Usually first report of a notable issue ,
Their purpose may be descriptive, analytical or both.
Case reports and case series are strictly speaking not studies. However, they serve a useful role in describing new or notable events in detail. These events often warrant further formal investigation. Examples include reports of unexpected benefits or adverse events, such as a case report describing the use of high-dose quetiapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia after intolerance to clozapine developed 9 and a case report of a medication error involving lookalike packaging. 10
Ecological studies are based on analysis of aggregated data at group levels (for example populations), and do not involve data on individuals. These data can be analysed descriptively, but not definitively for causation. Typical examples include studies that examine patterns of drug use over time. One example is the comparison of the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and COX-2 inhibitors in Australia and Canada. 11 Sometimes ecological studies describe associations between drugs and outcomes, such as changes in the rates of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage after the introduction of COX-2 inhibitors. 12 However, because individual-level data are not presented, causality is at best only implied in ecological studies. The 'ecological fallacy' refers to the error of assuming that associations observed in ecological studies are causal when they are not.
Cross-sectional studies collect data at a single point in time for each single individual, but the actual data collection may take place over a period of time or on more than one occasion. There is no longitudinal follow-up of individuals. Cross-sectional studies represent the archetypal descriptive study. 1 Typically, they provide a profile of a population of interest, which may be broad, like the Australian Health Survey undertaken intermittently by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, 13 or focused on specific populations, such as older Australians. 14
Case-control studies focus on determining risk factors for an outcome of interest (such as a disease or a drug’s adverse effect) that has already occurred. 5
Second, data on previous exposure to selected risk factors are collected and compared to see if these risk factors are more (or less) common among cases versus controls. Case-control studies are useful for studying the risk factors of rare outcomes, as there is no need to wait for these to occur. Multiple risk factors can be studied, but each case-control study can involve only one outcome. 5 One example explored the relationship between the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs (risk factor) and the risk of hospitalisation for bleeding (outcome) in older people with a history of stroke. 15 Another case-control study explored the risk factors for the development of flucloxacillin-associated jaundice (outcome). 16
Cohort studies compare outcomes between or among subgroups of participants defined on the basis of whether or not they are exposed to a particular risk or protective factor (defined as an exposure). They provide information on how these exposures are associated with changes in the risk of particular downstream outcomes. Compared to case-control studies, cohort studies take individuals with exposures and look for outcomes, rather than taking those with outcomes and looking for exposures. Cohort studies are longitudinal, that is they involve follow-up of a cohort of participants over time. This follow-up can be prospective or retrospective. Retrospective cohort studies are those for which follow-up has already occurred. They are typically used to estimate the incidence of outcomes of interest, including the adverse effects of drugs.
Cohort studies provide a higher level of evidence of causality than case-control studies because temporality (the explicit time relationship between exposures and outcomes) is preserved. They also have the advantage of not being limited to a single outcome of interest. Their main disadvantage, compared to case-control studies, has been that longitudinal data are more expensive and time-consuming to collect. However, with the availability of electronic data, it has become easier to collect longitudinal data.
One prospective cohort study explored the relationship between the continuous use of antipsychotic drugs (exposure) and mortality (outcome) and hospitalisation (outcome) in older people. 17 In another older cohort, a retrospective study was used to explore the relationship between long-term treatment adherence (exposure) and hospital readmission (outcome). 18
Compared to randomised controlled trials, observational studies are relatively quick, inexpensive and easy to undertake. Observational studies can be much larger than randomised controlled trials so they can explore a rare outcome. They can be undertaken when a randomised controlled trial would be unethical. However, observational studies cannot control for bias and confounding to the extent that clinical trials can. Randomisation in clinical trials remains the best way to control for confounding by ensuring that potential confounders (such as age, sex and comorbidities) are evenly matched between the groups being compared. In observational studies, adjustment for potential confounders can be undertaken, but only for a limited number of confounders, and only those that are known. Randomisation in clinical trials also minimises selection bias, while blinding (masking) controls for information bias. Hence, for questions regarding drug efficacy, randomised controlled trials provide the most robust evidence.
New and upcoming developments
New methods of analysis and advances in technology are changing the way observational studies are performed.
Clinical registries are essentially cohort studies, and are gaining importance as a method to monitor and improve the quality of care. 19 These registries systematically collect a uniform longitudinal dataset to evaluate specific outcomes for a population that is identified by a specific disease, condition or exposure. This allows for the identification of variations in clinical practice 20 and benchmarking across practitioners or institutions. These data can then be used to develop initiatives to improve evidence-based care and patient outcomes. 21
An example of a clinical registry in Australia is the Australian Rheumatology Association Database, 22 which collects data on the biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs used for inflammatory arthritis. Clinical data from treating specialists are combined with patient-reported quality of life data and linked to national databases such as Medicare and the National Death Index. This registry has provided insight into the safety and efficacy of drugs and their effect on quality of life. It was used by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee to assess cost-effectiveness of these drugs. 23
Another example is the Haemostasis Registry. It was used to determine the thromboembolic adverse effects of off-label use of recombinant factor VII. 24
Clinical registries can also be used to undertake clinical trials which are nested within the registry architecture. Patients within a registry are randomised to interventions and comparators of interest. Their outcome data are then collected as part of the routine operation of the registry. The key advantages are convenience, reduced costs and greater representativeness of registry populations as opposed to those of traditional clinical trials.
One of the first registry-based trials was nested within the SWEDEHEART registry. 25 This prospectively examined manual aspiration of thrombus at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention in over 7000 patients. 26 The primary endpoint of all-cause mortality was ascertained through linkage to another Swedish registry. The cost of the trial was estimated to be US$400 000, which was a fraction of the many millions that a randomised controlled trial would have cost.
Even without randomising people within cohorts, methods have emerged in recent years that allow for less biased comparisons of two or more subgroups. Propensity score matching is a way to assemble two or more groups for comparison so that they appear like they had been randomised to an intervention or a comparator. 27 In short, the method involves logistic regression analyses to determine the likelihood (propensity) of each person within a cohort being on the intervention, and then matching people who were on the intervention to those who were not on the basis of propensity scores. Outcomes are then compared between the groups. Propensity score analysis of a large cohort of patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis found that natalizumab was superior to interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in terms of improved outcomes. 28
Increasing sophistication in techniques for data collection will lead to ongoing improvements in the capacity to undertake observational studies (and also clinical trials). Data linkage already offers a convenient way to capture outcomes, including retrospectively. However, ethical considerations must be taken into account, such as the possibility that informed consent might be required before linking data. Machine learning will soon allow for easy analyses of unstructured text (such as free text entries in an electronic prescription). 29 Patient-reported outcome measures are important and in future will be greatly facilitated by standardised, secure hardware and software platforms that allow for their capture, processing and analyses.
While clinical trials remain the best source of evidence regarding the efficacy of drugs, observational studies provide critical descriptive data. Observational studies can also provide information on long-term efficacy and safety that is usually lacking in clinical trials. New and ongoing developments in data and analytical technology offer a promising future for observational studies in pharmaceutical research.
Conflict of interest: Julia Gilmartin-Thomas is a Dementia research development fellow with the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) - Australian Research Council (ARC). Ingrid Hopper is supported by an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship.
Feedback plays an indispensable role in pre-service teachers’ microteaching practice. It provides essential information about their microteaching performance, which is of great significance in their reflection and improvement. As AI and teaching analytics advance, feedback is no longer exclusively human-generated. AI technologies are increasingly capable of delivering feedback on microteaching performance. Yet, the effects of differing feedback types on the microteaching practices of pre-service teachers are not well documented. This study examines the impact of three types of feedback—observation-based, teaching analytics-based, and combined (a combination of both)—on pre-service teachers’ microteaching performance, scope of reflection, perceived usefulness, and satisfaction through an experimental research design. Sixty-five pre-service teachers voluntarily participated and were randomly assigned to three groups: observation-based feedback ( N = 21), teaching analytics-based feedback ( N = 23), and combined feedback ( N = 21). The findings indicate that combined feedback was most effective in enhancing pre-service teachers’ scope of teaching reflection, perceived usefulness of feedback, and satisfaction, but not on microteaching performance. However, when only teaching analytics-based feedback was provided, pre-service teachers perceived it as least useful and were least satisfied. The study discusses the implications of different types of feedback in teacher education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
Ahuja, K., Kim, D., Xhakaj, F., Varga, V., Xie, A., Zhang, S., & Agarwal, Y. (2019). EduSense: Practical classroom sensing at scale. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , 3 (3), 1–26.
