Laxness
Note: Internalizing problems: Controlled for sex, family structure, attending institution, annual household income, maternal education level, paternal education level, and T1 internalizing problems. Externalizing problems: Controlled for sex, family structure, attending institution, annual household income, maternal education level, paternal education level, and T1 externalizing problems. Abbreviations: Unstandardized coefficient (B); Standard Error (SE); Standardized coefficient (β); p -value ( p ); * significance at p < 0.05; ** significance at p < 0.01.
Effect of parenting practices at preschool (T1) on behavioral problems at first grade (T2) boys only.
Parenting Practices | Model 1 Laxness | Model 2 Over-Reactivity | Model 3 Laxness and Over-Reactivity | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE | β | B | SE | β | B | SE | β | ||||
Internalizing Problems | ||||||||||||
Laxness | 0.177 | 0.113 | 0.046 | 0.111 | - | - | - | - | 0.182 | 0.115 | 0.047 | 0.112 |
Over-reactivity | − | − | − | − | 0.106 | 0.081 | 0.038 | 0.192 | 0.088 | 0.082 | 0.032 | 0.285 |
Adjusted R | 0.369 | 0.375 | 0.380 | |||||||||
Externalizing Problems | ||||||||||||
Laxness | 0.244 | 0.113 | 0.055 | 0.028 * | - | - | - | - | 0.218 | 0.115 | 0.049 | 0.038 ** |
Over-reactivity | - | - | - | - | 0.170 | 0.085 | 0.054 | 0.042 * | 0.153 | 0.086 | 0.048 | 0.047 ** |
Adjusted R | 0.504 | 0.505 | 0.507 |
Note: Internalizing problems: Controlled for family structure, attending institution, annual household income, maternal education level, paternal education level, and T1 internalizing problems. Externalizing problems: Controlled for family structure, attending institution, annual household income, maternal education level, paternal education level, and T1 externalizing problems. Abbreviations: Unstandardized coefficient (B); Standard Error (SE); Standardized coefficient (β); p -value ( p ); * significance at p < 0.05; ** significance at p < 0.01.
Effect of parenting practices at preschool (T1) on behavioral problems at first grade (T2) girls only.
Parenting Practices | Model 1 Laxness | Model 2 Over-Reactivity | Model 3 Laxness and Over-Reactivity | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE | β | B | SE | β | B | SE | β | ||||
Internalizing Problems | ||||||||||||
Laxness | 0.119 | 0.117 | 0.030 | 0.308 | - | - | - | - | 0.088 | 0.119 | 0.022 | 0.460 |
Over-reactivity | - | - | - | - | 0.119 | 0.080 | 0.044 | 0.138 | 0.103 | 0.082 | 0.038 | 0.210 |
Adjusted R | 0.366 | 0.376 | 0.385 | |||||||||
Externalizing Problems | ||||||||||||
Laxness | 0.142 | 0.108 | 0.037 | 0.183 | - | - | - | - | 0.117 | 0.109 | 0.031 | 0.282 |
Over-reactivity | − | − | − | − | 0.188 | 0.076 | 0.071 | 0.014 * | 0.178 | 0.078 | 0.067 | 0.023 * |
Adjusted R | 0.456 | 0.464 | 0.474 |
Note: Internalizing problems: Controlled for family structure, attending institution, annual household income, maternal education level, paternal education level, and T1 internalizing problems. Externalizing problems: Controlled for family structure, attending institution, annual household income, maternal education level, paternal education level, and T1 externalizing problems. Abbreviations: Unstandardized coefficient (B); Standard Error (SE); Standardized coefficient (β); p -value ( p ); * significance at p < 0.05.
