quantitative research methods in hindi

• Shipping & Delivery Policy
• Cancellation & Refund Policy
• Terms & Conditions
• Privacy Policy

Social Link

Computerguidehindi -India's No-1 Computer Educational Website

• सभी पोस्ट देखें
• कंप्यूटर गाइड
• मोबाइल रिपेयरिंग
• रोचक जानकारी
• टिप्स
• वेब डिजाईन सेवा
• वैज्ञानिक नाम
• नेटवर्किंग
• अनसुलझे प्रश्नों के जवाब

Quantitative research क्या है?

मात्रात्मक अनुसंधान क्या है [what is quantitative research in hindi], मात्रात्मक अनुसंधान विशेषताएँ [quantitative research characteristics].

• संरचित उपकरण (Structured tools): मात्रात्मक डेटा एकत्र करने के लिए सर्वेक्षण, चुनाव या प्रश्नावली जैसे संरचित उपकरण का उपयोग किया जाता है। इस तरह के संरचित तरीकों का उपयोग सर्वेक्षण उत्तरदाताओं से गहन और कार्रवाई योग्य डेटा एकत्र करने में मदद करता है।
• नमूना आकार (Sample size): Quantitative research एक महत्वपूर्ण नमूना आकार पर आयोजित किया जाता है जो लक्ष्य बाजार का प्रतिनिधित्व करता है। अनुसंधान के उद्देश्य को सुदृढ़ करने के लिए नमूना प्राप्त करते समय उपयुक्त नमूनाकरण विधियों का उपयोग किया जाना चाहिए
• क्लोज्ड एंडेड प्रश्न (Close-ended questions): क्लोज एंडेड प्रश्न शोध के उद्देश्य के अनुसार बनाए जाते हैं। ये प्रश्न मात्रात्मक डेटा एकत्र करने में मदद करते हैं और इसलिए, मात्रात्मक शोध में व्यापक रूप से उपयोग किए जाते हैं।
• पूर्व अध्ययन (Prior Studies): उत्तरदाताओं से प्रतिक्रिया एकत्र करने से पहले शोध विषय से संबंधित विभिन्न कारकों का अध्ययन किया जाता है।  मेटा ने और 10,000 नौकरियों में कटौती की
• मात्रात्मक डेटा (Quantitative data): आमतौर पर, मात्रात्मक डेटा को टेबल, चार्ट, ग्राफ़ या किसी अन्य गैर-संख्यात्मक रूप द्वारा दर्शाया जाता है। इससे एकत्र किए गए डेटा को समझना आसान हो जाता है और साथ ही बाजार अनुसंधान की वैधता भी साबित होती है।
• परिणामों का सामान्यीकरण (Generalization of results): सुधार के लिए उचित कार्रवाई करने के लिए इस शोध पद्धति के परिणामों को पूरी आबादी के लिए सामान्यीकृत किया जा सकता है।

मात्रात्मक अनुसंधान का उद्देश्य क्या है? [What is the purpose of quantitative research?]

Post a Comment

Your Comment Will be Show after Approval , Thanks

Subscribe for our all latest News and Updates

Enter your email address:

Experience Teachmint X - AI driven Interactive Flat Panels and Smart Boards

More from Mukesh singh

Recommended content, learn from anywhere on any device.

Top Leader by G2

Top Performer by SourceForge

Top Leader by SoftwareSuggest

Ranked Amongst Top 25 Companies by LinkedIn

ISO27001 Certified

Most Preferred Workplace

We use cookies to enhance site navigation and analyse usage, read our Privacy Policy for more.

मात्रात्मक एवं गुणात्मक मापन में अंतर | difference between quantitative and qualitative measurement in hindi 

बीटीसी एवं सुपरटेट की परीक्षा में शामिल शिक्षण कौशल के विषय शैक्षिक मूल्यांकन क्रियात्मक शोध एवं नवाचार में सम्मिलित चैप्टर मात्रात्मक एवं गुणात्मक मापन में अंतर | difference between quantitative and qualitative measurement in hindi आज हमारी वेबसाइट hindiamrit.com का टॉपिक हैं।

मात्रात्मक एवं गुणात्मक मापन में अंतर | difference between quantitative and qualitative measurement in hindi

Tags  –  गुणात्मक और मात्रात्मक माप के बीच अंतर,गुणात्मक और मात्रात्मक के बीच का अंतर,difference between qualitative and quantitative, measurement in hindi,मात्रात्मक एवं गुणात्मक मापन में अंतर

मात्रात्मक/परिमाणात्मक एवं गुणात्मक मापन में अंतर | difference between quantitative and qualitative measurement in hindi

गुणात्मक और परिमाणात्मक/मात्रात्मक मापन के अन्तर को निम्नलिखित रूप में किया गया है–

आपके लिए महत्वपूर्ण लिंक

टेट / सुपरटेट सम्पूर्ण हिंदी कोर्स

टेट / सुपरटेट सम्पूर्ण बाल मनोविज्ञान कोर्स

50 मुख्य टॉपिक पर  निबंध पढ़िए

अब टाइम टेबल से नही TO DO लिस्ट बनाकर पढ़ाई करे।

आपको यह टॉपिक कैसा लगा हमे कॉमेंट करके जरूर बताइए । और इस टॉपिक को अपने मित्रों के साथ शेयर भी कीजिये ।

Tags – गुणात्मक और मात्रात्मक माप के बीच अंतर,गुणात्मक और मात्रात्मक के बीच का अंतर,difference between qualitative and quantitative, measurement in hindi,

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

गुणात्मक एवं मात्रात्मक मापन में अन्तर

अनुक्रम (Contents)

गुणात्मक एवं मात्रात्मक मापन में अन्तर (Difference between Qualitative and Quantitative Measurement)

गुणात्मक एवं मात्रात्मक मापन (Qualitative and Quantitative Measuremenet)- वर्तमान समय में भौतिक तथा सामाजिक दोनों प्रकार के विज्ञानों की मानव जीवन को आवश्यकता होती है। सामाजिक विज्ञानों में, जिनमें शिक्षा और मोविज्ञान भी सम्मिलित है, मापन भौतिक तथा स्थूल न होकर सूक्ष्म तथा गुणात्मक होते हैं और इनका मापन निश्चित एवं निर्दिष्ट इकाइयों में नहीं हो सकता है। अतः सामाजिक विज्ञानों का मापन गुणात्कम (Qualitative) होता है। इसके विपरीत भौतिक विज्ञानों के तथ्य स्थूल होते हैं, उन्हें भौतिक रूप से मापा जा सकता है। अतः भौतिक विज्ञान के माप परिणात्मक (Quantitative) होते हैं परिमाणात्मक मापन को मात्रात्मक मापन भी कहकर सम्बोधित करते हैं।

1. गुणात्मक मापन (Qualitative Measurement)

किसी वस्तु, प्राणी, घटना अथवा क्रिया की विशेषता को गुणों के रूप में देखने-समझने को गुणात्मक मापन कहते है। शिक्षा और मानोविज्ञान के क्षेत्र में मापन का सम्बन्ध मानसिक मापन से होता है। यह एक जटिल कार्य है क्योंकि इस मापन में व्यवहार का मापन किया जाता है। मानव व्यवहार परिस्थिति एवं उद्दीपक के साथ परिवर्तित होता रहता है। अतः मानसिक मापन का स्वरूप निश्चित नहीं हो सकता है। इसके अन्तर्गत आत्मनिष्ठता का गुण पाया जाता है और साथ-साथ वस्तु और घटना के सम्बन्ध में व्यक्ति की राय भी सम्मिलित होती है। यदि हमें किसी अध्यापक के कार्य की प्रभावशीलता का मापन करना हो या किसी के द्वारा बनायी गयी पेंटिंग के विषय में निर्णय देना हो तो किसी मानक को आधार बनना पड़ता है । उक्त निर्धारित मानक की सत्ता मूल्यांकनकर्त्ता के मन में ही रहती है। मूल्यांकनकर्त्ता द्वारा निर्धारित मानक आवश्यक नहीं है कि वह सर्वमान्य एवं उचित ही हो। उदाहरणार्थ एक छात्र द्वारा विज्ञान विषय के निबन्धात्मक प्रश्न के दिए गये उत्तर का मूल्यांकन उसकी विषय वस्तु, मौलिक चिन्तन, भाषा, व्याकरण या शब्दों की संख्या आदि के आधार पर जा सकता है और उसी के तदनुसार उसे अंक प्रदान किया जा सकता है। विद्यार्थी से प्राप्त उत्तर में किस तरह की विषय वस्तु, मौलिक चिन्तन, भाषा व्याकरण शब्दों की संख्या की आशा की जानी चाहिए इसका कोई निश्चित निर्धारित आदर्श नहीं होता है जिसके फलस्वरूप यह मूल्यांकनकर्ता के मन में स्थित मानक पर निर्भर है। संक्षिप्त रूप में गुणात्मक मापन की निम्न विशेषताएँ हैं—

• गुणात्मक मापन का आधार प्रायः मानदण्ड (Norms) होते हैं। जो सामान्य वितरण में औसत निष्पादन (Average Performance) के आधार पर प्राप्त किए जाते है।
• गुणात्मक मापन के मानदण्ड प्रायः सर्वमान्य नहीं होते हैं यदि एक बालक किसी शिक्षक की नजर में उत्तम बालक का दर्जा प्राप्त करता है तो यह आवश्यक नहीं है। कि अन्य शिक्षकों की नजर में भी इस श्रेणी (उत्तम) को प्राप्त करें। अतः गुणात्मक मापन निश्चित परिमाण की ओर संकेत नहीं करते हैं।
• गुणात्मक मापन में शून्य की स्थिति नहीं होती है जैसे- किसी बच्चे में, शैक्षिक लब्धि का पता लगाना हो या बुद्धिलब्धि का कोई शून्य बिन्दु नहीं होगा । यदि बच्चे की शैक्षिक लब्धि या बद्धि लब्धि शून्य दर्शा दी भी गई हो तो वास्तविकता से परे है।
• गुणात्मक मापन में इकाइयों का सम्बन्ध निरपेक्ष न होकर सापेक्ष होता है यदि एक बालक का गणित में प्राप्तांक 60 तथा दूसरे बालक का 30 है तो इससे यह अर्थ कदापि नहीं निकलता कि पहले बालक में, दूसरे बालक की अपेक्षा गणित में दुगना ज्ञान है।
• गुणात्मक मापन कभी भी शत प्रतिशत नहीं किया जा सकता है। जैसे-किसी बच्चे की नैतिकता का मापन शत प्रतिशत संभव नहीं है।
• गुणात्मक मापन परिवर्तनशील होते हैं क्योंकि यह मानसिक मापन गुणात्मक मापन का रूप होता है।

2. परिमाणात्मक या मात्रात्मक मापन (Quantitative Measurement)

परिमाणात्मक मापन का अर्थ भली-भाँति जानने हेतु ‘परिणाम’ का अर्थ जानना आवश्यक होता है। ‘परिमाण’ का अभिप्राय ऐसी कोई वस्तु जिसकी भौतिक जगत में सत्ता हो, जिसे देखा जा सकें और उसकी उपस्थिति या अनुपस्थिति को अनुभूत किया जा सके। इस प्रकार भौतिक मापन को परिणात्मक मापन की निम्नलिखित विशेषताएँ हैं-

