handwriting without tears continuing education

Handwriting Without Tears ® : General Education Effectiveness Through a Consultative Approach

• Standard View
• Article contents
• Figures & tables
• Supplementary Data
• Peer Review
• Open the PDF for in another window
• Get Permissions
• Cite Icon Cite
• Search Site

Denise K. Donica; Handwriting Without Tears ® : General Education Effectiveness Through a Consultative Approach. Am J Occup Ther November/December 2015, Vol. 69(6), 6906180050p1–6906180050p8. doi: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2015.018366

Download citation file:

• Ris (Zotero)
• Reference Manager

OBJECTIVE. This study explores the effectiveness of the Handwriting Without Tears ® (HWT) kindergarten printing curriculum in general education through a consultative approach with occupational therapy.

METHOD. One cohort of students was the control ( n = 19), whereas two other cohorts were experimental groups learning printing through the HWT curriculum ( n = 20 each). The Test of Handwriting Skills–Revised (THS–R) was used to collect end-of-year legibility scores for all cohorts.

RESULTS. Both experimental groups individually and both experimental groups combined into one group outperformed the control group on all 10 of the THS–R subtests—scoring significantly higher ( p < .05 using analysis of covariance controlling for age and gender) on 6 of the subtests for the former and 7 for the latter—and on overall score. Large treatment effects were found for the standard score for each experimental group ( d = 0.81, 1.03, and 1.00).

CONCLUSION. This study supports the consultative role of occupational therapy with teachers in general education for handwriting curriculum implementation and the success of HWT for printing instruction.

The role of occupational therapy practitioners in the school system is evolving. The Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA; Pub. L. 108–446) broadened the scope of the original legislation ( Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 1990 ; Pub. L. 101–476) to focus on improving student outcomes, preventing problems, and setting expectations for students with disabilities to achieve high standards ( Jackson, 2007 ). Preventive strategies in the school systems are addressed through mechanisms such as early intervening services (EIS) and response to intervention (RtI; American Occupational Therapy Association [ AOTA], 2011 ; Jackson, 2007 ). IDEA allows occupational therapy practitioners to consult with and sometimes provide direct services for students in general education, especially for students struggling with learning or behavior. This expanded role for practitioners fosters both a consultative and collaborative environment between practitioners and teachers ( AOTA, 2011 ).

• Occupational Therapy in General Education

Within general education, occupational therapy practitioners may be involved in EIS and RtI. EIS is a provision that allows schools to use some of their federal IDEA funding to provide training for teachers or to fund services for general education students. For example, practitioners may provide consultation regarding education concerns observed in general education students or may be asked to recommend a multisensory handwriting instruction approach to implement schoolwide ( Jackson, 2007 ).

RtI, an example of EIS, is a process that monitors the success of instructional strategies and services that are being implemented individually, in small groups, or classwide ( Jackson, 2007 ). RtI, although implemented differently by state, is typically a three-tiered model in which the first and foundational tier is focused on the effectiveness of education for all students, thus requiring evidence-based curricula and high-quality instruction ( AOTA, 2014 ). Through the RtI model, occupational therapy practitioners may be involved at any level of implementation ( AOTA, 2012 ). Because the importance of handwriting instruction and handwriting skills continues to be documented ( Puranik & Alotaiba, 2012 ), it is an important area of concern for school teachers and administrators that is often addressed by occupational therapy ( Asher, 2006 ; Case-Smith, 2002 ; Hoy, Egan, & Feder, 2011 ). Examples of the practitioner’s involvement in general education at Tier 1 include providing training for school personnel on handwriting strategies, assisting with handwriting screening, and suggesting research-based handwriting curricula ( AOTA, 2011 , 2012 , 2014 ).

When exploring current advancements in the roles of occupational therapy within an RtI model, a recent study of 276 school-based occupational therapists indicated that more than half had been involved in problem-solving teams, coaching and consultation, and one-on-one intervention. Other methods of involvement in RtI included identification of students needing extra support, in-services, progress monitoring, data collection, universal screening, program and curriculum development, and leadership or coleadership of groups ( Cahill, McGuire, Krumdick, & Lee, 2014 ). Occupational therapy practitioners also advocate for occupational therapy services to enhance student education under IDEA provisions ( AOTA, 2011 ).

• Evidence-Based Practice in General Education

The implementation of EIS and RtI requires evidence to be used in decision making regarding educational practices and curriculum selections. Therefore, successful steps have been taken to ensure that school-based occupational therapy practitioners are equipped to use evidence-based practice in the school setting ( Cahill, Egan, Wallingford, Huber-Lee, & Dess-McGuire, 2015 ). Recent research includes studies that have involved the implementation of occupational therapy–based approaches aligning with RtI in general education. Although this area of research is in its infancy, studies have been published supporting the consultative and collaborative efforts of practitioners and teachers to address student skills in general education ( Howe, Roston, Sheu, & Hinojosa, 2013 ; Ohl et al., 2013 ). In addition, the Write Start program is a recent example of a coteaching model for handwriting skills involving a general education teacher and an occupational therapy practitioner. Multiple studies have documented the effectiveness of this model ( Case-Smith, Holland, & Bishop, 2011 ; Case-Smith, Holland, Lane, & White, 2012 ; Case-Smith, Weaver, & Holland, 2014 ).

Handwriting Without Tears ® (HWT), used in this study, is an established handwriting curriculum historically used by occupational therapy practitioners in traditional one-on-one service delivery but also designed for full-classroom implementation and instruction ( Olsen & Knapton, 2008 ). The purpose of this study was to explore the effectiveness of HWT in general education kindergarten classrooms through teacher-led implementation supported by occupational therapist consultation.

