rogerian argument research paper topics

• Skip to primary navigation
• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer

25 Good Rogerian Argument Topic Ideas

Rogerian argument is known to be an effective problem-solving method and is often written as an essay. Choosing a topic for it can thus be difficult. This Buzzle article gives you a list of Rogerian argument topics for you to write on.

Did You Know?

A psychologist named Carl Rogers created this form of argument. It is used in many philosophy models to solve problems considering both sides of the argument.

Rogerian argument is one of the three types of arguments. The other two are Toulmin argument and the Classical argument, which are actually contradictory to the Rogerian theory. Rogerian argument is an argument where the both sides win because of the careful approach and persuasion. It is mainly useful in psychological arguments, rather than in logical or scientific arguments. Such an argument is supposed to lead to an appropriate solution by listening to and considering both the sides. And writing it can be a task in itself because it shouldn’t offend the reader or the audience. It should start with a common ground between the two and then should move on to explain the writer’s perspective. The views and opinions should be supported with proper reasoning as to why you’re saying that.

Choosing a topic for the Rogerian argument is an important part hence, choose it wisely. Take a topic of your interest which will help you in doing in-depth research on it. Below are some topics that you could use.

Rogerian Argument Topics

● Should smoking be allowed in public places? ● Is our election process fair to everyone? ● Research on animals, should it be encouraged? ● The taxation system: fair or unfair? ● Is euthanasia fair or unfair? ● Should marijuana be used in medicine? ● Do the cameras enforced by law invade privacy? ● Handgun ownership: threat or right? ● Should the legal age for drinking be lowered or raised? ● What is the right age to vote? Should it be raised or lowered? ● Is Internet censorship required? ● Same-sex marriages should be legal/illegal ● The two-child policy: Right or wrong? ● Technology: Are we too dependent on it? ● The discrimination in hierarchy of jobs: good or bad? ● Are the famous people paid more than needed? ● Are scores in school enough to evaluate a child’s progress? ● Marketing to children: right or wrong? ● Fighting video games influence children: right or wrong? ● Are single-sex schools better than co-ed? ● Does religion cause war? ● Is cheating becoming common? ● Is torture acceptable? ● Is unemployment related to crimes? ● Is our educational system affordable?

Note: Rogerian argument topics can be controversial hence, take utmost care not to hurt someone’s feelings.

Like it? Share it!

Get Updates Right to Your Inbox

Further insights.

Privacy Overview

50 Rogerian Essay Topics

Not all essay writing is designed to press the point of an argument with no regard for the other side. In fact, when it comes to writing a Rogerian essay, the goal is to find a way to bring both sides of an issue together. This essay writing style is named for American psychologist Carl Rogers, who developed a non-confrontational approach to counseling and psychotherapy. Unfortunately, this type of essay can be challenging to write for many reasons, including:

• You have to be able to see both sides of the issue, even if you don’t agree with either.
• You’re not trying to score points or win an argument; you’re looking for common ground.
• It can be difficult to stay impartial.

For students struggling with this type of assignment, we’ve created a detailed guide breaking down the fundamentals of Rogerian essay writing and included 50 Rogerian essay topics to help get the creative juices flowing.

Fundamentals of Rogerian Essay Writing

A Rogerian essay’s tone and writing style will differ from the more aggressive style of an argumentative essay. In a Rogerian essay, the writer starts by acknowledging that there is another side to the issue at hand and that valid points can be made for it. They then build on this common ground to further explore the issue. This means that students will need to do more research and pay closer attention to the other side of the problem.

The fundamental structure of a Rogerian essay is:

• Introduce the issue at hand, making sure to mention that there are two sides to it.
• Acknowledge the validity of the other side’s argument while also stating your own position.
• Present your solution to the issue, making sure that it considers both sides of the debate.
• Discuss any potential objections to your solution and how you would address them.
• Summarize your argument and reiterate that common ground has been found.

The Introduction: Start by Stating the Issue

Your Rogerian essay will begin with an introduction in which you state the issue at hand. It’s essential to make sure that you mention that there are two sides to this issue so that your audience knows what they’re getting into. For example, if you’re writing about whether or not the government should fund Planned Parenthood, you might start your essay with something like this:

“There has been much debate surrounding the government’s role in funding Planned Parenthood. Some argue that the government has a responsibility to provide this kind of health care to its citizens, while others believe that doing so would be an endorsement of abortion. In this essay, I will attempt to find common ground between these two sides and explore a potential solution to the issue.”

Presenting Both Sides of the Argument: The Body paragraphs

Now that you’ve stated the issue at hand and acknowledged that there are two sides, it’s time to start exploring these sides in more detail. In the body paragraphs of your Rogerian essay, you will want to:

• Present each side of the issue fairly and impartially.
• Discuss the points that each side is trying to make.
• Point out any areas where the two sides agree with each other.
• Explore the implications of each side’s position.

For example, if you’re writing about the government funding Planned Parenthood, your body paragraphs might look something like this:

“Those who argue in favor of government funding for Planned Parenthood typically do so because it is a health care provider and that all citizens have a right to health care. They also point out that Planned Parenthood offers a variety of services beyond abortion, including cancer screenings and STD testing. Those who oppose government funding for Planned Parenthood typically do so on the grounds that they believe it should not be an endorsement of abortion. They also argue that other health care providers can offer the same services as Planned Parenthood.”

“It is important to note that both sides of this debate agree that all citizens have a right to health care. They also both agree that Planned Parenthood offers valuable services. Where they disagree is on the question of whether or not the government should be involved in funding this organization.”

Finding a Solution: The Conclusion

In the conclusion of your Rogerian essay, you will want to:

• Present your solution to the issue.
• Discuss any possible objections to your solution and how you would address them.

For example, if you’re writing about government funding for Planned Parenthood, your conclusion might look something like this:

“I believe that the government should provide funding for Planned Parenthood. I think that this is the best solution because it would allow all citizens to have access to the health care services that they need. It would also be an endorsement of the important work that Planned Parenthood does. However, I recognize that some object to this solution because it would be an endorsement of abortion. To address this concern, I would point out that the government already funds various organizations that provide abortions, such as hospitals. I believe that funding Planned Parenthood would simply be an extension of this policy.”

With the wiring guide above, you should be feeling a little more confident in your ability to write a Rogerian essay. However, if you are struggling to come up with a topic, here are 50 potential Rogerian essay topics to get you started:

Rogerian Essay Topics About Social Issues

• Should the government do more to combat climate change?
• Should the death penalty be abolished?
• Do gun laws need to be stricter?
• Is police brutality a problem in the United States?
• What can be done to reduce the number of mass shootings in the United States?
• Do we need to reform our immigration system?
• Does the welfare state do more harm than good?
• Should the government do more to protect the environment?
• Do zoos do more harm than good?
• Is animal testing ethical?
• Should the drinking age be lowered?

Rogerian Essay Topics About Education

• Is homeschooling a viable form of education?
• How can we improve the education system in the United States?
• Is college worth the cost?
• Should the government do more to make college affordable?
• Should students be required to take physical education classes?
• Are standardized tests an effective measure of student achievement?
• Should the use of computers in classrooms be limited?
• How can we ensure all students have access to quality education?
• Should schools do more to teach students about different cultures?
• Should creationism be taught in schools?

Rogerian Essay Topics About Technology

• Is too much reliance on technology a bad thing?
• Should we be concerned about the amount of time we spend on our phones?
• How can we balance our use of technology and our need for face-to-face interaction?
• Is social media making us more lonely?
• Should there be limits on the use of social media?
• Is the internet making us less intelligent?
• How can we make sure our kids are using technology responsibly?
• Should there be more regulation of the internet?
• Is technology changing the way we think?

Rogerian Essay Topics About Health Care

• Do we need to reform our healthcare system?
• How can we ensure everyone has access to quality health care?
• Should the government do more to combat the obesity epidemic?
• What can be done to reduce the number of cases of heart disease?
• How can we make sure our aging population is healthy and happy?
• What can be done to reduce the number of suicides in the United States?
• Should the government do more to combat mental health issues?
• Is our current approach to treating addiction effective?
• What can be done to reduce the number of cancer cases?
• How can we improve the quality of care in nursing homes?

Rogerian Essay Topics About Family and Relationships

• Is divorce a problem in the United States?
• How can we make sure all families have access to quality child care?
• What can be done to reduce the number of teenage pregnancies?
• Should parents be more involved in their children’s education?
• How can we make sure all children are raised in a loving home?
• What can be done to reduce the number of divorces?
• Should single parents receive more support from the government?
• How can we ensure all families have access to quality health care?
• What role does religion play in family life?
• Are families getting stronger or weaker in the United States?

These 50 Rogerian essay topics should help you get started on your next essay. Whichever one you pick, be sure to argue both sides of the issue in a way that is fair, balanced, and respectful of your opponent’s point of view.

Related Posts

• 240 History Essay Topics
• 130 Informative Essay Topics
• 20 The Great Gatsby Essay Topics
• 125 Cause and Effect Essay Topics
• 160 Satire Essay Topics

Categories:

• Essay Samples
• Essay Topics
• Essay Writing Guides

Recent posts:

• 170 Ethics Essay Topics
• 160 Rhetorical Essay Topics
• 155 Criminal Justice Essay Topics
• 150 Political Essay Topics
• 145 Classification Essay Topics
• 140 Sociology Essay Topics
• 140 Opinion Essay Topics
• 140 Environmental Essay Topics
• 135 Controversial Essay Topics
• 125 Classification and Division Essay Topics
• 120 Literary Essay Topics
• 100 Profile Essay Topics
• 90 Heart of Darkness Essay Topics
• 80 Holocaust Essay Topics

Testimonials

415 Rogerian Essay Topics & Good Ideas

• Icon Calendar 18 May 2024
• Icon Page 3224 words
• Icon Clock 15 min read

Rogerian essay topics often delve into contentious issues, encouraging a balanced exploration of divergent perspectives. They may explore hot-button issues, like climate change, gun control, or immigration, always prioritizing empathetic understanding over rigid debate. Other topics can touch on social phenomena, like the impact of digital devices on mental health or the influence of video games on youth behavior. Cultural topics, examining norms, biases, and the effects of globalization, are also prevalent. The main purpose of these topics is not only to assert one’s viewpoint as the absolute truth but also to engage in a respectful, enlightening exchange of ideas. In turn, a good Rogerian essay topic can also discuss the complexities of educational reforms, healthcare systems, or artificial intelligence ethics, always encouraging nuanced discussion that illuminates common ground and cultivates mutual respect amidst differing viewpoints.

Best Rogerian Essay Topics

• Influence of Technology on Modern Education
• Adoption of Vegan Diets for Healthier Living
• Expanding Renewable Energy Use to Combat Climate Change
• Growth of Cryptocurrency in the Global Economy
• Comparing Traditional and Digital Art Mediums
• Examining Pros and Cons of Distance Learning
• Prospects of Space Exploration for Human Civilization
• Analyzing Therapeutic Use of Psychedelics
• Scrutinizing Surveillance: Privacy vs. Security
• Proliferation of Artificial Intelligence: A Blessing or a Curse
• Resolving Cultural Conflicts Through Mutual Understanding
• Evaluating the Influence of Social Media on Mental Health
• Evolving Gender Roles in Contemporary Society
• Debating Efficacy of Vaccines vs. Natural Immunity
• Envisioning Universal Basic Income’s Effect on Society
• Deliberating Genetic Modification in Agriculture
• Integration of Virtual Reality in Everyday Life
• Advancing Stem Cell Research for Medical Treatment
• Revisiting Historical Facts and Interpretations
• Deciphering Complexities of Quantum Computing
• Contemplating the Existence of Extraterrestrial Life
• Transitioning Toward Circular Economy: A Sustainable Choice
• Revolutionizing Healthcare With Telemedicine
• Improving Public Transport for Carbon-Neutral Cities

Easy Rogerian Topics

• Assessing Ethical Dimensions of Animal Testing
• Exploring Opportunities and Risks of Gene Editing
• Emphasizing Holistic Development in Education System
• Regulating Online Censorship: Freedom vs. Security
• Mitigating Challenges of the Aging Population
• Pursuing Sustainability in Fashion Industry
• Confronting Implications of Overpopulation
• Navigating Through Mental Health Stigmas
• Enhancing Sports Performance With Technology
• Addressing Disparities in Global Wealth Distribution
• Transforming Societies With Women’s Empowerment
• Understanding Neuromarketing: Manipulation or Effective Strategy
• Adapting to the Impact of Automation on the Workforce
• Exploring Intersectionality in Social Justice Movements
• Analyzing the Effects of Tourism on Local Cultures
• Demystifying Myths of Nuclear Energy
• Negotiating Ethical Boundaries of Cloning
• Outlining the Role of Play in Child Development
• Reforming Prison Systems for Better Rehabilitation
• Reimagining Urban Planning for Climate Resilience
• Deconstructing Stereotypes in Mass Media
• Illuminating the Role of Meditation in Stress Management
• Weighing Pros and Cons of Monarchy and Democracy
• Probing Influence of Music on Cognitive Development
• Balancing Nationalism and Globalization in Modern World
• Overcoming Biases in Artificial Intelligence
• Effects of Multilingualism on Cognitive Abilities
• Evaluating the Impacts of Single-Use Plastics on the Environment
• Necessity of Mental Health Awareness in Schools
• Augmenting Reality: Pros and Cons of AR in Education

Interesting Rogerian Topics

• Decoding the Influence of Parenting Styles on Child Behavior
• Benefits and Risks of Genetically Modified Foods
• Roles of Community Gardens in Urban Environments
• Impact of Microplastics on Aquatic Ecosystems
• Accessibility and Importance of Clean Water in Developing Nations
• Enhancing Accessibility in Public Spaces for Disabled Individuals
• Significance of Indigenous Knowledge in Conservation Efforts
• Assessing the Influence of Celebrity Culture on Youth
• Potential of Vertical Farming in Urban Landscapes
• Understanding the Phenomenon of Fast Fashion
• Roles of Art Therapy in Mental Health Treatment
• Influence of Binge-Watching on Social Behavior
• Importance of Cybersecurity in the Digital Age
• Roles of Music Therapy in Rehabilitation Programs
• Impacts of Deforestation on Climate Change
• Consequences of Child Labor on Society and Economy
• Roles of Microfinance in Alleviating Poverty
• Impacts of Gamification on Learning Outcomes
• Importance of Data Privacy in the Internet Age
• Influence of Classical Literature on Modern Society
• Roles of Green Architecture in Sustainable Development
• Decoding the Impact of Westernization on Non-Western Cultures
• Evaluating the Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Business Success
• Importance of Biodiversity Conservation for Human Survival
• Roles of E-sports in Modern Entertainment Culture

Rogerian Argument Topics

• Roles of Automation in Job Market Stability
• Legalization of Recreational Marijuana: Pros and Cons
• Adoption of Renewable Energy: A Solution to Climate Change
• Universal Healthcare: Economic Burden or Moral Obligation?
• Animal Rights in Industrialized Farming
• Impacts of Video Games on Adolescent Behavior
• GMO Foods: Threat or Solution to Global Hunger
• Parental Involvement in Child’s Educational Success
• Remote Work’s Effects on Employee Productivity
• Zero-Waste Lifestyle: Sustainable or Unrealistic?
• Homeschooling Versus Traditional Schooling
• Death Penalty: A Necessary Deterrent or Inhumane Practice?
• Influence of Violent Films on Society’s Aggression
• Veganism as a Solution to Health and Environmental Concerns
• Implications of Genetically Modified Organisms on Ecosystems
• Capitalism Versus Socialism: Economic and Social Impacts
• Gun Control: Safety Measures or Infringement on Rights?
• Immigration Policies: National Security or Humanitarian Crisis?
• Digital Privacy: Personal Protection or Hinderance to Law Enforcement?
• Abortion Rights: Pro-Life or Pro-Choice?
• Euthanasia: Compassionate Option or Ethical Dilemma?
• Body Cameras on Police: Accountability or Invasion of Privacy?
• Technological Dependency: Progress or Problem?

Rogerian Persuasive Topics

• Exploring the Balance Between Privacy and National Security
• The Role of Technology in Enhancing Education Quality
• Advantages and Drawbacks of Autonomous Vehicles
• Influence of Social Media on Adolescent Mental Health
• Potential Consequences of Extensive Genetically Modified Food Consumption
• Considerations Surrounding Physician-Assisted Suicide
• Climate Change: Evaluating Its Anthropogenic Causes
• Implications of Universal Basic Income Implementation
• Potential Benefits and Risks of Artificial Intelligence
• Digital Surveillance: Protection or Intrusion?
• Animal Testing: Necessity vs. Cruelty
• Impacts of Vegetarianism on Health and Environment
• Fossil Fuels vs. Renewable Energy: An Economic Perspective
• Stem Cell Research: Balancing Ethics and Progress
• Mandatory Vaccinations: Public Health vs. Personal Liberty
• Space Exploration: Is It Worth the Investment?
• Regulation of Cryptocurrency: Necessity or Hindrance?
• Unregulated Internet: Freedom or Chaos?
• Responsible Tourism: Balancing Local Culture and Economic Growth
• Immigration Policies: Humanitarian Concerns and National Security
• Human Cloning: Ethical Implications and Potential Benefits
• Gun Control: Balancing Public Safety and Constitutional Rights

Rogerian Essay Topics on Social Issues

• The Impact of Global Warming on Coastal Regions
• Achieving Gender Parity in the Workplace
• Overcoming Poverty: Empowering Individuals for Social Transformation
• Enhancing Mental Health Support Systems Within Educational Institutions
• Promoting Renewable Energy Adoption for a Sustainable Future
• Nurturing Inclusive Learning Environments for Students With Disabilities
• Combating Food Insecurity: Establishing Accessible Nutritional Programs
• Fostering Cross-Cultural Understanding in a Pluralistic Society
• Promoting Ethical Practices in the Fashion and Apparel Industry
• Resolving the Water Crisis: Sustainable Solutions for All Communities
• Reducing Income Inequality Through Equitable Taxation Policies
• Bridging the Digital Divide: Ensuring Universal Internet Connectivity
• Combating Human Trafficking: Safeguarding Vulnerable Populations
• Addressing Affordable Housing for Every Citizen
• Supporting LGBTQ+ Rights: Cultivating an Inclusive Society
• Ensuring Access to Quality Healthcare in Underserved Areas
• Preventing Cyberbullying: Fostering Safer Online Environments
• Encouraging Responsible Consumption to Mitigate Climate Change
• Improving Prison Rehabilitation Programs for Successful Reintegration
• Combating Substance Abuse: Adopting Holistic Recovery Approaches
• Focusing on Civic Education to Foster Active Citizenship
• Understanding Small Enterprises for Economic Growth
• Solving Gun Violence Through Comprehensive Firearms Regulation

Education Rogerian Essay Topics

• Nurturing Creativity and Critical Thinking Skills in Education
• Promoting Inclusivity and Diversity Within Educational Institutions
• Cultivating Effective Teacher-Student Relationships for Academic Success
• The Importance of Emotional Intelligence in Education
• Empowering Students Through Student-Centered Learning Approaches
• Enhancing Early Childhood Education for Lifelong Success
• Addressing the Achievement Gap: Strategies for Equal Opportunities
• Implementing Project-Based Learning for Real-World Applications
• The Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Educational Attainment
• Rethinking Standardized Testing: Alternative Assessment Methods
• Supporting Special Education Students: Individualized Approaches
• The Influence of Arts Education on Overall Academic Performance
• Integrating Multiculturalism in the Curriculum
• Parental Involvement: A Key to Student Achievement
• Promoting Environmental Awareness in Education for a Sustainable Future
• Benefits of Physical Education in Holistic Development
• Fostering Digital Literacy Skills for the 21st-Century Learner
• Effects of Assignments on Student Learning and Well-Being
• Early Intervention Programs: A Path to Educational Success
• Addressing Learning Disabilities: Strategies for Support and Achievement
• The Impact of Teacher Training and Professional Development
• Building Resilience and Perseverance in Students for Academic Success
• Promoting Global Citizenship in Education for a Connected World
• The Role of Education in Cultivating Responsible Citizenship

Technology Rogerian Essay Topics

• Enhancing Communication Through Social Media Platforms
• The Future of Autonomous Vehicles
• Harnessing Renewable Energy Sources for Sustainable Development
• Analyzing the Role of Big Data in Healthcare
• Implications of 3D Printing in Manufacturing
• The Evolution of E-Commerce and Its Economic Effects
• Psychological Effects of Video Games
• Unleashing the Potential of Blockchain Technology
• Robotics’ Roles in Enhancing Healthcare Services
• Cybersecurity: Protecting Data in a Digitized World
• Influence of Smart Devices on Human Behavior
• Augmented Reality’s Use in Marketing and Advertising
• Cloud Computing’s Impact on Business Operations
• Ethical Considerations in Genetic Engineering
• Artificial Intelligence’s Roles in Enhancing Education
• Social Impacts of Online Streaming Platforms
• Advancements in Nanotechnology and Their Applications
• Effects of Social Media on Mental Health
• Integrating Wearable Technology in Healthcare
• Future of Space Exploration and Colonization
• Algorithms’ Role in Decision-Making Processes
• Rise of Voice Assistants and Virtual Personalities
• The Intersection of Technology and Sustainability
• Exploring the Potential of Quantum Computing

Rogerian Essay Topics on Health Care

• Promoting Healthy Aging and Longevity in the Elderly Population
• Implementing Effective Strategies for Obesity Prevention and Management
• The Importance of Patient-Centered Care in Healthcare Systems
• Advancements in Precision Medicine and Personalized Healthcare
• Strategies for Promoting Health Literacy among Patients
• Ethical Considerations in Organ Transplantation and Allocation
• Fostering Cultural Competence in Healthcare Delivery
• The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Decision-Making
• Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infections Through Effective Measures
• The Role of Nursing in Enhancing Quality Healthcare Delivery
• Improving Palliative Care Services for Terminally Ill Patients
• Addressing the Opioid Crisis: Strategies for Pain Management
• Social Determinants of Health: Implications for Healthcare Outcomes
• Ensuring Health Equity in Access to Healthcare Services
• Innovations in Remote Patient Monitoring Technology
• Healthcare Policy: Ensuring Affordable and Accessible Care
• Integrating Complementary and Alternative Approaches Into Healthcare
• Ethical Considerations of Genetic Testing and Counseling in Healthcare
• Public Health Initiatives: Promoting Disease Prevention and Well-Being
• Promoting Health Literacy among Adolescent Populations
• Enhancing Healthcare Workforce Diversity and Cultural Competence
• Exploring the Global Impact of Medical Tourism on Healthcare Systems
• Benefits and Challenges of Universal Healthcare Coverage

Rogerian Essay Topics About Family & Relationship

• Building Trust and Trustworthiness in Intimate Relationships
• Nurturing Emotional Intelligence for Healthier Family Dynamics
• Fostering Mutual Respect in Parent-Child Relationships
• Balancing Independence and Interdependence in Sibling Relationships
• Promoting Equality and Gender Equity in Family Structures
• Cultivating Empathy in Intergenerational Relationships
• Embracing Diversity and Cultural Differences Within Family Units
• Enhancing Emotional Intimacy Through Active Listening in Romantic Relationships
• Addressing Addiction and Its Impact on Family Dynamics
• Understanding the Role of Boundaries in Healthy Family Relationships
• Exploring the Impact of Divorce on Parent-Child Relationships
• Promoting Mental Health and Well-Being in Family Settings
• Navigating Blended Families: Challenges and Solutions
• Examining the Influence of Technology on Family Relationships
• Exploring the Significance of Rituals and Traditions in Family Life
• Supporting Aging Parents and Elderly Relatives With Empathy and Care
• Nurturing Resilience in Children for Healthy Development
• Examining the Effects of Domestic Violence on Family Dynamics
• Supporting LGBTQ+ Family Members: Acceptance and Understanding
• Promoting Positive Co-Parenting Strategies After Separation or Divorce
• Exploring the Impact of Social Media on Teenagers’ Relationships With Family
• Fostering Emotional Safety in Parenting Styles
• Understanding the Role of Extended Family in Child Rearing
• Embracing Work-Life Balance for Stronger Family Connections
• Promoting Healthy Attachment in Parent-Child Relationships

Rogerian Essay Topics on Education Reforms

• Fostering Creativity and Innovation in the Classroom
• Addressing the Achievement Gap in Underprivileged Schools
• Rethinking Standardized Testing in Educational Assessment
• Supporting Teachers’ Professional Development and Well-Being
• Integrating Technology for Effective Learning in Schools
• Reducing Class Sizes for Improved Student Engagement
• Strengthening Early Childhood Education Programs
• Empowering Students’ Voices and Agency in Decision-Making
• Enhancing Cultural Competence in the Curriculum
• Promoting Environmental Education and Sustainability
• Addressing Bullying and Promoting Safe School Environments
• Reducing Homework Load for Student Well-Being
• Improving School Infrastructure and Facilities
• Implementing Comprehensive Sex Education in Schools
• Encouraging Parental Involvement in Education
• Bridging the Digital Divide in Underserved Communities
• Promoting Multilingual Education for Language Diversity
• Integrating Social and Emotional Learning in Schools
• Supporting Gifted and Talented Education Programs
• Strengthening Career Counseling and Guidance Services
• Focusing on Teacher-Student Relationships for Academic Success
• Promoting Financial Literacy Education in Schools
• Fostering Global Citizenship Education for a Connected World
• Addressing Mental Health in Schools Through Comprehensive Programs
• Understanding Experiential Learning Opportunities for Students
• Using Ethical Education for Responsible Citizenship