• परिमाणात्मक मापन का आधार सदैव इकाई अंक होते है। इकाई का अर्थ होता है – शून्य बिन्दु से ऊपर एक निश्चित मूल्य का होना। जैसे 12 फीट का तात्पर्य 0 से ऊपर 12 फीट।
• परिमाणात्मक मापन में प्रयुक्त यंत्र पर समान इकाइयाँ समान परिणाम हो व्यक्त करती है। जैसे मीटर पैमाने पर अंकित से० मी० बराबर दूरी पर होते हैं और एक किलोमीटर के सभी मीटर समान दूरी पर होते है।
• परिमाणात्मकं मापन की विवेचना की कोई विशेष आवश्यकता नहीं होती है क्योंकि वह स्वयं में अर्थयुक्त होता है।
• परिमाणात्मक मापन में गणितीय सम्बन्ध पाया जाता है क्योंकि वह इकाई पर आधारित होता हैं। परिमाणामात्मक मापन शत् प्रतिशत संभव है। जैसे किसी बालक का भार शत् प्रतिशत इकाई में व्यक्त किया जा सकता है।
• परिमाणात्मक मापन स्थिर एवं निरपेक्ष रहता है। यह आत्मनिष्ठा न होकर वस्तुनिष्ठ होता है मूल्यांकनकर्त्ताओं द्वारा निबन्धात्मक प्रश्न के उत्तर मूल्यांकन में विभिन्न अंक प्रदान किया जाता है। जबकि बोरे में रखी चावल की तौल, चाहे जितने व्यक्ति तौले एक समान ही रहेगी।
• परिमाणात्मक मापन में परिशुद्धता अधिक पाई जाती है जिसके आधार पर भविष्य कथन भी अधिक विश्वास के साथ किया जाता है।

गुणात्मक और परिमाणात्मक मापन में अन्तर (Difference between Qualitative and Quantitative Measurement)

गुणात्मक और परिमाणात्मक मापन में निम्नलिखित अन्तर पाए जाते हैं-

1. गुणात्मक मापन का शून्य से सम्बन्ध नहीं होता है। यदि इसमें मूल्यांकनकर्ता द्वारा शून्य प्रदान भी कर दिया जाता है तो वह अर्थहीन होता है। किसी बालक की शैक्षिक उपलब्धि के मापने के क्रम में शून्य अंक प्रदान किया जाए तो इसका अर्थ कदापि नहीं है कि उस बालक की शैक्षिक उपलब्धि शून्य है। जबकि परिमाणात्मक मापन का आधार शून्य. (0) होता है; जैसे-यदि किसी बालक का भार 50 किग्रा है तो इसका अर्थ इसका भार शून्य (0) से 50 किग्रा अधिक है।

2. गुणात्मक मापन की इकाइयाँ पूर्ण निर्दिष्ट एवं निश्चित नहीं होती है जबकि परिमाणात्मक मापन की इकाइयाँ पूर्ण निर्दिष्ट एवं निश्चित होती हैं; जैसे-6 मीटर और 7 मीटर में जो अन्तर विद्यमान होता है वह 6 तथा 7 प्राप्तांक में नहीं।

3. गुणात्मक मापन शत् प्रतिशत संभव नहीं है जबकि परिमाणात्मक मापन शत् प्रतिशत संभव होता है; जैसे बालक की रुचि का मापन शत् प्रतिशत संभव नहीं है जबकि बालक का भार शत् प्रतिशत मापा जा सकता है।

4. गुणात्मक मापन में दो विभिन्न मापों की परस्पर तुलना करना कठिन होता है जबकि परिमाणात्मक मापन में यह कार्य आसानी से किया जा सकता है।

5. गुणात्मक मापन के अर्थ स्पष्टीकरण हेतु विवेचना या व्याख्या की आवश्यकता होती. है जबकि परिमाणात्मक मापन अपने आप में पूर्ण होता है। अतः अर्थ स्पष्टीकरण हेतु विवेचना या व्याख्या की आवश्यकता नहीं। यदि किसी कपड़े की माप 5 मीटर है तो यह माप अपने आप में पूर्ण है जबकि यदि किसी बालक की बुद्धिलब्धि 110 है तो अपने आप में पूर्ण नहीं है।

6. गुणात्मक मापन में वस्तुनिष्ठ (Objectivity) नहीं पाई जाती है क्योंकि ये आत्मनिष्ठा (Subjective) होते हैं, जबकि दूसरी और परिमाणात्मक मापन में वस्तुनिष्ठता पाई जाती है क्योंकि ये आत्मनिष्ठा नहीं होते है। यदि किसी बुद्धिलब्धि परीक्षण में किसी छात्र की बुद्धिलब्धि 100 प्राप्त होती है तो यह आवश्यक नहीं है कि दूसरे बुद्धि परीक्षण में भी बुद्धिलब्धि अंक समान प्राप्त हो, जबकि यदि किसी बालक का भार 50 कि० ग्रा० है तो पुनः बार-बार पर समान भार ही प्राप्त होगा।

7. गुणात्मक मापन की अपेक्षा परिमाणात्मक मापन कम परिवर्तनशील होते हैं।

• परीक्षण की वैधता से आप क्या समझते हैं? वैधता के प्रकार एवं वैधता ज्ञात करने की विधियाँ

इसे भी पढ़े…

• पाठ्यचर्या विकास की प्रक्रिया
• पाठ्यचर्या निर्माण के लिए शिक्षा के उद्देश्य
• पाठ्यक्रम निर्माण के सिद्धान्त
• पाठ्यक्रम निर्माण के सामाजिक सिद्धान्त
• पाठ्यक्रम के प्रमुख निर्धारक
• पाठ्यक्रम विकास के मुख्य प्रसंग
• मानसिक मंदता से सम्बद्ध समस्याएँ
• विकलांगजन अधिनियम 1995
• सक्षम निःशक्तजनों का राष्ट्रीय संगठन
• मानसिक मंदित बालकों की पहचान
• शिक्षण अधिगम असमर्थता एवं शैक्षिक प्रावधान
• श्रवण अक्षमता क्या है? इसकी व्यापकता
• श्रवण अक्षमता के कारण

You may also like

भारत में नगरपालिका एवं जिला परिषद का शिक्षा में योगदान

केन्द्रीय प्रशासन के लाभ | केन्द्रीय प्रशासन की...

शैक्षिक प्रशासन के विभिन्न स्तर | शैक्षिक प्रशासन के...

परीक्षण एवं मापन में अन्तर (Difference between Testing...

मापन एवं मूल्यांकन में अन्तर – difference...

शैक्षिक प्रशासन व शैक्षिक संगठन में अन्तर

About the author.

Sarkari Guider Team

Leave a comment x.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Privacy Policy

Home » Quantitative Research – Methods, Types and Analysis

Quantitative Research – Methods, Types and Analysis

Table of Contents

Quantitative Research

Quantitative research is a type of research that collects and analyzes numerical data to test hypotheses and answer research questions . This research typically involves a large sample size and uses statistical analysis to make inferences about a population based on the data collected. It often involves the use of surveys, experiments, or other structured data collection methods to gather quantitative data.

Quantitative Research Methods

Quantitative Research Methods are as follows:

Descriptive Research Design

Descriptive research design is used to describe the characteristics of a population or phenomenon being studied. This research method is used to answer the questions of what, where, when, and how. Descriptive research designs use a variety of methods such as observation, case studies, and surveys to collect data. The data is then analyzed using statistical tools to identify patterns and relationships.

Correlational Research Design

Correlational research design is used to investigate the relationship between two or more variables. Researchers use correlational research to determine whether a relationship exists between variables and to what extent they are related. This research method involves collecting data from a sample and analyzing it using statistical tools such as correlation coefficients.

Quasi-experimental Research Design

Quasi-experimental research design is used to investigate cause-and-effect relationships between variables. This research method is similar to experimental research design, but it lacks full control over the independent variable. Researchers use quasi-experimental research designs when it is not feasible or ethical to manipulate the independent variable.

Experimental Research Design

Experimental research design is used to investigate cause-and-effect relationships between variables. This research method involves manipulating the independent variable and observing the effects on the dependent variable. Researchers use experimental research designs to test hypotheses and establish cause-and-effect relationships.

Survey Research

Survey research involves collecting data from a sample of individuals using a standardized questionnaire. This research method is used to gather information on attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of individuals. Researchers use survey research to collect data quickly and efficiently from a large sample size. Survey research can be conducted through various methods such as online, phone, mail, or in-person interviews.

Quantitative Research Analysis Methods

Here are some commonly used quantitative research analysis methods:

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis is the most common quantitative research analysis method. It involves using statistical tools and techniques to analyze the numerical data collected during the research process. Statistical analysis can be used to identify patterns, trends, and relationships between variables, and to test hypotheses and theories.

Regression Analysis

Regression analysis is a statistical technique used to analyze the relationship between one dependent variable and one or more independent variables. Researchers use regression analysis to identify and quantify the impact of independent variables on the dependent variable.

Factor Analysis

Factor analysis is a statistical technique used to identify underlying factors that explain the correlations among a set of variables. Researchers use factor analysis to reduce a large number of variables to a smaller set of factors that capture the most important information.

Structural Equation Modeling

Structural equation modeling is a statistical technique used to test complex relationships between variables. It involves specifying a model that includes both observed and unobserved variables, and then using statistical methods to test the fit of the model to the data.

Time Series Analysis

Time series analysis is a statistical technique used to analyze data that is collected over time. It involves identifying patterns and trends in the data, as well as any seasonal or cyclical variations.

Multilevel Modeling

Multilevel modeling is a statistical technique used to analyze data that is nested within multiple levels. For example, researchers might use multilevel modeling to analyze data that is collected from individuals who are nested within groups, such as students nested within schools.

Applications of Quantitative Research

Quantitative research has many applications across a wide range of fields. Here are some common examples:

• Market Research : Quantitative research is used extensively in market research to understand consumer behavior, preferences, and trends. Researchers use surveys, experiments, and other quantitative methods to collect data that can inform marketing strategies, product development, and pricing decisions.
• Health Research: Quantitative research is used in health research to study the effectiveness of medical treatments, identify risk factors for diseases, and track health outcomes over time. Researchers use statistical methods to analyze data from clinical trials, surveys, and other sources to inform medical practice and policy.
• Social Science Research: Quantitative research is used in social science research to study human behavior, attitudes, and social structures. Researchers use surveys, experiments, and other quantitative methods to collect data that can inform social policies, educational programs, and community interventions.
• Education Research: Quantitative research is used in education research to study the effectiveness of teaching methods, assess student learning outcomes, and identify factors that influence student success. Researchers use experimental and quasi-experimental designs, as well as surveys and other quantitative methods, to collect and analyze data.
• Environmental Research: Quantitative research is used in environmental research to study the impact of human activities on the environment, assess the effectiveness of conservation strategies, and identify ways to reduce environmental risks. Researchers use statistical methods to analyze data from field studies, experiments, and other sources.

Characteristics of Quantitative Research

Here are some key characteristics of quantitative research:

• Numerical data : Quantitative research involves collecting numerical data through standardized methods such as surveys, experiments, and observational studies. This data is analyzed using statistical methods to identify patterns and relationships.
• Large sample size: Quantitative research often involves collecting data from a large sample of individuals or groups in order to increase the reliability and generalizability of the findings.
• Objective approach: Quantitative research aims to be objective and impartial in its approach, focusing on the collection and analysis of data rather than personal beliefs, opinions, or experiences.
• Control over variables: Quantitative research often involves manipulating variables to test hypotheses and establish cause-and-effect relationships. Researchers aim to control for extraneous variables that may impact the results.
• Replicable : Quantitative research aims to be replicable, meaning that other researchers should be able to conduct similar studies and obtain similar results using the same methods.
• Statistical analysis: Quantitative research involves using statistical tools and techniques to analyze the numerical data collected during the research process. Statistical analysis allows researchers to identify patterns, trends, and relationships between variables, and to test hypotheses and theories.
• Generalizability: Quantitative research aims to produce findings that can be generalized to larger populations beyond the specific sample studied. This is achieved through the use of random sampling methods and statistical inference.

Examples of Quantitative Research

Here are some examples of quantitative research in different fields:

• Market Research: A company conducts a survey of 1000 consumers to determine their brand awareness and preferences. The data is analyzed using statistical methods to identify trends and patterns that can inform marketing strategies.
• Health Research : A researcher conducts a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a new drug for treating a particular medical condition. The study involves collecting data from a large sample of patients and analyzing the results using statistical methods.
• Social Science Research : A sociologist conducts a survey of 500 people to study attitudes toward immigration in a particular country. The data is analyzed using statistical methods to identify factors that influence these attitudes.
• Education Research: A researcher conducts an experiment to compare the effectiveness of two different teaching methods for improving student learning outcomes. The study involves randomly assigning students to different groups and collecting data on their performance on standardized tests.
• Environmental Research : A team of researchers conduct a study to investigate the impact of climate change on the distribution and abundance of a particular species of plant or animal. The study involves collecting data on environmental factors and population sizes over time and analyzing the results using statistical methods.
• Psychology : A researcher conducts a survey of 500 college students to investigate the relationship between social media use and mental health. The data is analyzed using statistical methods to identify correlations and potential causal relationships.
• Political Science: A team of researchers conducts a study to investigate voter behavior during an election. They use survey methods to collect data on voting patterns, demographics, and political attitudes, and analyze the results using statistical methods.

How to Conduct Quantitative Research

Here is a general overview of how to conduct quantitative research:

• Develop a research question: The first step in conducting quantitative research is to develop a clear and specific research question. This question should be based on a gap in existing knowledge, and should be answerable using quantitative methods.
• Develop a research design: Once you have a research question, you will need to develop a research design. This involves deciding on the appropriate methods to collect data, such as surveys, experiments, or observational studies. You will also need to determine the appropriate sample size, data collection instruments, and data analysis techniques.
• Collect data: The next step is to collect data. This may involve administering surveys or questionnaires, conducting experiments, or gathering data from existing sources. It is important to use standardized methods to ensure that the data is reliable and valid.
• Analyze data : Once the data has been collected, it is time to analyze it. This involves using statistical methods to identify patterns, trends, and relationships between variables. Common statistical techniques include correlation analysis, regression analysis, and hypothesis testing.
• Interpret results: After analyzing the data, you will need to interpret the results. This involves identifying the key findings, determining their significance, and drawing conclusions based on the data.
• Communicate findings: Finally, you will need to communicate your findings. This may involve writing a research report, presenting at a conference, or publishing in a peer-reviewed journal. It is important to clearly communicate the research question, methods, results, and conclusions to ensure that others can understand and replicate your research.

When to use Quantitative Research

Here are some situations when quantitative research can be appropriate:

• To test a hypothesis: Quantitative research is often used to test a hypothesis or a theory. It involves collecting numerical data and using statistical analysis to determine if the data supports or refutes the hypothesis.
• To generalize findings: If you want to generalize the findings of your study to a larger population, quantitative research can be useful. This is because it allows you to collect numerical data from a representative sample of the population and use statistical analysis to make inferences about the population as a whole.
• To measure relationships between variables: If you want to measure the relationship between two or more variables, such as the relationship between age and income, or between education level and job satisfaction, quantitative research can be useful. It allows you to collect numerical data on both variables and use statistical analysis to determine the strength and direction of the relationship.
• To identify patterns or trends: Quantitative research can be useful for identifying patterns or trends in data. For example, you can use quantitative research to identify trends in consumer behavior or to identify patterns in stock market data.
• To quantify attitudes or opinions : If you want to measure attitudes or opinions on a particular topic, quantitative research can be useful. It allows you to collect numerical data using surveys or questionnaires and analyze the data using statistical methods to determine the prevalence of certain attitudes or opinions.

Purpose of Quantitative Research

The purpose of quantitative research is to systematically investigate and measure the relationships between variables or phenomena using numerical data and statistical analysis. The main objectives of quantitative research include:

• Description : To provide a detailed and accurate description of a particular phenomenon or population.
• Explanation : To explain the reasons for the occurrence of a particular phenomenon, such as identifying the factors that influence a behavior or attitude.
• Prediction : To predict future trends or behaviors based on past patterns and relationships between variables.
• Control : To identify the best strategies for controlling or influencing a particular outcome or behavior.

Quantitative research is used in many different fields, including social sciences, business, engineering, and health sciences. It can be used to investigate a wide range of phenomena, from human behavior and attitudes to physical and biological processes. The purpose of quantitative research is to provide reliable and valid data that can be used to inform decision-making and improve understanding of the world around us.

Advantages of Quantitative Research

There are several advantages of quantitative research, including:

• Objectivity : Quantitative research is based on objective data and statistical analysis, which reduces the potential for bias or subjectivity in the research process.
• Reproducibility : Because quantitative research involves standardized methods and measurements, it is more likely to be reproducible and reliable.
• Generalizability : Quantitative research allows for generalizations to be made about a population based on a representative sample, which can inform decision-making and policy development.
• Precision : Quantitative research allows for precise measurement and analysis of data, which can provide a more accurate understanding of phenomena and relationships between variables.
• Efficiency : Quantitative research can be conducted relatively quickly and efficiently, especially when compared to qualitative research, which may involve lengthy data collection and analysis.
• Large sample sizes : Quantitative research can accommodate large sample sizes, which can increase the representativeness and generalizability of the results.

Limitations of Quantitative Research

There are several limitations of quantitative research, including:

• Limited understanding of context: Quantitative research typically focuses on numerical data and statistical analysis, which may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the context or underlying factors that influence a phenomenon.
• Simplification of complex phenomena: Quantitative research often involves simplifying complex phenomena into measurable variables, which may not capture the full complexity of the phenomenon being studied.
• Potential for researcher bias: Although quantitative research aims to be objective, there is still the potential for researcher bias in areas such as sampling, data collection, and data analysis.
• Limited ability to explore new ideas: Quantitative research is often based on pre-determined research questions and hypotheses, which may limit the ability to explore new ideas or unexpected findings.
• Limited ability to capture subjective experiences : Quantitative research is typically focused on objective data and may not capture the subjective experiences of individuals or groups being studied.
• Ethical concerns : Quantitative research may raise ethical concerns, such as invasion of privacy or the potential for harm to participants.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Phenomenology – Methods, Examples and Guide

Qualitative Research Methods

Survey Research – Types, Methods, Examples

Transformative Design – Methods, Types, Guide

Experimental Design – Types, Methods, Guide

Quasi-Experimental Research Design – Types...

Qualitative vs Quantitative Research Methods & Data Analysis

Saul Mcleod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul Mcleod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

What is the difference between quantitative and qualitative?

The main difference between quantitative and qualitative research is the type of data they collect and analyze.

Quantitative research collects numerical data and analyzes it using statistical methods. The aim is to produce objective, empirical data that can be measured and expressed in numerical terms. Quantitative research is often used to test hypotheses, identify patterns, and make predictions.

Qualitative research , on the other hand, collects non-numerical data such as words, images, and sounds. The focus is on exploring subjective experiences, opinions, and attitudes, often through observation and interviews.

Qualitative research aims to produce rich and detailed descriptions of the phenomenon being studied, and to uncover new insights and meanings.

Quantitative data is information about quantities, and therefore numbers, and qualitative data is descriptive, and regards phenomenon which can be observed but not measured, such as language.

What Is Qualitative Research?

Qualitative research is the process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting non-numerical data, such as language. Qualitative research can be used to understand how an individual subjectively perceives and gives meaning to their social reality.

Qualitative data is non-numerical data, such as text, video, photographs, or audio recordings. This type of data can be collected using diary accounts or in-depth interviews and analyzed using grounded theory or thematic analysis.

Qualitative research is multimethod in focus, involving an interpretive, naturalistic approach to its subject matter. This means that qualitative researchers study things in their natural settings, attempting to make sense of, or interpret, phenomena in terms of the meanings people bring to them. Denzin and Lincoln (1994, p. 2)

Interest in qualitative data came about as the result of the dissatisfaction of some psychologists (e.g., Carl Rogers) with the scientific study of psychologists such as behaviorists (e.g., Skinner ).

Since psychologists study people, the traditional approach to science is not seen as an appropriate way of carrying out research since it fails to capture the totality of human experience and the essence of being human.  Exploring participants’ experiences is known as a phenomenological approach (re: Humanism ).

Qualitative research is primarily concerned with meaning, subjectivity, and lived experience. The goal is to understand the quality and texture of people’s experiences, how they make sense of them, and the implications for their lives.

Qualitative research aims to understand the social reality of individuals, groups, and cultures as nearly as possible as participants feel or live it. Thus, people and groups are studied in their natural setting.

Some examples of qualitative research questions are provided, such as what an experience feels like, how people talk about something, how they make sense of an experience, and how events unfold for people.

Research following a qualitative approach is exploratory and seeks to explain ‘how’ and ‘why’ a particular phenomenon, or behavior, operates as it does in a particular context. It can be used to generate hypotheses and theories from the data.

Qualitative Methods

There are different types of qualitative research methods, including diary accounts, in-depth interviews , documents, focus groups , case study research , and ethnography.

The results of qualitative methods provide a deep understanding of how people perceive their social realities and in consequence, how they act within the social world.

The researcher has several methods for collecting empirical materials, ranging from the interview to direct observation, to the analysis of artifacts, documents, and cultural records, to the use of visual materials or personal experience. Denzin and Lincoln (1994, p. 14)

Here are some examples of qualitative data:

Interview transcripts : Verbatim records of what participants said during an interview or focus group. They allow researchers to identify common themes and patterns, and draw conclusions based on the data. Interview transcripts can also be useful in providing direct quotes and examples to support research findings.

Observations : The researcher typically takes detailed notes on what they observe, including any contextual information, nonverbal cues, or other relevant details. The resulting observational data can be analyzed to gain insights into social phenomena, such as human behavior, social interactions, and cultural practices.

Unstructured interviews : generate qualitative data through the use of open questions.  This allows the respondent to talk in some depth, choosing their own words.  This helps the researcher develop a real sense of a person’s understanding of a situation.

Diaries or journals : Written accounts of personal experiences or reflections.

Notice that qualitative data could be much more than just words or text. Photographs, videos, sound recordings, and so on, can be considered qualitative data. Visual data can be used to understand behaviors, environments, and social interactions.

Qualitative Data Analysis

Qualitative research is endlessly creative and interpretive. The researcher does not just leave the field with mountains of empirical data and then easily write up his or her findings.

Qualitative interpretations are constructed, and various techniques can be used to make sense of the data, such as content analysis, grounded theory (Glaser & Strauss, 1967), thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006), or discourse analysis .

For example, thematic analysis is a qualitative approach that involves identifying implicit or explicit ideas within the data. Themes will often emerge once the data has been coded .

Key Features

• Events can be understood adequately only if they are seen in context. Therefore, a qualitative researcher immerses her/himself in the field, in natural surroundings. The contexts of inquiry are not contrived; they are natural. Nothing is predefined or taken for granted.
• Qualitative researchers want those who are studied to speak for themselves, to provide their perspectives in words and other actions. Therefore, qualitative research is an interactive process in which the persons studied teach the researcher about their lives.
• The qualitative researcher is an integral part of the data; without the active participation of the researcher, no data exists.
• The study’s design evolves during the research and can be adjusted or changed as it progresses. For the qualitative researcher, there is no single reality. It is subjective and exists only in reference to the observer.
• The theory is data-driven and emerges as part of the research process, evolving from the data as they are collected.