• Handwriting Without Tears Evidence

Recognizing and incorporating evidence-based interventions are important not only to occupational therapy practitioners but also to other school personnel. Therefore, it is important to review existing evidence for HWT. Most of the published studies support its use in a variety of contexts. Studies have been done on HWT implementation in general education through full-class instruction or with students who have identified disabilities through individual or small-group instruction.

At the preschool level, the full preschool HWT curriculum was supported through full-class implementation with at-risk students in inclusion classrooms at a rural Head Start ( Donica, Goins, & Wagner, 2013 ; Lust & Donica, 2011 ). In addition, specific HWT techniques were supported for name writing and capital letter writing in full-class, small-group, and individual settings with preschool-age students ( Carlson, McLaughlin, Derby, & Blecher, 2009 ; Griffith, McLaughlin, Donica, Neyman, & Robison, 2013 ; LeBrun, McLaughlin, Derby, & McKenzie, 2012 ). Studies have also supported the use of HWT in general education first-grade classrooms ( Hape et al., 2014 ; Roberts, Derkach-Ferguson, Siever, & Rose, 2014 ; Salls, Benson, Hansen, Cole, & Pielielek, 2013 ). However, studies reviewing the use of HWT at the critical developmental grade of kindergarten are limited. Therefore, this study addresses this gap by asking the research question, Will students instructed using the kindergarten HWT curriculum at a private half-day kindergarten program have better end-of-year handwriting legibility scores than students in the same setting taught with teacher-developed lessons using the D’Nealian style of writing?

Research Design

This pilot study used a static group comparison. Because the elementary school administrative decision to implement HWT in the kindergarten classrooms was made near the end of an academic year, a control group was identified as the current students who had been receiving teacher-led handwriting instruction during that year. Therefore, a traditional pretest–posttest design could not be used. Additionally, the instrument used was not standardized for children under age 6 yr, so standard scores could not be calculated for a pretest–posttest comparison because the children were not yet 6 yr old during the pretest. Likewise, because the school administration decided to implement the HWT curriculum schoolwide, a traditional control versus experimental classroom approach was not possible. Instead, the control group was identified as the group of students in kindergarten the year before HWT implementation. The research study was approved by the head of the school and the university institutional review board. Parent permission was received for all study participants.

Participants

The participants were half-day kindergarten students in a private school (kindergarten to 8th grade) in rural eastern North Carolina. Although the school did not specifically use the RtI model, the consultative approach of the occupational therapist with the teachers mirrors a commonly identified expanded role of occupational therapy practice with general education students. All students enrolled in kindergarten during the last month of school were invited to participate in the study as the control cohort. Control students subsequently learned handwriting using HWT in first grade the year after they participated in the study. Likewise, all students in the first-year experimental group (HWT 1) and the second-year experimental group (HWT 2) were invited to participate, but students were not included if they did not have parent permission, withdrew from the school or joined the school during the academic year, or were under age 6 yr at the time of data collection. Therefore, the sample sizes were n = 19 (out of 25) for the control group, n = 20 (out of 29) for HWT 1, and n = 20 (out of 39) for HWT 2. Student demographics are presented in Table 1 .

Data collection occurred consecutively over 3 yr and included data from the control group and HWT 1 and 2. Data collection was completed using the Test of Handwriting Skills–Revised (THS–R; Milone, 2007 ), which was designed to assess a child’s neurosensory integration skill and is implemented to gather data on either manuscript (print) or cursive writing. For this study, the manuscript assessment was used. The test is standardized for children ages 6 yr 0 mo to 18 yr 11 mo and consists of 10 separate subtests. The activities in these subtests are described in Table 2 . The THS–R was administered to one class at a time and took about an hour per class.

The THS–R was selected to measure differences in handwriting skills because it is standardized and allows for a variety of scores to be used for analysis. The overall standard score, scaled subtest scores for each of the 10 subtests, and subsequent percentile scores were determined. Scaled scores have a mean ( M ) of 10 and a standard deviation ( SD ) of 3, whereas standard scores have an M of 100 and an SD of 15. The test–retest reliability was .82 for the total test score, with interrater reliability ranging from .75 to .90 based on the authors of the assessment ( Milone, 2007 ). Unfortunately, no standardized handwriting assessments exist with standard scores for students under age 6 yr, which limits the ability to collect standard scores from the beginning of the kindergarten year. Because the use of standard scores is ideal for data analysis, students younger than age 6 yr (72 mo) at the time of data collection (end of the school year) were excluded from data analysis.

Intervention

Throughout the kindergarten year, the control group received teacher-developed instruction using the D’Nealian style of writing, and HWT 1 and 2 learned printing through the use of kindergarten HWT. At the end of the kindergarten year, the students completed the THS–R to determine the quality of their handwriting skills. The end-of-year scores for the control group were compared with the end-of-year scores for HWT 1 and 2 and with both experimental groups combined (HWT combined).

Intervention Description.

HWT 1 and 2 were instructed by their classroom teachers, who followed the lesson plans in the HWT Kindergarten Teacher’s Guide ( Olsen & Knapton, 2008 ). The kindergarten HWT curriculum included the following materials: wood pieces for capital letters with mat; slate chalkboards (one classroom used the stamp-and-see screens with similar teaching techniques as the slates because of the teacher’s aversion to chalk); Roll a Dough set; Rock, Rap, Tap, and Learn CD; and Letters and Numbers for Me student workbook ( Olsen, 2008 ).

The lesson plans ( Olsen & Knapton, 2008 ) required approximately 15 min per day of teacher instructional time, which was typically adhered to throughout the 2 yr. Each lesson was taught to the full class and typically began with a gross motor activity coordinated with a handwriting-related song on the Rock, Rap, Tap, and Learn CD. Next, the teaching guidelines ( Olsen & Knapton, 2008 ) were followed to implement a learning activity, which was either forming specific letters with multisensory manipulatives or writing in the Letters and Numbers for Me workbook ( Olsen, 2008 ). In addition to the formal handwriting instruction time, an occasional review activity, often using the manipulatives, was used as an independent morning work activity. A classroom assistant helped with materials in all classrooms throughout the 2 yr.

As part of the consultative role for this intervention, a registered occupational therapist (the author) or two occupational therapy graduate students were present in the classrooms during the handwriting lesson one time per week. This presence allowed the occupational therapy personnel to answer questions about the implementation of the curriculum and to provide occasional assistance to struggling writers. Lessons were implemented similarly for both HWT 1 and 2. Consultation by an occupational therapy practitioner with the teachers did not occur with the control group.

Interveners.

Three kindergarten teachers were involved in the study. Two teachers with 17 yr and 4 yr of teaching experience at the beginning of HWT 1 intervention participated in all three cohorts. The same two teachers who taught HWT 1 also taught the control group. After the control year, these two teachers attended a full-day printing and cursive training workshop on the HWT curriculum, which is recommended but not required of the program. The teachers worked together to develop their lesson plans based on the HWT Kindergarten Teacher’s Guide ( Olsen & Knapton, 2008 ).

After HWT 1 completed kindergarten, an additional kindergarten teacher with approximately 6 yr of experience was added. The new teacher attended the same HWT training as the other two teachers, but this training occurred after HWT 2's school year had started. She collaborated with the former teachers to create her lesson plans and understand the materials.

Intervention Fidelity.

To address fidelity to instruction, approximately one lesson per week of HWT 1 was observed by the author. The author consulted with the teachers and provided feedback on the teaching strategies, checked for proper use of handwriting activities and verbal cuing, and assisted as needed to address handwriting needs of specific students. This process helped establish consistency in instruction for both HWT 1 and 2. Weekly visits from the occupational therapist were unnecessary during the second year because the teachers indicated they understood how to implement the program, but the author did periodically check in with the teachers to answer questions if they arose.

Data Collection

The THS–R assessments were coded and scored semiblindly. Handwriting assessments for the three cohorts (control, HWT 1, and HWT 2) were scored by trained occupational therapy graduate students at different times, so the scorers were not blind to the cohort. However, this kindergarten study was part of a larger study that included first-grade THS–R assessments and two additional administrations of the THS–R throughout the year (approximately 4 mo apart) for the experimental groups. Therefore, even though the scorers were aware of which cohort assessments they were scoring, they were blind to the grade level and when during the academic year the assessment occurred. Scorers were trained by the author and by the DVD included in the THS–R assessment. They scored four sample handwriting assessments and discussed their differences in scoring for consistency before scoring the participants’ assessments, and they were randomly assigned assessments to score. However, interrater reliability was not established formally.

Data Analysis

The scaled scores, standard scores, and percentile scores of the THS–R were used for data analysis. Data analysis was completed using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 22; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Descriptive statistics were calculated to determine the M scores and SD for each group on each of the subtests to identify specific skills and on the overall standard score for legibility. In addition, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to make statistical comparisons, controlling for age and gender because of documented differences in handwriting skills between boys and girls ( Graham, Berninger, Weintraub, & Schafer, 1998 ). Using ANCOVA, we compared the control group with HWT 1, HWT 2, and HWT combined. Treatment effect (Cohen’s d ) was calculated for each subtest comparison and for the overall score of the THS–R. This calculation serves as a frame of reference for the effect of the intervention on the outcomes and is valuable because of the small sample size. The effect size is considered small if 0.20 ≤ d ≤ 0.49, medium if 0.50 ≤ d ≤ 0.79, and large if d ≥ 0.80 ( Cohen, 1992 ; Thalheimer & Cook, 2002 ).

This study sought to determine whether students who completed kindergarten having learned handwriting skills from the HWT kindergarten printing curriculum would outperform students who learned printing from teacher-developed methods in D’Nealian-style writing in handwriting legibility skills. Table 2 includes the mean end-of-year THS–R scores for the control group compared with such scores for HWT 1, HWT 2, and HWT combined.

The experimental groups outscored the control group in all THS–R subtests and on overall score. ANCOVA showed that in 6 of the 10 subtests, both HWT 1 and HWT 2 scored significantly higher than the control group ( p < .05). In addition, ANCOVA showed that in 7 of the 10 subtests, HWT combined scored significantly higher than the control group ( p < .05). Figure 1 illustrates that the control group scored below the mean in 9 of the 10 subtests while almost all of the subtests for the experimental groups were above the mean (28 of 30). The control group performed at mean 36.63 percentile, whereas HWT 1 performed at mean 61.85 percentile and HWT 2 at mean 68.10 percentile. Refer to Table 2 for the specific results for scaled and standard scores.

Treatment effect (Cohen’s d) was calculated for each comparison. For all experimental groups (i.e., HWT 1, HWT 2, and HWT combined), a large treatment effect was found for 5–7 subtests and a medium treatment effect was found for 1–2 subtests. For HWT 2 and HWT combined, a small treatment effect was found for 2 subtests. In addition, for all experimental groups, a very large treatment effect was found for the overall standard score ( d = 0.81 for HWT 1, 1.03 for HWT 2, and 1.00 for HWT combined). The treatment effects for each subtest and overall standard scores are included in Table 2 .

