ultrasound presentation cephalic

• Type 2 Diabetes
• Heart Disease
• Digestive Health
• Multiple Sclerosis
• Diet & Nutrition
• Supplements
• Health Insurance
• Public Health
• Patient Rights
• Caregivers & Loved Ones
• End of Life Concerns
• Health News
• Thyroid Test Analyzer
• Doctor Discussion Guides
• Hemoglobin A1c Test Analyzer
• Lipid Test Analyzer
• Complete Blood Count (CBC) Analyzer
• What to Buy
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Medical Expert Board

What Is Cephalic Position?

The ideal fetal position for labor and delivery

• Why It's Best

Risks of Other Positions

• Determining Position
• Turning a Fetus

The cephalic position is when a fetus is head down when it is ready to enter the birth canal. This is one of a few variations of how a fetus can rest in the womb and is considered the ideal one for labor and delivery.

About 96% of babies are born in the cephalic position. Most settle into it between the 32nd and 36th weeks of pregnancy . Your healthcare provider will monitor the fetus's position during the last weeks of gestation to ensure this has happened by week 36.

If the fetus is not in the cephalic position at that point, the provider may try to turn it. If this doesn't work, some—but not all—practitioners will attempt to deliver vaginally, while others will recommend a Cesarean (C-section).

Getty Images

Why Is the Cephalic Position Best?

During labor, contractions dilate the cervix so the fetus has adequate room to come through the birth canal. The cephalic position is the easiest and safest way for the baby to pass through the birth canal.

If the fetus is in a noncephalic position, delivery becomes more challenging. Different fetal positions have a range of difficulties and varying risks.

A small percentage of babies present in noncephalic positions. This can pose risks both to the fetus and the mother, and make labor and delivery more challenging. It can also influence the way in which someone can deliver.

A fetus may actually find itself in any of these positions throughout pregnancy, as the move about the uterus. But as they grow, there will be less room to tumble around and they will settle into a final position.

It is at this point that noncephalic positions can pose significant risks.

Cephalic Posterior

A fetus may also present in an occiput or cephalic posterior position. This means they are positioned head down, but they are facing the abdomen instead of the back.

This position is also nicknamed "sunny-side up."

Presenting this way increases the chance of a painful and prolonged delivery.

There are three different types of breech fetal positioning:

• Frank breech: The legs are up with the feet near the head.
• Footling breech: One or both legs is lowered over the cervix.
• Complete breech: The fetus is bottom-first with knees bent.

A vaginal delivery is most times a safe way to deliver. But with breech positions, a vaginal delivery can be complicated.

When a baby is born in the breech position, the largest part—its head—is delivered last. This can result in them getting stuck in the birth canal (entrapped). This can cause injury or death.

The umbilical cord may also be damaged or slide down into the mouth of the womb, which can reduce or cut off the baby's oxygen supply.

Some providers are still comfortable performing a vaginal birth as long as the fetus is doing well. But breech is always a riskier delivery position compared with the cephalic position, and most cases require a C-section.

Likelihood of a Breech Baby

You are more likely to have a breech baby if you:

• Go into early labor before you're full term
• Have an abnormally shaped uterus, fibroids , or too much amniotic fluid
• Are pregnant with multiples
• Have placenta previa (when the placenta covers the cervix)

Transverse Lie

In transverse lie position, the fetus is presenting sideways across the uterus rather than vertically. They may be:

• Down, with the back facing the birth canal
• With one shoulder pointing toward the birth canal
• Up, with the hands and feet facing the birth canal

If a transverse lie is not corrected before labor, a C-section will be required. This is typically the case.

Determining Fetal Position

Your healthcare provider can determine if your baby is in cephalic presentation by performing a physical exam and ultrasound.

In the final weeks of pregnancy, your healthcare provider will feel your lower abdomen with their hands to assess the positioning of the baby. This includes where the head, back, and buttocks lie

If your healthcare provider senses that the fetus is in a breech position, they can use ultrasound to confirm their suspicion.

