current psychiatry research and reviews impact factor

Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews - Impact Score, Ranking, SJR, h-index, Citescore, Rating, Publisher, ISSN, and Other Important Details

Published By: Bentham Science Publishers B.V.

Abbreviation: Curr. Psychiatry Res. Rev.

Impact Score The impact Score or journal impact score (JIS) is equivalent to Impact Factor. The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly mean number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal, as indexed by Clarivate's Web of Science. On the other hand, Impact Score is based on Scopus data.

Important details.

About Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews

Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is a journal published by Bentham Science Publishers B.V. . This journal covers the area[s] related to Psychiatry and Mental Health, etc . The coverage history of this journal is as follows: 2019-2022. The rank of this journal is 22679 . This journal's impact score, h-index, and SJR are 0.34, 29, and 0.139, respectively. The ISSN of this journal is/are as follows: 26660822, 26660830 . The best quartile of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is Q4 . This journal has received a total of 44 citations during the last three years (Preceding 2022).

Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews Impact Score 2022-2023

The impact score (IS), also denoted as the Journal impact score (JIS), of an academic journal is a measure of the yearly average number of citations to recent articles published in that journal. It is based on Scopus data.

Prediction of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews Impact Score 2023

Impact Score 2022 of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is 0.34 . If a similar downward trend continues, IS may decrease in 2023 as well.

Impact Score Graph

Check below the impact score trends of current psychiatry research and reviews. this is based on scopus data..

Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews h-index

The h-index of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is 29 . By definition of the h-index, this journal has at least 29 published articles with more than 29 citations.

What is h-index?

The h-index (also known as the Hirsch index or Hirsh index) is a scientometric parameter used to evaluate the scientific impact of the publications and journals. It is defined as the maximum value of h such that the given Journal has published at least h papers and each has at least h citations.

Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews ISSN

The International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is/are as follows: 26660822, 26660830 .

The ISSN is a unique 8-digit identifier for a specific publication like Magazine or Journal. The ISSN is used in the postal system and in the publishing world to identify the articles that are published in journals, magazines, newsletters, etc. This is the number assigned to your article by the publisher, and it is the one you will use to reference your article within the library catalogues.

ISSN code (also called as "ISSN structure" or "ISSN syntax") can be expressed as follows: NNNN-NNNC Here, N is in the set {0,1,2,3...,9}, a digit character, and C is in {0,1,2,3,...,9,X}

Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews Ranking and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

SCImago Journal Rank is an indicator, which measures the scientific influence of journals. It considers the number of citations received by a journal and the importance of the journals from where these citations come.

Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews Publisher

The publisher of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is Bentham Science Publishers B.V. . The publishing house of this journal is located in the Netherlands . Its coverage history is as follows: 2019-2022 .

Call For Papers (CFPs)

Please check the official website of this journal to find out the complete details and Call For Papers (CFPs).

Abbreviation

The International Organization for Standardization 4 (ISO 4) abbreviation of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is Curr. Psychiatry Res. Rev. . ISO 4 is an international standard which defines a uniform and consistent system for the abbreviation of serial publication titles, which are published regularly. The primary use of ISO 4 is to abbreviate or shorten the names of scientific journals using the technique of List of Title Word Abbreviations (LTWA).

As ISO 4 is an international standard, the abbreviation ('Curr. Psychiatry Res. Rev.') can be used for citing, indexing, abstraction, and referencing purposes.

How to publish in Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews

If your area of research or discipline is related to Psychiatry and Mental Health, etc. , please check the journal's official website to understand the complete publication process.

Acceptance Rate

• Interest/demand of researchers/scientists for publishing in a specific journal/conference.
• The complexity of the peer review process and timeline.
• Time taken from draft submission to final publication.
• Number of submissions received and acceptance slots
• And Many More.

The simplest way to find out the acceptance rate or rejection rate of a Journal/Conference is to check with the journal's/conference's editorial team through emails or through the official website.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the impact score of current psychiatry research and reviews.

The latest impact score of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is 0.34. It is computed in the year 2023.

What is the h-index of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews?

The latest h-index of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is 29. It is evaluated in the year 2023.

What is the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews?

The latest SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is 0.139. It is calculated in the year 2023.

What is the ranking of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews?

The latest ranking of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is 22679. This ranking is among 27955 Journals, Conferences, and Book Series. It is computed in the year 2023.

Who is the publisher of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews?

Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is published by Bentham Science Publishers B.V.. The publication country of this journal is Netherlands.

What is the abbreviation of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews?

This standard abbreviation of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is Curr. Psychiatry Res. Rev..

