internet is better than books essay

Essay on Books vs. Internet

Students are often asked to write an essay on Books vs. Internet in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Books vs. Internet

Introduction.

Books and the internet are two primary sources of knowledge. While books have been around for centuries, the internet is a more recent phenomenon.

Books: The Traditional Route

Books offer a focused and in-depth understanding of topics. They are reliable, and the reader can take their time to absorb information.

Internet: The Modern Approach

The internet provides quick access to vast information. It’s interactive and constantly updated. However, it can be distracting and not always reliable.

Both books and the internet have their strengths and weaknesses. The choice depends on individual preference and the nature of the information sought.

250 Words Essay on Books vs. Internet

In the modern world, the debate between the traditional medium of knowledge, books, and the new-age powerhouse, the internet, is prevalent. Both have their distinct advantages and drawbacks, shaping our learning and knowledge acquisition.

The Case for Books

Books have been a time-tested medium for centuries, offering in-depth, well-researched, and often peer-reviewed information. They provide a tactile experience, aiding memory retention, and promote focused reading without digital distractions. Their linear structure encourages comprehensive understanding and critical thinking.

The Power of the Internet

Contrarily, the internet offers vast, immediate, and diverse information. It facilitates interactive learning through videos, infographics, and online forums. It’s a dynamic platform, allowing real-time updates and global collaboration. However, the internet’s credibility can sometimes be questionable due to unregulated content.

Striking a Balance

While the internet is an incredible tool for quick access to a broad range of information, books remain invaluable for in-depth study and cognitive development. Striking a balance between the two can maximize learning. Utilizing the speed and breadth of the internet, combined with the depth and focus offered by books, can create a holistic learning experience.

In conclusion, neither books nor the internet can be declared superior outright. They serve different purposes and complement each other in the pursuit of knowledge. The key lies in discerning the right tool for the right task, leveraging the strengths of both mediums.

500 Words Essay on Books vs. Internet

The advent of the internet has significantly transformed the way we access, consume, and share information. The traditional reliance on books as the primary source of knowledge has been challenged by the vast, digital expanse of the internet. However, the debate between books and the internet is not a simple one, as each offers unique benefits and drawbacks.

The Charm of Books

Books have been the cornerstone of knowledge for centuries. They offer a tactile and intimate experience that many readers cherish. Reading a book allows for an immersive experience, free from the distractions that are often present with digital platforms. Furthermore, books provide a linear, structured approach to presenting information, which can aid in understanding complex topics.

Books also promote better concentration and improve cognitive abilities. The physical act of turning pages and the lack of hyperlinks leading to other information sources contribute to a more focused reading experience. Additionally, books are often better curated and edited, ensuring a high-quality, reliable source of information.

On the other hand, the internet offers unparalleled accessibility and diversity of content. It enables instant access to an almost infinite amount of information, from scholarly articles to forums, blogs, and multimedia content. This broad spectrum of information can cater to different learning styles and preferences.

The internet also promotes interactivity and collaboration, enabling users to share and discuss ideas, thereby fostering a dynamic learning environment. Moreover, it allows for real-time updates, ensuring that the information is current and relevant.

Drawbacks: Books vs. Internet

Despite their respective merits, both books and the internet have their drawbacks. For books, the information can become outdated, and the physical form limits their accessibility. They also lack the interactive and dynamic nature of online content.

Conversely, the internet, while offering vast resources, can also lead to information overload. The credibility of online content can be questionable, and the constant barrage of hyperlinks and multimedia can be distracting. Moreover, prolonged screen time can lead to health issues like eye strain and can negatively impact sleep patterns.

Conclusion: A Balanced Approach

Books and the internet represent different ends of the information spectrum. While books offer a focused, immersive experience, the internet provides a dynamic, interactive platform for learning. Instead of choosing one over the other, a balanced approach that leverages the benefits of both can lead to a more enriching learning experience.

In conclusion, the debate between books and the internet is less about superiority and more about how we can integrate these resources to enhance our knowledge and understanding. Recognizing the strengths and weaknesses of each can guide us in making informed choices about when to use books and when to turn to the internet.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:

Essay on Excessive Use of Internet
Essay on A Day Without Internet
Essay on Uses of Electricity

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

Books vs. Internet

What's the difference.

Books and the internet are both valuable sources of information and entertainment, but they differ in several ways. Books offer a tangible and immersive reading experience, allowing readers to disconnect from the digital world and engage with the text on a deeper level. They provide a sense of nostalgia and tradition, with their physical presence and the ability to flip through pages. On the other hand, the internet offers instant access to a vast amount of information, making it a convenient and efficient tool for research and learning. It also provides interactive features, such as videos and forums, that enhance the learning experience. However, the internet can be overwhelming and distracting, with the constant temptation of social media and other online distractions. Ultimately, both books and the internet have their own unique advantages and it is up to the individual to choose the medium that best suits their needs and preferences.

Further Detail

Introduction.

Books and the Internet are two powerful sources of information that have revolutionized the way we access knowledge. While books have been around for centuries, the Internet is a relatively new invention that has rapidly gained popularity. Both mediums have their own unique attributes and advantages, and in this article, we will explore and compare the various aspects of books and the Internet.

Accessibility

One of the key advantages of the Internet is its unparalleled accessibility. With just a few clicks, you can access a vast amount of information from anywhere in the world. Whether you are at home, in a coffee shop, or on the go, as long as you have an internet connection, you can access a wealth of knowledge. On the other hand, books require physical access. You need to visit a library or bookstore to find the book you are looking for. This can be time-consuming and may not always be convenient, especially if you live in a remote area with limited access to libraries.

Furthermore, the Internet allows for real-time updates and instant access to the latest information. Websites and online platforms are constantly updated, ensuring that you have access to the most recent developments. Books, on the other hand, may become outdated over time, especially in rapidly evolving fields such as technology or science.

Depth of Information

Books are known for their in-depth analysis and comprehensive coverage of a particular subject. Authors spend months or even years researching and writing a book, ensuring that it provides a deep understanding of the topic. Books often contain detailed explanations, examples, and case studies that allow readers to delve into a subject and gain a thorough understanding. On the contrary, the Internet can sometimes provide superficial or incomplete information. With the abundance of user-generated content and the ease of publishing online, it can be challenging to distinguish reliable sources from unreliable ones. This can lead to misinformation or a lack of depth in the information obtained from the Internet.

However, the Internet also offers a wide range of resources that can complement the information found in books. Online articles, scholarly journals, and research papers provide additional perspectives and up-to-date information that can enhance one's understanding of a subject. The Internet allows for a more diverse range of opinions and viewpoints, which can be beneficial for research and critical thinking.

Portability

When it comes to portability, the Internet has a clear advantage. With smartphones, tablets, and laptops, you can carry a vast library of information in your pocket. Whether you are traveling or commuting, you can access the Internet and browse through articles, e-books, or online resources. On the other hand, books can be bulky and heavy, making them less convenient to carry around. If you want to have access to multiple books, you would need to carry a bag or choose a few select titles to take with you.

However, it is worth noting that books do not require any external devices or power sources to be read. You can read a book anytime, anywhere, without worrying about battery life or internet connectivity. Books are also more durable and resistant to damage compared to electronic devices, which can be prone to technical issues or accidental damage.

Reading Experience

The reading experience offered by books and the Internet differs significantly. Books provide a tactile experience that many readers find enjoyable. The feel of turning pages, the smell of ink and paper, and the ability to physically highlight or annotate text are all aspects that contribute to the unique experience of reading a book. Books also offer a distraction-free environment, allowing readers to focus solely on the content without the temptation of notifications or ads.

On the other hand, the Internet offers a more interactive reading experience. Hyperlinks, multimedia content, and the ability to search for specific keywords or phrases make it easier to navigate and find information quickly. The Internet also allows for user engagement through comments, forums, and social media platforms, enabling readers to discuss and share their thoughts on a particular topic.

Cost is an important factor to consider when comparing books and the Internet. Books, especially new releases or specialized textbooks, can be quite expensive. Building a personal library can require a significant investment. Libraries provide a cost-effective alternative, but they may not always have the specific books you need. On the other hand, the Internet offers a vast amount of free information. Many websites, blogs, and online platforms provide valuable content without any cost. However, it is important to be cautious and verify the credibility of the sources to ensure the accuracy of the information obtained.

Additionally, the Internet has opened up new opportunities for self-publishing and digital distribution, allowing authors to reach a wider audience without the need for traditional publishing channels. This has led to the availability of free or low-cost e-books, further reducing the financial barrier to accessing information.

In conclusion, both books and the Internet have their own unique attributes and advantages. The Internet offers unparalleled accessibility, real-time updates, and a wide range of resources, while books provide in-depth analysis, a tactile reading experience, and a distraction-free environment. The Internet is more portable and cost-effective, but books offer durability and a sense of permanence. Ultimately, the choice between books and the Internet depends on personal preferences, the nature of the information needed, and the specific context in which it will be accessed. Both mediums have their place in our modern world, and by leveraging their respective strengths, we can maximize our access to knowledge and information.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

Ten Reasons Libraries Are Still Better Than the Internet

By Marcus Banks | December 19, 2017

Google can bring you back 100,000 answers. A librarian can bring you back the right one. --Neil Gaiman

“Thanks to the internet, we no longer need libraries or librarians.” You most likely hear some variation on that theme pretty regularly.

Sixteen years ago, American Libraries published Mark Y. Herring’s essay “Ten Reasons Why the Internet Is No Substitute for a Library” (April 2001). Technology has improved exponentially since then—social media didn’t even exist yet. But even the smartest phone’s intelligence is limited by paywalls, Twitter trolls, fake news, and other hazards of online life. Here are 10 reasons why libraries are still better than the internet.

Libraries are safer spaces. The internet brings people together, often in enjoyable and productive ways, such as over shared interests (pop culture blogs, fanfic sites) or common challenges (online support groups). But cyberbullying and trolling can leave people reluctant to engage with folks they disagree with or to share their ideas in the first place. Libraries are places where people can gather constructively and all are welcome.
Libraries respect history. Web pages are ephemeral, and link rot is a real problem. The content of library collections is much more stable. Printed materials are generally published on acid-free paper, which will not disintegrate. And librarians are leading the way to bring similar stability to the web through services like the Internet Archive and perma.cc .
Librarians digitize influential primary sources. While looking at historical artifacts is valuable, repeated physical handling can damage them. Making digital versions of important works available online—as in the National Library of Medicine’s Turning the Pages project —is one solution. Library digitization projects also provide information to people who do not have the resources to travel to a particular library. Librarians are using the emerging technology of the internet to further the timeless mission of providing better access to information. The internet is the platform that enables this progress, but librarians are doing the work.
Librarians are leaders in increasing online access to scholarly information. The open access movement makes scholarly articles available to all readers online, and librarians have been strong advocates of the movement for more than a decade. This access is especially critical when reporting the results of medical research, which is often funded by taxpayer dollars.
Librarians are publishers. Scholarly publishers still provide the journals and books that researchers develop. But librarians have joined these efforts by becoming publishers themselves. New librarian-led publishing initiatives take full advantage of the web and generally make new work available on an open access basis. One example of library publishing, which is common in academic libraries, is the institutional repository . These repositories collect and preserve the broad range of a college or university’s intellectual output, such as datasets gathered in research studies, computer code used in software development, and conference proceedings.
Libraries host makerspaces. Given that makerspaces provide venues for creativity, learning, and community, it only makes sense that libraries champion them. The maker movement has grown rapidly— in 2016 there were 14 times as many makerspaces as in 2006 . Both public and academic libraries host makerspaces . You can learn about makerspaces online, of course. But to visit one you have to venture into the physical world.
Librarians can help you sort the real news from the fake. While a plethora of useful, accurate, and engaging content is available online, the web is filled with inaccurate and misleading information. “Click bait” headlines get you to click on the content even if the underlying information is superficial or inaccurate. Misinformation is the spread of deliberate falsehoods or inflammatory content online, such as the Russian-backed ads placed on social media during the 2016 US presidential election . Librarianship has always been about providing objective, accurate, and engaging information that meets the needs of a particular person. This has not changed, and it is why librarians are experts in information literacy .
Librarians guide you to exactly what you need. Google is an impressive search engine, but its results can be overwhelming, and many people do not know to filter them by content type (such as .pdf) or website source (such as .gov). Google offers many search tips , which are useful but generic. A conversation with a librarian can clarify exactly what you are looking for and figure out the best way to use Google—or many other resources—to find it.
Librarians do not track your reading or search history to sell you things. Amazon’s book purchase recommendation feature is useful for learning about new books. But this usefulness comes at the expense of your privacy because your reading data is valuable business intelligence for Amazon. The same is true for your web searching history, which is why you often see ads for a product for weeks after searching for it just once. Librarians value and protect your privacy .
Librarians do not censor. One core value of librarianship, as exemplified by the work of ALA’s Freedom to Read Foundation , is thwarting censorship and allowing the free and full exchange of ideas. The internet is a powerful tool for information sharing, but it takes human advocates to stand for information freedom.

Libraries continue to provide benefits that are both tangible—such as community spaces and human interaction—and harder to quantify—access, privacy, intellectual freedom. The internet is an indispensable and irreplaceable tool for modern living. But it is not a library and will not replace the work of librarians.

MARCUS BANKS is a journalist with prior experience as an academic library administrator.

Tagged Under

information literacy
intellectual freedom
makerspaces
open access
privacy rights

Fake news (illustration by Rebecca Lomax/American Libraries)

Fighting Fake News

How libraries can lead the way on media literacy.

Patron Rebecca Bloom repairs a rice cooker at Boulder (Colo.) Public Library's U-Fix-It Clinic.

Libraries and the Art of Everything Maintenance

Hosting repair events reduces waste, brings in new patrons.

April 11, 2013

15 min read

The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens

E-readers and tablets are becoming more popular as such technologies improve, but research suggests that reading on paper still boasts unique advantages

By Ferris Jabr

Getty Images

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing . By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

In a viral YouTube video from October 2011 a one-year-old girl sweeps her fingers across an iPad's touchscreen, shuffling groups of icons. In the following scenes she appears to pinch, swipe and prod the pages of paper magazines as though they too were screens. When nothing happens, she pushes against her leg, confirming that her finger works just fine—or so a title card would have us believe. The girl's father, Jean-Louis Constanza , presents "A Magazine Is an iPad That Does Not Work" as naturalistic observation—a Jane Goodall among the chimps moment—that reveals a generational transition. "Technology codes our minds," he writes in the video's description. "Magazines are now useless and impossible to understand, for digital natives"—that is, for people who have been interacting with digital technologies from a very early age. Perhaps his daughter really did expect the paper magazines to respond the same way an iPad would. Or maybe she had no expectations at all—maybe she just wanted to touch the magazines. Babies touch everything . Young children who have never seen a tablet like the iPad or an e-reader like the Kindle will still reach out and run their fingers across the pages of a paper book; they will jab at an illustration they like; heck, they will even taste the corner of a book. Today's so-called digital natives still interact with a mix of paper magazines and books, as well as tablets, smartphones and e-readers; using one kind of technology does not preclude them from understanding another. Nevertheless, the video brings into focus an important question: How exactly does the technology we use to read change the way we read? How reading on screens differs from reading on paper is relevant not just to the youngest among us , but to just about everyone who reads—to anyone who routinely switches between working long hours in front of a computer at the office and leisurely reading paper magazines and books at home; to people who have embraced e-readers for their convenience and portability, but admit that for some reason they still prefer reading on paper; and to those who have already vowed to forgo tree pulp entirely. As digital texts and technologies become more prevalent, we gain new and more mobile ways of reading—but are we still reading as attentively and thoroughly? How do our brains respond differently to onscreen text than to words on paper? Should we be worried about dividing our attention between pixels and ink or is the validity of such concerns paper-thin? Since at least the 1980s researchers in many different fields—including psychology, computer engineering, and library and information science—have investigated such questions in more than one hundred published studies. The matter is by no means settled. Before 1992 most studies concluded that people read slower, less accurately and less comprehensively on screens than on paper. Studies published since the early 1990s , however, have produced more inconsistent results: a slight majority has confirmed earlier conclusions, but almost as many have found few significant differences in reading speed or comprehension between paper and screens. And recent surveys suggest that although most people still prefer paper—especially when reading intensively—attitudes are changing as tablets and e-reading technology improve and reading digital books for facts and fun becomes more common. In the U.S., e-books currently make up between 15 and 20 percent of all trade book sales. Even so, evidence from laboratory experiments , polls and consumer reports indicates that modern screens and e-readers fail to adequately recreate certain tactile experiences of reading on paper that many people miss and, more importantly, prevent people from navigating long texts in an intuitive and satisfying way. In turn, such navigational difficulties may subtly inhibit reading comprehension. Compared with paper, screens may also drain more of our mental resources while we are reading and make it a little harder to remember what we read when we are done. A parallel line of research focuses on people's attitudes toward different kinds of media. Whether they realize it or not, many people approach computers and tablets with a state of mind less conducive to learning than the one they bring to paper.

"There is physicality in reading," says developmental psychologist and cognitive scientist Maryanne Wolf of Tufts University, "maybe even more than we want to think about as we lurch into digital reading—as we move forward perhaps with too little reflection. I would like to preserve the absolute best of older forms, but know when to use the new." Navigating textual landscapes Understanding how reading on paper is different from reading on screens requires some explanation of how the brain interprets written language. We often think of reading as a cerebral activity concerned with the abstract—with thoughts and ideas, tone and themes, metaphors and motifs. As far as our brains are concerned, however, text is a tangible part of the physical world we inhabit. In fact, the brain essentially regards letters as physical objects because it does not really have another way of understanding them. As Wolf explains in her book Proust and the Squid , we are not born with brain circuits dedicated to reading. After all, we did not invent writing until relatively recently in our evolutionary history, around the fourth millennium B.C. So the human brain improvises a brand-new circuit for reading by weaving together various regions of neural tissue devoted to other abilities, such as spoken language, motor coordination and vision. Some of these repurposed brain regions are specialized for object recognition —they are networks of neurons that help us instantly distinguish an apple from an orange, for example, yet classify both as fruit. Just as we learn that certain features—roundness, a twiggy stem, smooth skin—characterize an apple, we learn to recognize each letter by its particular arrangement of lines, curves and hollow spaces. Some of the earliest forms of writing, such as Sumerian cuneiform , began as characters shaped like the objects they represented —a person's head, an ear of barley, a fish. Some researchers see traces of these origins in modern alphabets: C as crescent moon, S as snake. Especially intricate characters—such as Chinese hanzi and Japanese kanji —activate motor regions in the brain involved in forming those characters on paper: The brain literally goes through the motions of writing when reading, even if the hands are empty. Researchers recently discovered that the same thing happens in a milder way when some people read cursive. Beyond treating individual letters as physical objects, the human brain may also perceive a text in its entirety as a kind of physical landscape. When we read, we construct a mental representation of the text in which meaning is anchored to structure. The exact nature of such representations remains unclear, but they are likely similar to the mental maps we create of terrain—such as mountains and trails—and of man-made physical spaces, such as apartments and offices. Both anecdotally and in published studies , people report that when trying to locate a particular piece of written information they often remember where in the text it appeared. We might recall that we passed the red farmhouse near the start of the trail before we started climbing uphill through the forest; in a similar way, we remember that we read about Mr. Darcy rebuffing Elizabeth Bennett on the bottom of the left-hand page in one of the earlier chapters. In most cases, paper books have more obvious topography than onscreen text. An open paperback presents a reader with two clearly defined domains—the left and right pages—and a total of eight corners with which to orient oneself. A reader can focus on a single page of a paper book without losing sight of the whole text: one can see where the book begins and ends and where one page is in relation to those borders. One can even feel the thickness of the pages read in one hand and pages to be read in the other. Turning the pages of a paper book is like leaving one footprint after another on the trail—there's a rhythm to it and a visible record of how far one has traveled. All these features not only make text in a paper book easily navigable, they also make it easier to form a coherent mental map of the text. In contrast, most screens, e-readers, smartphones and tablets interfere with intuitive navigation of a text and inhibit people from mapping the journey in their minds. A reader of digital text might scroll through a seamless stream of words, tap forward one page at a time or use the search function to immediately locate a particular phrase—but it is difficult to see any one passage in the context of the entire text. As an analogy, imagine if Google Maps allowed people to navigate street by individual street, as well as to teleport to any specific address, but prevented them from zooming out to see a neighborhood, state or country. Although e-readers like the Kindle and tablets like the iPad re-create pagination—sometimes complete with page numbers, headers and illustrations—the screen only displays a single virtual page: it is there and then it is gone. Instead of hiking the trail yourself, the trees, rocks and moss move past you in flashes with no trace of what came before and no way to see what lies ahead. "The implicit feel of where you are in a physical book turns out to be more important than we realized," says Abigail Sellen of Microsoft Research Cambridge in England and co-author of The Myth of the Paperless Office . "Only when you get an e-book do you start to miss it. I don't think e-book manufacturers have thought enough about how you might visualize where you are in a book." At least a few studies suggest that by limiting the way people navigate texts, screens impair comprehension. In a study published in January 2013 Anne Mangen of the University of Stavanger in Norway and her colleagues asked 72 10th-grade students of similar reading ability to study one narrative and one expository text, each about 1,500 words in length. Half the students read the texts on paper and half read them in pdf files on computers with 15-inch liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors. Afterward, students completed reading-comprehension tests consisting of multiple-choice and short-answer questions, during which they had access to the texts. Students who read the texts on computers performed a little worse than students who read on paper. Based on observations during the study, Mangen thinks that students reading pdf files had a more difficult time finding particular information when referencing the texts. Volunteers on computers could only scroll or click through the pdfs one section at a time, whereas students reading on paper could hold the text in its entirety in their hands and quickly switch between different pages. Because of their easy navigability, paper books and documents may be better suited to absorption in a text. "The ease with which you can find out the beginning, end and everything inbetween and the constant connection to your path, your progress in the text, might be some way of making it less taxing cognitively, so you have more free capacity for comprehension," Mangen says. Supporting this research, surveys indicate that screens and e-readers interfere with two other important aspects of navigating texts: serendipity and a sense of control. People report that they enjoy flipping to a previous section of a paper book when a sentence surfaces a memory of something they read earlier, for example, or quickly scanning ahead on a whim. People also like to have as much control over a text as possible—to highlight with chemical ink, easily write notes to themselves in the margins as well as deform the paper however they choose. Because of these preferences—and because getting away from multipurpose screens improves concentration—people consistently say that when they really want to dive into a text, they read it on paper. In a 2011 survey of graduate students at National Taiwan University, the majority reported browsing a few paragraphs online before printing out the whole text for more in-depth reading. A 2008 survey of millennials (people born between 1980 and the early 2000s) at Salve Regina University in Rhode Island concluded that, "when it comes to reading a book, even they prefer good, old-fashioned print". And in a 2003 study conducted at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, nearly 80 percent of 687 surveyed students preferred to read text on paper as opposed to on a screen in order to "understand it with clarity". Surveys and consumer reports also suggest that the sensory experiences typically associated with reading—especially tactile experiences—matter to people more than one might assume. Text on a computer, an e-reader and—somewhat ironically—on any touch-screen device is far more intangible than text on paper. Whereas a paper book is made from pages of printed letters fixed in a particular arrangement, the text that appears on a screen is not part of the device's hardware—it is an ephemeral image. When reading a paper book, one can feel the paper and ink and smooth or fold a page with one's fingers; the pages make a distinctive sound when turned; and underlining or highlighting a sentence with ink permanently alters the paper's chemistry. So far, digital texts have not satisfyingly replicated this kind of tactility (although some companies are innovating, at least with keyboards ). Paper books also have an immediately discernible size, shape and weight. We might refer to a hardcover edition of War and Peace as a hefty tome or a paperback Heart of Darkness as a slim volume. In contrast, although a digital text has a length—which is sometimes represented with a scroll or progress bar—it has no obvious shape or thickness. An e-reader always weighs the same, regardless of whether you are reading Proust's magnum opus or one of Hemingway's short stories. Some researchers have found that these discrepancies create enough " haptic dissonance " to dissuade some people from using e-readers. People expect books to look, feel and even smell a certain way; when they do not, reading sometimes becomes less enjoyable or even unpleasant. For others, the convenience of a slim portable e-reader outweighs any attachment they might have to the feel of paper books. Exhaustive reading Although many old and recent studies conclude that people understand what they read on paper more thoroughly than what they read on screens, the differences are often small. Some experiments, however, suggest that researchers should look not just at immediate reading comprehension, but also at long-term memory. In a 2003 study Kate Garland of the University of Leicester and her colleagues asked 50 British college students to read study material from an introductory economics course either on a computer monitor or in a spiral-bound booklet. After 20 minutes of reading Garland and her colleagues quizzed the students with multiple-choice questions. Students scored equally well regardless of the medium, but differed in how they remembered the information. Psychologists distinguish between remembering something—which is to recall a piece of information along with contextual details, such as where, when and how one learned it—and knowing something, which is feeling that something is true without remembering how one learned the information. Generally, remembering is a weaker form of memory that is likely to fade unless it is converted into more stable, long-term memory that is "known" from then on. When taking the quiz, volunteers who had read study material on a monitor relied much more on remembering than on knowing, whereas students who read on paper depended equally on remembering and knowing. Garland and her colleagues think that students who read on paper learned the study material more thoroughly more quickly; they did not have to spend a lot of time searching their minds for information from the text, trying to trigger the right memory—they often just knew the answers. Other researchers have suggested that people comprehend less when they read on a screen because screen-based reading is more physically and mentally taxing than reading on paper. E-ink is easy on the eyes because it reflects ambient light just like a paper book, but computer screens, smartphones and tablets like the iPad shine light directly into people's faces. Depending on the model of the device, glare, pixilation and flickers can also tire the eyes. LCDs are certainly gentler on eyes than their predecessor, cathode-ray tubes (CRT), but prolonged reading on glossy self-illuminated screens can cause eyestrain, headaches and blurred vision. Such symptoms are so common among people who read on screens—affecting around 70 percent of people who work long hours in front of computers—that the American Optometric Association officially recognizes computer vision syndrome . Erik Wästlund of Karlstad University in Sweden has conducted some particularly rigorous research on whether paper or screens demand more physical and cognitive resources. In one of his experiments 72 volunteers completed the Higher Education Entrance Examination READ test—a 30-minute, Swedish-language reading-comprehension exam consisting of multiple-choice questions about five texts averaging 1,000 words each. People who took the test on a computer scored lower and reported higher levels of stress and tiredness than people who completed it on paper. In another set of experiments 82 volunteers completed the READ test on computers, either as a paginated document or as a continuous piece of text. Afterward researchers assessed the students' attention and working memory, which is a collection of mental talents that allow people to temporarily store and manipulate information in their minds. Volunteers had to quickly close a series of pop-up windows, for example, sort virtual cards or remember digits that flashed on a screen. Like many cognitive abilities, working memory is a finite resource that diminishes with exertion. Although people in both groups performed equally well on the READ test, those who had to scroll through the continuous text did not do as well on the attention and working-memory tests. Wästlund thinks that scrolling—which requires a reader to consciously focus on both the text and how they are moving it—drains more mental resources than turning or clicking a page, which are simpler and more automatic gestures. A 2004 study conducted at the University of Central Florida reached similar conclusions. Attitude adjustments An emerging collection of studies emphasizes that in addition to screens possibly taxing people's attention more than paper, people do not always bring as much mental effort to screens in the first place. Subconsciously, many people may think of reading on a computer or tablet as a less serious affair than reading on paper. Based on a detailed 2005 survey of 113 people in northern California, Ziming Liu of San Jose State University concluded that people reading on screens take a lot of shortcuts—they spend more time browsing, scanning and hunting for keywords compared with people reading on paper, and are more likely to read a document once, and only once. When reading on screens, people seem less inclined to engage in what psychologists call metacognitive learning regulation—strategies such as setting specific goals, rereading difficult sections and checking how much one has understood along the way. In a 2011 experiment at the Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, college students took multiple-choice exams about expository texts either on computers or on paper. Researchers limited half the volunteers to a meager seven minutes of study time; the other half could review the text for as long as they liked. When under pressure to read quickly, students using computers and paper performed equally well. When managing their own study time, however, volunteers using paper scored about 10 percentage points higher. Presumably, students using paper approached the exam with a more studious frame of mind than their screen-reading peers, and more effectively directed their attention and working memory. Perhaps, then, any discrepancies in reading comprehension between paper and screens will shrink as people's attitudes continue to change. The star of "A Magazine Is an iPad That Does Not Work" is three-and-a-half years old today and no longer interacts with paper magazines as though they were touchscreens, her father says. Perhaps she and her peers will grow up without the subtle bias against screens that seems to lurk in the minds of older generations. In current research for Microsoft, Sellen has learned that many people do not feel much ownership of e-books because of their impermanence and intangibility: "They think of using an e-book, not owning an e-book," she says. Participants in her studies say that when they really like an electronic book, they go out and get the paper version. This reminds Sellen of people's early opinions of digital music, which she has also studied. Despite initial resistance, people love curating, organizing and sharing digital music today. Attitudes toward e-books may transition in a similar way, especially if e-readers and tablets allow more sharing and social interaction than they currently do. Books on the Kindle can only be loaned once , for example. To date, many engineers, designers and user-interface experts have worked hard to make reading on an e-reader or tablet as close to reading on paper as possible. E-ink resembles chemical ink and the simple layout of the Kindle's screen looks like a page in a paperback. Likewise, Apple's iBooks attempts to simulate the overall aesthetic of paper books, including somewhat realistic page-turning. Jaejeung Kim of KAIST Institute of Information Technology Convergence in South Korea and his colleagues have designed an innovative and unreleased interface that makes iBooks seem primitive. When using their interface, one can see the many individual pages one has read on the left side of the tablet and all the unread pages on the right side, as if holding a paperback in one's hands. A reader can also flip bundles of pages at a time with a flick of a finger. But why, one could ask, are we working so hard to make reading with new technologies like tablets and e-readers so similar to the experience of reading on the very ancient technology that is paper? Why not keep paper and evolve screen-based reading into something else entirely? Screens obviously offer readers experiences that paper cannot. Scrolling may not be the ideal way to navigate a text as long and dense as Moby Dick , but the New York Times , Washington Post , ESPN and other media outlets have created beautiful, highly visual articles that depend entirely on scrolling and could not appear in print in the same way. Some Web comics and infographics turn scrolling into a strength rather than a weakness. Similarly, Robin Sloan has pioneered the tap essay for mobile devices. The immensely popular interactive Scale of the Universe tool could not have been made on paper in any practical way. New e-publishing companies like Atavist offer tablet readers long-form journalism with embedded interactive graphics, maps, timelines, animations and sound tracks. And some writers are pairing up with computer programmers to produce ever more sophisticated interactive fiction and nonfiction in which one's choices determine what one reads, hears and sees next. When it comes to intensively reading long pieces of plain text, paper and ink may still have the advantage. But text is not the only way to read.

Board Members
Management Team
Become a Contributor
Volunteer Opportunities
Code of Ethical Practices

KNOWLEDGE NETWORK

Search Engines List
Suggested Reading Library
Web Directories
Research Papers
Industry News

Become a Member
Associate Membership
Certified Membership
Membership Application
Corporate Application

CIRS Certification Program
CIRS Certification Objectives
CIRS Certification Benefits
CIRS Certification Exam
Maintain Your Certification

Upcoming Events
Live Classes
Classes Schedule
Webinars Schedules

Latest Articles
Internet Research
Search Techniques
Research Methods
Business Research
Search Engines
Research & Tools
Investigative Research
Internet Search
Work from Home
Internet Ethics
Internet Privacy

Books Vs Internet Research (What’s Better?)

The internet has always been our go-to source for fast information. The internet provides information at the appropriate time, unlike books that'll require you to search thoroughly. The internet experience cannot be compared to reading books. Books are a slow process compared to the internet. You tend not to forget anything because you visualize ideas as you read.

Reading books and the internet has their different rewards. It is determined by the topic, the time frame you have to spend, and how deep the research is.

Reading Books for Research

Books are known as learning tools. Students in colleges must read books to support their research. The following are the advantages of reading books:

Books cover the topic you intend to find on the internet. There is no subject area you're researching that books don't cater to.
Books don't stress your eyes. You don't have to squint your eyes as you do on the internet. You can spend more time researching, and yet you won't get tired.
Books are convenient. You can pick it up any day and anytime without worrying.

The disadvantages of books over the internet include:

Books take a long time during the book research process.
You might spend more using books. It all depends on the topic you're targeting.
You might not be free to take books everywhere you go. Books are inconvenient.
Research books are tasking. On the other hand, the internet is a fast means of doing research.

Reading the Internet for Research

The internet is cheaper, and you have the opportunity to explore.
The internet is faster. It only requires an internet connection .

The disadvantages of the internet over book research are

Not everything on the internet is worthwhile. As a student, the internet has information that shouldn't be believed. There are usually different schools of thought.
The information online is usually quick and not well-structured.

The means to use for your research as a college student depends on how deep your research is.

Why is book research better than Internet Research ?

In a contest between books and the internet, books will always prevail. Although it may be quicker and less expensive, the internet also has the potential to lead people astray. For instance, if you search for "how to start a company idea," the results on the internet will vary. There will be a variety of information in the search results from various blogs. However, they won't go into great detail about what you want to understand.

Experts write books in the field you're trying to learn from. Professionals with a wealth of knowledge write them. All information in books is of great value and is carefully written.

Professional content writers usually write information on the internet. They spend time doing research and coming up with content. Online content is optimized for readability. The contents might not be information-rich.

Live Classes Schedule

MAY 24 CIRS Certification Internet Research Training Program Live Classes Online
MAY 24 Web Search Methods & Techniques Live Training Live Classes Online

World's leading professional association of Internet Research Specialists - We deliver Knowledge, Education, Training, and Certification in the field of Professional Online Research. The AOFIRS is considered a major contributor in improving Web Search Skills and recognizes Online Research work as a full-time occupation for those that use the Internet as their primary source of information.

Get Exclusive Research Tips in Your Inbox

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Advertising Opportunities
Knowledge Network

Publishing Perspectives

Submit Rights Deal

Books vs. Internet: Whose Information Is More Accurate?

In Discussion by Hannah Johnson October 25, 2011

By Hannah Johnson

Roger Tagholm reports on a makeshift library called Star Books (named for a nearby Starbucks) that has been set up at the Occupy London protest site near St. Paul’s Cathedral. Speaking about why he set up the library at the protest site, Ashley Bignall says, “I think a lot of young people get their information from the internet, but if you want to check something factual, it’s important to see it in a book.”

Another Star Books patron, seventeen-year-old Francis Haseldon said, “I think people are gradually dissociating more from books which is a shame. I think the act of reading makes you think — you confront ideas and opinions. I love the idea of the Occupy Library — a permanent place where people can interact with new ideas, or look at old ideas in a new way.”

So, are print books and the finite nature of the printed page a better source of information than the shifting sands of the internet? The “books vs. internet” argument is not new, nor has it seen a shortage of advocates for both sides.

While books have earned a trusted spot in our culture as legitimate sources of information, having been vetted by an entire network of people, the internet does not always have that same quality assurance — but it does have the wisdom of the crowds, relying that at least one reader will catch and point out the mistakes.

So tell us, do you trust books or the internet for information?

About the Author

Hannah johnson.

Hannah Johnson is the publisher of international book industry magazine Publishing Perspectives, which provides daily information and news about book markets around the world. In addition to building partnerships with international cultural and trade organizations, she works with the Frankfurt Book Fair to organize and support a number of its overseas initiatives. Hannah has also worked as the managing editor for an online media company, The Hooch Life, focused on craft distillers and cocktail experts. Prior to that, she worked as a project manager for the Frankfurt Book Fair’s New York office, managing various business and marketing activities.

IoT Standardization and Implementation Challenges

The lesser-known side of isaac asimov, openmind books, scientific anniversaries, jane goodall, the human voice of chimpanzees, featured author, latest book, change: 19 key essays on how the internet is changing our lives.

As a tool available to a reasonably wide public, the Internet is only twenty years old, but it is already the fundamental catalyst of the broadest based and fastest technological revolution in history . It is the broadest based because over the past two decades its effects have touched upon practically every citizen in the world. And it is the fastest because its mass adoption is swifter than that of any earlier technology.

It is impossible today to imagine the world without the Internet: it enables us to do things which only a few years ago would be unthinkable, and impinges on every sphere of our lives.

See book profile (PDF)

See trailer for this book.

All articles
Articles by humanities
Articles by technology
Articles by economy

Games and the Internet: Fertile Ground for Cultural Change

The music industry in an age of digital distribution, first the media, then us: how the internet changed the fundamental nature of the communication and its relationship with the audience, the internet's influence on the production and consumption of culture: creative destruction and new opportunities, the internet: changing the language, distributed innovation and creativity, peer production, and commons in networked economy, how is the internet changing the way we work, the internet and business, the way of the dodo, how the internet has changed everyday life, the internet and education, designing connections, the internet, politics and the politics of internet debate, the impact of the internet on society: a global perspective, cyber attacks, who owns big data, the internet of things: outlook and challenges, knowledge banking for a hyperconnected society, "ch@nge" comes to madrid: health, banking and connections that will change our lives, do you already know what the latest openmind book is about are you ready for ch@nge, francisco gonzález presents the latest openmind book: ch@nge, openmind launches the book “ch@nge” in madrid, david gelernter presents "cyberflow", iñaki vázquez: the origins of the internet of things, mikko hypponen: who owns the internet, evgeny morozov: internet and politics, federico casalegno: connections, neil selwyn presents "internet and education", mexico hosts the launch of the openmind book "ch@nge", openmind reflects on the social influence of the internet in the home of mit, thomas malone explains how the internet is changing the way we work, presentation at mit: how the internet is changing our lives, distributed innovation and creativity, peer production, and commons, lucien engelen and the medicine of the future, "the challenge is to turn data into information, and then into knowledge", dan schiller: geopolitical information, zaryn dentzel and the social media "ch@nge", paul dimaggio and cultural industry on the internet, edward castronova: games and the internet, sustainability, smart cities and "sensor citizens" in spain, peter hirshberg and the new communication environment on the internet, patrik wikström: the transformation of the music industry, david crystal: the language of the internet, we recommend "to save everything, click here", by evgeny morozov, do you want to stay up to date with our new publications.

Receive the OpenMind newsletter with all the latest contents published on our website

OpenMind Books

The Search for Alternatives to Fossil Fuels
View all books

About OpenMind

Connect with us.

Keep up to date with our newsletter

Books vs Internet Research (What’s Better?)

We all do research on various topics several times a day, many times without even realizing we are doing it. Whether we’re searching for a new recipe or looking to find out how to do something, regardless of the complexity of the task, more often than not, we turn to the almighty Internet for answers rather than searching for them in specialty books.

While this may seem to work just fine in many cases, what we usually don’t realise is that we’re actually missing out on a lot of information and make the active choice of speed over accuracy or complexity.

Let’s take a closer look at this “books vs Internet” debate and find out which one is actually better for our research needs.

Which Is Better for Research, the Internet or Books?

Well isn’t this a question for the ages? And unfortunately, the answer is yet to be found.

Even though many have tried to find a definitive answer, it all seems to come down to a series of factors:

The topic you’re researching
How much time you have
How in-depth you need your research to be

Obviously, both reading books and Internet research have a series of benefits and disadvantages when compared to the other. Let’s have a closer look at these pros and cons.

Reading Books for Research – Benefits and Disadvantages

While the Internet has been around for decades, books have proven their value for centuries. So one of the first and most compelling arguments for reading books is that they have been used for hundreds of years as learning tools. Books have played a tremendous role in the development of civilization and have been used for learning by people who pushed the technology ahead time and time again. One would argue that if books were good enough to shape Nikola Tesla into the genius he was, they should be good enough for us.
Despite the unfathomable amount of information available on the Internet today , books tend to better cover the subjects you’re researching.
Books are timeless and convenient. You don’t need any device, battery or a connection in order to open a book and start learning about the topic you’re interested in.
Books are easy on the eyes, which would allow you to spend a lot more time researching whatever you need to learn without any strain on the eyes.

Disadvantages

It takes longer to do research using books than it does using the Internet
Books don’t have a search function, so finding specific information using keywords is impossible
The cost of using books for research can turn out to be quite high, depending on the topic
Books are harder to carry around, so you might not always have access to them from anywhere

Using the Internet for Research – Benefits and Disadvantages

The Internet gives you access to more resources than you could ever absorb in a lifetime on any topic
The cost for Internet access nowadays is quite low and usually, there’s no limit to how much you are allowed to explore.
Internet research is quick, easy and facile. It can be done from anywhere nowadays, as long as you have a device with an Internet connection and a full battery.
You can’t trust everything you read on the Internet. We all learned that the hard way, especially in the past couple of years.
The information is usually not structured as well as it is in books.
The answers we find online to different questions usually only cover the subject superficially

That being said, the battle of Internet vs books ends up a draw in my opinion, at least when looking at the bigger picture. It all depends on the topic you’re researching and how well you need that subject to be covered in your research material.

Why Are Books Better Than the Internet for Research?

Many times, despite the Internet being quicker, cheaper and sometimes more convenient, the winners of the books vs the Internet battle will be the books. Here’s why.

Let’s say you’re interested in learning a new skill. Maybe you’re thinking of a career change or you just want to explore a certain topic for different reasons.

Maybe you want to start your own business or simply want to learn how to better run the business you already own.

A simple Internet search for “how to be a better entrepreneur” could provide some answers. You will find tens, hundreds of articles on different websites with a couple thousands words each, a handful of bullet points and a “recipe for success”, guaranteed to help you achieve your goals.

But that barely scratches the surface of what you should be learning in order to be a better entrepreneur. A book about management or leadership will contain hundreds of pages of valuable information, structured in an easily understandable manner and with a lot more context, which will help you better understand the topic than a couple of bullet points.

These books have been written by industry leaders, experts in their field, people who have dedicated their lives to the topic you’re researching and have spent hundreds of hours trying to condense their lifetime of experience into a couple hundred pages for your benefit.

Most articles you find online nowadays are written by professional content writers who research the topic you’re interested in for a couple of hours, read a couple of other materials for inspiration and spend another couple of hours actually writing the article that is supposed to make you turn your life around.

Online articles are usually optimized for readability, for better loading times, and for better positions in the search results of your preferred search engine.

There can’t even be a comparison between a book about leadership and an online search for “how to be a better leader”. How can it be? How can we compare a 200 pages book written by an expert to an online article written by a content writer who had a 3000 words limit for the article and had to follow strict optimization rules?

Can the Internet Replace Books?

That being said, one would tend to believe that books are the ultimate research tool and that the Internet can cover any subject only to a certain extent. That is not necessarily true though.

Again, the topic dictates the ideal research tool more than anything else.

For example, if you’re looking to learn how to cook better or simply want to try out new recipes from time to time, the Internet is probably the only place you will ever need to look from now on. The amount of information about cooking available online renders most cookbooks rather useless nowadays, especially if we take into account that the information is available online in different formats, which also includes video.

Why would you read how to cook a dish when you can watch that dish being cooked and learn this way?

On the other hand, the Internet won’t be as effective as a learning tool if you want to learn a more complex activity such as trading. The more complicated the skill you want to learn or the task you want to accomplish, the better off you are doing your research from actual books rather than the Internet.

Then again, there are certain topics however that give you no choice, where research from books vs the Internet research is a battle that is lost by books before it even starts.

I am referring to novelty subjects such as cryptocurrencies, digital marketing, app development. Since these topics are rather recent and became popular as books decreased in popularity, chances are you’re better off searching for information / tutorials online than in a library, simply because very few (or none) books have been written about them.

As you can see, and as I mentioned earlier, there is no definitive answer for this “reading books vs Internet” debate when it comes to doing research. The topic is the most important and decisive factor.

Why Are Textbooks Better Than the Internet?

When it comes to school learning though, despite the obvious benefits of also having access to the Internet, learning from books or textbooks is essential. Why?

First of all, because all textbooks are written by professionals, not by ghost writers or content writers. If you really want to learn about statistics for example, the better choice is, obviously, to use a textbook. It is written by a statistics professor who spent his life learning and teaching this subject.

Another important aspect of textbooks and another reason why they are a much better learning tool in school is that they were structured in a specific way that allows you to better grasp the concepts and to understand and learn the subject.

Their authors feed you information progressively, building your knowledge from the bottom up, in a manner and a rhythm that has been optimized over decades of experience teaching that specific subject.

No online resource can replace that. The Internet can be a great supplement though. For those who want to learn more than what’s in the textbook, the Internet could be a good place to gather additional information.

Do We Learn More on the Internet Than From Books?

Well, nobody really knows. Over the past decades, many things shifted towards the online environment, including education. Even though most of the school learning is still done with textbooks, the ratio of Internet vs books research tends to favor the former.

If we take into consideration how often we open up a browser to search for information and compare it with how often each of us opens a book to get that same information, it’s probably safe to assume that we do most of our learning online.

That is not necessarily a good thing though. As I mentioned, we can’t always believe everything we read on the Internet and we don’t always find correct or accurate information about the topic we’re interested in. Moreover, the information about any topic we find online barely scratches the surface of that particular subject when compared to a book.

Bottom Line

All in all, there shouldn’t really be a battle of books vs the Internet. We believe that the best results when it comes to research is combining the two rather than sticking to only one. Combining book reading with online research is bound to yield the best results. And considering how easy that becomes when you use a reading tracker app like Basmo , why wouldn’t you?

Getting the best of both worlds is incredibly easy. Basmo is an app available both on iOS and Android devices, designed for book lovers who want to take their hobby further.

Basmo allows you to:

Take notes while reading , which is especially useful whenever you read to learn rather than for pleasure. And since the app is already on your mobile device, combining the information you find online with what you find in the books becomes extremely easy.
Scan book pages and save important information as notes or quotes, which again can make your life a lot easier when combining online research with book reading
Create reading lists , which makes it a lot easier to line up all the books you want to read, in the order you want or have to read them
Analyze your time spent reading , raising your awareness in regards to your reading habits and reading speed
Set reading goals , a schedule and reminders , allowing you to become a more organized and efficient reader, regardless whether you do it for learning or for pleasure

Ready for the world’s first AI Chatbot for books? Start a chat with any book!

Get Basmo to experience the power of ChatGPT!

School vector created by pch.vector – www.freepik.com

How to Develop a Reading Habit and Why Should You?

The Best Reading Journal Ideas You Should Know Today

28 Benefits of Reading Books You Should Be Aware Of

Why Internet Is Better Than Books

03 Dec Why Internet Is Better Than Books

Books are the primary sources of knowledge to every human being and it is not until a kid grown up to understand how the technology works, that he/she is introduced to the world of internet. This is the era of internet where people are more dependent on browsers than bookish knowledge because there is lack of time, energy and patience.

For instance, while in older days to-be mothers used to read a lot of books to keep their mood swings at bay and also in a hope that the kids would be interested in reading too, nowadays mothers rely on internet to learn about diet, exercises and other practices during pregnancy.

Almost every household now has high speed internet connection and FTTH is one of the leading service providers to help them out.

Finding your favorite eBooks is just a click away.

Books Are Available On Internet

First things first, why would you spend some bucks in purchasing a paperback or hardcover book if the soft copy of that book is available as eBook on internet?

While many people still love to smell the pages of the books consider reading incomplete without touching the paper pages, those bibliophiles trying to save some money and time are being dependent on eBooks.

Downloading eBook’s Is Time And Cost Efficient

Most of the popular books are available in soft copies on different eBook websites and apps such as Project Gutenberg, Google eBook Store, Free eBooks, Book Boon, Kindle etc. where you can get eBook’s that are available free of cost or in exchange of minimal amount.

Finding your favorite eBooks is just a click away while for buying a paperback or hardcover book, you need to go to a store or order online that take at least few hours to arrive at your doorstep.

Besides, it is never easy to judge a book by its back-cover summary but reading a few pages online from an eBook gives you an idea of whether the book is up-to-the-mark.

Entertainment – Sis Loves Me

Sis Loves Me – Step Sisters

The brutal truth about the whole books VS. internet battle is… you can simply find much more exciting stuff online. Let Sis Loves Me be an exmaple. An adult series featuring the very controversial phenomenon of step sisters/brother porn . Unacceptable in social talks it’s the actual biggest genre of XXX genre when you read this. While we try to stay civil in the public we sure have some dark minds in private. Which is good. Books can’t beat a good video and there is over 200 episodes of Sis Loves Me already!

The latter option is undoubtedly timesaving especially if you are in hurry.

Surfing Internet Is Timesaving Than Reading Books

Suppose you need to learn about some topic from any subject and the book containing that topic or chapter is not within hand’s reach.

So, what you prefer –rummaging through different books consisting that chapter or just search about that topic on internet?

The latter option is undoubtedly timesaving especially if you are in hurry. Checking multiple websites on multiple tabs is definitely easier than checking different books at the same time.

Internet might not replace the contribution of books because no matter how easy, fast or timesaving it is, holding a book in your hand, rustling the pages and inhaling the smell of new or old pages will never be old. Still, in this digital era, internet definitely has an advantage because the reliance comes from the people only.

FTTH Conference

At FTTH conferences, we try to ensure that businesses and individual clients receive the most up to date information about internet speeds and availability. We envision a situation where the entire world will have easy access to the fiber-optic internet.

No Comments

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Analysis and Health

Does using the internet make us happier or sadder.

A study of more than 2 million people in 168 countries suggests that having access to the internet is linked to higher life satisfaction, but many questions remain unanswered

By Clare Wilson

13 May 2024

We still don’t know the potential well-being effects of social media specifically or how they could vary among people of different ages

Galina Zhigalova/Getty Images

Growing access to the internet is linked with better well-being around the world, a large study has concluded. The finding seems to be at odds with concerns that smartphones have led to a tsunami of mental health problems. So, where does the truth lie?

While concerns over excessive use of phones, computers and other devices may seem like a modern phenomenon, in fact they echo similar fears over past…

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox! We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

To continue reading, subscribe today with our introductory offers

No commitment, cancel anytime*

Offer ends 2nd of July 2024.

*Cancel anytime within 14 days of payment to receive a refund on unserved issues.

Inclusive of applicable taxes (VAT)

Existing subscribers

More from New Scientist

Explore the latest news, articles and features

Social media brings benefits as well as risks to young people

Subscriber-only

Stop calling it social media - these firms don't care what we want

Should social media come with a health warning, lack of sleep is more of a problem for teen girls than social media, popular articles.

30,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. Take the first step today

Here’s your new year gift, one app for all your, study abroad needs, start your journey, track your progress, grow with the community and so much more.

Verification Code

An OTP has been sent to your registered mobile no. Please verify

Thanks for your comment !

Our team will review it before it's shown to our readers.

Essay on Importance of Internet: Samples for Students

Updated on
Nov 23, 2023

Internet is not just a need or luxury, it has become a household necessity. It was used as a source of entertainment but now it is impossible to work in offices or study without the Internet. When the global pandemic locked everyone in their house, it became an important medium to connect, study and work. Students were able to study without the risk of catching COVID-19 because of the Internet. The importance of the internet is also a common topic in various entrance exams such as SAT , TOEFL , and UPSC . In this blog, you will learn how to write an essay on the importance of the Internet.

This Blog Includes:

Tips to write the perfect essay on internet, sample 1 of essay on the importance of the internet (100 words), sample essay 2 – importance of the internet (150 words), sample essay 3 on use of internet for student (300 words).

Nikita Puri

Nikita is a creative writer and editor, who is always ready to learn new skills. She has great knowledge about study abroad universities, researching and writing blogs about them. Being a perfectionist, she has a habit of keeping her tasks complete on time before the OCD hits her. When Nikita is not busy working, you can find her eating while binge-watching The office. Also, she breathes music. She has done her bachelor's from Delhi University and her master's from Jamia Millia Islamia.

8 Universities with higher ROI than IITs and IIMs

Grab this one-time opportunity to download this ebook

Connect With Us

30,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. take the first step today..

Resend OTP in

Need help with?

Study abroad.

UK, Canada, US & More

IELTS, GRE, GMAT & More

Scholarship, Loans & Forex

Country Preference

New Zealand

Which English test are you planning to take?

Which academic test are you planning to take.

Not Sure yet

When are you planning to take the exam?

Already booked my exam slot

Within 2 Months

Want to learn about the test

Which Degree do you wish to pursue?

When do you want to start studying abroad.

September 2024

January 2025

What is your budget to study abroad?

How would you describe this article ?

Please rate this article

We would like to hear more.

Asia Pacific
Open Access
Research Support
Ruth’s Rankings
All Categories
Library Jobs in Asia Pacific
Asia Library Conferences

Ten reasons libraries are still better than the internet

Ten reasons libraries are still…

“Thanks to the internet, we no longer need libraries or librarians.” You most likely hear some variation on that theme pretty regularly.

(19 December 2017) Sixteen years ago, American Libraries published Mark Y. Herring’s essay Ten Reasons Why the Internet Is No Substitute for a Library (April 2001). Technology has improved exponentially since then—social media didn’t even exist yet. But even the smartest phone’s intelligence is limited by paywalls, Twitter trolls, fake news, and other hazards of online life. Here are 10 reasons why libraries are still better than the internet.

American Libraries Magazine has the list of ten .

Privacy Overview

Enter your email address to receive the bi-weekly eNewsletter

Evaluating Research: Library vs. Internet

Library vs. Internet
Evaluating Journals
Evaluating Websites
Fake or Real?
Fair or Biased?
Get Research Help
Citation Help
Evaluating Information Video

What Type of Information are You Looking For?

Selecting a library database vs. the internet depends on the type of information you need to find. If you want some quick background information, Wikipedia is fast and easy, it is a great source for background information, and to lead you to citations, but it is not the source you want to base a paper on. For many assignments you will use a range of materials, books, journal articles, newspapers, archival sources, and websites.

WHY? Rationale for Evaluating What You Find on the Web

Information on the web is abundant, and anyone can put it there. You can find "proof" of any belief system you can imagine. If you are using a website as a source in your paper or project, you need to think critically about where that information is coming from.

You don't want to base your paper off a biased opinion or cite a website that's simply a mask for advertising.

Instead, you want to find credible, up-to-date, relevant information that's written by an expert or an authority on the topic, whose claims are based on fact and supported by evidence.

To learn how to separate the good information from the not-so-good or downright bad information that you might come across on-line, review the next tab and use the C.R.A.A.P. Test to evaluate a website.

Fitz & Pirillo. (2006). Image: The Whole Internet Truth

Considerations About the Web

Not Everything is on the Internet

The web contains at least over a billion web pages. Even with that amount of information, only 8% of all scholarly journals are on the web. Even though the information is FREE on the Internet, journal information is sometimes not. You have to pay.

The Needle (Your Search) in the Haystack (the Web)

The World Wide Web is a vast uncatalogued library. Whatever search engine you use, you are not searching the entire web. Unbelievable yes, but websites are not all websites are updated frequently, nor daily, weekly or even monthly. Sometimes searches can be a huge waste of time because you cannot find relevant information for your paper.

Quality Control Does Not Exist

The Internet is not going away, and will continue to grow, but in addition to all of the scientific, medical, and historical (if accurate) information that is on the web, a lot of it is junk and inferior to what you can find in a library database. Anyone can publish a website.

Sources on the Internet are Harder to Identify

Yes, full-text articles can be found on the web, but sometimes they are missing information you need for your own research, such as: footnotes, tables, graphs and formulae. It is also sometimes difficult to tell who is the author of a site. In a library journal, you will have the exact location of your information cited. Showing that exact location in your citation is required. See Stonehill’s Citation Guide . Information on the web can change or disappear overnight, information in a database cannot. See also Stonehill’s Academic Integrity Policy on why you should be citing your sources.

Library On-Line Resources are Available 24/7

Online databases can be accessed 24 hours a day 7 days a week from the library’s webpage. These databases are in the library’s collection and can be accessed on campus and remotely with your Student ID. This is not to be confused with searching the Internet.

For a complete list of Library Databases click here .

Tuition and Fees Pay for Library Use

Library resources are paid for with your tuition and fees, so take advantage of it. Libraries provide free access to scholarly books, journals, newspapers, encyclopedias, and other print reference sources. A lot of information on the Internet is FREE, except scholarly materials. A paid subscription is required to access.

Trained Professionals are Available for Assistance

Knowledgeable and friendly librarians are available to assist with locating information in person, chat, e-mail or telephone. Request assistance at the beginning of your research and spare yourself valuable time spent on the Internet.

E-Books are Available

E-books are full-text and searchable. Text can be searched automatically, and cross-referenced using hyperlinks. Dictionaries, reference works, and some textbooks, benefit from search and cross-reference capabilities. Content is available 24/7. Please visit Stonehill’s Catalog .

The Internet Has Fewer Archival Materials

The Internet is actually not that old. The library has older materials than the Internet, including Archived materials. You would be pressed to find information that is older than 10-15 years old. The Internet provides more timely information because it is changing constantly. If students are interested in archived materials, which can be great primary sources, please see Archives at Stonehill.

Libraries vs. the Internet

The Web is not a universal library. The library is a wealth of knowledge and information. Stonehill provides access to that knowledge and information.

Adapted from the article: Herring, Mark. (2001, April). 10 Reasons Why the Internet Is No Substitute for a Library. American Libraries . p. 76-78. Tennessee State University Library Information Literacy Information.

<< Previous: Home
Next: Evaluating Journals >>
Last Updated: Sep 11, 2023 10:22 AM
URL: https://libguides.stonehill.edu/evaluate

E-Books VS Printed Books: An Argumentative Essay

The norm for school reading is heavy, expensive textbooks. But some have proposed that e-textbooks, available through school tablets or laptops, could be a better alternative. A textbook is a book used to formally define concepts in education. An e-textbook contains the same material, but is not bound to a single physical object. A typical print textbook is not only expensive, costing 50 US$ or more, but also cumbersome to house and maintain. E-textbooks, on the other hand, are easily accessible with most devices and are much less expensive. In this paper, we’ll be discovering why e-textbooks are a better investment than cumbersome print textbooks.

One of the largest factors of resource decisions is the cost, and this applies to textbooks in addition to many other things. Print textbooks are a big investment for a school. The price of print textbooks is high simply because of the amount of materials required to make them. E-textbooks, however, are priced solely on their content, and tend to be much less expensive than print textbooks. Another factor is the costs going forward after the initial purchase. A print textbook is vulnerable to rips, stains, and mildew, and because of this print textbooks must be cared for carefully. If a print textbook falls victim to one of these mishaps, often a new textbook is required. E-textbooks, though, are accessible to all of the school upon purchase, and cannot degrade or be damaged. As a result, E-textbooks are very low maintenance.

The accessibility of the material is also important. With a print textbook, there is only a few copies, or sometimes only one, in circulation. Only one student can use a given book at a time. These problems are eliminated in e-textbooks, which can be accessed by anyone with an authorized device, even simultaneously. In addition, print textbooks are sometimes not allowed to leave the school, forcing students to read at school. However, with an e-textbook, a student can access the textbook from anywhere with an Internet connection.

Something that might not be considered as much is engagement. Many print textbooks look dull and boring just from their size, their rough paper, and their minuscule type. E-textbooks have the advantage of not being associated with a physical weight, and being presented through a screen that can be zoomed in to focus on the content. Print textbooks also have a stereotype applied to them that claims that they are flat, dull, and long-winded, which is only reinforced by their physical medium. But e-textbooks? They are accessed through an electronic device, the same devices that are used to plan outings with friends and chat with fellows. Simply by being accessed through a device that is often considered useful, or even fun, e-textbooks have the advantage of being associated with that usefulness.

Some might say that this is a disadvantage, and that being on a such a device would distract the student’s attention from the textbook. This point becomes moot if the device is issued by the school and does not allow access to distracting services such as social media. Others may claim that print textbooks make the student connect more with the real, physical world. It might do so, but since the connection is through a print textbook, the students might end up associating the dullness of such a book with the physical world.

Related Samples

Experiential and Transformational Learning Theories Essay Example
Importance of Early Childhood Education Essay Example
Essay Sample: Good Grades or Good Health
Narrative Essay about Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting
Essay on Disadvantages of Group Projects in High School
How Students’ Struggled in Online Class Essay Example
Schools Should Not Allow Social Media (Essay Example)
Essay About Integrity and the Effects of Cheating
Use of Smartphones in School
Self-Reflection on Reading and Writing

Didn't find the perfect sample?

You can order a custom paper by our expert writers

Search form

A for and against essay about the internet.

Look at the essay and do the exercises to improve your writing skills.

Instructions

Do the preparation exercise first. Then read the text and do the other exercises.

Preparation

Check your writing: grouping - ideas

Check your writing: gap fill - useful phrases, worksheets and downloads.

What's your opinion? Do you think the internet is bad for young people?

We will process your data to send you our newsletter and updates based on your consent. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the "unsubscribe" link at the bottom of every email. Read our privacy policy for more information.

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

Publications
Our Methods
Short Reads
Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

Print books vs. e-books: Which is better for what

Our recent e-reading report has received a lot of attention over the past week , and one section in particular that seemed to spark conversation was our “print vs. e-books” showdown :

We asked people who read both print books and e-books in the past year which format they thought was better for a variety of situations. We found that people prefer e-books when they need a book quickly, when they want a wide selection, or when they want to read “on-the-go” while commuting or traveling. Print, meanwhile, is the preferred format for “social reading,” such as sharing books with others or reading with a child.

And when it comes to the time-honored tradition of reading in bed? The verdict was split: 45% say e-books are best here, while 43% prefer print.

Here are more links to interesting discussions we’ve noticed around the web:

E-book revolution: We’re reading more than ever [The Christian Science Monitor’s Chapter & Verse blog]
Rise in E-Book Readership Is Good News for Reading Over All, Report Says [Wired Campus, The Chronicle of Higher Education]
E-books spur reading among Americans, survey shows [CNN.com]
Per the Latest Pew Study, the Most Social Way to Read Is Still in Print [The Atlantic]

What do you think? If you’re a “dual-format reader,” when does print win out over e-books (and vice versa?) How have e-books changed your reading habits—if at all? Hop over to our Facebook page and let us know!

Sign up for our weekly newsletter

Fresh data delivery Saturday mornings

Sign up for The Briefing

Weekly updates on the world of news & information

Three-in-ten Americans now read e-books

Facts on foreign students in the u.s., book reading 2016, long-form reading shows signs of life in our mobile news world, slightly fewer americans are reading print books, new survey finds, most popular.

1615 L St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 | Media Inquiries

Research Topics

Age & Generations
Coronavirus (COVID-19)
Economy & Work
Family & Relationships
Gender & LGBTQ
Immigration & Migration
International Affairs
Internet & Technology
Methodological Research
News Habits & Media
Non-U.S. Governments
Other Topics
Politics & Policy
Race & Ethnicity
Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts .

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

View all journals
Explore content
About the journal
Publish with us
Sign up for alerts
12 May 2024

Is the Internet bad for you? Huge study reveals surprise effect on well-being

Carissa Wong

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

A woman and a man sit in bed in a dark bedroom, distracted by a laptop computer and a smartphone respectively.

People who had access to the Internet scored higher on measures of life satisfaction in a global survey. Credit: Ute Grabowsky/Photothek via Getty

A global, 16-year study 1 of 2.4 million people has found that Internet use might boost measures of well-being, such as life satisfaction and sense of purpose — challenging the commonly held idea that Internet use has negative effects on people’s welfare.

US TikTok ban: how the looming restriction is affecting scientists on the app

“It’s an important piece of the puzzle on digital-media use and mental health,” says psychologist Markus Appel at the University of Würzburg in Germany. “If social media and Internet and mobile-phone use is really such a devastating force in our society, we should see it on this bird’s-eye view [study] — but we don’t.” Such concerns are typically related to behaviours linked to social-media use, such as cyberbullying, social-media addiction and body-image issues. But the best studies have so far shown small negative effects, if any 2 , 3 , of Internet use on well-being, says Appel.

The authors of the latest study, published on 13 May in Technology, Mind and Behaviour , sought to capture a more global picture of the Internet’s effects than did previous research. “While the Internet is global, the study of it is not,” said Andrew Przybylski, a researcher at the University of Oxford, UK, who studies how technology affects well-being, in a press briefing on 9 May. “More than 90% of data sets come from a handful of English-speaking countries” that are mostly in the global north, he said. Previous studies have also focused on young people, he added.

To address this research gap, Pryzbylski and his colleagues analysed data on how Internet access was related to eight measures of well-being from the Gallup World Poll , conducted by analytics company Gallup, based in Washington DC. The data were collected annually from 2006 to 2021 from 1,000 people, aged 15 and above, in 168 countries, through phone or in-person interviews. The researchers controlled for factors that might affect Internet use and welfare, including income level, employment status, education level and health problems.

Like a walk in nature

The team found that, on average, people who had access to the Internet scored 8% higher on measures of life satisfaction, positive experiences and contentment with their social life, compared with people who lacked web access. Online activities can help people to learn new things and make friends, and this could contribute to the beneficial effects, suggests Appel.

The positive effect is similar to the well-being benefit associated with taking a walk in nature, says Przybylski.

However, women aged 15–24 who reported having used the Internet in the past week were, on average, less happy with the place they live, compared with people who didn’t use the web. This could be because people who do not feel welcome in their community spend more time online, said Przybylski. Further studies are needed to determine whether links between Internet use and well-being are causal or merely associations, he added.

The study comes at a time of discussion around the regulation of Internet and social-media use , especially among young people. “The study cannot contribute to the recent debate on whether or not social-media use is harmful, or whether or not smartphones should be banned at schools,” because the study was not designed to answer these questions, says Tobias Dienlin, who studies how social media affects well-being at the University of Vienna. “Different channels and uses of the Internet have vastly different effects on well-being outcomes,” he says.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01410-z

Vuorre, M. & Przybylski, A. K. Technol. Mind Behav . https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000127 (2024).

Article Google Scholar

Heffer, T. et al. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 7 , 462–470 (2018).

Coyne, S. M., Rogers, A. A., Zurcher, J. D., Stockdale, L. & Booth, M. Comput. Hum. Behav . 104 , 106160 (2020).

Download references

Reprints and permissions

Public health

Daniel Kahneman obituary: psychologist who revolutionized the way we think about thinking

Obituary 03 MAY 24

Pandemic lockdowns were less of a shock for people with fewer ties

Research Highlight 01 MAY 24

The rise of eco-anxiety: scientists wake up to the mental-health toll of climate change

News Feature 10 APR 24

How ignorance and gender inequality thwart treatment of a widespread illness

Outlook 09 MAY 24

Bird flu in US cows: where will it end?

News 08 MAY 24

US funders to tighten oversight of controversial ‘gain of function’ research

News 07 MAY 24

Hunger on campus: why US PhD students are fighting over food

Career Feature 03 MAY 24

US National Academies report outlines barriers and solutions for scientist carers

Career News 02 MAY 24

We need more-nuanced approaches to exploring sex and gender in research

Comment 01 MAY 24

Recruitment of Principal Investigators by the School of Life Sciences, Peking University

The School of Life Sciences at Peking University is actively seeking talents, with an emphasis on bioinformatics/computational biology/AI/RNA biology.

Beijing (CN)

School of Life Sciences, Peking University

2024 Recruitment notice Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology: Shenzhen, China

The wide-ranging expertise drawing from technical, engineering or science professions...

Shenzhen,China

Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology

Head of Operational Excellence

In this key position, you’ll be responsible for ensuring efficiency and quality in journal workflows through continuous improvement and innovation.

United States (US) - Remote

American Physical Society

Rowland Fellowship

The Rowland Institute at Harvard seeks outstanding early-career experimentalists in all fields of science and engineering.

Cambridge, Massachusetts

Rowland Institute at Harvard

Postdoctoral Fellowship: Chemical and Cell Biology

The 2-year fellowship within a project that will combine biochemical, cell biological and chemical genetic approaches to elucidate migrasome biology

Umeå, Sweden

Umeå University

Quick links

Explore articles by subject
Guide to authors
Editorial policies

What’s the point of having a voice if you’re gonna be silent in those moments you shouldn’t be?

How to be a book blogger: beginner’s guide, krysten ritter’s fresh appearance sparks speculation about a jessica jones comeback, major historical events on may 12- today in history, how social media affects mental health, this summer will be different: by carley fortune.

Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that.
Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes review: Exploring Legacy, Power, and the Cycle of History

Why Books Are Better Than Internet?

In today’s digital age, the internet has become an essential tool for accessing information, connecting with others, and entertainment. However, the rise of the internet has sparked a debate about the role of books in our lives. While the internet provides a wealth of information, many argue that books remain superior sources of knowledge and entertainment. In this article, we will explore the reasons why books are better than the internet. We will examine the benefits of books, the limitations of the internet, the advantages of reading books over the internet, and the importance of books in today’s world.

Benefits of Books

Books offer several benefits that the internet cannot replicate. Here are some of the advantages of reading books:

In-depth information: Books provide a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of a particular topic. Unlike the internet, where information is fragmented and often shallow, books allow readers to delve deep into a subject, explore various perspectives, and gain a nuanced understanding of the topic.
Reliable information: Books are authored by experts in the field, which means that the information contained within them is usually reliable and accurate. In contrast, the internet is an open platform, which means that anyone can publish information, regardless of their credentials or expertise.
Cognitive benefits: Reading books has been shown to improve cognitive function, including vocabulary, memory, and critical thinking skills. In contrast, the internet often encourages multitasking and skimming, which can impair cognitive abilities.
Improved concentration: Books allow readers to focus on a single task for an extended period, improving their ability to concentrate and avoid distractions. In contrast, the internet is full of distractions, from social media notifications to ads, which can make it difficult to concentrate on a single task for an extended period.

Limitations of the Internet

While the internet provides a wealth of information, it has several limitations that make it inferior to books. Here are some of the limitations of the internet:

Overwhelming information: The internet is a vast and ever-growing repository of information, making it challenging to sort through and find relevant information. It is often overwhelming to navigate, especially for those who are not tech-savvy.
Questionable credibility: The internet is an open platform where anyone can publish information, regardless of its accuracy. This means that information found on the internet may be biased, inaccurate, or misleading.
Distracting nature: The internet is full of distractions, from social media notifications to pop-up ads. These distractions can make it difficult to focus on a single task, such as reading or studying.
Dependence on technology: The internet requires access to technology, such as a computer or smartphone, which not everyone has access to. Additionally, relying on technology to access information can be problematic, as technology can malfunction or fail, leading to lost or inaccessible information.

Advantages of Reading Books over Internet

While the internet has its advantages, reading books provides several unique benefits that the internet cannot provide. Here are some advantages of reading books over the internet:

Unique reading experience: Reading a physical book provides a unique reading experience that the internet cannot replicate. The tactile experience of holding a book, turning its pages, and the smell of ink on paper can be an enjoyable sensory experience that is not available when reading from a screen.
Tactile experience: The tactile experience of holding a book can be beneficial in other ways, such as promoting relaxation and reducing stress.
Engaging with the text: Reading a book allows readers to engage more deeply with the text, whether by underlining passages, taking notes, or simply highlighting important points. This level of engagement is not possible when reading on a screen.
Retention of information: Studies have shown that reading from a physical book leads to better retention of information than reading from a screen. This may be due to the unique reading experience of a book, which allows for deeper engagement with the text.
Privacy: When reading a book, there is no need to worry about data breaches or online privacy issues. Reading a book is a private experience that can be enjoyed without concern for security or privacy breaches.

Importance of Books in Today’s World

Books play an essential role in today’s world, even with the advent of the internet and digital media. They remain an important tool for preserving cultural heritage, promoting literacy, and fostering critical thinking. Books serve as a record of human history and experience, documenting our triumphs and struggles, and preserving our cultural heritage for future generations. They are an important tool for promoting literacy, which is critical for success in all aspects of life. Reading books encourages critical thinking, develops empathy and imagination, and fosters a lifelong love of learning. In today’s world, where information is often fragmented, and attention spans are shrinking, books remain a vital source of knowledge, inspiration, and entertainment.

Also Read: Famous Authors Whose First Book Was A Flop

X (Twitter)

Completed my PGDM from IMS Ghaziabad, specialized in (Marketing and H.R) "I truly believe that continuous learning is key to success because of which I keep on adding to my skills and knowledge."

Comments are closed.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!

IELTS Scores
Life Skills Test
Find a Test Centre
Alternatives to IELTS
General Training
Academic Word List
Topic Vocabulary
Collocation
Phrasal Verbs
Writing eBooks
Reading eBook
All eBooks & Courses
Sample Essays
Internet Vs Newspaper Essay

IELTS Internet vs Newspaper Essay

In this internet vs newspaper essay you have to discuss whether you think reading from newspapers will stay more popular than reading the news online.

This was a recent question in the IELTS exam. You'll find they pick on topical issues, which is why you should keep up-to-date with the news!

Although more and more people read news on the internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Thinking about the essay

Before you write your internet vs newspaper essay, you should spend some time deciding what your views and opinions are and how you will support them.

You could write about one side of the essay, for example stating that you think newspapers will remain more popular and then writing about the benefits of newspapers.

But there are two good reasons for making sure you discuss both reading newspapers and reading online .

Firstly as both those issues are mentioned in the questions you don't want the examiner thinking that you haven't fully answered the question . Also, if you discuss both you will have more to write about .

In this model IELTS internet vs newspaper essay that you can read below, the writer believes that online sources will become the most popular.

The writer supports this by first giving the counter-argument (opposing view) - why newspapers are still popular - but then goes on to explain why this habit will be taken over by online reading.

Now take a look at the internet vs newspaper essay model answer.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

Write at least 250 words.

Model Answer:

It is common at the present time to see people getting updates on the latest news from the internet rather than the traditional method of reading a newspaper. I would argue that electronic sources of news will gradually replace that of the newspaper.

Newspapers remain an important source of news for several reasons. The first of these is that the older generation still prefer to read their news this way, which is because they have traditionally bought a newspaper over the years and so do not wish to change or simply do not know how to do so online in some cases. In addition to this a newspaper also comes with other supplements, such as magazines and television guides, and sources of entertainment, such as crosswords. This makes it more attractive for some than going online.

However, though newspapers may not disappear completely, the Internet is likely to become the more dominant source of news over time. This is primarily because younger people tend to read the news online and prefer not to pay for it, so those reading newspapers, the older generations, will gradually decline. This links in with the second reason, which is that as media companies start to see a drop income from newspapers, printing them will become unprofitable and they will be forced to find ways to make money from news online.

In conclusion, although newspapers remain popular today, they will gradually be replaced by the desire to read the news through electronic sources. This may be a sad loss given their history, but unfortunately it is an unavoidable development.

(265 Words)

This internet vs newspaper essay would score highly in the test as it meets the four criteria required for a good IELTS band score.

It fully answers the question . The writer clearly sets out their opinion and then goes on to provide support for this.

The essay supports the opinion well as it sets out why people like to read newspapers but then goes on to explain why this will change , with people switching to online reading. The support of the question is specific and ideas are extended and explained.

The essay is also well-organised , with a clear introduction, body paragraphs and conclusion.

Topic sentences lead the reader through the essay and there are good linking devices that are not too mechanical. You don't want things too mechanical if you are looking for a score above band 6.

Examples of mechanical are 'firstly', 'secondly', 'thirdly' 'for example' . They can be a bit boring and easy.

It also has some good examples of vocabulary and collocations related to the topic, and a good range of complex sentences .

<<< Back

Next >>>

More Agree / Disagree Essays:

Airline Tax Essay: Would taxing air travel reduce pollution?

Airline Tax Essay for IELTS. Practice an agree and disagree essay on the topic of taxing airlines to reduce low-cost air traffic. You are asked to decide if you agree or disagree with taxing airlines in order to reduce the problems caused.

Scientific Research Essay: Who should be responsible for its funding?

Scientific research essay model answer for Task 2 of the test. For this essay, you need to discuss whether the funding and controlling of scientific research should be the responsibility of the government or private organizations.

Dying Languages Essay: Is a world with fewer languages a good thing?

Dying languages essays have appeared in IELTS on several occasions, an issue related to the spread of globalisation. Check out a sample question and model answer.

Multinational Organisations and Culture Essay

Multinational Organisations and Culture Essay: Improve you score for IELTS Essay writing by studying model essays. This Essay is about the extent to which working for a multinational organisation help you to understand other cultures.

IELTS Internet Essay: Is the internet damaging social interaction?

Internet Essay for IELTS on the topic of the Internet and social interaction. Included is a model answer. The IELTS test usually focuses on topical issues. You have to discuss if you think that the Internet is damaging social interaction.

Sample IELTS Writing: Is spending on the Arts a waste of money?

Sample IELTS Writing: A common topic in IELTS is whether you think it is a good idea for government money to be spent on the arts. i.e. the visual arts, literary and the performing arts, or whether it should be spent elsewhere, usually on other public services.

Return of Historical Objects and Artefacts Essay

This essay discusses the topic of returning historical objects and artefacts to their country of origin. It's an agree/disagree type IELTS question.

Role of Schools Essay: How should schools help children develop?

This role of schools essay for IELTS is an agree disagree type essay where you have to discuss how schools should help children to develop.

Free University Education Essay: Should it be paid for or free?

Free university education Model IELTS essay. Learn how to write high-scoring IELTS essays. The issue of free university education is an essay topic that comes up in the IELTS test. This essay therefore provides you with some of the key arguments about this topic.

Ban Smoking in Public Places Essay: Should the government ban it?

Ban smoking in public places essay: The sample answer shows you how you can present the opposing argument first, that is not your opinion, and then present your opinion in the following paragraph.

Paying Taxes Essay: Should people keep all the money they earn?

Paying Taxes Essay: Read model essays to help you improve your IELTS Writing Score for Task 2. In this essay you have to decide whether you agree or disagree with the opinion that everyone should be able to keep their money rather than paying money to the government.

IELTS Sample Essay: Is alternative medicine ineffective & dangerous?

IELTS sample essay about alternative and conventional medicine - this shows you how to present a well-balanced argument. When you are asked whether you agree (or disagree), you can look at both sides of the argument if you want.

Essay for IELTS: Are some advertising methods unethical?

This is an agree / disagree type question. Your options are: 1. Agree 100% 2. Disagree 100% 3. Partly agree. In the answer below, the writer agrees 100% with the opinion. There is an analysis of the answer.

Employing Older People Essay: Is the modern workplace suitable?

Employing Older People Essay. Examine model essays for IELTS Task 2 to improve your score. This essay tackles the issue of whether it it better for employers to hire younger staff rather than those who are older.

Human Cloning Essay: Should we be scared of cloning humans?

Human cloning essay - this is on the topic of cloning humans to use their body parts. You are asked if you agree with human cloning to use their body parts, and what reservations (concerns) you have.

Extinction of Animals Essay: Should we prevent this from happening?

In this extinction of animals essay for IELTS you have to decide whether you think humans should do what they can to prevent the extinction of animal species.

Truthfulness in Relationships Essay: How important is it?

This truthfulness in relationships essay for IELTS is an agree / disagree type essay. You need to decide if it's the most important factor.

IELTS Vegetarianism Essay: Should we all be vegetarian to be healthy?

Vegetarianism Essay for IELTS: In this vegetarianism essay, the candidate disagrees with the statement, and is thus arguing that everyone does not need to be a vegetarian.

Technology Development Essay: Are earlier developments the best?

This technology development essay shows you a complex IELTS essay question that is easily misunderstood. There are tips on how to approach IELTS essay questions

Examinations Essay: Formal Examinations or Continual Assessment?

Examinations Essay: This IELTS model essay deals with the issue of whether it is better to have formal examinations to assess student’s performance or continual assessment during term time such as course work and projects.

Any comments or questions about this page or about IELTS? Post them here. Your email will not be published or shared.

Before you go...

Check out the ielts buddy band 7+ ebooks & courses.

Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it?

Click on the HTML link code below.
Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.

Band 7+ eBooks

"I think these eBooks are FANTASTIC!!! I know that's not academic language, but it's the truth!"

Linda, from Italy, Scored Band 7.5

IELTS Modules:

Other resources:.

All Lessons
Band Score Calculator
Writing Feedback
Speaking Feedback
Teacher Resources
Free Downloads
Recent Essay Exam Questions
Books for IELTS Prep
Useful Links

Recent Articles

IELTS Essay: Loving Wildlife and Nature

May 10, 24 02:36 AM

Paraphrasing in the IELTS Test: Speaking and Writing

May 03, 24 10:26 AM

Fillers for IELTS Speaking: Avoid 'Eh', Uhm', 'You know'.

Apr 27, 24 05:48 AM

Important pages

IELTS Writing IELTS Speaking IELTS Listening IELTS Reading All Lessons Vocabulary Academic Task 1 Academic Task 2 Practice Tests

Connect with us

IELTS is a registered trademark of University of Cambridge, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia. This site and its owners are not affiliated, approved or endorsed by the University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia.

IMAGES

Top Ten Reasons Why Books are Better Than Internet
Books Vs Internet: Which is Better?
Paper Books Are Better Than E-Books
Effect of the Internet on Society
How the Internet Has Changed Everyday Life? Free Essay Example
🌈 Books vs technology essay. Textbooks Vs. Ebooks: Which is better for

VIDEO

5 line shot essay on Disadvantages of Internet in English l Disadvantages of Internet 5 line essay l
Write an essay on The Value of Books in English || Value of Books essay in English || #extension.com
Is my internet better than thesilentbangs
Essay || Nibandh Ka Best Books ! UPSC / BPSC / UPPSC
best Smart Money concept smc indicator in whole internet. better than lux algo #forex #forextrader
Books,people and situations teach me better than books.#youtubeshorts #short

COMMENTS

Essay on Books vs. Internet
500 Words Essay on Books vs. Internet Introduction. The advent of the internet has significantly transformed the way we access, consume, and share information. The traditional reliance on books as the primary source of knowledge has been challenged by the vast, digital expanse of the internet. ... Additionally, books are often better curated ...
Books vs. Internet
The Internet offers unparalleled accessibility, real-time updates, and a wide range of resources, while books provide in-depth analysis, a tactile reading experience, and a distraction-free environment. The Internet is more portable and cost-effective, but books offer durability and a sense of permanence. Ultimately, the choice between books ...
Essay on Books and the Internet
The book is one of the oldest sources of information in the history of mankind, with its beginnings about five thousand years ago by Sumerians. An old man said, "A room without books, like a body without a soul". The book is a lifelong companion who accompanies you at every step of your activity, when you have a desire and love for it.
Internet vs Books: Meaning And Differences
The answer is both. The internet and books are both valid sources of information and have their own unique benefits. The internet provides instant access to a vast amount of information, while books offer a more in-depth and comprehensive understanding of a particular topic. In this article, we will explore the advantages and disadvantages of ...
Ten Reasons Libraries Are Still Better Than the Internet
information literacy. intellectual freedom. makerspaces. open access. privacy rights. technology. Even the smartest phone's intelligence is limited by paywalls, Twitter trolls, fake news, and other online hazards. Here are 10 reasons why libraries are still better than the internet.
Trust No Sources
Trust No Sources - Books vs Internet. January 17, 2016. A question that is repeatedly faced by educators and students is how can we know whether to trust a source of information or not and what sources should we value. I wonder if at some point not long after Gutenberg's invention of the press if educators debated the merits of printed works ...
The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus
Attitudes toward e-books may transition in a similar way, especially if e-readers and tablets allow more sharing and social interaction than they currently do. Books on the Kindle can only be ...
Books Vs Internet Research (What's Better?)
You can compare essay examples of why books are a better option than the internet. An essential factor to note is that we are missing information by focusing on just the internet. We tend to skim and scan through words when reading on the internet. ... Additionally, your intended research method depends on the essay topic you wish to write ...
Why the Internet is More Attractive than the Library
And I didn't write down it was from the internet. … So she doesn't really know (Laughter) that it's from the internet. (U.S. university student, first year, female, age 19) I have better things to do than go drive all the way to the library when I can just sit at home and type it into my computer. (U.S. university student, first year, female ...
Books vs. Internet: Whose Information Is More Accurate?
The "books vs. internet" argument is not new, nor has it seen a shortage of advocates for both sides. While books have earned a trusted spot in our culture as legitimate sources of information, having been vetted by an entire network of people, the internet does not always have that same quality assurance — but it does have the wisdom of ...
Ch@nge
It is impossible today to imagine the world without the Internet: it enables us to do things which only a few years ago would be unthinkable, and impinges on every sphere of our lives. See book profile (PDF) Download this book. Kindle. 3.3 MB. EPUB. 13.6 MB. PDF. 4.1 MB.
[Essay]
Brazil. Jun 25, 2013. #1. In today's modern world, technology has a great influence on our life and time. Back in the early 19 [SUP]th [/SUP] century, when electronic devices had not been invented, the population could only use printed word such as books, posters, newspapers or magazines, to gather information.
Books vs Internet Research (What's Better?)
Disadvantages. It takes longer to do research using books than it does using the Internet. Books don't have a search function, so finding specific information using keywords is impossible. The cost of using books for research can turn out to be quite high, depending on the topic.
Why Internet Is Better Than Books » FTTH Conference
03 Dec Why Internet Is Better Than Books. Books are the primary sources of knowledge to every human being and it is not until a kid grown up to understand how the technology works, that he/she is introduced to the world of internet. This is the era of internet where people are more dependent on browsers than bookish knowledge because there is ...
Reading online vs offline: what's best for learning?
However, online reading can be very distracting. While it is easy to get information from online sources, the brain processes digital reading differently than it does when reading offline from paper. Shallower Processing. Online means constant exposure to fast-paced, and rapidly changing information. Digital media trains the brain to process ...
Does using the internet make us happier or sadder?
A study of more than 2 million people in 168 countries suggests that having access to the internet is linked to higher life satisfaction, but many questions remain unanswered. We still don't ...
Essay on Importance of Internet in 150, 200, 300 Words
Nov 23, 2023. 5 minute read. Internet is not just a need or luxury, it has become a household necessity. It was used as a source of entertainment but now it is impossible to work in offices or study without the Internet. When the global pandemic locked everyone in their house, it became an important medium to connect, study and work.
Ten reasons libraries are still better than the internet
"Thanks to the internet, we no longer need libraries or librarians." You most likely hear some variation on that theme pretty regularly. (19 December 2017) Sixteen years ago, American Libraries published Mark Y. Herring's essay Ten Reasons Why the Internet Is No Substitute for a Library (April 2001). Technology has improved exponentially since then—social media…
Evaluating Research: Library vs. Internet
Request assistance at the beginning of your research and spare yourself valuable time spent on the Internet. E-Books are Available. E-books are full-text and searchable. Text can be searched automatically, and cross-referenced using hyperlinks. Dictionaries, reference works, and some textbooks, benefit from search and cross-reference capabilities.
E-Books VS Printed Books: An Argumentative Essay
E-Books VS Printed Books: An Argumentative Essay. The norm for school reading is heavy, expensive textbooks. But some have proposed that e-textbooks, available through school tablets or laptops, could be a better alternative. A textbook is a book used to formally define concepts in education. An e-textbook contains the same material, but is not ...
A for and against essay about the internet
Instructions. Preparation. Reading. Check your writing: grouping - ideas. Check your writing: gap fill - useful phrases. Worksheets and downloads. A for and against essay about the internet - exercises 592.59 KB. A for and against essay about the internet - answers 136.91 KB. A for and against essay about the internet - essay 511.93 KB.
Print books vs. e-books: Which is better for what
We asked people who read both print books and e-books in the past year which format they thought was better for a variety of situations. We found that people prefer e-books when they need a book quickly, when they want a wide selection, or when they want to read "on-the-go" while commuting or traveling. Print, meanwhile, is the preferred ...
Is the Internet bad for you? Huge study reveals surprise ...
A global, 16-year study 1 of 2.4 million people has found that Internet use might boost measures of well-being, such as life satisfaction and sense of purpose — challenging the commonly held ...
Why Books Are Better Than Internet?
Improved concentration: Books allow readers to focus on a single task for an extended period, improving their ability to concentrate and avoid distractions. In contrast, the internet is full of distractions, from social media notifications to ads, which can make it difficult to concentrate on a single task for an extended period.
IELTS Internet vs Newspaper Essay
This makes it more attractive for some than going online. However, though newspapers may not disappear completely, the Internet is likely to become the more dominant source of news over time. This is primarily because younger people tend to read the news online and prefer not to pay for it, so those reading newspapers, the older generations ...