Article Google Scholar
Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., van Ginkel, S., Macfadyen, L. P., & Biemans, H. J. (2022). A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education. Educational Research Review , 37 , 100489.
Bardach, L., Klassen, R. M., Durksen, T. L., Rushby, J. V., Bostwick, K. C., & Sheridan, L. (2021). The power of feedback and reflection: Testing an online scenario-based learning intervention for student teachers. Computers & Education , 169 , 104194.
Bollenbach, J., Halbrügge, S., Wederhake, L., Weibelzahl, M., & Wolf, L. (2024). Customer satisfaction at large charging parks: Expectation-disconfirmation theory for fast charging. Applied Energy , 365 , 122735.
Buczynski, S., & Hansen, C. B. (2010). Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connections. Teaching and Teacher Education , 26 (3), 599–607.
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 43 (8), 1315–1325.
Cavalcanti, A. P., Barbosa, A., Carvalho, R., Freitas, F., Tsai, Y. S., Gašević, D., & Mello, R. F. (2021). Automatic feedback in online learning environments: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence , 2 , 100027.
Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, S. (2022). Microteaching: Theoretical origins and practice. Educational Practice and Theory , 44 (1), 23–40.
Chan, C. K., & Lee, K. K. (2021). Reflection literacy: A multilevel perspective on the challenges of using reflections in higher education through a comprehensive literature review. Educational Research Review , 32 , 100376.
Chen, Z., Li, J., Liu, H., Wang, X., Wang, H., & Zheng, Q. (2023). Learning multi-scale features for speech emotion recognition with connection attention mechanism. Expert Systems with Applications, 214 , 118943.
Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Fink, M. C., Timothy, V., Seidel, T., Fischer, F., & DFG Research group COSIMA. (2020). Facilitating diagnostic competences in higher education—a meta-analysis in medical and teacher education. Educational Psychology Review , 32 , 157–196.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Daltoè, T., Ruth-Herbein, E., Brucker, B., Jaekel, A. K., Trautwein, U., Fauth, B., & Göllner, R. (2024). Immersive insights: Unveiling the impact of 360-degree videos on preservice teachers’ classroom observation experiences and teaching-quality ratings. Computers & Education , 213 , 104976.
Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019). What makes for effective feedback: Staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 44 (1), 25–36.
Demszky, D., Liu, J., Hill, H. C., Jurafsky, D., & Piech, C. (2023). Can automated feedback improve teachers’ uptake of student ideas? Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in a large-scale online course (p. 01623737231169270). Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.
Floman, J. L., Hagelskamp, C., Brackett, M. A., & Rivers, S. E. (2017). Emotional bias in classroom observations: Within-rater positive emotion predicts favorable assessments of classroom quality. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment , 35 (3), 291–301.
Fong, C. J., Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., & Stautberg, S. (2019). A meta-analysis of negative feedback on intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology Review , 31 , 121–162.
Fougnie, D., & Marois, R. (2006). Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms. Psychological Science , 17 (6), 526–534.
Garino, A. (2020). Ready, willing and able: A model to explain successful use of feedback. Advances in Health Sciences Education , 25 (2), 337–361.
Garvey, B. (1978). Microteaching: Developing the concept for practical training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 9 (2), 142–149.
Goldberg, P., Sümer, Ö., Stürmer, K., Wagner, W., Göllner, R., Gerjets, P., & Trautwein, U. (2021). Attentive or not? Toward a machine learning approach to assessing students’ visible engagement in classroom instruction. Educational Psychology Review , 33 , 27–49.
Grainger, P. (2020). How do pre-service teacher education students respond to assessment feedback? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 45 (7), 913–925.
Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2014). The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: The role of feedback’s perceived usefulness. Educational Psychology , 34 (3), 269–290.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research , 77 (1), 81–112.
Heitzmann, N., Fischer, F., & Fischer, M. R. (2018). Worked examples with errors: When self-explanation prompts hinder learning of teachers diagnostic competences on problem-based learning. Instructional Science , 46 , 245–271.
Hoban, G. (2000). Making practice problematic: Listening to student interviews as a catalyst for teacher reflection. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education , 28 (2), 133–147.
Hoban, G., & Hastings, G. (2006). Developing different forms of student feedback to promote teacher reflection: A 10-year collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education , 22 (8), 1006–1019.
Huang, Y., Richter, E., Kleickmann, T., Wiepke, A., & Richter, D. (2021). Classroom complexity affects student teachers’ behavior in a VR classroom. Computers & Education , 163 , 104100.
