(USA)
1C
IG, Intervention Group; CG, Control Group; SP, Standardized Patient; CST, Communication Skills Training; IPCS, Interpersonal Communication Skills; SPEs, Standardized Patient Experiences; SPS, Standardized Patient Simulation.
The selected articles were independently evaluated by two reviewers (GA and VG), before being included in this review. The methodological validity was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument standardized critical appraisal instrument (JBI MAStARI). For the RCTs, the JBI MAStARI for RCTs was used. This checklist is made up of thirteen items. The possible answers to the items are yes, no, unclear or not applicable. If “yes” is answered, a point is obtained. For the study to be included, it had to obtain a score equal to or greater than seven. In the quasi-experimental studies, JBI MASTARI for quasi-experimental studies was used. This checklist is made up of nine items that can be rated yes, no, unclear or not applicable. If “yes” is chosen for the item, a point is obtained. For the study to be included in the systematic review, it had to obtain a score equal to or greater than five. This process enabled an increase in methodological rigor and evaluated possible biases and threats to the validity [ 25 ]. The discrepancies between the reviewers of the articles that were to be included in the review were discussed until a consensus was reached. After review, evaluation and discussion, eight articles were excluded that were not based on TC interventions, as defined in the inclusion criteria, or for methodological reasons. Finally, 19 articles were included after confirmation by both reviewers.
The overall sample size of the studies included in this review was N = 1,295 participants. In the included studies, there was a great deal of variation in the sample size, ranging from 26 to 147 (median, n = 62). Although the literature search was conducted from the year 2000, the first study included in this review was from 2006. Ninety percent of the studies (n = 18) were carried out in the last ten years and more than fifty percent (n = 10) were conducted in the last five years. Most studies (n = 9) were in mental health. The other areas represented were end-of-life and maternity. As for the study designs, the majority were quasi-experimental studies (n = 17) followed by RCTs (n = 2). In all of the included studies, pre-test and post-test measurements were performed (N = 19) ( Table 1 ).
Only two of the 19 studies included in this systematic review included a description of a theoretical framework. Donova and Mullen [ 26 ] used the Constructivist Learning Theory by Merriam, Cafferella and Baumgartner [ 27 ]. While Shorey et al. [ 28 ] used a combination of the two frameworks (a) the Self-Efficacy Theory [ 29 ]; and (b) the Authentic Learning Concept [ 30 ].
Eleven studies used simulation as the intervention. The majority of them (n = 8) used SP to facilitate learning [ 26 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ] and three studies used simulation to aid in the assessment of communication skills, performed by a faculty member [ 38 ], peer [ 39 ], or both [ 40 ]. Nine were carried out through simulation using Standardized Patients (SP) [ 26 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 40 ]. One study used simulation through role playing [ 39 ] and with high-fidelity patient (n = 1) [ 34 ]. Three studies used innovative educational methodologies, such as a blended learning environment [ 28 ], cooperative learning methods [ 41 ], and Case-Based learning [ 42 ]. Five studies focused their intervention on the development of courses [ 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ], and four of the courses indicated the included activities.
Regarding the contexts of the interventions, nine studies focused on mental health [ 26 , 31 , 33 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ], three studies on end-of-life [ 32 , 43 , 47 ], one focused on maternity [ 34 ], and six studies focused on general patient-centered communication skills [ 28 , 41 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]. As for the duration of the interventions, it varied from one hour to one semester ( Table 2 ).
Intervention characteristics.
Order Number | 1st Author, Date (Country) | Participants | Study Design | Theoretical Framework | Intervention | Quantitative Measures |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Becker et al. 2006 [ ] (USA) | n = 147 nursing students enrolled in a psychiatric nursing course (IG = 58; CG = 89). | Design: randomized control group. Data collection: pre-test, post-test. | Not mentioned. | Simulation—using Standardized Patient (SP). Lectures on therapeutic communication and nursing care of clients with depression (both group), Interview SP, debriefing, videotape self-analysis with accompanying handbook. Duration: once a week, 7 weeks. Interview SP (30 min), debriefing (30 min), videotape self-analysis (after 1 week of the SP encounter). CG - usual classroom lecture format. | Students: Communication Knowledge Test (CKT), developed by the authors for this study. Student Self-Evaluation of SP Encounter (SSPE), developed by the authors for this study. Patients: SP checklist, developed by the authors for this study. Standardized Patient Interpersonal Ratings (SPIR), developed by the authors for this study. |
2 | Baghcheghi et al. 2011 [ ] (Iran) | N = 34 sophomore nursing students (16 IG; 18 CG). | Design: Experimental, observer-blinder two groups study. Data collection: pre-test, post-test. | Not mentioned. | Cooperative learning methods. (work in group) Activities included in lectures: Socratic questioning, paired discussion of homework assignments, paired pop quizzes, small group discussion of case scenarios, paired concept-map generation exercises, student identification of examples for concepts being discussed, and think-pair-share exercises. Each group would be responsible for presenting a 15 to 20-minute review of information from their particular content category to the class. Throughout the semester the group members evaluated each other with a weekly evaluation tool; feedback. Duration: one semester. CG—usual classroom lecture format. | Nursing Students’ communication with patient scale. |
3 | Kim et al. 2012 [ ] (Korea) | n = 70 sophomores nursing students enrolled in a theoretical course in maternity. | Design: quasi-experimental study, two group study. Data Collection: pre-test, post-test. | Not mentioned | Simulation—using high-fidelity patient simulator. Duration: 9 h over three weeks (briefing, simulation lab, debriefing). CG—usual classroom lecture format. | Communication Skills Tool. Clinical Competence Tool (CCT). |
4 | Wittenberg-Lyles et al. 2012 [ ] (USA) | n = 32 nursing students. | Design: quasi-experimental pilot study. Data collection: pre-test, post-test. | Not mentioned | COMFORT communication and consulting course. interactive, educational training session and taught students using a combination of PowerPoint lectures, case studies, small group discussions, and exercises. Students were exposed to concepts including narrative clinical practice, person-centered messages, the task and relational components in all interactions, and participated in 3 encounters using these concepts. Duration: 3h. | Course Experience Questionnarie (CEQ) created by authors for this study. Perceived Importance of Medical Communication (PIMC). Communication Skill Attitude Scale (CSAS). Caring Self-Efficacy Scale (CES). |
5 | Jo and An 2013 [ ] (Korea) | n = 39 nursing students (19 IG; 20 GC) from two universities. | Design: quasi-experimental two group study. Data collection: Pre-test, post-test. | Not mentioned. | End-of-life- Care course teaching included uses humanistic educational methods such as lectures, group discussion, watching a movie, analysis of novel and poem, appreciation of music, and collage art, role-play, and sharing personal experiences. Duration: 2h x 16 weeks. CG—usual classroom lecture format. | Attitudes toward death. Death Anxiety Scale (DAS). Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). |
6 | Lau and Wang 2013 [ ] (China) | n = 62 fourth-year nursing students enrolled CST course. | Design: quasi-experimental single group study, two-phase mixed methods Data collection: pre-test, post-test. | Not mentioned. | Communication Skills Training (CST) course. Included theoretical lectures and practical components (Immediate feedback; Role Playing; Group discussion; didactical games). Duration: two day, 8 h per day. | Communication Ability Scale (CAS) Clinical Interaction Scale (CIS). Interpersonal Dysfunction Checklist (IDC). Social Problem Solving Inventory-Revised (C-SPSI-R). |
7 | Lin et al. 2013 [ ] (Taiwan) | n = 26 first year nursing students (14 IG; 12 CG). | Design: Randomized Controlled Study two group. Data collection: pre-test, post-test. | Not mentioned. | Simulation - using SP. Briefing; scenario demonstration; role-playing. Duration: 2-day (SP assessments with SP feedback and group discussion). CG—usual classroom lecture format. | Interpersonal Communication Skills (IPCS) assessment tool. Student Learning Satisfaction (SLS) Scale. |
8 | Lau and Wang 2014 [ ] (China) | n = 59 fourth-year nursing students attended the summer camp program. | Design: quasi-experimental single group study, two-phase mixed methods. Data collection: pre-test, post-test. | Not mentioned | Educational Summer Camp Program on Communication Skills—three sharing sessions and five experimental learning games. Sharing sessions on self-exploration, teambuilding, and clinical interaction. Experiential learning games were used as learning strategies (icebreaker, self-discovery, team building, problem solving, and communication). Duration: 3 days | Communication Ability Scale (CAS) Clinical Interaction Scale (CIS). Interpersonal Dysfunction Checklist validated Chinease (IDC). Social Problem Solving Inventory-Revised (SPSI-R). |
9 | Webster 2014 [ ] (USA) | n = 89 senior baccalaureate nursing students enrolled in a psychiatric clinical course. | Design: quasi-experimental, one group study. Data Collection: pre-test, post-test. | Not mecioned. | Simulation—using SP, simulations were video-recorded, watched their video and conducted a self-reflection of strengths and areas for improvement; debriefing conducted by faculty using a problem-based learning approach. Duration: Two SPEs, one at the beginning of the semester and one at the end of the semester. 15–20 min sessions. | The effectiveness of the use of SPEs to teach therapeutic communication skills in psychiatric nursing ckecklist created by author for this study. Feedback from faculty ckecklist created by author for this study. |
10 | Bloomfield et al. 2015 [ ] (UK) | n = 28 second-year nursing students and fourth-year medical students from a population of N = 180 nursing students and N = 450 medical students. | Design: quasi-experimental single group study, two-phase mixed methods. Data Collection: pre-test, post-test. | Not mentioned. | Simulation—using SP (two scenarios), pre-briefing; simulation; debrief. Duration: 45 min including pre-brief, simulation and debrief. | students’ perceived levels of confidence, competence, and concern when communicate with dying patients and their families questionnaire created by authors for this study. |
11 | Yoo and Park 2015 [ ] (Korea) | n = 143 (72 IG; 71 CG) sophomore undergraduate nursing student enrolled in a mandatory health communication course from a population of N = 151. | Design: quasi-experimental two group study. Data collection: pre-test, post-test. | Not mencioned. | Case-Based Learning (CBL) - as teaching activity in a course. Five authentic cases of patient-nurse communication. (Stage of each 5-Cases: Case presentation; Student´s case analysis individually; group discussion and analysis; finding proper solution by group; group presentation of the cases). Duration: 28 h. CG –traditional lecture-based learning. | Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). Problem-Solving Inventory (PSI). Instructional Materials Motivation Scale (IMMS). |
12 | Lai 2016 [ ] (Taiwan) | n = 50 quasi-experimental single group study. | Design: quasi-experimental single group study. Data collection: pre-test, post-test. | Not mentioned. | Simulation—using SP an online video peer assessment system. Recorded therapeutic consultation with a SP and uploaded to YouTube; peer assessment and feedback through a web-based assessment system; expert evaluation (two rounds; different scenarios). Duration: SP twice; once in the mid-term exam week and the other in the final exam week. Duration not stated. | Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale (ICAS). |
13 | Martin and Chanda 2016 [ ] (USA) | n = 28 prelicensure nursing students enrolled in a mental health nursing theory and clinical course. | Design: quasi-experimental, one group. Data collection: pre-test, post-test. | Not mentioned. | Simulation using SP (three stations; two simulation sessions). Briefing; simulation with two standardized patients and a case study; debriefing. Duration: 40-50 min simulation followed by an hour debriefing. | Confidence with Communication Skill Scale. Therapeutic communication and nontherapeutic communication techniques, checklist created by authors, with the purpose of evaluating skills that would occur during the SP encounters. |
