primary productivity assignment

This page has been archived and is no longer updated

Terrestrial Primary Production: Fuel for Life

Terrestrial ecosystems rely almost exclusively on the sun's energy to support the growth and metabolism of their resident organisms. Plants are quite literally biomass factories powered by sunlight, supplying organisms higher up the food chain with energy and the structural building blocks of life. Land plants, or autotrophs, are terrestrial primary producers: organisms that manufacture, through photosynthesis, new organic molecules such as carbohydrates and lipids from raw inorganic materials (CO 2 , water, mineral nutrients). These newly minted organic compounds lock up the sun's energy in chemical bonds, providing an energy currency accessible to heterotrophs, organisms that consume rather than produce organic molecules. In this way, primary producers are an essential vehicle for energy transfer from the sun to consumers, securing energy that can be passed from one consumer to another. The energetic and carbon-rich products of primary production supply consumers, including humans, with fuel to drive their metabolism while providing essential carbon-containing compounds that form the bricks and mortar of living cells.

Ecosystem ecologists have long been interested in two related metrics of terrestrial primary production. Gross primary production (GPP) is the total amount of carbon dioxide "fixed" by land plants per unit time through the photosynthetic reduction of CO 2 into organic compounds. A substantial fraction of GPP supports plant autotrophic respiration ( R a ), with the remainder allocated to the net primary production (NPP) of plant structural biomass in stems, leaves, and fruit, labile carbohydrates such as sugars and starch, and, to a much lesser extent, volatile organic compounds used in plant defense and signaling. Terrestrial GPP, therefore, relates to NPP as follows:

NPP = GPP - R a

Where do plants invest organic compounds designated for net primary production? Consider, as an example, a mature forest. The stems, leaves, flowers, and fruit are all visible displays of aboveground NPP (i.e., growth) that accrued over time — but what about belowground (root) NPP? Most of the NPP readily observed aboveground is matched in magnitude belowground by the less visible, but equally important, production of roots. For example, root growth comprised almost half of total ecosystem NPP in a ninety-year-old Michigan forest, indicating that belowground investments in biomass by plants are substantial (Figure 1). The total standing biomass of an ecosystem is a function of cumulative NPP over time minus biomass losses from senescence (i.e., death). In the same forest, stems (including trunks and branches) are the largest fraction of standing biomass, but roots comprise a quarter of the total biomass present in the ecosystem.

Measuring Gross and Net Primary Production

Recent technological advances also allow for on-the-ground estimates of terrestrial primary production using meteorological towers that measure the uptake or emissions of CO 2 by ecosystems (Figure 2). Meteorological towers measure net ecosystem CO 2 exchange (NEE), which is equal to GPP minus ecosystem respiration or the quantity of CO 2 respired by both autotrophs (plants) and heterotrophs (primarily microbes). GPP and NPP are calculated indirectly by adding ecosystem and heterotrophic respiration, respectively, to NEE. Meteorological approaches are employed worldwide in forest, agricultural, grassland, and desert ecosystems to track terrestrial primary production. For example, the international research network FLUXNET (Baldocchi et al. 2001) supports observations of terrestrial primary production on six of seven continents.

At the global scale, satellite data combined with mathematical modeling is essential to providing worldwide estimates of terrestrial primary production. Several approaches have been used, but most notable are products derived from NASA's Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), a satellite-mounted instrument that collects surface spectral, or color, data useful for tracking changes in the productivity of terrestrial and marine ecosystems. An example MODIS product is a "greenness" index of the Earth's surface used to estimate terrestrial primary production. Surface greenness and other remotely sensed data collected from space provide coarser assessments of NPP and GPP than inventory and meteorological tower based methods but have the advantage of providing estimates of terrestrial primary production for large areas where ground-based methods are not feasible.

Terrestrial Primary Production Over Time and Across the Earth's Surface

Over decades, a period that is meaningful to ecological succession, terrestrial primary production changes in response to shifts in plant competition and disturbance. Consider an abandoned field that undergoes a successional reversion back to forest. Plant communities will assemble during early succession, with fast-growing plants emerging first and because of low initial plant density there will be little competition for resources. As a result, total plant growth in the ecosystem, or NPP, will proceed at an increasingly higher rate for several years. NPP generally levels off or declines once plants start crowding one another and begin competing more intensively for limiting light, nutrient, and water resources (Figure 3). Terrestrial primary production also may change over time in response to natural disturbances such as insect outbreaks, wind, fire, and pathogens that diminish photosynthesis by reducing leaf biomass and causing plant death. Long-term increases in atmospheric CO 2 and nitrogen deposition associated primarily with fossil fuel burning generally increase plant growth over long periods of time.

Terrestrial primary production varies considerably across the surface of the Earth and among different ecosystem types. Terrestrial primary production, both NPP and GPP, vary from north to south (or latitudinally) due to gradients in plant community composition, growing season length, precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation. However, east to west (longitudinal) differences in terrestrial primary production also exist. These spatial differences are illustrated in a map of global NPP derived from NASA's MODIS satellite (Figure 4). For example, there is a precipitous decline in NPP from east to west in middle North America that is largely a function of declining precipitation. NPP generally declines from tropical regions to the poles because of temperature and light limitations. Tropical forests tend to be much more productive than other terrestrial ecosystems, with temperate forests, tropical savannah, croplands, and boreal forests all exhibiting middle levels of primary production (Table 1). Desert and Tundra Biomes, limited by precipitation and temperature respectively, contain the least productive ecosystems. In addition to climatic regulation of terrestrial primary production, disturbance, management, and land-use change (including urbanization) play critical roles in determining spatial differences in terrestrial primary production.

Figure 4: The global distribution of land and ocean net primary production (NPP) estimated from spectral data gathered by NASA's MODIS satellite Public Domain NASA Earth Observatory.

Tropical ecosystems, because of their high productivity and extensive footprint on the Earth's surface, comprise nearly half of global NPP and GPP (Table 1). Temperate ecosystems and croplands are also a substantial fraction of global terrestrial primary production, accounting for roughly a quarter of global NPP and GPP. Global estimates of terrestrial NPP range from 48.0 to 69.0 Pg (= Petagrams or 10 15 g) C yr -1 , with global terrestrial GPP estimated at 121.7 Pg C yr -1 or approximately double global NPP on land.

Haberl et al. (2007) estimated that nearly a quarter of global NPP is used by humans annually in the production of crops for food and fiber, timber for wood products and paper, and in support of livestock grazing. Humans exert an additional influence on global NPP through fires. Many ecologists are concerned that the rising global demand for biofuels, together with continued human population growth, will increase this already large human appropriation of global NPP to the detriment of ecological food webs and biodiversity.

Terrestrial Primary Production and Global Change

Considerable research in ecosystem ecology centers on understanding how climate change is affecting the primary production of terrestrial ecosystems and, conversely, how ecosystems may moderate changes in global climate by absorbing anthropogenic CO 2 emissions. Terrestrial primary production is an important ecosystem service, locking up carbon in biomass that might otherwise exist in the atmosphere as CO 2 , a potent greenhouse gas. Recent evidence suggests, however, that terrestrial NPP may be declining in response to global warming and accompanying drought, with Zhoa & Running (2010) estimating a 0.55 Pg, or about 1%, reduction in global terrestrial NPP from 2000 to 2009. Continued declines in global NPP would not only reduce carbon sequestration by terrestrial ecosystems but also compromise food security and disrupt the foundation of food webs.

References and Recommended Reading

Baldocchi, D. et al. FLUXNET: A new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 82 , 2415–2434 (2001).

Beer, C. et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: Global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329 , 834–838 (2010).

Field, C. B. et al. Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 281 , 237–240 (1998).

Gough, C. M. et al. The legacy of harvest and fire on ecosystem carbon storage in a north temperate forest. Global Change Biology 13 , 1935–1949 (2007).

Gough, C. M. et al . Controls on annual forest carbon storage: Lessons from the past and predictions for the future. Bioscience 58 , 609–622 (2008).

Haberl, H. et al . Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104 , 12942–12945 (2007).

Melillo, J. M. et al. Global climate-change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature 363 , 234–240 (1993).

Potter, C. S. et al. Terrestrial ecosystem production - a process model-based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 7 , 811–841 (1993).

