review of cafe essay

Free Shipping On ALL Orders | Guaranteed Lowest Prices | Defect Free Guarantee | Warranty on All Machines | Same Day Shipping

Sign in | Join

• Shipping & Return
• My Addresses

Recover password

Enter your email:

Remembered your password? Back to login

Create my account

Please fill in the information below:

Already have an account? Login here

Got a Question? Call Us

(888) 978-5224 Mon-Sun 9am-6pm Eastern

How to Write a Good Review for a Coffee Shop: Expert Tips and Guidelines

A well-written coffee shop review helps potential customers decide whether they want to visit the establishment or not, as well as provide valuable feedback to the coffee shop itself. Writing a great coffee shop review involves taking into account the entire experience, from the quality of the coffee to the ambiance, customer service, and any extra services offered by the establishment. By sharing your observations and opinions in a clear, concise, and constructive manner, you can contribute to the coffee community and help others make informed decisions about where to enjoy their next cup.

Before you start writing a review, it's essential to have an understanding of coffee and its various aspects. This knowledge will help you evaluate the coffee shop's main offering more accurately. Additionally, remember that the ambiance of the coffee shop plays a crucial role in the overall experience; it can be the difference between a one-time visit and becoming a regular customer. Pay close attention to elements like lighting, seating, and cleanliness, as these factors contribute to the coffee shop's atmosphere.

Customer service should not be overlooked when writing a coffee shop review either. Excellent customer service can sometimes make up for average coffee, while poor customer service could ruin the experience even if the drink is outstanding. Hence, mention your interactions with the staff and any extra services that made your visit memorable or disappointing.

Key Takeaways

• A good coffee shop review evaluates the quality of coffee, ambiance, and customer service.
• Understanding coffee and its various aspects will help create a more accurate and informative review.
• Assessing and highlighting extra services can make a review more valuable for prospective customers.

Understanding Coffee

Coffee is a beloved beverage for many people worldwide, and understanding its various aspects can greatly enhance one's ability to write an informative and helpful coffee shop review. In this section, we will delve into the types of coffee and brewing techniques.

Types of Coffee

There are several types of coffee beans, with the two primary ones being Arabica and Robusta .

• Arabica beans are known for their mild, nuanced flavors that range from fruity to chocolaty. These beans are generally considered to be higher in quality and are used primarily in specialty coffee shops.
• Robusta beans, on the other hand, tend to be more bitter, with a stronger taste and higher levels of caffeine. They are commonly used in commercial coffee production, such as in instant coffee and espresso blends.

Additionally, coffee beans' flavors are influenced by their origin, including factors like altitude, soil, and climate. Some popular coffee-producing regions are:

Each of these regions produces coffee with its unique flavor profiles, and an informed reviewer may mention how the mentioned coffee shop sources its beans and whether they showcase these flavors effectively.

Brewing Techniques

In order to craft a good review, it is also important to be aware of different coffee brewing techniques. Here are some popular methods:

• Drip coffee : Making coffee by using an automatic or manual drip brewer which allows water to pass through coffee grounds sitting on a paper or metal filter. It is a standard and widely used method in the United States and produces a clean, straightforward cup of coffee.
• Espresso : Using an espresso machine to force hot water under high pressure through finely ground coffee. Espresso serves as the base for many popular drinks like lattes, cappuccinos, and Americanos.
• French press : Brewing coffee by steeping coarse grounds in hot water for about four minutes and then pressing a plunger down to separate the liquid from the coffee grounds. This method creates a strong, full-bodied taste.
• Cold brew : Steeping coffee grounds in cold water for an extended period of time (usually 12-24 hours) and then filtering the resulting mixture. This produces a smooth, low-acidity, and slightly sweet coffee that is served cold.

Being knowledgeable about brewing techniques allows reviewers to better evaluate a coffee shop's offerings and expertise. Knowing the methods used and the tastes produced can help analyze the quality of the coffee served and convey accurate impressions to potential customers. Moreover, the equipment used in these establishments plays a crucial role in ensuring consistent taste and quality. For instance, investing in a commercial quality espresso machine can be a game-changer for many coffee shops, enabling them to serve premium beverages with precision. When cafes prioritize their machinery, it is often a testament to their dedication to offering top-notch coffee experiences. Those considering stepping up their game should consider exploring options to buy a commercial grade espresso maker for improved consistency and taste.

Evaluating the Coffee Shop Ambiance

Interior design.

The ambiance of a coffee shop plays a significant role in the overall experience. When evaluating the interior design, consider the layout, furniture, and decor. Look for a comfortable seating arrangement, whether it's sofas, tables and chairs, or a mix of both. Additionally, assess the overall aesthetic and the use of colors and textures in the space.

Noise Level

The noise level in a coffee shop can set the tone for the environment. Take note of the sounds coming from conversations, machinery, and the outside environment. A balance between a lively atmosphere and a quiet space is often ideal. A coffee shop might be too noisy or too quiet for comfort, and this should be mentioned in the review.

Lights and Music

The lighting and music also contribute to a coffee shop's ambiance. Evaluate the level and type of lighting, whether it's bright and energizing or dim and cozy. Consider the selection of music and its volume level, as well as whether it enhances or distracts from the experience. Striking a balance in lights and music is important for creating an enjoyable environment.

Aroma and Flavor Evaluation

When writing a review for a coffee shop, an essential aspect to consider is the aroma and flavor of the coffee. In this section, we will discuss how to evaluate and describe these two factors.

Coffee Aroma

The aroma of coffee can significantly impact the overall experience of enjoying a cup of coffee. To describe the coffee aroma, first inhale the scent and detect any prominent characteristics. A few common descriptors of coffee aroma include:

• Floral : Scents like honeysuckle, rose, or lilac.
• Fruity : Ranging from citrusy (orange, lemon) to tropical (mango, pineapple) or berry-like (strawberry, blueberry) notes.
• Nutty : Almond, hazelnut, or walnut scents.
• Spicy : Cinnamon, clove, or cardamom.

When mentioning the aroma in your review, be specific about the scents you detected and how strong or subtle they were.

Taste Profile

The taste profile of a coffee can be examined by considering the balance of its basic tastes (sweet, bitter, and sour) and any distinct flavors, such as:

• Nuances of Sweetness : Some coffees have subtle sweetness like honey, molasses, or brown sugar.
• Aromatic Wood : Cedar, pine, or sandalwood flavors can be present.
• Chocolate : Dark, milk, or white chocolate can add depth to the coffee flavor.
• Earthy : Flavors reminiscent of soil, mushroom, or mineral can contribute to the overall profile.

When discussing the taste profile in your review, mention any specific flavors you experienced, the intensity of the flavors, and how they complemented or contrasted each other.

Additionally, consider assessing the coffee's mouthfeel and body, such as its smoothness, creaminess, or astringency. Always remember that everyone's palate is different, so being specific and accurate in your descriptions will be helpful to readers in understanding the coffee shop's offerings.

Assessing Customer Service

Barista skills.

When writing a good coffee shop review, it is important to assess the skills of the baristas. Pay attention to their ability to create diverse and visually appealing coffee beverages. Here are some points to consider:

• Technique : Observe how they use various brewing methods, such as pour-over, French press, and espresso machines.
• Consistency : Check whether the temperature, taste, and strength of the coffee served are consistent across different beverages.
• Presentation : Consider the appearance of the drinks, including the quality of latte art, if applicable.

Customer Interaction

Another critical aspect of a coffee shop review is the evaluation of customer service and interaction. The following sub-sections provide guidance on factors that influence your assessment of this aspect:

• Friendliness : Notice how the staff greets customers and their overall demeanor when taking orders and serving beverages.
• Efficiency : Assess if the staff is speedy and organized, ensuring customers do not wait excessively for their orders.
• Knowledge : Gauge the baristas' understanding of different coffee beans, brewing methods, and their ability to answer customer questions.
• Problem-solving : Observe how staff members handle complaints, special requests, or any issues that arise.

By considering these elements when assessing customer service, your review will help potential customers make informed decisions and provide valuable feedback to the coffee shop.

Commenting on Extra Services

When writing a review for a coffee shop, it's essential to include information about any extra services available. These services often enhance the customer experience, and mentioning them will provide valuable information for potential visitors. In this section, we will discuss the importance of commenting on Wi-Fi availability and parking spaces.

Wi-Fi Availability

A coffee shop with reliable Wi-Fi is highly desirable for customers looking to work, study, or socialize online while enjoying their beverages. When commenting on Wi-Fi availability, consider the following points:

• Speed: Did you find the Wi-Fi speed sufficient for browsing, watching videos, or working without interruptions?
• Accessibility: Was it easy to connect to the Wi-Fi network? Did it require a password or any additional steps?
• Stability: How stable was the connection during your visit? Did it maintain a consistent performance?

By covering these aspects, you offer potential customers a better understanding of the coffee shop's Wi-Fi service quality.

Parking Spaces

For those who drive to a coffee shop, knowing the parking situation beforehand is quite helpful. To provide valuable insights, be sure to include these details when commenting on parking spaces in your review:

• Designated Parking: Are there any parking spots specifically reserved for the coffee shop guests?
• Nearby Parking Options: If there are no designated parking spots, describe the surrounding parking options, such as street parking or parking lots.
• Ease of Parking: Was it easy to find a parking spot? Mention any specific challenges or risks, like navigating tight spaces or limited availability during peak hours.

By addressing the Wi-Fi availability and parking situation in your coffee shop review, you provide potential customers with useful information and help them make informed decisions about their visit. Remember to maintain a confident, knowledgeable, neutral, and clear tone while writing in the third person to ensure that your review is informative and engaging.