Globalization Rogerian Essay Topics

• Ethical Dilemmas in a Globalized World
• Effects of Global Economic Integration on Traditional Industries
• Power Dynamics in the Era of Globalization
• Globalization and the Spread of Western Ideals
• Influence of Globalization on Education Systems
• Rise of Multinational Corporations in a Globalized Economy
• Sovereignty Challenges in the Context of Global Economic Integration
• Government’s Roles in Regulating Global Trade
• Addressing the Digital Divide in a Globalized Society
• Cultural Homogenization and Global Economic Integration
• Consumerism in the Age of Globalization
• Globalization’s Impacts on Healthcare Systems
• Language Shifts in a Globalized World
• Globalization and Income Inequality
• Transformation of Food Systems in a Globalized Economy
• Globalization’s Influence on Entertainment and Media
• Decline of Traditional Crafts in the Globalized Era
• Globalization’s Contribution to Climate Change
• Displacement of Indigenous Communities in a Globalized World
• Development Challenges in the Era of Globalization
• Gender Equality in the Globalized Society
• Protecting Cultural Heritage in the Face of Globalization
• Political Instability in the Context of Global Economic Integration

Rogerian Essay Topics About Gender & Sexuality

• Evaluating the Effects of Gender-Based Violence on Society
• Rethinking Traditional Gender Roles in the Workplace
• Examining the Intersectionality of Gender and Race
• Addressing the Challenges Faced by Transgender Individuals in Healthcare
• The Importance of Inclusive Language in Promoting Gender Equality
• Challenging Heteronormativity in Society
• Examining the Influence of Religion on LGBTQ+ Acceptance
• Understanding the Gender Pay Gap: Causes and Solutions
• Effects of Gender Socialization on Children’s Development
• Analyzing the Relationship Between Gender and Mental Health
• The Role of Masculinity in Shaping Men’s Health Issues
• Exploring Non-Binary Gender Identities and Experiences
• Examining the Representation of LGBTQ+ Characters in Media
• Promoting Supportive Environments for LGBTQ+ Youth
• Rethinking Consent Education: A Gender-Inclusive Approach
• Understanding the Stigma and Discrimination Faced by LGBTQ+ Seniors
• Exploring Gendered Expectations in Romantic Relationships
• Promoting Comprehensive Sexual Education for All Genders
• The Impact of Gender-Based Expectations on Career Choices
• Examining the History and Evolution of LGBTQ+ Rights Movements
• The Intersection of Gender and Disability: Challenges and Advocacy
• Analyzing the Role of Gender in Political Representation
• Rethinking Gender Equality in Sports: Breaking Barriers
• The Importance of Intersectional Approaches to Gender and Sexuality

Rogerian Essay Topics About Animal Rights

• Animal Welfare in Scientific Research and Experimentation
• The Moral Dilemma of Animal Agriculture
• Animal Rights and the Ethics of Hunting
• Animal-Assisted Therapy: Enhancing Human Well-Being With Animal Companions
• Animal Genetic Engineering: Implications and Ethical Concerns
• Ethical Fashion: Animal Rights and the Fur and Leather Industry
• Cruelty-Free Cosmetics: Ensuring Ethical Standards in the Beauty Industry
• Marine Parks and Animal Rights: Examining Captivity and Conservation
• Indigenous Cultures and the Ethical Treatment of Animals
• Animal Rights Activism: Strategies for Effective Advocacy
• Responsible Pet Ownership: Promoting Animal Welfare and Rights
• Responsible Wildlife Tourism: Respecting Animals in Their Natural Habitat
• Endangered Species Conservation: Protecting Animals on the Brink
• Animal Rights Laws: Challenges and the Need for Enforcement
• Animal Rehabilitation: Providing Refuge and Care for Injured Animals
• Ethics in Sports and Entertainment: The Use of Animals for Human Amusement
• Advancements in Biomedical Research: Ethical Implications for Animal Subjects
• Animal-Assisted Therapy: Harnessing the Healing Power of Animals
• Traditional Entertainment vs. Animal Welfare: The Circus Industry Debate
• Whaling Industry: Conservation Efforts and Ethical Dilemmas
• Animal Sanctuaries: Rescuing and Protecting Vulnerable Animals
• Animal Rights Organizations: Achievements and Ongoing Challenges
• Ethical Considerations in Pharmaceutical Testing: The Welfare of Animal Subjects

Gun Control Rogerian Essay Topics

• Exploring Alternative Approaches to Firearms Control
• Ensuring Second Amendment Rights and Public Safety
• Achieving a Balance: Individual Freedom and Gun Ownership
• Psychological Factors and Firearm Ownership Regulations
• Media’s Impacts on Public Perception of Guns
• Education’s Roles in Preventing Gun Violence
• Developing Comprehensive Background Check Systems
• Community-Based Solutions for Firearms Control
• Addressing Mental Health in Gun Violence Prevention
• Evaluating the Effectiveness of Assault Weapons Bans
• Firearms Ownership and Self-Defense in a Changing Society
• Ethical Considerations in Policies on Firearms Control
• Combating Illegal Firearms Trafficking
• Enhancing Firearm Safety Measures and Responsible Storage
• Cultural Perspectives on Firearms Control and Ownership
• Gun Control and Its Implications for Civil Liberties
• Firearms Control as a Public Health Issue
• Technological Advancements in Enhancing Gun Safety
• Assessing the Influence of Lobbying Groups on Firearms Policies
• International Perspectives on Firearms Control
• Exploring the Link Between Gun Control and Domestic Violence
• Evaluating the Effectiveness of Gun-Free Zones
• Balancing State and Federal Authority in Firearm Regulations
• Law Enforcement’s Roles in Preventing Gun Violence
• Historical Contexts and Legislation on Firearms Control
• Youth Access to Firearms and Preventive Measures

Business Rogerian Essay Topics

• Analyzing the Role of Leadership in Promoting Organizational Innovation
• Exploring Sustainable Business Models for Environmental Conservation
• Evaluating the Effects of Ethical Consumerism on Business Operations
• Addressing the Gender Pay Gap in the Corporate Sector
• Fostering Effective Communication Strategies in Virtual Work Environments
• Examining the Benefits of Workplace Diversity for Business Performance
• Enhancing Employee Engagement Through Empowerment and Inclusion
• Implementing Green Initiatives for Sustainable Supply Chain Management
• Assessing the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Business Efficiency
• Promoting Work-Life Balance for Employee Well-Being and Productivity
• Embracing Change Management for Successful Business Transformation
• Explaining the Influence of E-Commerce on Traditional Retail Industries
• The Role of Corporate Governance in Preventing Financial Fraud
• Addressing the Importance of Emotional Intelligence in Leadership
• Developing Effective Marketing Strategies for Small Businesses
• Evaluating the Implications of Data Privacy Regulations on Business Practices
• Enhancing Customer Experience Through Personalization and Customization
• Assessing the Benefits and Challenges of Remote Work Arrangements
• The Impact of Globalization on Local Business Communities
• Promoting Entrepreneurship as a Driver of Economic Growth
• Understanding the Role of Corporate Culture in Organizational Success
• Expanding on the Benefits of Cross-Functional Collaboration in Business
• Focusing on the Mental Health Challenges in the Workplace
• Addressing the Role of Corporate Ethics in Building Trust With Stakeholders
• Implementing Cybersecurity Measures to Protect Business Data

Rogerian Essay Topics About Culture & Society

• Balancing Immigration Policies: Security and Compassion
• Exploring Cultural Appropriation: Boundaries and Respect
• Education’s Roles in Shaping Cultural Identity
• Coexistence and Religious Freedom in Diverse Societies
• Global Responsibility: Environmental Sustainability
• Pop Culture’s Impacts on Societal Values
• Combating Mental Health Stigma: Raising Awareness and Acceptance
• Technological Advancements: Shaping Society’s Future
• Multiculturalism and Integration: Challenges and Opportunities
• Empowering Individuals Through Political Activism
• Modern Society’s Evolving Family Structures
• Art’s Roles in Reflecting and Shaping Culture
• Navigating Media Bias in the Era of Misinformation
• Cultural Identity in a Globalized World
• LGBTQ+ Rights: Progress, Challenges, and Aspirations
• Consumerism’s Societal and Environmental Impacts
• Traditional Rituals: Significance in Contemporary Culture
• Bridging the Digital Divide: Technology Access and Social Equality
• Embracing Workplace Diversity for Inclusive Progress
• Fashion’s Influence on Cultural Expression
• Social Justice Movements: Catalysts for Change
• Sports’ Roles in Cultivating Cultural Identity
• Civic Engagement: Strengthening Democracy and Society
• Addressing the Needs of an Aging Society
• Cultural Relativism vs. Universal Human Rights

To Learn More, Read Relevant Articles

277 Feminism Topics & Women’s Rights Essay Topics

• Icon Calendar 31 July 2023
• Icon Page 2272 words

447 Position Paper Topics & Essay Ideas

• Icon Calendar 29 July 2023
• Icon Page 3659 words

100+ Rogerian Essay Topics

The domain of essay writing is rich with various formats, each serving a unique purpose. One such fascinating and thoughtful style is the Rogerian essay, often considered a middle ground in arguments. Unlike traditional persuasive essays, Rogerian essays focus on acknowledging and understanding opposing views, creating a space for compromise and mutual understanding.

Table of Contents

What is a Rogerian Essay?

A Rogerian essay stems from the principles of psychologist Carl Rogers, the man behind the concept of ‘client-centered therapy.’ This essay style goes beyond the conventional win-lose argumentative strategies. Instead, it emphasizes understanding the opponent’s standpoint, recognizing its validity, and finding a common ground that allows for the reconciliation of opposing views. Essentially, the writer seeks a ‘win-win’ solution, nurturing empathy and cooperation rather than division and refutation.

Quick Guide: Choosing the Right Rogerian Essay Topic

Selecting an effective Rogerian essay topic is pivotal for the essay’s success. The key is finding a subject that represents genuinely differing perspectives, where common ground can be discovered. Here’s a quick guide:

• Understand the Spectrum: Choose a topic with at least two clear, opposing viewpoints that are equally arguable.
• Passion with Balance: Select an issue you are passionate about—but also willing to consider the opposing stance with empathy.
• Complexity Matters: Opt for a topic complex enough to explore differing viewpoints yet not so polarized that finding common ground is impossible.
• Research Potential: Ensure ample resources are available for research from both sides of the argument.
• Relevance: Consider your audience and choose a relevant topic that resonates with them on a personal or societal level.

Compelling Rogerian Essay Topics Lists

Finding the right topic can be a journey. Below, we’ve compiled a list of intriguing topics to help you start:

Human Rights and Social Issues

• The implications of same-sex marriages: societal viewpoints
• Police brutality: Examining Systemic challenges and reforms
• Capital punishment: ethical considerations versus societal security

Healthcare Debates

• The vaccination debate: personal freedom and public health
• Euthanasia: the right to die with dignity versus moral implications
• Mental health: individual responsibility or societal issue?

Environmental Concerns

• Climate change: economic advancement and environmental protection
• Renewable energy: feasibility and economic implications
• Animal rights: survival ethics versus humane treatment

Technology and Privacy

• Internet censorship: security needs versus freedom of speech
• Artificial intelligence: loss of jobs versus technological advancement
• Data privacy: personal rights and national security concerns

Education Discourses

• Standardized testing: measurement of ability or performance pressure?
• Online education: the future of learning or an ineffective substitute?
• College tuition: free education versus quality and value

Political and Economic Debates

• Immigration policies: human rights and national boundaries
• Globalization: cultural exchange versus national identity erosion
• Universal basic income: economic empowerment or dependency?

Legal and Ethical Dilemmas

• Gun control: individual rights versus public safety
• Abortion: women’s rights versus ethical implications
• Legalization of marijuana: medical use versus potential abuse

Cultural and Society Interactions

• Social media: connectivity benefits versus mental health issues
• Body image: individual expression versus societal standards
• Cultural appropriation: appreciation or exploitation?

