research on environmental management systems

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Implementation of environmental management system: a case study for construction companies in the philippines  †.

1. Introduction

2. methodology, 2.1. framework of study.

• In this phase, the environmental requirements needed for every project are identified for the company to acquire. This can be completed by conducting a focus group discussion with the engineering and operation departments. Solutions are offered for the identified requirements. The solutions may be in the form of tasks or activities considering the provisions of ISO14001:2015 [ 11 ] from the planning phase to the closing phase.
• Software is used in designing the templates of the expected reports in the proposed system, following the standards in the information technology for software and hardware component requirements for the system. Detailed design of the system is created using flowcharts, diagrams, and other modeling tools.
• Software for the coding and simulation of the proposed system is indispensable. Simulation is conducted to ensure the system is error- and bug-free.
• The developed system is installed in the company for utilization. The system’s functional suitability, performance efficiency, compatibility, usability, reliability, security, maintainability, and portability are assessed.

2.2. Software of EMIS

2.3. project evaluation, 3. results and discussion, 4. conclusions and recommendations, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Leyesa, M.C.; Florencondia, N.T.; Villar, M.J.M.; Galman, S.M.A. Decision Support System in Environmental, Health and Safety (DSS-EHS) Management Systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 12th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM), Manila, Philippines, 3–7 December 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• ISO Secretariat. Management System Standards. 2001. Available online: https://www.iso.org/management-system-standards.html (accessed on 14 July 2020).
• Leyesa, M.C.; Mariano, O.R.; Galvez, R.L. Project Cost Processing System for Electronics Systems Integrator. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 10th Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC), Hyderabad, India, 16–18 September 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Abella, & Abella. Permits Issued by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources–Environmental Management Bureau (EMB). 2022. Available online: https://greendevsolutions.com/all-environmental-permits-ph/ (accessed on 15 January 2023).
• Yin, Y.; Yin, L.; Wang, C. The whole process cost management of construction project based on business process reengineering. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Logistics Systems and Intelligent Management (ICLSIM), Harbin, China, 9–10 January 2010; pp. 412–415. [ Google Scholar ]
• Isenmann, R. Scholar Archive. July 2008. Available online: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2886&context=iemssconference#:~:text=Environmental%20Management%20Information%20Systems%20(EMIS)%20are%20socio%2Dtechnological%20systems,with%20other%20actors%20in%20industry (accessed on 8 February 2023).
• DPWH. List of Registered Contractors with valid PCAB License as of 2017. Department of Public Works and Highways, Republic of the Philippines. Available online: https://www.dpwh.gov.ph/DPWH/business/procurement/civil_works/contractors (accessed on 16 February 2023).
• DENR. Environmental Management Bureau. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Republic of the Philippines. Available online: https://emb.gov.ph/ (accessed on 8 February 2023).
• Dehao, G. Analysis and improvement of construction project management system based on network information. In Proceedings of the 2020 12th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA), Phuket, Thailand, 28–29 February 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rajdeep, S. Top Agile Software Development Companies for Startups. October 2021. Available online: https://medium.com/@sneharajdeep/top-agile-software-development-companies-for-startups-32cc2285fa8b (accessed on 28 February 2023).
• ISO 14001:2015 ; Environmental management systems—Requirements with guidance for use. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Leyesa, M.C. Implementation of Environmental Management System: A Case Study for Construction Companies in the Philippines. Eng. Proc. 2024 , 74 , 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024074032

Leyesa MC. Implementation of Environmental Management System: A Case Study for Construction Companies in the Philippines. Engineering Proceedings . 2024; 74(1):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024074032

Leyesa, Marlon C. 2024. "Implementation of Environmental Management System: A Case Study for Construction Companies in the Philippines" Engineering Proceedings 74, no. 1: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024074032

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Environmental Systems Research

Guest Editors: A.K.M. Saiful Islam,Achlesh Daverey, Khaled Benis Submission Status: Open from 15 July 2024   |   Submission Deadline: 25 March 2025

Guest Editors: Qaisar Mahmood, Sunil Kumar and Paromita Chakraborty Submission Status: Open   |   Submission Deadline:   30 June 2024

Environmental Systems Research is associated with  the global Network on Persistent, Emerging and Organic Pollution in the Environment (PEOPLE Network).

Annual Journal Metrics

Speed 2023 Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 4 Submission to acceptance (median days): 58

Usage 2023 Downloads: 505,317 Altmetric mentions: 46

• More about our metrics
• ISSN: 2193-2697 (electronic)

Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

Environmental Management Systems: History, Theory, and Implementation Research

DOI link for Environmental Management Systems: History, Theory, and Implementation Research

Click here to navigate to parent product.