Limitations of Qualitative Research

• Because of the time and costs involved, qualitative designs do not generally draw samples from large-scale data sets.
• The problem of adequate validity or reliability is a major criticism. Because of the subjective nature of qualitative data and its origin in single contexts, it is difficult to apply conventional standards of reliability and validity. For example, because of the central role played by the researcher in the generation of data, it is not possible to replicate qualitative studies.
• Also, contexts, situations, events, conditions, and interactions cannot be replicated to any extent, nor can generalizations be made to a wider context than the one studied with confidence.
• The time required for data collection, analysis, and interpretation is lengthy. Analysis of qualitative data is difficult, and expert knowledge of an area is necessary to interpret qualitative data. Great care must be taken when doing so, for example, looking for mental illness symptoms.

Advantages of Qualitative Research

• Because of close researcher involvement, the researcher gains an insider’s view of the field. This allows the researcher to find issues that are often missed (such as subtleties and complexities) by the scientific, more positivistic inquiries.
• Qualitative descriptions can be important in suggesting possible relationships, causes, effects, and dynamic processes.
• Qualitative analysis allows for ambiguities/contradictions in the data, which reflect social reality (Denscombe, 2010).
• Qualitative research uses a descriptive, narrative style; this research might be of particular benefit to the practitioner as she or he could turn to qualitative reports to examine forms of knowledge that might otherwise be unavailable, thereby gaining new insight.

What Is Quantitative Research?

Quantitative research involves the process of objectively collecting and analyzing numerical data to describe, predict, or control variables of interest.

The goals of quantitative research are to test causal relationships between variables , make predictions, and generalize results to wider populations.

Quantitative researchers aim to establish general laws of behavior and phenomenon across different settings/contexts. Research is used to test a theory and ultimately support or reject it.

Quantitative Methods

Experiments typically yield quantitative data, as they are concerned with measuring things.  However, other research methods, such as controlled observations and questionnaires , can produce both quantitative information.

For example, a rating scale or closed questions on a questionnaire would generate quantitative data as these produce either numerical data or data that can be put into categories (e.g., “yes,” “no” answers).

Experimental methods limit how research participants react to and express appropriate social behavior.

Findings are, therefore, likely to be context-bound and simply a reflection of the assumptions that the researcher brings to the investigation.

There are numerous examples of quantitative data in psychological research, including mental health. Here are a few examples:

Another example is the Experience in Close Relationships Scale (ECR), a self-report questionnaire widely used to assess adult attachment styles .

The ECR provides quantitative data that can be used to assess attachment styles and predict relationship outcomes.

Neuroimaging data : Neuroimaging techniques, such as MRI and fMRI, provide quantitative data on brain structure and function.

This data can be analyzed to identify brain regions involved in specific mental processes or disorders.

For example, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a clinician-administered questionnaire widely used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms in individuals.

The BDI consists of 21 questions, each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. 

Quantitative Data Analysis

Statistics help us turn quantitative data into useful information to help with decision-making. We can use statistics to summarize our data, describing patterns, relationships, and connections. Statistics can be descriptive or inferential.

Descriptive statistics help us to summarize our data. In contrast, inferential statistics are used to identify statistically significant differences between groups of data (such as intervention and control groups in a randomized control study).

• Quantitative researchers try to control extraneous variables by conducting their studies in the lab.
• The research aims for objectivity (i.e., without bias) and is separated from the data.
• The design of the study is determined before it begins.
• For the quantitative researcher, the reality is objective, exists separately from the researcher, and can be seen by anyone.
• Research is used to test a theory and ultimately support or reject it.

Limitations of Quantitative Research

• Context: Quantitative experiments do not take place in natural settings. In addition, they do not allow participants to explain their choices or the meaning of the questions they may have for those participants (Carr, 1994).
• Researcher expertise: Poor knowledge of the application of statistical analysis may negatively affect analysis and subsequent interpretation (Black, 1999).
• Variability of data quantity: Large sample sizes are needed for more accurate analysis. Small-scale quantitative studies may be less reliable because of the low quantity of data (Denscombe, 2010). This also affects the ability to generalize study findings to wider populations.
• Confirmation bias: The researcher might miss observing phenomena because of focus on theory or hypothesis testing rather than on the theory of hypothesis generation.

Advantages of Quantitative Research

• Scientific objectivity: Quantitative data can be interpreted with statistical analysis, and since statistics are based on the principles of mathematics, the quantitative approach is viewed as scientifically objective and rational (Carr, 1994; Denscombe, 2010).
• Useful for testing and validating already constructed theories.
• Rapid analysis: Sophisticated software removes much of the need for prolonged data analysis, especially with large volumes of data involved (Antonius, 2003).
• Replication: Quantitative data is based on measured values and can be checked by others because numerical data is less open to ambiguities of interpretation.
• Hypotheses can also be tested because of statistical analysis (Antonius, 2003).

Antonius, R. (2003). Interpreting quantitative data with SPSS . Sage.

Black, T. R. (1999). Doing quantitative research in the social sciences: An integrated approach to research design, measurement and statistics . Sage.

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology . Qualitative Research in Psychology , 3, 77–101.

Carr, L. T. (1994). The strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research : what method for nursing? Journal of advanced nursing, 20(4) , 716-721.

Denscombe, M. (2010). The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research. McGraw Hill.

Denzin, N., & Lincoln. Y. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications Inc.

Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing research, 17(4) , 364.

Minichiello, V. (1990). In-Depth Interviewing: Researching People. Longman Cheshire.

Punch, K. (1998). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage

Further Information

• Mixed methods research
• Designing qualitative research
• Methods of data collection and analysis
• Introduction to quantitative and qualitative research
• Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?
• Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data
• Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach
• Using the framework method for the analysis of
• Qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
• Content Analysis
• Grounded Theory
• Thematic Analysis

Related Articles

Research Methodology

Mixed Methods Research

Conversation Analysis

Discourse Analysis

Phenomenology In Qualitative Research

Ethnography In Qualitative Research

Narrative Analysis In Qualitative Research

Educational resources and simple solutions for your research journey

Qualitative vs Quantitative Research: Differences, Examples, and Methods

There are two broad kinds of research approaches: qualitative and quantitative research that are used to study and analyze phenomena in various fields such as natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities. Whether you have realized it or not, your research must have followed either or both research types. In this article we will discuss what qualitative vs quantitative research is, their applications, pros and cons, and when to use qualitative vs quantitative research . Before we get into the details, it is important to understand the differences between the qualitative and quantitative research.     

Table of Contents

Qualitative v s Quantitative Research  

Quantitative research deals with quantity, hence, this research type is concerned with numbers and statistics to prove or disapprove theories or hypothesis. In contrast, qualitative research is all about quality – characteristics, unquantifiable features, and meanings to seek deeper understanding of behavior and phenomenon. These two methodologies serve complementary roles in the research process, each offering unique insights and methods suited to different research questions and objectives.    

Qualitative and quantitative research approaches have their own unique characteristics, drawbacks, advantages, and uses. Where quantitative research is mostly employed to validate theories or assumptions with the goal of generalizing facts to the larger population, qualitative research is used to study concepts, thoughts, or experiences for the purpose of gaining the underlying reasons, motivations, and meanings behind human behavior .   

What Are the Differences Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research  

Qualitative and quantitative research differs in terms of the methods they employ to conduct, collect, and analyze data. For example, qualitative research usually relies on interviews, observations, and textual analysis to explore subjective experiences and diverse perspectives. While quantitative data collection methods include surveys, experiments, and statistical analysis to gather and analyze numerical data. The differences between the two research approaches across various aspects are listed in the table below.    

Data Collection Methods  

There are differences between qualitative and quantitative research when it comes to data collection as they deal with different types of data. Qualitative research is concerned with personal or descriptive accounts to understand human behavior within society. Quantitative research deals with numerical or measurable data to delineate relations among variables. Hence, the qualitative data collection methods differ significantly from quantitative data collection methods due to the nature of data being collected and the research objectives. Below is the list of data collection methods for each research approach:    

Qualitative Research Data Collection  

• Interviews  
• Focus g roups  
• Content a nalysis  
• Literature review  
• Observation  
• Ethnography  

Qualitative research data collection can involve one-on-one group interviews to capture in-depth perspectives of participants using open-ended questions. These interviews could be structured, semi-structured or unstructured depending upon the nature of the study. Focus groups can be used to explore specific topics and generate rich data through discussions among participants. Another qualitative data collection method is content analysis, which involves systematically analyzing text documents, audio, and video files or visual content to uncover patterns, themes, and meanings. This can be done through coding and categorization of raw data to draw meaningful insights. Data can be collected through observation studies where the goal is to simply observe and document behaviors, interaction, and phenomena in natural settings without interference. Lastly, ethnography allows one to immerse themselves in the culture or environment under study for a prolonged period to gain a deep understanding of the social phenomena.   

Quantitative Research Data Collection  

• Surveys/ q uestionnaires  
• Experiments
• Secondary data analysis  
• Structured o bservations  
• Case studies   
• Tests and a ssessments  

Quantitative research data collection approaches comprise of fundamental methods for generating numerical data that can be analyzed using statistical or mathematical tools. The most common quantitative data collection approach is the usage of structured surveys with close-ended questions to collect quantifiable data from a large sample of participants. These can be conducted online, over the phone, or in person.   

Performing experiments is another important data collection approach, in which variables are manipulated under controlled conditions to observe their effects on dependent variables. This often involves random assignment of participants to different conditions or groups. Such experimental settings are employed to gauge cause-and-effect relationships and understand a complex phenomenon. At times, instead of acquiring original data, researchers may deal with secondary data, which is the dataset curated by others, such as government agencies, research organizations, or academic institute. With structured observations, subjects in a natural environment can be studied by controlling the variables which aids in understanding the relationship among various variables. The secondary data is then analyzed to identify patterns and relationships among variables. Observational studies provide a means to systematically observe and record behaviors or phenomena as they occur in controlled environments. Case studies form an interesting study methodology in which a researcher studies a single entity or a small number of entities (individuals or organizations) in detail to understand complex phenomena within a specific context.   

Qualitative vs Quantitative Research Outcomes  

Qualitative research and quantitative research lead to varied research outcomes, each with its own strengths and limitations. For example, qualitative research outcomes provide deep descriptive accounts of human experiences, motivations, and perspectives that allow us to identify themes or narratives and context in which behavior, attitudes, or phenomena occurs.  Quantitative research outcomes on the other hand produce numerical data that is analyzed statistically to establish patterns and relationships objectively, to form generalizations about the larger population and make predictions. This numerical data can be presented in the form of graphs, tables, or charts. Both approaches offer valuable perspectives on complex phenomena, with qualitative research focusing on depth and interpretation, while quantitative research emphasizes numerical analysis and objectivity.  

When to Use Qualitative vs Quantitative Research Approach  

The decision to choose between qualitative and quantitative research depends on various factors, such as the research question, objectives, whether you are taking an inductive or deductive approach, available resources, practical considerations such as time and money, and the nature of the phenomenon under investigation. To simplify, quantitative research can be used if the aim of the research is to prove or test a hypothesis, while qualitative research should be used if the research question is more exploratory and an in-depth understanding of the concepts, behavior, or experiences is needed.     

Qualitative research approach  

Qualitative research approach is used under following scenarios:   

• To study complex phenomena: When the research requires understanding the depth, complexity, and context of a phenomenon.  
• Collecting participant perspectives: When the goal is to understand the why behind a certain behavior, and a need to capture subjective experiences and perceptions of participants.  
• Generating hypotheses or theories: When generating hypotheses, theories, or conceptual frameworks based on exploratory research.  

Example: If you have a research question “What obstacles do expatriate students encounter when acquiring a new language in their host country?”  

This research question can be addressed using the qualitative research approach by conducting in-depth interviews with 15-25 expatriate university students. Ask open-ended questions such as “What are the major challenges you face while attempting to learn the new language?”, “Do you find it difficult to learn the language as an adult?”, and “Do you feel practicing with a native friend or colleague helps the learning process”?  

Based on the findings of these answers, a follow-up questionnaire can be planned to clarify things. Next step will be to transcribe all interviews using transcription software and identify themes and patterns.   

Quantitative research approach  

Quantitative research approach is used under following scenarios:   

• Testing hypotheses or proving theories: When aiming to test hypotheses, establish relationships, or examine cause-and-effect relationships.   
• Generalizability: When needing findings that can be generalized to broader populations using large, representative samples.  
• Statistical analysis: When requiring rigorous statistical analysis to quantify relationships, patterns, or trends in data.   

Example : Considering the above example, you can conduct a survey of 200-300 expatriate university students and ask them specific questions such as: “On a scale of 1-10 how difficult is it to learn a new language?”  

Next, statistical analysis can be performed on the responses to draw conclusions like, on an average expatriate students rated the difficulty of learning a language 6.5 on the scale of 10.    

Mixed methods approach  

In many cases, researchers may opt for a mixed methods approach , combining qualitative and quantitative methods to leverage the strengths of both approaches. Researchers may use qualitative data to explore phenomena in-depth and generate hypotheses, while quantitative data can be used to test these hypotheses and generalize findings to broader populations.  

Example: Both qualitative and quantitative research methods can be used in combination to address the above research question. Through open-ended questions you can gain insights about different perspectives and experiences while quantitative research allows you to test that knowledge and prove/disprove your hypothesis.   

How to Analyze Qualitative and Quantitative Data  

When it comes to analyzing qualitative and quantitative data, the focus is on identifying patterns in the data to highlight the relationship between elements. The best research method for any given study should be chosen based on the study aim. A few methods to analyze qualitative and quantitative data are listed below.  

Analyzing qualitative data  

Qualitative data analysis is challenging as it is not expressed in numbers and consists majorly of texts, images, or videos. Hence, care must be taken while using any analytical approach. Some common approaches to analyze qualitative data include:  

• Organization: The first step is data (transcripts or notes) organization into different categories with similar concepts, themes, and patterns to find inter-relationships.  
• Coding: Data can be arranged in categories based on themes/concepts using coding.  
• Theme development: Utilize higher-level organization to group related codes into broader themes.  
• Interpretation: Explore the meaning behind different emerging themes to understand connections. Use different perspectives like culture, environment, and status to evaluate emerging themes.  
• Reporting: Present findings with quotes or excerpts to illustrate key themes.   

Analyzing quantitative data  

Quantitative data analysis is more direct compared to qualitative data as it primarily deals with numbers. Data can be evaluated using simple math or advanced statistics (descriptive or inferential). Some common approaches to analyze quantitative data include:  

• Processing raw data: Check missing values, outliers, or inconsistencies in raw data.  
• Descriptive statistics: Summarize data with means, standard deviations, or standard error using programs such as Excel, SPSS, or R language.  
• Exploratory data analysis: Usage of visuals to deduce patterns and trends.  
• Hypothesis testing: Apply statistical tests to find significance and test hypothesis (Student’s t-test or ANOVA).  
• Interpretation: Analyze results considering significance and practical implications.  
• Validation: Data validation through replication or literature review.  
• Reporting: Present findings by means of tables, figures, or graphs.   

Benefits and limitations of qualitative vs quantitative research  

There are significant differences between qualitative and quantitative research; we have listed the benefits and limitations of both methods below:  

Benefits of qualitative research  

• Rich insights: As qualitative research often produces information-rich data, it aids in gaining in-depth insights into complex phenomena, allowing researchers to explore nuances and meanings of the topic of study.  
• Flexibility: One of the most important benefits of qualitative research is flexibility in acquiring and analyzing data that allows researchers to adapt to the context and explore more unconventional aspects.  
• Contextual understanding: With descriptive and comprehensive data, understanding the context in which behaviors or phenomena occur becomes accessible.   
• Capturing different perspectives: Qualitative research allows for capturing different participant perspectives with open-ended question formats that further enrich data.   
• Hypothesis/theory generation: Qualitative research is often the first step in generating theory/hypothesis, which leads to future investigation thereby contributing to the field of research.

Limitations of qualitative research  

• Subjectivity: It is difficult to have objective interpretation with qualitative research, as research findings might be influenced by the expertise of researchers. The risk of researcher bias or interpretations affects the reliability and validity of the results.   
• Limited generalizability: Due to the presence of small, non-representative samples, the qualitative data cannot be used to make generalizations to a broader population.  
• Cost and time intensive: Qualitative data collection can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, therefore, it requires strategic planning and commitment.   
• Complex analysis: Analyzing qualitative data needs specialized skills and techniques, hence, it’s challenging for researchers without sufficient training or experience.   
• Potential misinterpretation: There is a risk of sampling bias and misinterpretation in data collection and analysis if researchers lack cultural or contextual understanding.   

Benefits of quantitative research  

• Objectivity: A key benefit of quantitative research approach, this objectivity reduces researcher bias and subjectivity, enhancing the reliability and validity of findings.   
• Generalizability: For quantitative research, the sample size must be large and representative enough to allow for generalization to broader populations.   
• Statistical analysis: Quantitative research enables rigorous statistical analysis (increasing power of the analysis), aiding hypothesis testing and finding patterns or relationship among variables.   
• Efficiency: Quantitative data collection and analysis is usually more efficient compared to the qualitative methods, especially when dealing with large datasets.   
• Clarity and Precision: The findings are usually clear and precise, making it easier to present them as graphs, tables, and figures to convey them to a larger audience.  

Limitations of quantitative research  

• Lacks depth and details: Due to its objective nature, quantitative research might lack the depth and richness of qualitative approaches, potentially overlooking important contextual factors or nuances.   
• Limited exploration: By not considering the subjective experiences of participants in depth , there’s a limited chance to study complex phenomenon in detail.   
• Potential oversimplification: Quantitative research may oversimplify complex phenomena by boiling them down to numbers, which might ignore key nuances.   
• Inflexibility: Quantitative research deals with predecided varibales and measures , which limits the ability of researchers to explore unexpected findings or adjust the research design as new findings become available .  
• Ethical consideration: Quantitative research may raise ethical concerns especially regarding privacy, informed consent, and the potential for harm, when dealing with sensitive topics or vulnerable populations.   

Frequently asked questions  

• What is the difference between qualitative and quantitative research? 

Quantitative methods use numerical data and statistical analysis for objective measurement and hypothesis testing, emphasizing generalizability. Qualitative methods gather non-numerical data to explore subjective experiences and contexts, providing rich, nuanced insights.  

• What are the types of qualitative research? 

Qualitative research methods include interviews, observations, focus groups, and case studies. They provide rich insights into participants’ perspectives and behaviors within their contexts, enabling exploration of complex phenomena.  

• What are the types of quantitative research? 

Quantitative research methods include surveys, experiments, observations, correlational studies, and longitudinal research. They gather numerical data for statistical analysis, aiming for objectivity and generalizability.  

• Can you give me examples for qualitative and quantitative research? 

Qualitative Research Example: 

Research Question: What are the experiences of parents with autistic children in accessing support services?  

Method: Conducting in-depth interviews with parents to explore their perspectives, challenges, and needs.  

Quantitative Research Example: 

Research Question: What is the correlation between sleep duration and academic performance in college students?  

Method: Distributing surveys to a large sample of college students to collect data on their sleep habits and academic performance, then analyzing the data statistically to determine any correlations.  

Researcher.Life is a subscription-based platform that unifies the best AI tools and services designed to speed up, simplify, and streamline every step of a researcher’s journey. The Researcher.Life All Access Pack is a one-of-a-kind subscription that unlocks full access to an AI writing assistant, literature recommender, journal finder, scientific illustration tool, and exclusive discounts on professional publication services from Editage.  

Based on 21+ years of experience in academia, Researcher.Life All Access empowers researchers to put their best research forward and move closer to success. Explore our top AI Tools pack, AI Tools + Publication Services pack, or Build Your Own Plan. Find everything a researcher needs to succeed, all in one place –  Get All Access now starting at just $17 a month !    

Related Posts

Take Top AI Tools for Researchers for a Spin with the Editage All Access 7-Day Pass!

Thesis Defense: How to Ace this Crucial Step

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research | Differences, Examples & Methods

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research | Differences, Examples & Methods

Published on April 12, 2019 by Raimo Streefkerk . Revised on June 22, 2023.

When collecting and analyzing data, quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings. Both are important for gaining different kinds of knowledge.

Common quantitative methods include experiments, observations recorded as numbers, and surveys with closed-ended questions.

Quantitative research is at risk for research biases including information bias , omitted variable bias , sampling bias , or selection bias . Qualitative research Qualitative research is expressed in words . It is used to understand concepts, thoughts or experiences. This type of research enables you to gather in-depth insights on topics that are not well understood.

Common qualitative methods include interviews with open-ended questions, observations described in words, and literature reviews that explore concepts and theories.

Table of contents

The differences between quantitative and qualitative research, data collection methods, when to use qualitative vs. quantitative research, how to analyze qualitative and quantitative data, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about qualitative and quantitative research.

Quantitative and qualitative research use different research methods to collect and analyze data, and they allow you to answer different kinds of research questions.

Quantitative and qualitative data can be collected using various methods. It is important to use a data collection method that will help answer your research question(s).

Many data collection methods can be either qualitative or quantitative. For example, in surveys, observational studies or case studies , your data can be represented as numbers (e.g., using rating scales or counting frequencies) or as words (e.g., with open-ended questions or descriptions of what you observe).

However, some methods are more commonly used in one type or the other.

Quantitative data collection methods

• Surveys :  List of closed or multiple choice questions that is distributed to a sample (online, in person, or over the phone).
• Experiments : Situation in which different types of variables are controlled and manipulated to establish cause-and-effect relationships.
• Observations : Observing subjects in a natural environment where variables can’t be controlled.

Qualitative data collection methods

• Interviews : Asking open-ended questions verbally to respondents.
• Focus groups : Discussion among a group of people about a topic to gather opinions that can be used for further research.
• Ethnography : Participating in a community or organization for an extended period of time to closely observe culture and behavior.
• Literature review : Survey of published works by other authors.

A rule of thumb for deciding whether to use qualitative or quantitative data is:

• Use quantitative research if you want to confirm or test something (a theory or hypothesis )
• Use qualitative research if you want to understand something (concepts, thoughts, experiences)

For most research topics you can choose a qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods approach . Which type you choose depends on, among other things, whether you’re taking an inductive vs. deductive research approach ; your research question(s) ; whether you’re doing experimental , correlational , or descriptive research ; and practical considerations such as time, money, availability of data, and access to respondents.

Quantitative research approach

You survey 300 students at your university and ask them questions such as: “on a scale from 1-5, how satisfied are your with your professors?”

You can perform statistical analysis on the data and draw conclusions such as: “on average students rated their professors 4.4”.

Qualitative research approach

You conduct in-depth interviews with 15 students and ask them open-ended questions such as: “How satisfied are you with your studies?”, “What is the most positive aspect of your study program?” and “What can be done to improve the study program?”

Based on the answers you get you can ask follow-up questions to clarify things. You transcribe all interviews using transcription software and try to find commonalities and patterns.

Mixed methods approach

You conduct interviews to find out how satisfied students are with their studies. Through open-ended questions you learn things you never thought about before and gain new insights. Later, you use a survey to test these insights on a larger scale.

It’s also possible to start with a survey to find out the overall trends, followed by interviews to better understand the reasons behind the trends.

Qualitative or quantitative data by itself can’t prove or demonstrate anything, but has to be analyzed to show its meaning in relation to the research questions. The method of analysis differs for each type of data.

Analyzing quantitative data

Quantitative data is based on numbers. Simple math or more advanced statistical analysis is used to discover commonalities or patterns in the data. The results are often reported in graphs and tables.

Applications such as Excel, SPSS, or R can be used to calculate things like:

• Average scores ( means )
• The number of times a particular answer was given
• The correlation or causation between two or more variables
• The reliability and validity of the results

Analyzing qualitative data

Qualitative data is more difficult to analyze than quantitative data. It consists of text, images or videos instead of numbers.

Some common approaches to analyzing qualitative data include:

• Qualitative content analysis : Tracking the occurrence, position and meaning of words or phrases
• Thematic analysis : Closely examining the data to identify the main themes and patterns
• Discourse analysis : Studying how communication works in social contexts

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Chi square goodness of fit test
• Degrees of freedom
• Null hypothesis
• Discourse analysis
• Control groups
• Mixed methods research
• Non-probability sampling
• Quantitative research
• Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Research bias

• Rosenthal effect
• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Selection bias
• Negativity bias
• Status quo bias

Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.

Quantitative methods allow you to systematically measure variables and test hypotheses . Qualitative methods allow you to explore concepts and experiences in more detail.

In mixed methods research , you use both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods to answer your research question .

The research methods you use depend on the type of data you need to answer your research question .

• If you want to measure something or test a hypothesis , use quantitative methods . If you want to explore ideas, thoughts and meanings, use qualitative methods .
• If you want to analyze a large amount of readily-available data, use secondary data. If you want data specific to your purposes with control over how it is generated, collect primary data.
• If you want to establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables , use experimental methods. If you want to understand the characteristics of a research subject, use descriptive methods.

Data collection is the systematic process by which observations or measurements are gathered in research. It is used in many different contexts by academics, governments, businesses, and other organizations.

There are various approaches to qualitative data analysis , but they all share five steps in common:

• Prepare and organize your data.
• Review and explore your data.
• Develop a data coding system.
• Assign codes to the data.
• Identify recurring themes.

The specifics of each step depend on the focus of the analysis. Some common approaches include textual analysis , thematic analysis , and discourse analysis .

A research project is an academic, scientific, or professional undertaking to answer a research question . Research projects can take many forms, such as qualitative or quantitative , descriptive , longitudinal , experimental , or correlational . What kind of research approach you choose will depend on your topic.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Streefkerk, R. (2023, June 22). Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research | Differences, Examples & Methods. Scribbr. Retrieved June 27, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-quantitative-research/

Is this article helpful?

Raimo Streefkerk

Other students also liked, what is quantitative research | definition, uses & methods, what is qualitative research | methods & examples, mixed methods research | definition, guide & examples, get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

• Bihar Board

James Dyson Award

Sanskriti university, srm university.

• Education News
• Web Stories
• Current Affairs
• Short Videos
• School & Boards
• College Admission
• Govt Jobs Alert & Prep
• GK & Aptitude

UGC NET Syllabus 2024: Download Paper 1 & Paper 2 Syllabus PDF

Ugc net syllabus 2024 for paper 1 and 2 has been released by the university grants commission. prospective candidates should review the subject-wise ugc net syllabus and exam pattern in both hindi and english before commencing their preparation. additionally, you can find the direct link to download the ugc net syllabus 2024 pdf here..

UGC NET Syllabus 2024 is prescribed by the University Grants Commission along with the notification. Aspirants planning to appear for the UGC NET exam, scheduled to be held on June 18,  must be conversant with the detailed syllabus. The exam is divided into two papers: Paper 1 and Paper 2. While Paper 1 is compulsory for all candidates, Paper 2 depends on the subject chosen by the candidates. There are a total of 83 UGC NET subjects from which the candidates have to choose.

UGC NET Syllabus 2024

The UGC NET exam is held twice a year to ascertain candidates' eligibility for Assistant Professor positions or both Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) and Assistant Professor roles in Indian universities and colleges. Lakhs of candidates appear for the exam; however, only a few are able to crack it. For the December 2023 session, 9.45 lakh candidates registered for the exam, but only 6.55 lakh candidates appeared for it.

UGC NET Syllabus 2024 for Paper 1

UGC NET Paper 1 Syllabus 2024 Subject-wise

Unit-i: teaching aptitude syllabus.

• Teaching: Concept, Objectives, Levels of teaching (Memory, Understanding and Reflection), Characteristics and basic requirements.
• Learner’s characteristics: Characteristics of adolescent and adult learners (Academic, Social, Emotional and Cognitive), Individual differences.
• Factors affecting teaching related to Teacher, Learner, Support material, Instructional facilities, Learning environment and Institution.
• Methods of teaching in Institutions of higher learning: Teacher centred vs. Learner-centred methods; offline vs. Online methods (Swayam, Swayamprabha, MOOCs etc.).
• Teaching Support System: Traditional, Modern and ICT based.
• Evaluation Systems: Elements and Types of evaluation, Evaluation in Choice Based Credit System in Higher education, Computer-based testing, Innovations in evaluation systems.

Unit-II: Research Aptitude Syllabus

• Research: Meaning, Types, and Characteristics, Positivism and Postpositivistic approach to research.
• Methods of Research: ExperimeUGCl, Descriptive, Historical, Qualitative and Quantitative Methods, Steps of Research.
• Thesis and Article writing: Format and styles of referencing.
• Application of ICT in research.
• Research ethics.

Unit-III Comprehension Syllabus

Unit-iv: communication.

• Communication: Meaning, types and characteristics of communication.
• Effective communication: Verbal and Non-verbal, Inter-Cultural and group communications, Classroom communication.
• Barriers to effective communication.
• Mass-Media and Society.

Unit-V: Mathematical Reasoning and Aptitude Syllabus

• Types of reasoning.
• Number series, Letter series, Codes and Relationships.
• Mathematical Aptitude (Fraction, Time & Distance, Ratio, Proportion and PerceUGCge, Profit and Loss, Interest and Discounting, Averages etc.).

Unit-VI: Logical Reasoning Syllabus

• Understanding the structure of arguments: argument forms, the structure of categorical propositions, Mood and Figure, Formal and Informal fallacies, Uses of language, Connotations and denotations of terms, Classical square of opposition.
• Evaluating and distinguishing deductive and inductive reasoning.
• Venn diagram: Simple and multiple uses for establishing the validity of arguments.
• Indian Logic: Means of knowledge.
• Pramanas: Pratyaksha (Perception), Anumana (Inference), Upamana (Comparison), Shabda (Verbal testimony), Arthapatti (Implication) and Anupalabddhi (Non-apprehension).
• Structure and kinds of Anumana (inference), Vyapti (invariable relation), Hetvabhasas (fallacies of inference).

UGC NET Exam Pattern

• UGC NET Eligibility
• UGC NET Preparation

Unit-VII: Data Interpretation Syllabus

• Sources, acquisition and classification of Data.
• Quantitative and Qualitative Data.
• Graphical representation (Bar-chart, Histograms, Pie-chart, Table-chart and Line-chart) and mapping of Data.
• Data Interpretation.
• Data and Governance.
• Unit-VIII: Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Syllabus
• ICT: General abbreviations and terminology.
• Basics of the Internet, Intranet, E-mail, Audio and Video-conferencing.
• Digital initiatives in higher education.
• ICT and Governance.

Unit-IX: People, Development and Environment Syllabus

• Development and environment: Millennium development and Sustainable development goals.
• Human and environment interaction: Anthropogenic activities and their impacts on the environment.
• EnvironmeUGCl issues: Local, Regional and Global; Air pollution, Water pollution, Soil pollution, Noise pollution, Waste (solid, liquid, biomedical, hazardous, electronic), Climate change and its Socio-Economic and Political dimensions.
• Impacts of pollutants on human health.
• Natural and energy resources: Solar, Wind, Soil, Hydro, Geothermal, Biomass, Nuclear and Forests.
• Natural hazards and disasters: Mitigation strategies.
• EnvironmeUGCl Protection Act (1986), National Action Plan on Climate Change, International agreements/efforts -Montreal Protocol, Rio Summit, Convention on Biodiversity, Kyoto Protocol, Paris Agreement, International Solar Alliance.

Unit-X: Higher Education System Syllabus

• Institutions of higher learning and education in ancient India.
• Evolution of higher learning and research in Post Independence India.
• OrieUGCl, Conventional and Non-conventional learning programmes in India.
• Professional, Technical and Skill-Based education.
• Value education and environmeUGCl education.
• Policies, Governance, and Administration.

UGC NET Syllabus PDF Paper 1

Individuals preparing for exam can access the UGC NET Paper 1 syllabus PDF either on the official website or click on the direct link mentioned below. Downloading UGC NET Syllabus Paper 1 PDF 2024 will be highly beneficial while preparing for the exam. 

⇒   UGC NET Paper 1 Syllabus PDF in English

UGC NET Paper 2 Syllabus PDF

UGC NET Paper 2 includes 83 subjects. Candidates should choose the subject in which they have completed their master's degree. If their chosen subject is not listed, they should select a related subject. The UGC NET Syllabus PDF for Paper 2 is mentioned in the article below for your convenience.

UGC NET Paper 2 Syllabus 2024 Subject-wise

UGC NET Syllabus Political Science

Candidates who have completed their master's in Political Science and selected this subject for UGC NET Paper 2 must possess a comprehensive understanding of the syllabus.

• Political Traditions
• Conservatism
• Multiculturalism
• Postmodernism
• Confucius, Plato, Aristotle, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Hegel, Mary Wollstonecraft, John Stuart Mill, Karl Marx, Gramsci, Hannah Arendt, Frantz
• Fanon, Mao Zedong, John Rawls

UGC NET Syllabus Law

Candidates gearing up for the UGC NET Law examination should thoroughly review the syllabus to devise an effective study plan. The subject code for UGC NET Law is 58, encompassing a syllabus consisting of 10 units. Check out the UGC NET Law Syllabus below.

• Nature and sources of law
• Schools of jurisprudence
• Law and morality
• Concept of rights and duties
• Legal personality
• Concepts of property, ownership, and possession
• Concept of liability
• Law, poverty, and development
• Global justice
• Modernism and post-modernism
• Preamble, fundameUGCl rights and duties, directive principles of state
• Union and State executive and their interrelationship
• Union and State legislature and distribution of legislative powers
• Emergency provisions
• Temporary, transitional and special provisions in respect of certain states
• Election Commission of India
• Nature, scope and importance of administrative law
• Principle of natural justice
• Judicial review of administrative actions 
• International law – Definition, nature and basis
• Sources of International law
• Recognition of states and governments
• Nationality, immigrants, refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs)
• Extradition and asylum
• United Nations and its organs
• Settlement of international disputes
• World Trade Organization (WTO)
• International humanitarian law (IHL) - Conventions and protocols
• ImplemeUGCtion of IHL - Challenges
• General principles of criminal liability – Actus reus and mens rea, individual and group liability and constructive liability
• Stages of crime and inchoate crimes - Abetment, criminal conspiracy and attempt
• General exceptions
• Offences against human body
• Offences against state and terrorism
• Offences against property
• Offences against women and children
• Drug trafficking and counterfeiting
• Offences against public tranquility
• Theories and kinds of punishments, compensation to the victims of crime
• Nature and definition of tort
• General principles of tortious liability
• General defenses
• Specific torts – Negligence, nuisance, trespass and defamation
• Remoteness of damages
• Strict and absolute liability
• Tortious liability of the State
• The Consumer Protection Act 1986 - Definitions, consumer rights and redressal mechanism
• The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - No fault liability, third party insurance and claims tribunal
• The Competition Act, 2002 - Prohibition of certain agreements, abuse of dominant position and regulation of combinations
• Essential elements of contract and e-contract
• Breach of contract, frustration of contract, void and voidable agreements
• Standard form of contract and quasi-contract
• Specific contracts - Bailment, pledge, indemnity, guarantee and agency
• Sale of Goods Act, 1930
• Partnership and limited liability partnership
• Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
• Company law – Incorporation of a company, prospectus, shares and debentures
• Company law – Directors and meetings
• Corporate social responsibility
• Sources and schools
• Marriage and dissolution of marriage
• Matrimonial remedies - Divorce and theories of divorce
• Changing dimensions of institution of marriage – Live-in relationship
• Recognition of foreign decrees in India on marriage and divorce
• Maintenance, dower and stridhan
• Adoption, guardianship and acknowledgement
• Succession and inheritance
• Will, gift and wakf
• Uniform Civil Code
• Meaning and concept of ‘environment’ and ‘environmeUGCl pollution’
• International environmeUGCl law and UN Conferences
• Constitutional and legal framework for protection of environment in India
• EnvironmeUGCl Impact Assessment and control of hazardous waste in India
• National Green Tribunal
• Concept and development of human rights
• Universalism and cultural relativism
• International Bill of Rights
• Group rights – Women, children, persons with disabilities, elderly persons, minorities and weaker sections
• Protection and enforcement of human rights in India – National Human Rights Commission, National Commission for Minorities, National Commission for Women, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, National Commission for Schedule Tribes and National Commission for Backward Classes
• Concept and meaning of intellectual property
• Theories of intellectual property
• International conventions pertaining to intellectual properties
• Copyright and neighboring rights – Subject matters, limitations and exceptions, infringement and remedies
• Law of patent – PateUGCbility, procedure for grant of patent, limitations and exceptions, infringement and remedies
• Law of trademark – Registration of trademarks, kinds of trademarks, infringement and passing off, remedies
• Protection of Geographical Indications
• Bio-diversity and Traditional Knowledge
• Information technology law- digital signature and electronic signature, electronic governance, electronic records and duties of subscribers
• Cyber crimes, penalties and adjudication
• Comparative Law – Relevance, methodology, problems and concerns in Comparison
• Forms of governments – Presidential and parliameUGCry, unitary and federal
• Models of federalism – USA, Canada and India
• Rule of Law – ‘Formal’ and ‘substantive’ versions
• Separation of powers – India, UK, USA and France
• Independence of judiciary, judicial activism and accouUGCbility – India, UK and USA
• Systems of constitutional review – India, USA, Switzerland and France
• Amendment of the Constitution – India, USA and South Africa
• Ombudsman –Sweden, UK and India
• Open Government and Right to Information - USA, UK and India

UGC NET English Literature

UGC NET Environmental Science Syllabus 2024

• Unit-I: Fundamentals of Environmental Sciences
• Unit-II: Environmental Chemistry
• Unit-III: Environmental Biology
• Unit-IV: Environmental Geosciences Unit-V: Energy and Environment
• Unit-IV: Environmental Geosciences
• Unit-V: Energy and Environment
• Unit-VI: Environmental Pollution and Control Unit-VII: Solid and Hazardous Waste Management

UGC NET History Syllabus

Best Books for Covering UGC NET Syllabus

Get here latest School , CBSE and Govt Jobs notification in English and Hindi for Sarkari Naukari and Sarkari Result . Download the Jagran Josh Sarkari Naukri App .

• How to download UGC NET Syllabus 2024 PDF for Paper 1 and Paper 2? + Candidates can download the UGC NET Syllabus PDF either from the official website or from the direct link provided here.
• Who prescribes NTA UGC NET Syllabus? + The syllabus of UGC NET exam is prescribed by the National Testing Agency and University Grant Commission.
• What is UGC NET Paper 1 Syllabus 2024? + The UGC NET Syllabus for Paper 1 comprises 10 units, namely, Teaching Aptitude, Research Aptitude, Communication, Mathematical Reasoning, Data Interpretation, Comprehension, Higher Education System, Logical Reasoning, and People, Development and Environment.
• What is UGC NET Syllabus 2024? + UGC NET Syllabus is divided into two parts: Paper 1 and Paper 2. Paper 1 is common to all candidates, while paper 2 is subject specific. The UGC NET Syllabus includes topics like Teaching Aptitude, Research Aptitude, Communication, Mathematical Reasoning, Comprehension, Logical Reasoning, and Data Interpretation.
• SSC CGL 2024 Notification
• SSC MTS 2024 Exam
• UPSC Exam Analysis 2024
• Manabadi AP TET Results 2024
• UPSC Prelims Cut Off 2024
• Bihar BEd Admit Card 2024
• Rajasthan BSTC Admit Card 2024
• APSC SO Result 2024
• APSC SO Admit Card 2024
• UPSC CSE Admit Card 2024

Latest Education News

SSC MTS Notification 2024 Out for 8326 MTS & Havaldar Posts: Apply Online at ssc.gov.in, Check Exam Date

T20 World Cup 2024 Semi Final: ये पांच भारतीय हो सकते है गेम चेंजर, एक बार फिर 'हिटमैन' के भरोसे बल्लेबाजी

RSMSSB Junior Accountant Result 2024 Declared at rsmssb.rajasthan.gov.in: Download Rajasthan JA Final Answer Key

Most Runs In T20 World Cup 2024

SSC MTS Recruitment Notification 2024 OUT at ssc.gov.in: Apply Online for 8326 Posts, Check Exam Dates

India vs England T20 World Cup 2024: इंग्लैंड को बाहर करने का क्या है प्लान? कौन होगा गेम चेंजर, देखें यहां

JEECUP UP Polytechnic Result 2024 OUT: यूपी पॉलिटेक्निक परीक्षा का रिजल्ट jeecup.admissions.nic.in पर घोषित, यहां तुरंत चेक करें स्कोरकार्ड

MJPRU Result 2024 Out at mjpru.ac.in: रोहिलखंड यूनिवर्सिटी रिजल्ट घोषित, यहां देखें UG, PG मार्कशीट PDF डाउनलोड लिंक

T20 World Cup 2024 Commentators List: हिंदी कमेंट्री पैनल में शामिल है ये भारतीय दिग्गज, देखें पूरी सूची

Word Search Puzzle: Only 2% can find the word “pawn” in 7 seconds!

CBSE Class 10 English Syllabus 2024-25: Download English Language and Literature FREE PDF 

CBSE Class 10 Syllabus 2024-25: Download Latest and Revised FREE PDFs

NCERT Book for Class 11 Biology PDF for 2024-25 (Revised)

NEET PG Exam Pattern 2024; Check Latest Pattern and Marking Scheme

BHU School Teaching Recruitment 2024; Apply Online for Teachers 48 Posts, Check Eligibility

India vs England Semi Final 2024: भारत या इंग्लैंड किसका रहा है दबदबा, देखें हेड टू हेड आकड़े

rsmssb.rajasthan.gov.in पर जारी हुआ RSMSSB Junior Accountant,CHO Result 2024 OUT, यहाँ से करें सबसे जल्दी चेक

ट्रेन का टिकट खोने या फटने पर क्या करें, यहां पढ़ें

Brain Teaser: Test Your Logical Reasoning By Finding the Odd Number Out

MJPRU Result 2024 OUT at mjpruiums.in; Download UG and PG Marksheet PDF

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Author Biographies
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Exploring the nexus between green space availability, connection with nature, and pro-environmental behavior in the urban landscape.

1. Introduction

• To explore the impact of UGS availability on different levels of perceived CN.
• To understand the association between perceived CN and engagement in environmental activities, reflecting PEB.
• To investigate the relationships between demographic factors such as gender, age, education, and work status on EB.

2.1. Study Area

2.2. data collection, 2.3. measures and data variables, 2.4. statistical analysis, 3.1. respondent demographic characteristics, 3.2. connection with nature against ugs availability, 3.3. connection with nature and engagement in environmental activities, 3.4. factors influencing engagement in environmental activities (ea), 4. discussion, 4.1. ugss’ role in enhancing perceived cn, 4.2. connection to nature and its association with pro-environmental behavior, 4.3. influencing demographic factors of pro-environmental behavior, 4.4. implications, limitations, and future research, author contributions, informed consent statement, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.

• Capaldi, C.A.; Dopko, R.L.; Zelenski, J.M. The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. 2014 , 5 , 92737. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Chawla, L.; Derr, V. Development of conservation behaviors in childhood and youth. In The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology ; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012; pp. 527–555. [ Google Scholar ]
• Shanahan, D.F.; Bush, R.; Gaston, K.J. Health benefits from nature experiences depend on dose. Sci. Rep. 2016 , 6 , 28551. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ives, C.D.; Abson, D.J.; Von Wehrden, H.; Dorninger, C.; Klaniecki, K.; Fischer, J. Reconnecting with nature for sustainability. Sustain. Sci. 2018 , 13 , 1389–1397. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Riechers, M.; Pătru-Dușe, I.A.; Balázs, A. Leverage points to foster human-nature connectedness in cultural landscapes. Ambio 2021 , 50 , 1670–1680. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Abson, D.J.; Fischer, J.; Leventon, J.; Newig, J.; Schomerus, T.; Vilsmaier, U.; Von Wehrden, H.; Abernethy, P.; Ives, C.D.; Jager, N.W.; et al. Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio 2017 , 46 , 30–39. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Fischer, J.; Riechers, M. A leverage points perspective on sustainability. People Nat. 2019 , 1 , 115–120. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2018. Available online: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/ (accessed on 12 May 2024).
• United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, (ST/ESA/SER.A/366). 2015. Available online: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-report.pdf (accessed on 12 May 2024).
• Church, S.P. From street trees to natural areas: Retrofitting cities for human connectedness to nature. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2018 , 61 , 878–903. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Clayton, S. Social issues and personal life: Considering the environment. J. Soc. 2017 , 73 , 667–681. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cleary, A.; Fielding, K.S.; Murray, Z.; Roiko, A. Predictors of nature connection among urban residents: Assessing the role of childhood and adult nature experiences. Environ. Behav. 2018 , 52 , 579–610. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gaston, K.; Soga, M. Extinction of experience: The need to be more specific. People Nat. 2020 , 2 , 575–581. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Soga, M.; Gaston, K.J. Extinction of experience: The loss of human-nature interactions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2016 , 14 , 94–101. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Frantz, C.M.; Mayer, F.S. The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs. Stud. Educ. Eval. 2014 , 41 , 85–89. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mayer, P.; Rabe, S.-E.; Grêt-Regamey, A. Operationalizing the Nature Futures Framework for ecological infrastructure. Sustain. Sci. 2023 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Díaz, S.; Pascual, U.; Stenseke, M.; Martín-López, B.; Watson, R.T.; Molnár, Z.; Hill, R.; Chan, K.M.A.; Baste, I.A.; Brauman, K.A.; et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 2018 , 359 , 270–272. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Nisbet, E.K.; Zelenski, J.M. The NR-6: A New Brief Measure of Nature Relatedness. Front. Psychol. 2013 , 4 , 813. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Lumber, R.; Richardson, M.; Sheffield, D. Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS ONE 2017 , 12 , e0177186. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Riechers, M.; Hunt, A.; Hinds, J.; Bragg, R.; Fido, D.; Petronzi, D.; Barbett, L.; Clitherow, T.; White, M. A measure of nature connectedness for children and adults: Validation, performance, and insights. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 3250. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zylstra, M.J.; Knight, A.T.; Esler, K.J.; Le Grange, L.L. Connectedness as a core conservation concern: An interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice. Springer Sci. Rev. 2014 , 2 , 119–143. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nisbet, E.K.; Zelenski, J.M.; Murphy, S.A. The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environ. Behav. 2009 , 41 , 715–740. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Barragan-Jason, G.; de Mazancourt, C.; Parmesan, C.; Singer, M.C.; Loreau, M. Human–nature connectedness as a pathway to sustainability: A global meta-analysis. Conserv. Lett. 2021 , 15 , e12852. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ives, C.D.; Oke, C.; Hehir, A.; Gordon, A.; Wang, Y.; Bekessy, S.A. Capturing residents’ values for urban green space: Mapping, analysis and guidance for practice. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017 , 161 , 32–43. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Van Heel, B.F.; Van Den Born, R.J.G.; Aarts, N. A Multidimensional Approach to Strengthening Connectedness with Nature in Everyday Life: Evaluating the Earthfulness Challenge. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 1119. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schultz, P.W. Inclusion with Nature: The Psychology Of Human-Nature Relations. In Psychology of Sustainable Development ; Schmuck, P., Schultz, W.P., Eds.; Springer: Greer, SC, USA, 2002; pp. 61–78. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hatty, M.A.; Smith, L.D.G.; Goodwin, D.; Mavondo, F.T. The CN-12: A brief, multidimensional connection with nature instrument. Front. Psychol. 2020 , 11 , 547374. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Tam, K.-P. Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. J. Environ. Psychol. 2013 , 34 , 64–78. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schnack, K. Participation, education, and democracy: Implications for environmental education, health education, and education for sustainable development. In Participation and Learning: Perspectives on Education and the Environment, Health and Sustainability ; Reid, A., Jensen, B., Nikel, J., Simovska, V., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 181–196. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ryan, R.L. Exploring the effects of environmental experience on attachment to urban natural areas. Environ. Behav. 2005 , 37 , 3–42. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schroeder, H.W. The motivations and values of ecosystem restoration volunteers. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Society and Resource Management, Columbia, MO, USA, 27–31 May 1998. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dresner, M.; Handelman, C.; Braun, S.; Rollwagen-Bollens, G. Environmental identity, pro-environmental behaviors, and civic engagement of volunteer stewards in Portland area parks. Environ. Educ. Res. 2015 , 21 , 991–1010. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Colding, J.; Barthel, S. The Potential of “Urban Green Commons” in the Resilience Building of Cities. Ecol. Econ. 2013 , 86 , 156–166. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Krasny, M.E.; Russ, A.; Tidball, K.G.; Elmqvist, T. Civic Ecology Practices: Participatory Approaches to Generating and Measuring Ecosystem Services in Cities. Ecosyst. Serv. 2014 , 7 , 177–186. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mackay, C.M.L.; Schmitt, M.T. Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis. J. Environ. Psychol. 2019 , 65 , 101323. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Whitburn, J.; Linklater, W.; Abrahamse, W. Meta-analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior. Conserv. Biol. 2019 , 34 , 180–193. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aldana-Domínguez, J.; Palomo, I.; Arellana, J.; Rosa, C.G. Unpacking the complexity of nature’s contributions to human well-being: Lessons to transform the Barranquilla Metropolitan Area into a biodiversity. Ecosyst. People 2022 , 18 , 430–446. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hartig, T.; Mitchell, R.; De Vries, S.; Frumkin, H. Nature and Health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2014 , 35 , 207–228. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ittelson, W.H. Visual perception of markings. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1996 , 3 , 171–187. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• WHO. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion (Issue WHO/EURO) ; World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1986. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mayer, F.S.; Frantz, C.M. Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environ. Behav. 2008 , 41 , 607–643. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dhyani, S.; Lahoti, S.; Khare, S.; Pujari, P.; Verma, P. Ecosystem based Disaster Risk Reduction approaches (EbDRR) as a prerequisite for inclusive urban transformation of Nagpur City, India. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018 , 32 , 95–105. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Surawar, M.; Kotharkar, R. Assessment of Urban Heat Island through Remote Sensing in Nagpur Urban Area Using Landsat 7 ETM+ Satellite Images. Int. J. Urban Civ. Eng. 2017 , 11 , 868–874. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lahoti, S.A.; Lahoti, A.; Dhyani, S.; Saito, O. Preferences and Perception Influencing Usage of Neighborhood Public Urban Green Spaces in Fast Urbanizing Indian City. Land 2023 , 12 , 1664. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lahoti, S.; Lahoti, A.; Saito, O. Benchmark assessment of recreational public Urban Green space provisions: A case of typical urbanizing Indian City, Nagpur. Urban For. Urban Green. 2019 , 44 , 126424. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lahoti, S.; Kefi, M.; Lahoti, A.; Saito, O. Mapping Methodology of Public Urban Green Spaces Using GIS: An Example of Nagpur City, India. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 2166. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Steg, L.; Vlek, C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. J. Environ. Psychol. 2009 , 29 , 309–317. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kormos, C.; Gifford, R. The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. J. Environ. Psychol. 2014 , 40 , 359–371. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pong, V.; Tam, K.P. Relationship between global identity and pro-environmental behavior and environmental concern: A systematic review. Front. Psychol. 2023 , 14 , 1033564. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Noe, E.E.; Stolte, O. Dwelling in the city: A qualitative exploration of the human-nature relationship in three types of urban greenspace. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2023 , 230 , 104633. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sheffield, D.; Butler, C.W.; Richardson, M. Improving Nature Connectedness in Adults: A Meta-Analysis, Review and Agenda. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 12494. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ohly, H.; White, M.P.; Wheeler, B.W.; Bethel, A.; Ukoumunne, O.C.; Nikolaou, V.; Garside, R. Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 2016 , 19 Pt B , 305–343. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hartig, T. Restorative environments. In Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology ; Spielberger, C., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004; Volume 3, pp. 273–279. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schebella, M.F.; Weber, D.; Lindsey, K.; Daniels, C.B. For the love of nature: Exploring the importance of species diversity and micro-variables associated with favorite outdoor places. Front. Psychol. 2017 , 8 , 2094. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Martin, L.; White, M.P.; Hunt, A.; Richardson, M.; Pahl, S.; Burt, J. Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours. J. Environ. Psychol. 2020 , 68 , 101389. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dasgupta, R.; Basu, M.; Hashimoto, S.; Estoque, R.C.; Kumar, P.; Johnson, B.A.; Mitra, B.K.; Mitra, P. Residents’ place attachment to urban green spaces in Greater Tokyo region: An empirical assessment of dimensionality and influencing socio-demographic factors. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022 , 67 , 127438. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, Y.; Van Dijk, T.; Tang, J.; Berg, A.E.v.d. Green space attachment and health: A comparative study in two urban neighborhoods. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015 , 12 , 12342–14363. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Raymond, C.M.; Brown, G.; Weber, D. The measurement of place attachment: Personal, community, and environmental connections. J. Environ. Psychol. 2010 , 30 , 422–434. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Samus, A.; Freeman, C.; Van Heezik, Y.; Krumme, K.; Dickinson, K.J.M. How do urban green spaces increase well-being? The role of perceived wildness and nature connectedness. J. Environ. Psychol. 2022 , 82 , 101850. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rosa, I.M.D.; Pereira, H.M.; Ferrier, S.; Alkemade, R.; Acosta, L.A.; Akcakaya, H.R.; Den Belder, E.; Fazel, A.M.; Fujimori, S.; Harfoot, M.; et al. Multiscale scenarios for nature futures. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017 , 1 , 1416–1419. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Lovati, C.; Manzi, F.; Di Dio, C.; Massaro, D.; Gilli, G.; Marchetti, A. Feeling connected to nature: Validation of the connectedness to nature scale in the Italian context. Front. Psychol. 2023 , 14 , 1242699. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Zelenski, J.; Warber, S.; Robinson, J.M.; Logan, A.C.; Prescott, S.L. Nature Connection: Providing a Pathway from Personal to Planetary Health. Challenges 2023 , 14 , 16. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Barbaro, N.; Pickett, S.M. Mindfully green: Examining the effect of connectedness to nature on the relationship between mindfulness and engagement in pro-environmental behavior. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2016 , 93 , 137–142. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Beery, T.H.; Wolf-Watz, D. Nature to place: Rethinking the environmental connectedness perspective. J. Environ. Psychol. 2014 , 40 , 198–205. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2020 , 2 , 314–324. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Steg, L.; de Groot, J.I.M. Environmental values. In Psychology and Climate Change: Human Perceptions, Impacts, and Responses ; Clayton, S., Manning, C., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 131–148. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Geng, L.; Xu, J.; Ye, L.; Zhou, W.; Zhou, K. Connections with Nature and Environmental Behaviors. PLoS ONE 2015 , 10 , e0127247. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Williams, S.J.; Jones, J.P.G.; Gibbons, J.M.; Clubbe, C. Botanic gardens can positively influence visitors’ environmental attitudes. Biodivers. Conserv. 2015 , 24 , 1609–1620. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Anderson, D.J.; Krettenauer, T. Connectedness to Nature and Pro-Environmental Behaviour from Early Adolescence to Adulthood: A Comparison of Urban and Rural Canada. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 3655. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sheasby, J.; Smith, A. Examining the Factors That Contribute to Pro-Environmental Behaviour between Rural and Urban Populations. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 6179. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ma, L.; Shahbaz, P.; Haq, S.U.; Boz, I. Exploring the Moderating Role of Environmental Education in Promoting a Clean Environment. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 8127. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Osuntuyi, B.V.; Lean, H.H. Economic growth, energy consumption and environmental degradation nexus in heterogeneous countries: Does education matter? Environ. Sci. Eur. 2022 , 34 , 48. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bandura, A. Toward a psychology of human agency: Pathways and reflections. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2018 , 13 , 130–136. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ardoin, N.M.; Bowers, A.W.; Gaillard, E. Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biol. Conserv. 2020 , 241 , 108224. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Clayton, S. Environmental identity: What it is and why it matters. In Psychology and Climate Change: Human Perceptions, Impacts, and Responses ; Clayton, S., Manning, C., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 45–64. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McDonald, R.; Beatley, T. Biophilic Cities for an Urban Century-”Why Nature Is Essential for the Success of Cities” ; Palgrave Pivot: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• McEwan, K.; Ferguson, F.J.; Richardson, M.; Cameron, R. The good things in urban nature: A thematic framework for optimising urban planning for nature connectedness. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2020 , 194 , 103687. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• De Bell, S.; Graham, H.; White, P.C.L. The role of managed natural spaces in connecting people with urban nature: A comparison of local user, researcher, and provider views. Urban Ecosyst. 2018 , 21 , 875–886. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Husk, K.; Lovell, R.; Cooper, C.; Garside, R. Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: A review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Urban Ecosyst. 2013 , 21 , 875–886. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Giusti, M.; Svane, U.; Raymond, C.M.; Beery, T.H. A framework to assess where and how children connect to nature. Front. Psychol. 2018 , 8 , 303174. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ives, C.; Giusti, M.; Fischer, J.; Abson, D.J.; Klaniecki, K.; Dorninger, C.; Laudan, J.; Barthel, S.; Abernethy, P.; Martín-López, B.; et al. Human–nature connection: A multidisciplinary review. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2017 , 26–27 , 106–113. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Davis, N.; Daams, M.; Hinsberg, A.; Sijtsma, F. How deep is your love-of nature? A psychological and spatial analysis of the depth of feelings towards Dutch nature areas. Appl. Geogr. 2016 , 77 , 38–48. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Lahoti, S.A.; Dhyani, S.; Sahle, M.; Kumar, P.; Saito, O. Exploring the Nexus between Green Space Availability, Connection with Nature, and Pro-Environmental Behavior in the Urban Landscape. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 5435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135435

Lahoti SA, Dhyani S, Sahle M, Kumar P, Saito O. Exploring the Nexus between Green Space Availability, Connection with Nature, and Pro-Environmental Behavior in the Urban Landscape. Sustainability . 2024; 16(13):5435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135435

Lahoti, Shruti Ashish, Shalini Dhyani, Mesfin Sahle, Pankaj Kumar, and Osamu Saito. 2024. "Exploring the Nexus between Green Space Availability, Connection with Nature, and Pro-Environmental Behavior in the Urban Landscape" Sustainability 16, no. 13: 5435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135435

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals