* 'Number Delimiters' only apply to 'Paragraph Order'
Daily devotionals.
Blue Letter Bible offers several daily devotional readings in order to help you refocus on Christ and the Gospel of His peace and righteousness.
Recognizing the value of consistent reflection upon the Word of God in order to refocus one's mind and heart upon Christ and His Gospel of peace, we provide several reading plans designed to cover the entire Bible in a year.
The Blue Letter Bible ministry and the BLB Institute hold to the historical, conservative Christian faith, which includes a firm belief in the inerrancy of Scripture. Since the text and audio content provided by BLB represent a range of evangelical traditions, all of the ideas and principles conveyed in the resource materials are not necessarily affirmed, in total, by this ministry.
View Desktop Site
Bible reference, biblical language resources, theological resources, topical indexes, help & support, devotionals.
Blue Letter Bible study tools make reading, searching and studying the Bible easy and rewarding.
Blue Letter Bible is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization
©2024 Blue Letter Bible | Privacy Policy
Translation selection order copied to bibles tab order, bibles tab order copied to translation selection order, translation selection order and bibles tab order have been reset.
You can copy the order of your preferred Bible translations from the Bibles Tab to the Version Picker (this popup) or vice versa. The Bibles Tab is found in the Tools feature on Bible pages:
Note: MLA no longer requires the URL as part of their citation standard. Individual instructors or editors may still require the use of URLs.
Share this page, email this page.
You must be logged in to send email.
Subscribe to the newsletter.
Interlinear |
Bibles |
Cross-Refs |
Commentaries |
Dictionaries |
Miscellaneous |
Login to your account.
Email / username or password was incorrect!
Check your email for password retrieval
Keep me logged in!
Did you forget your password?
Register a new BLB account
Complete the form below to register [?]
Error: That Email is already registered
Error: Please provide a valid Email
Error: Passwords should have at least 6 characters
Error: Passwords do not match
Error: Please provide a valid first name
Error: That username is already taken
Error: Usernames should only contain letters, numbers, dots, dashes, or underscores
← Login to Your Account
Passwords should have at least 6 characters. Usernames should only contain letters, numbers, dots, dashes, or underscores.
Thank you for registering. A verification email has been sent to the address you provided.
Your partnership makes all we do possible. Would you prayerfully consider a gift of support today?
Cookie Notice: Our website uses cookies to store user preferences. By proceeding, you consent to our cookie usage. Please see Blue Letter Bible's Privacy Policy for cookie usage details.
New testament.
The seven bowls of god's wrath.
16 Then I heard a loud voice from the temple telling ( A ) the seven angels, “Go and ( B ) pour out on the earth ( C ) the seven bowls of the wrath of God.”
2 So the first angel went and poured out his bowl on the earth, and harmful and painful ( D ) sores came upon the people who bore ( E ) the mark of the beast and worshiped its image.
3 The second angel poured out his bowl into the sea, and ( F ) it became like the blood of a corpse, and ( G ) every living thing died that was in the sea.
4 The third angel poured out his bowl into ( H ) the rivers and the springs of water, and ( I ) they became blood. 5 And I heard the angel in charge of the waters [ a ] say,
( J ) “Just are you, ( K ) O Holy One, ( L ) who is and who was, for you brought these judgments. 6 For ( M ) they have shed the blood of ( N ) saints and prophets, and ( O ) you have given them blood to drink. It is what they deserve!”
7 And I heard ( P ) the altar saying,
“Yes, Lord God the Almighty, ( Q ) true and just are your judgments!”
8 The fourth angel poured out his bowl on the sun, and it was allowed to scorch people ( R ) with fire. 9 They were scorched by the fierce heat, and ( S ) they cursed [ b ] the name of God who had power over these plagues. ( T ) They did not repent ( U ) and give him glory.
10 The fifth angel poured out his bowl on ( V ) the throne of the beast, and ( W ) its kingdom was plunged into darkness. People gnawed their tongues in anguish 11 and cursed ( X ) the God of heaven for their pain and ( Y ) sores. ( Z ) They did not repent of their deeds.
