The department offers a degree leading to the PhD in epidemiology. This program may be an extension of the applied biostatistics and epidemiology MS program and is especially aimed at persons with a strong background in medicine: in particular, students enrolled in the MD program of the Keck School of Medicine who wish to interrupt their MD studies after two years to complete a PhD degree. This program is designed to produce an epidemiologist with in-depth statistical skills. The program requires a solid core of courses in methodological aspects of statistics and in statistical thinking as applied to medicine, as well as a solid grounding in epidemiological methods and in certain medical disciplines. Summary of course requirements: Fourteen units of core course work are required in year 1 as preparation for the screening exam (assuming students have completed PM 510L and PM 512 or comparable classes from MS training). Additional units of track-specific course work are required in year 2 or after. A total of 60 units are required for completion, which may be fulfilled by any approved electives, plus dissertation research units. After passing the screening exam, all students must enroll in at least two semesters of PM 610 : Graduate Seminar in Biostatistics. The first semester of PM 610 is typically taken before the Qualifying Examination and the second semester of PM 610 before the final dissertation defense. Special Requirements : By the end of the first semester, the student should have selected a faculty mentor who will verify the student’s readiness for the screening exam (e.g., have passed the first semester’s core courses and be registered for the second semester’s courses or have equivalent prior training) and must sign the application for the screening exam. The mentor will also work with the student to identify a suitable dissertation chair and explore possible topics. Identification of the dissertation chair and formation of the student’s Qualifying Exam Committee is expected to be done by the end of the second year. Executive Committee: The Epidemiology Executive Education Committee will review mentors, as well as approve changes in the curriculum and qualifying exam. They will also ensure that required courses are taught, will make decisions on which electives are continued, added, or removed, and will work with the course organizers to collect and summarize course evaluations. Members of the Epidemiology Executive Education Committee are represented on the Preventive Medicine Education Committee, chaired by the Vice Chair for Education (currently Dr. Richard Watanabe), which is charged with establishing general department-wide policies. Admissions Committee: The majority of applications first come directly to the department and are reviewed by the Epidemiology Admissions Committee. Candidates recommended for admissions and funding are then presented to the KSOM PhD Programs Committee for approval. Direct admissions to the individual faculty member’s research team are handled in the same way, must meet the same standards and be approved by the Epidemiology Admissions Committee. PIBBS students may elect to join the Epidemiology PhD program, provided they have done at least one rotation with an epidemiology faculty member who agrees to support that student and the students acceptance is approved by the Chair of the Epidemiology Admissions Committee. Course Guidance or Advising Committee: The student will decide along with the student’s mentor and dissertation committee chair which, if any, additional course work will be undertaken. Qualifying Examination Committee: The student, in consultation with the student’s mentor, will nominate five faculty members to serve on the Qualifying Examination Committee. Three of the faculty must be from the Epidemiology Program and one from another department (the “External Member”). The Committee should reflect a diversity of expertise and typically will include one member from a different division of the Department of Preventive Medicine (e.g., one with subject-matter expertise in the proposed application portion of the dissertation). The role of the Qualifying Examination Committee is to guide the student on development of an appropriate dissertation project, both in content and time commitment, and to evaluate the student’s knowledge of the topic, epidemiological and biostatistical methodology, and readiness for completing the dissertation research. Dissertation Committee: The Dissertation Committee is typically drawn from the membership of the Qualifying Examination Committee and includes the student’s primary mentor as chair, an external member, and at least one other member of the Epidemiology Division. All Qualifying Examination Committee members may be retained if preferred by the student. The role of the Dissertation Committee is to advise the doctoral student on the research topic and methods, and then to review the final completed dissertation for acceptance. Students are expected to meet with the dissertation committee at least once per year to discuss progress; more frequent meetings will typically be needed as the student approaches the final defense of the dissertation. Dissertation committee members are expected to read and comment on a dissertation within two weeks from its submission. The student and faculty will coordinate a time line for the student to present the dissertation to the committee. This time line must allow all dissertation committee members enough time to fulfill their responsibilities within the two-week deadline. Review of Membership in Faculty Mentorship: Membership should be reviewed on a three-year cycle, with one-third of the members reviewed each year. The main criteria for membership are the existence of an active research program related to epidemiologic research; evidence of outstanding past mentoring; and participation in programmatic and/or teaching activities. Members are expected to actively participate in teaching, screening exams, qualifying exams, dissertation committees and recruitment. Review of members will be conducted by the Executive Committee. Mentors whose record reflects poor academic performance, poor mentoring or poor participation will be subject to non-renewal or to a probationary period in which improvements in noted deficiencies must be demonstrated as a condition of continuing membership. Prerequisites:As a condition of admission, students must hold a Master’s degree in a related discipline (e.g., mathematics, statistics, epidemiology, public health) and have completed a Master’s thesis. Students entering the program with a relevant Master’s degree that does not require a thesis (e.g. Master of Public Health) will be assigned an administrative or research mentor upon entering the program who will evaluate their quantitative and writing skills before the student takes the screening exam. All students are required to pass the program screening examination before being fully admitted as a doctoral student in the program. It is preferred that all students admitted to the program have successfully completed a minimum of one class in epidemiology and one class in biostatistics before entering the doctoral program. Some students may be admitted to the program without meeting the Master’s program requirements (e.g., if they have strong research background and clear evidence of ability in the health research field or were admitted through PIBBS), but will be expected to complete PM 510L and PM 512 and pass the screening examination prior to being considered fully admitted as a doctoral student in the program. - PM 510L Principles of Biostatistics Units: 4 (or the equivalent)
- PM 512 Principles of Epidemiology Units: 4
*It is recommended that students TA or re-take these courses if credit taken at separate institution prior to starting program at USC. Screening Exam Core Courses (14 units)- PM 511aL Data Analysis Units: 4 *
- PM 517a Research Methods in Epidemiology Units: 4
- PM 517b Research Methods in Epidemiology Units: 3
- PM 518a Statistical Methods for Epidemiological Studies I, II Units: 3
*PM 511b is recommended for Screening Exam EPIDEMIOLOGY TRACKS (11-12 units)Please choose one track: Cancer Epidemiology, Genetic Epidemiology, Environmental Epidemiology, Clinical Trials, or General Epidemiology and Methods Cancer Epidemiology- INTD 504 Molecular Biology of Cancer Units: 4
- PM 559 Cancer Epidemiology Units: 4
- PM 570 Statistical Methods in Human Genetics Units: 4 or
- PM 579 Statistical Analysis of High-Dimensional Data Units: 4
Genetic Epidemiology- PM 533 Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Units: 3
- PM 570 Statistical Methods in Human Genetics Units: 4
- INTD 531 Cell Biology Units: 4 or
- PM 549 Human Molecular Genetics and Genomics Units: 4
Environmental Epidemiology- PM 558 Environmental Epidemiology: Concepts, Methods, and Practice Units: 4
- PM 553 Human Exposure Assessment for Public Health Units: 4 or
- PM 554 Health Effects of Environmental Contaminants Units: 4 or
- PM 555 Environmental Health, Policy and Practice Units: 4
- PM 569 Spatial Statistics Units: 3 or
Clinical Trials- PM 523 Design of Clinical Studies Units: 3
- PM 511cL Data Analysis Units: 4 or
- PM 515 Multivariate Statistics in Health Behavior Research Units: 4
General Epidemiology and MethodsIncludes students who choose to design specific class electives with their adviser, tailored to their unique research interests. - PM 588 The Practice of Epidemiology Units: 4
- PM 605 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Units: 4
- PM 523 Design of Clinical Studies Units: 3 or
- PM 559 Cancer Epidemiology Units: 4 or
- PM 579 Statistical Analysis of High-Dimensional Data Units: 4 or
- PM 607 Nutrition and Health: Myths, Controversies and Science Units: 4
Electives (34-35 units)In addition to the required courses, the remaining required units may be selected from any of the following courses: - GERO 520 Life Span Developmental Psychology Units: 2 or 4
- INTD 531 Cell Biology Units: 4
- INTD 561 Molecular Biology Units: 4
- MICB 551 Prokaryotic Molecular Genetics Units: 4
- PHBI 550 Seminar in Advanced Cellular, Molecular and Systemic Physiology Units: 1
- PM 516a Statistical Problem Solving Units: 1
- PM 516b Statistical Problem Solving Units: 1
- PM 518b Statistical Methods for Epidemiological Studies I, II Units: 3
- PM 522a Introduction to the Theory of Statistics Units: 3
- PM 527 Epidemiology of Infectious Disease Units: 4
- PM 529 Environmental Health: An Epidemiological Approach Units: 4
- PM 530 Biological Basis of Disease Units: 4, 2 years
- PM 534 Statistical Genetics Units: 3
- PM 538 Introduction to Biomedical Informatics Units: 3
- PM 544L Multivariate Analysis Units: 3
- PM 552 Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Units: 3
- PM 553 Human Exposure Assessment for Public Health Units: 4
- PM 554 Health Effects of Environmental Contaminants Units: 4
- PM 569 Spatial Statistics Units: 3
- PM 571 Applied Logistic Regression Units: 3
- PM 575 Statistical Methods in Environmental Epidemiology Units: 3
- PM 591 Machine Learning for the Health Sciences Units: 4
- PM 603 Structural Equation Modeling Units: 4, 2 years
- PM 610 Seminar in Biostatistics and Epidemiology Units: 1
- PM 611 Advanced Topics in Epidemiology Units: 3
- PM 790 Research Units: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- PM 794a Doctoral Dissertation Units: 2
- PM 794b Doctoral Dissertation Units: 2
- PSCI 665 Drug Transport and Delivery Units: 4
- PSYC 514 Psychopathology Units: 4
- PSYC 524 Research Design in Developmental Psychology Units: 4
- RSCI 531 Industrial Approaches to Drug Discovery Units: 4
- RSCI 532 Early Stage Drug Development Units: 3
- RSCI 533 Safety Evaluation during Drug Development Units: 3
- SSCI 581 Concepts for Spatial Thinking Units: 4
- SSCI 582 Spatial Databases Units: 4
- SSCI 583 Spatial Analysis and Modeling Units: 4
- SSCI 585 Geospatial Technology Project Management Units: 4
- SSCI 586 GIS Programming and Customization Units: 4
- SSCI 587 Spatial Data Acquisition Units: 4
- SSCI 588 Remote Sensing for GIS Units: 4
- SSCI 589 Cartography and Visualization Units: 4
- SSCI 591 Web and Mobile GIS Units: 4
Electives will be determined by the student’s needs and interests. When appropriate, courses not listed above may be chosen from the University course offerings with approval from the student’s adviser and Program Director. Sufficient familiarity in computer languages to operate major software packages for data management and analysis is required. Additional RequirementsPreparation for Screening Examination The Screening Examination will be taken at the end of the first or second year after students have completed their core classes and covers material learned in these classes and the core knowledge of epidemiologic theory and applications. Prior to the screening examination a mentor who will serve on the qualifying exam committee must be identified. The screening examination will consist of an applied and theory component and will be conducted in class over two to three days. The written component will be drawn from the core courses. A student failing the screening examination may be given a second opportunity to retake either one or both portions. Students failing the examination for the second time will terminate with the MS degree upon satisfactory completion of 37 units and an acceptable master’s thesis. Annual Research Appraisal (ARA)After advancing to candidacy, progress on dissertation research is evaluated annually with an Annual Research Appraisal (ARA) by the Annual Dissertation Committee. A key element is participation in PM 610 : Graduate Seminar in Epidemiology and Biostatistics for at least two semesters after passing the Screening Exam. It is recommended that students take PM 610 to gain presentation experience and feedback before completing the qualifying examination and again before completing the final dissertation defense. Students give seminars and research updates that encompass both a global view of their area of investigation and a focus on the problem they are addressing. The oral portion of the screening examination as well as the qualifying examination and the defense examination will count as ARAs. Frequently asked questionsWhat is a phd. A PhD, which is short for philosophiae doctor (doctor of philosophy in Latin), is the highest university degree that can be obtained. In a PhD, students spend 3–5 years writing a dissertation , which aims to make a significant, original contribution to current knowledge. A PhD is intended to prepare students for a career as a researcher, whether that be in academia, the public sector, or the private sector. Frequently asked questions: Graduate schoolIn the US, most graduate school applications require you to include: - Transcripts from previous educational institutions
- Standardized test scores (such as the GRE or MCAT)
- A graduate resume
- 2–3 letters of recommendation
- A statement of purpose
Some programs may ask you to write a personal statement in addition to, or instead of, a statement of purpose. You may also be asked to an interview . Always carefully read the application instructions for the specific program you’re applying to. Most medical school programs interview candidates, as do many (though not all) leading law and business schools. In research programs, it depends—PhDs in business usually do, while those in economics normally do not, for example. Some schools interview everyone, while others only interview their top candidates. Look at the websites of the schools you’re applying to for more information on whether they conduct interviews. In addition to thinking about your answers for the most commonly asked grad school interview questions , you should reach out to former and current students to ask their advice on preparing and what sort of questions will be asked. Look back through your resume and come up with anecdotes that you could use for common questions, particularly those that ask about obstacles that you overcame. If you’re applying for a research program, ensure that you can talk about the previous research experience you’ve had. You should also read as much research in your field as possible. Research the faculty at the schools you’re applying to and read some of their papers. Come up with a few questions that you could ask them. Graduate schools often ask questions about why you are interested in this particular program and what you will contribute. Try to stay away from cliche answers like “this is a good program” or “I got good grades in undergrad” and focus instead on the unique strengths of the program or what you will bring to the table. Understand what the program is looking for and come up with anecdotes that demonstrate why you are a good fit for them. Different types of programs may also focus on different questions: - Research programs will often ask what topics you’d like to research and who you would like to work with, as well as specific questions about your research background.
- Medical schools are interested in your personal motivation, qualities such as integrity and empathy, and how you’d respond to common ethical dilemmas.
- Business schools will focus on your past work experience and future career prospects, and may be particularly interested in any experience you have managing or working with others.
Some students apply to graduate school straight from undergrad, but it’s also common to go back to school later in life. The ideal time to do so depends on various financial, personal, and career considerations . Graduate school is a big commitment, so you should apply at a time when you can devote your full attention to it. Your career path may also determine when you should apply. In some career fields, you can easily progress without a graduate degree, while in others—such as medicine, business, and law—it’s virtually impossible to move up the career ladder without a specific graduate degree. Most graduate school applications for American graduate programs are due in December or January for a September start. Some types of programs, especially law school, are rolling applications, meaning that the earlier you apply, the earlier you’ll hear back. In this case, you should aim to apply as early as possible to maximize your chances. Medical school follows a completely separate timeline with much earlier deadlines. If you’re applying for medical school, you should speak to advisors at your university for more information. A good starting point to aim for is about 18 months before you would start the program, or 6–9 months before the applications are due. In the first few months of the process, research programs and study for any standardized exams you might need. You can then begin writing your personal statements and statements of purpose , as well as contacting people to write your letters of recommendation . Ensure that you give recommenders plenty of time to complete their letters (ideally around 2–4 months). In the US, the graduate school application process is similar whether you’re applying for a master’s or a PhD . Both require letters of recommendation , a statement of purpose or personal statement , a resume or CV , and transcripts. Programs in the US and Canada usually also require a certain type of standardized test—often the GRE. Outside the US, PhD programs usually also require applicants to write a research proposal , because students are expected to begin dissertation research in the first year of their PhD. A master’s degree usually has a higher upfront cost, but it also allows you to start earning a higher salary more quickly. The exact cost depends on the country and the school: private universities usually cost more than public ones, and European degrees usually cost less than North American ones. There are limited possibilities for financial aid. PhDs often waive tuition fees and offer a living stipend in exchange for a teaching or research assistantship. However, they take many years to complete, during which time you earn very little. This depends on the country. In the United States, you can generally go directly to a PhD with only a bachelor’s degree, as a master’s program is included as part of the doctoral program. Elsewhere, you generally need to graduate from a research-intensive master’s degree before continuing to the PhD. This varies by country. In the United States, PhDs usually take between 5–7 years: 2 years of coursework followed by 3–5 years of independent research work to produce a dissertation. In the rest of the world, students normally have a master’s degree before beginning the PhD, so they proceed directly to the research stage and complete a PhD in 3–5 years. A master’s is a 1- or 2-year graduate degree that can prepare you for a variety of careers. All master’s involve graduate-level coursework. Some are research-intensive and intend to prepare students for further study in a PhD; these usually require their students to write a master’s thesis . Others focus on professional training for a specific career. It’s best to ask in person if possible, so first reach out and request a meeting to discuss your graduate school plans. Let the potential recommender know which programs you’re applying to, and ask if they feel they can provide a strong letter of recommendation . A lukewarm recommendation can be the kiss of death for an application, so make sure your letter writers are enthusiastic about recommending you and your work! Always remember to remain polite. Your recommenders are doing you a favor by taking the time to write a letter in support of your graduate school goals. This depends on the program that you are applying for. Generally, for professional programs like business and policy school, you should ask managers who can speak to your future leadership potential and ability to succeed in your chosen career path. However, in other graduate programs, you should mostly ask your former professors or research supervisors to write your recommendation letters , unless you have worked in a job that corresponds closely with your chosen field (e.g., as a full-time research assistant). Choose people who know your work well and can speak to your ability to succeed in the program that you are applying to. Remember, it is far more important to choose someone who knows you well than someone well-known. You may have taken classes with more prominent professors, but if they haven’t worked closely with you, they probably can’t write you a strong letter. The sections in your graduate school resume depend on two things: your experience, and the focus of the program you’re applying to. Always start with your education. If you have more than one degree, list the most recent one first. The title and order of the other sections depend on what you want to emphasize. You might include things like: - Professional experience
- Voluntary and extracurricular activities
- Publications
- Awards and honors
- Skills and certifications
The resume should aim for a balance between two things: giving a snapshot of what you’ve done with your life so far, and showing that you’re a good candidate for graduate study. A resume is typically shorter than a CV, giving only the most relevant professional and educational highlights. An academic CV should give full details of your education and career, including lists of publications and presentations, certifications, memberships, grants, and research projects. Because it is more comprehensive, it’s acceptable for an academic CV to be many pages long. Note that, outside of the US, resume and CV are often used interchangeably. No, don’t include your high school courses and grades. The education section should only detail your college education. If you want to discuss aspects of high school in your graduate school application, you can include this in your personal statement . A resume for a graduate school application is typically no more than 1–2 pages long. Note, however, that if you are asked to submit a CV (curriculum vitae), you should give comprehensive details of all your academic experience. An academic CV can be much longer than a normal resume. Always carefully check the instructions and adhere to any length requirements for each application. If you’re applying to multiple graduate school programs, you should tailor your personal statement to each application. Some applications provide a prompt or question. In this case, you might have to write a new personal statement from scratch: the most important task is to respond to what you have been asked. If there’s no prompt or guidelines, you can re-use the same idea for your personal statement – but change the details wherever relevant, making sure to emphasize why you’re applying to this specific program. If the application also includes other essays, such as a statement of purpose , you might have to revise your personal statement to avoid repeating the same information. The typical length of a personal statement for graduate school applications is between 500 and 1,000 words. Different programs have different requirements, so always check if there’s a minimum or maximum length and stick to the guidelines. If there is no recommended word count, aim for no more than 1-2 pages. A statement of purpose is usually more formal, focusing on your academic or professional goals. It shouldn’t include anything that isn’t directly relevant to the application. A personal statement can often be more creative. It might tell a story that isn’t directly related to the application, but that shows something about your personality, values, and motivations. However, both types of document have the same overall goal: to demonstrate your potential as a graduate student and s how why you’re a great match for the program. Ask our teamWant to contact us directly? No problem. We are always here for you. Our team helps students graduate by offering: - A world-class citation generator
- Plagiarism Checker software powered by Turnitin
- Innovative Citation Checker software
- Professional proofreading services
- Over 300 helpful articles about academic writing, citing sources, plagiarism, and more
Scribbr specializes in editing study-related documents . We proofread: - PhD dissertations
- Research proposals
- Personal statements
- Admission essays
- Motivation letters
- Reflection papers
- Journal articles
- Capstone projects
Scribbr’s Plagiarism Checker is powered by elements of Turnitin’s Similarity Checker , namely the plagiarism detection software and the Internet Archive and Premium Scholarly Publications content databases . The add-on AI detector is powered by Scribbr’s proprietary software. The Scribbr Citation Generator is developed using the open-source Citation Style Language (CSL) project and Frank Bennett’s citeproc-js . It’s the same technology used by dozens of other popular citation tools, including Mendeley and Zotero. You can find all the citation styles and locales used in the Scribbr Citation Generator in our publicly accessible repository on Github . Unfortunately we don't fully support your browser. If you have the option to, please upgrade to a newer version or use Mozilla Firefox , Microsoft Edge , Google Chrome , or Safari 14 or newer. If you are unable to, and need support, please send us your feedback . We'd appreciate your feedback. Tell us what you think! opens in new tab/window 11 steps to structuring a science paper editors will take seriouslyApril 5, 2021 | 18 min read By Angel Borja, PhD Editor’s note: This 2014 post conveys the advice of a researcher sharing his experience and does not represent Elsevier’s policy. However, in response to your feedback, we worked with him to update this post so it reflects our practices. For example, since it was published, we have worked extensively with researchers to raise visibility of non-English language research – July 10, 2019 Update: In response to your feedback, we have reinstated the original text so you can see how it was revised. – July 11, 2019 How to prepare a manuscript for international journals — Part 2In this monthly series, Dr. Angel Borja draws on his extensive background as an author, reviewer and editor to give advice on preparing the manuscript (author's view), the evaluation process (reviewer's view) and what there is to hate or love in a paper (editor's view). This article is the second in the series. The first article was: "Six things to do before writing your manuscript." When you organize your manuscript, the first thing to consider is that the order of sections will be very different than the order of items on you checklist. An article begins with the Title, Abstract and Keywords. The article text follows the IMRAD format opens in new tab/window , which responds to the questions below: I ntroduction: What did you/others do? Why did you do it? M ethods: How did you do it? R esults: What did you find? D iscussion: What does it all mean? The main text is followed by the Conclusion, Acknowledgements, References and Supporting Materials. While this is the published structure, however, we often use a different order when writing. General strcuture of a research article. Watch a related tutorial on Researcher Academy opens in new tab/window . Steps to organizing your manuscriptPrepare the figures and tables . Write the Methods . Write up the Results . Write the Discussion . Finalize the Results and Discussion before writing the introduction. This is because, if the discussion is insufficient, how can you objectively demonstrate the scientific significance of your work in the introduction? Write a clear Conclusion . Write a compelling Introduction . Write the Abstract . Compose a concise and descriptive Title . Select Keywords for indexing. Write the Acknowledgements . Write up the References . Next, I'll review each step in more detail. But before you set out to write a paper, there are two important things you should do that will set the groundwork for the entire process. The topic to be studied should be the first issue to be solved. Define your hypothesis and objectives (These will go in the Introduction.) Review the literature related to the topic and select some papers (about 30) that can be cited in your paper (These will be listed in the References.) Finally, keep in mind that each publisher has its own style guidelines and preferences, so always consult the publisher's Guide for Authors. Step 1: Prepare the figures and tablesRemember that "a figure is worth a thousand words." Hence, illustrations, including figures and tables, are the most efficient way to present your results. Your data are the driving force of the paper, so your illustrations are critical! How do you decide between presenting your data as tables or figures? Generally, tables give the actual experimental results, while figures are often used for comparisons of experimental results with those of previous works, or with calculated/theoretical values (Figure 1). Figure 1. An example of the same data presented as table or as figure. Depending on your objectives, you can show your data either as table (if you wish to stress numbers) or as figure (if you wish to compare gradients). Whatever your choice is, no illustrations should duplicate the information described elsewhere in the manuscript. Another important factor: figure and table legends must be self-explanatory (Figure 2) Figure 2. Figures must be self-explanatory. When presenting your tables and figures, appearances count! To this end: Avoid crowded plots (Figure 3), using only three or four data sets per figure; use well-selected scales. Think about appropriate axis label size Include clear symbols and data sets that are easy to distinguish. Never include long boring tables (e.g., chemical compositions of emulsion systems or lists of species and abundances). You can include them as supplementary material. Figure 3. Don't clutter your charts with too much data. If you are using photographs, each must have a scale marker, or scale bar, of professional quality in one corner. In photographs and figures, use color only when necessary when submitting to a print publication. If different line styles can clarify the meaning, never use colors or other thrilling effects or you will be charged with expensive fees. Of course, this does not apply to online journals. For many journals, you can submit duplicate figures: one in color for the online version of the journal and pdfs, and another in black and white for the hardcopy journal (Figure 4). Figure 4. Using black and white can save money. Another common problem is the misuse of lines and histograms. Lines joining data only can be used when presenting time series or consecutive samples data (e.g., in a transect from coast to offshore in Figure 5). However, when there is no connection between samples or there is not a gradient, you must use histograms (Figure 5). Figure 5. Use the right kind of chart for your data. Sometimes, fonts are too small for the journal. You must take this into account, or they may be illegible to readers (Figure 6). Figure 6. Figures are not eye charts - make them large enough too read Finally, you must pay attention to the use of decimals, lines, etc. Step 2: Write the MethodsThis section responds to the question of how the problem was studied. If your paper is proposing a new method, you need to include detailed information so a knowledgeable reader can reproduce the experiment. However, do not repeat the details of established methods; use References and Supporting Materials to indicate the previously published procedures. Broad summaries or key references are sufficient. Reviewers will criticize incomplete or incorrect methods descriptions and may recommend rejection, because this section is critical in the process of reproducing your investigation. In this way, all chemicals must be identified. Do not use proprietary, unidentifiable compounds. To this end, it's important to use standard systems for numbers and nomenclature. For example: For chemicals, use the conventions of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry opens in new tab/window and the official recommendations of the IUPAC–IUB Combined Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature opens in new tab/window . For species, use accepted taxonomical nomenclature ( WoRMS: World Register of Marine Species opens in new tab/window , ERMS: European Register of Marine Species opens in new tab/window ), and write them always in italics. For units of measurement, follow the International System of Units (SI). Present proper control experiments and statistics used, again to make the experiment of investigation repeatable. List the methods in the same order they will appear in the Results section, in the logical order in which you did the research: Description of the site Description of the surveys or experiments done, giving information on dates, etc. Description of the laboratory methods, including separation or treatment of samples, analytical methods, following the order of waters, sediments and biomonitors. If you have worked with different biodiversity components start from the simplest (i.e. microbes) to the more complex (i.e. mammals) Description of the statistical methods used (including confidence levels, etc.) In this section, avoid adding comments, results, and discussion, which is a common error. Length of the manuscriptAgain, look at the journal's Guide for Authors, but an ideal length for a manuscript is 25 to 40 pages, double spaced, including essential data only. Here are some general guidelines: Title: Short and informative Abstract: 1 paragraph (<250 words) Introduction: 1.5-2 pages Methods: 2-3 pages Results: 6-8 pages Discussion: 4-6 pages Conclusion: 1 paragraph Figures: 6-8 (one per page) Tables: 1-3 (one per page) References: 20-50 papers (2-4 pages) Step 3: Write up the ResultsThis section responds to the question "What have you found?" Hence, only representative results from your research should be presented. The results should be essential for discussion. However, remember that most journals offer the possibility of adding Supporting Materials, so use them freely for data of secondary importance. In this way, do not attempt to "hide" data in the hope of saving it for a later paper. You may lose evidence to reinforce your conclusion. If data are too abundant, you can use those supplementary materials. Use sub-headings to keep results of the same type together, which is easier to review and read. Number these sub-sections for the convenience of internal cross-referencing, but always taking into account the publisher's Guide for Authors. For the data, decide on a logical order that tells a clear story and makes it and easy to understand. Generally, this will be in the same order as presented in the methods section. An important issue is that you must not include references in this section; you are presenting your results, so you cannot refer to others here. If you refer to others, is because you are discussing your results, and this must be included in the Discussion section. Statistical rulesIndicate the statistical tests used with all relevant parameters: e.g., mean and standard deviation (SD): 44% (±3); median and interpercentile range: 7 years (4.5 to 9.5 years). Use mean and standard deviation to report normally distributed data. Use median and interpercentile range to report skewed data. For numbers, use two significant digits unless more precision is necessary (2.08, not 2.07856444). Never use percentages for very small samples e.g., "one out of two" should not be replaced by 50%. Step 4: Write the DiscussionHere you must respond to what the results mean. Probably it is the easiest section to write, but the hardest section to get right. This is because it is the most important section of your article. Here you get the chance to sell your data. Take into account that a huge numbers of manuscripts are rejected because the Discussion is weak. You need to make the Discussion corresponding to the Results, but do not reiterate the results. Here you need to compare the published results by your colleagues with yours (using some of the references included in the Introduction). Never ignore work in disagreement with yours, in turn, you must confront it and convince the reader that you are correct or better. Take into account the following tips: Avoid statements that go beyond what the results can support. Avoid unspecific expressions such as "higher temperature", "at a lower rate", "highly significant". Quantitative descriptions are always preferred (35ºC, 0.5%, p<0.001, respectively). Avoid sudden introduction of new terms or ideas; you must present everything in the introduction, to be confronted with your results here. Speculations on possible interpretations are allowed, but these should be rooted in fact, rather than imagination. To achieve good interpretations think about: How do these results relate to the original question or objectives outlined in the Introduction section? Do the data support your hypothesis? Are your results consistent with what other investigators have reported? Discuss weaknesses and discrepancies. If your results were unexpected, try to explain why Is there another way to interpret your results? What further research would be necessary to answer the questions raised by your results? Explain what is new without exaggerating Revision of Results and Discussion is not just paper work. You may do further experiments, derivations, or simulations. Sometimes you cannot clarify your idea in words because some critical items have not been studied substantially. Step 5: Write a clear ConclusionThis section shows how the work advances the field from the present state of knowledge. In some journals, it's a separate section; in others, it's the last paragraph of the Discussion section. Whatever the case, without a clear conclusion section, reviewers and readers will find it difficult to judge your work and whether it merits publication in the journal. A common error in this section is repeating the abstract, or just listing experimental results. Trivial statements of your results are unacceptable in this section. You should provide a clear scientific justification for your work in this section, and indicate uses and extensions if appropriate. Moreover, you can suggest future experiments and point out those that are underway. You can propose present global and specific conclusions, in relation to the objectives included in the introduction Step 6: Write a compelling IntroductionThis is your opportunity to convince readers that you clearly know why your work is useful. A good introduction should answer the following questions: What is the problem to be solved? Are there any existing solutions? Which is the best? What is its main limitation? What do you hope to achieve? Editors like to see that you have provided a perspective consistent with the nature of the journal. You need to introduce the main scientific publications on which your work is based, citing a couple of original and important works, including recent review articles. However, editors hate improper citations of too many references irrelevant to the work, or inappropriate judgments on your own achievements. They will think you have no sense of purpose. Here are some additional tips for the introduction: Never use more words than necessary (be concise and to-the-point). Don't make this section into a history lesson. Long introductions put readers off. We all know that you are keen to present your new data. But do not forget that you need to give the whole picture at first. The introduction must be organized from the global to the particular point of view, guiding the readers to your objectives when writing this paper. State the purpose of the paper and research strategy adopted to answer the question, but do not mix introduction with results, discussion and conclusion. Always keep them separate to ensure that the manuscript flows logically from one section to the next. Hypothesis and objectives must be clearly remarked at the end of the introduction. Expressions such as "novel," "first time," "first ever," and "paradigm-changing" are not preferred. Use them sparingly. Step 7: Write the AbstractThe abstract tells prospective readers what you did and what the important findings in your research were. Together with the title, it's the advertisement of your article. Make it interesting and easily understood without reading the whole article. Avoid using jargon, uncommon abbreviations and references. You must be accurate, using the words that convey the precise meaning of your research. The abstract provides a short description of the perspective and purpose of your paper. It gives key results but minimizes experimental details. It is very important to remind that the abstract offers a short description of the interpretation/conclusion in the last sentence. A clear abstract will strongly influence whether or not your work is further considered. However, the abstracts must be keep as brief as possible. Just check the 'Guide for authors' of the journal, but normally they have less than 250 words. Here's a good example on a short abstract opens in new tab/window . In an abstract, the two whats are essential. Here's an example from an article I co-authored in Ecological Indicators opens in new tab/window : What has been done? "In recent years, several benthic biotic indices have been proposed to be used as ecological indicators in estuarine and coastal waters. One such indicator, the AMBI (AZTI Marine Biotic Index), was designed to establish the ecological quality of European coasts. The AMBI