Cultural Dynamics

• Traditional vs. Western Medicine: Benefits and Limitations
• Home-schooling vs. Traditional Education: A Balance of Freedom and Structure
• Multilingualism: Cultural Preservation vs. Globalization
• Religion in Schools: Ethical Learning vs. Forced Indoctrination
• East vs. West Cultural Norms: Pros and Cons of Different Societal Values

Science and Nature

• Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs): Advancements in Agriculture vs. Natural Purity
• Animal Experimentation: Scientific Progress vs. Animal Rights
• Space Exploration: Pursuit of Knowledge vs. Earthly Investments
• Stem Cell Research: Medical Breakthroughs vs. Ethical Concerns
• Conservation vs. Development: Balancing Nature and Progress

Health and Lifestyle

• Vegetarianism: Health Benefits vs. Ethical Implications
• Yoga vs. Traditional Exercise: Mental Wellness and Physical Fitness
• Organic vs. Conventional Farming: Health Benefits and Economic Viability
• Meditation and Modern Stress: New Age Solution or Ancient Wisdom?
• Holistic Healing vs. Western Medicine: Complementary or Contradictory?

Media and Entertainment

• Streaming vs. Traditional TV: Flexibility vs. Scheduled Programming
• Online vs. Offline Reading: Digital Convenience or Tangible Experience?
• Reality TV: Entertainment Value vs. Ethical Implications
• Music Genres: Cultural Expression or Generational Divide?
• Video Games: Cognitive Development vs. Violence and Addiction

Politics and Governance

• Democracy vs. Authoritarianism: Freedom vs. Stability
• Welfare State: Social Responsibility vs. Individual Accountability
• Public vs. Private Healthcare: Accessibility vs. Quality
• Lobbying: Political Expression vs. Undue Influence
• Globalism vs. Nationalism: Shared Goals or Individual Identity?

Social Interactions and Relationships

• Online Dating: Modern Convenience or Loss of Genuine Connection?
• Social Networking: Building Bridges or Creating Isolation?
• Work-Life Balance: Career Aspirations vs. Personal Fulfillment
• Parenting Styles: Discipline vs. Freedom
• Age vs. Youth: Experience and Wisdom vs. Innovation and Energy

Ethics and Morality

• Artificial Intelligence Rights: Machines vs. Sentience
• Censorship: Protection vs. Freedom of Speech
• Genetic Engineering: Human Evolution or Playing God?
• Civil Disobedience: Morality vs. Rule of Law
• Charities: Altruism vs. Personal Gain

Economics and Commerce

• Global Trade: Economic Growth vs. Local Industry Support
• Cryptocurrency: Future of Finance or Bubble?
• Consumerism: Economic Drive vs. Ethical Implications
• Traditional vs. Online Retail: Experience vs. Convenience
• Renewable Energy: Environment vs. Economic Costs

Technological Advancements

• Augmented Reality vs. Real-World Experience: Enhancement or Detachment?
• Driverless Cars: Safety Efficiency vs. Job Displacement Concerns
• Digital Learning Tools: Innovative Education or Over-reliance on Technology?
• Robotics in Healthcare: Efficiency vs. Human Touch and Care
• Biometric Data: Security vs. Privacy Concerns

Travel and Exploration

• Space Tourism: Futuristic Adventure vs. Earthly Priorities
• Backpacking vs. Luxury Travel: Authentic Experience or Comfort?
• Ecotourism: Environmental Awareness or Commercial Exploitation?
• Solo vs. Group Travel: Independence or Shared Experiences?
• Urban vs. Rural Tourism: Cultural Hubs or Serene Retreats?

Arts and Expression

• Modern Art vs. Classical Art: Expression Evolution or Degradation?
• Digital vs. Physical Books: Convenience or Sensory Experience?
• Mainstream vs. Indie Music: Popularity or Authenticity?
• Professional vs. Fan Fiction: Originality or Creative Expansion?
• Theater vs. Cinema: Raw Performance or Visual Spectacle?
• Urban Farming: Sustainability or Impracticality?
• Fast Fashion vs. Sustainable Fashion: Affordability or Environmental Responsibility?
• Zero Waste Movement: Realistic Lifestyle or Extreme Measure?
• Ocean Cleanup Initiatives: Human Responsibility or Nature’s Resilience?
• Plant-based Diets: Health and Environmental Concerns vs. Dietary Diversity

Your Next Step: Expert Assistance is Just a Click Away!

Understanding and integrating two sides of an argument requires skill, patience, and practice. If you feel overwhelmed, remember professional help is readily available. Our experienced essay writers at WriteOnDeadline are experts in crafting well-balanced, thoroughly researched, and compelling Rogerian essays. Elevate your essay by clicking here and accessing personalized, professional writing services designed to meet your specific needs!

Useful References

• The Writing Center | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
• Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL)
• Carl R. Rogers – Client-Centered Therapy | Simply Psychology

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Rogerian Argument

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

The Rogerian argument (or Rogerian rhetoric) is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals. Developed by psychotherapist Carl Rogers and adapted to rhetoric by writing scholars Young, Becker, and Pike, the speaker seeks compromise, acknowledging positive aspects of each party’s argument to arrive at a mutually-beneficial solution to an issue. 

You may already use Rogerian argument in your everyday life to negotiate with your friends, family, and/or romantic partners. For example, if you wanted to watch a comedy and your friend wanted to watch a romance, you might compromise by offering to watch a rom-com, as this offers each of you a bit of what you are looking for in that particular moment. Note, however, that this style of argument is decidedly less common in academic settings, where various empirical or theoretical notions of truth are often prized above the practical advantages of the Rogerian method.

While Aristotelian styles of argument are often seen as eristic (concerned primarily with winning), the Rogerian argument can be viewed as more dialectic in nature (a conversation between two or more parties with the goal of arriving at some mutually-satisfying solution). Thus, practicing the Rogerian argument will enhance your ability to understand the complex relations of opposing viewpoints and provide tools for addressing such discrepancies sympathetically. It’s also great for day-to-day conflict resolution at home or in the workplace.

However, Rogerian argument does come with disadvantages. For example, because Rogerian argument relies on compromise between opposing parties, it may not work well when your opponents are unwilling or unable to compromise, or if they are arguing in bad faith (e.g., they care only about winning). It may also lead to sub-optimal solutions if your opponent’s position is demonstrably wrong, since in this case you may nevertheless be forced to sacrifice some of your (ostensibly superior) goals order to accommodate your opponent’s (inferior) ones.

In “Rhetoric: Discovery and Change” (1970), Young, Becker, and Pike describe the primary aims of the Rogerian argument as follows:

• to convey to the reader that he is understood,
• to delineate the area within which he believes the reader's position to be valid, and
• to induce him to believe that he and the writer share similar moral qualities (honesty, integrity, and good will) and aspirations (the desire to discover a mutually acceptable solution).

The first aim shows the reader that you understand the complexities of the argument and that you have listened sympathetically to what it is they have to say. This is important, because the success of the Rogerian arguments relies on cooperation and collaboration. The second aim puts this understanding into practice by seeking a symbiotic solution. The third aim builds ethos and rapport between the parties. If audiences believe they share a value system with a speaker or writer, they are more likely to agree to the terms of whatever solution is presented.

While each of these aims is important, Young, Becker, and Pike stress that they are just that: aims, not steps. You should not necessarily view these aims as occurring in a linear, step-by-step process. The authors present a synthesized discussion of what a successful Rogerian argument should contain, but they eschew any formalized structure. The structure of the argument should instead be determined by the speaker, and it should be modified and adapted according to the rhetorical situation at hand.

Again, there is no formalized structure for the Rogerian argument, though the following example provides a foundation   for considering how you might structure your own argument.

A successful Rogerian argument will likely include the following:

• Introduction (addressing the topic to be discussed and/or the problem to be solved)
• Opposing position (showing that you understand your opposition’s viewpoints/goals)
• Context for opposing position (showing that you understand the situations in which their viewpoint is valid)
• Your position (introducing/addressing your viewpoint as it differs from the reader’s)
• Context for your position (objectively showing the reader the context(s) under which your position is valid)
• Benefits (appeal to the opposition by showing how they would benefit by adopting elements of your position)

Below, we’ve provided an example Rogerian argument that follows the formula above. In this example, we will take the position that technology (e.g., laptops and tablets) should be allowed in writing classes while also considering the opinion of the opposition, who argue that such technology is more of a distraction than   a helpful tool. In so doing, we should be able to arrive at a solution that considers both arguments and develops a solution that benefits both parties while still achieving our goal of allowing technology in the classroom.

Introduction

Here, we would introduce the topic and briefly discuss why it is a matter of contention. We would lay out the differing perspectives, briefly mention the merits of each argument, and discuss the implications closely considering all perspectives to arrive at a solution that works for everyone.

Opposing position

Here, we would introduce the opposing position that digital technology should not be allowed in the writing classroom. We would also list and discuss their objections to the proposition of technology in the classroom. These might include the notions that it’s distracting for the individual, the class, and the instructor, and is often used to avoid the lesson and instead play games or go on social media.

Context for opposing position

Here we might provide specific details that lend merit to their argument. We want to show that we are fully considering their claims and not just giving lip service, in the hope that that they will give similar value to our opinions. We could include statistics, testimony from instructors and students, or even examples from media that support their theory that digital technology can indeed be a distraction during instruction.

Your Position

Here, we would introduce our claim that digital technology should be allowed in the writing classroom. We would still want to speak as objectively as possible in order to establish our ethos as concerned but unbiased speaker. We might even qualify our position by acknowledging that there are, of course, situations in which technology should be put away, but reiterate that, generally speaking, the presence of digital technology is a positive.

Context for your position

Here, we can provide examples that run contrary to the ones we used for the context of our opposition’s position. For example, we could gather testimony from students who claim that using these technologies in class has been beneficial. We could include research and scholarship that supports our position and even quote instructors who have developed pedagogy around these technologies. We might even subtly demonstrate that our opposition has failed to account for all possibilities by choosing our examples carefully. For instance, we could easily include accounts of students with learning disabilities who might otherwise have a difficult time succeeding in class without the help of assistive technologies.

Here, we would use the points we’ve established throughout the argument to appeal to our opposition and find some productive middle ground that benefits both parties. We would acknowledge that some instructors do not want digital technologies present in the classroom, as they believe they distract from paying attention during lectures. We would maintain, however, that these technologies can indeed be productive tools for learning—in some cases, they can even be a virtual requirement for learning. We could then offer a solution: that these digital technologies should be kept aside during lecture portions of a lesson except in the case of students with documented disabilities. This way, students will likely be paying attention, taking notes by hand which they can transcribe later if they so wish. However, once a class moves from lecture to activity (whether group or individual), students should be allowed to access these technologies to more effectively engage with the activity, organize their thoughts, and access information. Now that the instructor is no longer lecturing, it should be easier to monitor student progress and engagement and the use of technology for these activities will lead to more developed and better organized results from the students.

• How It Works
• Essay Examples

35 Rogerian Essay Topics

The topics of Rogerian arguments are different from those which we get used to writing various types of essays. Their point is to involve the opponent of the speaker into a debate and to encourage them to negotiate. Actually, Rogerian rhetoric can be considered as a peculiar version of the democratic debate.

It may seem that a Rogerian topic presupposes the only point of view. In reality, such an argument is aimed at finding common ground. That is why it is essential to choose a Rogerian debate topic right. You should know how to create an essay outline . Here are some topic options helpful for captivating Rogerian argument:

• Products Shouldn’t Be Tested on Animals.
• It Is allowable to Test Products on Animals.
• Smoking in Public Has to Be Banned.
• Smoking in Public Has to Be Permitted.
• Teenage Pregnancy Can Be Prevented by Using Condoms.
• Teenage Pregnancy Cannot Be Prevented by Using Condoms.
• School Education Is to Be Aimed at Developing Creativity.
• School Education Is to Be Aimed at Memorizing Information.
• Modern Society Needs Death Penalty to Be Banned.
• Modern Society Needs Death Penalty to Be Allowed.
• The Educational System Requires the Traditional Approach to the Curriculum.
• The Curriculum Has to Include E-Learning.
• The US Federal Law Has to State English as the Official Language of the Country.
• There Is No Need to Make English an Official Language of the Country in the US Federal Law.
• It is Acceptable to Euthanize People.
• It is Unacceptable to Euthanize People.
• The Curriculum Has to Include Evolution Studies.
• The Curriculum Does Not Have to Include Evolution Studies.
• Every Citizen Should Be Allowed to Own a Gun.
• It Is Dangerous to Allow Every Citizen to Own a Gun.
• The Set Limit of Minimum Legal Drinking Age Has to Remain 21 years.
• The Set Limit of Minimum Legal Drinking Age Can Be Lowered to 16 years.
• Children Cannot Be Involved in Trading Relations.
• Same-sex Marriages Are Ethically Wrong.
• Forbidding Same-sex Marriages Is Ethically Wrong.
• It Is Reasonable to Let Teenagers Make Decisions.
• It Is Not Reasonable to Let Teenagers Make Decisions.
• One Cannot Censor the Information on the Web.
• The Government Has to Censor the Information on the Web.
• Therapeutic Use of Cannabis Is to Be Legalized.
• Therapeutic Use of Cannabis Is Not to Be Legalized.
• The Government Has to Implement Two-Child Policy.
• The Government Should Not Implement Two-Child Policy.
• Sixteen-year-olds Should Be Allowed to Vote at the National Elections.
• The Age Limit for Voting at the National Elections Should Remain Unchanged.

As it is clear from the topics above, Rogerian rhetoric is a great example of free speech experience. A statement form makes a speaker defend his or her point, although the ultimate goal is to find a consensus. Free speech is not a controversial issue – it is a hundred percent human right! However, it may cost one a lot to exercise it. A lot of journalists get killed. Their number increases annually and is about to hit 150 a year. To draw the public attention to these drastic statistics, we celebrate World Press Freedom Day on the 3d of May.

If you are in search for steps to writing a dissertation you can discover our blog further.

• Chicago/Turabian Style Formatting Guidelines
• How to Write Dialogue in an Essay
• How To Write a Follow-up Letter
• Cause And Effect Essay: The Ultimate Guide
• How to Write a Thesis Statement

Essay Papers Writing Online

Master the art of writing a rogerian essay with these step-by-step guidelines.

Are you struggling to find common ground in an argumentative essay? A Rogerian essay might just be the solution you need. A Rogerian essay focuses on finding a middle ground and establishing rapport with the opposing viewpoint, rather than outright conflicting. This approach can lead to more constructive dialogue and understanding, making it a valuable tool in persuasive writing.

In this guide, we will explore the key elements of a Rogerian essay and provide you with tips on how to effectively structure and write one. Additionally, we will offer examples to illustrate the Rogerian approach in action, helping you to grasp the concept and apply it to your own writing.

Understanding the Rogerian Essay Approach

The Rogerian essay approach is a unique method of argumentation that aims to find common ground between conflicting viewpoints. Unlike traditional argumentative essays that focus on proving one side as the “right” side, Rogerian essays seek to understand and respect opposing perspectives. This approach emphasizes listening, empathy, and open-mindedness in order to foster constructive dialogue and resolution.

In a Rogerian essay, the writer acknowledges the validity of the opposing viewpoint before presenting their own position. This helps establish trust and credibility with the audience, creating a more receptive environment for discussion. By recognizing the merits of each perspective and finding areas of agreement, the Rogerian approach encourages cooperation and compromise rather than confrontation and conflict.

Overall, the Rogerian essay approach is effective in promoting understanding and collaboration between individuals with differing opinions. By approaching arguments with empathy and a willingness to engage in respectful dialogue, writers can create a more inclusive and productive discourse that promotes mutual understanding and consensus.

Overview of the Rogerian Essay Structure

A Rogerian essay is a form of argumentative essay that aims to find a middle ground between two conflicting perspectives. This type of essay is structured differently from traditional argumentative essays, focusing on finding common ground and understanding the opposing viewpoints. Below is an overview of the typical structure of a Rogerian essay:

• Introduction: Begin by introducing the topic and providing background information on the issue. Clearly state the problem or controversy at hand.
• Contextualization: Provide an overview of both sides of the argument, acknowledging the validity of each perspective without taking a definitive stance.
• Thesis Statement: Present your thesis, which should express a willingness to understand and compromise with the opposing viewpoint.
• Body Paragraphs: Develop your argument by exploring common ground and areas of agreement between the opposing perspectives. Use evidence and examples to support your points.
• Counterarguments: Acknowledge the strengths of the opposing viewpoint and address potential objections or concerns. Refrain from using confrontational language.
• Conclusion: Summarize the key points of your argument and reiterate the importance of finding common ground. End on a positive note, emphasizing the potential for cooperation and mutual understanding.

By following this structure, you can create a Rogerian essay that fosters constructive dialogue and promotes empathy and understanding between conflicting viewpoints.

Key Elements to Include in a Rogerian Essay

When writing a Rogerian essay, it is essential to include the following key elements:

How to Start Writing a Rogerian Essay

When starting a Rogerian essay, it is important to first choose a topic that is controversial yet has multiple viewpoints that can be explored. Consider issues that are debated in society but have no clear right or wrong answer.

Next, conduct thorough research on the chosen topic to understand different perspectives and arguments. This will help you present a well-rounded analysis in your essay.

Once you have gathered enough information, outline the main points of contention and areas of agreement between different viewpoints. This will serve as the basis for your argument and help you structure your essay effectively.

Remember that the goal of a Rogerian essay is to find common ground and establish mutual understanding. Approach the topic with an open mind and be willing to consider opposing viewpoints.

Lastly, start writing your essay by introducing the topic, presenting the different perspectives, and highlighting areas of agreement. Focus on building rapport with your audience and creating a respectful dialogue throughout the essay.

Examples of Rogerian Essays

Here are a few examples of Rogerian essays that showcase the principles of finding common ground and understanding different perspectives:

Tips for Writing a Successful Rogerian Essay

Writing a successful Rogerian essay involves careful planning and thoughtful consideration of your audience and argument. Here are some tips to help you craft a compelling and effective Rogerian essay:

Related Post

How to master the art of writing expository essays and captivate your audience, convenient and reliable source to purchase college essays online, step-by-step guide to crafting a powerful literary analysis essay, unlock success with a comprehensive business research paper example guide, unlock your writing potential with writers college – transform your passion into profession, “unlocking the secrets of academic success – navigating the world of research papers in college”, master the art of sociological expression – elevate your writing skills in sociology.

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

IV. Types of Argumentation

4.5 Rogerian Argument

Terri Pantuso

As discussed in the previous section, for Toulmin, argumentation is an attempt to justify a statement or a set of statements and focuses solely upon proving those statements. But what happens when you can concede that your opponent has a valid point? Because we are complex creatures, humans oftentimes find themselves strongly opposed to something that later changes for them once they are presented with different evidence. While many arguments can seemingly be based upon emotions alone, when presented with logical evidence to refute our position we may experience a crisis of conscience. Is it possible to hold firmly to one belief yet concede that the opposing side has merit? There is a way if you utilize the Rogerian method for argumentation.

Carl Rogers (1902-1987) was an American psychologist and clinical therapist who utilized a humanistic (client-centered) approach to psychology. When applied to argumentation, the Rogerian method makes use of examining counterarguments as enhancements, or concessions, rather than viewing them as completely oppositional. According to Lunsford et al., “Rogers argued that people involved in disputes should not respond to each other until they [can] fully, fairly, and even sympathetically state the other person’s position.” [1] Rogers’ non confrontational methods, when applied to argumentation in rhetoric, suggests that the most personal feelings are also the most common and, therefore, are the most likely to be understood.

One benefit to utilizing a Rogerian approach in composition studies is that it encourages the writer/arguer to build a bridge towards oppositional positions. This does not mean that you abandon your own position, and it does not mean that your position is weak. Rather, a Rogerian approach provides alternative perspectives for considering a given position as well as methods for responding to counterarguments that might seem to refute your major premise .

Much like the Toulmin method, the Rogerian method relies upon claims that can be supported with evidence (data). How the Rogerian method differs is in the concession where, if there is a strong, valid argument that refutes your claim, you concede that argument might be a valid point in a different context. Or, perhaps you concede that a portion of your opponent’s argument is valid for your position, yet point out how the circumstances differ, therefore making your position the most logical, strongest one for your given topic. While the goal remains to persuade your reader/audience to view your position as valid, when utilizing the Rogerian method you build common ground to other possibilities and demonstrate that counterviews are not entirely wrong.

When used in argumentation, the Rogerian method allows for a dialogue to occur surrounding an issue. By examining counterarguments to your claims, you are able to view your position/ thesis from a different point of view. Understanding all (or most) of the points surrounding your given topic will strengthen your own position as you will create a more fully informed essay.

• Andrea Lunsford, John J. Ruszkiewicz, and Keith Walters, Everything’s an Argument, 8th ed. (Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2018), 139. ↵

A human-centered approach or perspective to an issue.

The basic assumptions or understanding on which an argument is based or from which conclusions are drawn. A major premise is a statement of universal truth or common knowledge. A minor premise is a statement related to a major premise but concerns a specific situation.

A statement, usually one sentence, that summarizes an argument that will later be explained, expanded upon, and developed in a longer essay or research paper. In undergraduate writing, a thesis statement is often found in the introductory paragraph of an essay. The plural of thesis is theses .

4.5 Rogerian Argument Copyright © 2022 by Terri Pantuso is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Rogerian Argument: Definition and Examples

• An Introduction to Punctuation
• Ph.D., Rhetoric and English, University of Georgia
• M.A., Modern English and American Literature, University of Leicester
• B.A., English, State University of New York

Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy in which common goals are identified and opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground and reach an agreement. It is also known as  Rogerian rhetoric , Rogerian argumentation , Rogerian persuasion , and empathic listening .

Whereas traditional argument focuses on winning , the Rogerian model seeks a mutually satisfactory solution.

The Rogerian model of argument was adapted from the work of American psychologist Carl Rogers by the composition scholars Richard Young, Alton Becker, and Kenneth Pike in their textbook "Rhetoric: Discovery and Change" (1970).

Aims of Rogerian Argument

The authors of "Rhetoric: Discovery and Change" explain the process this way:

"The writer who uses the Rogerian strategy attempts to do three things: (1) to convey to the reader that he is understood, (2) to delineate the area within which he believes the reader's position to be valid, and (3) to induce him to believe that he and the writer share similar moral qualities (honesty, integrity, and good will) and aspirations (the desire to discover a mutually acceptable solution). We stress here that these are only tasks, not stages of the argument. Rogerian argument has no conventional structure; in fact, users of the strategy deliberately avoid conventional persuasive structures and techniques because these devices tend to produce a sense of threat, precisely what the writer seeks to overcome....

"The goal of Rogerian argument is to create a situation conducive to cooperation; this may well involve changes in Format of Rogerian Argument.

When presenting your case and the case of the other side, the style is flexible with how you set up your information and how long you spend on each section. But you do want to be balanced—spending an inordinate amount of time on your position and only giving lip service to the other side, for example, defeats the purpose of using the Rogerian style. The ideal format of a written Rogerian persuasion looks something like this (Richard M. Coe, "Form and Substance: An Advanced Rhetoric." Wiley, 1981):

• Introduction : Present the topic as a problem to solve together, rather than an issue.
• Opposing position : State the opinion of your opposition in an objective manner that's fair and accurate, so the "other side" knows that you understand its position.
• Context for the opposing position : Show the opposition that you understand under what circumstances its position is valid .
• Your position : Present your position objectively. Yes, you want to be convincing, but you want the opposition to see it with clarity and fairly as well, just as you presented its position earlier.
• Context for your position : Show the opposition contexts in which your position is also valid.
• Benefits : Appeal to the opposition and show how elements of your position could work to benefit its interests.

You use one type of rhetoric when discussing your position with people who already agree with you. To discuss your position with the opposition, you need to tone that down and break it into objective elements, so the sides can more easily see areas of common ground. Taking the time to state the opposing side's arguments and contexts means the opposition has less reason to get defensive and stop listening to your ideas.

Feminist Responses to Rogerian Argument

In the 1970s and into the early 1990s, some debate existed about whether women should use this conflict-solving technique.

"Feminists are divided on the method: some see Rogerian argument as feminist and beneficial because it appears less antagonistic than traditional Aristotelian argument. Others argue that when used by women, this type of argument reinforces the 'feminine' stereotype, since historically women are viewed as nonconfrontational and understanding (see especially Catherine E. Lamb's 1991 article 'Beyond Argument in Freshman Composition' and Phyllis Lassner's 1990 article 'Feminist Responses to Rogerian Argument')." (Edith H. Babin and Kimberly Harrison, "Contemporary Composition Studies: A Guide to Theorists and Terms." Greenwood, 1999)

• 50 Argumentative Essay Topics
• Common Ground in Rhetoric
• 5 Steps to Writing a Position Paper
• Tips on How to Write an Argumentative Essay
• Argument (Rhetoric and Composition)
• Preparing an Argument Essay: Exploring Both Sides of an Issue
• Usage and Examples of a Rebuttal
• LSAT Writing: What You Need to Know
• How to Write a Persuasive Essay
• Definition and Examples of an Ad Hominem Fallacy
• Writing an Opinion Essay
• What Does Argumentation Mean?
• presence (rhetoric)
• Premise Definition and Examples in Arguments
• Persuasion and Rhetorical Definition

The Rogerian Method: A Practical Guide to Effective Persuasion

People have studied and practiced the art of persuasion for centuries. As a result, they have developed various methods of conventional persuasive structures and techniques to present arguments. One such method is the Rogerian argument. A Rogerian way of argumentation aims to identify comparable perspectives between opposing viewpoints. This article will explore the Rogerian argument model and its application in essay writing, including its use in a rhetorical analysis essay.

The Rogerian argument is based on the principles of Rogerian communication, named after psychologist Carl Rogers. It seeks to understand the opposition of the audience. A Rogerian argument assumes that each party in a debate has similar moral qualities and can work together to find an acceptable solution. The Rogerian argument method is different from a traditional argument approach. The classical argument sets up a composition that aims to persuade the audience. In the case of the Rogerian argument, the author prioritizes shared interests and works towards finding a mutual solution. By acknowledging the validity of each point, the writer creates a productive dialogue.

In conclusion, the Rogerian argument method provides a unique and effective approach to writing essays. It prioritizes finding shared interests and shared priorities. By focusing on dialogue, cooperation, and compromise, the Rogerian strategy attempts to find overlapping interests. It does so by identifying mutually beneficial objectives and goals. With the right guidance from argumentative essay writers , you can use Rogerian argumentation in your essay. And also promote rhetoric discovery and change.

In the following sections, we will define the Rogerian argument model and explain its structure in detail. It offers tips on how to use it effectively in essay writing, including how to write a Rogerian essay in writing classes.

Definitions of the Rogerian Model

In this section, we will define Rogerian argument model. This method of argumentation seeks to establish mutual objectives between opinions. Psychologist Carl Rogers is the namesake of Rogerian rhetoric. The argument method involves three main parts: preface, body, and conclusion.

Emotionally charged topics need even more attention to audience analysis. You should approach such topics with sensitivity and respect. Take the time to understand the audience or reader’s perspective accurately. By doing so, writers can tailor their arguments to appeal to the reader’s values and beliefs. This can lead to a more productive and respectful dialogue, which will increase the likelihood of finding valid solutions.

The body of the argument paper is where the Rogerian approaches shine. By acknowledging the major barrier, the writer earns the trust of the audience. This approach helps to build a bridge between the two positions.

The conclusion of the Rogerian argument should highlight the two shared values and priorities. It should also propose an alternative solution that accommodates both viewpoints. Following the Rogerian argumentative essay outline can help writers effectively use this technique and promote constructive conflict resolution.

A Rogerian argument is a powerful tool for building bridges between the opposition. Additionally, rhetorical devices tend to be less aggressive than traditional or classical argument. In the next section, we will discuss the structure of the essay in more detail.

Finished papers

Customer reviews

Structure of Essay with Rogerian Method Argumentation

The structure of a Rogerian argument composition is distinct from that of a conventional argumentative essay. The argument begins with the foreword. Here the writer acknowledges the opposition to establish credibility. The conventional structure argumentative essay presents an opposing position, with the writer trying to persuade the audience to adopt their view. In contrast, a Rogerian essay aims to find similar perspectives between opposing viewpoints.

The structure has six main parts: Rogerian argument begins with an introduction. Then comes position 1, transition, position 2, reconciliation, and conclusion. This structure helps the writer to present the opposition fairly and objectively. In this type of writing, the writer also shows readiness to compromise in search of shared interests. In the next sections, we will explore each part of the Rogerian argument example.

Introduction

In a Rogerian argument, the intro is an important stage. The writer not only presents the topic but also acknowledges the other side to establish credibility. This section should also create a sense of goodwill and a willingness to find mutual objectives, setting the tone for the rest of the essay. The Rogerian approach in the introduction sets the stage for the writer’s intention to find a valid acceptable solution together, rather than merely winning an argument. This approach helps to avoid creating an adversarial relationship between the writer and the reader. It also leads to a more productive dialogue.

In the next section, Position 1 of the Rogerian argument, the writer presents the first opposing position or argument. This section should be presented fairly and objectively, without any bias. The writer should explain the opponent’s position thoroughly. For example, by providing supporting evidence for their point. This section is critical because it demonstrates that the writer has taken the time to understand the opposition accurately and can present it effectively to the reader. A Rogerian essay example can be helpful in understanding how to present an opposing view without bias.

In the Rogerian argument structure, the transition section plays a critical role in the essay. This section is where the writer moves from position 1 to position 2 while highlighting the common goals and goals that both viewpoints have in common, which can facilitate finding a valid solution and ultimately help to find the middle ground. By focusing on overlapping values, the writer makes it easier to bridge the gap between opposing positions and find the middle between them. The transition section is an essential part of the Rogerian argument, emphasizing the importance of identifying and acknowledging the overlapping interests and goals of both parties.

In the next section of the Rogerian argument composition, Position 2, the other side or argument is introduced. In this section, you write counterargument in essay. Present the opposing viewpoint fairly and objectively, just like position 1. The writer should explain the position in detail and provide supporting evidence for their argument. This approach ensures that the writer gives equal attention and consideration to both oppositions, which is key to creating a more productive dialogue and finding a valid solution. By acknowledging and addressing both sides of the issue, the writer can build trust and understanding of the reader’s perspective and promote a more collaborative approach to problem-solving.

Reconciliation

In the reconciliation section of a Rogerian essay, the writer aims to bring the two opposing viewpoints closer together. This section is where the writer identifies and highlights the overlapping interests, perspectives, and goals that both viewpoints have in common. By highlighting the mutual objectives between the two positions, the writer creates an atmosphere of goodwill and cooperation in the reconciliation section of the essay. In this paragraph, the writer presents an example of a solution that could be acceptable to both parties. This approach is critical because it shows that the writer is willing to work towards finding a mutual solution for both parties rather than trying to win an argument.

The conclusion should summarize the main points and emphasize the converging opinions and overlapping interests between the two positions. It should also underline the benefits of working towards a mutual solution and demonstrate that the writer is willing to compromise. Overall, The Rogerian argument method is an effective tool for finding solutions that satisfy both parties by prioritizing common goals and finding a middle ground.

The Rogerian argument method provides a unique and effective approach to writing essays. By focusing on finding overlapping perspectives and shared priorities, the writer can build a strong case that is both persuasive and respectful of opposing viewpoints. This approach encourages dialogue and cooperation between opposing parties, leading to a more productive and beneficial outcome for all involved. The Rogerian argument method can promote rhetoric discovery and change.

If you are struggling with writing an argumentative essay using the Rogerian approach, consider seeking help from a professional writer or tutor who can write your argumentative essay for you, or even buy argumentative essays online. To find appropriate topics for a Rogerian essay, consider one that you are passionate about.

Tips on How to Use Rogerian Argumentation in Essay

In the Rogerian essay example, it’s crucial to understand the method’s purpose and structure and know how to write a Rogerian argument effectively. Here are some tips on how to use Rogerian argumentation effectively in an essay:

• Acknowledge the Opposition. While using the Rogerian argument method, acknowledge the opposition. This helps you to establish credibility with the audience. The Rogerian approach in the introduction sets the stage for the writer’s intention to find a mutually acceptable solution than merely winning an argument.
• Find middle ground. The writer should focus on identifying and acknowledging the overlapping interests. This approach makes it easier to bridge the gap between opposing stances and find a shared point. The writer should suggest an example of a solution that could be acceptable to both parties. The author should also emphasize the importance of finding a mutual solution between the opposing views of the reader.
• Be collaborative . Seek common ground and explore the context of the opposing position respectfully and constructively. The writer’s position should be accompanied by a differing opinion.
• Consensus Building. Emphasizing consensual beliefs and goals is a crucial aspect of the Rogerian argument. Incorporating opponents’ positions and presenting them impartially support finding common ground. By highlighting an example of a solution, a willing writer shows they are not merely giving lip service to finding an acceptable solution.
• Shared solutions. Understand the context in which the opposing viewpoints were formed. By doing so, you can better comprehend how to write a Rogerian argument essay example in your writing classroom. The goal is not to attack or belittle the reader’s position. Instead, you have to find common ground and propose acceptable solutions. Avoid using inflammatory language, as it may make it harder to establish goodwill. Instead, argue, and remain calm and respectful. And focus on the areas of agreement between the two positions. This approach will help build trust with the willing reader and foster productive dialogue.

In a Rogerian essay example, finding overlapping perspectives is the main goal. By considering the reader’s perspective, custom essay writers create a dialogue toward a solution. This way, they tailor their arguments to appeal to the reader’s values and beliefs. It resulted in a persuasive and respectful essay.

To conclude, the Rogerian argument method let essays prioritize shared points. The Rogerian style mostly focuses on finding a compromise and a common ground. As such, it can help resolve conflicts and find answers or alternative solutions. If you find the Rogerian method overwhelming, ask professionals to write your argumentative essay for you. With the right guidance, you can effectively use Rogerian argumentation in your essay. And also promote rhetoric discovery and change.

Related posts:

• How To Write A Good Compare And Contrast Essay: Topics, Examples And Step-by-step Guide

How to Write a Scholarship Essay

• How to Write the Methods Section for a Research Paper: Effective Writing Guide
• Explaining Appeal to Ignorance Fallacy with Demonstrative Examples

Improve your writing with our guides

Definition Essay: The Complete Guide with Essay Topics and Examples

Critical Essay: The Complete Guide. Essay Topics, Examples and Outlines

Get 15% off your first order with edusson.

Connect with a professional writer within minutes by placing your first order. No matter the subject, difficulty, academic level or document type, our writers have the skills to complete it.

100% privacy. No spam ever.

Organizing an Argument

As with other aspects of writing an argument, your organizational strategy will vary according to the requirements of its disciplinary context, your knowledge and level of expertise within the field, and your previous experience preparing arguments.

There are probably as many ways to draft an argument as there are arguments; however, there are a few tried and true methods-from adversarial to mediation based, and deductive to inductive reasoning-which work well in the academic world. None of them are carved in stone, however. Here we'll explore a number of useful methods to guide you in drafting your own argument.

Rogerian Method

Most of the time we think of arguments as adversarial, taking place between people who fundamentally disagree. One will be right and the other wrong; one wins and the other loses. This works in legal systems as well as in the context of many other situations. But often-especially in academic arguing-no single position regarding a controversy is completely right.

When you're working on an issue or problem about which more than one viewpoint may be valid, you may want to try drafting an argument that is oriented more toward mediation. Unlike adversarial arguments, which typically begin with a firm claim, an argument that mediates will postpone stating a position until much later in the presentation, often the middle or the end.

There are a number of ways to do this; one of the best being based on the work of psychologist Carl Rogers. A Rogerian argument presumes that if author and audience find common ground regarding an issue or problem, they will be more likely to find, or agree upon, a common solution. It succeeds only when the author understands the audience. He or she must present the audience's perspective clearly, accurately, and fairly before asking them to consider an alternative position or solution.

This method downplays emotional appeals in favor of the rational and is particularly useful in dealing with emotionally charged, highly divisive issues and allows for people of good will on different sides of an issue to find, or agree upon, solutions together.

Parts of a Rogerian Argument

The introduction typically points out how both the author and the audience are similarly affected. Rather than presenting a thesis demanding agreement, which is often seen as an attack on whomever holds an opposing view; this presentation emphasizes unity, putting the audience first.

The audience perspective comes next. Described as clearly and accurately as possible-typically in neutral language-the author acknowledges their point of view and the circumstances and contexts in which their perspective or position is valid. Done well, the author builds good will and credibility with the audience, a crucial step leading toward potential compromise. Honest, heartfelt sincerity is the key here: if the audience perceives an attempt at manipulation, the Rogerian argument strategy generally backfires.

The author's perspective comes in the next chunk of the argument. For the audience to give it a listen it must be presented in as fair-minded a way as was theirs, in language as equally neutral and clear. To be convincing, besides describing the circumstances or contexts in which the position is valid, it must contain the evidence that supports the claim.

The closing of a Rogerian argument doesn't ask the audience to give up their position, but shows how they would benefit from moving closer toward that of the author's. In other words, it ends by laying out the ways a compromise or alternative solution benefits both audience and author under a wider variety of circumstances than either can account for alone.

Deductive Method

The traditional academic argument is deductive, placing the author's position in the introduction and devoting the rest of the argument to presenting the evidence. Unless you are in a field where inductive reasoning is the norm, you can hardly go wrong with this method.

In some cases, all the evidence may be directed at proving the main point; in others, each piece may lead to a sub-point that needs proving before a convincing argument for the main point can be made. Depending on how directly each piece of evidence relates to the position, a deductive argument can be organized in a variety of ways.

When All Evidence Relates...

When all evidence relates directly to your main point, or thesis, and each piece of evidence is equally relevant, a typical arrangement simply introduces the position and presents each piece. Transitions connect each to the thesis.

Depending on their strengths and weaknesses, the order in which each piece of evidence is presented, as well as the rebuttals of opposing arguments, can differ greatly.

