systematic literature review by

This paper provides an overview of the systematic literature review (SLR) method, based on the literature in health sciences, and explores its potential and challenges for design research. It is intended as a starting point for design researchers interested in the SLR methodology, with references and examples.

A systematic review is a type of review that uses repeatable methods to find, select, and synthesize all available evidence on a topic. It answers a clearly formulated research question and explicitly states the methods used to arrive at the answer.

A systematic literature review is a method to collect, identify, and critically analyze the available research studies on a topic. This paper presents a step-by-step and practical guide for computer-science researchers, with examples, keywords, and tools.

A systematic review collects secondary data, and is a synthesis of all available, relevant evidence which brings together all existing primary studies for review (Cochrane 2016). A systematic review differs from other types of literature review in several major ways.

Literature reviews establish the foundation of academic inquires. However, in the planning field, we lack rigorous systematic reviews. In this article, through a systematic search on the methodology of literature review, we categorize a typology of literature reviews, discuss steps in conducting a systematic literature review, and provide suggestions on how to enhance rigor in literature ...

Learn the definition, purpose, types, and steps of a systematic literature review, a summary and evaluation of all the existing research on a specific question. Follow the guide to formulate your question, plan your protocol, search for the literature, screen and assess the studies, extract and analyze the data, and present the results.

Systematic literature reviews (SRs) are a way of synthesising scientific evidence to answer a particular research question in a way that is transparent and reproducible, while seeking to include ...

The best reviews synthesize studies to draw broad theoretical conclusions about what a literature means, linking theory to evidence and evidence to theory. This guide describes how to plan, conduct, organize, and present a systematic review of quantitative (meta-analysis) or qualitative (narrative review, meta-synthesis) information.

A systematic review collects secondary data, and is a synthesis of all available, relevant evidence which brings together all existing primary studies for review (Cochrane 2016). A systematic review differs from other types of literature review in several major ways.

When performing a systematic literature review or meta-analysis, if the quality of studies is not properly evaluated or if proper methodology is not strictly applied, the results can be biased and the outcomes can be incorrect. However, when systematic reviews and meta-analyses are properly implemented, they can yield powerful results that ...

A Systematic Review (SR) is a synthesis of evidence that is identified and critically appraised to understand a specific topic. SRs are more comprehensive than a Literature Review, which most academics will be familiar with, as they follow a methodical process to identify and analyse existing literature (Cochrane, 2022).This ensures that relevant studies are included within the synthesis and ...

The systematic review is a rigorous method of collating and synthesizing evidence from multiple studies, producing a whole greater than the sum of parts. This textbook is an authoritative and accessible guide to an activity that is often found overwhelming.

This article provides a step-by-step approach to conducting and reporting systematic literature reviews (SLRs) in the domain of healthcare design and discusses some of the key quality issues associated with SLRs. SLR, as the name implies, is a systematic way of collecting, critically evaluating, int …

Systematic reviews are characterized by a methodical and replicable methodology and presentation. They involve a comprehensive search to locate all relevant published and unpublished work on a subject; a systematic integration of search results; and a critique of the extent, nature, and quality of evidence in relation to a particular research question. The best reviews synthesize studies to ...

A systematic review requires a considerable amount of time and resources, and is one type of literature review. If the purpose of a review is to make justifiable evidence claims, then it should be systematic, as a systematic review uses rigorous explicit methods.

Mixed studies review/mixed methods review: Refers to any combination of methods where one significant component is a literature review (usually systematic). Within a review context it refers to a combination of review approaches for example combining quantitative with qualitative research or outcome with process studies

A systematic review is a scholarly synthesis of the evidence on a clearly presented topic using critical methods to identify, define and assess research on the topic. [1] A systematic review extracts and interprets data from published studies on the topic (in the scientific literature), then analyzes, describes, critically appraises and summarizes interpretations into a refined evidence-based ...

Cochrane review protocols are peer reviewed and published on the Cochrane Library before the review commences. Changes to the protocol of a systematic review can introduce bias and should only be made if absolutely necessary. Table 1 is a summary of the inclusion criteria for systematic review protocols. During the process of the review, at ...

Overview. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is a research methodology to collect, identify, and critically analyze the available research studies (e.g., articles, conference proceedings, books, dissertations) through a systematic procedure .An SLR updates the reader with current literature about a subject .The goal is to review critical points of current knowledge on a topic about research ...

A systematic literature review (SLR) is an independent academic method that aims to identify and evaluate all relevant literature on a topic in order to derive conclusions about the question under consideration."Systematic reviews are undertaken to clarify the state of existing research and the implications that should be drawn from this."

The gray literature and a search of trials may also reveal important details about topics that would otherwise be missed ... Systematic review: A review that uses explicit, systematic methods to collate and synthesize findings of studies that address a clearly formulated question.

Every aspect of a systematic literature review, including the research protocols, which databases are used, and dates of each search, must be transparent so that other researchers can be assured that the systematic literature review is comprehensive and focused.

Systematic Review - seeks to systematically search for, appraise and synthesize research evidence on a specific question, often adhering to guidelines on the conduct of a review.. Meta-analysis - a technique that statistically combines the results of quantitative studies to provide a more precise effect of the results. A good systematic review is essential to a meta-analysis of the literature.

A systematic review attempts to collate all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria in order to answer a specific research question.It uses explicit, systematic methods that are selected with a view to minimizing bias, thus providing more reliable findings from which conclusions can be drawn and decisions made (Antman 1992, Oxman 1993).

A systematic literature review (SLR) allows us to find and evaluate existing evidence to answer a specific research question. But with increasing interest in reviews that are rapidly updated and cover a wide evidence-base - an evidence base that is increasing with the exponential growth in the volume of scientific literature - we see increasing demands on the resources needed to develop ...

The results of the systematic literature review of empirical studies addressed our research questions using the PEO framework (Bettany-Saltikov, 2012). For the letter P as a population and its problems, we determined the phrase "parents who are victims of violence by adult children" and the word "society," for E exposure to the term ...

With increased globalisation supply chain (SC) disruption significantly affects people, organisations and society. Supply chain network design (SCND) reduces the effects of disruption, employing mitigation strategies such as extra capacity and flexibility to make SCs resilient. Currently, no systematic literature review classifies mitigation strategies for SCND. This paper systematically ...

This study aims to holistically present a systematic literature review (SLR) triangulated with bibliometric analysis on environmental, social and governance (ESG) research to synthesize and comprehensively review its evolving journey and emerging research streams.,Using R-studio software, this study carried out a retrospective quantitative ...

ChatGPT has been used in several educational contexts,including learning, teaching and research. It also has potential to conduct the systematic literature review (SLR). However, there are limited empirical studies on how to use ChatGPT in conducting a SLR. Based on a SLR published,this study used ChatGPT to conduct a SLR of the same 33 papers in a design-based approach, to see what the ...

1. INTRODUCTION. Evidence synthesis is a prerequisite for knowledge translation. 1 A well conducted systematic review (SR), often in conjunction with meta‐analyses (MA) when appropriate, is considered the "gold standard" of methods for synthesizing evidence related to a topic of interest. 2 The central strength of an SR is the transparency of the methods used to systematically search ...