systematic literature review thesis example

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

Published on January 2, 2023 by Shona McCombes . Revised on September 11, 2023.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

• Search for relevant literature
• Evaluate sources
• Identify themes, debates, and gaps
• Outline the structure
• Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes , and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

What is the purpose of a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1 – search for relevant literature, step 2 – evaluate and select sources, step 3 – identify themes, debates, and gaps, step 4 – outline your literature review’s structure, step 5 – write your literature review, free lecture slides, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions, introduction.

• Quick Run-through
• Step 1 & 2

When you write a thesis , dissertation , or research paper , you will likely have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
• Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic.

Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

Don't submit your assignments before you do this

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.

Try for free

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

• Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
• Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
• Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
• Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions .

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

• Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
• Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
• Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:

• Your university’s library catalogue
• Google Scholar
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
• EconLit (economics)
• Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.

Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.

For each publication, ask yourself:

• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
• What are the key theories, models, and methods?
• Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
• How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible , and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Click on either button below to download.

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It is important to keep track of your sources with citations to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography , where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

• Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
• Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

• Most research has focused on young women.
• There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
• But there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order.

Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

• Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
• Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text , your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, you can follow these tips:

• Summarize and synthesize: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers — add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transition words and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts

In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance.

When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Not a language expert? Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services !

This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature review.

Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes.

Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations , theses, and research papers . Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other  academic texts , with an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion .

An  annotated bibliography is a list of  source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a  paper .  

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, September 11). How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved June 24, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

Reference management. Clean and simple.

How to write a systematic literature review [9 steps]

What is a systematic literature review?

Where are systematic literature reviews used, what types of systematic literature reviews are there, how to write a systematic literature review, 1. decide on your team, 2. formulate your question, 3. plan your research protocol, 4. search for the literature, 5. screen the literature, 6. assess the quality of the studies, 7. extract the data, 8. analyze the results, 9. interpret and present the results, registering your systematic literature review, frequently asked questions about writing a systematic literature review, related articles.

A systematic literature review is a summary, analysis, and evaluation of all the existing research on a well-formulated and specific question.

Put simply, a systematic review is a study of studies that is popular in medical and healthcare research. In this guide, we will cover:

• the definition of a systematic literature review
• the purpose of a systematic literature review
• the different types of systematic reviews
• how to write a systematic literature review

➡️ Visit our guide to the best research databases for medicine and health to find resources for your systematic review.

Systematic literature reviews can be utilized in various contexts, but they’re often relied on in clinical or healthcare settings.

Medical professionals read systematic literature reviews to stay up-to-date in their field, and granting agencies sometimes need them to make sure there’s justification for further research in an area. They can even be used as the starting point for developing clinical practice guidelines.

A classic systematic literature review can take different approaches:

• Effectiveness reviews assess the extent to which a medical intervention or therapy achieves its intended effect. They’re the most common type of systematic literature review.
• Diagnostic test accuracy reviews produce a summary of diagnostic test performance so that their accuracy can be determined before use by healthcare professionals.
• Experiential (qualitative) reviews analyze human experiences in a cultural or social context. They can be used to assess the effectiveness of an intervention from a person-centric perspective.
• Costs/economics evaluation reviews look at the cost implications of an intervention or procedure, to assess the resources needed to implement it.
• Etiology/risk reviews usually try to determine to what degree a relationship exists between an exposure and a health outcome. This can be used to better inform healthcare planning and resource allocation.
• Psychometric reviews assess the quality of health measurement tools so that the best instrument can be selected for use.
• Prevalence/incidence reviews measure both the proportion of a population who have a disease, and how often the disease occurs.
• Prognostic reviews examine the course of a disease and its potential outcomes.
• Expert opinion/policy reviews are based around expert narrative or policy. They’re often used to complement, or in the absence of, quantitative data.
• Methodology systematic reviews can be carried out to analyze any methodological issues in the design, conduct, or review of research studies.

Writing a systematic literature review can feel like an overwhelming undertaking. After all, they can often take 6 to 18 months to complete. Below we’ve prepared a step-by-step guide on how to write a systematic literature review.

• Decide on your team.
• Formulate your question.
• Plan your research protocol.
• Search for the literature.
• Screen the literature.
• Assess the quality of the studies.
• Extract the data.
• Analyze the results.
• Interpret and present the results.

When carrying out a systematic literature review, you should employ multiple reviewers in order to minimize bias and strengthen analysis. A minimum of two is a good rule of thumb, with a third to serve as a tiebreaker if needed.

You may also need to team up with a librarian to help with the search, literature screeners, a statistician to analyze the data, and the relevant subject experts.

Define your answerable question. Then ask yourself, “has someone written a systematic literature review on my question already?” If so, yours may not be needed. A librarian can help you answer this.

You should formulate a “well-built clinical question.” This is the process of generating a good search question. To do this, run through PICO:

• Patient or Population or Problem/Disease : who or what is the question about? Are there factors about them (e.g. age, race) that could be relevant to the question you’re trying to answer?
• Intervention : which main intervention or treatment are you considering for assessment?
• Comparison(s) or Control : is there an alternative intervention or treatment you’re considering? Your systematic literature review doesn’t have to contain a comparison, but you’ll want to stipulate at this stage, either way.
• Outcome(s) : what are you trying to measure or achieve? What’s the wider goal for the work you’ll be doing?

Now you need a detailed strategy for how you’re going to search for and evaluate the studies relating to your question.

The protocol for your systematic literature review should include:

• the objectives of your project
• the specific methods and processes that you’ll use
• the eligibility criteria of the individual studies
• how you plan to extract data from individual studies
• which analyses you’re going to carry out

For a full guide on how to systematically develop your protocol, take a look at the PRISMA checklist . PRISMA has been designed primarily to improve the reporting of systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses.

When writing a systematic literature review, your goal is to find all of the relevant studies relating to your question, so you need to search thoroughly .

This is where your librarian will come in handy again. They should be able to help you formulate a detailed search strategy, and point you to all of the best databases for your topic.

➡️ Read more on on how to efficiently search research databases .

The places to consider in your search are electronic scientific databases (the most popular are PubMed , MEDLINE , and Embase ), controlled clinical trial registers, non-English literature, raw data from published trials, references listed in primary sources, and unpublished sources known to experts in the field.

➡️ Take a look at our list of the top academic research databases .

Tip: Don’t miss out on “gray literature.” You’ll improve the reliability of your findings by including it.

Don’t miss out on “gray literature” sources: those sources outside of the usual academic publishing environment. They include:

• non-peer-reviewed journals
• pharmaceutical industry files
• conference proceedings
• pharmaceutical company websites
• internal reports

Gray literature sources are more likely to contain negative conclusions, so you’ll improve the reliability of your findings by including it. You should document details such as:

• The databases you search and which years they cover
• The dates you first run the searches, and when they’re updated
• Which strategies you use, including search terms
• The numbers of results obtained

➡️ Read more about gray literature .

This should be performed by your two reviewers, using the criteria documented in your research protocol. The screening is done in two phases:

• Pre-screening of all titles and abstracts, and selecting those appropriate
• Screening of the full-text articles of the selected studies

Make sure reviewers keep a log of which studies they exclude, with reasons why.

➡️ Visit our guide on what is an abstract?

Your reviewers should evaluate the methodological quality of your chosen full-text articles. Make an assessment checklist that closely aligns with your research protocol, including a consistent scoring system, calculations of the quality of each study, and sensitivity analysis.

The kinds of questions you'll come up with are:

• Were the participants really randomly allocated to their groups?
• Were the groups similar in terms of prognostic factors?
• Could the conclusions of the study have been influenced by bias?

Every step of the data extraction must be documented for transparency and replicability. Create a data extraction form and set your reviewers to work extracting data from the qualified studies.

Here’s a free detailed template for recording data extraction, from Dalhousie University. It should be adapted to your specific question.

Establish a standard measure of outcome which can be applied to each study on the basis of its effect size.

Measures of outcome for studies with:

• Binary outcomes (e.g. cured/not cured) are odds ratio and risk ratio
• Continuous outcomes (e.g. blood pressure) are means, difference in means, and standardized difference in means
• Survival or time-to-event data are hazard ratios

Design a table and populate it with your data results. Draw this out into a forest plot , which provides a simple visual representation of variation between the studies.

Then analyze the data for issues. These can include heterogeneity, which is when studies’ lines within the forest plot don’t overlap with any other studies. Again, record any excluded studies here for reference.

Consider different factors when interpreting your results. These include limitations, strength of evidence, biases, applicability, economic effects, and implications for future practice or research.

Apply appropriate grading of your evidence and consider the strength of your recommendations.

It’s best to formulate a detailed plan for how you’ll present your systematic review results. Take a look at these guidelines for interpreting results from the Cochrane Institute.

Before writing your systematic literature review, you can register it with OSF for additional guidance along the way. You could also register your completed work with PROSPERO .

Systematic literature reviews are often found in clinical or healthcare settings. Medical professionals read systematic literature reviews to stay up-to-date in their field and granting agencies sometimes need them to make sure there’s justification for further research in an area.

The first stage in carrying out a systematic literature review is to put together your team. You should employ multiple reviewers in order to minimize bias and strengthen analysis. A minimum of two is a good rule of thumb, with a third to serve as a tiebreaker if needed.

Your systematic review should include the following details:

A literature review simply provides a summary of the literature available on a topic. A systematic review, on the other hand, is more than just a summary. It also includes an analysis and evaluation of existing research. Put simply, it's a study of studies.

The final stage of conducting a systematic literature review is interpreting and presenting the results. It’s best to formulate a detailed plan for how you’ll present your systematic review results, guidelines can be found for example from the Cochrane institute .

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

How to Write a Systematic Review of the Literature

Affiliations.

• 1 1 Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
• 2 2 University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
• PMID: 29283007
• DOI: 10.1177/1937586717747384

This article provides a step-by-step approach to conducting and reporting systematic literature reviews (SLRs) in the domain of healthcare design and discusses some of the key quality issues associated with SLRs. SLR, as the name implies, is a systematic way of collecting, critically evaluating, integrating, and presenting findings from across multiple research studies on a research question or topic of interest. SLR provides a way to assess the quality level and magnitude of existing evidence on a question or topic of interest. It offers a broader and more accurate level of understanding than a traditional literature review. A systematic review adheres to standardized methodologies/guidelines in systematic searching, filtering, reviewing, critiquing, interpreting, synthesizing, and reporting of findings from multiple publications on a topic/domain of interest. The Cochrane Collaboration is the most well-known and widely respected global organization producing SLRs within the healthcare field and a standard to follow for any researcher seeking to write a transparent and methodologically sound SLR. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), like the Cochrane Collaboration, was created by an international network of health-based collaborators and provides the framework for SLR to ensure methodological rigor and quality. The PRISMA statement is an evidence-based guide consisting of a checklist and flowchart intended to be used as tools for authors seeking to write SLR and meta-analyses.

Keywords: evidence based design; healthcare design; systematic literature review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, Moraleda C, Rogers L, Daniels K, Green P. Crider K, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
• The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W. Soll RF, et al. Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
• Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement. Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M, Riley RD, Simmonds M, Stewart G, Tierney JF; PRISMA-IPD Development Group. Stewart LA, et al. JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1657-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3656. JAMA. 2015. PMID: 25919529
• Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine. DiSilvestro KJ, Tjoumakaris FP, Maltenfort MG, Spindler KP, Freedman KB. DiSilvestro KJ, et al. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):533-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546515580290. Epub 2015 Apr 21. Am J Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 25899433 Review.
• The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. Liberati A, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Jul 23. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 19631507
• A systematic review and meta-analysis of balance training in patients with chronic ankle instability. Guo Y, Cheng T, Yang Z, Huang Y, Li M, Wang T. Guo Y, et al. Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 12;13(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02455-x. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38347564 Free PMC article.
• Association between infection and the onset of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pacoureau L, Barde F, Seror R, Nguyen Y. Pacoureau L, et al. RMD Open. 2023 Nov;9(4):e003493. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003493. RMD Open. 2023. PMID: 37949615 Free PMC article.
• From Social Rejection to Welfare Oblivion: Health and Mental Health in Juvenile Justice in Brazil, Colombia and Spain. Carbonell Á, Georgieva S, Navarro-Pérez JJ, Botija M. Carbonell Á, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 29;20(11):5989. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20115989. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37297594 Free PMC article. Review.
• Why is didactic transposition in disaster education needed by prospective elementary school teachers? Noviana E, Syahza A, Putra ZH, Hadriana, Yustina, Erlinda S, Putri DR, Rusandi MA, Biondi Situmorang DD. Noviana E, et al. Heliyon. 2023 Apr 18;9(4):e15413. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15413. eCollection 2023 Apr. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 37128333 Free PMC article. Review.
• Comparative analysis of efficacy of different combination therapies of α-receptor blockers and traditional Chinese medicine external therapy in the treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: Bayesian network meta-analysis. Zhang K, Zhang Y, Hong S, Cao Y, Liu C. Zhang K, et al. PLoS One. 2023 Apr 20;18(4):e0280821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280821. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37079509 Free PMC article.
• Search in MeSH

Related information

• Cited in Books

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

• Ovid Technologies, Inc.

Other Literature Sources

• scite Smart Citations

• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

• Request new password
• Create a new account

Doing a Systematic Review: A Student's Guide

Student resources, chapter 1. carrying out a systematic review as a master's thesis.

Explore the wealth of resources available across the web. Here are some good places to start.

Link to the Campbell Collaboration, an organization that prepares, maintains and disseminates systematic reviews in education, crime and justice, social welfare and international development

www.campbellcollaboration.org

Link to the Cochrane Collaboration, an organization that conducts systematic reviews of RCTs of healthcare interventions and diagnostic tests

www.cochrane.org

Why and how to conduct a systematic literature review

Systematic literature reviews may seem daunting at first, but they offer substantial benefits, especially in enhancing the theoretical framework for your research! Learn more about systematic literature reviews and their benefits. And have a look at a simple step-by-step guide that breaks down the daunting task of conducting a systematic literature review into simple, actionable steps.

What is a systematic literature review?

Following the definition of a topic of interest and concrete research question, a systematic literature review starts by defining several keywords. Then, academic citation databases are used to retrieve all articles that include these keywords.

Systematic literature reviews are a means to rigorously review existing literature on a specific topic. They collect and analyse existing literature in a systematic and replicable way.

While systematic literature reviews require a lot of work, they can convincingly draw conclusions on the state of the art of existing knowledge, uncover research gaps, and support the creation of new theoretical and conceptual frameworks.

In a systematic literature review, inclusion and exclusion criteria for sorting through the existing literature are set up. Think of a time frame, the type of publication (articles, books etc.), a geographic focus, and a disciplinary background.

The difference between a systematic and a regular literature review

The main differences between a systematic and a regular literature review are the process of collecting and analyzing literature, the accuracy of claims, the scope and replicability.

In a regular literature review, authors select articles or other publications ad hoc, to support the arguments of their work. Authors make claims about the state of the art of academic knowledge on a specific topic, but do not necessarily provide systematic evidence to support their claims.

Additionally, the scope of a review differs immensely between systematic and regular literature reviews.

The difference between a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis

While a meta-analysis focuses on synthesizing data and drawing broad conclusions from multiple studies, a systematic literature review is geared towards answering a well-defined research question with a comprehensive and methodical approach.

A meta-analysis involves the comprehensive analysis of results from multiple studies on a particular topic, aiming to identify patterns and draw generalized conclusions. These analyses often rely on statistical methods to combine data from various sources.

Benefits of conducting a systematic literature review

One primary advantage of a systematic review is its ability to address the overwhelming volume of relevant literature that can leave researchers, particularly master’s and PhD students, feeling daunted and unsure of when to stop searching for more material.

By conducting a systematic review, all pertinent literature can be analyzed within specific parameters, alleviating concerns about potentially missing critical information.

Academic citation databases suitable for systematic literature reviews

To conduct systematic literature reviews, it is recommended to utilize a citation database that provides built-in features to refine search queries effectively.

Google Scholar to conduct a systematic literature review

Web of science to conduct a systematic literature review.

Web of Science provides a wide range of Booleans (depicted in the image below on the right) that you can utilize to precisely specify your search criteria. Booleans are a system of logic employed in programming and computer sciences, featuring operators like “AND,” “OR,” and “NOT.” By using these operators, you can fine-tune your search queries and filter results to precisely match what you are looking for.

Scopus to conduct a systematic literature review

Scopus the citation database by publisher Elsevier, boasts access to over 36,000 journals. Its layout and search options closely resemble those of Web of Science, making it a highly recommended platform to explore for research purposes. If you are familiar with Web of Science, you will find Scopus user-friendly and worthwhile to explore for comprehensive academic content.

Step-by-step guide for conducting a systematic literature review

Following these steps will help you conduct a thorough and well-organized systematic literature review.

Master Academia

Get new content delivered directly to your inbox, getting the most out of thesis supervision meetings, separating your self-worth from your phd work, related articles, how to address data privacy and confidentiality concerns of ai in research, how to write a good research proposal (in 9 steps), how to properly use ai in academic research, chatgpt for academics ethical considerations of ai in research.

What’s Included: Literature Review Template

This template is structure is based on the tried and trusted best-practice format for formal academic research projects such as dissertations and theses. The literature review template includes the following sections:

• Before you start – essential groundwork to ensure you’re ready
• The introduction section
• The core/body section
• The conclusion /summary
• Extra free resources

Each section is explained in plain, straightforward language , followed by an overview of the key elements that you need to cover. We’ve also included practical examples and links to more free videos and guides to help you understand exactly what’s required in each section.

The cleanly-formatted Google Doc can be downloaded as a fully editable MS Word Document (DOCX format), so you can use it as-is or convert it to LaTeX.

PS – if you’d like a high-level template for the entire thesis, you can we’ve got that too .

FAQs: Literature Review Template

What format is the template (doc, pdf, ppt, etc.).

The literature review chapter template is provided as a Google Doc. You can download it in MS Word format or make a copy to your Google Drive. You’re also welcome to convert it to whatever format works best for you, such as LaTeX or PDF.

What types of literature reviews can this template be used for?

The template follows the standard format for academic literature reviews, which means it will be suitable for the vast majority of academic research projects (especially those within the sciences), whether they are qualitative or quantitative in terms of design.

Keep in mind that the exact requirements for the literature review chapter will vary between universities and degree programs. These are typically minor, but it’s always a good idea to double-check your university’s requirements before you finalize your structure.

Is this template for an undergrad, Master or PhD-level thesis?

This template can be used for a literature review at any level of study. Doctoral-level projects typically require the literature review to be more extensive/comprehensive, but the structure will typically remain the same.

Can I modify the template to suit my topic/area?

Absolutely. While the template provides a general structure, you should adapt it to fit the specific requirements and focus of your literature review.

What structural style does this literature review template use?

The template assumes a thematic structure (as opposed to a chronological or methodological structure), as this is the most common approach. However, this is only one dimension of the template, so it will still be useful if you are adopting a different structure.

Does this template include the Excel literature catalog?

No, that is a separate template, which you can download for free here . This template is for the write-up of the actual literature review chapter, whereas the catalog is for use during the literature sourcing and sorting phase.

How long should the literature review chapter be?

This depends on your university’s specific requirements, so it’s best to check with them. As a general ballpark, literature reviews for Masters-level projects are usually 2,000 – 3,000 words in length, while Doctoral-level projects can reach multiples of this.

Can I include literature that contradicts my hypothesis?

Yes, it’s important to acknowledge and discuss literature that presents different viewpoints or contradicts your hypothesis. So, don’t shy away from existing research that takes an opposing view to yours.

How do I avoid plagiarism in my literature review?

Always cite your sources correctly and paraphrase ideas in your own words while maintaining the original meaning. You can always check our plagiarism score before submitting your work to help ease your mind. 

Do you have an example of a populated template?

We provide a walkthrough of the template and review an example of a high-quality literature research chapter here .

Can I share this literature review template with my friends/colleagues?

Yes, you’re welcome to share this template in its original format (no editing allowed). If you want to post about it on your blog or social media, all we ask is that you reference this page as your source.

Do you have templates for the other dissertation/thesis chapters?

Yes, we do. You can find our full collection of templates here .

Can Grad Coach help me with my literature review?

Yes, you’re welcome to get in touch with us to discuss our private coaching services , where we can help you work through the literature review chapter (and any other chapters).

• Library Guides

VU Systematic Literature Reviews

Vu systematic literature reviews: overview.

• Other review types
• Define question
• Identifying key concepts
• Databases and other sources of evidence
• Formulating keywords for each concept
• Determine controlled vocabulary (subject headings)
• Searching techniques
• Search filters and hedges
• Building and documenting your search strategy
• Test your search strategy and monitor its development
• Run your search on other databases
• Risk of Bias

On this page

Overview of systematic reviews, the process, guidelines and standards, further resources.

• Acknowledgements

This guide will explain the process of conducting a formal systematic review as well as provide you with relevant resources to ensure that you're meeting discipline standards. It's important to understand the time and resources that are required before you embark on conducting a systematic review. This  decision tree , gives a good, quick overview of what goes into each type of review. If you'd like to discuss the systematic review methodology in greater detail and decide which review is right for you, please make time to talk to a  librarian .

Move through the slide deck below to get an overview of systematic reviews. 

University of South Australia. (2019, March 14).  What is a systematic review  [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/ZWFmmRxHigI

Step 1: Define a clear and focused question

Step 2: develop a protocol.

This is the plan for your review.

• Search strategy and databases
• Eligibility criteria
• Screening process
• Risk of bias assessment
• Data analysis/synthesis process
• Register your protocol (e.g. with Prospero or Open Science Framework) or publish it in a relevant journal.

Then, per your protocol:

Step 3: Conduct systematic searches

• Databases and other sources of evidence  
• Building and documenting your search strategy

Step 4: Screen for studies that meet your eligibility criteria

Step 5: critically appraise the quality of the included studies  and assess risk of bias, step 6: extract relevant data from the included studies, step 7: synthesise the data you have extracted, step 8: write your paper to answer your question.

• Joanna Briggs
• Campbell Collaboration

A good way to think of the following guidelines is as a 'reporting standard'. By referencing these standards it is a way of signalling that you have done your due diligence when it comes to ensuring the transparency, reproducibility and therefore credibility of your review. In addition, it may be the case that specific journals have particular requirements in regards to these standards, so it is worthwhile checking what is required in the journal you are considering. All of the guidelines and standards outlined here are both well-established and authoritative so they serve as an excellent starting point for your systematic review.

“The process of preparing and publishing a Cochrane Review is different from that for other journals. Reviews are typically registered at conception and there is a closer working relationship between Cochrane and the review authors. In addition, Cochrane Reviews follow a highly structured format so that they can be published within the  Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , and their preparation follows a structured process.” -Cochrane Handbook, Part 1, Chapter 2.1.

• Cochrane handbook, part 1 (for Cochrane reviews) more... less... Part 1 addresses various organisational and procedural considerations when undertaking a Cochrane systematic review.
• Cochrane handbook, part 2 - core methods (for all health reviews) more... less... Part 2 provides the core methodology for undertaking systematic reviews on the effects of health interventions, with a particular emphasis on reviewing randomised trials.
• JBI manual for evidence synthesis more... less... This manual describes the detailed process of planning, undertaking and writing up various types of reviews - systematic, umbrella and scoping - using JBI methods.

• Campbell systematic reviews: Author guidelines more... less... Includes detailed methodological expectations for the conduct and reporting of Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews of intervention effects.
• Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) website more... less... Includes links to key documents including the PRISMA 2020 Statement, Checklist, Flow Diagram, and Explanatation and Elaboration, and all PRISMA Extensions.
• Guidelines for systematic review and evidence synthesis in environmental management. Version 4.2. more... less... This document provides guidelines aimed at reviewers intending to conduct systematic reviews in environmental management.
• HuGENet™ handbook of systematic reviews more... less... Guidelines for conducting a HuGE review, particularly describing population-based data and human genetic variants.
• Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care more... less... The Centre for Reviews and Dissemination provides a guidelines to standardise methods that are recognised by agencies such as the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) programme, and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).
• Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application more... less... This document provides methodical considerations, reflections and practice examples for systematic reviews in education research.
• COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments more... less... 'The COSMIN methodology is developed specifically for patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), and is now adapted for use in systematic reviews of other types of outcome measurement instruments' - COSMIN website

Doing a Systematic Review: A students guide  (2017)

Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application  (2020)

Conducting systematic reviews in sport, exercise, and physical activity (2019)

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)

• Glossary of terms more... less... Some of the commonly used terms associated with systematic reviews.
• Learning from research: systematic reviews for informing policy decisions: a quick guide. A paper for the Alliance for Useful Evidence. more... less... Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J 2013, London: Nesta.
• Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach more... less... An explanatory article co-authored Dr. Micah Peters. Abstract: Scoping reviews are a relatively new approach to evidence synthesis and currently there exists little guidance regarding the decision to choose between a systematic review or scoping review approach when synthesising evidence. The purpose of this article is to clearly describe the differences in indications between scoping reviews and systematic reviews and to provide guidance for when a scoping review is (and is not) appropriate.
• A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologie more... less... Grant, MJ & Booth, A 2009, Health Information & Libraries Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 91-108.
• What are systematic reviews? more... less... Cochrane Collaboration
• What authors do (infogram) more... less... Jessica Kaufman, Cochrane Consumers & Communication Review Group, Centre for Health Communication & Participation, La Trobe University, 2011. Copied under CC BY-NC 4.0
• Systematic review toolbox more... less... The Systematic Review Toolbox is an online catalogue of tools that support various tasks within the systematic review and wider evidence synthesis process.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to UniSA for creating a guide on Systematic Reviews  and sharing its contents as a basis for this guide. The UniSA guide was developed with the assistance and expertise of  Dr Anna Phillips ,  Prof Saravana Kumar , and  Assoc Prof Shylie Mackintosh .

Acknowledgement of Country

• Next: Other review types >>
• Last Updated: Jun 17, 2024 11:08 AM
• URL: https://libraryguides.vu.edu.au/systematicliteraturereviews

Log in using your username and password

• Search More Search for this keyword Advanced search
• Latest content
• Current issue
• Write for Us
• BMJ Journals

You are here

• Volume 24, Issue 2
• Five tips for developing useful literature summary tables for writing review articles
• Article Text
• Article info
• Citation Tools
• Rapid Responses
• Article metrics

• http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0157-5319 Ahtisham Younas 1 , 2 ,
• http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7839-8130 Parveen Ali 3 , 4
• 1 Memorial University of Newfoundland , St John's , Newfoundland , Canada
• 2 Swat College of Nursing , Pakistan
• 3 School of Nursing and Midwifery , University of Sheffield , Sheffield , South Yorkshire , UK
• 4 Sheffield University Interpersonal Violence Research Group , Sheffield University , Sheffield , UK
• Correspondence to Ahtisham Younas, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL A1C 5C4, Canada; ay6133{at}mun.ca

https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2021-103417

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions.

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Introduction

Literature reviews offer a critical synthesis of empirical and theoretical literature to assess the strength of evidence, develop guidelines for practice and policymaking, and identify areas for future research. 1 It is often essential and usually the first task in any research endeavour, particularly in masters or doctoral level education. For effective data extraction and rigorous synthesis in reviews, the use of literature summary tables is of utmost importance. A literature summary table provides a synopsis of an included article. It succinctly presents its purpose, methods, findings and other relevant information pertinent to the review. The aim of developing these literature summary tables is to provide the reader with the information at one glance. Since there are multiple types of reviews (eg, systematic, integrative, scoping, critical and mixed methods) with distinct purposes and techniques, 2 there could be various approaches for developing literature summary tables making it a complex task specialty for the novice researchers or reviewers. Here, we offer five tips for authors of the review articles, relevant to all types of reviews, for creating useful and relevant literature summary tables. We also provide examples from our published reviews to illustrate how useful literature summary tables can be developed and what sort of information should be provided.

Tip 1: provide detailed information about frameworks and methods

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Tabular literature summaries from a scoping review. Source: Rasheed et al . 3

The provision of information about conceptual and theoretical frameworks and methods is useful for several reasons. First, in quantitative (reviews synthesising the results of quantitative studies) and mixed reviews (reviews synthesising the results of both qualitative and quantitative studies to address a mixed review question), it allows the readers to assess the congruence of the core findings and methods with the adapted framework and tested assumptions. In qualitative reviews (reviews synthesising results of qualitative studies), this information is beneficial for readers to recognise the underlying philosophical and paradigmatic stance of the authors of the included articles. For example, imagine the authors of an article, included in a review, used phenomenological inquiry for their research. In that case, the review authors and the readers of the review need to know what kind of (transcendental or hermeneutic) philosophical stance guided the inquiry. Review authors should, therefore, include the philosophical stance in their literature summary for the particular article. Second, information about frameworks and methods enables review authors and readers to judge the quality of the research, which allows for discerning the strengths and limitations of the article. For example, if authors of an included article intended to develop a new scale and test its psychometric properties. To achieve this aim, they used a convenience sample of 150 participants and performed exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the same sample. Such an approach would indicate a flawed methodology because EFA and CFA should not be conducted on the same sample. The review authors must include this information in their summary table. Omitting this information from a summary could lead to the inclusion of a flawed article in the review, thereby jeopardising the review’s rigour.

Tip 2: include strengths and limitations for each article

Critical appraisal of individual articles included in a review is crucial for increasing the rigour of the review. Despite using various templates for critical appraisal, authors often do not provide detailed information about each reviewed article’s strengths and limitations. Merely noting the quality score based on standardised critical appraisal templates is not adequate because the readers should be able to identify the reasons for assigning a weak or moderate rating. Many recent critical appraisal checklists (eg, Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool) discourage review authors from assigning a quality score and recommend noting the main strengths and limitations of included studies. It is also vital that methodological and conceptual limitations and strengths of the articles included in the review are provided because not all review articles include empirical research papers. Rather some review synthesises the theoretical aspects of articles. Providing information about conceptual limitations is also important for readers to judge the quality of foundations of the research. For example, if you included a mixed-methods study in the review, reporting the methodological and conceptual limitations about ‘integration’ is critical for evaluating the study’s strength. Suppose the authors only collected qualitative and quantitative data and did not state the intent and timing of integration. In that case, the strength of the study is weak. Integration only occurred at the levels of data collection. However, integration may not have occurred at the analysis, interpretation and reporting levels.

Tip 3: write conceptual contribution of each reviewed article

While reading and evaluating review papers, we have observed that many review authors only provide core results of the article included in a review and do not explain the conceptual contribution offered by the included article. We refer to conceptual contribution as a description of how the article’s key results contribute towards the development of potential codes, themes or subthemes, or emerging patterns that are reported as the review findings. For example, the authors of a review article noted that one of the research articles included in their review demonstrated the usefulness of case studies and reflective logs as strategies for fostering compassion in nursing students. The conceptual contribution of this research article could be that experiential learning is one way to teach compassion to nursing students, as supported by case studies and reflective logs. This conceptual contribution of the article should be mentioned in the literature summary table. Delineating each reviewed article’s conceptual contribution is particularly beneficial in qualitative reviews, mixed-methods reviews, and critical reviews that often focus on developing models and describing or explaining various phenomena. Figure 2 offers an example of a literature summary table. 4

Tabular literature summaries from a critical review. Source: Younas and Maddigan. 4

Tip 4: compose potential themes from each article during summary writing

While developing literature summary tables, many authors use themes or subthemes reported in the given articles as the key results of their own review. Such an approach prevents the review authors from understanding the article’s conceptual contribution, developing rigorous synthesis and drawing reasonable interpretations of results from an individual article. Ultimately, it affects the generation of novel review findings. For example, one of the articles about women’s healthcare-seeking behaviours in developing countries reported a theme ‘social-cultural determinants of health as precursors of delays’. Instead of using this theme as one of the review findings, the reviewers should read and interpret beyond the given description in an article, compare and contrast themes, findings from one article with findings and themes from another article to find similarities and differences and to understand and explain bigger picture for their readers. Therefore, while developing literature summary tables, think twice before using the predeveloped themes. Including your themes in the summary tables (see figure 1 ) demonstrates to the readers that a robust method of data extraction and synthesis has been followed.

Tip 5: create your personalised template for literature summaries

Often templates are available for data extraction and development of literature summary tables. The available templates may be in the form of a table, chart or a structured framework that extracts some essential information about every article. The commonly used information may include authors, purpose, methods, key results and quality scores. While extracting all relevant information is important, such templates should be tailored to meet the needs of the individuals’ review. For example, for a review about the effectiveness of healthcare interventions, a literature summary table must include information about the intervention, its type, content timing, duration, setting, effectiveness, negative consequences, and receivers and implementers’ experiences of its usage. Similarly, literature summary tables for articles included in a meta-synthesis must include information about the participants’ characteristics, research context and conceptual contribution of each reviewed article so as to help the reader make an informed decision about the usefulness or lack of usefulness of the individual article in the review and the whole review.

In conclusion, narrative or systematic reviews are almost always conducted as a part of any educational project (thesis or dissertation) or academic or clinical research. Literature reviews are the foundation of research on a given topic. Robust and high-quality reviews play an instrumental role in guiding research, practice and policymaking. However, the quality of reviews is also contingent on rigorous data extraction and synthesis, which require developing literature summaries. We have outlined five tips that could enhance the quality of the data extraction and synthesis process by developing useful literature summaries.

• Aromataris E ,
• Rasheed SP ,

Twitter @Ahtisham04, @parveenazamali

Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests None declared.

Patient consent for publication Not required.

Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

The role of community energy schemes in reducing energy poverty and promoting social inclusion: a systematic literature review.

1. Introduction

2. materials and methods: the prisma approach, 3.1. energy poverty and energy vulnerability, 3.2. vulnerable groups, 3.3. community energy schemes, 3.4. vulnerable groups in community energy schemes, 3.4.1. barriers to community energy projects that address energy vulnerability, 3.4.2. drivers of community energy projects addressing energy vulnerability, 3.5. national context, 3.5.1. the united kingdom, 3.5.2. germany, 3.5.3. italy, 3.5.4. the netherlands, 3.5.5. spain, 3.5.6. denmark, 3.5.7. portugal, 3.5.8. poland, 3.5.9. austria, 3.5.10. slovenia, 4. the role of education in inclusive sustainable energy communities, 5. conclusions, supplementary materials, author contributions, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Todd, I.; Bulder, C.; McCauley, D.; Burns, M.-K. Assessing the post-COVID prospects for the energy transition in the Netherlands and the UK, using a policy barriers approach. Local Environ. 2022 , 27 , 712–727. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Otamendi-Irizar, I.; Grijalba, O.; Arias, A.; Pennese, C.; Hernández, R. How can local energy communities promote sustainable development in European cities? Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2022 , 84 , 102363. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Biresselioglu, M.E.; Limoncuoglu, S.A.; Demir, M.H.; Reichl, J.; Burgstaller, K.; Sciullo, A.; Ferrero, E. Legal provisions and market conditions for energy communities in Austria, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain, and Turkey: A comparative assessment. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 11212. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Boostani, P.; Sadeghiha, M. Identification of critical uncertainties in Tehran in order to achieve the development of low carbon city by using scenario writing method. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2022 , 6 , 100405. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Furmankiewicz, M.; Hewitt, R.J.; Kazak, J.K. Can rural stakeholders drive the low-carbon transition? Analysis of climate-related activities planned in local development strategies in Poland. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021 , 150 , 111419. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Snodin, H. Changes to the Energy Landscape and Potential Impact on Scotland’s Consumers ; CAG Consultants: London, UK, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Haddeland, I.; Hole, J.; Holmqvist, E.; Koestler, V.; Sidelnikova, M.; Veie, C.A.; Wold, M. Effects of climate on renewable energy sources and electricity supply in Norway. Renew. Energy 2022 , 196 , 625–637. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tsirou, V. Energy Refurbishment of Buildings to Combat Energy Poverty in Southern Europe. Master’s Thesis, International Hellenic University, Thermi, Greece, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
• Leonhardt, R. Government Instruments and Community Energy: Advancing Energy Transition in Northern and Indigenous Communities. Master’s Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• DellaValle, N.; Czako, V. Empowering energy citizenship among the energy poor. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2022 , 89 , 102654. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• van Bommel, N.; Höffken, J.I. Energy justice within, between and beyond European community energy initiatives: A review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021 , 79 , 102157. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chlechowitz, M.; Reuter, M. Energy Poverty in the EU ; European Parliament: Bruxelles, Belgium, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Leal Filho, W.; Marisa Azul, A.; Brandli, L.; Lange Salvia, A.; Wall, T. Affordable and Clean Energy ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pellegrini-Masini, G.; Pirni, A.; Maran, S.; Klöckner, C.A. Delivering a timely and Just Energy Transition: Which policy research priorities? Environ. Policy Gov. 2020 , 30 , 293–305. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leonhardt, R.; Noble, B.; Poelzer, G.; Fitzpatrick, P.; Belcher, K.; Holdmann, G. Advancing local energy transitions: A global review of government instruments supporting community energy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2022 , 83 , 102350. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nouri, A.; Khadem, S.; Mutule, A.; Papadimitriou, C.; Stanev, R.; Cabiati, M.; Keane, A.; Carroll, P. Identification of gaps and barriers in regulations, standards, and network codes to energy citizen participation in the energy transition. Energies 2022 , 15 , 856. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vernay, A.-L.; Sebi, C. Energy communities and their ecosystems: A comparison of France and the Netherlands. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020 , 158 , 120123. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Coenen, F.H.; Hoppe, T. Renewable Energy Communities and the Low Carbon Energy Transition in Europe ; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Shortall, R.; Mengolini, A.; Gangale, F. Citizen Engagement in EU Collective Action Energy Projects. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 5949. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Capellán-Pérez, I.; Johanisova, N.; Young, J.; Kunze, C. Is community energy really non-existent in post-socialist Europe? Examining recent trends in 16 countries. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020 , 61 , 101348. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Corvino, F.; Pellegrini-Masini, G.; Pirni, A.; Maran, S. Compensation for Energy Infrastructures: Can a Capability Approach be More Equitable? J. Hum. Dev. Capab. 2021 , 22 , 197–217. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Guruswamy, L. Energy justice and sustainable development. Colo. J. Int. Environ. Law Policy 2010 , 21 , 231. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pellegrini-Masini, G.; Pirni, A.; Maran, S. Energy justice revisited: A critical review on the philosophical and political origins of equality. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020 , 59 , 101310. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fetting, C. The European Green Deal ; ESDN Report; European Commission: Ispra, Italy, 2020; p. 53. [ Google Scholar ]
• Heffron, R.J.; McCauley, D. The concept of energy justice across the disciplines. Energy Policy 2017 , 105 , 658–667. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Heffron, R.J.; Heffron, R.J. What is the “just transition”? In Achieving a Just Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy ; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 9–19. [ Google Scholar ]
• McCauley, D.; Heffron, R. Just transition: Integrating climate, energy and environmental justice. Energy Policy 2018 , 119 , 1–7. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2021 , 134 , 103–112. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hanke, F.; Guyet, R.; Feenstra, M. Do renewable energy communities deliver energy justice? Exploring insights from 71 European cases. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021 , 80 , 102244. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Castro, L.F.; Carvalho, P.C.; Fidalgo, J.; Saraiva, J. Comparison among National Energy Community Policies in Brazil, Germany, Portugal, and Spain. In Proceedings of the 2022 18th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), Ljubljana, Slovenia, 13–15 September 2022; pp. 1–6. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sokołowski, M.M. Renewable and citizen energy communities in the European Union: How (not) to regulate community energy in national laws and policies. J. Energy Nat. Resour. Law 2020 , 38 , 289–304. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Marggraf, C.; Hearn, A.; Lamonaca, L.; Ackrill, R.; Galanakis, K. Report on “Must-Read” Factors in Policy Design to Tackle Energy Poverty through PED Creation ; Smart-BEEjS: Nottingham, UK, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Musolino, M.; Maggio, G.; D’Aleo, E.; Nicita, A. Three case studies to explore relevant features of emerging renewable energy communities in Italy. Renew. Energy 2023 , 210 , 540–555. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gerundo, R.; Marra, A. A Decision Support Methodology to Foster Renewable Energy Communities in the Municipal Urban Plan. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 16268. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bashi, M.H.; De Tommasi, L.; Le Cam, A.; Relaño, L.S.; Lyons, P.; Mundó, J.; Pandelieva-Dimova, I.; Schapp, H.; Loth-Babut, K.; Egger, C. A review and mapping exercise of energy community regulatory challenges in European member states based on a survey of collective energy actors. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023 , 172 , 113055. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Boemi, S.-N.; Papadopoulos, A.M. Energy poverty and energy efficiency improvements: A longitudinal approach of the Hellenic households. Energy Build. 2019 , 197 , 242–250. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tauš, P.; Beer, M. Evaluation of the Hydropower Potential of the Torysa River and Its Energy Use in the Process of Reducing Energy Poverty of Local Communities. Energies 2022 , 15 , 3584. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kata, R.; Cyran, K.; Dybka, S.; Lechwar, M.; Pitera, R. The Role of Local Government in Implementing Renewable Energy Sources in Households (Podkarpacie Case Study). Energies 2022 , 15 , 3163. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cumo, F.; Maurelli, P.; Pennacchia, E.; Rosa, F. Urban Renewable Energy Communities and Energy Poverty: A proactive approach to energy transition with Sun4All project. Proc. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022 , 1073 , 012011. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stojilovska, A.; Guyet, R.; Mahoney, K.; Gouveia, J.P.; Castaño-Rosa, R.; Živčič, L.; Barbosa, R.; Tkalec, T. Energy poverty and emerging debates: Beyond the traditional triangle of energy poverty drivers. Energy Policy 2022 , 169 , 113181. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Manjon, M.-J.; Merino, A.; Cairns, I. Business as not usual: A systematic literature review of social entrepreneurship, social innovation, and energy poverty to accelerate the just energy transition. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2022 , 90 , 102624. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hanke, F.; Grossmann, K.; Sandmann, L. Excluded despite their support-The perspectives of energy-poor households on their participation in the German energy transition narrative. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2023 , 104 , 103259. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sokołowski, J.; Lewandowski, P.; Kiełczewska, A.; Bouzarovski, S. A multidimensional index to measure energy poverty: The Polish case. Energy Sources Part B Econ. Plan. Policy 2020 , 15 , 92–112. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Thomson, H.; Snell, C.; Bouzarovski, S. Health, well-being and energy poverty in Europe: A comparative study of 32 European countries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017 , 14 , 584. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bouzarovski, S.; Thomson, H.; Cornelis, M. Confronting energy poverty in Europe: A research and policy agenda. Energies 2021 , 14 , 858. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Anais, V.; Jiglau, G.; Grossmann, K.; Guyet, R. Addressing energy poverty through technological and governance innovation. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2022 , 12 , 49. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bode, A. To what extent can community energy mitigate energy poverty in Germany? Front. Sustain. Cities 2022 , 4 , 1005065. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nolden, C.; Towers, L.; Schamroth Rossade, D.; Thomas, P.; Speciale, G.; Watson, R. Can liberalised electricity markets deliver on climate change and energy poverty? Evidence from community projects in Great Britain. Local Environ. 2022 , 27 , 1151–1171. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lowitzsch, J.; Lowitzsch, S.; Sangster. Energy Transition ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lacey-Barnacle, M. Proximities of energy justice: Contesting community energy and austerity in England. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020 , 69 , 101713. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cunha, F.B.F.; Carani, C.; Nucci, C.A.; Castro, C.; Silva, M.S.; Torres, E.A. Transitioning to a low carbon society through energy communities: Lessons learned from Brazil and Italy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021 , 75 , 101994. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fox, N. Increasing solar entitlement and decreasing energy vulnerability in a low-income community by adopting the Prosuming Project. Nat. Energy 2023 , 8 , 74–83. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ceglia, F.; Esposito, P.; Faraudello, A.; Marrasso, E.; Rossi, P.; Sasso, M. An energy, environmental, management and economic analysis of energy efficient system towards renewable energy community: The case study of multi-purpose energy community. J. Clean. Prod. 2022 , 369 , 133269. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Magnani, N.; Cittati, V.M. Combining the Multilevel Perspective and Sociotechnical Imaginaries in the Study of Community Energy: Two Case-Studies from Italy. Energies 2021 , 15 , 1624. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sareen, S. Digitalisation and social inclusion in multi-scalar smart energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021 , 81 , 102251. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hesselman, M.; Tirado Herrero, S.; Smith, M.; Cornelis, M.; Antepara, I.; Bajomi, A.; Barrella, R. Moving forward on the Right to Energy in the EU ; Engagement Toolkit: London, UK, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Živčič, L.; Tkalec, T. Slovenia: Focus on energy efficiency, community energy projects and energy poverty. In Energy Demand Challenges in Europe: Implications for Policy, Planning and Practice ; Palgrave Pivot: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 95–104. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lockwooda, M.; Devenisha, A.; Kerrb, N. The governance of residential heat transitions in the Netherlands and the UK. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2022 , 50 , 100818. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hoicka, C.E.; Lowitzsch, J.; Brisbois, M.C.; Kumar, A.; Camargo, L.R. Implementing a just renewable energy transition: Policy advice for transposing the new European rules for renewable energy communities. Energy Policy 2021 , 156 , 112435. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Winston, N. Sustainable community development: Integrating social and environmental sustainability for sustainable housing and communities. Sustain. Dev. 2022 , 30 , 191–202. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vadovics, E. The energy challenge in Hungary: A need for more complex approaches. In Energy Demand Challenges in Europe ; Palgrave Pivot: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; p. 83. [ Google Scholar ]
• Carley, S.; Konisky, D.M. The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition. Nat. Energy 2020 , 5 , 569–577. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hearn, A.X.; Castaño-Rosa, R. Towards a just energy transition, barriers and opportunities for positive energy district creation in Spain. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 8698. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kuschan, M.; Burghard, U.; Groneweg, K.; Strebel, A. Is the German Energy Transition Perceived as Gender-and Socially-Just? Working Paper Sustainability and Innovation: Karlsruhe, Germany, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Economidou, M.; Todeschi, V.; Bertoldi, P.; D’Agostino, D.; Zangheri, P.; Castellazzi, L. Review of 50 years of EU energy efficiency policies for buildings. Energy Build. 2020 , 225 , 110322. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ozarisoy, B. Energy effectiveness of passive cooling design strategies to reduce the impact of long-term heatwaves on occupants’ thermal comfort in Europe: Climate change and mitigation. J. Clean. Prod. 2022 , 330 , 129675. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fouladvand, J.; Ghorbani, A.; Sarı, Y.; Hoppe, T.; Kunneke, R.; Herder, P. Energy security in community energy systems: An agent-based modelling approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2022 , 366 , 132765. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ayllón, L.M.S.; Jenkins, K.E. Energy justice, Just Transitions and Scottish energy policy: A re-grounding of theory in policy practice. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2023 , 96 , 102922. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shi, X.; Zeng, P.; Cui, L.; Gao, X.; Qiu, T.; Jiang, Q.; Fu, L. Assessing the impact of marketization on energy poverty. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023 , 1–30. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, C.-f.; Dietz, T.; Fefferman, N.H.; Greig, J.; Cetin, K.; Robinson, C.; Arpan, L.; Schweiker, M.; Dong, B.; Wu, W. Extreme events, energy security and equality through micro-and macro-levels: Concepts, challenges and methods. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2022 , 85 , 102401. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Spasova, D.; Braungardt, S. Building a Common Support Framework in Differing Realities—Conditions for Renewable Energy Communities in Germany and Bulgaria. Energies 2021 , 14 , 4693. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tuerk, A.; Neumann, C.; Gubina, A.F.; Medved, T.; Singh, P.K.; Nathan, H.S.K.; Xu, X. Overview of International Approaches for Local Energy Systems and Energy Communities ; Compile: Luce, Slovenia, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wahlund, M.; Palm, J. The role of energy democracy and energy citizenship for participatory energy transitions: A comprehensive review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2022 , 87 , 102482. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sovacool, B.K.; Barnacle, M.L.; Smith, A.; Brisbois, M.C. Towards improved solar energy justice: Exploring the complex inequities of household adoption of photovoltaic panels. Energy Policy 2022 , 164 , 112868. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ali, A.; Esposito, L.; Gatto, A. Energy transition and public behavior in Italy: A structural equation modelling. Resour. Policy 2023 , 85 , 103945. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Baigorrotegui, G.; Lowitzsch, J. Institutional aspects of consumer (co-) ownership in RE energy communities. In Energy Transition: Financing Consumer Co-Ownership in Renewables ; Palgrave Pivot: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 663–701. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gouveia, J.P.; Mahoney, K. Perspective on Infrastructure Issues-State of Energy Infrastructure/Access to Technology/Smart-Metering in the UK ; EP-Pedia, ENGAGER COST Action: Brussels, Belgium, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Candelise, C.; Ruggieri, G. Status and evolution of the community energy sector in Italy. Energies 2020 , 13 , 1888. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Apostolopoulos, N.; Chalvatzis, K.J.; Liargovas, P.G.; Newbery, R.; Rokou, E. The role of the expert knowledge broker in rural development: Renewable energy funding decisions in Greece. J. Rural Stud. 2020 , 78 , 96–106. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Horstink, L.; Wittmayer, J.M.; Ng, K.; Luz, G.P.; Marín-González, E.; Gährs, S.; Campos, I.; Holstenkamp, L.; Oxenaar, S.; Brown, D. Collective renewable energy prosumers and the promises of the energy union: Taking stock. Energies 2020 , 13 , 421. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fernandez, R. Community renewable energy projects: The future of the sustainable energy transition? Int. Spect. 2021 , 56 , 87–104. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Botsaris, P.N.; Giourka, P.; Papatsounis, A.; Dimitriadou, P.; Goitia-Zabaleta, N.; Patsonakis, C. Developing a business case for a renewable energy community in a public housing settlement in greece—The case of a student housing and its challenges, prospects and barriers. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 3792. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Motsch, M.F.T. Development of an Energy Benchmarking Model for Municipalities to Estimate the Potential for Establishing a Renewable Energy Community. Master’s Thesis, Technische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lacey-Barnacle, M. Exploring Local Energy Justice in Times of Austerity: Civic Energy Sector Low-Carbon Transitions in Bristol City ; Cardiff University: Cardiff, UK, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
• Torabi Moghadam, S.; Di Nicoli, M.V.; Manzo, S.; Lombardi, P. Mainstreaming energy communities in the transition to a low-carbon future: A methodological approach. Energies 2020 , 13 , 1597. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Koirala, B.P.; van Oost, E.C.; van der Waal, E.C.; van der Windt, H.J. New pathways for community energy and storage. Energies 2021 , 14 , 286. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Roberts, J. Power to the people? Implications of the Clean Energy Package for the role of community ownership in Europe’s energy transition. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 2020 , 29 , 232–244. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Paskevicius, J. The Conceptualization of Energy Justice: The EU Sphere. Baltic JL Pol. 2020 , 13 , 163. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Arias, A.; Feijoo, G.; Moreira, M.T. Advancing the European energy transition based on environmental, economic and social justice. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2023 , 43 , 77–93. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fuller, S.; Bouzarovski, S. Introduction to the Handbook on Energy Justice. In Handbook on Energy Justice ; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2023; pp. 1–12. [ Google Scholar ]
• Segales, M.; Hewitt, R.J.; Slee, B. Social innovation and global citizenship: Guiding principles for sustainable, just and democratic energy transition in cities. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2023 , 106 , 103295. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hanke, F.; Guyet, R. The struggle of energy communities to enhance energy justice: Insights from 113 German cases. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2023 , 13 , 16. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hanke, F.; Lowitzsch, J. Empowering vulnerable consumers to join renewable energy communities—Towards an inclusive design of the clean energy package. Energies 2020 , 13 , 1615. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Energy-Community-Secretariat. Policy Guidelines by the Energy Community Secretariat on Identifying and Addressing Energy Poverty in the Energy Community Contracting Parties ; The Energy Community: Vienna, Austria, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hub, E.P.A. Tackling Energy Poverty through Local Actions: Inspiring Cases from across Europe ; Energy Poverty Advisory Hub & European Commission: Paris, France, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Koukoufikis, G.; Schockaert, H.; Paci, D.; Filippidou, F.; Caramizaru, A.; Della Valle, N.; Candelise, C.; Murauskaite-Bull, I.; Uihlein, A. Energy Communities and Energy Poverty—The Role of Energy Communities in Alleviating Energy Poverty ; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2023. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wittmayer, J.M.; Avelino, F.; Pel, B.; Campos, I. Contributing to sustainable and just energy systems? The mainstreaming of renewable energy prosumerism within and across institutional logics. Energy Policy 2021 , 149 , 112053. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Petrova, S.; Simcock, N. Gender and energy: Domestic inequities reconsidered. Soc. Cult. Geogr. 2021 , 22 , 849–867. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Loureiro, T.; Argumosa, P.J.; Aggeli, A.; Arniani, M.; Blanke, J.; Barrios, B. Energy communities: Engaging people and technologies in the future of energy. Open Res. Eur. 2022 , 2 , 137. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ring, M.; Wilson, E.; Ruwanpura, K.N.; Gay-Antaki, M. Just energy transitions? Energy policy and the adoption of clean energy technology by households in Sweden. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2022 , 91 , 102727. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Campos, I.; Marín-González, E. People in transitions: Energy citizenship, prosumerism and social movements in Europe. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020 , 69 , 101718. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tsagkari, M. The need for gender-based approach in the assessment of local energy projects. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2022 , 68 , 40–49. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dall-Orsoletta, A.; Cunha, J.; Araújo, M.; Ferreira, P. A systematic review of social innovation and community energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2022 , 88 , 102625. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Caramizaru, A.; Uihlein, A. Energy Communities: An Overview of Energy and Social Innovation ; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2020; Volume 30083. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mawhood, B.; Adcock, A. Empowering Community Energy Schemes ; House of Commons Library: London, UK, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Savaresi, A. The rise of community energy from grassroots to mainstream: The role of law and policy. J. Environ. Law 2019 , 31 , 487–510. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dudka, A.; Moratal, N.; Bauwens, T. A typology of community-based energy citizenship: An analysis of the ownership structure and institutional logics of 164 energy communities in France. Energy Policy 2023 , 178 , 113588. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rydin, Y.; Turcu, C. Revisiting urban energy initiatives in the UK: Declining local capacity in a shifting policy context. Energy Policy 2019 , 129 , 653–660. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cunha, F.B.F.; Carani, C.; Santos, J.A.F.d.A.; De Jong, P.; Torres, E.A.; Silva, M.S.; Nucci, C.A. Implementing collective energy schemes: Suggestions for the Italian national legal framework on energy communities. In Proceedings of the Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, Online, 1–5 September 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Walker Clarke, C. Democratising the Energy Transition: A Case Study into the Transformative Power of Energy Communities in the United Kingdom. Master’s Thesis, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Karimi, F.; Rodi, M. Energy Transition in the Baltic Sea Region: Understanding Stakeholder Engagement and Community Acceptance ; Taylor & Francis: New York, NY, USA, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pellegrini-Masini, G. Wind Power and Public Engagement: Co-Operatives and Community Ownership ; Routledge: London, UK, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Goedkoop, F.; Sloot, D.; Jans, L.; Dijkstra, J.; Flache, A.; Steg, L. The role of community in understanding involvement in community energy initiatives. Front. Psychol. 2022 , 12 , 775752. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Lacey-Barnacle, M.; Smith, A.; Foxon, T. Community wealth building in an age of just transitions: Exploring civil society approaches to net zero and future research synergies. Energy Policy 2023 , 172 , 113277. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pel, B.; Debourdeau, A.; Kemp, R.; Dumitru, A.; Vadovics, E.; Schäfer, M.; Markantoni, M.; Schmid, B.; Fahy, F.; Fransolet, A. Energy Citizenship: Ideals, Ideology and Ideal-types in the Energy Transition. In Proceedings of the European Forum for Studies of Policies for Research and Innovation (EU-SPRI), Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1–3 June 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Seu, I.B. Prosocial behaviour. In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Social Psychology ; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2017; pp. 345–364. [ Google Scholar ]
• Karunathilake, H.; Hewage, K.; Prabatha, T.; Ruparathna, R.; Sadiq, R. Project deployment strategies for community renewable energy: A dynamic multi-period planning approach. Renew. Energy 2020 , 152 , 237–258. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Standal, K.; Feenstra, M. Engaging the public for citizen energy production in Norway: Energy narratives, opportunities and barriers for an inclusive energy transition. In Energy Transition in the Baltic Sea Region ; Routledge: London, UK, 2022; pp. 135–154. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Riveros, J.Z.; Kubli, M.; Ulli-Beer, S. Prosumer communities as strategic allies for electric utilities: Exploring future decentralization trends in Switzerland. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2019 , 57 , 101219. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Decker, C. Protecting consumers in digitized and multi-source energy systems. Energy Sources Part B Econ. Plan. Policy 2021 , 16 , 1127–1142. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bedggood, R.; Russell-Bennett, R.; McAndrew, R.; Glavas, C.; Dulleck, U. Challenging the social-power paradigm: Moving beyond consumer empowerment to an energy ecosystem of shared value. Energy Policy 2023 , 173 , 113405. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sifakis, N.; Savvakis, N.; Daras, T.; Tsoutsos, T. Analysis of the energy consumption behavior of European RES cooperative members. Energies 2019 , 12 , 970. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McGovern, G. Capturing community value in civic energy business model design. Energy Policy 2021 , 156 , 112468. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Busch, H.; Ruggiero, S.; Isakovic, A.; Hansen, T. Policy challenges to community energy in the EU: A systematic review of the scientific literature. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021 , 151 , 111535. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Savelli, I.; Morstyn, T. Better together: Harnessing social relationships in smart energy communities. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021 , 78 , 102125. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mundaca, L.; Rotmann, S.; Ashby, K.; Karlin, B.; Butler, D.; Sequeira, M.M.; Gouveia, J.P.; Palma, P.; Realini, A.; Maggiore, S. Hard-to-reach energy users: An ex-post cross-country assessment of behavioural-oriented interventions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2023 , 104 , 103205. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Grignani, A.; Gozzellino, M.; Sciullo, A.; Padovan, D. Community cooperative: A new legal form for enhancing social capital for the development of renewable energy communities in Italy. Energies 2021 , 14 , 7029. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Csontos, C.; Soha, T.; Harmat, Á.; Campos, J.; Csüllög, G.; Munkácsy, B. Spatial analysis of renewable-based hybrid district heating possibilities in a Hungarian rural area. Int. J. Sustain. Energy Plan. Manag. 2020 , 28 , 17–36. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schwanitz, V.J.; Wierling, A.; Zeiss, J.P.; von Beck, C.; Koren, I.K.; Marcroft, T.; Müller, L.; Getabecha, M.; Dufner, S. The contribution of collective prosumers to the energy transition in Europe-Preliminary estimates at European and country-level from the COMETS inventory. SocArXiv 2021 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Heldeweg, M.A.; Saintier, S. Renewable energy communities as ‘socio-legal institutions’: A normative frame for energy decentralization? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020 , 119 , 109518. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cristóbal, A.B.; Sanz-Cuadrado, C.; Zhang, Z.; Victoria, M.; Fialho, L.; Cavaco, A.; Bokalič, M.; Narvarte, L. Delving into the modeling and operation of energy communities as epicenters for systemic transformations. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2023 , 1–17. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bilardo, M.; Cattaneo, F.; Dioni, E.; Liberi, E.; Milocco, L.; Serale, G. Community Energy for enhancing the energy transition. CERN IdeaSquare J. Exp. Innov. 2020 , 4 , 7–18. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bielig, M.; Kacperski, C.; Kutzner, F.; Klingert, S. Evidence behind the narrative: Critically reviewing the social impact of energy communities in Europe. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2022 , 94 , 102859. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Husiev, O.; Arrien, O.U.; Enciso-Santocildes, M. What does Horizon 2020 contribute to? Analysing and visualising the community practices of Europe’s largest research and innovation programme. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2023 , 95 , 102879. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Karytsas, S.; Theodoropoulou, E. Determinants of citizens’ involvement in community energy initiatives. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 2022 , 41 , 1836–1848. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• van Twuijver, M.W.; Olmedo, L.; O’Shaughnessy, M.; Hennessy, T. Rural social enterprises in Europe: A systematic literature review. Local Econ. 2020 , 35 , 121–142. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cuesta-Fernandez, I.; Belda-Miquel, S.; Calabuig Tormo, C. Challengers in energy transitions beyond renewable energy cooperatives: Community-owned electricity distribution cooperatives in Spain. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2020 , 33 , 140–159. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ahmed, S.; Ali, A.; D’Angola, A. A Review of Renewable Energy Communities: Concepts, Scope, Progress, Challenges, and Recommendations. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 1749. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Miller, J. Energy Justice for Members Only? Master’s Thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jelić, M.; Batić, M.; Tomašević, N.; Barney, A.; Polatidis, H.; Crosbie, T.; Abi Ghanem, D.; Short, M.; Pillai, G. Towards self-sustainable island grids through optimal utilization of renewable energy potential and community engagement. Energies 2020 , 13 , 3386. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Reis, I.F.; Gonçalves, I.; Lopes, M.A.; Antunes, C.H. Business models for energy communities: A review of key issues and trends. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021 , 144 , 111013. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Di Nucci, M.R.; Prontera, A. The Italian energy transition in a multilevel system: Between reinforcing dynamics and institutional constraints. Z. Polit. 2023 , 33 , 181–204. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• De Vidovich, L.; Tricarico, L.; Zulianello, M. How Can We Frame Energy Communities’ Organisational Models? Insights from the Research ‘Community Energy Map’in the Italian Context. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 1997. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ambrosio-Albalá, P.; Bale, C.S.E.; Pimm, A.J.; Taylor, P.G. What Makes Decentralised Energy Storage Schemes Successful? An Assessment Incorporating Stakeholder Perspectives. Energies 2020 , 13 , 6490. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Minuto, F.D.; Lazzeroni, P.; Borchiellini, R.; Olivero, S.; Bottaccioli, L.; Lanzini, A. Modeling technology retrofit scenarios for the conversion of condominium into an energy community: An Italian case study. J. Clean. Prod. 2021 , 282 , 124536. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sánchez-Robles, M.; Puertas, R.; Ribeiro-Soriano, D. Startup initiatives in social service industries: Cohousing and energy communities. Serv. Ind. J. 2023 , 1–19. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Silvast, A.; Valkenburg, G. Energy citizenship: A critical perspective. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2023 , 98 , 102995. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dobson, A. Environmental citizenship: Towards sustainable development. Sustain. Dev. 2007 , 15 , 276–285. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Delina, L.L. Co-producing just energy transition in everyday practices: Sociotechnical innovation and sustainable development in the Thailand-Myanmar border. Local Environ. 2022 , 27 , 16–31. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Goggins, G.; Fahy, F.; Heaslip, E. Reducing residential carbon emissions in Ireland: Challenges and policy responses. In Energy Demand Challenges in Europe: Implications for Policy, Planning and Practice ; Palgrave Pivot: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 47–57. [ Google Scholar ]
• Neska, E.; Kowalska-Pyzalska, A. Conceptual design of energy market topologies for communities and their practical applications in EU: A comparison of three case studies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022 , 169 , 112921. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ruggiero, S.; Busch, H.; Hansen, T.; Isakovic, A. Context and agency in urban community energy initiatives: An analysis of six case studies from the Baltic Sea Region. Energy Policy 2021 , 148 , 111956. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pantazis, K. Shedding Light on Energy Communities. Master’s Thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Roberts, J. “What Are Energy Communities Under the EU’s Clean Energy Package?”. In Renewable Energy Communities and the Low Carbon Energy Transition in Europe ; Coenen, F.H.J.M., Hoppe, T., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 23–48. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Määttä, S. Governance of Public Involvement in the Energy System Transition: Insights from Ireland and Scotland. Ph.D. Thesis, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kiteva Rogleva, N.; Fustik, V.; Petrova, N. Managing renewable energy projects including risk analysis. MEST J. 2019 , 7 , 71–79. [ Google Scholar ]
• Klein, J.; Nash, D.J.; Pribyl, K.; Endfield, G.H.; Hannaford, M. Climate, conflict and society: Changing responses to weather extremes in nineteenth century Zululand. Environ. Hist. 2018 , 24 , 377–401. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Adebisi, J.; Olasunbo, O.; Denwigwe, I.H.; Nwachukwu, P.A. A Review of Environmental, Social and Governance Frameworks in Sustainable Disposal of Waste from Renewable Energy Resources. J. Digit. Food Energy Water Syst. 2023 , 4 , 1–22. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sebi, C.; Vernay, A.-L. Community renewable energy in France: The state of development and the way forward. Energy Policy 2020 , 147 , 111874. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Prados, M.-J.; Iglesias-Pascual, R.; Barral, Á. Energy transition and community participation in Portugal, Greece and Israel: Regional differences from a multi-level perspective. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2022 , 87 , 102467. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schlindwein, L.; Montalvo, C. Energy citizenship: Accounting for the heterogeneity of human behaviours within energy transition. Energy Policy 2023 , 180 , 113662. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Heussaff, C.; Winkler, R. Incentives to Decentralise: Community Energy in Ireland’s Electricity Sector. Master’s Thesis, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mercier, S. Ireland’s Energy System: The Historical Case for Hope in Climate Action. New Labor Forum 2021 , 30 , 21–30. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lehtonen, O.; Okkonen, L. Energy cost reduction creates additional socioeconomic benefits—The case of Eno Energy Cooperative, Finland. Energy Policy 2019 , 129 , 352–359. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Di Silvestre, M.L.; Ippolito, M.G.; Sanseverino, E.R.; Sciumè, G.; Vasile, A. Energy self-consumers and renewable energy communities in Italy: New actors of the electric power systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021 , 151 , 111565. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Berka, A.; Dreyfus, M. Decentralisation and inclusivity in the energy sector: Preconditions, impacts and avenues for further research. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021 , 138 , 110663. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Poelzer, G.; Noble, B.; Lim, B. Social Value of Energy in Remote, Northern, Indigenous Communities: A Thematic Review. J. Aborig. Econ. Dev. 2023 , 14 , 74–91. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hoare, N. The Power of Renewable Energy Co-Operatives: How Can They Contribute to Wider Socio-Ecological Innovation in the UK? Master’s Thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wikipedia-Contributors. Robin Hood Energy. 2023. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robin_Hood_Energy&oldid=1189552969 (accessed on 2 April 2024).
• Krug, M.; Di Nucci, M.R.; Caldera, M.; De Luca, E. Mainstreaming Community Energy: Is the Renewable Energy Directive a Driver for Renewable Energy Communities in Germany and Italy? Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 7181. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Frieden, D.; Tuerk, A.; Neumann, C.; d’Herbemont, S.; Roberts, J. Collective Self-Consumption and Energy Communities: Trends and Challenges in the Transposition of the EU Framework ; COMPILE: Graz, Austria, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sciullo, A.; Gilcrease, G.W.; Perugini, M.; Padovan, D.; Curli, B.; Gregg, J.S.; Arrobbio, O.; Meynaerts, E.; Delvaux, S.; Polo-Alvarez, L. Exploring Institutional and Socio-Economic Settings for the Development of Energy Communities in Europe. Energies 2022 , 15 , 1597. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Curli, B.; Ferrero, E.; Perugini, M.; Ruozzi, E. What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The importance of the national energy systems. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020 , 13 , 136–147. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mulder, P.; Dalla Longa, F.; Straver, K. Energy poverty in the Netherlands at the national and local level: A multi-dimensional spatial analysis. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2023 , 96 , 102892. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fernández, J.M.R.; Payán, M.B.; Santos, J.M.R. Profitability of household photovoltaic self-consumption in Spain. J. Clean. Prod. 2021 , 279 , 123439. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• RD. Royal Decree 244/2019. Available online: https://climate-laws.org/documents/royal-decree-244-2019-regulating-the-administrative-technical-and-economic-conditions-of-the-self-consumption-of-electric-energy_51cf?id=royal-decree-244-2019-regulating-the-administrative-technical-and-economic-conditions-of-the-self-consumption-of-electric-energy_8775 (accessed on 10 April 2024).
• Nazarov, A.; Sulimin, V.; Shvedov, V. Renewable energy sources: Global implementation experience. E3S Web Conf. 2024 , 474 , 01030. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• AvedøreGreenCity. Available online: https://www.xn--avedregreencity-8tb.dk/om-agc/ (accessed on 10 April 2024).
• Johannsen, R.M.; Sorknæs, P.; Sperling, K.; Østergaard, P.A. Energy communities’ flexibility in different tax and tariff structures. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023 , 288 , 117112. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Eriksson Berggren, S.; Witt, T.; Van der Linden, E.; Saes, L.; Arvefjord, L.E.; Heckenberg, D.; Iglauer, T.; Sutinen, L.; Hanning, E.; Melin, G. Energy Communities ; Nordic Energy Research: Oslo, Norway, 2023. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sareen, S.; Nordholm, A.J. Sustainable development goal interactions for a just transition: Multi-scalar solar energy rollout in Portugal. Energy Sources Part B Econ. Plan. Policy 2021 , 16 , 1048–1063. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Walsh, M.; Castanié, M.; Giovannini, S. Community Energy: A Practical Guide to Reclaiming Power ; REScoop.EU: Brussels, Belgium, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• VERBUND. VERBUND Electricity Aid Fund from Caritas. Available online: https://www.verbund.com/de-at/ueber-verbund/verantwortung/soziales/stromhilfefonds (accessed on 11 April 2024).
• EUSEW. Slovenia’s First Self-Sufficient Energy Community Breaks New Ground for Rural Areas Worldwide in Renewable Energy Integration. Available online: https://eusew-2021.prezly.com/slovenias-first-self-sufficient-energy-community-breaks-new-ground-for-rural-areas-worldwide-in-renewable-energy-integration (accessed on 11 April 2024).
• EnergyCommunitiesHub. Luce Energy Community—A Rural Slovenian Municipality Setting an Example for Others. Available online: https://www.housingevolutions.eu/project/luce-energy-community-a-rural-slovenian-municipality-setting-an-example-for-others/ (accessed on 2 April 2024).
• Pillan, M.; Costa, F.; Caiola, V. How could people and communities contribute to the energy transition? Conceptual maps to inform, orient, and inspire design actions and education. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 14600. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Martínez, A.M.; Thiel, C.; Szabo, S.; Gherboudj, I.; van Swaaij, R.; Tanasa, A.; Jäger-Waldau, A.; Taylor, N.; Smets, A. The Role of Education and Science-Driven Tools in Scaling Up Photovoltaic Deployment. Energies 2023 , 16 , 8065. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Daoudi, M. Education in renewable energies: A key factor of Morocco’s 2030 energy transition project. Exploring the impact on SDGs and future perspectives. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open 2024 , 9 , 100833. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gifford, R.; Nilsson, A. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. Int. J. Psychol. 2014 , 49 , 141–157. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• UNESCO. Education for Sustainability from Rio to Johannesburg: Lessons Learnt from a Decade of Commitment ; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2002. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kioupi, V.; Voulvoulis, N. Education for sustainable development: A systemic framework for connecting the SDGs to educational outcomes. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 6104. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mullally, G.; Dunphy, N.; O’Connor, P. Participative environmental policy integration in the Irish energy sector. Environ. Sci. Policy 2018 , 83 , 71–78. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zarębski, P.; Katarzyński, D. A Theoretical Framework for a Local Energy Innovation System Based on the Renewable Energy Case of Poland. Energies 2023 , 16 , 3695. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Thoresen, V.W.; Doyle, D.; Klein, J.; Didham, R.J. Responsible Living: Concepts, Education and Future Perspectives ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hajdukiewicz, A.; Pera, B. Education for sustainable development—The case of massive open online courses. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 8542. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Finnegan, W. Beyond whole-school approaches to sustainability: Social practices and practice architectures at secondary schools in England. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2023 , 102 , 103186. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pellegrini-Masini, G.; Egner, L.E.; Klöckner, C.A.; Löfström, E. Sustainable Energy Policies and Equality: Is There a Nexus? Inferences From the Analysis of EU Statistical and Survey Data. Front. Sustain. Cities 2021 , 3 , 663000. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chlechowitz, M.; Reuter, M.; Rousselot, M.; Townend, A. Energy Poverty in the EU ; Odyssee-Mure Project: Paris, France, 2021; pp. 1–5. [ Google Scholar ]
• Malý, V.; Šafařík, M.; Matoušek, R. Consumer (Co-) Ownership in Renewables in the Czech Republic ; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 201–222. [ Google Scholar ]
• Morrison, C.; Ramsey, E. Power to the people: Developing networks through rural community energy schemes. J. Rural. Stud. 2019 , 70 , 169–178. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Narayanan, A.; Nardelli, P.H. Community Renewable Energy Systems. In Affordable and Clean Energy. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals ; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sareen, S. Metrics for an accountable energy transition? Legitimating the governance of solar uptake. Geoforum 2020 , 114 , 30–39. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Willis, R.; Simcock, N. Consumer (co-) ownership of renewables in England and Wales (UK). In Energy Transition: Financing Consumer Co-Ownership in Renewables ; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 369–394. [ Google Scholar ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Boostani, P.; Pellegrini-Masini, G.; Klein, J. The Role of Community Energy Schemes in Reducing Energy Poverty and Promoting Social Inclusion: A Systematic Literature Review. Energies 2024 , 17 , 3232. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133232

Boostani P, Pellegrini-Masini G, Klein J. The Role of Community Energy Schemes in Reducing Energy Poverty and Promoting Social Inclusion: A Systematic Literature Review. Energies . 2024; 17(13):3232. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133232

Boostani, Pariman, Giuseppe Pellegrini-Masini, and Jørgen Klein. 2024. "The Role of Community Energy Schemes in Reducing Energy Poverty and Promoting Social Inclusion: A Systematic Literature Review" Energies 17, no. 13: 3232. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133232

Article Metrics

Supplementary material.

ZIP-Document (ZIP, 124 KiB)

Further Information

Mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals