Leisure crafting
*The purpose column contains direct (verbatim) quotes from each record under evaluation. NA, Not applicable.
Job crafting and perceived opportunity to craft.
The majority of records ( n = 32) concerned job crafting. Appendix A shows the characteristics of the 32 job crafting records. Most records conceptualize job crafting as involving some combination of task, relational, cognitive, physical, skill, promotion-oriented, and prevention-oriented crafting behaviors. These categorized behaviors are used to optimize job resources and demands to create positive meaning or outcomes. Specific approaches like daily crafting, role-based crafting, perceived opportunity to craft, and crafting self-efficacy are also covered.
Looking at the components of job crafting, different perspectives were presented. The first perspective showed that job crafting has three main dimensions: task crafting, relational crafting, and cognitive crafting . Eight papers referred to these three dimensions (e.g., Berg et al., 2013 ; Slemp and Vella-Brodrick, 2013 ; Niessen et al., 2016 ). Task crafting refers to “altering the set of responsibilities prescribed by a formal job description by adding or dropping tasks, altering the nature of tasks, or changing how much time, energy, and attention are allocated to various tasks” ( Berg et al., 2013 , p. 2). Relational crafting refers to “exercising discretion about whom one interacts with at work” ( Slemp and Vella-Brodrick, 2013 , p. 127). Cognitive crafting “comprises re-framing how employees perceive their job and altering their cognitive representation of the job” ( Niessen et al., 2016 , p. 1289). Berg et al. (2010) used these dimensions but named them task emphasizing, job expanding, and role re-framing . Biron et al. (2023) used physical crafting as a dimension of job crafting instead of task crafting. They described physical crafting as the “active efforts to maintain work-nonwork boundaries and task allocation through managing the quantity, scope, and location of job tasks” ( Biron et al., 2023 , p. 3). Bindl et al. (2019) , p. 607 included promotion-oriented job crafting (“approach whereby the employee adds to and extends existing job aspects”) and prevention-oriented job crafting (“active changes to one’s job that will prevent negative outcomes from occurring”). Prevention-oriented job crafting does not constitute a withdrawal from work but rather proactive behavior. Bindl et al. (2019) , p. 607 furthermore added skill crafting that can occur as promotion-oriented (“gaining a wide range of skills through seeking out training opportunities or engaging in stretching assignments/projects”) or prevention-oriented (“minimizing failures by focusing on what one does best and optimizing performance in one’s area of expertise”). Lazazzara et al. (2020) , Bruning and Campion (2018) , Hu et al. (2020) , and Melo et al. (2021) used the terms approach and avoidance crafting. Approach crafting is often defined as attempts “directed toward solving problems, improving the work situation, and accepting and interpreting stressors in a positive way” ( Melo et al., 2021 , p. 1307). Avoidance crafting refers to “efforts to evading, reducing or eliminating parts of one’s work” ( Bruning and Campion, 2018 , p. 8). Furthermore, Melo et al. (2021) , Hu et al. (2020) , and Zhang and Parker (2019) described job crafting with the term behavioral crafting instead of task and relational crafting. Hu et al. (2020) described behavioral crafting as conscious efforts to change the nature of tasks and relationships at work.
Another view on job crafting is finding ways to optimize one’s job resources and manage job demands ( Tims et al., 2012 ). Thirteen records drew from this perspective and classified these behaviors as increasing structural job resources (“resources variety, opportunities for development, and autonomy”; Tims et al., 2012 , p. 176), increasing social job resources (“gaining access to instrumental and emotional support from others and fulfilling their psychological need for relatedness”; Petrou et al., 2017 , p. 132), increasing challenging demands (“attempts to engage in new activities”; Nielsen and Abildgaard, 2012 , p. 376), and decreasing hindering demands in this dimension (“efforts to reduce aspects or areas at work which drain energy”; Tims et al., 2012 , p. 175). Nielsen and Abildgaard (2012) also included decreasing social job demands (“active attempts to avoid emotionally challenging situations”; p. 376) in their job crafting dimensions. Kooij et al. (2015) classified these dimensions into accommodative crafting (“crafting activities directed toward regulating losses”; p. 156) and developmental crafting (“crafting activities that are directed toward learning new skills or growth”; p. 156). Lichtenthaler and Fischbach (2016) divided the resources and demands dimensions into promotion-focused job crafting (increasing resources and challenging demands) and prevention-focused job crafting (decreasing hindering demands). Demerouti and Peeters (2018) used the same division of the resources and demands but labeled them expansion-oriented (seeking resources and challenges) and reduction-oriented (reducing demands). Demerouti and Peeters (2018) and Roczniewska et al. (2020) added optimizing resources (“the simplification or optimization of work processes to make them more efficient”; Demerouti and Peeters, 2018 , p. 211) to this dimension. Melo et al. (2021) mentioned resources and demands in the cognitive and behavioral crafting practices within approach and avoidance crafting.
The results further showed that job crafting might include behaviors where individuals are crafting toward strengths (“the self-initiated changes that individuals make in the task boundaries of their work to make better use of their strengths”; Kooij et al., 2017 , p. 5) and crafting toward interests (sculpting and changing task boundaries at work to access and work within one’s interests; Kooij et al., 2017 ). Further, Kuijpers et al. (2020) included crafting toward development (“the initiatives that employees take to realize their potential by creating developmental opportunities for themselves”; p. 3). Kooij et al. (2020) further explored crafting as a daily activity, finding support for two behaviors: daily interests (“the self-initiated changes that individuals make in their work to make it more enjoyable”; p. 165) and the term daily work pressure (“the self-initiated changes that individuals make in their work to lower their work pressure”; p. 165) crafting .
Finally, Rofcanin et al. (2019) described relational job crafting as a form of job crafting. Relational crafting consists of expansion-oriented practices (expanding the type, number, and meaning of interactions employees have with coworkers at work) and contraction-oriented relational job crafting practices (contracting the type, number, and meaning of interactions employees have with coworkers at work). Van Wingerden and Niks (2017) described the dimension of perceived opportunity to craft (POC), which describes “employees’ perception of their opportunity to craft their job and may determine whether they will proactively craft their job” (p. 1). Wessels et al. (2019) described time-spatial job crafting with the elements of reflection (“a deliberate process of thinking about the tasks and private demands and working hours, places, and locations of work available on any particular”; p. 5), selection (“the actual choice of working hours, work locations, and workplaces, which is then likely to play a part in reaching the best time/spatial-demands fit”; p. 5), and adaption (“performing adaptive behaviors that address changing condition”; Hirschi et al., 2015 , p. 1).
The characteristics of the six records about work-life balance crafting and home crafting can be found in Appendix B . Five records focused on gaining more insights into work-life balance crafting. In contrast, Demerouti et al. (2020) focused on home crafting using empirical data in a quantitative study. The records about work-life balance crafting used empirical data (qualitative, n = 4 and both quantitative and qualitative, n = 1). Caringal-Go et al. (2022) focused on employees with telecommuting work arrangements, Dreyer and Busch (2021) focused on co-working couples running their own small family business, and Jammaers and Williams (2021) focused on individuals with a disability. Four records explored strategies, techniques, and/or activities individuals use to shape their work-life balance. Jammaers and Williams (2021) argue that studies on work-life balance have neglected the impact of self-care needs of people with disabilities. The five records yielded their definition of work-life balance crafting, but all were based on existing definitions.
Work-life balance crafting is “proactive, goal-oriented and self-initiated activities to shape boundaries and manage WLB in physical, cognitive, and relational ways” ( Dreyer and Busch, 2021 , p. 2). Reflecting on the presented dimensions of work-life balance-and home crafting, the results showed that most of the included records shared three components: physical-, cognitive-, and relational crafting. Physical crafting describes “how work is organized, and it entails joint decisions to change and distribute demands” ( Dreyer and Busch, 2021 , p. 12). Cognitive crafting “involves defining and framing perceptions of what a job means and entails” ( Sturges, 2012 , p. 1541). Finally, relational crafting “involves strategies workers employed to manage both work and non-work relationships” ( Caringal-Go et al., 2022 , p. 123).
Further, one record included physical crafting as a dimension of work-life balance crafting . It splits this crafting type into two dimensions: temporal-and locational (physical) crafting ( Jammaers and Williams, 2021 ). The paper by Jammaers and Williams (2021) described physical temporal crafting as the orienting “around controlling the length of a working day” (p. 122). On the other hand, Physical locational crafting is described as the “strategy, locational crafting, employees change the location of their work or home, to cut down the hours needed to get to or physically be present in their standard workplace” ( Jammaers and Williams, 2021 , p. 122).
Like work-life balance crafting, home crafting was found as an additional way individuals craft the nature and function of their home lives. Demerouti et al. (2020) defined home crafting as “changes that employees make to balance their home demands and home resources with their personal abilities and needs, to experience meaning and create or restore their person-environment fit” (p. 1013). These authors distinguished between three types of home crafting behaviors: seeking home resources (strategies employed at home to increase the availability of the required resources needed to manage home demands and to achieve goals), seeking home challenges (seeking new challenging tasks or taking on more responsibilities once home tasks are completed) and reducing home demands (efforts to lessen the emotional, psychological, or physical taxing aspects of home life).
