receivable assignment agreement

• Search Search Please fill out this field.
• Corporate Finance
• Corporate Debt

Assignment of Accounts Receivable: Meaning, Considerations

Adam Hayes, Ph.D., CFA, is a financial writer with 15+ years Wall Street experience as a derivatives trader. Besides his extensive derivative trading expertise, Adam is an expert in economics and behavioral finance. Adam received his master's in economics from The New School for Social Research and his Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in sociology. He is a CFA charterholder as well as holding FINRA Series 7, 55 & 63 licenses. He currently researches and teaches economic sociology and the social studies of finance at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.

Charlene Rhinehart is a CPA , CFE, chair of an Illinois CPA Society committee, and has a degree in accounting and finance from DePaul University.

Investopedia / Jiaqi Zhou

What Is Assignment of Accounts Receivable?

Assignment of accounts receivable is a lending agreement whereby the borrower assigns accounts receivable to the lending institution. In exchange for this assignment of accounts receivable, the borrower receives a loan for a percentage, which could be as high as 100%, of the accounts receivable.

The borrower pays interest, a service charge on the loan, and the assigned receivables serve as collateral. If the borrower fails to repay the loan, the agreement allows the lender to collect the assigned receivables.

Key Takeaways

• Assignment of accounts receivable is a method of debt financing whereby the lender takes over the borrowing company's receivables.
• This form of alternative financing is often seen as less desirable, as it can be quite costly to the borrower, with APRs as high as 100% annualized.
• Usually, new and rapidly growing firms or those that cannot find traditional financing elsewhere will seek this method.
• Accounts receivable are considered to be liquid assets.
• If a borrower doesn't repay their loan, the assignment of accounts agreement protects the lender.

Understanding Assignment of Accounts Receivable

With an assignment of accounts receivable, the borrower retains ownership of the assigned receivables and therefore retains the risk that some accounts receivable will not be repaid. In this case, the lending institution may demand payment directly from the borrower. This arrangement is called an "assignment of accounts receivable with recourse." Assignment of accounts receivable should not be confused with pledging or with accounts receivable financing .

An assignment of accounts receivable has been typically more expensive than other forms of borrowing. Often, companies that use it are unable to obtain less costly options. Sometimes it is used by companies that are growing rapidly or otherwise have too little cash on hand to fund their operations.

New startups in Fintech, like C2FO, are addressing this segment of the supply chain finance by creating marketplaces for account receivables. Liduidx is another Fintech company providing solutions through digitization of this process and connecting funding providers.

Financiers may be willing to structure accounts receivable financing agreements in different ways with various potential provisions.​

Special Considerations

Accounts receivable (AR, or simply "receivables") refer to a firm's outstanding balances of invoices billed to customers that haven't been paid yet. Accounts receivables are reported on a company’s balance sheet as an asset, usually a current asset with invoice payments due within one year.

Accounts receivable are considered to be a relatively liquid asset . As such, these funds due are of potential value for lenders and financiers. Some companies may see their accounts receivable as a burden since they are expected to be paid but require collections and cannot be converted to cash immediately. As such, accounts receivable assignment may be attractive to certain firms.

The process of assignment of accounts receivable, along with other forms of financing, is often known as factoring, and the companies that focus on it may be called factoring companies. Factoring companies will usually focus substantially on the business of accounts receivable financing, but factoring, in general, a product of any financier.

• Terms of Service
• Editorial Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Your Privacy Choices

• Receivables
• Notes Receivable
• Credit Terms
• Cash Discount on Sales
• Accounting for Bad Debts
• Bad Debts Direct Write-off Method
• Bad Debts Allowance Method
• Bad Debts as % of Sales
• Bad Debts as % of Receivables
• Recovery of Bad Debts
• Accounts Receivable Aging
• Assignment of Accounts Receivable
• Factoring of Accounts Receivable

Assignment of accounts receivable is an agreement in which a business assigns its accounts receivable to a financing company in return for a loan. It is a way to finance cash flows for a business that otherwise finds it difficult to secure a loan, because the assigned receivables serve as collateral for the loan received.

By assignment of accounts receivable, the lender i.e. the financing company has the right to collect the receivables if the borrowing company i.e. actual owner of the receivables, fails to repay the loan in time. The financing company also receives finance charges / interest and service charges.

It is important to note that the receivables are not actually sold under an assignment agreement. If the ownership of the receivables is actually transferred, the agreement would be for sale / factoring of accounts receivable . Usually, the borrowing company would itself collect the assigned receivables and remit the loan amount as per agreement. It is only when the borrower fails to pay as per agreement, that the lender gets a right to collect the assigned receivables on its own.

The assignment of accounts receivable may be general or specific. A general assignment of accounts receivable entitles the lender to proceed to collect any accounts receivable of the borrowing company whereas in case of specific assignment of accounts receivable, the lender is only entitled to collect the accounts receivable specifically assigned to the lender.

The following example shows how to record transactions related to assignment of accounts receivable via journal entries:

On March 1, 20X6, Company A borrowed $50,000 from a bank and signed a 12% one month note payable. The bank charged 1% initial fee. Company A assigned $73,000 of its accounts receivable to the bank as a security. During March 20X6, the company collected $70,000 of the assigned accounts receivable and paid the principle and interest on note payable to the bank on April 1. $3,000 of the sales were returned by the customers.

Record the necessary journal entries by Company A.

Journal Entries on March 1

Initial fee = 0.01 × 50,000 = 500

Cash received = 50,000 – 500 = 49,500

The accounts receivable don't actually change ownership. But they may be to transferred to another account as shown the following journal entry. The impact on the balance sheet is only related to presentation, so this journal entry may not actually be passed. Usually, the fact that accounts receivable have been assigned, is stated in the notes to the financial statements.

Journal Entries on April 1

Interest expense = 50,000 × 12%/12 = 500

by Irfanullah Jan, ACCA and last modified on Oct 29, 2020

Related Topics

• Sales Returns

All Chapters in Accounting

• Intl. Financial Reporting Standards
• Introduction
• Accounting Principles
• Business Combinations
• Accounting Cycle
• Financial Statements
• Non-Current Assets
• Fixed Assets
• Investments
• Revenue Recognition
• Current Assets
• Inventories
• Shareholders' Equity
• Liability Accounts
• Accounting for Taxes
• Employee Benefits
• Accounting for Partnerships
• Financial Ratios
• Cost Classifications
• Cost Accounting Systems
• Cost Behavior
• CVP Analysis
• Relevant Costing
• Capital Budgeting
• Master Budget
• Inventory Management
• Cash Management
• Standard Costing

Current Chapter

XPLAIND.com is a free educational website; of students, by students, and for students. You are welcome to learn a range of topics from accounting, economics, finance and more. We hope you like the work that has been done, and if you have any suggestions, your feedback is highly valuable. Let's connect!

Copyright © 2010-2024 XPLAIND.com

Contract for the assignment of receivables

A receivable assignment agreement is an agreement by which a creditor – the “assignor” – assigns to another person – the “assignee” – a receivable it holds against a third person – the “assigned debtor”. The assigned debtor is not a party to the assignment agreement. The mere exchange of consents between the assignor and the assignee is sufficient to give rise to the contract for the assignment of the receivable, the consent of the debtor not being necessary for its performance.

Related Lawyers

Related Topic Posts

Commercial Contracts are of crucial importance

Exit Clause For Shareholders

Management contract

Clause creating a dismemberment of the ownership, good leaver / bad leaver clause, convertible loan agreement.

Can I make commitments on behalf of a company that is not yet incorporated?

Loan contract, chairman deadlock clause.

Carry out the daily formalities related to the existence of the company

The distribution of dividends in the srl, clause on the internal organisation of the company, blocking clause.

“Simple company”

Not-for-profit association, head cabin contract (and other electrical infrastructure).

Board (of directors)

Amending the articles of association of a limited liability company, nominee presentation clause, commercial disputes prevention and management, preference right clause, voting agreement in the administrative bodies, incorporate a company, (so-called) “alarm bell” procedure, special report of the board of directors (alarm bell), grant different rights to shareholders in the same limited liability company srl, alarm bell procedure.

The minority shareholders action

Running your company alone or with others.

• Tracking Cookies

Our Insights

Assignment of Accounts Receivable – Trap for the Unwary

By  Steven A. Jacobson

Most businesses are familiar with the mechanics of an assignment of accounts receivable. A party seeking capital assigns its accounts receivable to a financing or factoring company that advances that party a stipulated percentage of the face amount of the receivables.

The factoring company, in turn, sends a notice of assignment of accounts receivable to the party obligated to pay the factoring company’s assignee, i.e. the account debtor. While fairly straightforward, this three-party arrangement has one potential trap for account debtors.

Most account debtors know that once they receive a notice of assignment of accounts receivable, they are obligated to commence payments to the factoring company. Continued payments to the assignee do not relieve the account debtor from its obligation to pay the factoring company.

It is not uncommon for a notice of assignment of accounts receivable to contain seemingly innocuous and boilerplate language along the following lines:

Please make the proper notations on your ledger and acknowledge this letter and that invoices are not subject to any claims or defenses you may have against the assignee.

Typically, the notice of assignment of accounts receivable is directed to an accounting department and is signed, acknowledged and returned to the factoring company without consideration of the waiver of defenses languages.

Even though a party may have a valid defense to payment to its assignee, it still must pay the face amount of the receivable to the factoring company if it has signed a waiver. In many cases, this will result in a party paying twice – once to the factoring company and once to have, for example, shoddy workmanship repaired or defective goods replaced. Despite the harsh result caused by an oftentimes inadvertent waiver agreement, the Uniform Commercial Code validates these provisions with limited exceptions. Accordingly, some procedures should be put in place to require a review of any notice of assignment of accounts receivable to make sure that an account debtor preserves its rights and defenses.