12 The sixth angel poured out his bowl on ( AA ) the great river Euphrates, and ( AB ) its water was dried up, ( AC ) to prepare the way for the kings ( AD ) from the east. 13 And I saw, coming out of the mouth of ( AE ) the dragon and out of the mouth of ( AF ) the beast and out of the mouth of ( AG ) the false prophet, three ( AH ) unclean spirits like ( AI ) frogs. 14 For they are ( AJ ) demonic spirits, ( AK ) performing signs, who go abroad to the kings of the whole world, ( AL ) to assemble them for battle on ( AM ) the great day of God the Almighty. 15 (“Behold, ( AN ) I am coming like a thief! ( AO ) Blessed is the one who stays awake, keeping his garments on, ( AP ) that he may not go about naked and be seen exposed!”) 16 And ( AQ ) they assembled them at the place that in Hebrew is called ( AR ) Armageddon.
17 The seventh angel poured out his bowl into ( AS ) the air, and a loud voice came out of the temple, from the throne, saying, ( AT ) “It is done!” 18 And there were ( AU ) flashes of lightning, rumblings, [ c ] peals of thunder, and ( AV ) a great earthquake ( AW ) such as there had never been since man was on the earth, so great was that earthquake. 19 ( AX ) The great city ( AY ) was split into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell, and God ( AZ ) remembered ( BA ) Babylon the great, ( BB ) to make her drain the cup of the wine of the fury of his wrath. 20 And ( BC ) every island fled away, and no mountains were to be found. 21 And ( BD ) great hailstones, about one hundred pounds [ d ] each, fell from heaven on people; and ( BE ) they cursed God for ( BF ) the plague of the hail, because the plague was so severe.
The Holy Bible, English Standard Version. ESV® Text Edition: 2016. Copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers.
The world is a confusing place right now. We believe that faithful proclamation of the gospel is what our hostile and disoriented world needs. Do you believe that too? Help TGC bring biblical wisdom to the confusing issues across the world by making a gift to our international work.
Other essays.
The existence and attributes of God are evident from the creation itself, even though sinful human beings suppress and distort their natural knowledge of God.
The existence of God is foundational to the study of theology. The Bible does not seek to prove God’s existence, but rather takes it for granted. Scripture expresses a strong doctrine of natural revelation: the existence and attributes of God are evident from the creation itself, even though sinful human beings suppress and distort their natural knowledge of God. The dominant question in the Old and New Testaments is not whether God is, but rather who God is. Philosophers both Christian and non-Christian have offered a wide range of arguments for God’s existence, and the discipline of natural theology (what can be known or proven about God from nature alone) is flourishing today. Some philosophers, however, have proposed that belief in God is rationally justified even without theistic arguments or evidences. Meanwhile, professing atheists have offered arguments against God’s existence; the most popular is the argument from evil, which contends that the existence and extent of evil in the world gives us good reason not to believe in God. In response, Christian thinkers have developed various theodicies, which seek to explain why God is morally justified in permitting the evils we observe.
If theology is the study of God and his works, then the existence of God is as foundational to theology as the existence of rocks is to geology. Two basic questions have been raised regarding belief in God’s existence: (1) Is it true ? (2) Is it rationally justified (and if so, on what grounds)? The second is distinct from the first because a belief can be true without being rationally justified (e.g., someone might irrationally believe that he’ll die on a Thursday, a belief that turns out by chance to be true). Philosophers have grappled with both questions for millennia. In this essay, we will consider what the Bible says in answer to these questions, before sampling the answers of some influential Christian thinkers.
The Bible opens not with a proof of God’s existence, but with a pronouncement of God’s works: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” This foundational assertion of Scripture assumes that the reader not only knows already that God exists, but also has a basic grasp of who this God is. Throughout the Old Testament, belief in a creator God is treated as normal and natural for all human beings, even though the pagan nations have fallen into confusions about the true identity of this God. Psalm 19 vividly expresses a doctrine of natural revelation: the entire created universe ‘declares’ and ‘proclaims’ the glorious works of God. Proverbs tells us that “the fear of the Lord” is the starting point for knowledge and wisdom (Prov. 1:7; 9:10; cf. Psa. 111:10). Denying God’s existence is therefore intellectually and morally perverse (Psa. 14:1; 53:1). Indeed, the dominant concern throughout the Old Testament is not whether God is, but who God is. Is Yahweh the one true God or not (Deut. 4:35; 1Kgs. 18:21, 37, 39; Jer. 10:10)? The worldview that provides the foil for Hebrew monotheism is pagan polytheism rather than secular atheism.
This stance on the existence of God continues into the New Testament, which builds on the foundation of the uncompromising monotheism of the Old. In his epistle to the Romans, the apostle Paul insists that God’s “eternal power and divine nature” are clearly perceived from the created order itself. Objectively speaking, there can be no rational basis for doubt about the existence of a transcendent personal creator, and thus there can be no excuse for unbelief (Rom. 1:20). Endued with a natural knowledge of our creator we owe God our honor and thanks, and our failure to do so serves as the primary basis for the manifestation of God’s wrath and judgment. The apostle’s robust doctrine of natural revelation has raised the question of whether anyone can truly be an atheist. The answer will depend, first, on how “atheist” is defined, and second, on what precisely Paul means when he speaks of people “knowing” God. If the idea is that all men retain some genuine knowledge of God, despite their sinful suppression of natural revelation, it’s hard to maintain that anyone could completely lack any cognitive awareness of God’s existence. But if “atheist” is defined as someone who denies the existence of God or professes not to believe in God, Romans 1 not only allows for the existence of atheists – it effectively predicts it. Atheism might then be understood as a form of culpable self-deception.
Paul’s convictions about natural revelation are put to work in his preaching to Gentile audiences in Lystra and Athens (Acts 14:15–17; 17:22–31). Paul assumes not only that his hearers know certain things about God from the created order but also that they have sinfully suppressed and distorted these revealed truths, turning instead to idolatrous worship of the creation (cf. Rom. 1:22–25). Even so, his appeals to general revelation are never offered in isolation from special revelation: the Old Testament Scriptures, the person of Jesus Christ, and the testimony of Christ’s apostles.
Elsewhere in the New Testament, the question of the existence of God is almost never explicitly raised, but rather serves as a foundational presupposition, an unquestionable background assumption. One exception would be the writer to the Hebrews, who remarks that “whoever would draw near to God must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who seek him” (11:6). In general, the New Testament is concerned less with philosophical questions about the existence of God than with practical questions about how sinners can have a saving relationship with the God whose existence is obvious. As in the Old Testament, the pressing question is never whether God is, but who God is. Is Jesus Christ the revelation of God in human flesh or not? That’s the crux of the issue.
Consider again the two questions mentioned at the outset. (1) Is belief in God true ? (2) Is it rationally justified ? One appealing way to answer both questions affirmatively is to offer a theistic argument that seeks to infer God’s existence from other things we know, observe, or take for granted. A cogent theistic argument, one assumes, would not only demonstrate the truth of God’s existence but also provide rational justification for believing it. There is a vast literature on theistic arguments, so only a sampling of highlights can be given here.
The first generation of Christian apologists felt little need to argue for God’s existence for the same reason one finds no such arguments in the New Testament: the main challenges to Christian theism came not from atheism, but from non-Christian theism (Judaism) and pagan polytheism. Not until the medieval period do we find formal arguments for the existence of God offered, and even then the arguments do not function primarily as refutations of atheism but as philosophical meditations on the nature of God and the relationship between faith and reason.
One of the most famous and controversial is the ontological argument of St. Anselm (1033–1109) according to which God’s existence can be deduced merely from the definition of God, such that atheism leads inevitably to self-contradiction. One distinctive of the argument is that it relies on pure reason alone with no dependence on empirical premises. Various versions of the ontological argument have been developed and defended, and opinion is sharply divided even among Christian philosophers over whether there are, or even could be, any sound versions.
Cosmological arguments seek to demonstrate that that the existence of the universe, or some phenomenon within the universe, demands a causal explanation originating in a necessary first cause beyond the universe. St. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) famously offered “Five Ways” of demonstrating God’s existence, each of which can be understood as kind of cosmological argument. For example, one of the Five Ways argues that any motion (change) has to be explained by some mover (cause). If that mover itself exhibits motion, there must be a prior mover to explain it, and because there cannot be an infinite regress of moved movers, there must be an original unmoved mover : an eternal, immutable, and self-existent first cause. Other notable defenders of cosmological arguments include G. W. Leibniz (1646–1716) and Samuel Clarke (1675–1729), and more recently Richard Swinburne and William Lane Craig.
Teleological arguments , which along with cosmological arguments can be traced back to the ancient Greeks, contend that God is the best explanation for apparent design or order in the universe. Simply put, design requires a designer, and thus the appearance of design in the natural world is evidence of a supernatural designer. William Paley (1743–1805) is best known for his argument from analogy which compares functional arrangements in natural organisms to those in human artifacts such as pocket watches. While design arguments suffered a setback with the rise of the Darwinian theory of evolution, which purports to explain the apparent design of organisms in terms of undirected adaptive processes, the so-called Intelligent Design Movement has reinvigorated teleological arguments with insights from contemporary cosmology and molecular biology while exposing serious shortcomings in naturalistic Darwinian explanations.
In the twentieth century, the moral argument gained considerable popularity, not least due to its deployment by C. S. Lewis (1898–1963) in his bestseller Mere Christianity . The argument typically aims to show that only a theistic worldview can account for objective moral laws and values. As with the other theistic arguments there are many different versions of the moral argument, trading on various aspects of our moral intuitions and assumptions. Since such arguments are typically premised on moral realism —the view that there are objective moral truths that cannot be reduced to mere human preferences or conventions—extra work is often required to defend such arguments in a culture where moral sensibilities have been eroded by subjectivism, relativism, and nihilism.
Cornelius Van Til (1895–1987) gained some notoriety for his forceful criticisms of the “traditional method” of Christian apologetics which capitulated to “autonomous human reason.” Van Til held that any respectable theistic argument ought to disclose the undeniability of the triune God revealed in Scripture, not merely a First Cause or Intelligent Designer. He therefore advocated an alternative approach, centered on a transcendental argument for the existence of God, whereby the Christian seeks to show that human reason, far from being autonomous and self-sufficient, presupposes the God of Christianity, the “All-Conditioner” who created, sustains, and directs all things according to the counsel of his will. As Van Til put it, we should argue “from the impossibility of the contrary”: if we deny the God of the Bible, we jettison the very grounds for assuming that our minds have the capacity for rational thought and for reliable knowledge of the world.
Since the renaissance of Christian philosophy in the second half of the twentieth century, there has been renewed interest and enthusiasm for the project of developing and defending theistic arguments. New and improved versions of the classical arguments have been offered, while developments in contemporary analytic philosophy have opened up new avenues for natural theology. In his 1986 lecture, “Two Dozen (or so) Theistic Arguments,” Alvin Plantinga sketched out an entire A to Z of arguments for God, most of which had never been previously explored. Plantinga’s suggestions have since been expanded into a book-length treatment by other philosophers. The discipline of Christian natural theology is thriving as never before.
Still, are any of these arguments actually needed? Does confidence about God’s existence have to be funded by philosophical proofs? Since the Enlightenment, it has often been held that belief in God is rationally justified only if it can be supported by philosophical proofs or scientific evidences. While Romans 1:18–21 has sometimes been taken as a mandate for theistic arguments, Paul’s language in that passage suggests that our knowledge of God from natural revelation is far more immediate, intuitive, and universally accessible.
In the opening chapters of his Institutes of the Christian Religion , John Calvin (1509–1564) considers what can be known of God apart from special revelation and asserts that a natural knowledge has been universally implanted in mankind by the Creator: “There is within the human mind, and indeed by natural instinct, an awareness of divinity” ( Institutes , I.3.1). Calvin speaks of a sensus divinitatis , “a sense of deity,” possessed by every single person in virtue of being created in God’s image. This internal awareness of the Creator “can never be effaced,” even though sinful men “struggle furiously” to escape it. Our implanted natural knowledge of God can be likened in some respects to our natural knowledge of the moral law through the God-given faculty of conscience (Rom. 2:14-15). We know instinctively that it’s wrong to lie and steal; no philosophical argument is needed to prove such things. Similarly, we know instinctively that there is a God who made us and to whom we owe honor and thanks.
In the 1980s, a number of Protestant philosophers led by Alvin Plantinga, Nicholas Wolterstorff, and William Alston developed a sophisticated defense of Calvin’s notion of the sensus divinitatis . Dubbed the “Reformed epistemologists,” they argued that theistic beliefs can be (and normally should be) properly basic : rationally justified even without empirical evidences or philosophical proofs. On this view, believing that God exists is comparable to believing that the world of our experience really exists; it’s entirely rational, even if we can’t philosophically demonstrate it. Indeed, it would be quite dysfunctional to believe otherwise.
Even granting that there is a universal natural knowledge of God, there are unquestionably people who deny God’s existence and offer arguments in their defense. Some have attempted to exposed contradictions within the concept of God (e.g., between omniscience and divine freedom) thereby likening God to a “square circle” whose existence is logically impossible. At most such arguments only rule out certain conceptions of God, conceptions that are often at odds with the biblical view of God in any case.
A less ambitious approach is to place the burden of proof on the theist: in the absence of good arguments for God’s existence, one ought to adopt the “default” position of atheism (or at least agnosticism). This stance is hard to maintain given the many impressive theistic arguments championed by Christian philosophers today, not to mention the Reformed epistemologists’ argument that belief in God is properly basic.
The most popular atheistic argument is undoubtedly the argument from evil. The strong version of the argument maintains that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of an all-good, all-powerful God. The more modest version contends that particularly horrifying and seemingly gratuitous instances of evil, such as the Holocaust, provide strong evidence against God’s existence. The problem of evil has invited various theodicies : attempts to explain how God can be morally justified in permitting the evils we encounter in the world. While such explanations can be useful, they aren’t strictly necessary for rebutting the argument from evil. It is enough to point out that given the complexities of the world and the considerable limitations of human knowledge, we are in no position to conclude that God couldn’t have morally justifying reasons for allowing the evils we observe. Indeed, if we already have grounds for believing in God, we can reasonably conclude that God must have such reasons, whether or not we can discern them.
This essay is part of the Concise Theology series. All views expressed in this essay are those of the author. This essay is freely available under Creative Commons License with Attribution-ShareAlike, allowing users to share it in other mediums/formats and adapt/translate the content as long as an attribution link, indication of changes, and the same Creative Commons License applies to that material.
COMMENTS
In one sense, all of God's revelation is word-revelation, because it proceeds from God's own speech, the Word of John 1:1-14. But sometimes God gives us word-revelation in a further sense: revelation in which the medium is human words. ... This essay is freely available under Creative Commons License with Attribution-ShareAlike, allowing ...
Divine revelation, which is a remarkable and gracious gift of God, comes in both general and special ways. General revelation is given to everyone everywhere is broad (though far from empty) in what it says about God. This kind of divine revelation is found in creation and in every person's conscience. Special revelation, on the other hand ...
Revelation is simply God "unveiling" Himself to us. He "discloses" to us more about Himself. And He does this in a variety of ways. What theologians term "the doctrine of revelation" is the study of how God has revealed Himself to humanity through time and how He continues to reveal Himself to us today. He is God; He does not have ...
The Bible is a big book that consists of many topics, diverse literature, and spans centuries. Yet, the Bible, despite being written by multiple authors and addressing various subjects, is one grand story whose central message is about what our triune Creator-covenant God planned in eternity, executed in time, to glorify himself by the redemption of his people, the judgment of sin, and making ...
His revelation in the Bible has two main messages, the law and the gospel. The law declares what is right and wrong, and it threatens God's punishment for sin. The gospel presents the love of God, which he has shown especially by providing salvation from sin through Jesus Christ. 5. We believe that the entire Bible is Christ-centered.
Divine revelation is the cornerstone of Christian faith, revealing God's nature, His will, and His plan for salvation. Through a gradual process of self-disclosure, culminating in the person of Jesus Christ, God has made Himself known to humanity. This revelation is a profound gift, calling us to respond with faith, love, and obedience.
General revelation. Also known as Universal revelation, general revelation deals with how God can be understood through his creation. More specifically, this can be manifest in physical nature, human nature, and history. General revelation does not impart truths that are necessary for salvation (e.g. sinfulness of humanity, the atonement, etc ...
Barth points out that precisely at this moment "…God's Word, revelation and the Bible are indeed one, and literally so.23 Levinas at this critical point of God's first revelation references Psalms 62:11: "Once God has spoken; twice have I heard this…"24 He brings out the concept that Scripture can have two meanings since it needs ...
In 19:1‑6, David shows us three things concerning God's revelation in His creation: A. There is abundant evidence of God's glory in His creation (19:1, 2, 4a). "Glory" comes from a word meaning "weight" or "worth.". We see abundant evidence of God's weight or worth by looking at His creation, especially at the vastness and ...
In two ways: 1. There is natural or general revelation. This is the revelation of God in the things he has created. It is a revelation that every person experiences. He has created the universe, and he has created human beings. (a) It is objective, a revelation outside us (the universe).
God Has Spoken to Us - Question 22. There are several conclusions that we can make about the subject of divine revelation. They include the following: 1. General Revelation and Special Revelation Are Dependent upon One Another. Both general revelation and special revelation are incomplete in themselves. General revelation gives evidence of ...
Revelation, as understood from its presentation in the Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation of Vatican II, Dei Verbum, is the personal communication of God's very self to man, the only adequate response to which is man's total self-commitment of faith in love (1 Jn4:16). As such, the model for this receptivity to God's self ...
The introduction typically begins with an address or greetings (sender to recipient, "greetings"). For example, "James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, To the twelve tribes in the Dispersion: Greetings" (Jas 1:1). Paul's introductory greetings are often longer, introducing important themes that arise in the body of the ...
The book's vivid portrayal of the ultimate victory of God's kingdom serves as a source of hope and assurance for believers, inspiring them to endure and remain steadfast in their faith, knowing that their ultimate vindication lies in the hands of a sovereign and just God. Moreover, the Book of Revelation conveys a message of eschatological hope ...
The book of Revelation or the Apocalypse of John of Patmos is one of the most famous books in the New Testament. Written near the end of the 1st century CE, it is the only apokalypsis (Greek: "unveiling of unseen realities") that was included in the New Testament canon and has been interpreted and reinterpreted for centuries, beginning in Late Antiquity, through the Middle Ages, and the modern ...
What is the sea of glass mentioned in Revelation 4:6 and 15:2? What does it mean that God is the one who was and is and is to come (Revelation 4:8)? Who are the four horsemen of the apocalypse? Who are the twenty-four (24) elders in Revelation? What is the verse about casting our crowns before the feet of Jesus?
The Revelation Of The Doctrine Of God Essay. 2126 Words; 9 Pages; The Revelation Of The Doctrine Of God Essay. Firstly, scripture has an essential role in the revelation of the doctrine of God, as it is an important part of one of the two methods by which he reveals himself to us, these two methods are general and special revelation. To begin ...
Paul refers to God's revelation in creation as showing us "his invisible attributes," "his eternal power and divine nature" (1:20) such that all who witness the creation see truths about God that are "plain to them" (1:19) and that are "clearly perceived" (1:20). ... This essay is part of the Concise Theology series. All views ...
Around God's throne are twenty-four other thrones with elders in white robes and golden crowns. Thunder and lightning emanate from the throne. The center has four living creatures covered in eyes, each different, continuously saying, "Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God Almighty." Chapter 5 - The Scroll and the Lamb
Progressive revelation means that God did not unfold His entire plan to humanity in the Book of Genesis or, for that matter, in the entire Old Testament. The Old Testament revelation, though accurate, is incomplete. The fullness of certain teachings cannot be found in the Old Testament. There Are Predictions That Remained Unfulfilled.
Reflection About Revelation. 843 Words4 Pages. The book of Revelation is such a world changing book because it addresses topics that aren't referenced earlier in the bible. Revelation is written in a chronological order of how the events leading to the downfall of earth will occur. John opens the text with "The revelation from Jesus Christ ...
God makes himself known to his creatures because he first knows himself perfectly as a personal, speaking God. Although all people suppress the knowledge of God in their sin, he has clearly communicated about himself to his creatures through the creation and through human's being made in the image of God. On top of this general revelation ...
It serves as a reminder of God's promise of a future filled with peace, joy, and eternal life. 7. The Mark of the Beast: A symbol of 666. The Mark of the Beast, cited in Revelation 13:16-18, is one of the most enigmatic symbols within the text. It's often associated with the figure '666' — another significant number in Revelation.
The Seven Bowls of God's Wrath - Then I heard a loud voice from the temple telling the seven angels, "Go and pour out on the earth the seven bowls of the wrath of God." So the first angel went and poured out his bowl on the earth, and harmful and painful sores came upon the people who bore the mark of the beast and worshiped its image. The second angel poured out his bowl into the sea ...
Summary. The existence of God is foundational to the study of theology. The Bible does not seek to prove God's existence, but rather takes it for granted. Scripture expresses a strong doctrine of natural revelation: the existence and attributes of God are evident from the creation itself, even though sinful human beings suppress and distort ...