literature review on english pronunciation

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

The Impact of English Pronunciation on Effective Oral Communication

2019, International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR)

The title of this paper is the impact of English pronunciation on effective oral communication. Therefore, in this paper, the researcher aims to explore whether the Sudanese secondary EFL learners' weakness in English pronunciation is regarded as a main obstacle for them to speak in English. Consequently, the researcher investigates the relation between pronunciation and oral communication in English and tries to show that pronunciation is one of the most important elements of effective oral communication. In spite of the important of English pronunciation skill in the field of language learning and teaching as one of the most important elements of effective oral communication, English pronunciation is still an area of teaching which is often neglected by English EFL teachers and learners at secondary schools in Sudan. Therefore, learners at secondary schools in Sudan have many problems with pronunciation in English when they try to speak in English. To that end, this paper focuses on areas of pronunciation problems that face learners at secondary school in Sudan, which lead to serious breakdown in oral communication in English and then tries to find solutions to them so as to ensure effective English oral communication. Thus, the researcher describes the causes behind the problems of pronunciation that the Sudanese learners of English at secondary schools face while trying to speak in English and the ways to cope with them. In this paper, the researcher, followed the descriptive analytic method and used a questionnaire as a main tool for data collection. The data gathered from the questionnaire are analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study displayed that the Sudanese secondary EFL learners' weakness in English pronunciation is regarded as a main obstacle for them to speak in English.

Related Papers

English Language and Literature Studies

Elkhair Hassan

Abdelmadjid Benraghda

Majority of Arab EFL students reach the university with generally poor English and bad pronunciation in particular. Students in Arab countries have little opportunities to speak English where Arabic is their native language. Since correct pronunciation is very important to avoid misunderstanding when communicating with others and to build self-confidence when trying to speak in front of other people, the current paper investigates the reasons for Arab EFL students to face problems in English pronunciation. The participants were 10 Preparatory Intensive English (PIE) students of University Malaysia Pahang (UMP). Using an in-depth qualitative methodology which is individual interviews, all interviews were audio-recorded with the participants’ consent. The participants were undergraduate Arab EFL students who completed their high school and they do not have exposure to English language. All recorded interviews were analyzed manually. From the data analyzed some emergent themes were fou...

Mohammad Shariq

BAIUST Academic Journal

The study was conducted to test the impact of factors on English pronunciation competence and oral presentation performance of the tertiary-level EFL learners in Bangladesh. The data was obtained from eighty students and thirty teachers from the departments of English in four Bangladeshi private and public universities. The experiment research was based on the survey of a self-developed Likert scale questionnaire and independent t-test. The results were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS). The independent t-test was statistically significant. Therefore, we rejected the null hypothesis. The independent t-test and the survey results showed a significant negative effect of factors on the ESL learners' pronunciation competence and English oral performance. The findings call for further research regarding what methods and techniques can be used to develop learners' pronunciation competence and English oral performance. Cite: Noor, L. (2021). Factors Affecting EFL Learners’ English Pronunciation Competence and Oral Presentation Performance: A Study on Tertiary Level in Bangladesh. BAIUST Academic Journal, 2(1), 174–188.

English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies

Magdaline Nkongho

The present study aims at investigating the pronunciation components in the prescribed English Language Syllabus for High Schools as well as the pronunciation instruction in some selected High Schools in Moundou, Chad, in order to determine the impact on learners’ production with respect to this phonological feature. The content analysis method was adopted for the investigation. Data were drawn from consultation of the National English Language Syllabus for High Schools in Chad, and 44 English Teachers’ logbooks for the 2021/2022 academic year. These logbooks were collected from 6 Government High Schools in Moundou. Two research questions guided the collection of data which were later on classified, put in numerical data and analysed within the framework of the Factors Affecting Pronunciation Theory. Results of the study revealed a total lack of pronunciation prescription in the English language syllabus and a zero percent representation of pronunciation related lessons in English l...

International Journal of Research in English Education

Meisam Ziafar

Sabri T . S . Ahmed

This study was designed to investigate the spoken communication difficulties encountered by the fourth-year EFL students of some rural faculties of Aden University and the factors that might negatively contribute to their poor acquisition of spoken communication proficiency during their learning of English in these faculties to reach some suggestions and solutions that may help in changing the current situation and enabling the concerned EFL programs produce proficient speakers of English. The data were collected through varied instruments, namely students' questionnaire (n = 120), teachers' questionnaire (n = 23), students' interviews (n = 30), speaking skill teachers' interviews (n = 4), students' spoken communication proficiency assessment rubric (n = 42), classroom observations (n = 6), and an assessment of speaking skill syllabi. The collected data were analyzed by using the SPSS 21 st version and manually. The results revealed that the majority of the students encounter fluency and automaticity related difficulties and lack of communication strategies. Moreover, some students also share one or more difficulties with these two major ones, such as phonological difficulties, comprehension difficulties, sociocultural difficulties, lack of discourse knowledge, affective difficulties, and lexical and grammatical difficulties, respectively. Though the majority of the students seem to have mastered a somehow sufficient level of grammar and vocabulary, many of them cannot put their lexical and grammatical knowledge into use orally. It has also been revealed that several factors are responsible for students' poor acquisition of spoken communication proficiency. These factors can be categorized into five types, namely a. factors related to the students themselves, namely students' lack of language learning strategies to develop spoken English and lack of integrative motivation, b. factors related to student's past education, namely students' poor English level when they joined the concerned faculties in addition to the traditional learning habits they brought from their pre-tertiary education, c. factors related to students' environment, namely lack of exposure to spoken English provided by the environment, d. factors related to teaching methodology, such as lack of communicative activities, majority of the students are rarely engaged in spoken activities, mother tongue use in English classes, no language laboratory or ICTs, low qualifications of some teachers, i.e. a semi-traditional teaching setting is still dominant in most classes, and e. curriculum-related factors, namely lack of time devoted to teaching spoken communication skills and the overuse of non-English subjects. As per the results, this study has provided some suggestions and solutions that will help in changing the current situation and enabling the concerned EFL programs to produce proficient speakers of English. To get a soft copy of the thesis, e-mail me to [email protected]

Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies

jalal ahmad

Mr. Ahmed Ismael sefaldin Aldikheri

Abstract This study is an attempt to investigate Errors committed by Sudanese EFL learners in consonants pronunciation. Since pronunciation is a very problematic aspect of language; it is worthy to investigate. The study aimed at identifies errors committed by Sudanese EFL learners in consonants pronunciation as well as to explore the impact of mother-tongue interference and spelling-pronunciation inconsistency. Moreover, to classify errors committed by Sudanese EFL learners in consonants pronunciation into types. The study adopted quantitative and descriptive-analytic approach. The data of the study was gathered by a pronunciation test. The test was applied for (40) second year students majoring in English language at Alzaiem Alazhari University. Simple Random Sampling is the technique to draw a representative from the study population. The study achieved several findings the most important of these are; a certain English consonants are difficult to pronounce for Sudanese EFL learners. The sounds were attributed to errors committed by Sudanese EFL learners are /p/, /b/, /f/, /v/, /t/, /d/, /ʧ/ and/ʤ/. They were also encountered errors by inserting a vowel sounds to break up the consonant clusters. They dropped the last sound that occur in consonant clusters syllable-final position and there were substitution of some sounds. Mother-tongue interference and spelling-pronunciation inconsistency was appeared most frequently and seemed to be major factors that constitute errors in consonants pronunciation. In the light of these findings the study recommended the following: First, teachers should recognize the problematic sounds and teach students how to pronounce those sounds correctly. Second, according to the importance of pronunciation as essential part of learning English, textbooks should included pronunciation lessons and activities to be same as lessons in other skills. Third, tools for practicing pronunciation should be offered at schools, universities and so on. Fourth, Sudanese EFL learners of English should check the dictionary to correct pronunciation of difficult words. At last but not least; as language teachers, it is necessary to teach pronunciation and its problems to students from the early stage of education.

مجلة جامعة كركوك للدراسات الإنسانية

Anmar Saeed

Apart from accuracy, fluency is one of the issues that concern language learners and teachers on parallel grounds. Fluency is generally defined as the rapid, smooth, and effortless use of spoken language. This study aims at suggesting a method and a set of techniques that can be employed in the pronunciation classroom to work on training Iraqi learners of English to learn and use some aspects of connected speech, viz. weak forms, sentence stress, linking and elision, and accordingly developing their fluency skills in speaking English. It basically draws on using a communicative approach with the following characteristics: first, maintaining a learner-centered teaching, encouraging pair/group work, and employing practice through using activities and tasks. The suggested method involves proceeding through three stages of practice: mechanical, meaningful, and communicative. Mechanical practice is a controlled type of practice carried out through repetition and substitution activities; meaningful practice is also a controlled practice through meaningful choices of items; and the last stage, communicative practice involves using language within real communicative contexts. The suggested techniques are also set into three stages in consonance with the stages of the method.

RELATED PAPERS

London Review of Education

John Brennan

TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM

Yusuf Ölmez

International Journal of Life-Sciences Scientific Research

Bhargava Kashyap

Revista Finanzas y Política Económica

William Gilberto Delgado Munevar

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies

Mohammad Rostampour

International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences

eiman Ali Saeed

Anales de Cirugía Vascular

Ahmed Suliman

Tarik Lama Gálvez

ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations

Matthieu Bonnivard

Jurnal Penelitian Kelapa Sawit

Yayuk Purwaningrum

University of Pitesti. Scientific Bulletin - Automotive Series

robert popa

Peter Midolo

Endangered Species Research

Jorge Urbán

Aloysia BERENS

Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment

JOSHUA OLANREWAJU OLAOYE

制作mcmaste学位证书 麦克马斯特大学毕业证学位证书样板毕业证认证原版一模一样

FLORA AND FAUNA

chandra bhanu singh

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Mobile-assisted language learning and pronunciation instruction: A systematic literature review

• Open access
• Published: 07 February 2024

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

• Rastislav Metruk   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4786-0265 1  

1396 Accesses

Explore all metrics

In recent years, learners worldwide have expressed increasing interest in mobile learning and the utilization of mobile devices for language learning purposes. However, few research synthesis studies have focused on pronunciation development in relation to employing MALL (mobile-assisted language learning). This review article contributes to the discourse on how mobile learning aids in acquiring and practicing EFL (English as a foreign language) pronunciation since it is this language system that is both a crucial and frequently neglected aspect of English language learning. With the emergence of e-generation, it is necessary to investigate the influence of MALL on pronunciation acquisition. This paper provides a systematic literature review of the findings of 15 empirical studies published between 2015 and 2022, which is based on PRISMA 2020. The aim of the review is threefold: to investigate the effect of mobile devices on L2 learners’ pronunciation performance, examine learners’ attitudes toward employing mobile learning for pronunciation practice and development, and identify which mobile devices and apps are present in the process. The results indicate that overall, mobile learning exerts a beneficial impact on L2 pronunciation and that participants in the reviewed studies demonstrate positive attitudes toward MALL. Moreover, smartphones appear to be at the center of attention as the primary mobile device, and it was revealed that a variety of mobile apps and platforms have been employed in the studies. The article concludes with pedagogical implications and recommendations for potential research exploration in the future.

Similar content being viewed by others

Language and communication in international students’ adaptation: a bibliometric and content analysis review

English Language Education in the Philippines: Policies, Problems, and Prospects

Content-Based Instruction

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Introduction

Students have demonstrated a growing interest in mobile learning and in the utilization of mobile devices for the purposes of English language learning (Dashtestani, 2016 ). Mobile learning can be referred to as an extension of e-learning that is realized via portable and wireless devices, providing learning anytime and anywhere on the basis of learners’ preferences and convenience (Kumar & Goundar, 2023 ; Kumar & Sharma, 2020 ; Traxler & Crompton, 2015 ). It involves teaching and learning through mobile technologies such as smartphones or tablet devices that provide users with the Internet access, including additional capabilities such as touch screens, cameras, downloadable apps, and location awareness (Fulantelli et al., 2015 ; Schuler et al., 2012 ). Mobile devices are often considered to be tools that have democratized access to technology since learners have in their hands more mobile devices in comparison to other types of gadgets, and these tools may be employed for the purposes of education, in particular within EFL teaching and learning (Hockly & Dudeney, 2018 ).