Prince, S. D. & Goward, S. N. Global primary production: A remote sensing approach. Journal of Biogeography 22 , 815–835. 1995.

Roy, J. et al. Terrestrial Global Productivity . San Diego, CA: Academic Press (2001).

Zhao, M. S. & Running, S. W. Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 through 2009. Science 329 , 940–943 (2010).

Article History

Flag inappropriate.

Email your Friend

•  |  Lead Editor: 

Within this Subject (24)

• Basic (13)
• Intermediate (5)
• Advanced (6)

Other Topic Rooms

• Ecosystem Ecology
• Physiological Ecology
• Population Ecology
• Community Ecology
• Global and Regional Ecology
• Conservation and Restoration
• Animal Behavior
• Teach Ecology
• Earth's Climate: Past, Present, and Future
• Terrestrial Geosystems
• Marine Geosystems
• Scientific Underpinnings
• Paleontology and Primate Evolution
• Human Fossil Record
• The Living Primates

© 2014 Nature Education

• Press Room |
• Terms of Use |
• Privacy Notice |

Visual Browse

Browse Course Material

Course info, instructors.

• Prof. Edward DeLong
• Prof. Penny Chisholm

Departments

• Civil and Environmental Engineering

As Taught In

• Earth Science

Learning Resource Types

Ecology i: the earth system, lectures 5 and 6 — primary productivity.

Lecture notes on primary productivity, Earth’s metabolism emerges from cellular metabolism, definitions, residence times and turnover rate, distribution of productivity on earth, terrestrial productivity, and aquatic productivity.

You are leaving MIT OpenCourseWare

If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

To log in and use all the features of Khan Academy, please enable JavaScript in your browser.

AP®︎/College Environmental science

Course: ap®︎/college environmental science   >   unit 1, primary productivity in ecosystems.

• Energy flow in a marine ecosystem
• Matter and energy flow

Want to join the conversation?

• Upvote Button navigates to signup page
• Downvote Button navigates to signup page
• Flag Button navigates to signup page

Video transcript

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

7.4 Patterns of Primary Production

Primary productivity varies both geographically and seasonally. Geographically, phytoplankton abundance generally decreases as you move from coastal to oceanic waters (Figure 7.4.1). Coastal waters are more productive than the central ocean for two main reasons. First, runoff from land often contains a high abundance of nutrients which get deposited in coastal waters and stimulate production. Second, the shallower bottom along the continental shelf can trap nutrients and prevent them from sinking to greater depths. It is easier for these nutrients to be brought back to the surface when they remain trapped in the shallows. Conversely, the central ocean generally has very low primary production, as these areas are far removed from any terrestrial sources of nutrients, and the great depth prevents the deep nutrients from returning to the surface.

Global averages for ocean surface primary production are about 75-150 g C/m 2 /yr. Some highly productive areas include the California coast (200-300 g C/m 2 /year), the Southern Ocean (200-400 g C/m 2 /year), and the coast of Peru (200-400 g C/m 2 /year), all regions with significant upwelling . The central ocean, by contrast, produces less than 50 g C/m 2 /year.

Regional and seasonal changes in primary production are due to a combination of the availability of light and the amount of nutrients provided by water mixing above the thermocline . In tropical regions sunlight is plentiful throughout the year, so light is not a limiting factor. The surface water is always warm and there is always a pronounced thermocline, leading to highly stratified water that prevents the nutrient-rich bottom water from reaching the surface ( section 6.2 ). Thus productivity in tropical water is always nutrient-limited, and productivity is low throughout the year (Figure 7.4.2). Because tropical water is nutrient-poor with little phytoplankton production, the water is very clear, as is the case with water in the central ocean.

At the poles, the water is uniformly cold at all depths, so there is not much of a thermocline and little stratification, allowing mixing to occur year-round ( section 6.2 ). This mixing distributes nutrients throughout the water column, so that for much of the year productivity will not be nutrient-limited. However, the polar regions may experience several months with little or no light during the winter, and the fluctuation in light levels leads to variation is seasonal productivity. In the winter months, mixing is occurring and nutrients are abundant, but there is no light, so there is no productivity. By late spring the sunlight returns, and combined with the abundance of nutrients, a spring/summer bloom of phytoplankton occurs (Figure 7.4.2). By late summer, the nutrients have been depleted and zooplankton have been grazing on the phytoplankton, so the bloom begins to decline. In the autumn, light levels decline and prevent further production throughout the winter. But during the winter the mixing is distributing nutrients throughout the water, ready for the sun to return and stimulate a bloom in the following summer.

