reverses the hypothesis and conclusion

Logic Laws: Converse, Inverse, Contrapositive & Counterexample

Logical statements.

Logical statements  are utterances that can be tested for truth or falsity. The phrase, "Jennifer's white birds" is not a logical statement because it lacks meaning. The phrase, "Jennifer is best at magic" is not logical because it is an opinion; it is not testable. The phrase, "Jennifer wears dresses every Tuesday" is logical because it can be tested. Either she wears dresses on Tuesdays or she does not.

Humans are not born to be logical. Most humans do not begin to learn logic until they are around 10 years old. Logic is a learned mathematical skill, a method of ferreting out truth using specific steps and formal structures. Some of those structures of formal logic are converse, inverse, contrapositive, and counterexample statements.

Logical statements must be tested to be valid. For example, one of the two statements below is logical in that they can be tested for its truthfulness. One is an opinion, which cannot be tested for truthfulness:

Cuban food tastes best.

Jennifer is a man.

The first statement is an opinion and is neither logical nor factual; it cannot be tested to be true. We know the second statement can be tested for its truthfulness. The second statement is logical but not factual.

Logic statement examples

Which of these phrases or utterances is a logical statement? Remember, it need not be true, just testable.

Mint chocolate chip ice cream is delicious.

Jennifer is a woman.

3 penguins and 2 water buffalo

Fricasé de Pollo is a type of Cuban food.

Statements 2 and 4 are logical statements; statement 1 is an opinion, and statement 3 is a fragment with no logical meaning.

Four testable types of logical statements are  converse, inverse, contrapositive, and counterexample statements . They can produce logical equivalence for the original statement, but they do not  necessarily  produce logical equivalence.

Logical equivalence

Suppose instead of writing an opinion for our first statement and a logical but not factual second statement, we wrote:

Jennifer is alive.

Living women eat food.

We can use these statements to form a  conditional statement  with a hypothesis and a conclusion:

If Jennifer is alive, then Jennifer eats food.

This type of if-then statement is the heart of logic. We can immediately see that the two statements result in a true conditional statement. Here is Jennifer; she is alive; she eats food (and we already know she likes Cuban food).

A  logical equivalence  recasts the same hypothesis and conclusion as a negative statement that produces the same result:

If Jennifer does not eat food, then Jennifer is not alive.

These statements have logical equivalence because they contain the same content and arrive at the same result. Statements with logical equivalence are either both true or both false.

Converse statements

The original if-then conditional statement was:

Switching the hypothesis for the conclusion provides the  converse statement :

If Jennifer eats food, then Jennifer is alive.

We have the same words, but the order of the two parts has changed. Has the truth of the conditional statement changed? In this case, the statement is still true, but it would not have to be true.

Switching the conclusion for the hypothesis does not  automatically  prove the logical conditional statement, so the converse statement could be true  or  false.

Inverse statements

A logical  inverse statement  negates both the hypothesis and the conclusion. Again, our original, conditional statement was:

By carefully making the hypothesis negative and then negating the conclusion, we create the inverse statement:

The inverse statement may or  may not  be true.

Let's compare the converse and inverse statements to see if we can make any judgments about them:

Converse: If Jennifer eats food, then Jennifer is alive.

Inverse: If Jennifer is not alive, then Jennifer does not eat food.

Both of those produce true statements. Neither would have to produce a true statement, but in this case they did. It is not possible for one to produce a true statement and the other to produce a false statement.

We now know these three facts about converse and inverse statements:

If one is true, the other statement is true.

If one statement is false, the other is false.

Converse and inverse statements are logically equivalent to one another.

Contrapositive statements

If the converse reverses a statement and the inverse negates it, could we do both? Could we flip  and  negate the statement?

Our original conditional statement was:

To create the logical  contrapositive statement , we negate the hypothesis and the conclusion and then we also switch them:

If the conditional statement is true, then the logical contrapositive statement is true. If the logical contrapositive statement is false, then the conditional statement itself is also false. They have logical equivalence.

Counterexamples

If you can find a substitute that tests the logical validity of the statement (but not its factual accuracy), you know the claim is not always true and is therefore not logically valid.

We need only find one instance, called a  counterexample , where the conditions set out in our arguments are not valid:

Original statement: If Jennifer is alive, then Jennifer eats food.

Contrapositive: If Jennifer does not eat food, then Jennifer is not alive.

We would need to find a single example of one of these conditions, any one of which would be a counterexample:

A living woman who does not eat food, or

A woman who eats food but who is not alive, or

A nonliving woman who eats food, or

A woman who does not eat food but who is alive

If we can find such an example, even a single example, in which the premises are valid but the conclusions are false, we would have a counterexample showing the original argument is invalid.

Surely you can see - leaving out zombies and vampires and other imaginary creatures - that we cannot produce a counterexample for any of our logical statements; our argument is valid.

The logical result of all this work with converse, inverse, contrapositive, and counterexample logical statements is, we learn that Jennifer is a living, breathing woman who eats.

And she likes Cuban food!

• School Guide
• Mathematics
• Number System and Arithmetic
• Trigonometry
• Probability
• Mensuration
• Maths Formulas
• Class 8 Maths Notes
• Class 9 Maths Notes
• Class 10 Maths Notes
• Class 11 Maths Notes
• Class 12 Maths Notes

Converse Statement

Converse Statement is a type of conditional statement where the hypothesis (or antecedent) and conclusion (or consequence) are reversed relative to a given conditional statement.

For instance, consider the statement: “If a triangle ABC is an equilateral triangle, then all its interior angles are equal.” The converse of this statement would be: “If all the interior angles of triangle ABC are equal, then it is an equilateral triangle”

In this article, we will discuss all the things related to the Converse statement in detail.

Table of Content

What is a Converse Statement?

How to write a converse statement, examples of converse statements.

• Truth Value of a Converse Statement

Truth Table for Converse Statement

• Other Types of Statements

A converse statement is a proposition formed by interchanging the hypothesis and conclusion of a conditional statement .

In simpler terms, it’s like flipping the order of “if” and “then” in a statement. For example, in the conditional statement “If it is raining, then the ground is wet”, the converse statement would be “If the ground is wet, then it is raining.”

Note: T he truth of the original statement doesn’t necessarily imply the truth of its converse, and vice versa.

Definition of Converse Statement

A converse statement is formed by exchanging the hypothesis and conclusion of a conditional statement while retaining the same meaning.

For instance, if the original statement is “If A, then B,” the converse is “If B, then A.” The validity of a converse statement doesn’t guarantee the truth of the original statement, and vice versa.

To write a converse statement, you simply switch the hypothesis and conclusion of a conditional statement while maintaining the same meaning. For example, if the original statement is “If it is raining (hypothesis), then the ground is wet (conclusion),” the converse statement would be “If the ground is wet (hypothesis), then it is raining (conclusion).” Remember, the converse statement may not always be true, even if the original statement is.

Some examples of converse statements are:

• Original Statement: If a shape is a square, then it has four equal sides. Converse Statement: If a shape has four equal sides, then it is a square.
• Original Statement: If it is summer, then the weather is hot. Converse Statement: If the weather is hot, then it is summer.
• Original Statement: If a number is divisible by 2, then it is even. Converse Statement: If a number is even, then it is divisible by 2.
• Original Statement: If a person is a teenager, then they are between 13 and 19 years old. Converse Statement: If a person is between 13 and 19 years old, then they are a teenager.
• Original Statement: If an animal is a dog, then it has fur. Converse Statement: If an animal has fur, then it is a dog.

