publication requirement for phd

• Communications
• Computer Science
• Criminal Justice
• Environmental Management
• Forensic Psychology
• Healthcare Admin
• Human Resources
• Project Management
• Social work
• Special Education
• Sports Management
• Supply Chain Management
• Adult Education
• Business Intelligence
• Early Childhood Education
• Educational Technology
• Homeland Security
• Information Systems Security
• Information Technology
• International Business
• Management Information Systems
• Nonprofit Management
• School Counseling
• Academic Publishing Guide
• Building a Graduate School Resume or CV
• Choosing Between a Thesis or Non-thesis Master's Degree
• Expert Guide to Studying Abroad
• FAQ: Online Master's Degrees
• Grad School Guide Book
• Graduate School for Students with Disabilities
• Green Graduate Degrees
• How to Be a Successful Grad Student
• How to Choose the Right Graduate Program
• How to Get a Master's Degree in an Unrelated Field
• How to Transfer College Credits in Grad School
• How to Write a Winning Personal Statement
• Inside Graduate Admissions
• Ivy League Grad Schools
• Master's Degrees for Veterans
• Master's Degree for Women
• Mental Health in Grad School
• Progressive LGBTQ Graduate Degrees
• Should You Apply for a Graduate School Assistantship?
• Surviving Grad School with a Family
• Taking a Gap Year Before Grad School
• Women in STEM Graduate Resources
• Writing a Successful Statement of Purpose
• Alternative Ways to Pay for School
• The Best Part-Time Jobs During Grad School
• Company Funded Graduate School
• FAFSA For Grad Students
• Financial Aid Resources
• Graduate Student Loans
• Paying for Your Master's Degree
• Paying Off Student Loans
• Paying for Your PhD
• Fellowship Opportunities
• LGBTQ Scholarships
• MBA Scholarships
• Scholarship Resources
• Scholarships for Veterans
• Scholarships for Women
• Crushing the GRE Guidebook
• GMAT Guidebook
• Guide to the LSAT
• MCAT Prep for Medical School
• Study Guide: Exam Resources
• TOEFL Prep for Non-Native English Speakers
•       Resources       Publish or Perish: Graduate Students' Guide to Publishing

Publish or Perish: Graduate Students' Guide to Publishing

In addition to endless piles of reading, demanding expectations in the classroom, student teaching responsibilities, and the always-looming awareness that they need to research, write, and edit a high-quality dissertation before graduating, today’s Ph.D. students also commonly feel stress about another topic: publishing. As more prospective employers expect degree seekers to get their names in academic journals and conferences while still in school, many learners feel overwhelmed by the prospects of making the grade. The following guide answers some of their most pressing questions, provides guidance on the ins and outs of publishing while still in school, and offers expert advice from a professor who knows better than most what it takes to publish rather than perish.

Understanding Publishing in Graduate School

Getting published as a grad student can feel overwhelming at first, because there’s so much to learn about the process and expectations surrounding it. With a bit of research, however, students can familiarize themselves with the specific language surrounding publishing and make in-roads towards getting their first paper published.

What Does it Mean to Get Published?

Within the context of graduate school, publishing refers to getting essays, papers, and research findings published in one of the academic journals or related forms seen as a leader in the field. As jobs in academia continue to become more competitive, it isn’t enough for learners to simply do well in their coursework. The degree seeker who hopes to land an important post-doctoral fellowship or find a teaching position at a college or university must make themselves stand out in other ways.

When Should a Ph.D. Candidate Get Published?

Getting a paper published takes a lot of time and effort, and those students who wait until the final year or two of a doctoral program may fail to actually have any published materials by the time they graduate. According to the University of Nebraska-Lincoln’s Graduate Connections program , getting a paper published – especially if it’s your first – can take up to three years. In addition to the fact that most journals publish quarterly, the panel review process typically takes a significant amount of time and those submitting for the first or second time usually need to make a large number of edits and complete rewrites in order to reach a publishable standard.

How to Get Published

In order to get published, students submit their work to the journal or conference of their choosing. They frequently also provide a cover letter outlining their research interests. Most journals put out generic calls for submissions once or twice a year, while some may ask for papers addressing specific topics that have a much shorter turnaround time. Grad students may find it intimidating to go up against more seasoned academics, but another option revolves around partnering with their dissertation supervisor or another professor with whom they work closely with to co-author a paper. This not only helps ensure the validity of their findings, but alerts the academic world know that this other, more recognized faculty member believes in the research the student is doing.

Who Should Get Published?

Learners most anxious to get published are those who see their future careers in teaching and research. Because the world of academia is relatively small when divided into individual subjects, it’s important for students who want to break into these ambitious arenas to make a name for themselves early on and create a curriculum vitae that captures the attention of hiring committees.

Where Should Students Get Published?

When deciding which publications to pursue, students should consider the research aims of each and their likelihood of getting published. Newer journals tend to take more submissions as they are still working on building up their roster of contributors. While less venerated than other publications, getting printed in these can help build up name recognition and make it easier to break into the top-tier publications over time.

In terms of where work is published, the majority of students look to academic journals when sending out cover letters and examples of their work. But other options exist as well. Presenting papers at conferences is a popular avenue, as are chapters in books. The following sections takes a more in-depth look at how and where to publish.

Realities & Challenges of Getting Published

Getting published, especially while still in grad school, takes tenacity, focus, and a thick skin. Those who continue working on their craft, presenting at conferences, collaborating with others, and not taking no for an answer, however, frequently find success. Some of the challenges students may encounter include:

Lack of time

It’s no secret that doctoral students have busy schedules that seldom allow for outside – or sometimes, even related – interests to take up much of their days. Because publishing is not a degree requirement, carving out the time needed to research, write, and edit the type of paper required for publishing can feel impossible. With this in mind, student should look for ways to multitask. If presenting at a conference, think about how that paper could be transformed into a journal article.

Lack of confidence

Studies have shown that mental stress and illness frequently increase in grad school as students feel intense pressure to stand out from their peers. These feelings are often intensified when considering publishing, as learners are going up against academics and researchers who have been working in the field far longer than them. It’s important to remember that each of those renowned individuals had to start somewhere.

Lack of funding

Completing the research needed for a competitive paper doesn’t only take time – it requires money. Whether traveling to archives or printing all the necessary documentation, funding for outside research can be scarce while in school. Some programs provide competitive grants for research travel to help offset these costs.

Intense competition

As discussed earlier, competition for publishing is fierce. Academic journals and conferences only have space for so many authors and trying to get noticed can feel like a losing battle. In addition to seeking out newer publications and co-authoring with more notable figures, consider taking part in symposiums at the school you attend to get your foot in the door. While research on the average number of rejections is lacking, don’t feel discouraged if it takes a long time to be chosen for publication.

Finding the right publisher

While getting your name in print within an academic journal you greatly admire is the ultimate goal, it may take some years for it to come to fruition. One of the biggest mistakes students make is applying to ill-suited publications. Look for journals with editorial board members whose names you recognize. If a professor knows one of them, don’t be afraid to ask if they can help get your paper in front of them.

Adequately addressing feedback

Getting a paper published often requires intense editing and even completely restructuring and rewriting what you conceived in the initial abstract. If an academic journal shows interest in your essay but suggests rewrites, pay close attention to their requests and try to work with an advisor to ensure you meet all the stated requirements.

What do Graduate Students Publish?

Academic journals may receive the lion’s share of discussion in the publishing world, but graduate students can actually choose from numerous outlets and paths for getting their work to a larger audience. Students should review the options listed below and think about which format might showcase their work best.

Tips for Publishing

Despite the great amount of work required to publish, students who meet the challenges and persevere stand to position themselves favorably for future job opportunities. The following section addresses some of the most common questions about the process and alleviates general fears about how publishing (or not) reflects upon them.

How many papers should a Ph.D. student try to publish before graduating?

According to scholar-practitioner Dr. Deniece Dortch, no single answer exists. “There is no hard and fast rule as to the number of publications students should have prior to graduation,” she notes. “The reality is students in STEM disciplines and those who use quantitative methods are more likely to have publications prior to graduation because they often work in research teams and labs. This is not to say that qualitative scholars or those in other disciplines aren’t, but it’s a much more standardized practice in STEM for students to graduate with two or three publications. Personally, I had one sole-authored publication accepted prior to graduation, one first-authored piece, and one second-authored piece.”

How many journal articles is it possible to publish during a PhD?

“The answer varies and is determined by factors such as length of program, research team access, and faculty relationships,” says Dr. Dortch. “I’ve seen folks finish with as many as 10 publications, although this is extreme and doesn’t happen often.” She continues, “Imagine you are in a four-year program and you get your idea to write an article in year two. You submit that article in year three after getting approval, collecting data, analyzing it, and then writing your paper. Year three you submit that paper; it may be accepted in year four after months of revisions at the request of the editor. You finally have one published paper as you graduate.”

Are there PhD students who have no journal publications? Should they be worried about that?

“It depends on the type of employment the student is seeking upon graduation,” says Dr. Dortch, “Students applying to or wanting to work in institutions and organizations with the highest levels of research productivity who have no publications may want to consider post-doctoral positions so they have the time and space to work on increasing their publication record after graduation.” She continues, “Postdocs are a very common practice in many disciplines and are used as a way to gain additional training and expertise in research and teaching.”

Is it absolutely essential to have publications to apply for a PhD program?

In a word, no. Individuals working toward doctoral degrees have many reasons for doing so, not all of which require them to publish. Admissions panels also recognize that students focus their efforts on many different goals (e.g. jobs, internships, presenting at symposiums) throughout bachelor’s and master’s programs. As long as learners can demonstrate an ongoing commitment to scholarship, publishing is not an absolute requirement.

Does publish or perish begin before starting a PhD program?

It’s true that many students begin worrying about publishing before starting a Ph.D. program, but the reality is that they have ample time during and after completing a doctorate to make their mark on the world of scholarship. According to a recent article by Inside Higher Ed , some individuals in the academy now wonder if too much emphasis is being placed on grad students publishing. Learners unsure about this should speak to a trusted advisor or mentor to figure out when to focus on getting published.

What is the difference between a published article and a Ph.D. thesis?

While a Ph.D. thesis is required for satisfactory completion of a degree, a published article is not. A Ph.D. also takes a much longer form than a published article, averaging approximately 90,000 words. Academic journal entries, conversely, are usually between 4,000 and 7,000 words.

Should I first write my Ph.D. thesis or publish journal articles?

Though publishing at the doctoral level is increasingly seen as a requirement in the job market, it is not part of degree requirements. With this in mind, students should prioritize the research and writing of their thesis above all else. If they have the time and mental clarity needed to publish journal articles, this can be a secondary focus.

From the Expert

Dr. Deniece Dortch is a scholar-practitioner known for her commitment to diversity, social justice and activism. Dr. Dortch holds a Ph.D. in Educational Leadership & Policy Analysis from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, an Ed.M. in Higher & Postsecondary Education from Columbia University, an M.A. in Intercultural Service, Diversity Leadership & Management from the School for International Training and a B.A. in Spanish from Eastern Michigan University. Hailed a graduate school expert by NPR, she has published numerous articles on the experiences of historically underrepresented undergraduate and graduate students. She is the creator of the African American Doctoral Scholars Initiative at the University of Utah and currently a Visiting Assistant Professor of Higher Education at The George Washington University .

Publishing as a student can feel intimidating. Why is this process important for learners to go through?

Long gone are the days of getting a good job by just having a solid dissertation or an award-winning thesis. Publishing your work while in school demonstrates a commitment to answering and understanding our world’s most complex problems. Further, institutions want to know that you have the capacity to publish. Now, publishing doesn’t mean you have to be first author or that you must publish sole-authored pieces only. Collaboration is also sufficient and often encouraged. The publishing process is intimidating for folks because it involves critique and, most often, rejection.

Receiving and giving critical feedback is part of the learning process and students should not shy away from it because it will only serve them well in the end as they learn to cope with disappointment and reward. But more importantly, there is no point spending months and years conducting research if you are just going to keep your findings to yourself. What you learn is meant to be shared.

What are some common mistakes these learners make when preparing their first papers?

Common mistakes that individuals make include not adhering to the guidelines outlined in the submission process. Examples of this can include ignoring formatting requirements (e.g. APA, MLA, etc.), going over the stated word count, inadequately proofreading, and not submitting a cover letter. This is probably the most important one.

What specific advice do you have for them in terms of finding the right outlet, preparing their work, and submitting to journals?

Students should have multiple individuals read over their work before submission. Writing is a process and even after it is submitted, it will need to be revised many more times before you will read it in print. It is part of the process. To find a good outlet for your work, pay attention to where other scholars are submitting their work. If you’re subject is aligned with theirs, you have a shot. Make a list of at least three outlets that fit your article. Also look out for special calls. A special call for submissions usually goes a lot faster than the regular submission process, so if you’re a student who is about to go on the job market, submit to those first. Also, the more competitive the academic, the longer the process, so keep that in mind. If you are rejected, just re-submit to the the next journal on your list.

In addition to publishing in journals, how else might a student go about getting recognition in their field while still in school?

Apply for all fellowships, grants, and awards that are specific to you and what you do. People in the academy love an award winner and they especially love people whose work has been recognized and/or funded by outside groups. A great way to increase a student’s visibility is to publish outside academic journals and publish in other media outlets. Also attend conferences in your field. Try to get on the program as a presenter or facilitator so that people in your field will start to know who you are and your research interests.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Published: 10 October 2019

Publication should not be a prerequisite to obtaining a PhD

• Sharif Moradi 1  

Nature Human Behaviour volume  3 ,  page 1025 ( 2019 ) Cite this article

12k Accesses

9 Citations

32 Altmetric

Metrics details

Mandating publications for graduation places a poor metric on PhD students’ skills and has detrimental effects on PhD training, argues Sharif Moradi, an Assistant Professor at the Royan Institute in Tehran; committees and future employers should focus on the many other skills that PhD students master.

Despite many differences, universities and research institutes appear to have one thing in common: publish or perish. Publishing has benefits for many, including PhD students, as it increases the likelihood of finding academic positions. However, problems arise when PhD students are required to publish papers as a prerequisite for graduation. PhD students constitute an integral part of academia and are often required to publish one or more articles before submitting their dissertation. This is particularly true in my country, Iran, where students need to have one to three journal articles published or accepted for publication (depending on the university) before graduation.

There are several arguments, including among PhD students themselves, both for and against the publishing requirement for doctoral students. Although the publication requirement ensures that PhD projects are externally peer-reviewed, it may not necessarily enhance the quality of the work due to potential reviewer bias or ineffective peer review. This requirement may also call into question the reliability of the thesis reviewing committee if their evaluation is considered valuable only when the work has already been peer-reviewed (and published).

Due to their massive workloads, PhD students are under considerable stress and mental pressure, and publishing requirements can worsen this situation. Some students may be under financial pressure if they are underpaid—or worse, not paid at all—especially when they have to delay receiving their doctorates because of delays in getting published. As something that I personally experienced and think is globally true, many doctoral students live on earnings from teaching courses, translating texts from one language to another, or other low-paying jobs. Supervisors may be opposed to this, since it distracts students from working on their thesis and increases the pressure they’re under. Students may end up publishing a low-quality paper in a low-profile journal, or even in fake and predatory journals which publish papers for a fee without rigorous peer review.

PhD mentors often have other priorities and concerns—such as finding funding, securing a permanent position, and coping with excessive administrative burdens—so often they cannot allocate enough time to their PhD students. Mentors may even engage PhD students in side projects to accelerate those projects, thereby delaying their graduation. Therefore, PhD students need to learn to say no to whatever distracts them from their thesis, although this might be sometimes difficult because PhD students are much more vulnerable than their supervisors to the consequences of potential conflicts. I believe PhD studentship is exactly the time during which people should learn how to maintain a healthy work–life balance, because this skill is more difficult to learn later.

PhD students should be encouraged to publish their PhD work after graduation (if it is not feasible to publish before graduation) because this indicates that they are able to take a project from beginning to completion and to advance their field of research. However, other criteria should be taken into consideration when assessing PhD students for their graduation, such as the ability to effectively defend their results before an unbiased, knowledgeable committee of referees or developing a product or service from their PhD project. There may be mitigating factors: for example, the PhD work needs more time to complete, is scooped by publications from other groups, turns out to be less relevant than initially thought or cannot be published due to intellectual property reasons. Therefore, it makes no sense to make graduation dependent on journal publication.

Both students wishing to remain in academia and students aiming for industrial careers need to learn many skills. Obviously, for students who want to work in industry, published papers are not crucial. But I think the same should be true for students who want to pursue academic careers. They, too, need to learn many skills, which they can demonstrate with or without publications to those in hiring positions. In assessing a postdoctoral applicant for a role in my lab, I would examine the tone and content of their application email, what achievements are listed on their CV (e.g., awards, grants and publications) and check in personally with their referees. Key questions to referees would be whether the applicant is passionate, detail-oriented, motivated, innovative, a team player and committed. What is the applicant’s personality and attitude? This is important as it is something that is hard to change. At interview, I would ask the applicant to give a chalk talk (or slide presentation) to analyse, in addition to their presentation skills, the strength of the applicant’s scientific reasoning and how he or she deals with criticism. The applicant should be familiar with management (time, budgets and projects) and communication skills (writing, speaking and networking). Applicants that have international experience and know how to organize meetings and symposia would be more interesting to me. Only after all these assessments would I question why an applicant has not yet published any papers from their thesis.

In situations where publishing a paper is still mandatory, I recommend that PhD projects be designed strongly, assigned to a team of researchers instead of a single person, quickly modified or changed if they appear not to be working, and effectively supervised by mentors. I would certainly encourage PhD students to get published, but think the disadvantages of a publication mandate for graduation of PhD students far outweigh its advantages. I would never assess a PhD student solely on the basis of their publications, or lack thereof.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran

Sharif Moradi

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharif Moradi .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Moradi, S. Publication should not be a prerequisite to obtaining a PhD. Nat Hum Behav 3 , 1025 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0690-7

Download citation

Published : 10 October 2019

Issue Date : October 2019

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0690-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

How iranian students can master integration into german academia.

• Ata Makarem
• Karel Douglas Klika

Nature Physics (2024)

Behind the curtains of academic publishing: strategic responses of economists and business scholars

• Fabian Scheidegger
• Andre Briviba
• Bruno S. Frey

Scientometrics (2023)

Publish and flourish: investigating publication requirements for PhD students in China

• Vincent Larivière

Questioning Scientific Publications: Understanding how Indonesian Scholars Perceive the Obligation to Publish and its Ethical Practices

• Yuliana Hanami
• Idhamsyah Eka Putra
• Syauqiyyah Syahlaa

Journal of Academic Ethics (2023)

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

Do all PhD programs have publishing requirements?

At the bottom of this webpage are publication requirements for PhD students at Skolkovo Institute of Technology. Is it common for PhD programs to have specific publication requirements like this?

• 3 Even among those programs that don't have formal publication requirements, there can be requirements on the level of the supervisor. The point is that a PhD thesis is a huge piece of work, and completing it becomes more manageable by splitting it into milestones/parts (which correspond to publications). –  lighthouse keeper Commented Dec 18, 2019 at 7:36
• In many humanities (English Literature, e.g.), the expectation is for the finished thesis to be turned into a book after graduation. But if it isn’t, you likely won’t get tenure anywhere. –  Jon Custer Commented Dec 18, 2019 at 13:57

7 Answers 7

I think it's not common to have specific requirements like that on the website , but it is pretty common that something like this exists at least as a guideline in the heads of supervisors and examiners. In every school I have studied / taught at so far in CS, rough numbers of what a minimum PhD thesis looks like were at least floating through the room (and they were not so far off from what is listed explicitly on this website - at least two somewhat beefy papers, usually plus some assorted materials). This isn't yet a good thesis, but it's one that most people would be ok signing off on.

To be honest, it's probably a good idea to write it on the website as this program does - a little bit of transparency often goes a long way.

I think the answer is no, not all do. But if you rephrase it slightly you get a different result. If we define PhD strictly as a research doctorate (though some schools might be weak on that), then a dissertation of some sort is required. In all fields, and for all advisors, I think that the attitude , if not the specific rule, is that the dissertation be of publishable quality . The exceptions, where the committee doesn't have such an attitude, seems to me to be a vanishingly small set.

That is a judgement made by the advisor and committee in many fields. In some fields, and apparently at some universities, prior publication is required. But that is just a way of having an independent judgement about publishable quality; by the journal/conference reviewers. The decision is, then, somewhat distributed.

Some dissertations never get published other than informally (university libraries, University Microfilms , etc). Some result, after the fact, in one or more publications. In my own case (though long long ago) there was no formal requirement other than a submission to what was then University Microfilms. But a shorter version of the dissertation was published a few years later.

As far as I'm aware specific publication requirements are common in Europe, but not in the UK or US.

My US institution does not require a publication prior to graduation. But, I am finding myself significantly hindered in my -academic- job search by not having any sort of publications prior to graduation. So for others who are reading this answer: while publishing might not always be necessary to get a degree you might want to keep in mind what you want to do after you graduate.

To answer your question title: I'm sure if someone was interested they could find one that doesn't, however...

The purpose of a PhD (in an optimistic sense) is to help further your chosen field. It doesn't matter how smart you are if you don't further anything, and the primary mode of this is a research paper.

Skolkovo seems to be especially strict about this, since most programs I see require only one: your dissertation. This is technically a published research paper, even if it is given a big, final boss-sounding name. Oftentimes, one will be part of multiple research papers anyways due to other requirements such as being a research assistant or just being in a research group, however there it isn't the publication itself that is important.

• This answer dances around the question. The OP links to a web page with a detailed policy about publishing n papers in certain types of journals. That's what they're asking about. They're not asking whether there are PhD programs that don't require a dissertation. –  user1482 Commented Dec 18, 2019 at 16:53
• 1 @BenCrowell OP was asking if publication requirements are common. I'm saying they all have at least one required publication inherently, but not like Skolkovo –  awsirkis Commented Dec 18, 2019 at 22:26

The requirements listed on that website are very soft. 2 can be conference proceedings and the remaining one must be peer reviewed but not necessarily first author. If you hang around a lab long enough you can accomplish that.

Institutions differ in specific requirements but nearly all, at least in the US, require some type of publication. But, that publication can be in-house, I.e., your dissertation is probably indexed by Scopus.

These are actually not difficult requirements as stated. In comparison, my last university required grad students have 3 peer reviewed articles to even be considered for PhD candidacy. That’s a high bar.

The requirement, like that of Skoltech, will vary from region to region, from country to country, and from institution to institution. However, to redirect your 'question', it might be best to look at the concept of doctorate within the context of higher degrees. Essentially the requirement, as stipulated at the bottom of the link, is basically a PhD by Publication - Prospective Route . This is common in parts of Europe like the Scandinavian Countries and in Australia. In the UK, it would often be referred to ' Alternate Thesis Format ' to distinguish it from the PhD by Publication - Retrospective Route (typically referred to as PhD by Published Work, or PhD by Prior Publication).

The requirement for sole-author or first author is to gauge the degree of individual effort as required for doctorate; the independent contribution to knowledge.

PS: I'm busy with a manuscript on this. I should share a preprint later. You can also read academic papers and blogs on PhD by Publication.

[ Skoltech ] Publication requirements and Conference participation for PhD students PhD students are expected to produce an original PhD thesis (check previous PhD Thesis Defenses), publish the results of their independent research in peer-reviewed academic journals, and present them at reputable international conferences.

Publication requirements :

Three peer-reviewed publications, of which two appear in WoS/Scopus indexed journals/conference proceedings. At least two publications in:

(i) Q1/Q2 journals in the corresponding fields or journals with impact factor (IF) > 2, or (ii) conference proceedings having a CORE rating of A/A*;

One (out of two) first/shared first/corresponding author publication.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for browse other questions tagged phd ..

• Featured on Meta
• Upcoming sign-up experiments related to tags

Hot Network Questions

• What is the difference between a Blockchain link (Blink) and an Action?
• Locking for update inside CTEs
• Why can't I conserve mass instead of moles and apply ratio in this problem?
• Does "my grades suffered" mean "my grades became worse" or "my grades were bad"?
• Are both vocal cord and vocal chord correct?
• Styling histograms
• How exactly does a seashell make the humming sound?
• Can I replace a GFCI outlet in a bathroom with an outlet having USB ports?
• Familiar senses outside of a turn order
• Short story about a boy living on a fake tropical island / paradise planet, who was actually an adult CEO but didn't remember it
• What rights does an employee retain, if any, who does not consent to being monitored on a work IT system?
• Binary Slashes Display
• sample size in chi-squared test
• Idiom for a situation where a problem has two simultaneous but unrelated causes?
• Weird behavior by car insurance - is this legit?
• Why would anyone kill a dragon rather than subdue it in OD&D?
• Can a video game developer restrict how people stream game content?
• How to join two PCBs with a very small separation?
• Did James Madison say or write that the 10 Commandments are critical to the US nation?
• Why can Ethernet NICs bridge to VirtualBox and most Wi-Fi NICs don't?
• Fancy bibliography items
• Poor performance in ListPlot[] Mathematica 14
• Why does c show up in Schwarzschild's equation for the horizon radius?
• Co-authors with little contribution

Research Voyage

Research Tips and Infromation

Do You Need Publications for a PhD Application? The Essential Guide for Applicants

The pursuit of a PhD is a significant academic endeavor that demands rigorous research, critical thinking, and a profound contribution to knowledge in a specific field. One crucial aspect that often sparks curiosity and deliberation among aspiring Ph.D. candidates is the role and quantity of publications in their application. The question of “How many publications should be there for a Ph.D.?” is both pertinent and multifaceted, as it delves into the intricate dynamics of academic expectations, research experiences, and the diverse landscapes of different disciplines.

This essential guide aims to navigate this query, providing aspiring doctoral candidates with insights, considerations, and valuable perspectives on the role publications play in the pursuit of a Ph.D. Understanding the nuances surrounding this aspect is vital for prospective researchers to tailor their approach, showcase their research potential effectively, and embark on a successful journey toward earning a Ph.D.

Importance of Publications in the Academic Journey

Purpose of the guide, variances across disciplines, b. institutional requirements, c. historical trends in publication expectations, a. academic field, b. specific phd program policies.

• C. Supervisors' Preferences

A. Quality vs. Quantity Debate

B. impact factor obsession, c. publications as the sole criterion, a. peer-reviewed journals, b. conference proceedings, c. other forms of scholarly output, a. sciences and engineering, b. social sciences, c. humanities, a. emphasizing research potential, b. demonstrating academic excellence, c. showcasing other research-related activities, a. research statement, b. letters of recommendation, c. academic achievements and qualifications, a. perspectives from phd admissions committees, b. insights from successful phd candidates, a. leveraging research experience, b. identifying collaborative opportunities, c. focusing on research potential and future plans, introduction.

The term “Ph.D.” stands for Doctor of Philosophy, a pinnacle academic degree that represents the highest level of expertise and accomplishment in a specific field. Contrary to its nomenclature, a Ph.D. is not limited to the realm of philosophy but encompasses a wide array of disciplines, including the sciences, humanities, social sciences, and more.

It is awarded to individuals who have demonstrated mastery in their chosen area of study, made an original contribution to the existing body of knowledge through independent research, and successfully defended their findings through a dissertation.

Publications serve as tangible evidence of a researcher’s ability to contribute meaningfully to their field. They take various forms, such as journal articles, conference papers, and books, and showcase the researcher’s capacity to conduct valuable and novel research. For Ph.D. candidates, the importance of publications lies in their ability to demonstrate not only the depth of their understanding but also their capability to disseminate knowledge to the broader academic community. Publications contribute to a researcher’s academic reputation, establish credibility, and play a crucial role in career advancement.

Example: In the field of scientific research, a Ph.D. candidate publishing groundbreaking findings in a reputable scientific journal not only adds to their academic credentials but also significantly influences the advancement of their field.

This guide is crafted with the aim of providing clarity and guidance to prospective Ph.D. applicants grappling with the question of how many publications are necessary for a successful application. Recognizing the varied expectations across disciplines and institutions, the purpose is to offer insights into the nuanced role publications play in the application process.

By navigating the complexities of this aspect, the guide seeks to empower aspiring Ph.D. candidates to strategically present their research profile, understand the significance of publications, and tailor their approach to meet the specific requirements of their academic journey.

Understanding PhD Programs’ Publication Expectations

1. Nature of Research Output:

Different academic disciplines have distinct norms regarding research output and publication expectations. For instance, in experimental sciences, the expectation for peer-reviewed journal articles might be higher compared to some humanities disciplines where books or critical essays hold more weight.

Example: In the field of computer science, a Ph.D. candidate might be expected to have a series of conference papers or journal articles showcasing their algorithmic innovations, while a literature Ph.D. candidate might be expected to produce a significant monograph.

2. Collaborative vs. Solo Research: The culture of collaboration varies among disciplines. Some fields encourage collaborative research leading to co-authored publications, while others emphasize individual contributions.

Example: In genetics research, collaborative efforts may lead to multiple authors on a paper, reflecting a collective contribution to a project, whereas in philosophy, a Ph.D. candidate may be expected to independently produce scholarly articles.

1. Departmental Expectations:

Different academic departments within the same institution may have specific publication expectations based on their unique academic focus and traditions.

Example: The expectations for publications in a Ph.D. program in economics might differ from those in a Ph.D. program in sociology within the same university, reflecting the distinctive research paradigms of each discipline.

2. Impact of Research Culture: Institutional research culture and priorities can influence the emphasis placed on publications. Research-intensive universities may have higher expectations compared to institutions with a stronger focus on teaching.

Example: A Ph.D. program at a research-intensive university might prioritize a candidate’s publication record more heavily, aligning with the institution’s emphasis on contributing to the academic discourse.

1. Evolution of Expectations:

The expectations for publications in Ph.D. programs can evolve over time due to changes in the academic landscape, technological advancements, or shifts in research methodologies.

Example: With the rise of open-access journals and the increasing importance of interdisciplinary research, some Ph.D. programs may now value a diverse range of publications beyond traditional academic journals.

2. Benchmarking Against Past Graduates: Historical data on the publication achievements of past Ph.D. graduates can serve as a benchmark for current expectations, providing insights into the evolving standards of academic success.

Example: If a university’s graduates historically made significant contributions to academic journals during their Ph.D. programs, it might indicate that the institution values a strong publication record among its candidates.

Factors Influencing Publication Requirements

1. Research Culture and Traditions:

The academic field or discipline significantly shapes publication expectations. Fields with a strong tradition of empirical research might emphasize journal articles, while those with a focus on theoretical contributions may prioritize books or book chapters.

Example: In the field of psychology, empirical studies published in reputable journals might be a common expectation, whereas in philosophy, a candidate may be more likely to publish monographs or critical essays in philosophical journals.

2. Publication Outlet Norms: Different academic fields often have established norms regarding prestigious publication outlets. Expectations can vary based on whether conferences, journals, or other forms of dissemination are highly regarded within a specific discipline.

Example: In computer science, presenting research at top conferences may carry as much weight as journal publications, while in medicine, publishing in reputable medical journals might be more emphasized.

1. Formal Program Guidelines:

Each Ph.D. program may have explicit guidelines outlining the expected publication requirements for candidates. These guidelines are often influenced by the program’s mission, goals, and the academic ethos of the institution.

Example: A Ph.D. program in environmental science might explicitly state that candidates are expected to have at least one peer-reviewed publication in a high-impact environmental journal before completing their degree.

2. Flexibility and Adaptability: Some programs may be more flexible in their approach, allowing candidates to tailor their publication strategies based on individual research goals and the evolving landscape of their academic field.

Example: A Ph.D. program in cultural studies might encourage candidates to explore alternative forms of dissemination, such as public engagement initiatives or multimedia presentations, alongside traditional publications.

C. Supervisors’ Preferences

1. Research Philosophy of Supervisors: The philosophy and expectations of individual research supervisors play a pivotal role in shaping a Ph.D. candidate’s publication trajectory. Some supervisors may prioritize a steady stream of publications, while others may emphasize the quality and impact of the work.

Example: A supervisor with a focus on applied research in engineering might encourage their candidate to publish in industry-relevant journals, while a supervisor in the humanities may place more importance on contributing to scholarly debates.

2. Alignment of Research Interests: The specific research interests of the supervisor can influence the choice of publication outlets and the overall publication strategy. Alignment with the supervisor’s expertise often guides the selection of journals or conferences.

Example: If a candidate’s research aligns with a supervisor’s expertise in political science, the supervisor may encourage publications in reputable political science journals that resonate with the ongoing discourse in the field.

Debunking Common Myths About PhD Publications

1. Myth: More Publications Mean Better Researcher:

There is a common misconception that the quantity of publications is directly proportional to the quality of research. However, the emphasis should be on the impact and significance of the work rather than sheer volume.

Example: A Ph.D. candidate with a few high-impact publications showcasing groundbreaking research may be viewed more favorably than a candidate with numerous publications of lower impact.

2. Reality: Emphasizing Depth and Impact: The quality vs. quantity debate highlights the importance of producing meaningful contributions to the field. A few well-regarded publications that significantly advance knowledge can outweigh a larger number of less impactful ones.

Example: A candidate with a single publication in a prestigious journal that changes the trajectory of research in their field may be considered more impactful than someone with several publications in less influential outlets.

1. Myth: Higher Impact Factor Always Better:

A common misconception is that the impact factor of a journal is the sole indicator of the quality and impact of a publication. While impact factor is a valuable metric, it should not be the exclusive criterion.

Example: A publication in a specialized journal with a lower impact factor might be highly influential within a niche field, showcasing the candidate’s expertise and impact.

2. Reality: Context Matters: Impact factors should be considered in the context of the specific field. A lower impact factor in one discipline might be equivalent to a higher impact factor in another, depending on the publishing norms of each field.

Example: In some social science disciplines, impactful work may be disseminated through respected conferences rather than high-impact journals, making conference publications a crucial metric alongside traditional journal impact.

1. Myth: Publications Determine Academic Worth: There’s a misconception that the number of publications alone defines a researcher’s academic worth. While publications are essential, other factors, such as teaching, mentorship, and the ability to collaborate, also contribute to academic success.

Example: A candidate with a strong teaching record, active involvement in collaborative projects, and impactful community engagement may demonstrate a well-rounded academic profile, even if the publication count is moderate.

2. Reality: Holistic Evaluation Required: Academic merit is multifaceted, and a holistic evaluation considers a candidate’s contributions to research, teaching, and service. Publications are crucial but should be viewed as one aspect of a broader academic portfolio.

Example: A Ph.D. candidate who actively contributes to departmental initiatives, mentors students, and collaborates on interdisciplinary projects may be highly valued, showcasing that academic success extends beyond publications alone.

Differentiating Between Traditional and Alternative Publications

1. Traditional Gold Standard:

Peer-reviewed journals are often considered the gold standard for academic publications. These journals undergo a rigorous review process where experts in the field evaluate the research for quality, validity, and significance before publication.

Example: An article published in a prestigious, peer-reviewed journal in the field of physics is typically held in high regard, signifying that the research has met stringent standards of excellence.

2. Credibility and Academic Recognition: Publications in peer-reviewed journals carry significant weight in academia. They provide a stamp of credibility, indicating that the research has been subjected to thorough scrutiny and validation by experts in the respective field.

Example: In the biomedical sciences, a Ph.D. candidate’s publication in a well-respected medical journal is likely to enhance their academic reputation and contribute to the advancement of medical knowledge.

1. Rapid Dissemination of Research:

Conference proceedings are a platform for researchers to present their work to a wider audience quickly. These publications often undergo a review process but may have a faster turnaround than traditional journals, allowing for timely dissemination of research findings.

Example: In computer science, where the pace of technological advancements is rapid, presenting research findings at conferences and publishing in proceedings is a common practice to share cutting-edge discoveries.

2. Networking and Collaboration: Conference publications not only contribute to a researcher’s body of work but also provide opportunities for networking and collaboration. Engaging with peers at conferences can lead to collaborative projects and further research opportunities.

Example: A Ph.D. candidate in environmental science presenting at an international conference not only disseminates their findings but also connects with experts in the field, potentially leading to collaborative research endeavors.

1. Diverse Avenues for Dissemination: Scholarly output extends beyond traditional journals and conferences. Books, book chapters, policy papers, public engagement initiatives, and even digital media can serve as alternative forms of disseminating research.

Example: In the humanities, a Ph.D. candidate might publish a monograph exploring a critical theory, contributing to academic discourse through a book that becomes a foundational reference in the field.

2. Expanding the Impact Beyond Academia: Alternative forms of scholarly output can have a broader impact, reaching audiences beyond academia. Policy papers, public lectures, and engagement with mainstream media contribute to knowledge dissemination in diverse spheres.

Example: A Ph.D. candidate in sociology who actively participates in public forums, writes opinion pieces for mainstream media, and engages with policymakers may impact societal conversations beyond the confines of academic journals.

Case Studies: Publication Expectations in Various Fields

1. Quantitative Research Emphasis:

In the sciences and engineering, there is often a strong emphasis on quantitative research and empirical studies. Ph.D. candidates in these fields are typically expected to produce a considerable number of peer-reviewed journal articles showcasing experimental methodologies, data analysis, and technological innovations.

Example: A Ph.D. candidate in materials science might publish research articles in top-tier journals, presenting novel findings related to the development of advanced materials with specific properties.

2. Conference Contributions: Conferences play a crucial role in disseminating findings rapidly in the sciences and engineering. Ph.D. candidates frequently present their work at conferences, publishing proceedings that contribute to the ongoing dialogue within the scientific community.

Example: In computer science, a Ph.D. candidate might showcase innovative algorithms or system designs at conferences, contributing to the field’s rapid pace of development.

1. Diversity of Publication Outlets:

Social sciences encompass a broad range of disciplines, leading to diverse publication expectations. While peer-reviewed journals remain significant, other outlets such as policy reports, books, and contributions to mainstream media are valued for their impact on societal understanding.

Example: A Ph.D. candidate in sociology might publish research articles in academic journals, but they may also contribute to policy discussions by writing reports that inform decision-makers about social issues.

2. Qualitative Research Recognition: Social sciences often value qualitative research methods. Publications may include in-depth case studies, ethnographic research, and theoretical contributions in addition to traditional quantitative studies.

Example: A Ph.D. candidate in psychology might publish a qualitative study exploring the lived experiences of individuals with a specific mental health condition, contributing to the field’s understanding of psychological well-being.

1. Book-Length Contributions:

In the humanities, the publication landscape often involves book-length contributions, critical essays, and monographs. Ph.D. candidates in these fields may focus on producing in-depth, scholarly works that contribute to theoretical frameworks and interpretative approaches.

Example: A Ph.D. candidate in literature might publish a monograph that offers a new interpretation of a classic work, contributing to the ongoing discourse within literary studies.

2. Engagement with Disciplinary Debates: Publications in the humanities frequently engage with broader disciplinary debates, offering critical perspectives and interpretations that shape the intellectual landscape.

Example: A Ph.D. candidate in philosophy might contribute to academic journals by publishing articles that challenge existing philosophical paradigms or propose novel ethical frameworks.

Navigating the PhD Application Process Without Publications

1. Strong Research Proposal:

In the absence of publications, prospective Ph.D. candidates can highlight their research potential by crafting a compelling and well-defined research proposal. Clearly articulating the research questions, methodologies, and potential contributions can demonstrate the candidate’s capacity for original and impactful research.

Example: An applicant in environmental science without prior publications might emphasize their research potential by proposing a project to investigate the impact of climate change on a specific ecosystem, showcasing a clear understanding of the field and potential contributions.

1. Letters of Recommendation: Strong letters of recommendation from professors who can attest to the candidate’s research abilities, work ethic, and intellectual curiosity can serve as powerful endorsements of research potential.

Example: A letter of recommendation from a professor highlighting the candidate’s exceptional research skills, despite a lack of publications, can provide evidence of their ability to contribute meaningfully to a Ph.D. program.

1. Outstanding Academic Record:

A stellar academic record, including high grades in relevant coursework and relevant honors, can serve as a strong indicator of a candidate’s intellectual capabilities and readiness for doctoral-level research.

Example: A Ph.D. applicant in economics with a consistently high GPA, awards for academic excellence, and a strong performance in advanced research-oriented courses can showcase their academic prowess.

2. GRE/GMAT/GATE/NET Scores and Standardized Tests: Strong performance in standardized tests like the GRE or GMAT or GATE or NET can reinforce a candidate’s academic qualifications and demonstrate their preparedness for rigorous academic inquiry.

Example: An applicant in computer science may compensate for a lack of publications by achieving a top percentile score in the GRE quantitative reasoning section, showcasing their strong analytical and problem-solving skills.