Turning a Fetus So They Are in Cephalic Position

External cephalic version (ECV) is a common, noninvasive procedure to turn a breech baby into cephalic position while it's still in the uterus.

This is only considered if a healthcare provider monitors presentation progress in the last trimester and notices that a fetus is maintaining a noncephalic position as your delivery date approaches.

External Cephalic Version (ECV)

ECV involves the healthcare provider applying pressure to your stomach to turn the fetus from the outside. They will attempt to rotate the head forward or backward and lift the buttocks in an upward position. Sometimes, they use ultrasound to help guide the process.

The best time to perform ECV is about 37 weeks of pregnancy. Afterward, the fetal heart rate will be monitored to make sure it’s within normal levels. You should be able to go home after having ECV done.

ECV has a 50% to 60% success rate. However, even if it does work, there is still a chance the fetus will return to the breech position before birth.

Natural Methods For Turning a Fetus

There are also natural methods that can help turn a fetus into cephalic position. There is no medical research that confirms their efficacy, however.

• Changing your position: Sometimes a fetus will move when you get into certain positions. Two specific movements that your provider may recommend include: Getting on your hands and knees and gently rocking back and forth. Another you could try is pushing your hips up in the air while laying on your back with your knees bent and feet flat on the floor (bridge pose).
• Playing stimulating sounds: Fetuses gravitate to sound. You may be successful at luring a fetus out of breech position by playing music or a recording of your voice near your lower abdomen.
• Chiropractic care: A chiropractor can try the Webster technique. This is a specific chiropractic analysis and adjustment which enables chiropractors to establish balance in the pregnant person's pelvis and reduce undue stress to the uterus and supporting ligaments.
• Acupuncture: This is a considerably safe way someone can try to turn a fetus. Some practitioners incorporate moxibustion—the burning of dried mugwort on certain areas of the body—because they believe it will enhance the chances of success.

A Word From Verywell

While most babies are born in cephalic position at delivery, this is not always the case. And while some fetuses can be turned, others may be more stubborn.

This may affect your labor and delivery wishes. Try to remember that having a healthy baby, and staying well yourself, are your ultimate priorities. That may mean diverting from your best laid plans.

Speaking to your healthcare provider about turning options and the safest route of delivery may help you adjust to this twist and feel better about how you will move ahead.

Glezerman M. Planned vaginal breech delivery: current status and the need to reconsider . Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2012;7(2):159-166. doi:10.1586/eog.12.2

Cleveland Clinic. Fetal positions for birth .

MedlinePlus. Breech birth .

UT Southwestern Medical Center. Can you turn a breech baby around?

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. If your baby is breech .

Roecker CB. Breech repositioning unresponsive to Webster technique: coexistence of oligohydramnios .  Journal of Chiropractic Medicine . 2013;12(2):74-78. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2013.06.003

By Cherie Berkley, MS Berkley is a journalist with a certification in global health from Johns Hopkins University and a master's degree in journalism.

• Normal Normal and Abnormal First Trimester Exam Normal Fetal Ultrasound Biometry Fetal Heart Ultrasound Determining Fetal Situs Fetal Urinary System Umbilical Cord CNS Critical Anatomy CNS Embryology and Early Development CNS Later Development CNS Ultrasound Brain Anatomy
• Fetal Anomalies Fetal Heart Fetal Chest Fetal Colon Fetal Central Nervous System Facial Clefts Skeletal Dysplasia Genetic Markers
• Doppler Editorial Board Fetal Doppler Middle Cerebral Artery Doppler
• Fetal/Maternal Conditions Transvaginal Ultrasound Fetal Anemia Interventions Preterm Labor Placenta and Umbilical Cord
• Twins Key Views Twins: Videos Diamniotic Dichorionic and Diamniotic Monochorionic Twins Monochorionic Monoamniotic Twins Twin to Twin Transfusion Syndrome Fetal Growth Restriction Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion Conjoined Twins
• Video Topics
• Access CMEs
• Other Links Topics A-Z Links CME Videos Upload Your Case Editorial Board
• Take A Free Tour
• Free Videos
• Editorial Board

Determining Normal Fetal Situs (Situs Solitus)

One of the first steps in obtaining cardiac views is to determine how the fetus is oriented within the uterus and to determine the right and left side of the abdominal contents versus the right and left side of the heart and thoracic contents.  This is not as easy as it might seem since the fetal left side can be on the maternal right and the opposite can be true.