The widespread adoption of formal environmental management systems (EMSs) by businesses and other organizations has been promoted as an innovation that has the potential to alter profoundly their environmental and economic performance and their resulting relationships with longstanding environmental regulatory policies and agencies. Advocates argue that when implemented, EMSs have the potential not only to improve compliance with environmental regulations but also to refocus the organization's attention beyond compliance toward a dynamic, continual process of improvement in environmental and economic performance. In the process, the organization likely will discover new opportunities to prevent rather than simply control pollution and opportunities to reduce wasteful uses of resources, thus saving money while improving the environment. It also may discover opportunities to manage the organization as a whole more effectively.

• Privacy Policy
• Terms & Conditions
• Cookie Policy
• Taylor & Francis Online
• Taylor & Francis Group
• Students/Researchers
• Librarians/Institutions

Connect with us

Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067 5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2024 Informa UK Limited

The benefits of implementing an environmental management system for your business

Prioritizing environmental sustainability isn’t just a trend: it’s a vital strategy for securing the health and prosperity of an organization for years to come. Balancing growth with environmental stewardship is more important than ever as the impacts of climate change grow in their scale and frequency.

One effective way to do good for the environment and keep a business strong is the implementation of an environmental management system (EMS). Tools and approaches like ISO 14001 are used around the world by organizations that need to assess, manage and improve their impact on the environment.

Table of contents

What is an environmental management system.

So what is an EMS, and why is environmental management necessary? An EMS model is a framework of policies, procedures and practices that helps organizations manage and reduce their impact on the environment. It provides a structured approach to identify, evaluate and mitigate environmental impacts.

• The primary goals of an EMS are to ensure:
• Compliance with environmental requirements
• The efficient use of resources
• Waste reduction and minimal pollution
• The continuous improvement of environmental performance

There are various examples of environmental management systems, but one of the best known and most widely used is ISO 14001 . This International Standard provides a systematic approach to environmental management and is recognized globally.

At first glance, an EMS might seem similar to a quality management system (QMS), but there are some important distinctions. The main difference between a QMS and an EMS is that a QMS (such as ISO 9001 ) usually focuses on improving performance related to products, services and customer outcomes. An EMS, on the other hand, has a specific focus on environmental impact. It allows organizations to establish an environmental management plan, set environmental controls, and track their environmental management objectives.

Sign up for email updates

Register for resources and updates on sustainability and environment related standards!

Almost done!  You are only one step away from joining the ISO subscriber list. Please confirm your subscription by clicking on the email we've just sent to you. You will not be registered until you confirm your subscription. If you can't find the email, kindly check your spam folder and/or the promotions tab (if you use Gmail).

Please see ISO privacy notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Key EMS components

The key components of environmental management include:

• Environmental policy: A statement that outlines an organization’s commitment to environmental sustainability.
• Planning: This involves identifying environmental objectives, setting targets and establishing programmes to achieve them.
• Implementation: This stage involves putting plans into action, allocating resources and assigning responsibilities.
• Checking: Regular monitoring of performance against objectives and targets is critical to ensure the timely implementation of corrective actions.
• Management review: A formal review of the EMS supports its continued effectiveness and suitability.

Understanding and implementing an EMS is crucial for businesses looking to reduce their environmental impact and contribute to a more sustainable future. It provides a systematic and effective approach to environmental management, helping organizations achieve their environmental goals while maintaining profitability.

Benefits of implementing an EMS in your business

The benefits of implementing an environmental management system are numerous. One of the biggest is that it helps fulfil compliance obligations. By implementing an EMS, businesses can ensure that they meet relevant environmental requirements. This not only helps to avoid legal issues and penalties for non-compliance, but also demonstrates a commitment to environmental stewardship.

• An EMS can also help address issues outside the realm of compliance, such as energy or water management, and can promote stronger operational controls and staff accountability. Some of these benefits are:
• Reduced risks: This proactive approach helps prevent incidents that could harm the environment, and exposure to litigation, fines or sanctions, and reputational damage.
• Enhanced image: By demonstrating a commitment to environmental sustainability through an EMS, businesses can attract environmentally conscious customers and build trust in their brand.
• Increased efficiency: By identifying and addressing areas where resources are being wasted – such as energy, water or material management – organizations can optimize their operations and reduce costs.
• Continuous improvements: A systematic approach helps businesses to continuously improve their environmental performance by setting goals, implementing measures, monitoring progress, and making necessary adjustments.

Ultimately, by integrating an EMS into their operations, businesses can foster a culture of sustainability and contribute to a more environmentally responsible future. Whether it’s about waste reduction, pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, conserving resources, or promoting other eco-friendly practices, an EMS empowers organizations to make positive environmental changes while still achieving their business goals.

Types of environmental management systems

There are several types of EMS and approaches to environmental management, so it’s important for organizations to choose one that works best for them. Companies could opt to develop their own bespoke system from scratch that puts their objectives, resources and strategies at the core of their environmental management plan. An in-house EMS will gel seamlessly with an organization’s operations, but they take a great deal of time and capital to develop effectively.

A more practical, cost-efficient approach is to follow existing best practices. Using international standards and guidelines allows a business to focus on getting its environmental management right without needing to sink resources into developing its own EMS system. Standards such as ISO 14001 are already aligned with compliance obligations, providing approaches and guidelines that are easy for businesses to follow.

What is ISO 14001?

ISO’s environmental standards translate passion into effective environmental action. ISO 14001 provides the criteria for an EMS that an organization can use to identify, track and enhance its environmental performance, fulfil its compliance obligations and achieve its environmental objectives. The standard can be used in whole or in part by any organization – regardless of size or industry – that wants to strengthen its environmental action; whether that’s by improving the sustainability of a product, a company’s operations or the services it provides.

What is the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle?

ISO 14001 is based on the continuous improvement model Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA). Through the PDCA cycle, businesses can stay ahead of changing environmental needs and expectations. They can identify areas for improvement, implement innovative solutions, and track their progress towards their environmental objectives. This iterative process ensures that the EMS remains effective and aligned with the organization’s business goals.

Practical steps to implement a successful EMS

Implementing an EMS can seem like a daunting task but, with a clear plan and stakeholder buy-in, any business can successfully integrate the methodology of environmental management into their operations. The following steps may serve as a useful starting point:

• Assess environmental impact: Organizations should conduct an environmental review to identify the areas where they have the most significant impact on the environment. This will help to prioritize their efforts and set goals for improvement.
• Establish environmental management objectives: Based on the findings from the environmental review, businesses should set specific and measurable objectives that align with their goals. These objectives might relate to reducing waste, conserving resources or improving energy efficiency.
• Develop an implementation plan: Businesses should then create a detailed plan that outlines the actions needed to achieve their environmental management objectives. This plan should include timelines, responsible parties and required resources.
• Engage employees: Organizations should engage their employees by communicating the importance of the EMS and their role in its success. Businesses should invest in training and resources to ensure that everyone understands their role and responsibilities in contributing to environmental sustainability.
• Implement monitoring and reporting systems: Businesses should put in place systems to track and measure their progress towards objectives. Regularly reviewing and analysing the data to identify areas for improvement and celebrate successes should be key actions.
• Continuously improve: Organizations should use the PDCA cycle to continuously improve their environmental performance. Set new objectives, implement measures, monitor progress and make necessary adjustments – all these ensure the EMS remains effective and aligned with business goals.
• ISO 14090 Adaptation to climate change
• ISO 14064-1 Greenhouse gases
• ISO 14068-1 Climate change management – Part 1: Carbon neutrality

The importance of continuous improvement

Continuous improvement is a fundamental aspect of any successful EMS. In order to effectively manage and reduce their environmental impact, organizations must be prepared to regularly measure their progress and change plans if they find a better way to do something.

Prioritizing continuous improvement allows businesses to achieve long-term sustainability and reap the benefits of reduced environmental impact and increased efficiency. It enables organizations to respond to new environmental requirements, industry trends and consumer demands, while staying competitive in the market.

By embracing the PDCA cycle and consistently striving for better environmental performance, businesses can make a lasting impact on their operations and contribute to a more sustainable future.

• The benefits of implementing an environmental …

Add to cart

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

JavaScript appears to be disabled on this computer. Please click here to see any active alerts .

• Basics of an EMS

An Environmental Management System (EMS) helps an organization address its regulatory requirements in a systematic and cost-effective manner. This proactive approach can help reduce the risk of non-compliance and improve health and safety practices for employees and the public. An EMS can also help address non-regulated issues, such as energy conservation, and can promote stronger operational control and employee stewardship. Basic Elements of an EMS include the following:

• Reviewing the organization's environmental goals;
• Analyzing its environmental impacts and compliance obligations (or legal and other requirements);
• Setting environmental objectives and targets to reduce environmental impacts and conform with compliance obligations;
• Establishing programs to meet these objectives and targets;
• Monitoring and measuring progress in achieving the objectives;
• Ensuring employees' environmental awareness and competence; and,
• Reviewing progress of the EMS and achieving improvements.

For additional information about EMSs, visit the following links:

• What is an EMS?
• Costs and Benefits of an EMS
• EMS Under ISO 14001
• EMS Resources
• Develop an EMS
• EMS at EPA Facilities

Advertisement

Apple-Based Farming Systems Improve Production and Rhizosphere Microbiome in The North-West Himalayan Region's Dry Temperate Environment

• Original Paper
• Published: 11 September 2024

Cite this article

• Himanshu Mehta 1 ,
• Pramod Kumar 1 ,
• N. C. Sharma 1 ,
• Anjali Chauhan 2 ,
• Arun Negi 3 &
• D. P. Sharma 1  