1. Research Experience and Internships:

Highlighting relevant research experience, internships, or projects can provide evidence of the candidate’s practical application of research skills, even if formal publications are limited.

Example: A candidate in sociology may detail their involvement in a community-based research project, showcasing their ability to apply research methodologies in real-world settings.

2. Conference Presentations: While not formal publications, presenting research findings at conferences demonstrates an active engagement with the academic community. This can be especially valuable for candidates without published work.

Example: A Ph.D. applicant in political science may showcase conference presentations where they presented findings from their undergraduate or master’s thesis, providing evidence of their commitment to scholarly discourse.

These strategies allow candidates to navigate the Ph.D. application process effectively, showcasing their potential for impactful research even in the absence of a substantial publication record.

Balancing Publications with Other PhD Application Components

1. Clear Research Objectives: In the research statement, candidates should articulate clear and well-defined research objectives. Even without a significant publication record, a compelling research statement can convey the candidate’s vision, the significance of their proposed research, and its potential impact on the field.

Example: A Ph.D. applicant in psychology, without publications, can use the research statement to outline a study investigating a novel aspect of cognitive psychology, emphasizing the research questions, hypotheses, and anticipated contributions.

2. Alignment with Program’s Goals: It is crucial to align the research statement with the goals and focus areas of the Ph.D. program. Demonstrating how the proposed research aligns with the program’s priorities can strengthen the application.

Example: A candidate in public health may emphasize in their research statement how their proposed research aligns with the program’s emphasis on community health and prevention, showcasing a tailored approach to the program’s objectives.

1. Detailed Assessments of Research Potential:

Letters of recommendation become even more critical when publications are limited. Recommenders should provide detailed assessments of the candidate’s research potential, work ethic, and intellectual capabilities, offering a comprehensive view of the candidate beyond their publication history.

Example: A letter from a professor who supervised the candidate’s research project can emphasize the candidate’s ability to formulate research questions, design studies, and analyze data, showcasing their research potential.

2. Addressing Research Skills and Collaboration: Recommenders can speak to the candidate’s research-related skills, such as data analysis, critical thinking, and collaboration. Highlighting these aspects can compensate for a lack of published work.

Example: A letter of recommendation from a supervisor in a research internship can detail the candidate’s proficiency in using statistical software, their ability to collaborate with a research team, and their dedication to producing high-quality work.

1. Relevant Coursework and Specializations:

Academic achievements beyond publications, such as relevant coursework, specializations, or advanced training, can reinforce the candidate’s qualifications for doctoral-level research.

Example: An applicant in environmental science can highlight coursework in advanced statistical methods and specialized training in environmental modeling, demonstrating their academic preparation for rigorous research.

2. Extracurricular and Leadership Roles: In addition to academic achievements, involvement in extracurricular activities, leadership roles, or participation in academic conferences can contribute to a well-rounded academic profile.

Example: A Ph.D. applicant in sociology, without a substantial publication record, may emphasize their leadership role in a research-oriented student organization, showcasing their commitment to scholarly activities beyond the classroom.

By strategically balancing these components, candidates can present a comprehensive and compelling application, demonstrating their potential for success in a Ph.D. program even when publications are not the primary focus.

Expert Opinions and Advice

1. Holistic Evaluation Approach:

PhD admissions committees often emphasize a holistic evaluation approach, considering various aspects beyond publications. Committees recognize that research potential can be demonstrated through research statements, letters of recommendation, and academic achievements.

Example: The admissions committee of a psychology Ph.D. program may highlight the importance of a well-crafted research statement, strong letters of recommendation, and relevant coursework alongside publications in their evaluation process.

2. Emphasis on Fit with Program Goals: Admissions committees look for candidates whose research interests align with the program’s goals and strengths. Demonstrating this alignment in the application can significantly impact the committee’s decision.

Example: If a Ph.D. program in computer science prioritizes artificial intelligence research, the admissions committee may favor applicants whose research statements clearly align with this focus, even if their publication record is modest.

1. Emphasizing Persistence and Growth:

Successful Ph.D. candidates often highlight their journey and growth throughout the application process. They emphasize not only their achievements but also the persistence and dedication demonstrated in the face of challenges, including a limited publication history.

Example: A successful Ph.D. candidate in political science may share in their application essay how they overcame initial obstacles, refined their research interests, and showcased their growth through involvement in research projects.

2. Leveraging Alternative Forms of Contribution: Candidates who have succeeded without an extensive publication record may discuss alternative contributions, such as conference presentations, public engagement, or collaboration, to showcase their impact on the academic community.

Example: A candidate in environmental studies might highlight their contributions to community-based projects, presentations at local environmental forums, and engagement with non-profit organizations, demonstrating a broader impact beyond traditional publications.

3. Networking and Collaborations:

Successful Ph.D. candidates often emphasize the importance of networking and collaborations in building a strong application. Establishing connections with potential advisors, attending conferences, and engaging with the academic community can enhance a candidate’s profile.

Example: A candidate in sociology may attribute their success to networking with professors in their area of interest, attending relevant conferences, and participating in collaborative research projects, all of which contribute to a robust application.

Expert opinions and advice underscore the significance of a comprehensive approach to Ph.D. applications, acknowledging that success is not solely determined by the quantity of publications but by a combination of factors that showcase research potential, academic excellence, and alignment with program objectives.

Strategies for Aspiring PhD Applicants

1. Highlighting Relevant Projects:

Aspiring Ph.D. applicants can leverage research experience by highlighting relevant projects they have been involved in during their academic journey. This can include coursework projects, research internships, or collaborative endeavors.

Example: An applicant in biochemistry may detail their involvement in a laboratory research project where they contributed to the discovery of a new protein function, showcasing hands-on experience and the application of research skills.

2. Showcasing Methodological Expertise: Emphasizing the methodologies employed in research projects is crucial. Candidates can showcase their proficiency in data collection, analysis, and interpretation, providing evidence of their research capabilities.

Example: A candidate in sociology might describe their involvement in a qualitative research project, highlighting their skills in conducting interviews, thematic analysis, and contributing valuable insights to the research team.

1. Networking with Potential Advisors: Aspiring Ph.D. candidates can proactively network with potential advisors by reaching out to them, attending departmental events, and expressing genuine interest in their research. Building these connections can lead to collaborative opportunities.

Example: An applicant interested in environmental policy might engage with a professor known for their work in this area, initiating a conversation about potential collaborations or expressing interest in contributing to ongoing research projects.

2. Participating in Interdisciplinary Initiatives: Exploring interdisciplinary opportunities allows candidates to broaden their research scope and engage with diverse perspectives. This can be appealing to Ph.D. programs that value multidisciplinary approaches.

Example: A candidate in urban planning might highlight their participation in an interdisciplinary workshop where they collaborated with researchers from sociology, economics, and environmental science to address complex urban challenges.

1. Crafting a Strong Research Statement:

A well-crafted research statement is a key component of the application. Applicants should clearly articulate their research interests, questions, and the potential impact of their work on the field, emphasizing the trajectory of their future research.

Example: An applicant in political science may outline their research statement, discussing their interest in studying the impact of policy changes on marginalized communities and how their work contributes to ongoing debates in the field.

2. Demonstrating Adaptability and Growth: Acknowledging the evolving nature of research interests and showcasing a willingness to adapt and grow can be compelling. Discussing how past experiences have shaped future research goals demonstrates maturity and self-awareness.

Example: A candidate in psychology might reflect on how their initial interest in cognitive psychology has evolved to include a fascination with the intersection of psychology and technology, indicating adaptability and growth.

These strategies empower aspiring Ph.D. applicants to strategically position themselves as researchers with valuable experiences, collaborative potential, and a clear vision for their future contributions to academia.

Unlock Exclusive Access to the PhD Navigator Tool – for a Streamlined Research Experience for FREE!

Dear fellow researchers,

If you are a PhD research scholar or planning to pursue PhD, I understand the value of time in your PhD journey. That’s why I have organized my blog posts related to PhD meticulously, categorizing more than 100 articles into various stages of PhD (from planning of PhD to careers after PhD).

You can get this tool ABSOLUTELY FREE , by sending an email to [email protected] with the subject line “Subscribe: PhD Navigator Tool-1.0” By subscribing not only will you gain free access to this invaluable tool, but you’ll also receive regular updates on this tool and our blog’s latest insights, tips, and resources tailored for researchers.

You can also visit my all articles related to PhD in my PhD Section . Of course, theses articles are in random order as I have written them whenever I got new ideas.

Happy researching!

Best regards,

Dr Vijay Rajpurohit

In conclusion, the pursuit of a Ph.D. is a multifaceted journey that extends far beyond a mere tally of publications. As we have navigated through the essential considerations in this comprehensive guide, it is evident that the role of publications in Ph.D. applications is nuanced, with expectations varying across disciplines, institutions, and individual programs. The landscape is complex, yet rich with opportunities for aspiring candidates to showcase their research potential and embark on a successful academic trajectory.

Upcoming Events

• Visit the Upcoming International Conferences at Exotic Travel Destinations with Travel Plan
• Visit for  Research Internships Worldwide

Recent Posts

• Top Mistakes to Avoid When Writing a Research Paper
• Average Stipend for Research/Academic Internships
• These Institutes Offer Remote Research/Academic Internships
• How to Include Your Journal in the UGC-CARE List? A Guide for Publishers
• Understanding UGC CARE Journals: A Comprehensive Guide
• All Blog Posts
• Research Career
• Research Conference
• Research Internship
• Research Journal
• Research Tools
• Uncategorized
• Research Conferences
• Research Journals
• Research Grants
• Internships
• Research Internships
• Email Templates
• Conferences
• Blog Partners
• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Research Voyage

Design by ThemesDNA.com

Publishing Requirements for a PhD: 6 Important Things to Know

Table of contents, introduction.

This article discusses the essential publishing requirements for a PhD. Pursuing a doctoral degree is an arduous yet rewarding journey culminating in producing a dissertation or thesis representing years of intensive research.

While the dissertation is a central component, publishing your PhD work is critical for several reasons. In this write-up, we will explore what exactly publishing entails during your PhD, the different types of publications, and provide helpful tips and advice along the way.

Publishing parts of your dissertation in peer-reviewed journals, books, or academic conferences is an integral milestone. It enables you to disseminate your novel contributions widely and demonstrate your expertise in your chosen field of research.

Publications also allow your work to be validated through a rigorous peer-review process. Most importantly, an established publication record is often a prerequisite for academic job openings after graduation. Therefore, developing effective publishing skills early on can set you up for future career success.

You will learn practical strategies to publish different components of your dissertation and common mistakes to avoid. The goal is to equip you with the knowledge to embark on your publishing journey with clarity and purpose.

1. What is a PhD?

A PhD, short for Doctor of Philosophy, is the highest academic degree awarded by universities. It is earned after completing an original research project and defending a dissertation that expands knowledge in a particular field or subject.

The PhD is significant because it represents the pinnacle of academic achievement and enhances opportunities for career advancement.

A key requirement of the PhD is getting research published in peer-reviewed journals or presented at academic conferences. This sharing of knowledge is essential for completing the degree. The number and type of publications vary across universities and disciplines. For example, my institution would require a PhD candidate to publish at least two journal papers in indexed journals.

2. Why Publishing Requirements for a PhD is Essential

Publishing research is a fundamental part of obtaining a PhD. It allows you to disseminate your findings, engage with the academic community, and advance knowledge in your field. Here are some key reasons why publishing is essential during your PhD:

Career Progression

Having publications under your belt is crucial for academic career advancement. Publications help you build your reputation and demonstrate your research capabilities to potential employers.

Developing Academic Skills

The process of publishing hones critical skills needed for a research career. Preparing manuscripts requires clearly articulating ideas, synthesizing information, and polishing writing abilities. Meeting all the publishing requirements for a PhD means that you are one step closer to stamping your authority in your field of expertise.

Disseminating Research

Academic publishing is the primary avenue for sharing your PhD research with the scholarly community. It allows you to publicize findings, spark discussion, and influence your field. Publications ensure your work gains visibility and can be built upon by others.

A PhD without publications has minimal impact, restricting opportunities for scientific advancement.

Building Your Reputation

In summary, publishing is not an optional extra during a PhD, and meeting the minimum publishing requirements for a PhD must become your goal. It is an integral milestone that marks the transition from student to independent researcher. Publishing enables you to progress professionally, develop critical skills, share discoveries, and build your reputation. A PhD without publications is an incomplete journey.

3. Types of PhD Publications

Journal articles.

Journal articles allow researchers to disseminate their findings, theories, and experiments to the wider scientific community. They are the main metric used to evaluate the productivity and impact of a researcher. For PhDs, having multiple journal publications is essential to prove the ability to conduct studies independently and contribute novel findings.

Conference Papers

Presenting at academic conferences is another valuable publication opportunity. Conference papers are usually short, concise reports on completed or ongoing research. They allow for gathering feedback from peers that can strengthen the research.

Publishing a book or book chapters presents a major way to synthesize and compile extensive research into a permanent contribution to the literature. Books involve communicating ideas and findings in a comprehensive format.

4. Understanding the Publishing Requirements for a PhD Work

Publishing your PhD research is crucial in establishing yourself as an expert in your field. However, there are several requirements you need to be aware of before submitting your work for publication.

The Peer-Review Process

Expect multiple revisions based on reviewer comments before your work is accepted. Be prepared to make edits, from clarifying your methodology to expanding certain sections. Approach this feedback constructively, even if it is negative at times.

Ethical Considerations

There are also ethical requirements around plagiarism, proper citation, and declaring any conflicts of interest. Breaching ethics can lead to publications being retracted and damage to your reputation.

Formatting Guidelines

Journals and conferences provide specific instructions for formatting your paper or article. This includes the word count, font style, citation style, and layout. Strictly adhering to these guidelines is essential.