Participants’ demographic characteristics at preschool (i.e., at baseline) are shown in Table 2 , and the relationships between participants’ demographic characteristics and emotional/behavioral problems at first grade are shown in Table 3 . The children’s average age was 6.09 years (SD = 0.30), with 51.1% boys ( n = 853) and 48.9% girls ( n = 815). Regarding family structure, in the mixed sample and girls sample, the internalizing problem scores of children from single-parent families were significantly higher than those of children from two-parent families; similarly, in the mixed sample and girls sample, externalizing problem scores of children from single-parent families were significantly higher than those of children from two-parent families. Regarding attending institution, in the mixed sample, nursery school children’s internalizing problem scores were significantly higher than kindergarten children’s internalizing problem scores; in the mixed sample, boys sample, and girls sample, nursery school children’s externalizing problem scores were significantly higher than kindergarten children’s externalizing problem scores. Regarding annual household income, in the mixed, boys, and girls samples, the internalizing problem scores of children from lower-income households were significantly higher than those of children from higher-income households; similarly, in the mixed, boys, and girls samples, the externalizing problem scores of children from lower-income households were significantly higher than those of children from higher-income households. Regarding maternal education level, in the mixed, boys, and girls samples, the internalizing problem scores of children from lower-income households were significantly higher than those of children from higher-income households; similarly, in the mixed, boys, and girls samples, the externalizing problem scores of children from lower-income households were significantly higher than those of children from higher-income households. Regarding paternal education level, in the mixed sample, the internalizing problem scores of children from lower-income households were significantly higher than those of children from higher-income households; in the mixed and boys samples, the externalizing problem scores of children from lower-income households were significantly higher than those of children from higher-income households.
The associations between parenting practices and children’s outcomes were assessed using multiple linear regression, with PS scores of laxness (i.e., permissive discipline) and over-reactivity (i.e., authoritarian discipline) as predictors and SDQ scores of internalizing or externalizing problems as the outcome (see Table 4 , Table 5 and Table 6 ). First, regarding analysis targeting boys and girls ( n = 1668), the results of the multivariate analysis between parenting practices and behavioral problems are shown in Table 4 . Regarding internalizing problems as the outcome, in the models that included individual predictors (i.e., Models 1 and 2), each predictor (i.e., laxness and over-reactivity) was not significantly associated with internalizing problems. Further, in Model 3 (which contained both predictors), no predictor was significantly associated with internalizing problems. On the other hand, regarding externalizing problems as the outcome, in Models 1 and 2, each predictor was significantly associated with externalizing problems. Further, in Model 3, both laxness (β = 0.040, p = 0.034) and over-reactivity (β = 0.055, p = 0.005) were significantly associated with externalizing problems.
Second, regarding analysis targeting only boys ( n = 853), the results of the multivariate analysis between parenting practices and behavioral problems are shown in Table 5 . Regarding internalizing problems as the outcome, in Models 1 and 2, laxness and over-reactivity were not significantly associated with internalizing problems. Further, even in Model 3, these predictors were not significantly associated with internalizing problems. On the other hand, regarding externalizing problems as the outcome, in Models 1 and 2, each predictor was significantly associated with externalizing problems. Further, in Model 3, both laxness (β = 0.049, p = 0.038) and over-reactivity (β = 0.048, p = 0.047) were significantly associated with externalizing problems.
Finally, regarding analysis targeting only girls ( n = 815), the results of the multivariate analysis between parenting practices and behavioral problems are shown in Table 6 . Regarding internalizing problems as the outcome, in Models 1 and 2, laxness and over-reactivity were not significantly associated with internalizing problems. Further, even in Model 3, both these predictors were not significantly associated with internalizing problems. On the other hand, regarding externalizing problems as the outcome, in Models 1 and 2, over-reactivity but not laxness was significantly associated with externalizing problems. Further, in Model 3, laxness was not significantly associated with externalizing problems, whereas over-reactivity was significantly associated with externalizing problems (β = 0.067, p = 0.023).
Based on our longitudinal observation, the findings of the present study highlighted the significant impact of parenting styles on children’s behavioral problems, focusing on the role of child gender. Our results demonstrate a clear relationship between discipline styles in preschool for five-year-old children and behavioral problems in first grade for six-year-old children. These findings are consistent with previous studies that suggest that authoritarian and permissive disciplinary styles are associated with disruptive behavioral problems [ 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ]. Specifically, multivariate analyses in the mixed sample revealed that not only higher over-reactivity (i.e., high authoritarian discipline) but also higher laxness (i.e., high permissive discipline) predicted clinically significant externalizing problems. In addition, based on an analysis of gender, authoritarian discipline was found to be related to externalizing problems in both boys and girls, whereas permissive discipline was related to externalizing problems only in boys. It is important to note that in our study, the relationships between parenting and child behavioral problems were found after controlling for child characteristics as well as demographic characteristics such as family structure and family SES at baseline. As these analyses controlled for these variables, the relationships between parenting and child behavioral problems were independent of the effect of child and demographic characteristics. Many studies have also suggested that behavior development identifies major risk factors for childhood behavioral problems; for example, not only parenting techniques but also child characteristics and family adversities such as low SES and single parenting have been shown to increase the risk of developing childhood behavioral difficulties [ 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 ]. A finding of note in the present study was gender difference that permissive discipline was related to externalizing behavioral problems for boys but not girls. Several of the mechanisms involved in this relationship between disciplinary styles and the risk of behavioral problems are likely to differ among boys and girls in early childhood.
The current findings suggest that the authoritarian parenting style was detrimental for both boys and girls. This finding is consistent with previous studies that also suggest that the authoritarian parenting style is linked to externalizing problems [ 69 , 70 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 ]. However, although most previous studies have analyzed mixed samples, they did not differentiate between boys and girls. This study, however, found that authoritarian discipline predicted clinically significant externalizing problems for both boys and girls. There was no gender difference in this relationship. Authoritarian discipline encompasses a restrictive style of interaction with children, which does not take the children’s views and wishes into account. Authoritarian parents can influence the behaviors of their children in society, who tend to be unsuccessful because prohibition and power assertion are likely to be related to anxiety, fear, and frustration in children; moreover, such parents are likely to be subjected to their children’s misbehaviors and other psychosocial behaviors. Indeed, children of parents with high-control parenting styles such as power-assertive, prohibitive, and punitive strategies have been shown to be less content, less secure, and more likely to become hostile or regressive and have greater difficulties dealing with somatic distress or psychological issues when under high stress than other children [ 84 , 85 ]. Moreover, coercive parenting styles are likely to prevent children from learning to self-regulate their own behaviors [ 86 , 87 ]. In addition, lack of parental warmth is also a risk factor for aggressive and disruptive behavioral problems in children [ 88 ] and could contribute to the development of deviant behaviors and adjustment problems. Therefore, in this study, children who received authoritarian parenting including high control and low warmth appear to be at an increased risk of externalizing behavioral problems.
Authoritarian parenting style tends to be more common in Japan than in Western countries [ 64 ], perhaps due to parents’ expectations or environmental conditions. In Japan, children are required to be more obedient and polite than in Western countries [ 61 ]. For instance, when children make noise, parents may overreact from worry about bothering others. Therefore, parents in Japan may be more severe than Western parents in punishing bad behaviors and thus use a more control-oriented parenting style. Although we hypothesized that authoritarian parenting was more associated with behavioral problems in girls than in boys, we found that it was associated with behavioral problems in both boys and girls, perhaps influenced by the Japanese cultural background.
Permissive parenting was found to be related to disruptive behavior in boys but not in girls. Permissive parents dislike having control and authority over their children and therefore do not guide them to regulate their behaviors and allow them to make decisions alone. Because they are not comfortable imposing restrictions on their children, they tend to avoid and tolerate their children’s misbehavior. This type of parenting style can allow the children to control their parents through coercion and thus indulges their low self-control and aggressive behaviors [ 41 , 42 , 89 ]. Consequently, it is assumed that the permissive parenting style will be positively associated with children’s externalizing behavioral problems.
In this study, there was significant gender difference; permissive discipline was related to externalizing behavioral problems in boys but not in girls. Some sources suggest that non-permissive (i.e., firm) disciplinary strategies may be particularly important primarily for boys. For instance, the early parenting model for the development of disruptive behavior focuses primarily on boys and emphasizes the importance of non-permissive discipline to deal with disruptive behaviors [ 90 , 91 ]. The model focusing on gender in early intervention programs suggests that permissive discipline may be particularly detrimental for boys, perhaps because boys have less well-developed self-regulation processes than similarly aged girls [ 92 , 93 ]. This may also be attributed to the gender differences among children in accepting parenting style. How children rate fathers’ or mothers’ parenting styles may depend on the child’s gender. A previous study suggested that boys perceived permissive parenting more than girls [ 94 ]. In addition, boys were likely to rate permissive styles less positively than girls [ 95 ]. These tendencies can more strongly influence the effect of permissive parenting on outcomes for boys than for girls. This study also found that respondents on parenting style were mothers. Boys, rather than girls, were more likely to rate mothers as permissive [ 94 ]. Thus, in this study, boys were more influenced by the permissive discipline of their mothers and in turn may be more exposed to the risk of behavioral problems from permissive parenting than girls. Therefore, in this study, there was likely to be gender difference; permissive discipline was related to externalizing behavioral problems in boys but not in girls.