14 | Taghizadeh et al. 2017 [ ] (Iran) | n = 66 last year nursing students and n = 132 patients. | Design: quasi-experimental single group study. Data collection: pre-test, post- test. | Not mentioned. | Communication Training Course. lectures and workshops using educational equipment and technology. Duration: 6 h. | Student´s Communication skills checklist created by the authors for this study. Quality of Care Questionnaire for Patients. |
15 | Shorey et al. 2018 [ ] (China) | n = 124 first-year undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the nursing course. | Design: quasi-experimental single group study. Data Collection: pre-test, post-test. | Bandura´s self-efficacy theory (1997). | Blended learning environment face-to-face each week for tutorials (Role-playing and problem-based learning); lecture materials online (breeze presentations, PowerPoints slides, and multi-media components, delivered) online quizzes, discussion forums, and reflection exercises; assessment (analyzing real life clinical scenarios by creating online videos; interview with SP). Duration: 13 weeks. Four modular credit x 10 h (2–3 h for face-to-face tutorial or lecture and 7–8 h for the self-directed learning). | Blended Learning Satisfaction Scale (BLSS). Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS). Communication Skills subscale of the Nursing Students Self-Efficacy Scale (C-NSSES). |
16 | Blake and Blake 2019 [ ] (USA) | n = 32 nursing students in their capstone course from a population of N = 35. | Design: quasi-experimental single group. Data collection: pre-test, post-test. | Not mentioned. | Simulation—role-playing, debriefing Duration: a week. | Self-efficacy related to therapeutic communication, developed by the authors for this study. A rubric for therapeutic and nontherapeutic statements or actions developed by the authors for this study. |
17 | Donovan and Mullen 2019 [ ] (USA) | n = 116 undergraduate nursing students registered for three successive mental health nursing courses during academic year from a population of N = 160 (RR 72.5%). | Design: quasi-experimental single group study. Data collection: pre-test, post-test. | Constructivist learning theory (Merriam et al. 2012). | Simulation—using SP. Lectures on therapeutic communication techniques, which included readings, video clips with discussion; simulation; debriefing. Duration: 60 min including briefing, simulation and debriefing. | Confidence Simulation, with a dimension about level of confidence of learned therapeutic communication skills. |
18 | Gaylle 2019 [ ] (USA) | n = 65 senior students enrolled in a psychiatric clinical rotation at a public university from a population of N = 67 (RR 97%). (IG = 32; CG = 33). | Design: quasi-experimental, two group study. Data collection: pre-test, post-test. | Not mentioned. | Simulation—using SP (four scenarios) briefing; simulation; In simulation-debriefing. Duration: one week. CG - briefing, simulation, postsimulation debriefing. | Students’ knowledge of psychiatric assessment. Therapeutic communication checklist created by author. Students’ perceived anxiety related to a psychiatric clinical practicum created by author. Perceptions of the debriefing experience checklist created by author for this study. |
19 | Ok et al. 2019 [ ] (Turkey) | n = 85 third-year nursing students enrolled in a course on mental health and psychiatric at two different universities from a population of N = 103 (RR 82.5%). (IG = 52; CG = 33) | Design: quasi-experimental two group Data collection: pre-test, post-test | Not mentioned. | Simulation—using SP theoretical lecture on communication skills and schizophrenia; simulation using SP, debriefing. Duration: 5 hours theoretical lectures, 10–12 min simulation, 30–35 min debriefing. CG—Theoretical lectures and clinical practices. | Communicational Skills Inventory (CSI) State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) |
IG, Intervention Group; CG, Control Group; SP, Standardized Patient; CKT, Communication Knowledge Test; SSPE, Student Self-Evaluation of Standardized Patient Encounter; SPIR, Standardized Patient Interpersonal Ratings; CST, Communication Skills Training; CCT, Clinical Competence Tool; CEQ, Course Experience Questionnarie; PIMC, Perceived Importance of Medical Communication; CSAS, Communication Skill Attitude Scale; CES, Caring Self-Efficacy Scale; DAS, Death Anxiety Scale; CAT, Communication Assessment Tool; CAS, Communication Ability Scale; CIS, Clinical Interaction Scale; IDC, Interpersonal Dysfunction Checklist; C-SPSI-R, Social Problem Solving Inventory Revised; IPCS, Interpersonal Communication Skills; SLS, Student Learning Satisfaction; SPEs, Standardized Patient Experiences; CBL, Case-Based Learning; PSI, Problem-Solving Inventory; IMMS, Instructional Materials Motivation Scale; ICAS, Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale; BLSS, Blended Learning Satisfaction Scale; C-NSSES, Communication Skills subscale of the Nursing Students Self-Efficacy Scale; CSI, Communicational Skills Inventory; STAI, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.
The included studies reported 19 different instruments of patient-centered communication. Most of the studies provided data on the reliability and validity of the instruments, either in previous studies or calculated for the study they carried out. However, several authors designed the instruments themselves to evaluate interpersonal communication. For six instruments, no validity data was provided [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 36 , 38 , 39 ].
Of the articles included in the review, thirteen determined a statistically significant improvement in the results. More than fifty percent (n = 11) of the studies used simulation as part of the training of patient-centered communication skills. Several studies that used simulation found no statistically significant differences between the groups [ 33 , 35 , 37 ]. However, they did determine an improvement in the patient-centered communication skills of the intervention group (IG) with respect to the control group (CG) [ 33 , 35 , 37 ] (see Table 3 ).
Main results and conclusions.
Order Number | 1st Author, Date (Country) | Findings | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Becker et al. 2006 [ ] (USA) | No significant differences were found between the two groups on measures of interpersonal skills, therapeutic communication skills, and knowledge of depression. | Further research is needed, this study support the use of SPs in nursing education for communication skills training. |
2 | Baghcheghi et al. 2011 [ ] (Iran) | The results showed that no significant difference between the two groups in students’ communication skills scores before the teaching intervention (p > 0.05), but did show a significant difference between the two groups in the interaction skills and problem follow up sub-scales scores after the teaching intervention (p < 0.05). | This study provides evidence that cooperative learning is an effective method for improving and increasing communication skills of nursing students especially in interactive skills and follow up the problems sub-scale, thereby it is recommended to increase nursing students’ participation in arguments by applying active teaching methods which can provide the opportunity for increased communication skills. |
3 | Kim et al. 2012 [ ] (Korea) | The communication skill score of the experimental group that participated in simulation-based education increased 0.58 points and the control group increased 0.09 points, indicating a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.020). The clinical competence score of the experimental group that participated in simulation-based education increased 0.63 points, and the score for the control group increased 0.15 points, indicating a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.009). | Simulation-based education in maternity is effective in promoting communication skill and clinical competence. |
4 | Wittenberg-Lyles et al. 2012 [ ] (USA) | The practical nurses’ exposure to the COMFORT communication training allowed students to see its benefits, resulting in more positive attitudes to communication skills learning as measured by the CSAS (p < 0.000). The COMFORT communication curriculum also increased perceptions of the importance of communication in nurse training as assessed by the PIMC (p < 0.009). In addition, COMFORT training resulted in an increase in practical nurses’ reported self-efficacy in using communication skills with patients and families, although no statistically differences were found (p = 0.052). | This study shows promise for the feasibility and use of the CONFORT curriculum for nursing students communication training. |
5 | Jo and An 2013 [ ] (Korea) | Attitudes toward death (p = 0.027) and communication skills (p = 0.008) appeared to have significantly increased in the experimental group. However, death anxiety (p = 0.984) did not significantly differ between the two groups after intervention. | The course is effective in reducing negative attitudes toward death and increasing the communication skills of nursing students. |
6 | Lau and Wang 2013 [ ] (China) | There were significantly increase between students: the mean pre-test and post-test scores for communication ability (p = 0.015). there were improvement in the scores for content of communication and handling of communication barriers (p < 0.001). In addition, the training was practically important, as indicated by the effect size of 2.39 in the score for the handling of communication barriers. Although the scales of communication ability, clinical interaction, interpersonal dysfunction, and social problem solving were improved, they were not statistically significant (p >.05). | The course was effective in improving communication skills in nursing students. |
7 | Lin et al. 2013 [ ] (Taiwan) | All participants expressed high SLS (94.44%) and showed significant (p ≤ 0.025) improvements on IPCS total scores, interviewing, and counseling. However, there were no significant differences between groups (p = 0.374). | Using SPs to teach IPCS to nursing students produced a high SLS, but future studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of SP feedback and group discussions. |
8 | Lau and Wang 2014 [ ] (China) | The analysis showed a significant difference between the mean pretest and posttest scores of the subscales (p = 0.003) and total communication skills scores (p < 0.0001). There was a statistically significant increase in the cognition of communication scores from pre-test to post-test (p < 0.0001), content of communication (p = 0.009), and handling of communication barriers (p < 0.001). The mean pretest and posttest CIS total scores increased (p < 0.0001), sympathetic consideration (p < 0.0001), active listening (p = 0.001), and taking the initiative in care subscales (p = 0.009). The scores of positive problem orientation subscale of the SPSI-R improved (p = 0.037). | The Educational Summer Camp Program was effective in improving nursing students´communication skills. |
9 | Webster 2014 [ ] (USA) | The students did not demonstrate significant improvement on 2 of the 14 evaluation criteria -approaching client with a nonthreatening body stance (p = 0.218) and introducing self (p = 0.74)- although there was improvement noted for the two evaluation criteria. There was improvement noted in anxiety, students’ ability to establish eye contact, to engage in efforts to put the patient at ease, safety assessments, the ability to set limits on inappropriate behavior (p < 0.05). In building a therapeutic relationship, Improvements were also noted in all three of these areas (using therapeutic communication techniques; responding appropriately to verbal statements and responding appropriately to nonverbal behavior), (p < 0.05). The ability to validate the meaning of a patient’s response increased significantly. Last, the appropriate termination were increase significantly for these two areas (summarizing content of interaction, terminating appropriately), (p < 0.05). | This study suggests that the use of SPEs is an effective methodology for promoting therapeutic communication skills in nursing students. |
10 | Bloomfield et al. 2015 [ ] (UK) | After the simulation, self-perceived confidence levels when communicating with the family and friends of dying patients increased significantly (p < 0.05). The majority of students reported increased levels of competence when talking with the family of dying patients (p < 0.05). | Simulation was found to be an effective means of preparing nursing students to communicate with dying patients and their families. |
11 | Yoo and Park 2015 [ ] (Korea) | A significant increase in the communication skills score of the intervention group was observed (p < 0.001) while a slight increase was observed for the control group (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the communication skills of the two groups (p < 0.001). A significant decrease in the problem solving ability score of the intervention group was observed (p < 0.001), whereas an increase was observed in the control group (p < 0.001). A significant improvement was observed for the problem-solving ability of the intervention group, as compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Finally, scores for learning motivation showed a significant increase (p < 0.001), for the intervention group, whereas a decrease (p > 0.05), was observed for the control group. Moreover, a significant difference was found in the learning motivation scores of the two groups (p < 0.001). | This finding suggests that case-based learning is an effective learning and teaching method. |
12 | Lai 2016 [ ] (Taiwan) | The scores given by the peers were significatly corelated with those given by experts (r = 0.36, p<0.05). In relation, students’ attitudes toward the peer assessment activities. Overall, the mean scores of each item were greater than 4 (agree) which means the students were satisfied with the peer assessment learning activities. | The nursing students had improved their skills in therapeutic communication as a result of the networking peer assessment. Expert evaluation scores showed that students’ communication performance, when involved in peer assessments, significantly improved. |
13 | Martin and Chanda 2016 [ ] (USA) | There was significant improvement (p = 0.000), in student’s self-reported confidence with their communication skills and knowledge following a mental health simulation experience using standardized patients. | A therapeutic communication mental health simulation give before students participating in their clinical experience should be integrated into undergraduate nursing education. |
14 | Taghizadeh et al. 2017 [ ] (Iran) | The results showed that there was a significant difference between the mean quality of patients’ care prior to and following the intervention (p≤0.001). Also, there was a significant difference between the means for nursing student’s’ communication skills before and after the intervention (p≤0.001). Moreover, there was a significant correlation between mean scores of students and the quality of care and communication skills (p≤0.001). | The course was effective in improving communication skills in nursing students. |
15 | Shorey et al. 2018 [ ] (China) | There was a statistically significant increase in the BLSS scores from pre-test to post-test (p = 0.012). Similarly, a statistically significant increase in the CSAS scores were seen from pre-test to post-test (p = 0.042). There was also a statistically significant increase in the C-NSSES scores from pre-test to post-test (p = 0.003). | Participants had enhanced satisfaction levels with blended learning pedagogy, better attitudes in learning communication skills, and improved communication self-efficacies at posttest. |
16 | Blake and Blake 2019 [ ] (USA) | An improvement in student self-efficacy in therapeutic communication skills after the course simulation as indicated by the five questions were all significant with p < 0.01. | The lab simulation was helpful in improving students regarding their therapeutic communication skills. |
17 | Donovan and Mullen 2019 [ ] (USA) | The pre/post results suggest the standardized simulated experience enhanced nursing student confidence p < 0.001. These results suggest that the student nurse confidence in therapeutic communication with a mental health patient had increased. | Simulation with SPs promoted an active learning environment that highlighted individualized confidence in therapeutic communication skills through a realistic application process. |
18 | Gaylle 2019 [ ] (USA) | The overall change from pretest to posttest for therapeutic communication for both groups combined was statistically significant and practically important with a large effect size of 1.34 (Cohen d). On average, both groups showed statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05). The in-simulation group demonstrated a greater increase in therapeutic-communication techniques and a larger decrease in nontherapeutic communication than their peers in the post-simulation group. Differences in means between the in-simulation and the post-simulation groups for therapeutic communication (mean, 1.39 and 0.83) but there are not statistically differences significant between groups. | In simulation debriefing is an effective tool for teaching therapeutic communication to nursing students. |
19 | Ok et al. 2019 [ ] (Turkey) | There are differences between the students who received and who did not receive SPS in terms of the scores obtained from the STAI-S (p = 0.01), STAI-T (p = 0.046), but there are not statistically differences in CSI (p = 0.09), except for the subscale cognitive of the CSI (p = 0.043). The comparison of the scores obtained by the intervention group prior to and after the SPS shows a statistically meaningful decrease in the anxiety levels (p = 0.001; p = 0.009) and a statistically meaningful increase in the communication skills of the intervention group after the simulation exercise (p = 0.001), except for the emotional subscale (p = 0.074). | Simulation with SPs may help nursing students gain experience and increase communication skills with patients. |
SP, Standardized Patient; SLS, Student Learning Satisfaction; CIS, Clinical Interaction Scale; IPCS, Interpersonal Communication Skills; SPSI-R, Social Problem Solving Inventory Revised; SPEs, Standardized Patient Experiences; BLSS, Blended Learning Satisfaction Scale; CSAS, Communication Skill Attitude; C-NSSES, Communication Skills subscale of the Nursing Students Self-Efficacy Scale; SPS, Standardized Patient Simulation; CSI, Communicational Skills Inventory; STAI, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Based on JBI criteria for the effectiveness of experimental designs, the two RCTs included were evaluated at level 1C (See Table 1 ). The quasi-experimental studies (n = 6) with two groups reported a level of evidence of 2C and the experimental studies with a single group (n = 11) reported evidence at level 2D for effectiveness, according to the criteria of evidence levels of JBI [ 25 ] ( Table 4 and Table 5 ).
Results of critical appraisal for quasi-experimental studies.
Order Number | MAStARI Question | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Baghcheghi et al. 2011 [ ] (Iran) | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
2 | Kim et al. 2012 [ ] (Korea) | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
3 | Wittenberg-Lyles et al. 2012 [ ] (USA) | Yes | Unclear | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
4 | Jo and An 2013 [ ] (Korea) | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
5 | Lau and Wang 2013 [ ] (China) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
6 | Lau and Wang 2014 [ ] (China) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
7 | Webster 2014 [ ] (USA) | Unclear | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
8 | Bloomfield et al. 2015 [ ] (UK) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | 6 |
9 | Yoo and Park 2015 [ ] (Korea) | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
10 | Lai 2016 [ ] (Taiwan) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 7 |
11 | Martin and Chanda 2016 [ ] (USA) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
12 | Taghizadeh et al. 2017 [ ] (Iran) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
13 | Shorey et al. 2018 [ ] (China) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
14 | Blake and Blake 2019 [ ] (USA) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | 5 |
15 | Donovan and Mullen 2019 [ ] (USA) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
16 | Gaylle 2019 [ ] (USA) | Unclear | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
17 | Ok et al. 2019 [ ] (Turkey) | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 6 |
Results of critical appraisal for Randomized Controlled Trials.
Order Number | MAStARI Question | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | Q11 | Q12 | Q13 | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Becker et al. 2006 [ ] (USA) | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 10 |
2 | Lin et al. 2013 [ ] (Taiwan) | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9 |
This systematic review provides an overview of the research carried out on nursing students in order to develop communication skills with the patient. The objective of this systematic review was to identify, critically evaluate and synthesize the evidence of the impact of educational interventions on nursing students to develop their communication skills with patients. Despite the various educational pedagogies used to develop communication skills with the patient. All research agrees on the importance of developing interventions to improve communication skills with the patient in nursing students. From the main findings, it can be indicated that the majority of the analyzed studies used simulation as the methodology for communication skills training, obtaining statistically significant results. Regarding the countries in which they have carried out the studies, it is worth noting that the majority have been carried out in the USA, these data coincide with those reported in previous research on the analysis of scientific communication publications [ 48 , 49 ]. Regarding theoretical and conceptual frameworks to guide the intervention studies, only two studies used theoretical frameworks to guide the intervention [ 26 , 28 ]. However, the theoretical and conceptual frameworks are essential to develop experimental studies allowing the variables and the relationship between them to be established, described in previous studies. The conceptual frameworks provide information about the subjects, the way of collecting and statistical analysis of the data, making it possible to guide the interventions in the experimental studies and helping the interpretation of the data [ 50 ].
However, measuring patient-centered communication can be difficult due to the numerous definitions that exist to refer to this type of communication such as TC, nurse–patient communication or interpersonal communication. In addition, there are numerous aspects of communication with the patient that must be considered, as reflected in, for example, the conceptual framework of interpersonal relationships [ 2 ]. The instruments used must prove to be valid and reliable. However, only fourteen of the articles reviewed provided data on the validity and reliability of the tool [ 26 , 28 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 40 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]. These issues suggest that researchers should consider the relevance of instruments to assess patient-centered communication before using them. In addition to considering the validity and reliability of the instruments, if they were developed in previous studies, psychometric tests should be performed for the study population. In the case that these instruments were developed by the researchers of the study, they should report the psychometric properties of them. On the other hand, previous studies have indicated the need to develop and validate instruments to assess patient-centered communication skills of nursing students [ 51 , 52 ]. The development of validated instruments to assess communication skills with patients would allow evaluating the impact of the interventions developed on nursing students and determining which interventions are more effective.
Regarding interventions to improve patient-centered communication skills of nursing students, it was observed that the majority focused on simulation, using SP (e.g., [ 26 , 32 , 33 ]), role-playing [ 39 ] or high-fidelity patient [ 34 ], to either facilitate learning or evaluate communication skills. Previous studies indicate the importance of incorporating simulation in communication skills training. In particular, simulation provides realistic scenarios that allow nursing students to practice and evaluate TC with patients, without putting real patients at risk [ 53 ]. In addition, various studies indicate that the simulation with SP offers nursing students the opportunity to practice TC before clinical practices, being able to improve communication with the patient in the clinical setting [ 54 , 55 ]. Simulation using SP can be effective in teaching patient-centered clinical skills [ 53 , 56 ]. On the other hand, previous studies have shown the training of individuals to treat patients in realistic situations provides an opportunity to improve the competencies of nursing students through human interaction and feedback [ 57 , 58 ]. In this review, all of the studies that implemented simulation conducted feedback with the nursing students. The process of providing feedback during or after the simulation sessions allowed them to address their strengths and weaknesses in order to improve their performance [ 57 , 58 ]. In conclusion, previous research indicates that the implementation of simulation in clinical skills training programs could be useful to improve nurses’ communication skills and the ability to interact with patients [ 6 , 52 ]. In relation to the application of innovative educational pedagogies, various studies have indicated the need to implement new active learning pedagogies that involve students in their training in order to improve their clinical skills [ 59 , 60 ]. Regarding the use of courses as an intervention to improve communication skills with the patient, they have been shown to be effective in some of the included studies. However, the development of courses based on master classes is not recommended as the only educational resource in the training of nursing students and should be combined with other educational pedagogies [ 61 ]. In short, previous studies indicate that the new generation of students prefer self-directed, immediate, exciting and immersive experiences [ 62 ]. They encourage nurse educators to superimpose the dissonances between traditional teaching and generational learning needs, based on active learning, simulations, reflective learning and educational games [ 63 , 64 ]. Hence, most studies are based on simulation or innovative pedagogies, to encourage student participation in the acquisition of skills.
Following the analysis of the included articles, the contexts were mainly based on mental health [ 26 , 31 , 33 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ], end-of-life [ 32 , 43 , 47 ] and maternity [ 34 ]. Six studies focused on general patient-centered communication skills [ 28 , 41 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]. Previous studies have indicated that interventions to teach nurse-patient communication skills target the most challenging clinical interactions [ 52 ]. These data are consistent with the studies included in this review. In particular, previous studies indicate that nursing students feel challenged and anxious when they have to talk and interact with mental health patients [ 65 , 66 ]; hence, it is one of the most predominant clinical areas in this review. In addition a review indicated that further studies are needed to improve the available evidence on the clinical practice of nursing students with mental health patients [ 67 ]. However, the communication skills involved in everyday conversation with patients are equally important, especially given the perception that nurses lack the time to communicate with patients [ 68 ] or with chronically ill patients [ 7 , 8 ], and this was not addressed in the nursing students. Regarding the year that the nursing students were enrolled in, statistically significant improvements were observed in both the students enrolled in their first year [ 28 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 42 ] and those in their last year of the nursing degree [ 33 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]. In addition, several studies indicate that communication skills training should be incorporated into the nursing degree curriculum every year. Therefore, the students learn and practice various communication skills before beginning their clinical practices in different clinical areas [ 15 , 68 ].
In this systematic review, in which 19 quantitative studies on patient-centered communication interventions in nursing students were reviewed, half of them were found, specifically thirteen [ 26 , 28 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ], to be effective in improving patient-centered communication skills. The differences between the obtained results may be due to the study design, as there was a lot of variability in the designs, sampling, teaching interventions, duration and sample size. In addition, several studies indicated improvements in patient-centered communication skills, although the results were not statistically significant in some of them (e.g., [ 33 , 35 , 37 ]). On the other hand, only one study evaluated the long-term impact of intervention on nursing students, finding statistically significant differences [ 38 ]. It would be necessary for future studies to evaluate the long-term impact of the interventions in order to improve their communication skills with patients and to determine the effectiveness over time.
A longitudinal study design is recommended to assess the stability and long-term influence of the improvements in communication skills observed in this study. Specifically, observational studies are needed to assess student performance in clinical areas.
This review includes the following limitations. First, articles that were not in English were excluded, which may constitute a bias by not considering other languages. Most of the included studies used self-report measures to identify the results and few studies used more objective measures. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the intervention methods and measurements of the studies’ results prevented a synthesis of results through meta-analysis. The studies need more evidence to address the possibility of bias due to the use of self-report measures and other potential forms of bias [ 69 ]. For example, the inclusion of quasi-experimental studies without randomization presents a selection bias. This aspect tends to overestimate the effects of intervention, even though a rigorous methodology and relevant data are presented. The studies of a single group that evaluate the impact of intervention, based on differences between pre-test and post-test measures, can interfere with internal validity by not being compared with students of the same cohort who were not exposed to the intervention. The studies where training was carried out over a period of time can lead to biases, as it is not possible to prove whether changes were due to the intervention or other academic activities. Another risk of bias in the studies is that the instructors who performed the interventions were not blinded due to the nature of the educational intervention studies. On the other hand, it is also important to consider that almost 50% of the studies were carried out within the context of mental health, as communication is a key element of the nurse-patient relationship in this area. However, it would be interesting in future research to be able to deepen the analysis of communication skills learning within the nursing curriculum and the subjects or areas in which it is involved.
This systematic review had some strengths. First, a broad search was performed using MeSH terms and keywords that addressed the communication of nursing students with the patient; and this search was performed in multiple databases. Despite this, research methods have been systematically applied in this review following the guidelines established for systematic review. In addition, a two-person review of what studies to include and the assessment of their quality increased the rigor of the findings. Therefore, the results obtained expand and update what was known thus far about patient-centered communication interventions for nursing students.
More research is needed to develop instruments that evaluate all aspects that interfere with patient-centered communication in order to improve patient-centered communication skills of nursing students through more effective educational strategies, guided by theoretical frameworks, in a more consistent way. In addition, studies should be carried out that report the perspective of the patient in regards to communication established with the nursing students.
This systematic review provides preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of interventions used to train nursing students in patient-centered communication. Although all the interventions obtained significant results in communication skills, it has not yet been determined which methodology is more effective. The majority of the analyzed studies used simulation as the methodology for communication skills training, obtaining statistically significant results. This methodology could be combined with other educational strategies that have indicated improved communication of nursing students with their patients.
Conceptualization, L.G.-P. and V.V.M.-H.; Methodology, L.G.-P., V.V.M.-H., V.G.-P., G.A.-M.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, L.G.-P., V.V.M.-H., and G.A.-M.; Writing—Review & Editing, V.G.-P. and G.G.-G.; Supervision: L.G.-P., V.V.M.-H.,V.G.-P., G.G.-G., G.A.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This research received no external funding
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
In this Types of Therapeutic Communication in Nursing article, we will explore various types of therapeutic communication techniques employed by nurses to enhance patient care.
Table of Contents
Therapeutic communication in nursing is a purposeful, patient-centered interaction that promotes a trusting relationship between the nurse and the patient. It involves active listening , empathy, and effective communication to address the physical and emotional needs of patients.
Establishing a strong therapeutic relationship through communication is crucial in nursing. It not only improves patient satisfaction but also contributes to better health outcomes and increased adherence to treatment plans.
Explore the various types of therapeutic communication in nursing that play a pivotal role in enhancing patient care.
Open-ended questions.
Nurses often use open-ended questions to encourage patients to express their thoughts and feelings freely. This technique promotes a more in-depth understanding of the patient’s concerns.
Reflective responses involve paraphrasing or restating what the patient has communicated. This technique validates the patient’s feelings and shows that the nurse is actively engaged in the conversation.
Clear communication is vital in healthcare. Nurses use clarification techniques to ensure that they understand the patient’s statements accurately, reducing the risk of misunderstandings.
Active listening.
Active listening involves not only hearing the patient’s words but also paying attention to their non-verbal cues. Nurses use this technique to demonstrate empathy and understanding.
Maintaining appropriate eye contact and positive body language conveys attentiveness and warmth, contributing to a trusting nurse-patient relationship .
Judicious use of touch, such as a comforting hand on the shoulder, can provide emotional support and reassurance to patients.
Beyond spoken words, the written form plays a vital role. Whether it’s documenting patient information or crafting empathetic notes, nurses proficient in written therapeutic communication ensure that every aspect of patient care is well-documented and understood.
Nurses validate patients’ feelings by acknowledging their emotions without judgment. This fosters a sense of understanding and support.
Expressing empathy through statements like “I understand how you feel” demonstrates compassion and helps patients feel heard and supported.
Teach-back method.
Nurses use the teach-back method to ensure patients comprehend medical information by asking them to explain it in their own words.
Clear and concise information about diagnoses, treatments, and care plans helps empower patients to actively participate in their healthcare.
Lightening the mood.
Appropriate humor can create a positive and relaxed atmosphere, easing tension and promoting a more comfortable patient experience.
Sharing light moments through humor helps build rapport between nurses and patients, contributing to a more positive therapeutic relationship.
Calm communication.
In high-stress situations, nurses employ de-escalation techniques, such as maintaining a calm tone and using soothing words, to diffuse tension.
Redirecting a patient’s focus from a stressful situation to a more positive or neutral topic can help de-escalate emotions.
Active listening to spiritual concerns.
Nurses acknowledge and respect patients’ spiritual beliefs, actively listening to their concerns and incorporating them into the care plan.
Offering spiritual support, such as facilitating visits from religious leaders or providing quiet spaces for prayer, contributes to holistic patient care.
In Types of Therapeutic Communication in Nursing conclusion, therapeutic communication in nursing involves a diverse set of techniques aimed at establishing meaningful connections with patients. Whether through verbal or non-verbal means, the goal is to create an environment that promotes trust, understanding, and collaboration in the pursuit of optimal patient care.
Therapeutic communication in nursing is crucial for building trust, understanding patient needs, and improving overall patient outcomes.
Nurses express empathy through validation, empathetic statements, and actively listening to patients’ concerns.
Humor can lighten the mood, build rapport, and create a positive atmosphere, contributing to a more comfortable patient experience.
Please note that this article is for informational purposes only and should not substitute professional medical advice.
Recent articles, nursing informatics: the intersection of nursing and technology, patient positioning: importance, techniques, and safety considerations, hyperthermia nursing diagnosis and care plan, types of immunity system of body, home care nursing services, benefits and challenges, types of nursing courses: which one is right for you, download nursing notes pdf, mental health nursing history collection, nursing assignment on contraceptive pills, case study on appendicitis nursing assignment, male and female reproductive system pdf, nursing foundation note for bsc and gnm, staff nurse syllabus and exam pattern question bank -1, sensory system and sense organs pdf, medical surgical nursing- nursing assignment on dialysis, more like this, gifts for nursing home residents, gift ideas for nursing students, crystalloid and colloid: differences and when to use each, how to insert a catheter in a female patient -female catheterization, mental health nursing diagnosis care plan pdf, child pediatric health nursing notes -bsc nursing, mid-wifery pdf notes for nursing students, national health programmes in india pdf, reproductive system nursing notes pdf, primary health care nursing notes pdf, psychology note nursing pdf, nursingenotes.com.
A Digital Platform For Nursing Study Materials
Most popular.
© Nursingenotes.com | All rights reserved |
For information regarding prerequisites for this course, please refer to the Academic Course Catalog .
View this course’s outcomes, policies, schedule, and more.*
*The information contained in our Course Guides is provided as a sample. Specific course curriculum and requirements for each course are provided by individual instructors each semester. Students should not use Course Guides to find and complete assignments, class prerequisites, or order books.
All individuals in any organization must be armed with strategies to communicate in crisis. Analyzing historic crises will ready them for future events and aid in the overall mitigation of organization crisis.
Textbook readings and lecture presentations.
No details available.
After reading the Course Syllabus and Student Expectations , the student will complete the related checklist found in the Course Overview.
Video Discussions are collaborative learning experiences. Therefore, the student will complete one Video Discussion: Introduction in this course. During the first week, the student will record a short video introducing himself or herself to the class. The student should post this in the initial thread. The length of the video is up to the student (but typically 2-4 minutes). Then, the student will post a written response of 200 words to 2 other classmates’ video introductions. No scholarly sources/citations are required.
Discussions are collaborative learning experiences. Therefore, the student will complete five standard discussions within this course. The content of this course is extensive and will require the student to look at a variety of concepts in a variety of ways. The student will have to think analytically, articulate carefully, and work quickly. The student will prepare an initial thread and then respond to at least 2 of his or her peers. Each thread must be a minimum of 400 words and include 3 scholarly citations (including 1 of the textbooks) and 1 Biblical reference in current APA format. Each reply must be a minimum of 250 words and include 2 scholarly citations and 1 Biblical reference in current APA format.
Compare and contrast the crisis communication strategies of two recent organizational crises. Analyze the effectiveness of pre-crisis planning, crisis response tactics, and post-crisis recovery efforts in each case to gain a better understanding of post-crisis success. These paper will be approximately 1,000 words in current APA format. It will include at least 8 references, including both of the course textbooks (2) and the Bible.
This assignment focuses on a critical analysis of a recent organizational crisis response and its communication strategies. The student will dissect the strengths and weaknesses of the communication approach, exploring alternative tactics that might have led to different outcomes. These paper will be approximately 1,000 words in current APA format. It will include at least 8 references, including both of the course texts (2) and the Bible.
After reading many case studies throughout this program, this assignment challenges the student to delve into a recent crisis and analyze its impact through a case study format. These paper will be approximately 1,000 words in current APA format. It will include at least 8 references, including both of the course textbooks (2) and the Bible.
Each quiz will cover the Learn material for the assigned Module: Week. Each quiz will be open-book/open-notes, contain 2-3 short-answer questions, and have a 1-hour time limit. The student should support his or her responses using the course textbooks and other outside sources.
Speak to one of our admissions specialists.
Inner Navigation
Have questions?
Apply FREE This Week*
*Some restrictions may occur for this promotion to apply. This promotion also excludes active faculty and staff, military, non-degree-seeking, DGIA, Continuing Education, WSB, and certificate students.
Request info about liberty university online, choose a program level.
Choose a program level
Bachelor’s
Master’s
Certificate
Select a field of study
Select a program
Legal first name.
Enter legal first name
Enter legal last name
Enter an email address
Enter a phone number
Enter an address
Apt., P.O. Box, or can’t find your address? Enter it manually instead .
Select a Country
Enter Street Address
Enter State
Enter Zip Code
Back to automated address search
Start my application now for FREE
BMC Nursing volume 23 , Article number: 623 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
Metrics details
The nursing workforce comprises multiple generations, each with unique values, beliefs, and expectations that can influence communication, work ethic, and professional relationships. In Qatar, the generational gap between nurses and nurse managers poses challenges to effective communication and teamwork, impacting job satisfaction and patient outcomes.
This study investigates the generational gap between nurses and nurse managers in Qatar, aiming to identify strategies to enhance collaboration and create a positive work environment.
A qualitative research design was used, involving semi-structured interviews with 20 participants, including frontline nurses and senior nurse managers. Participants were purposively sampled to represent different generations. Data were collected through face-to-face and virtual interviews, then transcribed and thematically analyzed.
Four key themes emerged: Optimizing the Work Environment : Older generations preferred transformational and situational leadership, while younger nurses valued respect, teamwork, accountability, and professionalism. Strengthening Work Atmosphere through Communication and values : Older nurses favored face-to-face communication, while younger nurses preferred digital tools. Cultivating Respect and Empathy : Younger nurses emphasized fairness in assignments and promotions, while older nurses focused on empathy and understanding. Dynamic Enhancement of Healthcare Systems : Younger nurses were more adaptable to technology and professional development, while older nurses prioritized clinical care and patient outcomes.
The study reveals significant generational differences in leadership preferences, communication styles, and adaptability to technology. Addressing these gaps through effective leadership, ongoing education, and open communication can improve job satisfaction and patient care.
Peer Review reports
The nursing profession faces a significant challenge of a multigenerational workforce that can cause conflict and hinder effective communication, especially between nurse managers and nurses [ 1 ]. In addition, a literature review of studies conducted over the past two decades indicates that the generational gap between nurses and nurse managers is a complex phenomenon requiring concerted efforts to address it [ 2 , 3 ].
The nursing workforce comprises four generations, including the Baby Boomers (born between 1946 and 1964), Generation X (born between 1965 and 1979), Generation Y or Millennials (born between 1980 and 1994), and Generation Z (born after 1995) [ 4 ]. These generations have unique values, beliefs, attitudes, and expectations that influence their communication style, work ethic, and approach to work [ 4 ].
In 2013, Hendricks and Cope discussed the impact of generational differences on the nursing workforce and the challenges it presents for nurse managers [ 5 ]. They searched various databases electronically and found that generational diversity affects nurses’ attitudes, beliefs, work habits, and expectations. The paper suggested that accepting and embracing this diversity can lead to a more harmonious work environment and facilitate nurse retention [ 5 ].
The article focused on the cultural and work ethic differences between Baby Boomers and Generation Xers, with Baby Boomers primarily managing the workforce [ 6 ]. Baby Boomers are described as driven and dedicated, equating work with self-worth and personal fulfillment [ 6 ]. At the same time, Generation Xers have ideas of an acceptable workplace, and their terms of employment are usually non-negotiable [ 6 ]. The article summarized recent literature and studies to guide healthcare leadership in recruiting, retaining, and managing Generation X workers in the nursing field [ 6 ].
Similarly, Carver & Candela (2008) conducted a study to inform nurse managers about the generational differences among nurses and how they affect the work environment [ 7 ]. With four generations in the nursing workforce, understanding the characteristics of each generation can lead to increased job satisfaction, productivity, and decreased turnover [ 7 ]. Considering generational differences as part of an overall strategy to increase organizational commitment can improve nursing work environments and address the global nursing shortage [ 7 ]. Managers should increase their knowledge of generational diversity to tap into the strengths of each generation [ 7 ]. In addition, Younger nurses have different career expectations than their older colleagues [ 8 ]. They seek a balanced lifestyle with reasonable work hours, demand to use the latest technology, and expect to be vocal team members [ 8 ].
Managing a multigenerational workforce requires recognizing and valuing the strengths of each generation. Leaders who maximize everyone’s talents and address individual and generational needs can create synergy and improve team performance. Each generation brings unique strengths to the workforce that should be celebrated and utilized to the organization’s advantage. Meeting the needs of each employee, such as providing opportunities for advancement, work/life balance, compensation, benefits, and learning and development, can lead to higher-functioning work teams [ 9 ]. Nurse leaders should know their employees’ multigenerational characteristics and expectations and provide timely and specific feedback to manage them effectively [ 9 ]. With an appreciation of multigenerational differences and a commitment to higher-functioning work teams, leaders can improve organizational efficiency and patient care outcomes [ 9 ].
To bridge the generational gap in nursing, the SIT offers a comprehensive approach to enhancing communication, collaboration, and teamwork between nurses and nurse managers [ 5 ]. This involves acknowledging and respecting each generation’s unique characteristics, values, and experiences, which fosters a better understanding and more effective cooperation. Establishing a shared vision and goal for patient care unites nurses and nurse managers, helping to overcome any multigenerational conflicts that might arise in the workplace [ 5 ]. Additionally, encouraging multigenerational communication and mentoring is vital. This can be facilitated through programs where experienced nurses share their knowledge and skills with younger colleagues, promoting a cohesive and supportive team environment. Furthermore, providing training and development opportunities tailored to each generation’s diverse learning styles and preferences is essential for building a more skilled and competent workforce [ 10 ].
The literature indicates that the generational gap between nurses and nurse managers is a global complex phenomenon that can affect communication, work values, job satisfaction, retention, and quality of care [ 11 ]. Nursing leaders can recognize generational differences in values and behaviors as potential strengths. By gaining a deeper understanding of generational influences, these insights can be harnessed to develop effective strategies that sustain the diverse yet shrinking nursing workforce. Leveraging generational differences can also create positive work environments, enhance quality and productivity, and ultimately improve patient care. As generational differences increasingly become a critical aspect of diversity, it is essential to understand the dynamics between work engagement and meaningful work across generational cohorts to tailor approaches that align with each organization’s unique needs [ 12 , 13 ].
Understanding how to bridge the generational gap in nursing is crucial for nurses and nurse managers to work together effectively and provide better patient care, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes. This study aims to enhance workplace communication and collaboration by identifying and addressing the factors contributing to multigenerational workplace conflicts. By doing so, nurses and nurse managers can build more cohesive and supportive teams, resulting in a more positive work environment. Finally, addressing the generational gap in nursing benefits the workplace and enables the organization to develop a more engaged and motivated workforce. Multigenerational learning and development opportunities can increase job satisfaction and retention. Recognizing and valuing the unique perspectives and experiences each generation brings is essential.
To the best of our knowledge, no studies have been conducted in Qatar that addressed the generational gap among nurses. In line with this, the study aims to identify and compare the work engagement levels and managerial approaches among nurses and nurse managers across different generations and explore and propose effective strategies for improving communication, collaboration, and job contentment in an intergenerational work environment. The findings will contribute to the nursing profession’s knowledge and provide practical solutions for managing a diverse nursing workforce in Qatar.
This study utilized a descriptive qualitative research design. After considering the participants’ time limits, commitments, and convenience, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with nurses and nurse managers (Executive and assistant executive directors of nursing). The authors developed the interview questions for this study (Supplementary File 1). Participants were recruited from healthcare facilities within the organization through purposive sampling. The sample size was determined based on the data saturation point, where no new themes or perspectives emerged. Interviews were conducted face-to-face or virtually, depending on the participant’s preference and availability. With the participant’s permission, interviews were audio-recorded to aid in accurate transcription and were thematically analyzed.
The interview guide was thoughtfully developed to capture participants’ experiences and insights effectively. The process began with an in-depth review of studies examining the generational gap between nurses and managers, identifying key themes such as work engagement, organizational environment, communication, and technological advancement. These themes provided the framework for creating open-ended questions to elicit detailed and reflective responses. Probing questions were also included to deepen the data collected by clarifying and expanding on participants’ initial answers. The draft questions underwent multiple rounds of review and refinement to ensure clarity, relevance, and the elimination of bias, with potential input from qualitative research experts.
Qualitative research aimed to generate a deep understanding of the generational gap between nurses and their managers. This understanding could not be answered in a quantitative approach. Several strategies were employed throughout the research process to ensure the credibility of the findings.
Firstly, to ensure the credibility of the data collected, the researcher established trust and rapport with the participants. This was achieved by being transparent about the research aims, building rapport, and showing genuine interest in the participants’ experiences. The researcher also ensured that the participants felt comfortable sharing their experiences and opinions by creating a safe and non-judgmental environment.
Secondly, data triangulation was used to enhance the credibility of the data. Data triangulation involves using multiple data sources to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon being studied.
Thirdly, the researcher conducted member checking to validate the data collected. Member checking involved sharing the findings with the participants and asking for their feedback on whether the findings accurately represented their experiences and opinions. This process ensured that the researcher’s interpretation of the data aligned with the participants’ experiences and perceptions.
Fourthly, the researcher engaged in reflexivity throughout the research process. Reflexivity involves reflecting on the researcher’s biases, values, and assumptions that might have influenced the research process and findings. By being aware of their biases, the researcher ensured they did not influence the data collection or interpretation of the findings.
Finally, the researcher used a systematic and rigorous approach to analyze the data collected. This study used thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes in the data. The analysis was conducted using a coding scheme, and the findings were supported with quotes from the participants, enhancing the credibility of the findings.
The participants were approached using a purposive sampling technique. A total of 20 participants were expected to join the study. All participants were approached based on an email from the corporate nursing mail group. The participants of this study met the following criteria: they represented diverse generations, with 3–4 from each of the subsequent generations: Generation X (1965–1980), Generation Y (1981–1996), and Generation Z (1997–2012); they had joined HMC for at least one year; and they were willing to participate in the study.
Before conducting the study, the researcher had obtained the consent of the participants (Research Information Sheet). Interviews were done face-to-face or virtually, depending on the participants’ preferences and availability. During the interviews, conversations were audio-recorded to facilitate transcriptions of the responses, completed within 24 h of the interview, and reviewed by two study researchers. The data saturation was determined by redundancy of information is indicated when similar patterns, themes, or categories keep appearing in the data, and no new information is being uncovered during additional interviews or data collection efforts.
The richness and depth of the data collected are critical. Saturation is considered reached when the data sufficiently explores and explains the research questions and key concepts, providing a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon. Data saturation was reached after twenty interviews; however, two additional interviews were conducted to confirm this. Ethical principles were strictly observed, primarily explaining the nature and purpose of the study before obtaining their consent to participate. Identifiers were removed from the transcripts, and codes were used to label participants (e.g., Participants 1, 2, etc.). Participants were informed that they had the right to withdraw from the study at any time should they decide not to participate in further sessions.
Initially, all interviews were professionally transcribed verbatim, with pseudonyms used to anonymize participants and protect their identities. Both authors (JK and NFA) thoroughly read and re-read the transcripts multiple times to become familiar with the content and ensure the transcripts accurately reflected the audio recordings. then applied an inductive coding approach, deriving codes directly from the data rather than imposing them beforehand. This involved systematically identifying and highlighting significant quotes and segments within the transcripts that were relevant to the research questions. These initial codes were subsequently organized into potential themes by grouping together codes that shared a common essence or underlying concept. Following this, the researchers organized these initial codes into potential themes by grouping codes that shared a common essence or underlying concept.
The potential themes underwent a two-phase review and refinement process. In the first phase, the researchers reviewed the coded data extracts to ensure they coherently supported the identified themes. In the second phase, the themes were examined in relation to the entire data set to confirm that they accurately represented the data and captured the full range of participants’ experiences. Some themes were modified, combined, or discarded during this process based on their relevance and data representation.
The final step involved crafting a coherent and compelling narrative that provided a detailed account of each theme. The report included illustrative quotes from participants to substantiate the themes and vividly depict their experiences. This structured approach ensured that the analysis was thorough and that the resulting themes were deeply rooted in the data. By following Braun and Clarke’s six-step process, the study moved from raw transcripts to well-defined themes that offer meaningful insights into the generational gap among nurses and Nurse managers.
This study had a cohort of ten frontline nurses from the new generation and ten senior nurse managers from the old generation, as shown in Table 1 . The mean age of the new generation was 32.4 years (SD 4.9 years). The nurses had an average of 8.3 years of overall work experience (SD 3.09 years), specifically at Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC); they had a mean work experience of 4.7 years (SD 1.1 years). Gender distribution among the participants was 80% male and 20% female. This demographic profile reveals a well-experienced group, particularly regarding their tenure at HMC, providing a stable basis for analyzing their professional perspectives and experiences.
On the other hand, the old generation demographics: 60% were Executive Directors and 40% were Assistant Executives. Most participants belonged to Generation X (ages 44 to 59 years old), suggesting a consistent age distribution. On average, the executives had 27.9 years of overall work experience (SD 9.46 years), highlighting substantial professional tenure with considerable variability. Specifically, their mean work experience at Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC) was 17.4 years (SD 8.24 years), reflecting a diverse range of service durations at this institution. The gender distribution was evenly split, with 50% male and 50% female participants. Details on the demographic data of the old generation participants are detailed in Table 2 . Three major themes were derived from the study, as illustrated in Fig. 1 .
The major themes and Sub-Themes derived from the study
Healthy work environments that maximize the health and well-being of nurses are essential in achieving good patient and societal outcomes, as well as optimal organizational performance. This theme consisted of three sub-themes: Influencing leadership style, Patient outcome and nurse satisfaction, and Adaptation of technological advancement.
When investigating the leadership style, all older generations consistently agreed to prefer the transformational one because of its capacity to inspire and motivate frontline staff. However, to respond to specific situational demands, the older generation in our study modified and combined aspects of situational and democratic leadership.
Which type of leadership I’m following is transformational leadership. But sometimes , we can take that democratic leadership in some situations , but not all of it. We can say situational leadership at the same time. But any leadership style you will follow should be , I can tell , a combination of some practice and attitude toward your staff”. (Participant 17).
On the other hand, the new generation perceives leadership style by retrieving the inner values of their leaders, such as respect, teamwork, accountability, and professionalism.
“Actually , our leaders primarily lead by maintaining a good relationship , and he is making sense of decreasing the distance between the higher and lower positions. So , I can say that I share the same attitudes and values with my senior managers , but it might differ from one person to another.” ( Participant 1).
The older generation perceived the working environment as a motivator for enhancing patient outcomes. Mainly, they are putting serving humanity at the top of their priority, which might be achieved through creativity, collaboration, and compassion. As articulated by Participant 7, “I believe that exerting the best effort in one’s job demonstrates ownership and respect for the profession. Serving humanity , I prioritize creativity , collaboration , and compassion in my work”.
This quote demonstrates the deep values held by this group, highlighting their strategy of combining individual achievement with a wider humanitarian influence.
The new generation views the working environment as a vital element in improving nurses’ satisfaction, considering many contributing factors, such as the current status of the global economy and the opportunities for nurses to work and move abroad. As elaborated by Participant 13,
“I think we can see a difference between the young and the old generation , and I think the way they look at nursing as a profession. There is a big difference between all the new generations , and I can see how the old generation looks at it. The older generation is looking at ways to help people. It is a way to provide support for older people. Unfortunately , I think the new generation has started looking at it as a job—more than a way of helping people. And I believe there are many different reasons for this. I think about the economic status around the world , and the other thing that you know is that I believe the world is open nowadays for nurses to travel around. Therefore , it’s started becoming a job more than a profession. Unfortunately , that’s why people start looking at it in a completely different way , which is not something good.” (Participant 13).
When examining the technological aspects, the older generation acknowledges the presence of the gab. Most of them believe the gap exists because they adhere to the old practices they learned previously.
“There is a noticeable difference between the younger and older generations of nurses , primarily due to advancements in technology and medical knowledge. Younger nurses are often more up-to-date with the latest care techniques and medical research , as they can access various modern resources. Older nurses , however , may adhere to practices they learned earlier in their careers , which might not incorporate recent technological changes”. (Participant 16)
On the other hand, the new generation views new technologies as an easy-to-adopt opportunity. They like to use the new potentials that come with AI. For example, the new generation is becoming more dependent on technology due to the greater benefits it provides compared to traditional approaches in terms of diagnosis and treatment.
“Technology is a significant factor for us , being part of the newer generation. It’s very important in our year of nursing. We use computers , advanced machines , and electronic documentation , which differ from past practices.”(participant 10) . “The younger generation is adapting more easily to new technologies and software , like using EMR for documentation. The older generation , who are used to manual documentation , find it harder to adapt to this new system in patient care. I’ve also heard that some facilities are using GPS and AI systems to assist in diagnoses and results. So , artificial intelligence is becoming a part of nursing , and younger generations are adapting more easily to it. It will take time for the older generation to adapt because they are accustomed to different practices”. (Participant 8)
Effective communication enhances working relationships and knowledge translation and reduces conflict responsible for errors, improving patient safety. This theme consisted of three sub-themes, diverse and practical communication approaches, positive work atmosphere cultivation, and emphasis on shared values across teams.
The older generation emphasizes the importance of training sessions on communication skills and advanced technologies to bridge the gap with the new generation. Moreover, they believe the new generation needs to be more skilled in direct interpersonal communication.
“Effective communication strategies that bridge generational gaps should be promoted. This could include training on communication best practices and the use of technology for older nurses and encouraging younger nurses to develop strong interpersonal skills for face-to-face interactions”. (Participant 20) “The older generations , always think of , they are more of insightful , in terms of , in the meetings they will be able to translate or interpret the information much differently. And that’s how I see.”( Participants − 18) .
According to the new generation, effective and direct communication without any mediator can enhance the work atmosphere and ease professional communication with older generations. It can help the new generation have more chances to interact with the old generation.
“Certainly , open and direct communication is helpful. As previously said , it is crucial to have someone who can assist in communicating with my manager in my home country. Establishing a direct line of communication with my management and developing a robust professional connection without intermediaries is vital. I appreciate the older generation’s facilitation of an open-door policy , as it cultivates a direct and efficient communication atmosphere.” (Participant 1).
When examining the intergenerational dynamics in the workplace, the findings indicated that differences in experience, training, and access to technology significantly impact the work environment and the level of collaboration among employees. As one participant articulated,
“The work atmosphere impacts collaboration. I think it does impact that and impacts these differences from one generation to another. It’s not about good and bad , but it’s rather about the differences in the experiences , differences in the training , and differences in the work environment as well as the availability of technology. So , I would say that there is a difference.” (Participant 19). However, the new generation focuses on the technological aspect and how that might affect the work atmosphere positively.
Conflicts arise when older generations rely on experience while new generations prefer evidence-based practices. This affects workplace shared values.
“For instance , there might be a conflict over a non-scientifically backed common practice. The older generation might argue that they’ve been doing it for years without issues. However , from a knowledge-based perspective , the practice might be incorrect. Overall , the older generation’s viewpoint is based on their experience , where they haven’t seen negative outcomes. Conversely , the new generation would argue based on scientific principles and current best practices. The older generation might resist changing to these new practices. So , conflicts like these might arise from differing viewpoints on practices and approaches.” (Participant 9) .
The new generations perceive shared values as part of the staff-manager relationship and can’t isolate it. When the old generation leads, the staff investigates the old generation’s way of leading, which will affect the new generation’s attitudes and values. Consequently, the new generation still takes the old generation as an example to be followed. This meaning can be found in Participant 1 answers. “Actually , our leaders primarily lead by maintaining a good relationship , and he is making sense of decreasing the distance between the higher and lower positions. So , I can say that I share the same attitudes and values with my senior managers , but it might differ from one person to another.” ( Participant 1) .
This theme focuses on two subthemes: commitment to fairness and fostering a sense of purpose among staff.
The results of the older generation highlight the importance of fostering empathy in the workplace. Participant 20 suggests promoting understanding by encouraging the new generation to consider their colleagues’ perspectives and motivations, enhancing mutual respect and cooperation.
“Encourage Empathy: Foster empathy among employees by encouraging them to put themselves in each other’s shoes. Encouraging individuals to consider the motivations and experiences of their colleagues can lead to better understanding” (Participant 20). “They can challenge you as a leader and they can challenge each other. That’s how you build a better workplace to have a conversation , a clear professional conversation. If you want to build a professional conversation , the two respect the critiques to respect the differences. So those differences are not conflicts. Differences are differences of opinion due to the experiences everybody can brings in.”(Participants 18) .
However, the new generation demands that older generations be more open to work-related discussions, assignments, and promotion opportunities. They believe the new generation has a greater chance to be promoted if they get a fair chance as they are equipped and well-educated. This was clear by Participant 9.“ Compared to the older generation , the new generation of nurses has more opportunities for service and promotion based on education. In the past , nurses often held diplomas or auxiliary nursing qualifications , with the attitude focused primarily on patient care. Now , there’s a trend towards having more knowledgeable nurses capable of providing advanced care”( Participant 9).
A sense of purpose plays a crucial role in developing cohesive nursing teams by promoting transparent communication and mutual learning, as emphasized by Participant 18.
“The most effective way that I felt worked during this period is the mentorship , working closely with the people and letting them have open communication all the time , providing the proper support , and providing the platform to share the experience and knowledge while you are learning or why they are learning from , and this learning process will be from both. So , this sharing of information through a clear mentorship , in one way or another , will create a culture of mutual respect , and this will end with time; this is not just easy; it takes time. But eventually , if it is done appropriately from the beginning , it will formulate a more cohesive nursing team.“(Participant 18).
The sense of purpose was more obvious among the new generation’s responses, as can be seen in Participant 7’s response: “ Our teamwork is initially built on collaboration , where each nurse supports and enhances the work of others.”
The new generation is more adaptable to technological changes and modern healthcare systems. They often embrace new approaches and value work-life balance and a more collaborative approach to patient care. Older nurses have been exposed to a traditional healthcare system and may have had to adapt to technological changes later in their careers.
The new generation is involved in all nursing and patient care areas. They are advancing in roles such as nurse advocates and nurse researchers. So, the new generation is expanding into new fields and trying to improve the nursing career by pursuing education and professional development. In contrast, the older generation focuses more on clinical areas and patient outcomes.
“There are more options available now , especially for the younger generations. Previously , options were limited. You would start at a hospital or a specific department and stay there. With education and different pathways , you can work in patient care or move into education or other areas. This variety of options makes it easier for the younger generations.” (Participant:8) . “The other thing that when you are dealing with the old generation , you’ll find the love to be with the patient , patient bedside dealing with the patient day today.” (Participant:13) .
The old generation perceived transparency as the need for the new and old generations to openly discuss changes, address concerns, and collaboratively adapt to evolving practices, fostering a transparent and supportive environment in the nursing profession. “Create an environment where nurses and nurse managers can openly discuss changes in the profession , address concerns , and work together to adapt” (Participant 20).
The new generation perceives transparency as a valuable key to promoting change. Participant No. 1’s answers reveal this meaning: “By open communication , that will help. Straight communication and effective communication indeed will help in preparing for the change. As I mentioned before , I need some help or someone to communicate with my manager in my home country. Also , by ensuring that there is no second person between you and your manager , maintain good relationships.”(Participant:1).
This study assessed the generational gap between the new and the old generation. We have identified four main themes: optimizing the working environment, strengthening the work atmosphere through communication and values, cultivating respect and empathy, and dynamic enhancement of healthcare systems. Overall, the results of this study identify the generational gap between these two generations. Moreover, the findings of this research shed light on significant subthemes that highlight the evolving dynamics within the nursing profession, particularly the differences and similarities between new and old generations. The demographic data provided a clear understanding of the structure of both generations, with a notable representation of male staff nurses in the new generation and a diverse range of experiences in healthcare.
Perceiving the work environment was evident as a generational gap in our study; the leadership style and other subthemes were also identified. This study discovered that the older generation significantly promotes effective leadership styles, including transformational and situational leadership. These styles enhance teamwork, promote autonomy, and ensure a supportive work environment. This is consistent with the findings of Cummings et al. (2018), who highlighted that transformational leadership positively impacts nurse satisfaction and patient outcomes by fostering a supportive and communicative work environment [ 14 ]. Furthermore, situational leadership is vital for the older generation in dynamic critical care units, offering flexibility to address staff readiness levels effectively [ 15 ].
On the other hand, the new generation stressed the importance of inner values such as respect, teamwork, accountability, and professionalism rather than the leadership style of the old generation. The new generation’s focus on internal values suggests a potential shift in organizational culture that prioritizes individual integrity and an attitude of collaboration over traditional hierarchical leadership approaches. This trend indicates that future healthcare entities’ strategies may incrementally prioritize cultivating an environment where ethical behaviors, mutual respect, and collective responsibility play crucial roles in achieving organizational success. This result is consistent with another study done by Boamah et al. (2018), who found that supportive leadership practices enhance nurses’ work engagement and patient care quality, emphasizing the need for recognition and acknowledgment strategies to boost job satisfaction [ 16 ].
In addition, our study evidently shows generational differences in adaptation to technological advancements, with the new generation demonstrating a higher ability to adopt new technologies into their practice. This finding is supported by Lera et al. (2020), who noted that the new generation is more comfortable with modern digital tools and evidence-based practices than the old generation [ 17 ].
The current study has found that generational differences in communication preferences exist, with the new generation leveraging technology for more accessible communication. In contrast, the old generation prefers face-to-face interactions for clearer understanding. This aligns with the findings of Rosi et al. (2019), who noted that younger healthcare professionals are more likely to use digital communication tools, whereas the older generation favors traditional methods [ 18 ]. Effective communication strategies that bridge these generational gaps are crucial. Training on communication best practices and the use of technology for the old generation, as well as encouraging the new generation to develop strong interpersonal skills for face-to-face interactions, are crucial [ 19 ].
Regular feedback mechanisms are crucial for identifying and addressing concerns related to the work atmosphere. Boamah et al. (2018) suggest that understanding and addressing generational differences in work preferences can improve team cohesion and reduce conflicts, ultimately leading to better patient care [ 16 ]. The study participants also emphasized the importance of feedback in creating a positive work environment, consistent with the findings of Lin et al. (2021), who stressed the value of input in fostering a supportive workplace [ 20 ]. The current study found that creating a work culture where debate is encouraged, disagreements are respectful, and active listening helps build a team-oriented mindset. This finding aligns with research by Flores et al. (2023), who noted that promoting shared values and respectful communication enhances team cohesion and collaboration [ 21 ].
The current study has found another generational gap in respect and empathy. The new generation emphasizes the importance of having fair assignments, work-related discussions, and promotion opportunities [ 22 ]. Choi et al. (2018), consistent with our study, reported that fair clinical assignments will enhance staff satisfaction, improve nurses’ working conditions, and positively impact patient outcomes [ 23 ].
Professional self-concept is crucial to staff satisfaction, retention, and well-being [ 24 ]. The sense of purpose is part of the nurse’s professional self-concept; hence, the old generation, especially the leaders, must promote staff well-being by considering their purpose and fostering an environment of mutual benefit [ 25 ]. This finding aligns with the current study, which revealed that the new generation views a sense of purpose as fundamental to their professional needs.
The healthcare system is generally considered a significant influence on nursing careers. Regardless of generation, the healthcare system affects nurses and healthcare providers as it is continuously changed, modified, and developed, creating new challenges and opportunities for healthcare providers.
The progression of nursing practice has been significantly influenced by advancements in education and professional development, leading to a shift in roles and opportunities for nurses. The new generation, who are more adaptable to technological changes and evidence-based practices, are increasingly moving into diverse roles beyond traditional clinical settings. They are now prominent in fields such as nurse advocacy, research, and education, reflecting a broadening of the nursing profession and ultimately enhancing healthcare systems. This shift contrasts with the experiences of the older generation who have primarily focused on direct patient care within clinical environments. Recent studies support this trend. For instance, a study found that new nurses are more likely to engage in continuous education and seek roles that allow for more incredible professional growth and diversification than older nurses [ 26 ].
Our study revealed that creating an environment that promotes openness and transparency is essential for fostering effective communication and collaboration between different generations of nurses. Fostering mentorship and knowledge sharing bridges the generational gap and ensures the transmission of valuable experiences and practices. An open dialogue between nurses and nurse managers about changes in the profession, concerns, and adaptation strategies is critical for cohesive teamwork. These findings are consistent with Bragadóttir et al. (2022), which indicate that organizational transparency and open communication channels significantly enhance teamwork and job satisfaction among nursing staff [ 24 ].
This study highlights the evolving dynamics within the nursing profession, focusing on generational differences and similarities. The new generation is more skillful at integrating technology and embracing diverse roles beyond traditional clinical settings, whereas the old generation brings valuable experience and historical perspectives. Effective leadership, continuous education, and open communication are critical for optimizing the work environment, enhancing nurse satisfaction, and improving patient outcomes. Bridging the generational gap through mentorship and fostering a culture of respect and empathy are essential for a cohesive and resilient healthcare system.
Future research should explore strategies to effectively bridge the generational gap in nursing by integrating leadership styles, communication preferences, and technology adoption across different generations. Longitudinal studies could examine how generational dynamics evolve as new generations enter the workforce and older generations transition out, providing insights into the sustainability of organizational changes. Additionally, expanding research to diverse healthcare settings and cultural contexts would enhance the generalizability of findings. At the same time, intervention studies could test the effectiveness of tailored mentorship programs, continuous education initiatives, and organizational transparency in fostering intergenerational collaboration and improving patient care outcomes.
The study’s methodology, including potential sampling bias due to purposive selection, interviewer bias, and the subjective nature of data saturation, could also influence the results. Additionally, the context-specific nature of the study and the use of virtual interviews might limit the depth and transferability of the findings. Finally, time constraints may have restricted the comprehensiveness of the data collected.
Nurse managers should adopt a multi-faceted leadership approach, embracing both transformational and situational styles, to meet the diverse needs of a multigenerational workforce. Implementing targeted communication training and fostering an environment of respect and empathy can improve team cohesion and patient outcomes. Investing in continuous professional development and technological training will further support the integration of new and experienced nurses.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Stanley D. Multigenerational workforce issues and their implications for leadership in nursing. J Nurs Manag. 2010;18(7):846–52.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Rudolph CW, Rauvola RS, Zacher H. Leadership and generations at work: a critical review. Leadersh Q. 2018;29(1):44–57.
Article Google Scholar
Santos SR, Cox K. Workplace adjustment and intergenerational differences between matures, boomers, and xers. Nurs Econ. 2000;18(1):7–13.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Blythe J, Baumann A, Zeytinoglu IU, Denton M, Akhtar-Danesh N, Davies S, et al. Nursing generations in the contemporary workplace. Public Personnel Manage. 2008;37(2):137–59.
Hendricks JM, Cope VC. Generational diversity: what nurse managers need to know. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(3):717–25.
Cordeniz JA. Recruitment, retention, and management of generation X: a focus on nursing professionals. J Healthc Manag/Am Coll Healthc Exec. 2002;47(4):237–49.
Google Scholar
Carver L, Candela L. Attaining organizational commitment across different generations of nurses. J Nurs Manag. 2008;16(8):984–91.
Greene J. What nurses want. Different generations. Different expectations. Hosp Health Networks. 2005;79(3):34–840.
Outten MK. From veterans to nexters: managing a multigenerational nursing workforce. Nurs Manage. 2012;43(4):42–7.
Rollan Oliveira S, Siles González J. Nursing professionals within the intergenerational context during the 20th and 21st centuries: an integrative review. Investigacion Y Educ en enfermeria. 2021;39(3).
Wolff AC, Ratner PA, Robinson SL, Oliffe JL, Hall LM. Beyond generational differences: a literature review of the impact of relational diversity on nurses’ attitudes and work. J Nurs Manag. 2010;18(8):948–69.
Arslan A, Ahokangas P, Haapanen L, Golgeci I, Tarba SY, Bazel-Shoham OJTF et al. Generational differences in organizational leaders: an interpretive phenomenological analysis of work meaningfulness in the nordic high-tech organizations. 2022;180:121717.
Tan SHE, Chin GFJB. Generational effect on nurses’ work values, engagement, and satisfaction in an acute hospital. 2023;22(1):88.
Cummings GG, Tate K, Lee S, Wong CA, Paananen T, Micaroni SP et al. Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: a systematic review. 2018;85:19–60.
Dorgham SR. SJIJoN Al-Mahmoud 2013 Leadership styles and clinical decision making autonomy among critical care nurses: a comparative study. Sci H 1 4 71–83.
Boamah SA, Laschinger HKS, Wong C, Clarke, SJNo. Effect of transformational leadership on job satisfaction and patient safety outcomes. 2018;66(2):180–9.
Lera M, Taxtsoglou K, Iliadis CK, Frantzana AA, Kourkouta LJAPINJ. Nurses’ Attitudes toward Lifelong Learn via new Technol. 2020;5(2):89.
Bridges D, Davidson RA, Soule Odegard P, Maki IV. Tomkowiak JJMeo. Interprofessional Collaboration: Three best Pract Models Interprofessional Educ. 2011;16(1):6035.
Chan PG, Schaheen LW, Chan EG, Cook CC, Luketich JD, D’Cunha JJJoSE. Technology-enhanced simulation improves trainee readiness transitioning to cardiothoracic training. 2018;75(5):1395–402.
Lin L-C, Huang Y-C, Carter P, Zuniga JJANR. Resilience among nurses in long term care and rehabilitation settings. 2021;62:151518.
Flores IF, Dator WLT, Olivar JJ, Gaballah MK, editors. Congruence of Effective Leadership values between nurse leaders and staff nurses in a Multicultural Medical City in Saudi Arabia: a sequential mixed-methods study. Healthcare: MDPI; 2023.
Moudatsou M, Stavropoulou A, Philalithis A, Koukouli S, editors. The role of empathy in health and social care professionals. Healthcare: MDPI; 2020.
Mlambo M, Silén C, McGrath CJB. Lifelong learning and nurses’ continuing professional development, a metasynthesis of the literature. 2021;20:1–13.
Bragadóttir H, Kalisch BJ, Flygenring BG, Tryggvadóttir GBJSON. The relationship of nursing teamwork and job satisfaction in hospitals. 2023;9:23779608231175027.
Allobaney NF, Eshah NF, Abujaber AA, Nashwan AJJJ. Professional self-concept and self-confidence for nurses dealing with COVID-19 patients. 2022;12(2):134.
Choi J, Miller PJJNS. Registered nurse perception of patient assignment linking to working conditions and outcomes. 2018;50(5):530–9.
Download references
The authors would like to acknowledge the nurses and nurse managers who participated in the study.
This study was funded by the Medical Research Center at Hamad Medical Corporation (MRC-01-23-206).
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Nursing, Hazm Mebaireek General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
Ahmad A. Abujaber, Abdulqadir J. Nashwan, Mark D. Santos, Nabeel F. Al-Lobaney, Rejo G. Mathew & Jamsheer P. Alikutty
University of Doha for Science & Technology, P.O. Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
Albara M. Alomari
Nursing and Midwifery Research Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
Jibin Kunjavara
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
AAA, AJN: Conceptualization. NFA, MDS, JK: Formal analysis.AAA, AJN, MDS, NFA, RGM, JPA, JK, AMA: Methodology, Data curation, Manuscript writing (draft and final review). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Correspondence to Abdulqadir J. Nashwan .
Ethical approval.
This study was approved by the Medical Research Center of Hamad Medical Corporation (MRC-01-23-206). The study has been conducted in accordance with the ethical standards noted in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consents were obtained from all the participants.
Not applicable.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Abujaber, A.A., Nashwan, A.J., Santos, M.D. et al. Bridging the generational gap between nurses and nurse managers: a qualitative study from Qatar. BMC Nurs 23 , 623 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02296-y
Download citation
Received : 29 June 2024
Accepted : 26 August 2024
Published : 05 September 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02296-y
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
ISSN: 1472-6955
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Strong communication skills are essential to provide safe, quality, patient-centered care. Nurses develop therapeutic relationships with patients and family members each day to ensure that health care concerns and needs are addressed. If communication breaks down, information exchange stops and needs go unidentified. Nurses optimize communication channels with patients and families by ...
Effective verbal communication in nursing encompasses several key principles: Pace and Intonation. The manner of speech, including the pace and intonation, significantly influences the impact of the message. For instance, speaking slowly and softly to an excited client can help calm them. Simplicity.
1. Therapeutic communication in nursing helps establish strong nurse-patient relationships. 2. Nursing therapeutic communication is an essential part of interdisciplinary relationships, promoting effective and efficient collaboration among team members to promote positive patient outcomes. 3.
Nurses engage in compassionate, supportive, professional relationships with their clients as part of the "art of nursing." [1] This chapter will review the nurse-client relationship, therapeutic communication, and motivational interviewing. It will also introduce teletherapy and telehealth.
To begin with, let's look at the following two definitions of communication: A process by which information is exchanged between individuals through a common system of symbols, signs, or behavior. 3 Communication is giving, receiving or exchanging ideas, information, signals or messages through appropriate media, enabling individuals or groups to persuade, to seek information, to give ...
Therapeutic communication is a vital skill in nursing for multiple reasons. It can help establish a trusting patient-nurse relationship, prevent misunderstandings and errors, promote patient-centered care, improve patient satisfaction, and improve outcomes (Slade & Sergent, 2023). Nurses should understand and practice various therapeutic ...
Effective communication is a vital skill for nursing assistants. Nursing assistants communicate professionally with patients and other health care team members throughout every shift. This chapter will review the communication process, discuss strategies for adapting communication based on the needs of the client and health care team, and introduce guidelines for documentation and reporting.
3.2 Communication Effective communication is a vital component of effective assignment, delegation, and supervision. It is also one of the Standards of Professional Performance established by the American Nurses Association (ANA). [1] Consider the fundamentals of good communication practices.
3.2 Communication Effective communication is a vital component of proper assignment, delegation, and supervision. It is also one of the Standards of Professional Performance established by the American Nurses Association (ANA). [1] Research has identified that new graduate nurses are more susceptible to stress and isolation within their job roles due to poor communication and teamwork within ...
What is Communication in Nursing. Effective communication in nursing refers to the exchange of information, thoughts, and feelings between healthcare professionals, patients, and their families. It serves as the cornerstone of quality healthcare and encompasses various dimensions, including verbal and non-verbal communication, active listening ...
Effective communication is the bedrock of exceptional nursing care. It goes beyond mere information exchange; it's about establishing trust, alleviating anxiety, and cultivating healing partnerships. In the intricate realm of healthcare, where emotions and decisions intertwine, a nurse's proficiency in communication becomes a powerful tool.
Nurses are critical in the delivery of essential health services and are core in strengthening the health system. They bring people-centred care closer to the communities where they are needed most, thereby helping improve health outcomes and the overall cost-effectiveness of services. Nurses usually act as first responders to complex humanitarian crises and disasters; protectors and advocates ...
Strategies for Success in a Nursing Program 10: Communicating 10.6: Barriers to Effective Communication ... Meredith waited impatiently the entire class session for Anvi to ask about the assignment. With class time almost up, Meredith spoke up, telling the instructor in front of the class that Anvi had a question about the assignment ...
For example: Nod your head, but never interrupt. Lean forward and maintain eye contact to let the person know you're engaged. Include minimal verbal encouragement, such as "I understand," and "go on.". 4. Written Communication. Written communication skills are also essential for effective nurse-to-nurse communication.
Sharma and Gupta (2022) summarize therapeutic communication strategies. These include: Open-ended questions -ask open ended questions to learn more about the patient and enable a free-flow of information exchange; closed-ended questions can be used to focus on specific information. Active listening -active listening involves behaviors such as ...
Examples of Assertive Communication in Nursing 1. Rejecting a Patient Assignment. Scenario: You arrive in the intensive care unit (ICU), go to check the assignment sheet, and get report. You notice that your second patient is in the OR for an open heart surgery and will be arriving later.
2. PRINCIPLES OF COMMUNICATION. Communication can be defined as a transaction and message creation. The entire process occurs in a context consisting of physical space, cultural and social values and psychological conditions ().Communication assists in the performance of accurate, consistent and easy nursing work, ensuring both the satisfaction of the patient and the protection of the health ...
3. Written Communication. Maintaining accurate and well-formatted medical information is fundamental for effective communication. Correct grammar, spelling, and diction are all integral parts of proper written conduct and remaining professional. 4. Presentation Skills.
The Four Cs of Communication in Nursing. Patient care can suffer and relationships lose trust when communication is not clear. Interactions with colleagues, patients, and families are dependent on quality communication. When evaluating your communication habits, try focusing on the four Cs - keep things Clear, Concise, Correct, and Complete.
Effective communication is an essential factor in nurse-patient interactions and a core component of nursing care. When communication in the nurse-patient dyad is patient-centered, it becomes therapeutic. It allows for trust and mutual respect in the care process, thereby promoting care practices that address patients' and caregivers' needs ...
Communication is an essential element of building trust and comfort in nursing, and it is the basis of the nurse-patient relationship (Dithole et al, 2017).Communication is a complex phenomenon in nursing and is influenced by multiple factors, such as relationship, mood, time, space, culture, facial expression, gestures, personal understanding and perception (McCarthy et al, 2013; Kourkouta ...
Utilizing the therapeutic & non-therapeutic techniques handouts, list 2 specific examples of non-verbal therapeutic communication that were utilized by the nurse in the videos. Division of Nursing- N Therapeutic Communication Assignment. Personal Appearance- the nurse looked professional in wrinkle-free clean looking scrubs and lab coat.
1. Introduction. Therapeutic communication (TC) is defined as the process of using verbal and nonverbal communication to connect with patients [].TC is holistic, patient-centered and involves aspects of the physiological, psychological, environmental and spiritual care of the patient [].It is based on understanding and addressing the patient's situation, including life circumstances, beliefs ...
Defining Therapeutic Communication in Nursing. Therapeutic communication in nursing is a purposeful, patient-centered interaction that promotes a trusting relationship between the nurse and the patient. It involves active listening, empathy, and effective communication to address the physical and emotional needs of patients.
Communication skills are essential for nurses collaborating on teams and providing efficient medical care. They tell patients about diagnostics, treatments, prevention, prognosis and rehabilitation. They also write accurate health records and descriptions of patients' conditions. Some nursing programs require aspiring nurses to take ...
Case Study Assignment. After reading many case studies throughout this program, this assignment challenges the student to delve into a recent crisis and analyze its impact through a case study format.
The nursing profession faces a significant challenge of a multigenerational workforce that can cause conflict and hinder effective communication, especially between nurse managers and nurses [].In addition, a literature review of studies conducted over the past two decades indicates that the generational gap between nurses and nurse managers is a complex phenomenon requiring concerted efforts ...