papers on hypothesis testing

Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Browse Titles

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

StatPearls [Internet].

Hypothesis testing, p values, confidence intervals, and significance.

Jacob Shreffler ; Martin R. Huecker .

Affiliations

Last Update: March 13, 2023 .

• Definition/Introduction

Medical providers often rely on evidence-based medicine to guide decision-making in practice. Often a research hypothesis is tested with results provided, typically with p values, confidence intervals, or both. Additionally, statistical or research significance is estimated or determined by the investigators. Unfortunately, healthcare providers may have different comfort levels in interpreting these findings, which may affect the adequate application of the data.

• Issues of Concern

Without a foundational understanding of hypothesis testing, p values, confidence intervals, and the difference between statistical and clinical significance, it may affect healthcare providers' ability to make clinical decisions without relying purely on the research investigators deemed level of significance. Therefore, an overview of these concepts is provided to allow medical professionals to use their expertise to determine if results are reported sufficiently and if the study outcomes are clinically appropriate to be applied in healthcare practice.

Hypothesis Testing

Investigators conducting studies need research questions and hypotheses to guide analyses. Starting with broad research questions (RQs), investigators then identify a gap in current clinical practice or research. Any research problem or statement is grounded in a better understanding of relationships between two or more variables. For this article, we will use the following research question example:

Research Question: Is Drug 23 an effective treatment for Disease A?

Research questions do not directly imply specific guesses or predictions; we must formulate research hypotheses. A hypothesis is a predetermined declaration regarding the research question in which the investigator(s) makes a precise, educated guess about a study outcome. This is sometimes called the alternative hypothesis and ultimately allows the researcher to take a stance based on experience or insight from medical literature. An example of a hypothesis is below.

Research Hypothesis: Drug 23 will significantly reduce symptoms associated with Disease A compared to Drug 22.

The null hypothesis states that there is no statistical difference between groups based on the stated research hypothesis.

Researchers should be aware of journal recommendations when considering how to report p values, and manuscripts should remain internally consistent.

Regarding p values, as the number of individuals enrolled in a study (the sample size) increases, the likelihood of finding a statistically significant effect increases. With very large sample sizes, the p-value can be very low significant differences in the reduction of symptoms for Disease A between Drug 23 and Drug 22. The null hypothesis is deemed true until a study presents significant data to support rejecting the null hypothesis. Based on the results, the investigators will either reject the null hypothesis (if they found significant differences or associations) or fail to reject the null hypothesis (they could not provide proof that there were significant differences or associations).

To test a hypothesis, researchers obtain data on a representative sample to determine whether to reject or fail to reject a null hypothesis. In most research studies, it is not feasible to obtain data for an entire population. Using a sampling procedure allows for statistical inference, though this involves a certain possibility of error. [1]  When determining whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis, mistakes can be made: Type I and Type II errors. Though it is impossible to ensure that these errors have not occurred, researchers should limit the possibilities of these faults. [2]

Significance

Significance is a term to describe the substantive importance of medical research. Statistical significance is the likelihood of results due to chance. [3]  Healthcare providers should always delineate statistical significance from clinical significance, a common error when reviewing biomedical research. [4]  When conceptualizing findings reported as either significant or not significant, healthcare providers should not simply accept researchers' results or conclusions without considering the clinical significance. Healthcare professionals should consider the clinical importance of findings and understand both p values and confidence intervals so they do not have to rely on the researchers to determine the level of significance. [5]  One criterion often used to determine statistical significance is the utilization of p values.

P values are used in research to determine whether the sample estimate is significantly different from a hypothesized value. The p-value is the probability that the observed effect within the study would have occurred by chance if, in reality, there was no true effect. Conventionally, data yielding a p<0.05 or p<0.01 is considered statistically significant. While some have debated that the 0.05 level should be lowered, it is still universally practiced. [6]  Hypothesis testing allows us to determine the size of the effect.

An example of findings reported with p values are below:

Statement: Drug 23 reduced patients' symptoms compared to Drug 22. Patients who received Drug 23 (n=100) were 2.1 times less likely than patients who received Drug 22 (n = 100) to experience symptoms of Disease A, p<0.05.

Statement:Individuals who were prescribed Drug 23 experienced fewer symptoms (M = 1.3, SD = 0.7) compared to individuals who were prescribed Drug 22 (M = 5.3, SD = 1.9). This finding was statistically significant, p= 0.02.

For either statement, if the threshold had been set at 0.05, the null hypothesis (that there was no relationship) should be rejected, and we should conclude significant differences. Noticeably, as can be seen in the two statements above, some researchers will report findings with < or > and others will provide an exact p-value (0.000001) but never zero [6] . When examining research, readers should understand how p values are reported. The best practice is to report all p values for all variables within a study design, rather than only providing p values for variables with significant findings. [7]  The inclusion of all p values provides evidence for study validity and limits suspicion for selective reporting/data mining.  

While researchers have historically used p values, experts who find p values problematic encourage the use of confidence intervals. [8] . P-values alone do not allow us to understand the size or the extent of the differences or associations. [3]  In March 2016, the American Statistical Association (ASA) released a statement on p values, noting that scientific decision-making and conclusions should not be based on a fixed p-value threshold (e.g., 0.05). They recommend focusing on the significance of results in the context of study design, quality of measurements, and validity of data. Ultimately, the ASA statement noted that in isolation, a p-value does not provide strong evidence. [9]

When conceptualizing clinical work, healthcare professionals should consider p values with a concurrent appraisal study design validity. For example, a p-value from a double-blinded randomized clinical trial (designed to minimize bias) should be weighted higher than one from a retrospective observational study [7] . The p-value debate has smoldered since the 1950s [10] , and replacement with confidence intervals has been suggested since the 1980s. [11]

Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval provides a range of values within given confidence (e.g., 95%), including the accurate value of the statistical constraint within a targeted population. [12]  Most research uses a 95% CI, but investigators can set any level (e.g., 90% CI, 99% CI). [13]  A CI provides a range with the lower bound and upper bound limits of a difference or association that would be plausible for a population. [14]  Therefore, a CI of 95% indicates that if a study were to be carried out 100 times, the range would contain the true value in 95, [15]  confidence intervals provide more evidence regarding the precision of an estimate compared to p-values. [6]

In consideration of the similar research example provided above, one could make the following statement with 95% CI:

Statement: Individuals who were prescribed Drug 23 had no symptoms after three days, which was significantly faster than those prescribed Drug 22; there was a mean difference between the two groups of days to the recovery of 4.2 days (95% CI: 1.9 – 7.8).

It is important to note that the width of the CI is affected by the standard error and the sample size; reducing a study sample number will result in less precision of the CI (increase the width). [14]  A larger width indicates a smaller sample size or a larger variability. [16]  A researcher would want to increase the precision of the CI. For example, a 95% CI of 1.43 – 1.47 is much more precise than the one provided in the example above. In research and clinical practice, CIs provide valuable information on whether the interval includes or excludes any clinically significant values. [14]

Null values are sometimes used for differences with CI (zero for differential comparisons and 1 for ratios). However, CIs provide more information than that. [15]  Consider this example: A hospital implements a new protocol that reduced wait time for patients in the emergency department by an average of 25 minutes (95% CI: -2.5 – 41 minutes). Because the range crosses zero, implementing this protocol in different populations could result in longer wait times; however, the range is much higher on the positive side. Thus, while the p-value used to detect statistical significance for this may result in "not significant" findings, individuals should examine this range, consider the study design, and weigh whether or not it is still worth piloting in their workplace.

Similarly to p-values, 95% CIs cannot control for researchers' errors (e.g., study bias or improper data analysis). [14]  In consideration of whether to report p-values or CIs, researchers should examine journal preferences. When in doubt, reporting both may be beneficial. [13]  An example is below:

Reporting both: Individuals who were prescribed Drug 23 had no symptoms after three days, which was significantly faster than those prescribed Drug 22, p = 0.009. There was a mean difference between the two groups of days to the recovery of 4.2 days (95% CI: 1.9 – 7.8).

• Clinical Significance

Recall that clinical significance and statistical significance are two different concepts. Healthcare providers should remember that a study with statistically significant differences and large sample size may be of no interest to clinicians, whereas a study with smaller sample size and statistically non-significant results could impact clinical practice. [14]  Additionally, as previously mentioned, a non-significant finding may reflect the study design itself rather than relationships between variables.

Healthcare providers using evidence-based medicine to inform practice should use clinical judgment to determine the practical importance of studies through careful evaluation of the design, sample size, power, likelihood of type I and type II errors, data analysis, and reporting of statistical findings (p values, 95% CI or both). [4]  Interestingly, some experts have called for "statistically significant" or "not significant" to be excluded from work as statistical significance never has and will never be equivalent to clinical significance. [17]

The decision on what is clinically significant can be challenging, depending on the providers' experience and especially the severity of the disease. Providers should use their knowledge and experiences to determine the meaningfulness of study results and make inferences based not only on significant or insignificant results by researchers but through their understanding of study limitations and practical implications.

• Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions

All physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals should strive to understand the concepts in this chapter. These individuals should maintain the ability to review and incorporate new literature for evidence-based and safe care. 

• Review Questions
• Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.
• Comment on this article.

Disclosure: Jacob Shreffler declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Martin Huecker declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article, provided that you credit the author and journal.

• Cite this Page Shreffler J, Huecker MR. Hypothesis Testing, P Values, Confidence Intervals, and Significance. [Updated 2023 Mar 13]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

In this Page

Bulk download.

• Bulk download StatPearls data from FTP

Related information

• PMC PubMed Central citations
• PubMed Links to PubMed

Similar articles in PubMed

• The reporting of p values, confidence intervals and statistical significance in Preventive Veterinary Medicine (1997-2017). [PeerJ. 2021] The reporting of p values, confidence intervals and statistical significance in Preventive Veterinary Medicine (1997-2017). Messam LLM, Weng HY, Rosenberger NWY, Tan ZH, Payet SDM, Santbakshsing M. PeerJ. 2021; 9:e12453. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
• Review Clinical versus statistical significance: interpreting P values and confidence intervals related to measures of association to guide decision making. [J Pharm Pract. 2010] Review Clinical versus statistical significance: interpreting P values and confidence intervals related to measures of association to guide decision making. Ferrill MJ, Brown DA, Kyle JA. J Pharm Pract. 2010 Aug; 23(4):344-51. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
• Interpreting "statistical hypothesis testing" results in clinical research. [J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2012] Interpreting "statistical hypothesis testing" results in clinical research. Sarmukaddam SB. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2012 Apr; 3(2):65-9.
• Confidence intervals in procedural dermatology: an intuitive approach to interpreting data. [Dermatol Surg. 2005] Confidence intervals in procedural dermatology: an intuitive approach to interpreting data. Alam M, Barzilai DA, Wrone DA. Dermatol Surg. 2005 Apr; 31(4):462-6.
• Review Is statistical significance testing useful in interpreting data? [Reprod Toxicol. 1993] Review Is statistical significance testing useful in interpreting data? Savitz DA. Reprod Toxicol. 1993; 7(2):95-100.

Recent Activity

• Hypothesis Testing, P Values, Confidence Intervals, and Significance - StatPearl... Hypothesis Testing, P Values, Confidence Intervals, and Significance - StatPearls

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

Connect with NLM

National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894

Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure

Help Accessibility Careers

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Hypothesis Testing | A Step-by-Step Guide with Easy Examples

Published on November 8, 2019 by Rebecca Bevans . Revised on June 22, 2023.

Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics . It is most often used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses, that arise from theories.

There are 5 main steps in hypothesis testing:

• State your research hypothesis as a null hypothesis and alternate hypothesis (H o ) and (H a  or H 1 ).
• Collect data in a way designed to test the hypothesis.
• Perform an appropriate statistical test .
• Decide whether to reject or fail to reject your null hypothesis.
• Present the findings in your results and discussion section.

Though the specific details might vary, the procedure you will use when testing a hypothesis will always follow some version of these steps.

Table of contents

Step 1: state your null and alternate hypothesis, step 2: collect data, step 3: perform a statistical test, step 4: decide whether to reject or fail to reject your null hypothesis, step 5: present your findings, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about hypothesis testing.

After developing your initial research hypothesis (the prediction that you want to investigate), it is important to restate it as a null (H o ) and alternate (H a ) hypothesis so that you can test it mathematically.

The alternate hypothesis is usually your initial hypothesis that predicts a relationship between variables. The null hypothesis is a prediction of no relationship between the variables you are interested in.

• H 0 : Men are, on average, not taller than women. H a : Men are, on average, taller than women.

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

For a statistical test to be valid , it is important to perform sampling and collect data in a way that is designed to test your hypothesis. If your data are not representative, then you cannot make statistical inferences about the population you are interested in.

There are a variety of statistical tests available, but they are all based on the comparison of within-group variance (how spread out the data is within a category) versus between-group variance (how different the categories are from one another).

If the between-group variance is large enough that there is little or no overlap between groups, then your statistical test will reflect that by showing a low p -value . This means it is unlikely that the differences between these groups came about by chance.

Alternatively, if there is high within-group variance and low between-group variance, then your statistical test will reflect that with a high p -value. This means it is likely that any difference you measure between groups is due to chance.

Your choice of statistical test will be based on the type of variables and the level of measurement of your collected data .

• an estimate of the difference in average height between the two groups.
• a p -value showing how likely you are to see this difference if the null hypothesis of no difference is true.

Based on the outcome of your statistical test, you will have to decide whether to reject or fail to reject your null hypothesis.

In most cases you will use the p -value generated by your statistical test to guide your decision. And in most cases, your predetermined level of significance for rejecting the null hypothesis will be 0.05 – that is, when there is a less than 5% chance that you would see these results if the null hypothesis were true.

In some cases, researchers choose a more conservative level of significance, such as 0.01 (1%). This minimizes the risk of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis ( Type I error ).

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

The results of hypothesis testing will be presented in the results and discussion sections of your research paper , dissertation or thesis .

In the results section you should give a brief summary of the data and a summary of the results of your statistical test (for example, the estimated difference between group means and associated p -value). In the discussion , you can discuss whether your initial hypothesis was supported by your results or not.

In the formal language of hypothesis testing, we talk about rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis. You will probably be asked to do this in your statistics assignments.

However, when presenting research results in academic papers we rarely talk this way. Instead, we go back to our alternate hypothesis (in this case, the hypothesis that men are on average taller than women) and state whether the result of our test did or did not support the alternate hypothesis.

If your null hypothesis was rejected, this result is interpreted as “supported the alternate hypothesis.”

These are superficial differences; you can see that they mean the same thing.

You might notice that we don’t say that we reject or fail to reject the alternate hypothesis . This is because hypothesis testing is not designed to prove or disprove anything. It is only designed to test whether a pattern we measure could have arisen spuriously, or by chance.

If we reject the null hypothesis based on our research (i.e., we find that it is unlikely that the pattern arose by chance), then we can say our test lends support to our hypothesis . But if the pattern does not pass our decision rule, meaning that it could have arisen by chance, then we say the test is inconsistent with our hypothesis .

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Normal distribution
• Descriptive statistics
• Measures of central tendency
• Correlation coefficient

Methodology

• Cluster sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Types of interviews
• Cohort study
• Thematic analysis

Research bias

• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Survivorship bias
• Availability heuristic
• Nonresponse bias
• Regression to the mean

Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses , by calculating how likely it is that a pattern or relationship between variables could have arisen by chance.

A hypothesis states your predictions about what your research will find. It is a tentative answer to your research question that has not yet been tested. For some research projects, you might have to write several hypotheses that address different aspects of your research question.

A hypothesis is not just a guess — it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations and statistical analysis of data).

Null and alternative hypotheses are used in statistical hypothesis testing . The null hypothesis of a test always predicts no effect or no relationship between variables, while the alternative hypothesis states your research prediction of an effect or relationship.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Bevans, R. (2023, June 22). Hypothesis Testing | A Step-by-Step Guide with Easy Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved June 12, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/hypothesis-testing/

Is this article helpful?

Rebecca Bevans

Other students also liked, choosing the right statistical test | types & examples, understanding p values | definition and examples, what is your plagiarism score.

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Understanding statistical hypothesis testing: the logic of statistical inference.

1. Introduction

2. basic idea of hypothesis testing, 3. key components of hypothesis testing, 3.1. step 1: select test statistic, 3.2. step 2: null hypothesis h 0 and alternative hypothesis h 1.

• null hypothesis: H 0 : θ = θ 0
• alternative hypothesis: H 1 : θ > θ 0
• alternative hypothesis: H 1 : θ < θ 0
• alternative hypothesis: H 1 : θ ≠ θ 0

3.3. Step 3: Sampling Distribution

• What is the sampling distribution?
• How to obtain the sampling distribution?
• How to use the sampling distribution?

3.4. Step 4: Significance Level α

3.5. step 5: evaluate test statistic from data, 3.6. step 6: determine the p-values, 3.7. step 7: make a decision about the null hypothesis.

• Decision based on the p -values: If p < α reject H 0 (14)
• Decision based on the threshold θ c : If t n > θ c reject H 0 (15)

4. Type 2 Error and Power

Connections between power and errors, 5. confidence intervals, 5.1. confidence intervals for a population mean with known variance, 5.2. confidence intervals for a population mean with unknown variance, 5.3. bootstrap confidence intervals, 6. an example and a warning, 7. historical notes and misinterpretations.

• Is the p -values the probability that the null hypothesis is true given the data? No, it is the probability of observing more extreme values than the test statistic, if the null hypothesis is true, that is, P ( x ≥ | t | | H 0 is   true ) see Equation ( 11 ). Hence, one assumes already that H 0 is true for obtaining the p -values. Instead, the question aims to find P ( H 0 | D ) .
• Is the p -values the probability that the alternative hypothesis is true given the data? No, see question (1). This would be P ( H 1 | D ) .
• If the null hypothesis is rejected, is the p -values the probability of your rejection error? No, the rejection error is the type I error given by α .
• Is the p -values the probability to observe our data sample given the null hypothesis is true? No, this would be the Likelihood.
• If one repeats an experiments does one obtain the same p -values? No, because p -valuess do not provide information about the long run frequencies of repeated experiments as the type I or type II errors. Instead, they give the probability resulting from comparing the test statistic (as a function of the data) and the null hypothesis assumed to be true.
• Does the p -values give the probability that the data were produced by random chance alone? No, despite the fact that the data were produced by H 0 assuming it is true. The p -values does not provide the probability for this.
• Does the same p -values from two studies provide the same evidence against the null hypothesis? Yes, but only in the very rare case if everything in the two studies and the formulated hypotheses is identical. This includes also the sample sizes. In any other case, p -valuess are difficult to compare with each other and no conclusion can be drawn.

8. The Future of Statistical Hypothesis Testing

9. conclusions, author contributions, conflicts of interest.

• Helbing, D. The Automation of Society Is Next: How to Survive the Digital Revolution. 2015. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2694312 (accessed on 1 June 2019).
• Hacking, I. Logic of Statistical Inference ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gigerenzer, G. The Superego, the Ego, and the id in Statistical Reasoning. In A Handbook for Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences: Methodological Issues ; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1993; pp. 311–339. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fisher, R.A. Statistical Methods for Research Workers ; Genesis Publishing Pvt Ltd.: Guildford, UK, 1925. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fisher, R.A. The Arrangement of Field Experiments (1926). In Breakthroughs in Statistics ; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1992; pp. 82–91. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fisher, R.A. The statistical method in psychical research. Proc. Soc. Psych. Res. 1929 , 39 , 189–192. [ Google Scholar ]
• Neyman, J.; Pearson, E.S. On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference: Part I. Biometrika 1967 , 20 , 1–2. [ Google Scholar ]
• Neyman, J.; Pearson, E.S. On the Problem of the Most Efficient Tests of Statistical Hypotheses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1933 , 231 , 289–337. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lehman, E. Testing Statistical Hypotheses ; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dudoit, S.; Shaffer, J.; Boldrick, J. Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments. Stat. Sci. 2003 , 18 , 71–103. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tripathi, S.; Emmert-Streib, F. Assessment Method for a Power Analysis to Identify Differentially Expressed Pathways. PLoS ONE 2012 , 7 , e37510. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Tripathi, S.; Glazko, G.; Emmert-Streib, F. Ensuring the statistical soundness of competitive gene set approaches: Gene filtering and genome-scale coverage are essential. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 , 6 , e53354. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Jiang, Z.; Gentleman, R. Extensions to gene set enrichment. Bioinformatics 2007 , 23 , 306–313. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Emmert-Streib, F. The Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Comparative Pathway Analysis. J. Comput. Biol. 2007 , 14 , 961–972. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Siroker, D.; Koomen, P. A/B Testing: The Most Powerful Way to Turn Clicks into Customers ; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mauri, L.; Hsieh, W.h.; Massaro, J.M.; Ho, K.K.; D’agostino, R.; Cutlip, D.E. Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007 , 356 , 1020–1029. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Deuschl, G.; Schade-Brittinger, C.; Krack, P.; Volkmann, J.; Schäfer, H.; Bötzel, K.; Daniels, C.; Deutschländer, A.; Dillmann, U.; Eisner, W.; et al. A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006 , 355 , 896–908. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Molina, I.; Gómez i Prat, J.; Salvador, F.; Treviño, B.; Sulleiro, E.; Serre, N.; Pou, D.; Roure, S.; Cabezos, J.; Valerio, L.; et al. Randomized trial of posaconazole and benznidazole for chronic Chagas’ disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014 , 370 , 1899–1908. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Shoptaw, S.; Yang, X.; Rotheram-Fuller, E.J.; Hsieh, Y.C.M.; Kintaudi, P.C.; Charuvastra, V.; Ling, W. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of baclofen for cocaine dependence: Preliminary effects for individuals with chronic patterns of cocaine use. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2003 , 64 , 1440–1448. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Sedlmeier, P.; Eberth, J.; Schwarz, M.; Zimmermann, D.; Haarig, F.; Jaeger, S.; Kunze, S. The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2012 , 138 , 1139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Casscells, W.; Schoenberger, A.; Graboys, T.B. Interpretation by Physicians of Clinical Laboratory Results. N. Engl. J. Med. 1978 , 299 , 999–1001. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ioannidis, J.P.A. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Med. 2005 , 2 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Banerjee, I.; Bhadury, T. Self-medication practice among undergraduate medical students in a tertiary care medical college, West Bengal. Ind. Psychiatry J. 2009 , 18 , 127–131. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Taroni, F.; Biedermann, A.; Bozza, S. Statistical hypothesis testing and common misinterpretations: Should we abandon p -values in forensic science applications? Forensic Sci. Int. 2016 , 259 , e32–e36. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Emmert-Streib, F.; Dehmer, M. Defining Data Science by a Data-Driven Quantification of the Community. Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr. 2019 , 1 , 235–251. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sheskin, D.J. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures , 3rd ed.; RC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chernick, M.R.; LaBudde, R.A. An Introduction to Bootstrap Methods with Applications to R ; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• Panagiotou, O.A.; Ioannidis, J.P.; Project, G.W.S. What should the genome-wide significance threshold be? Empirical replication of borderline genetic associations. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2011 , 41 , 273–286. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Murdoch, D.J.; Tsai, Y.L.; Adcock, J. p -valuess are random variables. Am. Stat. 2008 , 62 , 242–245. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Emmert-Streib, F.; Moutari, S.; Dehmer, M. A comprehensive survey of error measures for evaluating binary decision making in data science. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2019 , e1303. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Breiman, L. Statistics: With a View Toward Applications ; Houghton Mifflin Co.: Boston, MA, USA, 1973. [ Google Scholar ]
• Baron, M. Probability and Statistics for Computer Scientists ; Chapman and Hall/CRC: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Efron, B.; Tibshirani, R. An Introduction to the Bootstrap ; Chapman and Hall/CRC: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [ Google Scholar ]
• R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing ; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2008; ISBN 3-900051-07-0. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nix, T.W.; Barnette, J.J. The data analysis dilemma: Ban or abandon. A review of null hypothesis significance testing. Res. Sch. 1998 , 5 , 3–14. [ Google Scholar ]
• Szucs, D.; Ioannidis, J. When null hypothesis significance testing is unsuitable for research: A reassessment. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2017 , 11 , 390. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Biau, D.J.; Jolles, B.M.; Porcher, R. P value and the theory of hypothesis testing: An explanation for new researchers. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. ® 2010 , 468 , 885–892. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Lehmann, E.L. The Fisher, Neyman-Pearson theories of testing hypotheses: One theory or two? J. Am. stat. Assoc. 1993 , 88 , 1242–1249. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Perezgonzalez, J.D. Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A tutorial for teaching data testing. Front. Psychol. 2015 , 6 , 223. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Greenland, S.; Senn, S.J.; Rothman, K.J.; Carlin, J.B.; Poole, C.; Goodman, S.N.; Altman, D.G. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: A guide to misinterpretations. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2016 , 31 , 337–350. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Goodman, S. A Dirty Dozen: Twelve p -values Misconceptions. In Seminars in Hematology ; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; Volume 45, pp. 135–140. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wasserstein, R.L.; Lazar, N.A. The ASA’s statement on p -valuess: Context, process, and purpose. Am. Stat. 2016 , 70 , 129–133. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wasserstein, R.L.; Schirm, A.L.; Lazar, N.A. Moving to a World Beyond p < 0.05. Am. Stat. 2019 , 73 , 1–19. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ioannidis, J. Retiring significance: A free pass to bias. Nature 2019 , 567 , 461. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Amrhein, V.; Greenland, S.; McShane, B. Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature 2019 , 567 , 305. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Benjamin, D.J.; Berger, J.O. Three Recommendations for Improving the Use of p -valuess. Am. Stat. 2019 , 73 , 186–191. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gigerenzer, G.; Gaissmaier, W.; Kurz-Milcke, E.; Schwartz, L.M.; Woloshin, S. Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 2007 , 8 , 53–96. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Rahmatallah, Y.; Emmert-Streib, F.; Glazko, G. Gene Sets Net Correlations Analysis (GSNCA): A multivariate differential coexpression test for gene sets. Bioinformatics 2014 , 30 , 360–368. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• De Matos Simoes, R.; Emmert-Streib, F. Bagging statistical network inference from large-scale gene expression data. PLoS ONE 2012 , 7 , e33624. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Rahmatallah, Y.; Zybailov, B.; Emmert-Streib, F.; Glazko, G. GSAR: Bioconductor package for Gene Set analysis in R. BMC Bioinform. 2017 , 18 , 61. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cortina, J.M.; Dunlap, W.P. On the logic and purpose of significance testing. Psychol. Methods 1997 , 2 , 161. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hubbard, R.; Parsa, R.A.; Luthy, M.R. The spread of statistical significance testing in psychology: The case of the Journal of Applied Psychology, 1917–1994. Theory Psychol. 1997 , 7 , 545–554. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Emmert-Streib, F.; Dehmer, M. A Machine Learning Perspective on Personalized Medicine: An Automatized, Comprehensive Knowledge Base with Ontology for Pattern Recognition. Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr. 2018 , 1 , 149–156. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nickerson, R.S. Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychol. Methods 2000 , 5 , 241. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sawyer, A.G.; Peter, J.P. The significance of statistical significance tests in marketing research. J. Mark. Res. 1983 , 20 , 122–133. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 1995 , 57 , 125–133. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Efron, B. Large-Scale Inference: Empirical Bayes Methods for Estimation, Testing, and Prediction ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Emmert-Streib, F.; Dehmer, M. Large-Scale Simultaneous Inference with Hypothesis Testing: Multiple Testing Procedures in Practice. Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr. 2019 , 1 , 653–683. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Farcomeni, A. A review of modern multiple hypothesis testing, with particular attention to the false discovery proportion. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 2008 , 17 , 347–388. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bennett, C.M.; Baird, A.A.; Miller, M.B.; Wolford, G.L. Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem atlantic salmon: An argument for proper multiple comparisons correction. J. Serendipitous Unexpect. Results 2011 , 1 , 1–5. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Share and Cite

Emmert-Streib, F.; Dehmer, M. Understanding Statistical Hypothesis Testing: The Logic of Statistical Inference. Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr. 2019 , 1 , 945-961. https://doi.org/10.3390/make1030054

Emmert-Streib F, Dehmer M. Understanding Statistical Hypothesis Testing: The Logic of Statistical Inference. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction . 2019; 1(3):945-961. https://doi.org/10.3390/make1030054

Emmert-Streib, Frank, and Matthias Dehmer. 2019. "Understanding Statistical Hypothesis Testing: The Logic of Statistical Inference" Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction 1, no. 3: 945-961. https://doi.org/10.3390/make1030054

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

An Introduction to Statistics: Understanding Hypothesis Testing and Statistical Errors

Affiliations.

• 1 Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
• 2 Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
• PMID: 31656385
• PMCID: PMC6785820
• DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23259

The second article in this series on biostatistics covers the concepts of sample, population, research hypotheses and statistical errors.

How to cite this article: Ranganathan P, Pramesh CS. An Introduction to Statistics: Understanding Hypothesis Testing and Statistical Errors. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23(Suppl 3):S230-S231.

Keywords: Biostatistics; Research design; Statistical bias.

Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Similar articles

• An Introduction to Statistics: Diagnostic Tests. Ranganathan P. Ranganathan P. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Dec;25(Suppl 3):S283-S284. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24070. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID: 35615612 Free PMC article.
• An Introduction to Statistics: Choosing the Correct Statistical Test. Ranganathan P. Ranganathan P. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 May;25(Suppl 2):S184-S186. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23815. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID: 34345136 Free PMC article.
• Critical Care for COVID-19 Affected Patients: Updated Position Statement of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Mehta Y, Chaudhry D, Abraham OC, Chacko J, Divatia J, Jagiasi B, Kar A, Khilnani GC, Krishna B, Kumar P, Mani RK, Rao BK, Singh PK, Singh S, Tiwary P, Wattal C, Govil D, Dixit S, Samavedam S. Mehta Y, et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;24(Suppl 5):S225-S230. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23621. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 33354047 Free PMC article. Review.
• Understanding Research Study Designs. Ranganathan P. Ranganathan P. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec;23(Suppl 4):S305-S307. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23314. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019. PMID: 32021009 Free PMC article.
• An Introduction to Statistics - Data Types, Distributions and Summarizing Data. Ranganathan P, Gogtay NJ. Ranganathan P, et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;23(Suppl 2):S169-S170. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23198. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019. PMID: 31485129 Free PMC article. Review.
• Non-inferiority trials. Ranganathan P, Pramesh CS, Aggarwal R. Ranganathan P, et al. Perspect Clin Res. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):54-57. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_245_21. Epub 2022 Jan 6. Perspect Clin Res. 2022. PMID: 35198430 Free PMC article.
• Lacroix J,, Hébert PC,, Fergusson DA,, Tinmouth A,, Cook DJ,, Marshall JC,, et al. ABLE Investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Age of transfused blood in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2015;;372::1410-–1418.. - PubMed
• Holcomb JB,, Tilley BC,, Baraniuk S,, Fox EE,, Wade CE,, Podbielski JM,, et al. PROPPR Study Group. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;;313::471-–482.. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

• Europe PubMed Central
• PubMed Central
• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

HYPOTHESIS TESTING IN RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: A REVIEW

Hypothesis is usually considered as the principal instrument in research. It plays a major role in research. Its main function is to suggest new experiments and observations. It occupies a very small space in the thesis. A researcher cannot proceed in the research work without formulating one or more than one hypothesis. Hypothesis brings clarity, specificity and focus to a research problem. There are two types of hypothesis which are called the Null Hypothesis and the Alternative Hypothesis. There are four steps in hypothesis testing. After getting the results, the researcher tests whether the collected facts support the hypothesis formulated or not. There exist a number of statistical tools like ttest, F-test, chi-square test, D-W test, etc., to test the validity of hypothesis. Hypothesis testing shows whether the hypothesis should be accepted or rejected. It has been rightly said that “You torture the data until they confess”. This paper include the introduction, steps of hypothesis testing, function of hypothesis and testing of hypothesis.

Related Papers

IJESRT Journal

In order to survive in the present day global competitive environment, it now becomes essential for the manufacturing organizations to take prompt and correct decisions regarding effective use of their scarce resources. The content of this paper to promote the wider understanding and application of statistical methods for manufacturing decision making problems under uncertainty conditions. It is important for managers to know the statistical techniques that can be applied in industry and the ways in which these techniques can help them in their decision making. The aims of the study are the managers make decisions using Statistics. This paper will provide you with hands-on experience to promote the use of statistical thinking and techniques to apply them to make educated decisions, whenever you encounter variation in business data.

International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology (IJESRT) ISSN: 2277-9655 Chokshi et al., Journal Impact Factor (2013): 1.852

Prof. (Dr.) Jayeshkumar Pitroda

Fly-ash bricks are well known bricks. Fly-ash bricks are slow but surely replacing conventional clay bricks for wall constructions. It is green and environmentally friendly material. Fly ash brick is a really good option against Clay brick. It is green and environmentally friendly material. The fly ash bricks are comparatively lighter in weight and stronger and less costly than common clay bricks. Fly-ash Bricks is low value and high volume product and transporting it over long distances is uneconomical. But due to less awareness of fly ash bricks the different agencies of the construction wing using clay bricks. This research paper presents a comparison of fly-ash bricks and clay bricks. Based on Fly-ash bricks and clay bricks the data collected, Data will be collected through questionnaires and personal interviews targeting residential building and infrastructure projects. We can easily able to analysis of fly ash bricks and clay bricks by using Chi-square test through statistical methods (SPSS SOFTWARE).

Recently there has been a greater inclination towards natural fiber reinforced plastic composites because these are environmental friendly and cost effective to synthetic fiber reinforced composites. The availability of natural fiber and ease of manufacturing have tempted researchers worldwide to try locally available inexpensive fiber and to study their feasibility of reinforcement purposes and to what extent they satisfy the required specifications of good reinforced polymer composite for structural application. Now a-days, the natural fibres from renewable natural resources offer the potential to act as a reinforcing material for polymer composites alternative to the utilize of glass, carbon and other man-made fibres. Among an assortment of fibres, jute is widely used natural fibre due to its advantages like easy of availability, low concentration, low fabrication cost and satisfactory mechanical assets. designed for a composite material, its mechanical actions depends on many issues such as fibre content, orientation, types, length etc. In this research paper, we will study the effect of fibre loading and orientation on the mechanical, physical and water absorption behavior of jute/glass fibre reinforced epoxy based hybrid composites. A hybrid composite is a combination of two or more dissimilar kinds of fibre in which one type of fibre stability the scarcity of an additional fibre.

International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology

Ijesrt Journal

Fly-ash bricks are well known bricks. Fly-ash bricks are slow but surely replacing conventional clay bricks for wall constructions. It is green and environmentally friendly material. Fly ash brick is a really good option against Clay brick. It is green and environmentally friendly material. The fly ash bricks are comparatively lighter in weight and stronger and less costly than common clay bricks. Fly- ash Bricks is low value and high volume product and transporting it over long distances is uneconomical. But due to less awareness of fly ash bricks the different agencies of the construction wing using clay bricks. This research paper presents a comparison of fly-ash bricks and clay bricks. Based on Fly-ash bricks and clay bricks the data collected, Data will be collected through questionnaires and personal interviews targeting residential building and infrastructure projects. We can easily able to analysis of fly ash bricks and clay bricks by using Chi-square test through statistical methods (SPSS SOFTWARE).

Yapang Jamir

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is the method used to compare continuous measurements to determine if the measurements are sampled from the same or different distributions. It is an analytical tool used to determine the significance of factors on measurements by looking at the relationship between a quantitative "response variable" and a proposed explanatory "factor." This method is similar to the process of comparing the statistical difference between two samples, in that it invokes the concept of hypothesis testing. Instead of comparing two samples, however, a variable is correlated with one or more explanatory factors, typically using the F-statistic. From this F-statistic, the P-value can be calculated to see if the difference is significant. For example, if the P-value is low (P-value<0.05 or P-value<0.01-this depends on desired level of significance), then there is a low probability that the two groups are the same. The method is highly versatile in that it can be used to analyze complicated systems, with numerous variables and factors. INTRODUCTION ANOVA is a quantitative research method that tests hypotheses that are made about differences between two or more means. If independent estimates of variance can be obtained from the data, ANOVA compares the means of different groups by analyzing comparisons of variance estimates. There are two models for ANOVA, the fixed effects model, and the random effects model (in the latter, the treatments are not fixed). ANOVA is a very useful technique for testing the equality of more than two means of population. The word analysis of variance is used because the technique involves first finding out the total variation among the observation in the collection data, then assigning causes of components of variation to various factors and finally drawing conclusion about the equality of means. It also used to test the significance of a regression equation as a whole i.e., whether all the equation are equal to zero. Factor analysis is the process by which a complicated system of many variables is simplified by completely defining it with a smaller number of "factors." If these factors can be studied and determined, they can be used to predict the value of the variables in a system.

This paper aimed at studying the factors that affect the academic achievement of students at the Faculty of Sciences and Humanities, Thadiq, Shaqraa University-KSA. Multinomial Logistic Regression (M. Lo.R.) was used to analyze the data. A significant relationship was found between academic achievement and the studied factors. The variables father's educational status, mother's educational status, existence of desire in the specialization (EDS), existence of somebody helps in the study, the average number of hours of revision per day has an effect on the students’ academic achievement. Nearly 56 % of student academic achievement depends upon all the fifteen studied variables. Nearly 50 % of student academic achievement depends upon the five variables that mentioned above. The results of the present study can be made use of in planning for the enhancement of a student's academic achievement. Similar studies in other faculties are needed to support the results reached in the present study.

محمدحسن فرج

This paper aims at studying the factors that affect academic achievement of the student in Faculty of Sciences and Humanities (Thadiq) -Shaqraa University-KSA. The Logistic Regression (Lo.R.) was used to analyze the data. The important result was, there is significant relationship between the academic achievement of the student on one hand and the studied factors on the other hand. In consequence of the above mentioned results, there are two discussions: The first is to conduct similar studies in the other faculties, and the second is to take the advantages of this study in the planning and improvement of student's academic rate.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

• How it works

Hypothesis Testing – A Complete Guide with Examples

Published by Alvin Nicolas at August 14th, 2021 , Revised On October 26, 2023

In statistics, hypothesis testing is a critical tool. It allows us to make informed decisions about populations based on sample data. Whether you are a researcher trying to prove a scientific point, a marketer analysing A/B test results, or a manufacturer ensuring quality control, hypothesis testing plays a pivotal role. This guide aims to introduce you to the concept and walk you through real-world examples.

What is a Hypothesis and a Hypothesis Testing?

A hypothesis is considered a belief or assumption that has to be accepted, rejected, proved or disproved. In contrast, a research hypothesis is a research question for a researcher that has to be proven correct or incorrect through investigation.

What is Hypothesis Testing?

Hypothesis testing  is a scientific method used for making a decision and drawing conclusions by using a statistical approach. It is used to suggest new ideas by testing theories to know whether or not the sample data supports research. A research hypothesis is a predictive statement that has to be tested using scientific methods that join an independent variable to a dependent variable.  

Example: The academic performance of student A is better than student B

Characteristics of the Hypothesis to be Tested

A hypothesis should be:

• Clear and precise
• Capable of being tested
• Able to relate to a variable
• Stated in simple terms
• Consistent with known facts
• Limited in scope and specific
• Tested in a limited timeframe
• Explain the facts in detail

What is a Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis?

A  null hypothesis  is a hypothesis when there is no significant relationship between the dependent and the participants’ independent  variables . 

In simple words, it’s a hypothesis that has been put forth but hasn’t been proved as yet. A researcher aims to disprove the theory. The abbreviation “Ho” is used to denote a null hypothesis.

If you want to compare two methods and assume that both methods are equally good, this assumption is considered the null hypothesis.

Example: In an automobile trial, you feel that the new vehicle’s mileage is similar to the previous model of the car, on average. You can write it as: Ho: there is no difference between the mileage of both vehicles. If your findings don’t support your hypothesis and you get opposite results, this outcome will be considered an alternative hypothesis.

If you assume that one method is better than another method, then it’s considered an alternative hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis is the theory that a researcher seeks to prove and is typically denoted by H1 or HA.

If you support a null hypothesis, it means you’re not supporting the alternative hypothesis. Similarly, if you reject a null hypothesis, it means you are recommending the alternative hypothesis.

Example: In an automobile trial, you feel that the new vehicle’s mileage is better than the previous model of the vehicle. You can write it as; Ha: the two vehicles have different mileage. On average/ the fuel consumption of the new vehicle model is better than the previous model.

If a null hypothesis is rejected during the hypothesis test, even if it’s true, then it is considered as a type-I error. On the other hand, if you don’t dismiss a hypothesis, even if it’s false because you could not identify its falseness, it’s considered a type-II error.

Hire an Expert Researcher

Orders completed by our expert writers are

• Formally drafted in academic style
• 100% Plagiarism free & 100% Confidential
• Never resold
• Include unlimited free revisions
• Completed to match exact client requirements

How to Conduct Hypothesis Testing?

Here is a step-by-step guide on how to conduct hypothesis testing.

Step 1: State the Null and Alternative Hypothesis

Once you develop a research hypothesis, it’s important to state it is as a Null hypothesis (Ho) and an Alternative hypothesis (Ha) to test it statistically.

A null hypothesis is a preferred choice as it provides the opportunity to test the theory. In contrast, you can accept the alternative hypothesis when the null hypothesis has been rejected.

Example: You want to identify a relationship between obesity of men and women and the modern living style. You develop a hypothesis that women, on average, gain weight quickly compared to men. Then you write it as: Ho: Women, on average, don’t gain weight quickly compared to men. Ha: Women, on average, gain weight quickly compared to men.

Step 2: Data Collection

Hypothesis testing follows the statistical method, and statistics are all about data. It’s challenging to gather complete information about a specific population you want to study. You need to  gather the data  obtained through a large number of samples from a specific population. 

Example: Suppose you want to test the difference in the rate of obesity between men and women. You should include an equal number of men and women in your sample. Then investigate various aspects such as their lifestyle, eating patterns and profession, and any other variables that may influence average weight. You should also determine your study’s scope, whether it applies to a specific group of population or worldwide population. You can use available information from various places, countries, and regions.

Step 3: Select Appropriate Statistical Test

There are many  types of statistical tests , but we discuss the most two common types below, such as One-sided and two-sided tests.

Note: Your choice of the type of test depends on the purpose of your study 

One-sided Test

In the one-sided test, the values of rejecting a null hypothesis are located in one tail of the probability distribution. The set of values is less or higher than the critical value of the test. It is also called a one-tailed test of significance.

Example: If you want to test that all mangoes in a basket are ripe. You can write it as: Ho: All mangoes in the basket, on average, are ripe. If you find all ripe mangoes in the basket, the null hypothesis you developed will be true.

Two-sided Test

In the two-sided test, the values of rejecting a null hypothesis are located on both tails of the probability distribution. The set of values is less or higher than the first critical value of the test and higher than the second critical value test. It is also called a two-tailed test of significance. 

Example: Nothing can be explicitly said whether all mangoes are ripe in the basket. If you reject the null hypothesis (Ho: All mangoes in the basket, on average, are ripe), then it means all mangoes in the basket are not likely to be ripe. A few mangoes could be raw as well.

Get statistical analysis help at an affordable price

• An expert statistician will complete your work
• Rigorous quality checks
• Confidentiality and reliability
• Any statistical software of your choice
• Free Plagiarism Report

Step 4: Select the Level of Significance

When you reject a null hypothesis, even if it’s true during a statistical hypothesis, it is considered the  significance level . It is the probability of a type one error. The significance should be as minimum as possible to avoid the type-I error, which is considered severe and should be avoided. 

If the significance level is minimum, then it prevents the researchers from false claims. 

The significance level is denoted by  P,  and it has given the value of 0.05 (P=0.05)

If the P-Value is less than 0.05, then the difference will be significant. If the P-value is higher than 0.05, then the difference is non-significant.

Example: Suppose you apply a one-sided test to test whether women gain weight quickly compared to men. You get to know about the average weight between men and women and the factors promoting weight gain.

Step 5: Find out Whether the Null Hypothesis is Rejected or Supported

After conducting a statistical test, you should identify whether your null hypothesis is rejected or accepted based on the test results. It would help if you observed the P-value for this.

Example: If you find the P-value of your test is less than 0.5/5%, then you need to reject your null hypothesis (Ho: Women, on average, don’t gain weight quickly compared to men). On the other hand, if a null hypothesis is rejected, then it means the alternative hypothesis might be true (Ha: Women, on average, gain weight quickly compared to men. If you find your test’s P-value is above 0.5/5%, then it means your null hypothesis is true.

Step 6: Present the Outcomes of your Study

The final step is to present the  outcomes of your study . You need to ensure whether you have met the objectives of your research or not. 

In the discussion section and  conclusion , you can present your findings by using supporting evidence and conclude whether your null hypothesis was rejected or supported.

In the result section, you can summarise your study’s outcomes, including the average difference and P-value of the two groups.

If we talk about the findings, our study your results will be as follows:

Example: In the study of identifying whether women gain weight quickly compared to men, we found the P-value is less than 0.5. Hence, we can reject the null hypothesis (Ho: Women, on average, don’t gain weight quickly than men) and conclude that women may likely gain weight quickly than men.

Did you know in your academic paper you should not mention whether you have accepted or rejected the null hypothesis? 

Always remember that you either conclude to reject Ho in favor of Haor   do not reject Ho . It would help if you never rejected  Ha  or even  accept Ha .

Suppose your null hypothesis is rejected in the hypothesis testing. If you conclude  reject Ho in favor of Haor   do not reject Ho,  then it doesn’t mean that the null hypothesis is true. It only means that there is a lack of evidence against Ho in favour of Ha. If your null hypothesis is not true, then the alternative hypothesis is likely to be true.

Example: We found that the P-value is less than 0.5. Hence, we can conclude reject Ho in favour of Ha (Ho: Women, on average, don’t gain weight quickly than men) reject Ho in favour of Ha. However, rejected in favour of Ha means (Ha: women may likely to gain weight quickly than men)

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the 3 types of hypothesis test.

The 3 types of hypothesis tests are:

• One-Sample Test : Compare sample data to a known population value.
• Two-Sample Test : Compare means between two sample groups.
• ANOVA : Analyze variance among multiple groups to determine significant differences.

What is a hypothesis?

A hypothesis is a proposed explanation or prediction about a phenomenon, often based on observations. It serves as a starting point for research or experimentation, providing a testable statement that can either be supported or refuted through data and analysis. In essence, it’s an educated guess that drives scientific inquiry.

What are null hypothesis?

A null hypothesis (often denoted as H0) suggests that there is no effect or difference in a study or experiment. It represents a default position or status quo. Statistical tests evaluate data to determine if there’s enough evidence to reject this null hypothesis.

What is the probability value?

The probability value, or p-value, is a measure used in statistics to determine the significance of an observed effect. It indicates the probability of obtaining the observed results, or more extreme, if the null hypothesis were true. A small p-value (typically <0.05) suggests evidence against the null hypothesis, warranting its rejection.

What is p value?

The p-value is a fundamental concept in statistical hypothesis testing. It represents the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme, or more so, than the one calculated from sample data, assuming the null hypothesis is true. A low p-value suggests evidence against the null, possibly justifying its rejection.

What is a t test?

A t-test is a statistical test used to compare the means of two groups. It determines if observed differences between the groups are statistically significant or if they likely occurred by chance. Commonly applied in research, there are different t-tests, including independent, paired, and one-sample, tailored to various data scenarios.

When to reject null hypothesis?

Reject the null hypothesis when the test statistic falls into a predefined rejection region or when the p-value is less than the chosen significance level (commonly 0.05). This suggests that the observed data is unlikely under the null hypothesis, indicating evidence for the alternative hypothesis. Always consider the study’s context.

You May Also Like

Discourse analysis is an essential aspect of studying a language. It is used in various disciplines of social science and humanities such as linguistic, sociolinguistics, and psycholinguistic.

In correlational research, a researcher measures the relationship between two or more variables or sets of scores without having control over the variables.

Action research for my dissertation?, A brief overview of action research as a responsive, action-oriented, participative and reflective research technique.

USEFUL LINKS

LEARNING RESOURCES

COMPANY DETAILS

• How It Works

Help | Advanced Search

Mathematics > Statistics Theory

Title: federated nonparametric hypothesis testing with differential privacy constraints: optimal rates and adaptive tests.

Abstract: Federated learning has attracted significant recent attention due to its applicability across a wide range of settings where data is collected and analyzed across disparate locations. In this paper, we study federated nonparametric goodness-of-fit testing in the white-noise-with-drift model under distributed differential privacy (DP) constraints. We first establish matching lower and upper bounds, up to a logarithmic factor, on the minimax separation rate. This optimal rate serves as a benchmark for the difficulty of the testing problem, factoring in model characteristics such as the number of observations, noise level, and regularity of the signal class, along with the strictness of the $(\epsilon,\delta)$-DP requirement. The results demonstrate interesting and novel phase transition phenomena. Furthermore, the results reveal an interesting phenomenon that distributed one-shot protocols with access to shared randomness outperform those without access to shared randomness. We also construct a data-driven testing procedure that possesses the ability to adapt to an unknown regularity parameter over a large collection of function classes with minimal additional cost, all while maintaining adherence to the same set of DP constraints.

Submission history

Access paper:.

• HTML (experimental)
• Other Formats

References & Citations

• Google Scholar
• Semantic Scholar

BibTeX formatted citation

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, data and media associated with this article, recommenders and search tools.

• Institution

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

What is a scientific hypothesis?

It's the initial building block in the scientific method.

Hypothesis basics

What makes a hypothesis testable.

• Types of hypotheses
• Hypothesis versus theory

Additional resources

Bibliography.

A scientific hypothesis is a tentative, testable explanation for a phenomenon in the natural world. It's the initial building block in the scientific method . Many describe it as an "educated guess" based on prior knowledge and observation. While this is true, a hypothesis is more informed than a guess. While an "educated guess" suggests a random prediction based on a person's expertise, developing a hypothesis requires active observation and background research. 

The basic idea of a hypothesis is that there is no predetermined outcome. For a solution to be termed a scientific hypothesis, it has to be an idea that can be supported or refuted through carefully crafted experimentation or observation. This concept, called falsifiability and testability, was advanced in the mid-20th century by Austrian-British philosopher Karl Popper in his famous book "The Logic of Scientific Discovery" (Routledge, 1959).

A key function of a hypothesis is to derive predictions about the results of future experiments and then perform those experiments to see whether they support the predictions.

A hypothesis is usually written in the form of an if-then statement, which gives a possibility (if) and explains what may happen because of the possibility (then). The statement could also include "may," according to California State University, Bakersfield .

Here are some examples of hypothesis statements:

• If garlic repels fleas, then a dog that is given garlic every day will not get fleas.
• If sugar causes cavities, then people who eat a lot of candy may be more prone to cavities.
• If ultraviolet light can damage the eyes, then maybe this light can cause blindness.

A useful hypothesis should be testable and falsifiable. That means that it should be possible to prove it wrong. A theory that can't be proved wrong is nonscientific, according to Karl Popper's 1963 book " Conjectures and Refutations ."

An example of an untestable statement is, "Dogs are better than cats." That's because the definition of "better" is vague and subjective. However, an untestable statement can be reworded to make it testable. For example, the previous statement could be changed to this: "Owning a dog is associated with higher levels of physical fitness than owning a cat." With this statement, the researcher can take measures of physical fitness from dog and cat owners and compare the two.

Types of scientific hypotheses

In an experiment, researchers generally state their hypotheses in two ways. The null hypothesis predicts that there will be no relationship between the variables tested, or no difference between the experimental groups. The alternative hypothesis predicts the opposite: that there will be a difference between the experimental groups. This is usually the hypothesis scientists are most interested in, according to the University of Miami .

For example, a null hypothesis might state, "There will be no difference in the rate of muscle growth between people who take a protein supplement and people who don't." The alternative hypothesis would state, "There will be a difference in the rate of muscle growth between people who take a protein supplement and people who don't."

If the results of the experiment show a relationship between the variables, then the null hypothesis has been rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis, according to the book " Research Methods in Psychology " (​​BCcampus, 2015). 

There are other ways to describe an alternative hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis above does not specify a direction of the effect, only that there will be a difference between the two groups. That type of prediction is called a two-tailed hypothesis. If a hypothesis specifies a certain direction — for example, that people who take a protein supplement will gain more muscle than people who don't — it is called a one-tailed hypothesis, according to William M. K. Trochim , a professor of Policy Analysis and Management at Cornell University.

Sometimes, errors take place during an experiment. These errors can happen in one of two ways. A type I error is when the null hypothesis is rejected when it is true. This is also known as a false positive. A type II error occurs when the null hypothesis is not rejected when it is false. This is also known as a false negative, according to the University of California, Berkeley . 

A hypothesis can be rejected or modified, but it can never be proved correct 100% of the time. For example, a scientist can form a hypothesis stating that if a certain type of tomato has a gene for red pigment, that type of tomato will be red. During research, the scientist then finds that each tomato of this type is red. Though the findings confirm the hypothesis, there may be a tomato of that type somewhere in the world that isn't red. Thus, the hypothesis is true, but it may not be true 100% of the time.

Scientific theory vs. scientific hypothesis

The best hypotheses are simple. They deal with a relatively narrow set of phenomena. But theories are broader; they generally combine multiple hypotheses into a general explanation for a wide range of phenomena, according to the University of California, Berkeley . For example, a hypothesis might state, "If animals adapt to suit their environments, then birds that live on islands with lots of seeds to eat will have differently shaped beaks than birds that live on islands with lots of insects to eat." After testing many hypotheses like these, Charles Darwin formulated an overarching theory: the theory of evolution by natural selection.

"Theories are the ways that we make sense of what we observe in the natural world," Tanner said. "Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts." 

• Read more about writing a hypothesis, from the American Medical Writers Association.
• Find out why a hypothesis isn't always necessary in science, from The American Biology Teacher.
• Learn about null and alternative hypotheses, from Prof. Essa on YouTube .

Encyclopedia Britannica. Scientific Hypothesis. Jan. 13, 2022. https://www.britannica.com/science/scientific-hypothesis

Karl Popper, "The Logic of Scientific Discovery," Routledge, 1959.

California State University, Bakersfield, "Formatting a testable hypothesis." https://www.csub.edu/~ddodenhoff/Bio100/Bio100sp04/formattingahypothesis.htm  

Karl Popper, "Conjectures and Refutations," Routledge, 1963.

Price, P., Jhangiani, R., & Chiang, I., "Research Methods of Psychology — 2nd Canadian Edition," BCcampus, 2015.‌

University of Miami, "The Scientific Method" http://www.bio.miami.edu/dana/161/evolution/161app1_scimethod.pdf  

William M.K. Trochim, "Research Methods Knowledge Base," https://conjointly.com/kb/hypotheses-explained/  

University of California, Berkeley, "Multiple Hypothesis Testing and False Discovery Rate" https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~hhuang/STAT141/Lecture-FDR.pdf  

University of California, Berkeley, "Science at multiple levels" https://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/howscienceworks_19

Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now

Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.

What's the difference between a rock and a mineral?

Earth from space: Mysterious, slow-spinning cloud 'cyclone' hugs the Iberian coast

4,000-year-old 'Seahenge' in UK was built to 'extend summer,' archaeologist suggests

Most Popular

• 2 Rare fungal STI spotted in US for the 1st time
• 3 James Webb telescope finds carbon at the dawn of the universe, challenging our understanding of when life could have emerged
• 4 Neanderthals and humans interbred 47,000 years ago for nearly 7,000 years, research suggests
• 5 Noise-canceling headphones can use AI to 'lock on' to somebody when they speak and drown out all other noises
• 2 Bornean clouded leopard family filmed in wild for 1st time ever
• 3 What is the 3-body problem, and is it really unsolvable?
• 4 7 potential 'alien megastructures' spotted in our galaxy are not what they seem

Enhancing system safety in critical architectures: Augmented hypothesis testing with early design knowledge

• M. Rashid, Fryad Khalid

Hypothesis testing is a valuable method used to investigate ideas and test predictions arising from theories based on available data. In the context of critical system architecture, there is a need to effectively utilize hypothesis testing to identify faulty paths and improve system safety. This research aims to propose guidelines and best practices for presenting hypothesis testing in critical system architecture. The problem addressed in this study is the underutilization of hypothesis testing in life-critical system methods, resulting in a lack of identification of faulty paths. To address this challenge, we propose an enhanced pathway analysis technique that integrates error-derived information from a system's architectural description, thereby augmenting traditional hypothesis testing methods. By investigating various paths, we aim to identify false positive and false negative errors in life-critical system architecture. Furthermore, the proposed method is validated based on specific validation criteria for each step such as system boundary, assumption, content/architecture, and traceability validations. Also, the method is evaluated based on our claims. The results of our research highlight the significance of tracing errors in early system knowledge. By leveraging the augmented hypothesis testing method, we are able to identify hazards, safety constraints, and specific causes of unsafe actions more effectively. The findings emphasize the importance of integrating early design knowledge into hypothesis testing for enhanced hazard identification and improved system safety.

• DOI: 10.1007/s11276-024-03777-3
• Corpus ID: 270219571

An INS/UWB joint indoor positioning algorithm based on hypothesis testing and yaw angle

• Long Cheng , Fuyang Zhao , Wenhao Zhao
• Published in Wireless networks 2 June 2024
• Engineering, Computer Science

5 References

Greensky: a fair energy-aware optimization model for uavs in next-generation wireless networks, the navigation of mobile robot in the indoor dynamic unknown environment based on decision tree algorithm, an approach to robust ins/uwb integrated positioning for autonomous indoor mobile robots, research on pf-slam indoor pedestrian localization algorithm based on feature point map, non-parametric location estimation in rough wireless environments for wireless sensor network, related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers