Identify Goal
Define Problem
Define Problem
Gather Data
Define Causes
Identify Options
Clarify Problem
Generate Ideas
Evaluate Options
Generate Ideas
Choose the Best Solution
Implement Solution
Select Solution
Take Action
MacLeod offers her own problem solving procedure, which echoes the above steps:
“1. Recognize the Problem: State what you see. Sometimes the problem is covert. 2. Identify: Get the facts — What exactly happened? What is the issue? 3. and 4. Explore and Connect: Dig deeper and encourage group members to relate their similar experiences. Now you're getting more into the feelings and background [of the situation], not just the facts. 5. Possible Solutions: Consider and brainstorm ideas for resolution. 6. Implement: Choose a solution and try it out — this could be role play and/or a discussion of how the solution would be put in place. 7. Evaluate: Revisit to see if the solution was successful or not.”
Many of these problem solving techniques can be used in concert with one another, or multiple can be appropriate for any given problem. It’s less about facilitating a perfect CPS session, and more about encouraging team members to continually think outside the box and push beyond personal boundaries that inhibit their innovative thinking. So, try out several methods, find those that resonate best with your team, and continue adopting new techniques and adapting your processes along the way.
Empower your people to go above and beyond with a flexible platform designed to match the needs of your team — and adapt as those needs change.
The Smartsheet platform makes it easy to plan, capture, manage, and report on work from anywhere, helping your team be more effective and get more done. Report on key metrics and get real-time visibility into work as it happens with roll-up reports, dashboards, and automated workflows built to keep your team connected and informed.
When teams have clarity into the work getting done, there’s no telling how much more they can accomplish in the same amount of time. Try Smartsheet for free, today.
In this episode of the McKinsey Podcast , Simon London speaks with Charles Conn, CEO of venture-capital firm Oxford Sciences Innovation, and McKinsey senior partner Hugo Sarrazin about the complexities of different problem-solving strategies.
Podcast transcript
Simon London: Hello, and welcome to this episode of the McKinsey Podcast , with me, Simon London. What’s the number-one skill you need to succeed professionally? Salesmanship, perhaps? Or a facility with statistics? Or maybe the ability to communicate crisply and clearly? Many would argue that at the very top of the list comes problem solving: that is, the ability to think through and come up with an optimal course of action to address any complex challenge—in business, in public policy, or indeed in life.
Looked at this way, it’s no surprise that McKinsey takes problem solving very seriously, testing for it during the recruiting process and then honing it, in McKinsey consultants, through immersion in a structured seven-step method. To discuss the art of problem solving, I sat down in California with McKinsey senior partner Hugo Sarrazin and also with Charles Conn. Charles is a former McKinsey partner, entrepreneur, executive, and coauthor of the book Bulletproof Problem Solving: The One Skill That Changes Everything [John Wiley & Sons, 2018].
Charles and Hugo, welcome to the podcast. Thank you for being here.
Hugo Sarrazin: Our pleasure.
Charles Conn: It’s terrific to be here.
Simon London: Problem solving is a really interesting piece of terminology. It could mean so many different things. I have a son who’s a teenage climber. They talk about solving problems. Climbing is problem solving. Charles, when you talk about problem solving, what are you talking about?
Charles Conn: For me, problem solving is the answer to the question “What should I do?” It’s interesting when there’s uncertainty and complexity, and when it’s meaningful because there are consequences. Your son’s climbing is a perfect example. There are consequences, and it’s complicated, and there’s uncertainty—can he make that grab? I think we can apply that same frame almost at any level. You can think about questions like “What town would I like to live in?” or “Should I put solar panels on my roof?”
You might think that’s a funny thing to apply problem solving to, but in my mind it’s not fundamentally different from business problem solving, which answers the question “What should my strategy be?” Or problem solving at the policy level: “How do we combat climate change?” “Should I support the local school bond?” I think these are all part and parcel of the same type of question, “What should I do?”
I’m a big fan of structured problem solving. By following steps, we can more clearly understand what problem it is we’re solving, what are the components of the problem that we’re solving, which components are the most important ones for us to pay attention to, which analytic techniques we should apply to those, and how we can synthesize what we’ve learned back into a compelling story. That’s all it is, at its heart.
I think sometimes when people think about seven steps, they assume that there’s a rigidity to this. That’s not it at all. It’s actually to give you the scope for creativity, which often doesn’t exist when your problem solving is muddled.
Simon London: You were just talking about the seven-step process. That’s what’s written down in the book, but it’s a very McKinsey process as well. Without getting too deep into the weeds, let’s go through the steps, one by one. You were just talking about problem definition as being a particularly important thing to get right first. That’s the first step. Hugo, tell us about that.
Hugo Sarrazin: It is surprising how often people jump past this step and make a bunch of assumptions. The most powerful thing is to step back and ask the basic questions—“What are we trying to solve? What are the constraints that exist? What are the dependencies?” Let’s make those explicit and really push the thinking and defining. At McKinsey, we spend an enormous amount of time in writing that little statement, and the statement, if you’re a logic purist, is great. You debate. “Is it an ‘or’? Is it an ‘and’? What’s the action verb?” Because all these specific words help you get to the heart of what matters.
Simon London: So this is a concise problem statement.
Hugo Sarrazin: Yeah. It’s not like “Can we grow in Japan?” That’s interesting, but it is “What, specifically, are we trying to uncover in the growth of a product in Japan? Or a segment in Japan? Or a channel in Japan?” When you spend an enormous amount of time, in the first meeting of the different stakeholders, debating this and having different people put forward what they think the problem definition is, you realize that people have completely different views of why they’re here. That, to me, is the most important step.
Charles Conn: I would agree with that. For me, the problem context is critical. When we understand “What are the forces acting upon your decision maker? How quickly is the answer needed? With what precision is the answer needed? Are there areas that are off limits or areas where we would particularly like to find our solution? Is the decision maker open to exploring other areas?” then you not only become more efficient, and move toward what we call the critical path in problem solving, but you also make it so much more likely that you’re not going to waste your time or your decision maker’s time.
How often do especially bright young people run off with half of the idea about what the problem is and start collecting data and start building models—only to discover that they’ve really gone off half-cocked.
Hugo Sarrazin: Yeah.
Charles Conn: And in the wrong direction.
Simon London: OK. So step one—and there is a real art and a structure to it—is define the problem. Step two, Charles?
Charles Conn: My favorite step is step two, which is to use logic trees to disaggregate the problem. Every problem we’re solving has some complexity and some uncertainty in it. The only way that we can really get our team working on the problem is to take the problem apart into logical pieces.
What we find, of course, is that the way to disaggregate the problem often gives you an insight into the answer to the problem quite quickly. I love to do two or three different cuts at it, each one giving a bit of a different insight into what might be going wrong. By doing sensible disaggregations, using logic trees, we can figure out which parts of the problem we should be looking at, and we can assign those different parts to team members.
Simon London: What’s a good example of a logic tree on a sort of ratable problem?
Charles Conn: Maybe the easiest one is the classic profit tree. Almost in every business that I would take a look at, I would start with a profit or return-on-assets tree. In its simplest form, you have the components of revenue, which are price and quantity, and the components of cost, which are cost and quantity. Each of those can be broken out. Cost can be broken into variable cost and fixed cost. The components of price can be broken into what your pricing scheme is. That simple tree often provides insight into what’s going on in a business or what the difference is between that business and the competitors.
If we add the leg, which is “What’s the asset base or investment element?”—so profit divided by assets—then we can ask the question “Is the business using its investments sensibly?” whether that’s in stores or in manufacturing or in transportation assets. I hope we can see just how simple this is, even though we’re describing it in words.
When I went to work with Gordon Moore at the Moore Foundation, the problem that he asked us to look at was “How can we save Pacific salmon?” Now, that sounds like an impossible question, but it was amenable to precisely the same type of disaggregation and allowed us to organize what became a 15-year effort to improve the likelihood of good outcomes for Pacific salmon.
Simon London: Now, is there a danger that your logic tree can be impossibly large? This, I think, brings us onto the third step in the process, which is that you have to prioritize.
Charles Conn: Absolutely. The third step, which we also emphasize, along with good problem definition, is rigorous prioritization—we ask the questions “How important is this lever or this branch of the tree in the overall outcome that we seek to achieve? How much can I move that lever?” Obviously, we try and focus our efforts on ones that have a big impact on the problem and the ones that we have the ability to change. With salmon, ocean conditions turned out to be a big lever, but not one that we could adjust. We focused our attention on fish habitats and fish-harvesting practices, which were big levers that we could affect.
People spend a lot of time arguing about branches that are either not important or that none of us can change. We see it in the public square. When we deal with questions at the policy level—“Should you support the death penalty?” “How do we affect climate change?” “How can we uncover the causes and address homelessness?”—it’s even more important that we’re focusing on levers that are big and movable.
Simon London: Let’s move swiftly on to step four. You’ve defined your problem, you disaggregate it, you prioritize where you want to analyze—what you want to really look at hard. Then you got to the work plan. Now, what does that mean in practice?
Hugo Sarrazin: Depending on what you’ve prioritized, there are many things you could do. It could be breaking the work among the team members so that people have a clear piece of the work to do. It could be defining the specific analyses that need to get done and executed, and being clear on time lines. There’s always a level-one answer, there’s a level-two answer, there’s a level-three answer. Without being too flippant, I can solve any problem during a good dinner with wine. It won’t have a whole lot of backing.
Simon London: Not going to have a lot of depth to it.
Hugo Sarrazin: No, but it may be useful as a starting point. If the stakes are not that high, that could be OK. If it’s really high stakes, you may need level three and have the whole model validated in three different ways. You need to find a work plan that reflects the level of precision, the time frame you have, and the stakeholders you need to bring along in the exercise.
Charles Conn: I love the way you’ve described that, because, again, some people think of problem solving as a linear thing, but of course what’s critical is that it’s iterative. As you say, you can solve the problem in one day or even one hour.
Charles Conn: We encourage our teams everywhere to do that. We call it the one-day answer or the one-hour answer. In work planning, we’re always iterating. Every time you see a 50-page work plan that stretches out to three months, you know it’s wrong. It will be outmoded very quickly by that learning process that you described. Iterative problem solving is a critical part of this. Sometimes, people think work planning sounds dull, but it isn’t. It’s how we know what’s expected of us and when we need to deliver it and how we’re progressing toward the answer. It’s also the place where we can deal with biases. Bias is a feature of every human decision-making process. If we design our team interactions intelligently, we can avoid the worst sort of biases.
Simon London: Here we’re talking about cognitive biases primarily, right? It’s not that I’m biased against you because of your accent or something. These are the cognitive biases that behavioral sciences have shown we all carry around, things like anchoring, overoptimism—these kinds of things.
Both: Yeah.
Charles Conn: Availability bias is the one that I’m always alert to. You think you’ve seen the problem before, and therefore what’s available is your previous conception of it—and we have to be most careful about that. In any human setting, we also have to be careful about biases that are based on hierarchies, sometimes called sunflower bias. I’m sure, Hugo, with your teams, you make sure that the youngest team members speak first. Not the oldest team members, because it’s easy for people to look at who’s senior and alter their own creative approaches.
Hugo Sarrazin: It’s helpful, at that moment—if someone is asserting a point of view—to ask the question “This was true in what context?” You’re trying to apply something that worked in one context to a different one. That can be deadly if the context has changed, and that’s why organizations struggle to change. You promote all these people because they did something that worked well in the past, and then there’s a disruption in the industry, and they keep doing what got them promoted even though the context has changed.
Simon London: Right. Right.
Hugo Sarrazin: So it’s the same thing in problem solving.
Charles Conn: And it’s why diversity in our teams is so important. It’s one of the best things about the world that we’re in now. We’re likely to have people from different socioeconomic, ethnic, and national backgrounds, each of whom sees problems from a slightly different perspective. It is therefore much more likely that the team will uncover a truly creative and clever approach to problem solving.
Simon London: Let’s move on to step five. You’ve done your work plan. Now you’ve actually got to do the analysis. The thing that strikes me here is that the range of tools that we have at our disposal now, of course, is just huge, particularly with advances in computation, advanced analytics. There’s so many things that you can apply here. Just talk about the analysis stage. How do you pick the right tools?
Charles Conn: For me, the most important thing is that we start with simple heuristics and explanatory statistics before we go off and use the big-gun tools. We need to understand the shape and scope of our problem before we start applying these massive and complex analytical approaches.
Simon London: Would you agree with that?
Hugo Sarrazin: I agree. I think there are so many wonderful heuristics. You need to start there before you go deep into the modeling exercise. There’s an interesting dynamic that’s happening, though. In some cases, for some types of problems, it is even better to set yourself up to maximize your learning. Your problem-solving methodology is test and learn, test and learn, test and learn, and iterate. That is a heuristic in itself, the A/B testing that is used in many parts of the world. So that’s a problem-solving methodology. It’s nothing different. It just uses technology and feedback loops in a fast way. The other one is exploratory data analysis. When you’re dealing with a large-scale problem, and there’s so much data, I can get to the heuristics that Charles was talking about through very clever visualization of data.
You test with your data. You need to set up an environment to do so, but don’t get caught up in neural-network modeling immediately. You’re testing, you’re checking—“Is the data right? Is it sound? Does it make sense?”—before you launch too far.
Simon London: You do hear these ideas—that if you have a big enough data set and enough algorithms, they’re going to find things that you just wouldn’t have spotted, find solutions that maybe you wouldn’t have thought of. Does machine learning sort of revolutionize the problem-solving process? Or are these actually just other tools in the toolbox for structured problem solving?
Charles Conn: It can be revolutionary. There are some areas in which the pattern recognition of large data sets and good algorithms can help us see things that we otherwise couldn’t see. But I do think it’s terribly important we don’t think that this particular technique is a substitute for superb problem solving, starting with good problem definition. Many people use machine learning without understanding algorithms that themselves can have biases built into them. Just as 20 years ago, when we were doing statistical analysis, we knew that we needed good model definition, we still need a good understanding of our algorithms and really good problem definition before we launch off into big data sets and unknown algorithms.
Simon London: Step six. You’ve done your analysis.
Charles Conn: I take six and seven together, and this is the place where young problem solvers often make a mistake. They’ve got their analysis, and they assume that’s the answer, and of course it isn’t the answer. The ability to synthesize the pieces that came out of the analysis and begin to weave those into a story that helps people answer the question “What should I do?” This is back to where we started. If we can’t synthesize, and we can’t tell a story, then our decision maker can’t find the answer to “What should I do?”
Simon London: But, again, these final steps are about motivating people to action, right?
Charles Conn: Yeah.
Simon London: I am slightly torn about the nomenclature of problem solving because it’s on paper, right? Until you motivate people to action, you actually haven’t solved anything.
Charles Conn: I love this question because I think decision-making theory, without a bias to action, is a waste of time. Everything in how I approach this is to help people take action that makes the world better.
Simon London: Hence, these are absolutely critical steps. If you don’t do this well, you’ve just got a bunch of analysis.
Charles Conn: We end up in exactly the same place where we started, which is people speaking across each other, past each other in the public square, rather than actually working together, shoulder to shoulder, to crack these important problems.
Simon London: In the real world, we have a lot of uncertainty—arguably, increasing uncertainty. How do good problem solvers deal with that?
Hugo Sarrazin: At every step of the process. In the problem definition, when you’re defining the context, you need to understand those sources of uncertainty and whether they’re important or not important. It becomes important in the definition of the tree.
You need to think carefully about the branches of the tree that are more certain and less certain as you define them. They don’t have equal weight just because they’ve got equal space on the page. Then, when you’re prioritizing, your prioritization approach may put more emphasis on things that have low probability but huge impact—or, vice versa, may put a lot of priority on things that are very likely and, hopefully, have a reasonable impact. You can introduce that along the way. When you come back to the synthesis, you just need to be nuanced about what you’re understanding, the likelihood.
Often, people lack humility in the way they make their recommendations: “This is the answer.” They’re very precise, and I think we would all be well-served to say, “This is a likely answer under the following sets of conditions” and then make the level of uncertainty clearer, if that is appropriate. It doesn’t mean you’re always in the gray zone; it doesn’t mean you don’t have a point of view. It just means that you can be explicit about the certainty of your answer when you make that recommendation.
Simon London: So it sounds like there is an underlying principle: “Acknowledge and embrace the uncertainty. Don’t pretend that it isn’t there. Be very clear about what the uncertainties are up front, and then build that into every step of the process.”
Hugo Sarrazin: Every step of the process.
Simon London: Yeah. We have just walked through a particular structured methodology for problem solving. But, of course, this is not the only structured methodology for problem solving. One that is also very well-known is design thinking, which comes at things very differently. So, Hugo, I know you have worked with a lot of designers. Just give us a very quick summary. Design thinking—what is it, and how does it relate?
Hugo Sarrazin: It starts with an incredible amount of empathy for the user and uses that to define the problem. It does pause and go out in the wild and spend an enormous amount of time seeing how people interact with objects, seeing the experience they’re getting, seeing the pain points or joy—and uses that to infer and define the problem.
Simon London: Problem definition, but out in the world.
Hugo Sarrazin: With an enormous amount of empathy. There’s a huge emphasis on empathy. Traditional, more classic problem solving is you define the problem based on an understanding of the situation. This one almost presupposes that we don’t know the problem until we go see it. The second thing is you need to come up with multiple scenarios or answers or ideas or concepts, and there’s a lot of divergent thinking initially. That’s slightly different, versus the prioritization, but not for long. Eventually, you need to kind of say, “OK, I’m going to converge again.” Then you go and you bring things back to the customer and get feedback and iterate. Then you rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat. There’s a lot of tactile building, along the way, of prototypes and things like that. It’s very iterative.
Simon London: So, Charles, are these complements or are these alternatives?
Charles Conn: I think they’re entirely complementary, and I think Hugo’s description is perfect. When we do problem definition well in classic problem solving, we are demonstrating the kind of empathy, at the very beginning of our problem, that design thinking asks us to approach. When we ideate—and that’s very similar to the disaggregation, prioritization, and work-planning steps—we do precisely the same thing, and often we use contrasting teams, so that we do have divergent thinking. The best teams allow divergent thinking to bump them off whatever their initial biases in problem solving are. For me, design thinking gives us a constant reminder of creativity, empathy, and the tactile nature of problem solving, but it’s absolutely complementary, not alternative.
Simon London: I think, in a world of cross-functional teams, an interesting question is do people with design-thinking backgrounds really work well together with classical problem solvers? How do you make that chemistry happen?
Hugo Sarrazin: Yeah, it is not easy when people have spent an enormous amount of time seeped in design thinking or user-centric design, whichever word you want to use. If the person who’s applying classic problem-solving methodology is very rigid and mechanical in the way they’re doing it, there could be an enormous amount of tension. If there’s not clarity in the role and not clarity in the process, I think having the two together can be, sometimes, problematic.
The second thing that happens often is that the artifacts the two methodologies try to gravitate toward can be different. Classic problem solving often gravitates toward a model; design thinking migrates toward a prototype. Rather than writing a big deck with all my supporting evidence, they’ll bring an example, a thing, and that feels different. Then you spend your time differently to achieve those two end products, so that’s another source of friction.
Now, I still think it can be an incredibly powerful thing to have the two—if there are the right people with the right mind-set, if there is a team that is explicit about the roles, if we’re clear about the kind of outcomes we are attempting to bring forward. There’s an enormous amount of collaborativeness and respect.
Simon London: But they have to respect each other’s methodology and be prepared to flex, maybe, a little bit, in how this process is going to work.
Hugo Sarrazin: Absolutely.
Simon London: The other area where, it strikes me, there could be a little bit of a different sort of friction is this whole concept of the day-one answer, which is what we were just talking about in classical problem solving. Now, you know that this is probably not going to be your final answer, but that’s how you begin to structure the problem. Whereas I would imagine your design thinkers—no, they’re going off to do their ethnographic research and get out into the field, potentially for a long time, before they come back with at least an initial hypothesis.
Hugo Sarrazin: That is a great callout, and that’s another difference. Designers typically will like to soak into the situation and avoid converging too quickly. There’s optionality and exploring different options. There’s a strong belief that keeps the solution space wide enough that you can come up with more radical ideas. If there’s a large design team or many designers on the team, and you come on Friday and say, “What’s our week-one answer?” they’re going to struggle. They’re not going to be comfortable, naturally, to give that answer. It doesn’t mean they don’t have an answer; it’s just not where they are in their thinking process.
Simon London: I think we are, sadly, out of time for today. But Charles and Hugo, thank you so much.
Charles Conn: It was a pleasure to be here, Simon.
Hugo Sarrazin: It was a pleasure. Thank you.
Simon London: And thanks, as always, to you, our listeners, for tuning into this episode of the McKinsey Podcast . If you want to learn more about problem solving, you can find the book, Bulletproof Problem Solving: The One Skill That Changes Everything , online or order it through your local bookstore. To learn more about McKinsey, you can of course find us at McKinsey.com.
Charles Conn is CEO of Oxford Sciences Innovation and an alumnus of McKinsey’s Sydney office. Hugo Sarrazin is a senior partner in the Silicon Valley office, where Simon London, a member of McKinsey Publishing, is also based.
Related articles.
Research shows that companies devote too little effort to examining problems before trying to solve them. By jumping immediately into problem-solving, teams limit their ability to design innovative solutions.
The authors recommend that companies spend more time up front on problem-framing, a process for understanding and defining a problem. Exploring different frames is like looking at a scene through various camera lenses while adjusting your angle, aperture, and focus. A wide-angle lens gives you a very different photo from that taken with a telephoto lens, and shifting your angle and depth of focus yields distinct images. Effective problem-framing is similar: Looking at a problem from a variety of perspectives helps you uncover new insights and generate fresh ideas.
This article introduces a five-phase approach to problem-framing: In the expand phase, the team identifies all aspects of a problem; in examine, it dives into root causes; in empathize, it considers key stakeholders’ perspectives; in elevate, it puts the problem into a broader context; and in envision, it creates a road map toward the desired outcome.
Five steps to ensure that you don’t jump to solutions
The problem.
Research shows that most companies devote too little effort to examining problems from all angles before trying to solve them. That limits their ability to come up with innovative ways to address them.
Companies need a structured approach for understanding and defining complex problems to uncover new insights and generate fresh ideas.
This article introduces a five-phase approach to problem-framing: In the expand phase, the team identifies all aspects of a problem; in examine, it dives into root causes; in empathize, it considers key stakeholders’ perspectives; in elevate, it puts the problem into a broader context; and in envision, it creates a road map toward the desired outcome.
When business leaders confront complex problems, there’s a powerful impulse to dive right into “solving” mode: You gather a team and then identify potential solutions. That’s fine for challenges you’ve faced before or when proven methods yield good results. But what happens when a new type of problem arises or aspects of a familiar one shift substantially? Or if you’re not exactly sure what the problem is?
Research conducted by us and others shows that leaders and their teams devote too little effort to examining and defining problems before trying to solve them. A study by Paul Nutt of Ohio State University, for example, looked at 350 decision-making processes at medium to large companies and found that more than half failed to achieve desired results, often because perceived time pressure caused people to pay insufficient attention to examining problems from all angles and exploring their complexities. By jumping immediately into problem-solving, teams limit their ability to design innovative and durable solutions.
When we work with organizations and teams, we encourage them to spend more time up front on problem-framing, a process for understanding and defining a problem. Exploring frames is like looking at a scene through various camera lenses while adjusting your angle, aperture, and focus. A wide-angle lens will give you a very different photo from that taken with a telephoto lens, and shifting your angle and depth of focus yields distinct images. Effective problem-framing is similar: Looking at a problem from a variety of perspectives lets you uncover new insights and generate fresh ideas.
As with all essential processes, it helps to have a methodology and a road map. This article introduces the E5 approach to problem-framing—expand, examine, empathize, elevate, and envision—and offers tools that enable leaders to fully explore the problem space.
In the first phase, set aside preconceptions and open your mind. We recommend using a tool called frame-storming, which encourages a comprehensive exploration of an issue and its nuances. It is a neglected precursor to brainstorming, which typically focuses on generating many different answers for an already framed challenge. Frame-storming helps teams identify assumptions and blind spots, mitigating the risk of pursuing inadequate or biased solutions. The goal is to spark innovation and creativity as people dig into—or as Tina Seelig from Stanford puts it, “fall in love with”—the problem.
Begin by assembling a diverse team, encompassing a variety of types of expertise and perspectives. Involving outsiders can be helpful, since they’re often coming to the issue cold. A good way to prompt the team to consider alternative scenarios is by asking “What if…?” and “How might we…?” questions. For example, ask your team, “What if we had access to unlimited resources to tackle this issue?” or “How might better collaboration between departments or teams help us tackle this issue?” The primary objective is to generate many alternative problem frames, allowing for a more holistic understanding of the issue. Within an open, nonjudgmental atmosphere, you deliberately challenge established thinking—what we call “breaking” the frame.
It may be easy to eliminate some possibilities, and that’s exactly what you should do. Rather than make assumptions, generate alternative hypotheses and then test them.
Consider the problem-framing process at a company we’ll call Omega Soundscapes, a midsize producer of high-end headphones. (Omega is a composite of several firms we’ve worked with.) Omega’s sales had declined substantially over the past two quarters, and the leadership team’s initial diagnosis, or reference frame, was that recent price hikes to its flagship product made it too expensive for its target market. Before acting on this assumption, the team convened knowledgeable representatives from sales, marketing, R&D, customer service, and external consultants to do some frame-storming. Team members were asked:
In playing out each of those scenarios, the Omega team generated several problem frames:
Each of the frames presented a unique angle from which to approach the problem of declining sales, setting the stage for the development of diverse potential solutions. At this stage, it may be relatively easy to eliminate some possibilities, and that’s exactly what you should do. Rather than make assumptions, generate alternative hypotheses and then test them.
See more HBR charts in Data & Visuals
If the expand phase is about identifying all the facets of a problem, this one is about diving deep to identify root causes. The team investigates the issue thoroughly, peeling back the layers to understand underlying drivers and systemic contributors.
A useful tool for doing this is the iceberg model, which guides the team through layers of causation: surface-level events, the behavioral patterns that drive them, underlying systematic structures, and established mental models. As you probe ever deeper and document your findings, you begin to home in on the problem’s root causes. As is the case in the expand phase, open discussions and collaborative research are crucial for achieving a comprehensive analysis.
Let’s return to our Omega Soundscapes example and use the iceberg model to delve into the issues surrounding the two quarters of declining sales. Starting with the first layer beneath the surface, the behavioral pattern, the team diligently analyzed customer feedback. It discovered a significant drop in brand loyalty. This finding validated the problem frame of a “shifting brand perception,” prompting further investigation into what might have been causing it.
In this phase, the focus is on the stakeholders—employees, customers, clients, investors, supply chain partners, and other parties—who are most central to and affected by the problem under investigation. The core objective is to understand how they perceive the issue: what they think and feel, how they’re acting, and what they want.
First list all the people who are directly or indirectly relevant to the problem. It may be helpful to create a visual representation of the network of relationships in the ecosystem. Prioritize the stakeholders according to their level of influence on and interest in the problem, and focus on understanding the roles, demographics, behavior patterns, motivations, and goals of the most important ones.
Now create empathy maps for those critical stakeholders. Make a template divided into four sections: Say, Think, Feel, and Do. Conduct interviews or surveys to gather authentic data. How do various users explain the problem? How do they think about the issue, and how do their beliefs inform that thinking? What emotions are they feeling and expressing? How are they behaving? Populate each section of the map with notes based on your observations and interactions. Finally, analyze the completed empathy maps. Look for pain points, inconsistencies, and patterns in stakeholder perspectives.
Returning to the Omega case study, the team identified its ecosystem of stakeholders: customers (both current and potential); retail partners and distributors; the R&D, marketing, and sales teams; suppliers of headphone components; investors and shareholders; and new and existing competitors. They narrowed the list to a few key stakeholders related to the declining-sales problem: customers, retail partners, and investors/shareholders; Omega created empathy maps for representatives from each.
Here’s what the empathy maps showed about what the stakeholders were saying, thinking, feeling, and doing:
Sarah, the customer, complained on social media about the high price of her favorite headphones. Dave, the retailer, expressed concerns about unsold inventory and the challenge of convincing customers to buy the expensive headphones. Alex, the shareholder, brought up Omega’s declining financial performance during its annual investor day.
Sarah thought that Omega was losing touch with its loyal customer base. Dave was considering whether to continue carrying Omega’s products in his store or explore other brands. Alex was contemplating diversifying his portfolio into other consumer-tech companies.
As a longtime supporter of the brand, Sarah felt frustrated and slightly betrayed. Dave was feeling anxious about the drop in sales and the impact on his store’s profitability. Alex was unhappy with the declining stock value.
Sarah was looking for alternatives to the headphones, even though she loves the product’s quality. Dave was scheduling a call with Omega to negotiate pricing and terms. Alex was planning to attend Omega’s next shareholder meeting to find out more information from the leadership team.
When Omega leaders analyzed the data in the maps, they realized that pricing wasn’t the only reason for declining sales. A more profound issue was customers’ dissatisfaction with the perceived price-to-quality ratio, especially when compared with competitors’ offerings. That insight prompted the team to consider enhancing the headphones with additional features, offering more-affordable alternatives, and possibly switching to a service model.
This phase involves exploring how the problem connects to broader organizational issues. It’s like zooming out on a map to understand where a city lies in relation to the whole country or continent. This bird’s-eye view reveals interconnected issues and their implications.
For this analysis, we recommend the four-frame model developed by Lee Bolman and Terrence Deal, which offers distinct lenses through which to view the problem at a higher level. The structural frame helps you explore formal structures (such as hierarchy and reporting relationships); processes (such as workflow); and systems, rules, and policies. This frame examines efficiency, coordination, and alignment of activities.
The human resources frame focuses on people, relationships, and social dynamics. This includes teamwork, leadership, employee motivation, engagement, professional development, and personal growth. In this frame, the organization is seen as a community or a family that recognizes that talent is its most valuable asset. The political frame delves into power dynamics, competing interests, conflicts, coalitions, and negotiations. From this perspective, organizations are arenas where various stakeholders vie for resources and engage in political struggles to influence decisions. It helps you see how power is distributed, used, and contested.
The symbolic frame highlights the importance of symbols, rituals, stories, and shared values in shaping group identity and culture. In it, organizations are depicted as theaters through which its members make meaning.
Using this model, the Omega team generated the following insights in the four frames:
A deeper look into the company’s structure revealed siloing and a lack of coordination between the R&D and marketing departments, which had led to misaligned messaging to customers. It also highlighted a lack of collaboration between the two functions and pointed to the need to communicate with the target market about the product’s features and benefits in a coherent and compelling way.
This frame revealed that the declining sales and price hikes had ramped up pressure on the sales team, damaging morale. The demotivated team was struggling to effectively promote the product, making it harder to recover from declining sales. Omega realized it was lacking adequate support, training, and incentives for the team.
The key insight from this frame was that the finance team’s reluctance to approve promotions in the sales group to maintain margins was exacerbating the morale problem. Omega understood that investing in sales leadership development while still generating profits was crucial for long-term success and that frank discussions about the issue were needed.
This frame highlighted an important misalignment in perception: The company believed that its headphones were of “top quality,” while customers reported in surveys that they were “overpriced.” This divergence raised alarm that branding, marketing, and pricing strategies, which were all predicated on the central corporate value of superior quality, were no longer resonating with customers. Omega realized that it had been paying too little attention to quality assurance and functionality.
In this phase, you transition from framing the problem to actively imagining and designing solutions. This involves synthesizing the insights gained from earlier phases and crafting a shared vision of the desired future state.
Here we recommend using a technique known as backcasting. First, clearly define your desired goal. For example, a team struggling with missed deadlines and declining productivity might aim to achieve on-time completion rates of 98% for its projects and increase its volume of projects by 5% over the next year. Next, reverse engineer the path to achieving your goal. Outline key milestones required over both the short term and the long term. For each one, pinpoint specific interventions, strategies, and initiatives that will propel you closer to your goal. These may encompass changes in processes, policies, technologies, and behaviors. Synthesize the activities into a sequenced, chronological, prioritized road map or action plan, and allocate the resources, including time, budget, and personnel, necessary to implement your plan. Finally, monitor progress toward your goal and be prepared to adjust the plan in response to outcomes, feedback, or changing circumstances. This approach ensures that the team’s efforts in implementing the insights from the previous phases are strategically and purposefully directed toward a concrete destination.
Albert Einstein once said, “If I had one hour to solve a problem, I would spend 55 minutes thinking about the problem and five minutes thinking about the solution.” That philosophy underpins our E5 framework, which provides a structured approach for conscientiously engaging with complex problems before leaping to solutions.
As teams use the methodology, they must understand that problem-framing in today’s intricate business landscape is rarely a linear process. While we’re attempting to provide a structured path, we also recognize the dynamic nature of problems and the need for adaptability. Invariably, as teams begin to implement solutions, new facets of a problem may come to light, unforeseen challenges may arise, or external circumstances may evolve. Your team should be ready to loop back to previous phases—for instance, revisiting the expand phase to reassess the problem’s frame, delving deeper into an overlooked root cause in another examine phase, or gathering fresh insights from stakeholders in a new empathize phase. Ultimately, the E5 framework is intended to foster a culture of continuous improvement and innovation.
Based in Vancouver, BC, Mark leads the capital projects and infrastructure advisory practice with a major professional services firm. He brings 5+ years of experience in engineering and project management, and a passion for the natural and built environment. His work with projects has taken him all over the world.
The only constant on projects is change—and conflict, stemming from everything from scope creep to limited resources. The more you encounter conflict, the better you'll be able to prevent it from derailing your project. Here are a few you're likely to encounter and how to resolve them.
Conflicts are Inevitable: You can't avoid the conflict that comes with teamwork, so it's important to develop strong conflict resolution skills and a sense of how to transform problems into opportunities for collaboration.
Navigating Miscommunications: Misunderstandings can disrupt progress, so it's imperative to clarify expectations from the start and model good communication for the rest of the team.
Teamwork Makes the Dream Work: Successful project management heavily relies on teamwork, and you need to foster an open, collaborative environment that increases morale and the chances of project success.
From miscommunications to scope creep, conflicts are bound to pop up on any project and will test your problem-solving as a project manager.
I’ll explore some of the most common types of conflict that can arise and provide you with some practical conflict resolution solutions to navigate them smoothly.
These tips will improve your conflict management, help you maintain your composure, create win-win scenarios, and keep your projects on track.
Scope creep is the sneaky expansion of a project's goals and deliverables beyond what was originally agreed upon. It’s when a seemingly simple website redesign balloons into an entire ecommerce platform—with all the trimmings—without any adjustments to the budget or timeline.
Example conflict situation : You're managing a project to launch a new software tool. Initially, it was just supposed to include basic features. But as you progress, stakeholders start asking for additional functionalities.
Before you know it, you've added a CRM system, a mobile app, and integration with every other tool on the market. Your original timeline is in tatters and your budget? Let’s just say it’s not looking good.
Conflict resolution techniques to manage scope creep:
Communication issues can undermine even the most well-planned projects. Without effective communication, misunderstandings proliferate, deadlines are missed, and frustration grows. It’s like a game of “telephone” where everyone hears a different message, and no one knows what’s actually going on.
Example conflict situation : Imagine your team is spread across different continents. You send out an urgent email about a critical task, but due to time zone differences, half the team doesn’t see it until the following day. Meanwhile, the other half acts on outdated information. Chaos ensues, and the project timeline takes a hit.
Conflict resolution tips to improve open communication:
Sign up to get weekly insights, tips, and other helpful content from digital project management experts.
Resource conflicts happen when multiple projects compete for the same resources—whether that’s budget, equipment, or human talent. Think of it as several people fighting over the last piece of cake: someone is bound to be left unsatisfied.
Example conflict situation : Two departments both want the same senior developer to work on their projects. The developer is torn between priorities, overworked, and unable to deliver high-quality work on either project. This results in delays and frustration all around.
How to resolve conflicts in resourcing:
Treat your resources like a well-curated buffet—make sure everyone gets what they need without overloading their plate. And remember, nobody likes to see someone hogging all the shrimp.
When roles and responsibilities aren’t clearly defined, tasks can either fall through the cracks or get duplicated. It’s like trying to play football with no designated positions—everyone’s running around, but no one knows who’s supposed to score.
Example conflict situation : On a content creation project, one team thinks the writers are also responsible for editing, while the writers assume there’s a separate editing team. The end result is a heap of unedited content and a lot of finger-pointing.
Conflict resolution strategies for resolving conflicts before they happen:
Stakeholder disagreements can feel like being caught in a family feud. Different departments or key players have conflicting priorities or visions for the project, and you’re left in the middle, trying to find common ground. It’s a classic case of “too many cooks in the kitchen.”
Example conflict situation : Your design team wants to prioritize aesthetics, while the engineering team insists on functionality. Both are vital, but their inability to agree leads to team conflict and a stalemate, stalling the project and causing frustration on both sides.
How to manage stakeholder disagreements:
Unrealistic deadlines are the bane of any project manager’s existence. They lead to rushed work, stressed-out team members, and, ultimately, a lower-quality product.
Example conflict situation : A tech startup wants to launch a new app feature in a month, despite the development team’s warnings that it will take at least three months to develop and test properly. The result is a rushed, buggy release that frustrates users and damages the brand’s reputation.
Effective conflict resolution tips to handle unrealistic deadlines:
If you can’t negotiate a longer timeline, try to negotiate the scope. If the deadline is immovable, make sure everyone understands what can realistically be delivered within that timeframe.
Risk management might not be the most glamorous aspect of project management, but it’s certainly one of the most critical. When risks are ignored, they have a nasty habit of becoming reality at the worst possible time.