This research monitored the effect of integrated fruit-based farming system on production and rhizosphere microbiome of apple under dry temperate climate. The study also aims to understand the relationships among soil properties, production parameters and fruit yield of apple trees. Six cropping systems including, apple + pea, apple + kidney beans, apple + barley, apple + maize, apple + buckwheat, apple + garlic and apple monoculture were studied. The cropping systems treatments were cultivated with integrated farming approach, where measurements of the key indicators of productivity and nutrient cycling. Three blocks of district Kinnaur viz ., Nichar, Kalpa and Pooh were selected. A representative sample size of five sub-locations with four orchards in each sub-location and six apple-based cropping systems (CS) was collected from each block. The current study also examined the significance of microbial communities on nutrient dynamics and biological cycling on apple in legumes, pulses and millets-based cropping systems. Apple + pea increased plant height, tree girth, canopy diameter, shoot growth, and apple leaf area of trees. Maximum generative traits of trees were recorded for apple + pea and apple + kidney bean cropping systems. Fruit yield in apple + pea was determined higher than apple + buckwheat. Soil pH changed towards neutral. When compared to monoculture, apple + pea cropping system showed an increase in post-harvest soil chemical indicators. Microbial biomass in terms of bacteria, actinobacteria, soil fungi, AM fungi, Azotobacter and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria were also improved. Path analysis revealed a positive direct influence of soil chemical and microbial properties on yield. PCA determined that the first principal component caused maximum cumulative variance of 97.19 per cent. Soil organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, rhizosphere microbial population and nutrient availability were improved as a consequence of intercropped residues left over after harvest. In this study, apple-based cropping systems significantly improved nutrient dynamics, rhizosphere and microbial biomass due to crop residual management by intercropped companion crops left over in soil. Adoption of apple with pea intercrop has shown significant improvements in yield and soil fertility compared to conventional methods. The study thus concluded that transitioning to cropping systems has positive effects on apple cultivation which can be a viable alternative to conventional farming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Explore related subjects

• Environmental Chemistry

References   

Abdraboo MA, Farag AA, Abul-Soud M (2013) The intercropping effect on potato under net house as adaption procedure of climate change impacts. Researcher 5(6):48–60

Google Scholar  

Abouziena HFH, Motty EZ, Youseef RA, Sahab AF (2010) Efficacy of intercropping mango, mandarin or egyptian clover plants with date palm on soil properties, rhizosphere microflora and quality and quantity of date fruits. J Am Sci 6:230–238

Ahmad S, Khan PA, Verma DK, Mir NH, Sharma A, Wani SA (2018) Forage production and orchard floor management through grass/legume intercropping in apple-based agroforestry systems. Int J Chem Stud 6:953–958

Akmal M, Altaf MS, Hayat R, Hassan FU, Islam M (2012) Temporal changes in soil urease, alkaline phosphatase and dehydrogenase activity in rainfed wheat field of Pakistan. J Anim Plant Sci 22(2):457–462

CAS   Google Scholar  

Al-Yahyai R, Khan MM (2015) Date palm status and perspective in Oman. Date Palm Genet Resour Utilization 2:207–240

Article   Google Scholar  

Andersen MK, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen ES (2005) Biomass production, symbiotic nitrogen fixation and inorganic N use in dual and tri-component annual intercrop. Plant Soil 266:273–287

Archana M, Anusree T, Suma R, Manjunatha G (2019) Identifying association between pomegranate fruit yield and nutrient variables using correlation and linear multiple regression models. Int J For Soil Erosion 9(3):28–37

Aruani MC, Reeb PD, Barnes NE (2014) Influence of soil properties on yield and fruit maturity at harvest of Williams pear. Chilean J Agric Res 74(4):460–467

Arya R, Awasthi OP, Singh J, Arya CK, Bhatnagar P, Pandey SBS, Vashistha A (2010) Comparison of fruit-based multi-species cropping system versus sole cropping system under arid region of Rajasthan. Indian J Agric Sci 80:75–78

Atucha A, Merwin IA, Brown MG (2011) Long-term effects of four groundcover management systems in an apple orchard. HortScience 46:1176–1183

Aulakh CS, Singh S, Walia SS, Kaur G (2009) Farmers’ perceptions on organic farming in Punjab. J Res Punjab Agric Univ 46(1&2):9–13

Awasthi OP, Singh IS (2010) Effect of ber and pomegranate plantation on soil nutrient of typic torripsamments. Indian J Hortic 67:138–142

Berendsen RL, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM (2012) The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci 17:478–486

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Bhatti IH, Ahma R, Jabbar A, Nazir MS, Mahmood T (2006) Competitive behavior of component crops in different sesame–legume intercropping systems. Int J Agric Biol 8(2):165–167

Black CA (1957) Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy

Broeckling CD, Amanda K, Broz AK, Bergelson J, Manter DK, Vivanco JM (2008) Root Exudates Regulate Soil Fungal Community Composition and Diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(3):738–744

Chen X, Tian Y, Guo XF, Chen GK, He HZ, Li HS (2017) The effect of monoculture peanut and cassava-peanut intercropping on physical and chemical properties in peanut rhizosphere soil under the biochar application and straw mulching. Earth Environ Sci 59(1):012–021