has been used also for the determination of the ecological quality status within the context of the European Water Framework Directive. In this contribution, 38 different applications including six new case studies (hypoxia processes, sand extraction, oil platform impacts, engineering works, dredging and fish aquaculture) are presented." What are the main findings? "The results show the response of the benthic communities to different disturbance sources in a simple way. Those communities act as ecological indicators of the 'health' of the system, indicating clearly the gradient associated with the disturbance." Step 8: Compose a concise and descriptive titleThe title must explain what the paper is broadly about. It is your first (and probably only) opportunity to attract the reader's attention. In this way, remember that the first readers are the Editor and the referees. Also, readers are the potential authors who will cite your article, so the first impression is powerful! We are all flooded by publications, and readers don't have time to read all scientific production. They must be selective, and this selection often comes from the title. Reviewers will check whether the title is specific and whether it reflects the content of the manuscript. Editors hate titles that make no sense or fail to represent the subject matter adequately. Hence, keep the title informative and concise (clear, descriptive, and not too long). You must avoid technical jargon and abbreviations, if possible. This is because you need to attract a readership as large as possible. Dedicate some time to think about the title and discuss it with your co-authors. Here you can see some examples of original titles, and how they were changed after reviews and comments to them: Original title: Preliminary observations on the effect of salinity on benthic community distribution within a estuarine system, in the North Sea Revised title: Effect of salinity on benthic distribution within the Scheldt estuary (North Sea) Comments: Long title distracts readers. Remove all redundancies such as "studies on," "the nature of," etc. Never use expressions such as "preliminary." Be precise. Original title: Action of antibiotics on bacteria Revised title: Inhibition of growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by streptomycin Comments: Titles should be specific. Think about "how will I search for this piece of information" when you design the title. Original title: Fabrication of carbon/CdS coaxial nanofibers displaying optical and electrical properties via electrospinning carbon Revised title: Electrospinning of carbon/CdS coaxial nanofibers with optical and electrical properties Comments: "English needs help. The title is nonsense. All materials have properties of all varieties. You could examine my hair for its electrical and optical properties! You MUST be specific. I haven't read the paper but I suspect there is something special about these properties, otherwise why would you be reporting them?" – the Editor-in-Chief. Try to avoid this kind of response! Step 9: Select keywords for indexingKeywords are used for indexing your paper. They are the label of your manuscript. It is true that now they are less used by journals because you can search the whole text. However, when looking for keywords, avoid words with a broad meaning and words already included in the title. Some journals require that the keywords are not those from the journal name, because it is implicit that the topic is that. For example, the journal Soil Biology & Biochemistry requires that the word "soil" not be selected as a keyword. Only abbreviations firmly established in the field are eligible (e.g., TOC, CTD), avoiding those which are not broadly used (e.g., EBA, MMI). Again, check the Guide for Authors and look at the number of keywords admitted, label, definitions, thesaurus, range, and other special requests. Step 10: Write the AcknowledgementsHere, you can thank people who have contributed to the manuscript but not to the extent where that would justify authorship. For example, here you can include technical help and assistance with writing and proofreading. Probably, the most important thing is to thank your funding agency or the agency giving you a grant or fellowship. In the case of European projects, do not forget to include the grant number or reference. Also, some institutes include the number of publications of the organization, e.g., "This is publication number 657 from AZTI-Tecnalia." Step 11: Write up the ReferencesTypically, there are more mistakes in the references than in any other part of the manuscript. It is one of the most annoying problems, and causes great headaches among editors. Now, it is easier since to avoid these problem, because there are many available tools. In the text, you must cite all the scientific publications on which your work is based. But do not over-inflate the manuscript with too many references – it doesn't make a better manuscript! Avoid excessive self-citations and excessive citations of publications from the same region. As I have mentioned, you will find the most authoritative information for each journal’s policy on citations when you consult the journal's Guide for Authors. In general, you should minimize personal communications, and be mindful as to how you include unpublished observations. These will be necessary for some disciplines, but consider whether they strengthen or weaken your paper. You might also consider articles published on research networks opens in new tab/window prior to publication, but consider balancing these citations with citations of peer-reviewed research. When citing research in languages other than English, be aware of the possibility that not everyone in the review process will speak the language of the cited paper and that it may be helpful to find a translation where possible. You can use any software, such as EndNote opens in new tab/window or Mendeley opens in new tab/window , to format and include your references in the paper. Most journals have now the possibility to download small files with the format of the references, allowing you to change it automatically. Also, Elsevier's Your Paper Your Way program waves strict formatting requirements for the initial submission of a manuscript as long as it contains all the essential elements being presented here. Make the reference list and the in-text citation conform strictly to the style given in the Guide for Authors. Remember that presentation of the references in the correct format is the responsibility of the author, not the editor. Checking the format is normally a large job for the editors. Make their work easier and they will appreciate the effort. Finally, check the following: Spelling of author names Year of publications Usages of "et al." Punctuation Whether all references are included In my next article, I will give tips for writing the manuscript, authorship, and how to write a compelling cover letter. Stay tuned! References and AcknowledgementsI have based this paper on the materials distributed to the attendees of many courses. It is inspired by many Guides for Authors of Elsevier journals. Some of this information is also featured in Elsevier's Publishing Connect tutorials opens in new tab/window . In addition, I have consulted several web pages: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/ opens in new tab/window , www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~wilkins/writing/index.html. I want to acknowledge Dr. Christiane Barranguet opens in new tab/window , Executive Publisher of Aquatic Sciences at Elsevier, for her continuous support. And I would like to thank Dr. Alison Bert, Editor-in-Chief of Elsevier Connect; without her assistance, this series would have been impossible to complete. ContributorAngel Borja, PhDWe will keep fighting for all libraries - stand with us! Internet Archive Audio- This Just In
- Grateful Dead
- Old Time Radio
- 78 RPMs and Cylinder Recordings
- Audio Books & Poetry
- Computers, Technology and Science
- Music, Arts & Culture
- News & Public Affairs
- Spirituality & Religion
- Radio News Archive
- Flickr Commons
- Occupy Wall Street Flickr
- NASA Images
- Solar System Collection
- Ames Research Center
- All Software
- Old School Emulation
- MS-DOS Games
- Historical Software
- Classic PC Games
- Software Library
- Kodi Archive and Support File
- Vintage Software
- CD-ROM Software
- CD-ROM Software Library
- Software Sites
- Tucows Software Library
- Shareware CD-ROMs
- Software Capsules Compilation
- CD-ROM Images
- ZX Spectrum
- DOOM Level CD
- Smithsonian Libraries
- FEDLINK (US)
- Lincoln Collection
- American Libraries
- Canadian Libraries
- Universal Library
- Project Gutenberg
- Children's Library
- Biodiversity Heritage Library
- Books by Language
- Additional Collections
- Prelinger Archives
- Democracy Now!
- Occupy Wall Street
- TV NSA Clip Library
- Animation & Cartoons
- Arts & Music
- Computers & Technology
- Cultural & Academic Films
- Ephemeral Films
- Sports Videos
- Videogame Videos
- Youth Media
Search the history of over 866 billion web pages on the Internet. Mobile Apps- Wayback Machine (iOS)
- Wayback Machine (Android)
Browser ExtensionsArchive-it subscription. - Explore the Collections
- Build Collections
Save Page NowCapture a web page as it appears now for use as a trusted citation in the future. Please enter a valid web address - Donate Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape
Hello from Buxtehude, Vol 11, No 207, November 2023Audio with external links item preview. Share or Embed This ItemFlag this item for. - Graphic Violence
- Explicit Sexual Content
- Hate Speech
- Misinformation/Disinformation
- Marketing/Phishing/Advertising
- Misleading/Inaccurate/Missing Metadata
plus-circle Add Review comment ReviewsDownload options, in collections. Uploaded by joyofhex on November 25, 2023 SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata)Mobile Menu OverlayThe White House 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20500 FACT SHEET: President Biden Announces New Actions to Keep Families TogetherSince his first day in office, President Biden has called on Congress to secure our border and address our broken immigration system. As Congressional Republicans have continued to put partisan politics ahead of national security – twice voting against the toughest and fairest set of reforms in decades – the President and his Administration have taken actions to secure the border, including: - Implementing executive actions to bar migrants who cross our Southern border unlawfully from receiving asylum when encounters are high;
- Deploying record numbers of law enforcement personnel, infrastructure, and technology to the Southern border;
- Seizing record amounts of fentanyl at our ports of entry;
- Revoking the visas of CEOs and government officials outside the U.S. who profit from migrants coming to the U.S. unlawfully; and
- Expanding efforts to dismantle human smuggling networks and prosecuting individuals who violate immigration laws.
President Biden believes that securing the border is essential. He also believes in expanding lawful pathways and keeping families together, and that immigrants who have been in the United States for decades, paying taxes and contributing to their communities, are part of the social fabric of our country. The Day One immigration reform plan that the President sent to Congress reflects both the need for a secure border and protections for the long-term undocumented. While Congress has failed to act on these reforms, the Biden-Harris Administration has worked to strengthen our lawful immigration system. In addition to vigorously defending the DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood arrivals) policy, the Administration has extended Affordable Care Act coverage to DACA recipients and streamlined, expanded, and instituted new reunification programs so that families can stay together while they complete the immigration process. Still, there is more that we can do to bring peace of mind and stability to Americans living in mixed-status families as well as young people educated in this country, including Dreamers. That is why today, President Biden announced new actions for people who have been here many years to keep American families together and allow more young people to contribute to our economy. Keeping American Families Together - Today, President Biden is announcing that the Department of Homeland Security will take action to ensure that U.S. citizens with noncitizen spouses and children can keep their families together.
- This new process will help certain noncitizen spouses and children apply for lawful permanent residence – status that they are already eligible for – without leaving the country.
- These actions will promote family unity and strengthen our economy, providing a significant benefit to the country and helping U.S. citizens and their noncitizen family members stay together.
- In order to be eligible, noncitizens must – as of June 17, 2024 – have resided in the United States for 10 or more years and be legally married to a U.S. citizen, while satisfying all applicable legal requirements. On average, those who are eligible for this process have resided in the U.S. for 23 years.
- Those who are approved after DHS’s case-by-case assessment of their application will be afforded a three-year period to apply for permanent residency. They will be allowed to remain with their families in the United States and be eligible for work authorization for up to three years. This will apply to all married couples who are eligible.
- This action will protect approximately half a million spouses of U.S. citizens, and approximately 50,000 noncitizen children under the age of 21 whose parent is married to a U.S. citizen.
Easing the Visa Process for U.S. College Graduates, Including Dreamers - President Obama and then-Vice President Biden established the DACA policy to allow young people who were brought here as children to come out of the shadows and contribute to our country in significant ways. Twelve years later, DACA recipients who started as high school and college students are now building successful careers and establishing families of their own.
- Today’s announcement will allow individuals, including DACA recipients and other Dreamers, who have earned a degree at an accredited U.S. institution of higher education in the United States, and who have received an offer of employment from a U.S. employer in a field related to their degree, to more quickly receive work visas.
- Recognizing that it is in our national interest to ensure that individuals who are educated in the U.S. are able to use their skills and education to benefit our country, the Administration is taking action to facilitate the employment visa process for those who have graduated from college and have a high-skilled job offer, including DACA recipients and other Dreamers.
Stay ConnectedWe'll be in touch with the latest information on how President Biden and his administration are working for the American people, as well as ways you can get involved and help our country build back better. Opt in to send and receive text messages from President Biden. |
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Print Head Doctor 11. Print Head Doctor 11 machine for recovery of solvent, UV and water-based print heads. The ultimate recovery system for all kinds of solvent, eco-solvent, water-based and UV print heads. This model replaces model 7. It's equipped with dedicated vacuum pumps to take advantage of the Sonic RF Caps.
PHD2 is guiding software inspired by Stark Labs PHD Guiding. PHD2 is free of cost, open source, and community-developed and supported. Download v2.6.13 macOS Sonoma+ Download v2.6.13 for Windows. ... v2.6.11 [Windows Download EXE] [macOS Ventura- ZIP] [macOS 32-bit ZIP] v2.6.10 [Windows Download EXE] [macOS Ventura- ZIP ] [macOS ...
PHD offers pneumatic, hydraulic, and electric cylinders in a wide range of styles and sizes for automated manufacturing, packaging, assembly and more. ... Series TD 11. No Series match the selected Filters. Please try a different set of Filters. Contact Us. 9009 Clubridge Drive. Fort Wayne, IN 46809 (800) 624-8511.
PhD stands for Doctor of Philosophy. This is one of the highest level academic degrees that can be awarded. PhD is an abbreviation of the Latin term (Ph)ilosophiae (D)octor. Traditionally the term 'philosophy' does not refer to the subject but its original Greek meaning which roughly translates to 'lover of wisdom'.
The PhD programs advance scientific discovery by training and supporting students doing in-depth research that solves the world's biggest public health challenges. At the forefront of efforts to benefit the health of people worldwide, the School offers students the opportunity to join in shaping new ideas in public health and implementing ...
Victoria B. Chou, PhD '11, MS, is a maternal and child health epidemiologist that develops evidence-based resources for technical advocacy, program evaluation, and prioritization in global health.
Meet Mao Ye, PhD '11, one of the newest faculty members from across the SC Johnson College of Business.Ye earned his PhD in economics at Cornell University. He joins the Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management from the University of Illinois. Learn more about Ye's areas of expertise, research focus, courses he will be teaching, and other interests in this Q&A.
Kesner, PhD '11, is director of research and advanced development at Myomo, which produces a myoelectric-powered brace that helps a patient move an arm or hand as he or she intends, without implants or electrical stimulation. The robotic brace reads faint nerve signals from the skin's surface, then activates motors to amplify weak muscle ...
A Doctor of Philosophy, often known as a PhD, is a terminal degree —or the highest possible academic degree you can earn in a subject. While PhD programs (or doctorate programs) are often structured to take between four and five years, some graduate students may take longer as they balance the responsibilities of coursework, original research ...
Throughout my undergraduate career at Arizona State University I had volunteered and interned with local museums. A lot of graduate students give up hobbies or anything they view as recreational, erroneously believing that anything taking away time from your studying or writing is worthless, but I continued my volunteer activities.
PhD in Nutrition · 11 years of experience · Brazil. Excessive consumption of turmeric can cause reactions such as gastroesophageal reflux, diarrhea, abdominal pain, bloating, ...
Best PhD In Leadership Programs Online ... Advertiser Disclosure Published: Mar 13, 2024, 11:37am . Best Online Health Science Ph.D. And D.H.S. Programs Of 2024. Matt Whittle Education Writer.
Abdulgafoor M. Bachani, PhD '11, MHS '08, studies how to address burden of and preventing injury and disabilities, and to expand access to rehabilitation services. Contact Info 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room E8146
2024 E Monument St, Suite 2-700. Baltimore. Maryland. 21205. US. Jennifer Schrack, PhD '11, MS, uses data from wearable technology to elucidate novel, modifiable mechanisms of physical and cognitive decline with aging.
Graduate work at the University of Pennsylvania is conducted through graduate groups formed according to different areas of study. These groups administer programs leading to the AM and PhD degrees. Those seeking a graduate degree in Sociology should apply to the Graduate Group in Sociology. Sociology students earn their MA on the way to the ...
NORTH CAROLINA A&T'S CHANCELLOR-ELECT . James R. Martin II, Ph.D., was elected as the 13th chancellor of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University on June 21, 2024, by a vote of the University of North Carolina System Board of Governors, following his nomination by UNC System President Peter Hans.
A PhD in Psychology is the ultimate degree—a symbol of your commitment to the discipline and a representation of your knowledge and skills. Held by top-tier researchers, instructors in higher education, and clinical practitioners alike, a clinical psychology PhD may help you and the people and organizations you might one day serve. 1. While the benefits of a PhD in Psychology may be clear to ...
Whether you're just starting your research on PhD programs or you're ready to apply, we'll walk you through the steps to take to become a successful PhD candidate. Explore. ... 2024 and deadline to apply is December 15th, 2024, 11:59PM EST. The Wharton Doctoral Programs admits students for full-time study only beginning in the fall ...
It is said that the Engineer has 11 PhD according to the TF2 Wikia. I was wondering what PhDs did he get to create such machines that can build themeselves? Most likely relating to physics, math, computer science, engineering, and maybe even a bit of biology for the dispenser. I wonder how much debt the Engie has with all those student loans.
There can be no one-size-fits-all solution to improving how a PhD is assessed, because different subjects often have bespoke needs and practices (P. Denicolo Qual. Assur. Educ. 11, 84-91; 2003 ...
The programs on this list vary greatly in terms of cost. On the high end, the Chicago School at Los Angeles charges $1,703 per credit. At $528 per credit, Keiser University-Ft. Lauderdale offers ...
While a Ph.D. and a doctorate award "Doctor" titles, a Ph.D. tends to be an academic degree while a doctorate is usually a professional degree. Ph.D.s often focus on extensive research and may lead to job titles such as research scientist, historian, philosopher, professor or engineer. Because a doctorate typically provides students with ...
A Doctor of Philosophy (PhD, Ph.D., or DPhil; Latin: philosophiae doctor or doctor philosophiae) is a terminal degree that usually denotes the highest level of academic achievement in a given discipline and is awarded following a course of graduate study and original research.The name of the degree is most often abbreviated PhD (or, at times, as Ph.D. in North America), pronounced as three ...
11 Ongoing PhD admission Notifications 2024 | Central , State, IIT, and NITs PhD Admission 2024 @theteacherexam Latest PhD admission notification visits ou...
1-11 Table 1-11: U.S. citizen and permanent resident research doctorate recipients, by historical broad field of doctorate, ethnicity, and race: Selected years, 1976-2021: View Table 1-11: Download Table 1-11 Excel: Download Table 1-11 PDF: 1-12 Table 1-12: Median years to research doctorate, by historical major field of doctorate: Selected ...
The department offers a degree leading to the PhD in epidemiology. This program may be an extension of the applied biostatistics and epidemiology MS program and is especially aimed at persons with a strong background in medicine: in particular, students enrolled in the MD program of the Keck School of Medicine who wish to interrupt their MD studies after two years to complete a PhD degree.
A PhD, which is short for philosophiae doctor (doctor of philosophy in Latin), is the highest university degree that can be obtained. In a PhD, students spend 3-5 years writing a dissertation, which aims to make a significant, original contribution to current knowledge. A PhD is intended to prepare students for a career as a researcher ...
By Angel Borja, PhD. ... - July 11, 2019. How to prepare a manuscript for international journals — Part 2. In this monthly series, Dr. Angel Borja draws on his extensive background as an author, reviewer and editor to give advice on preparing the manuscript (author's view), the evaluation process (reviewer's view) and what there is to hate ...
Hello from Buxtehude, Vol 11, No 207, November 2023 ... PhD . Online journal Hello from ..., ISSN 2042-8871, volume 11, number 207. Addeddate 2023-11-25 12:50:12 Identifier hf-v11-n207 Identifier-ark ark:/13960/s2vfbzfd3xs Languages Piano Scanner Internet Archive HTML5 Uploader 1.7.0 ...
We'll be in touch with the latest information on how President Biden and his administration are working for the American people, as well as ways you can get involved and help our country build ...