In summary, situs refers to the right and left orientation of fetal organs.  For example situs solitus is the normal left to right axis arrangement in the fetus with the stomach and spleen on the left side of the body, and the liver and gallbladder on the right side.

Visual Summary of Normal Fetal Situs

Below are steps required to determine situs related to cephalic or breech presentation, and whether the spine or back is up (anterior) or down (posterior).

1.  Determine the lie of the fetus:

A.  Is the fetus head first with the head in front of the ultrasound screen?  This could also be termed cephalic or vertex presentation. B.  Is the fetal feet or bottom first with the head behind the screen?  This could also be termed footling or breech presentation. C.  Determine whether the spine or back is anterior (back up) or posterior (back down).

2.  Obtain a transverse cut of the thorax to demonstrate a 4-chamber view.  The left atrium is nearest the spine and the cardiac axis points to the left.

Detailed Method to Determine Fetal Situs

1.  Define within the uterus the presentation of the fetus (generally vertex or breech; less often the presentation is oblique or transverse.).

2.  Determine whether the fetal spine is parallel or transverse to the maternal spine.  In sagittal view, if the fetal and maternal spine are parallel, the fetus is in longitudinal lie.  When the fetal spine is perpendicular to the maternal spine, the fetus is in a transverse lie.

3.  Determine the position of the fetal left side.  The fetal left side will be as follows: A.  With respect to the maternal abdomen, the fetal left side is anterior and near to the ultrasound transducer. B.  With respect to the posterior uterine wall, the fetal left side is posterior and farthest from the transducer. C.  With respect to the right uterine wall, the fetal left side will be on the maternal right. D.  With respect to the left uterine wall, the fetal left side will be on the maternal left.

4.  Obtain a transverse view of the abdomen and define the fetal stomach which is positioned in the left side of the fetal abdomen.

5.  Obtain a 4-chamber view of the heart by obtaining a transverse view of the thorax.  The left atrium and descending aorta are nearest to the spine and the cardiac axis points to the left.

6.  Finally, ascertain if the stomach and heart are in their correct respective locations, i.e., the stomach is on the left side and the cardiac axis points to the left.

7.  Place a transverse image of the fetal abdomen and heart side by side and validate that the left side of the fetal abdomen (stomach near to the spine) is concordant with the left side of the fetal heart (left atrium and descending aorta near to the spine).  This is done by displaying a side by side comparison of a transverse view through the fetal stomach and a 4-chamber cardiac view.

Above.  Normal ultrasound orientation for situs solitus.

Right Hand Rule of Thumb:  Introduction

In their article “Sonographic definition of the fetal situs,” Bronshtein, Gover, and Zimmer [ 1 ]  describe a “right hand rule of thumb” to define fetal situs during transabdominal scanning, and a “left hand rule of thumb” for transvaginal scanning.

Right Hand Rule of Thumb:  Cephalic, supine, back down

Left.   The sonographer’s right hand represents the fetus with the thumb pointing to the fetal left.  The palm of the hand is anterior, or represents the ventral or face surface of the fetus.  The fetus is therefore face up, back down, and the thumb points to the fetal left.

Right.   Again, the imaginary fetus is back down with the stomach and cardiac axis pointing to the left.  (Ignore color scheme of fetal heart and vessels.)

Right Hand Rule of Thumb:  Cephalic, prone, back up

Left.   The sonographer’s right hand represents the fetus with the thumb pointing to the fetal left.  The top of the hand (dorsal surface or prone position) represents back up.

Right.  The imaginary fetus is back up with the stomach and cardiac axis pointing to the fetal left.

Right Hand Rule of Thumb:  Breech, supine, back down

Left.   The sonographer’s right hand represents the fetus with the thumb pointing to the fetal left.  The palm of the sonographer’s hand is anterior, or represents the ventral surface of the fetus.  The fetus is therefore face up, back down, and the thumb points to the fetal left.

Right .  The imaginary fetus is back down with the stomach and cardiac axis pointing to the left.  (Ignore color scheme of fetal heart and vessels).

Right Hand Rule of Thumb:  Breech, prone, back up

Right .  The imaginary fetus is back up with the stomach and cardiac axis pointing to the fetal left side.

• Normal CNS Anatomy
• Fetal Situs
• Normal Fetal Ultrasound Biometry

All are web-based courses. Subscribe Today!

• Literature Reviews
• Terms of Use

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Browse Titles

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

StatPearls [Internet].

External cephalic version.

Meaghan M. Shanahan ; Daniel J. Martingano ; Caron J. Gray .

Affiliations

Last Update: December 13, 2023 .

• Continuing Education Activity

In carefully selected patients, an external cephalic version (ECV) may be an alternative to cesarean delivery for fetal malpresentation at term. ECV is a noninvasive procedure that manipulates fetal position through the abdominal wall of the gravida. With the global cesarean section rate reaching 34%, fetal malpresentation ranks as the third most common indication for cesarean delivery, accounting for nearly 17% of cases. Studies suggest a 60% mean success rate for ECV, emphasizing its cost-effectiveness and potential to decrease cesarean delivery rates significantly. While particularly crucial in resource-limited settings where access to medical services during labor is constrained or cesarean delivery is unavailable or unsafe, ECV presents a viable option to improve rates of vaginal delivery in singleton gestations in all settings. 

This activity reviews the indications, contraindications, necessary equipment, preferred personnel, procedural technique, risks, and benefits of ECV and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in caring for patients who may benefit from this procedure.

• Select suitable candidates for an external cephalic version based on their clinical history and presentation.
• Screen patients effectively regarding the risks and benefits of an external cephalic version.
• Apply best practices when performing an external cephalic version.
• Develop and implement effective interpersonal team strategies to improve outcomes for patients undergoing external cephalic version.
• Introduction

The global cesarean section rate has increased from approximately 23% to 34% in the past decade. Fetal malpresentation is now the third-most common indication for cesarean delivery, encompassing nearly 17% of cases. Almost one-fourth of all fetuses are in a breech presentation at 28 weeks gestational age; this number decreases to between 3% and 4% at term. In current clinical practice, most pregnancies with a breech fetus are delivered by cesarean section.

Individual and institutional efforts are increasing to reduce the overall cesarean delivery rate, particularly for nulliparous patients with term, singleton, and vertex gestations. [1] [2]  An alternative to cesarean delivery for fetal malpresentation at term is an external cephalic version (ECV), a procedure to correct fetal malpresentation. ECV may be indicated when the fetus is breech or in an oblique or transverse lie after 37 0/7 weeks gestation. [3]  The overall success rate for ECV approaches 60%, is cost-effective, and can lead to decreased cesarean delivery rates. [4]  ECV is of particular importance in resource-poor environments, where patients may have limited access to medical services during labor and delivery or where cesarean delivery is unavailable or unsafe.

• Anatomy and Physiology

ECV can be attempted when managing breech presentations or fetuses with a transverse or oblique lie. Three types of breech presentation are established concerning fetal attitude: complete, frank, and incomplete, which is sometimes referred to as footling breech. In complete breech, the fetal pelvis engages with the maternal pelvic inlet, and the fetal hips and knees are flexed. In frank breech, the fetal pelvis engages with the maternal pelvic inlet, the fetal hips are flexed, the knees are extended, and the feet are near the head. In incomplete or footling breech, one (single footling) or both (double footling) feet are extended below the level of the fetal pelvis.

A fetus with a transverse lie is positioned with their long axis, defined as the spine, at a right angle to the long axis of the gravida. The fetal head may be to the right or left side of the maternal spine. The fetus may be facing up or down. The long axis of the fetus characterizes an oblique lie at any angle to the maternal long axis that is not 90°. An oblique fetus is usually positioned with their head in the right or left lower quadrants, although this is not universal.

• Indications

ECV may be indicated in carefully selected patients. The fetus must be at or beyond 36 0/7 weeks of gestation with malpresentation, and there must be no absolute contraindications to vaginal delivery, such as placenta previa, vasa previa, or a history of classical cesarean delivery. Fetal status must be reassuring, and preprocedural nonstress testing is recommended. While ECV may be performed as early as 36 0/7 weeks gestation, many practitioners will delay ECV until 37 0/7 weeks gestation to ensure delivery of a term fetus.

ECV is more successful in multigravidas, those with a complete breech or transverse or oblique presentation, an unengaged presenting part, adequate amniotic fluid, and a posterior placenta. Nulliparous patients and those with an anterior, lateral, or cornual placenta have lower success rates. Patients with advanced cervical dilatation, obesity, oligohydramnios, or ruptured membranes also have lower success rates. Additionally, if the fetus weighs less than 2500 g, is at a low station with an engaged presenting part, is frank breech, or the spine is posterior, the success of ECV is decreased. [5]  

Evidence supports the use of parenteral tocolysis, most often with the beta-2-agonist medication terbutaline, to improve the success of ECV; most studies evaluating the various aspects of ECV aspects include using a tocolytic agent. [6] [7] [8] [9]  Data regarding the improved success of ECV incorporating regional anesthesia is inconsistent. 

• Contraindications

Any contraindication to vaginal delivery would also be a contraindication to ECV. These contraindications include but are not limited to placenta previa, vasa previa, active genital herpes outbreak, or a history of classical cesarean delivery. A history of low transverse cesarean delivery is not an absolute contraindication to ECV. [10]  The overall success rate of ECV in patients with a previous cesarean birth ranges from 50% to 84%; no cases of uterine rupture during ECV were reported in the four trials evaluating this outcome in patients with a prior cesarean delivery. [11] [12] [13] [14]

Antepartum ECV is contraindicated in multiple gestations, although it can be utilized for twin gestations that would otherwise be suitable candidates for breech extraction. [15] [16]

Patients with severe oligohydramnios, nonreassuring fetal monitoring, a hyperextended fetal head, significant fetal or uterine anomaly, fetal growth restriction, and maternal hypertension carry a low likelihood of successful ECV and a significantly increased risk of poor fetal outcomes; ECV in such situations requires careful consideration.

If a gravida who is otherwise a suitable candidate for ECV presents in early labor with fetal malpresentation, ECV may be a reasonable option if the presenting part is unengaged, the amniotic fluid index is within the normal range, and there are no contraindications to ECV or vaginal delivery. Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2011 noted a success rate of 65% for ECV performed in carefully selected patients during the admission for delivery. [17]  ECV performed in this circumstance resulted in a significantly lower cesarean birth rate and hospital stay of greater than 7 days compared to patients with a persistent breech presentation at the time of delivery. [17]

External cephalic versions should be attempted only in settings where cesarean delivery services are readily available. Therefore, the required equipment for ECV includes all such requirements for cesarean delivery, including anesthesia services. Access to tocolytic agents, bedside ultrasonography, and external fetal heart rate monitoring equipment is also required. Following ECV, fetal status must be assessed; nonstress testing is preferred. If nonstress testing is unavailable, Doppler indices of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and ductus venosus may be performed. [18]

The personnel typically required to perform an ECV include:

• Obstetrician
• Labor and delivery nurse.

ECV may only be performed in a setting where cesarean delivery services are readily available. Personnel typically required for cesarean delivery include:

• Surgical first assistant
• Anesthesia personnel
• Surgical technician or operating room nurse
• Circulating or operating room nurse
• Pediatric personnel
• Note: for cesarean delivery, labor and delivery nurses may serve as surgical technicians, circulating, or operating room roles.
• Preparation

Before attempting ECV, informed consent must be obtained; this should include tocolysis and neuraxial analgesia if those procedures will be performed. Some clinicians will obtain consent from the patient for potential emergency cesarean delivery at this time, although this practice is not universal. Additionally, an ultrasound examination should be performed to verify fetal presentation, exclude fetal and uterine anomalies, locate the placental position, and evaluate the amniotic fluid index. Many clinicians will evaluate preprocedural fetal status with a nonstress test. 