Example conflict situation : A project team is developing a new app but fails to anticipate potential delays due to third-party integrations. Halfway through, a key vendor delays its integration, causing a ripple effect that pushes the launch date back by several weeks.
How to improve risk management:
Budget overruns are all too common in project management. They happen when costs exceed the original project estimate , often due to poor planning, unexpected expenses, or scope creep. It’s like trying to build a house with an unlimited appetite for granite countertops—costs quickly spiral out of control.
Example conflict situation : A marketing project aimed at launching a new product is underestimated in terms of the budget needed for digital ad spend. As the campaign progresses, additional funds are required to meet targets, leading to budget overruns and tough financial decisions.
How To Avoid Budget Overruns
To effectively avoid budget overruns, it’s essential to implement a robust cost control strategy from the outset. Here’s a more detailed approach to keeping your project finances in check:
1. Create a Comprehensive and Realistic Budget Plan
A well-crafted budget plan should be as detailed as possible. It must account for all potential costs, including those that might seem unlikely or are traditionally overlooked. The more specific you are, the fewer surprises you’ll encounter.
2. Implement a Rigorous Cost Tracking System
Tracking expenses in real-time is crucial to preventing budget overruns. By keeping a close eye on your spending, you can quickly identify any deviations from the budget and take corrective actions before things spiral out of control.
3. Establish Cost Control Policies and Procedures in Your Project Management Plan
Having clear policies and procedures for managing costs can help prevent budget overruns. These policies should outline how expenses are approved, tracked, and reported.
4. Monitor and Manage Scope to Prevent Scope Creep
Scope creep is one of the leading root causes of budget overruns. As new tasks or features are added without corresponding budget increases, costs can quickly spiral out of control.
5. Optimize Resource Allocation and Reduce Waste
Efficient use of resources is critical to controlling costs. By optimizing how resources are allocated and reducing waste, you can make the most of your budget.
6. Engage Stakeholders in Cost Management
Keeping stakeholders informed and engaged in the project management and budget management process can prevent surprises and ensure everyone is aligned on financial priorities.
Working with a diverse, global team can lead to unique challenges—particularly when cultural differences impact communication and collaboration. It’s like trying to conduct an orchestra when each musician is playing a different tune. Harmony is possible, but it requires careful coordination.
Example conflict situation : A global marketing campaign is being managed by a culturally diverse team. Different team members have varying expectations about work hours, the work environment, deadlines, and meeting formats, which can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts.
Conflict resolution when navigating cultural differences:
Embrace the variety, but make sure you have a good mix of personalities that complements rather than clashes with team dynamics and enhances teamwork.
Managing conflicts effectively is key to project success. By understanding these common conflicts and implementing a mix of strategic and practical solutions, you’ll upgrade your conflict resolution skills and be better prepared to keep your projects on track and your stakeholders happy.
Remember, a great project manager is not just a master of schedules and budgets but also a skilled mediator, problem-solver, and strategist.
Want to connect with other project managers to share resources and best practices? Join our membership community and get access to 100+ templates, samples, and examples, and connect with 100s of other digital project managers in Slack.
Vartika Kashyap
Project collaboration is a force multiplier.
It goes beyond just working together; it’s about teams strategizing intelligently, pooling experiences, and capitalizing on each others’ strengths to achieve more than they could achieve individually.
As Phil Jackson rightfully put it, “The strength of the team is each member. The strength of each member is the team.”
Because when teams are well-aligned and cohesive, they leave no scope for misalignments, rework, project delays, setbacks, and missed opportunities. Instead, they focus on improving and maximizing their core strength to enhance every individual’s contributions.
In this blog post, we will provide you with an in-depth outlook on collaboration, exploring its types, importance, and challenges. We will also discuss the effective tools, strategies, skills, and quick tips that project managers can use to achieve superior results.
Project collaboration refers to the practice of project teams and leaders contributing toward achieving a common project goal – cohesively, strategically, and purposefully.
Project managers play a crucial role in ensuring the project team works together to pull off a task without any hiccups. They always keep an eye on the team dynamics and address conflicts proactively, ensuring teams work in alignment for smooth project progression.
When teams understand each other’s skills, needs, knowledge, perspectives, and workload, they function more harmoniously in a collaborative environment. This enhances transparency, reduces misunderstandings, and fosters a shared understanding- regardless of the location and time zone.
Some proven benefits of project collaboration that make it crucial for successful businesses are:
A collaborative team is aware of each other’s responsibilities and project expectations. They spend more time getting work done than merely asking for clarifications.
Collaboration encourages open and transparent communication between team members, eliminating misunderstandings and facilitating shared understanding.
When teams know their efforts contribute to the company’s larger vision, they feel more encouraged and motivated to excel and outperform themselves.
Working closely with each other helps team members get on the same page. They approach challenges from a unified perspective, ensuring success looks the same to everyone.
When different team members with varied backgrounds, expertise, and experience come together, they can tap into their collective knowledge to form strategic decisions.
Project collaboration creates an opportunity for teams to brainstorm new ideas, innovative solutions, and creative suggestions, leading to competitive outcomes and results.
Despite dispersed work environments, collaborative teams always stay connected, update each other, and coordinate efforts to achieve project objectives.
Collaborative teams can produce high-quality standard deliverables by supporting each other and leveraging each others’ strengths. They can also share feedback to ensure the best possible results are delivered.
Discover how team collaboration can elevate your team’s productivity!
Here are some of the different types of collaboration you can encounter while managing different projects:
Internal collaboration occurs between individuals and groups within the same department or organization. It is particularly helpful in streamlining communication, creating shared understanding, and keeping everyone on the same page. Many organizations use internal discussion forums, intranets, and messaging apps to keep the data secured from external access.
Contrary to the collaboration method discussed above, external collaboration prioritizes knowledge and idea sharing outside the organization. It is typically done with external stakeholders, clients, investors, or customers. The aim is to gather diverse stakeholders’ opinions and feedback, which can be instrumental in making improvements and driving improvements.
Team collaboration is the most substantial, yet the most obvious type of project collaboration. There is a team leader responsible for bringing all the team members together to complete tasks and achieve the project objectives. Everyone knows their roles,responsibilities, deadlines, and expectations, making this the most direct and focused form of collaboration.
This collaboration brings together team members from different departments, verticals, and teams come together for a common goal. This is usually prioritized when a project requires varied expertise, strengths, and experiences for successful project execution and delivery.
Cloud collaboration is based on facilitating real-time coordination among team members through cloud applications. This collaboration maintains the balance between on-site and remote teams, providing everyone access to the latest data and resources. It allows them to read, edit, and access documents altogether, avoiding any duplicate work.
Whether the team members are in the office, down the hallway, or anywhere across the globe, virtual collaboration has become necessary for teams to keep the ball rolling. This collaboration allows everyone to connect virtually via digital appliances, like mobile, laptop, or tablet, and collaboration tools, such as Zoom, Google Workspace, and more.
Synchronous collaboration requires real-time interaction, where team members respond and engage almost instantly. This could be through live meetings, virtual conferences, or online chat rooms, team members use it to share ideas, brainstorm, edit, review, or proofread documents. This ensures everyone is actively engaged and coordinating in real time.
This collaboration type does not require immediate responses, making it ideal for teams spread across different time zones or with varying schedules. Communication happens through emails, shared documents, and discussion boards, ensuring that collaboration continues smoothly even when team members are not online at the same time.
Project collaboration isn’t as simple as it may seem. There are destructive hindrances that may shake up the foundation of teamwork.
It is the most common challenge workforces face every day. Be it conflicting perspectives, unfounded assumptions, or miscommunication, the impact is derogatory and can easily lead to disagreements and misinterpretations.
Global workforces often face collaboration challenges due to significant cultural and language differences. This can easily exacerbate issues, leading to misunderstandings, lack of clarity, and decreased productivity.
When teams lack a clear picture of project objectives and collaboration expectations, they lose direction and project progress suffers. Also, this can lead to duplicated efforts, mindless working, and frustration, ultimately causing delays and inefficiencies.
Unavailability of collaboration tools or incompatibility with current software are some of the major factors contributing to project collaboration challenges. Your team requires the right tools to keep pace with project demands and perform efficiently to streamline operations.
Silos are the barriers that strain the collaborative ability of an organization. And the situation worsens if the teams operate in remote and hybrid setups. While it is not always intentional, as sometimes operational structures can genuinely create divisions.
If team members confuse providing feedback with picking mistakes in their work, they will be hesitant to work together and respect others’ opinions. Also, when they do not trust each other for particular responsibilities or decisions, nothing can stop the project from derailing.
Different perspectives, working styles, and personalities can easily become reasons for team clashes and disagreements. These differences, if not addressed, can lead to silos formation, interpersonal conflicts, and collaboration breakdown.
Having the right workforce doesn’t mean they know how to function cohesively as a unit. You need to put in efforts to align their skills and strengths and get the most out of team efforts for successful project completion.
Here are some effective strategies to enhance team alignment and productivity:
Establishing collaboration as your core value and defining what successful collaboration looks like to you, helps you create a clear framework for your team members.
“ Collaboration is a key part of the success of any organization, executed through a clearly defined vision and mission and based on transparency and constant communication.” – Dinesh Paliwal
You should constantly communicate and review your company’s mission so that teams stay aligned and work together for effective teamwork. When they understand the reasons behind collaborative efforts, they will be more likely to embrace the collaborative culture and act accordingly. You can take company-wide initiatives or provide support to instill these values and practices in your operations.
Create an environment that empowers your employees to speak openly and transparently with each other and, most importantly, you. You cannot expect a smooth communication flow until there is a hesitation or a fear of judgment in them.
Instead, when employees openly talk about their beliefs and perceptions, there is no scope for misunderstandings and miscommunication. They should also reciprocate this openness in their behavior when listening to other people’s opinions and perspectives.
Having a centralized interface where employees can collaborate and coordinate in real-time is necessary to facilitate strong and effective collaboration. And this can be achieved by using online collaboration tools.
Distributed workforce or local, these tools create a centralized space for your team to communicate, track progress, share files, and provide updates. It brings all your team members, documents, and communication into one location for seamless project collaboration.
Explore the best online collaboration tools that boost productivity and keep your team on track.
You must ensure you have clear communication channels and protocols defined for effective project collaboration. Your team must know who to turn to and how to reach out to them for guidance and support.
You can also define communication roles and provide collaborative training to ensure seamless coordination without any hiccups. This promotes open communication between team members, eliminating information silo formation and avoiding communication breakdowns.
Make sure to take regular employee feedback to analyze current collaboration dynamics in your organization. Ask them to share their concerns and thoughts on team interaction, their communication preferences and styles, and any potential setbacks.
This helps you identify potential gaps and areas of friction, helping you instantly address them. You can use these insights to highlight areas for improvement and refine collaboration strategies.
Conflicts are bound to arise where diverse mindsets and perspectives thrive together. However, keeping them aligned and on the same page is the responsibility of a project manager.
Therefore, you must train yourself to manage conflicts without being biased and accusing anyone. Make sure to stay calm and neutral when addressing issues. Remember, your role is to resolve conflicts and not be a part of it. Understand everyone’s perspective and seek a mutual ground that benefits everyone.
Project collaboration isn’t a static rule; It is a dynamic process that demands ongoing assessment and refinement. As the project progresses through various stages, team members need to adjust their collaborative approach to stay in tune with changing requirements.
This means, you cannot expect your project collaboration plan to stay relevant over time. Instead, you must conduct regular retrospectives, refine strategies, and adapt them into your workflow to foster efficiency at every stage.
Discover 9 effective communication strategies to help your team stay connected
Project management collaboration tools are designed to facilitate real-time and effective communication and teamwork among project managers, teams, and external stakeholders. From coordinating work and managing tasks to facilitating knowledge sharing and enhancing progress visibility, these tools promote seamless and collaborative project execution.
Here is a list of the various categories of tools that facilitate collaboration among team members:
Project planning tools assist individuals and teams in managing and executing projects from beginning to completion. They can easily build project timelines, define project objectives, create tasks and subtasks, allocate resources, and track milestones and dependencies for successful project execution. Some common features include Gantt charts, Kanban board, resource management, milestones, etc.
Task management tools help you create a to-do list of all your tasks in the project. You can easily create tasks, add assignees, define deadlines , set priorities, and track progress to streamline your workflow. These tools include features like task lists, tasks, due dates, task views, task dependencies, etc.
Team communication tools come equipped with functionalities to facilitate real-time communication between team members. It creates a centralized knowledge base for teams to have in-person chats, mention team members, hold group discussions, and have brainstorming sessions.
Time tracking tools help businesses track time spent on tasks by employees to eliminate time wastage and improve team productivity. It allows team members to add manual estimates or use a built-in tracker for real-time monitoring. They can track both billable and non-billable hours and use timesheets for billing and invoicing clients.
Document management tools help businesses manage their digital assets and versions effectively, eliminating cluttered workspaces. With these cloud-based solutions, team members can easily store, manage, share, and access these documents from anywhere, anytime with a stable internet connection.
Reporting tools help teams and leaders collect real-time data and generate reports on various parameters and metrics. They can use these reports to gain valuable insights, identify areas for improvement, and make data-driven decisions. They can even share reports with project stakeholders to keep them in the loop and encapsulate their feedback and opinions on project progress.
Automation software helps teams streamline mundane, repetitive, and recurring tasks by automating them. This makes work execution faster, swifter, and easier, ensuring the process is error-free and consistent. This saves teams time working on strategic tasks and the ones that contribute more to overall project objectives.
Explore the top 11 project management collaboration tools to boost your teamwork and productivity!
A project manager’s role doesn’t end with forming a project team. In fact, they play a huge role in setting up a framework for them to collaborate effectively. This requires them to develop certain skill sets, shaped by experience and expertise.
Leaders are the influential figures who set the tone and guide the team toward achieving the desired goal. They must create an environment that encourages team members to contribute their best selves, without fear of judgment. By motivating the team, demonstrating through actions, and providing guidance and support, you can bring a positive shift to teamwork and performance.
Being a leader, you should be mindful of how you communicate with your team . Are you able to share instructions, expectations, and updates clearly and concisely? This ensures your context doesn’t get lost in translation, facilitating shared understanding, avoiding misunderstandings, and reducing conflicts.
Being emotionally mature is a crucial leadership skill that was long overlooked for more traditional traits. A great leader knows how to manage their own emotions and approach others with empathy for better collaboration. This helps them better understand team sentiments, handle conflicts, and build strong relationships within the team.
There could be several instances where teams become indecisive or overwhelmed by unexpected challenges and setbacks. Therefore, a project manager should train themselves to quickly analyze the problem, identify the root cause, and think of effective solutions.
Unforeseen challenges, changing priorities, and resource constraints can impact project progression adversely. Therefore, project managers should demonstrate their ability to adapt to evolving project needs and navigate these issues. Instead of being bogged down by setbacks, they must quickly pivot to find effective and efficient solutions.
Project management is a multi-faceted approach with many moving parts. Keeping track of tasks, deadlines, progress, and resources, a project manager has to stay organized to avoid scope creep and ensure the project stays on track.
Persuasion is a crucial skill that helps project managers convince stakeholders, especially in crucial hours when everything seems out of place. Also, the quality empowers them to negotiate solutions and maintain momentum to secure necessary support, resources, and buy in.
Ready to master the art of project management? Discover 28 essential project management skills for project managers.
Building a collaborative team where each team member understands their responsibility, supports each other, and coordinates effectively to achieve common goals requires intentional efforts.
Here are some effective tips you can follow to build a strong collaborative environment:
Successful project collaboration is a team effort. While team leaders should continually strive to improve collaboration practices, teams should actively engage and coordinate to achieve shared project goals. Everyone should work in fine alignment to make the project a huge hit.
Regardless of the project complexity and team dynamics, a project collaboration tool like ProofHub makes collaborating on projects seamless and efficient for teams. By streamlining tasks, facilitating real-time communication, and centralizing project management, it promotes accountability and enhances productivity.
Organize, manage, and collaborate seamlessly with ProofHub – All-in-one solution for projects, tasks, and teams
Project collaboration improves productivity by promoting better communication, clear role distribution, and effective teamwork. When team members are on the same page, they are more focused on coordinating effectively, minimizing overlaps, and ensuring projects are delivered on time.
Collaboration between dispersed workforces working on a project is an example of a project collaboration. With employees spread across different locations and time zones, establishing effective knowledge-sharing and communication between them requires using cohesive strategies and collaboration tools.
No per user fee. No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
COMMENTS
Problem-Solving Steps in Project Management. While the process you choose to solve problems may vary, here is a seven-step framework many project managers use. This problem-solving method combines primary and secondary problem-solving steps. #1. Define the Problem. Gather data and information from key stakeholders, team members, and project ...
Problem Solving is one of the Tools & Techniques used for Managing Quality and Controlling Resources. Modules 8 and 9 of the PM PrepCast cover Project Quality Management and Project Resource Management. Consider this study program if you're preparing to take your CAPM or PMP Certification exam. Disclosure: I may receive a commission if you ...
7. Solution evaluation. 1. Problem identification. The first stage of any problem solving process is to identify the problem (s) you need to solve. This often looks like using group discussions and activities to help a group surface and effectively articulate the challenges they're facing and wish to resolve.
Problem solving is an essential skill to handle the issues project managers encounter on a daily basis. Effective problem solving actually circles around the people element in your project management. How you relate and interact with people has a major impact on how effectively and how quickly you can solve problems.
Finding a suitable solution for issues can be accomplished by following the basic four-step problem-solving process and methodology outlined below. Step. Characteristics. 1. Define the problem. Differentiate fact from opinion. Specify underlying causes. Consult each faction involved for information. State the problem specifically.
In project management and team collaboration, problem-solving is the process of identifying and resolving issues that arise during a project. It is a crucial skill that helps fix broken processes, improve performance, and identify opportunities. Problem-solving enables project managers and team leaders to overcome challenges and achieve success ...
With the world moving at warp speed—and problems flying in from every direction—many project leaders are (understandably) looking for help: Nearly 40 percent of respondents in PMI's Pulse of the Profession ® report said enterprise-wide adoption of complex problem-solving tools and techniques was a high priority. That also means looking ...
To excel in problem solving, project managers should stay updated with industry best practices and leverage available tools and techniques. They should foster a collaborative and innovative environment that encourages creativity and critical thinking. By prioritizing problem solving, project managers can overcome obstacles and drive project ...
Steps in the Problem-Solving Process ¶. A systematic approach to problem-solving includes: 1. Identifying the problem: Clearly defining what needs to be solved. 2. Analyzing the problem: Understanding the context and constraints. 3. Generating options: Brainstorming possible solutions.
4 steps to better problem solving. While it might be tempting to dive into a problem head first, take the time to move step by step. Here's how you can effectively break down the problem-solving process with your team: 1. Identify the problem that needs to be solved. One of the easiest ways to identify a problem is to ask questions.
Taking Action to Solve Your Problems. 1. Defining the Problem is Your First Priority. The way you look at a problem, your employees won't. Because, when they see a problem, they want you to solve it for them, as you are the project manager. So, it's important for you to define the problem in the first place.
Choose. Now that you've analyzed the problem and understand contributing factors, identify the areas to address first. Your team likely can't address all elements of a problem at once, so they need to prioritize solutions in ways that will give the project the best ROI of energy and time. 4. Implement.
The problem-solving process typically includes the following steps: Identify the issue: Recognize the problem that needs to be solved. Analyze the situation: Examine the issue in depth, gather all relevant information, and consider any limitations or constraints that may be present. Generate potential solutions: Brainstorm a list of possible ...
Project Based Problem Solving and Decision Making is an essential everyday resource for professional project managers, as well as students studying project management. Dr. Kerzner is not only a world-renowned author in project management but also serves as the Senior Executive Director at the International Institute for Learning, Inc. (IIL).
Understanding the problem is the first step in crafting a statement that resonates. Begin with a solid foundation of data, which will inform the baseline of your problem statement. A robust problem statement should succinctly outline three key components: Current State, Future State, and Target Date. > Current State describes the present ...
3. Egg Drop. Helps with: Collaboration, decision-making. Why decision-making is important for problem-solving: Making decisions isn't easy, but indecision leads to team paralysis, stagnant thinking, and unsolved problems. Decision-making activities help your team practice making quick, effective choices.
There are different variations of the 6Ms, depending on the project's needs. You'll use the 6Ms during the brainstorming stage. You can use the 6Ms multiple times to hone in on a problem.
Summary. Problem management is an 8 step framework most commonly used by IT teams. You can use problem management to solve for repeating major incidents. By organizing and structuring your problem solving, you can more effectively get to the root cause of high-impact problems—and devise a solution. Solving the root cause prevents recurrence ...
Problem solving is a basic task for the project management. It is a process for developing and applying a solution for the occurred problems. The probability of the success rises, if a particular method is implemented to the project work. The problem solving can be described in the following steps. First of all it is necessary to determine the ...
Defer or suspend judgement. Focus on "Yes, and…" rather than "No, but…". According to Carella, "Creative problem solving is the mental process used for generating innovative and imaginative ideas as a solution to a problem or a challenge. Creative problem solving techniques can be pursued by individuals or groups.".
When we do problem definition well in classic problem solving, we are demonstrating the kind of empathy, at the very beginning of our problem, that design thinking asks us to approach. When we ideate—and that's very similar to the disaggregation, prioritization, and work-planning steps—we do precisely the same thing, and often we use ...
How Wicked Problem Solving Works. This interactive course and toolkit will teach you how to bring yourself or your team, from irresolution to resolution, using a simple, powerful, scalable approach to tackle any problem and make solutions visible. Watch quick videos, then get hands-on experience working through your problems in your companion ...
True problem-solving is a strategic process that involves identifying the root cause of an issue, analyzing potential solutions, and implementing the most effective course of action. ... Implement and monitor: They decide to use a project management platform for centralized updates and schedule brief bi-weekly cross-team meetings. The manager ...
Phase 4: Elevate. This phase involves exploring how the problem connects to broader organizational issues. It's like zooming out on a map to understand where a city lies in relation to the whole ...
This creates a forum for open dialogue and problem-solving. Document key decisions: Keep a record of every agreement and decision made. This reduces the chances of backtracking and rehashing old debates. 6. Unrealistic Deadlines. Unrealistic deadlines are the bane of any project manager's existence.
4. Problem-Solving. There could be several instances where teams become indecisive or overwhelmed by unexpected challenges and setbacks. Therefore, a project manager should train themselves to quickly analyze the problem, identify the root cause, and think of effective solutions. 5. Adaptability
Project managers must look at problem solving with the first objective being the quick elimination of possible causes, rather than the discovery of the root cause. This objective would seem to be counterintuitive, yet in practice this approach is the one factor that makes the difference between a project back on track in no time and an evil of ...