Is "Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews" a Journal, Conference or Book Series?

Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is a journal published by Bentham Science Publishers B.V..

What is the scope of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews?

• Psychiatry and Mental Health

For detailed scope of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews, check the official website of this journal.

What is the ISSN of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews?

The International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is/are as follows: 26660822, 26660830.

What is the best quartile for Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews?

The best quartile for Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is Q4.

What is the coverage history of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews?

The coverage history of Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews is as follows 2019-2022.

Credits and Sources

• Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR), https://www.scimagojr.com/
• Journal Impact Factor, https://clarivate.com/
• Issn.org, https://www.issn.org/
• Scopus, https://www.scopus.com/

Note: The impact score shown here is equivalent to the average number of times documents published in a journal/conference in the past two years have been cited in the current year (i.e., Cites / Doc. (2 years)). It is based on Scopus data and can be a little higher or different compared to the impact factor (IF) produced by Journal Citation Report. Please refer to the Web of Science data source to check the exact journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Impact Score, SJR, h-Index, and Other Important metrics of These Journals, Conferences, and Book Series

Check complete list

Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews Impact Score (IS) Trend

Top Journals/Conferences in Psychiatry and Mental Health

Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews Impact Factor & Key Scientometrics

Current psychiatry research and reviews overview, impact factor, i. basic journal info, journal issn: 26660822, 26660830, publisher: bentham science publishers b.v., history: 2019-2020, journal hompage: link, how to get published:, research categories, scope/description:, ii. science citation report (scr), current psychiatry research and reviews scr impact factor, current psychiatry research and reviews scr journal ranking, current psychiatry research and reviews scimago sjr rank, current psychiatry research and reviews scopus 2-year impact factor trend, current psychiatry research and reviews scopus 3-year impact factor trend, current psychiatry research and reviews scopus 4-year impact factor trend, current psychiatry research and reviews impact factor history, iii. other science influence indicators, current psychiatry research and reviews h-index, current psychiatry research and reviews h-index history.

Scientometrics

Citing bodies, current psychiatry research and reviews.

Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews

(Formerly as Current Psychiatry Reviews )

Impact Factor : 0.4

Indexed in: Scopus, ESCI, JCR... View all

Volume 20 , Issues 4, 2024

This journal supports open access

Submission for General Articles

Submit to thematic issues, volume 20, issue 4, the conflict between top-down and bottom-up impairments in consciousness disorder in schizophrenia.

Pp: 291-296 Author(s): Hesam Karbakhsh, Aliakbar Kouchakzadeh* and Shahriar Gharibzadeh DOI: 10.2174/2666082219666230907093951

Psychopharmacological Treatment of Depression and Anxiety and their Different Drug Delivery Targets

Pp: 297-322 Author(s): Aditya Sharma, Md. Aftab Alam*, Awaneet Kaur, Shaweta Sharma and Shikha Yadav DOI: 10.2174/2666082219666230822140902

Linguistic, Metalinguistic and Psychiatric Characteristics of Children with Speech Sound Disorder

Pp: 323-338 Author(s): Meysam Amidfar* DOI: 10.2174/2666082219666230828163404

The Prevalence of Video Games Addiction among Iraqi People in 2022

Pp: 339-349 Author(s): Hashim Talib Hashim*, Ali Talib Hashim, Asghar Shah, Jaffer Shah, Zoaib Habib Tharwani, Zarmina Islam, Mehr Muhammad Adeel Riaz, Shoaib Ahmad and Mustafa Abd al Latif Abd al Khudair DOI: 10.2174/2666082219666230627154627

Leveraging Social Networks to Integrate Depression Treatment into Primary Health and Tuberculosis Care in Brazil

Pp: 350-365 Author(s): Annika C. Sweetland*, Claudio Gruber Mann, Maria Jose Fernandes, Camila Matsuzaka, Fatima Virginia de Silva, Jae Lee, Christopher McCarty, Afranio Kritski, Sandra Fortes, Maria Cavalcanti, Marcelo Feijó Mello, Maria A. Oquendo, Thomas Valente, Harold Pincus and Milton L. Wainberg DOI: 10.2174/0126660822243332230921052022

Relation Between Monocyte-to-lymphocyte Ratio and Depressive Symptoms in Patients with Non-severe COVID-19 Infection

Pp: 366-375 Author(s): Doaa Ibrahim, Shaymaa Mohammed Arafa, Eman Mostafa Moazen*, Fatima Gaber Yehia, Ahmed Mohamed Khalifa, Sara Sallam and Eman Ali DOI: 10.2174/0126660822257804231026054939

