S&OP primarily balances supply and demand. IBP extends beyond this. It integrates financial planning and product development into its framework. This makes it a broader, more strategic approach. It encompasses long-term goals and focuses on profitability.
Embracing Integrated Business Planning positions you to manage your resources smartly. It keeps your business agile and aligned with market demands and growth objectives. It promotes sustained business success and differentiates your company in a competitive market.
Embrace Integrated Business Planning today with the right means and unlock the full potential of your business.
Elevate your forecasting strategies with integrated business planning that seamlessly integrates with your operations for synchronized decision-making, enhanced collaboration, and optimized resource allocation. Ensure success across every facet of your organization.
What are the key differences between s&op and integrated business planning.
S&OP primarily focuses on balancing supply and demand and aligning production and inventory levels with sales forecasts. In contrast, IBP integrates these operational planning activities with strategic and financial planning, providing a more holistic view and a longer-term focus.
Yes, Integrated Business Planning is highly adaptable and can be tailored to meet the specific needs of different industries and business models. By adjusting the focus on key metrics, processes, and strategic priorities, IBP can effectively support unique operational and strategic requirements across sectors.
Companies assess the effectiveness of their Integrated Business Planning initiatives through various metrics: improved forecast accuracy, increased revenue, enhanced customer satisfaction, and reduced inventory costs.
Equip yourself with more information on the latest trends in the market, technology, and how your peers are solving their business problems.
We help our customers harness the power of AI to make smarter decisions
All solutions.
© 2024 Impact Analytics.
Arunabh Bora
An introduction to SAP IBP for the uninitiated.
This article is inspired from a recent experience. I am sure there are many people who have heard about IBP and are interested to learn it but don’t know where to begin. I say this because I was at the same place once. There was no place where I could receive any formal training. While the best way to learn IBP is to be hands-on, in this article I will try to explain the software in layman terms but do note that some parts might get a bit technical.
In very simple terms, IBP (Integrated Business Planning) is a supply chain planning application. It has 6 modules inside it.
2. Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP)
3. Inventory Optimisation
4. Response and Supply Planning
5. Demand Driven Replenishment (DDMRP)
6. Control Tower
Before IBP, companies were using something called APO (Advanced Planning & Optimizer). I will show a table which shows the difference between APO and IBP.
There are some functionalities like Production Planning and Detailed Scheduling (PP/DS) and global Available to Promise (gATP) which are present in APO but not in IBP. These modules can be used in S4HANA.
What makes IBP special is, I believe, the excel based interface which enables real time collaboration. Also, it maintains stickiness since users do not have to transition from their excel sheets.
This part can get a bit technical but it is necessary to understand the structure of IBP. A planning model describes the structure of the system in terms of data and calculations. It defines how data is stored, calculated and aggregated in the system. All planning models are based on the following entities.
Let’s do a deep dive into the various components
Attributes are characteristics of master data types, for example, an attribute of the customer master data type might be country or region. Attributes can be either numeric or non-numeric. Attributes can be of the following datatypes — string, decimal, integer, timestamp.\
Master data types represent categories of information, for example, customer, location, product, or resource. It is used to segment planning data.
Different types of master data:
Time Profiles define a time interval used for managing planning data. A time profile is made up of time profile levels (e.g. months, quarters, or years). Each level is made up of periods, which are identified by a number, and describe the start and end time of the time period. These periods form a hierarchy which is then used to aggregate or disaggregate data along a time horizon.
A planning area is a model entity that defines the structure and forms the backbone of the planning process. A planning area consists of its assigned time profile, attributes of master data types, planning levels, key figures, and versions.
Planning areas can contain multiple versions — the base version and additional versions. Versions can share master data with the base version or can be based on independent sets of version-specific master data. A company can have multiple planning areas to enable the processes of SAP IBP in different business units.
A planning level is a set of attributes that identify and label key figure values, and forms part of the definition of a planning area. The attributes assigned to the planning area are available to form planning levels, as well as the time profile levels, and the attributes assigned to the time profile levels. A planning level enables you to analyze and plan at a specific aggregation level.
A planning level can be used as the base planning level of a key figure. The base planning level specifies the most granular level at which the value of the key figure is defined.
Key figures are series of numbers over time, where each number corresponds to a particular time period value.
Key figures are associated with a key, which is a combination of attributes from one or more master data objects. They represent variables that are associated with attributes (master data types), and can be imported into the SAP Integrated Business Planning system, calculated, and/or manually edited.
Types of key figures:
A version is a separate set of key figure data used to manage alternative plans. A baseline version is automatically generated after the initial configuration of the planning area. Additional versions can be defined to include a subset or all key figures of the planning area. Versions can share master data with the base version or have independent master data.
A planning operator uses an algorithm to compute large amounts of key figure data within a planning session.
All right, that was a ‘bit’ about the configuration part. Now let’s move on to the modules.
Demand Planning is the first module in IBP. This is where the cycle begins. Demand can be independent (from outside the org) or dependent (inside the org). We usually try to forecast the independent demand because it is the type that is actually customer facing. In demand forecasting, we usually perform these functions in order — cleaning the historical data, consider internal and external factors, perform initial forecasting, refine the forecast and measure the forecast accuracy.
Demand planning offer the following functionalities:
Inventory optimization helps manage uncertainty in the supply chain by determining the amount of safety stock to hold at stocking locations within the supply chain. It determines the lowest stocking cost possible to different inventory locations across the supply chain. It can provide stocking targets at an item-location-time level granularity.
Inventory optimization help lower the ‘Bullwhip Effect’ which refers to uncertainties across the supply chain due to the interdependency between suppliers, plants, warehouses, and customer sites. Too much safety stock can cause high holding costs or too low safety stocks can cause stock-outs.
Determining the optimal safety stock level depends on the following factors — customer demand, demand uncertainty, forecast error, lead times, replenishment frequency, lot sizes and target service levels.