The current evidence supports the administration of terbutaline 0.25mg subcutaneously 15 to 30 minutes before the ECV but does not support using calcium channel blockers or nitroglycerin for preprocedural tocolysis. [19]  While multiple studies report the increased success of ECV in patients who are administered epidural or spinal neuraxial anesthesia, overall data is insufficient to warrant a universal recommendation; neuraxial anesthesia may improve success rates for ECV in situations where tocolysis alone was unsuccessful. [20]

• Technique or Treatment

The gravida should be supine with a leftward tilt using a wedge support to relieve pressure on the great vessels. ECV is best performed using a 2-handed approach.

If the fetal presentation is breech, lift the breech out of the pelvis with one hand and apply downward pressure to the posterior fetal head to attempt a forward roll. If a forward roll is unsuccessful, a backward roll can be attempted. If the fetus is in either a transverse or oblique presentation, similar manipulation of the fetus is used to try to move the fetal head to the pelvis. [21]

Fetal well-being should be evaluated intermittently with Doppler or real-time ultrasonography during ECV. ECV should be abandoned if there is significant fetal bradycardia, patient discomfort, or if a version is not achieved easily. After a successful or unsuccessful ECV, external fetal heart rate monitoring should be performed for 30 to 60 minutes. If the gravida is Rh negative, anti-D immune globulin should be administered.

Immediate induction of labor to minimize reversion is not recommended. If the initial attempt at ECV is unsuccessful, additional attempts can be made during the same admission or at a later date.

• Complications

Complications of ECV are rare and occur in only 1% to 2% of attempts. The most common complication associated with ECV is fetal heart rate abnormalities, particularly bradycardia, occurring at a rate of 4.7% to 20%; these abnormalities usually are transient and improve upon completion or abandonment of the procedure.

More severe complications of ECV occur at a rate of less than 1% and include premature rupture of membranes, cord prolapse, vaginal bleeding, placental abruption, fetomaternal hemorrhage, emergent cesarean delivery, and stillbirth. Many of these rare complications require emergent cesarean delivery; some clinicians choose to perform ECV in the operating room, although this is neither necessary nor universal. [22]   

ECV is associated with changes in Doppler indices that may reflect decreased placental perfusion. It appears these changes are short-lived and have no detrimental effects on the outcomes of uncomplicated pregnancies. A recent prospective study investigating the effects of ECV on fetal circulation in the antepartum period noted no differences in the Doppler evaluation of the middle cerebral artery or ductus venosus; all studied patients remained stable and were discharged home after the procedure. [18]  

• Clinical Significance

Some data indicate that only 20% to 30% of eligible candidates are offered ECV. [23]  Patients who undergo a successful ECV procedure have a lower cesarean delivery rate than patients who do not but are still at a higher risk of cesarean delivery than patients with cephalic fetuses who do not require ECV. ECV is cost-effective if the probability of a successful ECV exceeds 32%. Overall, ECV is successful in 58% of attempts, reduces the risk for CS by two-thirds, and enables 80% of these patients to deliver vaginally. [24]

• Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

ECV is not a benign procedure and is most successful when performed under the care of an interprofessional team. Labor and delivery nurses play an integral role in the success of ECV as they frequently assist in the procedure, prepare the patient for ECV, and implement external fetal monitoring before, during, and after the procedure. Additionally, the support of emergent operating room staff promotes the safe delivery of a healthy fetus should complications arise during the ECV procedure. Clear and concise anticipatory interprofessional communication improves safety and outcomes for the gravida and the fetus should complications occur.

• Review Questions
• Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.
• Comment on this article.

Disclosure: Meaghan Shanahan declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Daniel Martingano declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Caron Gray declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article, provided that you credit the author and journal.

• Cite this Page Shanahan MM, Martingano DJ, Gray CJ. External Cephalic Version. [Updated 2023 Dec 13]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

In this Page

Bulk download.

• Bulk download StatPearls data from FTP

Related information

• PMC PubMed Central citations
• PubMed Links to PubMed

Similar articles in PubMed

• Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation in diagnosis of non-cephalic presentation. [Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020] Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation in diagnosis of non-cephalic presentation. De Castro H, Ciobanu A, Formuso C, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb; 55(2):248-256.
• External cephalic version at 38 weeks' gestation at a specialized German single center. [PLoS One. 2021] External cephalic version at 38 weeks' gestation at a specialized German single center. Zielbauer AS, Louwen F, Jennewein L. PLoS One. 2021; 16(8):e0252702. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
• External cephalic version in singleton pregnancies at term: a retrospective analysis. [Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008] External cephalic version in singleton pregnancies at term: a retrospective analysis. Zeck W, Walcher W, Lang U. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008; 66(1):18-21. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
• Review [Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - External Cephalic Version and other Interventions to turn Breech Babies to Cephalic Presentation]. [Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2...] Review [Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - External Cephalic Version and other Interventions to turn Breech Babies to Cephalic Presentation]. Ducarme G. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020 Jan; 48(1):81-94. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
• Review Association between hospitals' cesarean delivery rates for breech presentation and their success rates for external cephalic version. [Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Bi...] Review Association between hospitals' cesarean delivery rates for breech presentation and their success rates for external cephalic version. Athiel Y, Girault A, Le Ray C, Goffinet F. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Mar; 270:156-163. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

Recent Activity

• External Cephalic Version - StatPearls External Cephalic Version - StatPearls

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

Connect with NLM

National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894

Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure

Help Accessibility Careers

Cephalic index

• Report problem with article
• View revision history

Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data

At the time the article was created Yuranga Weerakkody had no recorded disclosures.

At the time the article was last revised Munyi Ambrose Ithiga had no financial relationships to ineligible companies to disclose.

• Cephalic index (CI)

The cephalic index (CI) is a ratio/value calculated using two fetal biometric parameters which are the occipitofrontal diameter (OFD) and the biparietal diameter (BPD) . It is measured with the cursor placed on the outer edge to the outer edge of the cranial bone.

It is calculated as:

cephalic index (CI) =  biparietal diameter (BPD) / occipitofrontal diameter (OFD)   x 100  

The cephalic index gives an idea of the fetal head shape. It can change according to various situations such as

presentation, e.g. breech presentation

ruptured membranes

presence of a twin pregnancy

The usual range is variable depending on various sources and different demographic groups. Often the mean value is taken ~ 78 (range 74-83 3 ) 

A grossly decreased cephalic index suggests dolichocephaly while a grossly increased one can suggest brachycephaly . 

• 1. Gray DL, Songster GS, Parvin CA et-al. Cephalic index: a gestational age-dependent biometric parameter. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74 (4): 600-3. - Pubmed citation
• 2. Merz E, Bahlmann F. Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. Thieme Medical Publishers. (2005) ISBN:1588901475. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
• 3. FP Hadlock, RL Deter, RJ Carpenter, SK Park. Estimating fetal age: effect of head shape on BPD. (2012) American Journal of Roentgenology. 137 (1): 83-5. doi:10.2214/ajr.137.1.83 - Pubmed

Incoming Links

• Brachycephaly
• Alobar holoprosencephaly
• Fetal bladder outlet obstruction

Promoted articles (advertising)

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

By Section:

• Artificial Intelligence
• Classifications
• Imaging Technology
• Interventional Radiology
• Radiography
• Central Nervous System
• Gastrointestinal
• Gynaecology
• Haematology
• Head & Neck
• Hepatobiliary
• Interventional
• Musculoskeletal
• Paediatrics
• Not Applicable

Radiopaedia.org

• Feature Sponsor
• Expert advisers