Chen X, Ding Z, Tang M, Zhu B (2018) Greater variations of rhizosphere effects within mycorrhizal group than between mycorrhizal group in a temperate forest. Soil Biol Biochem 717(18):30288–30298

Chen Y, Bonkowski M, Shen Y, Griffiths BS, Jiang Y, Wang X (2020) Root ethylene mediates rhizosphere microbial community reconstruction when chemically detecting cyanide produced by neighbouring plants. Microbiome 8:4

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Cruz AF, Pires MDC, Nascimento LKBD, Ramos MLG, Oliveira SA, Blum LEB, Yamanishi OK (2020) Cover cropping system and mulching can shape soil microbial status in fruit orchards. Sci Agric 77:e20180316

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Das B, Dhakar MK, Sarkar PK, Kumar S, Nath V, Dey P, Singh AK, Bhatt BP (2017) Performance of mango (Mangifera indica L.) based agri-horticultural systems under rainfed plateau conditions of eastern India. Indian J Agric Sci 87(4):521–527. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i4.69423

Debnath S, Patra AK, Ahmed N, Kumar S, Dwivedi BS (2015) Assessment of microbial biomass and enzyme activities in soil under temperate fruit crops in north western himalayan region. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 15(4):848–866

Dewey DR, Lu K (1959) A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agron J 51(9):515–518

Gaur A, Adholeya A (1994) Estimation of VAMF spores in soil: a modified method. Mycorrhiza News 6:10–11

Gerdemann JW, Nicolson TH (1963) Spores of mycorrhizal Endogoene species extracted from soil by wet sieving and decanting. Trans Br Mycol Soc 46:235–244

Ghosh SN, Pal PP (2010) Effect of inter-cropping on plant and soil of Mosambi sweet orange orchard under rainfed conditions. Indian J Hortic 67:185–190

Ghosh S, Sarkar S, Sau S, Karmakar S, Brahmachari K (2017) Influence of guava (Psidium guajava L.) based intercropping systems on soil health and productivity in alluvial soil of West Bengal, India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 6:241–251

Glick BR, Glick JL (2020) Beneficial Plant-Bacterial Interactions. Springer, Cham.

Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. Wiley

Gosain DK (2007) Diversification in agriculture through horticultural crops-a study of Bilaspur district of Himachal Pradesh. Asian J Hortic 2(2):288–290

Gourmelon V, Maggia L, Powell JR, Gigante S, Hortal S, Gueunier C (2016) Environmental and geographical factors structure soil microbial diversity in New Caledonian ultramafic substrates: a metagenomic approach. PLoS ONE 11:0167405

Gupta MK, Sharma SD (2009) Effect of tree plantation on soil properties, profile morphology and productivity index-II. Poplar in Yamunanagar district of Haryana. Ann For 17(1):43–70

Hall IR (1984) Species and mycorrhizal infections of New Zealand Endogonaceae. Trans Br Mycol Soc 68:341–356

Hall C, Dawson TP, Macdiarmid JI, Matthews RB, Smith P (2017) The impact of population growth and climate change on food security in Africa: looking ahead to 2050. Int J Agric Sustain 15(2):124–135

Hamer U, Makeschin F, Stadler J, Klotz S (2008) Soil organic matter and microbial community structure in set-aside and intensively managed arable soils in NE-Saxony, Germany. Appl Soil Ecol 40(3):465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.07.001

Hu XF, Chen J, Guo JF (2006) Two phosphate and potassium solubilizing bacteria isolated from Tiannu Mountain, Zhejiang, China. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:983–990

Hulugallea NR, Weaver TB (2007) Short-term variations in chemical properties of vertisols as affected by amounts, carbon/ nitrogen ratio, and nutrient concentration of crop residues. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 36:1449–1464

Jackson ML (1973) Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Delhi

Jahiruddin M, Satter MA (2010) Agricultural research priority: Vision 2030 and beyond. Final report. Sub-sector: land and soil resource management. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council and Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh

Jatav MK, Krishna H, Meena SR, Bhargava R, Sharma BD (2016) Yield and physical and microbial properties of soil under different fruit based diversified cropping models in arid region of Rajasthan. Int J Trop Agric 34(4):965–970

Jensen ES (1987) Inoculation of pea by application of Rhizobium in planting furrow. Plant Soil 97:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02149824

Jose S, Gillespie AR, Pallardy SG (2004) Interspecific interactions in temperate agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 61:237–255. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:agfo.0000029002.85273.9b

Kremer RJ, Kussman RD (2011) Soil quality in a pecan–kura clover alley cropping system in the Midwestern USA. Agrofor Syst 83:213–223

Kumar PN (2020) Effect of Intercropping on Fruit Crops: A Review. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 9(12):745–755

Kumar P, Chandel RS (2017) Generative developments and pomological traits of apple ( Malus x domestica Borkh.) scion cultivars canopy on dwarf clonal rootstocks in dry temperate ecosystem of north-west Himalayas. Sci Hortic 215:28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.12.012