More often than not, even when all evidence is directly relevant, some pieces may be more convincing-less open to question or interpretation-than others. In these cases, arguments are typically arranged as follows:

• Introduction establishing the context of the argument as well as the author's position.
• Body of Evidence presented, depending on the audience analysis, from most to least, or least to most convincing.
• Conclusion summarizing the argument, presenting a call to action, or suggesting further research.

When Seemingly Unrelated Sub-Points...

When seemingly unrelated sub-points need to be made and proven in order to prove the main point, the author must show how the particular premises of each, along with its supporting evidence, connect, collectively and logically, to support the main position.

An argument supporting a ban on logging in rain forests might first need to establish and provide evidence regarding five other environmental premises, each supporting the author's position, regarding the effects of logging. For instance:

• It causes soil erosion
• It affects global warming
• It destroys native species
• It alters water routes and levels
• It destroys indigenous lifestyles

Each premise is a debatable issue in and of itself. Therefore, some measure of the supportive evidence behind each-at least enough to connect them as reasonably evidentiary links-must be given before they can be used to collectively support the author's main position. In these cases, arguments are typically arranged as follows:

• Brief Preview outlining each premise, or reason, to be used as evidence supporting the claim.
• Body of Evidence presented, depending on audience analysis, in an order which will make the most sense to the audience.
• Conclusion summarizing the argument and demonstrating how each premise leads logically to the author's position, presents a call to action, or suggests further research.

Note: This arrangement is ideal for content sub-headings where each heading describes the premise/reason to be discussed.

When Opposing Arguments...

When opposing arguments or points of view must be addressed there are a variety of ways to argue against or refute them. They can be place almost anywhere in the text, however, the strength and power of the opposing arguments and how familiar your audience is with them should be your main considerations. Here are a couple of options:

When opposing arguments are less persuasive or, at best, equal to, rebuttals are best saved till last where the opposing argument will appear less credible in light of your own:

Introduction Your argument and evidence Rebuttal of opposition claims Conclusion

When opposing arguments are particularly strong and readily accepted, discrediting them point-by-point may be the best strategy for convincing an audience to consider alternative points or support a different position.

Introduction Rebut first opposing argument followed by first counter-argument Rebut next opposing arguments, followed by further counter-arguments as you go along Conclusion

Inductive Method

Inductive arguments are more difficult for an audience to follow, thus they are less commonly found in the academic world than deductive arguments. Typically they begin with the author introducing an issue without proposing a solution or stating a position. Instead, various takes and opposing positions are introduced and argued, for and against, all of which then leads up to the author stating his or her position.

The goal of an inductive strategy is to present all the evidence and information in a manner such that, when the author's position is finally stated, the audience has been moved, or persuaded to agree that it is the one and only logical conclusion.

Inductive arguments can be organized in a variety of ways depending either on your assessment of what position the audience already holds or, on whether you are arguing a position from original research. It may be completely inductive, saving your position for the end, or partially inductive, introducing your position somewhere in the middle of the argument.

When an Audience Completely Disagrees...

When an audience completely disagrees with your position convincing them that their reasons for disagreeing are faulty before presenting your own position may be the best strategy.

Introduction: States the issue to be addressed and why it is important.

Body of Argument: Examines positions already proposed and refutes each one, showing why they are inadequate. Typically organized like this.

Position 1 Your refutation of position 1 Position 2 Your refutation of position 2

Alternatively, all positions might be examined first and then refuted second.

Position 1 Position 2 Your refutation of position 1 Your refutation of position 2

Conclusion/Position Statement: Once all other positions are shown to be inadequate, conclude with your position as the only logical choice.

When an Audience Partially Disagrees...

When an audience partially disagrees with your position, the best strategy still looks a great deal like when they completely disagree: convincing them that their reasoning is faulty before presenting your own position.

Position Statement: Introduced as the only logical choice after the positions your audience finds most persuasive are shown to be inadequate.

Presentation of Evidence: Supports your position as not only reasonable, but the best one available as well.

When an Audience is Completely Unfamiliar...

When an audience is completely unfamiliar with the issue, presenting evidence and leading to a logical conclusion may be the best choice because you are informing the audience while simultaneously proving the position.

Body of Argument: Presents the different work done on the issue and the conclusions reached.

Logical Connections: Looks at how conclusions reached in the research fit together leading to a particular answer to the problem or position on the issue. An alternative arrangement would include connections between each conclusion presented and proven.

Conclusion/Position Statement: ends the argument with your position as the only logical choice.

When Original Research Forms the Basis...

When original research forms the basis for an argument, particularly in the sciences, the study itself and the results must be discussed before a conclusion or interpretation of the data can be discussed. It must be made obvious to the audience that your position emerges from the research rather than being one you are ensuring the research will support. A deductive arrangement, starting with the conclusion or position, implies that the research may be biased.

Research questions: Describes study and the issue, problem or question it was designed specifically to answer.

Methods: Describes in detail the methods employed in the study.

Results: Summarizes and provides a detailed presentation of findings.

Conclusion/Position Statement: Argues for a particular interpretation of the results which leads to a conclusion addressing or answering the original issue, problem or question investigated.

Tying it All Together

American methods of academic argument are best depicted as a straight line. No matter what-be it evidence, sub-points, refutations of other positions, or personal anecdotes-everything used must lead clearly back to the position being argued. Although the relevance of each is always clear to the author, their connections are not always so obvious to the audience. Therefore, it is up to the author to carefully explain them.

Toulmin Method

One of the best ways to demonstrate why a given piece of evidence supports the thesis, claim or position of an argument is to explain the reasoning process by which they are logically connected. In the Toulmin method, these explanations are referred to as warrants.

First, for each claim that is debatable, or open to question, a reason is offered that supports the claim's validity. A warrant-consisting of a sentence or two-then follows, explaining the reason. Finally, evidence is supplied that supports connecting the reason to a given point or the overall claim of the paper.

Example of the Toulmin Method

Thesis, Claim or Position

Grading should be optional in non-major courses.

Reason/Point #1

Non-major courses are designed to help students become intelligent, well-rounded citizens. If the goal of such courses is the exploration and acquisition of knowledge, grades only get in the way.

Rather than learning for the sake of becoming a better person, grades encourage performance for the sake of a better GPA. The focus grading puts on performance undercuts learning opportunities when students choose courses according to what might be easiest rather than what they'd like to know more about. [Introduces why proof is relevant to point]

For example, students polled at CSU in a College of Liberal Arts study cite the following reasons for choosing non-major courses:

• Easy grading (80%)
• Low quantity of work (60%)
• What was available (40%)
• Personality of teacher (30%)
• Something they were interested in knowing more about (10%)

Similarly, in an interview I conducted with graduating seniors, only two of the 20 people I spoke with found their non-major courses valuable. The other 18 reported that non-major courses were a waste of time for a variety of reasons:

• I'm never going to do anything with them.
• I just took whatever wouldn't distract me from my major so I didn't work very hard in them, just studying enough to get an A on the test.
• Non-major courses are a joke. Everyone I know took the simplest, stupidest, 100-level courses needed to fulfill the requirements. I can't even remember the ones I took now.

Although not everyone in the interviews or the CLA poll cited grades explicitly as the reason for choosing easy, irrelevant, non-major courses, we can read such reasoning into many of the less explicit references as well. Clearly, students are not choosing courses based on what they can learn from them. Yet they are fairly consistent in their choices: 100-level courses with little work. Although laziness might be seen as the cause of such choices, it is just as likely that choosing according to the amount of work, selecting simple courses, or only studying for the exam are a result of the GPA system. Higher work loads and more complex topics obviously could mean receiving a lower grade; thus, they should be avoided. [Demonstrates how proof leads to point as necessary conclusion.]

Using Subheadings and Transitions

Chunking text into sections according to where a new point is being made, a new reason in support of your thesis is offered, or a new opposing argument is being addressed helps establish coherence among the various parts of your argument. Using sub-headings to label these different sections will help the audience follow your argument.

In addition, transitions explaining why one section helps support the point made in the previous one or how the next point follows logically from the first helps the reader see more clearly how these points ultimately relate to the claim, or position being argued.

Using Subheadings and Transitions: An Example

Thesis/Claim: Greenlife's proposal to ban all logging in rain forests should be supported.

Reason #1: It would help prevent global warming. [This sentence then gets developed, followed by a transition leading to Reason #2.]

Transition between #1 and #2: Although global warming may be the most persuasive reason to stop logging in rainforests due to the effect it has on the entire planet's population, the effect on local culture, affecting a much smaller number of people, is just as important. Losing native habitats destroys ways of life which can never be replaced, displacing people and devastating cultures that can never be restored. [ Logic: both are equally important reasons to stop logging.]

Reason #2: Logging destroys indigenous lifestyles. [This gets developed, followed by a transition leading to Reason #3.]

Transition between #2 and #3: Not only is the effect on indigenous cultures and global climate impossible to reverse but logging also has a lasting effect on the local environment that could have equally disastrous consequences. The erosion caused by logging results in a change in the ecosystem, particularly the loss of rich, fertile soil essential to both plant and animal life. [ Logic: human effects of global warming and loss of indigenous cultures are not the only considerations: effects on ecosystems are also consequences of logging.]

Reason #3: Logging produces erosion in the local environment. [This gets developed, followed by a transition leading to Opposing Position #1.]

Transition between reason 3 and opposition #1: Of course, many have argued that the loss of plant life and soil should be considered necessary damages if they work in favor of increasing the quality of human life. [ Logic: Introduces opposing argument #1 and leads to its refutation.]

Opposition #1: The argument that human life is more important than plant life, however, simply does not hold up when considering that the devastation of an ecosystem also affects human life. These effects, as I've already shown, can be measured not only in terms of climate change and the loss of indigenous cultures, but also in terms of losses to farming and other local economic systems. [ Logic: Demonstrates that opposition to point 3 is not viable because of points 1, 2, and 3.]

Using Topic Sentences or Explanatory Paragraphs

Another good way to help an audience follow the logic of your argument is to use of topic sentences literally telling them how each point relates to the claim, clearly connecting them so that there isn't any question how or why they relate. In longer arguments, entire paragraphs can serve this purpose by explaining the connections between extended summaries of evidence or the logical arguments of sub-points to the main claim.

Paragraph Example

Claim/Thesis of Paper: Writing teachers fail to deal with multicultural issues to the detriment of their students.

Section One: An analysis of the weaknesses of current curricular approaches to writing

Transitional Paragraph tying analysis to thesis and next section: As the analysis above shows, none of the available curricular models address multiculturalism except in the most cursory manner. Worse, their very superficiality does more damage than good. By introducing the topic of writing for multiple communities, the pedagogies make an attempt to bring diversity into the classroom; yet their focus remains on teaching academic writing with standard usage and grammar. Although they admit that such teaching is only for this context, putting such emphasis on standard forms introduces the issue: which forms of writing have more power in society, something none of the pedagogies address. By putting forth the academic model as the one which must be taught and learned in schools, they implicitly devalue other forms. The failure to foreground these power issues, then, leads students of difference to conclude that although their language and forms of writing might be acceptable in certain places, they are not welcome in the places which count in society. The effect of such an implicit message can be devastating to maintaining cultural values and difference.

Section Two: Discussion of research on multicultural student reactions' to writing classes.

Topic Sentence Example

Main Claim or Thesis of Paper: Professor X is a good teacher and should retain her job at CSU.

Introduction: Agues that determining whether Professor X is a good teacher involves evaluating her performance against criteria for good teachers.

Body of Argument: Works through several criteria to judge Professor X's teaching quality.

Topic Sentence Example: The first and probably most important criteria for judging the quality of a teacher is student opinion and, by any measure of student opinion-course evaluations, interviews, and class enrollment-Professor X is clearly one of the best teachers at CSU. [Paper goes on to offer summaries of all three forms of proof listed and then moves onto the second criteria with a topic sentence that ties back to the overall judgment of Prof. X as a good teacher.]

Example of When Methods are Combined

Claim of Paper: Decreasing the average work week to 32 hours would help support family values.

From Body of Paper: Although most of us know that working too much affects family time and thus family structure, we usually assume that this is the case only for people who work 40+ hours a week. Studies of how work-related stress influences family time, however, suggest that too much work, even within what is considered "normal," has detrimental effects on family time. [Topic sentence connects evidence (studies) to the point that 40 hour work weeks have negative affects on families.] For example, in Smith's 1987 study of 15 average, middle-class families, he describes the undue pressure a 9-5 schedule puts on families. In particular, he notes that this time schedule translates to at least three forms of unnecessary family stress: (1) "rushed" mornings where parents desperately try sticking to a rigid time schedule that gets the children off to school and themselves to work between the hours of 7 and 9; (2) financial pressure of paying babysitters or day care facilities during school holidays and the 2 or 3 hours after school while parents are still at work; (3) overly frantic weekends where, since many businesses close at 5:00, all errands must be done before then. [Note how the author highlights only the parts of the study that influence family pressures.] The stresses Smith documents are not in families where parents work 60-70 hours a week. The parents working 40 hours a week are secretaries, mechanics, bank employees, etc. The effects on them, he notes, clearly translate to less time spent with family members because of work demands as well as increased pressure when the family is together. [Warrant explaining why proof shows the problem is the 40-hour work week discussed in the initial point made]

Such pressures can't help but influence the quality of time the family spends together, influencing its ability to stay together or to have the type of time most conducive to instilling family values. [Topic sentences which ties point 1 to overall claim of paper] In fact, as psychological studies show, the type of time spent together has a great influence on family cohesiveness. [Transition connecting point 1--effect of 40 hour week on families--to point 2: the influence of time pressures on keeping family together]

Next Paragraph: Summaries of psychological studies to support the new claim of effect on cohesiveness.

Reviewing and Revising Your Connections

After drafting an argument you'll want take a step back and check the logic of its organization. You want to make sure that everything is connected and that every connection will make sense to an audience.

Analyze by Outlining

Chunk your argument into numbered sections: read through the text and place a number in the margin every time you change focus, even slightly. These changes may or may not come at regular intervals: one section might take three paragraphs while another takes only one. When you are finished, ask the following questions:

• Do similar points come up in different sections? If so, put them together.
• Are any sections only a few sentences long? Are they relevant? If so, expand them; if not, cut them out.
• Can you define the relationship each section has to the position being argued? How is each one relevant? Look at your revised argument and create a list of reasons that connect each section to the position being argued. Those that don't should be cut. Save this list, the reasons you have identified will make excellent transitions between argument sections.
• Can you explain why section #2 follows section #1 and so on? If not consider how sections might be moved around so that you have a clear reason for why each one follows another. Make another list, including these reasons. Consider using them as transitions between argument sections as well.

Get Some Peer-Review

Have a friend or several friends read through your argument. Ask them to mark where they get lost or are not sure of your point or where you are going next. These are places where rearrangement or clearer transitions are probably necessary. Also, try reading the argument aloud, to yourself and your friends. Frequently, when you hear an argument out loud, you can pinpoint where its logic doesn't add up. Changes can then be made.

Cut and Paste

Cut and paste. Play around with your organizational structure. Literally cut your paper into paragraphs and then make piles out of those which have things in common. If only part of a paragraph does, then cut some more. Save the leftovers in a separate pile. What do the pieces in each pile have in common? Construct a title for each pile based on the reason: Finally, ask yourself: what is the relationship between each pile: How are they related? Don't be afraid to shuffle them around and look at them in different positions. This will help you order the sections of your argument when pasting it back together. Look at your pile of left over pieces to see if they belong. If they do, consider expanding them so their relevance is made clear. If not, leave them out. Remember, throwing stuff out is not a sign of failure; it's an integral part of rewriting.

LeCourt, Donna, Kate Kiefer, & Peter Connor. (1996). Organizing an Argument. Writing@CSU . Colorado State University. https://writing.colostate.edu/guides/guide.cfm?guideid=56

English (EN) - Composition: Rogerian Essay

• English Composition Home
• EN101 Information Literacy Toolkit
• EN102 Information Cycle
• EN Course Handouts & Activities
• EN Careers & Education
• Citing Sources This link opens in a new window
• Librarian Evaluation This link opens in a new window

What is a Rogerian Essay?

Some English instructors will assign a Rogerian Essay for class. A Rogerian Essay explores both sides of an issue and suggests a compromise, synthesis or solution. It's sometimes referred to as a "common ground" argument paper.

A Rogerian Essay outline may look like this*:

• Introduce the problem and show why you and your intended audience are affected by the problem.
• Lay down the common beliefs, ideas and arguments between you and your listeners (if you are speaking) or readers (if you are writing a position paper).
• Reveal the position that you are holding without saying that your position is better than the opposing belief.
• Show instances where and when your position is valid and how your position differs from the opposing belief.
• State your thesis .

*from the Tips for Essays and Research Papers website

Rogerian Essay Example and Topic Ideas

• Sample of a Rogerian Essay
• List of topics for the Rogerian Essay

Rogerian Essay Research

• Opposing Viewpoints in Context This link opens in a new window Opposing Viewpoints in Context is an online resource covering social issues. This cross-curricular research tool supports science, social studies, current events, and language arts classes.
• Points of View Reference Center This link opens in a new window This is a great database to help you understand the pro's and con's of different debatable topics. It's also a handy place to see a list of really interesting topics if you need paper topic ideas and don't know where to start.
• Research Library This link opens in a new window ProQuest Research Library provides access to a wide range of popular academic subjects from business and political science to literature and psychology. The database includes more than 4,070 titles, nearly 2,800 in full text, from 1971 forward. It includes a diversified mix of scholarly journals, trade publications, magazines, and newspapers.

Video Explanation of Rogerian Argument

• Last Updated: Feb 5, 2024 11:12 AM
• URL: https://subjectguides.grcc.edu/englishcomposition

EnglishComposition.Org

Be a Better Writer

Rogerian Argument: Explanation and Example

When most of us think of arguments, we think about winners and losers. And we think that the winners win because their arguments were strong and forceful. This common perception of argument aligns well with what is called an Aristotelian or classical argument:  “ This is my assertion and here is the compelling evidence that shows why I am right ." 

But that kind of argument doesn't work in all situations. When your audience is a difficult one in the sense that you know your audience isn’t going to completely agree with your side of the issue, it can be a good idea to search for a middle ground. A Rogerian argument helps you find that middle ground.

Based on the work of psychologist Carl Rogers, a Rogerian argument can be extremely persuasive and can help you, as a writer, understand your own biases and how you might work to solve problems by finding common ground with others. Here is a overview of the basic strategy for writing a Rogerian argument, followed by a Rogerian essay example:

10 Steps to Writing a Rogerian Argument

• Find common ground  — Because a Rogerian argument will help you find common ground with your audience, you should consider this style of argument when you have a difficult or controversial topic and want to use a connection with your audience as a part of your persuasive style. But what is common ground? Finding a common ground involves meeting your opposition in the middle.
• Know your audience  — Is your audience going to be reluctant to change on this issue? If so, a Rogerian argument can be persuasive. It is also going to be a wonderful exercise in helping you see things from your audience’s perspective, as your goal is to understand the other side of an issue and then meet your audience in the middle. Some brainstorming can help you as you think about how you are going to approach your audience and find the common ground you need.
• Introduce the problem  — When you begin your argumentative essay, you should introduce the problem or issue in a way that makes it clear to an opposing audience that you understand their position.
• Acknowledge other side  — Unlike some other argument structures, in a Rogerian argument, you should address the opposition in the very beginning of your essay. After your introduction, you should explain the contexts in which your opposition’s viewpoints make sense and are valid.
• State your position  — It’s now time to present your side. Your goal is to evenly and carefully make the case for your position in order to be as persuasive as possible to the other side. Explain the contexts in which your side of the issue makes sense.
• Bring two sides together  — After you present your position, your next step is to explain how the opposition would benefit from considering at least certain parts of your position. Focus on the value of your position while remembering the value of the other side.
• Reach a conclusion  — As you reach the end of your Rogerian essay, remember to remind your audience of your main points and try to leave your audience with something to consider, even if they are still not convinced by the balanced presentation on the issue you have presented.
• Not finished yet  — You now have your draft completed, but there is a world of work left to do in terms of revision and editing. Before you edit, you should revise the content of your work. To help with revision, it is a good idea to get feedback.
• Hear from the other side  — Get feedback from as many people as you can. It is helpful to participate in a peer review if your course offers one. But it is a good idea to go beyond that peer review as well. Try to get feedback from those who disagree with your position. Not everyone is going to agree with your argument, but the feedback helps you grow as a writer.
• Edit and polish  — Once your essay content has been revised, it is time to edit. Editing involves addressing things like grammar, spelling, and checking on your citation. A good editing process involves many passes. You can’t catch all of your errors in one pass. Remember that effective editing takes time!

Follow these steps and you will be well on your way to a strong Rogerian argument essay!

Rogerian Argument Example Essay

Now that you have had the chance to learn about Rogerian arguments, it’s time to see what a Rogerian argument might look like. Below, you’ll see a sample argumentative essay, written according to APA formatting guidelines, with a particular emphasis on Rogerian elements.

Click the image below to see the sample paper in a PDF format. Scroll over the purple dialog boxes to learn about the strategies and techniques the author used in this essay. In some browsers, you may need to download or save this file to be able to utilize all of its functionality.

Click here to see a sample Rogerian Essay

License and Attribution

Image Credit:  Sketch of Carl Ransom Rogers by Didius .

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

59 Rogerian Argument Model

Rogerian argument.

The Rogerian argument, inspired by the influential psychologist Carl Rogers, aims to find compromise or common ground about an issue.  If, as stated in the beginning of the chapter, academic or rhetorical argument is not merely a two-sided debate that seeks a winner and a loser, the Rogerian argument model provides a structured way to move beyond the win-lose mindset.  Indeed, the Rogerian model can be employed to deal effectively with controversial arguments that have been reduced to two opposing points of view by forcing the writer to confront opposing ideas and then work towards a common understanding with those who might disagree.

The following are the basic parts of a Rogerian Argument:

1.  Introduction : Introduce the issue under scrutiny in a non-confrontational way.  Be sure to outline the main sides in the debate.  Though there are always more than two sides to a debate, Rogerian arguments put two in stark opposition to one another. Crucially, be sure to indicate the overall purpose of the essay: to come to a  compromise  about the issue at hand.  If this intent is not stated up front, the reader may be confused or even suspect manipulation on the part of the writer, i.e., that the writer is massaging the audience just to win a fight.  Be advised that the Rogerian essay uses an inductive reasoning structure, so  do not  include your thesis in your introduction.  You will build toward the thesis and then include it in your conclusion.  Once again, state the  intent  to compromise, but do not yet state what the compromise is.

2.  Side A :  Carefully map out the main claim and reasoning for the  opposing side  of the argument first.  The writer’s view should never really come first because that would defeat the purpose of what Rogers called  empathetic listening , which guides the overall approach to this type of argument.  By allowing the opposing argument to come first, you communicate to the reader that you are willing to respectfully consider another’s view on the issue.  Furthermore, you invite the reader to then give you the same respect and consideration when presenting your own view.  Finally, presenting the opposition first can help those readers who would side against you to ease into the essay, keeping them invested in the project.  If you present your own ideas first, you risk polarizing those readers from the start, which would then make them less amenable to considering a compromise by the end of the essay.   You can listen to Carl Rogers himself discuss the importance of empathy on  YouTube   (https://youtu.be/2dLsgpHw5x0, transcript  here ).

3.  Side B : Carefully go over  your side  of the argument.  When mapping out this side’s claim and support, be sure that it parallels that of Side A.  In other words, make sure not to raise entirely new categories of support, or there can be no way to come to a compromise.  Make sure to maintain a non-confrontational tone; for example, avoid appearing arrogant, sarcastic, or smug.

4.  The Bridge : A solid Rogerian argument acknowledges the desires of each side and tries to accommodate both. In this part, point out the ways in which you agree or can find  common ground  between the two sides.  There should be at least one point of agreement.  This can be an acknowledgement of the one part of the opposition’s agreement that you also support or an admittance to a shared set of values even if the two sides come to different ideas when employing those values.  This phase of the essay is crucial for two reasons: finding common ground (1) shows the audience the two views are not necessarily at complete odds, that they share more than they seem, and (2) sets up the compromise to come, making it easier to digest for all parties. Thus, this section  builds a bridge  from the two initial isolated and opposite views to a compromise that both sides can reasonably support.

5.  The Compromise :  Now is the time to finally announce your compromise, which is your thesis.  The compromise is what the essay has been building towards all along, so explain it carefully and demonstrate the logic of it. For example, if debating about whether to use racial profiling, a compromise might be based on both sides’ desire for a safer society.  That shared value can then lead to a new claim, one that disarms the original dispute or set of disputes.  For the racial profiling example, perhaps a better solution would focus on more objective measures than race that would then promote safety in a less problematic way.

Rogerian Execise

Find a controversial topic, and begin building a Rogerian argument.  Write up your responses to the following:

• The topic or dilemma I will write about is…
• My opposing audience is…
• My audience’s view on the topic is…
• My view on the topic is…
• Our common ground–shared values or something that we both already agree on about the topic–is…
• My compromise (the main claim or potential thesis) is…

Write What Matters Copyright © 2020 by Liza Long; Amy Minervini; and Joel Gladd is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book