On the other hand, as mentioned in the Materials and Methods section, although in the present study, the concept of laxness (i.e., permissive discipline) was similar in the PS Japanese version to the original version, slight differences were observed in the items. In Japanese, “laxness” is used to mean that parents are at their children’s disposal rather than that parents negotiate with children to temporarily manage a given situation. Thus, the Japanese permissive parenting style may differ from Western countries’ version thereof, meaning that this trend (i.e., permissive discipline’s relation to externalizing behavioral problems in boys but not in girls) may differ in Western countries.
There are several limitations to this study, which need to be addressed in future research. First, this study was designed as an observational study. It is reasonable to assume that children’s problem behaviors interact with parenting styles in predicting developmental outcomes. Many studies have reported that there are bidirectional relationships between children’s conduct problems and negative parenting behaviors such as the use of harsh and coercive disciplinary strategies [ 70 , 96 , 97 ]. Negative parenting practices have often interacted with child oppositional and aggressive behavior, such that parents of children with behavioral problems were found to practice more negative parenting styles than parents of children without such problems [ 96 , 97 ]. Although this study included child behavioral problems as a baseline survey (T1) and a follow-up survey (T2), parenting style was only included in the baseline survey and therefore the transactional influence could not be estimated. Furthermore, although this study included child and family characteristics as moderator variables in the baseline survey to control for interaction effects, we did not include other multifaceted moderator variables. Therefore, further explorations should include parenting style in both the baseline and follow-up surveys and more multifaceted moderator variables or should conduct an intervention study.
Second, the present study did not include genetic factors. Child temperament has been conceptualized as a pathway through which children’s genotypes affect parenting style because child temperament is genetically influenced [ 98 ]. For instance, children’s negative emotionality was moderately associated with parental negativity and accounted for some part of the total child-based genetic contributions to parental negativity [ 99 ]. Further study should use a genetically informed design to include genetic factors; alternatively, twin studies could be conducted.
Third, in this study, to assess child behavioral problems, the SDQ was completed by parents only, which likely introduced reporting bias. Teachers’ reports might be needed to evaluate this more accurately and further explorations should combine teacher as well as caregiver SDQ ratings. Furthermore, in this study, only mothers were asked about their parenting styles and the parenting styles of mothers and fathers are likely to differ. Apart from the fact that the quantity of time fathers and mothers spend with their children is different, there are indications that parental involvement is also qualitatively different; for instance, mothers were more likely to use an authoritative style, whereas fathers were more likely to use an authoritarian style [ 100 , 101 ]. In addition, children pick up parenting style differently from fathers and mothers; for instance, boys were more likely than girls to rate mothers as permissive and fathers as authoritarian, while girls tended to rate their mothers as more authoritative and fathers as more permissive [ 94 ]. Thus, the parenting styles of fathers and mothers are likely to differ, while boys and girls are likely to have different views on their mothers’ and fathers’ parenting styles. In future research, it is necessary to grasp the child-rearing styles of both fathers and mothers.
Finally, these findings may not be generalizable to all families due to a risk of attrition bias. The retention rate from T1 to T2 was 53.9%, and the returning participants in T2 tended to have relatively higher SES than the non-returning participants, meaning that families with lower SES were underrepresented in our sample, and our results may be less generalizable to families with a lower socioeconomic background. This is a relatively universal problem in parenting research in general—parenting is sufficiently stressful that it is difficult to get the population of parents to participate. Future research would benefit from a study design using samples with higher retention rates (in particular, participants with lower SES).
This longitudinal study of a large sample of Japanese children found evidence that, during the important transition period between preschool and elementary school (age five to six), parenting style is associated with children’s behavioral problems at age six. Authoritarian and permissive parenting styles are likely to continue to negatively influence children’s development beyond childhood. In addition, authoritarian discipline was related to disruptive behaviors in both boys and girls, whereas permissive discipline was related to disruptive behaviors in boys but not in girls. The permissive parenting style will be associated positively with externalizing behavior in boys rather than girls because of gender deference. Few studies have examined the way parental authority influences the later development of behavioral problems in children, specifically with a focus on gender. These findings add to the substantial literature documenting the relationship between family processes and the development of disruptive behavior disorders in early childhood, specifically with a focus on gender. Therefore, support for parents that focuses on the negative effects of such child-rearing styles in early childhood according to child gender may be effective in preventing school maladjustment.
We gratefully acknowledge all the children, parents, and preschool teachers who participated in this study.
R.H. designed the study, conducted the analyses, assisted with the literature review and discussion, and completed the journal revisions. T.K. contributed to the project administration and assisted with the review and editing of the manuscript.
This research was funded by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 26893224 and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 16K20858.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Advertisement
Supported by
Guest Essay
By Margaret Renkl
Ms. Renkl is a contributing Opinion writer who reports from Nashville on flora, fauna, politics and culture in the American South.
It was lying in the street, rocking gently with the turns of a placid wind. At first I thought it was some bit of detritus set free by a garbage truck, the driver hurrying to complete his rounds before the temperature reached that day’s brutal high. By the time I got close enough to see that it wasn’t any sort of trash at all, the wind had lifted it and tossed it into our yard: a blue jay’s tail feather, newly molted .
In late summer, many resident songbirds undergo a full molt, leaving behind their old, battered feathers and growing gleaming new ones in their place. The new feathers will be needed to offer the best insulation against the cold in winter, and to make the bird’s best case for a mate come spring. The blue jay this feather once belonged to was already in the process of gaining a shiny new version of itself.
But the time between old feathers and new is hard for birds. They feel bad. They’re cross with one another. Blue jays and cardinals, especially, tend to lose many feathers at once. Sometimes they spend a few weeks completely bald . A bird without a full set of feathers is vulnerable. During the molt, they keep quiet and close to the shadows.
I left the blue jay feather where I found it last week. In nature, someone always makes use of what someone else doesn’t need. Another creature will use it to line a nest or a burrow.
I carried that feather with me all week in other ways, though. As with Wordsworth , the world has been too much with me lately, and I welcomed the reminder of the blue jay’s world. Though threatened, at least some things in nature are still timeless, proceeding exactly as they should. I wish I could say the same of us.
In our world, just days after a 14-year-old is alleged to have killed four people in Apalachee High School in Georgia and wounded nine others, a 6-year-old in Memphis brought a loaded gun to school , passing it around for classmates to handle. Days after that, schools were closed in southern Kentucky while authorities searched for an assailant who shot five strangers driving on Interstate 75. In the 25 years since the massacre at Columbine High School, advocates for common-sense gun laws have been indefatigable, their ranks continually growing , yet here we are again.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
On the Shelf
Runaway Train
By Eric Roberts St. Martin’s Press: 304 pages, $30 If you buy books linked on our site, The Times may earn a commission from Bookshop.org , whose fees support independent bookstores.
The entertainment industry is facing an existential crisis , with less content being produced and far fewer jobs for the taking . Fortunately, Eric Roberts got wise to this state of affairs well before anyone else did, even before we binged TV shows as a source of pride. “They now give you no time to rehearse and they pay you less,” says Roberts, who is best known for his live-wire films. “You can’t sit around and wait for the big paycheck anymore.”
As Roberts writes in his new memoir, ”Runaway Train: Or, the Story of My Life So Far” — out now — he leaned hard into this new normal years before everyone else was scrambling for scarce jobs. Roberts too feels that pinch, which is why he “says yes to everything.” “We are often overdrawn, broke and scared. I know people who were in the cast of ‘Titanic’ [who] can’t pay their rent,” Roberts writes in his memoir.
But Roberts has no use for fame anymore; he just wants to work. In the book, which Roberts wrote with journalist and novelist Sam Kashner, he boasts of having 750 credits on his IMDb page. By the time he sat down for this interview in August, that credit list had ticked up to nearly 850. “I’m an actor, first and foremost,” he says. “Everything else is secondary.”
A standout among a generation of New York theater actors who transitioned into film in the 1970s, Roberts burst into public consciousness in Bob Fosse’s 1983 biopic “Star 80” as Paul Snider, the homicidal husband of Playboy playmate Dorothy Stratten (portrayed by Mariel Hemingway). Roberts dissolved into his character, a manipulative small-time hustler whose self-hatred metastasizes into murderous rage.
Other high-profile roles followed, such as fugitive Buck McGeehy in Andrei Konchalovsky’s 1985 action thriller “Runaway Train.” The actor received an Oscar nomination for that role, and it transported him onto talk-show couches and tabloid covers. Flush and feeling himself, Roberts bought a penthouse apartment on Manhattan’s Upper East Side and a house in Greenwich, Conn. He also began to abuse cocaine. In time, he would lose the apartment and the house; the drugs remained.
But “Runaway Train” the book is not some weepy expiation for past sins, a Hollywood reclamation job designed to kick-start a once-buzzy career. Roberts knows all too well that he has made horrible choices, that his erratic behavior damaged his relationships with friends and family, including his sister Julia Roberts (their relationship remains touch and go; Roberts avers that “we have agreed not to talk about each other’s careers.”) Still, Hollywood lore is lousy with addicts who have thrived despite their bad habits, and for a while, Roberts walked the tightrope.
Pedro Almodóvar’s first book consists of a mix of short stories and personal essays that amount to ‘a fragmentary autobiography.’
Sept. 16, 2024
As Roberts describes in cringey detail in the book, his fall from grace came a little bit at a time, then all at once. He consistently wrested defeat from the jaws of victory, arguing himself out of acting roles with Quentin Tarantino and Oliver Stone, among others. “I was high when I showed up for my audition with Ron Howard,” says Roberts.
Roberts was an erratic maniac, no doubt, but much of what he learned about the dark arts of self-immolation came from his father, Walter, a screenwriter during the glory days of radio drama who then started his own theater in Atlanta, where Roberts was raised. A bitter, arrogant striver, Walter encouraged his son to act, only to savagely criticize him when he did so, which confused and angered his son.
Roberts’ father was a small-time grifter and once tried to enlist him to rob a pharmacy for much-needed cash. At night, Roberts’ mother frequently beat him with a dowel. Blessed relief from the lash of the dowel came when Roberts’ parents split. Walter was awarded custody of Roberts; sisters Julia and Lisa went to live with their mother. Walter continued to whittle his son down to size. “My father taught me a lot about the process of being a professional actor, but he would denigrate me at every turn,” says Roberts. “As a kid it was very difficult. How do you deal with a father like that? It was hard to process.”
Even when Roberts somehow scraped up the money to move to New York, his father continued to hound him with an endless stream of letters in which he would alternately browbeat him as an underachieving mediocrity, praise his talent, ask for money and accuse him of abandonment. “I was still getting thousands of letters,” says Roberts. “I still have them. It was insane, dude! Eventually, I realized you have to love people for who they are, but you can’t let them walk all over you. Even when it was sincere and loving, it felt misplaced and mean.”
In ‘The De Palma Decade,’ Laurent Bouzereau’s unabashed adoration of director Brian De Palma can be a hindrance to deeper understanding.
Sept. 3, 2024
Despite this epistolary “mind control,” Roberts soldiered on, landing his first TV gig in 1977 on the soap opera “Another World.” Roberts’ smoldering, high-beam intensity caught the attention of Joe Papp, a panjandrum of New York theater who cast Roberts in a Public Theater production of the Civil War drama “Rebel Women.” Roberts earned his Actors’ Equity card, then scored his first film role as Dave Stepanowicz, the scion of a New York crime family, in 1978’s “King of the Gypsies.”
Yet even as Roberts was endearing himself to a wider audience, he was enraging directors with his insistence on staying in character 24/7. “I would yell at people for no reason, lock myself in the trailer and violently kick the door from the inside,” Roberts writes about “Star 80.” “I began manifesting [Snider] to the point that it was imperiling the entire production and infuriating Fosse.”
After that, it was hard to shake the “problem actor” label, especially given the hair-trigger eccentrics he was manifesting so convincingly on film. Roberts’ drug addiction did little to help his cause. “Blow was everywhere,” he says. “I mean, you go to the prop truck on a set and they would have a big bowl of cocaine for everyone. How could I get any work done?”
Roberts’ private and public lives converged, as if he were using Stanislavski’s sense memory in reverse, conjuring up weird scenes from his films as material for his personal use. His stepson Keaton, whom Eric helped raise, moved out as a teenager, unnerved by Roberts’ erratic and often violent behavior. In 1995, Roberts was arrested for shoving his wife Eliza against a wall.
