literature review on web 3.0

To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, an integrative review of web 3.0 in academic libraries.

Library Hi Tech News

ISSN : 0741-9058

Article publication date: 25 June 2018

Issue publication date: 7 August 2018

The purpose of this paper is to present an integrated literature review exploring the nature of responsive, semantic and interactive Web 3.0 technologies applicable for academic libraries.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors conducted an integrated review of the literature combining a strategy of automated and keywords search. The main source for identifying the studies are Emerald Library Studies and Information & Knowledge Management eJournals, Web of Kn.edge and Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (EBSCO) databases. To this end, a sample of ( n = 140) studies was analyzed to characterize the Web 3.0 trends and its applications based on theme, years and document types.

A review of literature reveals that Web 3.0 needs evaluation as to what extent they are integrated, deployed and mainstreamed into library services and in information management practices. It is important to develop a conceptual framework that explores the linkages of Web 3.0 technologies and their applications in academic libraries.

Originality/value

This review shows how Web 3.0 technologies enhance library services in its holistic conceptualization and how academic libraries are moving into a more robust, inclusive and adaptable phase in their service values and innovation.

• Academic libraries
• Literature review
• Library 2.0
• Library services
• Web applications
• Web 3.0 technologies
• Web 3.0 theory
• Integrated literature review

Balaji, B.P. , M.S., V. , B.G., S. and J.S., M.R. (2018), "An integrative review of Web 3.0 in academic libraries", Library Hi Tech News , Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-12-2017-0092

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

English abstract

Purpose – The aim of this paper is to present an integrated literature review exploring the nature of responsive, semantic and interactive Web 3.0 technologies applicable for academic libraries. Design/methodology/approach – We conducted an integrated review of the literature combining a strategy of automated and keywords search. The main source for identifying the studies are Emerald Library Studies and Information & Knowledge Management eJournals, Web of Knowledge, and Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (EBSCO) databases. To this end, a sample of (n= 140) studies were analyzed to characterize the Web 3.0 trends and its applications based on theme, years and document types. Findings – A review of literature reveals that Web 3. needs evaluation as to what extent they are integrated, deployed and mainstreamed into library services and in information management practices. It is important to develop a conceptual framework that explores the linkages of Web 3.0 technologies and their applications in academic libraries. Originality/value –This review shows how Web 3.0 technologies enhance library services in its holistic conceptualization and how academic libraries are moving into a more robust, inclusive and adaptable phase in their service values and innovation.

Baro, E .E., Ebiagbe, E. J. and Godfrey, V. Z. (2013), "Web 2.0 tools usage: a comparative study of librarians in university libraries in Nigeria and South Africa", Library Hi Tech News, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp.10- 20.

Berners-Lee, T. and O’Hara, K. (2013), “The read–write Linked Data Web”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, Vol. 371 No. 1987, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0513.

Blackburn, H. (2011), “Millennials and the adoption of new technologies in libraries through the diffusion of innovations process”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 663-677, doi: 10.1108/07378831111189769.

Bolinder, J. (2008), “The return of Web 3.0 - cloud computing, browser extensions or the distributed Web”, blog post, 4 August, available at: http://impl.emented.com/2008/08/04/the-return-of-Web-30-cloud-computing-browser-extensions-or-the-distributed-Web/ (accessed 10 November 2017).

Clausen, H. (1999), “Evaluation of library Web sites: the Danish case”, The Electronic Library, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 83-87, doi: 10.1108/02640479910329527.

Comeaux, D. J. (2017), “Web design trends in academic libraries—a longitudinal study”, Journal of Web Librarianship, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 1-15, doi: 10.1080/19322909.2016.1230031.

Flynn, N. (2012), The Social Media Handbook: Rules, Policies, and Best Practices to Successfully Manage your Organization's Social Media Presence, Posts, and Potential Risks, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.

Foo, S. and Ng, J. (2008), “Library 2.0, libraries and library school”, in Proceedings of Library Association of Singapore Conference, 8-9 May, Singapore, Library Association of Singapore, Singapore.

Garoufallou, E. and Charitopoulou, V. (2012), “Web 2.0 in library and information science education: the Greek case”, New Library World, Vol. 113 No. 3/4, pp. 202-217, doi: 10.1108/03074801211218561.

Harris, S. (2016), “Trends and issues in Jamaican academic libraries 2010-2016”, New Library World, Vol. 117 No. 11/12, pp. 721-745, doi: 10.1108/NLW-08-2016-0055.

Hoodless, C. and Pinfield, S. (2016), “Subject vs. functional: should subject librarians be replaced by functional specialists in academic libraries”, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, pp. 1-16, doi: 10.1177/0961000616653647.

Huang, H., Chu, S.K.W. and Chen, D.Y.T. (2015), “Interactions between English‐speaking and Chinese‐speaking users and librarians on social networking sites”, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 66 No. 6, pp. 1150-1166, doi: 10.1002/asi.23251.