In temperate regions there is much more seasonal variation in the depth and intensity of the thermocline (see section 6.2 ). The thermocline is shallower and stronger in the summer, and is deeper and weaker in the winter, so mixing of deep and surface water is more pronounced in the winter months. As with the poles, this winter mixing creates nutrient-rich water during the winter, but the lack of light limits winter productivity. When light levels increase in the spring, the combination of abundant light and nutrients creates a spring bloom of productivity. By late summer there is still plenty of light, but the nutrients have been depleted by the phytoplankton bloom, and the summer thermocline has prevented further mixing, so productivity declines. In the autumn, cooler temperatures weaken the thermocline, and increasing storms cause a deeper mixed layer to form, bringing nutrients back to the surface. At the same time, there is still sufficient light available that a smaller autumn bloom occurs (Figure 7.4.2). But this bloom is short-lived, as light declines throughout the autumn and into the winter. Again, there is little production during the winter due to light limitations, but the winter storms and deep thermocline recharge the water with nutrients for the next spring bloom.

the synthesis of organic compounds from aqueous carbon dioxide by plants, algae, and bacteria (7.1)

drifting, usually single-celled algae that undergo photosynthesis (7.1)

flow of water down a slope, either across the ground surface, or within a series of channels (12.2)

in the context of primary production, substances required by photosynthetic organisms to undergo growth and reproduction (5.6)

the shallow (typically less than 200 m) and flat sub-marine extension of a continent (1.2)

process by which deeper water is brought to the surface (9.5)

a region in the water column where there is a dramatic change in temperature over a small change in depth (6.2)

small, drifting carnivorous organisms (7.1)

the topmost layer of the ocean, where winds, waves, and currents mix the water so that conditions are relatively constant; approximately the top 100 m (5.3)

Introduction to Oceanography Copyright © by Paul Webb is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

• ⋮⋮⋮ ×
• Course Topics
• Atmospheric Science
• Biogeoscience
• Environmental Geology
• Environmental Science
• Geochemistry
• Geomorphology
• GIS/Remote Sensing
• Hydrology/Hydrogeology
• Oceanography
• Paleontology
• Planetary Science
• Sedimentary Geology
• Structural Geology
• Incorporating Societal Issues
• Climate Change
• Complex Systems
• Ethics and Environmental Justice
• Geology and Health
• Public Policy
• Sustainability
• Strengthening Your Department
• Career Development
• Strengthening Departments
• Student Recruitment
• Teacher Preparation
• Teaching Topics
• Biocomplexity
• Early Earth
• Earthquakes
• Hydraulic Fracturing
• Plate Tectonics
• Teaching Environments
• Intro Geoscience
• Online Teaching
• Teaching in the Field
• Two-Year Colleges
• Urban Students
• Enhancing your Teaching
• Affective Domain
• Course Design
• Data, Simulations, Models
• Geophotography
• Google Earth
• Metacognition
• Online Games
• Problem Solving
• Quantitative Skills
• Rates and Time
• Service Learning
• Spatial Thinking
• Teaching Methods
• Teaching with Video
• Undergrad Research
• Visualization
• Teaching Materials
• Two Year Colleges
• Departments
• Workshops and Webinars

Exploring Primary Productivity

This activity was selected for the On the Cutting Edge Reviewed Teaching Collection

This activity has received positive reviews in a peer review process involving five review categories. The five categories included in the process are

For more information about the peer review process itself, please see https://serc.carleton.edu/teachearth/activity_review.html .

Interacting with Data: Using interactive on-line graphs and datasets created by the Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) from data collected from six oceanic arrays using hundreds of instruments, students can explore the relationships between chlorophyll production and multiple variables. They record their observations and extrapolate generalizations.

Expand for more detail and links to related resources

Activity Classification and Connections to Related Resources Collapse

Grade level.

