Sign up here.
Matthew D. Kohel, a partner in Saul Ewing's Baltimore office, represents clients in commercial litigation, intellectual property matters, and data privacy issues. His intellectual property experience includes claims for the misappropriation of trade secrets, trademark infringement, false advertising, the sale of counterfeit goods, and cases involving a variety of patent issues. He can be reached at [email protected].
Dana Silva, counsel in the Saul Ewing's Los Angeles office, handles business litigation and general civil suits. She has experience with breach of contract, fiduciary duty, trade secret disputes, fraudulent conveyance, unfair competition and shareholder disputes, among other matters. She can be reached at [email protected].
David Thomas
Mike Scarcella, David Thomas
Karen Sloan
Henry Engler
When Mexicans elected a new president, they also chose the next negotiator-in-chief who will make tough choices with the United States on issues from immigration and trade to fentanyl trafficking .
Mexicans voted overwhelmingly for Claudia Sheinbaum, giving her more than 58% of the vote and a substantial mandate to govern the second-largest economy in Latin America and the No. 1 trading partner for the United States.
When President Andrés Manuel López Obrador leaves his post and Sheinbaum takes office on Oct. 1, she'll inherit a country that is reeling from slow economic growth and violence linked to organized crime . She'll also face a fractured relationship with the United States. Despite deep cross-border economic ties, the U.S.-Mexico relationship has been tested by the countries' shared problems with global migration and drug trafficking .
"The two countries have been suffering from an incredible fumbling of the ball in dealing with each other," said Tony Payan, director of the Center for the U.S. and Mexico at Rice University's Baker Institute. "I think the two countries need to come back to the table."
Politics: 'Finish the wall.' Why the southern border became a big issue for this New England state.
Americans may love "taco Tuesday" and vacationing in Cancun, but the complexity of the U.S.-Mexico relationship is often lost amid marketing and political rhetoric. Mexico’s stamp on the U.S. is everywhere.
It’s in the Mexico-made car parts that keep U.S. autoworkers employed in Detroit , in the windmill blades exported to U.S. clean energy plants , in the pacemakers saving the lives of American patients with heart failure, and in the $15 avocado toast on restaurant menus nationwide.
U.S. exports to Mexico include grains grown in the Midwest and natural gas pumped in Texas. Mexico sends fruits and vegetables north, keeping grocery costs lower amid volatile inflation in the U.S.
The country became the United States’ largest trading partner last year, pushing China to the No. 2 spot, and the two neighbors now do nearly $800 billion in trade annually , according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
But it’s a fraught relationship. Mexico is also the transit country for hundreds of thousands of U.S.-bound migrants, provoking repeated humanitarian crises at the U.S. border. And it’s the source country for the fentanyl that kills tens of thousands of Americans each year.
The U.S.-Mexico-Canada foreign trade agreement, known as the USMCA – negotiated during the Trump administration – is up for renegotiation in 2026. U.S.-based business leaders are concerned that renegotiating the deal could create uncertainty and hurt both countries' economies.
"Mexico is now the U.S.’s main trading partner," said Jennifer Apperti, director of the Texas-Mexico Center at Southern Methodist University. "To again reopen the door to things that have just been negotiated would be, honestly, not the best use of time. And business time is of the essence."
Domingo Garcia, president of the U.S.-based League of United Latin American Citizens, said in a statement that he looked forward to "building bridges" with the Sheinbaum administration.
In past meetings, Garcia said he found Sheinbaum "open, engaging, and willing to listen and share her thoughts on moving forward. Mexicans are vital to the United States' economic future and our hemisphere's overall robust vibrancy. At the same time, we must consider environmental and scientific initiatives in the interest of our well-being today and for future generations."
With an estimated 60% turnout for Sunday's vote, it was one of Mexico’s biggest elections in history. Nearly 100 million people were eligible to vote.
For the first time, Mexican citizens living in the United States were able to cast their ballots in person at 20 consulates in the U.S., including in Phoenix.
Contributing: Rafael Carranza, Arizona Republic
Edward Lee is a Professor of Law at the Santa Clara University School of Law, starting in August 2024. This post is based on his recent article forthcoming in the U.C. Davis Law Review .
The Securities Act of 1933 defines “ security ” by identifying twenty examples of financial instruments or interests that constitute securities. “Investment contract” is the thirteenth example. It has assumed outsized importance in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) enforcement actions against entities that have made public offerings of unregistered securities. Yet, nearly a century since the 1933 Act’s passage, the meaning of “investment contract” is still contested.
Nowhere is that more apparent than in the SEC’s ongoing enforcement actions against so-called “crypto asset securities”—a term nowhere in the Securities Act, but one that the SEC has used broadly to describe cryptocurrencies and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) in various actions. According to the SEC, these crypto assets are securities if they are “investment contracts” under the seminal case of SEC v. W.J. Howey Co . , in which the Supreme Court interpreted the term in 1946. Under SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s expansive view , most cryptocurrencies are investment contracts. Even an NFT for a Pokémon card might be.
In “ The Original Public Meaning of Investment Contract ,” I provide historical research of newspapers and dictionaries before and contemporaneous with the enactment of the Securities Act of 1933. This historical research calls into question the SEC’s expansive approach. The research shows that “investment contract” was not a technical term or legal term of art, or neologism created by Congress or state legislatures. The reason Congress didn’t provide a definition of “investment contract” is simple: Congress didn’t create “investment contract.” People did. The term dates back as early as the 1800s, and was based on the ordinary meaning of “investment” and “contract.” People sold investments in contracts—the contract itself was the vehicle for a person’s investment. When Congress enacted the 1933 Act, it adopted the meaning of “investment contract” commonly understood by people at the time. Recognizing this key insight provides clarity—and an important limit—to the term.
The Original Public Meaning of Investment Contract in 1933
Starting in the 1800s, business entities advertised offerings of their “investment contracts” in newspapers. On January 17, 1887, for example, the real estate business the Davidson Company offered its “investment contracts” in an ad published in the St. Paul Daily Globe . The ad explained: “we make investments in St. Paul real estate … under our ‘ Investment Contracts ,’ whereby the party investing is guaranteed his (or her) money back and 6 per cent interest and a share of the profits.” Other real estate investment ventures offered similar investment contracts , which often targeted nonresidents. Even though some offerings, like the Davidson Company’s, purported to purchase the real estate in the name of the investor, the land sale was in name only (as was the case in Howey ). People were buying, not land, but instead, the contract—or the contractual right of receiving “a share of the profits” made by the offeror from its venture.
The term “investment contract” was not limited to real estate ventures. The term was used broadly to apply to an array of investments, including contractual offerings in bonds , insurance , mining businesses , and general, unspecified investments, such as the one offered by the American Contract Co . Often, the ad for the offering stipulated the amount of profits the contracts would putatively yield to investors—for example, the Davidson Company ad “guaranteed his (or her) money back and 6 per cent interest and a share of the profits.” Newspaper ads also sought the hiring of salesmen to sell “investment contracts.” And newspaper articles in the early 1900s reported state and federal prosecutions of fraudulent “investment contracts.”
By 1920, when the Supreme Court of Minnesota first considered a case involving the meaning of “investment contract” in the state’s blue-sky statute, State v. Gopher Tire & Rubber Co. , the term had a well-established meaning: its ordinary meaning. As the Court explained, “The placing of capital or laying out of money in a way intended to secure income or profit from its employment is an ‘investment’ as that word is commonly used and understood .” Although the Court did not define “contract,” there is no indication that the word meant anything other than the ordinary meaning of contract. Indeed, the Court described the certificates at issue in the case in contractual terms: the offeror’s “certificates are like stock in that they give their holders the right to share in the profits of the corporation.” As the Court recognized in two subsequent cases in 1923 and 1927, the state’s blue-sky law regulated “offers to the public of investment contracts evidencing a right to participate in the proceeds of a venture .” Such offerings solicit “the public … to invest money in the contracts [the offerors] propose to sell.”
In 1946, when the U.S. Supreme Court interpreted “investment contract” in the Securities Act in Howey , the Court expressly adopted its contemporaneous meaning “as used by Congress,” a term “the meaning of which had been crystalized by this prior judicial interpretation [ Gopher Tire ]” in 1920. Indeed, as analyzed above, newspaper articles and advertisements before the passage of the 1933 Act show that “investment contract” was a term commonly used in public discourse to refer to a contract offered as an investment.
Under the original public meaning, an investment contract involves a certain type of quid pro quo : individuals “invest money in a common enterprise,” the quid , in exchange for “the expectation that they would earn a profit solely through the efforts of the promoter,” the quo . Or, under Gopher Tire ’s formulation that the Howey Court quoted, one invests “money … to secure income or profit from its employment” by the offeror. Put simply, an investor pays money for the right to the offeror’s profits.
Examining the economic reality and substance of a scheme, such as the land sale plus service agreement in Howey , allows courts to look at what the scheme, in fact, does in operation. The form of an instrument is not dispositive. Of course, it does not have to be titled “investment contract” to be an investment contract. The substance of the financial arrangement is key. The offering of an investment contract may be implied based on the facts , including the conduct, course of dealing, and representations of the parties. But the examination of economic reality under Howey does not allow the courts to ignore the text of the Securities Act—or the original public meaning of investment contract. If the facts indicate there was no offering of a contractual right to receive a share of the offeror’s or venture’s profits—what the Supreme Court described as “ the shares in the enterprise ”—the economic reality is there was no investment contract under the 1933 Act. Every Supreme Court decision finding an investment contract has involved such a contractual right, as summarized by the Brief of Securities Law Scholars as Amici Curiae in Support of Coinbase’s Motion. To interpret “investment contract” more broadly to situations completely lacking any such offering of a contractual right would impermissibly read the word “contract” right out of the statute. And it would violate “the core administrative-law principle that an agency may not rewrite clear statutory terms to suit its own sense of how the statute should operate.”
Adhering to the original public meaning of the Securities Act accords with the Supreme Court’s general approach to statutory interpretation. As the Court recently explained , “[t]his Court normally interprets a statute in accord with the ordinary public meaning of its terms at the time of its enactment.” Otherwise, courts “would deny the people the right to continue relying on the original meaning of the law they have counted on to settle their rights and obligations.” This principle serves both due process and the rule of law by providing people with clear notice of the scope of securities law—and by providing a limit to the SEC’s enforcement power.
Requiring Securities Registration of Artwork NFTs Constitutes a Prior Restraint
Nowhere is the need for such transparency apparent than in the SEC’s ad hoc treatment of NFTs. During the boom in the emerging market for NFTs, when sales volume hit $27 billion in 2021, the SEC issued no public guidance on whether NFTs are securities that must be registered before their public sale. NFTs create a new type of property in and embodiment of digital artworks and other creative expression, and offer digital artists a nascent market for their artworks. The SEC’s silence left people in the dark. Then, in the span of just two weeks in 2023, the SEC announced the settlements of enforcement actions against two NFT projects for allegedly selling a collection of NFTs as unregistered securities to the public. The SEC concluded that the NFTs operated as “investment contracts” and were therefore securities under Howey . In both actions, SEC Commissioners Hester Peirce and Mark Uyeda dissented, disagreeing with the SEC’s overbroad classification of the NFTs. They admonished : “The Commission should have grappled with these questions long ago and offered guidance [to the public] when NFTs first started proliferating.”
The SEC’s orders ignored the First Amendment problem that arises when the SEC regulates NFTs involving artworks or creative expression protected by the First Amendment. Both NFT projects subject to the SEC orders involved artistic works: their artworks were embodied in their NFTs, which included pictorial and graphical images (keys depicting various symbols, and numerous cat characters for an animated series, respectively). And both NFT projects had plans to create artistic expression as their business: Impact Theory was developing an online game, and Stoner Cats , an animated web series featuring the cat characters. To require securities registration of artwork NFTs before an artist can distribute them to the public raises a serious First Amendment problem—and most likely constitutes an unlawful prior restraint in violation of the artist’s freedom of expression. A digital Pokémon NFT is just as much protected expression as a physical Pokémon card. Restraining the sale of either until the government approves its publication is a prior restraint in violation of the First Amendment.
Adhering to the original public meaning of “investment contract” avoids this First Amendment problem. Artwork NFTs are not investment contracts because they typically do not entitle, by contract, their holders to share the profits solely generated by the NFT project. Instead, the NFTs typically convey ownership in an embodiment of an artwork. Artwork NFTs are “original collectibles,” as Cassandra Hatton, a senior vice president at Sotheby’s who has overseen the sale of many NFTs, explained in Amy Whitaker and Nora Burnett Abrams’ book, The Story of NFTs: Artists, Technology, and Democracy .