• Announcement

• Trade Finance
• Letters of Credit
• Trade Insurance & Risk
• Shipping & Logistics
• Sustainable Trade Finance
• Incoterms® Rules 2020
• Research & Data
• Conferences
• Purchase Order Finance
• Stock Finance
• Structured Commodity Finance
• Receivables Finance
• Supply Chain Finance
• Bonds and Guarantees
• Find Finance Products
• Get Trade Finance

• Incoterms® 2020
• Letters of Credit (LCs)

Receivables Finance And The Assignment Of Receivables

Tfg legal trade finance hub, receivables finance and the assignment of receivables.

A receivable represents money that is owed to a company and is expected to be paid in the future. Receivables finance, also known as accounts receivable financing, is a form of asset-based financing where a company leverages its outstanding receivables as collateral to secure short-term loans and obtain financing.

In case of default, the lender has a right to collect associated receivables from the company’s debtors. In brief, it is the process by which a company raises cash against its own book’s debts.

The company actually receives an amount equal to a reduced value of the pledged receivables, the age of the receivables impacting the amount of financing received. The company can get up to 90% of the amount of its receivables advanced.

This form of financing assists companies in unlocking funds that would otherwise remain tied up in accounts receivable, providing them with access to capital that is not immediately realised from outstanding debts.

FIG. 1: Accounts receivable financing operates by leveraging a company’s receivables to obtain financing.  Source: https://fhcadvisory.com/images/account-receivable-financing.jpg

Restrictions on the assignment of receivables – New legislation

Invoice  discounting  products under which a company assigns its receivables have been used by small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to raise capital. However, such products depend on the related receivables to be assignable at first.

Businesses have faced provisions that ban or restrict the assignment of receivables in commercial contracts by imposing a condition or other restrictions, which prevents them from being able to use their receivables to raise funds.

In 2015, the UK Government enacted the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act (SBEEA) by which raising finance on receivables is facilitated. Pursuant to this Act, regulations can be made to invalidate restrictions on the assignment of receivables in certain types of contract.

In other words, in certain circumstances, clauses which prevent assignment of a receivable in a contract between businesses is unenforceable. Especially, in its section 1(1), the Act provides that the authorised authority can, by regulations “make provision for the purpose of securing that any non-assignment of receivables term of a relevant contract:

• has no effect;
• has no effect in relation to persons of a prescribed description;
• has effect in relation to persons of a prescribed description only for such purposes as may be prescribed.”

The underlying aim is to enable SMEs to use their receivables as financing to raise capital, through the possibility of assigning such receivables to another entity.

The aforementioned regulations, which allow invalidations of such restrictions on the assignment of receivables, are contained in the Business Contract Terms (Assignment of Receivables) Regulations 2018, which will apply to any term in a contract entered into force on or after 31 December 2018.

By virtue of its section 2(1) “Subject to regulations 3 and 4, a term in a contract has no effect to the extent that it prohibits or imposes a condition, or other restriction, on the assignment of a receivable arising under that contract or any other contract between the same parties.”

Such regulations apply to contracts for the supply of goods, services or intangible assets under which the supplier is entitled to be paid money. However, there are several exclusions to this rule.

In section 3, an exception exists where the supplier is a large enterprise or a special purpose vehicle (SPV). In section 4, there are listed exclusions for various contracts such as “for, or entered into in connection with, prescribed financial services”, contracts “where one or more of the parties to the contract is acting for purposes which are outside a trade, business or profession” or contracts “where none of the parties to the contract has entered into it in the course of carrying on a business in the United Kingdom”. Also, specific exclusions relate to contracts in energy, land, share purchase and business purchase.

Effects of the 2018 Regulations

As mentioned above, any contract terms that prevent, set conditions for, or place restrictions on transferring a receivable are considered invalid and cannot be legally enforced.

In light of this, the assignment of the right to be paid under a contract for the supply of goods (receivables) cannot be restricted or prohibited. However, parties are not prevented from restricting other contracts rights.

Non-assignment clauses can have varying forms. Such clauses are covered by the regulations when terms prevent the assignee from determining the validity or value of the receivable or their ability to enforce it.

Overall, these legislations have had an important impact for businesses involved in the financing of receivables, by facilitating such processes for SMEs.

Digital platforms and fintech solutions: The assignment of receivables has been significantly impacted by the digitisation of financial services. Fintech platforms and online marketplaces have been developed to make the financing and assignment of receivables easier.

These platforms employ tech to assess debtor creditworthiness and provide efficient investor and seller matching, including data analytics and artificial intelligence. They provide businesses more autonomy, transparency, and access to a wider range of possible investors.

Securitisation is an essential part of receivables financing. Asset-backed securities (ABS), a type of financial instrument made up of receivables, are then sold to investors.

Businesses are able to turn their receivables into fast cash by transferring the credit risk and cash flow rights to investors. Investors gain from diversification and potentially greater yields through securitisation, while businesses profit from increased liquidity and risk-reduction capabilities.

References:

https://www.tradefinanceglobal.com/finance-products/accounts-receivables-finance/  – 28/10/2018

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/26/section/1/enacted  – 28/10/2018

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2018/9780111171080  – 28/10/2018

https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap117.pdf  – Accessed 14/06/2023

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/asset-backedsecurity.asp  – Accessed 14/06/2023

https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2008/09/pdf/basics.pdf  – Accessed 14/06/2023

International Trade Law

1 | Introduction to International Trade Law 2 | Legal Trade Finance 3 | Standard Legal Charges 4 | Borrowing Base Facilities 5 | Governing law in trade finance transactions 6 | SPV Financing 7 | Guarantees and Indemnities 8 | Taking security over assets 9 | Receivables finance and the assignment of receivables 10 | Force Majeure 11 | Arbitration 12 | Master Participation Agreements 13 | Digital Negotiable Instruments 14 | Generative AI in Trade Law

Access trade, receivables and supply chain finance

Contact the trade team, speak to our trade finance team, want to learn more about trade finance download our free guides.

Learn more about Legal Structures in Trade Finance

Digital Negotiable Instruments

Electronic Signatures

Force Majeure

Master Risk Participation Agreements In Trade Finance

What is a Creditor?

What is a debtor (debitor).

About the Author

Trade Finance Global (TFG) assists companies with raising debt finance. While we can access many traditional forms of finance, we specialise in alternative finance and complex funding solutions related to international trade. We help companies to raise finance in ways that is sometimes out of reach for mainstream lenders.

• Description

Assignment of Receivables Agreement

Quebec English Civil law Unannotated

Contrat de cession de créance Contrat de cession de créance

D07200 - Quebec French Civil law Unannotated

Assignment of Receivables Agreement Assignment of Receivables Agreement

D07200a - Quebec English Civil law Unannotated

Grille d'analyse - Contrat de cession de... Grille d'analyse - Contrat de cession de créance

D07201 - Quebec French Civil law Unannotated

In order to be granted a loan, one must often provide security to guarantee repayment of the loan. When the borrower is also the creditor of another party, it may offer this debt-claim as security to obtain financing. This transaction is referred to as debt assignment. The debt-claim is assigned for an amount below its nominal value and the assignor guarantees its payment in principal, interest and fees. Our template sets out the legal framework for this type of financing arrangement.

0.00 INTERPRETATION 0.01 Terminology 0.01.01 Agreement 0.01.02 Breach 0.01.03 Change in Control 0.01.04 Confidential Information 0.01.05 Encumber or Encumbrance 0.01.06 Event of Default 0.01.07 Force Majeure 0.01.08 Fundamental Provisions 0.01.09 Law 0.01.10 Legal Representatives 0.01.11 PARTY 0.01.12 Person 0.01.13 Prime Rate 0.01.14 Receivables 0.02 Precedence 0.03 Jurisdiction 0.03.01 Governing Law 0.03.02 Non-compliance a) Severability b) Substitute Provision 0.04 Miscellaneous 0.04.01 Cumulative Rights 0.04.02 Time and Dates a) Time of the Essence b) Computation of Time c) Delays 0.04.03 Financial References 0.04.04 References within Agreement 0.04.05 Gender and Number 0.04.06 Headings 0.04.07 Presumptions 0.04.08 Knowledge 0.04.09 Approval 0.04.10 GAAP 1.00 PURPOSE 1.01 Assignment 1.02 Conditions 1.02.01 Required by ASSIGNOR 1.02.02 Required by ASSIGNEE 1.02.03 Choice 2.00 CONSIDERATION 3.00 TERMS OF PAYMENT 3.01 Base Amount 3.02 Interest 3.03 Loss of Term 4.00 SECURITY 4.01 In favour of ASSIGNOR 4.02 In favour of ASSIGNEE 5.00 MUTUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 5.01 Status 5.02 Authority 5.03 Binding Agreement 5.04 Canadian Resident 5.05 Commission 5.06 Insurance 5.07 Nominee 5.08 Fundamental Provisions 5.09 Disclosure 6.00 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF ASSIGNOR 6.01 Status 6.02 Authority 6.03 Binding Agreement 6.04 Insurance 6.05 Nominee 6.06 Fundamental Provisions 6.07 Disclosure 6.08 Existence of the Receivables 6.09 Defect and Nullity 6.10 Prior Assignment 6.11 Sole Owner 6.12 Condition of the Debtor 7.00 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF ASSIGNEE 7.01 Status 7.02 Authority 7.03 Binding Agreement 7.04 Insurance 7.05 Nominee 7.06 Fundamental Provisions 7.07 Disclosure 8.00 MUTUAL DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS 8.01 Confidential Information 8.01.01 Undertaking 8.01.02 End of Agreement 8.02 Insurance 8.02.01 Insured Risks 8.02.02 Amount of Coverage 8.02.03 Issuer 8.02.04 Co-insured 8.02.05 No Limitation 8.03 Indemnification 8.03.01 “Loss” 8.03.02 Scope 8.03.03 Procedure 8.03.04 Deductible 8.03.05 Limitation on Claims 8.04 Disclosure of Agreement 9.00 DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE ASSIGNOR 9.01 Guarantee 9.02 Execution of Documents 10.00 OBLIGATIONS OF ASSIGNEE 11.00 SPECIAL PROVISIONS 11.01 Assignment 11.01.01 Prohibition 11.01.02 Effect of Breach 11.01.03 Exception 11.02 Force Majeure 11.02.01 No Default 11.02.02 Duty 11.02.03 Rights of Other PARTY 11.03 Relationship 11.03.01 Independent Contractors 11.03.02 No Control over Performance 11.03.03 No Authority to Bind 11.04 Further Assurances 11.05 Other Remedies 11.05.01 Choices 11.05.02 No Limitations 11.06 Prescription 12.00 GENERAL PROVISIONS 12.01 Notice 12.02 Dispute Resolution 12.02.01 Good Faith Negotiations 12.02.02 Mediation 12.02.03 Arbitration 12.03 Election 12.04 Counterparts 12.05 Amendment 12.06 No Waiver of Rights 12.07 Electronic Transmission 12.08 Language 13.00 TERMINATION 13.01 Mutual Consent 13.02 Unilateral Termination 13.03 Without Notice 13.04 Prior Notice 13.05 Change of Control 14.00 EFFECTIVE DATE 14.01 Retroactivity 14.02 Execution 14.03 Deferral 15.00 DURATION 15.01 Instantaneous 15.02 Survival 16.00 SCOPE SCHEDULE A – EXCERPT FROM A RESOLUTION OF ASSIGNOR SCHEDULE B – EXCERPT FROM A RESOLUTION OF ASSIGNEE SCHEDULE C – ACCEPTANCE BY THE DEBTOR SCHEDULE D – ACCEPTANCE BY THE SURETY