The results from this pilot study show that the students who received handwriting instruction with HWT outperformed the control group consistently and across all skill areas. For uppercase letters, students in the HWT groups demonstrated a large treatment effect for printing the uppercase alphabet from memory (airplane), uppercase from dictation (butterfly), and copying selected uppercase letters (tree). These results are not surprising because the HWT curriculum begins with the students learning all uppercase letters before lowercase ones. The curriculum is diligent in instructing each uppercase letter individually in a developmental sequence through multiple multisensory mediums and in the workbook Letters and Numbers for Me ( Olsen, 2008 ).

Lowercase letters are taught in the HWT curriculum after all of the uppercase letters because of their complexity in line placement, stroke, and sequence. Each letter is instructed through multisensory techniques in a developmental sequence. The students in the HWT groups showed the largest treatment effects for printing lowercase from memory (bus). The experimental groups also demonstrated small to medium treatment effects for copying selected lowercase letters (horse) and medium to large treatment effects for copying words from a model (truck). Printing lowercase letters from dictation (frog) was not statistically significant but did demonstrate small treatment effects with the HWT 2 and HWT combined groups.

The formation of numbers from memory was also included in the THS–R (bicycle). Although the experimental groups demonstrated higher scores, differences were not statistically significant. The students began learning number formation early in the year through their math curriculum, which varied somewhat from the HWT number formations. Therefore, their introduction to this skill was not initially through the HWT curriculum.

The results for the skill level comparisons between individual upper- and lowercase letters were expected. However, large treatment effects were consistently seen for copying two sentences (book), and medium to large treatment effects were seen for writing words from dictation (lion). These effects were higher than expected because these skills are more complex than printing individual letters and are typically not well established at the end of kindergarten. Anecdotal teacher feedback supported these results, and teachers were pleased with the skills of the experimental groups.

Research supports the effectiveness of HWT in a full-class general education classroom ( Hape et al., 2014 ; LeBrun et al., 2012 ; Roberts et al., 2014 ; Salls et al., 2013 ); however, there is a gap in the literature for HWT use in kindergarten classrooms. This study was done in an effort to help bridge that gap while demonstrating how occupational therapy practitioners may serve as consultants to teachers in general education as supported by the current legislation.

• Limitations and Future Research

Although this study has produced some important results, it has limitations that must be considered when interpreting its usefulness in evidence-based practice. First, because of the way the school administration chose to implement the curriculum, it was impossible to do a pretest–posttest comparison for each of the groups. However, pretests were done on each of the HWT groups to ensure that their scores at the beginning of the treatment year were not higher than those of the control group at the end of kindergarten. In addition, a confounding variable is that the THS–R was completed 3 times by each experimental group but only one time by the control group. However, approximately 4 mo passed between administrations to minimize learning effects.

Limitations also exist because interrater reliability was not formally established, and although some level of blinding occurred, it was not complete across all three data collection points. Lack of formal intervention fidelity monitoring is somewhat of a limitation. However, this study was designed to see whether the curriculum instructed by a teacher with collaboration from occupational therapy was effective. Therefore, it was important to let the teachers implement the curriculum as they saw fit using the guidelines provided by the curriculum as a guide.

Further research should include more involvement of occupational therapy practitioners, not only with individual students but also at the classroom and system level. To establish more evidence regarding best practices in handwriting instruction, further research should be done at the kindergarten level. However, before that research, the development of a psychometrically sound tool to measure handwriting legibility skills for the kindergarten population should be considered.

• Implications for Occupational Therapy Practice

This study supports collaborative efforts between teachers and occupational therapy practitioners in teaching handwriting skills and gives occupational therapy practitioners more evidence on which to base recommendations in school problem-based teams and curriculum committees. The results have the following implications for occupational therapy practice:

Occupational therapy practitioners must continue to advocate for their involvement in general education problem-solving teams at the school level, which may include providing recommendations for handwriting curriculum.

Occupational therapy practitioner consultation with teachers can be successful in implementing handwriting curricula.

HWT is an evidence-based curriculum that can be recommended by occupational therapy practitioners for effective printing instruction at the classroom or institutional level.

• Acknowledgments

The author thanks the students and teachers who were involved in this study and the East Carolina University master of science in occupational therapy graduates who assisted with data collection: Simone Barnes, Kristen Gibbs, Anne Thomas, and Caitlin Zawistowicz. In addition, Suzanne Hudson, associate professor at East Carolina University, consulted on the statistical analysis. The author also thanks HWT, which provided discounted trainings for the teachers and graduate students involved in the study.

• Previous Article
• Next Article

Data & Figures

Mean scaled scores on end-of-year Test of Handwriting Skills–Revised subtests.

Note . Dark horizontal line indicates mean scaled score of 10. HWT = Handwriting Without Tears.

Participant Demographic Characteristics ( N = 59)

Note. HWT = Handwriting Without Tears; M = mean; SD = standard deviation.

Comparison of THS–R Mean Scaled Scores Between Control and Experimental Groups

Note. For all results, p < .05 is significant. p values were calculated while controlling for age and gender. HWT = Handwriting Without Tears; LC = lowercase; M = mean; SD = standard deviation; THS–R = Test of Handwriting Skills–Revised; UC = uppercase.

Supplements

Citing articles via, email alerts.

• Special Collections
• Conference Abstracts
• Browse AOTA Taxonomy
• AJOT Authors & Issues Series
• Online ISSN 1943-7676
• Print ISSN 0272-9490
• Author Guidelines
• Permissions
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Accessibility
• Terms of Use
• Copyright © American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

• edWebinar Calendar
• edWebinar Recordings
• AI in Education
• Structured Literacy and Language Diversity Week: Spring 2024
• Elementary Writing Week 2024
• Power of Purposeful Reading Practice Week 2024
• Science of Reading Week 2024
• Structured Literacy and Language Diversity Week: Winter 2024
• Emergent Bilingual Week
• Mental Health & Wellness Week
• Earn Free CE Certificates
• edWeb K-12 State Approvals
• Early Childhood Approvals
• Professional Association Approvals
• Communities
• Create a PLC on edWeb for Your Teachers and Staff
• Best Practices Guide & Framework
• Case Studies: Virtual Professional Learning
• District and Regional Members
• edWeb 2024 Professional Learning Survey
• About edWeb
• Advisory Board
• Press Releases
• Awards & Recognition
• Partners and Sponsors
• Testimonials
• Sponsorship Opportunities
• edWeb Tutorials
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Accessibility Information
• Member Login

Join live or receive a link to the recording and earn a CE certificate

« All Events

• This event has passed.

Get a Grip: Teaching an Important Handwriting Skill

Tuesday, january 18, 2022 @ 2:00 pm - 3:00 pm est.

Presented by Roxanne Thompson, OTR, National Presenter & Content Specialist, Learning Without Tears; and Valerie Zaryczny, MS, OTR/L, National Presenter & Content Specialist, Learning Without Tears

Sponsored by Learning Without Tears

Watch the Recording

Closed captioning will be added to the recording within 2 weeks of the live presentation. Get a CE Certificate for this edWebinar Learn more.

In honor of National Handwriting Day, celebrated on January 23rd each year, Learning Without Tears focuses on one of the most important prerequisites for the lifelong skill of handwriting—grip! In this edWebinar, you learn answers to frequently asked questions such as what age to start teaching grip, how to teach it effectively, and how to help older children who already have poor gripping habits. Whether you are a teacher, parent, therapist, or interventionist, you learn practical strategies to implement immediately with the students in your life.

This recorded edWebinar is of interest to K-5 teachers, occupational therapists, and education technology leaders.

Roxanne Thompson received her Bachelor of Science in occupational therapy from Texas Woman’s University in 1998. She has practiced OT in public schools, early intervention, and currently a private pediatric out-patient clinic. She also provides handwriting tutoring services to children in pre-school through middle school. She completed her Level 1 certification in March 2007 and has been presenting for Learning Without Tears since 2009.

Valerie Zaryczny received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Wake Forest University and a Master of Science degree in occupational therapy from Washington University in St. Louis. She is a pediatric OT with experience across multiple settings including schools, clinics, early intervention, and teletherapy. She first attended a Handwriting Without Tears workshop in 2004 as a new therapist and has been in love with the products and methods ever since! Valerie became a National Workshop Presenter for Learning Without Tears in 2011.

Closed captioning will be added to the recording within 2 weeks of the live presentation.

Join the Building Blocks for PreK–5 community to network with educators, participate in online discussions, receive invitations to upcoming edWebinars, and view recordings of previous programs to earn CE certificates.

• Google Calendar
• Outlook 365
• Outlook Live

Related Events

5:00 pm - 6:00 pm

The Secret Sauce of the Science of Reading: High-Impact Practice

12:00 pm - 1:00 pm

Competency-Based Education 101: Demystifying CBE, Unlocking Deep and Joyful Learning

3:00 pm - 4:00 pm

Nature-Based Emergent Curriculum: The Power of Place for Planning

0293 - Handwriting Without Tears

Description, accreditation.

• Concordia University School of Education 1.0 Professional Learning Credit(s)

Session Time-Out

Concordia university school of education, privacy policy, cookie policy.

Cookie policy

This statement explains how we use cookies on our website. For information about what types of personal information will be gathered when you visit the website, and how this information will be used, please see our privacy policy.

How we use cookies

All of our web pages use "cookies". A cookie is a small file of letters and numbers that we place on your computer or mobile device if you agree. These cookies allow us to distinguish you from other users of our website, which helps us to provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and enables us to improve our website.

Types of cookies we use

We use the following types of cookies:

• Strictly necessary cookies - these are essential in to enable you to move around the websites and use their features. Without these cookies the services you have asked for, such as signing in to your account, cannot be provided.
• Performance cookies - these cookies collect information about how visitors use a website, for instance which pages visitors go to most often. We use this information to improve our websites and to aid us in investigating problems raised by visitors. These cookies do not collect information that identifies a visitor.
• Functionality cookies - these cookies allow the website to remember choices you make and provide more personal features. For instance, a functional cookie can be used to remember the items that you have placed in your shopping cart. The information these cookies collect may be anonymized and they cannot track your browsing activity on other websites.

Most web browsers allow some control of most cookies through the browser settings. To find out more about cookies, including how to see what cookies have been set and how to manage and delete them please visit http://www.allaboutcookies.org/ .

Specific cookies we use

The list below identify the cookies we use and explain the purposes for which they are used. We may update the information contained in this section from time to time.

• JSESSIONID: This cookie is used by the application server to identify a unique user's session.
• registrarToken: This cookie is used to remember items that you have added to your shopping cart
• locale: This cookie is used to remember your locale and language settings.
• cookieconsent_status: This cookie is used to remember if you've already dismissed the cookie consent notice.
• _ga_UA-########: These cookies are used to collect information about how visitors use our site. We use the information to compile reports and to help us improve the website. The cookies collect information in an anonymous form, including the number of visitors to the website, where visitors have come to the site from and the pages they visited. This anonymized visitor and browsing information is stored in Google Analytics.

Changes to our Cookie Statement

Any changes we may make to our Cookie Policy in the future will be posted on this page.

Bringing Handwriting Professional Development to a City Near You!

Are you prepared to teach foundational writing skills.

Virtual sessions are convenient, but nothing can replace the immediate connection you’ll feel learning in person! Handwriting Without Tears is bringing expert-led workshops to you! Learn to build the foundational writing skills your students need to succeed. Learning Without Tears is an approved provider of continuing education by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. (AOTA).

Join us for a powerful new learning experience, and you’ll:

• EARN up to 13.5 contact hours (1.35 CEUs)
• NETWORK with peers in your city
• REINFORCE your skills through hands-on learning 

Upcoming Handwriting Workshops

Discover how to use music, hands-on manipulatives, and technology to help children develop the emergent writing skills needed for kindergarten readiness. Learn strategies for teaching grip, alphabet knowledge, and coloring skills to better prepare children to write letters, numbers, and their names.

Readiness & Writing

Discover how to use music, hands-on manipulatives, and technology to help children develop the emergent writing skills needed for kindergarten readiness.

SEE UPCOMING DATES

Handwriting Without Tears® Print

Explore our comprehensive, easy-to-use Handwriting Without Tears print curriculum. You’ll learn engaging, multisensory techniques to make handwriting a natural and automatic skill for your Grade K–2 students.

Handwriting Without Tears® Print + Cursive 

Through discussion and active learning, you'll acquire the skills to teach our print and cursive handwriting curriculum, helping students from K–Grade 6 develop writing into a natural and automatic skill.  

Handwriting Assessment  

In one, in-depth learning experience, you'll gather all the training you need to expertly assess K–5 handwriting skills using proven tools. Learn how to monitor progress, set goals, and determine specific areas needing remediation to better serve your students.  

Comprehensive Handwriting Bundle

(Limited availability) New for Summer 2024, in select cities, advance your handwriting instruction and assessment skills for children of all ages and abilities with our Comprehensive Handwriting Bundle. Get equipped and energized for the new school year!  +Includes FREE access to Live-Virtual Cursive Workshops (a $130 value)   

SEE UPCOMING DATES  

What Your Workshop Day Will Look Like

Each workshop is packed with information and tips that you can begin using in your classroom right away!

• FOCUS on foundational concepts
• LEARN techniques for teaching handwriting
• DISCOVER skills for spacing and writing
• GET ANSWERS from experts in our Q&A

Secure your Spot Early and Save

Use promo code earlybird24 to get 20% off 1 workshop (ends may 31), upcoming workshops, meet our facilitators.

You'll learn with our team of facilitators, comprised of educators, school leaders, occupational therapists, and parents who have collectively helped thousands of educators and the millions of students they serve.

Dr. Peter Giroux

Occupational Therapist

Peter Giroux is a full-time tenured Professor of Occupational Therapy at the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson, Mississippi. He has a Master’s of Health Science degree (MHS) from Mississippi College and a Doctoral degree (PhD) in Clinical Health Sciences from the University of Mississippi Medical Center.

Read About Dr. Peter Giroux

Katrina Erickson

Katrina received her Bachelor of Science degree in Occupational Therapy from The University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, Texas in 1990. Her experience has reached beyond her OT training in the design and delivery of summer camps and private tutoring services to develop and improve handwriting skills.

Read About Katrina Erickson

Valerie Zaryczny

Valerie received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Wake Forest University and a Master of Science degree in Occupational Therapy from Washington University in St. Louis. Valerie is passionate about helping children of all abilities develop the skills necessary to be successful at school and in daily life.

Read About Valerie Zaryczny

Roxanne Thompson

Roxanne Thompson received her Bachelor of Science in Occupational Therapy from Texas Woman’s University in 1998. She has practiced OT in the public schools, early intervention, and currently at a private pediatric out-patient clinic. She also provides handwriting tutoring services to children in pre-school through middle school.

Read About Roxanne Thompson

What Participants Are Saying

“Roxanne did an amazing job discussing and modeling different techniques that we can use in our classroom.”

“Valerie explained this program very well. I loved the videos of teachers putting Handwriting Without Tears into practice. Thank you!”

“I enjoyed learning tips from other educators in the break-out sessions.”

“Excellent explanations of the materials, content, and developmental applications of the specific lessons.”

Have any questions? We’re happy to answer them!

Please check back for more offers and information.

• MergersandAcquisitionsETC
• HigherEdETC
• ContinuingEdETC
• EnrollmentMarketingETC
• Press Releases
• Submissions
• Best Awards 2023 Winners

Learning Without Tears Unveils Handwriting Without Tears C2025: Elevating Literacy Education with Science-Backed Innovations

On National Handwriting Day,  Learning Without Tears , a leading early education company renowned for its unique teaching and learning approach, announces the latest evolution of  Handwriting Without Tears C2025 . Handwriting Without Tears C2025 retains its proven and beloved format, now with added content, features, and enhancements.

Handwriting Without Tears C2025, a dedicated TK-6 program grounded in the science of reading and handwriting, provides a compelling solution for essential literacy skills. Developed by occupational therapists to address handwriting challenges and informed by teachers attuned to educational needs, this research-backed initiative ensures improved student outcomes and success in school. Handwriting Without Tears C2025 seamlessly integrates with core ELA programs with its flexible and user-friendly design.

Key features of Handwriting Without Tears C2025 include:

• A dedicated print and digital handwriting solution driven by science.
• Flexible implementation with embedded professional development for teachers.
• Multisensory approach catering to all learning styles in English and Spanish.
• Integration of hands-on manipulatives for fine and gross motor skill development.
• Streamlined, user-friendly teacher’s guide providing step-by-step support for both new and experienced educators.

This year, California  joined 22 states  requiring public school students to learn cursive. In addition, there has been an  increased emphasis  on the science of reading and writing amidst declining reading scores. Handwriting Without Tears’ programs  align with the science of reading  by developing phonemic awareness, phonics, and automatic word recognition skills while facilitating gross and fine motor skills to build handwriting fluency.

“Research shows that handwriting improves academic performance in all subjects, from science to math, reading and social studies,” said Dr. Cheryl Lundy Swift, Professional Learning Director at Learning Without Tears. “Cursive writing, in particular, plays an essential role in today’s classroom because it improves brain development in the areas of thinking, language, working memory and literacy.”

“Through 40 years of experience, we’ve helped students develop the fundamental skills they need to become fluent writers with our dedicated handwriting program,” said Eric Olsen, Chairman at Learning Without Tears. “This newest evolution will help students discover the joy in writing using multi-sensory learning methods while aiding teachers in delivering engaging digital lessons without prep time.”

Source: PR Web

• February 10, 2024 February 10, 2024

Copyright © 2024 OccupationalTherapy.com - All Rights Reserved

• Handwriting Programs Used by Occupational Therapists

Helene Gillespie, Ph.D., OTR/L

January 22, 2013.

• Ask the Experts
• Assessments/Evaluations
• Developmental Disabilities
• Early Intervention and School-Based

What are some handwriting programs that can be used by occupational therapists when working with kindergarteners?

There are many handwriting programs that are available and are being used in kindergarten classrooms. It is important for occupational therapists to be familiar with the different programs available and the features of each.  It is important to also know the following:

•  It allows OTs to be able to collaborate with teachers in different classrooms.
•  Each program may have unique instruction features that can be applied across different curriculums.
• Some of the handwriting programs feature apps that allow the child to practice letter formation on a Smartboard or iPad.
• Research has not proved the consistent effectiveness of one handwriting curriculum versus another.

Here is a sampling of the handwriting programs used in schools:

• â Slanted style
• Per site, 87% of D'Nealian lower case letters are same as cursive letters.

https://www.dnealian.com/

Handwriting Without Tears

• Developed by an OT
• Per site, this program helps children develop their writing through explicit, multisensory, play based instruction.

https://www.hwtears.com/

Zaner-Bloser

• Upright formation of letters
• Per site, supports reading and mathematic acquisition.

https://www.zaner-bloser.com/handwriting/zaner-bloser-handwriting

Sunform Alphabet System

• Slanted formation of letters
• Per site, it teaches literacy skills fundamental to a successful beginning in reading, writing and spelling.

https://www.sunformalphabet.com/

• Has 26 movements, exercises or activities.
• Per site, the philosophy is that moving with intention leads to optimal learning.

https://www.braingym.org/

First Strokes Multi-Sensory Print Program

• Per site, letters are grouped and taught according to their "first strokes" such as a circle, short lines, tall lines and leaning letters.

https://www.therapro.com/First-Strokes-Multi-Sensory-Handwriting-Program-C307884.aspx

Sensible Pencil

• Uses 11 basic lines
• Per site, designed to help new writers achieve success quickly...by using sequential worksheets that move them ahead in short easy steps.

https://www.difflearn.com/product/Sensible_Pencil/handwriting_workbooks

Big Strokes for Little Folks

• Per site, it is an intensive intervention for children with sensory integration difficulties.

https://www.amazon.com/Strokes-Little-Bonnie-Levine-Rubell/dp/0761643672

Helene Gillespie, Ph.D. , OTR/L

Dr. Gillespie has worked as a pediatric occupational therapist in both school-based and private practice settings for over 35 years. Because of her strong interest in the field of learning disabilities, she completed a Ph.D. in that area, with a concentration in cognitive neuroscience, in 2003. Helene's doctoral research focused on component skills of handwriting. Currently, Dr. Gillespie is a consultant for a special education cooperative. Additionally, she consults with parents and teachers through her private practice: OT in the Classroom, LLC.

Related Courses

Foundations for school readiness: sensory regulation and yoga (day 1), course: #3841 level: introductory 1 hour, foundations for school readiness: visual and fine motor skills (day 2), course: #3842 level: introductory 1 hour, foundations for school readiness: executive functioning in the classroom (day 3), course: #3843 level: introductory 1 hour, foundations for school readiness: early ot exposure (eote), a mindful ot screening & intervention (day 4), course: #3844 level: introductory 1 hour, writing iep goals, course: #4100 level: intermediate 1 hour.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy .

Learning Without Tears Named 2024 SIIA CODiE Award Finalist Learn More

Explore Free Webinars

Our ongoing series of free webinars bring together educators from around the world to provide tips and tricks for making learning fun and easy while creating confident communicators. Attendees get support and strategies to help educators teach the critical skills of readiness, handwriting, and keyboarding.

TESTIMONIALS

"The intertwined connections to real world, real life and all the learning modalities facilitate learner success."

Vanessa Brown, B.A., M.Ed. Retired Assistant Principal and ELA Coordinator  

"With the implementation of the teacher’s guide, activity books and manipulatives, Pre-K teachers have the tools they need to successfully prepare young children for kindergarten."

Schronda McKnight-Burns M. Ed. Assistant Director of Early Childhood Education  

"The active teaching really brings the workbook to life by adding in different interactive learning strategies and activities on each page."

Lanor Payne, Ph.D Director of Early Childhood  

"Our students have used Keyboarding Without Tears for years. This program goes beyond nurturing students' typing skills. It gives them the confidence with technology they need to truly succeed today."

Mary Toomey Assistant Superintendent  

• Intensive Summer Course
• Testimonials
• Our Mission
• Our Team｜kids occupational therapy

Book your consultation today

+886 02-2231-2687

Handwriting Without Tears ®

To enhance children's writing skills through the use of multi-sensory strategies in line with their developmental stages.

Even with the advent of modern technology, which provides children with a wider range of learning media, children still rely heavily on writing for their learning and schoolwork in the classroom. Writing not only revitalizes the child's brain and enhances their learning-related skills such as listening, speaking, reading and critical thinking, but also promotes effective communication.

Many children in the clinical setting have an incorrect grip on the pen due to poor stability of the tiger's mouth, hand arches and front joints, such as a wrong grip with the thumb wrapped around the index finger, which will take more effort and time for the child and further affect their motivation to learn. Moreover, the pen becomes so straight when the thumb wraps around the index finger that the child has to tilt his head to see what he is writing.   An incorrect pencil grip can lead to poor body posture, which in the long run may result in scoliosis, shoulder height difference, cervical spine and neck and back muscle imbalance.

To this end, KickStart has introduced a writing therapy program that employs a fun, entertaining and developmentally appropriate approach that integrates multi-sensory activities to help children of all ages to improve their writing skills and increase their learning motivation, starting from the basics. This program has been incorporated into the formal writing curriculum by the US Department of Education in many states.

Kickstart stands to identify and inspire children’s potential and to help parents understand the needs of your child’s sensory integration development and how to address them. Kickstart emphasizes the wholistic development of the children, thus enriching the quality of life for children, parents, and the whole family.

© 2019 KickStart. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Office Hours

Tue - Thur: 9:00 am - 9:00 pm

Fri: 9:00 am - 8:30 pm

Sat: 8:30 am - 5:30 pm

10F., No. 37, Sec. 3, Roosevelt Rd., Da’an Dist., Taipei City

2F., No. 25, Aly. 15, Ln. 106, Sec. 3, Minquan E. Rd., Songshan Dist., Taipei City

A–Z for Mat Man® and Me - Now Accepting Orders!

• Contact Sales

Site Search

Handwriting without tears, from emergent writing in pre-k to cursive mastery in fifth grade, handwriting without tears helps students develop a fluency for writing success, no matter where they learn., building the foundation of literacy.

Handwriting Without Tears helps students build essential skills for emergent writing and handwriting success.

Children who master handwriting are more likely to succeed in school, writing with speed and ease in all subjects. But without a strong foundation, bad habits take root. Our unparalleled curriculum nurtures writing automaticity through direct, explicit instruction along with guided and independent practice.

Download brochure

Direct Instruction Builds Handwriting Automaticity

Handwriting Without Tears' pedagogy guides students to success with:

• Developmentally appropriate sequence of instruction
• Consistent guided practice to develop automaticity and fluency
• Multisensory components engage visual, audio, and kinesthetic learners
• Hands-on manipulatives for developing fine motor and phonics skills
• Simple, student-friendly, step-by-step language for letter formations on student practice pages AND teacher's guides

"Automatic letter writing is the single best predictor of length and quality of written composition in younger students." (Dinehart, 2013)

An Integrated Print and Digital Solution for K–5 Handwriting

Get the expert-backed and research-proven resources you need—in the classroom and online—to ensure student success. Our integrated and print and digital handwriting solution builds confident communicators by getting to the heart of every letter with developmentally appropriate, multisensory strategies.

Effective Handwriting Instruction for K–5

Our handwriting curriculum builds confident communicators by getting to the heart of every letter through developmentally appropriate, multisensory strategies and digital experiences for teachers and students.

Interactive Digital Teaching Tool

Our digital teaching tool supports teachers online with dozens of pre-loaded lesson plans, an assignment tracker, and resources like video, music, and animations to engage your classroom instruction.

Emergent Writing for Pre-K

Ease young learners into their communication journeys with this intentionally designed curriculum. Students build pre-writing and emergent writing skills developmentally through engaging, hands-on, play-based activities.

Emergent Writing Solution for Pre-K

Lessons address general readiness, pre-writing, alphabet knowledge, letter and number recognition, capital and lowercase letter formation, counting, drawing, shapes, and colors.

Pre-K Interactive Teaching Tool

Experience a new digital platform to help you bring Pre-K lessons to life with videos, animations, and songs—all in a friendly voice that connects with children. 

Why It Works Easy to learn & teach!

The Handwriting Without Tears® curriculum draws from years of innovation and research to provide developmentally appropriate, multisensory strategies for early writing. The program follows research of how children learn best and includes materials that address all styles of learning.

Multisensory Teaching Strategies

Multisensory activities and manipulatives appeal to all learning styles and provide a hands-on approach to handwriting.

Cross-Curricular Connections

Teach handwriting alongside other subjects! Fun letter lessons and writing activities connect handwriting to math, social studies, ELA, and science.

Unique Letter Order and Style

Innovative letter order and style are developmentally appropriate and promote easy learning for every letter—print and cursive.

Student Edition Design

Clean, simple, and intuitive approach to student editions invites personalization and fosters handwriting success. Lefty-friendly with large step-by-step models.

Line Success

Double lines and line generalization activities promote legible writing. When children know how to place letters, they can write well on any style of lined paper.

Assessments and Tailored Instructional Plans

Easy-to-use assessments track handwriting progress in the classroom and support your instruction for year-round handwriting success.

Proven Teaching Strategies

More than 3 million students benefit from the Handwriting Without Tears® program each year.

High end-of-year test scores show students using Handwriting Without Tears are prepared for the handwriting demands of school.

Grants and Funding Resources

You've got options! We'll help you find the best use of your COVID relief and stimulus funds by showing you how Learning Without Tears' proven, effective products qualify.

Hands-On, Multisensory Products

Browse multisensory products and student workbooks that make printing and cursive easy to teach and easy to learn. 

View Our Teaching Resources