toms csr case study

Its Value Network is strong and there is no reason for it not to continue. However, why restrict it to donating shoes? Isn't it possible to create value in those South American countries by getting things made there, which can then become a self-sustaining for-profit/not-for-profit and help progression of and lend pride to the people who contribute and are a part of it? The strong family culture is good, the values are fine. But families grow, have different thoughts and the parent has to look at how they are allowed to spread their wings.

While TOMS has been successful in product additions - sunglasses, bags - its consideration of the lifecycle aspect of the customer seems to have been low. Ideally, a teen to 40+ should be covered via different approaches and content. A teen or collegegoer would be more prone to share content on a variety of platforms in an innovative manner. However, as you grow older, your offline reach becomes stronger and you create content that extends to disproportionate reach. Say, for example, a teen begins with buying a shoe twice a year, shares, engages, encourages five of his peer group to purchase shoes. As she/he grows, the possibility of drifting away remains (say half of the six) and this has to be brought back in via different platforms, products, engagement and sharing. A local offline ambassador programme could help generate content and awareness, in addition to the celebrity endorsements. Remember, on social media everybody is a celebrity in her own right and the influence extends in different directions.

TOMS's work on non-competing alliances also seems to have been slow. Here one does not mean selling of the product but more in terms of reach, engaging socially aware or, more importantly, aware but too-lazy-to-dosomething-about-it target groups. Similarly, with a substantial online reach and base, it becomes relevant to focus on offline, low-cost or zero-cost activities that translate into reach, engagement, creation of fresh relevant content from additional target group.

The use of social media for marketing is nice. However, from a like/love status the brand needs to move towards achieving cult status, thereby ensuring competition does not catch up. The cult status is a difficult proposition when only online space is used, given the fickle nature of the beast. The time has come when social media needs to become supportive, unique, testimonial with offline doing its aggressive bit. Competition may move in fast if there is a single differentiator - socially aware target group - but the need is to splice this group into regular, innovative engaging aspects, maybe even flip it around. For example, contribute monthly or weekly for a shoe donation and get your shoe when it is completed. And many more.

• Advertise with us
• Privacy Policy
• Terms and Conditions
• Press Releases

Copyright©2024 Living Media India Limited. For reprint rights: Syndications Today

Add Business Today to Home Screen

Teaching Entrepreneurs & Business Students

Case Study: TOMS Shoes – The One-for-One Business Model

• Introduction

TOMS Shoes is a company that has revolutionized the way businesses operate. Founded in 2006 by Blake Mycoskie, TOMS Shoes has become a leader in the corporate social responsibility movement. The company’s one-for-one business model has been widely praised for its innovative approach to giving back to the community. Through this model, TOMS Shoes donates a pair of shoes to a child in need for every pair of shoes purchased. This model has allowed TOMS Shoes to become a successful business while positively impacting the world. This case study will explore the history of TOMS Shoes, its one-for-one business model, and its effect on the planet.

How TOMS Shoes’ One-for-One Business Model Has Revolutionized Corporate Social Responsibility

Exploring the impact of toms shoes’ one-for-one model on the global footwear industry, examining the challenges and opportunities of toms shoes’ one-for-one model, analyzing the success of toms shoes’ one-for-one model in developing countries, evaluating the impact of toms shoes’ one-for-one model on social entrepreneurship.

TOMS Shoes has revolutionized corporate social responsibility through its innovative one-for-one business model. This model, which was first implemented in 2006, is based on the idea that for every pair of shoes purchased, TOMS will donate a pair of shoes to a child in need. This model has been incredibly successful, with TOMS donating over 95 million pairs of shoes to needy children in over 70 countries.

The success of the one-for-one model has been attributed to its simplicity and transparency. Consumers can quickly understand the concept and appreciate their purchase’s direct impact on those in need. This has resulted in a strong sense of loyalty among TOMS customers, who are proud to be part of a company making a difference in the world.

The success of the one-for-one model has also had a significant impact on the corporate social responsibility landscape. It has demonstrated that companies can be profitable while also positively impacting society. This has encouraged other companies to adopt similar models, resulting in a shift towards more socially responsible business practices.

The one-for-one model has also positively impacted TOMS’ bottom line. The company has seen a significant increase in sales since implementing the model, as customers are more likely to purchase from a company making a positive difference in the world. This has allowed TOMS to expand its operations and reach more needy people.

Overall, TOMS Shoes’ one-for-one business model has revolutionized corporate social responsibility. It has demonstrated that companies can be profitable while positively impacting society and has encouraged other companies to adopt similar models. This has resulted in a shift towards more socially responsible business practices and allowed TOMS to expand its operations and reach more needy people.

The TOMS Shoes one-for-one model has significantly impacted the global footwear industry. The company, founded in 2006, has become a leader in the industry by providing a unique business model that has revolutionized how shoes are produced and distributed. The model is based on giving away one pair of shoes for every couple purchased. This has enabled TOMS to provide shoes to those in need while creating a sustainable business model that consumers worldwide have embraced.

The impact of the one-for-one model has been far-reaching. It has encouraged other companies to adopt similar models, increasing the number of companies offering shoes to those in need. This has increased the availability of affordable shoes, positively impacting the global footwear industry. Additionally, the model has encouraged companies to focus on sustainability and ethical production practices, which has helped reduce the industry’s environmental impact.

The one-for-one model has also had a positive impact on the economy. By providing shoes to those in need, TOMS has helped reduce poverty and improve the quality of life for many people worldwide. This has positively affected the global economy, as it has helped create jobs and stimulate economic growth.

The TOMS Shoes one-for-one model has significantly impacted the global footwear industry. It has encouraged other companies to adopt similar models, leading to an increase in the availability of affordable shoes and a focus on sustainability and ethical production practices. Additionally, it has positively impacted the economy by helping to reduce poverty and stimulate economic growth.

TOMS Shoes has become a well-known brand for its innovative One-for-One model, which provides a pair of shoes to a child in need for every couple purchased. This model has been praised for its potential to impact the world positively but has also been criticized. This paper will examine the challenges and opportunities of TOMS Shoes’ One-for-One model.

One of the primary challenges of TOMS Shoes’ One-for-One model is the sustainability of the donations. The company has been criticized for not providing long-term solutions to poverty, as gifts are not always used most effectively. The facilities are not always distributed equitably or beneficial to the local economy.

Another challenge is the potential for the One-for-One model to create a dependency on donations. This could lead to a lack of motivation to develop sustainable solutions to poverty, as people may become reliant on donations from TOMS Shoes.

Despite these challenges, TOMS Shoes’ One-for-One model has the potential to create a positive impact on the world. The donations provide immediate relief to those in need, and the company has taken steps to ensure that the gifts are used most effectively. Additionally, the model has raised awareness of poverty and has encouraged people to take action to help those in need.

The One-for-One model has also provided TOMS Shoes with a unique marketing opportunity. The company has leveraged charitable donations to create a positive brand image and attract customers looking to make a difference.

In conclusion, TOMS Shoes’ One-for-One model has both challenges and opportunities. While the model has been criticized for not providing long-term solutions to poverty, it has also been praised for its potential to impact the world positively. Additionally, the model has provided TOMS Shoes with a unique marketing opportunity.

TOMS Shoes is a for-profit company that has gained international recognition for its one-for-one model, which provides a pair of shoes to a child in need for every couple purchased. This model has been successful in developing countries, where access to necessities such as shoes is often limited. This paper will analyze the success of TOMS Shoes’ one-for-one model in developing countries, focusing on its impact on the lives of those in need.

The success of TOMS Shoes’ one-for-one model in developing countries can be attributed to its focus on providing necessities to those in need. TOMS Shoes has improved the health and well-being of those in developing countries by giving shoes to needy children. Studies have shown that access to shoes can reduce the risk of soil-transmitted diseases, such as hookworm, which can cause anemia and other health problems. Additionally, shoes can provide protection from cuts and scrapes, which can lead to infection. TOMS Shoes has improved the health and well-being of those in developing countries by giving shoes to those in need.

In addition to improving the health and well-being of those in need, TOMS Shoes’ one-for-one model has also positively impacted developing countries economies. TOMS Shoes has created jobs in the countries it operates by providing shoes to those in need. This has positively impacted the local economy, as those employed by TOMS Shoes can earn a living wage and contribute to the local economy. Additionally, the money spent by TOMS Shoes on materials and labor in the countries where it operates has positively impacted the local economy.

Finally, TOMS Shoes’ one-for-one model has positively impacted the environment of developing countries. By providing shoes to those in need, TOMS Shoes has reduced the waste created by discarded shoes. This has positively impacted the environment, as discarded shoes can decompose and release harmful chemicals into the atmosphere for years. Additionally, TOMS Shoes has been able to reduce the amount of energy used in the production of shoes, as the company uses recycled materials and energy-efficient production methods.

In conclusion, TOMS Shoes’ one-for-one model has been successful in developing countries, as it has positively impacted the lives of those in need, the economy of the countries where it operates, and the environment. By providing shoes to those in need, TOMS Shoes has improved the health and well-being of those in developing countries, created jobs, contributed to the local economy, and reduced the waste produced by discarded shoes. As such, TOMS Shoes’ one-for-one model has been successful in developing countries.

The One-for-One model of TOMS Shoes has significantly impacted social entrepreneurship. This model was first introduced in 2006 and involved the company donating shoes to a needy child for every pair of shoes purchased. Other companies have widely adopted this model and have become a significant part of social entrepreneurship.

The impact of the One-for-One model on social entrepreneurship can be seen in several ways. First, it has helped raise awareness of social entrepreneurship’s needs. By making the concept of giving back to the community a part of the purchase process, TOMS Shoes has helped to make social entrepreneurship more visible and accessible to the public. This has helped to create a greater understanding of the importance of social entrepreneurship and its potential to impact society positively.

Second, the One-for-One model has helped to create a more sustainable form of social entrepreneurship. By providing a tangible benefit to those in need, TOMS Shoes has helped to create a more sustainable form of giving. This has allowed other companies to adopt similar models, completing a more sustainable layout of social entrepreneurship.

Third, the One-for-One model has helped to create a more equitable form of social entrepreneurship. By providing a tangible benefit to those in need, TOMS Shoes has helped to create a more natural form of giving. This has allowed other companies to adopt similar models, completing a more simple layout of social entrepreneurship.

Finally, the One-for-One model has helped to create a more efficient form of social entrepreneurship. By providing a tangible benefit to those in need, TOMS Shoes has helped to create a more efficient form of giving. This has allowed other companies to adopt similar models, completing a more efficient layout of social entrepreneurship.

Overall, the One-for-One model of TOMS Shoes has significantly impacted social entrepreneurship. By raising awareness, creating a more sustainable form of giving, creating a more equitable layout of giving, and creating a more efficient design of giving, the One-for-One model has helped to create a more effective form of social entrepreneurship. As such, it has significantly impacted social entrepreneurship and helped create a more positive impact on society.

The TOMS Shoes business model is an excellent example of how a company can use a one-for-one approach to create a successful and sustainable business. By providing a product that is both fashionable and socially responsible, TOMS has been able to develop a loyal customer base and a strong brand identity. The company has also been able to use its one-for-one model to positively impact the lives of those in need. The success of TOMS Shoes demonstrates that a business can be both profitable and socially responsible.

Add a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please note that your conversations will be recorded.