Other products that might interest you

Unanimous shareholder agreement, sales representative agreement, commercial lease agreement - triple-net, service agreement - general, cleaning services agreement - simplified version, asset purchase agreement, share purchase agreement, over 1,000 french documents and over 850 english documents, are you sure you want to continue.

Your selection currently holds some items. By adding an item to your selection, you will replace its content and lose your previous selection.

Assignment of Accounts Receivable

The financial accounting term assignment of accounts receivable refers to the process whereby a company borrows cash from a lender, and uses the receivable as collateral on the loan. When accounts receivable is assigned, the terms of the agreement should be noted in the company's financial statements.

Explanation

In the normal course of business, customers are constantly making purchases on credit and remitting payments. Transferring receivables to another party allows companies to reduce the sales to cash revenue cycle time. Also known as pledging, assignment of accounts receivable is one of two ways companies dispose of receivables, the other being factoring.

The assignment process involves an agreement with a lending institution, and the creation of a promissory note that pledges a portion of the company's accounts receivable as collateral on the loan. If the company does not fulfill its obligation under the agreement, the lender has a right to collect the receivables. There are two ways this can be accomplished:

General Assignment : a portion of, or all, receivables owned by the company are pledged as collateral. The only transaction recorded by the company is a credit to cash and a debit to notes payable. If material, the terms of the agreement should also appear in the notes to the company's financial statements.

Specific Assignment : the lender and borrower enter into an agreement that identifies specific accounts to be used as collateral. The two parties will also outline who will attempt to collect the receivable, and whether or not the debtor will be notified.

In the case of specific assignment, if the company and lender agree the lending institution will collect the receivables, the debtor will be instructed to remit payment directly to the lender.

The journal entries for general assignments are fairly straightforward. In the example below, Company A records the receipt of a $100,000 loan collateralized using accounts receivable, and the creation of notes payable for $100,000.

In specific assignments, the entries are more complex since the receivable includes accounts that are explicitly identified. In this case, Company A has pledged $200,000 of accounts in exchange for a loan of $100,000.

Related Terms

Contributors

Moneyzine Editor

• France (FR)
• Germany (DE)
• Netherlands

United Kingdom

• United States

The Business Contract Terms (Assignment of Receivables) Regulations 2018: still more to do?

The Business Contract Terms (Assignment of Receivables) Regulations 2018 (the " Regulations ") are now in force. The Regulations are intended to make it easier for small businesses to access receivables-based finance by making ineffective any prohibitions, conditions and restrictions on the assignment of receivables [1] arising under contracts for the supply of goods, services or intangible assets.

The Regulations have a somewhat chequered history. The Law Commission advocated legislation to limit the effectiveness of anti-assignment clauses in 2005, however, the proposal failed to gain momentum and lay dormant for more than a decade. Draft legislation finally appeared in 2017, but was withdrawn following criticism by the Loan Market Association and others. The final form of the Regulations addresses some of the criticisms, but adds complexity in what is already a complex area of the law.

The Effect of the Regulations

A term in a contract to which the Regulations apply is ineffective to the extent that it prohibits or imposes a condition or other restriction on the assignment of a receivable arising under that contract or another contract between the same parties. That does not necessarily mean that the term will be entirely void as a result: contractual prohibitions on assignment often do not distinguish between the right to performance of the contract and the right to be paid amounts arising under it. Prohibitions of this type will remain effective to prevent an assignment of the right to performance, even if they are ineffective to prevent the assignment of receivables arising under the contract.

The Regulations provide that a term which prevents an assignee from determining the validity or the value of the receivable or restricts its ability to enforce the receivable will be deemed to be a condition or other restriction on assignment. This, for example, includes provisions which prevent an assignee from obtaining particulars and evidence of any potential defence or set-off by a party to the contract. Therefore, the Regulations permit disclosure of matters which might otherwise be caught by confidentiality provisions in the underlying contract.

When do the Regulations apply?

Subject to specified exceptions, the Regulations apply to any contract entered into on or after 31 December 2018.

Certain types of contract are excluded from the Regulations. For example, the Regulations do not apply :

• to contracts for certain prescribed financial services or to other specific types of contract, including those in relation to real estate, certain derivatives, certain project finance and energy agreements and operating leases.
• to contracts entered into in connection with the acquisition, disposal or transfer of an ownership interest in all or part of a business, firm or undertaking, provided the relevant contract includes a statement to that effect. The need for such a statement applies even where the purpose of the contract is obvious on its face.
• where one or more of the parties is a consumer, or where none of the parties has entered into the contract in the course of carrying on a business in the UK.

The Regulations do not apply if the supplier is a "large enterprise" or a "special purpose vehicle" (the " SME Test ") at the time of the assignment. For this purpose, a special purpose vehicle is a firm that carries out a primary purpose in relation to the holding of assets (except trading stock) or financing commercial transactions, which in either case involves it incurring a liability of £10m or more.

The question of whether a limited company is a "large enterprise" depends in part on turnover, balance sheet total and number of employees assessed by reference the most recent annual accounts filed by the company or its parent prior to the assignment. Therefore, at the time the supplier and the debtor enter into a contract, they will not necessarily know whether a contractual prohibition on the assignment of receivables will be effective.

The definition of a "large enterprise" may be difficult to apply in some circumstances and to some entities. For example, the Regulations imply that limited partnerships are included in scope and some commentators argue that in this situation it would be the general partner entity which would be assessed under the SME Test, however, this is not expressly provided for by the Regulations.

If another governing law is imposed by a party wholly or mainly for the purpose of enabling it to evade the operation of the Regulations, the Regulations state that they will nevertheless have effect. Aside from the practical difficulty in determining whether the choice of law was imposed for this purpose, the effect of this provision is not entirely clear. Under Rome I, the law governing an assigned claim determines its assignability and the relationship between the assignee and the debtor [2] . Therefore, the fundamental question of whether the debtor should pay the supplier or the assignee remains determined by the governing law of the contract, but subject it seems (at least as far as the English courts are concerned) to the mandatory provisions of the Regulations.

The Regulations only affect prohibitions, restrictions and conditions on assignment contained in the contract under which the receivable arises or another contract between the same parties. For example, they would not restrict the effectiveness of a negative pledge or a restriction on the disposal of receivables contained in a financing document with a third party lender.

The term "assignment" is not defined in the Regulations and, assuming it has its normal legal meaning, does not include the creation of a charge or trust. Therefore, it appears that the Regulations do not apply to the creation of a charge or a trust.

What if the Regulations do not apply?

As a result of the SME Test and the exclusion of certain types of contracts, there will be many situations in which the Regulations are not relevant to the assignment of a receivable. Where the Regulations do not apply, the current law recognises the effectiveness of contractual prohibitions on the assignment of receivables [3] . However, case law suggests that a prohibition on assignment will not normally be construed as preventing the creation of a trust. Receivables purchase agreements will therefore often provide for the supplier to hold the receivable and/or its proceeds on trust for the assignee to the extent that the assignment is ineffective. In response, some debtors include specific prohibitions on the creation of trusts over receivables in their contracts. However, assignees will try to circumvent the practical effect of even the most widely drafted prohibition by taking a power of attorney enabling them to bring an action against the debtor in the name of the supplier.

The law is still developing in response to this escalating arms race between assignees and debtors. In part this is due to an inevitable tension between the interest of the assignee in having its proprietary interest in the receivable recognised and the interest of the debtor in choosing whether it deals with anyone other than its original contractual counterparty.

This has led some to argue that the common law should recognise all assignments of receivables notwithstanding prohibitions on assignment, at least as between the assignor and the assignee. [4] Arguably, this approach would balance the legitimate interests of all parties.

Still more to do?

Where they apply, the Regulations will make it easier for SMEs to assign their receivables and to raise finance. However, the Regulations do not mean that assignees can ignore the terms of the underlying contractual arrangements between suppliers and debtors; for one thing any existing rights of set-off will continue to bind the assignee [5] . Also, because the Regulations do not apply to contracts entered into before 31 December 2018, prohibitions on assignment will continue to apply to many receivables owed to SME suppliers for a while yet.

Assessing whether a supplier is an SME involves reviewing the most recent relevant annual accounts and the status of the supplier in this respect may change throughout the term of a contract. There are also various types of contract to which the Regulations do not apply and, in some cases, applying those exceptions is not straightforward. The Regulations add an additional layer of complexity to the law.

In practice, the question that assignees ask their lawyers is very simple: what action can they take to recover? The Regulations may enable the answer to be more positive, but they also make it more nuanced. There is more work for legislation or precedent to do to simplify the law in this area.