Hussain, A. (2015), “Adoption of Web 2.0 in library associations in the presence of social media”, Program, Vol. 49 No. 2, pp. 151-169, doi: 10.1108/PROG-02-2013-0007.

Isaias, P., Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D.G. and Spector, J.M. Eds., (2011), Towards learning and instruction in Web 3.0: advances in cognitive and educational psychology, Springer, New York.

Kelly, B., Nevile, L., Sloan, D., Fanou, S., Ellison, R. and Herrod, L. (2009), “From Web accessibility to Web adaptability”, Disability and Rehability: Assistive Technology, Vol. 4 Iss 4, pp. 212 -226, doi: 10.1080/17483100902903408.

Kwanya, T., Stilwell, C. and Underwood, P.G. (2013), “Intelligent libraries and apomediators: distinguishing between Library 3.0 and Library 2.0”, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 187-197, doi: 10.1177/0961000611435256.

McKenna, M. (1994), “Libraries and the Internet”, available at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED377880.pdf (accessed 10 December 2017).

MacDonald, C.M. (2017), “It takes a village: on UX librarianship and building UX capacity in libraries”, Journal of Library Administration, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 194-214, doi: 10.1080/01930826.2016.1232942.

Rosario, V.C. (2012), “Generational differences in technology adoption in community colleges” unpublished dissertation, Drexel University, Philadelphia.

Shoniwa, P. and Hall, H. (2007), “Library 2.0 and UK academic libraries: drivers and impacts”, New Review of Information Networking, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 69-79.

Spivack, N. (2007), “Web 3.0: the third generation Web is coming”, available at: https://lifeboat.com/ex/Web.3.0 (accessed 14 December 2017).

Torres-Pérez, P., Méndez-Rodríguez, E. and Orduna-Malea, E. (2016), “Mobile Web adoption in top ranked university libraries: a preliminary study”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 329-339.

Virkus, S. (2008), “Use of Web 2.0 technologies in LIS education: experiences at Tallinn University, Estonia”, Program, Vol. 42 Iss 3, pp. 262-274, doi: 10.1108/00330330810892677.

W3C.org (2015), “Semantic Web”, available at: https://www.w3.org/standards/semanticWeb/ (accessed 18 November 2017).

Xu, C., Ouyang, F. and Chu, H. (2009), “The academic library meets Web 2.0: applications and implications”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 324-331, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2009.04.003.

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Web 3.0: Implications for Online Learning

• Published: 12 January 2011
• Volume 55 , pages 42–46, ( 2011 )

Cite this article

Robin D. Morris

2353 Accesses

32 Citations

3 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

The impact of Web 3.0, also known as the Semantic Web, on online learning is yet to be determined as the Semantic Web and its technologies continue to develop. Online instructors must have a rudimentary understanding of Web 3.0 to prepare for the next phase of online learning. This paper provides an understandable definition of the Semantic Web and its terminology, and then explores possible implications of Web 3.0 on online learning. The foundation of the Semantic Web is data integration. By using metadata, “display only” data is converted to meaningful information which can be located, evaluated, and delivered by software agents. Web 3.0 technologies will assist online instructors in the areas of course development, learner support, assessment, and record keeping. Online students will benefit from learning personalization and knowledge construction powered by the Semantic Web.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Anderson, T., & Whitelock, D. (2004). The Educational Semantic Web: Visioning and Practicing the Future of Education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education , 1 , 1–15. Retrieved from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/2004/1/editorial-2004-1.pdf

Google Scholar  

Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). THE SEMANTIC WEB. Scientific American , 284 (5), 34. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database.

Brindley, J. E., Walti, C., & Blaschke, L. M. (2009). Creating Effective Collaborative Learning Groups in an Online Environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning , 10 (3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php

Clark, K., Parsia, B., & Hendler, J. (2004). Will the Semantic Web Change Education?. Journal of Interactive Media in Education , 3 , 1–16. Retrieved from wwwjime.open.ac.uk/2004/3/clark-2004-3.pdf

Daly, C. (2009, April 9). The Semantic Web and E-Learning. eLearn Magazine: Education and Technology in Perspective . Retrieved from http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=77-1

Devedzic, V. (2006). Semantic Web and Education (Integrated Series in Information Systems) (1st ed.). New York: Springer.

Downes, S. (2005, October 17). E-learning 2.0. eLearn Magazine: Education and Technology in Perspective . Retrieved from http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=29-1

Ghaleb, F., Daoud, S., Hasna, A., AlJa’am, J. M., El-Seoud, S. A., & El-Sofany, H. (2006). E-Learning Model Based on Semantic Web Technology. International Journal of Computing & Information Sciences , 4 (2), 63–71. Retrieved from http://www.ijcis.info/Vol4N2/pp63-71.pdf

Hatala, M., Gasevic, D., Siadaty, M., Jovanovic, J., & Torniai, C. (2009). Can Educators Develop Ontologies Using Ontology Extraction Tools: An End-User Study. Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines: 4th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2009 Nice, France (1st ed., pp. 140–153). New York: Springer.