Kukulska-Hulme ( 2009 ) maintained that because of the popularity of m-learning in the field of second language acquisition, mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) emerged as an independent research domain. It is apparent that MALL provides learners with new, appealing, and exciting ways of language learning, offering major advantages in terms of foreign language education. “Key characteristics of mobile devices include among other things increasing portability, functionality, multimedia convergence, ubiquity, personal ownership, social interactivity, context sensitivity, location awareness, connectivity and personalization” (Cook, 2010 , p. 2). According to Zaki and Yunus ( 2015 ), the following features may be beneficial to language learners: mobility, ubiquity, wireless connection, interactivity, availability, and privacy.

Mall can also be utilized for the following purposes (Arvantis & Krystalli, 2021 ; Karsenti et al., 2013 ; Kukulska-Hulme, 2009 ):

increasing motivation for learning through technology that students are familiar with (e.g., smartphones or tablets);

providing further opportunities to develop communication skills;

promoting the use of L2 as a unique way of communicating;

facilitating the teaching and learning process by investigating, analyzing, discovering, and selecting activities that are reasonable;

enhancing and reinforcing interaction between real and virtual settings, learners in the same classroom and other classrooms, within and beyond school boundaries;

encouraging learning in a pleasing way.

On the other hand, it should be noted that implementing mobile technologies into the teaching and learning process appears to be a challenging task since there are a variety of factors impeding the adoption of m-learning, e.g., technical, cultural, and learner-centered factors (Bidin & Ziden, 2013 ; Kumar & Chand, 2019 ). Therefore, its adoption can be regarded as rather slow. In connection with this, m-learning is mostly self-directed (mobile learning facilitates self-directed learning) and is influenced by a number of factors (Karimi, 2016 ). Further, there are few successful examples which have completely utilized mobile learning capabilities (Bidin & Ziden, 2013 ; Karimi, 2016 ; Kumar & Chand, 2019 ). However, it should be noted that research on mobile learning is still in its early development (Almasri, 2016 ; Al-Rahmi et al., 2021 ; Alsharafat, 2021 ), and its theoretical foundation has not matured yet (Kumar & Chand, 2019 ). For example, several issues are raised when implementing the concept of mobile learning into the process of language learning, such as problems with multitasking, Internet connection, small screen size, choice of appropriate apps, distraction from learning, and the state of (un)preparedness of both teachers and students (Chen & Yan, 2016 ; Heil et al., 2016 ; Klimova, 2019 ; Metruk, 2022 ). Other authors draw attention to different challenges, such as creating a gap between technically sound students and their less technically equipped peers, high dependence on network resources, or the possibility of feeling isolated from teachers and other learners (Asabere, 2013 ; Chandhok & Babbar, 2011 ).

It should also be pointed out that the majority of studies regarding mobile learning and language development have concentrated on vocabulary (e.g., Bensalem, 2018 ; Bieńkowska et al., 2021 ; Dağdeler et al., 2020 ; Kassem, 2018 ; Perwita et al., 2021 ; Shahbaz & Khan, 2017 ) or grammar (Ghorbani & Ebadi, 2020 ; Kashanizadeh & Shahrokhi, 2021 ; Khodabandeh et al., 2017 ; Rozina, et al., 2017 ; Sabahi & Rabbani Yekta, 2019 ), while research on pronunciation in relation to MALL is rather scarce (Ghounane & Rabahi, 2021 ; Saran et al., 2009 ; Shirmardi et al., 2021 ). This possibly results from the fact that pronunciation instruction has always been somewhat neglected (Bajorek, 2017 ; Nadia, 2017 ; Pardede, 2018 ; Seyedabadi et al., 2015 ) when compared to other language skills and systems.

Therefore, this study attempts to conduct a systematic literature review, which is, to the best of our knowledge, the first systematic review on pronunciation instruction in relation to mobile learning. The primary contribution of this review is the identification of studies that provide empirical evidence related to the use of mobile devices for pronunciation practice and development.

2 Prior work

Although research on m-learning focusing on pronunciation acquisition lags behind research papers conducted on grammar or lexis, some studies have attempted to examine the effect of m-learning or MALL on pronunciation of EFL learners. Arashnia and Shahrokhi ( 2016 ) aimed to investigate whether using mobile phones on EFL Iranian students is effective. The results demonstrated that the experimental group performed more successfully than the control group, indicating that EFL learners may learn pronunciation in an effective manner when they receive instruction through mobile phones. The study conducted by Kim and Kwon ( 2012 , p. 31) “concludes that the ESL apps seem effective in that they provide a personal and learner-centered learning opportunity with ubiquitously accessible and flexible practices”. Jing’s ( 2017 ) experiment, during which phonetics teaching was combined with mobile learning, also supported the notion that m-learning has a beneficial influence on phonetics instruction. In connection with this, it was also Walesiak ( 2017 ) who was in favor of mobile learning, claiming:

Whether you teach pronunciation as a separate skill or simply integrate it spontaneously into your lessons, mobile apps can definitely help you create a stimulating classroom environment, improve the quality and effectiveness of your teaching and reinforce to students the need to learn pronunciation. (p. 16).

Amalia ( 2020 ) also attempted to investigate the effectiveness of employing MALL in teaching pronunciation at a secondary school. The research results indicated that the mobile-assisted language learning brought about a significant effect on increasing the level of learners’ pronunciation ability. In addition to this, Retnomurti et al. ( 2019 ) described in their study an Android Table Program PROTADROID whose purpose was to facilitate pronunciation practice of EFL learners in Jakarta, Indonesia. It was established that learners who displayed positive attitudes towards the app generally understood and demonstrated capability for operating this program with a keen interest.