The next category of crafting strategies derived from the literature relates to crafting activities in one’s leisure time. The results summarized in Appendix C show that these crafting strategies comprise leisure crafting ( n = 4) and off-job crafting ( n = 1). The records about leisure crafting were qualitative ( n = 1), quantitative ( n = 2), and mixed-method ( n = 1) in nature. The off-job crafting paper by Kosenkranius et al. (2020) was a quantitative study, whereas Tsaur et al. (2020) developed a scale for leisure crafting. Three records proposed leisure-crafting dimensions/strategies, and Kosenkranius et al. (2020) developed and designed a framework for off-job crafting. Petrou and Bakker (2016) focused on employee leisure crafting. Berg et al. (2010) described leisure crafting pursuing unanswered callings.
Leisure crafting is defined as “the proactive pursuit of leisure activities targeted at goal setting, human connection, learning, and personal development” ( Petrou and Bakker, 2016 , p. 508). In this respect, two approaches were apparent. First, Berg et al. (2010) focused on crafting leisure in pursuit of unanswered occupational callings . This record divided leisure crafting into two dimensions: vicarious experiencing (“seeking fulfillment through others’ participation in one’s own unanswered calling”; p. 980) and hobby participation (“pursuing leisure and volunteer activities related to an unanswered calling outside of work”; p. 980).
Second, three approaches drew from the conservation of resources theory ( Petrou and Bakker, 2016 ; Petrou et al., 2017 ; Tsaur et al., 2021 ) in their conceptualization of leisure crafting. These three records indicated that leisure crafting pertains to efforts associated with increasing resources and managing demands. These authors argued that leisure crafting consists of three dimensions: increasing social resources, increasing structural resources, and increasing challenging demands. Increasing social resources is described as “gaining access to instrumental and emotional support from others and fulfilling their psychological need for relatedness” ( Petrou et al., 2017 , p. 132). Increasing structural resources is “creating enriched jobs and a motivating job environment” ( Petrou et al., 2017 , p. 132). Lastly, increasing challenging demands is the “increasing feelings of competence and mastery experiences and by creating a challenging environment that promotes growth and learning” ( Petrou et al., 2017 , pp. 132–133). Tsaur et al. (2021) added decreasing leisure barriers as an additional dimension. Decreasing leisure barriers refers to “reduce factors hindering leisure participation” ( Tsaur et al., 2021 , p. 6). Additionally, Petrou and Bakker (2016) argued that leisure crafters actively craft through three activities: Goal setting (setting personal goals and creating strategies for actively achieving such through leisure activities), building human connection (increasing social contact with others and implementing strategies to develop new human relations during leisure time) and pursuing learning and personal development opportunities (seeking growth and development opportunities via leisure activities).
Like leisure crafting, Kosenkranius et al. (2020) introduced off-job crafting as a concept that refers to employees’ proactive and self-initiated changes in their non-working lives to satisfy their psychological needs. From this perspective, off-job crafting comprises of six proactive behaviors: crafting for detachmen t (“mentally disengaging from work-related matters”), crafting for relaxation (“proactively striving for feeling physically well and for reducing effortful activities”), crafting for autonomy (“striving for a feeling of being in control over one’s actions, life, and choices”), crafting for mastery (“seeking learning opportunities and optimal challenges to experience feelings of achievement and competence”), crafting for meaning (“engaging in activities that individuals perceive as opportunities to gain something valuable in life”), and crafting for affiliation (“the desire to experience relatedness and belongingness with other people”; Kosenkranius et al., 2020 , p. 2).
Career crafting and reemployment crafting emerged as distinctive crafting strategies individuals employ to facilitate career progression or to gain meaningful employment. Appendix D summarizes the different perspectives relating to career- ( n = 3) and reemployment crafting ( n = 1). De Vos et al. (2019) provided an overview of career crafting, while Lee et al. (2021) introduced a career crafting assessment, and Hulshof et al. (2020) introduced the concept of reemployment crafting.
Career crafting is defined as “a set of proactive and congruence-seeking behaviors that (a) broadens career-relevant resources in response to the evolving nature of jobs and (b) explores career options more congruent to one’s changing needs, values, and interests” ( Lee et al., 2021 , p. 718). Lee et al. (2021) divided career crafting into three dimensions: career-level task, career-level relationship, and career-level cognition crafting . Career-level task crafting is “the practice of changing the type, scope, and number of job tasks to suit an individual’s strengths and values better” ( Lee et al., 2021 , p. 718–719), which includes expanding task boundaries (“take on extra tasks to experience new career-related responsibilities in their organization”; Lee et al., 2021 , p. 731) . Career-level relationship crafting is defined as changes in “the amount and quality of interactions with other people encountered on the job” ( Lee et al., 2021 , p. 719) and includes changing relational boundaries (“the vital role of proactive relational crafting in producing positive career outcomes”; Lee et al., 2021 , p. 731) and utilizing relational resources (“the vital role of proactive relational crafting in producing positive career outcomes”; Lee et al., 2021 , p. 731). Career-level cognition crafting “involves altering the individual’s perception of their work, such as interpreting their job as a part of fulfilling their life story instead of viewing work as a means of living” ( Lee et al., 2021 , p. 719). This form of crafting includes reflecting positive career meaning (“indicating that career crafters view their careers as a significant part of their life”; Lee et al., 2021 , p. 731).
Tims and Akkermans (2020 , p. 14) explained that proactive career behaviors “should allow individuals to achieve life and career success.” Tims and Akkermans (2020) split proactive career behaviors into proactive career reflection and construction . Proactive career reflection represents “individuals who proactively reflect on their career motivations and skills (e.g., on motivations and qualities; p. 22).” Proactive career construction reflects “individuals who proactively try to advance their careers by networking, may be more likely to achieve careers they find fulfilling [e.g., networking and setting goals]”; ( Tims and Akkermans, 2020 , p. 22).
In their approach to career crafting, De Vos et al. (2019) described career crafting as an “Individual’s proactive behaviors aimed at optimizing career outcomes through improving person-career fit” (p. 129). Individuals should actively craft their careers over time by (a) reflecting on and being mindful of their career aspirations and motivation and (b) making choices that can impact both short-term and long-term success.
Finally, reemployment crafting was introduced as a set of behaviors and strategies for the unemployed and drew from the conservation of resources theory. Reemployment crafting is described as “the proactive, self-initiated behaviors undertaken by the unemployed to shape the environmental conditions of their job search in a way that enhances person-environment (P-E) fit during the job search process” ( Hulshof et al., 2020 , p. 58). Reemployment crafting consists of three dimensions: seeking resources (the individual’s personality, social support, financial resources, and ability to structure one’s time during unemployment) , reducing hindering demands (minimizing those aspects of the job search that exceed one’s capabilities), and seeking challenging demands (creating more positively interpreted demands to feel motivated to continue one’s job search).
Crafting strategies and behaviors that could not be classified into the aforementioned categories were classified as miscellaneous crafting types. These crafting strategies represent new or emerging research fields, the characteristics of which are summarized in Appendix E . This category includes life-crafting ( n = 2), leader role crafting ( n = 1), study crafting ( n = 1), needs crafting ( n = 1), bodily crafting ( n = 1), and crafting within and across life domains ( n = 1). The records relating to leader role crafting, bodily crafting , and study crafting were qualitative, whereas those describing needs crafting and life-crafting employed mixed-method approaches. The final life-crafting record and the record about crafting within and across life domains were theoretical. Three records introduced new concepts, and two records provided more insights into an already-known concept. Two records developed and validated a measure for a concept, and one validated the adaption of the job demands-resources theory. De Bloom et al. (2020) proposed a model to account for past conceptualizations of crafting motives.
Bodily crafting is described as “the unofficial techniques and activities disabled employees use to work on their bodies and keep fit for both work and non-work purposes to better articulate life and work–to better grasp the embodied experience of a neglected group of workers” ( Jammaers and Williams, 2021 , p. 120). Jammaers and Williams (2021) mentioned two dimensions of bodily crafting, namely cognitive crafting (“employees redefining what WLB means to them”; p. 122) and relational crafting (“building good relationships with key people in one’s environment, both inside and outside the workplace, to establish a better balance”; p. 122).
Study crafting is described as “the proactive changes that students make in their study demands and study resources, and therefore the active influence of the student on his or her study environment” ( Körner et al., 2021 , p. 14). Study crafting consists of increasing structural and social resources and limiting study demands. Increasing structural resources are behaviors that influence the study’s design. Increasing social resources is the social aspect of one’s study and consists of social support from lecturers and social support from fellow students. Limiting study demands are concerned with the psychological, physical, social, or organizational study aspects that require effort and are associated with mental or physiological costs ( Körner et al., 2021 ).
“Life-crafting is about (1) finding out what you stand for (i.e., values and passions), (2) finding out how to make it happen (i.e., goal-attainment plans), and (3) telling someone about your plans (i.e., public commitment; Schippers and Ziegler, 2019 , p. 12).” Seven steps were designed to craft lives. These steps are (1) discovering values and passion, (2) reflecting on current and desired competencies and habits, (3) reflecting on present and future social life, (4) reflecting on a possible future career, (5) writing about the ideal future, (6) writing down specific goal attainment and “if-then” plans, and (7) making public commitments to the goals set.
Chen et al. (2022) described life-crafting as “conscious efforts individuals exert to create meaning in their lives through (a) cognitively (re-)framing how they view life, (b) by seeking social support systems to manage life challenges, and (c) to actively seeking challenges to facilitate personal growth” (p. 1). Cognitive crafting is the “individual’s ability to proactively reshape or cognitively re-frame the physical, cognitive or social features of work or life in order for it to be perceived as more meaningful” (p. 1). Seeking social support is defined as “the extent to which individuals seek out social support systems and networks to achieve personal/professional goals and aid in managing adversity” (p. 1). Seeking challenges is “the active efforts implemented by individuals to stretch their current capabilities and learn new skills/abilities to facilitate personal growth and environmental mastery” ( Chen et al., 2022 , pp. 12–13).
