Criteria for Good Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Review
Fundamental Criteria: General Research Quality. Various researchers have put forward criteria for evaluating qualitative research, which have been summarized in Table 3.Also, the criteria outlined in Table 4 effectively deliver the various approaches to evaluate and assess the quality of qualitative work. The entries in Table 4 are based on Tracy's "Eight big‐tent criteria for excellent ...
How do you determine the quality of a journal article?
The better the quality of the articles that you use in the literature review, the stronger your own research will be. When you use articles that are not well respected, you run the risk that the conclusions you draw will be unfounded. Your supervisor will always check the article sources for the conclusions you draw. We will use an example to ...
Research quality: What it is, and how to achieve it
2) Initiating research stream: The researcher (s) must be able to assemble a research team that can achieve the identified research potential. The team should be motivated to identify research opportunities and insights, as well as to produce top-quality articles, which can reach the highest-level journals.
Quality in Research: Asking the Right Question
This column is about research questions, the beginning of the researcher's process. For the reader, the question driving the researcher's inquiry is the first place to start when examining the quality of their work because if the question is flawed, the quality of the methods and soundness of the researchers' thinking does not matter.
A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research
Researcher reflexivity, essentially a researcher's insight into their own biases and rationale for decision-making as the study progresses, is critical to rigor. This article reviews common standards of rigor, quality scholarship criteria, and best practices for qualitative research from design through dissemination.
Research quality: What it is, and how to achieve it
Section snippets What research quality historically is. Research assessment plays an essential role in academic appointments, in annual performance reviews, in promotions, and in national research assessment exercises such as the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA), the Research Excellence Framework (REF) in the United Kingdom, the Standard Evaluation Protocol (SEP) in the Netherlands ...
Good listening: A key element in establishing quality in qualitative
Given the subjective nature of the constructivist-qualitative approach, assessing the quality of such research is difficult. While this question has been the subject of many scholarly debates (Roulston, 2010), the centrality of "good" data is undoubtably a fundamental element in establishing quality in the research.
Assessing the quality of research
Figure 1. Go to: Systematic reviews of research are always preferred. Go to: Level alone should not be used to grade evidence. Other design elements, such as the validity of measurements and blinding of outcome assessments. Quality of the conduct of the study, such as loss to follow up and success of blinding.
PDF Criteria for Good Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Review
Strategies to establish rigor 4. The analytic lens for data examination Cohen and Crabtree (2008) Evaluative criteria for good qualitative research 1. Carrying out ethical research 2. Importance of the research 3. Clarity and coherence of the research report 4. Use of appropriate and rigorous methods 5.
Editorial: How to develop a quality research article and avoid a
1. Introduction. The process of concluding that a submitted research article does not align with the specific journals' aims and scope or meets the required rigour and quality, is commonly termed - desk rejection.This element of the review process is normally performed by the journal Editor directly or by the team of specialist sub-Editors.
Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary context
2.2 Search terms. Search terms were designed to identify publications that discuss the evaluation or assessment of quality or excellence 2 of research 3 that is done in a TDR context. Search terms are listed online in Supplementary Appendices 2 and 3.The search strategy favored sensitivity over specificity to ensure that we captured the relevant information.
A Step-To-Step Guide to Write a Quality Research Article
Today publishing articles is a trend around the world almost in each university. Millions of research articles are published in thousands of journals annually throughout many streams/sectors such as medical, engineering, science, etc. But few researchers follow the proper and fundamental criteria to write a quality research article.
Quality of Research Practice
The research quality model based on four basic concepts and 28 sub-concepts has-overall-been found valid, as an important contribution for describing the quality of research practice, by 42 senior researchers from three major Swedish universities. The majority of the respondents believed that all concepts in the model are important, and did ...
Sustainability
The strategic relevance of innovation and scientific research has amplified the attention towards the definition of quality in research practice. However, despite the proliferation of evaluation metrics and procedures, there is a need to go beyond bibliometric approaches and to identify, more explicitly, what constitutes good research and which are its driving factors or determinants.
Assessing Research Quality
Assessing Research Quality. This page presents information and tools to help evaluate the quality of a research study, as well as information on the ethics of research. The quality of social science and policy research can vary considerably. It is important that consumers of research keep this in mind when reading the findings from a research ...
Full article: The Many Meanings of Quality: Towards a Definition in
1. Introduction. Quality is a multi-faceted and intangible construct (Charantimath, Citation 2011; Zhang, Citation 2001) that has been subject to many interpretations and perspectives in our everyday life, in academia, as well as in industry and the public domain.In industry, most organisations have well-established quality departments (Sousa & Voss, Citation 2002), but the method of ...
Full article: Quality 2030: quality management for the future
6.1. General conclusions. Quality 2030 consists of five collectively designed themes for future QM research and practice: (a) systems perspectives applied, (b) stability in change, (c) models for smart self-organising, (d) integrating sustainable development, and (e) higher purpose as QM booster.
Full article: Four decades of research on quality: summarising
Previous quantitative studies of research on quality. Martínez-Lorente, Dewhurst, and Dale (Citation 1998) note that the term TQM started to become popular in the mid-1980s.Dereli, Durmuşoğlu, Delibaş, and Avlanmaz (Citation 2011) conclude that QM began to attract an increasing amount of interest from the service industry during the last decade.. Additionally, Dereli et al. (Citation 2011 ...
Clinical Quality Improvement and Quality Improvement Research
This article is intended to serve as a tutorial for speech-language pathology and audiology clinicians and researchers interested in pursuing quality improvement (QI) practice and research. Method Through a number of library database searches, author expertise, and first-hand experiences, we compiled this reference covering the history and ...
Google Scholar
Google Scholar provides a simple way to broadly search for scholarly literature. Search across a wide variety of disciplines and sources: articles, theses, books, abstracts and court opinions.
Practices in Data-Quality Evaluation: A Large-Scale Review of Online
In this study, I examine data-quality evaluation methods in online surveys and their frequency of use. Drawing from survey-methodology literature, I identified 11 distinct assessment categories and analyzed their prevalence across 3,298 articles published in 2022 from 200 psychology journals in the Web of Science Master Journal List.
Editorial: How to develop a quality research article and avoid a
Introduction. The process of concluding that a submitted research article does not align with the specific journals' aims and scope or meets the required rigour and quality, is commonly termed - desk rejection.This element of the review process is normally performed by the journal Editor directly or by the team of specialist sub-Editors.
COVID-19 Admission Rates and Changes in Care Quality in US Hospitals
Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used data from the 2019 and 2020 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases. Data were obtained for all nonfederal, acute care hospitals in 36 states with admissions in 2019 and 2020, and patients without a ...
Targeted temperature control following traumatic brain injury: ESICM
Aims and scope The aim of this panel was to develop consensus recommendations on targeted temperature control (TTC) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and in patients with moderate TBI who deteriorate and require admission to the intensive care unit for intracranial pressure (ICP) management. Methods A group of 18 international neuro-intensive care experts in the acute ...
A breakthrough for lupus treatment? Study explores CAR T-cell therapy
Researchers are striving to improve the quality of life for lupus patients through a clinical trial evaluating CAR T-cell therapy as a treatment for the autoimmune disease. ... our collaborative research includes clinical, translational and basic science studies. Research Programs; Search Clinical Trials; Clinical Research News; Participate in ...
CNBC
CNBC
Improving the quality of care in health systems: towards better
Abstract. Improving the quality of health care across a nation is complex and hard. Countries often rely on multiple single national level programmes to make progress. But the key is to use a framework to develop a balanced overall strategy, and evaluate the main elements continuously and over time. Achieving that requires having a critical ...
NYU Langone Opens Ambulatory Care Center Near Penn Station, Further
This distinction recognizes NYU Langone's consistent excellence in delivering high-quality care in five key domains: access to care, quality, efficiency, continuum of care, and equity. Media Inquiries. Steve Ritea Phone: 212-404-3525 ... Dr. Jonathan Yang has been named director of clinical research at the Brain and Spine Tumor Center. May 22 ...
Total Quality Management Practices' Effects on Quality Performance and
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 41 ( 2012 ) 273 â€" 280 1877-0428 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of The First International Confer ence on Leadership, Technology and Innovation Management doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.031 International Conference on Leadership, Technology and Innovation Management Total Quality Management ...
Space: The Final Frontier for Air Pollution Research Data
In a special symposium held at the American Thoracic Society (ATS) 2024 International Conference, NASA health and air quality specialists described the use of space-based systems and earth science ...
COMMENTS
Fundamental Criteria: General Research Quality. Various researchers have put forward criteria for evaluating qualitative research, which have been summarized in Table 3.Also, the criteria outlined in Table 4 effectively deliver the various approaches to evaluate and assess the quality of qualitative work. The entries in Table 4 are based on Tracy's "Eight big‐tent criteria for excellent ...
The better the quality of the articles that you use in the literature review, the stronger your own research will be. When you use articles that are not well respected, you run the risk that the conclusions you draw will be unfounded. Your supervisor will always check the article sources for the conclusions you draw. We will use an example to ...
2) Initiating research stream: The researcher (s) must be able to assemble a research team that can achieve the identified research potential. The team should be motivated to identify research opportunities and insights, as well as to produce top-quality articles, which can reach the highest-level journals.
This column is about research questions, the beginning of the researcher's process. For the reader, the question driving the researcher's inquiry is the first place to start when examining the quality of their work because if the question is flawed, the quality of the methods and soundness of the researchers' thinking does not matter.
Researcher reflexivity, essentially a researcher's insight into their own biases and rationale for decision-making as the study progresses, is critical to rigor. This article reviews common standards of rigor, quality scholarship criteria, and best practices for qualitative research from design through dissemination.
Section snippets What research quality historically is. Research assessment plays an essential role in academic appointments, in annual performance reviews, in promotions, and in national research assessment exercises such as the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA), the Research Excellence Framework (REF) in the United Kingdom, the Standard Evaluation Protocol (SEP) in the Netherlands ...
Given the subjective nature of the constructivist-qualitative approach, assessing the quality of such research is difficult. While this question has been the subject of many scholarly debates (Roulston, 2010), the centrality of "good" data is undoubtably a fundamental element in establishing quality in the research.
Figure 1. Go to: Systematic reviews of research are always preferred. Go to: Level alone should not be used to grade evidence. Other design elements, such as the validity of measurements and blinding of outcome assessments. Quality of the conduct of the study, such as loss to follow up and success of blinding.
Strategies to establish rigor 4. The analytic lens for data examination Cohen and Crabtree (2008) Evaluative criteria for good qualitative research 1. Carrying out ethical research 2. Importance of the research 3. Clarity and coherence of the research report 4. Use of appropriate and rigorous methods 5.
1. Introduction. The process of concluding that a submitted research article does not align with the specific journals' aims and scope or meets the required rigour and quality, is commonly termed - desk rejection.This element of the review process is normally performed by the journal Editor directly or by the team of specialist sub-Editors.
2.2 Search terms. Search terms were designed to identify publications that discuss the evaluation or assessment of quality or excellence 2 of research 3 that is done in a TDR context. Search terms are listed online in Supplementary Appendices 2 and 3.The search strategy favored sensitivity over specificity to ensure that we captured the relevant information.
Today publishing articles is a trend around the world almost in each university. Millions of research articles are published in thousands of journals annually throughout many streams/sectors such as medical, engineering, science, etc. But few researchers follow the proper and fundamental criteria to write a quality research article.
The research quality model based on four basic concepts and 28 sub-concepts has-overall-been found valid, as an important contribution for describing the quality of research practice, by 42 senior researchers from three major Swedish universities. The majority of the respondents believed that all concepts in the model are important, and did ...
The strategic relevance of innovation and scientific research has amplified the attention towards the definition of quality in research practice. However, despite the proliferation of evaluation metrics and procedures, there is a need to go beyond bibliometric approaches and to identify, more explicitly, what constitutes good research and which are its driving factors or determinants.
Assessing Research Quality. This page presents information and tools to help evaluate the quality of a research study, as well as information on the ethics of research. The quality of social science and policy research can vary considerably. It is important that consumers of research keep this in mind when reading the findings from a research ...
1. Introduction. Quality is a multi-faceted and intangible construct (Charantimath, Citation 2011; Zhang, Citation 2001) that has been subject to many interpretations and perspectives in our everyday life, in academia, as well as in industry and the public domain.In industry, most organisations have well-established quality departments (Sousa & Voss, Citation 2002), but the method of ...
6.1. General conclusions. Quality 2030 consists of five collectively designed themes for future QM research and practice: (a) systems perspectives applied, (b) stability in change, (c) models for smart self-organising, (d) integrating sustainable development, and (e) higher purpose as QM booster.
Previous quantitative studies of research on quality. Martínez-Lorente, Dewhurst, and Dale (Citation 1998) note that the term TQM started to become popular in the mid-1980s.Dereli, Durmuşoğlu, Delibaş, and Avlanmaz (Citation 2011) conclude that QM began to attract an increasing amount of interest from the service industry during the last decade.. Additionally, Dereli et al. (Citation 2011 ...
This article is intended to serve as a tutorial for speech-language pathology and audiology clinicians and researchers interested in pursuing quality improvement (QI) practice and research. Method Through a number of library database searches, author expertise, and first-hand experiences, we compiled this reference covering the history and ...
Google Scholar provides a simple way to broadly search for scholarly literature. Search across a wide variety of disciplines and sources: articles, theses, books, abstracts and court opinions.
In this study, I examine data-quality evaluation methods in online surveys and their frequency of use. Drawing from survey-methodology literature, I identified 11 distinct assessment categories and analyzed their prevalence across 3,298 articles published in 2022 from 200 psychology journals in the Web of Science Master Journal List.
Introduction. The process of concluding that a submitted research article does not align with the specific journals' aims and scope or meets the required rigour and quality, is commonly termed - desk rejection.This element of the review process is normally performed by the journal Editor directly or by the team of specialist sub-Editors.
Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used data from the 2019 and 2020 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases. Data were obtained for all nonfederal, acute care hospitals in 36 states with admissions in 2019 and 2020, and patients without a ...
Aims and scope The aim of this panel was to develop consensus recommendations on targeted temperature control (TTC) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and in patients with moderate TBI who deteriorate and require admission to the intensive care unit for intracranial pressure (ICP) management. Methods A group of 18 international neuro-intensive care experts in the acute ...
Researchers are striving to improve the quality of life for lupus patients through a clinical trial evaluating CAR T-cell therapy as a treatment for the autoimmune disease. ... our collaborative research includes clinical, translational and basic science studies. Research Programs; Search Clinical Trials; Clinical Research News; Participate in ...
CNBC
Abstract. Improving the quality of health care across a nation is complex and hard. Countries often rely on multiple single national level programmes to make progress. But the key is to use a framework to develop a balanced overall strategy, and evaluate the main elements continuously and over time. Achieving that requires having a critical ...
This distinction recognizes NYU Langone's consistent excellence in delivering high-quality care in five key domains: access to care, quality, efficiency, continuum of care, and equity. Media Inquiries. Steve Ritea Phone: 212-404-3525 ... Dr. Jonathan Yang has been named director of clinical research at the Brain and Spine Tumor Center. May 22 ...
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 41 ( 2012 ) 273 â€" 280 1877-0428 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of The First International Confer ence on Leadership, Technology and Innovation Management doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.031 International Conference on Leadership, Technology and Innovation Management Total Quality Management ...
In a special symposium held at the American Thoracic Society (ATS) 2024 International Conference, NASA health and air quality specialists described the use of space-based systems and earth science ...