And the mere expectation of appreciation in the value of an artwork, whether embodied in NFTs or canvas, doesn’t create an investment contract any more than the appreciation in Barbie dolls, Birkin bags, Nike sneakers, Pokémon cards, Rolex watches, and Picasso paintings. Even if people who invest in these collectibles reasonably expect an appreciation in value—i.e., profits—from their respective makers’ efforts, such as in developing their brands and returning value to their collectors, that speculative expectation of profit doesn’t turn these collectibles into investment contracts. The economic realities of buying collectibles are different in kind from investing in investment contracts. Buying a rare Barbie, even if purchased from Mattel as an NFT expecting it will appreciate, is different from buying a right to a business’s profit. The former lacks the contractual right to profits that the latter has.
A link to the article on SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4819525
Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>
Supported By:
Program on corporate governance advisory board.
Manchester City are opening a new front in their legal battle with the Premier League .
They are already due to defend themselves against 115 charges of breaching the Premier League’s profit and sustainability rules (PSR) — which they deny — but they have now turned the tables.
City have brought a separate legal case against the Premier League’s associated party transaction (APT) rules, which will begin on June 10. The implications, if City are successful, could reshape the division’s financial landscape.
With Premier League clubs set to meet for their AGM on Thursday, this will be the central topic on their representatives’ lips. What does it all mean? The Athletic explains.
Rules already existed, but tightened-up regulations were first rushed into place immediately after the Saudi-led takeover of Newcastle United was eventually approved in October 2021. Rival clubs feared Newcastle’s new owners — Saudi Arabia ’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) — could use their vast array of companies to strike a multitude of inflated sponsorship deals. This would drive revenue and circumvent PSR rules.
Advertisement
The clubs initially voted for a temporary suspension but eventually agreed on a framework which would see all associated-party transactions subjected to a fair market value test. Essentially, teams would have to prove that any deal was financially justifiable to all parties based on the going rate.
For example, Newcastle’s sponsorship deals with PIF-linked events company Sela and e-commerce company Noon were both subject to this test.
A new version of these rules was then agreed in February of this year.
City have always opposed or abstained when voting on the introduction of these policies in Premier League meetings — the club’s sponsorship network has historically been tied to figures who sit on the board of the City Football Group (CFG).
For example, title sponsor Etihad — whose name sits on both the club’s shirt and stadium — is the state airline of the United Arab Emirates. City’s owner — the Abu Dhabi United Group (ADUG) — is a private equity company with strong links to the UAE government. ADUG insists the two are separate. Nevertheless, until August 2021, Etihad was chaired by Mohamed Al Mazrouei — who sat on City’s board until January 2022.
The Athletic reported in 2022 that City receive in excess of £67.5million per year from Etihad for their sponsorship of the club.
City recorded Premier League record revenues in 2022-23, bringing in £712.8million, of which almost half — £341.4m — was commercial income. That is 13 per cent bigger than Manchester United , English football’s traditional commercial powerhouse. City’s commercial income is up 50 per cent since 2019 and now makes up 48 per cent of total revenue.
As an aside, City and Newcastle are not alone in this — Leicester City ’s owners, King Power, for example, sponsor the club’s stadium, jersey and training kit. However, City and Newcastle’s close links to state investment offer them a far deeper well — which is why rival Premier League clubs mobilised to close the loophole.
In February, new rules were agreed. At the same meeting, Premier League chief executive Richard Masters informed clubs that an unnamed club — named as City by The Athletic at the time — was threatening legal action in response, claiming the new regulations were in breach of competition law.
That has now come to pass — in a two-week hearing which will take place in private from next Monday. According to a source with knowledge of the situation, who like all those spoken to for this article asked to be kept anonymous as they did not have permission to speak, City deem the rules to have been rushed through — the first suspension of APT laws came just four days after Newcastle’s takeover was finalised — and believe the rules were applied in a targeted manner. That City source, however, stressed that the club does want some form of regulation to remain — albeit in a guise they would view as non-discriminatory.
According to a 165-page legal submission seen by British newspaper The Times , City have argued that they have suffered “discrimination” as a result of the new rules, alleging they amounted to a “tyranny of the majority”. The Premier League requires a majority of 14 clubs to impose new regulations.
The Times also reported that City will seek damages for losses they claim to have suffered since APT laws were introduced.
UEFA , incidentally, have their own fair-market value test. City’s legal case does not address those laws and the club will still have to comply with them in European competition. And according to a source, at least one European superclub is following proceedings closely, wary of the implications that a growth in City’s revenue could have.
Rival clubs are able to make their voices heard by providing witness statements or evidence in favour of either City or the Premier League.
In theory, Newcastle are natural allies with City — an end to APT rules would facilitate several further lucrative sponsorship deals with PIF-owned companies. Newcastle have been operating close to their PSR limits and may face the need to sell a prize asset in the summer, but increasing their revenue allows them to continue investing in their squad.
Sources with knowledge of the situation said other Premier League clubs are also considering supporting City due to their own potential abilities to take advantage of APT rules in future. Others, while they support the regulations in principle, agree with City that the rules were hurriedly implemented and could be improved upon.
However, the majority of the league will still be hoping City lose their case — although as this matter will take place under competition law in private arbitration, rather than be subject to a Premier League vote, their voices ultimately carry limited sway.
Teams have always sought to maintain pressure on the Premier League over City’s ability to spend. This has included informal phone calls to Premier League HQ from owners and chief executives of its clubs, or even legal letters or requests for information that would land at the Premier League.
At a basic level, teams such as City and Newcastle will be able to immediately strike several deals and enter this summer’s transfer market with renewed force. Other clubs may scramble to find related-party sponsorship deals of their own to circumvent PSR laws.
Last season, two teams — Everton and Nottingham Forest — faced points deductions for breaching PSR rules. A promoted team (Leicester City) are facing an identical charge. These regulations financially capped the majority of teams. Success for City has the potential to upend the league’s financial landscape.
There is a strong correlation between wage bills and finishing positions — clubs who can increase sponsorship revenue can put that money directly into player contracts without fear of a points deduction.
But the implications could be even wider.
“If a challenge to the legality of these APTs can succeed, then it is not inconceivable that someone might try to challenge the overarching profit and sustainability rules more generally,” says Daniel Gore, a senior associate at law firm Withers, who specialises in competition law and arbitration.
“This could reverse the moves made to ensure that clubs operate within their means — something people may argue has increased the overall competitiveness of the Premier League and reduced clubs going insolvent.”
City’s objection to the Premier League’s ‘two-thirds majority’ framework — which they termed as “tyranny” — directly challenges the league’s democratic process.
“This is a common threshold for corporate procedure and means that there is a reasonable and transparent process,” says Gore. “It is hard to see how effective governance could take place without a threshold such as this, so Manchester City’s challenge could plunge the Premier League’s governance structure into chaos and make it harder for any decision to take place.”
Nothing, in a literal sense. The rules will remain as they are — though City always have the ability to attempt to table a vote to change the regulations in a Premier League meeting.
However, this is just part of City’s battle against the Premier League. Sometimes, it is easy to forget that the league’s dominant team — its victors for six of the last seven seasons — have been either investigated or in open dispute with the Premier League for almost the entirety of that time.
Some legal experts, who have advised on elements of the European Super League (ESL), have theorised that City’s ongoing dispute with the Premier League may be one way in which the competition may be reborn. Real Madrid and Barcelona are still pursuing the concept of an ESL. Italian club Juventus withdrew from those plans on Saturday.
If City lose their challenge over APT regulations and are found guilty of breaching a number of the 115 FFP charges, relationships with the Premier League will be at an all-time low, raising the possibility of City entering open revolt by seeking to rejoin the ESL.
But speaking of those 115 charges…
Yes and no. On the one hand, the 115 charges relate to allegations of past financial breaches — essentially, disguising payments made to the club by their ownership as sponsorship revenue, with those sponsorship deals themselves inflated. In contrast, City’s APT dispute will govern what they are allowed to do going forward.
However, if APT laws are found to be unlawful — and with City accused of leveraging them by the Premier League — City’s defence in the parent case will be significantly strengthened.
Progress in that has been lengthy and contentious, with City’s lawyers — led by Lord Pannick, one of the United Kingdom’s most expensive barristers — opposing the Premier League at every step.
In one email, published by German newspaper Der Spiegel in 2018, a City lawyer claims that Khaldoon al Mubarak, the club’s chairman, had said that “he would rather spend 30million on the 50 best lawyers in the world to sue them for the next 10 years” than agree to any financial settlement or penalty from UEFA — who had been involved in their own lengthy legal process against the English side.
City’s legal action here is another way in which the club can muddy the process and attack the Premier League.
The Premier League’s legal capabilities are already stretched — The Athletic has already reported on their need to recruit extra help to deal with the caseload at the end of last season. This will only add to their plate.
In a sense, they are also in a tough spot politically. Even if the Premier League wins this case, the shadow of City’s 115 charges still looms — with rival clubs insistent that City must be appropriately punished for what they view as a breach. A verdict is not expected until at least the spring of 2025.
If the Premier League lose, then clubs with links to state ownership will be even more empowered financially, which will lead to fierce questioning from rival sides over the division’s credibility.
Thursday’s AGM will be interesting.
(Top photo: Naomi Baker/Getty Images)
Get all-access to exclusive stories.
Subscribe to The Athletic for in-depth coverage of your favorite players, teams, leagues and clubs. Try a week on us.
Jacob Whitehead is a reporter for The Athletic, who covers a range of topics including investigations and Newcastle United. He previously worked on the news desk. Prior to joining, he wrote for Rugby World Magazine and was named David Welch Student Sportswriter of the Year at the SJA Awards. Follow Jacob on Twitter @ jwhitey98
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
3. Enhance your presentation by cutting the copy. Keep your bullet points short and your slides sparse. Although visual impact is an important part of your overall presentation, you should have minimal words on the page. You don't want your audience to be distracted as they try to read ahead or catch up.
Use Storytelling: A legal case is essentially a story with a problem and a resolution. Tapping into the power of storytelling can make your presentation more engaging and memorable. Practice, Practice, Practice: Rehearse your presentation multiple times. This helps reduce nervousness and ensures you're comfortable with the material.
Presentation. Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Acronyms, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia . PRESENTATION, eccl. law. The act of a patron offering his clerk to the bishop of the diocese to be instituted in a church or benefice. A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier.
A trial presentation helps you present your evidence in a way that's easy for the judge to understand and see the strength of your case. Preparing a Trial Presentation not only helps you present your evidence effectively but also assists you in organizing your thoughts and arguments. With a well-structured outline and identified key points ...
Legal writing is any type of writing within the legal profession that seeks to confer legal information to others that is usually clear, concise, and above all, accurate. In many legal settings, specialized forms of written communication are required. In many others, writing is the medium in which a lawyer must express their analysis of an ...
Putting a soft return (shift+return) where you want the title to break onto the next line makes a big difference in readability. 4. Better Typography = More Readable Text. A presentation full of text slides can definitely get boring for audiences. But even the best presenters need the occasional bulleted list slide.
This resource will help you develop effective presentation skills in a legal context. Work through the material and exercises and you should be able to: develop appropriate learning strategies to enhance your presentation skills. learn and apply the three key rules of presenting. use presentation skills effectively in advocacy and questioning.
PowerPoint presentations have long been used in the courtroom to deliver important arguments to a judge and jury. Although this technology is not new, many attorneys still struggle to use the software effectively. Without the right tools, even the strongest legal arguments may be lost on the audience.The Basics: Know Your ScreenThe type of screen on which your presentation will be displayed ...
In ecclesiastical law. The act of a patron or proprietor of a living in offering or presenting a clerk to the ordinary to be instituted in the benefice. Presentation oi&ee. The office of the lord chancellor's official, the secretary of presentations, who conducts all correspondence having reference to the twelve canonries and sis hundred and ...
Presentations Law and Legal Definition. Presentations means "any content intended to inform or influence the viewers or readers of a given media venue. It may be in an advertising, public service, editorial, informational or any other format. It may be text, graphics, audio, multimedia, or a combination of any communication methods." ...
This is the main body of your presentation. Tell them what you have told them. When you reach the end of the main body, summarise by repeating your core theme, this time with the supporting points in short, bullet point style. When writing your speech, keep your sentences short and, where possible, avoid words of more than two syllables.
As the use of visual aids and technology during litigation increases, it's imperative that you keep up with presentation trends so that you can use all the tools available to you to persuade a jury. Increasingly, attorneys need to hone their design skills as PowerPoint presentations move away from bullet points, to graphics. Here are some tips and resources for you to upgrade your PowerPoint ...
Whether an in-person or virtual presentation or class, this article will help you establish best practices for legally using images in presentation slides and minimizing your risks of copyright infringement. Images include photographs, charts, maps, illustrations, charts and more. You may also like our online copyright course that includes an ...
1. Preparation - plan ahead for your presentation and do your homework so you are confident your work is the best it can be. Print your speech and rehearse it beforehand. If possible, visit the venue and check for possible technical faults prior to event. Use positive mental imagery to visualise yourself giving a confident performance.
PRESENTMENT. § 3-501. PRESENTMENT. (a) " Presentment " means a demand made by or on behalf of a person entitled to enforce an instrument (i) to pay the instrument made to the drawee or a party obliged to pay the instrument or, in the case of a note or accepted draft payable at a bank, to the bank, or (ii) to accept a draft made to the drawee.
presentment: A Grand Jury statement that a crime was committed; a written notice, initiated by a grand jury, that states that a crime occurred and that an indictment should be drawn. In relation to Commercial Paper ,presentment is a demand for the payment or acceptance of a negotiable instrument, such as a check. The holder of a negotiable ...
A special agreement by which the endorser waives the presentment. The receiving security or money by an endorser to secure himself from loss, or to pay the note at maturity. In this case, when the indemnity or money is a full security for the amount of the note or bill, no presentment is requisite. The receiving the note by the holder from the ...
The Uniform Commercial Code § 3-501 defines Presentment as: "a demand made by or on behalf of a person entitled to enforce an instrument (i) to pay the instrument made to the drawee or a party obliged to pay the instrument or, in the case of a note or accepted draft payable at a bank, to the bank, or (ii) to accept a draft made to the drawee
Law is a vast and diverse field that offers a wide range of interesting topics for presentation. Whether you are a law student looking for ideas for your next presentation or a professional looking to expand your knowledge, there are plenty of fascinating subjects to explore. In article, delve some intriguing law topics perfect presentations. 1.
PRESENTATION definition: 1. a talk giving information about something: 2. an occasion when prizes, qualifications, etc. are…. Learn more.
Presentation skills are the abilities and qualities necessary for creating and delivering a compelling presentation that effectively communicates information and ideas. They encompass what you say, how you structure it, and the materials you include to support what you say, such as slides, videos, or images. You'll make presentations at various ...
Definition: A presentation is a form of communication in which the speaker conveys information to the audience. In an organization presentations are used in various scenarios like talking to a group, addressing a meeting, demonstrating or introducing a new product, or briefing a team. It involves presenting a particular subject or issue or new ideas/thoughts to a group of people.
Definition & Citations: 1. Being in a set place at a given time. 2. To bring a motion before a court. Find the legal definition of PRESENT from Black's Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition. 1.
Presentations. Comprehensive FLSA Presentation (Microsoft PowerPoint) ... Law. Fair Labor Standards Act; Regulations. 29 CFR Chapter V; Civil Money Penalty Inflation Adjustments. Starting in 2016, agencies across the federal government must adjust their penalties for inflation each year. Below is a table that reflects the adjustments that have ...
The fair-housing law placed a sweeping prohibition on all acts of discrimination related to the home buying and renting process, making prejudicial treatment based on race, religion or national ...
Matthew D. Kohel and Dana Silva of Saul Ewing LLP discuss steps a company can take to protect its confidential material and trade secrets in light of the Federal Trade Commission's ban on the use ...
Adobe Connect gives you complete control over your virtual sessions, with the ability to create stunning, custom experiences. Adobe Connect helps deliver engaging training and learning sessions, highly customized, branded, and engagement-led webinars, as well as reliable, personalized, high-quality meetings.
Mexico's incoming president will inherit a fractured relationship with the U.S., tested by shared problems with global migration and drug trafficking.
The Securities Act of 1933 defines "security" by identifying twenty examples of financial instruments or interests that constitute securities. "Investment contract" is the thirteenth example. It has assumed outsized importance in the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC's) enforcement actions against entities that have made public offerings of unregistered securities.
Some legal experts, who have advised on elements of the European Super League (ESL), have theorised that City's ongoing dispute with the Premier League may be one way in which the competition ...