Selecting the right journal or conference venue that aligns with your research area is key to successfully meeting publishing requirements. Their guidelines reflect the standards and expectations of that field.

5. Tips to Meet Publishing Requirements Successfully

Getting your research published as part of your PhD journey can seem daunting, but following key tips can set you up for success.

Focus on Clear, Concise Writing

Thoroughly edit and proofread.

Carefully edit your paper to strengthen your argument and flow of ideas. Check for grammar, spelling, and formatting errors. Ask colleagues or advisors to review your work. Use editing tools like Grammarly if needed.

Select the Right Journal

Understand the peer review process, revise effectively.

Use reviewer feedback to improve your paper through revisions. Don’t take criticisms personally. Consult your advisors on constructive ways to modify your work. Come back to comments with fresh eyes during the revision process.

Build Your Academic Reputation

6. common mistakes to avoid when publishing your phd work.

Publishing research from your PhD is an integral part of the journey but can also be riddled with pitfalls if you are not careful. Here are some of the most common mistakes PhD students make when trying to get their work published, and how to avoid them:

Not Following Journal Guidelines

Not adhering to these guidelines signals to editors and reviewers that you did not do your due diligence. Thoroughly read the author guidelines for your target journal and ensure you format everything just as they require.

Poorly Written Abstract

The abstract is the first thing editors and reviewers will read, so it needs to be well-written and accurately convey your key findings and contributions. Many researchers struggle to summarize their work effectively with a tight word limit. Invest time writing a good journal abstract that hooks and encourages readers to read further.

Unclear Contribution

Disorganized structure, poor citations.

Failing to cite previous related work or not providing appropriate references to back up claims can undermine your paper’s credibility. Do your due diligence to ensure all sources used are correctly referenced. Follow the journal’s recommended citation style accurately to avoid references being formatted incorrectly.

Grammatical Errors

Typos, grammar mistakes, and unclear writing will immediately reject your paper. Many journal chief editors I worked with did not want to deal with poorly constructed papers and would usually reject these manuscripts outright.

Avoiding these common pitfalls and dedicating time to submit a rigorously written, formatted and referenced paper will give you the best chance of acceptance. Do not let easily rectified mistakes derail your PhD publications!

A critical section understood the specific requirements for publishing PhD research. This includes adhering to rigorous peer review, ethical standards, and journal formatting guidelines. Selecting the right journal or venue aligned with your specialization is also key.

Remember that publishing is a skill that improves with practice. Learn from every opportunity and feedback. Most importantly, believe in yourself and your research’s value to your field.

1 thought on “Publishing Requirements for a PhD: 6 Important Things to Know”

Leave a comment cancel reply.

• Future Students
• Current Students
• Faculty/Staff

Admissions & Aid

• Admissions Home
• Application Requirements
• Financing Options
• Diversity Profile

You are here

Application requirements for all doctoral programs (phd).

All of our doctoral programs are designed to develop outstanding educational researchers who have a deep understanding of the scientific, practical and policy issues they study. All require full-time study, and we promise five years of full-time financial support for every student we admit. Our doctoral programs are small, typically ranging from about 25 to 35 new students a year. The small size of our doctoral cohorts creates big educational advantages for students: the classes are almost always small, students receive individualized attention from their advisors, and they have many opportunities to develop close collegial relationships with fellow students.

It is extremely important to demonstrate in your statement of purpose that your interests converge closely with the current research of faculty who work in the program to which you are applying. Other doctoral applicants will certainly do this, and if you don't, you will forfeit an important competitive advantage to them. 

If you wish to contact faculty, please read our Which Degree Which Program article, by Professor Eamonn Callan, which outlines the appropriate process for contacting faculty with whom you share research interests. 

• Program website:  Degrees and Programs/PhD
• Length of Program:  5 years (average length)
• Tuition: fellowship/assistantship salary and tuition guaranteed for first five years of the program (autumn, winter and spring quarters) for all students, including international students. Funding includes two summers.

Application Requirements:

Application form.

Complete and submit Stanford's graduate online application .

Application Fee

The application fee is $125 , is non-refundable, and must be received by the application deadline.

Application Fee Waivers

Stanford offers three types of application fee waivers for which GSE applicants may apply and be considered:

• GRE Fee Reduction Certificate-Based Waiver
• Diversity Program Participation-Based Waiver
• School-Based Waiver

Please visit the Stanford Graduate Diversity website for instructions, deadlines, and the fee waiver application form.

Statement of Purpose

A Statement of Purpose is required. Your statement should be typed, single-spaced and should be between one to two pages . Describe succinctly your reasons for applying to the proposed program, your preparation for this field of study, and why our program is a good fit for you, your future career plans, and other aspects of your background as well as interests which may aid the admissions committee in evaluating your aptitude and motivation for graduate study. You may indicate potential faculty mentors as part of your study and research interests. Be sure to keep a copy for your records. What's a Good Statement of Purpose?

A resume or CV  is required of all applicants, depending on which document is most appropriate for your background. There is no page limit for resumes or CVs, though we typically see resumes of one page in length. Please upload your resume or CV in the online application.

Three (3) Letters of Recommendation

Applicants are required to submit three letters of recommendation . In the online application, you will be asked to identify your recommenders and their email addresses. Please notify your recommenders that they will receive an email prompt to submit their recommendation online. You can submit your request for letters of recommendation through the system without submitting the entire online application.  Stanford GSE only accepts online recommendations through the application system ; Stanford GSE cannot accept mailed, emailed or faxed recommendations.

Recommendations should be written by people who have supervised you in an academic, employment, or community service setting. We very strongly recommend that at least one of these letters be from a university professor familiar with your academic work. Your recommendations should directly address your suitability for admission to a graduate program at Stanford GSE.

It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that all three letters of recommendation are submitted through the system by the application deadline , so please work closely with your recommenders to remind them of the deadline.

College and University Transcripts

Transcripts are required from every college and university you have attended for at least one academic year as a full-time student. When submitting your online application, transcripts should be uploaded to the application as a scanned copy or PDF ; this is sufficient for the application review process. Please refrain from sending a secured PDF/transcript with a digital signature as our system cannot upload these properly. The best way to ensure we receive an upload-able document is for you to print out the secured transcript, scan it, and upload the scanned copy (not to exceed 10MB) as a PDF. 

If you earned a degree at the institution from which you are submitting a transcript, please ensure that the degree conferral date and the degree conferred is clearly visible on the document. If you are currently enrolled in a degree program and will not have earned the respective degree by the time of submitting your GSE application, you should submit your most recent in-progress transcript from your institution.

Only if admitted will we contact you with instructions on sending two copies of your official transcripts to our office. We cannot accept mailed, emailed or faxed copies of your transcripts during the application process. Please note: the instructions for sending transcripts on the online application and on the general Stanford Graduate Admissions Office website differ from this Stanford GSE requirement.

Concerning course work completed in a study abroad program

If the coursework and grades are reflected on the transcript of your home institution, you do not need to submit original transcripts from the study abroad institution.

Concerning foreign institutions

If your institution provides a transcript in a language other than English, we require that you submit a translation of the transcript that is either provided by the institution or a certified translator. Translations must be literal and complete versions of the original records.

If your transcript does not include your degree conferral date and the degree conferred , please submit a scanned copy of your diploma, a conferral statement, or a conferral document in addition to your transcript . If you are currently enrolled in a degree program and will not have earned the respective degree by the time of submitting your GSE application, you should submit your most recent in-progress transcript from your institution.

Stanford University requires the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) from all applicants whose native language is not English. The GSE requires a minimum TOEFL score of 250 for the computer-based test, 600 for the paper-based test or 100 for the internet-based test in order to be considered for admission. The Test of Written English (TWE) portion of the TOEFL is not required. Applicants who have completed a four-year bachelor's degree or a two-year master's program (or its equivalent) in the U.S. or at an institution where English is the main language of instruction are not required to take the TOEFL. For more information on TOEFL requirements, please refer to the Required Exams  page on the main Stanford Graduate Admissions website. You may register for the TOEFL test directly at the ETS website .

TOEFL Dates and Deadlines

PhD applicants who are required to take the TOEFL should plan to take the internet-based TOEFL test and have official TOEFL scores sent electronically to Stanford at institution code 4704 (department code does not matter) no later than November 1 . This will give your official TOEFL scores time to be sent from ETS and be received by our system in time for the December 1 deadline. PhD applicants to Knight-Hennessy Scholars should plan to take the internet-based TOEFL test no later than October 16 so your scores can be received by our system in time for the November 16 KHS GSE deadline. Please note that the TOEFL may be taken no earlier than 18 months prior to the application deadline.

Does Stanford accept tests other than TOEFL?

No. We accept only TOEFL scores; we do not accept IELTS or other test scores.

Contact Information

Admissions:  [email protected]  

• Financial Aid
• Current Student Info

Stanford Graduate School of Education

482 Galvez Mall Stanford, CA 94305-3096 Tel: (650) 723-2109

• Contact Admissions
• GSE Leadership
• Site Feedback
• Web Accessibility
• Career Resources
• Faculty Open Positions
• Explore Courses
• Academic Calendar
• Office of the Registrar
• Cubberley Library
• StanfordWho
• StanfordYou

Improving lives through learning

• Stanford Home
• Maps & Directions
• Search Stanford
• Emergency Info
• Terms of Use
• Non-Discrimination
• Accessibility

© Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 .

Do you have to publish papers to obtain a PhD?

Universities cannot reasonably expect published papers as a requirement for graduation.

It is common for friction to arise between graduate students and their supervisors (PIs) over how many and what kind of papers the students need to publish before graduating. While on occasion the students’ complaint is that their PI keeps them from publishing, 1 the much more common scenario is one where the PI wants the student to complete x papers in y journals while the student just wants to graduate and move on. When these conflicts come to a head, students usually start to inquire what the minimum requirements are before graduation.

Of course there is only one correct answer to this question:

A PhD thesis/dissertation does not in any way require papers be published from the work. https://t.co/AIGnIcDyY7 — Drug Monkey ( @drugmonkeyblog ) January 6, 2017

As much as PIs may want to impose a publication requirement, because it benefits them, 2 they cannot require the students to do something that is entirely outside of the control of both student and PI. A PhD is defined as an independent body of research, performed by the student and assessed by the PhD committee. If the student has done the research proposed during the proposal defense and has written up the resulting work in the form of a thesis, then the committee needs to evaluate that work and, if it is of sufficient quality, grant the degree.

There are multiple reasons why requiring published papers as a condition of graduation is wrong. First, as all working scientists know, the peer review process can drag out months or even years, and it may take multiple submissions to multiple different journals before a paper is accepted. Much of this process is out of the hands of the author. Even a perfectly well executed and written paper can be held up forever, for all sorts of reasons that have nothing to do with the quality of the work. Thus, it is entirely unreasonable to ask a graduate student to wait until this process is over before being allowed to graduate.

Second, sometimes a reasonable effort at investigating a question simply doesn’t lead to important new insight. A student may have very carefully studied a system for many years, only to conclusively prove that the interesting results they saw in their first month in the lab were caused by temperature fluctuations in the incubator room. Such work would be appropriate for a PhD thesis but it would likely not be suitable for publication in a major research journal.

Third, by requiring a published article, the PhD committee is skirting its responsibility to evaluate the student’s work. The committee is saying, in effect, that they cannot judge whether the work is PhD-worthy unless an external body (the editors and reviewers of a scientific journal) has judged the work to be worthy of publication.

Now, having said all this, I am of course very much in favor of graduate students publishing their work. None of my past graduate students have graduated without at least one first-author paper, and I want all my graduate students to submit a paper as soon as possible, ideally in year one or two of their graduate career. Also, I generally expect a PhD thesis to consist of at least three distinct projects, which should have been developed to the point where they could be submitted as a journal article. But to the question of whether a publication is strictly required, the answer has to be “no.”

There’s an inherent conflict of interest between students and PIs, in that minor, pedestrian papers will be of very little value to an established PI but can be of exceptional value to a graduate student who hasn’t published much and wants to apply for a fellowship or postdoc position. There’s a lesson here for prospective students or postdocs: If a lab publishes a steady stream of minor papers, it likely does so out of the PI’s sense of duty towards their mentees. A lab that only publishes in Nature, Science, and Cell will likely not be good for a significant chunk of its trainees, no matter how great it is for those that manage to be first author on one of the celebrated papers. ↩︎

What PIs will say is that any papers that haven’t been published by the time the student graduates will likely never be published. This statement is indeed true, in my experience. However, it also demonstrates that the paper is more important to the PI than to the student. In my opinion, any PI who cares so much about a given paper should just complete it themselves. ↩︎

Claus O. Wilke

Professor of integrative biology.

• How to reject a rejection
• Hiding journal names from your publication list stinks
• The Google Scholar preprint bug redux
• Safety projects
• How to prepare an article for resubmission, Part II

Coronavirus (COVID-19): Latest Updates | Visitation Policies Visitation Policies Visitation Policies Visitation Policies Visitation Policies | COVID-19 Testing | Vaccine Information Vaccine Information Vaccine Information

Trainee Handbook

Phd student publication requirement.

• Basic Science PhD programs All students are required to be the primary author on a peer-reviewed journal article submitted for publication prior to defending their PhD research.
• Epidemiology, Health Services Research and Policy, and Statistics PhD programs All students are expected to be the primary author on a peer-reviewed journal article submitted for publication prior to defending their PhD research.

Do You Need Publications to Apply for a PhD Program?

The publication question comes up all the time when talking about grad school applications. It’s something that many applicants spent a lot of time worrying about. So, do you need to have publications on your CV when applying for PhD programs?