Exploring the Link between Autistic Traits, Emotional Intelligence, and Self-efficacy in Understanding Social Anhedonia

Pp: 376-387 Author(s): Usha Barahmand*, Kefira Carvey, Naila Shamsina, Angelica Mae Ancheta and Oscar Sanchez DOI: 10.2174/0126660822265651231215074803

Manifestation of Psychosis and Impairments of Executive Functions Emphasize the Interaction of Psychological and Neurological Dysfunctions in People Who Use Methamphetamine

Pp: 388-400 Author(s): Nutthika Chaidee, Natcharee Kraiwattanapirom, Vorasith Siripornpanich, Jirapa Chetsawang and Banthit Chetsawang* DOI: 10.2174/0126660822267387231215061934

Acknowledgement to Reviewers

Pp: 401-401 DOI: 10.2174/266608222004240604234855

Restricted Access Panel

• About Journal
• Editorial Board
• Current Issue
• Volumes /Issues
• Author Guidelines
• Graphical Abstracts
• Fabricating and Stating False Information
• Research Misconduct
• Post Publication Discussions and Corrections
• Publishing Ethics and Rectitude
• Increase Visibility of Your Article
• Archiving Policies
• Peer Review Workflow
• Order Your Article Before Print
• Promote Your Article
• Manuscript Transfer Facility
• Editorial Policies
• Allegations from Whistleblowers
• Forthcoming Thematic Issues
• Guest Editor Guidelines
• Editorial Management
• Ethical Guidelines for New Editors
• Reviewer Guidelines
• Abstract Ahead of Print 0
• Article(s) in Press 37
• Free Online Copy
• Most Cited Articles
• Most Accessed Articles
• Highlighted Article
• Most Popular Articles
• Editor's Choice
• Thematic Issues
• Open Access Articles
• Open Access Funding
• Library Recommendation
• Trial Requests
• Advertise With Us
• Meet the Executive Guest Editor(s)
• Brand Ambassador
• Author's Comment & Reviews
• New Journals 2023
• New Journals 2024
• Alert Subscription

Biography of

Current Psychiatry Reports

Current Psychiatry Reports provides in-depth review articles contributed by international experts on the most significant developments in the field. By presenting clear, insightful, balanced reviews that emphasize recently published papers of major importance, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of psychiatric disorders.

• Michelle B. Riba

Latest issue

Volume 26, Issue 6

Latest articles

Enhancing brain health and well-being in older adults: innovations in lifestyle interventions.

• John L. Beyer
• Helen H. Kyomen

Grief as a Risk Factor for Psychosis: A Systematic Review

• Pablo del Pozo-Herce
• Ana Gonzalo-de Miguel
• Alejandro Porras-Segovia

Eating Disorders in Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents

• Jason M. Nagata
• Elena Stuart
• Jason M. Lavender

Dignity in Medicine: Definition, Assessment and Therapy

• Luigi Grassi
• Maria Giulia Nanni
• Federica Folesani

The Impact of Chronic Diseases on Mental Health: An Overview and Recommendations for Care Programs

• M. M. A. Shalahuddin Qusar
• Md. Rabiul Islam

Journal information

• Current Contents/Clinical Medicine
• Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences
• Google Scholar
• Japanese Science and Technology Agency (JST)
• OCLC WorldCat Discovery Service
• Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)
• Semantic Scholar
• Social Science Citation Index
• TD Net Discovery Service
• UGC-CARE List (India)

Rights and permissions

Editorial policies

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews

(Formerly as Current Psychiatry Reviews )

Impact Factor : 0.4

Indexed in: Scopus, ESCI, JCR... View all

Volume 20 , Issues 4, 2024

This journal supports open access

Submission for General Articles

Submit to thematic issues.

• Peer Review Workflow

Selection of Reviewers

All manuscripts submitted to Bentham Science Publishers (BSP) are peer-reviewed by members of the journals’ editorial board, expert reviewers, and the editor-in-chief. Only those manuscripts which successfully meet our quality requirements are published.

External reviewers are selected from PubMed and WOS, depending on the field of expertise relevant to the articles’ scope. Members of the editorial board and Bentham’s reviewer panel are also invited to share their opinion.

Peer Review Invitation

Manuscripts are forwarded to editors for evaluation initially and subsequently to independent external reviewers to check if the research work presented in the manuscript:

• Falls within the scope of the journal and
• Meets the editorial criteria of BSP in terms of originality and quality.

Regarding the first point, editors may recommend the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript by conducting the scope review themselves, based on their knowledge and experience, or they may take assistance and advice from other experts in the field.