Suffice to say, he didn’t walk into rehab; a court order got him there, for 18 months.
When he emerged, somewhat purged of his own self-hate, Eliza was waiting for him. She pulled him up, brushed him off and transitioned him into a life where he would sublimate his addictive impulses into steady work. She is Roberts’ manager and consigliere, and the pairing has paid off nicely. This year alone, Roberts has acted in 73 productions — a western miniseries, a few low-budget sci-fi films and something called “My Redneck Neighbor: Chapter 1 — The Rednecks Are Coming.” He’s also a contestant on the new season of “Dancing With the Stars,” premiering Tuesday.
And Keaton came back. A singer-songwriter and TV and film composer, he has subsequently worked with Roberts. As for Emma, Roberts’ daughter with former partner Kelly Cunningham, Roberts says, considering that they haven’t been involved in each other’s lives and don’t communicate with each other that much, their relationship is “cordial and supportive, but not close.”
Given how many times Roberts has tried to sabotage his life and his career, he is well aware that it could have gone the other way. “I’m not sure how all this worked out for me, honestly,” he says. “If it weren’t for my wife, I might have been dead by now. I know that sounds dramatic, but it’s a fact.”
Eric Roberts will be signing copies of his memoir, “Runaway Train,” at 7 p.m. Sept. 25 at Barnes & Noble at the Grove in L.A.
Aug. 21, 2024
Aug. 13, 2024
July 16, 2024
Sign up for our Book Club newsletter
Get the latest news, events and more from the Los Angeles Times Book Club, and help us get L.A. reading and talking.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
Sept. 13, 2024
Sept. 12, 2024
Sept. 6, 2024
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD Department of Psychology University of Roehampton 2019. 2 ABSTRACT ... higher levels of behavior problems (Study 1), and callous-unemotional traits, 19.5% . 3 (Study 2). In Studies 3 and 4, behavior problems were associated with problems in
Results: The results revealed that the most common behavioral problems inside the classroom are not paying attention to teachers and being the source of distraction (standing, shouting, changing ...
PRESCHOOL BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS: ANTECEDENT FACTORS OF FAMILY. STRUCTURE, FAMILY CHANGE, AND PARENTING BEHAVIORS. Submitted by. Marc C. Rizzo. Department of Human Development and Family Studies. Master's Committee: In partial fulfillment of the requirements. For the Degree of Master of Science. Colorado State University.
Academic achievement is among the most thoroughly studied social consequences of mental health problems. Most studies come from outside the sociology of mental health, especially from sociology of education, social epidemiology, and developmental psychology (e.g., Campbell and von Stauffenberg 2007). These studies find that youth with mental ...
The Effect of Direct Instruction Math Curriculum on Higher-Order Problem Solving, Pamela Christofori. PDF. The Effects of Response Cards on the Performance and Generalization of Parenting Skills, Bennie L. Colbert. PDF. A Comparison of Two Prompting Procedures on Tacting Behavior, Kelley N. Gardner. PDF
Administrators report that, in general, approximately 40% to 50% of the students in this school are classified as having some form of disability, most often Emotional/Behavioral Disabilities (EBD) and/or Learning Disability (LD). The school typically serves between 30 and 45 students, ranging in age from 15-19 years.
1. Introduction. Childhood behavior problems are considered early indicators of antisocial behavior, especially aggressive and destructive behavior [1,2].They have been characterized as persistent and repetitive patterns of behavior in which the basic rights of others, norms, or age-appropriate social rules are not respected [].Specifically, externalizing problems are uncontrolled behaviors ...
behavior is exhibited, and the role of the family's, school's, and broader society's contexts. These factors perpetuate and accumulate, and the more negative parameters in a child's life ...
Behavior problems create unpleasant teacher-student interactions that eventually affect relationships. Zee et al. (2017) said that there is a reciprocal relationship between students' behaviors and teachers' perceptions of the student-teacher relationship, so that disharmonious relationships and escalating behavior problems create a negative
difficulties, both in childhood and in adulthood. Furthermor e, Sutherland et al. predicte d that behavioral problems at a young age are strongly linked to behavioral challenges in adolescence (e.g., drug use, violence, and dropping out of school). Sutherland et al. noted that interventions (such as classroom activities) are very important when
Introduction. Psychological maltreatment is an important predictor of emotional and behavioral problems in adolescents (Arslan, 2012, Langevin et al., 2015, Lowell et al., 2014, Miller-Perrin and Perrin, 2007, Şimşek and Önder, 2011).Although it involves significant negative outcomes on children's health and development, there is no universally accepted definition of psychological ...
