essay about intellectual revolution

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

We're Hiring!
Help Center

First page of “On the Intellectual and Revolution”

Download Free PDF

On the Intellectual and Revolution

2013, Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies

This essay is not an attempt to provide a comprehensive historical or sociological treatment of the subject of intellectuals and their role in revolution; rather, it is a conceptual contribution that aims to produce knowledge through critique and the differentiation of key terms-linguistically, conceptually, and historically. In so doing, Bishara examines terms such as "the intellectual," "the intelligentsia," "the organic intellectual," and, finally, "the public intellectual". For the latter, emphasis is placed on public intellectuals' ability to go beyond their specializations and engage directly with the public on issues concerning state and society. This paper distinguishes between intellectuals and those who work in a field that mainly relies on their intellectual ability; between academics, whose sole focus is their field, and social actors who take an interest in several fields but are not specialized in a specific one. A conceptual distinction is then drawn between the intellectual and the rest of society. Through this endeavor, the author clarifies what he considers to be the main attribute of an intellectual-the ability to take stances based on epistemological grounds and value judgments at the same time. Finally, the paper concludes that two types of intellectuals are scarce in the Arab revolutions: the "revolutionary intellectual," who maintains a critical distance not only from the regime, but also from the revolution, and the "conservative intellectual," who argues for the preservation of the regime due to the potential for change that exists within it, and the wisdom embedded in the state and its traditions. For Bishara, the role of the revolutionary intellectual does not end with the outbreak of a revolution, but, in fact, takes on greater complexity and significance once the need to propose post-revolutionary alternatives arises.

Related papers

Intellectuals and Civil Society in the Middle East is based on papers presented at a workshop at the European University Institute, Florence, Italy in March, 2008. The volume, edited by Mohammed Bamyeh, is wide-ranging and provides a comprehensive analysis of the social role of intellectuals in the Middle East. The analysis made in the chapters of the book presents a deep, insightful, and perceptive examination of the role of intellectuals in politics, culture, and society in the Middle East.

American Journal of Islam and Society, 2023

The academic literature equates the Arab Spring politics of Egypt’s two highest official religious figures – the Shaykh al-Azhar Ahmad al-Tayyib and Grand Mufti Ali Gomaa—as “anti-revolutionary.” This article argues that al-Tayyib and Gomaa’s politics are fundamentally different. While Gomaa’s politics are submissive to the state, al-Tayyib’s politics are a negotation without confrontation. I explain the former by Gomaa’s struggle for religious authority either by seeking official positions or obstructing the revealing of information harmful to his religious legitimacy. The statist legitimacy threat against Gomaa is central to understanding his politics. Defending al-Azhar, on the other hand, is what explains al-Tayyib’s fluctuating politics. Theoretically, I advocate that explaining intellectuals’ politics requires focusing on their political deliberation. Only with a methodologically rigorous reconstruction of the intellectuals’ political deliberation and its context, can we decide the relative relevance of factors like ideals, interests, and structures (e.g., the state). I establish this with more than a thousand chronologically ordered primary sources and twenty interviews with people in Gomaa and al-Tayyib’s circles.

Most Arabs, including intellectuals, agree that the recent uprisings have profoundly changed the realities they have known for decades since the independence of their states. The historical character of the moment, and the emergence of a youth capable of producing unprecedented changes, have together forced an older generation of Arab intellectuals, born roughly between the 1930s and the 1950s, to acknowledge the coming of a new generation of critics and rebels. This article looks at how thinkers of the older generation have written about the uprisings and its actors, by examining their public statements in the form of articles or interviews on television channels, in newspapers and journals, some of them newly launched. I focus on Lebanese poet Abbas Baydoun, Syrian philosopher Sadeq Jalal al-Azm, Lebanese novelist Elias Khoury, Egyptian novelist Baha’ Taher, Bahraini thinker Muhammad Jaber al-Ansari, Syrian poet Adonis and Tunisian sociologist Taher Labib. While most of them value the importance of intellectual work in the struggle for human dignity and freedom, they also admit its limitations. They reflect on the significance of the popular and youth participation in advancing the causes they militated for in previous decades.

The paper explores the role of intellectuals in the Arab Spring. In response to Western journalists that lamented the absence of Arab intellectuals at the lead of the uprisings—Where was the Arab Václav Havel? they asked—the paper shows how novelists played a vital role in resisting authoritarianism before the uprisings, and thus served to pave the way for the possibility of revolution. Using extensive quotes from the Arab novelists the paper paints a dramatic portrait of literature’s role in the fight against tyranny and of the individuals who sacrificed so much for so long.

Routledge Handbook of Middle East Politics, 2020

On the political significance of intellectual history in the contemporary Arab context

Unpublished Master Thesis, Middle east Technical University, 2001

American Journal of Islam and Society

With the uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa come scores ofintellectual initiatives and academic investigations geared toward understandingthe forces and motives propelling these unprecedented developments.Conferences are being convened and special issues ofjournals are being dedicated to addressing some aspects of the currentphenomena ‒ not to talk of droves of “experts” (academic tourists?)pouring into the Muslim world for research. In short, the so-called“Arab Spring” ‒ also known by the people from the region as revolution(thawra), uprising (intifāÌa), renaissance (nahÌa) and awakening(ṣaḥwa)1 ‒ has been an intellectual treasure trove for academics in the areasof Middle Eastern Studies, Islamic Studies, and Comparative Politics.But are the attempts to explain these phenomena enough to guide the presentand future Muslim generations to proper trajectories toward sociopoliticaland intellectual success? This editorial is intended to argue that, despitethe potential positiv...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

La governance dell’intelligenza artificiale tra etica e diritto, in Notizie di Politeia, fasc. 1, pp. 59-82 (ISSN 1128-2401), 2020

Spiegel Spezial , 1999

En attendant Nadeau , 2021

Pénélope. Fazer e Desfazer História, 1989

Springer briefs in education, 2019

Auto Encoders, 2019

Jurnal Pengabdian Magister Pendidikan IPA

Revue internationale du Travail, 2010

Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, 2011

Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Management Research (AICMaR 2019), 2020