[1] "Receivable" is defined in broad terms as a right (whether or not earned by performance) to be paid any amount under a contract for the supply of goods, services or intangible assets.

[2] Regulation (EC) No 593/2008: Article 14(2), Rome I

[3] Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd [1994] 1 AC 85

[4] See in particular Professor Roy Goode's article " Contractual Prohibitions Against Assignment " [2009] LMCLQ 300 cited by approval by Lady Justice Gloster in First Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC and BP Oil International Limited [2018] EWCA Civ 14

[5] In recovery situations, set-off and disputes in relation to liability are often more significant issues for the debtor from a commercial perspective than the question of whether a prohibition on assignment is legally effective.

Receivables Financing Agreement

Jump to section, what is a receivables financing agreement.

A receivables financing agreement, also known as a factoring arrangement, is a type of financial transaction in which a business sells its accounts receivable (invoices) to a third party (the factor). The factor then becomes the legal owner of the invoices and is responsible for collecting the payment from the debtors. In exchange for assuming this risk, the factor pays the business an up-front fee (the purchase price) and/or a percentage of the money collected from the debtors. This can be an attractive option for businesses that need quick access to cash but don't want to wait 30 or 60 days for customers to pay their bills.

Common Sections in Receivables Financing Agreements

Below is a list of common sections included in Receivables Financing Agreements. These sections are linked to the below sample agreement for you to explore.

Receivables Financing Agreement Sample

Reference : Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.22 17 d541813dex1022.htm EX-10.22 , Viewed April 22, 2022, View Source on SEC .

Who Helps With Receivables Financing Agreements?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on receivables financing agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with a receivables financing agreement?

Post a project  in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate receivables financing agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.

Meet some of our Receivables Financing Agreement Lawyers

Ferraro Law Firm was founded by Dean C. Ferraro. Dean earned his Bachelor's Degree from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona ("Cal Poly Pomona") in 1992 and his J.D. Degree from the University of Mississippi School of Law ("Ole Miss") in 1996. He is licensed to practice law in the State Courts of Colorado, Tennessee, and California. Dean is also admitted to practice before the United States District Courts of Colorado (District of Colorado), California (Central District), and Tennessee (Eastern District). Shortly after earning his law license and working for a private law firm, Dean joined the District Attorney's office, where he worked for five successful years as one of the leading prosecuting attorneys in the State of Tennessee. After seven years of practicing law in Tennessee, Dean moved back to his birth state and practiced law in California from 2003-2015. In 2015, Dean moved with his family to Colorado, practicing law in beautiful Castle Rock, where he is recognized as a highly-effective attorney, well-versed in many areas of law. Dean's career has entailed practicing multiple areas of law, including civil litigation with a large law firm, prosecuting criminal cases as an Assistant District Attorney, In-House Counsel for Safeco Insurance, and as the founding member of an online law group that helped thousands of people get affordable legal services. Pursuing his passion for helping others, Dean now utilizes his legal and entrepreneurial experience to help his clients in their personal and business lives. Dean is also a bestselling author of two legal thrillers, Murder in Santa Barbara and Murder in Vail. He currently is working on his next legal thriller, The Grove Conspiracy, set to be published in 2023.

Jason is a self-starting, go-getting lawyer who takes a pragmatic approach to helping his clients. He co-founded Fortify Law because he was not satisfied with the traditional approach to providing legal services. He firmly believes that legal costs should be predictable, transparent and value-driven. Jason’s entrepreneurial mindset enables him to better understand his clients’ needs. His first taste of entrepreneurship came from an early age when he helped manage his family’s small free range cattle farm. Every morning, before school, he would deliver hay to a herd of 50 hungry cows. In addition, he was responsible for sweeping "the shop" at his parent's 40-employee HVAC business. Before becoming a lawyer, he clerked at the Lewis & Clark Small Business Legal Clinic where he handled a diverse range of legal issues including establishing new businesses, registering trademarks, and drafting contracts. He also spent time working with the in-house team at adidas® where, among other things, he reviewed and negotiated complex agreements and created training materials for employees. He also previously worked with Meriwether Group, a Portland-based business consulting firm focused on accelerating the growth of disruptive consumer brands and facilitating founder exits. These experiences have enabled Jason to not only understand the unique legal hurdles that can threaten a business, but also help position them for growth. Jason's practice focuses on Business and Intellectual Property Law, including: ​ -Reviewing and negotiating contracts -Resolving internal corporate disputes -Creating employment and HR policies -Registering and protecting intellectual property -Forming new businesses and subsidiaries -Facilitating Business mergers, acquisitions, and exit strategies -Conducting international business transactions ​​ In his free time, Jason is an adventure junkie and gear-head. He especially enjoys backpacking, kayaking, and snowboarding. He is also a technology enthusiast, craft beer connoisseur, and avid soccer player.

Founder David W. Weygandt, the Singing Lawyer, is passionate about helping families and businesses stay in tune with what they care about and avoid conflict. When injustice has been done, David is proud to stand up to the modern Goliath and vindicate your rights on your behalf. David lives and practices law in The Woodlands, Texas, and assists clients all across Texas.

Attorney Nicole B. Phillips is a northwestern Iowa native and devotes her practice to the area of Family Law. She is an experienced trial attorney with over 12 years of family law experience. ​ Nicole graduated from The University of South Dakota with a degree in Criminal Justice, and attended Oklahoma City University School of Law to obtain her law degree. Prior to establishing Phillips Law Firm, P.C., Nicole built her first successful law practice in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, where she focused on Family Law, Estate Planning and Personal Injury Law, and her second successful law practice in Sherman, Texas, focusing primarily on Family Law. ​ Nicole has one daughter, Arabella. In addition to enjoying time with her daughter, Nicole enjoys reading, family dinners, traveling, spending time with friends, and game nights.

Ari is a transactional attorney with substantial experience serving clients in regulated industries. He has worked extensively with companies in regulated state cannabis markets on developing governance documents (LLC operating agreements, corporate bylaws, etc...), as well as drafting and negotiating all manner of business and real estate contracts.

I'm a knowledgable and experienced New York licensed attorney with strong contract drafting and negotiation skills, a sophisticated business acumen, and a background working in entertainment and technology law.

I am the Founding Member of Evan Ficaj Law Firm PLLC, and I am passionate about helping businesses launch, grow, and succeed. My law firm assists clients with business, contract, entertainment, IP, and estate planning matters.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

How It Works

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Financial lawyers by top cities

• Austin Financial Lawyers
• Boston Financial Lawyers
• Chicago Financial Lawyers
• Dallas Financial Lawyers
• Denver Financial Lawyers
• Houston Financial Lawyers
• Los Angeles Financial Lawyers
• New York Financial Lawyers
• Phoenix Financial Lawyers
• San Diego Financial Lawyers
• Tampa Financial Lawyers

Receivables Financing Agreement lawyers by city

• Austin Receivables Financing Agreement Lawyers
• Boston Receivables Financing Agreement Lawyers
• Chicago Receivables Financing Agreement Lawyers
• Dallas Receivables Financing Agreement Lawyers
• Denver Receivables Financing Agreement Lawyers
• Houston Receivables Financing Agreement Lawyers
• Los Angeles Receivables Financing Agreement Lawyers
• New York Receivables Financing Agreement Lawyers
• Phoenix Receivables Financing Agreement Lawyers
• San Diego Receivables Financing Agreement Lawyers
• Tampa Receivables Financing Agreement Lawyers

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

Accounts Receivable Assignment

An accounts receivable assignment can be an agreement between a lending company and a borrowing company. The lender gets the right to collect the borrower's accounts receivable should they default on their loan. Also, an accounts receivable assignment can be an agreement for a third-party collection agency, like AAB, to collect your accounts receivable.

It should be noted that a receivable is not sold or ownership transferred under an accounts receivable assignment. An assignment formally grants a collection agency the right to collect a receivable on your behalf. The other main factor is the terms and commissions contained in an accounts receivable assignment.

Accounts Receivable Assignment Terms

The assignment may limit an agency's authorization to sue accounts on your behalf. Usually, the agency's ability to sue is contingent on the facts justifying litigation and written approval from the client before the commencement of a suit.

Another assignment term is the commission rate a collection agent will charge for collecting your accounts receivable. Suppose a client has a mix of consumer and commercial accounts. In that case, different rates could apply to different types of accounts.

A proper accounts receivable assignment should define when the collection agency remits the net funds collected on your accounts. Special handling instructions for your accounts can also be included in an assignment. Reporting delinquent accounts to the credit bureaus is another example of terms that should be considered when negotiating an accounts receivable assignment.

AAB Accounts Receivable Assignment/Agreement

At AAB, we consider the assignment process to be fundamental. A proper accounts receivable assignment or agreement clearly defines the rights and obligations of both parties. Everything is upfront, and both sides understand the terms. Each client differs in some respect, so this is the reason we don't rely on a standard format for an accounts receivable assignment.

At AAB, we aim to provide an accounts receivable assignment that is fair to both sides. Different types of accounts receivable require different combinations of debt collection services. When dealing with AAB you will be dealing with an AAB professional who has over 20 years of experience in the trenches, collecting accounts.

Get the ball rolling with a quick call to an AAB professional or request a free quote for a fair, cost-effective accounts receivable assignment

• Help Center Home

Get Started

• Cloud Readiness / What's New
• APIs & Schema
• Configure and Extend
• Analyze and Report

• Cloud Applications

Oracle Financials 24B

Oracle Financials delivers a comprehensive solution designed to automate and streamline your organization's financial management processes end-to-end.

Select your update:

Learn What's New in Your Update

• See What's New
• Access readiness announcements

Understand Your Solution

• Review cumulative documentation
• Watch how-to videos
• See Oracle Architecture Center

Join Communities

• Join Oracle Cloud Customer Connect
• Submit a product review of your Oracle experiences

Start Your Subscription

• Order Oracle Cloud Applications
• Activate your order
• Manage and monitor services