rate (fps): 20 • Scan type: Progressive
We encourage submissions of stand-alone videos in the following themes:
1. NOVELTY : novel scientific or technological breakthrough;
2. HISTORY : most early examples of autonomous 40 years old or beyond;
3. DIDACTIC : video with educational content, either summarising achievements in a domain or presenting a novel approach in a didactic/tutorial manner;
4. FUNNY/UNCANNY : any video of unique, amusing, or unexpected nature.
The emphasis should be on real robotics and automation systems.
To submit a stand-alone video to ICRA@40, please refer to the following instructions:
• Duration : 1-4 minutes. • Size : up to 50 MB. • Format (only one of the following should be used): mpeg, mp4, mpg • Maximum duration : 240 sec • Minimum video quality : 720p • Minimum frame rate (fps): 24 • Codecs : Do not use special codecs in order to provide as much portability across platforms as possible. Any variance from the suggested formatting may result in difficulties playing the file on different platforms and could be blocked. • If recorded footage is sped up in the video, the speedup factor should be clearly indicated. • Audio is optional, but lack of audio should have minimal impact on the comprehension of the video. • Structure : The video must include at the beginning a video cover with the title, authors and affiliation and the credits at the end.
The submission of the videos will be through the electronic submission process via PaperPlaza .
Each video submission must be accompanied by a one-page description in PDF file format, using the smae paper template that are available here which includes:
• title, authors, and affiliation • video category (regular video OR blooper) • 200-word abstract, and • contact information
The selected videos (and the PDF descriptions) will be linked in the program. Videos will be displayed during the conference and to the public via social media and IEEE TV and may be used in the Robotics History project.
If you are an invited speaker, you can submit a maximum 1 page abstract and short biography as pdf via PaperPlaza
Papers accepted for publication in the IEEE Transactions on Robotics (T-RO), the IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (RA-L), the IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine (RAM) and IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering (T-ASE) presentation at ICRA @ 40 . This applies to all non-evolutionary papers accepted from September 1 2023 until May 31, 2024.
All deadlines are 11:59 PM Pacific time
7-July-24 | |
7-July-24 | |
7-July-24 | |
7-July-24 | |
15-July-24 | |
15-July-24 | |
31-July-24 | |
31-July24 | |
31-July-24 | |
31-July-24 |
State | american thesaurus.
Word of the Day
Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio
to press the button on the left of a computer mouse in order to make the computer do something
Simply the best! (Ways to describe the best)
To add ${headword} to a word list please sign up or log in.
Add ${headword} to one of your lists below, or create a new one.
{{message}}
Something went wrong.
There was a problem sending your report.
Copilot integration in microsoft 365 apps makes it a snap to generate first drafts, revise text, and get instant summaries for long docs or email threads. here’s how to use copilot for writing assistance in word, outlook, and onenote..
One of the most enticing uses for generative AI is to help you write. Anyone can get writing help from Microsoft’s Copilot genAI tool via the free Copilot web or mobile app. But Copilot becomes especially useful when it’s integrated with various Microsoft 365 apps.
As you compose, edit, or view a document in Word, for example, you can summon Copilot to assist you in several ways: It can generate rough drafts, polish or change the tone of your writing, and summarize long passages of text. Copilot can also help you compose or summarize emails in Outlook and help you rewrite or summarize notes in OneNote.
This guide will get you started on the basics of using Copilot for your writing in Microsoft 365 apps. But you’ll have to pay for a Copilot subscription in addition to your current Microsoft 365 plan.
How to use copilot in microsoft 365 apps, generate a rough draft in word or outlook.
Summarize long documents, notes, emails, or threads.
Individuals with a free Microsoft account or a Microsoft 365 Family or Personal subscription can purchase a Copilot Pro subscription for $20 per month. (A one-month free trial is available.) Each person who wants to use Copilot Pro must have their own subscription.
If you have a free Microsoft account, the Copilot Pro subscription lets you use Copilot in certain Microsoft 365 apps on the web only. If you have a paid Microsoft 365 plan, you’ll be able to use Copilot in the desktop and mobile versions of those M365 apps as well. Once you’ve signed up, you may need to refresh your Microsoft 365 license before Copilot becomes available in the apps.
If you’re on a Microsoft 365 business plan (such as through a company you work for), a Copilot for Microsoft 365 subscription costs $30 per user per month. This must be paid annually at $360 up front, and there’s no trial period. (Apparently, Microsoft presumes that your company will foot this hefty tab.) A Copilot Pro subscription cannot be used with a Microsoft 365 business account.
This guide goes over how to use Copilot in Word, Outlook, and OneNote to help you compose and revise text. I’ll demonstrate using Copilot Pro with an individual Microsoft 365 account, but the descriptions also apply to Copilot for Microsoft 365 used with a Microsoft 365 business plan. Most of the steps and user interfaces are alike. I’ll also note additional features that are available under the business versions of Copilot and Microsoft 365.
Note: Microsoft 365 apps aren’t completely consistent on different platforms — for instance, a menu choice in Word for Windows might be named differently from the same option in the web version of Word. In these cases, I’ve tried to include both names. You may still find instances where a button or menu item doesn’t match, but it’s generally obvious what to do.
Copilot can help you compose text drafts in Word and Outlook. In Outlook, you use Copilot through a panel that appears over the main area of the app. In Word, you can use Copilot from a similar panel that overlays the document, or from a sidebar that opens along the right of the page.
Word: Start with a new, blank document or open an existing document that you’d like to add more writing to. (Set the cursor where you want the generated text to be inserted.) Click the Copilot icon that appears in the left margin.
To get started with Copilot in Word, click the Copilot icon in the left margin or press Alt-I on your keyboard.
Howard Wen / IDG
The “Draft with Copilot” panel appears over the document. In the text entry box, you’ll type in a prompt that describes the text you want Copilot to write. (More on that in a moment.)
Type your prompt into the “Draft with Copilot” panel.
In the desktop version of Word for Windows, there’s a Reference a file button at the bottom of the Draft with Copilot panel. Clicking this may let you select a document in your OneDrive or SharePoint for Copilot to base its generated text on, including content, writing style, and formatting. (Business users can select up to three files for Copilot to reference.) You can also type your prompt followed by a / (forward slash) and a document’s file name to trigger Copilot to reference it.
But know that this function may not work for you – it apparently depends on whether Copilot itself thinks you have documents that it can reference for you.
Outlook: With the cursor in the message body of a new email, click the Copilot button on the Home tab of the ribbon toolbar. On the drop-down menu that opens, click Draft with Copilot .
To get started with Copilot in Outlook, click the Copilot button in the ribbon toolbar.
On the “Draft with Copilot” panel that opens, type your prompt inside the text entry box. The panel is similar to what you see in Word, but with an additional option: a button with two sliders on it that may say Adjust or Generate options , depending on your version of Outlook. When you click it, a drop-down menu opens that lists options for tone of voice and word length for the generated email draft.
In Outlook, you can designate tone of voice and general length for Copilot’s output.
Prompts are sentences that you enter to instruct Copilot (or other AI assistants) how to compose the text you want created. Your prompt should minimally include the subject and a few specifics about the writing you want it to generate.
To get started, describe the kind of text you want Copilot to generate and add a detail or two about it. These prompts can be simple or a little more complex. For example:
The more specifics you include in your prompt, the more likely you are to get good results. For instance, if you have notes that contain specific data points that you want to include in the generated text, copy and paste those notes into your prompt. If you have an outline for the topics you want to cover in the draft, paste that in as well.
But frankly, there are no hard rules about writing prompts — just use your imagination and see how Copilot responds. Expect that the AI may not generate results that you like (if it generates any at all). Keep experimenting with the descriptions in your prompts until you coax Copilot to produce a useful response.
Once you’ve entered your prompt (and optionally selected a tone and length in Outlook), click the Generate button or press Enter on your keyboard and wait for Copilot to work its AI magic.
When Copilot has generated a draft, it appears in the document or email with a toolbar below it.
In Word, use the toolbar below the generated draft to keep, retry, discard, or refine the text.
You can use the toolbar to perform the following functions:
In Outlook, the buttons and text entry box are arranged differently in the toolbar, but they perform the same actions on an email draft that Copilot generates for you. You can also use the Adjust or Generate options button to change the tone or length.
The toolbar that appears with generated text in Outlook offers the same functions as in Word.
Important: All AI-generated content can contain errors or outright fabrications, known as hallucinations. When you insert text that Copilot has generated into a document or email, be sure to fact-check it carefully.
AI-generated content also tends to be generic and a bit boring, so you’ll likely want to edit it to inject your own personality or writing style.
On the Home tab in Word’s ribbon toolbar, click the Copilot button. This will open the Copilot sidebar to the right. At the bottom of the sidebar, type your prompt inside the text entry box and click the arrow button (or press Enter). Copilot will generate text and display it inside the sidebar.
Generated text in the Copilot sidebar in Word.
Click the Copy button to copy the writing to your PC clipboard. You can then paste it into a document, note, email, or elsewhere.
Unlike the Draft with Copilot panel, the Copilot sidebar doesn’t include tools for refining text it generates from scratch. What’s more, Copilot’s behavior in the sidebar feels a little unreliable, producing inconsistent results. The sidebar seems better used for summarizing your document or asking the AI questions about it than for generating text.
If you’d rather compose emails yourself but would like some suggestions for improvement, there’s a nifty Copilot feature in Outlook called email coaching. After you’ve written your email draft, click the Copilot button on the Home tab in the ribbon toolbar. On the menu that appears, choose Coaching by Copilot .
Copilot will review your draft and offer specific suggestions for improving it in terms of tone, reader engagement, and clarity.
Copilot can critique your email draft and offer suggestions for improvement.
You can rewrite passages of text in a Word document or a OneNote page. This can be useful if you feel that your writing could use a little more detail, or if a paragraph sounds too wordy.
In Word, you can use either the Copilot panel or sidebar (as described earlier in this guide) to command Copilot to rewrite. In OneNote, you can use the sidebar or a right-click menu option.
Note: As of this writing, Copilot is available for OneNote only in the Windows desktop app.
Highlight the passage of text that you want Copilot to rewrite. The Copilot button will appear in the margin to the left of the text that you highlighted. Click it, and on the menu that opens, select Auto rewrite or Rewrite with Copilot . Alternatively, you can right-click on your highlighted text, and on the menu that opens, select Copilot > Rewrite with Copilot .
In Word, select the text you want to rewrite, click the Copilot icon in the left margin, and select Auto rewrite .
Either way, the “Rewrite with Copilot” panel appears below your highlighted text. Copilot will generate and present up to three rewritten versions in the panel. Click the arrows at the top of the panel to cycle through the rewrites.
Reviewing and refining Copilot’s suggested rewrite for the highlighted text.
Below the rewritten text, you can click the following buttons:
Note: Users with Copilot and M365 business subscriptions can also have Copilot rewrite messages in Teams . This feature works similarly to the Rewrite with Copilot panel in Word.
On the Home tab in the ribbon toolbar, click the Copilot button to open the Copilot sidebar to the right. To have Copilot rewrite the whole document or note, type rewrite inside the sidebar’s text entry box. To have it rewrite a specific paragraph, supply the paragraph number. You can also describe how you want the text to be rewritten, such as rewrite first paragraph to be shorter or rewrite paragraph 3 to sound more professional .
Copilot’s rewritten text appears in the sidebar. Below this result you’ll see the Copy button to copy the rewritten text to your clipboard.
A rewritten paragraph in the sidebar.
If you want to adjust Copilot’s rewriting result, you can click one of the suggested prompts that appear in the sidebar below the generated text and above the text entry box. To see different prompt suggestions, click the circular arrow icon.
In the text entry box, you can refine the result by typing more prompts.
Although the Copilot sidebar offers more options for refining its rewritten text than it does for text it generates from scratch, it’s still underpowered compared to the Rewrite with Copilot panel. The best way to rewrite text with Copilot in Word is to use the Rewrite with Copilot panel.
Alternatively, in OneNote, you can right-click the top bar of a text field on a page. On the menu that opens, select Copilot and on the next menu, Rewrite .
In OneNote, you can use a text field’s right-click menu to trigger a Copilot rewrite.
This action will trigger Copilot to rewrite everything inside this text field. The rewrite will then be set inside the top of the text field.
The rewritten text appears in the text field above the original text.
You can have Copilot generate a brief summary of a long document in Word or a page in OneNote. For this to work well, Microsoft says the document or page should contain at least 300 words but no more than 20,000.
In Outlook, Copilot can summarize a long email and, even more useful, the conversation within an entire email thread.
With the document opened in Word or page opened in OneNote, highlight the text that you want summarized. (If you want a summary of the entire document or page, skip this step.)
Click the Copilot button on the Home tab of the ribbon toolbar to open the Copilot sidebar. Inside the text entry box, type summarize and click the arrow button.
Copilot will generate a summary and display it inside the sidebar.
Copilot’s summary of a long document appears in the sidebar.
Below the summary, there’s the familiar Copy button to copy the summary to your PC clipboard.
Below that, you can click References to see a list of citations within the document that Copilot used to generate this summary. Clicking a snippet of the cited text will show in the main window of the app where in the document or page these words are. Clicking the down arrow to the right of a citation will show the passage that Copilot used as a citation.
Click References to view citations from the document that Copilot used for its summary.
Between the results field and the text entry box, you’ll see suggested prompts that you can click to revise the summary. Click the circular arrow icon to refresh these prompts with new suggestions.
Right-click the top bar of a text field. On the menu that opens, select Copilot > Summarize . This action will trigger Copilot to summarize everything inside this text field. The summary will then be set inside the top of the text field.
Copilot summaries created via OneNote’s right-click menu appear at the top of the text field being summarized.
Open the email or conversation that you want to summarize. Click Summarize or Summary by Copilot at the top of the email thread. Copilot will generate a summary of the email or thread.
A Copilot-generated summary of an email.
This summary will be posted at the top of the email or thread. Thread summaries may include citations that Copilot used in generating the summary. Clicking a citation (denoted by a number) will scroll down the thread to the cited email for you to view.
This Copilot-generated summary of an email thread includes citations you can click to go to the source email.
If you have Copilot with a Microsoft 365 business plan, you can use Copilot to generate a summary of a Word document when you share it with your co-workers. This summary is inserted as a passage of text inside the message that your co-workers receive inviting them to collaborate on the document.
With the document open in Word, click the Share button toward the upper right. On the Share panel that opens, click the Copilot icon inside the lower right of the “Add a message” composition box. The AI will generate and insert the summary. You can edit the summary before you send out the invite.
Microsoft to archive unlicensed onedrive business accounts, charge reactivation fee, microsoft warns of serious vulnerability in office, microsoft loop cheat sheet, from our editors straight to your inbox.
Howard Wen ( www.howardwen.com ) is a longtime contributor to Computerworld . He specializes in explainer guides, how-tos, and reviews of office applications and productivity tools.
The best new slack features for business, make slack’s design update work for you, microsoft onedrive cheat sheet: using onedrive for web, google spaces cheat sheet: how to get started, microsoft onedrive cheat sheet: using onedrive in windows, google sheets power tips: how to use dropdown lists, 9 chrome extensions that upgrade google meet, google workspace power tips: tap into cross-app productivity, most popular authors.
Convenience has a cost, privacy has iphone.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Stated. One of the most common ways to replace "said" in an essay is "stated.". It's a great formal synonym that helps to keep things direct and clear for the reader. It works well before a quote. You should write "stated" to clarify that you're about to run a quote by the reader. Of course, you can't claim that someone ...
Synonyms for STATED: declared, specified, avowed, specific, explicit, definite, express, unequivocal; Antonyms of STATED: inferred, implied, implicit, ambiguous ...
Another way to say As Stated By? Synonyms for As Stated By (other words and phrases for As Stated By).
The content reveals. The excerpt indicates. The piece conveys. 1. The document asserts. "The document asserts" is a formal way to convey that the text presents a clear statement or position on a topic. It implies a level of authority and confidence in the information presented.
Most related words/phrases with sentence examples define As stated meaning and usage. Thesaurus for As stated. Related terms for as stated- synonyms, antonyms and sentences with as stated. Lists. synonyms. antonyms. definitions. sentences. thesaurus. Parts of speech. adverbs. Synonyms Similar meaning. View all. allegedly. avowedly. purportedly.
Other Ways to Say "In the Text It States". 1. The Author Notes. Example: "The author notes that the study's findings are inconclusive.". Meaning: This expression indicates that the author of the text makes a specific observation or point. It suggests a direct attribution of ideas or findings to the author.
4. The author asserts. " The author asserts " is a strong way to convey that the author is stating something with confidence or authority. This phrase is particularly effective when the author is making a clear, definitive statement about a topic.
Synonyms for stated include declared, indicated, identified, specified, designated, listed, quantified, defined, stipulated and noted. Find more similar words at ...
Example sentence. Transition words and phrases. Addition. We found that the mixture was effective. Moreover, it appeared to have additional effects we had not predicted. indeed, furthermore, moreover, additionally, and, also, both x and y, not only x but also y, besides x, in fact. Introduction.
Another way to say Stated? Synonyms for Stated (other words and phrases for Stated).
If you're struggling to choose the right words for your essay, don't worry—you've come to the right place! In this article, we've compiled a list of over 300 words and phrases to use in the introduction, body, and conclusion of your essay. Contents: Words to Use in the Essay Introduction. Words to Use in the Body of the Essay.
Synonyms for STATES: countries, nations, commonwealths, kingdoms, republics, provinces, lands, sovranties; Antonyms of STATES: suppresses, stifles, restricts ...
4. That is to say. Usage: "That is" and "that is to say" can be used to add further detail to your explanation, or to be more precise. Example: "Whales are mammals. That is to say, they must breathe air.". 5. To that end. Usage: Use "to that end" or "to this end" in a similar way to "in order to" or "so".
Synonyms for STATE: nation, country, commonwealth, kingdom, land, province, republic, sovereignty; Antonyms of STATE: degradation, debasement, subordination ...
Synonyms for STATED: established, fixed, regular, declared, aforesaid, said, declared, alleged, expressed, maintained, held, asserted, contended, claimed, avowed ...
Synonyms of 'stated' in British English. stated (adjective) in the sense of declared. Synonyms. declared . specified . given. the number of accidents at this spot in a given period . said . ... or tips on writing the perfect college essay, Harper Reference has you covered for all your study needs. February 13, 2020 Read more
STATED - Synonyms, related words and examples | Cambridge English Thesaurus
Synonyms for STATED in English: declared, specified, given, said, alleged, claimed, described, asserted, designated, affirmed, …
Synonyms for states include conditions, shapes, situations, positions, statuses, outlooks, circumstance, form, kilter and order. Find more similar words at wordhippo.com!
"After 24 years in the Army National Guard, Command Sergeant Major Walz retired from the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion in 2005," the state website says.
Donald Trump rambled and lied for over an hour without any follow up questions or fact-checking. MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell says that while he hopes Vice President Harris answers questions ...
Synonyms for States that. 280 other terms for states that - words and phrases with similar meaning. says that. asserts that. declares that. establishes that. affirms that. proclaims that. says.
The Costs of War Project is a team of 35 scholars, legal experts, human rights practitioners, and physicians, which began its work in 2011. We use research and a public website to facilitate debate about the costs of the post-9/11 wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.
The ex-University of Kentucky student caught on viral video attacking a black student while firing off an arsenal of racist slurs — including the N-word more than 200 times — has pleaded ...
Place one double-spaced blank line between the paper title and the author names. Center author names on their own line. If there are two authors, use the word "and" between authors; if there are three or more authors, place a comma between author names and use the word "and" before the final author name. Cecily J. Sinclair and Adam Gonzaga
We received 509 contributions: 295 Extended Abstracts, 49 Video Submissions, and 165 papers transferred from IEEE RAS journals (RAL, TRO, RAM, TASE). All submissions were screened by the organization committee. We encourage authors of extended abstracts to leverage the opportunity to discuss their work at ICRA@40 to further develop their ...
STATE - Synonyms, related words and examples | Cambridge English Thesaurus
STATE - Synonyms, related words and examples | Cambridge English Thesaurus
To get started with Copilot in Word, click the Copilot icon in the left margin or press Alt-Ion your keyboard. Howard Wen / IDG The "Draft with Copilot" panel appears over the document.
Today, the smudged fingerprints of colonization still linger on the scientific enterprise. The lingua franca of research is English.Top scientists—those with the most cited papers—disproportionately work in former colonizing nations or in a few former colonies including the United States.