The short answer is no. Publications are not required to apply for a PhD. The longer answer is that the admissions committee wants to see that you have the potential to become an excellent researcher. While publications are one indication of this, they are not the only way to show that you have strong research skills. Presenting at undergraduate conferences, volunteering in a lab, winning research awards, or doing an industry internship also show your research aptitude. Additionally, your letters of recommendation can speak to your potential for research excellence or indicate if the research you’re involved in may lead to a publication eventually. If you are involved in research as an undergraduate or Master’s student that leads to a publication, think of it as a nice bonus rather than a need-to-have.

Having a publication on your CV (even if it’s in a different field) can help your application stand out when applying to a competitive program or make up for a weakness elsewhere in your application. You may notice that some current students in the program published during undergrad, but again, this doesn't make it an application requirement. 

Keep in mind that every field has its own publishing expectations. In the humanities, for example, publications are very rare even at the PhD level and many graduate from top PhD programs without publishing. Engineering is another field that has lower PhD publishing expectations that high output fields like biology. Some fields also have longer experiment times, so it’s understood that, while you may be doing high quality work, it will take longer for your findings to be published. 

Rather than worry about publications, focus instead on gaining solid research experience. Ask to volunteer in a lab. Find a job as a research assistant. Present at an undergraduate conference. Submit a paper to an undergraduate journal. These are equally valuable ways to build up the kind of research experience that makes you a promising applicant. 

Discover related jobs

Discover similar employers

Accelerate your academic career

Tips for Moving to Sweden to Research or Study

Sweden is one of the best countries in Europe to study and research. Her...

How to Email a Potential Supervisor

This type of introductory email is an important part of the graduate sch...

Practical Advice for Moving to Germany to Study or Research

Everything you need to know about moving to Germany to research or study...

Find Work-Life Balance in Grad School

A good work-life balance contributes to your overall mental and physical...

More International Researchers Means Better Science

A study in Nature shows the benefit of attracting global research talent...

PhD, Postdoc, and Professor Salaries in Sweden

Sweden is a favourite destination for academics. Here's a breakdown of t...

Jobs by field

• Electrical Engineering 192
• Machine Learning 179
• Artificial Intelligence 163
• Programming Languages 162
• Molecular Biology 144
• Mechanical Engineering 131
• Electronics 131
• Materials Engineering 124
• Cell Biology 117
• Engineering Physics 102

Jobs by type

• Postdoc 351
• Assistant / Associate Professor 141
• Research assistant 105
• Researcher 102
• Professor 100
• Engineer 83
• Lecturer / Senior Lecturer 77
• Management / Leadership 55
• Tenure Track 32

Jobs by country

• Belgium 350
• Netherlands 136
• Morocco 124
• Switzerland 122
• Luxembourg 73

Jobs by employer

• KU Leuven 133
• Mohammed VI Polytechnic Unive... 128
• Ghent University 88
• University of Luxembourg 72
• ETH Zürich 64
• KTH Royal Institute of Techno... 55
• Eindhoven University of Techn... 41
• Karolinska Institutet 38
• University of Twente 35

• Washington State University
• School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science

Computer Engineering

• Computer Science
• Cybersecurity
• Electrical Engineering
• Software Engineering
• Senior Design Course
• Course Transfer Requirements
• Current Students
• Online Master’s Degree in Software Engineering
• Advising Appointments
• Faculty Mentors
• Internships and Tutoring
• Laptop Requirements
• Scholarships and Awards
• Student Clubs
• Electronic Design Automation (EDA)
• High Performance Computing (HPC) and Scalable Data Science
• Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
• Bioinformatics
• Distributed Systems
• Power Engineering
• Systems Engineering
• Executive Council
• News and Events
• Computer Science Scholarships
• Faculty Openings

PhD Student Publication Requirement List

As of Fall 2019, all PhD students must have one accepted paper in the below list of venues before their preliminary exam and two accepted papers (at least one in a journal) before they can schedule their PhD defense. Questions, please contact the EECS Graduate Coordinator or GSC Chair .

Microelectronics

• IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits (JSSC)
• IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques
• IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I
• IEEE Transactions on Very Large-Scale Integration Systems
• IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
• IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
• IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems
• IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology
• IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
• IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters
• IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II
• Microwave and Optical Technology Letters (MOTL)
• Electronic Letters

Conference Publications

• International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC)
• International Microwave Symposium (IMS)
• Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium (RFIC)
• Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC)
• International Symposium VLSI Design, Automation, and Test/International Symposium on VLSITechnology, Systems and Applications (VLSI-TSA/DAT)
• European Microwave Conference (EUMC)
• European Solid State Circuits Conference (ESSCIRC)
• Asia Pacific Microwave Conference (APMC)
• Radio Frequency Information Technology (RFIT)
• Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (ASSCC)
• International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS)
• Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS)
• Proceedings of the IEEE
• IEEE Industrial Informatics
• IEEE on Smart Grid
• IEEE Industrial Electronics
• IEEE on Power Electronics
• IEEE on Sustainable Energy
• IEEE on Power Systems
• IEEE Vehicular Technologies
• IEEE Automatic Control
• IEEE Energy Conversion
• International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
• IEEE on Power Delivery
• IEEE Systems Journal
• IET Renewable Power Generation
• Electric Power Systems Research
• IEEE Circuits and Systems, Part I
• IEEE Industry Applications
• IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
• IET Power Electronics
• Nature energy
• Power Systems Computations Conference
• IEEE Smartgridcomm
• IEEE PowerTech
• IEEE PES General Meeting
• IREP Symposium on Bulk Power System Phenomena
• IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)
• North American Power Symposium (NAPS)
• IEEE Conference on Smart Grid Synchronized Measurements and Analytics (SGSMA)
• American Control Conference (ACC)
• IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies ISGT
• IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference (T&D)
• IEEE Transactions on Computers (TC)
• IEEE Transactions on Very Large-Scale Integration Systems (TVLSI)
• IEEE Transactions on CAD (TCAD)
• ACM Transactions on Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES)
• ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (TECS)
• ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems (JETC)
• Design Automation Conference (DAC)
• Design Automation and Test in Europe (DATE)
• International Conference on CAD (ICCAD)
• Embedded Systems Week (ESWEEK)
• International IEEE International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD)
• IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (ISLPED)
• IEEE International Test Conference (ITC)
• IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
• IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory (JSAIT)
• IEEE Transactions on Communications
• IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC)
• IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
• IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
• IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Signal Processing
• IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
• IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networks
• IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
• IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing
• IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
• IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
• IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems
• IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
• International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
• International Journal of Control
• European Journal of Control
• Journal of the Franklin Institute
• IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
• IEEE Transactions on Computers
• IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
• IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I-Regular Papers
• IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
• Applied Physics Letters

Other Journals with Significant Systems Content:

• IEEE Communications Magazine
• IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
• IEEE Control Systems Magazine

Conference Publications in the Systems Area

• IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)
• IEEE Global Communications Conference (Globecom)
• IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)
• Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS)
• Allerton Conference on Communications, Computing and Control
• Military Communications Conference (MILCOM)
• IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference
• IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
• IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)
• IEEE International Conference on Data Mining
• SIAM International Conference on Data Mining
• The Magnetic Recording Conference (TMRC)
• IEEE International Magnetics Conference

• International
• Today’s Paper
• T20 World Cup
• Express Shorts
• Mini Crossword
• Premium Stories
• Health & Wellness

Not mandatory to publish in journals before final PhD thesis: UGC

According to the latest available report of the all india survey on higher education (aishe), the enrolment at phd level rose from 1,26,451 to 2,02,550 (0.5 per cent of total enrolment in higher education) between 2015-16 and 2019-20..

In new regulations for doctoral programmes notified Monday, the University Grants Commission (UGC) scrapped the mandatory requirement of getting research papers published in peer-reviewed journals before the final submission of a PhD (Doctor of Philosophy) thesis.

So far, it was mandatory for MPhil (Master of Philosophy) scholars to present at least one research paper in a conference or seminar while PhD scholars had to publish at least one research paper in a refereed journal and make two paper presentations in conferences or seminars before the submission of their thesis for adjudication.

When contacted, Prof M Jagadesh Kumar, Chairperson, UGC, said by scrapping the mandatory publication requirement, the higher education regulator has recognised that the “one-size-fits-all” approach is not desirable. Elaborating on the need to shun a common approach towards assessing all disciplines, he pointed out that many doctoral scholars in computer science prefer presenting their papers at conferences rather than publishing in journals.

However, it does not mean PhD scholars should stop publication of research papers in peer-reviewed journals, he said. “Focussing on high-quality research will lead to publications in good journals, even if it is not mandatory. It will add value when they apply for employment or post-doctoral opportunities,” he told The Indian Express .

According to the latest available report of the All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE), the enrolment at PhD level increased from 1,26,451 to 2,02,550 (0.5 per cent of total enrolment in higher education) between 2015-16 and 2019-20.

In 2018, The Indian Express had published a series of investigative reports on how India has emerged as one of the biggest markets for sub-standard research journals with many doctoral candidates getting their papers published for a fee.

Following that, a four-member UGC committee chaired by P Balram, former Director of the Indian Institute of Science in Bengaluru, had recommended that publication of research material in “predatory” journals or presentations in conferences organised by their publishers should not be considered for academic credit in any form.

In draft regulations floated in March this year, the UGC had proposed universities be allowed to draw up their own guidelines in this area. It also sought public feedback on replacing the term mandatory with “desirable”, but that clause has now been removed altogether under the final UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedures for Award of PhD Degree) Regulations, 2022, notified on Monday.

The commission has also dropped its plan to make universities and colleges reserve at least 60 per cent of their annual intake of doctoral candidates for NET or JRF qualified students, according to the revised PhD regulations. In the draft regulations floated in March, the UGC had proposed that 60 per cent of the total vacant seats in an academic year in a higher education institution be drawn from NET/JRF qualified students.

The draft regulations had also envisaged a common entrance test for PhD admissions. This also does not find mention in the final version of the guidelines, which means that universities and colleges will remain free to admit students through NET/JRF as well as entrance exams without having to adhere to any cap for either of the two categories in line with the prevailing norms.

In cases where selection of candidates are through entrances conducted by the individual universities, a weightage of 70 per cent will be given to performance in the written test and 30 per cent to interview.

The final regulations, however, retain the provision of part-time PhDs that is primarily targeted at working professionals aspiring to obtain doctoral degrees. IITs already allow such programmes. “The Higher Educational Institution concerned shall obtain a No Objection Certificate through the candidate for a part-time PhD programme from the appropriate authority in the organisation where the candidate is employed…,” state the regulations.

Under the revised regulations, those joining PhD programmes after a four year UG programme can do so after a one-year master’s degree, while graduates of conventional three-year UG degrees need to have completed two year master’s degrees.

Candidates who have completed the M.Phil programmes with at least 55 per cent marks in aggregate also figure in the eligibility criteria. While the M.Phil programme will be phased out with the notification of the new rules, it will not have any bearing on M.Phil degree programmes which have already commenced.

To ensure quality of their output, earlier, research scholars had to appear before a Research Advisory Committee once in six months and present progress of their work for evaluation and further guidance. They will have to do so each semester now.

“I urge the universities to ensure that the PhD evaluation process is strengthened and research scholars are trained to publish in peer-reviewed journals, present at conferences, and apply for patents where feasible,” Prof Jagadesh Kumar said.

What's Dy Speaker’s role & how often has it been Subscriber Only

Death on melon farm & hard lives of illegal Indian Subscriber Only

In great power rivalry across Eurasia, an opening for India Subscriber Only

UPSC Key | Deputy Speaker, Moody’s Report, disaster resilience Subscriber Only

How the new Public Examinations Act can deal with cheating Subscriber Only

Who dies in a heat wave? High temperatures don’t affect Subscriber Only

What elephants talk when we aren't listening Subscriber Only

Confrontation will continue to define politics Subscriber Only

How do MPs take oath? What happens if an MP Subscriber Only

Cristiano Ronaldo's AI language Subscriber Only

How Shivraj Singh Chouhan can transform Indian agriculture Subscriber Only

‘Americans versus the Americans is the most dangerous war out Subscriber Only

Amid setbacks, first signs of progress in lithium mining in Subscriber Only

• University Grants Commission

Kalki 2898 AD is the first pan-Indian sci-fi film, featuring a star-studded cast from all major film-making centres in India. The film's first half is slow and meandering, but the second half picks up with epic hero-villain confrontations and a rousing climax. The film's sprawling storyline and large cast make it a challenge to keep the audience engaged, but Amitabh Bachchan towers over Prabhas.

• India vs England Live Score, T20 World Cup 2024 Semi Final: ENG 26/1 (3.1 overs), Axar Patel snaps up Jos Buttler for 23 11 mins ago
• IND vs ENG Semi Final, Guyana Weather Live Updates: Clear skies in Guyana, no signs of rain; Axar removes Buttler early 13 mins ago
• Trump vs Biden US Presidential Debate 2024 Live Updates: With fitness, age and danger to democracy in question, two Presidential hopefuls to face off today 17 mins ago
• Latest News Today Live Updates: Should collectively denounce attempts to undermine credibility of our democracy, says President Murmu 2 hours ago

Best of Express

Buzzing Now

Jun 27: Latest News

• 01 US charges Russian in Ukraine hack, offers $10 million reward
• 02 Ensure law and order is restored in areas hit by post-poll violence: Calcutta High Court to Bengal govt
• 03 Israeli defence chief says progress made on munitions supply in US talks
• 04 Argentina trial starts into gun attack on ex-President Cristina Kirchner
• 05 Russian pranksters release hoax video call with UK’s David Cameron about Ukraine
• Elections 2024
• Political Pulse
• Entertainment
• Movie Review
• Newsletters
• Web Stories

Publish and flourish: investigating publication requirements for PhD students in China

• Published: 30 October 2023
• Volume 128 , pages 6675–6693, ( 2023 )

Cite this article

• Wei Quan 1 ,
• Fei Shu 2 , 3 ,
• Meijia Yang 1 , 5 &
• Vincent Larivière 3 , 4  

941 Accesses

15 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

This study analyzes the publication requirements of PhD programs in China. It is based on a representative sample of PhD programs from 164 Chinese universities from all fields of science. Our results show that Chinese PhD student significant pressures to publish in order to obtain their degree, with papers indexed in the Science Citation Index often a mandatory requirement for students to obtain their degree. Moreover, it is found that first authorship is also mandatory: only as first authors count towards the degree, which may affect PhD students’ collaborative behavior. These findings highlight the role of publications indexed in the Science Citation Index for China’s PhD programs and contributes to our understanding of the landscape of research evaluation in China’s higher education system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Understanding procrastination: A case of a study skills course

First-year university students’ academic success: the importance of academic adjustment.