Recommend or Not

Overall impression.

When writing a good review for a coffee shop, it's important to include your overall impression. This will help readers understand whether you would recommend the coffee shop or not. Begin by describing the atmosphere and ambience of the coffee shop. For example, mention if it has a cozy, relaxing environment, or if it's more of a modern, fast-paced location.

Next, discuss the quality of the drinks and food served at the coffee shop. Mention if the coffee and beverages met your expectations, and if you found the flavors, temperature, and presentation to be satisfactory. Don't forget to mention the variety of the menu, and whether there were options for different dietary preferences or restrictions.

Furthermore, the overall impression should cover the customer service experienced at the coffee shop. Discuss the friendliness, attentiveness, and professionalism of the staff, and whether they made your visit more enjoyable.

Lastly, consider mentioning the value for money. Assess if the prices were reasonable in comparison to the quality and quantity of the food and drinks, as well as the overall experience.

By providing a detailed yet concise overall impression, readers will be able to make an informed decision on whether to visit the coffee shop based on your review. Remember to maintain a confident, knowledgeable, neutral, and clear tone throughout your review, and to write in third person for a more professional appeal.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key aspects to consider when reviewing a coffee shop.

When reviewing a coffee shop, consider aspects such as ambiance and atmosphere, coffee quality, customer service, and the variety and quality of food served. Also, try to give a well-rounded and helpful review that other customers can benefit from.

How do I effectively describe the ambiance and atmosphere?

To describe the ambiance and atmosphere of a coffee shop, pay attention to details such as the decor and layout, noise level, and overall vibe. Mention if the space is cozy, trendy, or artsy, and if it is suitable for activities like studying, working, or catching up with friends.

What factors should I focus on when evaluating coffee quality?

When evaluating coffee quality, focus on aspects like aroma, taste, and presentation. Describe the notes you catch in the aroma, such as a strong, sweet, or bitter smell. Discuss the flavor profile of the coffee, mentioning any distinct acidity, sweetness, or bitterness. Lastly, comment on the presentation, including the crema and artwork, if applicable.

How do I assess the customer service provided by the staff?

To assess the customer service, observe the staff's attentiveness, friendliness, and knowledge about the menu and products. Mention any specific instances where the staff went above and beyond to provide an exceptional experience, or if there were any issues with the service.

How can I mention the variety and quality of food served?

When discussing the variety and quality of food served, mention the types of food available, such as pastries, sandwiches, and desserts. Comment on the presentation and taste of the dishes, and if they are made fresh or sourced from local suppliers. Additionally, note if there are options available for people with dietary restrictions, such as vegan or gluten-free choices.

What are the tips for giving a well-rounded and helpful review?

To give a well-rounded and helpful review, try to cover all aspects mentioned in the previous sub-sections. Be honest, but fair in your assessment, avoiding exaggeration or false claims. Use clear and concise language, and structure your review with paragraphs to provide an easy-to-read and understandable evaluation. Remember to maintain a confident, knowledgeable, neutral, and clear tone throughout your review.

Tony Barlow

Tony Barlow, with over a decade of experience in the coffee industry, is the go-to technical sales expert at Majesty Coffee. He's passionate about helping businesses find the right espresso equipment for their needs.

Featured products

MajestyCoffee Verified Customer Testomonials

This grinder does a great job for my decaf espresso beans! Thanks Baratza!

I went from a Breville Barista Express to this dual boiler beauty and couldn't be happier with this purchase. Cost a pretty penny, but every espresso made makes me reassured about my purchase. Shipping took a few days longer than normal, but assumed that was due to the open box. Steams milk incredibly quick, and my lattes taste even better! Hope this is my last espresso machine purchase since I don't think my wallet can take another hit like this.

The grinder has all the desirable features for all types of coffee beverages. The price is good and worth paying for this high quality product

Lelit Fred Conical Burr Coffee Grinder PL044MMT

I've had my Quick Mill Silvano machine for 3 years now. I purchased it after 2 Breville consumer machines crapped out after 2 years... one stopped making steam, the other leaked. And neither made great tasting coffee or substantial crema. So I took the plunge and purchased this machine and I'm so happy I did. What I love about it: the PID display of boiler temp and brew time. The simplicity of the controls. The fact that I can froth at the same time as pulling shots. The quality of the parts and longevity of the machine. The ease of cleaning. Finally, and most importantly, the great taste of the espresso I get every morning from the Silvano.

I just got my Lelit Bianca V3 and I love it. The people at Majesty Coffee were a delight to work with and they were very prompt. I would highly recommend them.

This machine has been a joy to own and use. Majesty Coffee was great to work with and I would definitely continue to buy from them.

Yes, $3,000 is a lot of money. However, when you decide to enter this high level espresso machine category (DB, PID, flow control, excellent steam power, etc.), you will quickly find that the Lelit Bianca V3 is a bargain. Moving up from a Gaggia Classic, I was concerned that I was over-buying and paying for a lot of features I would never use. Wrong! Initially, I left everything at factory settings and did not touch the flow control. A few weeks and tons of perfect shots later, I'm experimenting with shot profiles, Turbo shots... you name it. I'm getting great shots and only wish I had saved the money from the earlier machines and gone straight to the Bianca. It's that good. Downsides: None that I can see. You will love this machine.

Ceado E37J Espresso Grinder CEADO-E37J

A bit complicated but otherwise Very good machine. Tony was very helpful wirh instructions and helping me get started

I have been loving my new espresso machine! It is taking some time to dial in, but it has been a fun process.

My experience with Majesty Coffee was highly personalized. I had 8-9 emails with them about different color combinations, changing my mind as we went. They were service oriented every step of the way. They were out of the Elizabeth, so they offered a Bianca v3 which has ended years of frustration trying to get excellent shots and silky milk. It is spoiling me to a degree that I won’t be able to get coffee from a cafe without thinking that I could do so much better at home.

If you want the most you can get from the bean in front of you... this is the grinder to get. Fast to setup and dial in. Extracts the full flavor of the bean every time. I like the ability to take it apart in seconds for cleaning and reassembly is as fast. Grounds are not splattered all over your workplace. After 2 weeks I hit the grinder with a sponge and done in seconds too. Replacement parts are on the website. I would be shocked if I ever needed them. Great grinder for a great price. But this should be the last filter grinder you need.

Still waiting for the install company to contact us back for scheduling installation.

• Opens in a new window.

Beaaaaautifulllllkk

Easy for consistency

• Essay Topic Generator
• Summary Generator
• Thesis Maker Academic
• Sentence Rephraser
• Read My Paper
• Hypothesis Generator
• Cover Page Generator
• Text Compactor
• Essay Scrambler
• Essay Plagiarism Checker
• Hook Generator
• AI Writing Checker
• Notes Maker
• Overnight Essay Writing
• Topic Ideas
• Writing Tips
• Essay Writing (by Genre)
• Essay Writing (by Topic)

Restaurant Essay: Review & Evaluation of a Restaurant, Topics, Prompts

It might be quite an unusual topic to write about. Don’t worry, we will explain how to outline your work and advise what you should and shouldn’t do.

In this article, we will tell you how to write a restaurant review essay. We have prepared some tips, a list of topics, writing prompts, and three essay samples. You will also find the FAQ section at the end of the article. Let’s begin!

• 🍽️ Restaurant Essay Writing Tips
• 🥗 85 Restaurant Essay Topics
• 📊 Restaurant Evaluation Samples

🍽️ Restaurant Essay. Writing Tips

Here are some valuable tips on restaurant essay writing. Use these hacks to save your time and nerves and make a perfect writing piece.

Start a Restaurant Essay with Research

Research essays of other scholars and professional critics’ reviews. Based on the discovered information, decide what kind of essay suits you the best. Also, research the restaurant that you will describe in the paper.

Here are the things you need to consider:

• Vocabulary. Notice the specific language that appears in this type of writing. Make a small glossary and search for the meaning of frequently used words.
• Structure. Probably, you need to write a descriptive paper. Research its structure and observe how others implement it in long and short essays.
• Critical thinking. Everything you have found needs evaluation. Not all of the information is relevant. And more importantly, not all of the sources are worth your attention.
• Your notes. Make sure you include all the ideas you’ve found for your restaurants essay.

Be Objective in Any Kind of Essay about Restaurant

Sure, the paper should reflect your opinion. But don’t make it a Google review. You need to support your thoughts with solid argumentation and evidence.

Follow these tips to be more objective:

• Use exact numbers. For example, instead of “many,” write the number or percentage.
• Write in the third person. Unless you have other instructions, avoid using the word “I” and such statements as “I believe,” “I think,” or “in my opinion.” But if your topic is “My favorite restaurant,” or you do a review based on your experience, it is okay to make it first-person.
• Don’t use words that can exaggerate your writing. Such terms as “very,” “really,” “never” are better to avoid.
• Support your statements with facts. If you express a thought, prove it with credible sources.

Outline Your Restaurant Essay

You need an outline to create a roadmap to your restaurant essay. It is also useful when it comes to planning your time and the content of the paper.

• Introduction. Explain the focus of the paper and provide background. Introduce the questions that you will answer in the following paragraphs. Don’t forget to make the last sentence your thesis statement. It will be a summary of what you will describe in the body of your essay.
• Body . The content of body paragraphs depends on the type of paper. For example, in an argumentative essay, each passage presents a separate argument. Let’s suppose you write an essay about your favorite restaurant. Describe these aspects separately: cuisine, interior, and service. Add details and analyze them.
• Conclusion. Summarize the main points of your essay and synthesize the information. Restate your thesis and don’t introduce any new information.

🥗 85 Food & Restaurant Essay Topics

Here we will suggest some titles for your restaurant evaluation essay. You can pick one of those or use it as a starting point.

Restaurant Review Essay

• How do restaurants and cafes use social media for their benefit?
• Describe a business plan to enhance a restaurant’s revenue.
• What is the best time to visit a restaurant?
• Describe your most unpleasant experience in a restaurant.
• Review a popular restaurant in your town.
• Restaurant takeaway food review: Does it feel the same to eat restaurant food at home?
• Tell a story about visiting a restaurant as a child.
• What restaurant would you recommend to people who visit your town?
• Fast food restaurants: Review.
• Describe a restaurant you would never visit again.
• Review a restaurant that is the nearest to your home.
• Best Food Superstores’ negative customer experience.

Restaurant Evaluation Essay

• Evaluation of the main course in a restaurant.
• Evaluation of the service provided in a restaurant.
• Pizza Hut Restaurant’s evaluation using Porter’s Five Forces model.
• Evaluation of entertainment in a restaurant.
• Evaluation of the interior in a restaurant.
• Evaluation of the quality of food in a restaurant.
• Evaluation of the concept of a restaurant.
• Evaluation of a popular chain of restaurants.
• The Penang Mutiara Restaurant operations management.
• How can you define that the restaurant you visit is a good one?
• Evaluation of Highlands Restaurant.
• What three criteria would you use to evaluate any restaurant?
• Legal Seafood Company’s mission, culture and philosophy.
• Compare your expectations and an authentic experience visiting a restaurant.
• Frank’s All-American BarBeQue restaurant analysis.

My Favorite Restaurant Essay

• Describe an imaginary ideal restaurant you would like to visit.
• Describe your favorite fast-food restaurant chain.
• How many favorite restaurants did you have in your life?
• Describe your favorite restaurant that you visited while traveling.
• What was your favorite restaurant in childhood?
• What are the things that your favorite restaurant lacks?
• Tell your readers about the first experience visiting your favorite restaurant.
• Describe your favorite dish served in a restaurant.
• The reasons why you like your favorite restaurant.
• How do people choose their favorite restaurants?

Home Cooking vs. Restaurant Cooking Essay

• The advantages and disadvantages of eating in a restaurant.
• Restaurant training: Country cooking program.
• Is it possible for a regular person to cook like restaurant chefs?
• Describe your favorite meal that you can cook at home.
• Mexican cuisine: restaurant vs. home food.
• Tell about a dish that is traditional in your family.
• Is there something that you can cook better than in a restaurant?
• Restaurant business model: How much should the dishes cost?
• Do you prefer eating at home or in restaurants?
• Is there a restaurant dish that you would like to learn to cook?
• Why do people visit restaurants instead of eating at home?

Other Restaurant Essay Topics

• Restaurant services and competitive advantage.
• Operations management and productivity at Hard Rock Café.
• Strategic marketing of Oishi Gourmet Restaurant.
• Mega sport events impact on London’s restaurant market.
• Novikov Group: Internationalization of the Russian restaurant business.
• Café Coffee Day: Business plan.
• Briefing for restaurant employees.
• Restaurant outsourcing: Case study.
• Managers’ motivation in the US restaurant business.
• Effective management of a restaurant.
• Motivating the Nectar Restaurant waitresses.
• “Angliss Restaurant”: Angliss Entertainment Complex’s code of conduct.

Food Essay Topics

• Fresh food for low income families and individuals.
• Genetically modified food overview.
• History of sustainable global food economy.
• Ben Foods Pte.: Online ERP integration sales catalogue.
• Youngsters’ and television: Impact of food advertisements on an increase in obesity rates.
• Loving Organic Foods: Case report.
• Effects of climate change on agriculture and food.
• Whole Foods Market Inc.’s finance and capital.
• McDonald’s fast food company: Operations management.
• Kudler Fine Foods Company’s marketing research.
• Technology transfer in global food management.
• The Whole Foods Company’s opportunities and threats.
• Kudler Fine Foods Store’s marketing analysis.
• Whole Foods Market company analysis.
• Foodstuffs Company’s strategic human resource management.
• Kraft Food Group’s integrative analysis.
• Bay Health Foods Company’s environments.
• Sainsbury’s Supermarket: The UK food retail industry.
• Indian ethnic food in the UK: The new product development.
• Multinational company in the fast food industry: McDonald’s.
• McDonald’s leadership role in the fast-food industry.
• An evaluation of the Prospects for Sainsbury’s Supermarkets in the UK food retail industry.
• Fast food industry: Service quality and customer retention.
• The triple bottom line in a snack food company.
• Working conditions in the seafood industry.

📊 Restaurant Evaluation Essay Sample

Here are a few samples of essays on restaurants and cuisine. Use them as references for your future writing. You can also find some inspiration or ideas in the passages.

Restaurant Review Essay: Modernity in the Heart of Brooklyn

Modernity is a contemporary experimental restaurant located in the heart of Brooklyn. A blue neon sign which blinks from time to time attracts your attention immediately. This restaurant is a good place for people who look for the unusual interior, interesting food, and fast service. The restaurant looks like a futuristic mix of bright colors, unusual furniture, and futurism. There are two floors, a bar on the first floor and tables of different sizes and shapes on the second floor. The walls are decorated with abstract paintings, pictures of aliens and UFOs, and small neon signs like the one above the entrance. The staff wears uniforms that remind space suits. Light techno music and static sounds are playing. The restaurant is consistent with its name. The menu might seem confusing when you first open it. Such dishes as “Martian’s brain” or “Unicorn’s milk” turn out to be pumpkin soup served with colorful bread and a milkshake. I ordered a dish called “Jupiter on vacation” and a “Weightlessness” drink. They brought me a chicken bowl with blue seasoning that reminded Jupiter and a dark cherry drink with zero calories. Modernity is a place where you can try amazing food, but it is pretty simple in taste. As soon as I arrived and chose a table, a smiling waiter gave me the menu. I just had to press the “Emergency evacuation” button to see him again and place my order. They brought it in five minutes, which is quite fast for a restaurant full of visitors. The waiters and waitresses seem busy and going from one part of the restaurant to another. I recommend visiting Modernity at least once to see the way it looks and enjoy the service. It is a place where every detail is conceptual and exciting. If you are looking for a restaurant where you can take some photos and enjoy a creative atmosphere, Modernity is a good choice.

A cafe called Cliff is not far from where I live. You might not even notice it in the surrounding trees; however, this is what makes Cliff worth visiting. I love this place because of its qualitative coffee and meals, beautiful location, and service. They serve specialty coffee, which made me their regular customer. Its taste is a perfect mix of bitterness, chocolate flavor, and a bit of sour aftertaste. I am a big coffee lover, so this café impressed me. Cliff also offers twenty different deserts that are an excellent match to a cup of coffee. Some of them are vegan options; that is why anyone can choose a treat for themselves. You can also order a sandwich or a salad here, and the food is always fresh. Their approach to nature deserves respect. The café’s outside area looks like a small park with tiny chairs, tables, and benches. If you ask for a blanket or bring your own, you can enjoy your meal sitting on the lawn in a comfortable position. Cliff is a ten-minute walk from my apartment, so I often go there to study surrounded by these beautiful trees. The interior combines brown and grey colors; most of the objects are made of concrete and wood. The waiters and baristas are cheerful and always ready for a small chat. They help me with my choice and complete the orders fast. Cliff also has quite a fast Internet connection. That is the reason why I regularly see at least ten freelancers working there constantly. The music that plays there is not too loud, but you can still hear it from any spot. Cliff looks clean and neat, that is why I enjoy every minute I spend there. There are many good coffee shops in the area, and this one is worth your attention. Try this place if you enjoy nature, polite service, and a peaceful atmosphere. Choose your favorite coffee drink and a small dessert to dine in the garden.

I don’t visit restaurants so often because my father is a chef. He has been in the culinary sphere for more than 20 years, working in an Italian restaurant. I prefer eating at home to eat as delicious food as in restaurants, hone my culinary skills, and spend more time with my family. Every meal my father cooks at home is a product of his professional approach and good taste. He even creates his dishes and invites us to try them. He changes recipes, experiments with flavors and seasonings, and describes everything he did while we were testing the dish. I feel like a famous food critic each time I try to guess the ingredients and the way of cooking. The next thing I love about eating at home is cooking. I enjoy spending time in the kitchen, even though I know I will not do it professionally one day. My dream is to become a software engineer, but good cooking skills are always a benefit. Having such a teacher as my father, I am sure my culinary skills become better each time. We buy groceries, cook, eat, and clean up together. It is like a small ritual that became a tradition in our family. That is far more than just visiting a restaurant to me. We don’t wear fancy clothes, stand in a queue or make reservations, and spend as much time as we want together. We find it more convenient since we have fun and don’t have to go anywhere. Eating at home can be a better experience than eating in a restaurant if you enjoy cooking. There are so many things to explore. You can try different cuisines, experiment with recipes, and teach each other. If you haven’t tried such time spending, I highly recommend it!

How to Structure a Restaurant Essay?

Most academic essays consist of five paragraphs. In your restaurant essay, include an introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion. You can also make a small glossary before the introduction or in it.

How to Write a Restaurant Review Essay?

Share your experience through making a narrative. Provide some background information about a restaurant and describe your general opinion. Explain your point in the following paragraphs, support it with evidence. Conclude your essay with a summary of the evaluation and state whether you recommend it or not.

How to Write the Name of a Restaurant in an Essay?