Regarding the second point, Bentham conducts independent peer reviews on all papers submitted for publication. Before sending any manuscript to reviewers, Bentham Science seeks consent from potential reviewers and editorial board members about their availability and willingness to review the paper. Correspondence between the members of the journal’s editorial office and the reviewers is kept confidential. The reviewers are asked to:

• Accept or decline review invitation based on the title and abstract.
• Suggest alternative reviewers (optional) if the reviewers decline the review invitation based on their field of expertise not being directly relevant to the article scope, their busy schedule, or any potential conflict of interest with the authors.

Access to the full-text version of the manuscript is provided to the agreed reviewers via our online system ( https://bentham.manuscriptpoint.com/manuals/index.html) . To use our online peer-review system module, please read the reviewer’s manual or watch the tutorial.

Bentham follows a double-blind peer review process where the identities of both the reviewer and author are kept undisclosed to each other, ensuring anonymity and maintaining confidentiality throughout the entire review procedure. The anonymity of reviewers ensures an objective and unbiased assessment of the manuscript by the reviewers.

After receiving the review of the manuscript by at least three independent experts, in addition to the views of the editor, the decision is relayed to the authors via our Manuscript Processing System (MPS), which may be categorized as:

• Requires minor changes
• Requires major changes
• Rejected with no resubmission

Purpose of a Review

A review report provides the editor-in-chief/senior editor with an expert opinion on the quality of the manuscript under consideration. It also supplies authors with explicit feedback on how to improve their papers to make them acceptable for publication in the journal. Remarks that may help improve the quality of the manuscript are forwarded to the authors for their consideration.

Selfless Peer Review

BSP aims to facilitate objective peer review free of self-interested bias. It is highly recommended to avoid self-promotion in any form, including the following:

• Potentially competitive work, whether in progress or submitted elsewhere, must not impact the timeliness of the manuscript or editorial assessment.
• All requests for particular citations must be relevant to the submission. During peer-review, referencing citations of the authors’ own or his/her coworkers’ publications must be avoided.
• Unless approved by the publisher, reference to articles with actual, potential, or perceived conflict of interest must be avoided. Competing interests guidelines must be followed.

How to Review

Reviewers are expected to provide advice on the following points in their review reports (depending on the type of article):

• Does the article lie within the scope of the journal?
• Is the manuscript written comprehensively? If not, how could it be improved?
• Have adequate proofs been provided for the declaration?
• Is this a new/ original contribution of significance?
• Does the paper offer enough details of its methodology to reproduce the experiments? In the case of experimentation on human subjects, has informed consent been taken?
• Has the author provided the approval from the local institutional review board? Or does the manuscript conform to the Helsinki Declaration on human experiments in the “Methods” section? For further details, please visit: https://benthamscience.com/journal/174/ifa#research-ethics-and-policies
• Have the authors used the Reporting Guidelines, i.e., CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, STARD, CARE, EQUATOR, in their studies (if applicable)? For further details, please visit: https://benthamscience.com/journal/174/ifa#standards-of-reporting
• Has the author obtained the approval of the institutional ethics committee regarding experimentation on animals or other species? Is the name of the species mentioned in the article's title, abstract, and methods section? For more details, please visit https://benthamscience.com/journal/174/ifa#research-ethics-and-policies
• Bentham Science encourages authors to publish detailed protocols as supporting information online. Does any particular method used in the manuscript warrant such a protocol?
• Are figures/illustrations of appropriate quality?
• Is the sample size adequate for the study?
• What are the main findings of the paper?
• Is relevant work of other authors in the field appropriately acknowledged and comprehensive references given to the previous relevant literature?

During the review process, if reviewers find any scientific misconduct or fraud, plagiarism, conflict of interest, or any other unethical behavior related to the manuscript, they are expected to inform the editorial office immediately. Similarly, if they think that they are unable to review a certain section of the manuscript, then the editorial office should also be informed.

Reviewers are required to rate manuscripts on each of the above mentioned points along with their remarks for authors and editors. For further details, please review a sample evaluation form [Template Evaluation Form]. The authors are conveyed the comments of the reviewers, and given the opportunity to respond to them. In case the author does not agree with the comments of the reviewer, then the Editor-in-Chief may decide in the matter or the manuscript may be conveyed to additional reviewers for a decision. The identity of the reviewers is always kept strictly confidential.

Use of Generative AI and AI-assisted Technologies in the Peer Review Process

Since the use of AI technology has increased, it has brought its own challenges regarding the originality of the review of submitted manuscripts. Bentham Science has been striving to improve its policies accordingly. With time, we will continue to update our policies to support our reviewers, authors, and editors.

The quality of the peer review of submitted articles has been our top priority. The reviewers are advised not to use AI technologies or any other related assisting resources to generate review reports that could compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the reports.

Publishers recommend that reviewers review COPE Ethical Guidelines to provide quality unbiased review reports. Please read the complete guidelines at Committee on Publication Ethics available online.

BSP recommends its reviewers to strictly adhere to COPE guidelines to comply with the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

Confidentiality

The peer-review of a manuscript is a confidential process. Reviewers should keep the whole process completely confidential. They should consult the EIC/senior editor and take permission before consulting another colleague for help in the peer-review of the submitted manuscript.

Prompt Review

Reviewers should not disclose any information whatsoever to anyone before the publication of the manuscript.

Privileged Information/Transparency

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript should not be used in an editor's or reviewer's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage

Peer Review Manipulation

Peer-review manipulations are dealt with as per the guidelines given by COPE .

• Peer-review manipulation suspected during the peer-review process [VIEW FLOW CHART] .
• Peer-review manipulation suspected after publication [VIEW FLOW CHART] .

Review Time

The agreed reviewers are expected to provide their reports within 2-4 weeks since a prompt review leads to the timely publication of a manuscript, which is beneficial not only to the authors but also to the scientific community. However, a reviewer who needs extra time for reviewing should consult the editorial office

Changes in Review Reports

The editorial staff relays the comments of the reviewers on behalf of the editor-in-chief/handling editor. The review reports are edited by the editor-in-chief/handling editor if the comments contain confidential information or are written in a language not suitable for scholarly communication. Reviewers should include such comments in the confidential section of the review form, which is intended to be read by the editors only.

Conflict of Interest

Bentham Science respects requests for not having the manuscripts peer-reviewed by those experts who may have a competing interest with the author(s) of a submitted manuscript. It is not possible for editors to be aware of all competing interests; therefore, we expect that reviewers would inform the editor-in-chief/handling editor/ editorial manager if they notice any potential competing interest during review of a manuscript; reviewers are not encouraged to contact authors directly regarding any of their conflict of interest. Peer reviewers should follow journals’ policies in situations they consider to represent a conflict to reviewing. If no guidance is provided, they should inform the editorial manager in case: they work at the same institution as any of the authors (or will be joining that institution or are applying for a job there), they are or have been recent (e.g., within the past 3 years) mentors, mentees, close collaborators or joint grant holders, and they have a close personal relationship with any of the authors. Reviewers are asked to re-confirm that they do not have any conflict of interest with the authors of the submitted manuscript at the time of review completion. For further details, please visit: https://benthamscience.com/journal/174/ifa#research-ethics-and-policies

Editorial Decision

The authors are usually requested to resubmit the revised paper within 15 days, and it is then returned to the reviewers for further evaluation. The publishers normally allow one round of revision, and in exceptional cases, a second round of revision may be allowed. If further revision is needed, then the manuscript is rejected, and the author is requested to resubmit the manuscript for fresh processing.

The final decision regarding acceptance or rejection is by the editor-in-chief, depending on his/her assessment on the revisions recommended by the referees, and about the overall quality of the revised manuscript. In rare cases, manuscripts recommended for publication by the referees may be rejected in the final assessment by the editor-in-chief.

Transferred Articles

If a manuscript is rejected due to its unsuitability according to the aims and scope of a particular journal, then it may be transferred to another journal (with the consent of the author) that has a similar scope as the manuscript. For further details, please visit: https://benthamscience.com/journal/174/manuscript-transfer-facility

Appeals and Complaints

Generally, editorial decisions by Bentham Science are not reverted. However, authors who think that their manuscript was rejected due to a misunderstanding or mistake may seek an explanation for the decision. Appeals must give sound reasoning and compelling evidence against the criticism raised in the rejection letter. A difference of opinion regarding the interest, novelty, or suitability of the manuscript for the journal will not be considered an appeal. The editor-in-chief and other relevant editors will consider the appeal, and the decision thereafter taken by the journal will be deemed final. Acceptance of the manuscript is not guaranteed even if the journal agrees to reconsider the manuscript, and the reconsideration process may involve previous or new reviewers or editors and substantive revision.

Complaints on ethical practices or academic misconduct will be handled according to the processes outlined in our academic misconduct guidelines.

Authors who wish to make a complaint should refer to the editor-in-chief of the journal concerned by contacting the editorial office. Complaints to the publisher may be emailed to [email protected] . Bentham Science sends an acknowledgment to the complainant and undertake appropriate action. For matters involving the editor-in-chief of a journal, Bentham Science seeks the opinion of the editor-in-chief and suitable action is then taken.

Reviewers’ Acknowledgement

Bentham Science greatly appreciates the reviewers for their efforts and valuable time during the peer-review process. Therefore, it publishes names of reviewers under the section “Acknowledgment to the reviewers” who have reviewed manuscripts for over 12 months, whether manuscripts are published or not.

The complete peer-review history of a reviewer is maintained in our Online Manuscript Processing System. Each review is awarded some points, which can be redeemed by reviewers whenever they require.

Bentham Science has also made its publication and review information available on Publons. Publons provides formal recognition to our peer reviewers by producing a verified record of their peer reviews and editorial contributions to academic journals. Learn more about Publons here:

Become a Reviewer

For joining our reviewers’ panel, the candidates must have

• Ph.D. degree and research experience in the main subject area of the journal and the articles under review
• Reviewed manuscripts earlier
• Published manuscripts that are very well-cited by the research community.

Those willing to join our reviewers' panel are expected to submit their details at (REVIEWER REGISTRATION FORM)

• About Journal
• Editorial Board
• Current Issue
• Volumes /Issues
• Author Guidelines
• Graphical Abstracts
• Fabricating and Stating False Information
• Research Misconduct
• Post Publication Discussions and Corrections
• Publishing Ethics and Rectitude
• Increase Visibility of Your Article
• Archiving Policies
• Order Your Article Before Print
• Promote Your Article
• Manuscript Transfer Facility
• Editorial Policies
• Allegations from Whistleblowers
• Forthcoming Thematic Issues
• Guest Editor Guidelines
• Editorial Management
• Ethical Guidelines for New Editors
• Reviewer Guidelines
• Abstract Ahead of Print 0
• Article(s) in Press 37
• Free Online Copy
• Most Cited Articles
• Most Accessed Articles
• Highlighted Article
• Most Popular Articles
• Editor's Choice
• Thematic Issues
• Open Access Articles
• Open Access Funding
• Library Recommendation
• Trial Requests
• Advertise With Us
• Meet the Executive Guest Editor(s)
• Brand Ambassador
• Author's Comment & Reviews
• New Journals 2023
• New Journals 2024
• Alert Subscription

Biography of

Current Psychiatry Reports

Subject Area and Category

• Psychiatry and Mental Health

Current Science, Inc.

Publication type

15233812, 15351645

1996, 1999-2023

Information

How to publish in this journal

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Evolution of the number of published documents. All types of documents are considered, including citable and non citable documents.

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Evolution of the percentage of female authors.

Evolution of the number of documents cited by public policy documents according to Overton database.

Evoution of the number of documents related to Sustainable Development Goals defined by United Nations. Available from 2018 onwards.

Leave a comment

Name * Required

Email (will not be published) * Required

* Required Cancel

The users of Scimago Journal & Country Rank have the possibility to dialogue through comments linked to a specific journal. The purpose is to have a forum in which general doubts about the processes of publication in the journal, experiences and other issues derived from the publication of papers are resolved. For topics on particular articles, maintain the dialogue through the usual channels with your editor.

Follow us on @ScimagoJR Scimago Lab , Copyright 2007-2024. Data Source: Scopus®

Cookie settings

Cookie Policy

Legal Notice

Privacy Policy

Select Your Interests

Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.

• Academic Medicine
• Acid Base, Electrolytes, Fluids
• Allergy and Clinical Immunology
• American Indian or Alaska Natives
• Anesthesiology
• Anticoagulation
• Art and Images in Psychiatry
• Artificial Intelligence
• Assisted Reproduction
• Bleeding and Transfusion
• Caring for the Critically Ill Patient
• Challenges in Clinical Electrocardiography
• Climate and Health
• Climate Change
• Clinical Challenge
• Clinical Decision Support
• Clinical Implications of Basic Neuroscience
• Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology
• Complementary and Alternative Medicine
• Consensus Statements
• Coronavirus (COVID-19)
• Critical Care Medicine
• Cultural Competency
• Dental Medicine
• Dermatology
• Diabetes and Endocrinology
• Diagnostic Test Interpretation
• Drug Development
• Electronic Health Records
• Emergency Medicine
• End of Life, Hospice, Palliative Care
• Environmental Health
• Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
• Facial Plastic Surgery
• Gastroenterology and Hepatology
• Genetics and Genomics
• Genomics and Precision Health
• Global Health
• Guide to Statistics and Methods
• Hair Disorders
• Health Care Delivery Models
• Health Care Economics, Insurance, Payment
• Health Care Quality
• Health Care Reform
• Health Care Safety
• Health Care Workforce
• Health Disparities
• Health Inequities
• Health Policy
• Health Systems Science
• History of Medicine
• Hypertension
• Images in Neurology
• Implementation Science
• Infectious Diseases
• Innovations in Health Care Delivery
• JAMA Infographic
• Law and Medicine
• Leading Change
• Less is More
• LGBTQIA Medicine
• Lifestyle Behaviors
• Medical Coding
• Medical Devices and Equipment
• Medical Education
• Medical Education and Training
• Medical Journals and Publishing
• Mobile Health and Telemedicine
• Narrative Medicine
• Neuroscience and Psychiatry
• Notable Notes
• Nutrition, Obesity, Exercise
• Obstetrics and Gynecology
• Occupational Health
• Ophthalmology
• Orthopedics
• Otolaryngology
• Pain Medicine
• Palliative Care
• Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
• Patient Care
• Patient Information
• Performance Improvement
• Performance Measures
• Perioperative Care and Consultation
• Pharmacoeconomics
• Pharmacoepidemiology
• Pharmacogenetics
• Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology
• Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
• Physical Therapy
• Physician Leadership
• Population Health
• Primary Care
• Professional Well-being
• Professionalism
• Psychiatry and Behavioral Health
• Public Health
• Pulmonary Medicine
• Regulatory Agencies
• Reproductive Health
• Research, Methods, Statistics
• Resuscitation
• Rheumatology
• Risk Management
• Scientific Discovery and the Future of Medicine
• Shared Decision Making and Communication
• Sleep Medicine
• Sports Medicine
• Stem Cell Transplantation
• Substance Use and Addiction Medicine
• Surgical Innovation
• Surgical Pearls
• Teachable Moment
• Technology and Finance
• The Art of JAMA
• The Arts and Medicine
• The Rational Clinical Examination
• Tobacco and e-Cigarettes
• Translational Medicine
• Trauma and Injury
• Treatment Adherence
• Ultrasonography
• Users' Guide to the Medical Literature
• Vaccination
• Venous Thromboembolism
• Veterans Health
• Women's Health
• Workflow and Process
• Wound Care, Infection, Healing
• Download PDF
• Share X Facebook Email LinkedIn
• Permissions

JAMA Psychiatry —The Year in Review, 2023

• 1 Editor, JAMA Psychiatry
• 2 McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts
• Peer Reviewers List JAMA Psychiatry Peer Reviewers in 2023 JAMA Psychiatry

JAMA Psychiatry saw a post–COVID-19 pandemic period of steady growth and impact in 2023. Our editorial team worked hard to maintain high standards, stay abreast of developments in the field, and present to our audience the best psychiatric research of the year. Among many others, we published a randomized clinical trial on sequential adaptive interventions for psychosis risk, 1 an article on the adverse impact of abortion restrictions on mental health, 2 and a Viewpoint series on mental health in a changing planet. 3 We also continued to cover all aspects of the therapeutic potential and pitfalls of psychedelics and even devoted one of our popular podcasts to the topic. 4

The past year saw continued runs of years with very high submission volumes. We received more than 1800 submissions, of which 1442 were research manuscripts; 9% of research manuscripts were ultimately accepted ( Table ). We also maintained our rapid turnaround times, with a median of 3 days to reach a decision for manuscripts without peer review and 33 days for peer-reviewed manuscripts. Our journal has had a well-earned reputation for a rigorous review process for decades, and the credit for maintaining our high standards goes, as always, to our expert peer reviewers. The complete list of our 2023 reviewers can be found online. 13 The Table also lists multiple other metrics characterizing JAMA Psychiatry in 2023 as a highly influential journal. The Journal Impact Factor was 25.8; we send our electronic table of contents to more than 135 000 recipients each week; and users viewed or downloaded articles from our website more than 8.8 million times. Finally, you can view in the Table our articles with the highest number of views/downloads, 5 - 7 Altmetric scores (reflecting influence in news and social media), 7 - 9 and Web of Science citations. 10 - 12

When I give presentations about JAMA Psychiatry and in my Year in Review articles, I highlight our journal’s ambition to be the outlet for the best psychiatric research articles. Original Investigations are the lifeblood of our journal and will remain that way. We have always prioritized meaningful advances coming from rigorous and definitive research over flashy topics that may be popular one year and forgotten the next, even if those flashy topics might bring the journal greater attention and recognition. Thus, I ask all of you to consider JAMA Psychiatry as a venue for your best research work. On the other hand, showcasing original research does not mean excluding other kinds of articles from the journal. We are constantly striving to improve the journal beyond our core strengths, and this has meant the introduction of new features in the journal over the past decade, including the Viewpoints, Psychiatry and Neuroscience articles, JAMA Network Insights, and Brief Reports article formats and the addition of visual abstracts with published randomized clinical trials.