However, employing mobile technologies for the purposes of pronunciation instruction is not always straightforward and without complications, as a number of scholars have underpinned its effectiveness in terms of pedagogical interventions (Lan, 2022 ). There exists substantial controversy regarding how much attention ought to be devoted to technology while teaching pronunciation (Henderson et al, 2012 ). Most mobile learning pronunciation courses and applications do not seem to be pedagogically driven, as they do not offer clear instructional goals and adequate learner support, which results in learners experiencing out-of-the-classroom difficulties (Colpaert, 2006 ). Furthermore, Kukulska-Hulme ( 2005 ) maintained that a high number of mobile apps were not explicitly designed for pronunciation instruction; thus, teachers need to carefully and accordingly select mobile apps to meet the course objectives (Stockwell, 2010 ). Mobile courses do not always succeed in achieving learning efficiency without a well-structured mobile-mediated design of a pronunciation course (Kukulska-Hulme & Shield, 2008 ). It was also Aratusa et al. ( 2022 ) who, apart from identifying a positive perception of MALL in the teaching and learning process, found out that there also existed some difficulties in this regard, such as smartphone performance, redirections of students, and learners’ familiarity with the exploitation of phones for language learning purposes. It is therefore, important that there is an effective pedagogical intervention within pronunciation courses and their design to demonstrate the positive influence of mobile learning on pronunciation instruction.

Although innovative technology tends to stand out in a crowd and may even temporarily veil pedagogic falsity, EFL pronunciation instructors planning to employ MAPT must take into account the design of an effective pedagogical approach to facilitate interactive and collaborative learning in pronunciation and in turn achieve successful learning outcome. (Lan, 2022 , p. 1562-1563).

There is no doubt that in spite of numerous advantages of employing mobile learning for pronunciation learning purposes, there are areas which merit further exploration so that mobile devices are exploited accordingly and effectively.

3 Research method

The methodological approach of this literature review is considered as the systematic literature review, which can be regarded as an essential tool for summarizing evidence in an accurate and reliable manner. A systematic review attempts to collect empirical evidence that is relevant to predefined eligibility criteria to precisely answer the formulated research questions (Moher et al., 2009 ). This review is based on PRISMA 2020, which is an updated guideline of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement published in 2009 (Page et al., 2021 ).

A review protocol was established, including identifying the data source, search strategy along with query strings, and inclusion/exclusion criteria. The primary source for the systematic literature review was one of the largest bibliographic databases, Web of Science (Ruggieri et al., 2021 ), which offers access to the world’s leading scholarly literature (Hugar, 2019 ) in all disciplinary fields.

The aim of this review is to examine, summarize and characterize the use of mobile devices for the purposes of pronunciation practice and learning. To obtain this kind of information, the following research questions were proposed:

What is the effect of mobile devices on pronunciation acquisition?

What are learners’ attitudes toward employing mobile learning for pronunciation practice and development?

Which mobile devices are applied in the articles and which pronunciation apps are employed?

3.1 Search strategy and query strings

Search strings ought to cover as much ground as possible while being sound in their size (Schardt et al., 2007 ). The query strings, which arose out of the previously formulated research questions, in the WoS database (all editions of the Web of Science Core Collection) within the field “Topic” were “mobile” OR “cell” OR “cellular” OR “portable” OR “mobile-assisted” OR “mobile assisted” OR “mobile-based” OR “mobile based” OR “m-learning” OR “smartphone” OR “smart-phone” OR “mobile device” OR “smartphone-assisted” OR “smartphone assisted” OR “smartphone based” OR “smartphone enhanced” OR “smartphone-enhanced” OR “MALL” OR “MALU” OR “SPALL” OR “SALL” OR “MAPT”. The second row (FIELD = TOPIC), which was combined with the first query row using the “AND” operator, contained the string “pronunciation” AND “accent”. The third row (FIELD = TOPIC) also employed the “AND” operator, containing the following terms: “practice” OR “training” OR “instruction” OR “learning” OR “teaching” OR “acquisition” OR “exercise” OR “drill” (Table  1 ).

3.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

To evaluate the selected articles, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined. Only those articles that met the criteria in Table  2 were accepted for the purposes of this systematic literature review.

The initial search resulted in 300 articles. After applying all the limits (document type, publication years, language of article, Web of Science categories), the final number of records for screening was 74. The next step was to screen the titles and abstracts for articles relevant to the topic of this review. After careful evaluation of the 74 records, 42 articles were excluded for the following reasons: not relevant to the research questions (33 records), focused on a system or skill other than pronunciation (3 records), wrong sample (3 records), not an empirical study (2 records), and retracted article (1 record). This accounted for the total of 25 records sought for retrieval. The next step was locating the article full texts; it was not possible to find 7 full text articles, which means that the number of articles assessed for eligibility was 25. After reading the full texts of every article, 10 articles were excluded because of the following: not relevant to the research questions or outcomes (6 articles), wrong intervention (3 articles), and wrong population (1 article), resulting in a total of 15 studies included in the review (Fig.  1 ).

PRISMA flow chart on paper identification, screening, eligibility assessments and inclusion. **If automation tools were used, indicate how many records were excluded by a human and how many were excluded by automation tools

This section contains an in-depth analysis of the collected outcomes. The three research questions are answered, followed by the results interpretation and summary. Figure  2 displays which countries the empirical studies took place in, and Table  3 presents an overview of the studies.

Countries involved

4.1 The effect of mobile devices on pronunciation acquisition

The primary objective of this systematic literature review is to examine and evaluate the effect of portable mobile devices on pronunciation development. Three studies did not mention the influence of mobile devices on pronunciation, but all of the remaining thirteen studies confirm the positive impact of mobile technology on EFL learners’ pronunciation. While some studies have revealed the usability of MALL in pronunciation learning (Ghounane, 2019 ) or statistically insignificant differences in learners’ sound perception and production (Fouz-Gonzáles, 2020 ), the majority of reports suggest that there exists a positive effect on the pronunciation of EFL learners, which is also substantiated by calculating statistically significant figures. For example, Lan ( 2022 ) aimed to investigate the effects of mobile-assisted pronunciation training (MAPT) on EFL students’ pronunciation performance as compared to computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT) instruction. “The statistical results of research question one attested that the MAPT students had not only achieved significant improvements after the treatment, but more importantly, had outperformed the CAPT students on the posttest” (Lan, 2022 , p. 1579). Furthermore, the mobile app involved (English Pronunciation Tutor) proved to be an effective app, and most students suggested that they were satisfied and highly motivated when using the app, as it offered instructional videos, authentic material, and interactive learning environments. Alternatively, Khalil ( 2022 ) explored the impact of a pronunciation app (English Pronunciation, designed by HEPHAM) on nonnative Saudi EFL students. A statistically significant difference in the students’ performance before and after using the application was identified, indicating its positive effect. Another study concentrated on the effectiveness of m-learning on developing English phonetic competence of prospective interpreters. “From the results, it is clear that usage of m-learning increases the knowledge of terminology and ability to product and percept English speech easily” (Gurova et al., 2020 , p. 71). Therefore, it can be concluded that overall, the effect of mobile devices is positive and beneficial to EFL learners regarding their pronunciation acquisition. However, it should be also emphasized that further exploration in this area must be conducted.

4.2 Learners’ attitudes toward m-learning

Most of the reviewed studies have demonstrated positive attitudes of EFL learners toward the implementation of m-learning for the purposes of pronunciation acquisition, while three studies did not involve discussing attitudes in this regard. Mobile-assisted language learning seems to represent an important motivational factor in pronunciation development, providing learners with exciting ways of L2 learning and offering major advantages in terms of foreign language education.

Tejedor-García et al. ( 2020 ) investigated a novel learning game for the purposes of L2 pronunciation training in which players are challenged with each other. “The integration of automatic speech recognition (ASR) and text-to-speech (TTS) technology allowed users to improve their pronunciation while being immersed in a highly motivational game” (Tejedor-García et al., 2020 , p. 74250). Alternatively, Chen’s study ( 2022 ) aimed to examine the potential of adopting speech-to-text recognition (STR) technology EFL oral training at the university level. Apart from recognizing the app’s effectiveness, the research participants also demonstrated positive attitudes toward the tasks in the app.

These findings appear to be in line with the fact that EFL learners generally express positive attitudes toward integrating MALL into the process of L2 learning (e.g., Botero, et al., 2018 ; Saidouni & Bahloul, 2016 ; Tra, 2020 ).

4.3 Types of mobile devices and apps/platforms involved in the studies

MALL can be defined as the use of “mobile technologies in language learning, especially in situations where device portability offers specific advantages” (Kukulska-Hulme, 2013 , p. 3701). To better understand the utilization of MALL for the purposes of language learning, this review article also attempts to identify which mobile devices have been used most. While some studies did not explicitly mention the device involved (e.g., Tejedor-Garcia et al., 2020 ; Yang, 2022 ; Chen, 2022 ), it seems that smartphones were the most frequently used mobile devices in the studies (e.g., Cerezo et al., 2019 ; Lan, 2022 ; Akkara et al., 2020 ). Other studies involved both smartphones and other devices, such as laptops or iPads (Jiang et al., 2022 ; Kan & Tang, 2020 ; Yurieva et al., 2021 , p. 93). However, smartphones were the most prevalent ones, being at the center of attention regarding MALL due to their availability, popularity, and computer-like functionality – features that enable the users to install third-party apps into the device (Horvath et al., 2020 ; Kim et al., 2014 ; Mindog, 2016 ).

Pronunciation apps are illustrated in Table  3 . It is apparent that a variety of apps can be utilized for pronunciation practice. On the one hand, this fact is to learners’ advantage, and they can experience and enjoy all the benefits apps offer, such as ubiquity, portability, opportunity to share language work with their peers, and chance to practice all the language skills and systems. (Hossain, 2018 ). On the other hand, there also exist some challenges that must be confronted by both EFL teachers and students. App developers are working around the clock, the number of apps on the market is substantial, and learners might experience difficulties in selecting the most appropriate and relevant apps to tailor their needs. Furthermore, functionality apps may be sometimes questionable; some of them may contain bugs which need to be eventually eradicated by the developers (Metruk, 2020 ). It should also be noted that EFL instructors should aid in helping their learners select proper apps.

5 Discussion and conclusion

This article attempted to explore, summarize, and characterize the use of portable devices for the purposes of pronunciation acquisition and practice. Out of the initially identified 300 articles, only 15 remained as they were considered eligible for the purposes of this systematic literature review, which is based on PRISMA 2020.

It was established that according to the reviewed articles, mobile learning (mobile-assisted language learning) demonstrates a beneficial influence on L2 pronunciation acquisition. The findings are in line with, for example, those of conducted by Arashnia and Shahrokhi ( 2016 ), Jing ( 2017 ), Kaiser ( 2018 ), and Walesiak ( 2017 ). However, throughout the course of its investigation, several researchers have questioned the effectiveness of pedagogical interventions within courses, raising a number of questions. For example, it is debatable whether there is a sufficient amount of pedagogical aspects, or how much priority ought to be assigned to technology within the teaching and learning process. Furthermore, numerous apps are not designed for explicit pronunciation practice, and there is also the issue of providing adequate feedback when using m-learning for pronunciation purposes. This area of foreign language instruction appears to be underexplored, and further empirical studies involving statistical support as well as discussing pedagogical elements of MALL need to be carried out.

The second research question concentrated on the attitudes of learners toward m-learning in the reviewed articles. It is confirmed that m-learning has achieved popularity among EFL learners and that it has its place in future teaching and learning as the majority of learners within the studies demonstrated positive attitudes toward mobile learning. These outcomes are in line with those of Botero et al., 2018 , Saidouni and Bahloul ( 2016 ), and Tra ( 2020 ). The finding appears to be linked with the fact that younger generations consider their smart device (smartphones in particular) to be a rather vital part of their lives that can also be utilized for language learning purposes, exploiting the device in an innovative and exciting way for learning L2. Nonetheless, there are questions that need to be raised. For instance, it is the matter of learners’ (and teachers’) preparedness for using smartphones in EFL instruction. Furthermore, there are questions concerning their distraction from the learning process or employing smart devices for the purposes of speculative and unacademic behavior. Future studies should also concentrate on opinions and attitudes toward mobile learning in relation to EFL instruction.

The third research question focused on the types of mobile devices and apps/platforms involved. It seems that smartphones are the most prevalent mobile device identified in the studies. However, tablets or iPads were also mentioned. Smartphones stand in the center of attention, playing a major role in the lives of learners. As far as pronunciation apps are concerned, a variety of apps were employed (Table  3 ), but as has already been mentioned, there exist numerous challenges one must address due to the fact that new apps are developed all the time. For instance, it appears to be difficult for language learners to choose a suitable app since there is a massive amount of applications readily available on the market. Another aspect is concerned with its functionality – apps might not work in a way they were designed and may contain bugs, which makes it difficult to facilitate the process. It is also the appropriateness that seems to be in doubt as it can be a rather difficult task to find and employ apps that are perfectly appropriate for developing particular language systems (e.g., the phonological one and its partial components) or skills. One of the solutions to these challenges might lie in increased mutual cooperation between students and their instructors, who need to possess a range of skills in this area of expertise. The skills can be acquired by completing relevant university degree in the given field, undergoing subjects and courses that concentrate on this matter so that their level of preparedness for adequate implementation of mobile devices and apps is markedly increased. However, it may be the lifelong education of individual teachers in the given field which can make the most significant difference as mobile apps are developed round the clock. Indubitably, much remains to be explored in the realms of employing mobile learning for the purposes of pronunciation acquisition.

Other issues, such as physical properties (e.g., smaller screen size, issues with batteries), connectivity issues, price, multitasking problems, and the like clearly merit attention of educators and researchers. Further, learners tend to be distracted by using their smart devices at their lessons, employing them to a high extent for nonacademic purposes (social networking, chatting with peers, etc.). Alternatively, it is also the possibility of isolation and lack of social contact which may come into being. The examples that have been mentioned demonstrate that there exist a number of considerable challenges which need to be confronted and eventually overcome by language teachers. A potential solution here may be that teachers agree on certain rules of implementing mobile devices into the teaching and learning process, holding regular discussion meetings on this matter with their peers. This will certainly increase their workload, but it appears to be the necessary step towards the more effective and higher-quality use of mobile devises for the purposes of language learning. Other options include the use of artificial intelligence and augmented reality; yet again, despite the fact that it is the learner-centered approach that is being advocated, teachers are required to take the first step so that this type of new technology is adequately mirrored in the teaching and learning process, generating pedagogically sensible environment.

Future studies should, therefore, focus on empirical evidence – seeking statistically sound articles that discuss the effectiveness of mobile learning. Further, addressing the issue of attitudes and motivation regarding MALL for pronunciation purposes also appears to be underexplored. It is still the case that other language systems (e.g., vocabulary, grammar) or skills (e.g., reading or listening) are explored to a higher degree. However, pronunciation acquisition and instruction need to be devoted adequate attention, as it is often this aspect of language that causes intelligibility problems and breakdowns in communication.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Almasri, A. (2016). New mobile learning process model for higher education students in Jordanian Universities. Asian Journal of Information Technology, 15 (2), 2016–2022. https://doi.org/10.36478/ajit.2016.2016.2022

Article   Google Scholar  

Akkara, S., Anumula, V. S. S., & Mallampalli, M. S. (2020). Impact of WhatsApp interaction on improving L2 speaking skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15 (3), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i03.11534

Al-Rahmi, A. M., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A., Almutairy, S., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2021). Exploring the factors affecting mobile learning for sustainability in higher education. Sustainability, 13 (14), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147893

Alsharafat, M. (2021). A theoretical discussion of factors affecting the acceptance of m-learning by integrating is success model with TAM model. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 99 (17), 4213–4259.

Google Scholar  

Amalia, I. (2020). The application of mobile assisted language learning (Mall) in teaching pronunciation. International Journal of Language Education and Cultural Review, 6 (2), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.21009/IJLECR.062.20

Arashnia, M., & Shahrokhi, M. (2016). Mobile assisted language learning: English pronunciation among Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3 (4), 149–162.

Aratusa, Z., Suriaman, A., Darmawan, D., Marhum, R., Rofiqoh, R., & Nurdin, N. (2022). Students’ perceptions on the use of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) in learning pronunciation. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 5 (7), 2652–2660. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V5-i7-50

Arvantis, P., & Krystalli, P. (2021). Mobile assisted language learning (MALL): Trends from 2010 to 2020 using text analysis techniques. European Journal of Education, 4 (1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejls-2019.v5i1-191

Asabere, N. Y. (2013). Benefits and challenges of mobile learning implementation: Story of developing nations. International Journal of Computer Applications, 73 (1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.5120/12706-9504

Bajorek, J. (2017). L2 pronunciation in CALL: The unrealized potential of Rosetta Stone, Duolingo, Babbel, and Mango languages. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 5 (1), 60–87. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_itet_v5i1_bajorek

Bensalem, E. (2018). The impact of WhatsApp on EFL students' vocabulary learning. Arab World English Journal, 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no1.2

Bidin, S., & Ziden, A. A. (2013). Adoption and application of mobile learning in the education industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90 , 720–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.145

Bieńkowska, I., Klimczok, A., Polok, K., & Modrzejewska, J. (2021). Use of mobile assisted language learning (MALL) in teaching vocabulary to ESP students. The International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 12 (3), 81–95.

Botero, G., Cincinnato, Q., He, T., & Zhu, C. (2018). Acceptance and usage of mobile assisted language learning by higher education students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30 , 426–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9177-1

Chen, K. (2022). Speech-to-text recognition in University English as a foreign language learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27 , 9857–9875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11016-5

Cerezo, R., Calderón, V., & Romero, C. (2019). A holographic mobile-based application for practicing pronunciation of basic English vocabulary for Spanish speaking children. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 124 , 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.11.009

Chandhok, S., & Babbar, P. (2011). M-learning in distance education libraries: A case scenario of Indira Gandhi national open university. The Electronic Library, 29 (5), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471111177071

Chen, Q., & Yan, Z. (2016). Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 54 , 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.047

Colpaert, J. (2006). Pedagogy-driven design for online language teaching and learning. CALICO Journal, 23 (3), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v23i3.477-497

Cook, J. (2010). Mobile phones as mediating tools within augmented contexts for development. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2 (3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4018/jmbl.2010070101

Dağdeler, K., Konca, M., & Demiröz, H. (2020). The effect of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) on EFL learners’ collocation learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16 (1), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.712891

Dashtestani, R. (2016). Moving bravely towards mobile learning: Iranian students’ use of mobile devices for learning English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29 (4), 815–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1069360

Fouz-Gonzáles, J. (2020). Using apps for pronunciation training: An empirical evaluation of the English File Pronunciation app. Language Learning & Technology, 24 (1), 62–85. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/44709

Fulantelli, G., Taibi, D., & Arrigo, M. (2015). A framework to support educational decision making in mobile learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 47 , 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.045

Ghorbani, N., & Ebadi, S. (2020). Exploring learners’ grammatical development in mobile assisted language learning. Cogent Education, 7 (1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1704599

Ghounane, N. (2019). The attitudes of second year EFL students at Dr Moulay Tahar University towards learning English pronunciation through mobile assisted language. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, (5), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call5.9

Ghounane, N., & Rabahi, H. (2021). The use of computer assisted pronunciation training in teaching English pronunciation for first-year EFL students at Saida University. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 10 (6), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.10n.6p.76

Grimshaw, J., & Cardoso, W. (2018). Activate space rats! Fluency development in a mobile game-assisted environment. Language Learning & Technology, 22 (3), 159–175. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/44662

Gurova, T., Riabukha, T., Zinenko, N., & Gostishcheva, N. (2020). Mobile learning in developing phonetic competence of future interpreters. Advanced Education, 14 , 66–74. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.155398

Heil, C. R., Wu, J. S., Lee, J. J., & Schmidt, T. (2016). A review of mobile language learning applications: Trends, challenges, and opportunities. The EuroCALL Review, 24 (2), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2016.6402

Henderson, A., Frost, D., Tergujeff, E., Kautzsch, A., Murphy, D., Kirkova-Naskova, A., Waniek-Klimczak, E., Levey, D., Cunnigham, U., & Curnick, L. (2012). The English pronunciation teaching in Europe survey: Selected results. Research in Language, 10 (1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-011-0047-4

Hockly, N., & Dudeney, G. (2018). Current and future digital trends in ELT. RELC Journal, 49 (2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218777318

Horvath, J., Mundinger, C., Schmitgen, M. M., Wolf, N. D., Sambataro, F., Hirjak, D., Kubera, K. M., Koenig, J., & Christian Wolf, R. (2020). Structural and functional correlates of smartphone addiction. Addictive Behaviors, 105 , 106334–106337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106334

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Hossain, M., 2018. Exploiting smartphones and apps for language learning: a case study with the EFL learners in a Bangladeshi university. Review of Public Administration Management, 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.4172/2315-7844.1000241

Hugar, J. G. (2019). Scientific publications of Goa University as reflected in web of science database during 2008–2017 (August 1, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3620143

Inceoglu, S., Lim, H., & Chen, W. (2020). ASR for EFL pronunciation practice: segmental development and learners’ beliefs. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 17 (3), 824–840. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.3.5.824

Jiang, M. Y.-C., Jong, M. S.-Y., Lau, W. W.-F., Chai, C.-S., & Wu, N. (2022). Exploring the effects of automatic speech recognition technology on oral accuracy and fluency in a flipped classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12732

Jing, X. (2017). Application of mobile learning system in phonetics teaching. International conference on Education, E-business, E-management and E-learning - IC4E, 17 , 19–23.

Kan, Q., & Tang, J. (2020). Researching mobile-assisted English language learning among adult distance learners in China: Emerging practices and learner perception of teacher role. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 8 (3). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2018070101

Karimi, S. (2016). Do learners’ characteristics matter? An exploration of mobile-learning adoption in self-directed learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 63 , 769–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.014

Karsenti, T., Fievez, A., Collin, S., Simard, S., Dumouchel, G., Giroux, P., Rasmy, A., Morin, M., Dupuis, A., Boily, A., & Roy, N. (2013). L’iPad à l’école: usages, avantages et défis. Résultats d’une enquête auprès de 6057 élèves et 302 enseignants du Québec (Canada) . CRIFPE.

Kaiser, D. (2018). Mobile-assisted pronunciation training: The iPhone pronunciation app project. IATEFL Pronunciation Special Interest Group Journal, 58 , 38–52.

Kassem, M. (2018). The effect of a suggested in-service teacher training program based on MALL applications on developing efl students’ vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9 (2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0902.05

Kashanizadeh, I., & Shahrokhi, M. (2021). The use of mobile to boost Iranian EFL learners’ grammar knowledge: the case of grammar learning application in focus. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 8 (1), 1–10.

Khalil, S. M. (2022). Effectiveness of mobile learning in enhancing Saudi English majors’ skills in learning vowels. Arab World English Journal, 13 (4), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no4.18

Khodabandeh, F., Alian, J., & Soleimani, H. (2017). The effect of mall-based task on EFL learners' grammar learning. Teaching English with Technology, 17 (2), 29–41.

Kim, D., Chun, H., & Lee, H. (2014). Determining the factors that influence college students’ adoption of smartphones. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65 (3), 578–588. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22987

Kim, H., & Kwon, Y. (2012). Exploring smartphone applications for effective mobile-assisted language learning. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 15 (1), 31–57.

Article   MathSciNet   CAS   Google Scholar  

Klimova, B. (2019). Impact of mobile learning on students’ achievement results. Education Sciences, 9 (2), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020090

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005). Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers . Psychology Press.

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21 (2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000202

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 3701–3709). Wiley.

Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20 (3), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000335

Kumar, B. A., & Chand, S. S. (2019). Mobile learning adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 24 , 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9783-6

Kumar, B. A., & Goundar, M. S. (2023). Developing mobile language learning applications: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28 , 5651–5671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11377-x

Kumar, B. A., & Sharma, B. (2020). Context aware mobile learning application development: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 25 , 2221–2239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10045-x

Lan, E. (2022). A comparative study of computer and mobile-assisted pronunciation training: The case of university students in Taiwan. Education and Information Technologies, 27 , 1559–1583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10647-4

Metruk, R. (2020). EFL learners’ perspectives on the use of smartphones in higher education settings in Slovakia. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18 (6), 537–549. https://doi.org/10.34190/JEL.18.6.006

Metruk, R. (2022). Smartphone English language learning challenges: a systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079627

Mindog, E. (2016). Apps and EFL: A case study on the use of smartphone apps to learn English by four Japanese students. The JALT CALL Journal, 12 (1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v12n1.199

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med , 6 (7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Nadia, B. (2017). The effects of explicit pronunciation instruction on the comprehensibility and intelligibility of Tunisian EFL learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 6 (3), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2016.1480

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.  BMJ .  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pardede, P. (2018). Improving EFL students’ English pronunciation by using the explicit teaching approach. Journal of English Teaching, 4 (3), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v4i3.852

Perwita, T., Asmana, C., & Arifani, Y. (2021). Mobile-assisted language learning based using scientific approach to improve students vocabulary. Journal of English Teaching, Literature, and Applied Linguistics, 4 (1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.30587/jetlal.v4i1.2390

Retnomurti, A., Hendrawaty, N., & Tiwiyanti, L. (2019). Development of android-based protadroid application in pronunciation practice learning for undergraduate students. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7 (2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v7i2.1721

Rozina, A., Shima, T., Shah, M., Rahmah, L., & Hafiza, A. (2017). Mobile assisted language learning (mall) in developing second language learners’ understanding of grammar. Journal of Academia UiTM Negeri Sembilan, 5 (1), 187–208.

Ruggieri, R., Pecoraro, F., & Luzi, D. (2021). An intersectional approach to analyse gender productivity and open access: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian National Research Council. Scientometrics, 126 , 1647–1673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03802-0

Sabahi, A., & Rabbani Yekta, R. (2019). Enhancing the accuracy of the use of verb tenses by Iranian intermediate EFL students through Mall: The case of English grammar ultimate software app. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Translation Studies, 4 (1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.22034/efl.2019.225388.1029

Saidouni, K., & Bahloul, A. (2016). Teachers and students’ attitudes towards using mobile-assisted language learning in higher education. Arab World English Journal, Special Issue on CALL, (3) . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2822983

Saran, M., Seferoglu, G., & Cagiltay, K. (2009). Mobile assisted language learning: English pronunciation at learners’ fingertips. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34 , 97–114.

Seyedabadi, S., Fatemi, A., & Pishghadam, R. (2015). Towards better teaching of pronunciation: Review of literature in the area. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (4), 76–81.

Schardt, C., Adams, M. B., Owens, T., Keitz, S., & Fontelo, P. (2007). Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 7 (1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-7-1

Schuler, C., Winters, N., & West, M. (2012). The future of mobile learning: Implications for policy makers and planners . UNESCO.

Shahbaz, M., & Khan, R. (2017). Use of mobile immersion in foreign language teaching to enhance target language vocabulary learning. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 7 (1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2017/v7/i1/1448

Shirmardi, F., Roohani, A., & Jam, B. (2021). Effect of mobile game-based instruction on Iranian EFL learners’ pronunciation: exploring their motivational perception. Interdisciplinary Studies in English Language Teaching, 1 (1), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.22080/ISELT.2021.21811.1014

Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14 (2), 95–110.

Tejedor-García, C., Escudero-Mancebo, D., Cardeñoso-Payo, V., & González-Ferreras, C. (2020). Using challenges to enhance a learning game for pronunciation training of English as a second language. IEEE Access, 8 , 74250–74266. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988406

Tra, P. (2020). Mobile-assisted language learning in a university context in Vietnam: Students’ attitudes. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 36 (1), 103–116.

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Traxler, J. M., & Crompton, H. (2015). Mobile learning.  Encyclopedia of mobile phone behavior .  IGI Global , 506–518

Walesiak, B. (2017). Mobile pron. apps: A personal investigation. Speak Out! Journal of the IATEFL Pronunciation Special Interest Group, 57 , 16–28.

Yang, L. (2022). Student engagement with teacher feedback in pronunciation training supported by a mobile multimedia application.  SAGE Open, 12 (2).  https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221094604

Yurieva, O., Musiichuk, T., & Baisan, D. (2021). Informal English learning with online digital tools: Non-linguist students. Advanced Education, 8 (17), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.223896

Zaki, A., & Yunus, M. (2015). Potential of mobile learning in teaching of ESL academic writing. English Language Teaching, 8 (6), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p11

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication was written with the support of the Operational Programme Human Resources 2014–2020 of the project Pedagogical Practice as a Determining Factor concerning Modern Teacher Adaptation in the Context of Knowledge Society, ITMS code 312011AFW8, co-financed by the European Social Fund.

Open access funding provided by The Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic in cooperation with Centre for Scientific and Technical Information of the Slovak Republic This study is funded by Slovakia CVTI Consortium Transformative Agreement with Springer Nature. Contract no. 92/CVTISR/2023.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Faculty of Humanities, Department of English Language and Literature, University of Žilina, Žilina, Slovakia

Rastislav Metruk

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rastislav Metruk .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The author has no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Financial interests

The author declares he has no financial interests.

Non-financial interests

Additional information, publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Metruk, R. Mobile-assisted language learning and pronunciation instruction: A systematic literature review. Educ Inf Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12453-0

Download citation

Received : 30 June 2023

Accepted : 10 January 2024

Published : 07 February 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12453-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Mobile language learning
• Smartphone-assisted language learning
• Pronunciation learning and acquisition
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• Cambridge Dictionary +Plus

English pronunciation of literature

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

(English pronunciations of literature from the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary & Thesaurus and from the Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary , both sources © Cambridge University Press)

Word of the Day

any of the rods that join the edge of a wheel to its centre, so giving the wheel its strength

Worse than or worst of all? How to use the words ‘worse’ and ‘worst’

Learn more with +Plus

• Recent and Recommended {{#preferredDictionaries}} {{name}} {{/preferredDictionaries}}
• Definitions Clear explanations of natural written and spoken English English Learner’s Dictionary Essential British English Essential American English
• Grammar and thesaurus Usage explanations of natural written and spoken English Grammar Thesaurus
• Pronunciation British and American pronunciations with audio English Pronunciation
• English–Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Simplified)–English
• English–Chinese (Traditional) Chinese (Traditional)–English
• English–Dutch Dutch–English
• English–French French–English
• English–German German–English
• English–Indonesian Indonesian–English
• English–Italian Italian–English
• English–Japanese Japanese–English
• English–Norwegian Norwegian–English
• English–Polish Polish–English
• English–Portuguese Portuguese–English
• English–Spanish Spanish–English
• English–Swedish Swedish–English
• Dictionary +Plus Word Lists
• All translations

To add ${headword} to a word list please sign up or log in.

Add ${headword} to one of your lists below, or create a new one.

{{message}}

Something went wrong.

There was a problem sending your report.