literature review biomedical sciences

A literature review is a body of text that aims to review the critical points of current knowledge on a particular topic. Most often associated with science-oriented literature, such as a thesis, the literature review usually proceeds a research proposal, methodology and results section. Its ultimate goals is to bring the reader up to date with ...

The Literature Review Structure: Like a standard academic essay, a literature review is made up of three key components: an introduction, a body and a conclusion. Most literature reviews can follow the following format: • Introduction: Introduce the topic/problem and the context within which it is found. • Body: Examine past research in the ...

Writing a literature review is a very challenging task. Figure 7.2 summarises the steps of writing a literature review. Depending on why you are writing your literature review, you may be given a topic area, or may choose a topic that particularly interests you or is related to a research project that you wish to undertake.

The best proposals are timely and clearly explain why readers should pay attention to the proposed topic. It is not enough for a review to be a summary of the latest growth in the literature: the ...

The academic peer review process of the biomedical science field has evolved rather haphazardly over time, but is now increasingly subject to scrutiny and the demand for higher standards. This paper has provided an overview of the processes, including the types of peer review and their advantages, limitations and areas for improvement.

Over 5000 reviews of research on medical treatments, practices, and diagnostic tests are provided in this database. Cochrane Reviews is the premier resource for Evidence Based Practice. PubMed comprises more than 22 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books.

Literature reviews are most commonly performed to help answer a particular question. While you are at medical school, there will usually be some choice regarding the area you are going to review. Once you have identified a subject area for review, the next step is to formulate a specific research question. This is arguably the most important ...

A literature review is an integrated analysis-- not just a summary-- of scholarly writings that are related directly to your research question. That is, it represents the literature that provides background information on your topic and shows a correspondence between those writings and your research question. A literature review may be a stand ...

Criteria. Reviews provide comprehensive and authoritative coverage of a topic area. Key aims of reviews are to provide systematic and substantial coverage of mature subjects, evaluations of progress in specified areas, and/or critical assessments of emerging technologies.

Research Assistance. The Eskind Biomedical Library Reference Librarians can assist the Vanderbilt community by assisting with literature searches, consulting on literature searches, and training on biomedical information resources and citation management programs. Contact us by calling the Information Desk at (615) 936-1410 or using one of our ...

A literature review has a number of purposes. It enables you to: Set the background on what has been researched on a topic. Show why a topic is significant to a subject area. Discover relationships between ideas. Identify major themes & concepts. Identify critical gaps & points of disagreement. Help the researcher turn a network of articles ...

A good literature review will consist of a summary of key sources, and is analytical and synthesizes information. Usually a literature review is organized, not however a chronological description of discoveries in your field, and explains how your research will address gaps in existing literature on a particular topic. Doing a literature review.

Writing and reviewing for the biomedical literature are both privileges and responsibilities. A careful review takes time and can be challenging. ... Laine C, Mulrow C. Peer review: Integral to science and indispensableto Annals. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec16; 139 (12):1038-40. [Google Scholar] 18.

A bibliometric review of the biomedical literature could be essential in synthesizing evidence if thoroughly conducted and documented. Although very similar to review papers in nature, it slightly differs in synthesizing the data when it comes to providing a pile of evidence from different studies into a single document. This paper provides a preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric ...

PubMed - The premier medical database for review articles in medicine, nursing, healthcare, other related biomedical disciplines. PubMed contains over 20 million citations and can be navigated through multiple database capabilities and searching strategies. CINAHL Ultimate - Offers comprehensive coverage of health science literature. CINAHL is particularly useful for those researching the ...

The review should identify innovative research and, where relevant, weaknesses in studies. The review provided an interpretation through the way the information is organized (argument) and the conclusions that are drawn. The literature review should be in narrative (essay) form. It should include a summary, introduction, main body and ...

Summary. Biomedical and life sciences literature is unique because of its exponentially increasing volume and interdisciplinary nature. Biomedical literature access is essential for several types of users including biomedical researchers, clinicians, database curators, and bibliometricians. In the past few decades, several online search tools ...

Find methods information, sources, references or conduct a literature review on BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE. Science topics: Biological Science Biomedical Science. Science topic.

European database of biomedical and pharmacologic literature. PubMed. PubMed comprises more than 21 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Scopus. Largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature and quality web sources. Contains conference papers. Web of Science

This resource covers medicine, dentistry, nursing, physical therapy, biomedical research, clinical practice, administration, policy issues, and health care services. It also includes extra life sciences journals and ebooks in addition to MEDLINE. ScienceDirect This link opens in a new window. Excellent place to start a literature review. Get ...

Methods: We adopted a modified thematic review approach focused on understanding AI ethics aspects relevant to biomedical research. For this review, four scientific literature databases at the cross-section of medical, technical, and ethics science literature were queried: PubMed, BMC Medical Ethics, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar.

The review draws on the latest literature, articles, and best practice guidelines from journals and books on scientific paper writing in biomedical sciences and related life sciences. Though primarily aimed at biomedical early career researchers, many of the recommendations may have broader relevance across diverse disciplines.

Background: FAM83D is a spindle related protein and plays critical roles in mid-plate formation during mitosis. Aberrant FAM83D expression was reported in multiple cancers. Besides, it was observed that FAM83D was capable of promoting the proliferation and migration of normal or cancer cells in several tissues. Objective: we are aiming to update the latest advancement in FAM83D findings, and ...

Division of Dental Technology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. ... This systematic literature review focuses on assessing the potential utility of bitemark analysis in forensic identification.

Identifying critical research within the growing body of academic work is an essential element of quality research. Systematic review processes, used in evidence-based medicine, formalise this as a procedure that must be followed in a research program. However, it comes with an increasing burden in terms of the time required to identify the important articles of research for a given topic. In ...

The authors found that overall retraction rates quadrupled during the study period — from around 11 retractions per 100,000 papers in 2000 to almost 45 per 100,000 in 2020. Of all the retracted ...

Addressing this gap, our review article presents a thorough literature survey encompassing studies on musical NF conducted over the past decade. This review highlights the several benefits and applications ranging from neurorehabilitation to therapeutic interventions, stress management, diagnostics of neurological disorders, and sports ...

In this paper, we review and discuss big data application in four major biomedical subdisciplines: (1) bioinformatics, (2) clinical informatics, (3) imaging informatics, and (4) public health informatics. Specifically, in bioinformatics, high-throughput experiments facilitate the research of new genome-wide association studies of diseases, and ...

Work on the "double empathy problem" (DEP) is rapidly growing in academic and applied settings (e.g., clinical practice). It is most popular in research on conditions, like autism, which are characterized by social cognitive difficulties. Drawing from this literature, we propose that, while research on the DEP has the potential to improve understanding of both typical and atypical social ...

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications - Early marriage of girls in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a literature review ... Shamim Al Aziz Lalin: literature review, data curation ...