We will continue these efforts in the coming year by increasing the number of Narrative Reviews and Systematic Reviews we publish. JAMA Psychiatry has historically published a very small number of review articles each year, but we plan to change that. Reviews by themselves do not contribute new evidence to benefit our field, but at their best, they can synthesize recent developments, reach novel conclusions, and present future directions. In this way, they can also perform a specific function to enrich our journal. Going forward, we will solicit and publish more high-impact review articles. Therefore, I invite you to consider what kind of review article you would like to write for a broad psychiatry audience and what kind of review articles you would like to read in the journal.

As I do every year, I will close by highlighting the contributions of our editorial team to the work of the journal. There have been no changes to our personnel, and we remain a close and committed group. Deputy Editor Martin Paulus, MD; Associate Editor Helen Blair Simpson, MD, PhD; Web Editor John Torous, MD, MS; Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Editor Kara S. Bagot, MD; and Editorial Fellow Claudia Lugo-Candelas, PhD, have all worked hard every week to review articles, suggest topics for coverage, and participate in discussion of all issues relevant to the journal. I thank them deeply for their dedication. One notable change to the editorial team took place in early 2024: Dr Lugo-Candelas stepped down from her role as Editorial Fellow after 2 years of distinguished service. We have an ongoing search for our next Editorial Fellow and expect to appoint a new Fellow very soon. I am also grateful for the important contributions our Editorial Board members and Statistical Editors make to our journal. Relevant to this group, I want to point out that the JAMA Network has published an Editorial on improving equity in our journals, which provides the self-reported aggregate demographic characteristics of editors and editorial board members, including those at JAMA Psychiatry . 14 And finally, I want to recognize the single most important person for the success of JAMA Psychiatry , our Editorial Manager, Sara DiBari. Sara is not only a superb office manager but also a voice for common sense and asks the right questions to keep us focused on the mission of the journal, and I am grateful for having her on the team.

Corresponding Author: Dost Öngür, MD, PhD, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 115 Mill St, Mailstop #108, Belmont, MA 02478 ( [email protected] ).

Published Online: March 20, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0138

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

See More About

Öngür D. JAMA Psychiatry —The Year in Review, 2023. JAMA Psychiatry. 2024;81(5):435–436. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0138

Manage citations:

© 2024

Artificial Intelligence Resource Center

Psychiatry in JAMA : Read the Latest

Browse and subscribe to JAMA Network podcasts!

Others Also Liked

• Register for email alerts with links to free full-text articles
• Access PDFs of free articles
• Manage your interests
• Save searches and receive search alerts

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Keep up to date with all the top stories and latest evidence with our hub page, including official congress videos and expert takeaways.

Springer Medicine

Current psychiatry reports, current psychiatry reports onlinefirst articles, enhancing brain health and well-being in older adults: innovations in lifestyle interventions, grief as a risk factor for psychosis: a systematic review, eating disorders in sexual and gender minority adolescents, the impact of chronic diseases on mental health: an overview and recommendations for care programs, illness anxiety disorder: a review of the current research and future directions, recent advances in cognitive-behavioural therapy for eating disorders (cbt-ed), writing to keep on living: a systematic review and meta-analysis on creative writing therapy for the management of depression and suicidal ideation, correction to: mechanisms of tactile sensory phenotypes in autism: current understanding and future directions for research, latest issues, current psychiatry reports 6/2024, current psychiatry reports 5/2024, current psychiatry reports 4/2024, current psychiatry reports 3/2024, current psychiatry reports 2/2024, current psychiatry reports 1/2024, current psychiatry reports 12/2023, current psychiatry reports 11/2023, current psychiatry reports 10/2023, current psychiatry reports 9/2023.

scroll for more

use your arrow keys for more

scroll or use arrow keys for more

About this journal

Current Psychiatry Reports provides in-depth review articles contributed by international experts on the most significant developments in the field. By presenting clear, insightful, balanced reviews that emphasize recently published papers of major importance, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of psychiatric disorders.

• Medical Journals
• Webcasts & Webinars
• CME & eLearning
• Newsletters
• ESMO Congress 2023
• 2023 ERS Congress
• ESC Congress 2023
• Advances in Alzheimer’s
• About Springer Medicine
• Diabetology
• Endocrinology
• Gastroenterology
• Geriatrics and Gerontology
• Gynecology and Obstetrics
• Infectious Disease
• Internal Medicine
• Respiratory Medicine
• Rheumatology