This module is geared towards enabling collaboration and increasing the speed and agility of planning. S&OP evaluates time-phased projections for demand, supply, product and portfolio changes, strategic projects, and the resulting financial plans over the mid- to long-term planning horizon.
It is essentially a re-planning process to manage organizational changes effectively. It involves all functions of the company, making it a cross-functional process and it is driven by demand and strategy.
SAP IBP S&OP has the following functionalities — process orchestration, scenario creation and management for what-ifs, performing multi-level supply planning heuristics, creating a rough-cut capacity plan.
With Response and Supply, we can create a rough-cut capacity plan or a constrained supply plan. It can create a master production schedule and form procurement plans based on exploding the Bill of Material. It can create planned orders, purchase requisitions and stock transfer orders (STOs). It helps us gain visibility for projected shortage at relevant levels of aggregation.
Through its detailed model configuration capabilities, IBP allows businesses to create tailored planning models that meet their specific needs.
By leveraging baseline and additional versions, companies can ensure a dynamic and responsive approach to supply chain planning. This flexibility is crucial in today’s rapidly changing business environment, where agility and foresight can make a significant difference.
Planning operators facilitate essential functions like simulation, demand-driven replenishment, and inventory optimization, ensuring that businesses can maintain optimal inventory levels and meet customer demand effectively.
Text to speech
Getting started.
Understand the scope of SAP IBP and plan your implementation! Learn how to navigate the system, load data, and use the basic planning model.
Follow comprehensive steps for configuring SAP IBP, starting with the baseline functionality common to all planning applications. Then, delve into application-specific setup.
Learn to balance demand and supply, perform demand forecasting, use order simulation, optimize inventory levels, manage buffer levels, monitor KPIs, and more!
Sandy Markin has more than 40 years of experience in manufacturing and supply chain management.
Amit Sinha is an expert in SAP supply chain processes and digital technology with more than 16 years of experience in leading supply chain transformation projects.
Sanchit Chandna is a supply chain leader with more than 11 years of experience developing supply chain strategies and delivering digital business transformation programs.
Jay Foster is the director of solution management at SAP for SAP IBP. As a supply chain and manufacturing veteran of more than 30 years, Jay brings a wealth of practical experience and logical insight to solving today’s business challenges.
Lei Wang, Sanchit Chandna, Jeroen Kusters, Atul Bhandari
419 pages, hardcover
from $84.99
Janet Salmon, Stefan Walz
593 pages, hardcover
from $74.99
James Olcott, Jon Simmonds
434 pages, hardcover
Take your supply chain to the cloud! Walk through the SAP Integrated Business Planning applications―S&OP, demand, response and supply, demand-driven MRP, and inventory. Then learn to monitor and control these processes. See how to set up and use your SAP IBP system, from planning areas to key figures. With coverage of intelligent visibility, SAP IBP for demand-driven replenishment, and more, you can be sure you’re getting the latest information on supply chain planning with SAP!
Getting Started
Understand the scope of SAP IBP and plan your implementation! Learn how to navigate the system, load data, and use the basic planning model.
Configuration
Follow comprehensive steps for configuring SAP IBP, starting with the baseline functionality common to all planning applications. Then, delve into application-specific setup.
Functionality
Learn to balance demand and supply, perform demand forecasting, use order simulation, optimize inventory levels, manage buffer levels, monitor KPIs, and more.
About the Authors
Sandy Markin has more than 40 years of experience in manufacturing and supply chain management. He began his career in operations management in the consumer products industry and subsequently worked for several software providers. In 1994, he joined SAP, where he is now the senior director for the digital supply chain. During his tenure at SAP, he has been instrumental in bringing to market several industry-leading supply chain solutions, including SAP Advanced Planning and Optimization (SAP APO) and SAP Integrated Business Planning (SAP IBP). Sandy is a lifelong Chicago-area resident and received his BS from the University of Illinois and his MBA from Loyola University of Chicago.
Amit Sinha is an expert in SAP supply chain processes and digital technology with more than 16 years of experience in leading supply chain transformation projects. He has worked extensively with different industry sectors across the globe in the areas of sales and operations planning (S&OP), demand planning, supply planning, inventory optimization, manufacturing, and supply chain analytics. He is an expert in SAP IBP and other SAP supply chain applications. Amit has authored multiple books and research papers on supply chain management and digital technology applications for creating intelligently automated supply chains. He has been a speaker at global supply chain conferences and serves as a board member for two nonprofit organizations focused on manufacturing organizations and supply chain education. Currently working as a leader in the supply chain Strategy & Transformation team at Microsoft, Amit has also been active with the teaching, research, and spreading knowledge about digital supply chains for helping students, professionals, organizations, and related ecosystem partners.
Sanchit Chandra is a supply chain leader with more than 11 years of experience developing supply chain strategies and delivering digital business transformation programs. He has worked extensively across consumer, chemical, and hi-tech industries, helping clients design and implement SAP supply chain planning solutions in the areas of demand management, master production scheduling, inventory planning and optimization, and S&OP. Sanchit has worked with multiple SAP IBP customers
The purpose of this document is to cover common questions that come up prior to purchasing integrated business planning applications. if you have technical questions related to an implementation, please see: sap integrated business planning faqs for implementations., general questions.
The term “IBP” is an industry standard term referring to the process of integrating sales forecasts, inventory targets, supply plans, and financial plans into a single operational plan for the business or business unit, agreed by all parties (sales, operations, logistics, finance) and “blessed” by business leadership.
In SAP terms, “IBP” is the next generation SAP supply chain planning applications that sit on SAP HANA and support the above Integrated Business Planning process.
SAP IBP for supply chain: 1 Page Product Overview
There are 5 applications in SAP IBP:
1 Page Product Overview | YouTube Demo
2. SAP Supply Chain Control Tower: “Visibility”
1 Page Product Overview
3. SAP Integrated Business Planning for inventory “Master Uncertainty, use inventory efficiently”
4. SAP Integrated Business Planning for demand: “Forecast Better”
5. SAP Integrated Business Planning for response and supply: “Master supply planning and response intelligence”
Comparison of each of the SAP IBP solutions and their capabilities: LINK
SAP IBP Overview Blog: Getting started: What is SAP Integrated Business Plannin g
SAP IBP Overview Webinar: SAP IBP Overview Webinar
SAP IBP adds important functionality to SAP APO and other Advanced Planning software, but the true answer depends on YOU!
Every customer is different. That being said there are different ways of adopting the solution.
Even if you have SAP APO DP, you can leverage demand sensing (part of SAP IBP for demand), to obtain better short-term forecasting based on pattern recognition and multiple forecast inputs.
SAP APO SNP vis a vis SAP IBP for inventory
SAP IBP for inventory is a planning tool, taking in factors around risk and uncertainty (forecast error, supply uncertainty) to most efficiently absorb risk using the lowest amount of inventory to meet customer service levels. It accomplishes this by setting most-efficient safety stock targets across the supply chain.
SAP SNP then uses these SAP IBP for inventory “SS” targets to optimize how to most efficiently supply demand (forecast + demand + any change in SS). This meets both service levels (by supplying safety stock), forecast and existing orders.
SAP APO SNP does have a safety stock optimization function, but this is extremely limited in scope: SAP APO SNP only handles an individual location, essentially considering only demand variability. SAP IBP for inventory considers the entire supply, using multi-stage optimization, as well as considering additional uncertainties like supply timing variability. SAP IBP for inventory can meet the same service level targets using (typically) 10-30% less inventory.
SAP IBP for sales and operations + SAP Supply Chain Control Tower = Management level strategic control and visibility over the business.
SAP IBP for sales and operations + SAP IBP for inventory = taking S&OP to SIOP, taking S&OP decisions and applying multistage inventory optimization in near-real-time to drive inventory targets to the Planners the same day the S&OP decision is made.
SAP IBP for inventory + SAP I BP for demand : = A 1-2 punch against uncertainty! Use IBP for demand to improve forecasting and, recognizing that even the best forecast is not 100% accurate (and suppliers aren’t 100% reliable either), position inventory most efficiently to buffer the remaining uncertainty in your supply chain.
SAP IBP for supply and response + SAP Supply Chain Control Tower = Provides instant visibility to global inventory and capacity utilization. It incorporates the ability to understand exceptions and run what-if simulations on a global level to make decisions and effectively orchestrate fast issue resolution.
Yes - please check out this blog post for more details.
SAP IBP YouTube channel
Want to try SAP IBP out: https://www.sapstore.com/solutions/60032/SAP-Integrated-Business-Planning-starter-edition%2C-non-production
Please contact L.W.Bryan Charnock if you have any questions with the Starter Edition on the SAP Store. Starter Edition FAQ .
Our sales team would be happy to clarify any questions that you may have regarding SAP Integrated Business Planning and the Onboarding Process.
Contact our SAP IBP Sales experts below:
See our complete list of local country numbers
We have a large number of SAP Integrated Business Planning customers from many industries including: High Tech, Consumer Products, Life Science, Chemicals, and Industrial Machinery and Components.
Here are some ways to hear from our customers:
1. Listen to recorded SAP IBP Customer Story Webcasts:
2. Listen to a short customer story video:
3. Review a case study:
4. Reference Call:
SAP hosts multiple reference live calls where you can ask your questions directly to our customers.
Contact your SAP Sales Team to request a recording of a previous session or to be included in a future session.
Starter Edition, Test, and Production systems can be available in as little as 5 business days of completing the order and submitting the completed provisioning checklist.
Think about all the IT dollars you will save!
SAP wants to make sure you get the latest and greatest bug fixes and enhancements, therefore we provide our customers with system updates every 2 to 3 weeks.
Updated Releases (with major enhancements) come out 4 times a year.
To find out more about the upgrade process and communication Information, please see this link .
Implementations can take as little as 3 months. Of course, implementation timelines can range due to scope, implementation approach, data quality, and resource availability.
Upon request, the SAP Services team and SAP Partners would be happy to provide you with a sample implementation approach and plan.
Please contact L.W.Bryan Charnock for more information regarding SAP Partners for IBP.
Through a URL provided by SAP. You can access SAP IBP through Internet Explorer or Google Chrome.
SAP’s proprietary SAP Cloud Integration has prebuilt templates that allow you to load and extract data from many standard SAP systems as well as non-SAP systems.
SAP has very high levels of data center and data security meeting all the key certification and audit requirements.
SAP takes data security and system reliability very seriously. Take a tour of our data centers and learn about data security at the SAP Cloud Trust Center: https://www.sap.com/about/cloud-trust-center.html
SAP commits to a 99.5% system availability SLA for IBP on the cloud:
http://www.sap.com/corporate-en/about/our-company/policies/cloud/service-level-agreement.html
New Export/Import for SAP IBP FAQ
SAP IBP Best Practices frequently asked questions (FAQ)
SAP IBP Starter Edition frequently asked questions (FAQ)
SAP IBP for Inventory FAQ
SAP Integrated Business Planning FAQs
SAP IBP Platform Topic - Calendars FAQ
SAP IBP Integration using CPI-DS Mini-Series FAQ
Buying - SAP Integrated Business Planning FAQs
SAP IBP Intelligent User Assistance with SAP Enable Now FAQ
SAP Integrated Business Planning - Learning Hub Digital Enablement for SAP FAQ
SAP IBP Converged Cloud Migration FAQs
IBP Partner Sales Enablement Webinar - IBP for inventory Q+A
IBP Partner Sales Enablement Webinar - IBP for sales and operations Q+A
Statistical Forecasting in SAP Integrated Business Planning for demand FAQ
Managing the availability of supply to meet volatile demand has never been easy. Even before the unprecedented challenges created by the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine, synchronizing supply and demand was a perennial struggle for most businesses. In a survey of 54 senior executives, only about one in four believed that the processes of their companies balanced cross-functional trade-offs effectively or facilitated decision making to help the P&L of the full business.
That’s not because of a lack of effort. Most companies have made strides to strengthen their planning capabilities in recent years. Many have replaced their processes for sales and operations planning (S&OP) with the more sophisticated approach of integrated business planning (IBP), which shows great promise, a conclusion based on an in-depth view of the processes used by many leading companies around the world (see sidebar “Understanding IBP”). Assessments of more than 170 companies, collected over five years, provide insights into the value created by IBP implementations that work well—and the reasons many IBP implementations don’t.
Integrated business planning is a powerful process that could become central to how a company runs its business. It is one generation beyond sales and operations planning. Three essential differentiators add up to a unique business-steering capability:
An effective IBP process consists of five essential building blocks: a business-backed design; high-quality process management, including inputs and outputs; accountability and performance management; the effective use of data, analytics, and technology; and specialized organizational roles and capabilities (Exhibit 1). Our research finds that mature IBP processes can significantly improve coordination and reduce the number of surprises. Compared with companies that lack a well-functioning IBP process, the average mature IBP practitioner realizes one or two additional percentage points in EBIT. Service levels are five to 20 percentage points higher. Freight costs and capital intensity are 10 to 15 percent lower—and customer delivery penalties and missed sales are 40 to 50 percent lower. IBP technology and process discipline can also make planners 10 to 20 percent more productive.
When IBP processes are set up correctly, they help companies to make and execute plans and to monitor, simulate, and adapt their strategic assumptions and choices to succeed in their markets. However, leaders must treat IBP not just as a planning-process upgrade but also as a company-wide business initiative (see sidebar “IBP in action” for a best-in-class example).
One global manufacturer set up its integrated business planning (IBP) system as the sole way it ran its entire business, creating a standardized, integrated process for strategic, tactical, and operational planning. Although the company had previously had a sales and operations planning (S&OP) process, it had been owned and led solely by the supply chain function. Beyond S&OP, the sales function forecast demand in aggregate dollar value at the category level and over short time horizons. Finance did its own projections of the quarterly P&L, and data from day-by-day execution fed back into S&OP only at the start of a new monthly cycle.
The CEO endorsed a new way of running regional P&Ls and rolling up plans to the global level. The company designed its IBP process so that all regional general managers owned the regional IBP by sponsoring the integrated decision cycles (following a global design) and by ensuring functional ownership of the decision meetings. At the global level, the COO served as tiebreaker whenever decisions—such as procurement strategies for global commodities, investments in new facilities for global product launches, or the reconfiguration of a product’s supply chain—cut across regional interests.
To enable IBP to deliver its impact, the company conducted a structured process assessment to evaluate the maturity of all inputs into IBP. It then set out to redesign, in detail, its processes for planning demand and supply, inventory strategies, parametrization, and target setting, so that IBP would work with best-practice inputs. To encourage collaboration, leaders also started to redefine the performance management system so that it included clear accountability for not only the metrics that each function controlled but also shared metrics. Finally, digital dashboards were developed to track and monitor the realization of benefits for individual functions, regional leaders, and the global IBP team.
A critical component of the IBP rollout was creating a company-wide awareness of its benefits and the leaders’ expectations for the quality of managers’ contributions and decision-making discipline. To educate and show commitment from the CEO down, this information was rolled out in a campaign of town halls and media communications to all employees. The company also set up a formal capability-building program for the leaders and participants in the IBP decision cycle.
Rolled out in every region, the new training helps people learn how to run an effective IBP cycle, to recognize the signs of good process management, and to internalize decision authority, thresholds, and escalation paths. Within a few months, the new process, led by a confident and motivated leadership team, enabled closer company-wide collaboration during tumultuous market conditions. That offset price inflation for materials (which adversely affected peers) and maintained the company’s EBITDA performance.
Our research shows that these high-maturity IBP examples are in the minority. In practice, few companies use the IBP process to support effective decision making (Exhibit 2). For two-thirds of the organizations in our data set, IBP meetings are periodic business reviews rather than an integral part of the continuous cycle of decisions and adjustments needed to keep organizations aligned with their strategic and tactical goals. Some companies delegate IBP to junior staff. The frequency of meetings averages one a month. That can make these processes especially ineffective—lacking either the senior-level participation for making consequential strategic decisions or the frequency for timely operational reactions.
Finally, most companies struggle to turn their plans into effective actions: critical metrics and responsibilities are not aligned across functions, so it’s hard to steer the business in a collaborative way. Who is responsible for the accuracy of forecasts? What steps will be taken to improve it? How about adherence to the plan? Are functions incentivized to hold excess inventory? Less than 10 percent of all companies have a performance management system that encourages the right behavior across the organization.
By contrast, at the most effective organizations, IBP meetings are all about decisions and their impact on the P&L—an impact enabled by focused metrics and incentives for collaboration. Relevant inputs (data, insights, and decision scenarios) are diligently prepared and syndicated before meetings to help decision makers make the right choices quickly and effectively. These companies support IBP by managing their short-term planning decisions prescriptively, specifying thresholds to distinguish changes immediately integrated into existing plans from day-to-day noise. Within such boundaries, real-time daily decisions are made in accordance with the objectives of the entire business, not siloed frontline functions. This responsive execution is tightly linked with the IBP process, so that the fact base is always up-to-date for the next planning iteration.
In our experience, integrated business planning can help a business succeed in a sustainable way if three conditions are met. First, the process must be designed for the P&L owner, not individual functions in the business. Second, processes are built for purpose, not from generic best-practice templates. Finally, the people involved in the process have the authority, skills, and confidence to make relevant, consequential decisions.
IBP gives leaders a systematic opportunity to unlock P&L performance by coordinating strategies and tactics across traditional business functions. This doesn’t mean that IBP won’t function as a business review process, but it is more effective when focused on decisions in the interest of the whole business. An IBP process designed to help P&L owners make effective decisions as they run the company creates requirements different from those of a process owned by individual functions, such as supply chain or manufacturing.
One fundamental requirement is senior-level participation from all stakeholder functions and business areas, so that decisions can be made in every meeting. The design of the IBP cycle, including preparatory work preceding decision-making meetings, should help leaders make general decisions or resolve minor issues outside of formal milestone meetings. It should also focus the attention of P&L leaders on the most important and pressing issues. These goals can be achieved with disciplined approaches to evaluating the impact of decisions and with financial thresholds that determine what is brought to the attention of the P&L leader.
The aggregated output of the IBP process would be a full, risk-evaluated business plan covering a midterm planning horizon. This plan then becomes the only accepted and executed plan across the organization. The objective isn’t a single hard number. It is an accepted, unified view of which new products will come online and when, and how they will affect the performance of the overall portfolio. The plan will also take into account the variabilities and uncertainties of the business: demand expectations, how the company will respond to supply constraints, and so on. Layered risks and opportunities and aligned actions across stakeholders indicate how to execute the plan.
Trade-offs arising from risks and opportunities in realizing revenues, margins, or cost objectives are determined by the P&L owner at the level where those trade-offs arise—local for local, global for global. To make this possible, data visible in real time and support for decision making in meetings are essential. This approach works best in companies with strong data governance processes and tools, which increase confidence in the objectivity of the IBP process and support for implementing the resulting decisions. In addition, senior leaders can demonstrate their commitment to the value and the standards of IBP by participating in the process, sponsoring capability-building efforts for the teams that contribute inputs to the IBP, and owning decisions and outcomes.
To make IBP a value-adding capability, the business will probably need to redesign its planning processes from a clean sheet.
First, clean sheeting IBP means that it should be considered and designed from the decision maker’s perspective. What information does a P&L owner need to make a decision on a given topic? What possible scenarios should that leader consider, and what would be their monetary and nonmonetary impact? The IBP process can standardize this information—for example, by summarizing it in templates so that the responsible parties know, up front, which data, analytics, and impact information to provide.
Second, essential inputs into IBP determine its quality. These inputs include consistency in the way planners use data, methods, and systems to make accurate forecasts, manage constraints, simulate scenarios, and close the loop from planning to the production shopfloor by optimizing schedules, monitoring adherence, and using incentives to manufacture according to plan.
Determining the frequency of the IBP cycle, and its timely integration with tactical execution processes, would also be part of this redesign. Big items—such as capacity investments and divestments, new-product introductions, and line extensions—should be reviewed regularly. Monthly reviews are typical, but a quarterly cadence may also be appropriate in situations with less frequent changes. Weekly iterations then optimize the plan in response to confirmed orders, short-term capacity constraints, or other unpredictable events. The bidirectional link between planning and execution must be strong, and investments in technology may be required to better connect them, so that they use the same data repository and have continuous-feedback loops.
Finally, every IBP process step needs autonomous decision making for the problems in its scope, as well as a clear path to escalate, if necessary. The design of the process must therefore include decision-type authority, decision thresholds, and escalation paths. Capability-building interventions should support teams to ensure disciplined and effective decision making—and that means enforcing participation discipline, as well. The failure of a few key stakeholders to prioritize participation can undermine the whole process.
Decision-making autonomy is also relevant for short-term planning and execution. Success in tactical execution depends on how early a problem is identified and how quickly and effectively it is resolved. A good execution framework includes, for example, a classification of possible events, along with resolution guidelines based on root cause methodology. It should also specify the thresholds, in scope and scale of impact, for operational decision making and the escalation path if those thresholds are met.
In addition to guidelines for decision making, the cross-functional team in charge of executing the plan needs autonomy to decide on a course of action for events outside the original plan, as well as the authority to see those actions implemented. Clear integration points between tactical execution and the IBP process protect the latter’s focus on midterm decision making and help tactical teams execute in response to immediate market needs.
With all the elements described above, IBP has a solid foundation to create value for a business. But IBP is no silver bullet. To achieve a top-performing supply chain combining timely and complete customer service with optimal cost and capital expenditures, companies also need mature planning and fulfillment processes using advanced systems and tools. That would include robust planning discipline and a collaboration culture covering all time horizons with appropriate processes while integrating commercial, planning, manufacturing, logistics, and sourcing organizations at all relevant levels.
As more companies implement advanced planning systems and nerve centers , the typical monthly IBP frequency might no longer be appropriate. Some companies may need to spend more time on short-term execution by increasing the frequency of planning and replanning. Others may be able to retain a quarterly IBP process, along with a robust autonomous-planning or exception engine. Already, advanced planning systems not only direct the valuable time of experts to the most critical demand and supply imbalances but also aggregate and disaggregate large volumes of data on the back end. These targeted reactions are part of a critical learning mechanism for the supply chain.
Over time, with root cause analyses and cross-functional collaboration on systemic fixes, the supply chain’s nerve center can get smarter at executing plans, separating noise from real issues, and proactively managing deviations. All this can eventually shorten IBP cycles, without the risk of overreacting to noise, and give P&L owners real-time transparency into how their decisions might affect performance.
P&L owners thinking about upgrading their S&OP or IBP processes can’t rely on textbook checklists. Instead, they can assume leadership of IBP and help their organizations turn strategies and plans into effective actions. To do so, they must sponsor IBP as a cross-functional driver of business decisions, fed by thoughtfully designed processes and aligned decision rights, as well as a performance management and capability-building system that encourages the right behavior and learning mechanisms across the organization. As integrated planning matures, supported by appropriate technology and maturing supply chain–management practices, it could shorten decision times and accelerate its impact on the business.
Elena Dumitrescu is a senior knowledge expert in McKinsey’s Toronto office, Matt Jochim is a partner in the London office, and Ali Sankur is a senior expert and associate partner in the Chicago office, where Ketan Shah is a partner.
Related articles.
After completing this lesson, you will be able to explain Demand Planning challenges using SAP IBP for Demand .
Previous chapter: 3 Philosophy and Fundamentals
4.1 introduction to the dsdm principles.
The eight principles of DSDM support DSDM’s philosophy that “best business value emerges when projects are aligned to clear business goals, deliver frequently and involve the collaboration of motivated and empowered people”. They also bring the Agile values to life by guiding the team in the attitude it must take and the mindset it must adopt in order to deliver consistently whilst still remaining flexible.
Compromising any of the following principles undermines the philosophy of DSDM and introduces risk to the successful outcome of the project. If a team doesn’t follow all of these principles then it won’t get the full benefit of the approach. The collective value of DSDM’s principles enables organisations to deliver best value business solutions collaboratively.
The eight DSDM principles are: This is Point 4.2 - Principle 1
Every decision taken during a project should be viewed in the light of the overriding project goal - to deliver what the business needs to be delivered, when it needs to be delivered. It is important to remember that a project is a means to an end, not an end in itself. In order to fulfil this principle, DSDM teams will:
Specific business roles in DSDM, in conjunction with the business products created in the Foundations phase, and key practices such as timeboxing and MoSCoW prioritisation, enable DSDM teams to fulfil this principle.
Delivering a solution on time is a very desirable outcome for a project and is quite often the single most important success factor. Late delivery can often undermine the very rationale for a project, especially where market opportunities or legal deadlines are involved.
Even for projects without a need for a fixed end date, on time delivery of intermediate or contributing products is still the best way to demonstrate control over evolution of the solution.
In order to fulfil this principle, DSDM teams need to:
Combining the DSDM practices of timeboxing and MoSCoW prioritisation enables DSDM teams to protect deadlines whilst flexing the features, and to build a reputation for timely and predictable delivery. The ability to deliver on time and to meet the prioritised expectations of the business in the short term – the timebox – forms the basis of control over the longer-term deliver y of the project through timely delivery of Increments.
Teams that work in a spirit of active cooperation and commitment will always outperform groups of individuals working only in loose association. Collaboration encourages increased understanding, greater speed and shared ownership, which enable teams to perform at a level that exceeds the sum of their parts. In order to fulfil this principle, DSDM teams need to:
DSDM’s Business Visionary, Business Ambassador and Business Advisor roles bring the appropriate subject matter experts into the project so they can contribute to the solution. The Solution Development Team brings together business and technical roles in a single team. This one-team culture is fostered by the Business Analyst helping to facilitate business agreement on the requirements and the Team Leader taking responsibility for facilitating a high level of collaboration between all Solution Development Team members. Facilitated workshops enable stakeholders to share their knowledge effectively with other members of the project team.
In DSDM, the level of quality to be delivered should be agreed at the start. All work should be aimed at achieving that level of quality - no more and no less.
A solution has to be ‘good enough’. If the business agrees that the features in the Minimum Usable SubseT meet the agreed acceptance criteria, then the solution should be ‘good enough’ to use effectively. In order to fulfil this principle, DSDM teams need to:
Ensuring testing is properly integrated into the Iterative Development process, with regular reviews throughout the project lifecycle, helps the DSDM team to build a quality solution. The review and quality control products created as the project proceeds help demonstrate that the quality of the solution is meeting the expected standard.
Using DSDM, everything is tested as early as possible. MoSCoW prioritisation and timeboxing are used to ensure that testing is appropriate and under taken without introducing unnecessary risks. In an IT project, the use of test-driven development techniques can also significantly improve the quality of the solution by ensuring that the acceptability of the solution is understood before development starts.
One of the key differentiators for DSDM within the Agile space is the concept of establishing firm foundations for the project before committing to significant development. DSDM advocates first understanding the scope of the business problem to be solved and the proposed solution, but not in such detail that the project becomes paralysed by overly detailed analysis of requirements.
Once firm foundations for development have been established, DSDM advocates incremental deliver y of the solution in order to deliver real business benefit as early as is practical. Incremental delivery encourages stakeholder confidence, offering a source of feedback for use in subsequent Timeboxes and may lead to the early realisation of business benefit.
DSDM teams implement this principle through the appropriate application of a project lifecycle, which delivers a solid base of knowledge during Feasibility and Foundations phases before building the solution incrementally during the Evolutionary Development phase.
DSDM uses a combination of Iterative Development, frequent demonstrations and comprehensive review to encourage timely feedback. Embracing change as par t of this evolutionary process allows the team to converge on an accurate business solution. The concept of iteration is at the heart of everything developed as part of the DSDM approach. It is very rare that anything is created perfectly first time and it is important to recognise that projects operate within a changing world. In order to fulfil this principle, DSDM teams need to:
Within the constraints of time and cost, change is actively encouraged in order to evolve the most appropriate solution. DSDM uses iteration and constant review to make sure that what is being developed is what the business really needs. Cycles of feedback should form part of the process for evolving all project deliverables e.g. all plans and documentation.
Poor communication is often cited as the biggest single cause of project failure.
DSDM practices are specifically designed to improve communication effectiveness for both teams and individuals. In order to fulfil this principle, DSDM teams need to:
DSDM emphasises the value of human interaction through Stand-ups (see Chapter 13 - Timeboxing), Workshops, clearly defined roles and active business involvement.
Modelling and Prototyping make early instances of the solution available for scrutiny. These practices are far more effective than the use of large textual documents, which are sometimes written for reasons other than achieving the business objectives of the project.
It is essential to be in control of a project at all times and to be able to demonstrate that this is the case. This can only be achieved by reference to a plan for the work being done, which is clearly aligned with agreed business objectives.
It is also vital to ensure transparency of all work being performed by the team.
In order to fulfil this principle, DSDM teams, especially the Project Manager and Team Leader, need to:
The use of well-defined Timeboxes, with constant review points, and the preparation of the Management Foundations and Timebox Plans, are designed to assist the Project Manager and the rest of the project team to follow this principle.
The eight principles help direct and shape the attitude and mindset of a DSDM team. Compromising any of the principles undermines DSDM’s philosophy, as together they deliver a collective value that outweighs their individual benefits.
Next chapter: 5 Preparing for Success
Book categories, collections.
Agile project management for dummies.
Agile product development focuses on continuous improvement, scope flexibility, team input, and delivering essential valuable outcomes. Agile development approaches include scrum as a framework for exposing progress, extreme programming (XP) for building in quality upfront, and lean thinking to eliminate waste. These and many other tools and techniques help organizations, teams, and individuals adhere to the Agile Manifesto and the 12 Agile Principles, which focus on small, long-lived, self-organizing teams, effective communications, continuously releasable product, and flexibility.
The Manifesto for Agile Software Development, commonly known as the Agile Manifesto, is an intentionally streamlined expression of the core values of agile project management and product development. Use this manifesto as a guide to implement agile practices into your products.
“We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through this work, we have come to value:
That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more.”
©Agile Manifesto Copyright 2001: Kent Beck, Mike Beedle, Arie van Bennekum, Alistair Cockburn, Ward Cunningham, Martin Fowler, James Grenning, Jim Highsmith, Andrew Hunt, Ron Jeffries, Jon Kern, Brian Marick, Robert C. Martin, Steve Mellor, Ken Schwaber, Jeff Sutherland, Dave Thomas.
This declaration may be freely copied in any form, but only in its entirety through this notice.
The principles behind the Agile Manifesto, commonly referred to as the 12 Agile Principles, are a set of guiding concepts that support product teams in implementing agile product development and project management techniques. Use these principles as a litmus test to determine whether or not you’re being agile in your product work and thinking:
The Roadmap to Value, shown in the following figure, is a high-level view of an agile product development cycle.
Following is a description of the stages of the Roadmap to Value:
It takes a cooperative and collaborative team of people to successfully develop a product. Agile product teams are made up of many people and include the following five roles:
Product development progress needs to be transparent and measurable. Agile product development teams often use six main artifacts to enable transparency, inspection and adaptation, as listed here:
Most products navigate various levels of planning. Agile product development efforts include seven recurring events:
A big agile product development world is out there. Here are a few useful links to members of the agile practitioner community:
This article is from the book:.
Mark C. Layton , "Mr. Agile ® ," is an executive and BoD advisor. He is the Los Angeles chair for the Agile Leadership Network, a Certified Scrum Trainer (CST), and founder of agile transformation firm Platinum Edge. Mark is also coauthor of Agile Project Management For Dummies. David Morrow is a Certified Scrum Professional (CSP), Certified Agile Coach (ICP-ACC), and an executive agile coach.
Mark C. Layton, "Mr. Agile ® ," is an executive and BoD advisor. He is the Los Angeles chair for the Agile Leadership Network, a Certified Scrum Trainer (CST), and founder of agile transformation firm Platinum Edge. Mark is also coauthor of Agile Project Management For Dummies. David Morrow is a Certified Scrum Professional (CSP), Certified Agile Coach (ICP-ACC), and an executive agile coach.
Challenge yourself by keeping up with practical business analysis techniques you can apply on the job.
MOSCOW TECHNIQUE - Includes Free Template
Requirements need to be prioritized because stakeholders can’t always have everything they want, or should I say, because we can’t always give them everything they want. This is not because we don’t like their faces but because most projects are faced with a limited budget and time frame. As a BA, how do you ensure you focus on the most important requirements?
The MoSCoW technique is used by analysts and stakeholders for prioritizing requirements in a collaborative fashion.
Using a Human Resources System as an example, here’s an explanation of the MoSCoW Technique:
Defines a requirement that has to be satisfied for the final solution to be acceptable e.g. The HR system “must” store employee leave history.
This is a high-priority requirement that should be included if possible, within the delivery time frame. Workarounds may be available for such requirements and they are not usually considered as time-critical or must-haves. e.g. The HR system “should” allow printing of leave letters.
This is a desirable or nice-to-have requirement (time and resources permitting) but the solution will still be accepted if the functionality is not included e.g. The HR system “could” send out notifications on pending leave dates.
WON’T or WOULD (W)
This represents a requirement that stakeholders want to have, but have agreed will not be implemented in the current version of the system. That is, they have decided it will be postponed till the next round of developments e.g. The HR system “won’t” support remote access but may do so in the next release.
You'll notice that the HR system features have been discussed in a decreasing order of priority - from what we must have, to what we should have, could have and won't have in that order.
Practical Application
This technique is best used when the BA has gathered all existing solution requirements.
The BABOK Guide provides 8 criteria to be used for assigning priorities to requirements. They are:
The above criteria can be used for prioritizing requirements by assigning weights to each requirement using a decision table. Requirements with the highest scores receive greater priority than those with lower scores. Other useful techniques for requirements prioritization are time-boxing and voting.
MoSCoW technique was introduced by Dai Clegg of Oracle UK in 1994.
This business analyst blog contains practical insights into business analysis, software testing and business process management. I will be sharing business analyst tips, CBAP Certification tips, lessons learnt and insights into all the things I've learnt during my BA career.
Requirements Discovery List How to Start Your BA Career BA Template Toolkit BA Email Toolkit
Subscribe to Blog by Email
Sign up with your email address to receive news and updates.
We respect your privacy.
Business Analyst Glossary | Privacy Policy & Disclosures | Advertisements | Submitting A Post | BAL Services
Australian Business Number (ABN): 27 735 714 328
IMAGES
COMMENTS
IBP typically focuses on horizons of 24-60 months, as opposed to the short term. That focus equates to Integrated Tactical Planning or Sales and Operations Planning and Execution. Since the process must be fully integrated, it removes the departmental silos. Plus, the IBP process must adapt to the organizational construct of every business (IBP ...
The three main parts of integrated business planning are categorized as "Plan," which involves creating a strategy, "Execute," which involves carrying out the plan; and "Monitor and Adjust," which involves reviewing and making changes as needed. The Plan element involves the initial step of creating a strategy.
Integrated business planning framework. Integrated Business Planning (IBP) is a holistic approach that integrates strategic planning, operational planning, and financial planning within an organization. IBP brings together various functions, including sales, marketing, finance, supply chain, human resources, IT and beyond to collaborate across ...
What is the purpose of integrated business planning? IBP is a process designed to enhance the efficiency of the decision-making process for the entire organization. It enables management to lay down a detailed plan for managing the enterprise with a long-term horizon. Some of the key aspects that IBP addresses are allocating crucial resources ...
Integrated business planning is an advanced approach to business organization that merges operational and financial data across the whole business. It allows organizations to maximize results by connecting sales, financial, operational, and other sectors. It also gives businesses greater visibility of their whole process, from the entire supply ...
IBP operates on a rolling horizon, typically spanning 24 to 36 months. This enables retail leaders to make proactive decisions based on long-term forecasts and analyses. This forward-thinking approach aligns strategic and operational plans. It ensures that tactical decisions support the business's overarching goals.
In very simple terms, IBP (Integrated Business Planning) is a supply chain planning application. It has 6 modules inside it. SAP Modules (Image taken from SAP IBP site) Demand Planning. This ...
Bundle. $89.99. Available. 526 pages, 3rd, updated and revised edition 2021. E-book formats: EPUB, PDF, online. ISBN 978-1-4932-2143-1. Take your supply chain to the cloud! Walk through the SAP Integrated Business Planning applications—S&OP, demand, response and supply, demand-driven MRP, and inventory. Then learn to monitor and control these ...
SAP Integrated Business Planning for Supply Chain enables businesses to centralize demand, supply, inventory, sales, and operations planning on one platform to create more efficient and resilient supply chains. With embedded analytics, what-if simulations, alerts, and other machine learning capabilities, you can quickly identify and respond to ...
e business is the essence of Integrated Business Planning (IBP).The latest installment in AFP's FP&A Guide Series, Building an Integrated Business Planning Capa. ility, was written to help your business rise above the average. As AFP's authors say, "Turning your planning capability into an enterprise strength will provide insight, agility ...
ord to operate to disconnected plans. Integrated business planning (IBP) directly addresses this problem, connecting systems, data and planning across business functions with a unified experience, common evidence and coordination that m. e better, faster decisions possible. This integration of business plans gives organizations the essential ...
Walk through the SAP Integrated Business Planning applications―S&OP, demand, response and supply, demand-driven MRP, and inventory. Then learn to monitor and control these processes. See how to set up and use your SAP IBP system, from planning areas to key figures. With coverage of intelligent visibility, SAP IBP for demand-driven ...
SAP Integrated Business Planning FAQ. The purpose of this document is to cover common questions that come up prior to purchasing Integrated Business Planning applications. If you have technical questions related to an implementation, please see: SAP Integrated Business Planning FAQs for implementations.
One global manufacturer set up its integrated business planning (IBP) system as the sole way it ran its entire business, creating a standardized, integrated process for strategic, tactical, and operational planning. Although the company had previously had a sales and operations planning (S&OP) process, it had been owned and led solely by the supply chain function.
SAP IBP for demand consists of traditional demand planning (mid— and/or long-term) and demand sensing (short-term forecasting). Mid- or long-term forecasting helps you to cope with the uncertainty of the future, relying on historical data and on the analysis of trends. Demand Sensing makes these mid- or long-term results more accurate in the ...
Collaborate across departments. Break down operational and planning silos and improve teamwork and efficiency in the planning process. Our S&OP software lets you model various business alternatives, create and optimize business plans, and combine input from multiple constituencies, like finance, sales, marketing, and supply chain departments.
Discover APIs and prepackaged integrations from SAP and select partners to connect solutions to your existing landscape or write your own custom extensions. Visit SAP API Business Hub. Germany. Explore how key capabilities of SAP Integrated Business Planning can help you improve supply chain management, forecasting, and demand planning.
Course announcements. In this course you will gain a solid understanding of the SAP Integrated Business Planning for Supply Chain solution, the components, and their associated business processes. Instructor-led training is supplemented with hands-on exercises using the most recently released version of the SAP IBP supply chain solution.
4.2 Principle 1 - Focus on the Business Need. Every decision taken during a project should be viewed in the light of the overriding project goal - to deliver what the business needs to be delivered, when it needs to be delivered. It is important to remember that a project is a means to an end, not an end in itself.
The Manifesto for Agile Software Development, commonly known as the Agile Manifesto, is an intentionally streamlined expression of the core values of agile project management and product development. Use this manifesto as a guide to implement agile practices into your products. "We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it ...
The above criteria can be used for prioritizing requirements by assigning weights to each requirement using a decision table. Requirements with the highest scores receive greater priority than those with lower scores. Other useful techniques for requirements prioritization are time-boxing and voting. MoSCoW technique was introduced by Dai Clegg ...