Kumar B, Gupta RK, Bhandari AL (2008) Soil Fertility Changes after Long-Term Application of Organic Manures and Crop Residues under Rice-Wheat System. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 56(1):80–85

Kumar P, Sharma SD, Yadav SK (2013) Correlation and regression studies in Mango (Mangifera indica L.). J Plant Nutr 36(6):929–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2012.759971

Kumar D, Ahmed N, Srivastava KK, Dar TA (2014) Effect of trunk cross sectional area of rootstock on growth, yield, quality and leaf nutrient status in Apricot (Prunus armeniaca) cv. CITH-Apricot-2. Indian J Agric Sci 84(2):236–240

Laik R, Kumar K, Das DK (2009) Organic carbon and nutrient build-up in a calciorthent soil under six forest tree species. Forest Trees Livelihoods 19(1):81–92

Laishram M, Ghosh SN (2017) Effect of intercropping on plant and soil of jackfruit grown in New Alluvial soil of West Bengal. J Crop Weed 13:55–59. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.029

Lee A, Neuberger P, Omokanye A, Ramirez GH, Kim K, Gorzelak MA (2023) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in oat-pea intercropping. Sci Rep 13:390

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Lehmann J, Da Silva JP, Trujillo L, Uguen K (2000) Legume cover crops and nutrient cycling in tropical fruit tree production. Acta Hortic 531:65–72. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2000.531.8

Lian T, Mu Y, Jin J, Ma Q, Cheng Y, Cai Z, Nian H (2019) Impact of intercropping on the coupling between soil microbial community structure, activity and nutrient-use efficiencies. Peer J 7:6412. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6412

Lindsay WA, Norvell WA (1978) Development of DTPA soil tests for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x

Liu Y, Ma W, He H, Wang Z, Cao Y (2021) Effects of Sugarcane and Soybean Intercropping on the Nitrogen-Fixing Bacterial Community in the Rhizosphere. Front Microbiol 12:713349. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.713349

Malobane ME, Nciizah AD, Nyambo P, Mudau FN, Wakindiki II (2020) Microbial biomass carbon and enzyme activities as influenced by tillage, crop rotation and residue management in a sweet sorghum cropping system in marginal soils of South Africa. Heliyon 6(11):05513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05513

Meena RS, Yadav RS, Meena H, Kumar S, Meena YK, Singh A (2015) Towards the current need to enhance legume productivity and soil sustainability worldwide: a book review. J Clean Prod 104:513–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.002

Merwin HD, Peach M (1951) Exchangeability of soils potassium in the sand silt and clay fractions as influenced by the nature of the complementary exchangeable cations. Proc Am Soil Sci Soc 15:125–128. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1951.036159950015000c0026x

Montagnını F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon Sequestration: An underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 61:281–295. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:agfo.0000029005.92691.79

Mougel C, Offre P, Ranjard L, Corberand T, Gamalero E, Robin C, Lemanceau P (2006) Dynamic of the genetic structure of bacterial and fungal communities at different developmental stages of Medicago truncatula Gaertn. cv. Jemalong line J5. New Phytol 170:165–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01650.x

Mucheru-Muna M, Pypers P, Mugendi D, Kung’u J, Mugwe J, Merckx R, Vanlauwe B (2010) A staggered maize–legume intercrop arrangement robustly increases crop yields and economic returns in the highlands of central Kenya. Field Crops Res 115:132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.013

Nath V, Pandey SD, Singh NP, Pandey S (2021) Litchi Production and Post-harvest Management. IBPSS, New Delhi

Olsen SR, Culs CV, Wortanade FS, Deam LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Dep Agric 939:19–23

Ouma G (2009) Intercropping and its application to banana production in East Africa: A review. J Plant Breeding Crop Sci 1:13–15

Ozturkmen AR, Ramazanoglu E, Almaca A, Çakmakli M (2020) Effect of intercropping on soil physical and chemical properties in an olive orchard. Appl Ecol Environ Res 18(6):7783–7793. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1806_77837793

Panse VG, Sukhatme PV (1989) Statistical methods of agricultural workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India

Petersen SO, Frohne PS, Kennedy AC (2002) Dynamics of a soil microbial community under spring wheat. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66(3):826–833

Pikovskaya RI (1948) Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with the vital activity of some microbial species. Mikrobiologiya 7:362–370

Piper CS (1966) Soil chemical analysis. Asia Publishing House, Bombay

Ramos ME, Benítez E, García PA, Robles AB (2010) Cover crops under different managements vs. frequent tillage in almond orchards in semiarid conditions: effects on soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol 44:6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.08.005

Rangaswami G (1966) Agricultural microbiology. Asia Publishing House, p 413

Ren C, SunP KD, Zhao F, Feng Y, Ren G, Han X, Yang G (2016) Responsiveness of soil nitrogen fractions and bacterial communities to afforestation in the Loess Hilly Region (LHR) of China. Sci Rep 6:28469. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28469

Rusinamhodzi L, Corbeels M, Nyamangara J, Giller KE (2012) Maize-grain legume intercropping is an attractive option for ecological intensification that reduces climatic risk for smallholder farmers in central Mozambique. Field Crop Res 136:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.07.014

Sarathambal C, Singh VP, Barman KK, Raghuvanshi MS, Dubey RP (2015) Intercropping and weed management effect on soil microbial activities in newly planted mango and citrus orchard. Indian J Weed Sci 47(2):178–182

Sharma SD, Kumar P, Yadav SK (2014) Glomus-Azotobacter association affects phenology of mango seedlings under reduced soil nutrient supply. Sci Hortic 173:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.04.039

Sharma SD, Kumar P, Bhardwaj SK, Chandel A (2015) Agronomic performance, nutrient cycling and microbial biomass in soil as affected by pomegranate based multiple crop sequencing. Sci Hortic 197:504–515

Sharma SD, Bhardwaj SK, Kumar P, Chandel A, Kashyap B, Sharma VK (2017) Impact assessment of integrated walnut fruit sequencing in exposed subsoil on vegetative growth traits, soil quality indicators and biological diversity in rainfed ecological system. Indian J Agric Sci 87(11):1487–1498

Shweta BS, Bhatia SK, Sharma JR (2015) Intercropping Studies in Guava Orchard. Int J Trop Agric 33(3):2189–2192

Silva CDF, Medeiros EVD, Santana MD, Araujo MBD, Martins FAP, Moura MFD (2018) Soil microbiological activity and productivity of maize fodder with legumes and manure doses. Rev Caatinga 31:882–890. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252018v31n410rc

Singh SK, Sharma M (2016) Evaluating significance of vermicompost and intercropping Amorphophallus for integrated Indian goose berry orchard management. Int J Agric Sci 8(39):1809–1812

Singh SR, Banik BC, Hasan MA (2013) Effect of different intercrops on yield, quality and shelf-life in mango cv. Himsagar (Mangifera indica L). Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol 6(1):121–126

Singh SK, Singh PK, Dwivedi SV (2014) Elephant Foot Yam (Amorphophallus)-An efficient intercrop under Indian goose berry ( Phylanthus emblica ) orchard for Purvanchal. Trends Biosci 7(14):1778–1780

Singh NV, Singh J, Singh S, Gill PS (2022) Soil-leaf nutrient relationships with fruit quality and yield of litchi ( Litchi chinensis ) in northern India. Indian J Agric Sci 92(12):1453–1457. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i12.124134

Solanki MK, Wang Z, Wang FY, Li CN, Lan TJ, Singh RK, Singh P, Yang LT, Li YR (2017) Intercropping in sugarcane cultivation influenced the soil properties and enhanced the diversity of vital diazotrophic bacteria. Sugar Tech 191:36–147

Song YN, Marschner P, Li L, Bao XG, Sun JH, Zhang FS (2007) Community composition of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in the rhizosphere of intercropped wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), maize ( Zea mays L.), and faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Biol Fertil Soils 44:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0205-y

Subbiah BV, Asija GL (1956) A rapid procedure for the estimation of the available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci 25:259–260. https://doi.org/10.14264/40543d9

Sultani M, Gill M, Anwar M, Athar M (2007) Evaluation of soil physical properties as influenced by various green manuring legumes and phosphorus fertilization under rain fed conditions. Int J Environ Sci Technol 4:109–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03325968

Suman A, Lal M, Singh AK, Gaur A (2006) Microbial biomass turnover in Indian subtropical soils under different sugarcane intercropping systems. Agron J 98(3):698–704. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0173

Sun YM, Zhang NN, Wang ET, Yuan HL, Yang JS, Chen WX (2009) Influence of intercropping and intercropping plus rhizobial inoculation on microbial activity and community composition in rhizosphere of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) and Siberian wild rye ( Elymus sibiricus L.). Microbiol Ecol 70:218–226

Swain SC (2014) Performance and profitability study of different mango based intercropping systems in Eastern ghat high land zone of Odisha. J Crop Weed 10:170–178

Swain SC, Patro L (2007) Horticulture based cropping system-A strategy for sustainable development in rainfed upland. Environmental hazard. Sonali Publication, New Delhi, pp 44–46

Swain SC, Sahoo SC, Mishra PJ (2012) Effect of intercropping systems on growth, yield, fruit quality and leaf nutrient status of mango under rainfed situation. Int J Agric Sci 8(1):174–178

Tang C, McLay CDA, Barton L (1997) A comparison of proton excretion of twelve pasture legumes grown in nutrient solution. Aust J Exp Agric 37:563–570. https://doi.org/10.1071/ea96151

Tiwari R, Baghel BS (2014) Effect of intercropping on plant and soil of Dashehari mango orchard under low productive environments. Asian J Hortic 9:439–442. https://doi.org/10.15740/has/tajh/9.2/439-442