Hussain, B., Riaz, A., & Shahzadi, U. (2019). Quantity of feedback provision: University students’ perceptions from gender perspectives and association with achievement. Review of Education Administration & Law , 2 (1), 1–9.
Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology , 64 (4), 349.
Ion, G., Sánchez Martí, A., & Agud Morell, I. (2019). Giving or receiving feedback: Which is more beneficial to students’ learning? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 44 (1), 124–138.
Jacobs, J., Scornavacco, K., Clevenger, C., Suresh, A., & Sumner, T. (2024). Automated feedback on discourse moves: Teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning tool. Educational Technology Research and Development , 1–23.
Jacobs, J., Scornavacco, K., Harty, C., Suresh, A., Lai, V., & Sumner, T. (2022). Promoting rich discussions in mathematics classrooms: Using personalized, automated feedback to support reflection and instructional change. Teaching and Teacher Education , 112 , 103631.
Jiao, R., Wang, G., & Liu, L. (2010). The development of the vocational maturity questionnaire for pre-service teachers. Psychological Development and Education , (2), 183–188.
Johnson, M. (2016). Feedback effectiveness in professional learning contexts. Review of Education , 4 (2), 195–229.
King, P. E., Schrodt, P., & Weisel, J. J. (2009). The instructional feedback orientation scale: Conceptualizing and validating a new measure for assessing perceptions of instructional feedback. Communication Education , 58 (2), 235–261.
Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. Berrett-Koehler Publisher s.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin , 119 (2), 254.
Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education , 19 (2), 149–170.
Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 50 (2), 212–247.
Link, S., Mehrzad, M., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement. Computer Assisted Language Learning , 35 (4), 605–634.
Lipnevich, A. A., & Panadero, E. (2021). December). A review of feedback models and theories: Descriptions, definitions, and conclusions. Frontiers in Education , 6 , 720195.
Marcos, J. J. M., & Tillema, H. (2006). Studying studies on teacher reflection and action: An appraisal of research contributions. Educational Research Review , 1 (2), 112–132.
Mayordomo, R. M., Espasa, A., Guasch, T., & Martínez-Melo, M. (2022). Perception of online feedback and its impact on cognitive and emotional engagement with feedback. Education and Information Technologies , 27 (6), 7947–7971.
McGarr, O. (2021). The use of virtual simulations in teacher education to develop pre-service teachers’ behaviour and classroom management skills: Implications for reflective practice. Journal of Education for Teaching , 47 (2), 274–286.
Mohamed, M., Rashid, R. A., & Alqaryouti, M. H. (2022). Conceptualizing the complexity of reflective practice in education. Frontiers in Psychology , 13 , 1008234.
Nagro, S. A. (2020). Reflecting on others before reflecting on self: Using video evidence to guide teacher candidates’ reflective practices. Journal of Teacher Education , 71 (4), 420–433.
Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, van J. J. G. Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 125–144). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Narciss, S. (2013). Designing and evaluating tutoring feedback strategies for digital learning. Digital Education Review , 23 , 7–26.
Ndukwe, I. G., & Daniel, B. K. (2020). Teaching analytics, value and tools for teacher data literacy: A systematic and tripartite approach. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education , 17 , 1–31.
Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37 , 375–401.
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B. P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies , 28 (4), 4221–4241.
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review , 9 , 129–144.
Parsons, M., & Stephenson, M. (2005). Developing reflective practice in student teachers: Collaboration and critical partnerships. Teachers and Teaching , 11 , 116–195.
Patra, I., Alazemi, A., Al-Jamal, D., & Gheisari, A. (2022). The effectiveness of teachers’ written and verbal corrective feedback (CF) during formative assessment (FA) on male language learners’ academic anxiety (AA), academic performance (AP), and attitude toward learning (ATL). Language Testing in Asia , 12 (1), 1–21.
Perlberg, A. (1970). Microteaching: A new procedure to improve teaching and training. British Journal of Educational Technology , 1 (1), 35–43.
Pourdana, N., Nour, P., & Yousefi, F. (2021). Investigating metalinguistic written corrective feedback focused on EFL learners’ discourse markers accuracy in mobile-mediated context. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education , 6 , 1–18.
Prilop, C. N., Weber, K. E., & Kleinknecht, M. (2020). Effects of digital video-based feedback environments on pre-service teachers’ feedback competence. Computers in Human Behavior , 102 , 120–131.
Prilop, C. N., Weber, K. E., & Kleinknecht, M. (2021). The role of expert feedback in the development of pre-service teachers’ professional vision of classroom management in an online blended learning environment. Teaching and Teacher Education , 99 , 103276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103276
Quddus, L., Khalid, M., & Khan, W. A., M (2019). Teachers’ self-assessment of their teaching effectiveness at higher secondary level in Pakistan: A case study. KnE Social Sciences , 3 (22), 807–817.
Rakoczy, K., Pinger, P., Hochweber, J., Klieme, E., Schütze, B., & Besser, M. (2019). Formative assessment in mathematics: Mediated by feedback’s perceived usefulness and students’ self-efficacy. Learning and Instruction , 60 , 154–165.
Ryan, T., Henderson, M., Ryan, K., & Kennedy, G. (2023). Identifying the components of effective learner-centred feedback information. Teaching in Higher Education , 28 (7), 1565–1582.
Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education , 101 , 103305.
Scheeler, M. C., Ruhl, K. L., & McAfee, J. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education , 27 (4), 396–407.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass .
Sergis, S., & Sampson, D. G. (2017). Teaching and learning analytics to support teacher inquiry: A systematic literature review. Learning Analytics: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends: A View of the Current State of the Art to Enhance e-Learning , 25–63.
Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Gillet, D., Pelliccione, L., & de Jong, T. (2019). Using educational data from teaching and learning to inform teachers’ reflective educational design in inquiry-based STEM education. Computers in Human Behavior , 92 , 724–738.
Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction , 20 (4), 291–303.
Suraworachet, W., Zhou, Q., & Cukurova, M. (2023). Impact of combining human and analytics feedback on students’ engagement with, and performance in, reflective writing tasks. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education , 20 (1), 1–24.
Tang, J., Zhang, P., & Zhang, J. (2023). Design and implementation of intelligent evaluation system based on pattern recognition for microteaching skills training. International Journal of Innovative Computing Information and Control , 1 (19), 153–162.
Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2013). Understanding feedback: A learning theory perspective. Educational Research Review , 9 , 1–15.
Tian Lan, Z., Zhizhen, Chen, & Yujiao (2015). A study on the Effect of Video in promoting pre-service teachers’ reflection on Microteaching. Modern Educational Technology , 10 , 54–60. (In Chinese).
Van de Ridder, J. M., Peters, C. M., Stokking, K. M., de Ru, J. A., & Ten Cate, O. T. J. (2015). Framing of feedback impacts student’s satisfaction, self-efficacy and performance. Advances in Health Sciences Education , 20 , 803–816.
Van der Kleij, F. M., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2021). Student perceptions of assessment feedback: A critical scoping review and call for research. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability , 33 , 345–373.
Wang, M., Luo, L., Chen, Z., Zheng, Q., Li, J., & Gao, W. (2022, December). Intelligent multimodal analysis framework for teacher-student interaction. In IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Education and Intelligent Research (IEIR) (pp. 65–70).
Wang, Y. S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management , 41 (1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-7206(03)00028-4
Wang, Z., & Han, F. (2022). The effects of teacher feedback and automated feedback on cognitive and psychological aspects of foreign language writing: A mixed-methods research. Frontiers in Psychology , 13 , 909802.
Warner, R., & Miller, J. (2015). Cultural dimensions of feedback at an Australian university: A study of international students with English as an additional language. Higher Education Research & Development , 34 (2), 420–435.
Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 31 (3), 379–394.
Weng, X., Ng, O. L., & Chiu, T. K. (2023). Competency development of pre-service teachers during video-based learning: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Computers & Education , 199 , 104790.
Winstone, N., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Heron, M. (2022). From feedback-as-information to feedback-as-process: A linguistic analysis of the feedback literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 47 (2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1902467
Yu Guoliang, X., Tao, & Shen Joliang. (1995). Teachers’ teaching efficacy: A study on its structure and influencing factors. Journal of Psychology (02). (In Chinese).
Zhang, Y., Chen, H., Pi, Z., & Yang, J. (2024). Interactive equality in peer assessment: The impacts on preservice teachers’ technology-enhanced learning design and feedback uptake. Teaching and Teacher Education , 138 , 104408.
Zheng, Q., Chen, Z., Wang, M., Shi, Y., Chen, S., & Liu, Z. (2024). Automated multi-mode teaching behavior analysis: A pipeline based event segmentation and description. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17 , 1717–1733.
Zhou, L., Gao, Y., Hu, J., Tu, X., & Zhang, X. (2022). Effects of perceived teacher support on motivation and engagement amongst Chinese college students: Need satisfaction as the mediator. Frontiers in Psychology , 13 , 949495.
Download references
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all the colleagues, teachers, and pre-service teachers who participated in this study.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 62077022), Central China Normal University (Project No. CCNU24ai013), the Postgraduate Education Innovation Funding Project of Central China Normal University (Project No. 30106230470), and the China Scholarship Council (CSC202306770066).
Authors and affiliations.
Faculty of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430079, China
Mengke Wang, Taotao Long, Yawen Shi & Zengzhao Chen
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430079, China
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Zengzhao Chen .
Ethics approval.
The study involving participants was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Central China Normal University.
Participants were volunteers who signed a written informed consent form. They had the right to withdraw from the study at any point. Finally, personal information and other data were desensitized.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of financial or non-financial interests to report. This research has no conflicts of interest.
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Microteaching performance evaluation
Microteaching Performance Evaluation | ||
---|---|---|
Dimension | Content | Score |
Teaching objective | Objectives are clearly defined, aligning with curriculum standards and students’ actual needs. | 3 |
Teaching content | Key concepts are clearly articulated; Difficult topics are appropriately addressed. Attention is paid to students’ existing knowledge and experiences, with a focus on skills development.Classroom interaction is emphasized, and knowledge is accurately explained. | 5 |
Teaching methods | The instructional content is processed in line with the philosophy of the new curriculum standards, effectively implementing teaching objectives. Approaches to autonomous, inquiry-based, and collaborative learning are highlighted, reflecting diverse learning methods and enabling effective teacher-student interaction. | 7 |
Teaching process | Overall instructional planning is logical, with well-organized phases and clear structure. Textbooks are used creatively; distinctive teaching features are emphasized. Multimedia materials are used appropriately to supplement instruction, and teaching demonstrations are standardized. | 7 |
Teaching quality | The teacher displays a natural and friendly demeanour, appropriate conduct, and pays attention to eye contact. Instructional language is standard, precise, lively, and concise. | 4 |
Teaching effectiveness | Teaching tasks are completed on time, with a high level of objective achievement. | 4 |
Teaching innovation | The teaching process is creative; textbooks are used innovatively. Teaching methods are flexible and diverse, with distinctive features. | 5 |
Blackboard content alignment | Blackboard writing reflects the intent of the teaching design, emphasizing key and difficult points and successfully engaging student initiative and enthusiasm. | 4 |
Blackboard composition | Blackboard writing designs are clever and creative, with natural layouts and visually intuitive illustrations that significantly assist the teaching process. | 4 |
Blackboard writing | Blackboard writing is quick and smooth, with appropriately sized and shaped characters, a clear and neat presentation, and a standard and aesthetically pleasing appearance. | 2 |
| 45 |
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
Wang, M., Long, T., Li, N. et al. The impact of different types of feedback on pre-service teachers’ microteaching practice and perceptions. Educ Inf Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13024-z
Download citation
Received : 08 June 2024
Accepted : 26 August 2024
Published : 13 September 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13024-z
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Revised on June 22, 2023. An observational study is used to answer a research question based purely on what the researcher observes. There is no interference or manipulation of the research subjects, and no control and treatment groups. These studies are often qualitative in nature and can be used for both exploratory and explanatory research ...
Observational Research. Definition: Observational research is a type of research method where the researcher observes and records the behavior of individuals or groups in their natural environment. In other words, the researcher does not intervene or manipulate any variables but simply observes and describes what is happening.
The observation method in psychology involves directly and systematically witnessing and recording measurable behaviors, actions, and responses in natural or contrived settings without attempting to intervene or manipulate what is being observed. Used to describe phenomena, generate hypotheses, or validate self-reports, psychological observation can be either controlled or naturalistic with ...
This is a type of observation research that is employed mostly in psychological research and in the field of marketing. Controlled observation serves as an exception to the non-experimental criterion of observational research, for this method observes behaviour in a controlled laboratory setting. An 'un-controlled observation' simply ...
Observational research is a social research technique that involves the direct observation of phenomena in their natural setting. An observational study is a non-experimental method to examine how research participants behave. Observational research is typically associated with qualitative methods, where the data ultimately require some ...
Naturalistic observation is one of the research methods that can be used for an observational study design. Another common type of observation is the controlled observation . In this case, the researcher observes the participant in a controlled environment (e.g., a lab).
Revised on 20 March 2023. An observational study is used to answer a research question based purely on what the researcher observes. There is no interference or manipulation of the research subjects, and no control and treatment groups. These studies are often qualitative in nature and can be used for both exploratory and explanatory research ...
Qualitative observation is a type of observational study, often used in conjunction with other types of research through triangulation. It is often used in fields like social sciences, education, healthcare, marketing, and design. This type of study is especially well suited for gaining rich and detailed insights into complex and/or subjective ...
Health research study designs benefit from observations of behaviors and contexts. •. Direct observation methods have a long history in the social sciences. •. Social science approaches should be adapted for health researchers' unique needs. •. Health research observations should be feasible, well-defined and piloted.
Naturalistic observation is an observational method that involves observing people's behavior in the environment in which it typically occurs. Thus naturalistic observation is a type of field research (as opposed to a type of laboratory research). Jane Goodall's famous research on chimpanzees is a classic example of naturalistic observation ...
Observational research is a method of collecting data by simply observing and recording the behavior of individuals, animals or objects in their natural environment. It offers researchers insights into human and animal behavior, revealing patterns and dynamics that would otherwise go unnoticed. This article explores the definition, types ...
Observational research is a broad term for various non-experimental studies in which behavior is carefully watched and recorded. The goal of this research is to describe a variable or a set of variables. More broadly, the goal is to capture specific individual, group, or setting characteristics. Since it is non-experimental and uncontrolled, we ...
There are seven types of observational studies. Researchers might choose to use one type of observational study or combine any of these multiple observational study approaches: 1. Cross-sectional studies. Cross-sectional studies happen when researchers observe their chosen subject at one particular point in time.
Naturalistic observation is an observational method that involves observing people's behavior in the environment in which it typically occurs. Thus naturalistic observation is a type of field research (as opposed to a type of laboratory research). Jane Goodall's famous research on chimpanzees is a classic example of naturalistic observation ...
2.1 Introduction. Observation is one of the most important research methods in social sci-. ences and at the same time one of the most diverse. e term includes. several types, techniques, and ...
A way to gather data by watching people, events, or noting physical characteristics in their natural setting. Observations can be overt (subjects know they are being observed) or covert (do not know they are being watched). Participant Observation. Researcher becomes a participant in the culture or context being observed.
4. Complete Participant. This is a fully embedded researcher, almost like a spy. Here the observer fully engages with the participants and partakes in their activities. Participants aren't aware that observation and research is being conducted, even though they fully interact with the researcher.
Observation in qualitative research "is one of the oldest and most fundamental research methods approaches. This approach involves collecting data using one's senses, especially looking and listening in a systematic and meaningful way" (McKechnie, 2008, p. 573).Similarly, Adler and Adler (1994) characterized observations as the "fundamental base of all research methods" in the social ...
Observation. Observation, as the name implies, is a way of collecting data through observing. This data collection method is classified as a participatory study, because the researcher has to immerse herself in the setting where her respondents are, while taking notes and/or recording. Observation data collection method may involve watching ...
Let's take a closer look at the different types of observational study design. The 3 types of Observational Studies. The different types of observational studies are used for different reasons. Selecting the best type for your research is critical to a successful outcome. One of the main reasons observational studies are used is when a ...
When to use participant observation. Participant observation is a type of observational study.Like most observational studies, these are primarily qualitative in nature, used to conduct both explanatory research and exploratory research.Participant observation is also often used in conjunction with other types of research, like interviews and surveys. ...
Introduction. Observational studies involve the study of participants without any forced change to their circumstances, that is, without any intervention.1 Although the participants' behaviour may change under observation, the intent of observational studies is to investigate the 'natural' state of risk factors, diseases or outcomes. For drug therapy, a group of people taking the drug ...
This study examines the impact of three types of feedback—observation-based, teaching analytics-based, and combined (a combination of both)—on pre-service teachers' microteaching performance, scope of reflection, perceived usefulness, and satisfaction through an experimental research design. ... and satisfaction through an experimental ...