If you want to avoid mistakes, visit the restaurant’s website. You can find the exact spelling there. In your essay, start it with a capital letter. Don’t use quotation marks unless they appear in the official name of the restaurant. If the restaurant doesn’t have a website, try to find their social media accounts.

Café – Review Writing – Sample

Jan 30, 2023 | Review Writing | 0 |

The place I recently visited was a cozy little cafe in the heart of the city. From the moment I walked in, I was greeted with a warm and inviting atmosphere. The decor was charming and simple, with just the right amount of character.

The menu offered a wide variety of delicious coffee and tea options, as well as an array of pastries and light bites. I tried their specialty latte and it was hands down one of the best I have ever had. The staff was friendly and attentive, always making sure I was comfortable and had everything I needed.

In addition to the great drinks and food, the cafe had a comfortable seating area, perfect for enjoying a quiet moment or catching up with friends. The overall ambiance was calm and relaxed, making it the perfect spot for a relaxing break from the bustling city outside.

In conclusion, this cafe is a must-visit for anyone in the area looking for a warm and welcoming spot for a quick bite or a leisurely drink. I will definitely be back soon to enjoy another cup of their delicious coffee.

Related Posts

Website Review – Review Writing – Sample

Review Writing – Film

Sports centre – Review

Harry Potter – Film Review – Sample

Leave a reply cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advancements

• Get Your Writing Reviewed

Writing Exercises

• Email Writing
• Review Writing
• Report Writing
• Article Writing

Important Pages

• Pastpapers 0510
• Less Common Vocabulary
• Specimen papers 2024
• Syllabus 0510

Reading Exercises

• Reading Comprehension
• Multiple Matching
• Note Making
• Summary Writing
• Uncategorized

Listening Links

• Listening Challenge- 1 minute Videos
• Oct/Nov 2022 - Listening Tracks
• May/June 2022 - Listening Tracks
• CAE / C1 Advanced

Solved Pastpapers

• OCT-NOV 2022
• May-June 2022
• Model Answers

Recent Posts

• Feb March 2024 – Exercise-4
• Feb-March 2024 Exercise-3
• Feb-March 2024 Exercise-2
• Feb March 2024 – Exercise-1
• OCT-NOV 2022 – SOLVED PAPER – Article WRITING – 0510/22

You cannot copy content of this page

SEO & Content Copywriter

Social Media Content Writer

Copywriting Services

— SaaS & Tech Content Writer

— LinkedIn Profile Writer

— Email Content Writer

— Food Content Writer

— Ad Copywriter

— Travel Content Writer

Vera is a Senior Content Writer at a Singaporean lifestyle publication, ConfirmGood where she covers stories on all things food, lifestyle, and perspectives.

Throughout my career as a content writer at various lifestyle publications in Singapore , many a time have I been tasked to write a review for a restaurant .

A review of a restaurant is incredibly important to the business. Given that 94% of diners refer to reviews before making a decision to eat somewhere, the power reviews have to sway the consumer’s decision is immense.

Having been in this profession for a while now, I can safely say that I’ve seen my fair share of good and bad examples of restaurant reviews. And boy, do I have something to say!

But before I go into the details, let’s start with the basics. How should you structure your restaurant review article?

Restaurant review format

1) lay the table.

Just as how you’d set up the table in preparation for every meal, you need to set up your article in preparation for your readers’ eyes.

Provide some background information about the restaurant, its owner(s), and what it specializes in. Check out the opening paragraph of our Carne Burgers Singapore Review : 

The reader is immediately hit with some key facts that establishes the restaurant as a reputable business. If a sustainability-focused restaurant run by a Michelin star chef doesn’t entice you, I don’t know what does.

A well-written introduction is essential as a hook to capture your reader’s attention right from the being and keep them engaged til the end of your review.

2) Start serving your mains

Now that you’ve invited your readers to the table, it’s time to show them what the restaurant has to offer.

A majority of the body of your restaurant review should showcase the best dishes the establishment has to offer. Check out what we showcased in our Seoul Garden a la carte menu review .

As a buffet restaurant, Seoul Garden has a wide selection of cooked and uncooked food items on its menu. But we only featured the most popular and best-looking items. And these are the Wagyu Picanha and Salmon slices.

You should always feature the best items that the owner wants to feature and take good pictures of them ot feature in your restaurant review. The first impression always counts 👀

Some things that should be in in this part of your review include what the dishes are, why you ordered them, and what makes them great. Describe the sight , smell , flavours , and texture of the dishes you’re reviewing. You’ll be surprised by how effective these descriptive paragraphs can be in selling the restaurant.

Quick tip 💡 Prepare an arsenal of words you can use to describe food so you can easily pull them out to use in your article.

3) Wrapping things up

End off by summarizing why you enjoyed (or did not enjoy) the food. I’d strongly recommend adding some quirky final thoughts to leave your readers with a cute aftertaste. 

You can look at what I wrote for my review on Restaurant Salt.

Tips on writing great restaurant reviews

1) learn from the best restaurant review sites.

As with learning any new skill, look at what others have already done. 

A great source of restaurant reviews are lifestyle publications. They are generally divided into different sections like travel, finance, and food. ConfirmGood’s food blog showcases some of the best places to it in Singapore.

Check out the various articles we’ve put out to learn how to write great restaurant reviews. Learn the vocabulary, structure, and writing style.

2) Look at Tripadvisor and Google restaurant reviews

This one may come as a surprise to some of you. Why would you want to refer to reviews left behind by random people? After all, these aren’t professional food writers . What’s there to learn from?

If you take a look at the list of reviews you see on such sites, you’ll notice that some of these reviews are exceptionally well written. You can pick up pretty useful vocabulary from them. I guess some people really take writing reviews on Google really seriously 🤣

Another reason why you should look at restaurant reviews is because you get to learn about what is important to a customer. Perhaps being led to the table properly is important to some. To others, it’s really just the quality of the food. See what pops up most often and take note of it.

If a restaurant hires you to write a review about them, you should include these factors in your article when promoting the business.

3) Take the best photos

Taking great pictures of the food you are reviewing is absolutely necessary. Words alone cannot do the job of convincing your readers to eat at a particular restaurant. 

Humans are visual creatures and well-taken shots of the restaurants’ best dishes can help sway your readers’ decision.

4) STOP USING “DELICIOUS”, “GREAT”, “GOOD”

Expand your food vocabulary.

If you want to write great restaurant reviews, you can’t describe that flaky pastry that oozes creamy custard fulling as delicious.

You aren’t doing the melt-in-your-mouth tender steak any justice by calling it amazing.

So just stop ❌

Again, refer to the article I listed above for some good examples of words and phrases you can use to describe food.

5) Include the restaurant’s story

A restaurant is more than its menu.

It’s also about its history, its owners’ histories, culture, and even purpose.

Establishing the restaurant’s story in the introduction of your review can help pique your readers’ interest in the place.

6) Pay attention to cultural nuances

To add to my previous point, you should always be mindful when writing about food.

Do not refer to dishes as ‘ethnic’, ‘exotic’, or worse, ‘oriental’.

Food carries with them the long history of struggle and achievements of the culture which they are from. You need to be respectful of that.

7) It’s ok to not like the food

You don’t have to lie when writing restaurant reviews.

This may even cause the restaurant to receive harsher negative reviews as they were overhyped by your article. So don’t be afraid to be honest about how you find their food. Just don’t trash them unnecessarily. 

You’re all set to start writing an awesome restaurant review !

Those are my top 7 restaurant review writing tips. I hope you’ve found them useful. Becoming a food writer is not going to be easy. But this article is a great start for you!

To get more writing tips to help improve your writing, check out Writing Wildly’s amazing writing blog !

More resources

How to write an awesome & engaging blog post for a business, top 21 finance & investment blogs in singapore, 10 reasons why content writing is important for business & marketing.

Freelance SEO blog content writing

— Freelance B2B SaaS and tech writer

— Freelance food writer

— Freelance travel writer

Freelance Social Media Content Writer

— Freelance LinkedIn profile writer

— Freelance email writer

— Freelance ad copywriting

© Writing Wildly

24/7 writing help on your phone

To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”

Restaurant Review - Free Essay Examples and Topic Ideas

A restaurant review is an evaluation of a dining experience written by a critic or a customer. It typically includes details about the food quality, service, ambiance, price, and overall dining experience. Restaurant reviews can be found in online platforms, such as Yelp or TripAdvisor, or in print media, such as newspapers or magazines. They serve as a guide for potential customers to decide whether they should visit the restaurant or not. Restaurant reviews can be both positive or negative and can influence the restaurant’s reputation and success.

• 📘 Free essay examples for your ideas about Restaurant Review
• 🏆 Best Essay Topics on Restaurant Review
• ⚡ Simple & Restaurant Review Easy Topics
• 🎓 Good Research Topics about Restaurant Review

Essay examples

Essay topic.

Save to my list

Remove from my list

• Feasib Rationale of Restaurant
• Restaurant Review
• Restaurant Observation Essay
• Restaurant Concept Statement
• Oldtown Restaurant Review
• Kababji Grill
• Challenges of restaurants facing in HK
• China Buffet Restaurant Review
• Beefeater Restaurant Review
• Barrio Fiesta Restaurant Review
• My Visit To The Restaurant
• Restaurant Cleanliness
• Production System of Benihana Restaurant Review
• Restaurant Report
• Chili’s Restaurant
• My Favorite Restaurant
• Opening a restaurant
• Narrative Report in a Restaurant
• Restaurant Business Plan
• Research of the Restaurant Business
• Dinner at the Homesick Restaurant by Anne Tyler
• Overview of Chipotle Mexican Grill Restaurant
• Advertising Campaign for a Soul Food Restaurant
• Restaurant Marketing Project
• McDonald’s “Seniors” Restaurant
• Operations Analysis Of McDonald’s Restaurant
• Two problems regarding the Parlor restaurant case
• KFC – The Leading Chicken Fast Food Restaurant
• Importance of Recipe Evaluation Form in Restaurant Business
• The restaurant industry and the 5 forces
• Indian Restaurant Case Study
• NFC-Based Smart Restaurant Ordering System

FAQ about Restaurant Review

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

• PRO Courses Guides New Tech Help Pro Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Upgrade Sign In
• EDIT Edit this Article
• EXPLORE Tech Help Pro About Us Random Article Quizzes Request a New Article Community Dashboard This Or That Game Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
• Browse Articles
• Learn Something New
• Quizzes Hot
• This Or That Game
• Train Your Brain
• Explore More
• Support wikiHow
• About wikiHow
• Log in / Sign up
• Occupations
• Media Careers

How to Write a Food Review

Last Updated: August 28, 2023 Fact Checked

This article was co-authored by Wayne Dang . Wayne Dang is a Fast Food Expert & Video Creator specializing in sharing restaurant and fast food reviews. Wayne has a follower base of over 90,000 YouTube subscribers and his videos have over 21 million views. He also has over 1.2 million followers on Tiktok. Wayne is known for his high energy and entertaining content. Some of his most popular content includes secret menu reviews and trying special items at restaurants. This article has been fact-checked, ensuring the accuracy of any cited facts and confirming the authority of its sources. This article has been viewed 868,954 times.

The job of a food reviewer is to accurately convey the taste, texture, smell, and presentation of a restaurant's food. You not only comment on the food but also on the atmosphere, staff knowledge and attentiveness, the speed of service, the general impression of the restaurant or cafe. A great food review puts the reader at your table with you, allowing them to decide whether or not they want to visit the restaurant when they're done reading.

Writing Your Review

• Start by reading the restaurant's website. Look up the owner and executive chef to get an idea of their training, style, and past ventures.

• Promise a story or surprise, such as "it may have taken a while to get to my mouth, but I've found the best paella on the planet." Make sure, however, that you deliver on the promise later!
• Give an interesting, tangential fact, like "Chef Zurlo only started cooking 2 years ago, yet she's quickly risen through the ranks to operate Oakland's best new bagel shop."
• Describe a particularly captivating or compelling part of the ambiance, good or bad, like a great view or a funny smell from the kitchen.

• Presentation: How'd the dish look when it arrived, and how did it make you feel? Excited? Hungry? Like royalty? Like you were in your family's kitchen again?
• Taste: The big, obvious one, but that is only because it is so important. Use descriptive language, metaphor, and simile to put your reader in your shoes, or mouth. Name spices or flavors when you can.
• Texture: This usually includes cooking process as well. Did it melt in your mouth? Was it still hot when it arrived? Was it juicy and tender or tough and brittle? Were their multiple textures (such as something soft with a crunchy crust), and did they work well together?

• This includes the atmosphere, the surface, and the location. The more specific details, the better. Try for one good detail about every interaction/part of the restaurant.

• What kind of atmosphere are they going for here? Do they pull it off?
• How do your preferences match the restaurants? If you hate seafood, but that is the restaurant's specialty, you may want to tone down the negative reviews of the salmon or tell your readers that you aren't generally a fan of fish.

• "While my servers were incredibly kind and accommodating, it doesn't change the fact that the food was a bit cold when it came out."
• "Head chef Mathew Tucci has designed an amazing menu, and it's a shame that he only has 10 tables to serve to in his small little restaurant."

• If there is little of merit in the restaurant and you firmly believe is should be avoided, feel free to write a negative review. However, you should usually try a restaurant a second time, making sure that you didn't try out a fluke of a dish, before attacking it.

Getting The Right Details

• If you are an established reviewer you should make reservations under a different name.
• You should still bring a notebook or small recorder with you to take notes, though you can also take them on your phone. To write a great review, you should be taking notes.

• Do the decorations create an appealing ambiance?
• How are people enjoying their meals? At large, talkative tables or many small, intimate dates?

• As a food reviewer, you need to try everything you can to get a good idea of the restaurant.
• What you order is, of course, a matter of personal preference. However, asking the servers for recommendations is a great way to see what the kitchen and staff are proudest off. Most servers have tasted everything on the menu with the chef's guidance, so they should be able to help you order and determine what you're eating.

Eating Like a Food Critic

• If you are at a restaurant that allows it, try and snap a quick picture with your phone. This will make it much easier to write about the appearance later.

• Make sure you eat the dish the way it was intended first-- don't pick out any ingredients or try things separately until later.

• Writing down specific details now about why you liked/disliked a dish will make your writing much, much easier later.

• Texture. How does the food feel in your mouth? Again, be specific, as there is a variety of textures, all of which can be good or bad.
• Spices: Are the spices consistent throughout the meal? Can you tell what some of the spices are?
• Complexity: A hard one to describe, complexity is a measure of the variety of flavors in a food. A good cook doesn't just go for "lemon-flavored" or "garlic & pepper," they go for a nuanced, unique taste to their food. Do the individual parts of the dish come together to make something new or better than the sum of their parts?

• Be sure to write down the exact name of each dish for later reference. Your reader will want to know what to order or avoid.

Sample Reviews

Expert Q&A

• Be open minded with every food you sample. Thanks Helpful 0 Not Helpful 0
• Avoid superlatives like "the very best" or "the absolute worst," as they kill your credibility and don't actually give the reader that much information. Best and worst are subjective, and you want to give your reader facts. Thanks Helpful 0 Not Helpful 0

• Telling a restaurant that you are reviewing them can lead to free food or drinks, but it also leads to a false representation of the restaurant's quality and is not recommended. Thanks Helpful 6 Not Helpful 0

You Might Also Like

Expert Interview

Thanks for reading our article! If you’d like to learn more about writing as a career, check out our in-depth interview with Wayne Dang .

• ↑ https://grammar.yourdictionary.com/grammar/writing/how-to-write-a-hook.html
• ↑ https://k12.thoughtfullearning.com/minilesson/elaborating-food-review
• ↑ https://www.grammarly.com/blog/how-to-write-a-restaurant-review/
• ↑ https://www.eater.com/2019/1/28/18196389/how-to-write-restaurant-review-yelp-google-foursquare-tripadvisor
• ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/06/learning/using-sensory-images-restaurant-reviews.html

About This Article

To write a food review, start by choosing 3-5 dishes that you sampled to focus on. Then, describe the impression those dishes made on you, good or bad, including specific details and reasons. For each dish, try to write about the presentation, the taste, and the texture of the food. In addition to describing the food, include interesting details about the atmosphere of the restaurant and the overall ambiance. To learn how to eat food like a food critic, scroll down! Did this summary help you? Yes No

• Send fan mail to authors

Reader Success Stories

Suzette Somcio

Dec 19, 2017

Did this article help you?

Carol Cameron

Apr 23, 2018

Aug 11, 2016

Fiona Black

Aug 3, 2016

Arihant Nahar

Mar 31, 2017

Featured Articles

Trending Articles

Watch Articles

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Do Not Sell or Share My Info
• Not Selling Info

Don’t miss out! Sign up for

wikiHow’s newsletter

30+ Good Restaurant Review Examples to Copy & Paste

Having good restaurant reviews is crucial these days. It is not just making our decision to pick one easier, it is also helping the restaurant be more successful. You can quickly copy and paste these good restaurant review examples, publish them on Facebook , Yelp or other rating platform and help the restaurant get higher ratings and more customers.

When the online review system was introduced, restaurants and other businesses as well improved their quality and service in order to gain more positive feedbacks from guests. Restaurant owners are now going an extra mile to satisfy their clients. By adding free dessert, “on the house” drink, and extra politeness are some of the new features that are helping them get good reviews for their restaurant. We always try our best not to forget to write review, especially when we are satisfied from the service and food in a small family owned restaurant , but sometimes can be a pressure. So, we decided to make this list with good restaurant review examples that you can copy and paste to help you speed up the process and help their business.

Good Restaurant Review Examples

LEGEND for Good restaurant review examples: – Restaurant name – ( RN ) – City name – ( CN ) – Food name – ( FN )

1. This cozy restaurant has left the best impressions! Hospitable hosts, delicious dishes, beautiful presentation, wide wine list and wonderful dessert. I recommend to everyone! I would like to come back here again and again.

3 . It’s a great experience. The ambiance is very welcoming and charming. Amazing wines, food and service. Staff are extremely knowledgeable and make great recommendations.

4 . This place is great! Atmosphere is chill and cool but the staff is also really friendly. They know what they’re doing and what they’re talking about, and you can tell making the customers happy is their main priority. Food is pretty good, some italian classics and some twists, and for their prices it’s 100% worth it.

7 . I have to say, I enjoyed every single bite of the meal in ( RN ). I had a 3 course meal, with a couple of beers. Considering the quality, the price is reasonable. Ideal for those who want a romantic night out. There was also plenty of room for bigger groups.

8 . Excellent food. Menu is extensive and seasonal to a particularly high standard. Definitely fine dining. It can be expensive but worth it and they do different deals on different nights so it’s worth checking them out before you book. Highly recommended.

More Good Restaurant Review Examples on the next page

Home — Essay Samples — Life — Coffee — Caffeine Island Coffeehouse Review

Caffeine Island Coffeehouse Review

• Categories: Coffee Malaysia

About this sample

Words: 3118 |

16 min read

Published: Sep 19, 2019

Words: 3118 | Pages: 7 | 16 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Verified writer

• Expert in: Life Geography & Travel

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 1022 words

1 pages / 461 words

1 pages / 503 words

1 pages / 592 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Coffee

The demand for coffee has a significant impact on the global economy, as well as on the environment and the livelihood of coffee farmers. In this essay, we will explore the importance of demand on coffee and its implications for [...]

Coffee is a beloved beverage enjoyed by people worldwide. Whether you're a coffee connoisseur or just looking for that daily caffeine fix, brewing the perfect cup of coffee can be a delightful and satisfying ritual. In this [...]

Coffee is one of the most popular beverages in the world, and in the United States, two of the most well-known coffee chains are Peet's Coffee and Starbucks. Both of these companies have a strong presence in the market, and they [...]

Coffee, the beloved beverage that kickstarts the day for millions around the world, holds a special place in our hearts and our daily routines. From the aroma of freshly ground beans to the rich, velvety texture of a perfectly [...]

Coffee is something very personal and the right way to make it is how you prefer it best. That being said, mastering a few fundamentals will help you perfect your technique. From here, we encourage you to experiment with [...]

Coming to the social media, Starbucks makes a really virtuous use of the social media as its marketing strategy. The first and foremost thing they did was to offer free Wi-Fi to its customers. When anyone talks about social [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

CPE sample writings

Welcome to the biggest on-line collection of articles, essays, letters, reports, proposals and reviews for the CPE and CAE Cambridge English Exams. Teachers and students from all over the world arparticipate by submitting their writings. Support the Blog with a Paypal donation and I will correct your writing. For more info write me via Email (see my profile below). Enjoy the Blog !

HOW TO WRITE A REVIEW OF A RESTAURANT

No comments:

Post a comment.

‘Confessions of a Good Samaritan’ Review: Penny Lane Delivers a Documentary Essay on Altruism and Its Discontents

An exploration of the science, history and ethics of organ donation in the context of the filmmaker's kidney donation.

By Alissa Simon

Alissa Simon

Film Critic

• ‘Confessions of a Good Samaritan’ Review: Penny Lane Delivers a Documentary Essay on Altruism and Its Discontents 3 days ago
• ‘Bad Shabbos’ Review: An Interfaith Couple Survive a Sabbath Meal They Will Never Forget 1 week ago
• ‘Longing’ Review: Richard Gere Flounders as a Businessman Who Discovers He Fathered a Son 19 Years Ago 3 weeks ago

Related Stories

Youtube tv needs more than the nfl to combat cord-cutting blitz, biden l.a. fundraiser with obama, george clooney, julia roberts, raises record $28 million, popular on variety.

The statistics are shocking. In the United States, nearly 100,000 people are listed on a national database for kidney transplantation, but perhaps three-quarters of them will die before an appropriate match is found. Yet the choice to make a live, non-directed donation is relatively rare. As Lane hears from others and experiences for herself, many friends and relatives regard the would-be donor as crazy.

Among the interesting interviewees is psychology professor Abigail Marsh, whose personal history prompted her interest in understanding the neural and cognitive basis of empathy, altruism, aggression and psychopathy. When studying brain scans of people diagnosed with psychopathy, Marsh hypothesized that perhaps they represented one end of a continuum, and that the brains of people expressing more empathy than the average joe would also be differently wired. 

Marsh explains that the brain’s amygdala is linked to all of our sensory processing systems and gives a corresponding emotional response to the information processed. Psychopathic brains have amygdalas that on average are up to 20% smaller than normal people. Altruistic people have amygdalas which are around 8% larger than average. The scan she performs on Lane proves that the filmmaker’s amygdala is quite large.

Meanwhile, advocate and author Dr. Sally Satel, a recipient of a donated kidney, makes a compelling argument for government legislated rewards for altruistic organ donation, since it is against the law for a recipient to offer cash or other financial benefits to a donor and for a donor to accept them. Given that non-directed donations comprise only 2% of all the kidney transplants performed and black-market organs comprise 10%, the title of her book neatly sums up the problem: “Altruism Is Not Enough.” Archival footage showing a 1984 Senate inquiry (chaired by a young Al Gore) into an organs-for-money scheme shows that doctors have been thinking about this issue for some time.

Bio-ethicist and psychiatrist Dr. Jacob Appel helps Lane understand the history of progress in kidney transplantation, which came rapidly after the discovery of cyclosporine, an immunosuppressive agent used to treat organ rejection post-transplant. And he describes to her a possible future of organs being grown inside genetically modified pigs.

In contrast to the theoretical issues that Appel puts forward, the ebullient surgeon Dr. Keith Melancon is literally hands-on. He describes his pleasure at seeing a donated organ “pink-up” inside the body of the recipient.

The film makes a virtue of its small budget through incorporating a digital esthetic throughout.

Reviewed online, June 24, 2024. In SXSW, Hot Docs film festivals. Running time: 103 MIN. 

• Production: (Documentary) A Spinning Nancy presentation of a Sandbox Films production, in association with Olive Hill Media, Impact Partners. (World sales: Submarine Entertainment, NY.) Producer: Gabriel Sedgwick. Executive producers: Greg Boustead, Jessica Harrop, Tim Lee, Michael Cho, Mimi Rode.
• Crew: Director, writer: Penny Lane. Camera: Naiti Gámez. Editor: Hannah Buck. Music: Carolina Eyck. 
• With: Penny Lane, Professor Abigail Marsh, Keith Melancon, Sally Satel, Jacob Appel.

More from Variety

‘the boys’ viewership grows by 21% with season 4, amazon says, how roblox is facilitating animated films’ domination of 2024 box office, ‘night manager’ season 2 casts indira varma, paul chahidi, hayley squires, aubrey plaza, joe wengert set animated series about a house cat at amazon, ame institute to host “state of the creative industries” panel, sponsored by variety vip+, ‘house of david’ biblical drama at amazon casts its david, goliath, king saul and more (exclusive), more from our brands, childish gambino world tour: where to find tickets, rivian wants to launch five new models after $5 billion volkswagen investment, scotus chevron rejection could upend ncaa, college athlete cases, the best loofahs and body scrubbers, according to dermatologists, neuromancer: briana middleton joins callum turner in apple tv+ adaptation of sci-fi classic, verify it's you, please log in.

You are using an outdated browser. Upgrade your browser today or install Google Chrome Frame to better experience this site.

• IMF at a Glance
• Surveillance
• Capacity Development
• IMF Factsheets List
• IMF Members
• IMF Financial Statements
• IMF Senior Officials
• IMF in History
• Archives of the IMF
• Job Opportunities
• Climate Change
• Fiscal Policies
• Income Inequality

Flagship Publications

Other publications.

• World Economic Outlook
• Global Financial Stability Report
• Fiscal Monitor
• External Sector Report
• Staff Discussion Notes
• Working Papers
• IMF Research Perspectives
• Economic Review
• Global Housing Watch
• Commodity Prices
• Commodities Data Portal
• IMF Researchers
• Annual Research Conference
• Other IMF Events

IMF reports and publications by country

Regional offices.

• IMF Resident Representative Offices
• IMF Regional Reports
• IMF and Europe
• IMF Members' Quotas and Voting Power, and Board of Governors
• IMF Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific
• IMF Capacity Development Office in Thailand (CDOT)
• IMF Regional Office in Central America, Panama, and the Dominican Republic
• Eastern Caribbean Currency Union (ECCU)
• IMF Europe Office in Paris and Brussels
• IMF Office in the Pacific Islands
• How We Work
• IMF Training
• Digital Training Catalog
• Online Learning
• Our Partners
• Country Stories
• Technical Assistance Reports
• High-Level Summary Technical Assistance Reports
• Strategy and Policies

For Journalists

• Country Focus
• Chart of the Week
• Communiqués
• Mission Concluding Statements
• Press Releases
• Statements at Donor Meetings
• Transcripts
• Views & Commentaries
• Article IV Consultations
• Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP)
• Seminars, Conferences, & Other Events
• E-mail Notification

Press Center

The IMF Press Center is a password-protected site for working journalists.

• Login or Register
• Information of interest
• About the IMF
• Conferences
• Press briefings
• Special Features
• Middle East and Central Asia
• Economic Outlook
• Annual and spring meetings
• Most Recent
• Most Popular
• IMF Finances
• Additional Data Sources
• World Economic Outlook Databases
• Climate Change Indicators Dashboard
• IMF eLibrary-Data
• International Financial Statistics
• G20 Data Gaps Initiative
• Public Sector Debt Statistics Online Centralized Database
• Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves
• Financial Access Survey
• Government Finance Statistics
• Publications Advanced Search
• IMF eLibrary
• IMF Bookstore
• Publications Newsletter
• Essential Reading Guides
• Regional Economic Reports
• Country Reports
• Departmental Papers

Policy Papers

• Selected Issues Papers
• All Staff Notes Series
• Analytical Notes
• Fintech Notes
• How-To Notes
• Staff Climate Notes

Interim Review of The Resilience and Sustainability Trust and Review of Adequacy of Resources

Publication Date:

June 24, 2024

Electronic Access:

Free Download . Use the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view this PDF file

The Resilience and Sustainability Trust (RST) provides affordable longer-term financing to help eligible IMF members address longer-term structural challenges, thereby progressing toward strengthening their prospective balance of payments stability. This paper takes stock of the initial experience with the RST—focusing on progress and challenges so far—and proposes fine-tuning RST design with a view to strengthening implementation of the Trust’s objectives. The paper also provides an assessment of the adequacy of the Trust’s resources and finds that increased near-term fundraising will be needed to meet strong demand. The Trust’s reserves remain adequate in the baseline and under a range of risk scenarios.

Policy Paper No. 2024/031

Climate change Climate finance Climate policy Environment Financial institutions Loans Natural disasters

9798400281297/2663-3493

PPEA2024031

Please address any questions about this title to [email protected]

Updated by business owner 2 months ago

Popular dishes

Tomato Basil

Taro Einspanner

Strawberry Croffle

Basil Bagel

Sweet Potato Cake

People also searched for

Einspanner Coffee

Study Spots

Restaurants

Location & Hours

Suggest an edit

300 S Hobart Blvd

Los Angeles, CA 90020

Koreatown, Wilshire Center

Amenities and More

8 More Attributes

Ask the Community

Ask a question

I tried looking at the menus to see the food items but could not find any but I do see pictures of pastries just wondering what items are their to eat?

Hi there:) We do have croffles, pastries, cakes and donut. Its all like desserts than food here

Recommended Reviews

Main Navigation

• Contact NeurIPS
• Code of Ethics
• Code of Conduct
• Create Profile
• Journal To Conference Track
• Diversity & Inclusion
• Proceedings
• Future Meetings
• Exhibitor Information
• Privacy Policy

NeurIPS 2024

Conference Dates: (In person) 9 December - 15 December, 2024

Homepage: https://neurips.cc/Conferences/2024/

Call For Papers 

Abstract submission deadline: May 15, 2024

Full paper submission deadline, including technical appendices and supplemental material (all authors must have an OpenReview profile when submitting): May 22, 2024

Author notification: Sep 25, 2024

Camera-ready, poster, and video submission: Oct 30, 2024 AOE

Submit at: https://openreview.net/group?id=NeurIPS.cc/2024/Conference  

The site will start accepting submissions on Apr 22, 2024 

Subscribe to these and other dates on the 2024 dates page .

The Thirty-Eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2024) is an interdisciplinary conference that brings together researchers in machine learning, neuroscience, statistics, optimization, computer vision, natural language processing, life sciences, natural sciences, social sciences, and other adjacent fields. We invite submissions presenting new and original research on topics including but not limited to the following:

• Applications (e.g., vision, language, speech and audio, Creative AI)
• Deep learning (e.g., architectures, generative models, optimization for deep networks, foundation models, LLMs)
• Evaluation (e.g., methodology, meta studies, replicability and validity, human-in-the-loop)
• General machine learning (supervised, unsupervised, online, active, etc.)
• Infrastructure (e.g., libraries, improved implementation and scalability, distributed solutions)
• Machine learning for sciences (e.g. climate, health, life sciences, physics, social sciences)
• Neuroscience and cognitive science (e.g., neural coding, brain-computer interfaces)
• Optimization (e.g., convex and non-convex, stochastic, robust)
• Probabilistic methods (e.g., variational inference, causal inference, Gaussian processes)
• Reinforcement learning (e.g., decision and control, planning, hierarchical RL, robotics)
• Social and economic aspects of machine learning (e.g., fairness, interpretability, human-AI interaction, privacy, safety, strategic behavior)
• Theory (e.g., control theory, learning theory, algorithmic game theory)

Machine learning is a rapidly evolving field, and so we welcome interdisciplinary submissions that do not fit neatly into existing categories.

Authors are asked to confirm that their submissions accord with the NeurIPS code of conduct .

Formatting instructions:   All submissions must be in PDF format, and in a single PDF file include, in this order:

• The submitted paper
• Technical appendices that support the paper with additional proofs, derivations, or results 
• The NeurIPS paper checklist  

Other supplementary materials such as data and code can be uploaded as a ZIP file

The main text of a submitted paper is limited to nine content pages , including all figures and tables. Additional pages containing references don’t count as content pages. If your submission is accepted, you will be allowed an additional content page for the camera-ready version.

The main text and references may be followed by technical appendices, for which there is no page limit.

The maximum file size for a full submission, which includes technical appendices, is 50MB.

Authors are encouraged to submit a separate ZIP file that contains further supplementary material like data or source code, when applicable.

You must format your submission using the NeurIPS 2024 LaTeX style file which includes a “preprint” option for non-anonymous preprints posted online. Submissions that violate the NeurIPS style (e.g., by decreasing margins or font sizes) or page limits may be rejected without further review. Papers may be rejected without consideration of their merits if they fail to meet the submission requirements, as described in this document. 

Paper checklist: In order to improve the rigor and transparency of research submitted to and published at NeurIPS, authors are required to complete a paper checklist . The paper checklist is intended to help authors reflect on a wide variety of issues relating to responsible machine learning research, including reproducibility, transparency, research ethics, and societal impact. The checklist forms part of the paper submission, but does not count towards the page limit.

Please join the NeurIPS 2024 Checklist Assistant Study that will provide you with free verification of your checklist performed by an LLM here . Please see details in our  blog

Supplementary material: While all technical appendices should be included as part of the main paper submission PDF, authors may submit up to 100MB of supplementary material, such as data, or source code in a ZIP format. Supplementary material should be material created by the authors that directly supports the submission content. Like submissions, supplementary material must be anonymized. Looking at supplementary material is at the discretion of the reviewers.

We encourage authors to upload their code and data as part of their supplementary material in order to help reviewers assess the quality of the work. Check the policy as well as code submission guidelines and templates for further details.

Use of Large Language Models (LLMs): We welcome authors to use any tool that is suitable for preparing high-quality papers and research. However, we ask authors to keep in mind two important criteria. First, we expect papers to fully describe their methodology, and any tool that is important to that methodology, including the use of LLMs, should be described also. For example, authors should mention tools (including LLMs) that were used for data processing or filtering, visualization, facilitating or running experiments, and proving theorems. It may also be advisable to describe the use of LLMs in implementing the method (if this corresponds to an important, original, or non-standard component of the approach). Second, authors are responsible for the entire content of the paper, including all text and figures, so while authors are welcome to use any tool they wish for writing the paper, they must ensure that all text is correct and original.

Double-blind reviewing:   All submissions must be anonymized and may not contain any identifying information that may violate the double-blind reviewing policy.  This policy applies to any supplementary or linked material as well, including code.  If you are including links to any external material, it is your responsibility to guarantee anonymous browsing.  Please do not include acknowledgements at submission time. If you need to cite one of your own papers, you should do so with adequate anonymization to preserve double-blind reviewing.  For instance, write “In the previous work of Smith et al. [1]…” rather than “In our previous work [1]...”). If you need to cite one of your own papers that is in submission to NeurIPS and not available as a non-anonymous preprint, then include a copy of the cited anonymized submission in the supplementary material and write “Anonymous et al. [1] concurrently show...”). Any papers found to be violating this policy will be rejected.

OpenReview: We are using OpenReview to manage submissions. The reviews and author responses will not be public initially (but may be made public later, see below). As in previous years, submissions under review will be visible only to their assigned program committee. We will not be soliciting comments from the general public during the reviewing process. Anyone who plans to submit a paper as an author or a co-author will need to create (or update) their OpenReview profile by the full paper submission deadline. Your OpenReview profile can be edited by logging in and clicking on your name in https://openreview.net/ . This takes you to a URL "https://openreview.net/profile?id=~[Firstname]_[Lastname][n]" where the last part is your profile name, e.g., ~Wei_Zhang1. The OpenReview profiles must be up to date, with all publications by the authors, and their current affiliations. The easiest way to import publications is through DBLP but it is not required, see FAQ . Submissions without updated OpenReview profiles will be desk rejected. The information entered in the profile is critical for ensuring that conflicts of interest and reviewer matching are handled properly. Because of the rapid growth of NeurIPS, we request that all authors help with reviewing papers, if asked to do so. We need everyone’s help in maintaining the high scientific quality of NeurIPS.  

Please be aware that OpenReview has a moderation policy for newly created profiles: New profiles created without an institutional email will go through a moderation process that can take up to two weeks. New profiles created with an institutional email will be activated automatically.

Venue home page: https://openreview.net/group?id=NeurIPS.cc/2024/Conference

If you have any questions, please refer to the FAQ: https://openreview.net/faq

Abstract Submission: There is a mandatory abstract submission deadline on May 15, 2024, six days before full paper submissions are due. While it will be possible to edit the title and abstract until the full paper submission deadline, submissions with “placeholder” abstracts that are rewritten for the full submission risk being removed without consideration. This includes titles and abstracts that either provide little or no semantic information (e.g., "We provide a new semi-supervised learning method.") or describe a substantively different claimed contribution.  The author list cannot be changed after the abstract deadline. After that, authors may be reordered, but any additions or removals must be justified in writing and approved on a case-by-case basis by the program chairs only in exceptional circumstances. 

Ethics review: Reviewers and ACs may flag submissions for ethics review . Flagged submissions will be sent to an ethics review committee for comments. Comments from ethics reviewers will be considered by the primary reviewers and AC as part of their deliberation. They will also be visible to authors, who will have an opportunity to respond.  Ethics reviewers do not have the authority to reject papers, but in extreme cases papers may be rejected by the program chairs on ethical grounds, regardless of scientific quality or contribution.  

Preprints: The existence of non-anonymous preprints (on arXiv or other online repositories, personal websites, social media) will not result in rejection. If you choose to use the NeurIPS style for the preprint version, you must use the “preprint” option rather than the “final” option. Reviewers will be instructed not to actively look for such preprints, but encountering them will not constitute a conflict of interest. Authors may submit anonymized work to NeurIPS that is already available as a preprint (e.g., on arXiv) without citing it. Note that public versions of the submission should not say "Under review at NeurIPS" or similar.

Dual submissions: Submissions that are substantially similar to papers that the authors have previously published or submitted in parallel to other peer-reviewed venues with proceedings or journals may not be submitted to NeurIPS. Papers previously presented at workshops are permitted, so long as they did not appear in a conference proceedings (e.g., CVPRW proceedings), a journal or a book.  NeurIPS coordinates with other conferences to identify dual submissions.  The NeurIPS policy on dual submissions applies for the entire duration of the reviewing process.  Slicing contributions too thinly is discouraged.  The reviewing process will treat any other submission by an overlapping set of authors as prior work. If publishing one would render the other too incremental, both may be rejected.

Anti-collusion: NeurIPS does not tolerate any collusion whereby authors secretly cooperate with reviewers, ACs or SACs to obtain favorable reviews. 

Author responses:   Authors will have one week to view and respond to initial reviews. Author responses may not contain any identifying information that may violate the double-blind reviewing policy. Authors may not submit revisions of their paper or supplemental material, but may post their responses as a discussion in OpenReview. This is to reduce the burden on authors to have to revise their paper in a rush during the short rebuttal period.

After the initial response period, authors will be able to respond to any further reviewer/AC questions and comments by posting on the submission’s forum page. The program chairs reserve the right to solicit additional reviews after the initial author response period.  These reviews will become visible to the authors as they are added to OpenReview, and authors will have a chance to respond to them.

After the notification deadline, accepted and opted-in rejected papers will be made public and open for non-anonymous public commenting. Their anonymous reviews, meta-reviews, author responses and reviewer responses will also be made public. Authors of rejected papers will have two weeks after the notification deadline to opt in to make their deanonymized rejected papers public in OpenReview.  These papers are not counted as NeurIPS publications and will be shown as rejected in OpenReview.

Publication of accepted submissions:   Reviews, meta-reviews, and any discussion with the authors will be made public for accepted papers (but reviewer, area chair, and senior area chair identities will remain anonymous). Camera-ready papers will be due in advance of the conference. All camera-ready papers must include a funding disclosure . We strongly encourage accompanying code and data to be submitted with accepted papers when appropriate, as per the code submission policy . Authors will be allowed to make minor changes for a short period of time after the conference.

Contemporaneous Work: For the purpose of the reviewing process, papers that appeared online within two months of a submission will generally be considered "contemporaneous" in the sense that the submission will not be rejected on the basis of the comparison to contemporaneous work. Authors are still expected to cite and discuss contemporaneous work and perform empirical comparisons to the degree feasible. Any paper that influenced the submission is considered prior work and must be cited and discussed as such. Submissions that are very similar to contemporaneous work will undergo additional scrutiny to prevent cases of plagiarism and missing credit to prior work.

Plagiarism is prohibited by the NeurIPS Code of Conduct .

Other Tracks: Similarly to earlier years, we will host multiple tracks, such as datasets, competitions, tutorials as well as workshops, in addition to the main track for which this call for papers is intended. See the conference homepage for updates and calls for participation in these tracks. 

Experiments: As in past years, the program chairs will be measuring the quality and effectiveness of the review process via randomized controlled experiments. All experiments are independently reviewed and approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB).

Financial Aid: Each paper may designate up to one (1) NeurIPS.cc account email address of a corresponding student author who confirms that they would need the support to attend the conference, and agrees to volunteer if they get selected. To be considered for Financial the student will also need to fill out the Financial Aid application when it becomes available.

Content Search

Review, translation and design of nine research papers.

• Kvinna Till Kvinna

The program “Feminist Power in Action for Women’s Economic Rights” (FemPawer) aims to strengthen the capacities of young women who face multiple economic gender-based violence (E/GBV) discriminations in Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine, and Tunisia to become leaders for change. FemPawer is led by a consortium of 4 organizations and consists of a network of 39 Women's Rights Organizations (WROs), also referred to as Partner Organizations (POs), that are diverse and vary in size, experience, geographical location, and profile.

In Jordan, nine WROs conducted a research on eGBV. Kvinna till Kvinna and the Arab Women Organization (AWO) are seeking a consultancy team to review, translate, and compile these research studies into a single booklet.

About Kvinna till Kvinna and Arab Women Organization

The Kvinna till Kvinna Foundation has defended women’s rights since 1993 and is now a leading feminist organization. We work in war and conflict zones to empower women, collaborating with around 150 partner organizations in 20 countries to achieve gender equality, justice, and lasting peace. Our focus includes both conflict-affected and humanitarian contexts, supporting women's rights and peacebuilding with a long-term perspective. We aim to be a flexible and reliable partner, helping women’s rights organizations adapt to changing conflict and emergency situations.

AWO is a Jordanian local women’s rights organization dedicated to gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls. Over its 50-year history, AWO has focused on advancing women’s leadership and solutions for political, social, and economic empowerment. It brings feminist analyses to national policy dialogues, builds partnerships, coordinates women's rights meetings, and forms coalitions around gender issues.

Objectives of this consultancy

• Identify key research points and methodologies.
• Summarize findings and arguments.
• Write an introduction that provides context and outlines the key themes across all papers.
• Write conclusions that synthesize the overall findings and suggest potential areas for future research.
• Formulate observations and insights based on the reviewed papers.
• Translate all reports and summaries from Arabic to English (approximately 85,000 words)
• Design the nine research papers (both English and Arabic) into one cohesive booklet.

Intended Users

The intended users are decision makers targeted in advocacy against eGBV (government officials, private sector, international community).

To be discussed with the selected consultancy team.

Deliverables

• Nine research papers in Arabic, reviewed and consolidated, each with a summary and an introduction covering all nine papers.
• Translated document of the above from Arabic to English.
• Designed booklet, in both English and Arabic.

A detailed budget suggested by the consultant in EUR should be shared along with examples of previous work. (The monetary amount suggested by the external consultant is “All tax included”). We do not cover any tax.

Qualifications

The consultant (s) should meet the desired criteria:

• Advanced degree in Gender Studies, Social Sciences, Law, Public Policy, or a related field.
• Proven experience in conducting and reviewing research on gender-based violence, women's rights, or related fields.
• Demonstrated experience in translating academic or technical documents from Arabic to English and vice versa.
• Previous experience in designing and consolidating research documents or reports, preferably in the field of human rights or gender studies.
• Strong analytical and critical thinking skills to synthesize findings and provide insights.
• Excellent written and verbal communication skills in both Arabic and English.
• Proficiency in document design and layout software.
• In-depth understanding of economic gender-based violence and its impacts.
• Familiarity with the socio-economic and cultural context of Jordan.
• Ability to handle tight deadlines in a professional manner.
• Great communication skills.
• Organized and timely.
• Creative in overcoming barriers and ability to coordinate with multiple entities.

How to apply

The consultant(s) is invited to submit a file to [email protected] with the following title in the email subject « Review, translation and design of nine research papers».

If a consultant is not part of a team but has experience in one specific aspect of the deliverables—(1) review and analysis, (2) translation, or (3) design—you are also invited to submit your offer. Please mention which area you wish to be considered for. If we do not find a suitable team, individual consultants will be considered.

Submission deadline: July 07, 2024, at 23:55 pm GMT+3

Applicant(s) Location : Flexible/Remote

*Provision of References

• Applicants are required to provide contact information for three professional work references.
• This information should include the names of the references, their positions, their places of work, and contact details (such as email and telephone number).
• These references may be contacted to evaluate the professional competencies and past experiences of the applicant, with the aim of ensuring the selection of the most suitable candidates for the program’s requirements and goals. We will only contact the reference if you are shortlisted and we informed you that we will contact the references.

**Disclosure of previous work with consortium partners

• Applicants must clearly disclose any previous collaboration or work undertaken with any of the consortium partners involved in this program.
• Details of such collaboration should include the name of the partner, the nature of the work performed, and the period of collaboration.
• In cases where previous collaboration exists, the relevant partner may be contacted to obtain an assessment and feedback on the applicant's performance and competence.

Related Content

Jordan + 3 more

Understanding and supporting female immigrant labour: Comparing the cases of Jordan and Norway

Jordan + 2 more

Bridging Adversity to Resilience: 2023 Annual Needs Assessment (Executive Summary)

Jordan + 1 more

Jordan - Protection Sector: Who does What, Where & When GBV SWG (29 May 2024)

Jordan + 14 more

Taking Stock: Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in Climate Commitments - an Arab States Review

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Roma communities in Perm Krai: historical and ethnical aspects

Two large groups of Roma are settled in the territory of Perm Krai, the Ruska Roma and Kalderari. Roma live both in cities and countryside. Roma living in the countryside keeps elements of traditional culture. In Perm Krai we can find different families of the Ruska [Russian] Roma: Gorbovichi, Nemzengery, Bashnengery, Polyaki, Sapuny, Gubany. In contrast to the Kalderari the community of Ruska Roma is based not only on family-territorial principle. Sometimes community is based on ethnic-territorial ground when the Ruska Roma living in an urban area despite family ties can be a part of the community. Traditional activity of Ruska Roma living in countryside is a seasonal grazing of livestock. One of the main sectors of activity is trading. Roma sell cars and jewelry. Kelderari live in compact groupings in Perm. They call themselves Moldavska Roma and consider themselves to be part of Ruvoni [wolf in Romani language] family. Traditional activity of Kelderari is metal work (especially tin-smith’s work) which impact also their modern business. The main work activity of men till now is working with metals such as base metal trading and metal items repair. Traditional women activity is fortune-telling. Bilingualism, traditional way of living, ethnic isolation, unique and particular material and spiritual culture are common for all of Roma. The main problems for Roma nowadays are safeguarding of ethnicity and as well as some educational and social issues.

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024