Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review
VIDEO
Evaluating and Debugging Generative AI course collaboration with DeepLearning.AI
Literature review example: Using mind mapping as a technique to design your research
The IPL Review Show
BIMTEK Meta Analysis dan Systematic Literature Review (SLR) || Part 1
Recap- Workshop on Systems Approach to Research and Systematic Literature Review
Systematic Literature Review_#1
COMMENTS
A systematic literature review on benchmarks for evaluating...
This systematicliteraturereview provides an overview of benchmarksforevaluatingdebuggingapproaches. It supports researchers to choose the best suited benchmark(s) for evaluating their approaches.
A systematic literature review on benchmarks for evaluating ...
Highlights •Identification of 73 benchmarksforevaluatingdebuggingapproaches.•Comparison of benchmarks w.r.t. size, language, and realization of FAIR criteria.•Discussion of problems in benchmar...
A systematic literature review on benchmarks for evaluating ...
We compare the different benchmarks w.r.t. their size and the provided information such as bug reports, contained test cases, and other code metrics. This comparison is intended to help...
A Systematic Mapping of the Proposition of Benchmarks in the ...
However, the reasons that inspire researchers to propose novel benchmarks are not fully understood. This article reports the investigation, identification, classification, and externalization of the state of the art about the proposition of benchmarks on software testing and debugging domains.
Benchmarking the Benchmarks | Proceedings of the 2023 ACM ...
A systematic literature review on benchmarks for evaluating debuggingapproaches. Journal of Systems and Software 192 (2022), 111423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111423 Digital Library
SoK: A Tale of Reduction, Security, and Correctness ...
Asystematicliteraturereviewonbenchmarksforevaluatingdebuggingapproaches Abstract Bug benchmarks are used in development and evaluation of debugging approaches, e.g. fault localization and automated repair.
Supplemental Material for a Systematic Literature Review on ...
For these reasons, we have performed a systematicliteraturereview where we have identified 73 benchmarks that can be used to evaluatedebuggingapproaches. We compare the different benchmarks with respect to their size and the provided information such as bug reports, contained test cases, and other code metrics.
"A systematic literature review on benchmarks for evaluating ...
A systematicliterature review on benchmarks for evaluatingdebuggingapproaches. J. Syst. Softw. 192: 111423 (2022)
A systematic literature review on benchmarks for evaluating ...
A novel bugbenchmark for DLSW, Denchmark, is introduced, consisting of 4,577 bug reports from 193 popular D LSW projects, collected through a systematic dataset construction process, to provide an invaluable starting point for the automatic debugging techniques of DLSw.
Supplemental Material for a Systematic Literature Review on ...
This comparison is intended to help researchers to quickly identify all suitable benchmarks for evaluating their specific debugging approaches. More information can be found in the publication: Thomas Hirsch and Birgit Hofer: "A Systematic Literature Review on Benchmarks for Evaluating Debugging Approaches", submitted to the Journal of Systems ...
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
This systematic literature review provides an overview of benchmarks for evaluating debugging approaches. It supports researchers to choose the best suited benchmark(s) for evaluating their approaches.
Highlights •Identification of 73 benchmarks for evaluating debugging approaches.•Comparison of benchmarks w.r.t. size, language, and realization of FAIR criteria.•Discussion of problems in benchmar...
We compare the different benchmarks w.r.t. their size and the provided information such as bug reports, contained test cases, and other code metrics. This comparison is intended to help...
However, the reasons that inspire researchers to propose novel benchmarks are not fully understood. This article reports the investigation, identification, classification, and externalization of the state of the art about the proposition of benchmarks on software testing and debugging domains.
A systematic literature review on benchmarks for evaluating debugging approaches. Journal of Systems and Software 192 (2022), 111423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111423 Digital Library
A systematic literature review on benchmarks for evaluating debugging approaches Abstract Bug benchmarks are used in development and evaluation of debugging approaches, e.g. fault localization and automated repair.
For these reasons, we have performed a systematic literature review where we have identified 73 benchmarks that can be used to evaluate debugging approaches. We compare the different benchmarks with respect to their size and the provided information such as bug reports, contained test cases, and other code metrics.
A systematic literature review on benchmarks for evaluating debugging approaches. J. Syst. Softw. 192: 111423 (2022)
A novel bug benchmark for DLSW, Denchmark, is introduced, consisting of 4,577 bug reports from 193 popular D LSW projects, collected through a systematic dataset construction process, to provide an invaluable starting point for the automatic debugging techniques of DLSw.
This comparison is intended to help researchers to quickly identify all suitable benchmarks for evaluating their specific debugging approaches. More information can be found in the publication: Thomas Hirsch and Birgit Hofer: "A Systematic Literature Review on Benchmarks for Evaluating Debugging Approaches", submitted to the Journal of Systems ...