Koper, R. (2004). Use of the Semantic Web to Solve Some Basic Problems in Education: Increase Flexible, Distributed Lifelong Learning, Decrease Teachers’ Workload. Journal of Interactive Media in Education , 6 , 1–23. Retrieved from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/2004/6/

Miller, P. (Host). (2008, February 27). Sir Tim Berners-Lee Talks about the Semantic Web. Nodalities blog . Podcast retrieved from http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2008/02/sir_tim_bernerslee_talks_about_1.php

Ohler, J. (2008a). The Semantic Web in Education. EDUCAUSE quarterly , 31 (4). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSE

QuarterlyMagazineVolum/TheSemanticWebinEducation/163437

Ohler, J. (2008b) Web 3.0 - The Semantic Web Cometh. Docstoc. Retrieved from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/25619755/Web-30---The-Semantic-Web-Cometh/

Ounnas, A., Davis, H. and Millard, D. (2008) Semantic Web-based Group Formation for E-learning. In: PhD Symposium in the 5th European Semantic Web Conference 2008 . Retrieved from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/15855/

RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. (2004, February 10). World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) . Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_summary

Reynard, R. (2010, February 3). Web 3.0 and Its Relevance for Instruction. THE Journal . Retrieved from http://thejournal.com/articles/2010/02/03/web-3.0-andits-relevance-for-instruction.aspx

Shadbolt, N., Hall, W., & Berners-Lee, T. (2006). The Semantic Web Revisited. IEEE Intelligent Systems , 21 (3), 96–101. Retrieved from http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/MIS.2006.62

Article   Google Scholar  

Stojanovic, L., Staab, S and Studer, R. (2001) eLearning Based on the Semantic Web. Proceedings WebNet2001 - World Conference on the WWW and Internet, Orlando, Florida. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.16.295

Wheeler, S. (2009, April 13). Learning with ‘e’s: e-Learning 3.0. Learning with ‘e’s . Retrieved from http://steve-wheeler.blogspot.com/2009/04/learning-30.html

Yu, L. (2007). Introduction to the Semantic Web and Semantic Web Services . Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/Crc.

Book   Google Scholar  

Download references

Author information

Additional information.

“…the Semantic Web is all about data integration…”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Robin D. Morris. Web 3.0: Implications for Online Learning. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 55 , 42–46 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0469-9

Download citation

Published : 12 January 2011

Issue Date : January 2011

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0469-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Online Learning
• Online Instruction
• Semantic Web
• Educational Technology
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

An Integrative Review of Web 3.0 in Academic Libraries

2018 Abstract Purpose – The aim of this paper is to present an integrated literature review exploring the nature of responsive, semantic and interactive Web 3.0 technologies applicable for academic libraries. Design/methodology/approach – We conducted an integrated review of the literature combining a strategy of automated and keywords search. The main source for identifying the studies are Emerald Library Studies and Information & Knowledge Management eJournals, Web of Knowledge, and Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (EBSCO) databases. To this end, a sample of (n= 140) studies were analyzed to characterize the Web 3.0 trends and its applications based on theme, years and document types. Findings – A review of literature reveals that Web 3. needs evaluation as to what extent they are integrated, deployed and mainstreamed into library services and in information management practices. It is important to develop a conceptual framework that explores the linkages of Web 3.0 technologies and their applications in academic libraries. Originality/value –This review shows how Web 3.0 technologies enhance library services in its holistic conceptualization and how academic libraries are moving into a more robust, inclusive and adaptable phase in their service values and innovation.

Related Papers

9th International Library Information Professional Summit (l-LIPS) Conference on “Academic Libraries: Latest Trends, Challenges and Opportunities” February 14-16, 2020, Jiwaji University

Shivani Gupta

Today, In the modern innovative technological environment or world, the enormous development of web technologies plays an important role as use of the web of information, interactive & collaborative Portals or platform, semantic web, artificial intelligence, Internet of things, etc. The first stage (web 1.0) of the web was considered as a one-way communication or read-only web. The second stage (web 2.0) was started as a web emerging tool in the context of social media. And third stage (web 3.0) of the web is regarded as semantic or intelligent web. This paper focuses especially on Web 3.0(semantic or metadata web) tool with its some definitions and concepts in the internet world that provide various web technologies to empower the communication between Machines and human being by creating or constructing flexible intelligent information system or semantic web structure with define various web components, characteristics, advantages & emerging challenges.

Khalid Mahmood

The Electronic Library

The International Information & Library Review

sunil kumar , Manorama Tripathi

DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology

Brij Mohan Gupta

A Master's Paper for the MS in LS degree (November), …

Michael Habib

Sudesh K Sood

This article suggests that recent thinking describing the changing Web as "Web 2.0" will have substantial implications for libraries, and recognizes that while these implications keep very close to the history and mission of libraries; they still necessitate a new paradigm for librarianship. The paper applies the theory and definition to the practice of librarianship, specifically addressing how Web 2.0 technologies at level 1 such as Ajax (Asynchronous JavaScript and XML), API (Application Programming Interface), Mashup, P2P (Peer-to-peer), RSS (Really Simple Syndication), XML (Extended Markup Language) and at level 2 such as Social Networks, Blogs, Wiki, Social Book Marks, Podcast, technological resources are used to create a final product: languages, systems and other tools that allow the professional to develop or adapt these applications. The services and ways of implementing current Web 2.0 trends into libraries like OPAC 2.0, Social networks, Blogs, WIKIS, RSS and Social Bookmarks have been explained. With this article we would like to incite reflection on the changes that the Web 2.0 has brought to the information retrieval on the web, and therefore on libraries. The Web 2.0 movement is laying the groundwork for exponential business growth and another major shift in the way our users live, work, and play. We have the ability, insight, and knowledge to influence the creation of this new dynamic – and guarantee the future of our profession. Librarian 2.0. To conclude, we discuss some of the weak points libraries face when using 2.0 technologies.

Handbook of Research on Digital Devices for Inclusivity and Engagement in Libraries

Library Hi Tech

Frank Boateng

Purpose– This paper aims to explore Web 2.0 technologies usage and trends in the top 100 US academic libraries as exemplified through the academic library websites.Design/methodology/approach– The top 100 universities were selected from the US News & World Report's (USNWR) 2013 ranked list's top 100 of the best colleges in the USA. Content analysis was used in terms of quantitative approach. A checklist was developed as the main research instrument based on other checklists and questionnaires. Each of the selected university library websites was visited within a period of two weeks to explore implementation and usage of web tools, including SNS, blog, RSS, wikis, podcast/vodcast, and social bookmarking/tagging.Findings– All 100 academic libraries had a social media presence on Facebook and Twitter, making SNS the most widely applied Web 2.0 tool. The wiki was the least applied Web 2.0 technology, with a 34 percent participation rate. Blog was the second most popular tool wit...

National Conference on 21st Century Librarianship

Santosh Biradar

Web 2.0 technologies are really mash-up of traditional library services and innovative. It has engrossed the attention of libraries around the world as a means for endorsing and extending their services. Web 2.0 technologies such as synchronous messaging and streaming media, blogs, wikis, social networks, tagging and RSS feeds might intimate changes in library services. This study has made an attempt to know the various features of Web 2.0 technologies and also deals with how Web 2.0 technologies could be used in the academic library context. It also provides solid evidence of the application of Web 2.0 in academic libraries websites.

RELATED PAPERS

Leonardo Summa

Faits de Langues, 53(1)

Hrach Martirosyan

Srinivasan Kalyanaraman

Daniel Taradaciuc

Alma Lilia Hernandez Olvera

Mediterranea. International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge

Marie Cronier

Farah Ahmed

cristian cisneros

Sergio Brillante

The Art Book

Craig Bunch

Molecular Ecology Resources

Tjard Bergmann

Line Joranger

Sabah Al-Fedaghi

Biophysical Journal

Miguel Holmgren

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials

Kazuaki Morizane

National Development and Human Security: Orunmwense, F. F. O and Omoruyi, I. O. (eds)

Osamede S Abusomwan

hgvfgd ghtgf

Cuestiones Juridicas

Rubi magdalena soto peña

Rajnish Kumar

Begarving Arthur

Geoarchaeology-an International Journal

Judith Bunbury

Soil Research

Neyde Giarola

2009 22nd International Conference on VLSI Design

Nilanjan Mukherjee

Medicinski podmladak

Igor Stosic

Food Chemistry

José Carlos Lopes

Tatyana Teplova

Charles Mbohwa

Science Bulletin

Xin-zhuan Su

Bulletin of the Geological Society of Malaysia

Heru Purwanto

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

The use of web 3.0 tools for reading skill development: case blogs in virtual education

Ieee account.

• Change Username/Password
• Update Address

Purchase Details

• Payment Options
• Order History
• View Purchased Documents

Profile Information

• Communications Preferences
• Profession and Education
• Technical Interests
• US & Canada: +1 800 678 4333
• Worldwide: +1 732 981 0060
• Contact & Support
• About IEEE Xplore
• Accessibility
• Terms of Use
• Nondiscrimination Policy
• Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity. © Copyright 2024 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.