Capstone Documents: Oral Defense
- Supplemental Resources for the PhD Social Work
- DBA Capstone: Traditional Capstone Options
- DBA Capstone: Portfolio Project Options
- DBA Capstone: Consulting Capstone Option
- DHA Doctoral Study (Summer 2021 or before)
- DIT Doctoral Study
- DNP Doctoral Project
- Doctor of Nursing Program Capstone Resources
- DNP Capstone Resources NURS 8702 and NURS 8703
- DPA Doctoral Study
- DrPH Doctoral Study
- DSW Doctoral Study
- EdD Doctoral Study
- PsyD Doctoral Study
- Doctoral Prospectus Resources This link opens in a new window
- Oral Defense
- Capstone Committee Process
- Doctoral Prospectus Resources
- DHS Doctoral Study
- DHA Doctoral Study Landing Page
- DHA Doctoral Study (Fall 2021 or after)
- Previous Page: Doctoral Prospectus Resources
- Next Page: Capstone Committee Process
Oral Defense Information
- Conference Call Request Form (Faculty Only)
Please submit this form at least three business days prior to the requested conference call date. This form is used when the necessary approvals are in place to hold a conference call for one of the following: For Student and Committee Members (sessions are recorded):
- Proposal Oral Presentation - The Proposal Oral Presentation should only be scheduled after committee approval of the proposal has been finalized .
- Final Oral Presentation - The Final Oral Presentation should only be scheduled after Form & Style approval has been finalized . When scheduling the Final Oral Presentation, the requested day/time should take place no sooner than the day following the Form & Style due date or date of return if completed before the due date.
- Faculty Only Oral Defense Resources
Presentation Templates
Here are a few oral presentation templates to get you started in preparing for your oral presentation. If a template is not listed for your program; this program currently does not provide generic models for the oral presentation. Please, reach out to your committee chair to determine the appropriate materials to prepare and the process that will be used in the call
- PhD Dissertation Proposal Oral Defense Template
- PhD Dissertation Final Oral Defense Template
- DBA Presentation Template
- DBA Consulting Capstone Oral Defense Template
- DHA Oral Defense Template
- DHS Proposal Oral Defense Template
- DHS Final Oral Template
- DIT Proposal Oral Presentation Template
- DIT Final Oral Presentation Template
- DrPH Oral Proposal Defense PowerPoint Template
- DrPH Oral Final Defense PowerPoint Template
- DSW Proposal Defense Template
- DSW Final Oral Defense Template
- DNP Final Project Defense Template
- EdD Capstone Proposal Oral Defense Template
- EdD Capstone Final Study Oral Defense Template
Oral Defense Archives (Listen to Oral Defenses)
- Oral Defense Recordings (Student Access Only)
Social Media
Connect with the office of research and doctoral services.
- Office of Student Disability Services
Walden Resources
Departments.
- Academic Residencies
- Academic Skills
- Career Planning and Development
- Customer Care Team
- Field Experience
- Military Services
- Student Success Advising
- Writing Skills
Centers and Offices
- Center for Social Change
- Office of Academic Support and Instructional Services
- Office of Degree Acceleration
- Office of Research and Doctoral Services
- Office of Student Affairs
Student Resources
- Doctoral Writing Assessment
- Form & Style Review
- Quick Answers
- ScholarWorks
- SKIL Courses and Workshops
- Walden Bookstore
- Walden Catalog & Student Handbook
- Student Safety/Title IX
- Legal & Consumer Information
- Website Terms and Conditions
- Cookie Policy
- Accessibility
- Accreditation
- State Authorization
- Net Price Calculator
- Cost of Attendance
- Contact Walden
Walden University is a member of Adtalem Global Education, Inc. www.adtalem.com Walden University is certified to operate by SCHEV © 2024 Walden University LLC. All rights reserved.
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
ORAL DEFENSE RUBRIC
Overall presentation quality ☐ Poorly organized ☐ Poor presentation ☐ Poor communication skills ☐ Slides and handouts difficult to read ☐ Presentation reveals critical weaknesses in depth of knowledge in subject matter ☐ Clearly organized ☐ Clear presentation ☐ Good communication skills ☐ Slides and handouts clear ☐ Presentation demonstrates depth of knowledge in subject matter Quality of response to questions/critical thinking skills ☐ Responses were incomplete ☐ Respondent exhibited lack of knowledge in subject area ☐ Responses did not meet level expected of an MPH graduate ☐ Presentation does not reflect well developed critical thinking skills ☐ Responses were complete ☐ Respondent exhibited adequate knowledge in subject area ☐ Responses met level expected of an MPH graduate ☐ Presentation demonstrates critical thinking skills OVERALL ASSESSMENT ☐ DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATIONS (UNSATISFACTORY) ☐ MEETS EXPECTATIONS (SATISFACTORY)
Related Papers
Prof. Hassan Mohamed Abouelkheir
Introduction: Design of a standardized rubric for measuring student performance in presentations is a critical issue. Materials and Methods: Thirty male students (Group I) and thirty female students (Group II) participated in this study. Likert scale was used (excellent, good, average, and unsatisfactory). It was used against the itemized criteria (introduction, content, slide arrangement, written work, delivery and use of references). Results: high Cronbach's alpha reliability of the rubric was found in either Group I (0.945) or Group II (0.878) where it is slightly higher in the Group I at the 5% level. Corrected item-total correlation for delivery variable in Group I is very weak (0.222) while correlation for reference variable in Group II was averaged (0.525). Conclusion: Group II showed higher delivery performance than Group I as Group I had a lack of English language proficiency, while in Group II, they miss reference citation which can be corrected.
Chinmay Shah
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Michael Peeters
Ana Sofia Agudelo Muñoz
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
Asko Mononen
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to design a rubric instrument for assessing oral presentation performance in higher education and to test its validity with an expert group. Design/methodology/approach This study, using mixed methods, focusses on: designing a rubric by identifying assessment instruments in previous presentation research and implementing essential design characteristics in a preliminary developed rubric; and testing the validity of the constructed instrument with an expert group of higher educational professionals (n=38). Findings The result of this study is a validated rubric instrument consisting of 11 presentation criteria, their related levels in performance, and a five-point scoring scale. These adopted criteria correspond to the widely accepted main criteria for presentations, in both literature and educational practice, regarding aspects as content of the presentation, structure of the presentation, interaction with the audience and presentation delivery. ...
Farah Kalmey
Revista Universidad Eafit
Ana Milena Lopez Restrepo
GMS Journal for Medical Education
Susanne Gerhardt-Szep
Aim: At the annual meeting of German dentists in Frankfurt am Main in 2013, the Working Group for the Advancement of Dental Education (AKWLZ) initiated an interdisciplinary working group to address assessments in dental education. This paper presents an overview of the current work being done by this working group, some of whose members are also actively involved in the German Association for Medical Education's (GMA) working group for dental education. The aim is to present a summary of the current state of research on this topic for all those who participate in the design, administration and evaluation of university-specific assessments in dentistry. Method: Based on systematic literature research, the testing scenarios listed in the National Competency-based Catalogue of Learning Objectives (NKLZ) have been compiled and presented in tables according to assessment value. Results: Different assessment scenarios are described briefly in table form addressing validity (V), reliab...
Rie Koizumi
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
RELATED PAPERS
Research Gate
DR.C.KARTHIKEYAN DR.C.KARTHIKEYAN
Athletic Training Education Journal
Paul Geisler
Assessing Writing
Valerie Meier
Louis Schembri
Nancy Heine
Mohammad Salehi
Medical Education
Martha Elks
Aymen Elsheikh
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Baki Tezcan
Roger Neighbour
T. Singel , Chinmay shah
Xenia Delieza
Journal of Orthodontics & Endodontics
Roula Abiad
Philip Bashook
ainslie martin
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children
Timothy Slocum
International Educational Research
enceng yana
Fr. Eric Tosi
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Michael Riolo , Jeryl English
Javed Hayat
The American Journal of Surgery
Michael Krausz
Saudi Medical Journal
Mohammed Jan
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
- Find new research papers in:
- Health Sciences
- Earth Sciences
- Cognitive Science
- Mathematics
- Computer Science
- Academia ©2024
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Form 5b - Rubrics for Final Oral Defense RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Indicators 5 4 3 2 1 1. Tables and figures are scholarly presented 2. Drawing implications from the discovery of the study were done properly. 3. Analysis of datasets is well-written and done. 4. Interpretation of the results is objectively and subjectively presented. 5.
Rubrics for Research Proposal/Oral Defense - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. This rubrics would be helpful to the teachers or instructors of Research to give fair and just rating to students who will undergo research proposal or oral defense
The gap of knowledge of the study is clearly and specifically stated in paragraph 3 to convince the readers of the need to conduct such study. 7. The research paradigm is able to provide the direction and skeletal framework of the study. 8. The aims/ purposes or objectives were thoroughly presented.
Form 6b - Rubrics for Final Oral Defense RESEARCH RUBRICS FOR FINAL ORAL DEFENSE Title of the Study: _____ ORAL PRESENTATION Presenter 1:_____ Presenter 2:_____ ... Are the proposals sound and relevant? Does the speaker make clear explanations of their specific part in the proposal?
The purpose of the oral defense of the dissertation proposal is to determine whether the PhD student is adequately prepared t o undertake dissertation research. Assessment Rubric for Defense of Dissertation Proposal . Criteria High Pass (HP) Pass (P) Low Pass (LP) Fail (F) Assessment (HP, P, LP, or F) Student demonstrates ability to state a ...
For the rubric, comp lete both sections below by marking an (x) in the appropriate box for each rubric line. The chair will summarize the rubric scores on form 2252 Thesis Defense Report. Instructions for Thesis Committee Chair: For each rubric row (i.e., Organization Rubric, Presentation Rubric, etc.), 1.
dissertation, you must conduct and pass your formal oral defense as a doctoral candidate. The purpose of the oral defense is for doctoral candidates to demonstrate competence in describing, discussing, and supporting all aspects of their dissertation study to their Chair and two committee members. Although the oral defense is a time of
Superficial understanding of their research. Research proposal has a few major flaws that interfere with completion of the project. Variables need clarification, were not the most significant variables to investigate. Needs to improve scientific accuracy of the information presented. Proposal meets all requirements with minimum effectiveness.
Rubric for a Successful Doctoral Dissertation Oral Defense Category Considerations for Ratings Research Questions/ ... Literature Review Identifies relevant research and literature; well-organized and timely critique Theoretical Framework (If applicable) Uses theory, if applicable, to generate the hypothesis or to make the problem area more ...
between 1 (Poor) and 5 (Excellent) for each of the criteria described below using the attached rubric. Briefly comment on the rationale if your score is less than 5. Submit your completed scoring sheet to the committee chair before leaving the defense. Score (1 - 5) Criterion Comment Organization of Oral Defense Presentation Style ...
Dissertation Oral Defense Rubric Student: _____ Committee Chair: _____ First Reader: _____ Second Reader: _____ I. Learning Goals Students will demonstrate the ability to defend, clarify, and expand upon arguments made in the written dissertation. Students will demonstrate the ability to articulate their understanding of the nature of the ...
AP® Research — Presentation and Oral Defense 2021 Scoring Guidelines. NOTE: To receive the highest performance level presumes that the student also achieved the preceding performance levels in that row. ADDITIONAL SCORES: In addition to the scores represented on the rubric, teachers can also assign scores of 0 (zero). A score of. A score of.
This document contains a rubric for evaluating oral defenses of individual research projects presented to a panel. The rubric assesses presenters on five indicators: delivery, organization, use of visual aids, familiarity with the subject matter, and preparedness. Each indicator is scored from 1 to 5, with a maximum total score of 80 points across all indicators. The document lists the title ...
All examination documents (rubrics and written comments) must be completed regardless of the outcome of the Dissertation Defense. A copy of the completed forms (both rubrics and written comments) must be submitted to the College of Graduate Studies Dean (or Dean's designee), at the conclusion of the dissertation defense.
This document contains a rubric for evaluating oral defense presentations of research proposals. The rubric includes 20 criteria organized into 5 categories: scientific thought and engineering goals, creativity and inventiveness, thoroughness, research skills, and oral presentation. Each criterion is scored from 1-5, with 5 indicating strong agreement that the criterion was met. The rubric ...
Oral Defense Information. Conference Call Request Form. (Faculty Only) Please submit this form at least three business days prior to the requested conference call date. This form is used when the necessary approvals are in place to hold a conference call for one of the following: For Student and Committee Members (sessions are recorded):
Assessment Rubric for Defense of Dissertation Proposal :: ... Student Name Date of Meeting Purpose: The purpose of the oral defense of the dissertation proposal is to determine whether the EdD candidate is adequately prepared to execute the dissertation research. The can; didate must achieve a "pass" (3, 2, or 1 ... approach and plan for ...
Download Free PDF. View PDF. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. Assessing oral presentation performance. 2017 •. Asko Mononen. Purpose The purpose of this paper is to design a rubric instrument for assessing oral presentation performance in higher education and to test its validity with an expert group.
This document contains a rubric for evaluating oral defenses of research manuscripts. It assesses manuscripts across several criteria in different sections, including the introduction, literature review and conceptual framework, research design and methods, results and discussion, conclusion, and references. For each criterion, reviewers assign a score from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest ...
Oral Defense Individual Rubric - Free download as Word Doc (.doc), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. This document provides a grading rubric for oral examinations given to individual students. It evaluates students based on criteria such as depth and relevance of their statements to the group's thesis, integration of concepts and lessons to the group ...
This document contains rubrics for evaluating a research project and oral defense. The research project rubric includes categories for clarity, reasoning and organization, research design and methodology, and writing mechanics. Scoring criteria are provided for each category. The oral defense rubric includes sections on content, presentation, and uses scoring criteria to evaluate elements such ...
This document contains rubrics for evaluating a practical research final defense at Caraga National High School in Davao Oriental, Philippines. The rubrics assess chapters in the research covering the introduction, methods, results and discussion, and summary/conclusion. Areas of evaluation include significance of the research topic, literature review, research design, data analysis, findings ...