AI: Hello human, I am a GPT3 powered AI chat bot. Ask me anything!

BRAND & NEW EPISODES

TOMS Shoes: Standing for Tomorrow, the Case Study of a Trailblazing Brand

Published: November 5, 2019

Brand & New

Internet Explorer users, please open this podcast episode in Spotify here: TOMS Shoes: Standing for Tomorrow, the Case Study of a Trailblazing Brand

Jessica Murray Senior CSR and IP Director, Toms Shoes Inc. Los Angeles, California, USA

In advance of the 2020 Annual Meeting & Leadership Meeting , we’re revisiting this interview with Jessica Murray, Senior CSR and IP Director at TOMS Shoes Inc., who will moderate the session “The Good Business of Sustainable Brands” on November 16.

Many brands publicly support good causes, but it’s much less common for brands to build their core identity on the idea of “giving back.” That is what makes the TOMS brand pretty unique, as its message, offer, and customer base were all from the outset based on philanthropic principles, notably with their famous “One for One” shoe-giving program and other corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives.

In this episode, we discuss TOMS’ innovative brand strategy with Jessica Murray, Senior CSR and IP Director at TOMS Shoes Inc., based in Los Angeles, California. With TOMS since 2013, she has spent her career protecting brands across various sectors such as luxury goods and hospitality. She shares with us her perspective on brand enforcement, and more specifically how to foster consumer loyalty through meaningful principles and genuine commitment to social causes.

Related Resources

2020 Annual Meeting & Leadership Meeting Session : “The Good Business of Sustainable Brands,” moderated by Jessica Murray ( November 16, 2020 )

To go further: About Jessica Murray

Also of interest : INTA Bulletin: Interview with Jessica Murray

About TOMS’ Stand for Tomorrow program

About B Corporation certification

About TOMS’ founder, Blake Mycoskie

Forbes: What Retailers Can Learn About Social Responsibility From Toms and Patagonia

INTA Daily News (page 6): Making the World a Better Place

INTA 2020 March Conference, Brands in Society: Their Influence and Responsibility

About Brand & New

Our hosts discuss compelling business and legal topics relating to intellectual property, innovation, technology, and change with an international roster of influential experts and industry visionaries.

Brand & New guests contribute to this podcast in their personal capacity, and the opinions expressed (or experiences shared) are their own. They do not purport to reflect the views or opinions of INTA or our members.

See Details

Recent Episodes

Brand & New Episode

Pulling Back the Curtain on Brand Valuation

Brands: past, present, and future, progress in europe: advancing dei, leveraging ai, and protecting..., ip and the sdgs: building our common future with innovation and..., women leaders series: overcoming the broken pipeline, subscribe and listen to all brand & new podcasts ..

• Privacy Overview
• Functionality Cookies
• Performance Cookies
• Targeting/Advertising Cookies

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

To find out more please see our  Cookies Policy  and  Privacy Policy .

These cookies are used to identify a user’s browser as the visitor goes from page to page on the Site.  These are session cookies, which means that the cookie is deleted when you leave the Site.  It is an integral piece of the Site software and used to let the server know which users are on the Site at any given time and make certain parts of the Site easier to use.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

These cookies are used to collect information about how visitors use our Site.  The cookies collect information in anonymous form, including the numbers of visitors to the Site, where visitors have come to the Site from, the pages they visited and how they have interacted with tools on the Site like search and embedded media players.  We use the information to compile statistical reports of our users’ browsing patterns so that we can improve the Site.

Please enable Functionality Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!

These cookies are used to deliver advertising relevant to the interests of visitors to our Site. They are persistent, which means they will remain on your device after you leave the Site.

• Facebook (Ad Pixel)
• Google (Ad Pixel)
• LinkedIn (Ad Pixel)
• Quattro Anonymous

Shoes for Social Impact: An Interview with the Chief Strategy and Impact Officer of TOMS

When I was ten years old, my mom and I purchased matching navy blue and floral shoes from TOMS.  I was elated; I thought it was cool to match with my mom, but I also was happy that TOMS would donate a pair of shoes to a child in need.  For the last 15 years, TOMS has served as a leader in corporate social impact.  Not only has the shoe company served as a leader for other corporations, but it also underscores the importance of ethical consumption.  The Giving Team at TOMS has contributed to the rise of consumer attention toward corporate social responsibility when spending money.

TOMS was founded with its initial “One for One” model but over the last year evolved their giving model to also include impact grants to support specific grassroots organizations.  The company is at the forefront of innovating its giving model as it continuously strives to understand how impact investing can be more effective and socially conscious.

Amy Smith, the Chief Strategy and Impact Officer of TOMS, leads the company’s corporate and strategy impact while also managing TOMS environmental sustainability efforts, B Corp certification, and employee engagement.  In this interview, she discusses the important role of social impact in the TOMS business model and the increasing presence of social responsibility in corporate America.

To start off, can you give our readers a background on TOMS’ corporate social responsibility model and on how the "One for One” idea originated?

TOMS was founded by Blake Mycoskie 14 years ago with the idea to give shoes to children who were without them. This was the start of the now widely known “One for One'' model, in which every pair of shoes purchased led to a pair given to a child in need. This idea of profit and purpose shaped an entire industry and we are so proud to have been the catalyst for the movement.  After 14 years we have learned a lot, we have given almost 100M pairs of shoes and we have developed deep partnerships with our Giving Partners around the globe. Over the last few years needs have evolved. We've asked ourselves could we do more?   Last year, we shifted our giving model to give 1/3 of our net profits to organizations that are working to create positive change. That means that for every $3 we make, we give $1 away in the form of impact grants to fuel meaningful work.

How do you identify Giving Partners?

Our giving platform focuses on Mental Health, Ending Gun Violence and Access to Opportunity. Giving Partners are chosen based on these impact areas, which are the areas of focus where we feel TOMS can make the most impact. Our in-house giving team thoroughly vets all new potential partners by looking at the work they focus on, the communities they serve, and if TOMS’ giving model would effectively support the work they do. Our Giving Partners are experts in their areas of focus and they are on the ground, doing the work everyday, so we work to support and lift up the voices of these experts and follow their lead - it’s a very grassroots approach.

There are so many important humanitarian issues vying for our attention, and even more so this year with challenges stemming from the pandemic, US political instability,  and the racial justice crisis. How did you determine TOMS’ response?

While my job at TOMS is centered around impact, last year was a uniquely challenging one, there is no doubt about that. At TOMS we’ve had to make a lot of pivots in our plans to adapt to the needs of these unprecedented times. Our evolved giving model gave us the flexibility to direct resources where they were most urgently needed, like the frontlines of the global health crisis, as well as the frontlines of the movement for racial justice. In response to the worldwide health crisis, we developed the TOMS COVID-19 Global Giving Fund. Over the course of 5 months, we directed ⅓ of our net profits to organizations combating COVID-19. Thanks to our incredible customers, the Global Giving Fund generated $2 Million.  Those funds are being distributed to Giving Partners that are directly responding to COVID-19—both at home and abroad— through mental health support, hand washing, and medical supplies in under resourced communities. As you mentioned, we were faced with several other pressing issues in 2020.  We are constantly listening to our customers, Giving Partners, and employees in order to address issues where we can support and provide meaningful impact. We are currently in the process of distributing over $100,000 to organizations that are working to create racial justice and equity.  Finally, it was more important than even to engage voters for the November 2020 election.  We partnered with Vote.org to encourage people to use their voice. We offered a suite of tools on the TOMS website encouraging visitors to register to vote, check their registration status, request an absentee ballot, see each state’s specific mail in deadlines, and sign up for election reminders.  We are proud to see a record voter turnout in this election! Across all issues, we feel it is very important to listen to our partners and understand how our support can best help with what is most needed in the communities they serve. This obviously added to the work we do as a company, but we felt it was essential to take a stand on these issues in such a trying year for everyone.

What are short term and long term goals for the Giving Team?

As a giving team our core goal to create the most positive impact we can with the resources available to us through customers' purchases of TOMS products. As 2020 has shown us, needs are always changing, so instead of getting too focused on predetermined goals we work to develop an annual giving strategy grounded in the needs and realities of our partners, the causes our community cares most about, and the areas where we feel we can have the most meaningful impact in the US and internationally. This gives our work structure while still allowing ample flexibility to quickly respond to evolving needs.

There are many issues abroad that demand action, but there are also serious issues within the United States that need attention.  The 2019 Impact report states that shoes are given to 38 U.S. states and TOMS is involved with the March for Our Lives gun control movement. How did TOMS become more involved in domestic issues?

Gun violence is a serious issue we face here in the US.  100 people per day in the US lose their lives to gun violence and thousands more are injured.  We recognized that we were in a position to help address this horrible epidemic that continually affects many of us as it’s happening in our hometowns.  In 2018, we launched the End Gun Violence Together campaign with the goal to help end the gun violence epidemic in America.  We committed to give $5 million to organizations across the country that are addressing the complex nature of gun violence through various tactics including programming in communities of color, mental health, research and policy, suicide prevention, and more. We are proud to work with Giving Partners both domestically and internationally, to create worldwide change.  In addition to the financial commitment, we also called on Americans to send a postcard to congress to advocate for universal background checks on the purchases of firearms.  In the following months, more than 700,000 people from every corner of the country heard that call to action and visited TOMS.com to join the campaign and send a postcard.   In January, TOMS embarked on a cross country road trip to meet with impacted communities and to bring the postcards from TOMS HQ to Washington D.C.  TOMS called on everyone to join us for the End Gun Violence Together Day of Action on the steps of Capitol Hill  to help hand deliver the postcards advocating for H.R. 8, the Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2019, to our representatives. At the end of February, HR 8, the bill that would require a background check for EVERY firearm sale was passed by the House of Representatives.  There is still a lot of work to be done in this space and we are committed to continuing to support and make change.

What was the process of changing TOMS’ giving model?

It’s no secret that the world is changing, so we spent a lot of time asking ourselves some tough questions about our impact. Mainly, “Are we doing all we can with the resources that we have?” I’ve thought a lot about what it means to have built a movement, as well as the opportunity, or maybe more accurately obligation, to innovate and evolve.  After a ton of research and a bit of soul searching, we made the bold decision to decouple our impact from our original One for One® model.  Now, for every $3 we make, we give $1 away. We’re focused on supporting grassroots organizations that are working on innovative ways to build a more equitable future through physical safety, mental health, and access to opportunity. As you might imagine, we didn’t make this decision lightly.  And candidly, we’re still figuring it all out. But, we know that this is the right next step for TOMS, and we can’t wait to see how our community will continue to show up in new and meaningful ways, will continue to do the same

How do you think in the future social impact can take more of a role in corporate America?

We have done a lot of research and we know that doing good is also good for business, so corporate America should be taking note. Over half the people on the planet now say that a company's stand on societal issues impact their willingness to purchase from that brand. I think that in the future, social impact will increasingly play a larger role in the day-to-day of business—because shoppers are increasingly looking to buy from brands that align with their values.  I’m proud that TOMS has inspired many other businesses to incorporate social impact into their business model.  I hope that as TOMS giving evolves and we continue to push the boundaries, this will encourage more companies to continue to keep giving at the forefront of everything they do.  

Why do you think impact investing, rather than corporate philanthropy after profits are collected, is a better model?

At TOMS, giving is built into the DNA of our company and our impact is directly intertwined to the purchases of our products.  It is at the center of everything we do and every employee has a hand in how we create impact.  This ensures that when times get tough or sales aren’t what they were projected to be, we remain committed to our give.  More and more companies are starting with purpose in mind.  I think that’s the best, easiest, most authentic way to give but you have to be committed to your model always.  We have found that in order to make this work, there are several elements that need to be priority:

• Remain grounded in our mission and purpose - this is easy to say but more difficult to do.
• Consider our stakeholders –– not just your shareholders
• Get buy in from the top –– Our leadership team understands and is committed to our giving
• Employ a full team of experts in impact - this work can’t be someone’s part time or off the edge of their desk assignment.  It won’t work.
• Build deep relationships with the experts at the NGO that we work with - we can create more impact when we learn from our partners and take their lead

How are you empowering your customers to influence where their dollars from their purchases go?

We know that customers are voting their values and beliefs with their dollars, so we focus on sharing the stories of our giving partners who are on the ground doing the work.   We listen to our customers, respond to their feedback, and provide them with resources to get involved in the TOMS community and in their local communities.  It’s going to take all of us to build a better tomorrow - one where everyone has a chance to thrive.

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

The Founder of TOMS on Reimagining the Company’s Mission

• Blake Mycoskie

Mycoskie realized that a desire to sustain hypergrowth had pushed the company away from its mission. So he took a sabbatical to figure out the future of TOMS and his role in it. The improbable result was an expansion into coffee.

In the fall of 2012 the author decided he needed to do some soul-searching. The start-up he’d founded six years earlier had grown into a global company with more than $300 million in revenue, and it was still delivering on its promise to donate a pair of shoes for every pair sold, but Mycoskie felt disillusioned. His days were monotonous, and he had lost his connection to many of the executives in charge of daily operations.

He and his wife moved to Austin, Texas, so that he could take a sabbatical. He dedicated a lot of time to private contemplation, but he also spoke regularly with his executive coach, entrepreneur friends, and business nonprofit leaders he admired. He traveled to conferences around the country to learn from experts in social enterprise and international development. And he read Start with Why, by Simon Sinek, about leaders who inspire action and companies that create compelling products.

All this, combined with a chance conversation about the coffee trade in Rwanda, led to the creation of TOMS Roasting—which, like TOMS Shoes, would have a one-for-one model: For every bag of coffee sold, the company would provide a week’s worth of clean water to a person in need. As TOMS approaches its 10th anniversary, the author writes, he feels more energized and committed than ever.

In the fall of 2012 I did something I never thought I’d do: I took a sabbatical from TOMS. It was not your typical travel-the-world sabbatical. My wife, Heather, and I moved to Austin, Texas, where I’d grown up, and I used the physical and psychological separation from the company to do some soul-searching.

• BM Blake Mycoskie is the founder and Chief Shoe Giver of TOMS.

Partner Center

Award winner: TOMS Shoes: The Buy-one-give-one Social Enterprise Business Model

This case won the Ethics and Social Responsibility  category at The Case Centre Awards and Competitions 2020 . #CaseAwards2020

Author perspective

Who – the protagonist.

Blake Mycoskie , TOMS  founder.

TOMS is a privately-held for-profit social enterprise. For every pair of shoes TOMS sells, it donates another.

Despite the positive associations with the TOMS brand, and the success of its social enterprise, TOMS has faced repeated criticism of its business model.

Critics maintain that TOMS provides a short-term fix that simultaneously distorts local markets whilst assuaging Western consumers’ guilt at economic imbalance. TOMS is accused of being complicit in a business model that relies on poverty in order to maintain its business operations.

It was 2006 when Blake visited Argentina. But it was 2011 when he was presenting a keynote speech at SXSW in Texas, US, and about to respond to the critics.

TOMS is based in California, US, but Blake was inspired by a trip to Argentina, where he witnessed a charity drop for shoeless children. This is where he pledged to reconfigure the volunteers’ shoe drop activities into a for-profit that could provide a constant supply of shoes for donation.

Blake was ready to respond to the critics and answer concerns about the business model that have been asked since 2007. What he was about to reveal would change the business massively. So, what would his answer be?

AUTHOR PERSPECTIVE 

Natascha said: “It is enormously gratifying to win such a prestigious award. Something that started as a case you’ve researched, written and taught in your own personal teaching context, is being taught and discussed in classes around the world, is a fantastic thought.”

Global interest

Ana commented: “Currently, there is a very strong focus on sustainability in the fashion industry, and social enterprises appear as a very valid alternative in terms of business models. It is amazing to see that more and more students across business schools all over the world are interested in the case.”

Framing the narrative

Natascha added: “We both found the one-for-one business model fascinating when we first came across it, so it was interesting to find out more about TOMS by asking ourselves the whats, hows and whys of the business, and then the challenge came as how to frame a narrative that would capture students’ imagination and put them right at the centre of the case.”

Immerse yourself in the case

Ana explained: “Writing about a topic you are passionate about is key. I think when you are immersed in it, it helps to unpack and to translate all of that knowledge into the case.

“I would also say, as much as possible, do a lot of field and primary research about the brand. It helps to understand the context and the company a lot better.

“Furthermore, I think that because we had experience of teaching with case studies, we could see what angles and questions would work better.”

Development

Natascha concluded: “This was the very first case that Ana and I wrote, and we never imagined it would be so popular.

“We had both been on The Case Centre’s case method workshops . I highly recommend attending one if you have a chance, as it really brings the process to life.”

The authors

Celebrating the win

Unfortunately, due to the Coronavirus pandemic, we were unable to present the authors in person with their trophies for winning the Ethics and Social Responsibility category 2020.

We are delighted to celebrate Natascha and Ana’s win by sharing this picture of Natasha and her award - congratulations!

The protagonist

Educators can login to view a free educator preview copy of this case and its teaching note.

View all the 2020 winners

Stay in touch with all the latest case news and views in our free newsletter,  Connect .

Read it online or sign up to have it delivered direct to your inbox!

Discover more

• [email protected]

Apply for the Amazing Workplaces Certification Today!!

• August 27, 2023
• Best Practices | People Management

From Profit to Purpose: Toms Shoes – A Tale of Entrepreneurial Compassion, Global Impact, and the Pursuit of Positive Change

Amazing Workplaces

Image Courtesy: https://www.businesstoday.in/

Compassion in Entrepreneurship: The Toms Shoes Story

In the bustling world of entrepreneurship, where profit often takes center stage, occasionally emerges a remarkable tale that captures the very essence of human compassion. This is the story of Blake Mycoskie, an entrepreneur seasoned in building and selling successful businesses, whose life took a transformative turn during a journey to Argentina in 2006. Little did he know that this trip would plant the seeds of an idea destined to touch the lives of countless children worldwide.

Argentina, with its vibrant culture and breathtaking landscapes, held within its heart a stark contrast that deeply moved Mycoskie. Among its dusty streets, he couldn’t help but notice children walking barefoot. Engaging in conversations with locals unveiled a heartbreaking truth – in Argentina, and in many developing countries, children lacked the basic necessity of shoes because their families couldn’t afford them.

This poignant encounter ignited a spark within Mycoskie’s heart, a fervent desire to make a difference. In his mind, he envisioned a company that wouldn’t be solely profit-driven but would also extend a compassionate hand to those in need. And so, the journey of Toms Shoes began.

  Get a chance to be recognized as an Amazing Workplaces® Certified Organization. Is your workplace truly amazing? It’s time to find out! Take the Amazing Workplaces® survey and certification – your chance to benchmark your company against top performers, uncover hidden strengths and weaknesses, and embark on a journey to build a workplace that’s the envy of your entire industry.  Know more Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form. Name * First Last Designation * Mobile * Email * Company Name * Submit  

The “One for One” Model:

At its core, Toms Shoes embraced a business model grounded in the powerful concept of “one for one.” With every pair of shoes sold, Toms Shoes committed to donating another pair to a child in need. This wasn’t merely a noble sentiment; it was a tangible and unwavering commitment to making the world a better place. Through strategic partnerships spanning over 70 countries, the shoes found their way to countless tiny feet. Since its inception, Toms Shoes has generously given away more than 90 million pairs of shoes, each one a beacon of hope and comfort.

The beauty of the Toms One for One model lies in its simplicity and effectiveness. It’s a concept that resonates deeply with the human spirit – a clear and measurable way for Toms Shoes to give back to the global community and leave a profoundly positive mark on the world. This model has even sparked a movement, inspiring other socially conscious companies, such as Warby Parker and Bombas, to recognize the profound impact a business can have when it prioritizes social good alongside profitability.

Extending the Reach:

Beyond the One for One model, Toms Shoes extends its reach through various social impact initiatives. One such noble endeavor is Toms Gives, a program that provides critical funding to organizations relentlessly dedicated to improving the lives of children worldwide. The company also runs Toms Touching Lives, a poignant platform that shares the inspiring stories of the children whose lives have been profoundly touched by the benevolence of Toms Shoes.

Embodying Corporate Social Responsibility:

In essence, Toms Shoes personifies the spirit of corporate social responsibility. It’s a company that’s committed not only to turning a profit but to making a profound and lasting difference in the lives of the less fortunate. The One for One model, now synonymous with Toms Shoes, has not only adorned millions of children in shoes but has also cast a spotlight on the pervasive issue of poverty.

Yet, as with any enterprise bearing the ambitious vision of changing the world, Toms Shoes hasn’t been without its fair share of challenges. These obstacles, however, have only fortified the company’s dedication to its mission.

Quality Concerns:

One notable critique directed at Toms Shoes revolves around the quality of the shoes donated. Critics argue that these donations often fall short of the durability and comfort standards expected, leaving recipients with footwear that doesn’t endure. Toms Shoes takes this concern seriously, acknowledging that true impact hinges on the quality of the contributions.

Another challenge revolves around the sustainability of the One for One model. Skeptics express worry that by inundating developing countries with free shoes, Toms Shoes might unintentionally harm local shoe businesses, leading to job losses and economic disparities. This concern sheds light on the complexities inherent in addressing global issues through charitable endeavors.

Furthermore, Toms Shoes has faced criticism regarding its labor practices, with accusations of sweatshop labor tarnishing its reputation as a socially conscious brand.

Resilience and Improvement:

Yet, these challenges haven’t deterred Toms Shoes; instead, they’ve acted as catalysts for growth and improvement. The company has demonstrated remarkable resilience in the face of adversity, actively working to address these concerns.

Toms Shoes has aligned itself with organizations committed to enhancing the quality of the shoes it donates. Their focus on durability and comfort aims to ensure that every pair of shoes truly fulfills its purpose.

Recognizing the necessity for a more sustainable approach, Toms Shoes is in the process of evolving its business model. Sustainability isn’t merely a buzzword; it’s a solemn commitment to ensuring that the company’s impact on the environment and local economies remains positive and enduring.

When it comes to labor practices, Toms Shoes remains unwavering in its commitment to maintaining a supply chain free of sweatshop labor. This pledge serves as a testament to the company’s dedication to ethical business practices.

Conclusion:

In a world where businesses frequently prioritize profit above all else, Toms Shoes stands as a beacon of an alternate path. It’s not just a company; it’s a movement. Toms Shoes reminds us that success need not come at the expense of social responsibility. The One for One model, conceived from a place of profound compassion, has not only clad children’s feet but has also ignited a flame in the hearts of countless individuals. It’s a testament to the extraordinary power of small acts of kindness, when multiplied, to create a wave of transformative change.

Toms Shoes isn’t merely a corporation; it’s an inspiration. It offers compelling proof that it’s possible to turn a profit while doing substantial good in the world. Toms Shoes serves as a poignant reminder that the human spirit, when ignited by empathy, can turn a simple idea into a potent force for positive transformation. With every step they take, Toms Shoes not only talks the talk but, more importantly, walks the walk, proving unequivocally that business can indeed be a vehicle for meaningful change, one pair of shoes at a time.

Recent posts:

Microsoft’s Comprehensive Learning and Development: A Model for Employee Growth and Innovation

The Taj Magic: Cultivating Unique Culture and Leadership in Global Hospitality

Innovation Best Practices at Unilever: Pioneering a Sustainable Future

AJAX Engineering Appoints Mr. Gautam Eunny as Chief Marketing Officer

Vantage circle introduces vantage swags: the trusted choice of fortune 500 for elevating employee experience, medibuddy and bank of baroda join forces to empower employees with health and wellness solutions, personalized recognition: the key to employee engagement and productivity, talent retention, culture surveys & core values: how this ngo is matching corporate professionalism, navigating the it talent landscape: fostering inclusion, championing personalized career development and continuous learning.

Do You Have Internal communication Design Requirements ?

Click here to know more abouts us, buy customized employee recognition plaques.

Looking For A Online / Offline Workshop For Your Employees ?

We work with some of the best minds in the industry to bring you extremely powerful online and offline training sessions.

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

The Amazing Workplaces platform was set up with the core purpose of enhancing, enriching, and promoting 7 main and 2 sub pillars that form the core of an Amazing Workplace and thereby a great employer brand.

Quick Links

• Privacy & Policy
• Terms & Conditions
• Advertise With Us

Important Links

• Video Interviews
• Book Review

Transform Your Organization into Amazing Workplaces

Download Our Free Guide Now

More From Forbes

What retailers can learn about social responsibility from toms and patagonia.

• Share to Facebook
• Share to Twitter
• Share to Linkedin

An attendee grabs a Patagonia Inc. bag at the company's booth during the 2017 Outdoor Retailers ... [+] Winter Market Show in Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S., on Wednesday, Jan. 11, 2017. The Bloomberg Consumer Comfort Index, a survey which measures attitudes about the economy, is scheduled to be released on January 12. Photographer: George Frey/Bloomberg

A corporation is a golem. Unlike a flesh and blood person, it doesn’t have a conscience---unless its founders and C-level execs imbue it with one.

Corporate leaders are increasingly opting to lead with conscience. Over 500 American companies , and 13,000 worldwide , have signed the UN Global Compact, which sets standards for members “to align strategies and operations with universal principles on human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption, and take actions that advance societal goals.”

A related UN initiative, the Principles for Responsible Investment, has grown from 100 signatories to over 1,800 in the past 12 years. PRI signatories, which include investment banks like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs Asset Management, control around $70 trillion in global assets.

Smaller companies and retailers are also making daily choices that put social responsibility before profits, and with good reason. Let’s look at why social responsibility matters for retailers, and how to lead with conscience.

The Data-Driven Case For Corporate Social Responsibility

In a paper published by the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences , researchers Rui Albuquerque, Yrjö Koskinen, and Chendi Zhang sampled 28,578 firm-years, with each firm assessed by their performance in “community, diversity, employee relations, environment, product, and human rights attributes.”

Their findings support the theory that companies choosing to engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR) have higher profit margins and valuation, but lower risk. These benefits are amplified when the corporation already has high product differentiation, but at the same time, high CSR helps boost product differentiation. Companies with high CSR also have more stable returns on their assets, even as the GDP fluctuates. Systemic risk for such companies is “statistically and economically significantly lower.”

Customers, not investors, are the most important consideration in adopting strategic CSR policies. Pressure from customers, who expect CSR from the brands they support, reaches all the way up the supply chain, as evidenced by Apple’s 2013 about-face when it went from enforcing a “long-term policy against” cooperating with Chinese environmental activists, to actively courting them.

But disingenuous CSR has a way of backfiring. Profiteering disguised as social justice is easy to sniff out. Exxon-Mobile’s token donation to a GOP-led climate plan, for example, has left some skeptical that their motives are noble. By contrast, consider a company like Toms, which enjoys broad consumer support for its social initiatives.

The Heart-Driven Case for CSR: Toms

Toms has always been a do-gooder company, founded on the idea of giving away a pair of shoes for every pair sold. They offer consumers a chance to give, and their model is a hit. In the 12 years since he founded the company, Blake Mycoskie says they’ve given shoes to 86 million children. That alone is significant.

“You can harness the energy of your customers who already support you because you stand for something,” Mycoskie told MSNBC in November.

Lately there’s a more pressing issue for Toms. In an emotional announcement on The Tonight Show , Mycoskie recounted how close to home the Thousand Oaks shooting hit for his family. “Damn it,” he responded through tears, “we’re going to do something about it.”

According to MSNBC, gun violence claimed 12,950 American lives in 2018, with nearly one mass shooting and 96 deaths each day. Gun violence is the second leading cause of death for American children and teens. Meanwhile, “ninety percent of Americans are for universal background checks,” Mycoskie says.

Toms created a 30 second system that sends your legislators a physical postcard saying you support universal background checks. In the 12 hours following Mycoskie’s announcement, 58,000 people sent postcards.

Additionally, Toms is giving $5 million to “organizations who are working hard on the ground every day to end gun violence,” says Myoskie, calling it “the single largest corporate gift to end gun violence in the history of the United States.”

What can we learn from Mycoskie and Toms? CSR takes a stand on salient issues, and pushes for broad impact.

The Spirit-Driven Case For CSR: Patagonia

Patagonia announced their plan to give $10 million, the full refund from a federal tax cut they called “irresponsible,” to fight for environmental causes threatened by the tax cut itself.

“Our government continues to ignore the seriousness and causes of the climate crisis,” said founder Yvon Chouinard. “It is pure evil.” His strong choice of words suggests this is not a move motivated by the promise of long term gains, or to score brownie points with the public.

Chouinard adds what he sees as the necessary solutions: renewable energy, sustainable small scale agriculture that supports working families, and the protection of public lands and waters, which he says are “all we have left.”

Patagonia doesn’t need the street cred, or the dollar boost from a PR stunt. Their profits have quadrupled in the last handful of years , with revenues approaching $1 billion, thanks to CEO Rose Marcario.

Marcario, a practicing Buddhist, took the reigns in 2014 after what she describes as a midlife crisis traveling to India and meditating in a cave. She struggled to reconcile her spiritual practice and her work. “I’m really good at making profits for shareholders,” she mused. “How could I convert that into something actually meaningful and good for people and the planet?”

Soon she was CEO and losing sleep over the Trump administration’s environmental attacks, even though Patagonia stood to profit from them. She sent out late night company wide emails reinforcing the company’s environmental commitments and calling upon staff at all levels to double down on them. Under her leadership, Patagonia even sued the Trump administration for their attack on Bears Ears National Monument.

Marcario’s personal commitment to the company’s espoused values, Chouinard’s impassioned rhetoric, the severe $10 million maneuver backing it, and the consistency of Patagonia’s campaigns all suggest a corporation operating with genuine social conscience.

What can we learn from Patagonia? CSR requires real sacrifice in honor of firmly held values.

Taking Cues From Toms and Patagonia for Your Own CSR Strategy

While it’s all but proven that CSR is profitable, that’s never been the point. Exemplary leaders like those at Toms and Patagonia remind us that guiding companies with conscience isn’t just a business move, it’s about imbuing your company with humanity.

Considering 100 companies are responsible for 70 percent of greenhouse gas emissions since 1988, we need company leaders to change the future---if we’re to have one.

Rose Marcario, when asked what call to action she would give fellow CEOs aspiring to lead with responsibility, said “our financial results are better than most of our public competitors’. That says it’s possible. The business case is there.”

But she touched on the deeper level, too. “Maya Angelou said that if you’re going to cultivate one virtue, you should cultivate courage, because it’s the one you need to cultivate all the other ones. That is very much in need right now.”

“We can give money, and other companies I’m hoping will join us too,” Mycoskie adds, “but most important is we give every American an opportunity to act.”

When you structure your company to support social responsibility, follow their examples by making sure the issues you address are salient, the corporate sacrifice is real, and the impact is far-reaching.

• Editorial Standards
• Reprints & Permissions

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

THE NARRATIVES AND THEIR TURNS: A CHRONOLOGICAL CASE STUDY OF TOMS SHOES

This descriptive case study discusses the evolution of TOMS, one of the world's most famous 'double bottom line' companies, in terms of narratives and corporate social responsibility practices. This paper also discusses the company's crisis-response strategy and management after the company's model, referred to as One-for-one model, has been widely criticised by media following the study conducted by an outside research team. The work also aims to point out the dynamics of the competing and contrasting narratives from various stakeholders such as media outlets and outside researchers to provide an in-depth account of the various events that affected the narrative turns of the company narratives.

Related Papers

Craig Mattson

This essay asks how social enterprises like TOMS generate so much consumer affective investment in an age whose cause-related messaging fatigues shoppers. I find one answer in the energizing buy-one-give-one mode in which TOMS participates and to which it gives collective access. The mode expresses an increasingly widespread sensibility that company growth cannot proceed indefinitely without constraint by company largesse: gathering and growth must be countered by expenditure and even a kind of waste. Modal analysis of metonymic tropes within TOMS’s discourse (by chief executive officer Blake Mycoskie) shows how the company gives a feel for connecting the apparently opposed concerns of self-interested acquisition and “wasteful” expenditure— doing good and doing well—without collapsing one into the other. Unfortunately, other social enterprise rhetorics have failed not only to acquire but also to “waste” consumer enthusiasm in similarly generative fashion, thereby deactivating at times the significance of social enterprise’s projects. This essay concludes by discussing why modal reading of affective investments matters for rhetorical scholarship in this historical moment.

Margrit Talpalaru

Hyunjin Seo

This study examines the role of social media-based marketing in generating social capital by analyzing wall posts and comments on Facebook pages of a for-profit social enterprise (TOMS) and a conventional for-profit company (Sperry Top-Sider). Our content analysis shows that compared to the Sperry Facebook page, the TOMS Facebook page featured a higher proportion of wall posts involving community engagement and social issues. While aspects of bonding social capital were most prominent in both Facebook pages, the TOMS online community was more likely to generate bridging social capital than the Sperry online community. These results suggest that the social entrepreneurship aspect of TOMS contributes to information exchanges between weak ties and forging of new ties via its brand community on Facebook. This research enhances our understanding of differences and similarities between for-profit social enterprises and conventional for-profit companies in use of social media for public relations and their implications for creating a dialogic space essential for facilitating development of social capital.

Iannone F., Izzo F. (2016). Salvatore Ferragamo: an Italian Heritage Brand and its Museum. Journal Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, pp.1-13. DOI 10.1057/s41254-016-0053-3.

Floriana Iannone

This paper explores the case of Salvatore Ferragamo, a famous Italian fashion brand that uses a corporate museum as an ''identity medium'' to express its corporate and heritage brand values. By integrating the heritage quotient model implemented by Urde, Greyser, and Balmer (2007) with literature on heritage brand and corporate identity, this paper adopts a narrative approach in order to analyze the corporate brand identity of Salvatore Ferragamo and the way it is expressed through the Salvatore Ferragamo Museum located in Florence. From a methodological perspective, the fieldwork is based on a mix of observation , semi-structured interviews to managers and visitors, and analysis of secondary data. Results show that the corporate museum represents an ideal place to communicate the socially constructed forms of collective memory related to the brand heritage. Moreover, the Salvatore Ferragamo Museum is also able to express a set of values connected to the cultural identity of Made in Italy that contribute to enforce the authenticity and credibility of the brand. The paper concludes with discussion of contribution to the academic literature and of related managerial implications.

Prue L Robson

Abstract Social media has dramatically impacted the public relations industry in the last few years. Publics are increasingly geographically dispersed, traditional media and user-generated content are converging, and the discrete titles of 'consumer'and 'producer'often no longer apply. There is also a growing emphasis on social media as an effective vehicle for two-way symmetrical communication between practitioners and publics. However, it is too early to assume the public relations industry has become 'borderless'.

Respublica Litereria

Costantinos Berhutesfa Costantinos

The former Ethiopian First Lady Ms. Roman Tesfaye reflected that, "Empowering Ethiopians, especially women and girls, is an issue close to my heart and there is no one who better to serve as a role model for them than Bethlehem." UN Representative, Eugene Owusu, noted, "Ethiopia's GTP sets a bold vision of a middle-income country by 2025. Fundamental to achieving this vision, is the rapid growth of local industries and the promotion of the private sector as an engine of growth. Sole Rebels is not just helping to create jobs for members of her community ; she is helping to place Ethiopia at the forefront of a growing export industry" No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of which by far the greater part of the numbers are poor and miserable. Society was in fact constantly improving; that it was being propelled, willy-nilly, toward a positive goal because there was a concealed dynamic beneath the surface of things, which powered the social whole like an enormous engine and the tremendous gain in productivity, which sprang from the minute division and specialisation of labour… 'Sole Rebels' Abstract African economies are growing fast with questionable "quality of growth", where the majority of the people remain excluded from the benefits of this growth. The growing gap between the livelihoods of people and increasing number of poor people in many countries have driven the "citizen sector to discover what the business sector learned long ago: there is nothing as powerful as a new idea in the hands of a first-class entrepreneur. Social entrepreneurs are a different breed of creative humans driven by the mission to alleviate humanity from vulnerabilities. In early 2005, Bethlehem founded soleRebels to provide ecologically and economically sustainable jobs for her local community. The company began out of a workshop on a plot of land owned by her. The objective of the research is to investigate the unique traits of social entrepreneurship at Sole Rebels answering questions related to the level of social entrepreneurship development in Ethiopia, the unique traits of social entrepreneurship at Sole Rebels and how Sole Rebels prime the gap between the social benefits and the profit motives of social entrepreneurship. The case study focuses on soleRebels unique traits of social entre-preneurship at Sole Rebels in Ethiopia that has been acclaimed globally for its success as an African icon in this unique area of entrepreneurship. As Oscar Wilde in The Critic as Artist said, "Yes: I am a dreamer. For a dreamer is one who can only find his way by moonlight, and his punishment is that he sees the dawn before the rest of the world." Key words: Sole Rebels, Bethlehem, Social entrepreneurs, sustainable, social entrepreneurship,

Management Communication Quarterly

Shui-yin Sharon Yam

Josh Greenberg

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Stefano Ponte

Kate Mirandilla-Delmo

Reputation and Image Recovery for the Tourism Industry

Andrew Brooks

International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management

Stephen G Kimotho

Scandinavian Journal of Management

Lucia Garcia

Thomas Michel, PhD

Nugzar Todua , Charita Jashi

Charita Jashi

Marita Vos , Markus Mykkänen

Nathalie Sajda

Kemi C. Yekini

Yvonne Ai-Chi Loh

Betry Indraswari

Public Relations Review

Chan Tak Jie , Nurul Ain Mohd Hasan

Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal

Norman Zafra

Journal of Business Ethics

The Routledge Companion to Media Studies and Digital Humanities

Radhika Gajjala

International Journal of Emergency Management

Sustainability As Usual

Alexandra Stubbings

Martin Williams

Audra Diers-Lawson

Sjoerd Keulen , Ronald Kroeze

Goran Tomka , Visnja Kisic

Journal of Marketing Management

Francis Buttle

Gerard McElwee

Debats. Revista de cultura, poder i societat

Diana Martinelli

Dana Schowalter

Peter James Kpolovie

pedro carvalho de almeida

Electronic Cigarette Taxation and Its Evaluation from Turkey's Perspective

RÜKAN KUTLU KORLU

Graeme Sterne

Lisa Ann Richey

The 11th International Critical Management Conference – CMS 2019

Lorayne Finol Romero

Philip Roundy , W. Randy Evans

Meta G Carstarphen

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Tom’s Shoes as Socially Responsible Company Case Study

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Company Name and Industry

Why are they your favorite company, approach toward social responsibility, descriptions and examples of socially responsible behaviors, suggestions for socially responsible behaviors, consumer influence.

My favorite socially-responsible company is Tom’s Shoes (TOMS). It is a for-profit company that designs and sells shoes, clothes, and handbags. It also dabbles in cosmetics, producing eyewear, and sells stylized coffee products (Kingston and Guellil 285). The company was founded in 2006 by Blake Mycoskie, and is known for its philanthropic approach to business as well as its charity actions around the world.

TOMS is my favorite company because of the conscious way it is doing business. The company is aware of the ecological imprint it leaves from its production and tries to minimize it (Kingston and Guellil 284). Also, it is conscious of suffering in poor countries in Africa and the Middle East, and makes frequent donations to the poor, in order to improve their wellbeing by providing them with essential items (Kingston and Guellil 285).

TOMS’ approach to social responsibility is deeply rooted in sustainability practices and ethical solutions to problems. The company seeks to ensure that the materials it uses for their products are received from ethical sources that do not engage in exploitation of vulnerable populations (Kang et al. 68). In addition, they make sure that the materials they use are recyclable and do not cause as much damage to the environment as some other shoe companies do (Kang et al. 65). Finally, TOMS invests in the local and distant communities either directly or through the supply of various commodities.

There are several examples of TOMS expressing socially-responsible behaviors. Some of their most notorious programs include the one-for-one deal. In essence, for each pair of shoes a customer buys, a child in Africa receives a pair of shoes for free (Wydick et al. 728). Since many countries in that region are beyond poor, individuals do not have enough money to buy shoes. The children are in the direst need of footwear due to the fact that they are growing and cannot afford to change shoes every year or so. TOMS seeks to help alleviate this problem by providing shoes for free, paid for by the wealthy customers abroad.

The second example of a socially-responsible behavior is the use of recyclable materials in the production of their shoes. TOMS shoes utilize hemp, cotton, and recycled polyester, which allows to minimize the requirements for inorganic materials and helps recycle the shoes after they have expired (Wydick et al. 731). Finally. Their packaging materials are made largely of recycled waste, while the logo is printed with soy ink. Finally, TOMS requires their suppliers to present certificates to ensure that the materials they buy were not produced using slave labor, child labor, and meet the guidelines of Fair Trade (Wydick et al. 732).

While TOMS is a company with a good heart and good intentions, it should re-evaluate the effectiveness of some of its socially-responsible behaviors, with one-for-one program being the primary target. Giving out shoes may not be the best solution to a country that does not have the infrastructure to sustain and support a shoe-wearing population (Kang et al. 60). In addition, doing so carelessly destroys local businesses and small companies, leaving people jobless (Kang et al. 62). TOMS should consider donating money to infrastructure projects and businesses to help revitalize the economy.

As a socially-responsible company, TOMS is greatly influenced by consumer demands. The quality of its products is comparable to their competitors, while the prices are generally higher and aimed at the middle-class or above in the Western market (Wydick et al. 749). The reasons it makes sales is because of its socially-responsible behavior (Haski-Leventhal 37). TOMS will have to continue to engage their consumer base on moral reasons to continue making sales.

Haski-Leventhal, Debbie. Strategic corporate social responsibility: Tools and theories for responsible management . Sage, 2018.

Kang, Charles, et al. “Washing away your sins? Corporate social responsibility, corporate social irresponsibility, and firm performance.” Journal of Marketing , vol. 80, no. 2, 2016, pp. 59-79.

Kingston, Lindsey N., and Jeanette Guellil. “TOMS and the citizen-consumer: Assessing the impacts of socially-minded consumption.” Journal of Human Rights Practice , vol. 8, no. 2, 2016, pp. 284-297.

Wydick, Bruce, et al. “Shoeing the Children: the impact of the TOMS Shoe donation program in rural El Salvador.” The World Bank Economic Review , vol. 32, no. 3, 2018, pp. 727-751.

• The Amazon Company's Success Reasons
• Airticket24: Case Study
• TOMS Company Operating
• The Toms Firm’s Sustainability Profile Analysis
• Transforming Lives and Making a Difference
• Amazon Adds 11 More Cargo Jets to Its Growing Air Fleet
• DHS and I&A: Culture, Climate, and Ethical Decisions
• CovOil: The Upstream Petroleum Exploration Project
• AJ Distributors: Business Plan
• The Coca-Cola Company's Financial Condition and Operations
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2022, June 29). Tom’s Shoes as Socially Responsible Company. https://ivypanda.com/essays/toms-shoes-as-socially-responsible-company/

"Tom’s Shoes as Socially Responsible Company." IvyPanda , 29 June 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/toms-shoes-as-socially-responsible-company/.

IvyPanda . (2022) 'Tom’s Shoes as Socially Responsible Company'. 29 June.

IvyPanda . 2022. "Tom’s Shoes as Socially Responsible Company." June 29, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/toms-shoes-as-socially-responsible-company/.

1. IvyPanda . "Tom’s Shoes as Socially Responsible Company." June 29, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/toms-shoes-as-socially-responsible-company/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Tom’s Shoes as Socially Responsible Company." June 29, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/toms-shoes-as-socially-responsible-company/.

Lessons in Corporate Social Responsibility from TOMS (Shoes)

• Nonprofit Organizations
• Retail Small Business
• Restauranting
• Real Estate
• Import/Export Business
• Freelancing & Consulting
• Food & Beverage
• Event Planning
• Construction
• Operations & Success
• Becoming an Owner

Joanne Fritz is an expert on nonprofit organizations and philanthropy. She has over 30 years of experience in nonprofits.

For several years, one of the darlings of the corporate philanthropy fan club has been TOMS. And for good reasons.

TOMS is the handiwork of Blake Mycoskie, a young entrepreneur whose business model put a new spin on corporate social responsibility .

Mycoskie has built a company that is winning both sales and hearts by the buy one/give one model.

Initially, it was TOMS Shoes. Mycoskie got the idea for TOMS Shoes when he visited Argentina and saw many children who had no shoes. At the same time, many adults in that country were wearing a very simple yet comfortable shoe that caught Mycoskie's eye.

Mycoskie's company, TOMS Shoes, adopted that shoe​ style produced it in many styles and colors, and promised customers that for every pair of shoes they bought, another pair would go to people in need.

Mycoskie's idea took off to such an extent that TOMS has dropped the “shoes” from its name and built a merchandising behemoth; it has now expanded into sunglasses,  coffee (the purchase of which provides water where it's needed), and other social entrepreneurial enterprises. The TOMS giving universe keeps on expanding and now includes nutrition, healthcare, and education.

TOMS has also been emulated by many social entrepreneurs . Warby Parker, which sells affordable eyeglasses online with the buy one / give one model, may be the most well-known example.

There's also quirky  Out Of Print , which donates books when it sells its clothing line featuring out-of-print book designs. And there is Figs, a producer of clothing for healthcare workers, giving matching "scrubs" to healthcare professionals in developing countries. More recently, we've seen  Bixby , for backpacks and lunchboxes; Bombas for socks; and Twice as Warm for hats, tops, and scarves.

TOMS, from following the emerging trend of social responsibility, has kicked off a wave of businesses that 'do-good' as part of their business plans. And the wave continues as the line blurs between nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Today, there are several ways to set up a business so that it can do good more easily.  Examples include hybrid organizations and B Corporations

Lessons from TOMS for Social Entrepreneurs

Ride a Trend: TOMS just happened to intersect with the rise in consumers who have become more conscious about their spending. They are willing to spend on consumer goods that also do some good in the world.

As of writing, the latest Cone Communications CSR study revealed that 63% of Americans (perhaps giving up on government action) hope that businesses will lead to social and environmental change. Furthermore, 78% want companies to get involved in social justice issues.

As for buying power, 87% of consumers say they will purchase a product because a company got involved with an issue they cared about while 76% say they would refuse to buy a company’s products or services if it supported an issue they thought was wrong.

The rising popularity of  cause-related marketing  has been spectacular, benefiting many causes as well as helping companies polish their reputations as good corporate citizens. TOMS rode that trend to spectacular success.

TOMS also fits with another trend taking place in the nonprofit world. That is the move toward social entrepreneurship within a nonprofit setting. TOMS resembles in many ways the characteristics of organizations described in Crutchfield and Grant's book, "Forces for Good." Those groups are called "high impact" organizations. TOMS could be the commercial equivalent of those social good organizations.

Bake in the Good: TOMS goes beyond what other companies do. It is founded on the premise that sales equal the good done. Mycoskie has said, "...we know every day that we're going to give away one pair of shoes for every one we sell, and that's that. If we can't make the business work that way, then the business just doesn't work."

Build in Sustainability: The model for TOMS is a self-feeding loop. Mycoskie has made the assertion, "If I would've taken half a million dollars and just bought shoes to give to the kids, I would've been able to give the shoes once. It never would've been as far-reaching and sustainable as TOMS Shoes is now."

Give Employees a Reason to Be Proud: Mycoskie insists that the employee morale at TOMS is phenomenal. "..how could you be down when you know everything you do makes children happy?" he has said.

Attach a Story to Your Product: Give your customers a story that they can retell again and again. These shoes (and glasses, and all the other TOMS merchandise) are unique enough and stylish enough to appeal to the modern consumer, young and older. Purchasers can boast about the fact that they are from TOMS, and here is what it means. Buyers feel good about their purchase and want to tell their friends. TOMS merchandise is fresh and creates buzz.

(Quotes from Success Magazine, 2009)

The Business of Giving - TOMS Shoes , Success Magazine, 2009

Toms Sets Out To Sell A Lifestyle, Not Just Shoes , Fast Company, 2013

The Founder of TOMS on Reimagining the Company’s Mission , Harvard Business Review 2016

• What Every Nonprofit Should Know About Cause Marketing
• How to Make Your Nonprofit Attractive to Corporate Sponsors
• How to Get the Most Out of a Charity Contest
• 3 Cause-Marketing Trends for Nonprofits and Their Business Partners
• 10 Secrets to Being Awesome on Instagram for Nonprofits
• Alternatives to Starting a Charitable Nonprofit
• A Traditional Nonprofit Is Not the Only Way to Make Social Change
• How Even Small Charities Can Get Corporate Sponsorships
• How Do Nonprofits Make Money?
• Nonprofits Replacing Staff With Volunteers
• What Is a 501(c)(7) Social Club?
• 15 Unexpected Benefits of Volunteering That Will Inspire You
• How a Nonprofit Job Is Different from a For-Profit Job
• Want a Nonprofit Job? Change Your Resume in These 3 Ways
• How to Set Up an Affinity Program for Your Nonprofit
• What Is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act?

TOMS Shoes Marketing Strategy 2024: A Case Study

In this case study, we will delve into the marketing strategy of TOMS Shoes, a renowned footwear brand that has successfully combined profit and philanthropy. Since its founding in 2006, TOMS Shoes has gained recognition for its unique approach, using social cause marketing to promote its brand and connect with its target audience. Their strategy revolves around the “one-for-one” business model, wherein they provide a pair of free, new shoes to a child in need for every sale of a retail product.

One of the significant milestones in TOMS Shoes’ marketing history was in 2011 when they introduced their line of eyewear. With their eyewear line, TOMS not only provides fashionable eyewear to customers but also gives the gift of sight to those in need. This expansion into different product categories aligns with TOMS Shoes’ mission to make a positive social impact beyond footwear.

Social media serves as a critical component of TOMS Shoes’ marketing strategy . The brand leverages platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Pinterest, Instagram, and Google Plus to tell their story, engage with their customers, and spread awareness about their initiatives. TOMS Shoes has cultivated a strong social media presence, with a community intentionally kept small at around two million on Facebook to allow for a more intimate connection with their audience.

Celebrities also play a role in raising brand awareness for TOMS Shoes through social media. Notable figures such as Keira Knightley, Scarlett Johansson, Liv Tyler, Anne Hathaway, Tom Felton, and Julia Roberts have contributed to the visibility of TOMS Shoes and its mission.

Key Takeaways:

• TOMS Shoes’ marketing strategy emphasizes social cause marketing to promote brand awareness and connect with their audience.
• Their “one-for-one” business model, providing a pair of free, new shoes to a child in need, has been the centerpiece of TOMS Shoes’ marketing approach since its inception.
• Expansion into eyewear and the book industry showcases TOMS Shoes’ commitment to social impact beyond footwear.
• Social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Pinterest, Instagram, and Google Plus are used to engage with customers and spread awareness about TOMS Shoes’ initiatives.
• Celebrities have played a role in raising brand awareness for TOMS Shoes through social media channels.

Toms Shoes’ Unique “One for One” Model

The heart of Toms Shoes’ marketing strategy lies in its innovative “One for One” model. For every pair of shoes sold, Toms Shoes donates a pair to a child in need. This simple yet powerful concept has resonated with consumers who want their purchases to make a difference in the world. By incorporating social cause marketing into their business model, Toms Shoes has captured the attention and loyalty of customers who value brands that prioritize making a positive social impact.

Since 2006, Toms Shoes has given away more than 35 million pairs of shoes in 60 countries, demonstrating their commitment to providing footwear to those who need it most. This brand positioning has not only established Toms Shoes as a leader in social impact but has also inspired other businesses to adopt the one-for-one model, such as Warby Parker, Roma Boots, Nouri Bar, Sir Richard’s, KNO Clothing, and Soapbox Soaps.

Bain Capital’s $300 million investment for a 50% stake in Toms Shoes is a testament to the profitability of their model. This acquisition signifies the success and appeal of Toms Shoes’ marketing campaigns, which are centered around their unique approach to social responsibility. Unlike traditional companies, Toms Shoes focuses on giving back rather than solely maximizing profits.

One study conducted by Garth Frazer in The Economic Journal revealed that textile donations in Africa had unintended consequences, contributing to the decline of the local textile industry. However, companies like Toms Shoes have learned from these experiences and have modified their models to have a more sustainable impact. For instance, Toms Shoes expanded beyond footwear by selling coffee and providing clean water for every pound of coffee sold. They are also working on developing local manufacturing in Haiti for the donated shoes, furthering their commitment to social responsibility.

The success of Toms Shoes’ marketing strategy can be attributed to their ability to engage consumers through storytelling and social media campaigns. Their initiatives, such as “One Day Without Shoes,” have not only raised awareness but also encouraged active participation from their target audience.

Celebrities like Charlize Theron and Jessica Alba have also played a significant role in promoting Toms Shoes’ brand awareness and social impact. By wearing Toms Shoes, these influential individuals have helped position the brand as a symbol of style and social responsibility.

Toms Shoes’ collaborations with partners such as Marvel and Once Upon a Farm have allowed them to tap into new audiences and amplify their social impact message. These partnerships have expanded their reach and reinforced their brand positioning as a leader in corporate social responsibility.

In addition to their online presence, Toms Shoes’ retail stores feature interactive displays that showcase the impact of their “one for one” model. This hands-on approach enhances customer engagement and empathy, allowing shoppers to connect with the brand on a deeper level.

Despite changes in ownership, Toms Shoes remains steadfast in its commitment to social responsibility and sustainability. The brand continues to donate millions of pairs of shoes to children in need, making a lasting impact on communities worldwide.

Diversification and Social Impact

TOMS Shoes, known for its “One for One” giving model, has successfully diversified its product line to include more than just shoes. Recognizing the power of social causes in attracting customers, TOMS expanded its philanthropic efforts to other products such as eyewear and books.

In 2011, TOMS introduced eyewear, promising to provide sight-saving surgery, glasses, or medical treatment to individuals in need with every purchase. This strategic move allowed TOMS to extend its impact beyond the shoe industry and address a different social need. Through this initiative, TOMS has restored sight to nearly a million people and established 55 vision centers in countries like Bangladesh, India, and Nepal.

In 2014, TOMS Shoes ventured into the world of books, aiming to promote education and literacy. With each book purchase, TOMS donates books through their giving partners to underserved communities. This holistic approach to social causes showcases TOMS’ commitment to making a difference in various areas and resonates with its socially conscious target audience.

TOMS Shoes has effectively utilized social media platforms to spread awareness about its diversified product offerings and the impact it creates. By sharing stories of individuals whose lives have been positively influenced by TOMS’ social mission, the brand engages its audience and builds a community of like-minded individuals committed to making a difference.

TOMS Shoes’ social media strategy revolves around highlighting its impact initiatives, encouraging community participation, and fostering emotional connections. Engaging visuals, compelling storytelling, and user-generated content showcasing customers aligning with the company’s social mission are key components of TOMS’ social media content strategy.

By doing so, TOMS Shoes continues to attract its targeted audience, particularly millennials who are known for favoring brands that promote social causes. With 91% of millennials choosing to shop from businesses that have a social cause to serve and 72% of customers preferring brands that support good causes, TOMS’ focus on social impact resonates with its audience and strengthens its brand appeal.

The Power of Social Media Marketing

TOMS Shoes has recognized the influential role that social media plays in their digital marketing strategy. By leveraging platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Pinterest, Instagram, and Google Plus, TOMS Shoes effectively shares their brand story and connects with their target audience. Through compelling content and strategic engagement, they have built a strong presence on these platforms, fostering a sense of community and driving brand advocacy.

One of the key elements of TOMS Shoes’ social media strategy is the emphasis on user-generated content. By encouraging their customers to share their own experiences with the brand and its products, TOMS Shoes has created a movement where individuals become brand ambassadors. This not only helps to spread awareness about their philanthropic efforts but also amplifies their message across various social networks.

To further enhance their reach and influence, TOMS Shoes collaborates with influencers who align with their brand values. These influencers, who have significant followings on social media, help to showcase TOMS Shoes’ products and mission to a wider audience, generating buzz and interest.

TOMS Shoes has also successfully executed several impactful social media campaigns. The 2014 #WithoutShoes campaign, for instance, resulted in the donation of 296,243 pairs of shoes in just 10 days. Such campaigns not only engage their audience but also encourage them to take part in the brand’s mission.

Overall, TOMS Shoes’ digital marketing strategy heavily relies on social media to share their mission, inspire their audience, and drive brand loyalty. By harnessing the power of social media, they have successfully connected with their target market and generated a strong online presence, cementing their position as a socially conscious brand.

The Role of Celebrity Endorsements

Celebrity endorsements have played a significant role in the marketing strategy of TOMS Shoes. By associating themselves with well-known figures like Keira Knightley, Scarlett Johansson, and Julia Roberts, TOMS Shoes has been able to leverage the influence and reach of these celebrities to increase brand visibility and attract a larger audience.

These celebrity endorsements have helped TOMS Shoes connect with their targeted audience and reinforce their brand image as both socially conscious and trendy. By partnering with influential celebrities who resonate with their target demographic, TOMS Shoes has been able to create a buzz around their brand and generate interest among potential customers.

Moreover, celebrity endorsements have provided TOMS Shoes with a powerful tool for online advertising. By featuring celebrities wearing their products in promotional campaigns and on social media platforms, TOMS Shoes has been able to tap into the massive followings of these celebrities and gain exposure to a wider audience.

Through these strategic partnerships, TOMS Shoes has been able to position themselves as a socially responsible brand that appeals to a younger and more diverse consumer base. Celebrity endorsements have not only helped TOMS Shoes expand their reach but also strengthened their brand loyalty among existing customers.

In summary, celebrity endorsements have played a crucial role in TOMS Shoes’ marketing strategy, allowing the brand to connect with their targeted audience, garner online visibility, and reinforce their brand image as socially conscious and trendy.

Social Media Platforms and Target Audience

TOMS Shoes understands the power of social media and employs an effective social media strategy to engage with their targeted audience. By utilizing various platforms, TOMS Shoes effectively reaches their audience and shares their mission, values, and philanthropic efforts.

Facebook and Twitter play a crucial role in TOMS Shoes’ social media strategy. These platforms allow the brand to connect with their customers in real-time, share updates about their One for One program, and address any questions or concerns. TOMS Shoes recognizes that millennials, who make up a significant portion of their target audience, are actively present on these platforms. With US-based millennials estimated to be the largest generation, TOMS Shoes has identified the importance of engaging with this key market segment .

YouTube is another valuable platform for TOMS Shoes, as it enables visual storytelling and allows the brand to showcase their philanthropic efforts. By creating impactful videos, TOMS Shoes effectively communicates the impact of their One for One program and engages viewers emotionally. This platform helps TOMS Shoes reach a wider audience and build a connection with their brand.

Pinterest is utilized by TOMS Shoes to connect with fashion and lifestyle-oriented individuals, particularly women. By sharing visually appealing content related to fashion, style, and lifestyle inspiration, TOMS Shoes effectively targets their desired audience on this platform. This strategic use of Pinterest helps TOMS Shoes strengthen their brand affinity and influence purchase decisions.

Instagram, with its visually-driven nature and extensive user base, is an ideal platform that aligns with TOMS Shoes’ targeted audience. With over one billion monthly active users, Instagram provides TOMS Shoes with a platform to showcase their products, inspire their followers, and tell their brand story through captivating visuals. Not only does this engage their current customers, but it also attracts potential new customers who resonate with the brand’s values and vision.

Google Plus may not be as widely popular as other social media platforms, but it serves as a niche platform for TOMS Shoes to enhance their search visibility and connect with a unique professional audience. By actively participating in relevant communities and sharing valuable content, TOMS Shoes establishes themselves as a thought leader among professionals interested in topics related to social impact and sustainability.

By strategically leveraging various social media platforms, TOMS Shoes effectively targets their audience, engages with their customers, and spreads awareness about their One for One program. These efforts not only drive brand loyalty but also attract new customers who align with their values and mission.

The Strengths of Toms Shoes’ Marketing Strategy

One of the key strengths of TOMS Shoes’ marketing strategy lies in its successful brand positioning. With its innovative “One for One” model, TOMS Shoes has not only made a significant social impact but also created a unique selling proposition in a highly competitive market. By integrating social responsibility into its business model, TOMS Shoes has been able to attract a loyal customer base of socially-conscious consumers.

TOMS Shoes’ marketing campaigns have effectively communicated its brand message and values, resonating with its target audience. Through storytelling and emotional appeals, TOMS Shoes has been able to connect with customers on a deeper level and build a strong brand identity. This emotional connection has translated into increased brand loyalty and advocacy among consumers.

Furthermore, TOMS Shoes’ commitment to sustainability has strengthened its brand image. By using organic cotton, recycled materials, and eco-friendly dye in their products, TOMS Shoes has positioned itself as an environmentally-conscious brand, appealing to consumers who prioritize sustainability.

TOMS Shoes’ marketing strategy has also leveraged the power of social media to engage with its target audience and create a sense of community. Through platforms like Instagram and Twitter, TOMS Shoes has fostered a two-way conversation with its customers, allowing them to actively participate in the brand’s journey. This level of engagement has built trust and loyalty among consumers, while also expanding TOMS Shoes’ reach and visibility.

Additionally, TOMS Shoes’ status as a Certified B Corporation further strengthens its brand positioning. This certification, which demonstrates TOMS Shoes’ commitment to meeting high social and environmental performance standards, adds credibility and authenticity to the brand.

Expansion into New Product Categories

TOMS Shoes’ commitment to social impact goes beyond footwear. The brand has successfully expanded into new product categories, allowing them to make a difference in various areas of need, while continuing to grow their business.

One of TOMS’ notable expansions is their eyewear initiative, which is aligned with their “One for One” model. For every pair of eyewear purchased, TOMS provides prescription glasses, medical treatment, or sight-saving surgery to individuals in need. This expansion not only addresses the issue of eye health but also enables TOMS to reach a wider audience and create a positive social impact.

In addition to eyewear, TOMS entered the market of bags. Their eco-friendly bags promote sustainability and environmentally conscious practices. As part of their commitment to social impact, TOMS invests in projects that provide clean drinking water to communities in need. Through partnerships and product sales, TOMS contributes to combating the global water crisis.

Table: TOMS Shoes’ Product Expansion and Social Impact

Furthermore, TOMS Shoes ventured into the coffee market. With every bag of TOMS coffee purchased, the brand supports initiatives that provide clean and safe drinking water to underprivileged communities. This expansion not only creates a sustainable source of revenue for TOMS but also addresses a vital need for many communities around the world.

TOMS’ expansion into new product categories not only attracts a wider audience but also demonstrates their commitment to making a positive social impact. Through eyewear, bags, and coffee, TOMS continues to leverage their “One for One” model and extend their reach to communities in need.

Building a Community and Fostering Customer Interaction

TOMS Shoes understands the significance of community building and actively engages with their customers through various channels, especially social media. By prioritizing customer engagement and fostering a sense of belonging, TOMS Shoes has built a vibrant online community of brand advocates.

Through their robust social media strategy, TOMS Shoes effectively connects with their targeted audience and strengthens their brand presence. With over 900 thousand followers on Instagram alone, TOMS leverages this platform to showcase their products, engage with their followers, and share heartwarming customer stories.

One of the key elements of TOMS Shoes’ social media strategy is to encourage user-generated content. By highlighting their customers’ experiences and style choices, TOMS showcases their products in an authentic and relatable way. This not only fosters a sense of community but also acts as a form of social proof for potential customers.

TOMS Shoes understands that their targeted audience values social responsibility and appreciates the brand’s commitment to creating positive change. By connecting with consumers on social issues, TOMS has gained earned media and the attention of millions of Americans through platforms like The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon, Rolling Stone, and Huffington Post.

By actively engaging with their community, TOMS Shoes not only strengthens their brand loyalty but also gathers valuable feedback from their customers. This feedback loop enables TOMS to constantly improve their products and better serve their customers’ needs.

Moreover, TOMS Shoes has provided their consumers with a platform to voice their opinions and support causes they believe in. Through TOMS.com, customers have sent over 680,000 letters to politicians in support of universal background checks, demonstrating the power of community-driven advocacy.

Fostering Belonging and Impact

Building a community goes beyond just social media engagement for TOMS Shoes. They strive to create a strong sense of belonging and impact through their brand mission. By focusing on three interconnected pillars of impact: Mental Health, Access to Opportunity, and Ending Gun Violence, TOMS aims to make a lasting difference in society.

TOMS has transitioned from individual donations to dedicating one-third of their profits to mental health initiatives, underlining their commitment to address the growing mental health challenges in today’s stressful world.

The brand’s pillar of Access to Opportunity aims to empower individuals to escape poverty, access education, secure clean water, and find economic opportunities. By providing opportunities for growth and development, TOMS truly embodies their mission of creating a better world.

TOMS Shoes also takes a stand against gun violence in the United States, dedicating efforts to raise awareness and support initiatives that aim to create safer communities. By tackling challenging social issues head-on, TOMS demonstrates their commitment to making a meaningful impact.

Every purchase at TOMS contributes to creating a better world, making customers an integral part of the brand’s mission for social impact. With 27% of customers stating that belonging to a brand influences their decision to do business, TOMS’ commitment to community building and social responsibility resonates with their audience on a deep level.

In conclusion, TOMS Shoes has successfully built a community of brand advocates by prioritizing customer engagement, fostering a sense of belonging, and promoting their mission for social impact. By leveraging social media platforms and actively connecting with their targeted audience, TOMS has created an authentic and passionate community that supports their efforts to make the world a better place.

TOMS’ Competitive Strategy and Corporate Social Responsibility

TOMS Shoes has implemented a competitive strategy that sets them apart in the shoe market. By appealing to socially conscious consumers through their charitable initiatives, TOMS has successfully differentiated themselves from their competitors. The company’s unique “One for One” model, where they donate a pair of shoes to a person in need for every pair purchased, has been a cornerstone of their success. Through this program, TOMS has given away over 100 million pairs of shoes globally by June 2020, positively impacting the lives of millions of people.

In addition to their shoe donations, TOMS has expanded its social responsibility initiatives to include other areas of impact. In 2011, they launched a program for eyewear, providing prescription glasses and eye surgery to those in need. This diversification allows TOMS to address different social issues and broaden their reach. They have also ventured into the coffee industry with TOMS Roasting Co., promoting safe drinking water through their partnerships.

TOMS’ commitment to corporate social responsibility goes beyond their philanthropic efforts. The company has transitioned to a capital-backed collaboration model, partnering with approximately 30 allies focused on mental health equity, access opportunities, and ending gun violence. By aligning with these initiatives, such as Wildfang and ProjectQ, TOMS not only promotes social goals but also emotionally connects with their consumers, who share similar values.

Amy Smith, a marketing expert, emphasizes three crucial steps for a successful socially-driven marketing strategy: alignment on mission, thorough research on social issues, and focusing on progress rather than perfection. TOMS has embodied these principles, focusing on developing authentic connections with their consumers through storytelling about their social impact programs. By sharing their mission and the positive changes they are making, TOMS fosters a sense of purpose and inspires their customers to contribute to their cause.

Impacts of Corporate Social Responsibility

The importance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is further validated by research. A study analyzing 28,578 firm-years found that companies engaged in CSR had higher profit margins and valuation, lower risk, and more stable returns on assets. This not only benefits the companies themselves but also creates a positive impact on society.

Customers play a significant role in shaping CSR policies, as they prioritize companies that align with their values and contribute to positive social change. TOMS’ niche of socially conscious consumers resonates well with the increased disposable income and the desire of consumers to support charitable causes. By focusing on their corporate social responsibility initiatives, TOMS attracts and retains loyal customers who appreciate their commitment to making a difference.

Celebrating the success of their giving model, TOMS has given away shoes to 86 million children since its founding. Their impact extends beyond shoes, with initiatives like mobilizing 58,000 people to send postcards supporting universal background checks for gun violence prevention within 12 hours of announcing their initiative and pledging $5 million, the largest corporate donation, to combat gun violence in the United States.

Corporate leaders like those at TOMS and Patagonia exemplify the importance of imbuing companies with humanity through guiding them with conscience. Their commitment to corporate social responsibility sets an example for other businesses, demonstrating the power of integrating social impact into competitive strategies.

TOMS Shoes’ marketing strategy, centered around their unique “One for One” model, has positioned them as a socially conscious brand with a strong focus on philanthropy. By aligning their sales objectives with their broader purpose of improving lives, TOMS Shoes has not only captured the attention and loyalty of consumers but also inspired other socially conscious companies.

Through their extensive presence in over 70 countries and strategic partnerships with aid organizations, TOMS Shoes has been able to provide shoes to those less fortunate. This commitment to social impact has resonated with consumers, who display brand loyalty and engagement on various social media platforms.

While TOMS Shoes faces competition in the footwear industry, their dedication to corporate social responsibility and innovative marketing tactics have set them apart. However, they have also faced criticism and skepticism regarding the quality and authenticity of their charitable activities.

Despite these challenges, TOMS Shoes has donated over 90 million pairs of shoes since its inception, making a direct impact on helping children in need. As they continue to evolve their business model and address concerns, TOMS Shoes remains committed to sustainability, ethical business practices, and maintaining a supply chain free of sweatshop labor. Their resilience and commitment showcase their dedication to improvement and social responsibility.

What is the "One for One" model?

How has toms shoes diversified its product offerings, how does toms shoes utilize social media in its marketing strategy, are there any celebrity endorsements associated with toms shoes, which social media platforms does toms shoes target for their marketing efforts, what are the strengths of toms shoes’ marketing strategy, how has toms shoes expanded into new product categories, how does toms shoes foster customer interaction and community building, what is toms shoes’ competitive strategy, what is the significance of toms shoes’ corporate social responsibility, related posts:.

• Unilever Marketing Strategy 2024: A Case Study
• Boosting Engagement with Video Marketing
• B2C Marketing Strategies for Better Engagement
• Creating Engaging Marketing Webinars

Nina Sheridan is a seasoned author at Latterly.org, a blog renowned for its insightful exploration of the increasingly interconnected worlds of business, technology, and lifestyle. With a keen eye for the dynamic interplay between these sectors, Nina brings a wealth of knowledge and experience to her writing. Her expertise lies in dissecting complex topics and presenting them in an accessible, engaging manner that resonates with a diverse audience.

HBO Max Marketing Strategy 2024: A Case Study

Red ribbon marketing strategy 2024: a case study.

Module 6: Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility

Case study: social entrepreneurship at tom’s shoes, learning outcomes.

• Give examples of corporate social responsibility

While there is no universally accepted definition of social entrepreneur , the term is typically applied to an individual who uses market-based ideas and practices to create “social value,” the enhanced well-being of individuals, communities, and the environment. Unlike ordinary business entrepreneurs who base their decisions solely on financial returns, social entrepreneurs incorporate the objective of creating social value into their founding business models.

Social entrepreneurship has become exceedingly popular in recent years, and a number of prestigious business schools have created specific academic programs in the field. It is often said that social entrepreneurs are changing the world. They are lauded for their ability to influence far-reaching social change through innovative solutions that disrupt existing patterns of production, distribution, and consumption. Prominent social entrepreneurs are celebrated on magazine covers, praised at the World Economic Forum in Davos, awarded millions of dollars in seed money from “angel” investors, and applauded as “harbingers of new ways of doing business.”

Social entrepreneurs are thus often hailed as heroes—but are they actually effecting positive social change?

Undeniably, social entrepreneurship can arouse a striking level of enthusiasm among consumers. Blake Mycoskie, social entrepreneur and founder of TOMS Shoes, tells the story of a young woman who accosted him in an airport, pointing at her pair of TOMS while yelling, “This is the most amazing company in the world!” Founded in 2006, TOMS Shoes immediately attracted a devoted following with its innovative use of the so-called One for One business model, in which each purchase of a pair of shoes by a consumer triggers the gift of a free pair of shoes to an impoverished child in a developing country.

The enthusiasm associated with social entrepreneurship is perhaps emblematic of increased global social awareness, which is evidenced by increased charitable giving worldwide. A 2012 study showed that 83 percent of Americans wish brands would support causes; 41 percent have bought a product because it was associated with a cause (a figure that has doubled since 1993); 94 percent said that, given the same price and quality, they were likely to switch brands to one that represented a cause; and more than 90 percent think companies should consider giving in the communities in which they do business.

Despite the eager reception from consumers, critics of social entrepreneurship have raised concerns about the creation of social value in a for-profit context. Thus, TOMS is sometimes mistaken for a charity because it donates shoes to children in developing countries, yet it is also in business to sell shoes. The company earns an estimated $300 million a year and has made Mr. Mycoskie a wealthy man. While companies are starting to look more like charities, nonprofits are also increasingly relying on business principles to survive an uncertain economy in which donors expect to see tangible results from their charitable contributions.

Our understanding of social entrepreneurship is complicated by the absence of any consensus on ways to measure social outcomes. As a result, there is little concrete statistical data available on the impact of social entrepreneurship. Indeed, there is not much agreement on a precise definition of social entrepreneurship, so it becomes difficult to say to what extent any given company is an example of social entrepreneurship. TOMS’ Chief Giving Officer, Sebastian Fries, recently told the New York Times that the company is “not in the business of poverty alleviation.”

Does this mean that increased social value is merely a happy byproduct of the business of selling shoes? If so, what makes Blake Mycoskie a social entrepreneur?

Some critics go so far as to suggest that social entrepreneurs are merely using public relations tactics to engage in social or environmental greenwashing—taking advantage of consumers’ desire to do good. In some cases, it has been argued, social entrepreneurs can even do more harm than good. Lacking a full understanding of the socioeconomic and cultural dynamic of the developing countries in which they intervene, social enterprises can undermine fragile local markets and foster dependence on foreign assistance. But in the end, the individual impact of social entrepreneurial ventures may outweigh some of these concerns.

• Revision and adaptation. Authored by : Linda Williams and Lumen Learning. License : CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
• Good Corporation, Bad Corporation: Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global Economy. Authored by : Guillermo C. Jimenez and Elizabeth Pulos. Provided by : Open SUNY Textbooks. Located at : http://pressbooks.opensuny.org/good-corporation-bad-corporation/chapter/5/ . License : CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
• Toms. Authored by : Danielle Henry. Located at : https://www.flickr.com/photos/waterandglass/5826939576/ . License : CC BY-SA: Attribution-ShareAlike
• TOMS - Gives new shoes to children in need. One for One. Provided by : TOMS. Located at : https://youtu.be/7MV3HWQHl1s . License : All Rights Reserved . License Terms : Standard YouTube License
• Thank You Notes From The Field. Provided by : TOMS. Located at : https://youtu.be/7b05syjxe2E . License : All Rights Reserved . License Terms : Standard YouTube License

• Skip to main content
• Skip to search
• Skip to footer

Products and Services

Partner Incentives

Maximize your profitability with one-time enrollment in Cisco incentives.

Are you a Cisco partner?

• Share full article

For more audio journalism and storytelling, download New York Times Audio , a new iOS app available for news subscribers.

• Apple Podcasts
• Google Podcasts

The Republican Plan to Challenge a Harris Victory

How a right-wing takeover of an obscure, unelected board in georgia could swing the election..

Hosted by Michael Barbaro

Featuring Nick Corasaniti

Produced by Olivia Natt Asthaa Chaturvedi and Eric Krupke

Edited by Patricia Willens

With Lexie Diao and Michael Benoist

Original music by Dan Powell Corey Schreppel Rowan Niemisto and Diane Wong

Engineered by Chris Wood

Listen and follow ‘The Daily’ Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | YouTube | iHeartRadio

At the Democratic National Convention, party officials are celebrating polls showing that Kamala Harris is now competitive with Donald Trump in every major swing state across the country.

But in one of those swing states, Republicans have laid the groundwork to challenge a potential Harris victory this fall, by taking over an obscure, unelected board.

Nick Corasaniti, a Times reporter who focuses on voting and elections, explains.

On today’s episode

Nick Corasaniti , a reporter covering national politics for The New York Times.

Background reading

The unelected body that shapes voting rules in Georgia has a new conservative majority, whose members question the state’s 2020 results. They now have new power to influence the results in 2024 .

Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are in close races across Arizona, Georgia, Nevada and North Carolina , crucial swing states that Mr. Trump had seemed poised to run away with.

There are a lot of ways to listen to The Daily. Here’s how.

We aim to make transcripts available the next workday after an episode’s publication. You can find them at the top of the page.

Fact-checking by Susan Lee .

The Daily is made by Rachel Quester, Lynsea Garrison, Clare Toeniskoetter, Paige Cowett, Michael Simon Johnson, Brad Fisher, Chris Wood, Jessica Cheung, Stella Tan, Alexandra Leigh Young, Lisa Chow, Eric Krupke, Marc Georges, Luke Vander Ploeg, M.J. Davis Lin, Dan Powell, Sydney Harper, Michael Benoist, Liz O. Baylen, Asthaa Chaturvedi, Rachelle Bonja, Diana Nguyen, Marion Lozano, Corey Schreppel, Rob Szypko, Elisheba Ittoop, Mooj Zadie, Patricia Willens, Rowan Niemisto, Jody Becker, Rikki Novetsky, Nina Feldman, Will Reid, Carlos Prieto, Ben Calhoun, Susan Lee, Lexie Diao, Mary Wilson, Alex Stern, Sophia Lanman, Shannon Lin, Diane Wong, Devon Taylor, Alyssa Moxley, Olivia Natt, Daniel Ramirez and Brendan Klinkenberg.

Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landsverk of Wonderly. Special thanks to Sam Dolnick, Paula Szuchman, Lisa Tobin, Larissa Anderson, Julia Simon, Sofia Milan, Mahima Chablani, Elizabeth Davis-Moorer, Jeffrey Miranda, Maddy Masiello, Isabella Anderson, Nina Lassam and Nick Pitman.

Nick Corasaniti is a Times reporter covering national politics, with a focus on voting and elections. More about Nick Corasaniti

Advertisement