(obedient, self-discipline, politeness, honouring parents and elders, loyal, responsible)
He presented the structural model of basic values which takes the form of a circle. Complementary values, i.e., values that are similar to motivational content, are located side by side on this circle while competing values are located at opposing sides [ 18 , 19 ]. The closer any two values in either direction around the circle, the more similar their underlying motivations; the more distant, the more antagonistic their motivations [ 19 ]. It seems that the whole set of ten values relates to each other closely or distantly and by that mean they may interrelate with any other variable such as behaviour, attitude, age, etc. ( Figure 1 ).
Theoretical model of relations among ten motivational types of values.
The concept of values has been defined differently in the literature depending on the contexts and the situations. However, along with the rapid changes in the world, the concepts of values and value education have gained renewed attention due to the increased social immorality [ 21 ]. Value education can address different forms and definitions. In religious senses, it is most possibly defined as moral and spiritual development. To sociological concepts, it can be termed as the part of socialisation and personality development or the transmission of cultural elements. In the dimension of education, it is addressed through citizenship education. However, in the most general sense, value education stresses the process by which people develop moral values and transfer them through factors such as social relationships, religion and education.
The values, attitudes and personal qualities of young people and the role of the school in spiritual, moral, social and cultural development have received renewed attention in recent years [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. As education is a personality-building process [ 24 ], school education is challenged by preparing students to face the complexities of future life. Rapidly changing socioeconomic structures and their consequences in terms of patterns of work, family life and social relationships requires an educational response. In that context, experts have recognised the 21st century school curriculum as the most influential mode of transferring values to the younger generation other than the family and other immediate social units. Sahin [ 16 ] suggests that implicit or planned values education in schools plays an active role in transferring values from society to society. By its definition, value education refers to those pedagogies that educators use to create enriching learning experiences for students and addresses issues related to character formation [ 25 ] and moral development. Moral values are the values that make individuals distinguish between what is good or bad and right or wrong and simply it gives the ideas about the good personal and social life. Halstead and Tylor [ 21 ] refer to a discussion document on Spiritual and Moral Development and highlight that the moral values that school should promote are telling the truth, keeping promises, respecting the rights and property of others, acting considerately towards others, helping those less fortunate and weaker than ourselves, taking personal responsibility for one’s actions and self-discipline. Moreover, schools reject bullying, cheating, deceit, cruelty, irresponsibility and dishonesty.
Sahin [ 16 ] has identified the four main characteristics of values education as:
Sahin [ 16 ] views the main purpose of values education as to make values permanent behaviours in students. Providing students with the knowledge and insight into values and beliefs that enables them to reflect on their experience in a way that develop their spiritual awareness and self-knowledge, teaches them the principles which distinguish right from wrong and teaches students to appreciate their cultural traditions and the diversity and richness of other cultures are among the basic functional aspects of value education provided through the school education [ 21 ]. Accordingly, the particular theme of value education is directly related to inculcating moral values in students, and it can be identified as another phase of personal value development since the same aspects are named and described in personal value models and frameworks in more or less similar terms. For example, the features that institutions wish to promote through moral or value education are discussed in the ten basic values in Schwartz theory of basic values under the themes of conformity, benevolence, tradition, security and universalism. As Schwartz [ 19 ] views, benevolence and conformity values both promote cooperative and supportive social relations and both values may motivate the same helpful act, separately or together. Traditional values imply one’s affection towards religious beliefs and respect for tradition and customs while security values inspire one’s need for safety and harmony. Hence, through value education, it develops values such as conformity, security, universalism and benevolence.
In developing values in individuals, it is widely recognised that schools are not the only nor are they the greatest influence on the values, attitudes and personal qualities of young people, but parents, communities and other agencies are also influential [ 21 ]. The early-stage value development through the family, neighbours, practice of religion, culture and nursery forms the foundation for the personal values system that one holds. It can be further sharpened through the formal and informal educational and cultural practices in the school or any other institution.
Approaches to learning mainly focus on how children engage in learning referring to the use of skills and behaviours. In addition, they are discussed incorporating emotional, behavioural and cognitive domains. Learning is a process of changing behaviour through experiences and is relatively a permanent product. Hence, it is important to understand student learning approaches to improve and maintain the quality of the learning experience. Beyaztas and Senemoglu [ 26 ] define learning approaches in terms of how a learner’s intentions, behaviours and study habits change according to their perception of a learning task to the context which the learner regards.
According to Lietz and Matthews [ 27 ] two major perspectives have guided theory and research into student learning: The first is The Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) rooted in North America, and the second is The Students’ Approaches to Learning (SAL) that is prominent in Europe and Australia/Southeast Asia. In parallel to that, Matthews et al. (2007) [ 3 ] cite Biggs’ [ 28 ] findings on Asian student learning approaches, and according to it, learning is based on two types: the Information Processing Approach and the Contextually and Experientially Based Learning Approach. The above findings specifically refer to the geographical region and it is reasonable to pose the argument that the variation patterns in learning approaches are existing to the sociogeographical factors such as country, region and culture.
Biggs [ 29 , 30 ] specified three distinct approaches (see Table 2 ) to learning namely, The Surface, The Deep and The Achieving approaches to learning [ 3 , 27 ]. In addition, each approach is composed of a motivation that directed learning and a strategy for the implementation of the learning approach [ 3 ].
Motivations and strategies in student approaches to learning.
Approach | Motive | Strategy |
---|---|---|
Surface Motivation (SM) is instrumental: to meet requirements minimally; a balance between working too hard and failing | Surface Strategy (SS) is reproductive: to limit the target to bare essentials and reproduce through rote learning | |
Deep Motivation (DM) is intrinsic: study to actualize interest in what is being learned; to develop competence | Deep Strategy (DS) is meaningful: read widely, interrelating with previous relevant knowledge | |
in academic subjects Achieving Motivation (AM) is based on competition and ego-enhancement: to obtain the highest grades, whether or not material is interesting | Achieving Strategy (AS) is based on organising time and working space; to follow up suggestions; behave like a ‘model’ student |
Note. MNNote. Matthews et al. (2007) [ 3 ] following Biggs [ 29 ] and Murray-Harvey [ 31 ].
Li’s [ 32 ] perspective on student learning approaches is quite different from the above and states that students are smart in different ways and have different learning approaches. According to Na Li, the two major perspectives of learning are the constructivist and student-centred learning approaches: Inquiry-based learning, Problem-based learning, the Situated and embodied cognition model, Self-regulated learning and Cognitive apprenticeship model and Technology-enhanced learning approaches.
Research into learning approaches has focused on studying the impact of background factors such as gender, sociocultural backgrounds, discipline area, personal values and the learning culture of students. As highlighted by Lietz and Matthews [ 27 ], Cano-Garcia [ 33 ] has shown that older female students tended to score higher on the deep and achieving approaches to learning than younger male students. In addition, studies of Jones et al. [ 34 ] and Smith and Miller [ 35 ] reflected strong relationships between learning approaches and academic disciplines. Beyaztas and Senemoglu [ 26 ] reveal another dimension of research on learning approaches in relation to the examination on students’ learning and studying behaviour towards exams and exam types. Results of these interventions revealed that students’ learning approaches change according to the examination type they were preparing for and Ramsden [ 36 ] has proposed strategic learning approaches for students who have more exam-oriented study behaviours.
Another major area that researchers concentrated is changes in the learning approach over time. A number of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have investigated changes in learning approaches over time [ 3 , 10 , 37 ]. Both Lietz and Matthews [ 27 ] and Tarabashkina and Lietz [ 10 ] refer to the same group of studies that investigated changes in learning approaches over time. As they arranged into the chronological order the earliest, Watkins and Hattie’s [ 38 ] study on a sample of undergraduate students found that the longer students had studied, the more they displayed characteristics of the deep approach to learning. Contrary to the results of their first study, Watkins and Hattie’s longitudinal study [ 39 ] showed no evidence of students’ deep learning approaches intensifying over time. However, Biggs [ 29 ] reported a general decline in the deep approach from the first to final year of study in a sample of undergraduate students in Australia. However, no significant changes were observed for other learning approaches. In the study by Gow and Kember [ 40 ], results showed that older students used the deep approach significantly more often than younger students. In addition, students at the beginning of their studies appeared to prefer an achieving approach compared to students who were further advanced in their studies. In addition, the more time that had elapsed since leaving school, the fewer the number of students who displayed characteristics of the surface approach. In another study by Kember [ 41 ], it was uncovered that younger students showed a preference for a more superficial approach in a comparison of first, second and third-year students. In contrast to the results of his study in 1990 [ 40 ], he found that first-year students showed significantly higher scores on the deep approach to learning than second and third-year students. Zeegers’s [ 42 ] study on a class of chemistry students over 30 months has shown a significant decline in the achieving strategy and a significant increase in the surface strategy over the time of the study. For the deep approach, no statistically significant changes emerged over time. Another study carried out by Matthews [ 3 ] on the same issue discovered that students’ approaches to learning generally became deeper over time. In contrast, Cano’s [ 33 ] study observed a significant decline from junior to senior high school with regards to the deep and surface learning approaches both in boys and girls.
In general, preference for a deep learning approach has emerged as the major concern of all studies, and there is no specific pattern of applying a particular approach for learning among the students. Hence, there may be some other background factors influencing the selection and application as well as the changing of a specific approach to learning. In the point of factors affecting students’ learning approaches, Beyaztas and Senemoglu [ 26 ] summarize the 3P model (Presage, Process and Product), and according to it, prior knowledge, abilities, preferred ways of learning, values and expectations, teaching context (including the curriculum) and teaching methods affect the student’s selection.
As revealed through the research studies, approaches to learning are probable to change in response to gender, ability, formal teaching authority, time, personal values [ 3 , 27 ], the requirements of and as an adaptation to new environments, the learning culture and the academic discipline and its nature [ 10 , 27 ]. Additionally, as Beyaztas and Senemoglu [ 26 ] state, referring to an early study of Ramsden [ 36 ], students’ perception of their teachers and departments also have important effects on their learning approaches. In addition, the curriculum and sociocultural environment also may have an effect on selecting the learning approach. Thus, it can be concluded that students’ preference for learning approach is influenced by several factors and they may be inborn or situational. In other words, learning approached may be a result of a combination of several internal and external factors including personal value traits.
This research is based on a systematic review of the literature with a narrative summary that exclusively depended on online databases. The predetermined selection criteria, which are given in Table 3 , were applied during the database search screening of the text titles, abstracts and whole texts.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Type of Criterian | Creiteria | Inclusion | Exclusion |
---|---|---|---|
Type of publication | Journal articles | ||
Conference papers | * | ||
Reports | * | ||
Dissertations | |||
Books | * | ||
Access | Online | * | |
Paper | * | ||
Publication period | 2000–2020 | * | |
Place of publication | World wide | * | |
Types of study | Emphirical studies | * | |
Theoritical studies | * | ||
Research methods | Quantitaive | * | |
Qualitative | * | ||
Mixed | * |
Following the above-mentioned criteria, full texts that were reported within 20 years were purposely selected due to the availability of a limited number of accessible resources to retrieve the literature. In relation to the year of publication, the search action was conducted with the use of online databases. As the main sources of data, Google Scholar, JSTOR and Elsevier were used. The ResearchGate database was also used for the search of resources.
The comprehensive search resources were completed based on a wide range of key terms and phrases including “values”, “personal values”, “learning approaches”, “learning communities” and “learning approaches—academic achievement and value education”. However, similar terms that are often used interchangeably in the literature were also used. In particular, with regards to the concepts of personal values and value education, they have also been searched through the terms “humanistic values”, “soft skills”, “social skills” and “moral education”.
As the search action resulted in a limited number of appropriate and accessible sources, the reference section of the found texts were studied in the search for more relevant texts. After the exclusion of sources that did not satisfy the criteria in Table 3 , 38 texts were selected for analysis. The content of the selected resources was studied and analysed in detail. Then, the required data were organized under four main themes following the study objectives.
In the most general sense, approaches to learning describe what a student does when he/she is learning and why he/she should do it. In other words, it is the way that students perceive and value the learning process and how they behave during the process. As suggested by the aforementioned facts and information, education correlates with personal values. Hence, a considerable number of educational studies have been carried out to examine the composition and structure of personal values and their relationships with learning approaches. Values are considered to be precursors as well as predictors of behaviour [ 3 ]. In the same way, studies have proven that a tendency towards certain types of behaviours depends strongly on the structure of one’s values. Conversely, learning can be seen as a type of individual-specific behavioural pattern. In that respect, it is justifiable to accept that there is a relationship between personal values and the learning approaches of students. In addition, the values are believed to be influenced by background factors such as religion, culture, political factors, age and many others. Assuming that they also definitely influence in preference of a student’s learning approach, research into learning approaches has focused on a variety of backgrounds. According to Lietz and Matthews [ 27 ], research studies have focused on studying the differences in choice of learning approach and personal values relationships depending on gender, discipline area of study, prior performance and the experiences of students, especially the students who undertake higher education in another country. With regards to personal values, researchers in this context have confirmed that values are correlated with different learning approaches.
The influence of personal values on life goals are better described as follows: “values refer to desirable goals that motivate action” [ 19 ]. Wilding and Andrew’s [ 43 ] study results of “Life goals, approaches to study and performance in an undergraduate cohort” can be discussed taking that as the ground. According to them, the deep approach and the surface approach are the two main approaches to studying that have been distinguished by several researchers. In addition, an achieving or strategic approach employs either deep or surface strategies, depending on the demands of the task. The research aimed to investigate factors contributing to the choice of the preferred study approach at university and relations between these factors and academic performance. Based on the results, as the researchers state, this study has shown that approaches to study are related to wider attitudes to life or the general life goals and relations were found to be consistent with the deep approach being associated with altruistic life goals and the surface approach being associated with wealth and status life goals. The achieving approach was related to both types of life goal, but more strongly to wealth and status life goals.
The most frequently referred research of Matthews [ 3 ] on sojourner students in Australia has found interesting relationships between values and learning approaches. From the three pairs of canonical variables that emerged out of the analysis the first pair of variables illustrated that students with clearly defined value structure had equally well-defined learning motivations and strategies. The second pair of variables showed that students who had low integrity values showed a higher preference for surface or superficial learning. In contrast, the third pair of variables indicated that students who had a lesser emphasis on values associated with the Confucian ethos showed a strong preference for the deep strategy [ 3 ].
In the study of “Values and Learning approaches of students at an international University”, Matthews, Lietz and Darmawan [ 3 ] relate the ten values postulated by Schwartz et al. [ 18 ] to Biggs’ [ 29 ] six subscales and the relationships between values and approaches to learning has been estimated by canonical correlation analysis. It has revealed that values can be linked to learning approaches even in a situation where students have left their home countries to undertake tertiary studies in a new social, cultural and educational environment. There, the results have been interpreted to the higher-order values: self-aggrandisement, conservatism, self-directedness and benevolent change, which were initially termed as self-enhancement, self-transcendence, openness to change and conservation, respectively, as proposed by Schwartz [ 18 ]. Four distinct pairings between values and learning approaches were established: (a) self-aggrandisement (Achievement and power values) is linked to the achievement learning approach, (b) conservatism (universalism and benevolence values) relates to the surface learning approach, (c) self-directedness (self-direction and stimulation values) is linked to the deep learning approach and (d) benevolent change (conformity, tradition and security values) is related to the learning strategies variables were emerged as the results.
In terms of the main research question, the impact of students’ personal values on learning approaches and changes in them over time of Lietz and Matthews [ 27 ] longitudinal study on “The Effects of College Students’ Personal Values on Changes in Learning Approaches” has given mixed results. The three-year study results have shown no changes within students in the deep and surface approaches to learning but a significant decline for the achieving approach, particularly for students who previously experienced a more formal teaching authority. As they described, the students who identified to a greater extent with the achievement, hedonism and security values have demonstrated a higher achieving approach to learning at the start of their higher education. Conversely, but in line with expectations, students who valued having fun and a good time more than other students have displayed fewer characteristics of the achieving approach to learning. However, none of the personal values were found to influence how the achieving approach to learning changed over time. Based on the research outcome they have concluded that, while personal values appear to explain differences in learning approaches at one point in time they do not seem to contribute to explaining changes in learning approaches over time. In that case, as explained in a similar study by Matthews (2007) [ 3 ] students are likely to change both their personal values and learning approaches due to the influence of the new environment or it may result to pursue their education.
Parallel to the theme of the above studies, Tarabashkina and Lietz [ 10 ] carried out a longitudinal research study on “The impact of values and learning approaches on student achievement: Gender and academic discipline influences” using a cohort of international students who started their three-year Bachelor of Arts or Bachelor of Science degrees in September 2004 at a university in Germany. According to the results, hedonism and achievement were consistently related to the achieving approach over three years, whereas the achievement value probably had a large positive effect on the achieving approach, and hedonism (that is, the tendency to have fun) was negatively related to this approach across all occasions. Hedonism was also consistently and negatively linked to the deep approach throughout all years, whereas self-direction had a positive impact on this approach over a two-year period. Self-direction emerged as a constant predictor of the surface approach, although in the opposite direction to this effect for the deep approach.
Accordingly, the reported literature provides insights that the personal values and learning approaches are two components that occur at the same time with parallel construction. In addition, it establishes the relationship regarding how personal values are linked with different learning approaches and how these interrelationships change over time.
Personal characteristics such as skills, abilities and values, academic adaptability, concern on learning objectives, decision making, innovation and communication are some of the main features of any valid evaluation criteria. When elaborating on the state of personal values in line with its impact on one’s academic achievement, knowledge as a human-specific activity is in direct relation with the way a person through his values perceives the world, the phenomena and events Daniela et al. [ 2 ]. The values favoured by different individuals can be more or less equal or different. Similarly, within each unique and specific view of the world, each person attributes different values to the same experience or the same value to different experiences [ 4 ]. Accordingly, the existing similarities and differences in values cause much diversity in behaviour. Typically, human beings tend to adapt their values according to the circumstances. In addition, it can be assumed that the values do reflect themselves through all the activities of individuals. Identifying the worth of studying these variations, in addition to exploring the link between values and learning approaches, the relationships between personal values and academic achievement, including the effect of factors such as gender and academic discipline, has been carried out by scholars. As the literature notes, the achievement motive and achievement goal are different in their nature, but they both share a commonality in terms of the role that individuals’ values may play as their underlying antecedents [ 44 ]. The argument is further confirmed citing Kaplan and Maehr [ 45 ], and they contend that individuals’ achievement goals are associated with their values. Similarly, values are considered desirable goals and individuals work hard to pursue them. Hence it is justifiable to say that in the academic setting students personal values or their personal goals substantially influence the academic achievement of the students.
Among the several research studies made to study the impact of values on academic achievements, Bala [ 46 ] discusses the values and adjustment problem of high achievers and low achievers based on a sample of 100 students from two senior secondary schools. There, the researcher has considered values in terms of theoretical, economic, aesthetic, social, political and religious values and adjustments related to social, health and emotional, school and home values. Achieving one of the specific objectives to determine the nature of the values of High and Low achievers, it arrives at several conclusions: (a) Higher achievers are more theoretical and social in comparison to low achievers and they have a dominant interest in knowledge, learning and believe more in kindness, charity and love; (b) High achievers and low achievers are similar as far as religious value is concerned; (c) Low achievers are more economic in comparison to high achievers. They believe more in materialistic life than high achievers; (d) High achievers are more political in their approach in comparison to low achievers; (e) Low achievers are superior on the aesthetic value in comparison to high achievers.
There has been little research to study the effect of a school’s disciplinary climate on improving students’ learning and academic achievement. However, the available past and present research support the view that student learning is immediately affected by the nature of the school’s disciplinary climate [ 4 ] as it controls students’ conduct by restricting the engagement in misbehaviour during school time and, thus, enhance student learning.
According to Ma and Willms [ 47 ], research findings based on a sample of grade 8 students in the US, the two most important disciplinary factors that affect academic achievement pertain to whether students were concerned about class disruptions, the proportion of students who talked to a school counsellor or teacher about disciplinary matters and the effect of the teacher–student relationship. As they revealed, with respect to the effects of indiscipline on academic achievement, the disciplinary measure that had the strongest relationship to academic achievement pertains mainly to classroom disruption. Additionally, they say that the effect of behaviour concern, which is a more traditional indicator of disciplinary climate, was negatively related to academic success. As they have found that students’ indiscipline has a significant detrimental effect on their academic achievement, to improve academic achievement from the perspective of a disciplinary climate, providing an orderly classroom environment has been suggested as a remedy.
Research conducted at the individual level has consistently shown a correlation between low cognitive ability, poor academic performances, learning disabilities, delinquency and particularly the relationship between academic performances and discipline [ 47 ]. In schools where advantaged students are concentrated, there will be fewer discipline problems and higher achievement levels as they completely target academic success rather than other issues, whereas schools serving disadvantaged students will have even worse discipline problems and lower levels of academic achievement. Ma and Willms [ 47 ] support that claim with Hawkins and Lishner [ 48 ], who have framed the relationship between academic performance and discipline as a circular process. School misconduct in the early elementary grades, combined with low ability or learning disabilities, are antecedents of poor academic performance in the late grades; poor academic performance in the late elementary grades leads to a low commitment to educational activities, disaffection toward school and an association with delinquent peers. These factors lead to dropping out or to delinquent behaviour. Value education is another concerned faculty that is gaining much concern in education. The results of a study on students attending character education and some of which did not have shown that the scores of those who underwent character education were higher than the scores of others [ 49 ]. As a whole, according to these authors, schools’ or any other learning community’s disciplinary climate acknowledges that better-behaved students generally are higher academic achievers. On that basis, as highlighted in the aforementioned discussion, if personal values are considered as abstract ideals that guide people’s behaviour, then there should be a correlation between delinquent behavioural patterns, cognitive ability level, academic performance and the personal values of an individual.
Liem et al. [ 44 ] examined the relationships between values, achievement motives, achievement goals and academic achievement among Indonesian high school students. There, in terms of the relationships between values and achievement motives, findings indicate that security and conformity values are positive predictors of the social-oriented achievement motive; self-direction is a positive predictor of the individual-oriented achievement motive, whereas hedonism is a negative predictor of both achievement motive orientations. There is also evidence for the direct effects of values on academic achievement. How personal values influenced students’ learning approaches and in turn, how they related to students’ achievement has been examined several times, and they have resulted in more or less similar results, as in Liem et al. [ 44 ]. Accordingly, Wilding and Andrew [ 43 ], based on their study cohort behaviour, have observed that those with less interest in wealth and status life goals produced better academic results. In other words, the successful students would seem to apply themselves more (or more effectively) to the immediate task rather than wider ambitions. Hence, they concluded the two variables associated with better performance were a self-reported achieving approach to learning, reflecting good organization and a systematic programme of study and a lower emphasis on wealth and status achievement in life. Furthermore, they stress that Biggs’ achievment approach to learning has consistently been shown to be positively related to academic performance, but neither the surface approach nor the deep approach has shown any such consistent relation. In contrast to that, the results of a study on a sample of university students by Tarabashkina and Lietz [ 10 ] showed that specific combinations of values were related to each learning approach and their relationship with the academic achievement of students over three years. In general, certain consistencies of these relationships have been observed throughout the study period. The deep and achieving learning approaches were associated with higher achievement, whereas students who displayed more characteristics of the surface learning approach had lower academic performance. Through statistical analysis, they built up the positive and negative relationships between personal values and learning approach: (a) Achieving learning approach—self-direction, achievement and hedonism; (b) Deep learning approach—self direction and hedonism; (c) Surface learning approach—conformity and self-direction. As they found, if the deep and achieving learning approaches were associated with higher achievement, then it can be assumed that self-direction, achievement and hedonism values are consistently associated with academic achievements, affecting them negatively and/or positively.
Similarly, the research findings of the study on learning approaches of successful students done using freshman students ranked in the top one percent portion in a university placement exam (2013) in Ankara by Beyaztaş & Senemoğlu [ 50 ] were supported with the similar research literature and has shown that students can enhance their level of success by increased use of the deep learning approach and decreased use of the surface approach. Furthermore, references made in Watkins’s [ 51 ] meta-analysis of 60 studies addressing learning approaches and academic achievement found a negative relationship between academic achievement and surface learning approaches in 28 studies, a positive relationship between academic achievement and deep learning approaches in 37 studies and a positive relationship between academic achievement and strategic learning approach in 32 studies. Additionally, in a study by Senemoğlu [ 52 ] a positive and meaningful relationship was found between Turkish and American students’ perceived level of success and learning approaches. This study reported that students who perceived themselves to be successful tended to adopt deep and strategic learning approaches, whereas students who thought they were less successful used surface learning approaches in both countries. According to the outcomes of the above-mentioned research studies, any consistent assumptions cannot be made about the correlation between the effectiveness of the learning approaches and students’ academic achievements or about how learning approaches influence academic performance. As emerged in the previous research literature, students’ learning behaviour along with personal values may change according to the circumstances and, in turn, it makes a direct effect on the students’ academic achievement.
Education is a combined process in which the advancement of knowledge, development of skills and the acquisition of beliefs and habits progress from an earlier age. Education providers, especially schools, play an important role in helping young people to develop and manage their physical, social and emotional well-being, and to live and work with others in different contexts. Specifically, they are partly responsible for enlightening an individual in both personal and professional areas. In that sense, personal value development is given a prominent place in most of academic interventions since they are considered as the concepts of beliefs that guide behaviours, attitudes and social norms. Education is naturally and inevitably directly related to a person’s goals and values [ 53 ]. The objective of developing an individual’s personal values as a part of academic life has been discussed, mainly concerning the theme of value education in many of the studies. In general value, education occupies an impressive place in contemporary society and school education is the most influential means of developing an individual and the schools are meeting places of value and are also full of values [ 54 ].
Values education itself has been defined simply as a purposive attempt to teach what is good or bad. As Iscan and Senemoglu [ 49 ] define it, values education is an open initiative aimed to provide instruction in values, value development or value actualization. According to the definition underpinning the Value Education Study, Australia [ 55 ], ‘Values education’ is broader and refers to any explicit and/or implicit school-based activity to promote student understanding and knowledge of values and to inculcate the skills and dispositions of students so they can enact particular values as individuals and as members of the wider community. Beena [ 56 ] says that value education given at schools is much concerned with striving for personal wholeness as well as generating a responsible attitude towards others and an understanding of wrong and right behaviour. For Thornberg and Oguz [ 57 ], all kinds of activities in schools in which students learn or develop values and morality are often referred to as values education. It seems that through the value education at school, children are encouraged to explore the powers of good and bad while unconsciously setting appropriate limits to behaviour. In relation to the Schwartz theory of personal values, the school value education promotes the values (benevolence, universalism, tradition, conformity, security) that primarily regulate how one relates socially to others and affects their interests. Security and universalism values are boundary values primarily concerned with others’ interests, but their goals also regulate the pursuit of their own interests [ 19 ]. Particularly, schools being sites for ethical practices, it seems that they focus much on social value development rather than personal development. According to Kunduroglu & Babadogan [ 53 ], that may be because the values students get with values education affect firstly their families and circle of friends, then their acquaintances and at the end, all the community.
As Thornberg and Oguz [ 57 ] emphasize, referring to several studies, value education is accomplished in two distinct ways such as explicit values education (schools’ official curriculum of what and how to teach values and morality, including teachers’ explicit intentions and practices of values education and implicit values education (associated with a hidden curriculum and implicit values, embedded in school and classroom practices). Bergmark [ 54 ] also mentions that schools are full of implicit and explicit values which shape school leaders’, teachers’ and students’ perceptions and actions. Furthermore, Thornberg and Oguz [ 57 ] mention two general approaches to values education as described in the literature. The first is the Traditional Approach: adult transmission of the morals of society through character education, direct teaching, exhortation, and the use of rewards and punishments. The aim is to teach and discipline students to develop good character and virtues (being honest, hardworking, obeying legitimate authority, kind, patriotic and responsible) and to conform to the dominant values, legitimate rules and the authority of society. In contrast, the Progressive or Constructivist Approach emphasises children’s active construction of moral meaning and development of a personal commitment to principles of fairness and concern for the welfare of others through processes of social interaction and moral discourse. Reasoning and explanations, deliberative discussion about moral dilemmas and participation in decision-making processes are viewed as typical methods for this approach. The aim is to promote moral autonomy, rational thinking, moral reasoning skills and democratic values and competence among the students.
Values education has always been a part of the school curriculum in many countries aiming to inculcate religious beliefs, moral values, duties and social responsibilities as the social values are of crucial importance for an individual’s life [ 53 ]. Therefore, the personal value development of students is important as it is beneficial for the individual in academic, professional and social life. Academic development achieved without personal value development is worthless because individuals who are not disciplined find it difficult to survive in the long run of professional and social life. They lack positive qualities such as punctuality, flexibility, the willingness to learn, a friendly nature, an eagerness to help others, sharing and caring and many more. In addition, they do not believe in themselves and others and lack self-confidence, self-efficacy and self-courage, which are considered the main components of personal development. Obviously, educating people on an only cognitive level is incomplete and not functional [ 53 ]. Henceforth, academic growth must be supplemented with personal value development to strengthen the individual to fit in the competitive society and do away with negative behavioural traits. That gives the sense that better personalities yield positive results in academics, social and professional life.
The research study by Iscan and Senemoglu [ 49 ] on the effectiveness of values education curriculum for fourth graders to equip students with the values of “universalism” and “benevolence” on students’ value-related cognitive behaviours, affective characteristics and performances has resulted in important findings. The experimental group of the study has shown higher values-related cognitive behaviour acquisition level and used more expressions reflecting values in the interviews during and after the implementation of the program. Additionally, the experimental group has displayed a larger number of positive value-related behaviours during the study than the control group. In parallel to the particular study, Iscan and Senemoglu [ 49 ] highlight the the importance of value-based educational interventions. As they revealed, exposing students to such experiences may make them aware of moral issues, establish empathy with others and understand their moral values, decreasing bullying and violence. Furthermore, they have made students more tolerant, polite, compassionate and forgiving, and [ 58 ] it has led to positive changes in students’ respect and responsibility levels along with a decrease in unacceptable behaviour. A similar study on “Values Education Program Integrated with the 4th Grade Science and Technology Course’’ [ 53 ] has revealed that at the end of the 6-week intervention period, students in the experimental group improved their perspective on the values, being more open-minded, unbiased and scientific. In addition, they have interrogated values concepts and developed positive behaviours for the relevant values.
As a whole, it proves that value education is an essential component in the general teaching-learning procedure since it highly encourages positive personal quality development and value gain which in turn benefit the whole community, society and the world.
Definitions for learning communities that have been given by a variety of journals, top universities and educational experts indicate a common set of characteristics. Considering them all together, a learning community can be defined as the same groups of students taking the same subjects or studying in the same class together. In addition, they see and meet each other frequently, share the same learning experiences, work across boundaries, spend a considerable amount of time together and engage in common academic activities in two or more classes as a specific unit. Additionally, they hold common goals, characterize collaboration, peer review and relationship building.
Sometimes the learning community can be the whole class or a group of students. Otherwise, it can be the whole learning institution: a school, university or any other institution where the individuals of the community develop their intellectual and professional skills and abilities while improving socioethical values. In addition, they work collaboratively as a single unit for achieving a set of common academic goals, sharing and bearing all kinds of similarities and differences [ 58 ]. In a more formal sense, according to the literary evidence, developing and implementing an intentional learning community (LC) has emerged as a popular method for improving the quality of the undergraduate experience at a range of higher educational institutions. Learning communities have a long history in higher education, dating from the 1920s when Alexander Meiklejohn introduced the “Experimental College” at the University of Wisconsin [ 59 ].
It is known that, from early ages, pupils are greatly influenced by their peers [ 21 ], and this has been empirically studied. Zhao and Kuh [ 58 ] state that students who actively participate in various out-of-class activities are more likely to connect with an affinity group of peers, which is important for student retention, success and personal development. Peer communities sometimes encourage and sometimes discourage value development as the students encountered different learning activities. Ma and Willms [ 47 ] view peer relationships are associated with delinquency in early adolescence. So, the potential role of peers as an influential factor on others in the process of values formation at the schools has been studied several times. In this respect, the study of Garnier and Stein [ 60 ] confirms that peer groups in which people interact and share norms and goals are another significant matter that affects the personal values of an individual. One important source of values is that of a ‘pivotal’ person: a person observed as displaying values that would produce advantageous benefits for the observer [ 4 ]. In a learning community, there is a possibility of a friend or friends becoming a pivotal person or persons other than the teacher or the instructor. Hence, it is evident that learning communities trigger personal value development through peers, their behaviours and attitudes and all the personal attributes.
To address the above features through the teaching and learning process, different approaches have been taken by the educational practitioners to figure out the best way to teach their students, and many have failed. However, some have succeeded and are still on the ground with alterations and developments. Among them, the cooperative learning strategy has continued to be developed and used by the teachers at all levels. Hence, by exposing students to collaborative or cooperative learning experience, they are encouraged to work together with colleagues to achieve common targets. As the word sense, it is not just group work but a very dynamic strategy [ 61 ] that provides room for students to experience different personalities, to promote social interaction, to identify sociocultural dynamics, to transfer ideas, and to develop group leadership skills among students. Cooperative learning is a teaching practice that breaks students into groups of three to four, with each student having a particular role within the group [ 61 ]. However, collaborative learning goes beyond working together, and it inspires self-management, self-monitoring and self-directed earning while developing a core skill required for employment [ 62 ]. In that sense, when comparing the intended outcomes of collaborative and cooperative learning approaches with the Schwartz’s [ 19 ] categorisation of values, they enhance values such as self-direction, achievement, benevolence and universalism.
Zhao and Kuh [ 58 ] refer to several studies, and according to them, most learning communities incorporate active and collaborative learning activities and promote involvement in complementary academic and social activities that extend beyond the classroom. Such approaches are linked with such positive behaviours such as increased academic effort and outcomes such as promoting openness to diversity, social tolerance and personal and interpersonal development. In parallel to that, Stassen [ 59 ] points out the results of the empirical studies collectively and show that “living-learning communities have a significant positive effect on several student outcomes, including: student gains in autonomy and independence, intellectual dispositions and orientations, and generalized personal development and socialization”. Stassen [ 59 ] mentions that students in learning communities show greater institutional commitment, greater intellectual development and opportunities to analyse and integrate ideas, greater tolerance for difference and appreciation for pluralism and demonstrate higher persistence and academic performance as measured by college grade point average.
Taken together, by taking classes together and/or engaging in peer-to-peer learning as a learning community, students get to know each other better, learn from each other and support each other. Along with that, students experience more social relationships. A connected learning environment increases the potential for academic success while creating more opportunities for students to adapt themselves to the individual needs of each other, to adjust their schedules and to work with diverse groups since learning groups are a mixture of different intellectual abilities, academic interests and goals and learning styles. Then again, social relationships established as a result of learning communities will continue through the end of the academic experience and will last even after promoting social harmony. As explained in Schwartz’s [ 1 ], benevolence values provide an internalized motivational base for voluntarily promoting the welfare of others. Equally, conformity values promote prosocial behaviour to avoid negative outcomes for oneself. Hence, both benevolence and conformity values motivate the same helpful act of promoting cooperative and supportive social relations, separately or together. As discussed above the learning communities also directly or indirectly enrich the development of values such as benevolence and conformity in learners, since they support the natural integration of academic life with social life providing opportunities to interact with a variety of individuals. In turn, the learning community will be benefited or disturbed by the certain characteristics of the personal values held by the individual.
Based on the above literature on the themes of personal values and related directions, it is clear that there is no universally accepted definition for personal values. However, despite the diversity and gaps in the definitions, values and personal values have been viewed basically as the concepts or beliefs which are depicted through behavioural patterns, selections and personal goals. Furthermore, intrinsic and extrinsic factors including family, social and economic background, neighbourhood, religion and education have been identified as the influential factors on value formation and development. Their effect on the life of a person alternate according to the circumstances. Jardim et al. [ 63 ] identified this nature of values as the two main functions: as a motivator (materialist or humanitarian law) or as guidance (personal, social or central). Furthermore, based on the different attributes of values and priorities given to them in different contexts, they have been defined, named and grouped in various ways with more or fewer similarities to each other. However, both Schwartz [ 19 ] and Jardim [ 63 ] explained the similarities of values and value systems. As they state values have a basic universal structure and character which make them to be believed as the judgment of truths. The emphasis given to values in many areas has resulted in a number of theories and frameworks, and they have been used as the theoretical grounds to evaluate the research outcomes. According to the search results of this particular study revealed that Schwatrz theory of personal values has been frequently used in many of the recent education-based research studies in comparison to the other theories.
The study of personal values can provide greater insight into the entirety of human behaviour. Therefore, it has been studied concerning a variety of disciplines including education. Although there are a limited number of educational studies dealing with values, attempting to explore the relationship between personal values and learning approaches, personal values and academic achievement, influence of one’s personal values on learning community and vice versa and value education are important trends that emerged in educational research. Those studies mainly focused on identifying students’ preferred learning approaches at different stages of academic life and underlying values that are likely to influence the preference. In addition, the positive and negative behaviours of the underlying values with the learning approaches over time and the changes were aimed at. When concerned with the learning approaches that are found frequently in studies, the deep, surface, achieving and strategic approaches are prominent. According to Wilding and Andrews [ 43 ], the two main approaches to studying are the deep approach and the surface approach, as distinguished by several researchers. In addition, an achieving or strategic approach employs either deep or surface strategies, depending on the demands of the task. Contrastingly, Matthews et al. [ 3 ] and Lietz and Matthews [ 27 ] cite Biggs [ 29 ], and he has specified three distinct approaches to learning, namely, The Surface, The Deep and The Achieving approaches to learning. The classification of Biggs’ [ 29 ] learning approaches appeared in many of the studies related to personal values, learning approaches and academic achievements. Research by Matthews et al. and Lietz et al. [ 3 , 27 , 37 ] based on personal values and their effect on students’ preference for learning approaches have revealed similar relationships and their changes over time, mainly related to the underlying values along with the other factors. In fact, revealing the correlation among value, learning approach and academic achievement is extremely important for educational practices. However, as they conclude, there is no consistency in those changes, and it has been further revealed that one learning approach is influenced by several value attributes. In general, deep and strategic learning approaches are found to be positively related to the academic achievement of successful students, whereas the surface learning approach is reported with less successful students. Self-direction and achievement values were identified as the most influential in students’ success through the above approaches. Collectively, the above study results offer potential insights that may be useful when designing new academic courses or in any teaching-learning intervention. Furthermore, though personal values are not the sole determinant of educational or career choice, the correct understanding of values is useful in addressing the arising needs and issues in any discipline. Especially to address a wide range of issues relating to schooling and any educational outcomes such as academic achievement, retention, participation, dropping out, discipline and career selection.
With regard to today’s transforming society, value education has identified a crucially important requirement. Both the cognitive and affective domains of a child need to be developed through education. Kunduroglu and Babadogan [ 53 ] stressed that the purpose of education is to furnish students with affective behaviours. Mainly, schools and other educational institutions are the places where students continue their value education process, which begins at home. One of the objectives of values education in schools is to develop a healthy, consistent and balanced personality in students [ 16 ]. In that sense, formal educational interventions are better focused on enhancing the values that children have already started to develop and help children to reflect, understand and implement their own values accordingly. At this point, direct or indirect inclusion of themes such as moral, religious, civic, democratic, national, personal and social goals and issues in the school curricula has been stressed as important. Furthermore, the need of treating value education as a high priority in terms of ensuring the continuity of society and cultural transmission at a personal level also highlighted in many studies. The effectiveness of curricula including value education has been studied several times, and the results revealed the robust links between value education, student disciplinary conduct and academic achievements. Additionally, the consideration given to the respective roles of formal and informal education, learning communities, peers, parents and other institutions and agencies in making sense of values and forming personal values is emphasized in much of the value-education-based research.
Another concept that emerged as important in the dimension of personal values is its close relationship with the learning community and vice versa. The peer group influence on shaping academic behaviour and personal behaviour have long been studied by scholars over different perspectives. Concerning that, many researchers have focused on cooperative/collaborative learning interventions as the means of establishing social relationships and value development.
In general, when analysing the contents of research studies, it was notable that research related to personal values and learning approaches have been the major focus of many scholars in comparison to the other directions. A few studies found online databases discussing the relationship between personal values and academic achievement. Study reports directly focusing on the correlation of personal values and learning community and vice versa and the importance of personal values as a part of academic life are found lacking in online databases. Methodologically, it was found that many of the studies tend to apply mixed method designs and only a few have taken qualitative and quantitative research as their main research method. Other than that, literature-based reports are also available as useful academic resources. In the data collection process, questionnaires and interviews were found as the most commonly used instruments.
The discussion of personal values includes many distinct dimensions and can be approached through numerous perspectives: education, personal and social life, professional world, culture, political, religion and so on. It is realized that focusing only on a part of it cannot result in a holistic study of the concept but still it would be important to understand the depth of the concept. Depending on online resource availability and the time period set for the selection of resources for the current review may have resulted in the exclusion of some valuable research outcomes and directions. However, the comparative analysis based on available literature would probably shed light on the variety of interpretations, findings and research tendencies.
Finally, as the research literature reveals, the insight gained through the results of value-related studies facilitate the clear identification of the role of value in personal life and partly as a deciding factor of academic life. If one is not clear of his or her own values, then he/she is not clear with aims and is ineffective in controlling their life. Hence, further investigation on value-related topics over the wide range of its interrelated dimensions would give a more holistic and profound view of the role of personal values in education.
Based on the above discussion, it is apparent that still there is much room for future research studies on the theme of personal values since they affect all the avenues of human life, individually or in common as a group or a community. Conversely, several factors influence personal values and their changes. Therefore, a detailed further examination of the complex interplay of factors influencing personal values and how personal values influence an individual and in common to the whole human community seems to be valuable.
According to the analyses presented in this article, it is implied that the topic of personal values is very much important in the field of education to identify students’ behaviours, life goals and expectations, learning styles and how these change over time. Furthermore, increased attention is given to value education since values are considered as essential social or soft skills that one must acquire and practice in the 21st century world. Therefore, education, regardless of the level of junior, secondary, tertiary or professional, should aim at making human life better not only through professional or economic enhancement but also through social, moral and spiritual strengthening. At present, schools and other educational providers have adopted several co-curricular programmes that uplift values in students, such as peer support systems, community service projects and student action teams. These interventions provide students with opportunities to develop a sense of responsibility, empathy, unity, appreciation of others and their views, lifestyles and cultures and work with others to resolve the problems. These programmes have been recorded with notable achievements. This is a common feature of almost all the educational contexts that ensure values are incorporated into teaching programmes across the key learning areas to develop students’ civic and social skills. Thus, there is a need for a realistic and balanced curriculum in which the programs that inspire the value acquisition and internalisation of socially beneficial skills and behaviours are emphasized. In addition, the integration of such features into the disciplines in the curriculum is also important. Along with that, research studies to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses and the positive and negative aspects of such programmes need to be continued. According to the general and most practiced procedure, during or at the end of the academic experience, cognitive behaviours are always tested, but testing effective behaviours is always neglected. Hence, it is a noteworthy point to mention the importance of assessing processes for the progress of value development in students.
Finally, the current study based on the available literature has shown that students probably tend to adjust their approaches to a specific learning strategy due to several factors: learning environment, subject area, expectations, curriculum, teacher and teaching style, origin and cultural context, gender, religion, etc. Furthermore, there is no significant pattern of selecting learning approaches such as deep, surface or achieving, etc., at different levels of the context of learning. Therefore, deep study into how learning approaches are changed, on what basis and what the most influential motives for such alterations are will be beneficial to understanding students’ learning behaviours. Hence, research studies further investigating such dimensions would probably useful and needed at present and in future.
Conceptualisation, K.A.A.G.; methodology, D.M.S.C.P.K.D. and K.A.A.G.; formal analysis, D.M.S.C.P.K.D. and S.Y.E.; investigation, D.M.S.C.P.K.D. and K.A.A.G.; resources, K.A.A.G.; writing—original draft preparation, D.M.S.C.P.K.D.; writing—review and editing, K.A.A.G.; supervision, K.A.A.G. and S.Y.E.; project administration, K.A.A.G. and S.Y.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This research received no external funding.
Not applicable.
Data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This study addresses important concerns about the application, effectiveness, and impact of values education on student success as it examines the varied impacts of this kind of instruction on students' academic, social, and personal growth. In addition, the research looks at practical methods teachers use to instill moral principles in the classroom. It explores the critical elements that lead to students' success, highlighting the influence of personal values on learning strategies and scholastic performance. Additionally, it lists the core principles that elementary school students should uphold and emphasizes their importance in developing successful students and morally upright adults. Moreover, the study outlines the most effective ways to incorporate values education into school curricula, with a focus on ways to involve every member of the school community and foster an inclusive, happy environment that upholds the lessons taught. Furthermore, the study explores the critical elements that support values education programs' ability to help students develop positive social skills and personal behaviors. It emphasizes the critical roles that effective teacher involvement, dedicated staff, and school leadership play in this regard. In this study, the approach was descriptive research. The researcher actively engages the participants in a face to face in-depth-interview and focus group discussion. The study aims to explore the impact of values education. It was revealed three themes, Personal Development Factors, Academic Development Factors, Social Development Factors. The school practices implementing values education program and the positive gains of values education programs in school. Six sub-themes were mentioned number one table: (i) Creation of Supportive Environment, (ii) Classroom Environment Accepting Diversity, (iii) Encouragement of Responsibility and Diligence, (iv) Promotion of Social Harmony, (v) Understanding of Cultural Diversity. In school practices in promoting values education programs. Additionally, in table number two, lots of themes were revealed. They are promotion of positive outlook, personal values in learning approaches, expectations at primary level, and relevant values in curriculum. Five sub-themes were mentioned like creation of supportive environment, classroom environment accepting diversity, encouragement of responsibility and diligence, promotion of social harmony. Lastly, understanding cultural diversity. In table three, positive gains in values education programs in school identified different aspects as themes, Spiritual Gains, Professional Gains, Social Gains, Psychological Gains, Emotional Gains and Educational Gains. Lots of sub-themes were mentioned.
Keywords: Academic, Social and Personal Growth, Personal Values, Values Education Program, Positive Social Skills, Students Success
Posted on: April 3, 2024
This paper was written by Roger Gordon Packham , Western Sydney University, Associate Professor, and presented at the Oxford Roundtable on Education in July 2023 . Professor Packham is co-editor of How Values Education Can Improve Student and Teacher Wellbeing.
Values education is needed for the traditional reasons of education people of character who will ensure a harmonious society, one that can deal in better ways with many of the current social issues and helps to promote the wellbeing of all. Notwithstanding this vital rationale, it is also my contention that the issues of the Anthropocene (the current geologicale age, the period during which human activity has been the dominant influence on the Earth, are dramatic and require a values-based approach if they are to be improved such that human and all other life can be sustained. Such issues must be addressed urgently; education holds a key role if society as we know it is to be sustained rather than doomed.
The place to start is with our own view of human nature. As humans are complex creatures with a good side and a not-so-good side, the questions is: which side do we turn to? Educators need to support the positive view of humankind, that humans are more cooperative rather than competitive, that human kindness and altruism can change how we think and act, as a foundation for achieving true change in our society. This is a key aim of values education, to stand up for human goodness despite the cynicism that this may bring out in others, and the fact that it may need us to stand up against the 'powers that be' since it can threaten their powers.
This more realistic view of human nature has major implications for how young people are educated to this truer view of humankind. What is needed is a change that is rooted in the hearts and consciences of individuals - their innate values. There is a need for a values education that draws on the good work that is already being done and expands it, not as a separate speciality within education, but as a responsibility of all of society, enabling all educators to incorporate values into the whole school environment.
This was the aim of the Australian Federal Government project that ran in the early 2000's and demonstrated many benefits. So how might incorporating values education into schools be developed further today? All teachers are aware of the need to address all three learning domain areas - the affective as well as the cognitive and the psychomotor competences - to achieve a holistic education for their students, with holistic education seen as the development of the physical, cognitive, emotional, social, and spiritual dimensions of a person in an integrated way. However, impediments to teachers introducing values and Character Education in their classrooms include time and curriculum constraints, yet often more importantly, a lack of understanding about exactly what and how to teach in the area of values education. Teachers may be overwhelmed with trying to understand the deeper meanings of desired values, so often they give up, or only pay lip service at a surface level, rather than getting to the deeper understanding that is what brings about changes in students (and themselves).
However, there are many opportunities to teach the principles of human values through all curriculum subjects and topics, with the added advantage that schools do not have to abdicate in any way their responsibility to teach the academic (cognitive) and other skills; however, it does require that they rethink the ways in which they do this.
Every subject taught has a basic vocabulary, a language which expresses, defines, and captures the scope and uniqueness of that particular subject area. Values education is no different; it also needs a vocabulary which allows people to manipulate and tease out an understanding of vlues through an awareness of social behaviour, emotions, and other affective domain issues.
A framework that enables this to be done effectively is the Education in Human Values (EHV) programme. The EHV model is based on eliciting five human values that are seen as universal and inter-dependent, that are already inherent in all of us, and that are traditional to most cultures: Truth, Right Action, Peace, Love and Non-violence. The framework allows for schools/teachers to identify the values that are important for their contexts and wider culture.
A fundamental principle of EHV is that all teaching needs to be based on Love and that the teacher's example in 'living' the values is the most critical component.
The goals of EHV are:
There are several teaching approaches that are particularly useful in drawing out the values inherent within children. Here is an overview of the five key ones:
These concepts are expanded, described, and discussed in our forthcoming book "How Values Education Can Improve Student and Teacher Wellbeing: A simple guide to the 'Education in Human Values' Approach", Packham, R, Taplin, M., and Francis, K. (Eds), Routledge, 2024.
Bregman, Rutger (2020) Humankind: A Hopeful History, Bloomsbury, publishing, London,UK.
Ellis, E. C., (2018) Anthropocene: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions), Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lovat, T., Clement, N., Dally, K., and Toomey, R. (2011) The impact of values education on school ambience and academic diligence, International Journal of Educational Research. 50, 3, pp. 166-170
Lovat, T., Toomey, R., Clement, N., and Daly, K. (2023) Second International Research Handbook on Values Education and Student Wellbeing, Springer.
Packham, R., Taplin, M., and Francis, K., (Eds.) (2024a) Chapters 1 and 2, In: How Values Education Can Improve Student and Teacher Wellbeing: A Simple Guide to the ‘Education in Human Values’ Approach, Routledge, UK.
Packham, R., Taplin, M., , and Francis , k. ,(Eds.) (2024b) Ch. 4&8, In: How Values Education Can Improve Student and Teacher Wellbeing: A Simple Guide to the ‘Education in Human Values’ Approach, Routledge, UK.
Packham, R., Taplin, M., , and Francis , k. ,(Eds.) (2024b) Ch. 11, In: How Values Education Can Improve Student and Teacher Wellbeing: A Simple Guide to the ‘Education in Human Values’ Approach, Routledge, UK
Packham, R., Taplin, M., and Francis, k. ,(Eds.) (2024d) Introduction, In: How Values Education Can Improve Student and Teacher Wellbeing: A Simple Guide to the ‘Education in Human Values’ Approach, Routledge, UK.
Packham, R., Taplin, M., and Francis, k., (Eds.) (2024e) Ch. 9, In: How Values Education Can Improve Student and Teacher Wellbeing: A Simple Guide to the ‘Education in Human Values’ Approach, Routledge, UK.
Packham, R, Taplin, M., and Francis, k., (Eds.) (2024f) How Values Education Can Improve Student and Teacher Wellbeing: A Simple Guide to the ‘Education in Human Values’ Approach, Routledge, UK.
Scheler, M. (1971) Formalism in ethics and nonformal ethics of values: A new attempt towards the foundations of an Ethical Personalism. Trans. M.S. Frings and R.L. Funk, Northwestern University Press, Evenstone, Il.
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström J., Cornell1, S.E., Fetzer, I., Bennett. E. M., Biggs R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C.A., Folke1, C., Gerten, D., Heink, J., M. Mace, G.M., Perss, L.M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., Sverker, S., (2015a), Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 13:347, Issue 6223, 1259855.
Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O. Ludwig, C., (2015b). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration, The Anthropocene Review. 2 (1): 81–98.
Taplin, M. (2014). A model for integrating spiritual education into secular curricula. International Journal of Children's Spirituality,19, 1, pp.4 – 16.
Taplin. M. & Li, L. (2021). Teachers' perceptions of silent sitting as a buffer to their problems. Ch. 11, In: S. Parakaharan (Ed.) A Human Values Pathway for Teachers. pp.125-150. Springer, Singapore.
The Two Wolves , (2023): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Wolves#:~:text=The%20story%20of%20the%20Two%20Wolves%20is%20a,a%20metaphor%20of%20two%20wolves%20fighting%20within%20him
(downloaded 11-9-2023).
Home > News & Articles > Importance of Value Education: Aim, Types, Purpose, Methods
Updated on 25th June, 2024 , 8 min read
Value-based education places an emphasis on helping students develop their personalities so they can shape their future and deal with challenges with ease. It shapes children to effectively carry out their social, moral, and democratic responsibilities while becoming sensitive to changing circumstances. The importance of value education can be understood by looking at its advantages in terms of how it helps students grow physically and emotionally, teaches manners and fosters a sense of brotherhood, fosters a sense of patriotism, and fosters religious tolerance.
"Value education" is the process through which people impart moral ideals to one another. Powney et al. define it as an action that can occur in any human organization. During this time, people are assisted by others, who may be older, in a condition they experience in order to make explicit our ethics, assess the effectiveness of these values and associated behaviors for their own and others' long-term well-being, and reflect on and acquire other values and behaviors that they recognize as being more effective for their own and others' long-term well-being. There is a distinction to be made between literacy and education.
This notion refers to the educational process of instilling moral norms in order to foster more peaceful and democratic communities. Values education, therefore, encourages tolerance and understanding beyond our political, cultural, and religious differences, with a specific emphasis on the defense of human rights, the protection of ethnic minorities and vulnerable groups, and environmental conservation.
Value education ought to be integrated into the educational process rather than being considered a separate academic field. The value of value education can be understood from many angles. The following are some reasons why value education is essential in the modern world-
Also read more National Education Day and Women's Education in India .
Value education is significant on many levels in the modern world. It is essential to ensure that moral and ethical values are instilled in children throughout their educational journey and even after.
The main goals of value education are as follows:
Read more about the Importance of Books and Distance Education Universities .
The scope of value education is as follows-
Importance of value education: types , cultural value.
Cultural values are concerned with what is right and wrong, good and evil, as well as conventions and behavior. Language, ethics, social hierarchy, aesthetics, education, law, economics, philosophy, and many social institutions all reflect cultural values.
Ethical principles include respecting others' and one's own authority, keeping commitments, avoiding unnecessary conflicts with others, avoiding cheating and dishonesty, praising people and making them work, and encouraging others.
Personal values include whatever a person needs in social interaction. Personal values include beauty, morality, confidence, self-motivation, regularity, ambition, courage, vision, imagination, and so on.
Spiritual worth is the greatest moral value. Purity, meditation, yoga, discipline, control, clarity, and devotion to God are examples of spiritual virtues.
Spiritual value education emphasizes self-discipline concepts. satisfaction with self-discipline, absence of wants, general greed, and freedom from seriousness.
A person cannot exist in the world unless they communicate with others. People are looking for social values such as love, affection, friendship, noble groups, reference groups, impurity, hospitality, courage, service, justice, freedom, patience, forgiveness, coordination, compassion, tolerance, and so on.
The perception of the human predicament is defined by universal ideals. We identify ourselves with mankind and the universe through universal ideals. Life, joy, fraternity, love, sympathy, service, paradise, truth, and eternity are examples of universal values.
The inclusion of value education in school curricula is crucial because it teaches students the fundamental morals they need to develop into good citizens and individuals. Here are the top reasons why valuing education in school is important:
We all understand the value of education in our lives in this competitive world; it plays a crucial part in molding our lives and personalities. Education is critical for obtaining a good position and a career in society; it not only improves our personalities but also advances us psychologically, spiritually, and intellectually. A child's childhood ambitions include becoming a doctor, lawyer, or IAS official. Parents desire to picture their children as doctors, lawyers, or high-ranking officials. This is only achievable if the youngster has a good education. As a result, we may infer that education is extremely essential in our lives and that we must all work hard to obtain it in order to be successful.
Education in values is crucial for a person's growth. In many ways, it benefits them. Through value education, you can achieve all of your life goals, and here's how:
After understanding the significance of this important topic, the next step is choosing the type that best meets your needs. The teaching of values can start at a young age (in primary school) and continue through higher education and beyond. Understanding the various opportunities available to you will make it easy to find the right fit.
Value education is now being taught in many primary, middle, and high schools all over the world. The best way to learn the skills taught in this training is to be taught how important it is from a young age.
One of the best ways to teach students about values and foster a sense of responsibility in them is through student exchange or gap year programs. Student exchange programs are another exceptional way to experience various cultures and broaden your understanding of how people behave and function. This is a fantastic chance for first- and second-year undergraduate students.
People who are four to five years into their careers frequently show signs of irritation, unhappiness, fatigue, and burnout, which is a worrying statistic worth noting. As a result, the relevance and significance of education for adults is a notion that is currently steadily gaining support within the global community.
Teaching value education can be done using a variety of methodologies and techniques. Four of the many are the most frequently used. They are
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both traditional education and values education are important for personal development since they help us establish our life goals. However, although the former educates us about social, scientific, and humanistic knowledge, the latter teaches us how to be decent citizens. In contrast to traditional education, there is no separation between what happens inside and outside the classroom in values education.
Similar articles.
Pilot Salary in India 2024: Starting Salary, Requirements, Qualifications, Per Month Salary
West Bengal (WBSCVT) ITI Merit List 2023 PDF (RELEASED): Admission Process, Important Dates, Seat Allotment
What are the 5 main values of education.
Ans. There are five fundamental approaches to values education, according to Superka, Ahrens, and Hedstrom (1976): inculcation, moral development, analysis, values clarification, and action learning.
Ans. An individual develops abilities, attitudes, values, and other types of positive behavior depending on the society he lives in through the process of value education.
Ans. Every person must ensure a holistic approach to the development of their personality in regard to the physical, mental, social, and moral aspects. It gives the students a constructive direction in which to mold their future, assisting them in growing in maturity and responsibility and in understanding the meaning of life.
Ans. Yes, value education has been shown to boost emotional intelligence (particularly when given at a young age). For a variety of personal, academic, and professional opportunities, EQ is a crucial factor that is evaluated.
Ans. Yes, you will. You can develop a fresh perspective on people and groups from various communities and professions with the aid of value education. This aerial perspective of various people is a great way to hone your socialization abilities.
Popular searches, popular colleges/universities, top colleges by courses, top courses.
Value-based education is the foundation that helps shape not just academic knowledge but also the moral compass of individuals. In today’s rapidly evolving world, where technology and societal influences play a crucial role in child development, there’s a growing need to foster a holistic education system. This approach ensures that students grow into not only knowledgeable but also ethically responsible citizens.
Moreover, values help enhance emotional intelligence, critical thinking, and interpersonal skills. When children are nurtured with these principles, they develop a deeper understanding of their responsibilities towards themselves and society. Value-based education goes beyond textbooks, molding well-rounded individuals equipped to contribute meaningfully to their communities.
Universal values: honesty, integrity, respect.
At the foundation of value-based education are universal values —qualities that are recognized across cultures and societies. Three of the most critical universal values are honesty , integrity , and respect .
These universal values lay the groundwork for moral and ethical living, ensuring that students grow up to be responsible, ethical, and socially aware adults.
While universal values provide a broad foundation, it is essential to recognize the significance of cultural and societal values . These localized ethics vary from one community to another and reflect the unique traditions, customs, and moral teachings of a particular region or society.
Developing emotional intelligence and empathy in children creates a generation of compassionate individuals who contribute to a more harmonious and understanding society.
Schools are one of the most influential environments for a child’s development. Beyond academics, schools have the responsibility to foster value formation in students. This role is not just limited to the classroom but extends to the overall environment and culture created by educators and staff.
By consistently modeling and promoting values, educators have a profound impact on a child’s moral development.
Incorporating values into the school curriculum can be done in both formal and informal ways. Rather than treating values as a separate subject, schools should integrate them into daily lessons and activities. Here are several ways schools can do this:
Co-curricular activities provide a unique opportunity for students to practice values in real-world situations. Whether it’s through sports, drama, or student organizations, these activities allow children to apply the principles they’ve learned in the classroom.
Co-curricular activities are an essential aspect of value-based education because they offer hands-on experiences where children can internalize and apply the values they’ve learned.
Building moral character.
A key benefit of value-based education is the development of a child’s moral character . By teaching children the difference between right and wrong, schools ensure that students grow up with a clear sense of ethical responsibility.
Moral character lays the groundwork for ethical decision-making in adulthood, leading to a more just and compassionate society.
Values not only shape a child’s character but also influence their critical thinking abilities. By encouraging children to think about ethical dilemmas and moral questions, schools help students develop deeper cognitive skills.
Strong social skills are built on a foundation of values . By teaching children how to communicate respectfully and empathize with others, value-based education enhances their ability to form positive and lasting relationships.
Cognitive and emotional growth through values.
Children who are exposed to core values such as honesty, empathy, and integrity from a young age often demonstrate better cognitive and emotional growth. Here’s how:
The intersection of cognitive and emotional growth allows children to approach challenges with both intellectual and emotional intelligence, ensuring well-rounded development.
By supporting mental health through values education, schools contribute to the emotional well-being of children, helping them grow into balanced and confident individuals.
Parental role.
Parents play a crucial role in a child’s value-based education. While schools provide a structured environment for learning values, the home is the child’s first classroom. Parents are the earliest role models, and children often mirror their behavior and beliefs. The involvement of parents in a child’s moral and ethical education ensures that the values taught at school are reinforced in their daily lives.
A child’s journey toward understanding and practicing values begins at home. Simple day-to-day interactions, such as sharing, respecting elders, and being truthful, form the basis of value-based learning. Parents introduce concepts such as honesty, empathy, and responsibility long before a child enters formal education. Here are some key ways parents contribute:
Challenges faced by parents in today’s digital age.
In today’s digital world, parents face new challenges when it comes to teaching values. The influence of technology , particularly social media, exposes children to a wide range of perspectives and behaviors, not all of which align with traditional values. This can lead to conflicting messages about what is right or wrong.
Parents must actively guide their children in navigating this complex digital landscape by setting clear boundaries and engaging in conversations about the values they encounter online.
Case studies from around the world.
Countries around the world approach value-based education in different ways, reflecting their cultural priorities. For example:
These case studies show that while the core values may remain consistent, the methods of teaching them can be adapted to suit local cultures.
It is important for educators to be aware of these cultural differences when teaching values, especially in diverse or multicultural classrooms. Understanding cultural contexts allows teachers to create an inclusive environment where all students feel respected and valued.
In today’s globalized world, many classrooms are multicultural, which presents both challenges and opportunities for teaching values. Educators must find ways to adapt value-based education to meet the needs of students from different backgrounds. Some strategies include:
While the principles of value-based education are timeless, there are modern challenges that complicate their application. Technology , social media , and shifting societal values all pose obstacles that educators and parents must address.
Technology and social media are powerful tools that shape how children perceive values. On one hand, technology can be used to promote positive values such as global awareness and social responsibility. However, it can also expose children to negative influences, including cyberbullying, materialism, and unrealistic social comparisons.
Balancing academic performance with values education.
Another challenge in modern education is finding the balance between academic performance and values education . In many schools, the focus on standardized testing and grades can overshadow the importance of teaching values. However, academic success should not come at the cost of ethical and moral development.
Schools can balance these priorities by integrating values into academic lessons. For example:
Formal vs. informal methods of teaching values.
Both formal and informal methods are essential for creating a holistic value-based education system.
Countries like Finland , Japan , and Singapore are examples of places where value-based education has been successfully integrated into the curriculum. In these countries:
These examples show how value-based education can be successfully implemented in schools, leading to the development of responsible and empathetic citizens.
Teachers play a critical role in modeling values for their students. Children look up to their teachers and often mirror their behavior. Teachers can model values such as integrity , kindness , and respect in their interactions with both students and colleagues.
Value-based education extends beyond individual growth; it has a profound impact on society as a whole.
Children who grow up with a strong foundation of values are more likely to become responsible and ethical citizens. They understand the importance of empathy, social justice, and community involvement. As adults, they are more likely to engage in civic duties, respect the law, and contribute positively to society.
Importance of values in leadership and social change.
Values play a crucial role in shaping ethical leaders. Leaders who prioritize integrity , empathy , and social responsibility are better equipped to create positive social change. Value-based education fosters these qualities, preparing future leaders who will make decisions that benefit society as a whole.
Montessori principles that align with value-based education, child-centered approach to instilling values.
The Montessori Method focuses on the child as an active participant in their learning process. This child-centered approach allows children to practice values in real-life situations. For example, children work in mixed-age groups, which promotes collaboration and mutual respect.
What is value-based education, why is value-based education important, how can schools incorporate value-based education.
Schools can incorporate value-based education by embedding values into their curriculum and co-curricular activities. Teachers play a critical role by modeling ethical behavior, promoting classroom discussions on values, and encouraging community service. Additionally, schools can create programs that allow students to practice values in real-life situations, reinforcing the lessons learned in the classroom.
As educators, parents, and communities, we must prioritize the integration of values into our educational systems. This not only benefits individual growth but also promotes a more harmonious and ethically sound society. The future of education lies in nurturing both the mind and the heart, creating citizens who contribute meaningfully to a globalized world.
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
2019, International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education (IJCSBE)
Today education has become industrialized and it is limited in the teaching of concept printed in the book. At the same time, inappropriate understanding of the teaching profession has made students be away from value based education system. India is a country of unique culture, tradition and its deferent leaving style of citizens, getting step by step modified in connecting thisvalue of life among civilians. High influence of western lifestyle, the growth of urbanization and technological development is making the young population of India lose an opportunity in adopting the value-based lifestyle, empathetic behaviour and respective attitude in their day today’s leaving. The other hand unchanged Indian education system is also playing major role behind deciding the future of its young generation. This may affect the value based social system of tomorrow. Sharada Vidyanikethan Public School, Administrated by Tulunaadu Educational Foundation is one of the schools providing value-based education with modern facilities in India. The case study is exploring the benefits of value-added education in preparing students population as well trained and equipped with human values, character, moral integrity, and the knowledge and skills to be good citizens of a particular country.
Kandlakunta Anantha Mohan
isara solutions
International Res Jour Managt Socio Human
We are living in a world of dilemma, on the one hand science and technology has been developed day by day on the other hand most of the society are facing problems like alcohol, drug abuse, corruption, mental illness, stress, crime etc. therefore it is very important to introduce value education from the very beginning of our educational system from primary to higher education. But, who will give value education? it is not only responsibility of teachers, parents, community members, social reformer can also play vital role in this regard. What type of valued to be inculcated among the children and youth? The various Commissions has been suggested the following values such as moral, spiritual, social, aesthetic, world citizenship, small family norm, equality of gender etc. Value education can be provided through the curricular and co-curricular activities at the primary level of education. Introduction:-Values are not inborn in nature. These are shaped / natured and developed at home and educational institution. Therefore since ancient times, education is viewed as transmission of values and accumulated knowledge of society. Gandhiji rightly said "education is the preparation for complete living, adjustment to environment, perfection of one's nature, character building and personality" We are living in a world of dilemma, on the one hand science and technology has been developed day by day on the other hand most of the society are facing problems like alcohol, drug abuse, corruption, mental illness, stress, crime etc. therefore it is very important to introduce value education from the very beginning of our educational system from primary to higher education. Value refers to the ideals, beliefs, norms, which a majority of members of society holds. A value is what is desired or what is sought which forms guiding principle of human life. Values are determinants of human behabviours. They play vital role in the lives of every individual. Value education is very much important as Indrani (2012)expressed value shapes our relationship, our behaviors, our actions and our sense of who we are. So, it is one of the reason why value education being taught in all types of education. It plays great role towards learner's personality development and help to become successful in their life span and carriers as well. Vallabhi Patel the great architect of modern India once observed "education without values is of no use". A student from his school age to higher education finds corruption, dishonesty, artificiality play very vital role in the modern society but he does not understand why it is so. Gandhiji rightly
CHAMAN LAL BANGA
AARF Publications Journals
In India, most value education programmes have been initiated by religious organizations. They are generally secular in nature and universal values like honesty, trust, responsibility, compassion etc., are given prime importance. Over the years, value education has taken the back seat. In recent times, the CBSE and NCERT have been making efforts to reintroduce Value Education into the curriculum. CBSE has laid down guidelines for the Life Skills, Attitudes and Values in their Comprehensive and Continuous Evaluation. Value based education (VBE) and Value Based Integrated Learning (VBIL) imparts social, moral, integrity, character, spirituality and many more. It builds the qualities of humility, strength and honesty in a person. Including our history and mythology we all discuss about high values and integrity, but it is the time for value based action. Our country very much needs a value-oriented educational system among the children. There have been efforts to define the role of education in national life. The values inculcated among young generation would remain with them permanently. Mother is the first teacher for her child. The role of schools and teachers are very important. The feeling of unity and communal harmony helps build values in a student. Value discipline is still a great lesson that has to be imparted and need to be taught through mutual interaction and inter-communion. Proper training of teachers should be arranged. Television can become an important medium for values based education. Value education should be included in higher education levels. Values can be taught from
SATHEESH ANUSH
Jyoti Patra
Values are like seeds that sprout, become saplings, grow into trees and spread their branches all around. To be able to think right, to feel the right kind of emotions and to act in the desirable manner are the prime phases of personality development. Building up of values system starts with the individual, moves on to the family and community, reorienting systems, structures and institutions, spreading throughout the land and ultimately embracing the planet as a whole. The culture of inclusivity is particularly relevant and important in the context of our society, nation and making education a right for all children.
Dr Yashpal D Netragaonkar
In the present study, an attempt has been made to focus on the need to introduce value education in curricula. Growth of industrialization, Lust for power ,indiscipline , selfishness, materialistic attitude, social disorganization, bad Character, Violence, Corruption, advancement of Science and technology, injustice, Casteism, modernization , Lack of feeling of loyalty, lack of code and Conduct, Psychology movements and social sensitiveness are considered the major causative factors of degradation of human values. Everywhere is cry of value degradation. At present, India is passing through a period of value crisis in several fields of national life. It is generally being said that the life of individuals as well as our social life is plagued with the evil values. It is need of the hour to introduce value education in curricula at all levels of education. Value crisis may be over, If parents, develop sanskara in their children and teachers give practical shape to sanskara to their students and government provides concerned facilities to institutions. It is not hope only, but, full faith that this article would be very helpful for the educators, Philosophers, leaders, governments and parents to infuse the values among the students and members of the society and stop the degradation of human values and develop congenial environment for better living, even teaching, learning and evaluation.
TJPRC Publication
Values are the beliefs about what is right, what is wrong and what is important in life. These values are gained from differences sources. Value education is important to give for any individual. The good values have to be inculcated in the individual's mind right from their childhood. In this context, the educational institutions play a major role in giving value education to the children from their school age itself. By understanding the need of the 'Value Education' for the children and students, this paper discusses about the definition of Value Education, its need, aims, objectives, its evolution in India, how is it taught globally and also analyzed the role of teachers in promoting the concept.
IJAR Indexing
Value education means inculcating in the children a sense of humanism that would build the nation and bring back to the people pride in work that brings order, security and assured progress. Present age is age of science and technology there is a great confusion and great losses. War and conflicts never come to an end, and the innumerable vicious phenomena are covering the world. The cause of such confusion and loses is due to the lack of value oriented education or the collapse of traditional views of values. In this paper an attempt is made to discuss the need of value based education in a present society. In this study it was carried out how one might study and modify a society to make it peaceful and more functional. In the present educational system the main emphasis is giving on scientific and information oriented education rather than value education. Spiritual values, social values, moral values and religious values are being neglected. Value suffers when too much emphasis is giving on materialistic satisfaction. The aim of this paper was why there is a need for imparting value based education in educational institutions and to develop the programs for inculcating values insociety. This paper tried to examine the role of value based education on inculcating code of ethics to develop the qualities of good conduct, self-confidence, unity, cooperation, justice, peace and prosperity in present society. This paper is aimed at to impart value based education in educational institutions, family and society as well and to churn out good citizens for the maintenance of world peace and harmony.
Yojana Patil
In India Value Based Education is the real need of the hour. As we see how the Society is diminishing in case of values day by day. It is necessary to develop the programs for inculcating values in the society. Today’s Indian youths are little bit confused because of the bombarding of the new technological devices, information explosion and violent news by the press & media. To inculcate the value system in their confused minds and make them value-oriented-powerful leaders, educational institutions should take the initiative to impart Value Based Spiritual Knowledge to this new generation. “Imbibing the qualities of good conduct, self-confidence and high values would help students earn a significant place in society. Education without values is like a flower without fragrance. Students should realize that character building is equally important as career building. A good character in life is ultimate thing that stretches person’s self-realization”. An attempt is made in this paper to discuss the role of the value based education in society, it elaborately discusses about the implications to develop the value education. Rena, R. rightly points out that “There is a popular misconception that values are “better caught than taught”. In reality however, values are both caught and taught.” Today’s generation is not going to catch the values without teaching. We have to teach the values to this generation before they are caught by the bombarding of the new technological devices, information explosion and also by the media. The paper lastly discusses about the value education attempt taken by the author herself by creating the “SanskarSarjan Blog” for her college students. According to the author Value Based education cannot be taught without Spiritual Knowledge or Spiritual Consciousness. In conclusion, mere desire or aspiration to progress in life is not enough; success should be based on values. And for that value-based education must be imparted in today’s institutions. So that the students may emerge as good leaders in their chosen fields.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
SRF Research Foundation
Dr. Mangal Nath Tiwari , Dr. Sandeep Kumar Sharma
Satyanand Sharma
Ractim Goswami
International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology
rasmita mallick
IJMRA Publications
International Journal of Transformation in English & Education [ISSN: 2581-3951(online)]
Ajay krishan Tiwari
Sky Institute
Chandan Roy
IOSR Journals
Dr. Bishwajit Bhattacharjee
Dr.Rajkumar Nayak
International Journal of Advance and Innovative Research
Dr. Harjot Dhatt , Dr. Ratani Thakur
Olajide Titi
Vijaya Lakshmi Mohanty
Dr. Harjot Dhatt
SOMESHWAR ASUTKAR
Ram Komal Prasad
Dibakar Sarangi
ijifr journal
International Research Journal Commerce arts science
COMMENTS
5 Benefits of Learning Through Case Studies. 1. Take New Perspectives. The case method prompts you to consider a scenario from another person's perspective. To work through the situation and come up with a solution, you must consider their circumstances, limitations, risk tolerance, stakeholders, resources, and potential consequences to ...
It's been 100 years since Harvard Business School began using the case study method. Beyond teaching specific subject matter, the case study method excels in instilling meta-skills in students.
research was conducted in a case study design, which is one of the qualitative research methods. A purposive sampling method ... 2017). In this context, values education must form an important dimension of the education to be provided to individuals. Values education has irreplaceable importance both in shaping an individual's character and ...
The information collected clearly shows that the representatives that were surveyed consider virtue education to be of greater importance. Although education authorities promote the values education paradigm, omitting to mention virtues, most schools (84.7%) have a virtues education programme, compatible with values education, in which ...
Value Education at Taupo-Nui-A-Tia College in New Zealand. In 2004, a questionnaire was sent to New Zealand institutions to demonstrate the effect of incorporating character education in schools. A similar questionnaire was sent in 2007 as a follow up study and from the combined response rate of 85%, the results demonstrated the enhancement in ...
Abstract. The article introduces the special issue by exploring international research findings that identify certain forms of values education constituting an effective catalyst for good practice pedagogy and, in turn, contributing to holistic learning. It refers firstly to research that justifies and explains how values education works to ...
The most important issues in value education are as follows; a) ... A case study of Federal College of Education (Special), Oyo, Genetically modified food controversies: A review paper and ...
Education, after all, is a purpo-. paramount. What we consider "good" or "bad," "right" or "wrong," "important" or "unimportant" constantly. guides our practice. As R. S. Peters (1970) has observed, Education implies that something worthwhile has been in- tentionally transmitted in a morally acceptable manner.
The case study is exploring the benefits of value-added education in preparing students population as well trained and equipped with human values, character, moral integrity, and the knowledge and ...
fundamental to any potential implementation of Values Education. The Values Education approach is based on the belief that for children to develop values there is a requirement for both the practical modelling of what these values entail and a vocabulary to understand what they mean and how to apply them in practice. (Eaude, 2008:33).
Value Education: Meaning, Importance, Benefits. Academic education and value education are virtually intertwined; hence, they are equally important. Without the former, nobody will be able to learn skills such as reading, writing, and arithmetic. One cannot secure a good job or manage even the simplest daily essentials if they do not know how ...
The objective of developing an individual's personal values as a part of academic life has been discussed, mainly concerning the theme of value education in many of the studies. In general value, education occupies an impressive place in contemporary society and school education is the most influential means of developing an individual and ...
Need and Importance of Value Education. 1. It enables the students to learn the real purpose of life and gives them a progressive way for their future. 2. Value education helps students to become more responsive and practical which helps them to recognize the perception of life more effectively and lead a positive life as a responsible resident.
Community: The broader community contributes to value education by providing examples of social responsibility and cooperation.Engaging children in community service and social initiatives helps them understand the importance of contributing to society. School: Schools are responsible for integrating values into both academic and extracurricular activities.
This study addresses important concerns about the application, effectiveness, and impact of values education on student success as it examines the varied impacts of this kind of instruction on students' academic, social, and personal growth. In addition, the research looks at practical methods teachers use to instill moral principles in the classroom.
The Importance of Values Education. Posted on: April 3, 2024. This paper was written by Roger Gordon Packham, Western Sydney University, Associate Professor, and presented at the Oxford Roundtable on Education in July 2023.Professor Packham is co-editor of How Values Education Can Improve Student and Teacher Wellbeing.
The importance of value education can be understood by looking at its advantages in terms of how it helps students grow physically and emotionally, teaches manners and fosters a sense of brotherhood, fosters a sense of patriotism, and fosters religious tolerance. "Value education" is the process through which people impart moral ideals to one ...
By teaching children the importance of localized ethics, schools can create a more inclusive and culturally aware environment that encourages mutual respect and understanding.. Emotional Intelligence and Empathy. Another critical aspect of value-based education is the development of emotional intelligence and empathy.These values teach students how to understand and manage their own emotions ...
Two articles focus on the challenges associated with creating nation- or systemwide assessment systems. Martin and colleague present a case study that reflects on development of the field in Australia. It discusses insights from a review of institutional websites and a survey of leaders regarding learning outcomes identified by institutions.
Value discipline is still a great lesson that has to be imparted and need to be taught through mutual interaction and inter-communion. Proper training of teachers should be arranged. Television can become an important medium for values based education. Value education should be included in higher education levels. Values can be taught from
In hierarchical cultures, social power, authority, humility, and wealth are some of the core values. On the contrary, in egalitarian societies, individuals are seen as morally equal and do share fundamental interests as human beings (Gutterman, 2010; Schwartz, 2006, 2011). The final set of values is Mastery-Harmony.
Value-added models are concerned with the effect that a school and/or teacher has on a student's progress. In other words, according to Peng and Klieme (2014: 1), 'The value-added school effects are defined as the "net" contribution of a school to students' learning after sorting out the impact of other factors'.The impact of these 'other factors' specifically relates to the ...
Value-oriented. education is good for the development of both the individual young person and the society as a whole. since it encourages our kids to follow and embrace the established norms of ...