100
150
200
250
6.5
11.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
(i) Copy and complete the table. (Take g = 10ms-2 ) (ii) Plot a graph with weight, W, on the vertical axis and extension, e, on the horizontal axis. (iii) Using the graph, determine the force constant of the spring. (iv) Determine the natural length of the spring if its length was 38.0 cm when loaded with 250 g mass.
8. (a) Define heat capacity and state its unit. (b) List two effects of heat on a substance (c) Explain how a tightly fitted glass stopper could be removed from a reagent bottle. (d) A quantity of pepper soup of mass 800g poured into a plastic container with a tight fitting lid has a temperature of 30oC. The container is then placed in a microwave oven, rated 1200 W, and operated for 3 minutes. (i) Calculate the final temperature attained by the soup. (Assuming no heat losses). (ii) Explain why containers with tight-fitting lids are not suitable for use in microwave cooking. (iii) When the soup is brought out and allowed to cool, a dent was observed on the container. Explain. [ Take specific heat capacity of the soup = 4000 Jkg-1 K-1 ]
9. (a) State the three characteristics of sound and the factor on which each of them depends. (b) Explain resonance as applied to sound. (c) Explain why sound waves cannot be plane polarized. (d) What role does echo play in the construction of a concert hall? (e) The surface of an eardrum (assumed circular) has a radius 2.1 mm. It resonates with an amplitude of 0.8 x 10-7 m as a result of impulses received from an external body vibrating at 2400 Hz. If the resulting pressure change on the eardrum is 3.6 x 10-5 Nm-2. Calculate the: (i) period of oscillation (ii) velocity (iii) acceleration (iv) force. [Pi = 3.14]
10. (a) Define electromotive force. (b) State: (i) the principle of operation of a potentiometer; (ii) two advantages that a potentiometer has over a voltmeter in measuring the potential difference. (c) (i) Sketch and label a diagram of a gold-leaf electroscope. (ii) Give one use of a gold-leaf electroscope. (d) (i) Explain the action of a magnetic relay: (ii) List two factors that determine the magnitude of an induced emf in a coil. (iii) A current of 5 A passes through a straight wire in a uniform magnetic field of flux density 2.0 x 10-3 T. Calculate the force per unit length exerted on the wire when it is inclined at 30o to the field.
11. (a) Write Einstein’s photoelectric equation and identity each component of the equation.
(b) For a photocell, state one factor each that is responsible for the: emission; r ate of emission; energy of photoelectrons.
(c) (i) Two nuclear equations are given below: + ……………………..equation A + ……………………..equation B Determine the values of: (p and q in equation A; (β) m and n in equation B and identify X. (ii) Give a reason why it is important to dispose of radioactive waste safety. (d) (i) A certain atom emits ultra-violet photon of wavelength 2.4 x 10-7m Calculate the energy of the photons
(i) – 6.0 x 10-19J
(ii) -8.2 x 10-19J -8.8 x 10-19J -1 6.7 x 10-19J
[h = 6.6 x 10-34 Js; c = 3.0x 108 ms-1]
Note: There is nothing like Neco Physics Expo 2022 online. Neco Ssce candidates are to desist from patronizing online fraudsters/vendors who say they can provide such services as they are not real.
Neco commerce answers 2023 for essay-obj questions is out, other recommended posts for you, neco bece 2023 registration form & time table is now out, neco data processing answers 2023 practicals is out, neco animal husbandry answers 2023 [essay-obj-practical] is out, comments (6).
Please why you thanking them
Thanks for study questions and answers, keep up!
Are you sure these questions are real? I want to be sure.
This was the same thing some people commented for the biology questions but later turned out to be the correct questions.
I will like to be informed when the rest is out
Comments are closed.
The combination of our free WAEC Physics questions 2021 and the WAEC Physics answers 2021 samples for 2021 theory (essay) & OBJ (objectives) below, will help WAEC candidates to score A or B in this exam.
All the WAEC 2021 Physics Questions and Answers samples below have been completely solved for the 2021 candidates.
Each question, including the OBJ questions and the theory questions on this page has been solved and each answer is written beside the question.
This is 2021 free WAEC Physics Expo answers 2021 samples for 2021 theory (essay) paper 2 & OBJ (objectives) paper 1 for 2021 WAEC candidates.
With the idea you will obtain from this, you will be able to even solve every other question (including the WAEC past questions and answers on physics) by yourself.
The theory section will give you the “showing working” of each of the WAEC Physics essay and theory sample questions and answers for 2021 (i.e paper 2). Study the steps and master them in case you see similar questions during the exam.
You can also try solving the questions by yourself (following the same steps we used) and later compare the answer you get with the ones we have provided on this page. Study the entire WAEC physics questions 2021 samples on this page and check their correct answer.
Use the following WAEC 202 1 Physics Objective Questions and Answers samples for the OBJ paper 1 for reference.
Study the entire sample WAEC physics questions 2021 below and check their correct answer. Proceed to the theory section at the bottom to see how each question is solved.
Register WAEC here
1. One Joule is Equal to?
Correct Answer is C) 10 7 ergs
2. Which of these principles does Optical fiber works on?
The correct answer is C) total internal reflection
3. Why is the base of an electric iron usually brightly polished?
Correct Answer is: C) to reduce heat loss by radiation
5. A riffle of mass 15kg fires a bullet of mass 60g with a velocity of 200ms -1. Calculate the recoil velocity of the riffle.
The correct answer is A. -0.8ms -1
5. Which of this is the correct formula for Kinetic energy?
The correct answer is D. ½ mu 2
6. If the efficiency of a machine is 60%, find in joules, the work done by the student using this machine to raise a load of 150kg through a vertical distance of 2.5m (g = 10ms -1 )
The correct answer is D. 6250 Joules
7. Calculate the height from which a body is released from rest if its velocity just before hitting the ground is 30ms -1
The correct answer is B. 45m
8. A mango fruit from the top of its tree which is 5m long drops to the ground. How long does it take the mango to reach the ground?
The correct answer is D. 1.0s
Additionally, the following WAEC past questions and answers on physics objective will help you to get more ideas on how to solve physics WAEC questions.
Also, do well to scroll to the bottom to see how each of these questions is solved to arrive at the answer.
1. The equation P x V y T z = constant is Gay-Lussac’s law if____?
The correct answer is B. x = 1, y = 0 and z = -1
2. Calculate the effort put into a machine whose efficiency is 75% and lifts a load of 1000N, if its velocity ratio is 4.
The correct answer is E. 333.33N
Theory question: A rocket is burning fuel at the rate of 200gs -1 and ejecting all the gas in one direction at the rate of 400ms -1 . What is the maximum weight the rocket can have if it is going to move vertically upwards?
Mass of gas per second = 200 / 1000 kgs -1 .
Velocity of expulsion = 400ms -1 .
Momentum change per second = 200 / 1000 x 400kgms -2 .
From Newton’s second law, we have F =W = 200 / 1000 x 400N
Below are the showing working of the WAEC Physics essay and theory sample questions and answers for 2021 paper 2.
Study the steps and master them in case you see similar questions during the exam.
1 . A stationary ball is hit by an average force of 50N for a time range of 0.03sec. Calculate the impulse experienced by the ball.
Solution: impulse (I) = Ft
=5×0.03
2. Calculate the recoil velocity of a riffle of mass 15kg which fires a bullet of mass 60g with a velocity of 200ms -1.
Mass of the riffle = 15kg, while the mass of the bullet = 60g
The velocity of the bullet = 200ms -1.
The momentum before firing is zero
Momentum after firing = 15 x V + 60/100 X 200 = 15v + 12
Since the momentum is conserved, we will have;
15v + 12 =0
v = – 12 / 15 = -0.8ms -1
Question 3. i . What is the width of the image of an object which subtends an angle of 8 0 at the pinhole of a camera 0.5m long?
ii . How long is the image of the sun on this camera? Take the mean distance of the sun as 1.5 X 10 11 m, and the diameter of the sun as 1.4 X 10 9
Let the width of the image = h (m)
tan8 0 = h/0.5m
h = 0.5 X tan8 0 = 0.5 X 0.1405m = 7cm Ans.