Crafting within and across life domains is described as a motivated process, including goal-directed initiation and engagement in crafting efforts to satisfy psychological needs ( De Bloom et al., 2020 ). It consists of approach-and avoidance-focused crafting strategies . Approach-focused strategies consist of the “expansion-oriented crafting efforts aimed at approaching or adding desirable aspects of work or nonwork identities” ( De Bloom et al., 2020 , p. 1424) and include autonomy (“the need to decide by oneself which activities to complete”), competence (“the need to effectively bring about desired effects and outcomes”), and relatedness (“the need to feel close and connected to significant others”; Bindl et al., 2019 , p. 606). Avoidance-focused crafting strategies are “ contraction-oriented crafting aimed at avoiding or reducing the negative aspects of work or nonwork roles” ( De Bloom et al., 2020 , p. 1424). Avoidance needs include detachment (a subjective experience that goes beyond the pure physical distance from one’s workplace; Sonnentag and Fritz, 2015 , p. 74). Relaxation (a process often associated with leisure activities is characterized by a state of low activation and increased positive affect; Sonnentag and Fritz, 2007 , p. 206), whereas stress reduction is the need for strategies that manage one’s reaction to stress and induce feelings of calmness and relaxation.
Needs crafting is “the proactive self-management of need-based experiences and entails both awareness of one’s personal sources of psychological need satisfaction and a tendency to act upon this awareness” ( Laporte et al., 2021 , p. 68). The three dimensions of need crafting are autonomy need crafting, competence need crafting, and relatedness need crafting . Autonomy need crafting are activities that allow for a better realization of one’s personal interests, values, and preferences. Competence need crafting consists of activities conducive to one’s skill development and emerging mastery. Lastly, relatedness need crafting is about creating genuine, reciprocal care and intimate relationships.
Finally, leader role crafting “is a conscious, purpose-driven activity aimed at influencing the development of leader roles and exploring how it is interlinked with role identities” ( Gjerde and Ladegård, 2019 , p. 45). Leader role crafting includes leader role identity, personal role definition, and subordinates’ role expectations. Role-crafting strategies consist of the steps (1) present, (2) adapt, (3) challenge, and (4) explore. Present consists of inform (inform subordinates about how they will enact the leader role) and demonstrate (show [behaviorally and symbolically] how they interpret the leader role) elements. Adapt includes comply (compliance to subordinate’s leader role expectations) and moderate behavior (alter behavior to meet subordinates’ leader role expectations) facets. Challenge is divided into persuade (sell in an attempt to convince subordinates about their own leader role conception) and oppose (oppose role expectations to fight for their own leader role conception) components. Explore consists of experiment with old ways (exploring old ways of enacting the leader role by drawing upon experience from previous roles) and experiment with new ways (copying ways of enacting the leader role from role models and improvising with new forms of enacting the leader role).
The extracted data were subjected to conventional content analysis to determine the overlap among various crafting approaches and their underlying behaviors. This involved an iterative process of classification and categorization, which is summarized in Table 2 . First, the conceptual overlap between crafting behaviors in different domain-specific crafting strategies was identified and categorized. The results showed that 223 categories of crafting could be extracted from the data. From these crafting categories, 48 elements of crafting could be identified. These elements represented general crafting behaviors that could be subjected to further categorization. Second, the elements were categorized into seven broader themes representing general ‘life-crafting strategies’: cognitive crafting, environmental crafting, relational crafting, resources-demands crafting, skill crafting, and task crafting. Third, for inclusion into our final model of life-crafting, crafting behaviors (or elements) should have been present in at least two of the three broader domain-specific contexts. To simplify the classification process, the crafting behaviors or elements were categorized into three broad domains: crafting at work (job crafting, career crafting, reemployment crafting), crafting at home (home crafting, work-life balance crafting, leisure crafting, off-job crafting), and miscellaneous crafting. For an element to be included in the Holistic Life-crafting Model, it must be prevalent in at least two of the three crafting domains. Table 2 presents the frequency of each crafting behavior in each life domain.
Content Analysis: Life Crafting Strategies, Behaviors, and Domains
Cognitive Crafting | Altering perceptions | Redefine view of tasks | 3 | - | - | 3 |
Acceptance | Accepting the conditions of one’s work roles | - | 1 | - | 1 | |
Identify Formation | Creating a positive self-concept in non-work domains through investing in important non-work identities such as that of a family member, friend or volunteer | 3 | - | 8 | 11 | |
Reflective Practices | Reflect on and being mindful about aspirations and motivations | 4 | - | 4 | 8 | |
Meta-Cognition | Thinking about the process through which individuals interpret and enact roles and make decisions | 3 | - | - | 3 | |
Cognitive Detachment | Mentally disengaging from work-related matters | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Strategic Risk Taking (Autonomy of Choice) | Viewing (im)balance as a consequence of choice/responsibility | 1 | - | 5 | 6 | |
Expanding Perceptions | Widening one's understanding of work's influence/impact or purpose | 6 | - | - | 6 | |
Cognitive Withdrawal | Offloading responsibility for incidents or critical situations onto colleagues | 3 | - | - | 3 | |
Focusing Perceptions | Emphasize the positive qualities of work | 2 | - | 1 | 3 | |
Linking Perceptions | Mentally connecting certain activities or relationships to interests, outcomes, or elements of identities that are meaningful | 3 | - | - | 3 | |
Environmental Crafting | Crafting Towards Development | The initiatives that employees take to realize their potential by creating developmental opportunities for themselves, such as opportunities to apply their unused knowledge and skills | 3 | - | - | 3 |
Boundary Management | Workers manage, compartmentalize, and control time to maintain work-life balance. | 9 | 15 | 2 | 26 | |
Opportunities to Craft | Being conscious of, or seeking opportunities to engage in crafting behavior | 1 | - | - | 1 | |
Interests Crafting | Hobby Participation | Directly engaging in activities outside the work domain to increase one’s sense of joy and meaning | - | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Vicarious Experiencing | Seeking fulfilment by following the involvement of other people | - | 2 | - | 2 | |
Redesign Interests | Organize work/life so it matches personal interests | 5 | - | - | 5 | |
Interests Alignment | Dividing tasks/activities between peers to match interests | 4 | - | - | 4 | |
Adding Interests | Take on more tasks/activities which one enjoys | 3 | - | - | 3 | |
Relational Crafting | Relatedness Crafting | More effectively ensuring the development of relationships characterized genuine, reciprocal care and intimacy | - | - | 2 | 2 |
Avoiding Social Demands | Reducing unwanted or draining interactions with individuals at home and work | 1 | - | - | 1 | |
Building Relationships | Approaches people employ to foster positive, mutually beneficial relationships characterized by feelings of pride, love, dignity, appreciation, and self-worth | 5 | - | 1 | 6 | |
Re-frame Relationships | Changing the nature of current relationships to serve a new or more meaningful purpose | 5 | - | - | 5 | |
Expanding Relationships | Expanding relationships during free time (e.g., meeting colleagues during free time) | 10 | 1 | 1 | 12 | |
Adapting Relationships | Changing the nature and/or function of relationships | 2 | - | - | 2 | |
Influencing and Negotiating | Persuading others to take over tasks | 1 | - | - | 1 | |
Managing Social Interactions | Using relationships with friends and family to support and maintain work−life balance | 2 | 5 | - | 7 | |
Resources-Demands Crafting | Autonomy Crafting | Allow for a better realization of their personal interests | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Reducing Hindering Demands | Make work emotionally less intense by reducing those aspects that exceed one’s capabilities | 31 | 8 | 4 | 43 | |
Vitality Management | Taking care of one’s physical and mental health | - | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Optimizing Demands | The simplification or optimization of work processes to make people more efficient (e.g., Traveling business class to work whilst commuting) | - | 2 | - | 2 | |
Seeking Structural Resources | Actions to increase growth-promoting resources (e.g., requesting flexible working hours) | 11 | 9 | 4 | 24 | |
Seeking Social Resources | Creating social support networks or gaining supervisory feedback or coaching (e.g., asking others at work for advice or feedback) | 14 | 6 | 4 | 24 | |
Increasing Challenging Demands | Initiatives to increase challenging demands in life and at work | 8 | 1 | 1 | 10 | |
Skill Crafting | Personal Growth Initiatives | Viewing failures, or mistakes as learning opportunities | 1 | - | 1 | 2 |
Using Skills in Different Ways | Seeking opportunities to use current skills in novel and creative ways | 2 | - | - | 2 | |
Professional Development Initiatives | Actively seeking training and development opportunities | 4 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
Competence Crafting | Behaviors associated with skill development and an emerging sense of mastery | - | - | 2 | 2 | |
Decision Latitude | Autonomy to make independent decisions in the execution of tasks (e.g., deciding how and when to engage in academic activities) | - | - | 1 | 1 | |
Skill and Strengths Use | Seeking opportunities to use skills, knowledge and strengths to the fullest in life and at work | 11 | - | 1 | 12 | |
Task Crafting | Work Organization | Reshaping systems and strategies to organize the tangible elements of work. | 2 | - | - | 2 |
Redesigning Tasks | Changing the nature or function of life tasks to make them more meaningful | 10 | 2 | - | 12 | |
Prioritize Tasks | Prioritizing specific tasks over others to improve efficiency and task execution | - | - | 1 | 1 | |
Task Emphasizing | Highlighting important tasks which are already part of a formal job description or life role | 2 | 1 | - | 3 | |
Task Expansion | Adding tasks or projects perceived to be meaningful | 21 | 1 | - | 22 | |
Task Enlargement | Include elements of work and related activities not originally in the formal job description | 3 | - | - | 3 | |
Task Avoidance | Avoid risky situations/cases/tasks | 1 | - | - | 1 | |
Task Delegation | Delegating tasks | 1 | - | - | 1 |
Numbers represent the frequency of occurrence.
First, cognitive crafting refers to how people alter their perceptions of different areas or elements of work and life ( Berg et al., 2013 ; Chen et al., 2022 ). This crafting theme consists of several elements: altering perceptions (redefine the view of life tasks), acceptance (crafting work-life balance by accepting the nature of a task or a role), identity formation (creating a positive self-concept in non-work domains through investing in important non-work identities), reflective practices (reflect on and being mindful about aspirations and motivations), meta-cognition (thinking about the process through which employees interpret and enact roles and make decisions), and cognitive detachment (disengage mentally from work-related matters). Furthermore, cognitive crafting consists of strategic risk-taking (viewing [im]balance as a consequence of choice/responsibility), expanding perceptions (cultivating meaning by widening their understanding of their jobs’ influence or purpose), cognitive withdrawal (offloading of responsibility for incidents or critical situations), focusing perceptions (emphasize the positive qualities), and linking perceptions (make use of existing components by mentally connecting certain activities or relationships to interests, outcomes, or elements of identities that are meaningful). Only identity formation, reflective practices, cognitive detachment, strategic risk-taking, and focusing perceptions were present in two or more life domains and were retained within the final model.
Second, environmental crafting refers to individuals’ adjustments to their physical work, home, or life environments to cultivate more meaningful life experiences ( Dash and Vohra, 2020 ). The elements of environmental crafting were crafting toward development (taking the initiative to realize one’s potential by creating or seeking developmental opportunities), boundary management (managing, compartmentalizing, and controlling time to maintain work-life balance), and opportunities to craft (being conscious of or seeking opportunities to engage in crafting behavior). Only boundary management was present in two or more life domains and was retained in the final model.
Third, interests crafting refers to the behaviors exhibited to expand or engage in activities or hobbies people find interesting ( Kooij et al., 2020 ). This theme includes elements of hobby participation (engaging directly in activities to increase a sense of joy), vicarious experiencing (seeking fulfillment by following the involvement of other people), redesigning interests (organizing work/life to match interests), interests alignment (dividing tasks/activities to match interests), and adding interests (take on more tasks/activities which one enjoys). Only hobby participation was present in two or more life domains and was retained for the final model.
Fourth, relational crafting refers to the behaviors people use to create meaning by changing how, when, and with whom they interact ( Berg et al., 2013 ). Relational crafting includes the elements of relatedness crafting (effectively ensuring the development of relationships characterized by care and intimacy), avoiding social demands (reducing unwanted or draining interactions with individuals at home and work), building relationships (approaches people employ to foster positive, mutually beneficial relationships characterized by feelings of pride, love, dignity, appreciation, and self-worth); re-frame relationships (changing the nature of current relationships to serve a new or more meaningful purpose), expanding relationships (expanding relationships during free time), adapting relationships (changing the nature or function of a relationship), influencing and negotiating (persuading others to take over tasks), and managing social interactions (using relationships with friends and family to support and maintain work-life balance). Only building relationships, expanding relationships, and managing social interactions were present in two or more life domains and were retained in the final model.
Fifth, resources-demands crafting refers to the behaviors associated with optimizing life resources, managing obstructive or hindering life demands, and attempting to avoid unnecessary resource loss ( Chen et al., 2022 ). Resources-demands crafting consists of autonomy crafting (allowing for a better realization of personal interests), reducing hindering demands (reducing those aspects that exceed one’s capabilities), vitality management (taking care of one’s physical and mental health), optimizing demands (the simplification or optimization of work processes to make people more efficient), seeking structural resources (actions to increase growth-promoting resources), seeking social resources (creating social support networks or gaining supervisory feedback or coaching), increasing challenging demands (initiatives to increase challenging demands in life and at work). Only optimizing demands were absent in two or more life domains and, therefore, not included in the final model.
Sixth, skill crafting is concerned with developing a wide range of skills through seeking out training opportunities, engaging in stretching assignments/projects, minimizing failures by focusing on what one does best, and optimizing performance in one’s area of expertise ( Bindl et al., 2019 ). Skill crafting contains elements of personal growth initiatives (viewing failures as learning opportunities), using skills in different ways (seeking opportunities to use current skills in novel and creative ways), professional development initiatives (seeking out training and development opportunities), competence crafting (behaviors associated with skill development and an emerging sense of mastery), decision latitude (autonomy to make independent decisions), and skill and strengths use (seeking opportunities to use current skills, knowledge, and strengths to the fullest in life and work). Only personal growth opportunities, professional development initiatives, and skill/strengths use were present in two or more life domains and were retained in the final model.
Seventh, task crafting describes behaviors people engage in to physically alter the type, number, scope, and nature of tasks they perform at work and in life ( Wrzesniewski and Dutton, 2001 ; Chen et al., 2022 ). The elements of task crafting are work organization (reshaping systems and strategies to organize the tangible elements of life), redesigning tasks (changing the nature or function of life tasks to make them more meaningful), prioritizing tasks (prioritizing specific tasks over others to improve efficiency and task execution), task emphasizing (highlighting important tasks which are already part of a formal job description or life role); task expansion (adding tasks or projects perceived to be meaningful), task enlargement (including elements of work and related activities not originally in the formal job description), task avoidance (avoiding risky situations/cases), and task delegation (delegating tasks). Only redesigning tasks, task emphasizing, and task expansion were present in two or more life domains and were retained in the final model.
The present study aimed to advance the theoretical understanding of life-crafting by investigating shared elements or behaviors across different crafting approaches. The review identified 51 records, reflecting five crafting approaches (job crafting, work-life balance and home crafting, leisure crafting and off-job crafting, career crafting, and miscellaneous crafting strategies), comprising 48 different crafting strategies and 223 behaviors. Based on our classification criteria, 22 dimensions were included in the holistic life-crafting model. Content analysis classified these behaviors into seven broader themes representing a general ‘life-crafting’ approach: cognitive crafting, environmental crafting, interest crafting, relational crafting, resources-demands crafting, skill crafting, and task crafting (see Figure 2 ). The proposed framework comprehensively explains how individuals can actively shape their lives to promote meaningful experiences. The sections below briefly discuss the findings and their implications for future research.
The Holistic Life-Crafting Model.
The first objective was to frame an integrative definition of life-crafting based on the prevailing literature. Results show that life-crafting can be defined as a holistic, continuous process of proactively creating meaning by intentionally balancing demands and resources and altering cognitive, environmental, interest, relational, skill, and task aspects to promote growth and wellbeing. Specifically, this holistic approach indicates that those individuals who actively engage in life-crafting employ seven strategies: cognitive crafting, environmental crafting, interest crafting, relational crafting, resources-demands crafting, skill crafting, and task crafting.
First , cognitive crafting refers to how individuals consciously alter the perceptions held or meaning attached to/derived from different areas of work and life. Here, the focus is not on physically changing the nature of life or life-related tasks but rather on the subjective perceptions about work or life ( Berg et al., 2013 ). It encompasses a set of actions taken to create important non-work identities, reflect upon one’s aspirations and motivations, and the practices employed to disengage from work mentally. It further consists of taking strategic risks and emphasizing the positive qualities of work. These activities assist people in seeking, constructing, and experiencing a meaningful existence by increasing their awareness of why their life matters and what they accomplish via their daily actions. When people alter how they think about their lives, it creates a sense of control and mastery, leading to experiences that are perceived to be more meaningful ( Berg et al., 2013 ; Chen et al., 2022 ). This is in line with the basic tenets of cognitive behavioral therapy, where changes in thoughts, beliefs, and attitudes lead to changes in behaviors, which, in turn, leads to changes in emotional regulation ( Thoma et al., 2015 ).
Second , environmental crafting refers to individuals’ physical changes to their work, home, or life environments to cultivate more meaningful life experiences. Specifically, it relates to individuals’ strategies to effectively manage the boundaries between various areas of their lives. Boundary management can lead to more meaningful life experiences by allowing individuals to prioritize their values and goals, establish a sense of control/autonomy over their lives, achieve a better work-life balance, and maintain meaningful relationships with others ( Kodama, 2009 ; Kossek et al., 2012 ). Given that the environment plays a vital role in both the search for and experience of meaning, it is essential to develop abilities to effectively manage the interaction between different areas of one’s life. Boundary management is a crucial aspect of environmental crafting, which includes managing, compartmentalizing, and governing time to achieve a healthy work-life balance ( Wessels et al., 2019 ). Effective boundary management allows people to prioritize their values and goals and allocate their time and energy accordingly ( Kossek et al., 2012 ). According to Kossek et al. (2012) , setting and managing clear boundaries helps people focus on more personally meaningful activities such as spending time with loved ones, engaging in activities that align with their values, or spending time with loved ones. Effective boundary management could also increase the sense of control or autonomy people experience, leading to a greater sense of self-determination and fulfillment ( Ryan and Deci, 2000 ).
Third, interest crafting refers to behaviors exhibited to expand or engage in activities/hobbies that people find interesting and meaningful. This includes proactively seeking out, creating, or engaging in enjoyable, fun activities that align with one’s interests and passions ( Kooij et al., 2020 ). When involved in meaningful activities, individuals develop new skills, knowledge, and abilities that contribute to personal and professional development ( Van Zyl et al., 2019 , 2020 ). Furthermore, when people engage in interest crafting, there are greater opportunities to enhance self-efficacy. This is because when people engage in activities that are aligned with their interests/passions, they tend to feel more confident in their abilities and more motivated to achieve other goals ( Rottinghaus et al., 2003 ). Further, Kooij et al. (2020) argued that interest crafting could foster creativity as individuals can use their unique skills and perspectives to contribute to their work/lives in new or more innovative ways. This could also lead to a sense of pride or accomplishment as people see the tangible results of their efforts and contributions to their lives ( Rottinghaus et al., 2003 ). Finally, interest crafting can help individuals recharge and re-energize, contributing to overall wellbeing and satisfaction.
Fourth , relational crafting refers to the behaviors people use to create meaning by changing how, when, and with whom they interact. It includes behaviors required to create and expand current relationships and those needed to manage personally draining relationships. Research suggests that social relationships play the most important role in creating meaningful life experiences ( Steger et al., 2014 ); thus, building and maintaining social connections are essential for mental health and wellbeing. Relational crafting also encompasses skills and abilities to navigate complex social situations, such as managing conflict and establishing boundaries to maintain better social health and wellbeing ( Keyes, 2002 ). Therefore, by investing in building positive relationships and managing challenging ones, people can create more meaningful connections with others, enhancing their overall sense of purpose and fulfillment.
Fifth, resources-demands crafting refers to the behaviors associated with optimizing life resources, managing obstructive or hindering life demands, and attempting to avoid unnecessary resource loss. The underlying elements of resources-demands crafting include reducing hindering demands, vitality management, seeking social resources, seeking challenges, pursuing structural resources, increasing challenging demands, and autonomy crafting. By actively managing one’s resources and demands, people can optimize their use of their resources, manage obstructive demands, and avoid unnecessary resource loss. Research suggests that the availability and use of resources are critical components of the experience of meaning and that resources-demands crafting can help people build and maintain the resources essential for wellbeing ( Tims et al., 2012 ). People experience less stress, conflicts, or pressure when they reduce hindering demands. In this way, people have more energy, which they can invest in other aspects of life that are perceived as meaningful. Proactive vitality management is described as adaptable behaviors that enable people to balance their physical and mental energies ( Tisu and Vîrgă, 2022 ). Improving the balance between physical and mental energies makes people feel more purposeful, leading to a more meaningful life. Increasing structural resources includes opportunities for self-development, autonomy, and resource variety ( Yen et al. 2018 ). These opportunities help people experience a purpose in life and, in turn, more meaning. Increasing social resources is strongly associated with pursuing social support, coaching, or feedback from others ( Yen et al., 2018 ). People may feel more connected, have more in common with others, and have stronger social identities due to developing and maintaining meaningful relationships. Overall, having more access to resources or more opportunities to use resources may facilitate crafting behaviors. This enhances the meaning of life and contributes to an overall sense of purpose in life. Increasing challenging demands refers to the attempts to enlarge the life scope or change the content of tasks ( Yen et al., 2018 ). People develop new skills/abilities and overcome challenges by pursuing difficult goals. Therefore, seeking challenges and increasing challenging demands may result in achievement, progress, and mastery, contributing to their sense of meaning and fulfillment in life. Autonomy crafting is described as pursuing control over one’s actions, life, and choices ( Kosenkranius et al., 2020 ). People may enjoy a higher sense of control, authenticity, and meaning by taking responsibility for their decisions and behaviors.
Sixth, skill crafting refers to developing a wide range of skills through seeking out training opportunities, stretching assignments/projects, or minimizing failures by focusing on what one does best and optimizing performance in one’s area of expertise. In essence, skill crafting ensures a closer alignment between the capabilities of the self and the demands/needs/resources of the environment. The underlying elements of skill crafting include personal growth initiatives, professional development initiatives, and skill and strength use. Skill crafting aims to develop new and optimize current skills/abilities to facilitate personal growth and development. Activities that require a more comprehensive range of skills are seen as more meaningful ( Berg et al., 2013 ). People grow more assured, capable, and self-aware when they take the time to develop their skills. These characteristics allow people to take advantage of new chances, work toward worthwhile objectives, and eventually find meaning and fulfillment in their lives. It also aims to develop skills and abilities to facilitate professional development. Persons can expand their knowledge base, develop a higher level of expertise in their industry, and perform better. In response, one’s sense of success and satisfaction increases, boosting confidence and self-esteem. Finally, it aims to facilitate active skills and strengths use to facilitate more meaningful life experiences. Active skill and strength use can improve a person’s sense of competence, self-efficacy, and autonomy, resulting in more fulfilling life experiences. A larger variety of skills and challenges makes tasks and life more meaningful ( Li et al., 2020 ).
Finally , task crafting refers to the behaviors people exhibit to physically alter the type, number, scope, and nature of their tasks at work and in life. The underlying elements of task crafting include redesigning life tasks, task emphasizing, and task expansion. Task crafting aims at restructuring tasks or elements of life tasks. It enables people to shape their lives consistent with their values, talents, and interests. It gives people the power to make their lives more personally fulfilling, giving them more meaning and purpose ( Hackman and Oldman, 1980 ). Furthermore, task crafting includes task emphasizing. People craft meaning when engaging in activities that they see as opportunities to gain something valuable ( Kosenkranius et al., 2020 ). Finally, task crafting includes expanding one’s tasks perceived to be more meaningful. Tasks that require a wider range of skills are seen as more meaningful ( Berg et al., 2013 ).
This holistic approach to life-crafting shares similarities with the Schippers and Ziegler (2019) and Chen et al. (2022) life-crafting approaches in that it aims to present elements required to create more meaningful life experiences and intentionally shape one’s life to align with one’s personal values, interests, needs, and goals. It broadly draws from both the cognitive re-framing and the conservation of resources perspectives on crafting, whereby the focus is on cognitively re-framing life experiences, actively seeking out the means to manage work/life demands, and/or increasing available resources. Furthermore, all three approaches require a deeper level of self-awareness and intentionality as they involve making intentional choices about how to shape experiences and environments. Finally, all three approaches include elements related to increasing and optimizing social aspects of life by highlighting the importance of building and maintaining current and future relationships as routes toward meaning. However, despite these similarities, these approaches have several key differences.
Unlike Schippers and Ziegler (2019) and Chen et al. (2022) , our model presents a holistic perspective involving crafting all aspects of life, including nurturing work and home relationships, personal growth, and leisure to create meaning. There are also some global differences among Schippers and Ziegler (2019) , Chen et al. (2022) , and this approach. All three generally conceive life-crafting as a deliberate process of sculpting and designing one’s life but with a different focus. Schippers and Ziegler (2019) emphasize the psychological components of the process, whereas Chen et al. (2022) emphasize the operationalization and assessment of life-crafting. Chen et al. (2022) developed and established validity evidence for a multidimensional life-crafting measure with three dimensions: cognitive crafting, seeking social support, and seeking challenges. The degree to which people take deliberate action to build a meaningful and fulfilling existence is gaged by this scale. In contrast, Schippers and Ziegler (2019) define life-crafting as a process of looking for meaning and purpose in one’s life and placing more emphasis on its psychological aspects. They contend that the process of ‘life-crafting’ includes ongoing investigation of one’s values, aptitudes, and interests as well as soliciting feedback from others to clarify one’s sense of direction; they stress the significance of taking the initiative to live a life that is consistent with one’s values and aspirations.
The holistic life-crafting model offers clearer insight into the underlying behaviors supporting various life-crafting strategies to synthesize material and offer more comprehensive perspectives on life-crafting. By analyzing the common components and behavioral tactics for diverse crafting strategies, this research seeks to clarify the theoretical underpinnings of life-crafting. Specifically, this paper focused on changing how one thinks (cognitive), functions (environment, resource-demands), acts (task, skill, interest), and fits in (relational) to social contexts. In contrast, Chen et al. (2022) are focused more narrowly on managing resources, and Schippers and Ziegler (2019) on setting goals (aligning values with true self). Despite these global differences, there are also more nuanced differences worth noting.
Whereas Schippers and Ziegler (2019) present life-crafting as an intervention strategy, our life-crafting approach is positioned as an ongoing process whereby an individual continuously reassesses their values, needs, and goals and adjusts their life designs, ensuring better alignment. Furthermore, our approach focuses more on global crafting behaviors and strategies rather than specific solution-orientated tasks such as goal setting, goal attainment, and goal commitment. In contrast to our holistic approach, Schippers and Ziegler (2019) focus on a seven-step process to develop a future or ‘ideal state’ and develop goals required to close the gap between ideal states and the current states. The Schippers and Ziegler (2019) approach seems less about ‘crafting’ per se and is more aligned with traditional goal-setting theory, which argues that people are motivated to achieve certain life goals by setting and pursuing mastery and performance objectives ( Latham and Yukl, 1975 ). From this perspective, an ideal state is envisioned, and a clear, actionable plan is created to facilitate the change from the current to the ideal state ( Latham and Yukl, 1975 ). In contrast, holistic life-crafting refers to proactive behaviors required to shape life experiences to align with goals, values, and interests. Furthermore, Schippers and Ziegler’s (2019) approach focuses less on personal agency and meaning and more on improving overall ‘life performance’. Their approach is positioned as a targeted and specific intervention strategy, focusing on achieving personal life outcomes. In contrast, holistic life-crafting is broad, flexible, and focuses on creating more meaningful life experiences.
Similarly, the holistic life-crafting approach also differs from the Chen et al. (2022) framework, focusing on conserving resources (i.e., managing demands/increasing resources) and facilitating growth and development. The Chen et al. (2022) framework heavily relies on the conservation of resources theory. It negates the importance of the environment and the role of tasks, skills, and interests. Furthermore, the Chen et al. (2022) approach arguably provides an oversimplified view of the importance of social relationships in meaning-making, indicating that only relational-seeking behavior is important. In contrast, the findings from this study show that relational crafting has both promotive and preventative components, helping people increase social closeness, build new relationships (and not just seek social support), re-framing the nature of current relationships, and expanding the role of relationships beyond mere functionality. Holistic life-crafting also aims to manage the impact of relationships deemed non-beneficial or ‘draining’ through initiating strategies to avoid social demands and manage social interactions. Only three particular crafting behaviors could be inferred from the questionnaire from Chen et al. (2022) : cognitive crafting, seeking social support, and seeking challenges. Our approach included 22 crafting behaviors of life-crafting. Where Chen et al. (2022) used cognitive crafting as a dimension, our holistic model of life-crafting used this type of crafting as a broader theme representing more general “life-crafting” strategies.
The holistic life-crafting model proposed in this paper offers several implications for the discipline and practical application. First, the model emphasizes the value of a comprehensive approach to life-crafting by highlighting the overlap of approaches used in different domains and their interconnectedness. Second, the model provides a practical roadmap to help develop a clear strategy for creating meaningful life experiences to guide goal-setting and decision-making. Third, the model highlights the need for a continuous process of self-reflection and assessment to adjust one’s approach over time as circumstances change. Life-crafting can have a positive impact on individuals and organizations, especially on innovation outcomes. By focusing on their personal goals and values, people may become more motivated, engaged, and productive, resulting in more creativity and innovation. Fourth, the model fosters creativity as people use their unique skills and perspectives to contribute to their work/lives in new or more innovative ways. Finally, for organizations, our concept of life-crafting can guide employers and employees in developing a more innovative and empowered culture. People are more likely to contribute fresh viewpoints and original ideas when encouraged to pursue and develop their interests and skills. This may result in a wider variety of solutions and consistent moral and work culture improvements.
Consolidating the life-crafting literature using an AI-assisted systematic literature review significantly extends the crafting and meaning-making literature. Notably, we used stringent review and evaluation procedures to identify relevant records and evaluate the intersection of these records to promote an inclusive and delineated model (see Figure 2 ). Our model, Holistic Life-Crafting, pinpoints seven unique dimensions of life-crafting and highlights the unique behavioral expressions of each dimension. In this way, our model successfully consolidated the most relevant literature at the time of evaluation and produced a theoretically grounded framework to help researchers and theorists conceptualize how dynamic forms of crafting fit together. Moving forward, it will be important for researchers to evaluate the structure and formation of our model quantitatively. One unique way of accomplishing this goal is to construct and evaluate a multidimensional assessment tool. Specifically, researchers can design multi-tiered studies to construct and evaluate sets of items to determine the merit of our organizational model. It will be important for researchers to use new-wave psychometric procedures to verify the factor structure and stability of our model across time. To this end, it is recommended that researchers implement modern data driven or exploratory structural equation models ( Van Zyl and Ten Klooster, 2022 ; Van Zyl et al., 2023a ) in their studies. Such modeling techniques offer a more accurate representation of how related yet independent dimensions of a construct function together; it assesses how different dimensions intersect in complex models. Assessing intersection elements appears key in life-crating approaches as many dimensions are expected to have dynamic relationships ( Chen et al., 2022 ).
Despite efforts to conduct a thorough and comprehensive systematic literature review, a few limitations are worth noting. Although we employed various methods to ensure the inclusion of all potentially relevant texts and followed best practices for systematic reviews, some manuscripts may have been overlooked. Also, excluding gray literature may have resulted in a biased view of the crafting types, as popular psychology press books, dissertations, and theses that present alternative perspectives were not included. Future research might consider a more comprehensive literature analysis, including gray literature and non-academic texts. This may provide new insights which could expand the current model. Another potential limitation relates to the novelty of this study’s machine learning-based screening methods. The model was trained on initial predefined data, but there is currently no means to evaluate the margin of error in the model. This resulted in more time-consuming manual data checking to ensure no important records were missing. Additionally, given the magnitude of the study and the available data on different crafting types, the time frame of our approach was limited (1997–2022). Innovations and publications post-2022 were not included and should be considered in future research. Finally, the criteria for constructing the final holistic life-crafting model may pose challenges. In the current study, we decided to include elements that were present in at least two life domains. However, other elements may also be used in various life domains that science has not yet explored.
The holistic life-crafting model offers an integrative approach to support individuals in crafting meaningful life experiences by using strategies across various areas of their lives. Our results suggest considerable overlap in the behaviors and strategies people exhibit to craft meaning in different life domains, which signifies the universality of such a concept. Unlike domain-specific approaches, like job crafting or leisure crafting, holistic life-crafting highlights the importance of considering multiple dimensions of an individual’s life to pursuit purpose, meaning, and wellbeing.
Author contributions.
LZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review, editing. NC: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review, editing. BD: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review, editing. JK: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft. LV: Writing – review, editing.
We would like to extend our appreciation to the two reviewers and the editor for their expert feedback and guidance throughout the editorial review process. Their comments and suggestions significantly improved the quality of the manuscript.
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1271188/full#supplementary-material
*Include record
440 Accesses
4 Citations
Using social media and other Internet-based sources could distract students from decent academic learning and lead to negative learning, and self-control is required to foster self-regulated learning. Self-control involves the trait-like capacity for self-control and the state-like level of self-control strength, which could be used for performing self-control tasks. Capacity for self-control can be increased by regularly practicing self-control similar to a muscle that needs training for strengthening. We encourage creating study environments in which self-control is reasonably demanded. In particular, we propose that students should be enabled to engage in study crafting behavior. Study crafting represents environmental self-control behavior, which involves designing one’s study environment to achieve some form of identity. This allows redirecting self-control strength into academic studies, fostering goal attainment such as finishing homework on time or graduating. We make recommendations for stimulating study crafting behavior. These involve increasing students’ autonomy setting complex study goals for increasing students’ motivation for crafting behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
The role of self-regulation in doctoral students’ status of all but dissertation (abd).
Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65 (10), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712453471
Article Google Scholar
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations . New York, NY: Free Press.
Google Scholar
Berg, J. M., Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2010). Perceiving and responding to challenges in job crafting at different ranks: When proactivity requires adaptivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31 (2–3), 158–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.645
Chen, C. Y., Yen, C. H., & Tsai, F. C. (2014). Job crafting and job engagement: The mediating role of person-job fit. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 37 , 21–28.
Corno, L. (2010). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed., pp. 191–225). New York, NY: Routledge.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Gevers, J. M. (2015). Job crafting and extra-role behavior: The role of work engagement and flourishing. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91 , 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.09.001
Demerouti, E., Xanthopoulou, D., Petrou, P., & Karagkounis, C. (2017). Does job crafting assist dealing with organizational changes due to austerity measures? Two studies among Greek employees. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26 (4), 574–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1325875
Dierdorff, E. C., & Jensen, J. M. (2017). Crafting in context: Exploring when job crafting is dysfunctional for performance effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103 (5), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000295
Diestel, S., Rivkin, W., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2015). Sleep quality and self-control capacity as protective resources in the daily emotional labor process: Results from two diary studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100 (3), 809–827. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038373
Diestel, S., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2011). The moderating role of cognitive control deficits in the link from emotional dissonance to burnout symptoms and absenteeism. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16 (3), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022934
Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M., & Bednar, J. (2010). Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. Academy of Management Review, 35 (2), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.2.zok265
Facebook. (2018). Company info . Retrieved August 4, 2018, from https://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/
Fernandez, C. F., & Vecchio, R. P. (1997). Situational leadership theory revisited: A test of an across–jobs perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 8 (1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(97)90031-X
Fried, Y. (1991). Meta-analytic comparison of the Job Diagnostic Survey and Job Characteristics Inventory as correlates of work satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (5), 690–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.690
Furtak, E. M., & Kunter, M. (2012). Effects of autonomy-supportive teaching on student learning and motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80 (3), 284–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.573019
Ghitulescu, B. E. (2007). Shaping tasks and relationships at work: Examining the antecedents and consequences of employee job crafting . Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburg.
Gordon, H. J., Demerouti, E., Le Blanc, P. M., & Bipp, T. (2015). Job crafting and performance of Dutch and American health care professionals. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14 (4), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000138
Greenberg, M. T., & Rhoades, B. L. (2010). Self-regulation and executive function: What can teachers and schools do? In C. L. Cooper, J. Field, U. Goswami, R. Jenkins, & B. J. Sahakian (Eds.), Mental capital and wellbeing (pp. 377–382). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness . New York, NY: Paulist Press.
Hacker, W., & Sachse, P. (2014). Allgemeine Arbeitspsychologie: Psychische Regulation von Tätigkeiten (3rd ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Happ, R., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., & Schmidt, S. (2016). An analysis of economic learning among undergraduates in introductory economics courses in Germany. The Journal of Economic Education, 47 (4), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2016.1213686
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2 , 96–99.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44 (3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., Glaser, J. R., Angerer, P., & Weigl, M. (2010). Beyond top-down and bottom-up work redesign: Customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31 (1–2), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.625
Kehr, H. M. (2004). Implicit/explicit motive discrepancies and volitional depletion among managers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (3), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256967
Ko, I. (2012). Crafting a job: Creating optimal experiences at work. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 72 (10-A), 3914.
Kooij, D. T. A. M., van Woerkom, M., Wilkenloh, J., Dorenbosch, L., & Denissen, J. J. (2017). Job crafting towards strengths and interests: The effects of a job crafting intervention on person–job fit and the role of age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102 (6), 971–981. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000194
Kuhl, J. (1984). Motivational aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 99–171). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Laurence, G. A. (2010). Workaholism and expansion and contraction oriented job crafting: The moderating effects of individual and contextual factors . Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse.
Leana, C., Appelbaum, E., & Shevchuk, I. (2009). Work process and quality of care in early childhood education: The role of job crafting. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (6), 1169–1192. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.47084651
Lichtenthaler, P. W., & Fischbach, A. (2016). Job crafting and motivation to continue working beyond retirement age. Career Development International, 21 (5), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-01-2016-0009
Lin, B., Law, K. S., & Zhou, J. (2017). Why is underemployment related to creativity and OCB? A task-crafting explanation of the curvilinear moderated relations. Academy of Management Journal, 60 (1), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0470
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15 (5), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x
Lu, C. Q., Wang, H. J., Lu, J. J., Du, D. Y., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Does work engagement increase person–job fit? The role of job crafting and job insecurity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84 (2), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.12.004
Lyons, P. (2008). The crafting of jobs and individual differences. Journal of Business and Psychology, 23 (1–2), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9080-2
Mullarkey, S., Jackson, P. R., Wall, T. D., Wilson, J. R., & Grey-Taylor, S. M. (1997). The impact of technology characteristics and job control on worker mental health. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18 (5), 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199709)18:5<471::AID-JOB810>3.0.CO;2-V
Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126 (2), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247
Neubach, B., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2008). Haupt- und Interaktionseffekte von Selbstkontrollanforderungen auf Indikatoren der Arbeitsbeanspruchung [Main and interaction effects of self-control demands on indicators of job strain]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 52 , 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089.52.1.17
Niessen, C., Weseler, D., & Kostova, P. (2016). When and why do individuals craft their jobs? The role of individual motivation and work characteristics for job crafting. Human Relations, 69 (6), 1287–1313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715610642
Patterson, M. C. (2017). A naturalistic investigation of media multitasking while studying and the effects on exam performance. Teaching of Psychology, 44 (1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677913
Petrou, P., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2017). Regular versus cutback-related change: The role of employee job crafting in organizational change contexts of different nature. International Journal of Stress Management, 24 (1), 62–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000033
Qi, Y., Wu, X., & Wang, X. (2016). Job crafting and work engagement in primary and secondary school teachers: A cross-lagged analysis. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24 , 935–938.
Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30 , 91–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001
Rudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017). Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102 , 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.008
Schmidt, K.-H., Hupke, M., & Diestel, S. (2012). Does dispositional capacity for self-control attenuate the relation between self-control demands at work and indicators of job strain? Work & Stress, 26 (1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.660367
Schmidt, K.-H., & Diestel, S. (2015). Self-control demands: From basic research to job-related applications. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14 (1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000123
Sekiguchi, T., Li, J., & Hosomi, M. (2017). Predicting job crafting from the socially embedded perspective: The interactive effect of job autonomy, social skill, and employee status. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 53 (4), 470–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886317727459
Shenavar, F. (2017). Assessment the mediating role of person-job fit and psychological ownership in the relationship between job crafting and job satisfaction. Journal of Psychology, 20 (4), 376–392.
Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2014). Optimising employee mental health: The relationship between intrinsic need satisfaction, job crafting, and employee well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15 (4), 957–977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9458-3
Smith, K. (2018). 47 Incredible Facebook statistics and facts. Brandwatch . https://www.brandwatch.com/blog/47-facebook-statistics/
Spector, P. (1986). Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 39 , 1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678603901104
Stone, A. G., Russell, R. F., & Patterson, K. (2004). Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25 (4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410538671
Stumm, S., Thomas, E., & Dormann, C. (2010). Selbstregulationsstärke und Leistung. Zeitschrift für Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 54 , 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000029
Tangney, J. P., Boone, A. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2018). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-regulation and self-control: Selected works of Roy F. Baumeister (pp. 181–220). London: Routledge.
Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (6), 1256–1269. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1256
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18 (2), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032141
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2014). Daily job crafting and the self-efficacy–performance relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29 (5), 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-05-2012-0148
Tims, M., Derks, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2016). Job crafting and its relationships with person–job fit and meaningfulness: A three-wave study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92 (February), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.007
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 9 (5), 584–590. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584
Vasquez, A. C., Patall, E., Fong, C. J., Corrigan, A. S., & Pine, L. (2016). Parent autonomy support, academic achievement, and psychosocial functioning: A meta-analysis of research. Educational Psychology Review, 28 (3), 605–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9329-z
Vecchio, R. P. (1987). Situational Leadership Theory: An examination of a prescriptive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72 (3), 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.444
Wang, H. J., Demerouti, E., & Le Blanc, P. (2017). Transformational leadership, adaptability, and job crafting: The moderating role of organizational identification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100 (June 2017), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.03.009
Wilcox, K., & Stephen, A. T. (2012). Are close friends the enemy? Online social networks, self-esteem, and self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1086/668794
Wolfe, R. N., & Johnson, S. D. (1995). Personality as a predictor of college performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55 , 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055002002
Worldometers. (2018). Current world population . Retrieved August 4, 2018, from http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26 (2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378011
Wrzesniewski, A., LoBuglio, N., Dutton, J. E., & Berg, J. M. (2013). Job crafting and cultivating positive meaning and identity in work. In A. B. Bakker (Ed.), Advances in positive organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 281–302). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1108/S2046-410X(2013)0000001015
Chapter Google Scholar
Yang, R., Ming, Y., Ma, J., & Huo, R. (2017). How do servant leaders promote engagement? A bottom-up perspective of job crafting. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45 (11), 1815–1827. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6704
Yepes-Baldó, M., Romeo, M., Westerberg, K., & Nordin, M. (2018). Job crafting, employee well-being, and quality of care. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 40 , 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945916680614
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25 (1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41 (2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (3), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284
Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Pant, H. A., Lautenbach, C., Molerow, D., Toepper, M., & Brückner, S. (2017). Modeling and measuring competencies in higher education . Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Book Google Scholar
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Business and Economics Education, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
Christian Dormann & Christina Guthier
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Christian Dormann .
Editors and affiliations.
Olga Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia
Reprints and permissions
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Dormann, C., Guthier, C. (2019). Successful and Positive Learning Through Study Crafting: A Self-Control Perspective. In: Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. (eds) Frontiers and Advances in Positive Learning in the Age of InformaTiOn (PLATO). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26578-6_5
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26578-6_5
Published : 03 January 2020
Publisher Name : Springer, Cham
Print ISBN : 978-3-030-26577-9
Online ISBN : 978-3-030-26578-6
eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Policies and ethics
Biography crafts engage kids in learning. Let’s look at five possibilities. First, to focus on character traits, try a foldable. If you’d like kids to refer to events in the person’s life, create social media posts or build biography cubes. To bring in history, use double timelines. And lastly, if you’re pinched for time, make cute little tube characters.
Our favorite fourth grade teacher, Ms. Sneed, sat at the back table with her student teacher. “Let’s continue planning our ELA block ,” she said. “Today, we’ll work on our biography unit .”
She pulled a thick file folder from her teaching bag. From it, she pulled out a set of typed lesson plans .
“As you can see, we’ll start the genre study with picture books. Then kids will read full-length biographies. Instead of boring book reports, I’d like them to do some crafts.”
“Fun!” Mr. Grow exclaimed.
Ms. Sneed smiled and set some sample projects in front of him. “We’ll look through these and see what interests you.”
Ms. Sneed picked up the first sample. “For this project,” explained Ms. Sneed, “kids fold the paper in thirds. Then they draw the person’s face on the front.” She opened the front flap. “Inside, students write about the person.”
“Maybe they’d like they’d like this one,” said Mr. Grow. He pulled out a shaded piece of paper.
“I love that one even more!” Ms. Sneed exclaimed. “The student creates a social media post – sort of like Facebook – for the person they’re studying. Notice how they create a conversation about a compelling event. Kids eat it up.”
She picked up another paper. “Now check out these biography crafts. I think our class would enjoy this. When finished, each side of this biography cube would feature an event from the person’s life.” Ms. Sneed stopped and quickly folded the sample. “See? Kids simply color, fold, and tape.”
Next, Ms. Sneed handed Mr. Grow a double timeline. “These aren’t really biography crafts. Instead, they’re more serious projects. Kids list events in the person’s life on one side and events in history on the other. Above all, this project shows how history affected the person. In addition, kids can clearly see how the person changed history.”
Ms. Sneed walked over to the cabinet. She rummaged around for a while. “Here it is,” she said.
Mr. Grow could see that she held a toilet paper tube in her hand. “If we’re in a time pinch,” Ms. Sneed said, “these are great little biography crafts. Kids can usually finish these in ten or fifteen minutes. When they’re done, you have an entire set of figures to display.”
Mr. Grow studied the sample project. “I see. They just cut strips of construction paper for the head, body, and legs. Then they cut more pieces for hair and headdresses, as well as other props – like this hatchet for Tecumseh.”
Mr. Grow sighed. “It’s hard to choose just one! I can see that biography crafts come in many shapes and sizes. No matter what, though, they helped engage kids in the study of famous people.”
“Yep, and they will add some pizzazz to our unit. Don’t worry, though. We can choose a few – and maybe even use one of them when we celebrate Martin Luther King’s birthday . Now let’s talk about the culmination of our genre study: a wax museum project .”
Mr. Grow’s eyes glowed. “Really? Great! I did that when I was in elementary school and loved it.”
Atrial fibrillation, an irregular heartbeat, is three times more common than previously thought, according to a new study published on Wednesday.
Estimates from more than two decades ago had projected that atrial fibrillation (or A-fib) affects 3.3 million adults in the U.S. But researchers at the University of California, San Francisco found that A-fib affects 10.5 million adults, or nearly 5% of the adult U.S. population.
The researchers at UCSF reviewed the medical records of nearly 30 million adults who received “acute or procedural care” in California from 2005 to 2019, and found that about 2 million of those patients had been diagnosed with A-fib. The number of diagnoses increased over time — from nearly 4.5% of patients between 2005 and 2009 to 6.8% of patients between 2015 and 2019. The data was then standardized to be nationally representative, giving researchers a final estimate of at least 10.5 million A-fib cases nationwide.
A-fib is one of the most common causes of stroke and can lead to increased risk of heart failure, blood clots, chronic kidney disease and dementia .
Dr. Gregory Marcus , a senior author of the study and cardiologist at UCSF Health, tells Yahoo Life that researchers suspected A-fib was more common than previously estimated — “but we were surprised by the large magnitude of the actual difference observed” in the study.
“These data also help to provide some comfort to the millions of patients contending with the disease, so they know they are not alone,” he says.
Marcus hopes the study’s findings will lead to more allocation of resources to help A-fib patients, including more funding for research and treatment. “For example, there is now strong evidence that physical activity can reduce the burden of this disease, and yet Medicare does not cover cardiac rehabilitation programs for atrial fibrillation,” he says.
Experts say the increase is likely due to a combination of more cases and enhanced detection of the disease.
There’s an uptick in known risk factors. “The longer people live with many chronic conditions, such as high blood pressure, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, obesity, sleep apnea and other medical problems, the more likely they are to develop A-fib,” Dr. Paul Wang , director of the Stanford Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, tells Yahoo Life. Dr. Rod Passman , director of the Center for Arrhythmia Research at Northwestern University, adds that obesity — which is also on the rise in the U.S. — is often responsible for A-fib cases in younger patients.
Detection methods are improving. Not only are medical-grade monitors picking up more instances of A-fib, but consumer wearables like Apple Watches and Fitbits are bringing more cases to clinicians’ attention. “Barely a week goes by in my office where someone doesn’t come in and say, ‘My Apple Watch told me I had atrial fibrillation and I didn’t feel anything,’” Passman tells Yahoo Life. But don’t just rely on a diagnosis from your smartwatch; Passman notes that it’s important to visit a doctor and get confirmation.
Everyone is aging. “A-fib is known to increase with age,” Wang says. “As the population ages, A-fib is expected to increase.”
Healthy habits can decrease your chances of an A-fib diagnosis.
Keep chronic conditions under control. Wang says that managing chronic conditions that are associated with developing A-fib may help. “For example, treating diabetes and hypertension may reduce A-fib,” he says. Dr. Frederick Ehlert , a cardiac electrophysiologist and associate professor of medicine at Columbia University, tells Yahoo Life that patients should control their blood pressure with medication, if necessary, and monitor blood glucose levels.
Make good lifestyle choices. Passman and Ehlert recommend staying in shape and maintaining a healthy weight — “physical activity is key,” Passman says — along with getting a good night’s sleep, reducing stress and staying hydrated.
Cut back on drinking and smoking. “Moderate or even eliminate substances that can trigger atrial fibrillation, especially alcohol, caffeine and nicotine,” Ehlert says. This is especially true for people who have A-fib and notice that it triggers their symptoms, he adds.
However, as Ehlert points out, “sometimes you can do everything possible and still get atrial fibrillation.”
While wearable tech like an Apple Watch or a Fitbit might pick up signs of A-fib, it’s formally diagnosed by a clinician using tests like an electrocardiogram (or EKG), which measures the electrical activity of the heart.
Early detection and treatment is important as it can reduce the risk of serious outcomes, such as stroke and blood clots.
“There are now many evidence-based effective treatments for the disease, such as catheter ablation , and well-tolerated medicines to help avoid the [worst] consequences,” Marcus says.
Ehlert adds that while A-fib is “rarely an immediately life-threatening condition,” if you feel your heart “racing” or experience shortness of breath or lightheadedness, it’s best to seek medical attention for help with treating those symptoms.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
autobiography. hagiography. memoir. Costa Book Awards. character writer. biography, form of literature, commonly considered nonfictional, the subject of which is the life of an individual. One of the oldest forms of literary expression, it seeks to re-create in words the life of a human being—as understood from the historical or personal ...
Abstract. The Biographical Turn showcases the latest research through which the field of biography is being explored. Fifteen leading scholars in the field present the biographical perspective as ...
When studying literature, biography and its relationship to literature is often a subject of literary criticism, and is treated in several different forms.Two scholarly approaches use biography or biographical approaches to the past as a tool for interpreting literature: literary biography and biographical criticism.Conversely, two genres of fiction rely heavily on the incorporation of ...
In this paper, we discuss evidence-based ways of finding purpose, via a process that we call "life crafting.". This process fits within positive psychology and the salutogenesis framework - an approach focusing on factors that support human health and well-being, instead of factors that cause disease.
A biography (BYE-og-ruh-fee) is a written account of one person's life authored by another person. A biography includes all pertinent details from the subject's life, typically arranged in a chronological order. The word biography stems from the Latin biographia, which succinctly explains the word's definition: bios = "life" + graphia = "write."
Biography, autobiography, and memoir are the three main forms used to tell the story of a person's life. Though there are similarities between these forms, they have distinct differences in terms of the writing, style, and purpose. A biography is an informational narrative and account of the life history of an individual person, written by someone who is not the subject of the biography.
—though even an institutional study, for example, an inquiry into the Royal Society or the American Psy-chological Association, will of necessity be concerned with individu-als, but perhaps not at the depth, say, that a study of the accom-plishments of William James would entail. Ofcourse,boththeeffortsI 'vementioned—ascertainingthefactsand
A biography, or simply bio, is a detailed description of a person's life. It involves more than just basic facts like education, work, relationships, and death; it portrays a person's experience of these life events. ... The study of decision-making in politics is important for scholarly political biographers, who can take different approaches ...
See why leading organizations rely on MasterClass for learning & development. Biographies are how we learn information about another human being's life. Whether you want to start writing a biography about a famous person, historical figure, or an influential family member, it's important to know all the elements that make a biography worth ...
Writing Biography: Historians & Their Craft. Writing Biography. : Lloyd E. Ambrosius. U of Nebraska Press, Jan 1, 2004 - History - 166 pages. The historian as biographer must resolve questions that reflect the dual challenge of telling history and telling lives: How does the biographer sort out the individual?s role within the larger historical ...
Unsure of what to include in a biography? Whether about yourself or someone else, write one easily with these key parts of a biography.
The novel began to flourish in an architecture of growing privacy, and solitary fantasy. By contrast biography may partly have developed from the enormous growth in congenial coffee-houses, companionable taverns, and clubs, where gossip, anecdote, and the telling of 'the latest story' became a premium.
Conduct relevant interviews. Whenever possible, seek firsthand accounts from those who knew or interacted with the subject. Conduct interviews with family members, friends, colleagues, or experts in the field. Their insights and anecdotes can provide a deeper understanding of the person's character and experiences.
In Writing Biography, six prominent historians address these issues and reflect on their varied experiences and divergent perspectives as biographers. Shirley A. Leckie examines the psychological ...
What is Biography? I was a teaching fellow for this history seminar led by Jill Lepore. Here is the course description: "Biographers write histories of lives. Their storytelling is often novelistic but their standards of evidence are those of the historian. They confront distinctive questions: What lives are worth writing?
They study materials such as diaries, personal letters, oral histories and autobiographies. The most accurate biographies are based on historical evidence. But some biographers are less thorough and careful in their research and may not use the best source materials. Also, the book may be fictionalized, or partly made up.
7. Get feedback and polish the text. If you're going to publish your own biography, you'll have to polish it to professional standards. After leaving your work to rest for a while, look at it with fresh eyes and edit your own manuscript eliminating passive voice, filler words, and redundant adverbs.
Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide. Forged from a partnership between a university press and a library, Project MUSE is a trusted part of the academic and scholarly community it serves.
This study aims to clarify the theoretical conceptualization of life-crafting by identifying common strategies and behaviors underlying different meaning-making crafting approaches. Through a systematic literature search of six databases between January and April 2022, we identified 16,479 published records.
Playing games, reading books and crafting could reduce your chances of developing mild cognitive impairment by 30% to 50%, according to a 2011 study published in The Journal of Neuropsychiatry.
Study crafting represents environmental self-control behavior, which involves designing one's study environment to achieve some form of identity. This allows redirecting self-control strength into academic studies, fostering goal attainment such as finishing homework on time or graduating. ... a healthy life style, and a happy life ...
5 Quick and Easy Biography Crafts to Try Now. Biography crafts engage kids in learning. Let's look at five possibilities. First, to focus on character traits, try a foldable. If you'd like kids to refer to events in the person's life, create social media posts or build biography cubes. To bring in history, use double timelines.
This intervention can aid individuals to find a purpose in life, while at the same time ensuring that they make concrete plans to work toward this purpose. The idea is that life crafting enables ...
Atrial fibrillation, an irregular heartbeat, is three times more common than previously thought, according to a new study published on Wednesday.. Estimates from more than two decades ago had ...