Introductory oceanography class for either non-majors or majors.

Skills and concepts that students must have mastered

Ability to read graphs. Basic understanding of Primary Productivity, specifically the role that chlorophyll plays.

How the activity is situated in the course

Culminating project. It could work as a lab following Primary Production as it is composed of 6 stand-alone modules.

Content/concepts goals for this activity

Primary Productivity/Chlorophyll Production as it relates to: Dissolved Organic Matter; Temperature; Season and Hemisphere; Proximity to Land; Proximity to the Poles, Tropics or Mid-Latitudes; and local Major Current and its Temperature.

Higher order thinking skills goals for this activity

Analysis of Data Pattern Recognition Extrapolating data to general patterns Recognizing limitations of data

Other skills goals for this activity

Ability to manipulate the datasets and graphs presented by the Ocean Observatories Initiative.

Description and Teaching Materials

The Students will follow the instructions on the lab worksheet manipulating datasets in graphic form to highlight different variables.

• Student Handout (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 38kB Feb25 21)

The lab worksheet which will include a link to: 1. Six OOI datasets https://datalab.marine.rutgers.edu/explorations/

2. A wikipedia commons map https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:World_map_indicating_tropics_and_subtropics.png 3. Five linked worksheets for the students to enter their observations Internet Access is required. Worksheet II (Excel 2007 (.xlsx) 11kB Feb25 21) Worksheet IV (Excel 2007 (.xlsx) 12kB Feb25 21) Worksheet V (Excel 2007 (.xlsx) 12kB Feb25 21) Worksheet VI (Excel 2007 (.xlsx) 12kB Feb25 21) Worksheet VII (Excel 2007 (.xlsx) 32kB Feb25 21)

Teaching Notes and Tips

You will need to be lenient on the specific datapoints identified by students as Maximums and Minimums as well as certain seasonal dates. There is a lot of data in these graphs. Sometimes they spot points that I have overlooked!

75% or better on the assignment.

This file is only accessible to verified educators. If you are a teacher or faculty member and would like access to this file please enter your email address to be verified as belonging to an educator. Email Adress Submit

References and Resources

https://datalab.marine.rutgers.edu/explorations/

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:World_map_indicating_tropics_and_subtropics.png

See more Search the Portal »

• Search Menu
• Sign in through your institution
• Advance articles
• Author Guidelines
• Open Access
• About Integrative and Comparative Biology
• About the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
• Editorial Board
• Advertising and Corporate Services
• Journals Career Network
• Self-Archiving Policy
• Dispatch Dates
• Journals on Oxford Academic
• Books on Oxford Academic

Article Contents

• < Previous

Aquatic Primary Production

• Article contents
• Figures & tables
• Supplementary Data

CHARLES R. GOLDMAN, Aquatic Primary Production, American Zoologist , Volume 8, Issue 1, February 1968, Pages 31–42, https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/8.1.31

• Permissions Icon Permissions

The ecosystem concept has been particularly useful and extensively employed in the study of aquatic primary productivity. The flow of energy through the system is an attractive area of investigation when it involves some process, but has a more restricted value when units of biomass are simply converted to calories. Although we are able to measure primary productivity in terms of the carbon fixed, we are not yet able to measure the actual change in the oxidative state of the newly fixed carbon. The fate of photosynthate as food for higher trophic levels is therefore dependent upon a considerable array of biological and environmental variables. Primary productivity is considered in terms of its evolution from measures of standing crop and yield, which have been gradually replaced by measures of rate of carbon uptake or oxygen production, or by measure of nutrient loss, or by change of CO 2 in the environment. Data from five lakes are used to illustrate the evolutionary thread of eutrophication and the great range in primary productivity to be expected on the basis of either unit volume or unit surface area at different trophic states. Light and nutrients are important in limiting primary productivity, and are contributing factors to the great variability which one may encounter within a given lake. Only with a sounder understanding of productivity at the base of the food-chain can we have any real hope of controlling the productivity of aquatic environments for the benefit of man.

Email alerts

Citing articles via.

• Recommend to your Library

Affiliations

• Online ISSN 1557-7023
• Print ISSN 1540-7063
• Copyright © 2024 The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Institutional account management
• Rights and permissions
• Get help with access
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Copilot tutorial: Prepare for a meeting

Note:  This feature is available to customers with a Copilot for Microsoft 365 (work) license.

Duration: 58 seconds

See how Copilot for Microsoft 365 can help you prepare for meetings quickly. With AI-powered assistance, you can identify critical questions and concerns to create more targeted agendas, fostering improved communication and outcomes.

See more videos

Catch up with a coworker

Keep your team on track

Browse all Copilot videos

Need more help?

Want more options.

Explore subscription benefits, browse training courses, learn how to secure your device, and more.

Microsoft 365 subscription benefits

Microsoft 365 training

Microsoft security

Accessibility center

Communities help you ask and answer questions, give feedback, and hear from experts with rich knowledge.

Ask the Microsoft Community

Microsoft Tech Community

Windows Insiders

Microsoft 365 Insiders

Was this information helpful?

Thank you for your feedback.

Setting Up Your Production Company: All About LLCs

John hadity.

Before you seek funding for your independent film, you need to set up a business entity for your project. This post explains how a Limited Liability Company (LLC) works and why it presents a versatile way for producers to mitigate risk while managing finances—from funding through filming and even in post.

Throughout, I’ll explain various LLC structures and functions, talk about timing, and detail how LLCs apply to international projects and co-productions.

To start, let’s go over some definitions. 

What is a Limited Liability Company (LLC)?

An LLC is a legal entity that serves as the primary rights holder on your project and is the entity through which your equity financing flows. It controls the financing and distribution for a film or television project.

There are three primary components of an LLC:

• Members:  A production LLC often has multiple members, including investors and other key stakeholders involved in the project. Each member contributes financially or through services to the production and usually has profit-sharing arrangements, as outlined in the operating agreement.
• Manager(s):  LLCs appoint one or more managers responsible for overseeing the day-to-day operations of the production, including budgeting, hiring crew, securing locations, and managing logistics. Managers are members of the LLC and make all the business decisions for the enterprise, including how distribution will be handled.
• Operating Agreement:  The operating agreement outlines the rights, responsibilities, and obligations of the members and managers involved in a project—providing clarity and accountability for all parties involved. Meant to serve as a governing document, this agreement typically includes details on decision-making and conflict-resolution processes as well as profit distribution specifics. 

Basic functions of a production LLC:

• Financing:  An LLC solicits investments from individuals, production companies, studios, and other sources. It may issue membership interests or equity stakes in exchange for capital contributions to cover pre-production, filming, and post-production expenses.
• Production Management:  The LLC is responsible for all the logistical and creative aspects of production, including—but not limited to—scheduling, hiring personnel, securing filming locations, managing equipment rentals, and coordinating post-production activities. The LLC ensures that the project adheres to the budget, timeline, and quality standards agreed upon by producers and stakeholders.
• Distribution and Marketing:  The LLC oversees marketing and promotional efforts to attract viewership to the project and secures distribution deals with networks, streaming platforms, and other distributors.
• Revenue Distribution:  As revenue is generated, the LLC manages the distribution of profits according to the terms outlined in the operating agreement. Revenue can come from distribution deals, licensing agreements, or ancillary sources such as merchandise sales and streaming royalties. Payments are typically sent to investors recouping initial investments, shareholders, and residual or royalty recipients.
• Legal and Contractual Matters:  The LLC enters into contracts and agreements with production-related parties, including talent, crew, vendors, distributors, and other third parties. It also obtains necessary clearances, permits, and insurance coverage.

Put simply, a production LLC is a central hub for coordinating all aspects of a project, from inception through release and beyond. The entity serves as a legal framework for organizing resources, managing risks, and maximizing success.

Production entities: How to choose the best option

A production entity can be established as an LLC, C-Corp, sole proprietorship, partnership, or S-corp—with LLCs and C-Corps being the most common. Each option has distinct advantages and disadvantages relating to operational flexibility, liability protection, and tax implications: 

• Sole-proprietorships, partnerships, and S corporations  are all known as ‘pass-through entities,’ which means taxable income ‘passes through’ to the personal tax return of the owner. The owner pays personal income tax on company profits but can also withdraw profits as tax-free dividends from the company. 
• C-corporations  pay corporate tax on income, then distribute any remaining money to stockholders. Stockholders must also pay personal income tax on money received, meaning it is double-taxed.

Productions typically utilize one of two LLC types:

• Single Member LLCs  are straightforward to set up and manage, making them ideal for independent producers who prefer minimal administrative burden. However, they offer limited liability protection when shielding the member’s personal assets from legal claims or debts incurred by the production. Also, decision-making authority rests solely with the member, potentially limiting collaborative input and creative exchange. Single-member LLCs are often taxed as sole proprietorships by default, which may result in less favorable tax treatment than other structures.
• Multi-member LLCs  allow for shared decision-making and resource pooling among multiple members, promoting collaboration and diversification of expertise. This setup accommodates a wider range of skills, resources, and investment contributions, enhancing operational flexibility and scalability. However, differences in vision, goals, or financial contributions have the potential to disrupt the production process. Managing relationships and resolving conflicts requires clear communication and comprehensive operating agreements.

The choice of how to structure your LLC often comes down to how the investors are involved and the producer’s desired level of control. 

In the indie film space, it’s common for producers to use two entities:  a multi-member LLC  for rights management and fundraising  and a C-Corp  for physical production. In this situation, the C-Corp handles all elements of physical production—hiring talent and crew, entering into leases, making purchases, and so on. By separating physical production activity from the LLC members, producers can both minimize the possibility of conflict leading to disruption during filming and avoid exploitation of rights issues. 

To make sure you’re set up for success, we recommend consulting legal and financial professionals to help you choose the most suitable corporate structure.

Timing is key: When to establish your LLC/production entity

Ideally, you should establish an LLC as soon as underlying rights have been secured and you are ready to start your fundraising. 

Prior to setting up your production entity, it’s important to know if you’ll be working domestically or internationally, where you’ll be filming, and if you’re pursuing a partnership or collaboration, like a co-production. Once you have answers to those questions, you can work with an entertainment accountant and attorney to determine the best corporate structure for your LLC.

How LLCs apply to international productions and co-productions

Not surprisingly, productions become more complex when filming internationally or collaborating with another individual or team via a co-production. In either case, producers must navigate regulatory requirements, tax implications, and contractual obligations across multiple jurisdictions. It may even be necessary to set up multiple entities in order to comply with regulatory tax laws and be eligible for international tax credits.  Learn more about the various types of co-production partnerships and how to vet partners in this guide to co-production.

Due to the complex nature of international filming, it’s best to speak with an entertainment attorney, experienced accountant, and incentives experts to determine the right structure for your project.

Pros and Cons of using one LLC for multiple productions

Using a single entity for multiple productions looks great on paper. Streamlined administrative processes, cost savings, and enhanced brand recognition are quite appealing! And if you establish a production entity that serves as an umbrella company for multiple projects, you can capitalize on economies of scale by consolidating resources and taking advantage of existing relationships with investors and talent.

Though the convenience factor is high, there are several potential drawbacks to consider. 

Specifically:

• A new project may have unique financial, legal, and operational requirements that conflict with the interests of other projects under the same LLC. For example, one project may require a different investment structure or revenue-sharing model than another, leading to complexities in managing finances and fairly allocating resources.
• Co-mingled funds get complicated, especially if you’re working on a project that continues earning revenue for months or years after its release. 
• If one project faces legal issues or financial challenges, all assets operating under the LLC are potentially at risk. If a project fails to meet financial obligations, creditors can come after the LLC’s other assets to settle their debts. 
• Administrative management of transient cast and crew is challenging if you merge multiple productions into one LLC, especially when distributing residuals or royalties. 
• Errors and omissions insurance coverage gets muddied when liabilities are co-mingled. 
• Proving chain-of-title is more difficult, which can be problematic when working with various film unions, as they require extensive paperwork for each project. 

Put simply, combining multiple projects under one LLC blurs the lines of liability and accountability.  While the idea may initially seem appealing, it’s not always the most practical choice. 

Maintaining separate entities for each project provides greater financial protection, risk mitigation, legal clarity, and creative autonomy—ultimately enhancing the likelihood of success. 

The big takeaway: Expert consultation is essential

While understanding the fundamentals of LLCs is a great start, navigating the intricacies of indie film financing requires expert guidance. Entertainment Partners’ experienced in-house accountants, attorneys, and incentive experts are here to help. We've managed tens of thousands of productions and have spent decades helping producers like you make sure you're set up for success. When you're ready to discuss your next project,  get in touch .

Related Content

Indie Producer’s Playbook: Setting Up a Successful Production

Reminder of Impending Deadline and New Requirements in California’s Annual Employer Pay Data Filing

SB 1162: California Pay Data Reporting Law FAQs

Conquering Compliance: Setting Up and Operating a Loan-Out in Canada

Conquering Compliance: Paid Sick Leave

Conquering Compliance: Workers' Compensation

Conquering Compliance: Form I-9 Changes

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. A lock ( ) or https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Keyboard Navigation

• Agriculture and Food Security
• Anti-Corruption
• Conflict Prevention and Stabilization
• Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance
• Economic Growth and Trade
• Environment, Energy, and Infrastructure
• Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment
• Global Health
• Humanitarian Assistance
• Innovation, Technology, and Research
• Water and Sanitation
• Burkina Faso
• Central Africa Regional
• Central African Republic
• Côte d’Ivoire
• Democratic Republic of the Congo
• East Africa Regional
• Power Africa
• Republic of the Congo
• Sahel Regional
• Sierra Leone
• South Africa
• South Sudan
• Southern Africa Regional
• West Africa Regional
• Afghanistan
• Central Asia Regional
• Indo-Pacific
• Kyrgyz Republic
• Pacific Islands
• Philippines
• Regional Development Mission for Asia
• Timor-Leste
• Turkmenistan
• Bosnia and Herzegovina
• North Macedonia
• Central America and Mexico Regional Program
• Dominican Republic
• Eastern and Southern Caribbean
• El Salvador
• Middle East Regional Platform
• West Bank and Gaza
• Dollars to Results
• Data Resources
• Strategy & Planning
• Budget & Spending
• Performance and Financial Reporting
• FY 2023 Agency Financial Report
• Records and Reports
• Budget Justification
• Our Commitment to Transparency
• Policy and Strategy
• How to Work with USAID
• Find a Funding Opportunity
• Organizations That Work With USAID
• Resources for Partners
• Get involved
• Business Forecast
• Safeguarding and Compliance
• Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
• Mission, Vision and Values
• News & Information
• Operational Policy (ADS)
• Organization
• Stay Connected
• USAID History
• Video Library
• Coordinators
• Nondiscrimination Notice and Civil Rights
• Collective Bargaining Agreements
• Disabilities Employment Program
• Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey
• Reasonable Accommodations
• Urgent Hiring Needs
• Vacancy Announcements
• Search Search Search

Revolutionizing Precision in Kosovo’s Wood Production Industry and Beyond

In Kosovo's bustling wood industry, precision isn't just a preference—it's a necessity. A single miscalculation in measurement can cascade into dramatic financial losses. Some industry experts estimate that the sector loses around €6 million from measurement errors each year, severely limiting profitability for many companies. 

To address this pressing issue, USAID's Kosovo Compete Activity recently partnered with the Dekoriti Training Center to introduce the industry to the FARO M70 Laser Scanner. This advanced tool, renowned for its millimetric accuracy and ability to measure 500 points per minute, is revolutionizing the industry's approach to measurement and quality control in Kosovo. Coupled with the use of new software, the FARO M70 has become a game changer for local industry. 

Through a rigorous two-week training program, 22 representatives from 17 different companies learned to leverage the scanner in their work. The results were transformative, with companies reporting up to 50 percent reductions in both costs and time required for individual projects.  

High-tech solutions to a problem for local wood processing companies are also benefiting other critical industries in Kosovo. For example, the Dekoriti Training Center recently collaborated with a geodetic company to use the FARO M70 to assess damage to a turbine at Kosova A Power Station. 

USAID Kosovo has been a steadfast supporter of the wood industry since 2004 and remains dedicated to bolstering the sector comprehensively, enhancing its competitiveness and forging new connections and export pathways.