Let the radius of the sun be l (m)
l / 0.5 = 0.7 X 109/1.5 X 10 11 =tan0
l = 0.5 X 0.7 X 109/1.5 X 1011 = 0.233X10-2m
Therefore, the diameter of the image = 0.46cm
The combination of the above WAEC Physics questions 2021 and the WAEC Physics answers 2021 samples for essay, theory, and OBJ (objectives) above, will surely help candidates a lot.
So kindly follow the way each of the questions is solved and master them.
I need the objective and essay
I need questions and answers
This is awesome
Good work,I need waec 2021date it will start April I need the date
I need question and answers 2020
Hi Okika Franklin!! Thanks for showing interest.. Note that WAEC Exam is yet to start..
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Laspotech post utme form 2022/2023 |nd full time admission portal, you may also like, waec history questions and answers 2022/2023 expo [obj & theory].
WAEC physics 2024 answers are now available. WAEC physics questions and answers 2024/2025 objective and essay and other exam details for WASSCE 2024 are on this page. See the 2024 WAEC physics answers for both objective and theory below. Get the WAEC physics objective and essay answers here.
The 2024 physics WAEC OBJ and theory questions and answers are provided here for free. All you have to do is to go through the questions and take note of the WAEC physics answers 2024. Read on to find out.
Have you been searching on Google in order to get the WASSCE physics questions and answers 2024? If so, we have got you covered!
We have the 2024 WAEC physics questions and our team of experts will soon upload the WAEC physics questions and their accurate answers to help you pass the 2024 WAEC physics examination.
The 2024 WAEC physics theory questions and OBJ will be uploaded any moment from now. So if you are searching for the WAEC physics answers 2024 for objective and theory, then you are on the right page. See WAEC physics objective and essay questions and answers below.
The West Africa Examinations Council (WAEC) is an examination body in Nigeria that conducts the Senior Secondary Certificate Examination and the General Certificate in Education in May/June and November/December respectively.
The 2024 WAEC physics questions are set from the SS1 to SS3 physics syllabus. So all the questions you will encounter in this year’s examination are in the syllabus, and nearly 90% of the questions are repeated.
You don’t have to worry about the 2024 WAEC physics questions and answers PDF (essay and objective). The WAEC physics answers 2024 will be uploaded any moment from now. All you need to do is to keep refreshing this page so as not to miss out.
Once again, keep refreshing this page because we will upload the original WAEC physics questions and answers for this year’s exams on this page at any moment from now. Also, to download the past questions and answers, click on this link WAEC physics past questions .
If you have any questions about the WAEC physics questions 2024 and answers, feel free to use the comment box below or use the Chat With Us button and we will respond immediately.
The 2024 WAEC physics answers will be posted here. Be patient. Keep checking and reloading this page for the correct answers. WAEC 2024 physics answers loading…….
There is nothing like WAEC physics expo 2024 online. All students are advised to avoid all patronizing online fraudsters/vendors who claim to provide such services.
Neco animal husbandry questions and answers 2023 objectives and essay, federal poly ekowe admission list 2023/2024 academic session, christopher university post utme form 2024/2025 academic session, leave a reply cancel reply.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
A large crowd logged on last week for the IoP/ISTA review of the marking for last summer's Leaving Cert Physics Exam. I've uploaded sample solutions to a few of the questions from section B, which are a vailable here, for anybody interested - about half way down on the left I felt that in general the exam paper would have been a fair challenge to any well-prepared student. There are always one or two variations from from what we've seen before and that's as it should be, but nothing beyond that.
One thing I noticed is that in question 7, students were asked to use vector analysis to calculate both the speed and the direction of the wind. It was often the case in the past that the direction of a vector would be required, but in more recent years, students were generally just asked to find the magnitude of a vector, so this is a bit of a change. But - at the risk of saying I told you so - this did not come without warning .* The deferred paper from 2022, sat by students who were unable to sit the main paper in June, also required students to calculate the direction of a vector.
The 2022 deferred paper was published in the spring of this year. My understanding is that very small numbers qualify for the deferred paper, and that for some subjects this means that nobody was sitting one - in which case it wasn't published. I haven't heard of any students who sat a deferred physics paper last summer, so I don't think we will know if it even existed this summer until the deferred papers are published. Presumably in the spring again.
That is unless somebody out there knows of any body who sat such a paper, If so, do let us know!
But if/when one is published, I know I will be looking carefully through it for any shots across the bow that might remind us to cover something for the 2024 students!
2023 Sample Solutions: general resources | PhysicsResourceBank
(* i.e. I told you so)
Summer reading....
Modern Physics: which mass to use from the tables?
IoP survey on teaching resources...
Good
RELATED POST: Free 2023 WAEC Chemistry Expo
Please don't post or ask to join a "Group" or "Whatsapp Group" as a comment. It will be deleted. To join or start a group, please click here
{{ quote.posted_by.display_name }}
Please wait..., modal title, {{ feedback_modal_data.title }}, quick questions.
The Forum on the History and Philosophy of Physics (FHPP) of the American Physical Society is proud to announce the outcome of our 2023 History of Physics Essay Contest. We received thirty entries from seven countries: the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Oman, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. The entries were evaluated by our FHPP Executive Committee . The essays were judged on originality, clarity, and potential to contribute to the field.
Rebecka Mähring -- for the outstanding essay, " Hilde Levi: A Jewish Woman's Life in Physics in the 20th Century ." This inspiring account of Dr. Hilde Levi's life describes her pioneering interdisciplinary labors in biophysics and on the applications of radioisotopes. Levi collaborated with various other physicists, scientists, and medical professionals. Her unpretentious kindness enabled her to fulfill, renegotiate, and transcend traditional gender roles.
An abridged version will be published as the Back Page of APS News . Rebecka Mähring receives a cash award of $ 1,000.00, plus support (up to a $ 2,000.00 value) for travel, registration, hotel lodging and meals, to be an Invited Speaker at the APS April 2024 Meeting in Sacramento, California, to present a talk based on the essay.
We also award three Runners-Up , in a three-way tie, with cash awards of $ 500 each. In alphabetical order, they are: Stefano Farinella, “Galileo’s Use of Mathematics in its Historical Context”; Preetha Sarkar, “Meghnad Saha: A Win for Science”; and Jessica Schonhut-Stasik, “The Transit of Venus, King Kal ā kaua, and Indigenous Knowing.” Below, we include information about each award recipient, links to their commendable essays, and past winners.
The FHPP Essay Contest promotes interest in the history of physics. The contest is intended for undergraduate and graduate students but is open to anyone without a Ph.D. in physics or history. Entries can address the work of physicists, physics discoveries, or other related topics. At 2,500 words, entries should be scholarly and accessible to scientists and historians. Previously published work, excerpts, or entries with multiple authors are not accepted.
On behalf of FHPP, I congratulate the four Award Winners, and I warmly thank all other participants too for submitting essays. In a few weeks, we will announce our 2024 Essay Contest, on this webpage. Alberto Martinez, Chair of APS FHPP
Join a Unit
APS Member Directory
2023 winner.
Essay: "Hilde Levi: A Jewish Woman's Life in Physics in the 20th Century" Rebecka Mähring graduated in May 2023 with a bachelor’s degree in Physics from Princeton University. Her senior thesis research was on dark matter phenomenology. While at Princeton, she also developed a strong interest in the history of science, which led to a research visit at the Niels Bohr Archive in Copenhagen, Denmark, during the summer. The APS essay is the result of this research.
. Winning Essay
Stefano Farinella University of Hamburg
Essay: “Galileo’s Use of Mathematics in its Historical Context” Stefano Farinella is a first-year Ph.D. student at the University of Hamburg. He completed his B.S. in Physics at the University of Padua, and his M.S. in Theoretical Physics at the University of Amsterdam. He is now part of the Centre for the Study of Manuscript Cultures in Hamburg, and his research focuses on the interplay between processes of transformation of knowledge and early modern manuscript culture in the notes of mathematician and natural philosopher Thomas Harriot (1560-1621).
Preetha Sarkar University of Illinois
Essay: “Meghnad Saha: A Win for Science” Preetha Sarkar is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Physics and the Illinois Materials Research Science and Engineering Center at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research focuses on understanding how the electronic properties of two-dimensional van der Waals materials, such as graphene, are modified under mechanical strain by conducting low temperature electron transport experiments. She is passionate about science outreach and diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in STEM. In her free time, she enjoys painting, writing poetry, singing, swimming, reading history and fiction, and volunteering for social causes. View Essay
Jessica Schonhut-Stasik Vanderbilt University
Essay: “The Transit of Venus, King Kalākaua, and Indigenous Knowing.” Jessica Schonhut-Stasik is a Ph.D. candidate in astronomy at Vanderbilt University, specializing in Galactic Archaeology. After being diagnosed with autism, ADHD, and OCD at age 27, Jessica became a neurodivergent self-advocate and is the Program and Communications Manager at the Frist Center for Autism and Innovation, housed in Vanderbilt’s School of Engineering. She works remotely from her home on Hawai'i Island, where she lives with her husband, dogs, and cats. Jessica has become deeply rooted in the community since emigrating from the U.K. in 2015 to live and work in the Hawai'i astronomy community. She participates in outreach and education initiatives such as the Maunakea Scholars program. She hosts the AstronomerAND podcast, which interviews non-traditional astronomers to elevate the voices of marginalized communities. View Essay
2022 winner.
Miguel Ohnesorge is a PhD Student at the University of Cambridge and Visiting Fellow at Boston University’s Philosophy of Geoscience Lab. In his PhD project, he reconstructs how physical geodesists measure(d) planetary figures and explores the insights that this problem holds for the epistemology of scientific measurement. His other work focuses on the global history of physics and the ethics and epistemology of industry-funded science. You can learn more about his research on his website https://www.mohnesorgehps.com .
Winning Essay
Shraddha Agrawal University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
I am a fifth-year Ph.D. student in the Department of Physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. My research is in atomic physics, specifically using ultracold atomic gases to explore novel topological phenomena. Outside of research, I enjoy reading fiction, writing physics-related essays and stories, doing crosswords, and making good food. View Essay
Briley Lewis is a fourth-year graduate student and NSF Fellow at the University of California, Los Angeles studying Astronomy & Astrophysics. Her research focuses on how we can apply techniques from direct imaging of exoplanets to other planetary science questions. She is a member of the Astrobites collaboration, contributing author for Massive Science , and former organizer for ComSciCon-Los Angeles . She also teaches writing at UCLA in her course for first year undergraduates, “Astrobiology in Science Journalism.” Follow her on Twitter @briles_34 or visit her website www.briley-lewis.com .
Advait Iyer is an undergraduate freshman studying engineering at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. His interests include physics, soccer statistics, whistling and writing.
I am a second-year PhD student in Department of Physics and the Illinois Quantum Information Science and Technology (IQUIST) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I completed my B.S. dual-degree in Physics and Chemistry at Baylor University in Waco, Texas. My research is in ultracold atomic physics with the goal of investigating novel states of quantum matter for experimental approaches to quantum computing. I enjoy playing the piano and all kinds of formal writing from research-driven works to musical compositions.
Hannah Pell currently works in science publishing and as a freelance science writer. She is a former Research Assistant for the Center for History of Physics at the American Institute of Physics and an alumna of the Fulbright Program. She earned her B.S. in Physics and B.A. in Music from Lebanon Valley College and her M.A. in Music Theory from the University of Oregon. Her current research interests include science policy and communication with regards to nuclear power, large-scale high energy physics collaborations, and intersections between science and labor history. She has also been appointed to the Citizens Advisory Panel for the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant decommissioning process.
John Vastola Vanderbilt University
John Vastola is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Physics and Astronomy at Vanderbilt University. He currently uses theoretical tools from physics to better understand how individual cells regulate how many proteins and RNA of various kinds they have. More broadly, he is interested in asking and trying to answer questions about nature; for example, how do collections of apparently inanimate atoms conspire to form our friends and family?
Zhixin Wang is a Ph.D. candidate at the Department of Applied Physics and the Yale Quantum Institute at Yale University. He completed his B.S. in electrical engineering at Tsinghua University in Beijing, and his M.S. and M.Phil. in applied physics at Yale University. His research focuses on the experimental and theoretical study of superconducting quantum circuits, microwave quantum optics, and hybrid quantum systems.
Melia Bonomo is a Ph.D. candidate in applied physics at Rice University in Houston, TX. She completed her B.S. in physics with a minor in Italian at Dickinson College in Carlisle, PA and her M.S. in applied physics at Rice. Prior to graduate school, Melia spent several years teaching high school in Italy. Her current research interest is in theoretical biophysics, with a focus on applications to studying the human brain. She also enjoys investigating the history of physics and obscure scientists, particularly those with underrepresented genders.
Flavio Del Santo is a Ph.D. student in physics at the University of Vienna and Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information. He completed his Bachelor in Physics and Astrophysics at the University of Florence (Italy) and his Masters in Theoretical Physics at the University of Vienna. His main research interests are the foundations of quantum mechanics, with a focus on the quantum measurement problem. He is also engaged in research activities in the history and philosophy of science.
Grigoris Panoutsopoulos is a Ph.D. student at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, in the Department of Philosophy and History of Science. He holds a B.Sc. in Physics and a M.A. in History and Philosophy of Science and Technology. His research has focused on the history of CERN, Modern Physics, Big Science, the relationship between theory and experiment and the contemporary crises in the field of High Energy Physics. He has made presentations in international conferences and he has published articles in international journals and edited collections. He is the co-author, of the book Borders, Bodies and Narratives of Crisis in Europe, (Palgrave Macmillan 2018).
Ryan is a first-year Ph.D. student at The College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, VA. His interest in fusion began through a 2016 Summer Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internship (SULI) at General Atomics in San Diego, CA. During that summer he researched energetic particles on the DIII-D Tokamak and this experience guided him towards a research career in fusion energy and intrigued him to learn more about the history of the science.
Shaun Datta is a senior studying Physics, Mathematics, and Computer Science at MIT.
Become an APS Member
Submit a Meeting Abstract
Submit a Manuscript
Find a Journal Article
Donate to APS
Renew Membership
Join APS Unit
Update Contact Information
The American Physical Society (APS) is a nonprofit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics.
© American Physical Society | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Headquarters: 1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844 | Phone: 301.209.3200
Get the Most Legit Information and Guide on the Latest Jobs in Nigeria, Facebook and Education Here
NECO Physics Questions and Answers 2023. I will be showing you the NECO Physics objective and theory answers as well as repeated questions for free in this post. You will also understand how NECO Physics questions are set and how to answer them.
The National Examinations Council (NECO) is an examination body in Nigeria that conducts the Senior Secondary Certificate Examination and the General Certificate in Education in June/July and December/January respectively.
Table of Contents
The 2023 NECO Physics expo will be posted here today 27th July during the NECO Physics examination. Keep checking and reloading this page for the answers.
NECO 2023 Physics Answers Loading.. .
NECO Physics OBJ Answers: The Answers will soon be posted here. Be patient we are solving.
1-10: EADCAEBEBC
11-20: ECDDCDBCCB
21-30: CECBEADCBB
31-40: BADDCDCAAA
41-50: EDACDCACAA
51-60: CEBACCBCAC
Essay Answers:
(i) Solar water heaters: These are devices that use solar collectors to absorb energy from the sun and heat water for domestic or industrial use.
(ii) Solar air heaters: These are devices that use solar collectors to absorb energy from the sun and heat air for space heating or ventilation purposes.
Total Magnification = Magnification of Objective Lens × Magnification of Eyepiece Lens.
Total Magnification = 10
Magnification of Objective Lens = 2
Let “E” represent the magnification of the eyepiece lens.
Static friction is a type of friction that exists between two surfaces in contact with each other when they are not moving relative to each other.
Coefficient of static friction (μs) = Force of static friction/ Normal force
Force of static friction = 3N
Normal force = 5N
μs = 3N / 5N = 0.6
The velocity ratio of a machine is the ratio of the distance moved by the effort to the distance moved by the load. It is a measure of the effectiveness of a machine in transmitting force.
Velocity ratio = distance moved by effort / distance moved by load
A second order lever has the load in the middle, with the effort applied on one side and the fulcrum on the other. The effort arm is longer than the load arm, which means the machine has a mechanical advantage. Examples of second order levers include wheelbarrows and nutcrackers WHILE A third order lever has the effort applied on one end, the load on the other end, and the fulcrum in between. The load arm is longer than the effort arm, which means the machine has a mechanical disadvantage. Examples of third order levers include tweezers and shovels.
Q4&5????
– Angle of incidence (θ₁) = 60°
– Speed of light in air = 3×10⁸ m/s
– Speed of light in glass = 2×10⁸ m/s
The refractive index (n) of a medium can be calculated using the formula:
n = speed of light in vacuum / speed of light in the medium
Refractive index of air (n₁):
n₁ = speed of light in vacuum / speed of light in air
n₁ = 3×10⁸ m/s / 3×10⁸ m/s
Refractive index of glass (n₂):
n₂ = speed of light in vacuum / speed of light in glass
n₂ = 3×10⁸ m/s / 2×10⁸ m/s
Using Snell’s law to find the angle of refraction (θ₂):
n₁ × sin(θ₁) = n₂ × sin(θ₂)
1 × sin(60°) = 1.5 × sin(θ₂)
sin(θ₂) = (1 × sin(60°)) / 1.5
sin(θ₂) = sin(60°) / 1.5
θ₂ = arcsin(sin(60°) / 1.5)
θ₂ ≈ arcsin(0.86602540378 / 1.5)
θ₂ ≈ arcsin(0.57735026919)
θ₂ ≈ 35.26°
(i) Electric motors: Electromagnets are used in electric motors to convert electrical energy into mechanical energy. An electric motor contains an armature with a coil of wire that rotates within a magnetic field created by an electromagnet.
(ii) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Electromagnets are used in MRI machines to create a strong magnetic field that aligns the protons in the body’s tissues. Radio waves are then used to create images of the body’s internal structures.
The soft iron bar can be converted to a magnet by placing it in contact with a bar magnet. When the bar magnet is brought close to the soft iron bar, the magnetic domains in the soft iron bar become aligned with the magnetic field of the bar magnet. This causes the soft iron bar to become magnetized and it will now be able to attract other magnetic materials.
Reactance refers to the opposition that an electrical circuit or component exhibits to the flow of alternating current (AC). It is a fundamental concept in understanding AC circuits and is closely related to the concept of impedance.
Xc = 1/(2πfC)
Xc = Capacitive reactance in ohms (Ω)
π = 3.14 (approximate value)
f = Frequency in Hertz (Hz)
C = Capacitance in Farads (F)
Capacitive reactance (Xc) = 3000Ω
Capacitance (C) = 5µF = 5 * 10-⁶F
Rearranging the formula to solve for frequency (f):
f = 1/(2*π* Xc* C)
Substituting the given values:
f = 1/(2 * 3.14 * 3000 * 5 * 10-⁶ )
f = 1/(2 * 3.14 * 3000 * 0.000005)
f = 1/(6.28 * 0.015)
f = 1/0.0942
f=10.62Hz (approx. 2 decimal).
Photoelectrons are electrons that are emitted from a material when it absorbs electromagnetic radiation, typically in the form of photons (light). This phenomenon is known as the photoelectric effect.
Formula for threshold frequency;
F= Frequency
E = Work function(Energy)
h= Plank’s constant (6.6×10-³⁴)
Converting the work function to joules:
Work function (ϕ) = 3.5 eV = 3.5 × 1.6 × 10-¹⁹ J = 5.6 × 10-¹⁹ J
Substituting the values
F= 5.6 × 10-¹⁹/6.6×10-³⁴
F= 8.48×10¹⁴Hz
(i) Radiation exposure: X-rays are a type of ionizing radiation, which means that they can damage the DNA in cells and increase the risk of cancer. Exposure to high doses of X-rays can also cause radiation sickness, which can lead to nausea, vomiting, and hair loss.
(ii) Skin burns: X-rays can cause skin burns if the skin is exposed to a high dose of radiation. The severity of the burn depends on the dose of radiation and the duration of exposure.
(i) Soft X-rays have lower energy levels, while hard X-rays have higher energy level
(ii) Soft X-rays are commonly used in scientific research, such as studying atomic structures and electronic properties while Hard X-rays are more prevalent in medical and industrial applications, like diagnosing fractures, inspecting welds, or examining luggage at airports for security purposes.
(iii) Soft X-rays are more easily absorbed by matter than hard X-rays. As a result, softer X-rays are used to examine lighter elements, while harder X-rays are preferred for studying heavier elements in samples.
——————————————————————————————————-
———————————————————————————–
See: NECO Civic Education Answers
The questions below are the NECO 2022 Physics Practice Questions. Go through them and be ready to score high in your NECO 2022 Physics Examination.
1. The equation X 150 62 => Y 150 63 + -1 + energy, represents
A. Alpha decay
B. Beta-decay
C. Gamma decay
D. Photon emission
ANSWER: B (Beta-decay)
2. The ice and steam points of a thermometer are 20mm and 100mm respectively. A temperature of 75 degree Celsius corresponds to Y mm on the thermometer. What is Y?
ANSWER: C (80mm)
3. When a yellow card is observed through a blue glass, the card would appear as
ANSWER: A (Black)
4. In a nuclear plant, the final mass of the products is 6.32×10^-27kg, while the initial mass of the reactant is 6.30×10^-27kg, the energy released in the process is (speed of light in vacuum 3.0×10^8m/s, 1eV = 1.6×10^-19J)
A. 11.25meV
B. 11.25 MJ
D. 12.25meV
ANSWER: A (11.25meV)
5. A 1.5kg stone was thrown vertically upward with an initial velocity of 42m/s, What is the potential energy of the stone at the highest point reached.
6. When two objects P and Q are supplied with the same quantity of heat, the temperature change in p is observed to be twice that of Q. The mass of P is half that of Q. The ratio of the specific heat of P to Q is
ANSWER: C (1:1)
7. The following statements were made by some students describing what happened during the determination of the melting point of solids
1. The temperature of the solid was constant until melting started
2. The temperature of the solid rose until melting started
3. During melting, the temperature was rising
4. During melting, the temperature was constant
5. The temperature continued to rise after all the solid had melted.
6. The temperature stopped rising after all the solid had melted. Which of the following gives correct statements in the right order?
A. 2, 4 and 5
B. 2, 3 and 6
C. 1, 3 and 6
D. 1, 3 and 5
ANSWER: A (2, 4, and 5)
8. A silver spoon and a wooden spoon are both at room temperature. The silver spoon is cooler to touch because silver
A. has a greater density
B. can be polished
C. is a less absorbent material than wood
D. is a better conductor of heat
ANSWER: D (is a better conductor of heat)
See: NECO Timetable
1. (a) A student makes a model of an atom. The model contains 24 electrons, 25 protons and 26 neutrons. Some of these particles are inside a nucleus at the centre of the model. (i) Determine the nucleon number (mass number) of the atom. (ii) Explain why the model represents a charged atom. (iii) The student makes a new model of a different isotope of the same element. Describe the nucleus of this new model.
Ans: 1 (a) (i) 51 B1 (ii) more protons than electrons or different number of protons and electrons positive and negative do not cancel. (iii) 25 protons. a different number of neutrons.
2. Fig. 1.1 shows the distance-time graph for two cyclists A and B. They start a 500 m race together but finish the race at different times.
(a) Use Fig. 1.1 to determine (i) the distance between A and B at time t = 20s, (ii) the difference in the time taken by A and B for the race.
(b) Cyclist C starts the race at the same time as A and B and covers the first 200m of the race at a constant speed of 5.0 m/s. He then accelerates and finishes the race at t = 60s. (i) On Fig. 1.1, draw the distance-time graph for cyclist C. (ii) Calculate the average speed of cyclist C for the whole race.
Ans: (a) (i) 60 m (ii) 12s (b) (i) straight line from origin to 200 m at 40s any line straight or curved from (40,200) to (60,500) (ii) s = d/t or 500/60 = 8.3m/s
If a satellite travels at a constant speed round the earth in a circular orbit,
1. Which of the quantities in the list below are scalars. (a) acceleration (b) force (c) mass (e) speed.
2. The velocity of the satellite changes, but its speed is constant. State what is meant by velocity…………………….
3. Explain why the velocity changes……………………………
4. Explain what makes this satellite move in an orbit that is circular
You have decided to pass NECO Physics 2023 and I am sure of that. Now, the next thing you should do is set targets.
You have told yourself, “I will score A in Neco Physics 2023”, that’s not all. You need to plan on how to make it happen. Create a timetable and master plan to achieve your goals.
Normally, NECO recommends books for the examination. But apart from NECO English Literature where certain novels are compulsory, you are free to use any good English Language textbook to prepare for NECO 2023 exam.
Some textbooks are more difficult to understand. If you have any topic you are finding difficult to understand, then get a textbook that will simplify the topics and make life better for you.
Many candidates are fond of skipping exercises and even examples while studying textbooks. In fact, we like notebooks so much that we could ask, “can I read my notebook and pass NECO Physics 2023?” Don’t be scared of attempting exercises in Biology. Face the challenges.
Note: The above questions are likely NECO Physics Questions and Answers, not the real questions
If you have any questions about the NECO Physics Questions and Answers 2023 , kindly drop your question in the comment box.
Last Updated on July 27, 2023 by Admin
Please sir I need today answer
Thank you sir for your kindness heart
Pls can I know what neco will set for chemistry obj theory and practical
Thank you sir for your kind gesture
thank you so much sir for your kindness to us wish you long life and prosperity
Thanks alot pls put the one foe chemistry
Pls sir I need today physics answers
Please Sir i need neco answer physics today
Please I need today physics
Please can I get the answers before the examination????
pls physics question & answer now pls thank
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.
B Y THE TIME children born today are in kindergarten, artificial intelligence ( AI ) will probably have surpassed humans at all cognitive tasks, from science to creativity. When I first predicted in 1999 that we would have such artificial general intelligence ( AGI ) by 2029, most experts thought I’d switched to writing fiction. But since the spectacular breakthroughs of the past few years, many experts think we will have AGI even sooner—so I’ve technically gone from being an optimist to a pessimist, without changing my prediction at all.
After working in the field for 61 years—longer than anyone else alive—I am gratified to see AI at the heart of global conversation. Yet most commentary misses how large language models like Chat GPT and Gemini fit into an even larger story. AI is about to make the leap from revolutionising just the digital world to transforming the physical world as well. This will bring countless benefits, but three areas have especially profound implications: energy, manufacturing and medicine.
Sources of energy are among civilisation’s most fundamental resources. For two centuries the world has needed dirty, non-renewable fossil fuels. Yet harvesting just 0.01% of the sunlight the Earth receives would cover all human energy consumption. Since 1975, solar cells have become 99.7% cheaper per watt of capacity, allowing worldwide capacity to increase by around 2m times. So why doesn’t solar energy dominate yet?
The problem is two-fold. First, photovoltaic materials remain too expensive and inefficient to replace coal and gas completely. Second, because solar generation varies on both diurnal (day/night) and annual (summer/winter) scales, huge amounts of energy need to be stored until needed—and today’s battery technology isn’t quite cost-effective enough. The laws of physics suggest that massive improvements are possible, but the range of chemical possibilities to explore is so enormous that scientists have made achingly slow progress.
By contrast, AI can rapidly sift through billions of chemistries in simulation, and is already driving innovations in both photovoltaics and batteries. This is poised to accelerate dramatically. In all of history until November 2023, humans had discovered about 20,000 stable inorganic compounds for use across all technologies. Then, Google’s GN o ME AI discovered far more, increasing that figure overnight to 421,000. Yet this barely scratches the surface of materials-science applications. Once vastly smarter AGI finds fully optimal materials, photovoltaic megaprojects will become viable and solar energy can be so abundant as to be almost free.
Energy abundance enables another revolution: in manufacturing. The costs of almost all goods—from food and clothing to electronics and cars—come largely from a few common factors such as energy, labour (including cognitive labour like R & D and design) and raw materials. AI is on course to vastly lower all these costs.
After cheap, abundant solar energy, the next component is human labour, which is often backbreaking and dangerous. AI is making big strides in robotics that can greatly reduce labour costs. Robotics will also reduce raw-material extraction costs, and AI is finding ways to replace expensive rare-earth elements with common ones like zirconium, silicon and carbon-based graphene. Together, this means that most kinds of goods will become amazingly cheap and abundant.
These advanced manufacturing capabilities will allow the price-performance of computing to maintain the exponential trajectory of the past century—a 75-quadrillion-fold improvement since 1939. This is due to a feedback loop: today’s cutting-edge AI chips are used to optimise designs for next-generation chips. In terms of calculations per second per constant dollar, the best hardware available last November could do 48bn. Nvidia’s new B 200 GPU s exceed 500bn.
As we build the titanic computing power needed to simulate biology, we’ll unlock the third physical revolution from AI : medicine. Despite 200 years of dramatic progress, our understanding of the human body is still built on messy approximations that are usually mostly right for most patients, but probably aren’t totally right for you . Tens of thousands of Americans a year die from reactions to drugs that studies said should help them.
Yet AI is starting to turn medicine into an exact science. Instead of painstaking trial-and-error in an experimental lab, molecular biosimulation—precise computer modelling that aids the study of the human body and how drugs work—can quickly assess billions of options to find the most promising medicines. Last summer the first drug designed end-to-end by AI entered phase-2 trials for treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a lung disease. Dozens of other AI -designed drugs are now entering trials.
Both the drug-discovery and trial pipelines will be supercharged as simulations incorporate the immensely richer data that AI makes possible. In all of history until 2022, science had determined the shapes of around 190,000 proteins. That year DeepMind’s AlphaFold 2 discovered over 200m, which have been released free of charge to researchers to help develop new treatments.
Much more laboratory research is needed to populate larger simulations accurately, but the roadmap is clear. Next, AI will simulate protein complexes, then organelles, cells, tissues, organs and—eventually—the whole body.
This will ultimately replace today’s clinical trials, which are expensive, risky, slow and statistically underpowered. Even in a phase-3 trial, there’s probably not one single subject who matches you on every relevant factor of genetics, lifestyle, comorbidities, drug interactions and disease variation.
Digital trials will let us tailor medicines to each individual patient. The potential is breathtaking: to cure not just diseases like cancer and Alzheimer’s, but the harmful effects of ageing itself.
Today, scientific progress gives the average American or Briton an extra six to seven weeks of life expectancy each year. When AGI gives us full mastery over cellular biology, these gains will sharply accelerate. Once annual increases in life expectancy reach 12 months, we’ll achieve “longevity escape velocity”. For people diligent about healthy habits and using new therapies, I believe this will happen between 2029 and 2035—at which point ageing will not increase their annual chance of dying. And thanks to exponential price-performance improvement in computing, AI -driven therapies that are expensive at first will quickly become widely available.
This is AI ’s most transformative promise: longer, healthier lives unbounded by the scarcity and frailty that have limited humanity since its beginnings. ■
Ray Kurzweil is a computer scientist, inventor and the author of books including “The Age of Intelligent Machines” (1990), “The Age of Spiritual Machines” (1999) and “The Singularity is Near” (2005). His new book, “The Singularity is Nearer: When We Merge with AI”, will be published on June 25th.
By invitation june 22nd 2024, vladimir putin’s war against ukraine is part of his revolution against the west.
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
The Biden administration has played dirty and shown staggering incompetence, argues Joe Lonsdale
Or it could try to change the EU from within—which would be worse, reckons Jean Pisani-Ferry
It is more in touch with voters, says the longest-serving female MP—but there is more work to do
He is leading Russia into a new phase of strategic confrontation, says Stephen Covington, a longtime NATO adviser
Bringing gene therapies and obesity drugs to the masses will require financial innovation too, says Steven Pearson
They need to be clear about what opposing populism does and doesn’t mean, argues Yair Zivan
December 28, 2023
Across disciplines and industries, scientific discoveries happen every day, so how can you stay ahead of emerging trends in a thriving landscape? At CAS, we have a unique view of recent scientific breakthroughs, the historical discoveries they were built upon, and the expertise to navigate the opportunities ahead. In 2023, we identified the top scientific breakthroughs , and 2024 has even more to offer. New trends to watch include the accelerated expansion of green chemistry, the clinical validation of CRISPR, the rise of biomaterials, and the renewed progress in treating the undruggable, from cancer to neurodegenerative diseases. To hear what the experts from Lawrence Liverpool National Lab and Oak Ridge National Lab are saying on this topic, join us for a free webinar on January 25 from 10:00 to 11:30 a.m. EDT for a panel discussion on the trends to watch in 2024.
While the future of AI has always been forward-looking, the AI revolution in chemistry and drug discovery has yet to be fully realized. While there have been some high-profile set-backs , several breakthroughs should be watched closely as the field continues to evolve. Generative AI is making an impact in drug discovery , machine learning is being used more in environmental research , and large language models like ChatGPT are being tested in healthcare applications and clinical settings.
Many scientists are keeping an eye on AlphaFold, DeepMind’s protein structure prediction software that revolutionized how proteins are understood. DeepMind and Isomorphic Labs have recently announced how their latest model shows improved accuracy, can generate predictions for almost all molecules in the Protein Data Bank, and expand coverage to ligands, nucleic acids, and posttranslational modifications . Therapeutic antibody discovery driven by AI is also gaining popularity , and platforms such as the RubrYc Therapeutics antibody discovery engine will help advance research in this area.
Though many look at AI development with excitement, concerns over accurate and accessible training data , fairness and bias , lack of regulatory oversight , impact on academia, scholarly research and publishing , hallucinations in large language models , and even concerns over infodemic threats to public health are being discussed. However, continuous improvement is inevitable with AI, so expect to see many new developments and innovations throughout 2024.
Green chemistry is a rapidly evolving field that is constantly seeking innovative ways to minimize the environmental impact of chemical processes. Here are several emerging trends that are seeing significant breakthroughs:
New materials for biomedical applications could revolutionize many healthcare segments in 2024. One example is bioelectronic materials, which form interfaces between electronic devices and the human body, such as the brain-computer interface system being developed by Neuralink. This system, which uses a network of biocompatible electrodes implanted directly in the brain, was given FDA approval to begin human trials in 2023.
The global Artemis program is a NASA-led international space exploration program that aims to land the first woman and the first person of color on the Moon by 2025 as part of the long-term goal of establishing a sustainable human presence on the Moon. Additionally, the NASA mission called Europa Clipper, scheduled for a 2024 launch, will orbit around Jupiter and fly by Europa , one of Jupiter’s moons, to study the presence of water and its habitability. China’s mission, Chang’e 6 , plans to bring samples from the moon back to Earth for further studies. The Martian Moons Exploration (MMX) mission by Japan’s JAXA plans to bring back samples from Phobos, one of the Mars moons. Boeing is also expected to do a test flight of its reusable space capsule Starliner , which can take people to low-earth orbit.
The R&D impact of Artemis extends to more fields than just aerospace engineering, though:
After years of research, setbacks, and minimal progress, the first formal evidence of CRISPR as a therapeutic platform technology in the clinic was realized. Intellia Therapeutics received FDA clearance to initiate a pivotal phase 3 trial of a new drug for the treatment of hATTR, and using the same Cas9 mRNA, got a new medicine treating a different disease, angioedema. This was achieved by only changing 20 nucleotides of the guide RNA, suggesting that CRISPR can be used as a therapeutic platform technology in the clinic.
The second great moment for CRISPR drug development technology came when Vertex and CRISPR Therapeutics announced the authorization of the first CRISPR/Cas9 gene-edited therapy, CASGEVY™, by the United Kingdom MHRA, for the treatment of sickle cell disease and transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia. This was the first approval of a CRISPR-based therapy for human use and is a landmark moment in realizing the potential of CRISPR to improve human health.
In addition to its remarkable genome editing capability, the CRISPR-Cas system has proven to be effective in many applications, including early cancer diagnosis . CRISPR-based genome and transcriptome engineering and CRISPR-Cas12a and CRISPR-Cas13a appear to have the necessary characteristics to be robust detection tools for cancer therapy and diagnostics. CRISPR-Cas-based biosensing system gives rise to a new era for precise diagnoses of early-stage cancers.
MIT engineers have also designed a new nanoparticle DNA-encoded nanosensor for urinary biomarkers that could enable early cancer diagnoses with a simple urine test. The sensors, which can detect cancerous proteins, could also distinguish the type of tumor or how it responds to treatment.
The immuno-oncology field has seen tremendous growth in the last few years. Approved products such as cytokines, vaccines, tumor-directed monoclonal antibodies, and immune checkpoint blockers continue to grow in market size. Novel therapies like TAC01-HER2 are currently undergoing clinical trials. This unique therapy uses autologous T cells, which have been genetically engineered to incorporate T cell Antigen Coupler (TAC) receptors that recognize human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) presence on tumor cells to remove them. This could be a promising therapy for metastatic, HER2-positive solid tumors.
Another promising strategy aims to use the CAR-T cells against solid tumors in conjunction with a vaccine that boosts immune response. Immune boosting helps the body create more host T cells that can target other tumor antigens that CAR-T cells cannot kill.
Another notable trend is the development of improved and effective personalized therapies. For instance, a recently developed personalized RNA neoantigen vaccine, based on uridine mRNA–lipoplex nanoparticles, was found effective against pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Major challenges in immuno-oncology are therapy resistance, lack of predictable biomarkers, and tumor heterogenicity. As a result, devising novel treatment strategies could be a future research focus.
Multiple well-funded efforts are underway to decarbonize energy production by replacing fossil fuel-based energy sources with sources that generate no (or much less) CO2 in 2024.
One of these efforts is to incorporate large-scale energy storage devices into the existing power grid. These are an important part of enabling the use of renewable sources since they provide additional supply and demand for electricity to complement renewable sources. Several types of grid-scale storage that vary in the amount of energy they can store and how quickly they can discharge it into the grid are under development. Some are physical (flywheels, pumped hydro, and compressed air) and some are chemical (traditional batteries, flow batteries , supercapacitors, and hydrogen ), but all are the subject of active chemistry and materials development research. The U.S. government is encouraging development in this area through tax credits as part of the Inflation Reduction Act and a $7 billion program to establish regional hydrogen hubs.
Meanwhile, nuclear power will continue to be an active R&D area in 2024. In nuclear fission, multiple companies are developing small modular reactors (SMRs) for use in electricity production and chemical manufacturing, including hydrogen. The development of nuclear fusion reactors involves fundamental research in physics and materials science. One major challenge is finding a material that can be used for the wall of the reactor facing the fusion plasma; so far, candidate materials have included high-entropy alloys and even molten metals .
Neurodegenerative diseases are a major public health concern, being a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. While there is currently no cure for any neurodegenerative disease, new scientific discoveries and understandings of these pathways may be the key to helping patient outcomes.
Drive industry-leading advancements and accelerate breakthroughs by unlocking your data’s full potential. Contact our CAS Custom Services SM experts to find the digital solution to your information challenges.
share this!
June 26, 2024
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies . Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
by University of Hawaii at Manoa
Across Asia, the Pacific Ocean, and the Americas, El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) brings variations in winds, weather, and ocean temperature that can cause droughts, floods, crop failures, and food shortages. Recently, the world has experienced a major El Niño event in 2023–2024, dramatically impacting weather, climate, ecosystems, and economies globally.
By developing an innovative modeling approach, researchers from the School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology (SOEST) at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa are now able to forecast ENSO events up to 18 months ahead of time—significantly improving conventional climate model forecasting.
Their findings, which meld insights into the physics of the ocean and atmosphere with predictive accuracy, were published in Nature .
"We have developed a new conceptual model—the so-called extended nonlinear recharge oscillator (XRO) model—that significantly improves predictive skill of ENSO events at over one year in advance, better than global climate models and comparable to the most skillful AI forecasts," said Sen Zhao, lead author of the study and an assistant researcher in SOEST.
"Our model effectively incorporates the fundamental physics of ENSO and ENSO's interactions with other climate patterns in the global oceans that vary from season to season."
Scientists have been working for decades to improve ENSO predictions given its global environmental and socioeconomic impacts. Traditional operational forecasting models have struggled to successfully predict ENSO with lead times exceeding one year.
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have pushed these boundaries, achieving accurate predictions up to 16–18 months in advance. However, the "black box" nature of AI models has precluded attribution of this accuracy to specific physical processes.
Not being able to explain the source of the predictability in the AI models results in low confidence that these predictions will be successful for future events as the Earth continues to warm, changing the currents in the oceans and atmosphere.
"Unlike the 'black box' nature of AI models, our XRO model offers a transparent view into the mechanisms of the equatorial Pacific recharge-discharge physics and its interactions with other climate patterns outside of tropical Pacific," explained Fei-Fei Jin, the corresponding author and professor of atmospheric sciences in SOEST.
"The initial states of the extratropical Pacific, tropical Indian Ocean, and Atlantic enhance ENSO predictability in distinct seasons. For the first time, we are able to robustly quantify their impact on ENSO predictability, thus deepening our knowledge of ENSO physics and its sources of predictability."
"Our findings also identify shortcomings in the latest generation of climate models that lead to their failure in predicting ENSO accurately," said Malte Stuecker, assistant professor of oceanography in SOEST and study co-author.
"To improve ENSO predictions, climate models must correctly capture the key physics of ENSO and additionally, three compounding aspects of other climate patterns in the global oceans: accurate knowledge of the state of each of these climate patterns when the ENSO forecasts starts, the correct seasonally varying 'ocean memory' of each of these climate patterns, and correct representations of how each of these other climate patterns affect ENSO in different seasons."
"Different sources of predictability lead to distinct ENSO event evolutions," said Philip Thompson, associate professor of oceanography in SOEST and co-author of the study. "We are now able to provide skillful, long lead time predictions of this 'ENSO diversity,' which is critical as different flavors of ENSO have very different impacts on global climate and individual communities."
"In addition to El Niño, the new XRO model also improves predictability of other climate variabilities in tropical Indian and Atlantic Oceans, such as the Indian Ocean Dipole, which can significantly alter the local and global weather patterns beyond the impacts of El Niño," added Zhao.
The implications of this research are far-reaching, offering prospects for more accurate and longer lead time ENSO predictions and global climate model improvements.
Though ENSO originates in the tropical Pacific, we can no longer think of it as a tropical Pacific Ocean problem only, either from a modeling and prediction perspective or from an observational perspective. The global tropics and the higher latitudes are integral to improving seasonal climate forecasts.
"By tracing model shortcomings and understanding these climate pattern interactions with our new conceptual XRO model, we can substantially refine our global climate models," remarked Stuecker.
"This paves the way for the next-generation of global climate models to incorporate these findings, improving our approach to predicting and mitigating the effects of climate variability and change. Such advancements are crucial for societal preparations and adaptations to climate-related hazards."
The UH team of researchers was rounded out with contributing authors from Columbia University, NOAA, Korea, and China.
Journal information: Nature
Provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa
Explore further
Feedback to editors
23 hours ago
Jun 29, 2024
Jun 28, 2024
Relevant physicsforums posts, the secrets of prof. verschure's rosetta stones.
Jun 27, 2024
Jun 18, 2024
Jun 13, 2024
Jun 4, 2024
Jun 3, 2024
More from Earth Sciences
Mar 19, 2024
Apr 14, 2023
Nov 28, 2023
Apr 15, 2021
Jan 8, 2020
Let us know if there is a problem with our content.
Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form . For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines ).
Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request
Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.
Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.
Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form.
Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties.
More information Privacy policy
We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X's mission by getting a premium account.
Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World
Read our research on:
Full Topic List
Read Our Research On:
Table of contents.
Pew Research Center conducted this study to understand Americans’ attitudes about U.S. government, such as its size and role.
This report is based primarily on a survey of 8,709 adults, including 7,166 registered voters, from April 8 to 14, 2024. Some of the analysis in this report is based on a survey of 8,638 adults from May 13 to 19, 2024.
Everyone who took part in these surveys is a member of the Center’s American Trends Panel (ATP), an online survey panel that is recruited through national, random sampling of residential addresses. This way nearly all U.S. adults have a chance of selection. The survey is weighted to be representative of the U.S. adult population by gender, race, ethnicity, partisan affiliation, education and other categories. Read more about the ATP’s methodology .
Here are the questions used for the report and its methodology .
While the economy, immigration and abortion have emerged as major issues in the 2024 election, Joe Biden and Donald Trump also have dramatically different ideas about the size and role of government.
These differences reflect decades-old divisions between Democrats and Republicans over the scope of government.
Among registered voters, large majorities of Biden supporters – roughly three-quarters or more – favor a bigger, more activist government.
Trump supporters, by comparable margins, take the opposing view on all three questions.
The Pew Research Center survey of 8,709 adults – including 7,166 registered voters – conducted April 8-14, 2024, examines Americans’ views of the role and scope of government , the social safety net and long-term trends in trust in the federal government .
Democratic support for bigger government is little changed in the last five years but remains higher than it was a decade ago. Republicans’ views have shifted less over the last 10 years.
Among all adults, about three-quarters of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents favor a bigger government, up from about six-in-ten in 2014 and 2015. The share of Republicans and Republican leaners who prefer a bigger government has increased only modestly over the same period.
Democratic support for bigger government, while slightly lower than in 2021 (78%), remains at nearly its highest level in five decades. During Bill Clinton’s presidency in the 1990s, fewer than half of Democrats said they preferred a bigger government with more services.
Voters continue to express very different views about government’s role in specific areas than about the government generally.
A large majority of voters (80%) – including 82% of Biden supporters and 78% of Trump supporters – say that in thinking about the long-term future of Social Security, benefits should not be reduced in any way.
However, Biden supporters are more likely than Trump supporters to say Social Security should cover more people with greater benefits.
Most Americans (65%) continue to say the federal government has a responsibility to make sure all Americans have health care coverage.
Democrats overwhelmingly (88%) say the federal government has this responsibility, compared with 40% of Republicans.
The share of Republicans who say the government has a responsibility to provide health coverage has increased 8 percentage points since 2021, from 32% to 40%.
There are wide income differences among Republicans in opinions about the government’s role in health care:
When asked how the government should provide health coverage, 36% of Americans say it should be provided through a single national program, while 28% say it should be through a mix of government and private programs. These views have changed little in recent years.
Democrats continue to be more likely than Republicans to favor a “single payer” government health insurance program (53% vs. 18%).
Fresh data delivery Saturday mornings
Weekly updates on the world of news & information
6 facts about presidential and vice presidential debates, biden, trump are least-liked pair of major party presidential candidates in at least 3 decades, cultural issues and the 2024 election, more than half of americans are following election news closely, and many are already worn out, most popular, report materials.
1615 L St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 | Media Inquiries
ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts .
© 2024 Pew Research Center
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
WASSCE/WAEC Physics (2023) Questions and Answers 41 - 50. paragraph. 41. Which of the following statements about the properties of the electric field produced by charged parallel plates is not correct. paragraph. (a) The electric field in the region outside the parallel plate is zero except for the edge effects.
D. The electric field is uniform everywhere in the space between the parallel plates. View Answer & Discuss WAEC 2023. 2. The diagram above illustrates a mode of vibration of a wire of length 125 cm. The speed of the waves along the wire is 120 ms-1. Use the diagram to answer questions 2 and 3. A. 1.00m. B. 0.75m.
General Comments. The quality of this year's exam paper was impressive, with appropriate items and clear, unambiguous questions that fell within the scope of the syllabus. The paper also included well-reflected operational and graphical cases, and rubrics were provided clearly. Additionally, the allotted time for the exam was sufficient.
The following are the expected 2023 WAEC Physics objective questions and their respective answers. 1. Three capacitors each of capacitance 18µf are connected in series. Calculate the effective capacitance. A. 54µf. B. 18 µf. C. 6µf. D. 0.17uf.
Physics 1 2023 Free-Response Questions . When the cart is at + L. and momentarily at rest, a block is dropped onto the cart, as shown in Figure 3. The block . sticks to the cart, and the block-cart-spring system continues to oscillate between −. L. and + L. The masses of the cart and the block are . m. 0. and 3. m. 0, respectively. (b)
Creating an engaging and contemporary Physics Extended Essay can be particularly rewarding when the topic is relevant to modern situations and challenges. Fresh Breath Ideas for Physics IB EE in 2023/2024. Here are 12 topics that connect to current events or recent advancements in technology, along with a brief explanation of their relevance:
WASSCE Animal Husbandry Essay and Objectives Questions For 2023. WASSCE English Language Questions For 2023 Candidates - Paper 1& 2. Download Waec WASSCE Core Mathematics Past Questions Paper 1& 2- PDF. Download WASSCE Further Mathematics (Elective Maths) Questions 1& 2- PDF. WASSCE Financial Accounting Questions 1& 2- PDF For 2023 Candidates.
TO SUBSCRIBE FOR 2024 WAEC PHYSICS OBJ AND THEORY ANSWERS VIA LINK. JUST GO OUT AND BUY MTN CARDS OF N800 ( 400 + 400 = 800) GO TO YOUR MESSAGE, TYPE THE CARD PINS CORRECTLY AND SEND TO 08107431933. DON'T CALL, JUST TEXT, IF THE CARDS PINS ARE VALID, A REPLY WILL BE SENT TO YOU CONFIRMING THAT YOU HAVE BEEN SUBSCRIBED.
Practice WAEC Physics Questions Objective and Theory For Free 2022/2023. 1. The inner diameter of a test tube can be measured accurately using a. A. micrometer screw gauge. B. pair of dividers. C. metre rule. D. pair of vernier calipers. 2.
The Waec physics answers for 2024 questions can now be seen here. The West African Examination Council (WAEC) Physics paper will be taken on Tuesday, 21st May 2024. WAEC Physics questions and answers for essay objectives are now available. The Waec Physics 2 (Essay) paper will start by 2:00 pm and will last for 1hr 30 mins while the Waec ...
SAT Practice Essays and Score Explanations—Digital NOTE: The Essay is only available in certain states where it's required as part of SAT School Day administrations. If you're going to be taking the SAT on a school day, ask your counselor if it will include the Essay section.
The questions below are not exactly 2023 WAEC Physics questions and answers but likely WAEC Physics repeated questions and answers. These questions are for practice. The 2023 WAEC GCE Physics expo will be posted on this page on the day of the WAEC GCE Physics examination. 1. Which electrical device does the diagram above illustrate? (a) a.c ...
WAEC Physics OBJ Answers: 1-10: CBAACCAABD. 11-20: DBDDCDAAAD. 21-30: BDCDADDCCB. 31-40: CBBABACBBC. 41-50: ADDACCCCCD. No 1. To use dimensional analysis to determine the values of x, y and z, let's first look at the dimensions of each variable: F = force.
NECO Physics Answers 2023 Questions. 1. (a) A stone projected horizontally from the top of a tower with a speed of 4 ms-1 lands on the level ground at a horizontal distance of 25 m from the foot of the tower. Calculate the height of the tower. [ g = 10 ms-2 ] (b) A spiral spring with a metal extends by 10.5cm in the air When the metal Is fully in.
The 2023 NECO physics questions are set from the SS1 to SS3 physics syllabus. So all the questions you will encounter in this year's examination are in the syllabus, and nearly 95% of the questions are repeated. You don't have to worry about the 2023 NECO physics questions and answers PDF (essay and objective).
B. 2023 WAEC GCE PHYSICS ESSAY (THEORY) ANSWERS. (iii) Optical fibers play a key role in various diagnostic imaging techniques such as Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). (i) Optical fibers are extensively used in military communication systems. (ii) They serve as the backbone for various fiber optic sensor systems used in defense applications.
Below are the showing working of the WAEC Physics essay and theory sample questions and answers for 2021 paper 2. Study the steps and master them in case you see similar questions during the exam. 1. A stationary ball is hit by an average force of 50N for a time range of 0.03sec. Calculate the impulse experienced by the ball.
The 2024 WAEC physics questions are set from the SS1 to SS3 physics syllabus. So all the questions you will encounter in this year's examination are in the syllabus, and nearly 90% of the questions are repeated. You don't have to worry about the 2024 WAEC physics questions and answers PDF (essay and objective).
2023 Sample Solutions. A large crowd logged on last week for the IoP/ISTA review of the marking for last summer's Leaving Cert Physics Exam. I've uploaded sample solutions to a few of the questions from section B, which are available here, for anybody interested - about half way down on the left I felt that in general the exam paper would have ...
Important Dates for the 2023/2024 WAEC Physics Runz: The WAEC Physics examination typically takes place Tuesday, 23rd May, 2023 Physics 2 (Essay) - 2:00pm - 3:30pm Physics 1 (Objective) - 3:30pm - 4:45pm However, it's crucial to note that relying on leaked questions and answers is against the rules and regulations of the WAEC.
WAEC Past Questions App; WAEC Past Questions Software; Post-UTME Past Questions Papers; Post-UTME App for CBT; Post-UTME Software for CBT; Post-UTME Past Questions Agent; List of CBT Training Centres; Project Topics & Materials; Full Math Video Lessons - All topics; Full English Video Lessons - All topics; Advertising With Us
2023 Essay Contest The Forum on the History and Philosophy of Physics (FHPP) of the American Physical Society is proud to announce the outcome of our 2023 History of Physics Essay Contest. ... Entries can address the work of physicists, physics discoveries, or other related topics. At 2,500 words, entries should be scholarly and accessible to ...
Here are 20 potential physics topics for extended essays: Quantum Computing and its Applications. Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Artificial Intelligence in Physics. Renewable Energy and its Efficiency. Advancements in Nanotechnology. The Physics of Sports. The Physics of Music and Sound. The Physics of Medical Imaging.
Read CNN's analysis and commentary of the first 2024 presidential debate between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump in Atlanta.
NECO Physics Essay Questions. 1. (a) A student makes a model of an atom. The model contains 24 electrons, 25 protons and 26 neutrons. Some of these particles are inside a nucleus at the centre of the model. (i) Determine the nucleon number (mass number) of the atom.
In all of history until November 2023, humans had discovered about 20,000 stable inorganic compounds for use across all technologies. Then, Google's GN o ME AI discovered far more, increasing ...
At CAS, we have a unique view of recent scientific breakthroughs, the historical discoveries they were built upon, and the expertise to navigate the opportunities ahead. In 2023, we identified the top scientific breakthroughs, and 2024 has even more to offer. New trends to watch include the accelerated expansion of green chemistry, the clinical ...
A study of 17 commonly-used synthetic 'forever chemicals' has shown that these toxic substances can readily be absorbed through human skin.
Topics. Week's top ; Latest news; Unread news ... floods, crop failures, and food shortages. Recently, the world has experienced a major El Niño event in 2023-2024, dramatically impacting ...
Trump supporters, by comparable margins, take the opposing view on all three questions. The Pew Research Center survey of 8,709 adults - including 7,166 registered voters - conducted April 8-14, 2024, examines Americans' views of the role and scope of government, the social safety net and long-term trends in trust in the federal government.