what is quality assurance essay

Are you a ComplianceQuest Customer?

Quality Assurance (QA)

Quality assurance is an integral component of quality management. Organizations across industries, including manufacturing, technology, government agencies, food and beverage, health and beauty, finance, nonprofit, and government agencies must conduct QA checks.

What is Quality Assurance?

Quality assurance (QA) is a systematic process that ensures products, services, or processes meet or exceed established quality standards. It involves activities and techniques aimed at preventing defects, identifying and resolving issues, and improving overall quality throughout the entire lifecycle of a product or service. QA (Quality assurance) aims to ensure consistent and reliable performance, customer satisfaction, and compliance with regulatory requirements.

Quality assurance is a means to prevent mistakes and defects in the manufacturing process at every stage of the product life cycle. The term encompasses several aspects of quality such as best practices and methodologies to ensure customer delight and regulatory compliance.

Quality assurance is defined by ISO 9000 as a “part of quality management focused on providing confidence that quality requirements will be fulfilled.” With QA, manufacturers can ensure that customers receive a defect-free product by preventing mistakes at the time of manufacturing. Businesses can improve compliance to standards by monitoring processes and use feedback to improve efficiency and effectiveness.

Related Assets

With e-commerce and virtual marketplaces gaining popularity, the logistics industry has emerged as a critical connecting point between the seller…

Many Life-Science organizations still suffer from DRIP (data rich, information poor) because of on-premises, disconnected systems that house critical quality…

Business leaders worldwide, especially in the manufacturing sector, are facing a major predicament – dealing with supply chain disruptions and…

What is the Difference Between Quality Control and Quality Assurance?

Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA) are two distinct but complementary aspects of quality management. Quality Control focuses on the identification and correction of defects in finished products or services. It involves activities such as inspections, testing, and measurements to ensure that the product or service meets specific quality standards. QC is reactive and occurs at the end of the production process. On the other hand, QA (Quality Assurance) is a proactive process that aims to prevent defects from occurring in the first place. It involves establishing and implementing processes, procedures, and systems to ensure that products or services are designed, developed, and produced consistently and reliably. QA focuses on planning, defining quality objectives, implementing quality control measures, conducting audits, and continuously improving processes to enhance overall quality.

Types of Quality Assurance

Quality Assurance (QA) takes various forms across industries, each tailored to specific processes and products.

Functional Quality Assurance

Ensures the product or service functions as intended, meeting specified requirements and functional expectations.

Process Quality Assurance

Optimises and monitors the processes involved in product development or service delivery to ensure efficiency and adherence to standards.

Software Quality Assurance (SQA):

Specific to the software development lifecycle, SQA involves processes and activities to ensure the quality of software products.

Regulatory Compliance Quality Assurance

Ensures adherence to industry-specific regulations, standards, and legal requirements, avoiding legal issues and ensuring ethical practices.

Supplier Quality Assurance

Evaluating and monitoring the quality of materials and components supplied by external vendors to maintain consistent product quality.

Product Quality Assurance

Concentrates on the final product, ensuring it meets defined quality standards and customer expectations.

What Industries does Quality Assurance Apply to?

Quality assurance focuses on both administrative and procedural activities that are implemented in a quality system to meet the requirements and purpose of a product, service, or activity. QA includes systematic measurement, standard comparison, processes monitoring, and drawing feedback with the intent to prevent errors. To that end, quality assurance can be implemented across industries including:

Government agencies

Manufacturing

Food and beverage

Healthy and beauty

The Power of Cloud for Deploying Quality 4.0 & Industry 4.0 Practices & Why it is So Important

What are the functions of quality assurance.

The functions of quality assurance are defined by the objectives laid out. These functions include:

Planning and management of product quality compliance as per QA standards

Coordinating with the manufacturing department to ensure QA is carried out at all stages from testing, auditing, and reporting

Review the QA specifications and procedures with quality control

Conduct technical audits to ensure the standards are met consistently

What are the Methods of Quality Assurance?

Each method has its own advantages. Some of the most commonly used quality assurance methods are mentioned below:

• Statistical sampling
• Operations analysis
• Quality management methodologies, e.g., Six Sigma, Lean Manufacturing
• Business process re-engineering
• Specifications
• Standard operating procedures
• ISO accreditation
• Benchmarking
• Cost-benefit analysis
• Ishikawa diagrams

Making the Digital Quality Journey in Cell and Gene Therapy: From Bench to Bedside to Benefit

Quality assurance best practices.

Implementing effective Quality Assurance (QA) involves adopting a set of best practices to ensure consistent quality across processes, products, and services. Some key best practices for Quality Assurance include:

Clearly Defined Processes: Document and communicate standardized processes to ensure consistency and understanding across the organization.

Set Clear Quality Objectives: Define measurable quality objectives aligned with organizational goals to guide the QA process and measure success.

Training and Skill Development: Invest in ongoing training and development programs to ensure that team members possess the necessary skills and knowledge.

Effective Communication: Foster open and transparent communication within the organization to promote a shared understanding of quality goals and expectations.

Regular Audits and Reviews: Conduct regular internal audits and reviews to assess compliance with processes, identify areas for improvement, and ensure continuous enhancement.

Customer Feedback and Satisfaction: Collect and analyze customer feedback to understand their needs, expectations, and satisfaction levels, integrating this information into QA processes.

Risk Management: Implement risk management practices to identify, assess, and mitigate potential risks that could impact product or service quality.

Use of QA Tools and Technologies: Leverage appropriate tools and technologies for testing, monitoring, and analyzing data to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of QA processes.

Collaboration and Teamwork: Encourage collaboration and teamwork to foster a collective responsibility for quality throughout the organization.

Continuous Improvement: Embrace a culture of continuous improvement, regularly reviewing processes and seeking opportunities to enhance efficiency, effectiveness, and quality.

What are the Advantages of Quality Assurance Systems?

Noncompliance to the new price transparency requirements can lead make the business vulnerable to public disclosure and exposure of trade secrets. A cohesive strategy that focuses on value-based contracts (VBCs) by relating payment to its value is necessary and requires businesses to create a model that helps forecast and conduct scenario analysis for possible VBCs. It should be able to predict the financial impact and share it with a cross-functional team to understand the implications for the business. This will have an impact on the contract arrangements and needs current processes, documentation , and systems to be updated. It will require change management for any new contracting approach that is implemented.

By using a quality QHSE system by CQ, businesses can significantly reduce the effort involved in maintaining ISO 9001:2015 Quality System by automating the required processes to maintain full traceability. In addition, the system also provides a complete view of the organization’s data concerning the performance and effectiveness of the quality and compliance management system . Some of the primary advantages of using a quality assurance system include:

Improved products and business

• Innovate with an adaptable quality platform
• Drive continuous improvement and business growth
• Deliver exceptional customer experiences to build customer loyalty
• Leverage data for a factual approach to decision making
• Gain greater efficiency

Consistency

• Reduce variability of waste, materials, and rework to cut time and costs
• Keep quality processes repeatable to increase knowledgeable staff and reduce human error
• Prevent delays by minimizing disruptions to stay on time and under budget.
• Improve process control to reduce quality gaps
• Reduce lead time with an increase in production yield

Effective compliance

• Ensure quality standards are being met
• Experience total traceability
• Turn insights into action
• Provide historical audit trails to speed compliance
• Become adaptable to changing or emerging market conditions and to environmental and other government regulations.

Risk reduction

• Provide visibility between quality processes, product records, requirements, and related processes
• Enable teams to adjust plans and resolve issues faster
• Quickly find the root cause and speed up resolution
• Reduce the risk of probable quality failure through predictive analysis of data
• Limit damages to profits, reputation, and existing relationships

A great QMS package

CQ has proven to be intuitive, easy to use and customization is as easy as speaking to the CQ team. The validation scripts are straightforward and easy to edit to meet our organizations particular needs. The system feels familiar while delivering the QMS system tools that we need and the CQ team is responsive to any questions that arise.

Dorothy Wilson, Quality Assurance & Document and Records Specialist

How to Ensure Complete Quality Assurance?

QA (Quality Assurance) can be ensured using the PDCA (Plan, Do, Check, and Act) cycle, a four-step methodology that helps control and improve the quality of products and services. It is an effective process to ensure that the organization maintains high standards of quality for the products, thus improving the reputation of the organization in the long run. It can be conducted when

• Starting a new quality improvement project
• Developing improvements for a process, product, or service
• Planning collection and analysis of data to rectify problems or root causes
• Defining repetitive work process
• Implementing any quality change in the organization

The PDCA cycle can be implemented as follows:

• Recognize a quality improvement opportunity and plan a change
• Do a test run with the change by carrying out a small-scale study
• Review the test and check the results
• Act on the new information by taking necessary action

Using PDCA has become a fundamental principle of quality management as it ensures consistency across business activities. Through continuous feedback to analyze, measure, and identify areas of improvement, manufacturers can take corrective action to meet customer requirements.

How does CQ's Next-Gen Quality Assurance System help Quality Leaders?

In life sciences industries, the top three priorities are:

• Maintaining compliance
• Bringing new products to market, and
• Improving manufacturing/production performance

A solution such as the ComplianceQuest’s quality assurance system aligns with all the major regulatory standards and its scalable and flexible architecture helps businesses adopt a risk-based approach to ensure:

• Identifying and mitigating risks
• Continuous improvements
• Ease of compliance, thanks to a collaborative and data-driven workflow

It empowers quality leaders with transparency and traceability, with integrated root cause analysis and CAPA management where required. Change Management , Inspection , and Audit Management also automate the workflows, improve compliance, and ensures quality assurance. Document Management is also made intuitive and facilitates reporting in a timely manner.

In the complex world of stringent regulatory requirements that can vary from region to region and requires the same organization to manage the variations in their different units in a centralized manner, ComplianceQuest’s Quality Assurance System can provide the flexibility and scalability they so need to minimize the risk of non-compliance and the resulting product recalls, penalties and brand erosion.

Ensure product is defect-free by preventing mistakes with Quality Assurance

Related checklists.

Quality Assurance Checklist – Part A (Project Management)

Checklist | September 7th, 2022

General Quality Control and Assurance Points for ATMPs

Checklist | March 29th, 2022

Quality Assurance Checklist – Part B (Project Deliverables)

Quality-centric Companies Rely on CQ QMS

Frequently Asked Questions

QA (Quality Assurance) Management is the systematic process of ensuring that products or services meet specified quality standards and customer expectations. It involves the development and implementation of policies, procedures, and methodologies to monitor and improve the quality of processes and deliverables.

QA Management encompasses activities such as process audits, quality planning, and the establishment of quality metrics. The goal is to prevent defects, identify and correct deviations from standards, and continuously enhance overall quality. QA Management is integral in various industries, including manufacturing, software development, healthcare, and services, to achieve and maintain high-quality outcomes.

ComplianceQuest – A 100% modern cloud Enterprise Quality & Safety Management System (QHSE) meets every requirement for ISO 9001:2015. By automating the entire ISO 9001 Quality Management System requirements, CQ EQMS significantly reduces the effort involved in maintaining ISO 9001:2015 Quality System and improves traceability. Also, it provides a complete view of the organization’s data, enhancing the performance and effectiveness of quality and compliance management processes. While ISO 9001:2015 is still based on the same seven quality principles, there is increased attention to the transformation of business methods over the past decade. ISO 9001:2015 changes the focus from documentation to managing and mapping processes with risk-based thinking. The new standards place a heightened emphasis on the importance of formal risk analysis. An end-to-end quality management system such as the one from ComplianceQuest provides a comprehensive and enterprise-wide view that enables life sciences companies with the ability to create strategies around pricing and enables VBC. The key reasons for adopting ComplianceQuest’s solution included its:

Comprehensive yet flexible approach to designing a workflow that works for your enterprise

Platform capabilities that enable a roadmap for product innovation with a deep focus on quality

A best practices-based integration strategy and validation

Engineering

ISO 9001:2015 is the most internationally recognized quality assurance standard. Quality assurance affects different aspects of business, including finance, quality, brand, and time. Providing the advantage of evolving, agile, and next-generation technology capabilities, CQ Quality Management Software acts as the building block for a ‘Continuously Improving’ quality management process to deliver a high-quality product.

Related Insights

Agile Quality Audits: Improve Responsiveness with AI-powered Insights

A 20% time saving on regulatory audits and a 10% saving on audits of standards like ISO 9001 – who…

7 Reasons Why You Need Quality Assurance Yesterday

In Jan 2022, McKinsey Quarterly published an article titled “Embedding…

2 Directors of Quality Directing the Way for Operational Excellence

The role of leadership in quality management forms the backbone…

The Finer Nuances of Quality Control Vs. Quality Management

In January 2022, McKinsey Quarterly published an article on the…

Connect with a CQ Expert

Learn about all features of our Product, Quality, Safety, and Supplier suites. Please fill the form below to access our comprehensive demo video.

Please confirm your details

By submitting this form you agree that we can store and process your personal data as per our Privacy Statement. We will never sell your personal information to any third party.

In Need of Smarter Ways Forward? Get in Touch.

Got questions we can help.

Chat with a CQ expert, we will answer all your questions.

• Professional Scrum Product Owner (PSPO)
• SAFe for Government
• Professional Scrum Master (PSM)
• Certified ScrumMaster
• PMI-ACP Exam Prep
• Leading SAFe® 6.0 Certification
• SAFe Scrum Master
• Certified Scrum Product Owner (CSPO)
• SAFe for Teams
• Agile Scrum Foundation
• AgilePM Foundation and Practitioner Certification
• Agile Scrum Master (ASM)
• Kanban Training
• Scrum Fundamentals
• PMP Certification
• Project Management Fundamentals
• CAPM Exam Prep
• Change Management Foundation and Practitioner Certification
• PRINCE2 Foundation & Practitioner Certification (7th Edition)
• PRINCE2 Agile Foundation & Practitioner Certification
• Business Analysis Foundation and Practitioner Certification
• Microsoft Project Training
• JIRA Certification Training
• Lean Project Management
• ITIL 4 Foundation
• VeriSM™ Foundation
• SIAM Foundation
• SIAM Professional
• 7 QC Tools Training
• Minitab Essentials
• Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt
• Six Sigma Awareness
• Lean Six Sigma Green Belt
• Design for Six Sigma
• Lean Six Sigma Black Belt
• Lean Fundamentals
• Value Stream Mapping
• Quality by Design
• Quality Function Deployment
• BPM and Six Sigma
• RCA through Six Sigma
• DevOps Foundation
• DevOps Master
• DevOps Professional
• Continuous Delivery Architecture
• COBIT 5 Certification
• Corporate Group Training
• 1-to-1 Training
• Join as a Trainer

• Top Blogs on Quality Management

What is Quality Assurance?

Quality Assurance is like the GPS for businesses, guiding them towards excellence in their products and services. In this guide, we’ll break down QA into simple terms, showing why it’s crucial for businesses of all kinds. Whether it’s a simple or complex product, QA ensures your products are top-notch and your customers are happy. 

We’ll explore how QA differs from Quality Control (QC) and how it’s applied in real-life situations, making it easier for you to understand and implement in your business. 

So, let’s dive in and discover how QA can be your secret weapon for success!

Table of Contents

What is Quality Assurance

Importance of quality assurance, methods used in quality assurance, quality assurance vs quality control, qa standards, qa in software, qa vs testing, use of qa in industry, example of quality assurance.

Quality Assurance (QA) is like the foundation of a business’s efforts to maintain product quality and meet industry standards. It involves a series of organized steps to ensure products consistently meet certain quality standards. 

Essentially, QA is about always finding ways to improve products. By implementing QA processes, businesses can detect problems early on, saving time and resources while maintaining a strong reputation for quality and reliability.

For many businesses, QA is more than just a checklist of tasks; It’s a commitment to their team and customers. It’s a promise to deliver excellent products that meet expectations and create a great experience for users. 

When companies make QA a priority, they show they’re serious about providing top-notch quality and are dedicated to always improving their products and services.

Businesses must understand that QA isn’t a one-time task but an ongoing process deeply ingrained in their operations. By embracing QA as a fundamental aspect of their business strategy, companies can bring a culture of quality consciousness and continuous improvement. 

Companies can build strong brand loyalty and differentiate themselves from competitors by consistently delivering superior products that meet or exceed customer expectations. 

QA isn’t just about meeting standards; It’s about exceeding them and setting new benchmarks for quality and innovation in the industry.

Quality Assurance (QA) is immensely important across industries for several reasons. First, it ensures that products or services meet predefined quality standards, thus enhancing customer satisfaction and loyalty. 

By consistently delivering high-quality products, businesses can build trust with their customers and maintain a competitive edge in the market.

Moreover, QA helps minimize risks and costs associated with defects or errors in products or processes. By identifying and addressing issues early on, companies can avoid costly recalls, rework, and customer complaints, significantly saving time and resources.

Additionally, QA promotes continuous improvement within organizations. By establishing systematic procedures for monitoring and evaluating quality, businesses can identify areas for enhancement and implement corrective actions to optimize their processes and enhance overall efficiency.

Overall, quality assurance is essential for ensuring product integrity, maintaining customer trust, reducing costs, and driving continuous improvement, making it a successful business operation.

Software Development Methodologies Waterfall, Agile , and Scrum offer insight into three prominent approaches to software development. Each methodology offers different frameworks and strategies for managing the software development process. 

Through concise analysis, this exploration provides a comprehensive understanding of these methodologies and their implications for modern software development projects.

• Quality Planning: Involves defining quality objectives, processes, and criteria necessary to meet customer requirements. It includes creating quality plans, establishing quality metrics, and setting targets for performance and reliability.
• Quality Control (QC): QC involves executing planned activities to verify that products or services meet quality requirements. This may include inspections, testing, and sampling to identify defects or deviations from specifications.
• Process Improvement: Continuous process improvement methodologies such as Lean, Six Sigma, and Total Quality Management (TQM) are often used in QA to identify inefficiencies, reduce waste, and enhance overall quality and productivity.
• Statistical Analysis: Statistical methods such as statistical process control (SPC), hypothesis testing, and regression analysis are employed to analyze data and monitor process performance over time, helping to identify trends, patterns, and areas for improvement.
• Root Cause Analysis (RCA): Root Cause Analysis is a systematic approach to identify the underlying causes of problems or defects and develop corrective actions to prevent recurrence. Techniques such as Fishbone diagrams , 5 Whys, and Pareto analysis are commonly used in RCA.
• Quality Audits: Regular audits assess compliance with quality standards, procedures, and regulations. Audits may be internal or external and help identify non-conformities and opportunities for improvement.
• Documentation and Standardization: Proper documentation of processes, procedures, and standards ensures consistency and transparency in quality assurance activities. Standardization helps streamline operations and facilitates continuous improvement efforts.
• Training and Education: Providing employees with training and education on quality principles, procedures, and tools is essential for building a culture of quality and ensuring that everyone understands their role in maintaining product integrity and customer satisfaction.

The Quality Control team conducts tests post-product development to identify errors and bugs before the product reaches customers, focusing on rectifying issues.

Conversely, the Quality Assurance team is actively involved throughout the development process, ensuring that every part of the product aligns with quality standards and striving to deliver a satisfactory customer experience. 

By working collaboratively, both teams contribute to ensuring that the end product meets or exceeds customer expectations in terms of quality and functionality.

QA methodologies have evolved to adapt to changing businesses as with QA standards. The most recent iteration, ISO 9001:2015, reflects a heightened emphasis on customer-centric approaches, top management’s pivotal role in organizational transformation, and the integration of continuous improvement practices. 

In addition to enhancing the overall framework of ISO 9001 , the 2015 version introduces structural refinements. 

It provides comprehensive guidelines for risk-based decision-making, ensuring that companies remain agile and responsive to evolving market dynamics.

Software Quality Assurance (SQA) aims to systematically identify patterns and necessary actions to enhance development cycles in software projects. Addressing coding errors can sometimes lead to unintended consequences, potentially breaking other features or functionalities in the process.

As developers increasingly prioritize proactively avoiding errors, SQA has become crucial, saving time and expenses in the development process. Despite the implementation of SQA processes, software updates can still introduce defects, commonly called bugs.

Various strategies exist within the domain of SQA. For instance, the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) focuses on performance improvement by assessing maturity levels across organizational areas and suggesting enhancements, ranging from disorganization to optimal efficiency.

Software development methodologies, including Waterfall, Agile, and Scrum, have evolved to incorporate SQA practices. 

• Waterfall follows a linear progression from requirements gathering to release, often criticized for its perceived slowness, prompting the emergence of alternative methodologies.
• Agile, a team-centric approach, treats each step as a sprint, offering adaptability but reduced predictability due to potential changes in project scope. 
• Scrum combines aspects of both methodologies, dividing developers into teams for specific tasks, with each task segmented into multiple sprints.

To implement an effective QA system, it is essential to establish standardized goals, considering the benefits and drawbacks of each approach, such as maximizing efficiency, reducing costs, or minimizing errors.

Management commitment to process changes and collaborative efforts to support and uphold quality standards are essential to successful QA implementation.

Quality involves a collaborative effort by various professionals who play distinct yet interrelated roles within the quality assurance and testing stream. Let’s take a closer look at the key individuals involved in this process and their unique contributions to ensure the delivery of high-quality software products.

Here are some key roles commonly found in a QA team!

• QA Engineers/Testers: They execute test cases, identify defects, and ensure the software meets quality standards.
• QA Managers/Leads: They oversee the QA process, coordinate testing activities, and ensure testing objectives are met. QA Managers may also create test plans and manage the QA team.
• Automation Engineers: They develop and maintain automated testing scripts to streamline the testing process and improve efficiency.
• Performance Engineers: They focus on testing the performance, scalability, and reliability of software applications under different conditions, such as heavy loads or high traffic.
• UX/UI Testers: They evaluate the software’s user experience and interface design to ensure that it is user-friendly and meets user expectations.
• DevOps Engineers: DevOps Engineers collaborate with developers and QA team members to integrate testing into the software development lifecycle and automate deployment processes.
• Product Owners/Managers: Product Owners provide input on quality requirements, prioritize features, and collaborate with the QA team to ensure the software meets user needs and business objectives.
• Customer Support/Feedback Analysts: They gather feedback from customers and end-users, identify issues or areas for improvement, and communicate these findings to the QA team for further investigation and resolution.

Quality Assurance and Software Testing are crucial for delivering high-quality products in software development. QA focuses on establishing standards and processes to optimize development, while Testing evaluates functionality to identify defects. Understanding their distinctions is key to implementing effective quality strategies.

Quality Assurance (QA):

• QA is a comprehensive process that ensures the software development process is efficient and effective in delivering a high-quality product.
• It involves defining and implementing processes, standards, and methodologies to ensure that the software development life cycle is well-managed and that quality is built into the product.
• QA encompasses establishing quality standards, defining processes, conducting audits, and ensuring compliance with standards and best practices.
• It is a proactive approach aimed at preventing defects and ensuring that the development process itself can produce high-quality software.

Software Testing:

• Software testing is a subset of QA that verifies the software behaves as expected and meets the defined requirements.
• Testing involves executing the software with the intent of finding defects or errors. This includes validating functionality, performance, security, usability, and other quality attributes.
• Testing can be manual or automated and involves techniques such as unit testing, integration testing, system testing, acceptance testing, and regression testing.
• While QA concerns the entire software development process, testing is primarily concerned with evaluating the product itself to identify and address defects.

Quality assurance is a cornerstone across diverse industries, ensuring products and services meet strict standards and regulations. From manufacturing to healthcare, software development to construction, QA processes safeguard quality, reliability, and compliance, ultimately enhancing customer satisfaction and industry reputation.

• Manufacturing: QA ensures that products meet quality standards throughout production, reducing defects and enhancing reliability.
• Healthcare: QA processes ensure compliance with regulations, accuracy in diagnosis, and safety in patient care, ultimately improving healthcare outcomes.
• Software Development: QA verifies that software meets requirements, functions correctly, and is user-friendly, enhancing user satisfaction and reducing errors.
• Construction: QA ensures adherence to building codes and standards, resulting in safe and durable structures.
• Food Industry: QA ensures food safety, hygiene standards, and compliance with regulations, safeguarding consumer health.
• Automotive Industry: QA verifies the safety, performance, and reliability of vehicles, enhancing customer satisfaction and brand reputation.

Quality Assurance demonstrates the multifaceted role of quality assurance across industries, highlighting its key function in ensuring product and service excellence. From monitoring manufacturing processes to optimizing customer service and regulatory compliance, QA plays a critical role in identifying and rectifying issues before they escalate. 

Through collaborative efforts and proactive measures, QA teams uphold standards, enhance operational efficiency, and bring trust among stakeholders, ultimately contributing to organizational success and customer satisfaction.

Customer Service Enhancement

In businesses providing customer service, quality assurance ensures customer interactions meet high standards and resolve issues effectively. 

For instance, if a telecommunications company notices a rise in customer complaints about billing errors, the quality assurance team will investigate the root cause. Upon finding that a recent software update led to billing contrasts, they would collaborate with the IT department to rectify the issue promptly. 

Additionally, they recommend implementing new training protocols for customer service representatives to handle billing inquiries better, ensuring a smoother customer experience and preventing further complaints.

Product Development Optimization

Quality assurance extends to product development processes to ensure that products meet customer needs and expectations. Consider a software development company releasing a new mobile application. 

If user feedback indicates frequent crashes and performance issues, the quality assurance team would analyze user reports and conduct descriptive testing to identify bugs and usability issues. 

Subsequently, they would collaborate with developers to prioritize and address these issues, ensuring that subsequent updates enhance the application’s functionality and user experience. 

Through continuous monitoring and improvement, the quality assurance team helps optimize product development processes and deliver superior products.

Regulatory Compliance Assurance

In industries subject to strict regulations, such as finance or healthcare, quality assurance is crucial in ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. 

For example, a pharmaceutical company receiving reports of adverse effects from a newly launched medication would prompt the quality assurance team to investigate. 

Upon discovering discrepancies in manufacturing processes leading to dosage variations, they would initiate corrective actions to rectify the issue and ensure compliance with regulatory standards. 

Additionally, they would implement enhanced monitoring procedures to prevent similar deviations in the future, safeguarding both patient safety and regulatory compliance.

Data Integrity and Privacy Protection

Maintaining data integrity and protecting user privacy are paramount concerns for businesses in the digital age. Quality assurance teams collaborate closely with IT departments to safeguard data against breaches and ensure compliance with data protection regulations. 

Suppose an e-commerce platform detects unauthorized access to customer payment information. In that case, the quality assurance team would promptly investigate the security breach, assess the extent of the damage, and implement measures to enhance cybersecurity protocols. 

By conducting thorough audits and implementing encryption technologies, they mitigate risks and reinforce data integrity, fostering customer trust and preserving the company’s reputation.

Understanding what quality assurance is essential for businesses striving to deliver exceptional products and services. Through meticulous planning, implementation of standards, and continuous improvement, It ensures that organizations meet customer expectations, comply with regulations, and maintain competitive advantages in their respective industries. 

By recognizing the importance of quality assurance, embracing appropriate methods and standards, and distinguishing it from quality control, businesses can foster a culture of quality excellence. From software development to manufacturing, quality assurance in every aspect of the industry, safeguarding reputation and driving success.

Take your understanding of Quality Management Courses to the next level by enrolling in quality management certification courses offered by Invensis Learning. Gain valuable insights, enhance your skills, and become a certified quality management professional to lead your organization towards excellence in quality assurance. Join us today to embark on your journey towards mastering quality management principles and practices.

Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt Certification Training

Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Certification Training

Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Certification Training

Lean Fundamentals Certification Training

Lean IT Certification Training

RCA Through Six Sigma Certification Training

7QC Tools Certification Training

Value Stream Mapping Certification Training

RELATED ARTICLES MORE FROM AUTHOR

What is Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ)?

Top 6 Quality Management Trends to Follow in 2024

What is the Plan Do Check Act (PDCA) Cycle?

Leave a reply.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• 14,515 Likes
• 444 Followers
• 98,000 Subscribers
• 2,170 Followers

Related Articles

DevOps Vs. Agile Vs. Traditional IT

Valuable Skills That Can Make You the Best Quality Manager

Essential Skills, Qualification, and Qualities of a Scrum Master

Most Common Questions Asked about ITIL – Part 1

What is COBIT? A Beginner’s Guide to COBIT Framework

Popular posts.

The Project Management Life Cycle Explained

Roles and Responsibilities of a Quality Control Inspector

7 Cs of Effective Communication with Example

Top 5 Factors for Project Success

Quality Analyst Job Role and Responsibilities- Explained!

Suggested posts.

• 7 Cs of Effective Communication with Examples
• Project Management Lifecycle
• Project Success Factors
• Quality Control Inspector Job Description
• Risk Management Examples
• QA Manager Job Description
• Quality Management Team Roles and Responsibilities
• Risk Management Tools & Techniques
• Quality Analyst Job Description
• What is Business Value
• Who are Project Stakeholders
• Importance of Project Management
• What is Project Management
• Project Management Skills
• Project Manager Job Description
• Agile Project Manager Interview Questions
• Risk and Compliance Manager Job Description
• Risk Management Process
• Project Scope Management
• Healthcare Project Manager Job Description
• Six Sigma Project Examples
• Risk Analysis Methods
• ITIL Service Lifecycle
• Risk Manager Job Description

POPULAR CATEGORIES

• Best Project Management Blogs 265
• Top Agile Blog Posts 158
• Top Blogs on Quality Management 126
• Latest IT Service Management Blogs 108
• Trending Articles on DevOps 65
• Popular Blogs on IT Security and Governance 55
• Top Blogs on Professional Development 33
• Top Infographics Collection 8

Download E-book Blog

Thank You for submitting your enquiry. One of our training consultants will get in touch with you shortly.

50+ Training and Certification Programs - Upskill Today Learn more about our training programs.

Quality assurance: A critical ingredient for organizational success

Trust makes the world go round. Without it, democracies crumble and relationships suffer. The same goes for organizations and businesses – without the trust of their customer base, they simply cannot succeed.

Trust, however, is never a given. Like respect, it must be won, and in an ever-evolving business landscape, it is earned through a commitment to consistency, reliability and quality management . Through every step of the process – whether as part of the manufacturing, delivery or consumption of goods and services – there simply is no trust without quality assurance .

Global markets and consumer expectations are rapidly evolving. In this fast-changing landscape, it isn’t always easy to stay ahead of the curve. So how can organizations optimize quality assurance (QA) in our uncertain but increasingly interconnected world?

Table of contents

What is quality assurance.

Is there a quality assurance definition? In essence, it is a clear and concise framework that embraces every element of the operations of an organization, not least quality management which plays an instrumental role in fostering a culture of constant, ongoing improvement . The QA team is involved in all stages of development: production, testing, packaging and delivery.

The primary aim of QA is to reduce the risk of defects – and importantly, to address faults as early as possible in the value chain. This reduces the number of defects which are revealed at the stage of final inspection, when correction becomes difficult and costly. The further upstream a defective element is identified and corrected, thanks to a tightly managed quality assurance system , the less time and energy is wasted, reducing costs and safeguarding brand reputation.

In practice, this means putting in place both technical and managerial processes, so as to efficiently monitor and improve product or service quality. A QA system ensures these processes are implemented, including product testing, employee surveys or equipment safety assessments. Once implemented, all these elements will be geared towards maintaining and improving an organization’s quality standards. QA also ensures compliance with industry standards and regulations, gives organizations a competitive edge, and directly contributes to higher profitability.

Best practices in quality assurance

Quality assurance retains its magic when implemented in alignment with a series of best practices, including:

• Strong leadership commitment and support
• Detailed quality planning in product design and process development
• Comprehensive training on QA principles and procedures
• Rigorous process documentation and control
• Extensive collaboration and communication across teams
• Ongoing audits and risk assessment
• Use of statistical quality control tools
• Validation of corrective/preventive actions
• Continual measurement and analysis of quality data
• Recognition and replication of best practices

Close adherence to best practices ensures the integration of quality into every step of the value chain, from R&D to procurement, production to distribution – and all the way to post-sales services.

Sign up for email updates

Register to receive resources and updates on quality management and related standards.

Almost done!  You are only one step away from joining the ISO subscriber list. Please confirm your subscription by clicking on the email we've just sent to you. You will not be registered until you confirm your subscription. If you can't find the email, kindly check your spam folder and/or the promotions tab (if you use Gmail).

To learn how your data will be used, please see our privacy notice .

Creating a quality assurance plan in six key steps

A robust plan requires careful planning, design, and a well-executed roll-out. Although the following steps may appear daunting at first glance, organizations typically find that they quickly become part of their operational fabric.

Here’s a brief rundown:

• Sharpen your focus : Conduct risk assessments to identify areas that would benefit from QA focus and develop procedures that are aligned with business processes.
• Define quality objectives : Clear and measurable goals, metrics and performance targets will make the plan much easier to implement.
• Roles and responsibilities : Training staff to detect and repair issues in the early stages of product development is crucial. This hinges upon the availability of easily digestible processes and rules that clearly describe objections and expectations in the day-to-day language of the organization.
• Analyse the results : Following implementation, it’s time to collect quality data. This will support strategic analysis, action and the review of key performance metrics.
• Make adjustments : After reviewing and reflecting upon feedback, the next step is to revisit original goals, making agreed-upon adjustments. This should be followed by a regular audit every two to three months – or at shorter intervals if needed.
• Celebrate QA successes : If the QA plan has boosted end goals, sales rates or customer satisfaction, let the teams know. Positive feedback anchors employee motivation. This will encourage staff to extend their knowledge of the process and contribute to a culture of operational excellence.

What is quality control?

The terms quality assurance and quality control (QC) are sometimes used interchangeably, but they represent distinct concepts. Here are the essential differences between quality assurance and quality control:

• Quality assurance asks: “Are we doing the process right and preventing defects?” It refers to preventive activities to design, document and build quality into processes.
• Quality control asks: “Are we producing the right product and meeting specifications?” It involves more detective work, such as conducting testing and inspection to identify defects and correct them.

In essence, quality assurance provides the system for quality control activities to take place. An effective quality system integrates both assurance and control to deliver products and services that consistently meet requirements.

In a similar fashion, there are important differences between quality assurance and quality management. In quality assurance, only potentially negative influences on the quality of the end product are analysed, and then, at best, eliminated. By contrast, quality management positively focuses on the quality of the product. It’s the ongoing quest to seek better and better. In other words, quality management establishes policies and objectives that improve organizational performance.

So, while quality management provides the overarching strategy, quality assurance deploys practices and processes to implement that strategy. Together, these coordinated activities focus on directing and controlling the quest for quality.

ISO 9001  Quality management systems

Standards of quality

A quality assurance system underscores an organization’s credibility, while also improving work processes and efficiency. ISO is a driving force behind QA practices and mapping the processes used to implement QA.

QA is often associated with the ISO 9000 family of standards. Many companies use ISO 9001 to ensure that their quality assurance system is in place and effective. ISO 9001 guidance includes a strong customer focus, top management practices, and how to keep pace with continuing improvement. It also contains practical information for risk-based decision making.

Quality assurance: Powering success

In today’s highly competitive global markets, organizations that make wise investments in QA are reaping the benefits. They mitigate risks, proactively reduce the chances of defects, perform to a consistent standard of quality , build trust among consumers, strengthen their industry position, and excel in crucial business metrics. In short, they embody the hallmarks of a credible, dependable and bankable brand that customers and stakeholders can believe in.

• Quality assurance: A critical ingredient for organizational …

Add to cart

Presentations made painless

• Get Premium

122 Quality Assurance Essay Topic Ideas & Examples

Inside This Article

Quality assurance is an essential aspect of any industry or organization, ensuring that products and services meet the highest standards of excellence. As such, it is crucial for professionals in this field to stay informed about the latest trends and best practices. To help you stay ahead of the curve, we have compiled a list of 122 quality assurance essay topic ideas and examples that you can use for your next research paper or project.

• The importance of quality assurance in the manufacturing industry
• Strategies for implementing a successful quality assurance program
• How to measure the effectiveness of a quality assurance program
• The role of technology in improving quality assurance processes
• Best practices for conducting quality audits
• The impact of quality assurance on customer satisfaction
• The relationship between quality assurance and risk management
• The benefits of implementing a total quality management system
• Quality assurance in the healthcare industry
• Quality assurance in the food industry
• The role of quality assurance in the pharmaceutical industry
• Quality assurance in the automotive industry
• Quality assurance in the aerospace industry
• Quality assurance in the construction industry
• The impact of globalization on quality assurance practices
• The role of quality assurance in ensuring compliance with regulations
• The relationship between quality assurance and continuous improvement
• The challenges of implementing a quality assurance program in a small business
• The role of leadership in promoting a culture of quality assurance
• The impact of quality assurance on employee morale
• The role of training and development in quality assurance
• The role of quality assurance in reducing costs and increasing efficiency
• The impact of quality assurance on brand reputation
• Quality assurance in the service industry
• The impact of quality assurance on supply chain management
• The role of quality assurance in ensuring product safety
• The challenges of implementing a quality assurance program in a global organization
• The impact of quality assurance on product innovation
• The role of quality assurance in new product development
• The relationship between quality assurance and customer loyalty
• The impact of quality assurance on organizational performance
• The role of quality assurance in maintaining competitive advantage
• The challenges of implementing a quality assurance program in a regulated industry
• The role of quality assurance in reducing waste and improving sustainability
• The impact of quality assurance on employee engagement
• The role of quality assurance in fostering a culture of continuous improvement
• The relationship between quality assurance and customer retention
• The impact of quality assurance on organizational resilience
• The role of quality assurance in ensuring product reliability
• The challenges of implementing a quality assurance program in a decentralized organization
• The impact of quality assurance on product differentiation
• The role of quality assurance in ensuring product quality
• The relationship between quality assurance and customer trust
• The impact of quality assurance on cost control
• The role of quality assurance in managing supplier relationships
• The challenges of implementing a quality assurance program in a fast-paced industry
• The impact of quality assurance on organizational culture
• The role of quality assurance in fostering innovation
• The relationship between quality assurance and organizational resilience
• The impact of quality assurance on employee satisfaction
• The role of quality assurance in ensuring product consistency
• The challenges of implementing a quality assurance program in a highly regulated industry
• The impact of quality assurance on product performance
• The role of quality assurance in ensuring customer satisfaction
• The relationship between quality assurance and organizational agility
• The impact of quality assurance on organizational efficiency
• The role of quality assurance in promoting a culture of quality excellence
• The challenges of implementing a quality assurance program in a dynamic industry
• The impact of quality assurance on product competitiveness
• The role of quality assurance in maintaining market leadership
• The relationship between quality assurance and organizational effectiveness
• The impact of quality assurance on product reliability
• The challenges of implementing a quality assurance program in a global supply chain
• The impact of quality assurance on customer loyalty

In conclusion, quality assurance is a critical component of any organization, ensuring that products and services meet the highest standards of excellence. By exploring these 122 quality assurance essay topic ideas and examples, you can gain a deeper understanding of the key issues and trends in this field, enabling you to develop innovative solutions and drive continuous improvement within your organization.

Want to create a presentation now?

Instantly Create A Deck

Let PitchGrade do this for me

Hassle Free

We will create your text and designs for you. Sit back and relax while we do the work.

Explore More Content

• Privacy Policy
• Terms of Service

© 2023 Pitchgrade

• Integrations
• Learning Center

Quality Assurance

What is quality assurance.

The quality assurance process helps a business ensure its products meet the quality standards set by the company or its industry. Another way to understand quality assurance (QA) is as a company’s process for improving the quality of its products.

Many businesses view their QA program as a promise to internal stakeholders and customers that the company will deliver high-quality products that provide a positive user experience.

What’s the Difference Between Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control?

Quality assurance is a broad process for preventing quality failures. The QA team is involved in all stages of a product’s development: production, testing, packaging, and delivery. In contrast, quality control (QC) is a narrower process. QC focuses on detecting mistakes, errors, or missed requirements in a product.

The two key differences between QA and QC are:

1. QA is proactive vs. QC is reactive.

The QA team operates proactively. They seek to uncover and address the sources of quality problems, such as human error or a business using the wrong materials. Whereas the QC team is reactive, checking the product for mistakes or components not built to specification.

Here is another way to understand this distinction: QC seeks to catch quality errors, while QA seeks to uncover and fix the issues that lead to quality errors.

2. QC takes place after development, while QA is ongoing.

The QC team performs their tests after the product team has built the product. So they are looking only to catch errors and bugs before the company makes the product available to customers. On the other hand, the QA team is working throughout the development process, making sure each aspect of the product is on track to deliver a high-quality customer experience.

What Do Quality Assurance Engineers Do?

The roles of quality assurance engineers will vary by company and industry. Using software as an example, a QA engineer’s job description might include the following responsibilities:

• Usability testing
• Feature testing
• System testing
• Integration testing
• Creating test plans built on automated scripts to test the product
• Developing standards to ensure quality software code

What’s An Example of Quality Assurance in Practice?

The following hypothetical story illustrates how quality assurance might work in a business.

ABC roofing company has a leak problem  

The problem:

A national roofing installer receives an increase in customer complaints about leaks. The common thread is that customers whose roofs were installed within the last six months are experiencing leaks during the first rain.

The source:

The QA team investigates and finds that the company’s roof tile supplier changed the composition of its tiles. After speaking with experts, the team realizes the supplier’s cheaper components make their tiles more porous.

The solution:

The QA team alerts the executives, who put the pressure the supplier to improve its tile quality or lose the company as a customer. The QA team then writes a new policy requiring a weather test for any new materials added to the company’s roof installation process.

Related Terms

continuous improvement , alpha test , definition of done , acceptance criteria , Quality Function Deployment (QFD)

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Share on mastodon.

Quality Assurance Program and Its Importance Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Introduction

Qa program in hospitals and their importance, improving and maintaining quality care, healthcare coverage debates in congress.

Quality assurance can be referred to as a set of activities taken to ensure that healthcare organizations’ standards are maintained. It also entails evaluating the situation to improve performance. The ultimate goal is to provide effective and safe care. The Healthcare industry is characterized by an exorbitant amount of protocols. Quality assurance (QA) programs are therefore used to monitor and ensure services offered are of quality standard. QA programs are key areas in healthcare organizations and are thus emphasized. The department of the same is managed by a dedicated team of professionals headed by the medical director.QA program department is responsible for analyzing healthcare requirements and ensuring protocols are observed within the organization. To meet their goals as a department, the team employs a quantitative approach to collecting and analyzing data necessary for the task (Nelson, et al ., 1999).

QA programs have been the center of attention for many healthcare organizations. This has seen most of them lay workers off. They have concentrated on this department at the expense of others. This is because many organizations allocate most of their resources and funds to this department. Moreover, the proposed policies and projects are carried out without much consideration of other departments. All this is done for the good of the organization. It is recorded that negligence of these programs has led to failure of many healthcare organizations.

QA programs ensure the harmonization of all the other departments in the hospital. It ensures that things run well in the hospitals by identifying areas in the departments that need quality improvement and coming up with policies to rectify the situation as well as outlining procedures of doing things in the organization. A quality performance is used to measure performance during auditing. In case the collected data indicate that the expected standards have not been met, the department comes up with quality improvement projects to address the issues affecting them.

The programs also ensure that the healthcare organization complies with crucial requirements such as legal procedures. These programs thus ensure that the organization is committed and maintains compliance. QA programs need to be efficient and effective. For this reason, many health organizations use measurability in order to get a level of evidence. In addition, it ensures that more relevant information is collected hence quality improvement is easier (Hess, et al ., 1999).

Health systems need Quality Assurance to attain the objectives of the organizations. This can only be achieved by improving service delivery as expected by the public. In other words, healthcare services provided are of high quality. This also means that every staff performs his/her duties to the best of their knowledge with an aim of satisfying the public.

Being in between the management and the organization itself, the department is seen as a hindrance to good coexistence especially when enforcing policies. Resistance is another challenge faced by the QA programs team. This is because members of the staff are involved in quality improvement projects. In addition, performance is emphasized (Donald and Douglas, 2000).

There are some aspects of QA programs that are important in improving and maintaining quality healthcare. For example, the programs should be patient-based. That is, the policies and projects established should aim at improving the conditions of the patients. Once the patients are satisfied with the organization’s services, the public will and thus the healthcare will gain self-confidence.

The performance of the staff in another area should be evaluated since it contributes immensely to the quality of care. The QA programs should evaluate the performance of staff. The most productive members of the staff should be the only ones maintained and awarded. Good staff performance translates to improved quality care.

The ongoing debate on healthcare also emphasizes QA programs. In ensuring its promotion, the committee proposes some recommendations. For example, they suggest that healthcare organizations should promote and support Quality Improvement Boards. This will work for hand in hand with the QA team in improving the quality.

QA programs depend on data gathered to improve. Healthcare organizations should therefore continually give support towards this process and provide the best facilities for the task. In addition, they should invest in the training of this team. The staff should be encouraged to participate in the reviewing of the policies influencing the Quality and selection of the QA members.

Modern trends and the high population seeking medical attention have influenced the healthcare industry today. The health organizations, therefore, have to adopt the new protocols to offer efficient services to the public. Quality assurance programs have thus been put in place to address this issue. With the information gathered, the team can monitor quality based on performance. The programs are also responsible for implementing policies and projects that improve care quality. Any health organization should therefore invest in QA programs more than any other department because their impacts, positively influence all the others.

Donald, E. & Douglas, C. (2000). Principles and methods of quality management in healthcare. Aspen publishers: Gaithersburg, Maryland.

Hess, A. et al. (1999). Building and Idealized Measurement System to Improvement Clinical Office Practice Performance. Managed Care Quarterly , 7(3): 26-38.

Nelson, E. et al. (1999).Building Measurement and Data Collection into Medical Practice. Annals of Internal Medicine , 128: 460-466.

• Standards and Quality Assurance Standards
• Trends in Global Terrorism. Conflict Resolution and Iraq
• Plan of Assessing Learner Performances
• Long-Term Care Hospital: Changes in Control Mechanism
• The Medically Needy Program at Fort Lauderdale: Review
• Margaret Tietz: Nursing and Rehabilitation
• VAMC Management: Review
• Hospital Merger: Situation Analysis
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2022, March 31). Quality Assurance Program and Its Importance. https://ivypanda.com/essays/quality-assurance-program-and-its-importance/

"Quality Assurance Program and Its Importance." IvyPanda , 31 Mar. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/quality-assurance-program-and-its-importance/.

IvyPanda . (2022) 'Quality Assurance Program and Its Importance'. 31 March.

IvyPanda . 2022. "Quality Assurance Program and Its Importance." March 31, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/quality-assurance-program-and-its-importance/.

1. IvyPanda . "Quality Assurance Program and Its Importance." March 31, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/quality-assurance-program-and-its-importance/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Quality Assurance Program and Its Importance." March 31, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/quality-assurance-program-and-its-importance/.

• Undergraduate
• High School
• Architecture
• American History
• Asian History
• Antique Literature
• American Literature
• Asian Literature
• Classic English Literature
• World Literature
• Creative Writing
• Linguistics
• Criminal Justice
• Legal Issues
• Anthropology
• Archaeology
• Political Science
• World Affairs
• African-American Studies
• East European Studies
• Latin-American Studies
• Native-American Studies
• West European Studies
• Family and Consumer Science
• Social Issues
• Women and Gender Studies
• Social Work
• Natural Sciences
• Pharmacology
• Earth science
• Agriculture
• Agricultural Studies
• Computer Science
• IT Management
• Mathematics
• Investments
• Engineering and Technology
• Engineering
• Aeronautics
• Medicine and Health
• Alternative Medicine
• Communications and Media
• Advertising
• Communication Strategies
• Public Relations
• Educational Theories
• Teacher's Career
• Chicago/Turabian
• Company Analysis
• Education Theories
• Shakespeare
• Canadian Studies
• Food Safety
• Relation of Global Warming and Extreme Weather Condition
• Movie Review
• Admission Essay
• Annotated Bibliography
• Application Essay
• Article Critique
• Article Review
• Article Writing
• Book Review
• Business Plan
• Business Proposal
• Capstone Project
• Cover Letter
• Creative Essay
• Dissertation
• Dissertation - Abstract
• Dissertation - Conclusion
• Dissertation - Discussion
• Dissertation - Hypothesis
• Dissertation - Introduction
• Dissertation - Literature
• Dissertation - Methodology
• Dissertation - Results
• GCSE Coursework
• Grant Proposal
• Marketing Plan
• Multiple Choice Quiz
• Personal Statement
• Power Point Presentation
• Power Point Presentation With Speaker Notes
• Questionnaire
• Reaction Paper
• Research Paper
• Research Proposal
• SWOT analysis
• Thesis Paper
• Online Quiz
• Literature Review
• Movie Analysis
• Statistics problem
• Math Problem
• All papers examples
• How It Works
• Money Back Policy
• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• We Are Hiring

Quality Assurance (QA), Essay Example

Pages: 1

Words: 324

Hire a Writer for Custom Essay

Use 10% Off Discount: "custom10" in 1 Click 👇

You are free to use it as an inspiration or a source for your own work.

Quality Assurance (QA) in the context of software development considers both verification and validation concepts.  In the Project Management method PRINCE2 in the UK, this considers QA from three different perspectives in the development of software. Essentially these are what is known as Stage Gate Reviews at the end of a specific software build cycle e.g. Analysis, Design, Construction etc.  (Bogue, R. 2011)

The QA review looks at the work being accomplished in that stage from three different perspectives i.e. User Assurance, Technical Assurance and Business Assurance. The User assurance is primarily geared around ensuring the software satisfies the user specifications of requirements and is most dominant in the User Acceptance Testing stage.  Technical Assurance focuses on the technical integrity and specifications of the system, whereas as the Business Assurance is more heavily focused on the Design stage and ensuring the key business and strategic requirements are met. (Prince2.com, 2011).

There are numerous examples of where inadequate QA procedures have caused system failures. One recent example being in 2008  where an automated baggage handling system malfunctioned and stopped a large number of passengers from checking in baggage for their flights. It was stated that this failure was attributed to a time  when a major a software upgrade was in progress, despite pre-testing of the software.  This malfunction carried on for several months. (softwareQAtest.com, 2011).  Another lack of QA was attributed to a  suburban school district in  2009. In this case a new computer system  was found to contain numerous software errors and resulted in many students commencing the school year with inaccurate schedules or none at all. This resulted in a massive upset with grades and the students / parents completing blogs on social network sites.  (softwareQAtest.com, 2011).

Bogue, R. (2011, 11 25). Anatomy of a Software Development Role: Development Manager . Retrieved from developer.com: http://www.developer.com/java/ent/article.php/3529081/Anatomy-of-a-Software-Development-Role-Development-Manager.htm

Prince2.com. (2011, 11 25). PRINCE2 Methodology Overview . Retrieved from Prince2.com: http://www.prince2.com/prince2-structure.asp softwareQAtest.com. (2011, 11 25). Software QA and Testing . Retrieved from softwareQAtest.com: http://www.softwareqatest.com/qatfaq1.html

Stuck with your Essay?

Get in touch with one of our experts for instant help!

What is Organizational Change? Essay Example

Class or Course Focused on Social Work, Essay Example

Time is precious

don’t waste it!

Plagiarism-free guarantee

Privacy guarantee

Secure checkout

Money back guarantee

Related Essay Samples & Examples

Voting as a civic responsibility, essay example.

Words: 287

Utilitarianism and Its Applications, Essay Example

Words: 356

The Age-Related Changes of the Older Person, Essay Example

Pages: 2

Words: 448

The Problems ESOL Teachers Face, Essay Example

Pages: 8

Words: 2293

Should English Be the Primary Language? Essay Example

Pages: 4

Words: 999

The Term “Social Construction of Reality”, Essay Example

Words: 371

• Software Engineering Tutorial
• Software Development Life Cycle
• Waterfall Model
• Software Requirements
• Software Measurement and Metrics
• Software Design Process
• System configuration management
• Software Maintenance
• Software Development Tutorial
• Software Testing Tutorial
• Product Management Tutorial
• Project Management Tutorial
• Agile Methodology
• Selenium Basics
• System Design Tutorial
• System Design Interview Bootcamp - A Complete Guide

What is System Design

• What is Systems Design - Learn System Design
• System Design Life Cycle | SDLC (Design)
• What are the components of System Design?
• Goals and Objectives of System Design
• Why is it important to learn System Design?
• Important Key Concepts and Terminologies – Learn System Design
• Advantages of System Design

System Design Fundamentals

• Analysis of Monolithic and Distributed Systems - Learn System Design
• Structured Analysis and Structured Design (SA/SD)
• System Design Strategy - Software Engineering
• Database Sharding | System Design
• Horizontal and Vertical Scaling | System Design
• Load Balancer - System Design Interview Question
• Routing requests through Load Balancer
• Caching - System Design Concept
• Object-Oriented Analysis and Design(OOAD)
• 6 Steps To Approach Object-Oriented Design Questions in Interview
• Difference between Structured and Object-Oriented Analysis
• Communication Protocols In System Design
• Web Server, Proxies and their role in Designing Systems

Scalability in System Design

• What is Scalability and How to achieve it?
• Which Scalability approach is right for our Application? | System Design
• Primary Bottlenecks that Hurt the Scalability of an Application | System Design

Databases in Designing Systems

• Complete Reference to Databases in Designing Systems - Learn System Design
• SQL vs NoSQL: Which Database to Choose in System Design?
• File and Database Storage Systems in System Design
• Block, Object, and File Storage in Cloud with Difference
• Normalization Process in DBMS
• Denormalization in Databases

High Level Design(HLD)

• What is High Level Design – Learn System Design
• Availability in System Design
• Consistency Model in Distributed System
• Reliability in System Design
• The CAP Theorem in DBMS
• Difference between Process and Thread
• Difference between Concurrency and Parallelism
• Activity Diagrams | Unified Modeling Language (UML)

Low Level Design(LLD)

• What is Low Level Design or LLD - Learn System Design
• Difference between Authentication and Authorization
• What is Data Encryption?
• Code Optimization in Compiler Design
• Unit Testing - Software Testing
• Integration Testing - Software Engineering
• CI/CD: Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery
• Introduction to Modularity and Interfaces In System Design
• Unified Modeling Language (UML) Diagrams
• Data Partitioning Techniques in System Design

Testing and Quality Assurance

• Types of Software Testing
• Software Quality Assurance - Software Engineering
• Essential Security Measures in System Design

Interview Guide for System Design

• How to Crack System Design Interview Round
• Grokking Modern System Design Interview Guide
• System Design Interview Questions and Answers
• Most Commonly Asked System Design Interview Problems/Questions
• 5 Common System Design Concepts for Interview Preparation
• 5 Tips to Crack Low-Level System Design Interviews

System Design Interview Questions & Answers

• Design Dropbox - A System Design Interview Question
• Designing Twitter - A System Design Interview Question
• System Design Netflix | A Complete Architecture
• System Design of Uber App | Uber System Architecture
• Design BookMyShow - A System Design Interview Question
• Designing Facebook Messenger | System Design Interview
• Software Design Patterns Tutorial
• Complete Roadmap to Learn System Design for Beginners

Software Quality Assurance – Software Engineering

Software Quality Assurance (SQA) is simply a way to assure quality in the software. It is the set of activities which ensure processes, procedures as well as standards are suitable for the project and implemented correctly. 

Software Quality Assurance is a process which works parallel to Software Development. It focuses on improving the process of development of software so that problems can be prevented before they become a major issue. Software Quality Assurance is a kind of Umbrella activity that is applied throughout the software process. 

Table of Content

• Software Quality Assurance (SQA) encompasses
• Elements Of Software Quality Assurance:
• Software quality assurance focuses on:
• Software Quality Assurance has
• Major Software Quality Assurance Activities

Benefits of Software Quality Assurance (SQA)

Disadvantage of software quality assurance (sqa), faqs on software quality assurance (sqa).

Generally, the quality of the software is verified by the third-party organization like international standard organizations .

Software Quality Assurance (SQA) encompasse s

SQA process Specific quality assurance and quality control tasks (including technical reviews and a multitiered testing strategy) Effective software engineering practice (methods and tools) Control of all software work products and the changes made to them a procedure to ensure compliance with software development standards (when applicable) measurement and reporting mechanisms

Elements of Software Quality Assurance (SQA)

• Standards: The IEEE, ISO, and other standards organizations have produced a broad array of software engineering standards and related documents. The job of SQA is to ensure that standards that have been adopted are followed, and all work products conform to them.
• Reviews and audits: Technical reviews are a quality control activity performed by software engineers for software engineers. Their intent is to uncover errors. Audits are a type of review performed by SQA personnel (people employed in an organization) with the intent of ensuring that quality guidelines are being followed for software engineering work.
• Testing: Software testing is a quality control function that has one primary goal—to find errors. The job of SQA is to ensure that testing is properly planned and efficiently conducted for primary goal of software.
• Error/defect collection and analysis : SQA collects and analyzes error and defect data to better understand how errors are introduced and what software engineering activities are best suited to eliminating them.
• Change management: SQA ensures that adequate change management practices have been instituted.
• Education: Every software organization wants to improve its software engineering practices. A key contributor to improvement is education of software engineers, their managers, and other stakeholders. The SQA organization takes the lead in software process improvement which is key proponent and sponsor of educational programs.
• Security management: SQA ensures that appropriate process and technology are used to achieve software security.
• Safety: SQA may be responsible for assessing the impact of software failure and for initiating those steps required to reduce risk.
• Risk management : The SQA organization ensures that risk management activities are properly conducted and that risk-related contingency plans have been established.

Software Quality Assurance (SQA) focuses on

• software’s portability
• software’s usability
• software’s reusability
• software’s correctness
• software’s maintainability
• software’s error control

Software Quality Assurance (SQA) has

• A quality management approach.
• Formal technical reviews.
• Multi testing strategy. 
• Effective software engineering technology. 
• Measurement and reporting mechanism.  

Major Software Quality Assurance (SQA) Activities

• SQA Management Plan:  Make a plan for how you will carry out the SQA throughout the project. Think about which set of software engineering activities are the best for project. check level of SQA team skills. 
• Set The Check Points:  SQA team should set checkpoints. Evaluate the performance of the project on the basis of collected data on different check points. 
• Measure Change Impact:  The changes for making the correction of an error sometimes re introduces more errors keep the measure of impact of change on project. Reset the new change to check the compatibility of this fix with whole project. 
• Multi testing Strategy:  Do not depend on a single testing approach. When you have a lot of testing approaches available use them. 
• Manage Good Relations:  In the working environment managing good relations with other teams involved in the project development is mandatory. Bad relation of SQA team with programmers team will impact directly and badly on project. Don’t play politics. 
• Maintaining records and reports : Comprehensively document and share all QA records, including test cases, defects, changes, and cycles, for stakeholder awareness and future reference.
• Reviews software engineering activities : The SQA group identifies and documents the processes. The group also verifies the correctness of software product.
• Formalize deviation handling : Track and document software deviations meticulously. Follow established procedures for handling variances.
• SQA produces high quality software. 
• High quality application saves time and cost. 
• SQA is beneficial for better reliability. 
• SQA is beneficial in the condition of no maintenance for a long time. 
• High quality commercial software increase market share of company. 
• Improving the process of creating software. 
• Improves the quality of the software. 
• It cuts maintenance costs. Get the release right the first time, and your company can forget about it and move on to the next big thing. Release a product with chronic issues, and your business bogs down in a costly, time-consuming, never-ending cycle of repairs.

There are a number of disadvantages of quality assurance.

• Cost: Some of them include adding more resources, which cause the more budget its not, Addition of more resources For betterment of the product.
• Time Consuming: Testing and Deployment of the project taking more time which cause delay in the project.
• Overhead: Software Quality Assurance (SQA) will create depends on the administrator it will make slow the speed of the project.

Software Quality Assurance (SQA) maintain a most important role in the ensuring the quality, reliability and efficiency of the product. By implementation of these control process which cause the improvement of the software engineering process. SQA gives a higher quality product which help to meet user expectations, its having some drawback also like Cost, time-consuming process, after maintaining the process of the SQA its improved the reliability and maintain the maintenance cost which affect in a future.

Overall, Software Quality Assurance (SQA) is important for the success in the project development in Software Engineering

What Does Do Software Quality Assurance (SQA) in software Development?

SQA makes sure that the software is made according to the need and checking its build.

How does Software Quality Assurance (SQA) help software work better?

SQA Finds the faults in the Software before its use, it will help to make software more trustable.

What parts are important in Software Quality Assurance (SQA)?

SQA Checks the software follows rules, it will learn from example, manage changes, check working well, educate teams, ensure security, and handle the risk

Please Login to comment...

Similar reads.

• Software Engineering

Improve your Coding Skills with Practice

What kind of Experience do you want to share?

Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Browse Titles

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Busse R, Klazinga N, Panteli D, et al., editors. Improving healthcare quality in Europe: Characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies [Internet]. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2019. (Health Policy Series, No. 53.)

Improving healthcare quality in Europe: Characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies [Internet].

1 an introduction to healthcare quality: defining and explaining its role in health systems.

Reinhard Busse , Dimitra Panteli , and Wilm Quentin .

1.1. The relevance of quality in health policy

Quality of care is one of the most frequently quoted principles of health policy, and it is currently high up on the agenda of policy-makers at national, European and international levels (EC, 2016 ; OECD, 2017 ; WHO, 2018 ; WHO/OECD/World Bank, 2018 ). At the national level, addressing the issue of healthcare quality may be motivated by various reasons – ranging from a general commitment to high-quality healthcare provision as a public good or the renewed focus on patient outcomes in the context of popular value-based healthcare ideas to the identification of specific healthcare quality problems ( see Box 1.1 ).

Reasons for (re)focusing on quality of care.

At the European level, the European Council’s Conclusions on the Common Values and Principles in European Union Health Systems highlight that “the overarching values of universality, access to good quality care, equity, and solidarity have been widely accepted in the work of the different EU institutions” (European Council, 2006 ). The European Commission (EC, 2014 ; EC, 2016 ) also recognizes quality as an important component of health system performance (i.e. the extent to which health systems meet their goals; we return to the link between quality and performance later in the chapter).

At the international level, quality is receiving increasing attention in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), as the SDGs include the imperative to “achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all”. This is reflected in two World Health Organization (WHO) reports published in 2018, a handbook for national quality policies and strategies (WHO, 2018 ) and a guide aiming to facilitate the global understanding of quality as part of universal health coverage aspirations (WHO/OECD/World Bank, 2018 ).

A previous study on quality of care by the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (Legido-Quigley et al., 2008 ) noted that the literature on quality of care in health systems was already very extensive and difficult to systematize ten years ago – and this is even truer today. Research is available on a vast range of approaches or strategies for assuring or improving quality of care, often focusing on certain organizations (hospitals, health centres, practices) or particular areas of care (emergency care, maternal care, etc.) (Flodgren, Gonçalves & Pomey, 2016 ; Ivers et al., 2014 ; Houle et al., 2012 ; Gharaveis et al., 2018 ). This body of evidence has contributed to a better understanding of the effectiveness of particular interventions in particular settings for particular groups of patients. However, the available literature rarely addresses the question of the superiority of individual strategies and usually does not provide guidance to policy-makers on which strategy to implement in a particular setting.

In addition, despite the vast literature base and the universal acknowledgement of its importance in health systems, there is no common understanding of the term “quality of care”, and there is disagreement about what it encompasses. The definition of quality often differs across contexts, disciplinary paradigms and levels of analysis. Yet, as prescribed by the seminal work of Avedis Donabedian ( 1980 ), assessing and improving quality predicates an understanding of what it entails. Therefore, the aim of this chapter is to provide clarity about the definition of quality and its relation to health system performance as well as introduce the level of analysis adopted in this book. The chapter concludes with a brief introduction to the aims and the structure of the book.

1.2. Definitions of healthcare quality

Early definitions of healthcare quality were shaped almost exclusively by health professionals and health service researchers. However, there has been increasing recognition that the preferences and views of patients, the public and other key players are highly relevant as well (Legido-Quigley et al., 2008 ). Table 1.1 summarizes some of the most influential definitions of healthcare quality from different contexts, starting with the definition of Donabedian ( 1980 ) and ending with the definition provided by WHO’s handbook for national quality policy and strategy (WHO, 2018 ).

Selected definitions of quality, 1980–2018.

Donabedian defined quality in general terms as “the ability to achieve desirable objectives using legitimate means”. This definition reflects the fact that the term “quality” is not specific to healthcare and is used by many different people in various sectors of society. People use the term quality when they describe a range of positive aspects of hospitals and doctors – but also when they speak about food or cars. In fact, the widespread use of the term quality explains part of the confusion around the concept of healthcare quality when policy-makers or researchers use the term for all kinds of positive or desirable attributes of health systems. However, Donabedian also provides a more specific definition of quality of care, stating that it is “care which is expected to maximize an inclusive measure of patient welfare, after one has taken account of the balance of expected gains and losses that attend the process of care in all its parts” (Donabedian, 1980 ).

Donabedian’s definition is interesting because it specifies that quality of care is related to the process of care in all its parts and that the goal of high-quality care is to maximize patient welfare. Patient welfare certainly includes the health status of the patient (later specified as encompassing physical, physiological and psychological dimensions; see also Donabedian, Wheeler & Wyszewianski, 1982 ). However, the concept of patient welfare is also in line with an approach that considers what patients find important. Furthermore, Donabedian’s definition recognizes the natural limits of quality and its improvement, by highlighting that gains and losses are expected in the process of care.

A decade later the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in the US defined quality of care as “the degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge” ( see Table 1.1 ). At first glance, the IOM’s definition’s focus on “health outcomes” seems to be more restrictive than Donabedian’s notion of “patient welfare”. However, in their elaboration of the definition, the IOM specified that these “desired” health outcomes were expected to reflect patient satisfaction and well-being next to broad health status or quality-of-life measures. The IOM’s definition has inspired the understanding of quality by many other organizations in the USA and internationally.

In contrast to other popular definitions of quality in healthcare around that time (including Donabedian’s), which mainly referred to medical or patient care, the IOM’s definition set the focus on health services in general (as “health care implies a broad set of services, including acute, chronic, preventive, restorative, and rehabilitative care, which are delivered in many different settings by many different health care providers”) and on individuals and populations (rather than patients), thus strengthening the link of quality with prevention and health promotion. Finally, the concept of “current professional knowledge” both reinforced the movement for evidence-based care and highlighted that the concept of quality is dynamic and continuously evolving. In that sense, providers can only be assessed against the current state of knowledge as a service that is considered “good quality” at any given time may be regarded as “poor quality” twenty years later in light of newer insights and alternatives.

The definition of quality by the Council of Europe included in Table 1.1 , published seven years after the IOM’s definition as part of the Council’s recommendations on quality improvement systems for EU Member States, is the first to explicitly include considerations about the aspect of patient safety. It argues that quality of care is not only “the degree to which the treatment dispensed increases the patient’s chances of achieving the desired results”, which basically repeats the IOM definition, but it goes on to specify that high-quality care also “diminishes the chances of undesirable results” (The Council of Europe, 1997 ). In the same document the Council of Europe also explicitly defines a range of dimensions of quality of care – but, surprisingly, does not include safety among them.

The final two definitions included in Table 1.1 are from the European Commission ( 2010 ) and from WHO ( 2018 ). In contrast to those discussed so far, both of these definitions describe quality by specifying three main dimensions or attributes: effectiveness, safety and responsiveness or patient-centredness. It is not by chance that both definitions are similar as they were both strongly influenced by the work of the OECD’s Health Care Quality Indicators (HCQI) project (Arah et al., 2006 ; see below). These final two definitions are interesting also because they list a number of further attributes of healthcare and healthcare systems that are related to quality of care, including access, timeliness, equity and efficiency. However, they note that these other elements are either “part of a wider debate” (EC, 2010 ) or “necessary to realize the benefits of quality health care” (WHO, 2018 ), explicitly distinguishing core dimensions of quality from other attributes of good healthcare.

In fact, the dimensions of quality of care have been the focus of considerable debate over the past forty years. The next section focuses on this international discussion around the dimensions of quality of care.

1.3. Dimensions of healthcare quality

As mentioned earlier, Donabedian posited that assessing and improving quality of care presupposes an understanding of what it does and does not entail. Different definitions of quality often specify relatively long lists of various attributes that they recognize as part of quality. Table 1.2 provides an overview of the dimensions of quality mentioned by ten selected definitions (including those in Table 1.1 ).

Quality dimensions in ten selected definitions of quality, 1980–2018.

The table shows that effectiveness, patient safety and responsiveness/patient-centredness seem to have become universally accepted as core dimensions of quality of care. However, many definitions – also beyond those shown in Table 1.2 – include attributes such as appropriateness, timeliness, efficiency, access and equity. This is confusing and often blurs the line between quality of care and overall health system performance. In an attempt to order these concepts, the table classifies its entries into core dimensions of quality, subdimensions that contribute to core dimensions of quality, and other dimensions of health system performance.

This distinction is based on the framework of the OECD HCQI project, which was first published in 2006 (Arah et al., 2006 ). The purpose of the framework was to guide the development of indicators for international comparisons of healthcare quality. The HCQI project selected the three dimensions of effectiveness, safety and patient-centredness as the core dimensions of healthcare quality, arguing that other attributes, such as appropriateness, continuity, timeliness and acceptability, could easily be accommodated within these three dimensions. For example, appropriateness could be mapped into effectiveness, whereas continuity and acceptability could be absorbed into patient-centredness. Accessibility, efficiency and equity were also considered to be important goals of health systems. However, the HCQI team argued – referring to the IOM ( 1990 ) definition – that only effectiveness, safety and responsiveness are attributes of healthcare that directly contribute to “increasing the likelihood of desired outcomes”.

Some definitions included in Table 1.2 were developed for specific purposes and this is reflected in their content. As mentioned above, the Council of Europe ( 1997 ) definition was developed to guide the development of quality improvement systems. Therefore, it is not surprising that it includes the assessment of the process of care as an element of quality on top of accessibility, efficacy, effectiveness, efficiency and patient satisfaction.

In 2001 the IOM published “Crossing the Quality Chasm”, an influential report which specified that healthcare should pursue six major aims: it should be safe, effective, patient-centred, timely, efficient and equitable. These six principles have been adopted by many organizations inside and outside the United States as the six dimensions of quality, despite the fact that the IOM itself clearly set them out as “performance expectations” (“a list of performance characteristics that, if addressed and improved, would lead to better achievement of that overarching purpose. To this end, the committee proposes six specific aims for improvement. Health care should be …”; IOM, 2001 ). For example, WHO ( 2006b ) adapted these principles as quality dimensions in its guidance for making strategic choices in health systems, transforming the concept of timeliness into “accessibility” to include geographic availability and progressivity of health service provision. However, this contributed to the confusion and debate about quality versus other dimensions of performance.

The European Commission’s Expert Panel on Effective Ways for Investing in Health Care also opted for a broad consideration of quality, including the dimensions of appropriateness, equity and efficiency in its recommendations for the future EU agenda on quality of care in 2014 (EC, 2014 ). Similarly, WHO ( 2016 ) used timeliness (as originally described by the IOM) instead of accessibility (as used by WHO in 2006b ), and added integration in healthcare provision as a dimension of high-quality care, in line with the approach taken by the Health Care Council of Canada (Health Care Council of Canada, 2013 ). The understanding of integrated care as part of patient-centredness can also be found in the updated version of the HCQI framework published by the OECD in 2015 (Carinci et al., 2015 ).

This long and inconsistent list of different dimensions inevitably contributes to the confusion about the concept of quality of care. However, conceptual clarity about quality is crucial, as it will influence the types of healthcare policies and strategies that are adopted to improve it. Part of the confusion around the demarcation between quality of care and health system performance originates from insufficiently distinguishing between intermediate and final goals of health systems and between different levels at which quality can be addressed.

The next section aims to provide more clarity about the role of quality in health systems and health systems performance assessment by highlighting the difference between healthcare service quality and healthcare system quality. In so doing, the section sets the background for the way quality is understood in the remainder of the book.

1.4. The role of quality in health systems and health system performance assessment

Numerous frameworks have been developed over the past 20 years with the aim of facilitating a better understanding of health systems and enabling health system performance assessments (Papanicolas, 2013 ; Fekri, Macarayan & Klazinga, 2018 ). Most of these frameworks implicitly or explicitly include quality as an important health system goal but they differ in how they define quality and how they describe its contribution to overall health system goals. A particularly influential framework is the WHO ( 2006a ) “building blocks” framework for health systems strengthening ( see Fig. 1.1 ). The framework conceptualizes health systems in terms of building blocks, including service delivery, health workforce, information, medical products, financing and leadership/governance. In addition, the framework defines quality and safety as intermediate goals of health systems, together with access and coverage. Achievement of these intermediate goals will ultimately contribute to achieving overall health system goals of improved health, responsiveness, financial protection and improved efficiency.

Quality is an intermediate goal of health systems. Source: WHO, 2006

It is worth noting that quality and safety are mentioned separately in the framework, while most of the definitions of quality discussed above include safety as a core dimension of quality. For more information about the relationship between quality and safety, see also Chapter 11 .

As mentioned above, Donabedian defined quality in general terms as “the ability to achieve desirable objectives using legitimate means” (Donabedian, 1980 ). Combining Donabedian’s general definition of quality with the WHO building blocks framework ( Fig. 1.1 ), one could argue that a health system is “of high quality” when it achieves these (overall and intermediate) goals using legitimate means. In addition, Donabedian highlighted that it is important to distinguish between different levels when assessing healthcare quality (Donabedian, 1988 ). He distinguished between four levels at which quality can be assessed – individual practitioners, the care setting, the care received (and implemented) by the patient, and the care received by the community. Others have conceptualized different levels at which policy developments with regard to quality may take place: the health system (or “macro”) level, the organizational (“meso”) level and the clinical (“micro”) level (Øvretveit, 2001 ).

While the exact definition of levels is not important, it is essential to recognize that the definition of quality changes depending on the level at which it is assessed. For simplicity purposes, we condense Donabedian’s four tiers into two conceptually distinct levels ( see Fig. 1.2 ). The first, narrower level is the level of health services, which may include preventive, acute, chronic and palliative care (Arah et al., 2006 ). At this level, there seems to be an emerging consensus that “quality of care is the degree to which health services for individuals and populations are effective, safe and people-centred” (WHO, 2018 ).

Two levels of healthcare quality.

The second level is the level of the healthcare system as a whole. Healthcare systems are “of high quality” when they achieve the overall goals of improved health, responsiveness, financial protection and efficiency. Many of the definitions of healthcare quality included in Table 1.2 seem to be concerned with healthcare system quality as they include these attributes among stated quality dimensions. However, such a broad definition of healthcare quality can be problematic in the context of quality improvement: while it is undoubtedly important to address access and efficiency in health systems, confusion about the focus of quality improvement initiatives may distract attention away from those strategies that truly contribute to increasing effectiveness, safety and patient-centredness of care.

To avoid confusion and achieve conceptual clarity, we therefore propose reserving the use of the term “healthcare quality” for the first level, i.e. the healthcare services level. Concerning the second level, i.e. the health(care) system level, there seems to be an international trend towards using the term “health system performance” to describe the degree to which health systems achieve their overall and intermediate goals.

Frameworks to assess health system performance by the OECD (Carinci, 2015 ) and the European Commission ( 2014 ) include healthcare quality at the service level as a core dimension – besides other elements of performance such as accessibility, efficiency and population health. In other words, health system performance is a better term for health system “quality” (according to Donabedian’s broad definition of the term), and healthcare service quality is one of its core components.

The relationship between quality and the achievement of final health system goals is aptly illustrated in another, relatively recent framework for health system performance comparisons ( Fig. 1.3 ). The framework has condensed the four intermediate goals of the WHO building blocks model into only two: access (including coverage) and quality (including safety). It posits that population health outcomes and system responsiveness depend on the extent to which the entire population has access to care and the extent to which health services are of good quality (i.e. they are effective, safe and patient-centred). The resources, financial or otherwise, required to produce final health system goals determine efficiency in the system.

The link between health system performance and quality of healthcare services. Source: Busse, 2017. Note: *Financial protection is both an enabling condition for access as well as a final outcome.

The framework highlights that health systems have to ensure both access to care and quality in order to achieve the final health system goals. However, it is important to distinguish conceptually between access and quality because very different strategies are needed to improve access (for example, improving financial protection, ensuring geographic availability of providers) than are needed to improve quality of care. This book focuses on quality and explores the potential of different strategies to improve it.

1.5. What are quality improvement strategies? Aims and structure of this book

As mentioned in the Preface, the purpose of the book is to provide a framework for understanding, measuring and ultimately improving the quality of healthcare through a variety of strategies. In general, a strategy can be viewed as an approach or plan that is designed or selected to achieve a desired outcome (for example, attain a goal or reach a solution to a problem). The 2018 WHO Handbook for National Quality Policy and Strategy differentiates between the two titular concepts by underlining that policy refers to an agreed ambition for the health system with an explicit statement of intention, i.e. a “course of action”. Accordingly, it would usually mainly outline broad priorities to be addressed rather than the concrete steps to address them. The corresponding strategy, on the other hand, provides a clear roadmap for achieving these priorities (WHO, 2018 ). In this conceptualization, a number of tools, or interventions, can be used to implement the strategy and aid in the attainment of its milestones.

For the purpose of this book, we use the term “strategy” more narrowly and in a sectoral way to denote a mechanism of action geared towards achieving specific quality assurance or improvement goals by addressing specific targets within healthcare provision (for example, health professionals, provider organizations or health technologies). For example, we consider accreditation of healthcare providers and clinical practice guidelines as quality strategies, whereas the same concepts would be described as “quality interventions”, “quality initiatives”, “quality improvement tools” or “quality improvement activities” elsewhere.

Table 1.3 summarizes a range of selected quality strategies (or interventions) and clusters them into system level strategies, institutional/organizational strategies and patient/community level strategies. This categorization follows the one used by the OECD in its Country Quality Reviews and the recent report on the economics of patient safety (OECD, 2017 ; Slawomirksi, Auraaen & Klazinga, 2017 ). Table 1.3 also includes strategies listed in the 2018 WHO Handbook (WHO, 2018 ), as well as a few others. The strategies discussed in more detail in the second part of this book are marked in grey in the table.

A selection of prominent quality strategies (marked in grey are the strategies discussed in Chapters 5 to 14 of this book).

As becomes evident in Table 1.3 , the focus of this book is on system level and organizational/institutional level strategies. Its aim is to provide guidance to policy-makers who have to make choices about investing political and economic resources into the implementation or scale-up of different options from this vast number of different strategies. The book does not attempt to rank the best quality strategies to be implemented across countries, because different strategies will need to be prioritized depending on the motivation, the identified quality improvement needs and the existing structures or initiatives already in place. Instead, it hopes (1) to provide an overview of the experience with the selected strategies to date in Europe and beyond, (2) to summarize the available evidence on their effectiveness and – where available – cost-effectiveness and the prerequisites for their implementation, and (3) to provide recommendations to policy-makers about how to select and actually implement different strategies.

The book is structured in three parts. Part I includes four chapters and deals with cross-cutting issues that are relevant for all quality strategies. Part II includes ten chapters each dealing with specific strategies. Part III focuses on overall conclusions for policy-makers.

The aim of Part I is to clarify concepts and frameworks that can help policy-makers to make sense of the different quality strategies explored in Part II . Chapter 2 introduces a comprehensive framework that enables a systematic analysis of the key characteristics of different quality strategies. Chapter 3 summarizes different approaches and data sources for measuring quality. Chapter 4 explores the role of international governance and guidance, in particular at EU level, to foster and support quality in European countries.

Part II , comprising Chapters 5 to 14 , provides clearly structured and detailed information about ten of the quality strategies presented in Table 1.3 (those marked in grey). Each chapter in Part II follows roughly the same structure, explaining the rationale of the strategy, exploring its use in Europe and summarizing the available evidence about its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. This is followed by a discussion of practical aspects related to the implementation of the strategy and conclusions for policy-makers. In addition, each chapter is accompanied by an abstract that follows the same structure as the chapter and summarizes the main points on one or two pages.

Finally, Part III concludes with the main findings from the previous parts of the book, summarizing the available evidence about quality strategies in Europe and providing recommendations for policy-makers.

• Arah OA, et al. A conceptual framework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project. International Journal for Quality in Health Care . 2006; 18 S1:5–13. [ PubMed : 16954510 ]
• Busse R. High Performing Health Systems: Conceptualizing, Defining, Measuring and Managing. Presentation at the “Value in Health Forum: Standards, Quality and Economics”; Edmonton. 19 January 2017. 2017.
• Carinci F, et al. Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators. International Journal for Quality in Health Care . 2015; 27 (2):137–46. [ PubMed : 25758443 ]
• Donabedian A. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Vol 1. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: Health Administration Press; 1980.
• Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed. Journal of the American Medical Association . 1988; 260 (12):1743–8. [ PubMed : 3045356 ]
• Donabedian A, Wheeler JR, Wyszewianski L. Quality, cost, and health: an integrative model. Medical Care . 1982; 20 (10):975–92. [ PubMed : 6813605 ]
• EC. EU Actions on Patient Safety and Quality of Healthcare. European Commission, Healthcare Systems Unit. Madrid: European Commission; 2010.
• EC. Communication from the Commission – On effective, accessible and resilient health systems. European Commission. Brussels: European Commission; 2014.
• EC. Report by the Expert Group on Health Systems Performance Assessment. European Commission (EC). Brussels: European Commission; 2016. So What? Strategies across Europe to assess quality of care.
• European Council. Council Conclusions on Common values and principles in European Union Health Systems. Official Journal of the European Union . 2006; C146 :1–2.
• Fekri O, Macarayan ER, Klazinga N. Health system performance assessment in the WHO European Region: which domains and indicators have been used by Member States for its measurement? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2018. (Health Evidence Network (HEN) synthesis report 55) [ PubMed : 30091869 ]
• Flodgren G, Gonçalves-Bradley DC, Pomey MP. External inspection of compliance with standards for improved healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 12 :CD008992. [ PMC free article : PMC6464009 ] [ PubMed : 27911487 ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gharaveis A, et al. The Impact of Visibility on Teamwork, Collaborative Communication, and Security in Emergency Departments: An Exploratory Study. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal . 2018; 11 (4):37–49. [ PubMed : 29069916 ]
• Health Council of Canada. Better health, better care, better value for all: refocussing health care reform in Canada. Toronto: Health Care Council of Canada; 2013. 2013.
• Houle SK, et al. Does performance-based remuneration for individual health care practitioners affect patient care? A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine . 2012; 157 (12):889–99. [ PubMed : 23247940 ]
• IOM. Medicare: A Strategy for Quality Assurance: Volume 1. Washington (DC), US: National Academies Press; 1990. [ PubMed : 25144047 ]
• IOM. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington (DC), US: National Academies Press; 2001. [ PubMed : 25057539 ]
• Ivers N, et al. Growing literature, stagnant science? Systematic review, meta-regression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health care. Journal of General Internal Medicine . 2014; 29 (11):1534–41. [ PMC free article : PMC4238192 ] [ PubMed : 24965281 ]
• Legido-Quigley H, et al. Observatory Studies Series, 12. Copenhagen: WHO on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2008. Assuring the Quality of Health Care in the European Union: A case for action.
• OECD. OECD Reviews of Health Care Quality. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017. Caring for Quality in Health: Lessons learnt from 15 reviews of health care quality. Available at: http://dx ​.doi.org/10 ​.1787/9789264267787-en , accessed 9 April 2019.
• Øvretveit J. Quality evaluation and indicator comparison in health care. International Journal of Health Planning Management . 2001; 16 :229–41. [ PubMed : 11596559 ]
• Papanicolas I. International frameworks for health system comparison. In: Papanicolas I, & Smith P (eds.), editors. Health system performance comparison: An agenda for policy, information and research. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Open University Press; New York: 2013.
• Slawomirski L, Auraaen A, Klazinga N. The economics of patient safety. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2017.
• The Council of Europe. The development and implementation of quality improvement systems (QIS) in health care. Recommendation No. R (97) 17 and explanatory memorandum. Strasbourg: The Council of Europe; 1997.
• WHO. Everybody’s business: Strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s framework for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006a.
• WHO. Quality of care: a process for making strategic choices in health systems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006b.
• WHO. WHO global strategy on people centred and integrated health services. Interim Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
• WHO. Handbook for national quality policy and strategy – A practical approach for developing policy and strategy to improve quality of care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
• WHO/OECD/World Bank. Delivering quality health services: a global imperative for universal health coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and The World Bank; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
• Cite this Page Busse R, Panteli D, Quentin W. An introduction to healthcare quality: defining and explaining its role in health systems. In: Busse R, Klazinga N, Panteli D, et al., editors. Improving healthcare quality in Europe: Characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies [Internet]. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2019. (Health Policy Series, No. 53.) 1.
• PDF version of this title (4.8M)

In this Page

• The relevance of quality in health policy
• Definitions of healthcare quality
• Dimensions of healthcare quality
• The role of quality in health systems and health system performance assessment
• What are quality improvement strategies? Aims and structure of this book

Other titles in this collection

• European Observatory Health Policy Series

Related information

• PMC PubMed Central citations
• PubMed Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

• An introduction to healthcare quality: defining and explaining its role in healt... An introduction to healthcare quality: defining and explaining its role in health systems - Improving healthcare quality in Europe

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

Connect with NLM

National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894

Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure

Help Accessibility Careers

Streamlined support with our essay writing app

Enjoy enhanced peace of mind and convenience with our innovative app, tailored to provide expertly crafted papers at your fingertips.

Trusted by 1,5M+ happy students

Essays app - tackling compositions for every level

Discover the potential of our exceptional app, skillfully crafting professional papers for any degree of complexity.

Why opt for our EssayPro app

Decades of expertise.

Rely on our team of skilled, native-speaking experts committed to delivering quality work.

Subject varieties and paper types

Our dedication to excellence enables clients to trust us with any paper they need, regardless of the topic's difficulty.

Originality guarantee and unique papers

Secure a one-of-a-kind essay through our apps, and delight in the added benefit of a free plagiarism report to ensure originality.

Timely paper submissions

Feeling anxious as time ticks away? Let our app skillfully and virtuously craft your paper in just hours.

Embrace our app's global availability on both iOS and Android platforms

Hesitate no longer – secure top-notch essays for yourself today!

Order effortlessly

1. give task guidelines.

Download our app and complete the task instructions form with the necessary information.

2. Pick a suitable expert

Select your preferred expert by reviewing their portfolios and chatting with them through the app, then deposit funds to initiate the process.

3. Get paper & pay

Upon completion of the task, you may request revisions if necessary, and upon satisfaction with the results, your funds will be released to your writer.

A closer look at user feedback and satisfaction

Take a moment to read the reviews and see for yourself how our app has positively impacted other people's academic life.

Essaypro is my jam when it comes to cranking out perfect essays. And their app is lit making it super easy to keep track of my orders and stay on top of things while Im out and about.

I hit up this essay helper app for like 5 or 6 orders and it was a breeze. Quality was on point and never missed a deadline. Had to rev one order, but they hooked it up for free. Lit! Def gonna order more papers next time.

No doubt the sickest app for Androids. Runs smooth and packs all the same heat as the website

EssayPro's app for essays is next level convenience. The customer squad placed my order in a hot minute and helped me pick the perfect expert. Final product was lit and I'm def using this service again no doubt!!

Stress-free life thankss to this essay app. Gained so much free time and zero stress for my deadlines. Used this service a ton and they always bring the heat with their pro writers who actually care about giving you fire work.

Hit up this app every time I need to talk to my essay expert. They respond quick and I know the chat's encrypted so I feel safe no cap

An app hooks you up with real-deal professionals. Had 3 different writers for different subjects and they've all been lit. Easy to stay in control and make edits cuz the writers are quick to respond and super cool )

I was like "meh" bout tryna use another app but I'm glad I took the leap. The outlining and research features are lit AF for a student like me. And the best part? I can export my work in diff formats, sick! Only downside is the interface can be a bit much at first but once you get the hang of it, it's the bomb for writin essays.

If you ain't downloaded this app yet, you're missing out big time. Was struggling with my paper but the customer squad hooked me up and I got my paper done in just 3 days..... no joke.

Find only the most skilled native writers on our app

Our expert writing team upholds the values of efficiency, creativity, and professionalism.

Achieving excellence with our top app

Effortlessly craft perfect essays - download our app or register on our website to get started today!

Frequently asked questions

Why should i opt for your app, what is the background and role of the writers, what are the offers of your essay writing app, what is the turnaround time for receiving my essay, does your company offer customer guarantees, does your app for essay provide special offers.