Examples of Converse Statements in Mathematics or Logic

Some examples of converse statements in mathematics or logic:

• Original Statement: If two angles are congruent, then they have the same measure. Converse Statement: If two angles have the same measure, then they are congruent.
• Original Statement: If a number is divisible by 6, then it is divisible by 2 and 3. Converse Statement: If a number is divisible by 2 and 3, then it is divisible by 6.
• Original Statement: If two lines are perpendicular, then their slopes are negative reciprocals of each other. Converse Statement: If the slopes of two lines are negative reciprocals of each other, then the lines are perpendicular.

Converse, Inverse and Contrapositive Statements

Inverse Statement: The inverse of a conditional statement is formed by negating both the hypothesis and the conclusion of the original statement.

Contrapositive Statement: The contrapositive of a conditional statement is formed by switching the hypothesis and conclusion of the original statement and negating both.

Example of Inverse Statements

Original Statement: If a number is even, then it is divisible by 2. Inverse Statement : If a number is not even, then it is not divisible by 2.

Original Statement: If x > 5, then 2x > 10. Inverse Statement: If x ≤ 5, then 2x ≤ 10.

Example of Contrapositive Statements

Original Statement: If a shape is a square, then it has four equal sides. Contrapositive Statement: If a shape does not have four equal sides, then it is not a square.

Original Statement: If a number is even, then it is divisible by 2. Contrapositive: If a number is not divisible by 2, then it is not even.

To create a truth table for the converse statement, we need to consider both the original statement and its converse.

Let’s represent the original statement as “If p, then q” or “p → q” where p is the hypothesis and q is the conclusion. The converse of this statement is “If q, then p” or “q → p”. Then truth table is given by:

Truth Table for Inverse and Contrapositive Statement

To create a truth table for the inverse and contrapositive statements, let’s start with the original statement “If p, then q” or “p → q” where p is the hypothesis and q is the conclusion. The inverse of this statement is “If not p, then not q” or “~p → ~q”, and the contrapositive is “If not q, then not p” or “~q → ~p”. Then truth table is given by:

Solved Questions on Converse Statement

Example 1: If all squares are rectangles, are all rectangles squares?

Converse: If a shape is a rectangle, then it is a square.

The original statement says that all squares are rectangles. This is true because a square, by definition, has four sides of equal length and four right angles, making it a special type of rectangle where all sides are equal. However, the converse statement is not necessarily true. Not all rectangles are squares because rectangles can have unequal side lengths, whereas squares have all sides equal. Therefore, the converse statement is false.

Example 2: If all right angles are 90 degrees, are all 90 degree angles right angles?

Converse: If an angle measures 90 degrees, then it is a right angle.

The original statement is true because a right angle, by definition, measures 90 degrees. However, the converse statement is also true. If an angle measures 90 degrees, then it must be a right angle, as any angle measuring exactly 90 degrees forms a perfect right angle.

Example 3: If a number is divisible by 3, then it is an odd number.

Converse: If a number is an odd number, then it is divisible by 3.

The original statement is false. While it is true that all odd numbers are not divisible by 2, they are not necessarily divisible by 3. For example, the number 5 is an odd number but is not divisible by 3. Therefore, the converse statement is also false because not all odd numbers are divisible by 3.

Example 4: If a shape has four sides, then it is a quadrilateral.

Converse: If a shape is a quadrilateral, then it has four sides.

The original statement is true. A quadrilateral is defined as a polygon with four sides, so any shape with four sides is indeed a quadrilateral. Similarly, the converse statement is true. If a shape is a quadrilateral, then it must have four sides because that is a defining characteristic of a quadrilateral. Therefore, both the original statement and its converse are true.

Converse Statement: Practice Questions

Q1: If all birds have wings, do all winged creatures have beaks?

Q2: If all triangles have three sides, do all polygons with three sides have to be triangles?

Q3: If all vehicles are cars, are all cars vehicles?

Converse Statement: FAQs

What is conditional statement.

A conditional statement is a fundamental concept in logic and mathematics where a hypothesis is followed by a conclusion, often represented as “If p, then q.”

What is the Converse of a Statement?

The converse of a statement is formed by interchanging the antecedent and the consequent of a conditional statement. For example, if the original statement is “If it is raining, then the ground is wet,” the converse would be “If the ground is wet, then it is raining.”

How do Mathematicians Use Converse?

Mathematicians use the converse of a statement to explore the logical relationships between different assertions. By examining both the original statement and its converse, mathematicians can gain a deeper understanding of implications and relationships within a given context.

Is a Conditional Statement Logically Equivalent to a Converse and Inverse?

A conditional statement is not logically equivalent to its converse or inverse. While a conditional statement asserts a specific relationship between two events or conditions, the converse and inverse statements may or may not hold true in the same context.

Do the Converse and the Inverse Have The Same Truth Value?

The truth value of the converse and the inverse may differ from that of the original conditional statement. In some cases, the converse and the inverse of a true conditional statement may also be true, but this is not always the case. Each statement must be evaluated independently to determine its truth value.

Please Login to comment...

Similar reads.

• School Learning
• Maths-Class-11
• How to Get a Free SSL Certificate
• Best SSL Certificates Provider in India
• Elon Musk's xAI releases Grok-2 AI assistant
• What is OpenAI SearchGPT? How it works and How to Get it?
• Content Improvement League 2024: From Good To A Great Article

Improve your Coding Skills with Practice

What kind of Experience do you want to share?

Converse, Inverse & Contrapositive of Conditional Statement

Converse, inverse, and contrapositive of a conditional statement.

What we want to achieve in this lesson is to be familiar with the fundamental rules on how to convert or rewrite a conditional statement into its converse, inverse, and contrapositive. 

But first, we need to review what a conditional statement is because it is the foundation or precursor of the three related sentences that we are going to discuss in this lesson.

What is a Conditional Statement?

A conditional statement takes the form “If [latex]p[/latex], then [latex]q[/latex]” where [latex]p[/latex] is the hypothesis while [latex]q[/latex] is the conclusion. A conditional statement is also known as an implication .

Sometimes you may encounter (from other textbooks or resources) the words “antecedent” for the hypothesis and “consequent” for the conclusion. Don’t worry, they mean the same thing.

In addition, the statement “If [latex]p[/latex], then [latex]q[/latex]” is commonly written as the statement “[latex]p[/latex] implies [latex]q[/latex]” which is expressed symbolically as [latex]{\color{blue}p} \to {\color{red}q}[/latex].

Given a conditional statement, we can create related sentences namely: converse , inverse , and contrapositive . They are related sentences because they are all based on the original conditional statement.

Let’s go over each one of them!

The Converse of a Conditional Statement

For a given conditional statement [latex]{\color{blue}p} \to {\color{red}q}[/latex], we can write the converse statement by interchanging or swapping the roles of the hypothesis and conclusion of the original conditional statement. Therefore, the converse is the implication [latex]{\color{red}q} \to {\color{blue}p}[/latex].

Notice, the hypothesis [latex]\large{\color{blue}p}[/latex] of the conditional statement becomes the conclusion of the converse. On the other hand, the conclusion of the conditional statement [latex]\large{\color{red}p}[/latex] becomes the hypothesis of the converse.

The Inverse of a Conditional Statement

When you’re given a conditional statement [latex]{\color{blue}p} \to {\color{red}q}[/latex], the inverse statement is created by negating both the hypothesis and conclusion of the original conditional statement. Thus, the inverse is the implication ~[latex]\color{blue}p[/latex] [latex]\to[/latex] ~[latex]\color{red}q[/latex].

The symbol ~[latex]\color{blue}p[/latex] is read as “not [latex]p[/latex]” while ~[latex]\color{red}q[/latex] is read as “not [latex]q[/latex]” .

The Contrapositive of a Conditional Statement

Suppose you have the conditional statement [latex]{\color{blue}p} \to {\color{red}q}[/latex], we compose the contrapositive statement by interchanging the hypothesis and conclusion of the inverse of the same conditional statement.

In other words, to find the contrapositive, we first find the inverse of the given conditional statement then swap the roles of the hypothesis and conclusion. Therefore, the contrapositive of the conditional statement [latex]{\color{blue}p} \to {\color{red}q}[/latex] is the implication ~[latex]\color{red}q[/latex] [latex]\to[/latex] ~[latex]\color{blue}p[/latex].

Truth Tables of a Conditional Statement, and its Converse, Inverse, and Contrapositive

Now that we know how to symbolically write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of a given conditional statement, it is time to state some interesting facts about these logical statements.

To save time, I have combined all the truth tables of a conditional statement, and its converse, inverse, and contrapositive into a single table .

Here are some of the important findings regarding the table above:

• The conditional statement is NOT logically equivalent to its converse and inverse.
• The conditional statement is logically equivalent to its contrapositive. Thus, [latex]{\color{blue}p} \to {\color{red}q}[/latex] [latex] \equiv [/latex] ~[latex]\color{red}q[/latex] [latex]\to[/latex] ~[latex]\color{blue}p[/latex].
• The converse is logically equivalent to the inverse of the original conditional statement. Therefore, [latex]{\color{red}q} \to {\color{blue}p}[/latex] [latex] \equiv [/latex] ~[latex]\color{blue}p[/latex] [latex]\to[/latex] ~[latex]\color{red}q[/latex].

You might also like these tutorials:

• Introduction to Truth Tables, Statements, and Logical Connectives
• Truth Tables of Five (5) Common Logical Connectives or Operators

Converse, Inverse, and Contrapositive

This is the third post in a series on logic, with a focus on how it is expressed in English. We’ve looked at basic ideas of translating between English and logical symbols, and in particular at negation (stating the opposite). Now we are ready to consider how to change a given statement into one of three related statements.

A conditional statement and its converse

We’ll start with a question from 1999 that introduces the concepts:

Ricky has been asked to break down the statement, “A number divisible by 2 is divisible by 4,” into its component parts, and then rearrange them to find the converse of the statement. I took the question:

We commonly write such a statement symbolically as “\(p\rightarrow q\)“, where the hypothesis is p and the conclusion is q . I rewrote each part slightly to allow it to exist outside of the sentence, naming the number N to avoid needing pronouns. What was important was to rewrite the statement in if/then form.

The converse of this statement swaps the hypothesis and conclusion, making “\(q\rightarrow p\)“:

Ricky was asked to decide whether the converse is true or not, and then prove it, whichever way it goes. This part goes beyond mere logic and enters the realm of “number theory”; but commonly this sort of question is first asked in cases where the proof is not too hard, which is the case here.

To show that a statement is not always true, we only need to find an example for which it is false. In this case, an easy example is 2, or we could use 6, or 102, or whatever we like.

But the question was about the converse:

I didn’t give a proof, in part because Ricky needed to think about that for himself, but also because I didn’t know what level of proof Ricky is expected to handle. One approach is to see that any multiple of 4 can be written as 4 k for some integer k ; but that can be written as 2(2 k ), which is clearly a multiple of 2.

Converse, inverse, and contrapositive

Now we can review the meanings of all three terms, in this 1999 question, which again uses an example from basic number theory:

Doctor Kate could have asked Hollye  for  her  answers to part A, to make sure she understands that part; but she chose to provide them:

It’s important to identify the parts of a conditional statement (if p then q ); and since two of the new statements require negations, that also might as well be done early. Notice that the negation of “is even” could have been written as “is not even”, but since every number (integer) is either odd or even, writing “is odd” is cleaner. Also, the negation of “both are even” is “at least one is not even”; this is an application of De Morgan’s law, or can be seen by considering that if it is not true that both are even, then there must be one that is not even. These ideas were discussed last time.

Now here are the new statements:

We saw the converse above; there we just swap p and q . The inverse keeps each part in place, but negates it. The contrapositive both swaps and negates the parts.

So now we know that the contrapositive, “If either m or n is odd, then m + n is odd,” is false, because there is at least one case, 3 and 7, where the hypothesis is true but the conclusion is false.

That’s the essence of a counterexample.

Doctor Kate continued, showing a way to prove that B and C (the converse and inverse) are both false. You can read that on your own, since my goal here is just to look at the logic. (We’ll have a series on proofs some time in the future.)

Rewriting the statement

Continuing, here is a similar question, where statements must first be written in conditional form:

The second statement is straightforward, but the others need thought. Doctor Achilles first defined the three forms, as we’ve already seen, and then dealt with the first case:

Thus, “all” (the universal quantifier) translates directly to a conditional. The answer, left for Hana to do, will be:

• Converse: “If x is a quadrilateral, then x is a square”; i.e. “Any quadrilateral is a square.”
• Inverse: “If x is not a square, then x is not a quadrilateral”; i.e. “Anything that is not a square is not a quadrilateral.”
• Contrapositive: “If x is not a quadrilateral, then x is not a square”; i.e. “Anything that is not a quadrilateral is not a square.”

The original statement, and the contrapositive, are true, because a square is a kind of quadrilateral; the converse and inverse are false, and a counterexample would be an oblong rectangle, which is not a square but is a quadrilateral.

The questions so far, where they dealt with truth at all, only asked about specific examples. Our last two questions will look more broadly at when these statements are equivalent.

Which can I use in a proof?

Consider this question, from 2002:

If we know a statement is true, can we conclude that the inverse is true? Doctor TWE answered with a counterexample:

Here we are using logic to talk about logic: The statement “For all p and q , \((p\rightarrow q)\rightarrow(\lnot p\rightarrow\lnot q)\)” is false! Sometimes both original and inverse are true, but we can’t conclude the latter from the former.

Giving one example where the contrapositive is true does not prove that it is always equivalent; we’ll prove it below.

In fact, the converse and inverse turn out to be equivalent to one another, though not to the original.

Why is the contrapositive equivalent?

Let’s look at one more, from 2003:

The opening statement describes the contrapositive as the inverse of the converse. What that means is this: Suppose we start with “\(p\rightarrow q\)“. Its converse is “\(q\rightarrow p\)” (swapping the order), and the inverse of that is “\(\lnot q\rightarrow\lnot p\)” (negating each part). This is the contrapositive. In the example, the converse of “If I like cats, then I have cats” is “If I have cats, then I like cats”, and the inverse of that is “If I don’t have cats, then I don’t like cats”, which is the contrapositive.

Doctor Achilles, perhaps misreading the question, answered the bigger question: Which of these are true?

In effect, he has made a truth table:

If you are unconvinced by any of the reasoning, see  Why, in Logic, Does False Imply Anything? .

So the truth table for the contrapositive is that same as for the original; this is what we mean when we say that two statements are logically equivalent .

We can instead just think through the example:

Which is more convincing? That depends upon you.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Converse Statement

A statement that is of the form "If p then q" is a conditional statement. Here 'p' refers to 'hypotheses' and 'q' refers to 'conclusion'.

For example, "If Cliff is thirsty, then she drinks water."  This is a conditional statement. It is also called an implication . The converse statement is " If Cliff drinks water then she is thirsty". 

A converse statement is the opposite of a conditional statement. It is to be noted that not always the converse of a conditional statement is true. 

For example, in geometry , "If a closed shape has four sides then it is a square" is a conditional statement, The truthfulness of a converse statement depends on the truth of hypotheses of the conditional statement.

In this mini-lesson, we will learn about the converse statement, how inverse and contrapositive are obtained from a conditional statement, converse statement definition, converse statement geometry, and converse statement symbol.

Lesson Plan

What Is Converse Statement?

A statement obtained by reversing the hypothesis and conclusion of a conditional statement is called a converse statement.

Explanation

Let us understand the terms "hypothesis" and "conclusion."

A statement which is of the form of "if p then q" is a conditional statement, where 'p' is called hypothesis and 'q' is called the conclusion.

A converse statement is gotten by exchanging the positions of 'p' and 'q' in the given condition.

For example,

"If Cliff is thirsty, then she drinks water" is a condition.

The converse statement is "If Cliff drinks water, then she is thirsty."

The hypothesis 'p' and conclusion 'q' interchange their places in a converse statement.

What Is Inverse Statement?

A statement obtained by negating the hypothesis and conclusion of a conditional statement.

An inverse statement changes the "if p then q" statement to the form of  "if not p then not q."

"If John has time, then he works out in the gym."

The inverse statement is "If John does not have time, then he does not work out in the gym." 

What Is Contrapositive Statement?

A statement obtained by exchanging the hypothesis and conclusion of an inverse statement. 

A contrapositive statement changes "if not p then not q" to "if not q to then, not p."

• The converse of the conditional statement is “If  Q  then  P .”
• The contrapositive of the conditional statement is “If not  Q  then not  P .”
• The inverse of the conditional statement is “If not  P  then not  Q .”

If it is a holiday, then I will wake up late. - Conditional statement

If it is not a holiday, then I will not wake up late. - Inverse statement

If I am not waking up late, then it is not a holiday. - Contrapositive statement

What Is a Conditional Statement? 

A conditional statement is a statement in the form of "if p then q," where 'p' and 'q' are called a hypothesis and conclusion.

A conditional statement defines that if the hypothesis is true then the conclusion is true.

"If we have to to travel for a long distance, then we have to take a taxi" is a conditional statement.

Converse of a Conditional Statement

To get the converse of a conditional statement, interchange the places of hypothesis and conclusion.

If you eat a lot of vegetables, then you will be healthy. - Conditional statement

If you are healthy, then you eat a lot of vegetables. - Converse of Conditional statement

Inverse of Conditional Statement

To get the inverse of a conditional statement, we negate both the hypothesis and conclusion.

If you read books, then you will gain knowledge. - Conditional statement

If you do not read books, then you will not gain knowledge. -Inverse of conditional statement

Contrapositive of Conditional Statement

To get the contrapositive of a conditional statement, we negate the hypothesis and conclusion and exchange their position.

Emily's dad watches a movie if he has time. - Conditional statement

If Emily's dad does not have time, then he does not watch a movie. - Contrapositive of a conditional statement

• In a conditional statement "if p then q," 'p' is called the hypothesis and 'q' is called the conclusion.
• There can be three related logical statements for a conditional statement.

Solved Examples

Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive statement of the following conditional statement.

If you win the race then you will get a prize.

The conditional statement given is "If you win the race then you will get a prize." 

It is of the form "If p then q".

Here 'p' is the hypothesis and 'q' is the conclusion.

From the given inverse statement, write down its conditional and contrapositive statements.

If there is no accomodation in the hotel, then we are not going on a vacation.

The inverse statement given is "If there is no accomodation in the hotel, then we are not going on a vacation."

It is of the form "If not p then not q"

Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive statement for the following conditional statement. 

If you study well then you will pass the exam. Solution

Given statement is - If you study well then you will pass the exam.

• If 2a + 3 <  10, then a = 3. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive statements and verify their truthfulness.

Interactive Questions 

Here are a few activities for you to practice. Select/Type your answer and click the "Check Answer" button to see the result.

Let's Summarize

The mini-lesson targeted the fascinating concept of converse statement. Hope you enjoyed learning! Now you can easily find the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of any conditional statement you are given!

At  Cuemath , our team of math experts is dedicated to making learning fun for our favorite readers, the students!

Through an interactive and engaging learning-teaching-learning approach, the teachers explore all angles of a topic.

Be it worksheets, online classes, doubt sessions, or any other form of relation, it’s the logical thinking and smart learning approach that we, at Cuemath, believe in.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. what is the negation of a statement.

A statement that conveys the opposite meaning of a statement is called its negation.

2. How do you write a converse statement?

A statement formed by interchanging the hypothesis and conclusion of a statement is its converse.

• Live one on one classroom and doubt clearing
• Practice worksheets in and after class for conceptual clarity
• Personalized curriculum to keep up with school

A free service from Mattecentrum

If-then statement

• Logical correct I
• Logical correct II

When we previously discussed inductive reasoning we based our reasoning on examples and on data from earlier events. If we instead use facts, rules and definitions then it's called deductive reasoning.

We will explain this by using an example.

If you get good grades then you will get into a good college.

The part after the "if": you get good grades - is called a hypotheses and the part after the "then" - you will get into a good college - is called a conclusion.

Hypotheses followed by a conclusion is called an If-then statement or a conditional statement.

This is noted as

$$p \to q$$

This is read - if p then q.

A conditional statement is false if hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false. The example above would be false if it said "if you get good grades then you will not get into a good college".

If we re-arrange a conditional statement or change parts of it then we have what is called a related conditional.

Our conditional statement is: if a population consists of 50% men then 50% of the population must be women.

If we exchange the position of the hypothesis and the conclusion we get a converse statemen t: if a population consists of 50% women then 50% of the population must be men.

$$q\rightarrow p$$

If both statements are true or if both statements are false then the converse is true. A conditional and its converse do not mean the same thing

If we negate both the hypothesis and the conclusion we get a inverse statemen t: if a population do not consist of 50% men then the population do not consist of 50% women.

$$\sim p\rightarrow \: \sim q$$

The inverse is not true juest because the conditional is true. The inverse always has the same truth value as the converse.

We could also negate a converse statement, this is called a contrapositive statemen t:  if a population do not consist of 50% women then the population do not consist of 50% men.

$$\sim q\rightarrow \: \sim p$$

The contrapositive does always have the same truth value as the conditional. If the conditional is true then the contrapositive is true.

A pattern of reaoning is a true assumption if it always lead to a true conclusion. The most common patterns of reasoning are detachment and syllogism.

If we turn of the water in the shower, then the water will stop pouring.

If we call the first part p and the second part q then we know that p results in q. This means that if p is true then q will also be true. This is called the law of detachment and is noted:

$$\left [ (p \to q)\wedge p \right ] \to q$$

The law of syllogism tells us that if p → q and q → r then p → r is also true.

This is noted:

$$\left [ (p \to q)\wedge (q \to r ) \right ] \to (p \to r)$$

If the following statements are true:

If we turn of the water (p), then the water will stop pouring (q). If the water stops pouring (q) then we don't get wet any more (r).

Then the law of syllogism tells us that if we turn of the water (p) then we don't get wet (r) must be true.

Video lesson

Write a converse, inverse and contrapositive to the conditional

"If you eat a whole pint of ice cream, then you won't be hungry"

• Angles, parallel lines and transversals
• Congruent triangles
• More about triangles
• Inequalities
• Mean and geometry
• The converse of the Pythagorean theorem and special triangles
• Properties of parallelograms
• Common types of transformation
• Transformation using matrices
• Basic information about circles
• Inscribed angles and polygons
• Advanced information about circles
• Parallelogram, triangles etc
• The surface area and the volume of pyramids, prisms, cylinders and cones
• SAT Overview
• ACT Overview

• Anatomy & Physiology
• Astrophysics
• Earth Science
• Environmental Science
• Organic Chemistry
• Precalculus
• Trigonometry
• English Grammar
• U.S. History
• World History

... and beyond

• Socratic Meta
• Featured Answers

What is the difference between a hypothesis and a conclusion?

And a conclusion is drawn AFTER the experiment is performed, and reports whether or not the results of the experiment supported the original hypothesis...

Related questions

• How can the scientific method be applied to everyday life?
• What are some common mistakes students make with the scientific method?
• What are hypotheses according to the scientific method?
• What is a theory according to the scientific method?
• Do scientists have to record all data precisely in order to follow the scientific method?
• What is the goal of peer review in the scientific method?
• Why is the scientific method important to follow?
• How did Tycho Brahe and Kepler employ the scientific method?
• Do all scientists use the scientific method?
• Why should scientists provide an abstract for, or summary of their research?

Impact of this question

Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

What are the differences between "inverse", "reverse", and "converse"?

What distinctions can be made among the meanings of the words "inverse", "reverse", "converse", and, for good measure, "transverse" and "obverse"? Is it ever possible to use some of them interchangeably?

Are they the same for purposes of casual discourse? Do the differences become more salient in a particular technical context, such as engineering, math, or linguistics?

• differences

• 4 I've marked the most exhaustive answer so far as the accepted answer, but I hope that doesn't discourage anyone from adding any specific, odd, technical, or otherwise interesting uses of these words. –  jscs Commented Apr 27, 2011 at 7:27
• For the logic terms, see https://www.quora.com/Debate/What-is-the-difference-between-inverse-converse-opposite-etc –  Pacerier Commented Mar 3, 2016 at 21:05

4 Answers 4

inverse : opposite or contrary in position, direction, order, or effect in mathematics - something obtained by inversion or something that can be applied to an element to produce its identity element reverse : opposite primarily in direction in law - reverse or annul in printing - make print white in a block of solid color or half tone in electronics - in the direction that does not allow significant current in geology - denoting a fault or faulting in which a relative downward movement occurred in the strata situated on the underside of the fault plane converse : corresponding yet opposing in mathematics - a theorem whose hypothesis and conclusion are the conclusion and hypothesis of another also a brand of shoe transverse : situated across from something obverse : the opposite or counterpart of something (particularly a truth) in biology - narrower at the base or point of attachment than at the apex or top

Reverse is the only one I've commonly heard in casual speech and only referring to the direction of a car (in US... don't know about UK et al). Some could be used interchangeably, but it would be best to avoid it considering that each generally has a specific meaning in its context.

• 6 It's worth noting that all of these are borrowed whole from Latin. "Vertere" is productive root in Latin but "verse" is not a productive root in English. –  SevenSidedDie Commented Apr 25, 2011 at 21:51
• 4 There is also averse to risk. –  ogerard Commented Apr 25, 2011 at 22:01
• 3 Confusingly, notwithstanding the definition above, obverse is often used as the opposite of reverse . –  Charles Commented Apr 25, 2011 at 23:25
• (I mean, in those few cases where it is used at all.) –  Charles Commented Apr 25, 2011 at 23:25
• 1 The "reverse -- in printing " entry is interesting. I would've thought that was "inverse". –  jscs Commented Apr 26, 2011 at 0:07

obverse : the front side of a coin (as opposed to the reverse)

converse and inverse in mathematical logic take a conditional hypothesis and swap or negate its clauses, respectively:

• Original hypothesis: "If I have received $100 in the mail today, I will buy a pair of pants tomorrow."
• Converse: "If I buy a pair of pants tomorrow, I have received $100 in the mail today."
• Inverse: "If I have not received $100 in the mail today, I will not buy a pair of pants tomorrow."

The truth or falsehood of the original hypothesis is not equivalent to either the converse or the inverse, but the converse and the inverse are equivalent to each other.

• Those are great! Do you think it would be useful to add an example of logical "obverse", which is linked to from the WP "inverse" page? –  jscs Commented Apr 26, 2011 at 0:09
• uh.... I answered converse and inverse because I've known about them (+ contrapositive, which is more immediately useful). I glanced at the "obversion" page in wikipedia and my eyes glazed over. –  sibbaldiopsis Commented Apr 26, 2011 at 3:20
• Late to the party: if your original statement is P => Q, then the converse is Q => P and the inverse is !P => !Q. It happens that the inverse and the converse are logically equivalent, but they are both ways of obtaining statements that are related but logically non-equivalent to the original statement. In contrast the obverse applies to statements of the form "For each s P(s) is true" (where P is some predicate) to obtain an equivalent statement. The obverse of that statement is "There is no s such that P(s) is false". Note that it doesn't apply to the general setting of propositions P, Q. –  Julien Clancy Commented Oct 14, 2015 at 17:09

These are good definitions and clarifications, but since I don't see direct answers, I will offer one. As a software engineer, I am familiar with logic, and so converse and inverse are everyday words for me.

The converse, defined as swapping hypothesis and conclusion, is of course a position change. Since reverse indicates direction, I have often heard and even used reverse as a natural substitute for converse .

Think of someone saying, "If I have to do it, you do too!" A common reply would be "And the reverse!" This is actually referring to the converse, but that would not be said by most people with whom I am familiar.

I believe that those are the only two that would be confused in casual discourse, and that the differences would indeed become more salient in technical contexts.

• "As a software engineer, I am familiar with logic" Not a requirement for a software engineer. Sometimes I wonder if it is discouraged. I blame JavaScript <s> –  Richard Haven Commented Nov 9, 2020 at 21:34

Don't forget the contrapositive , which goes from 'If I get $100, I shall buy a coat.' 'If I have not bought a coat, I have not received $100.'and is true when the original assertion were.

If A --> B (condition 'A' always implies condition 'B')

Converse: B --> A False---more than one road can lead to Rome (one might not have got the $100 but instead opted for cheaper pants)

Inverse: (for the 'not' operator '~') ~A --> ~B False, for the same reason as is the Converse. (Remember,'A-->B' doesn't mean that A were the only way to get to B.)

Contrapositive: ~B-->~A True, if the original assertion is---if fire always implies smoke, then 'no smoke' implies 'no fire'...and so the existence of 'no smoke' and 'flame' with a correctly used propane torch means that the original assertion is not true for all definitions of fire.

• 1 Your converse example switches to pants instead of coats. ;) –  MrHen Commented Jan 8, 2014 at 19:57
• Note that you changed tense in the sentence; I think it should be "If I shall not buy a coat, I won't get $100". Also, I think describing the con-/inverse as false is inaccurate; it would be more accurate to say that they don't follow from the original proposition. Formally, <math>(A implies B) does-not-imply (B implies A)</math> but not <math>(A implies B) implies (B does-not-imply A)</math>. Aside: a cute example of the contrapositive is "what doesn't make me stronger kills me". (Off-topic debate: is this a reductio ad absurdum of Nietzsche's aphorism?) –  Jonas Kölker Commented May 13, 2017 at 12:59

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged differences or ask your own question .

• Featured on Meta
• Bringing clarity to status tag usage on meta sites
• We've made changes to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy - July 2024
• Announcing a change to the data-dump process

Hot Network Questions

• Meaning of て form here: 「あなたどう思って？」と聞いた。
• Is it possible to do physics without mathematics?
• Enable all snapping types in QGIS using Python
• Resonance structure of aromatic [S4N4]2+
• using a tikz foreach loop inside a newcommand
• Need strftime() output in the buffer
• Seth and Cain take turns picking numbers from 1 to 50. Who wins?
• Flyback Diode Question
• Is the error in translation of Genesis 19:5 deliberate?
• How Can this Limit be really Evaluated?
• How do I safely remove a mystery cast iron pipe in my basement?
• Why does Russia strike electric power in Ukraine?
• Interpretation of the ideal gas single particle partition function
• default-valued optional (boolean) parameter for a new command in tikz
• Where did Geordi's eyes go?
• Reduce String Length With Thread Safety & Concurrency
• There are at least 3 versions of a quote, with 2 having different attributions. What is the original, who said it, and what does the quote mean?
• What are the limits of Terms of Service as a legal shield for a company?
• Did US troops insist on segregation in British pubs?
• What is it called when perception of a thing is replaced by an pre-existing abstraction of that thing?
• What can I do when someone else is literally duplicating my PhD work?
• Crystal Oscillator Waveform
• How is the grammar of this sentence explained?
• Sources for Raba bar bar Hana legends explanations

Have an account?

Suggestions for you See more

28.2K plays

Polynomial addition and subtraction, tens and ones, 19.9k plays, 10.8k plays, exponential relationships.

Conditional Statements, Inductive, and D...

9th - 10th grade, mathematics.

Conditional Statements, Inductive, and Deductive Reasoning

62 questions

Introducing new   Paper mode

No student devices needed.   Know more

Which of the following is a conditional statement?

All even numbers are divisible by 2.

If an even number is divisible by 2.

Then even numbers are divisible by 2.

If an integer is an even number, then it is divisible by 2.

How do you write the converse of a conditional statement?

Negate the hypothesis and conclusion

Reverse the hypothesis and conclusion

Negate and reverse the hypothesis and conclusion

Take it to Journeys and buy the converses.

Which is the inverse of the given statement:

"If you are human, then you are mortal."

If you are not human, then you are not mortal.

If you are mortal, then you are human.

You are human if and only if you are mortal.

If you are not mortal, then you are not human.

What do you call the first part of a conditional statement that follows the word "if"?

conjunction

What do you call the second part of a conditional statement that follows the word "then"?

hypoallergenic

Which of the following is the contrapositive of the given statement:

Negate the following statement:

"I love geometry."

Geometry I love

If and only if I love geometry

If I love geometry, then I do not love geometry.

I do not love geometry

Which of the following DOES NOT describe inductive reasoning?

process of reasoning based on known facts

reaches conclusion based on a pattern of specific examples

reaches conclusion based on past events

starts with an observation and works its way up

Which of the following DOES NOT describe deductive reasoning?

starts with a hypothesis and works its way down

uses evidence to reach a logical conclusion

Find the next term:

3, 5, 9, 15, 23, . . .

Which algebraic expression generalizes the pattern for the nth term?

Give a counter example to the following statement:

"All odd numbers are prime numbers."

"If candy is crunchy, then it contains nuts."

Snickers Bar

Which of the following phrases can be found in a biconditional statement?

supercalifragilisticexpialidocious

if and only if

if it implies

In order to write a biconditional statement, which must be true?

p → q p\rightarrow q p → q and q → p q\rightarrow p q → p

p → q p\rightarrow q p → q and p p p

p → q p\rightarrow q p → q and q → r q\rightarrow r q → r

p → q p\rightarrow q p → q and ∼ p → ∼ q \sim p\rightarrow\sim q ∼ p → ∼ q

Which law states that if a conditional statement is true and its hypothesis is true, then its conclusion must also be true?

Law of Detainment

Law of Detachment

Law of Syllogism

Law of Syllables

Which law states that given 2 true conditionals with the conclusion of the first being the hypothesis of the second, there exists a third true conditional having the hypothesis of the first and the conclusion of the second?

Law of Determination

Law of Solilquy

If the argument is valid, determine by which law statement 3 follows from statements 1 and 2.

(1) If you are over 54 inches tall, then you can ride the roller coaster.

(2) Cindy is 56 inches tall.

(3) Cindy can ride the roller coaster.

Law of Contrapositive

Invalid Argument

(1) If you ride your bike to school, then you exercise.

(2) If you exercise, then you are happy.

(3) If you ride your bike to school, then you are happy.

Law of Biconditionals

(1) If you loose a tooth, then the tooth fairy will bring you money.

(2) John has money.

(3) John lost a tooth.

Law of Symbolism

Write the following as a conditional statement:

"Rain makes the grass grow."

The grass will grow only if it rains.

If rain makes the grass grow.

If it does not rain, then the grass will not grow.

If it is raining, then the grass will grow.

Write the following statement as a conditional statement:

A dog with proper training will not misbehave.

If a dog has proper training, then it will not misbehave.

If a dog does not behave, then it had proper training.

A dog had proper training if and only if it will not misbehave.

What is a conjecture?

A statement believed to be true based on observations.

An example which disproves an hypothesis.

A statement that reverses the hypotheses and the conclusion.

This is used to prove that a conjecture is false.

Counterexample

Inductive Reasoning

Concluding statement

• 25. Multiple Choice Edit 2 minutes 1 pt Which number is a counterexample to the following statement? :  All numbers that are divisible by 2 are divisible by 4 0 12 28 42

Deductive reasoning means...

Guessing without any information

Sounding knowledgeable even when you are not

Testing and observing patterns to make conjectures

Drawing conclusions from situations based on facts and definitions

• 27. Multiple Choice Edit 2 minutes 1 pt Identify the hypothesis and conclusion of the conditional statement: If you give me twenty dollars, then I will be your best friend. Hypothesis: I will be your best friend Conclusion: you give me twenty dollars Hypothesis: you give me twenty dollars Conclusion: I will be your best friend Hypothesis: if you have to pay for friends Conclusion: then you probably should reevaluate your life Hypothesis: you will not have to pay twenty dollars Conclusion: if you have lots of friends
• 28. Multiple Choice Edit 1 minute 1 pt Given, "If angles are congruent, then the measures of the angles are equal." Identify the contrapositive. If the measures of the angles are equal, then the angles are congruent. If angles are not congruent, then the measures of the angles are not equal. If the measures of the angles are not equal, then the angles are not congruent. If the angles are not congruent, then the measure of the angles are equal.

Original: If Emily is not late to class, then she will not be marked tardy.

What is this? If Emily is late to class, then she will be marked tardy.

Contrapositive

What is this mean? (Given the original p --> q )

Conditional Statement

• 31. Multiple Choice Edit 3 minutes 1 pt Conditional: If Maria gets married, then the reception will be at the country club. What is this statement: If the reception is at the country club, then Maria will be getting married. Converse Inverse Contrapositive Negation

Which two statements make up the following biconditionals: "A polygon is a triangle if and only if it has exactly 3 sides."

1. If a polygon is a triangle, then the polygon has exactly three sides. 2. If a polygon has exactly three sides then it is a triangle

1. If a polygon is not a triangle, then the polygon does not have three side. 2. If a polygon does not have three sides, then it is not a triangle.

1. A polygon is a triangle. 2. The polygon has three sides.

How can you combine the following statements as a biconditional? If this month is June, then next month is July. If next month is July, then this month is June.

This month is June if and only if the next month is July.

This month is not June if and only if the next month is not July.

If this month is July, then the previous month was June.

This month is July if and only if the previous month was June.

• 34. Multiple Choice Edit 2 minutes 1 pt When can a biconditional statement be written? When the inverse and the converse are both true When the original statement (conditional statement) & the contrapositive are both true. When the converse is true. When the original statement (conditional statement) and the converse are both true.

"A bird is an animal that flies" is not a good definition because:

It does not use clearly understood terms.

It and its contrapositive are not true.

It and its converse are not true.

It and its inverse are not true.

conditional

contrapositive

Make a conclusion.

1. If a number is divisible by 10, then it is divisible by 2.

2. If a number is divisible by 2, then it is even.

If a number is divisible by 10, then it is even,

If a number is even, then it is divisible by 10.

If a number is divisible by 2, then it is even.

If a number is even, then it is divisible by 2.

The Giants have lost their last seven games. Thus, they will probably lose their next game.

What type of reasoning was used?

All students go to school. You are a student. Therefore you go to school.

Since it rained every christmas day for the past four years it will rain on christmas day this year.

A child examines ten tulips from a crop, all of them are red, and concludes that all tulips must be red.

Oviparous animals are animals that lay their eggs, Clarke has a platypus. Clarke went to clean up her platypus' nest this morning and saw a pair of eggs, so she concluded that a platypus is an oviparous animal.

If two lines do not intersect then they are coplanar and parallel, or skew. Lines AB and CD do not intersect.

Lines AB and CD are parallel and not coplanar.

Lines AB and CD are parallel and coplanar or they are skew.

Lines AB and CD are skew.

No Conclusion can be made.

If there is lightening, then it is not safe to be out in the open. Mary sees lightening from her home.

It is not safe for the lightening

No conclusion can be made.

It is not safe for Marty to be out in the open.

There is lightening.

If you go to the swimming pool, then you will enjoy yourself. If you enjoy yourself, you will want to return.

If you return to the pool you will enjoy yourself.

If you enjoy yourself, then you went to the pool.

If you go to the pool, you will want to return.

• 48. Multiple Choice Edit 2 minutes 12 pts Draw a conclusion from the statement. If a whole number is even, then its square is divisible by 4. The number I am thinking of is an even number. Then it's not odd. Then it's a whole number. Then its square is divisible by 4 Then it's even.
• 49. Multiple Choice Edit 2 minutes 1 pt Use the Law of Detachment to draw a conclusion from the two given statements. If not possible, write not possible. Statement 1: If I study for one hour each day, then I will score well on the exam Statement 2: I will score well on the exam  I study for 1 hour each day. I do not study for 1 hour each day If I do well on the exam, I studied for 1 hour each day. not possible

Which law of logic is this?

If I clean the bathroom, then I don't have to do the dishes.

I cleaned the bathroom.

Therefore, I don't have to do the dishes.

Write the statement below as a conditional statement.

Vertical Angles are congruent

Two angles are vertical if and only if they are congruent.

If two angles are congruent, then they are Vertical.

If two angles are Vertical, then they are congruent.

Write the conditional statements as a biconditional statement:

1) If B is between A and C, then AB+BC=AC.

2) If AB+BC=AC, then B is between A and C.

Segment Addition Postulate

B is between A and C when AB+BC=AC if and only if Segment Addition Postulate.

B is between A and C if and only if AB+BC=AC.

What is the conclusion that you can infer from these two premises below:

All tigers are cat

All cats are animals

Therefore the conclusion is .................................

Cat are tigers

Animals are cats

All tigers are animals

All birds have wings

No humans have wings

Thus the conclusion is ..........................................

Birds and humans have wings

No humans are birds.

birds are humans

Birds and humans are different

Law of Contrapositives

Law of Diminishing Returns

If possible use the Law of Detachment to make a conclusion.

If the band plays, then the people are happy.

The people are happy.

The band plays

The band didn't play

The people are not happy

Cannot determine

If possible use the Law of Syllogism to make a conclusion.

If Jon wins the contest, then he will get a lot of money.

If Jon gets a lot of money, then he will pay off his mortgage.

If Jon wins the contest, he will pay off his mortgage.

If Jon loses the contest, he will not pay off his mortgage.

If Jon pays off his mortgage, he will win the contest.

If my teacher assigns homework, then I can't play video games.

If my teacher assigns homework, then I do it after school.

If my teacher assigns homework, then I play video games.

If I do my homework after school, then I can play video games.

If my teacher doesn't assign homework, then I can play video games.

If the doctor suspects a broken bone, then he will take an x-ray.

Lilly's arm is red and swollen, after falling off her bike.

The doctor will not take an x-ray.

The doctor will take an x-ray.

Lilly will not go to the doctor.

If possible use the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism to make a conclusion.

If a river is the longest in the region, then it is the longest on the continent.

If a river in the region is more than 1412 miles long, then it is the longest in the region.

The Calumet River is 1624 miles long.

The Amazon is the longest on the continent.

The Calumet River is not the longest in the region

The Calumet River is less than 1412 miles long.

The Calumet River is the longest on the continent.

If person lives in Chicago, then they live in Illinois.

If a person lives in Illinois, then they live in the Midwest.

Michael lives in Chicago.

Michael does not live in Illinois.

Michael lives in the Midwest.

Michael doesn't live in the Midwest.

Steve lives on the East Coast.

Explore all questions with a free account

Continue with email

Continue with phone

Inverse vs. Converse vs. Reverse: Understanding the Differences Clearly

Marcus Froland

March 28, 2024

Words can be like a puzzle, each piece fitting neatly with another to create a clear picture. But sometimes, similar words can make the puzzle feel more like a labyrinth. Inverse, converse, and reverse are three words that often lead to confusion. They sound alike and even share a few letters, but their meanings aren’t identical twins. Instead, they’re more like cousins, related but distinct.

Unlocking the differences between these terms can clear up misunderstandings and sharpen your communication skills. Knowing when to use each word correctly is not just about grammar; it’s about painting the exact picture you have in mind with your words. So, if you’ve ever mixed them up or scratched your head wondering which to use, you’re in the right place. The distinctions are simpler than you might think, and we’re about to lay them all out. But first, let’s set the stage for why it matters.

The main subject of this discussion is understanding the difference between inverse , converse , and reverse . Each of these terms has a unique meaning and usage in the English language. The inverse refers to a situation or statement that is the opposite in position, direction, order, or effect. For example, the inverse of being happy is being sad. On the other hand, converse means a statement that switches the hypothesis and conclusion of another statement. If we say “All birds can fly,” its converse would be “Everything that can fly is a bird.” Lastly, reverse implies moving backward or in the opposite direction to what is usual. It also means to change something to its opposite, like reversing a decision. Understanding these differences helps in clear communication and avoids confusion.

Breaking Down Conditional Statements in Logic and Mathematics

Conditional statements are the foundation of logical reasoning in mathematics. These statements employ a unique structure that consists of two critical components: the hypothesis and the conclusion. By understanding these components and their interactions, we can unlock the potential of if-then statements in math and logic.

The Concept of “If-Then” Statements and Their Components

At its core, the structure of a conditional statement is comprised of a hypothesis and a conclusion. The hypothesis part is introduced after the word “if” and provides the premise of the statement. The conclusion part follows the word “then” and suggests a resultant condition based on the hypothesis. The hypothesis is notated as (p) and the conclusion as (q), resulting in the expression “If (p), then (q).”

Consider the following example:

If it is raining, then the grass is wet.

In this statement, “it is raining” serves as the hypothesis ((p)), while “the grass is wet” acts as the conclusion ((q)).

Identifying Hypothesis and Conclusion in Conditional Statements

Recognizing the hypothesis and the conclusion is integral to understanding and manipulating conditional statements . In the quintessential “if-then” statement form, one can easily identify the hypothesis as the statement following “if” and the conclusion as what comes after “then.”

To further illustrate this, let’s take a look at the table below with examples of conditional statements and their respective hypothesis and conclusion:

Conditional Statement	Hypothesis ((p))	Conclusion ((q))
If a number is even, then it is divisible by 2.	A number is even	It is divisible by 2
If you study hard, then you will pass the exam.	You study hard	You will pass the exam
If the product is defective, then the warranty is void.	The product is defective	The warranty is void

By identifying the hypothesis and conclusion in conditional statements, we can better understand their underlying logical structure and utilize them in various mathematical and logical applications, such as constructing converse, inverse, and contrapositive statements .

Converse Statements: Flipping Conditional Components

In the realm of logic and mathematics, converse statements arise from the interchange of the hypothesis and the conclusion of a conditional statement. Unlike the original conditional, the converse results in a distinct statement requiring independent evaluation for its truth value. Engaging with converse statements enhances your understanding of logical reasoning and fosters a stronger grasp of mathematical concepts and relationships.

To help illustrate the concept of converse statements , consider the following example:

If it rains, then they cancel school

By flipping the hypothesis and conclusion of this conditional statement, you construct the converse:

If they cancel school, then it rains

It is crucial to acknowledge that the truth of a converse statement doesn’t necessarily follow from the truth of the original conditional. Consequently, each statement needs to be evaluated on its own merits. For a more in-depth look at how converse statements function, ponder scenarios that involve “if-then” relationships in daily life:

• If you study, then you receive good grades
• If a figure is a square, then it has four equal sides
• If a plant receives sunlight, then it grows

Now, consider the converse statements generated from these examples:

• If you receive good grades, then you study
• If a figure has four equal sides, then it is a square
• If a plant grows, then it receives sunlight

As you can see, when comparing the original conditional statement to its converse, some may share the same truth value, while others do not. Therefore, understanding and evaluating each statement is of utmost importance.

Original Conditional Statement	Converse Statement
If it rains, then the ground is wet	If the ground is wet, then it rains
If you heat water to 100°C, then it boils	If water is boiling, then it’s heated to 100°C

Converse statements provide logical insight, pushing you to dissect conditional statements and analyze their components thoughtfully. By flipping the hypothesis and conclusion, you gain a deeper understanding of mathematical statements and the intricate conditional relationships that logic and reasoning are based upon.

The Inverse Relationship: Negating Hypotheses and Conclusions

When examining conditional statements, a profound understanding of inverse relationships is essential. An inverse statement is generated by negating both the hypothesis ( p ) and the conclusion ( q ), turning the original statement “If p , then q ” into “If not p , then not q “. This transformation is pivotal in determining logical relationships between statements, as well as their truth values.

Consider an example: the statement “If it rains, then they cancel school” can be turned into the inverse “If it does not rain, then they do not cancel school.” The creation of the inverse statement induces a direct impact on the original statement’s truth value and their logical relationship. If the inverse statement is true, then the corresponding converse statement is also true due to their logical equivalence .

How Negation Affects the Truth Value of Statements

Statement negation plays a significant role in a conditional statement’s truth value. As you negate different components of a conditional statement, it affects the truth values and their logical relationships . Understanding the effects of statement negation is crucial when working with mathematical proofs and logical reasoning.

A key principle to remember: the truth of the original statement does not guarantee the truth of its inverse statement, and vice versa.

• Negating the hypothesis does not automatically negate the conclusion.
• Negating both hypothesis and conclusion creates an inverse statement that maintains unique truth value characteristics.
• Understanding the truth value impact resulting from statement inversion is vital when evaluating logical relationships .

In summary, mastering inverse statements and negation logic is fundamental to comprehensive problem-solving and reasoning in mathematical contexts. By understanding the intricate interplay between negation and truth value, you can gain valuable insight into logical relationships and statement negation effects .

Reverse vs. Converse: Are They the Same?

When exploring the relationship between reverse and converse statements in mathematical logic , it is crucial to clarify the difference. These distinctions are vital when discussing the interchangeability and logical equivalence of statements within mathematics and logic.

The reverse of an implication is considered equal to the original implication itself. For instance, if given an implication such as “If p , then q ,” its reverse would be the same as the original statement:

If p , then q .

On the other hand, the converse of an implication involves exchanging the hypothesis and the conclusion, thereby creating a unique statement not necessarily equivalent in truth to the original implication. Given the same implication, “If p , then q ,” its converse would be:

If q , then p .

This converse statement is not inherently true if the original statement is true. Recognizing this differentiation is crucial when evaluating logical proposition relationships, especially when working with if-then statement variations .

Here’s a brief comparison of reverse and converse statements to emphasize the distinctions between them:

Statement Type	Description	Example
Reverse	Same as the original implication.	If , then .
Converse	Exchange of hypothesis and conclusion of the original implication.	If , then .

Understanding the differences between reverse and converse statements in mathematical logic allows you to recognize the nature and utility of these if-then statement variations . This knowledge is not only valuable for practicing mathematicians but also for anyone looking to strengthen their logical reasoning skills in various disciplines.

When a Statement and Its Contrapositive Hold True

In the realm of mathematics and logical reasoning, understanding the intricate relationship between a conditional statement and its contrapositive is crucial. The principle of logical equivalence underscores their significance, as it denotes that when the original statement (If (p), then (q)) holds true, so does its contrapositive (If not (q), then not (p)). This symmetry between their truth values plays a pivotal role in proving theorems and navigating complex logic structures.

As a fundamental technique in logical reasoning in math , the contrapositive relationship aids in deducing the truth of one condition from the other. For instance, suppose you’re tackling a mathematical proof involving the statement “If a quadrilateral is not a rectangle, then it does not have two pairs of parallel sides.” Employing contrapositive reasoning, you can confidently assert that if a quadrilateral has two pairs of parallel sides, then it is a rectangle. This methodical approach is paramount in deciphering various logical implications and theorems.

Ultimately, mastering the associations between original conditional statements and their contrapositive statements , as well as their implications of mathematical equivalence , equips you with essential tools for solving complex mathematical problems and proofs. Harnessing this knowledge empowers you to unravel the intertwined relationships that underpin logical discourse, thereby maximizing the efficacy of your mathematical pursuits.

Subscribe now and transform your language skills with insider tips, tricks, and exclusive content!

You May Also Like:

“Pray” vs. “Prey”: Unveiling the Linguistic Distinctions

‘til’ vs ‘till’ vs ‘until’: what’s the difference, “for me” or “for myself” find correct version, “assist with” or “assist in” – difference (with examples), rational vs. rationale: understanding the distinction, staff vs. staph homophones spelling & definition, two minute english.

English Made Simple: Two-Minute Lessons for Busy Learners

Copyright © 2024 • TwoMinEnglish.com

Geometry 1-4 to 1-5

Students also viewed