This thesis seeks to understand better how the mental health of young children, in interaction ... specific hypotheses as to why the problem behavior occurs, and intervention strategies that include positive behavioral supports. Classroom management -- how educators run their classrooms, to include behavior and ...
Background Previous studies have shown that children who display behavioral problems also tend to display low social competence. The relation does however vary according to type of behavior being measured, as well as demographic characteristics of the respondent. The present meta-analysis examined the correlation between different types of behavioral problems and social competence among ...
A study by Srinath et al., in 2005, conducted on a community-based sample in Bengaluru, revealed the prevalence rates of behavioral problems to be around 12.5% in children up to 16 years of age. [4] Another study done on school children in Chandigarh found the rate of behavioral problems among 4-11 years' old to be 6.3%. [5]
Background Several quantitative studies support the effectiveness of the Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) psychosocial skills training group component for adolescents with impulse-control disorder and/or emotional dysregulation. However, qualitative research to assess this psychotherapeutic tool in the adolescent population is sparse. This study aims to examine the subjective experience of ...
CHAPTER ONE. DEPRESSION AND BEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS IN ELEMENTARY. SCHOOL CHILDREN. by. DEBRA S. ERICKSON STONE. A Research Paper. Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Science Degree With a Major in. Guidance and Counseling.
behavior problems are failure in submitting assignments/projects on time, verbal aggression, speaking foul languages, inattentiveness, physical aggression and bullying other students.
This study's objective was to identify the predictive effect of indicators concerning social vulnerability, chronic adversity, and maternal depression on behavioral problems among school-aged children, according to the perceptions of mothers and teachers, considering the presence or absence of difficulties in the contexts of family and school. A total of 85 pairs of mothers and school ...
of behavioral problems and their causes; establish relationship between profile and perception on the pupils' behavioral problems; and propose possible measures to reduce behavioral problems of pupils. The researcher used the descriptive method of research with 91 teacher-respondents who are teaching intermediate pupils in
A few important implications result from this study. First, even though behavior problems are concerns by themselves, the effect of behavior on reading skills is an especially critical finding particularly given research (Allensworth & Easton, 2007), which suggests that course failure in English is a predictor for later school dropout. Our ...
Child maltreatment, including physical, emotional, and sexual abuse, as well as emotional and physical neglect is a global phenomenon (Dubowitz & Bennett, Reference Dubowitz and Bennett 2007; Stoltenborgh, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Alink, & van IJzendoorn, Reference Stoltenborgh, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Alink and van IJzendoorn 2015).It is defined as "any act or series of acts of commission or ...
This kind of biological problem-solving - an outcome of natural selection and genetic drift - is conventionally called 'adaptation'. Though it is crucial to the evolution of life, new research suggests it may also be crucial to the origins of life. This problem-solving perspective is radically altering our knowledge of the Universe.
In this study, critical situations relating to students with emotional and behavioral problems in inclusive German secondary schools were analyzed. The objective was to identify behaviors and ...
Together, these papers lay out recommendations and highlight specific strategies to connect the oftentimes fragmented crisis care system, and strengthen America's approach to providing behavioral healthcare overall, in accordance with President Biden's Unity Agenda.
1. Introduction. Behavioral problems including externalizing problems (e.g., hyperactivity, rule-breaking behaviors, and aggression) and internalizing problems (e.g., anxiety, withdrawal, and depression) are among the most common mental health issues in early childhood [1,2,3].Moreover, behavioral problems in early childhood are a significant predictor of negative mental health outcomes in ...
Ms. Renkl is a contributing Opinion writer who reports from Nashville on flora, fauna, politics and culture in the American South. It was lying in the street, rocking gently with the turns of a ...
Eric Roberts' memoir isn't a Hollywood reclamation job designed to kick-start a once-buzzy career. Roberts knows all too well that his erratic behavior damaged his relationships with friends and ...