Toaima SEA (2006) Effect of Intercropping Soybean, Cowpea and Guar with Maize on Yield and its components. Mansoura Univ J Agric Sci 31(1):55–70. https://doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2006.235685

Trappe J (1982) Synoptic keys to the genera and species of zygomycetous mycorrhizal fungi. Phytopathology 72:1102–1108

Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) Microbial biomass measurements in forest soils: The use of the chloroform fumigation-incubation method in strongly acid soils. Soil Biol Biochem 19(6):697–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90051-4

Walkley AJ, Black LA (1934) Estimation of soil organic carbon by the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:259–260. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003

Wang ZG, Jin X, Bao XG, Li XF, Zhao JH, Sun JH, Christie P, Li L (2014) Intercropping enhances productivity and maintains the most soil fertility properties relative to sole cropping. PLoSONE 9:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113984

Wang J, Ren C, Cheng H, Zou Y, Bughio MA, Li Q (2017) Conversion of rainforest into agroforestry and monoculture plantation in China: Consequences for soil phosphorus forms and microbial community. Sci Total Environ 595:769–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.012

Wang N, He H, Lacroix C, Morris C, Liu Z, Ma F (2019) Soil fertility, leaf nutrients and their relationship in kiwifruit orchards of China’s central Shaanxi province. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 65(4):369–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2019.1624481

Westwood MN (1978) Plant efficiency, growth and yield measurements. In: Temperate zone pomology. W H Freeman and company, San Fransisco, California, USA, pp 119–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(78)80256-7

Wollum AG (1982) Cultural methods for soil microorganisms. In: Page AK, Millar RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part II. Chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy Monograph No 9. ASA-SSSA Publisher, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp 781–802

Xia H, Zhao J, Sun J, Xue Y, Eagling T, Bao X, Zhang F, Li L (2013a) Maize grain concentrations and above-ground shoot acquisition of micronutrients as affected by intercropping with turnip, faba bean, chickpea, and soybean. Sci China Life Sc 56:823–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-013-4524-y

Xia HY, Wang ZG, Zhao JH, Sun JH, Bao XG, Christiea P, Zhanga FS, Li L (2013) Contribution of interspecific interactions and phosphorus application to sustainable and productive intercropping systems. Field Crop Res 154:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.07.011

Zaccheo PVC, Neves CSVJ, Mariano DC, Zorzenoni TO, Higashibara LR, Piccinin GG, Okumura RS (2013) Green manure in fruticulture: aspects on soil quality and use in agriculture. Afr J Agric Res 11:1469–1474

Zang H, Wang J, Kuzyakov Y (2016) N fertilization decreases soil organic matter decomposition in the rhizosphere. Appl Soil Ecol 108:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.07.021

Zhang FS, Li L (2003) Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Structure and functioning of cluster roots and plant responses to phosphate deficiency. Plant Soil 248:305–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0243-1_26

Zhang S, Liu T, Wei W, Shen L, Wang X, Tuertia T, Li L, Zhang W (2022) In Arid Regions, Forage Mulching between Fruit Trees Rows Enhances Fruit Tree Light and Lowers Soil Salinity. Agriculture 12(11):1895. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12111895

Zhang M, Li B,  Xiong Z (2016) Effects of organic fertilizer on net global warming potential under an intensively managed vegetable field in southeastern China: a three-year field study. Atmos Environ 145:92–103

Zhao J, Zeng Z, He X, Chen H, Wang K (2015) Effects of monoculture and mixed culture of grass and legume forage species on soil microbial community structure under different levels of nitrogen fertilization. Eur J Soil Biol 68:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2015.03.008

Zheng BX, Hao XL, Ding K, Zhou GW, Chen QL, Zhang JB, Zhu YG (2017) Long-term nitrogen fertilization decreased the abundance of inorganic phosphate solubilizing bacteria in an alkaline soil. Sci Rep 7(1):42284. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42284

Download references

This study was not funded by any agency.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Fruit Science, Dr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, HP, India

Himanshu Mehta, Pramod Kumar, N. C. Sharma & D. P. Sharma

Department of Soil Science and Water Management, Dr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, HP, India

Anjali Chauhan

Regional Horticultural Research & Training Station, Dr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Sharbo, Kinnaur, HP, India

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Himanshu Mehta: Data curation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing-original draft, Software. Pramod Kumar: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing—review & editing. NC Sharma: Methodology. Anjali Chauhan: Methodology. Arun Negi: Methodology. DP Sharma: Methodology.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pramod Kumar .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 KB)

Rights and permissions.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Mehta, H., Kumar, P., Sharma, N.C. et al. Apple-Based Farming Systems Improve Production and Rhizosphere Microbiome in The North-West Himalayan Region's Dry Temperate Environment. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-02006-2

Download citation

Received : 01 April 2024

Accepted : 27 August 2024

Published : 11 September 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-02006-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Cropping systems
• Microbial communities
• Path coefficient
• Relationship studies
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research