Open access research outputs receive more diverse citations

Data is retrieved from the Ministry of Education.

Double-blind peer review is extensive using doctoral dissertation review.

Amjad, T., Ding, Y., Xu, J., Zhang, C., Daud, A., Tang, J., & Song, M. (2017). Standing on the shoulders of giants. Journal of Informetrics , 11(1), 307–323.

Article   Google Scholar  

Barbero, E. J. (2013). Journal paper requirement for PhD graduation. Latin American & Caribbean Journal of Engineering Education, 2 (2), 51–53.

Google Scholar  

Biagioli, M. (2003). Rights or rewards? Changing frameworks of scientific authorship. In P. Galison & M. Biagioli (Eds.), Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science (pp. 255–279). Routledge.

Birnholtz, J. P. (2006). What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution, and collaboration in science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (13), 1758–1770.

Callary, B., Werthner, P., & Trudel, P. (2012). The lived experience of a doctoral student: The process of learning and becoming. Qualitative Report, 17 (43), 1–20.

Cargill, M., Gao, X., Wang, X., & O'Connor, P. (2018). Preparing Chinese graduate students of science facing an international publication requirement for graduation: Adapting an intensive workshop approach for early-candidature use. English for Specific Purposes, 52 , 13–26.

Chen, L., & Huang, D. (2013). Internationalization of Chinese higher education. Higher Education Studies, 3 (1), 92–105.

Christian, K., Hey-Cunningham, A., Corte, T., Goh, N., Jaffar, J., Reynolds, P., Teoh, A., Troy, L. (2022). Establishing CREATE: lessons learned in setting up a training environment for early-career researchers in respiratory medicine. BMC Medical Education . 22 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03169-1 .

Diao, L. (2008). Investigation on the current situation of communication between postgraduates and supervisors and its improvement strategies . Chong Qing University.

Ding, W., & Rui, Y. (2008). Take the number of papers published as the defense of the dissertation legal inquiry of premise. Tribune of Political of Law, 02 , 164–169.

Editor Board. (1982). Graduate education in our college has developed rapidly. Bulleyin of Geological Science and Technology, 04 , 95.

Editor Board. (2019). Look beyond publications in assessment of PhDs. Nature Human Behavior, 3 (10), 1001–1001.

Evans, T. M., Bira, L., Gastelum, J. B., Weiss, L. T., & Vanderford, N. L. (2018). Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 36 (3), 282–284.

Gao, L. (2005). Exploration and practice of anonymous review of doctoral dissertation. China Higher Education Research, 05 , 39–41.

Gong, X., & Songyun, Z. (2019). On the academic standards for awarding master’s and doctor’s degrees. Academic Degree & Graduate Education, 03 , 56–64.

Guthrie, S., Lichten, C. A., Van Belle, J., Ball, S., Knack, A., & Hofman, J. (2018). Understanding mental health in the research environment: A Rapid Evidence Assessment. Rand health quarterly, 7 (3), 2.

Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature , 520 (7548), 429–431.

Horta, H., & Santos, J. M. (2016). The impact of publishing during PhD studies on career research publication, visibility, and collaborations. Research in Higher Education, 57 (1), 1–23.

Horta, H., & Shen, W. (2020). Current and future challenges of the Chinese research system. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42 (2), 157–177.

Huang, B., & Li，Wencan. (2008). Discussion on the requirement of publishing papers in the awarding of doctoral degree. China Collective Economy, 16 , 150–151.

Huang, J., & Qiuyuan, C. (2013). Present situation, causes and Countermeasures of doctoral students’ delayed graduation: An investigation of doctoral students in Peking University. Academic Degree & Graduate Education, 7 , 50–55.

ICMJE Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. 2022.

Jackson, D. (2013). Completing a PhD by publication: A review of Australian policy and implications for practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 32 , 355–368.

Jennings, A. R. E. R. (2011). Effective postgraduate supervision: Improving the student-supervisor relationship . Open University Press.

Jiang, D. (1985). The reform of postgraduate education has trained a large number of excellent talents for the construction of the four modernizations. Academic Degree & Graduate Education, 01 , 54–56.

Larivière, V. (2012). On the shoulders of students? The contribution of Phd students to the advancement of knowledge. Scientometrics, 90 (2), 463–481.

Lei, J., & Hu, G. (2019). Doctoral candidates’ dual role as student and expert scholarly writer: An activity theory perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 54 , 62–74.

Li, B., & Yan, Y. (2006). Writing for international publication: The case of Chinese doctoral science students . City University of Hong Kong.

Li, H. (2012). Analysis on the influencing factors of doctoral students’ delay in completing their studies in China—Based on a questionnaire survey of 42 graduate schools. Academic Degree & Graduate Education, 05 , 9–15.

Li, J., & Xue, E. (2020). Shaping the policies on abolishing the “five only.” Shaping education reform in China: Exploring education policy in a globalized world: Concepts, contexts, and practices. Springer.

Li, L., & Xie, Yongsheng. (2015). Questionnaire survey and analysis of doctoral students’ requirements for publishing academic papers when applying for a degree. Academic Degree & Graduate Education, 06 , 60–64.

Li, X. (2019). The academic society in a catalytic chamber. Nature Human Behaviour, 3 (10), 1022–1023.

Li, Y. (2016). “Publish SCI papers or no degree”: Practices of Chinese doctoral supervisors in response to the publication pressure on science students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36 , 545–558.

Liang, L. (2003). Evaluating China’s research performance: How do SCI and Chinese indexes compare? Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 28 (1), 38–43.

Liang, L., Liu, J. & Rousseau, R. (2004). Name order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: A case study of three major Chinese universities. Scientometrics, 61 (1), 3–18.

Liu, W., Hu, G., Tang, L., & Wang, Y. (2015). China's global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (1978–2013). Journal of Informetrics , 9 (3), 555–569.

Ma, L. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of the research on university ranking in China—Based on the perspective of masters and doctoral dissertations. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 08 , 48–56.

Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159 (3810), 56–63.

Ministry of Education. (2018). Implementation of the special action of clearing up ‘only paper, only academic title, only professional title, only diploma, and only award’. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s7062/201811/t20181113_354444.html .

Moradi, S. (2019). Publication should not be a prerequisite to obtaining a PhD. Nature Human Behaviour, 3 (10), 1025–1025.

Mydin, F., Rahman, R. S. A. R., , & Wan Mohammad, W.M.. (2021). Research collaboration: Enhancing the research skills and self- confidence of early career academics. Asian Journal of University Education, 17 (3), 142–153.

Nethsinghe, R., & Southcott, J. (2015). A juggling act: Supervisor-candidate partnership in a doctoral thesis by publication. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10 , 167–185.

Pasco, H. A. (2009). Should graduate students publish? Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 40 (3), 231–240.

Powell, K. (2016). Does it take too long to publish research? Nature News, 530 (7589), 148.

Prazeres, F. (2017). PhD supervisor-student relationship. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 5 , 220–221.

Quan, W., Chen, B., & Shu, F. (2017). Publish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999–2016). Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69 (5), 486–502.

Quan, W., Mongeon, P., Sainte-Marie, M., Zhao, R Y., &  Larivière, V. (2019). On the development of China’s leadership in international collaborations. Scientometrics, 120 (2), 707–721.

Rezende, J. L. D., Xexéo, G., R. T. Da Silva, M. S. Araujo and J. M. De Souza. (2006). Supporting student-supervisor scientific collaboration: International conference on computer supported cooperative work in design. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on CSCW in design , CSCWD 2006, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

Richards, G. C., Bradley, S. H., Dagens, A. B., Haase, C. B., Kahan, B. C., Rombey, T., Wayant, C., Williams, L. Z. J., & Gill, P. J. (2021). Challenges facing early-career and mid-career researchers: Potential solutions to safeguard the future of evidence-based medicine. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 26 , 8–11.

Shi, Y., & Yi, R. (2010). China’s research culture. Science, 329 (5996), 1128.

Shu, F., Quan, W., Chen, B.,  Qiu, J., Sugimoto,C.R., & Larivière, V.. (2020). The role of Web of Science publications in China’s tenure system. Scientometrics, 122 (3), 1683–1695.

Small, H. (2004). On the shoulders of Robert Merton: Towards a normative theory of citation. Scientometrics, 60 (1), 71–79.

Smith, E. M., Williams-Jones, B., Master,Z., Larivière,V., Sugimoto, C.R., Paul-Hus, A.,Shi,M.& David B. Resnik. (2020). Misconduct and misbehavior related to authorship disagreements in collaborative science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1–27.

Song, C., & Li,Yan. (2012). The status, reasons and measures of doctoral students’ extended term for graduation: Taking Beijing university of aeronautics and astronautics for example. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (social Sciences Edition), 25 (6), 116–120.

Song, Y., Li, Z., & Junping, Q. (2022). Reflections on the construction of scientific research evaluation system under the background of “breaking the five focuses. Journal of Intelligence, 41 (2), 190–197.

Suikkala, A., Kivelä, E., & Käyhkö, P. (2016). Collaborative learning in gerontological clinical settings: The students’ perspective. Nurse Education in Practice, 17 , 229–234.

Sun, M. (2010). Education system reform in China after 1978: Some practical implications. International Journal of Educational Management, 24 (4), 314–329.

Tang, L. (2019). Five ways China must cultivate research integrity. Nature, 575 (7784), 589–591.

Wagner, C. S. (2005). Six case studies of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics, 62 (1), 3–26.

Wan, Y. (2021). How to guarantee the quality of doctoral students’ training after canceling the requirement of issuing papers? China Science Daily.

Wang, H. (2021). Breaking the “five-only” higher education evaluation: Difficulty, pain and breakthrough. Journal of Chongqing University (social Science Edition), 27 (3), 44–53.

Wang, L., & Sai, Jiangtao. (2010). Development of Chinese forestry graduate education. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (social Sciences), 9 (01), 131–137.

Wang, Z., & Zhangyao, Z. (2009). Discussion on the evaluation of doctoral dissertations. Academic Degree & Graduate Education, 03 , 38–42.

Woolston, C. (2019). PhDs: The tortuous truth. Nature, 575 (7782), 403–406.

Xie, M. (2018). Living with internationalization: The changing face of the academic life of Chinese social scientists. Higher Education, 75 (3), 381–397.

Xu, L. (2020). Publication of academic papers as the criteria for awarding doctoral degrees: Logical legitimacy and misunderstanding clarification. Academic Degree & Graduate Education, 07 , 31–39.

Xuecheng, L. I. (2012). Status analysis and consideration of medical education system in China and abroad. Higher Education of Social Science, 3 (2), 40–44.

Yan, J. (1990). Reasons and counter measures of doctoral students’ delayed graduation. Academic Degree & Graduate Education, 2 , 22–23.

Yang, T. (2022). Rethinking on the cancellation of “dissertation publication requirement”: Based on the triangular coordination model. Journal of Graduate Education, 01 , 63–71.

Yin, X. (2014). Research on the main influencing factors of doctoral training quality: An empirical analysis based on five universities in Chongqing . Southwest University.

Ying, L. (2019). Delayed graduation of doctoral students: Influencing factors and governance strategies. Academic Degree & Graduate Education, 06 , 60–64.

Zhang, J. (2003). On the system requiring graduate students’ publication. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (social Science Edition), 5 (5), 26–27.

Zhang, L., & Sivertsen, G. (2020). The New Research Assessment Reform in China and Its Implementation. Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2 (1), 3.

Zhao, S., Xiaoxin, S., & Wenxin, S. (2018). Is there any relationship between the quality of doctoral dissertation and the publication of academic papers: Analysis based on 165 doctoral dissertations. Academic Degree & Graduate Education, 08 , 41–45.

Zhu, J. (2020). Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Research in China’s Colleges: A Review of Policy Reforms, 2000–2020. ECNU Review of Education, 3 (3), 556–561.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research for this article has been funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University and Small Equipment Funding for Young Scholars from Hunan University, Educational Science Research Base Project from Hunan Province, National Social Science Funding (22CTQ039), China.

This work is supported by the National Social Science Fund of China Grant No. 22CTQ039 to Wei Quan.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Educational Science Research Institute, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China

Wei Quan & Meijia Yang

Chinese Academy of Science and Education Evaluation (CASSE), Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China

École de Bibliothéconomie Et Des Sciences de L’information, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada

Fei Shu & Vincent Larivière

Observatoire Des Sciences Et Des Technologies (OST), Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche Sur La Science Et La Technologie (CIRST), Université du Québec À Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada

Vincent Larivière

Western Pipeline Co. Ltd of Pipe China, Urumqi, China

Meijia Yang

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WQ FS. Performed the experiments: WQ FS VL. Analyzed the data: WQ MJY. Contributed reagents/material/analysis tools: WQ FS VL MJY. Wrote the paper: WQ VL.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Quan .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Quan, W., Shu, F., Yang, M. et al. Publish and flourish: investigating publication requirements for PhD students in China. Scientometrics 128 , 6675–6693 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04854-8

Download citation

Received : 05 June 2023

Accepted : 10 October 2023

Published : 30 October 2023

Issue Date : December 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04854-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• PhD students
• Journal publication
• Science citation index
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Centre for Postgraduate Studies (CPS)

PUBLICATION REQUIREMENT

Based on Postgraduate Regulation (Revised 2022), all Ph.D. students are required to meet the standard criteria of publication at all Centres of Studies, based on the Publication Equivalence (PE) as follows:

For Kulliyyah of Engineering, the postgraduate students are required to meet the standard criteria of publication, based on the Publication Equivalence (PE) as follows:

In addition to the flexibility for the type of publication mentioned above, a new matric for publication type and PE is proposed as follows:

Note on Publication criteria for postgraduate students with Matric Number ‘G141xxx – G173xxx’

GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS

• PhD by Publication

Written by Mark Bennett

A PhD by publication is a degree awarded in recognition of an extensive amount of research published in numerous formats or journals. Unlike a conventional doctorate, you are not expected to undertake a new research project. This page will give a simple overview of what a PhD by publication is, and how to get one.

What is a PhD by publication?

Also known as a PhD by portfolio or by published works , a PhD by publication should not be confused with publishing parts of your doctoral thesis . Instead, the degree is awarded to someone who has several existing publications on related topics which can constitute a portfolio of original work at PhD level. This allows people who have not followed the traditional route towards a PhD to obtain recognition for the research they have done and the subject knowledge they have developed throughout their career.

How does a PhD by publication work?

As applicants for a PhD by portfolio will have already completed and published much of their research, this type of doctorate works very different than a standard PhD. We've answered some common questions below.

What subjects can you do a PhD by publication in?

In principle, this type of doctorate can be obtained in any subject (technically, if you’ve already done PhD-level work, there shouldn’t be any reason you can’t get a PhD by portfolio). But, doing the work you’ll need for a PhD by publication is more practical in some subjects than in others. For example, to do research in STEM subjects you might need specialist skills and access certain facilities.

These are usually available during a traditional PhD, making a PhD by publication less common in these subjects. It’s important to note that not all universities offer this route to a PhD and some may restrict access to academic staff.

How long does a PhD by publication take?

This route towards a PhD is much shorter and typically takes upto one year and can be done part-time.

Do you have a supervisor for a PhD by publication?

Similarly to a PhD by thesis, a supervisor is usually involved. They’ll guide you through the process of forming a thesis from your work, helping you decide what publications should be in the portfolio and establish the connections between them.

What types of publications can be used for the PhD portfolio?

The eligibility of the publications can vary depending on the university or the institution. Rules apply to the type, the number, how recently the work has been published and how / whether they are linked.

These publications generally should not have been used in another research degree and can include the following:

• Academic papers
• Book chapters
• Scholarly editions of text
• Technical reports
• Creative work in relevant areas
• Media presentations
• Surveys (and accompanying analysis)

This list offers you a general guideline and there may be some universities that do not accept certain types of publications and / or offer additional platforms to present your research.

How long should a submitted paper be?

Each university will have their own submission length guidelines. However, your portfolio should be comparable in length to a doctoral thesis, totalling between 80,000 and 100,000 words. This usually means you'll need three to eight publications to make up your publication. This number can vary if your publications are shorter in length.

Aside from your publications, your portfolio will likely need to include an introduction, critical analysis and conclusion. Your supervisor will be able to guide you on how long these should be.

How is a PhD by publication assessed?

A portfolio of various publications is bookended with an introduction and a conclusion, consisting of around 10,000 words (this can vary with discipline). This is then assessed much like a traditional PhD: the portfolio thesis is read and critiqued by two examiners in the relevant field of research. If the candidate is a staff member, then the examiners must both be external (from a different university to the one awarding the degree).

This assessment takes the form of an oral examination, or viva voce , carried out between the PhD candidate and their examiners. Once this has taken place, the examiners will determine whether the portfolio and the verbal discussion meet the requirements to award a PhD by publication.

Publishing during a PhD

A PhD by publication should not be confused with publishing during your PhD , which is a common part of a standard doctorate. This is an optional (but valuable) way to boost your academic CV and gain recognition within your field.

Applying for a PhD by publication

Some of the entry requirements for a PhD by publication are similar to those for a normal PhD by thesis (after all, you’re still seeking to prove that you’re up to the standard required for a doctorate). However, the application process can be quite different.

What are the entry requirements for a PhD by publication?

To apply for a PhD by publication, you must have a Bachelors degree and may be expected to have held this qualification for several years (as the PhD by publication is for established researchers / practitioners, not fresh graduates). You may also need to have relevant professional / academic experience on your CV, in addition to your publications.

Other admission requirements vary. Some universities state that the applicant must be a current staff member, whereas others allow external candidates to apply (so it is always best to check with the individual institution). In the UK, PhD by publication is more common among staff members, but this PhD model is becoming a popular option for early career researchers in other parts of the world.

What is the application process for a PhD by publication?

The PhD by publication route isn’t normally advertised and students don’t usually begin by searching for a supervisor and presenting a research proposal. Instead, universities encourage applicants to contact the head of department in the relevant subject area before applying. They will discuss your previous research and advise you on the application process.

The application generally involves a postgraduate application form consisting of a CV and a supporting statement , outlining how the publications fit together, methodologies (and why they were used), a brief discussion of findings and most of all, how this research has given a unique and original contribution to the field. You won’t normally need to provide a research proposal as you aren’t planning an extensive new project.

Fees and funding for PhDs by publication

The costs of a PhD by portfolio are minimal compared to that of a PhD by thesis. However, funding for this route is much less common.

How much does it cost to do a PhD by publication?

The cost usually equates to the typical PhD fee for one year of study. The fees can vary depending on whether you are an external candidate or a staff member. In the UK, the cost of a PhD is usually £4-5,000 for a year for home students.

Can you get funding for a PhD by publication?

Unfortunately, there generally isn’t any funding for a PhD by publication, as this type of degree is aimed at established academics and practitioners who will not be eligible for Research Council studentships and PhD loans. Staff members may get a lower PhD fee and/or some help with the costs, but this will vary depending on the university.

PhD by publication vs PhD by thesis

There are several things to bear in mind when thinking about whether to complete a conventional doctorate or seek a PhD based on your existing work.

Here are some of the advantages and disadvantages of doing a PhD by publication:

• Work has already been peer-reviewed and critiqued, which gives you an advantage when it comes to your oral examination, as you may already have some ideas of the types of questions and queries that can come up
• Offers a faster (and therefore cheaper) way of earning your doctorate
• You can often continue working whilst creating your PhD portfolio
• A PhD by publication is a useful way of formalising professional experience, meaning you may be able to qualify for more senior roles and progress in your career
• May only be available in specific circumstances (see below)
• It is not suitable for all projects / subjects (some topics need to be set up as complete projects from the start)
• You have less freedom to investigate a new area and design your own research methods
• You won’t normally benefit from other parts of the PhD experience: structured training, academic work experience (teaching, presenting, etc)
• There is limited funding available

Looking for a PhD?

Check out our database of PhDs to find the latest programme opportunities from around the world.

You may also like...

The PhD is the most common variety of doctorate, but others are awarded in specific disciplines or sometimes particular countries.

Joint PhD programmes involve collaboration between two (or more) different universities. So how does that work? Who can apply? And what are the advantages (and disadvantages) of researching in this way?

Integrated PhD programmes consist of a one-year Masters followed by three years of PhD research. Find out more about what it's like to study an integrated PhD, how to apply and the funding options available.

Thinking of applying for the Doctor of Engineering (EngD)? Our guide covers everything you need to know about the qualification, including costs, applications, programme content, and how it differs from a PhD.

A PhD isn't the only option for postgraduate researchers. Our guides explain professional doctorates, joint degrees and compare other qualification types.

How does the value of an MPhil compare with a PhD, and why might you choose the Masters over the doctorate?

FindAPhD. Copyright 2005-2024 All rights reserved.

Unknown    ( change )

Have you got time to answer some quick questions about PhD study?

Select your nearest city

You haven’t completed your profile yet. To get the most out of FindAPhD, finish your profile and receive these benefits:

• Monthly chance to win one of ten £10 Amazon vouchers ; winners will be notified every month.*
• The latest PhD projects delivered straight to your inbox
• Access to our £6,000 scholarship competition
• Weekly newsletter with funding opportunities, research proposal tips and much more
• Early access to our physical and virtual postgraduate study fairs

Or begin browsing FindAPhD.com

or begin browsing FindAPhD.com

*Offer only available for the duration of your active subscription, and subject to change. You MUST claim your prize within 72 hours, if not we will redraw.

Do you want hassle-free information and advice?

Create your FindAPhD account and sign up to our newsletter:

• Find out about funding opportunities and application tips
• Receive weekly advice, student stories and the latest PhD news
• Hear about our upcoming study fairs
• Save your favourite projects, track enquiries and get personalised subject updates

Create your account

Looking to list your PhD opportunities? Log in here .

• Education News

UGC withdraws mandatory research publication before PhD thesis submission to enhance quality

Visual Stories

• PROSPECTIVE STUDENTS
• NEW STUDENTS
• CURRENT STUDENTS
• PROGRAMME OF STUDY
• FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE & SCHOLARSHIPS
• PUTRA SARJANA
• OTHER INFORMATION

https://ttsreader.com/ https://www.naturalreaders.com/online/

Requirement of Publication In Journal For PhD and Masters by Research Students

Updated:: 03/02/2023 [aslamiah]

Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang ,Selangor

Contact List by Unit Staff and Services

	University of Houston
	Jun 27, 2024   2024-2025 Graduate Catalog (Catalog goes into effect at the start of the Fall 2024 semester)     2024-2025 Graduate Catalog (Catalog goes into effect at the start of the Fall 2024 semester) | Education    > Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences    > School Psychology, PhD Accredited by the American Psychological Association and adhering to a scientist-practitioner training model, the School Psychology program develops professional school psychologists. Graduates engage in applied research and apply critical analysis and inquiry to identify, select, implement, and evaluate evidence-based practices with sensitivity to cultural and linguistic considerations, and in consideration of diverse client preferences. Embedded throughout the training experience, sensitivity to diversity issues becomes an essential tool, in part because the UH is one of the most culturally and linguistically diverse research institutions in the nation. Varied practicum placements provide opportunities in numerous school districts, as well as specialized assessment and intervention clinics in hospital and community-based settings within the Houston area. These settings provide opportunities for students to obtain supervised experience with diverse populations, conditions, professionals, settings, and procedures as they matriculate through the program. Program graduates typically meet requirements for licensure in Texas as a licensed psychologist, a licensed specialist in school psychology, and a nationally certified school psychologist.  For more information, please visit http://www.uh.edu/education/degree-programs/school-psyc-phd/ . Admission Requirements The College of Education takes into consideration a number of criteria when determining admission, including prior college or university performance, letters of recommendation, standardized test scores and statement of intent. All applicants must abide by the minimum qualifications for admissions to a masters or doctoral program. All graduate applicants (regardless of citizenship status) must demonstrate proficiency in English to obtain admission to the University. For more information, visit http://www.uh.edu/graduate-school/admissions/international-students/english-proficiency/ . An applicant is responsible for ensuring that all required materials for the evaluation of admissions are received by the College before the program’s deadline. If the application is not complete by the program’s deadline, it will not be evaluated for the admissions. Full details of the online application process can be found at www.uh.edu/graduate-school/admissions/how-to-apply . Applicant Checklist Complete online graduate application including statement of interest, resume/c.v., writing sample, letters of recommendation, and application fee payment Official transcripts from all previous college/university work sent to the UH Graduate School International students have additional documentation requirements which can be found at www.uh.edu/graduate-school/admissions/international-students/ Proposed GRE Waiver Option The GRE requirement is waived for applicants to the PhD in School Psychology program who have at least one of the following from an institution accredited by one of the six regional accrediting associations: an overall undergraduate grade point average of 3.00 or higher (on a 4‐point scale), or a master’s or terminal degree. Grade Point Average Requirements Admission requirements for the College of Education require a minimum cumulative grade point average (GPA) of 2.6 for undergraduate coursework or over the last 60 credit hours of coursework. The College requires a minimum cumulative grade point average (GPA) of 3.0 for graduate coursework. The College’s admission committees evaluate all credentials submitted by applicants to determine a student’s ability and potential to succeed in graduate study. In addition, the committee is interested in the applicant’s potential to contribute to his/her program of study and the University community as a whole. Please visit the program’s Admission Application Instructions page for more information. Degree Requirements Credit hours required for this degree: 101.0 Students are required to complete all 101 hours of coursework listed below in three categories: School Psychology Doctoral Courses Department /College Required Courses Additional Courses and would also have to demonstrate that they have achieved the Program’s 39 professional and personal competencies. No courses from Category A can be waived or transferred. In very rare instances, with appropriate documentation and demonstration of competency, students may transfer courses from Category B. Students entering with transferable credit (no more than 9 hrs.) would take all courses in categories A and B as well as courses from Category C that are necessary to ensure that the student has (a) achieved the Program’s 39 professional and personal competencies, and (b) completed no less than the 101 hours of graduate coursework necessary for degree completion (including transfered coursework credits). Students who enter the program without  a completed Master’s or Educational Specialist degree in school psychology from a NASP-approved program will need to complete two additional semesters of School Psychology practicum and two semesters of LSSP Internship (12 total credits) for a total of 113 credits. Students may complete additional elective courses to broaden or deepen their competencies. Students are encouraged to discuss the advantages and disadvantages associated with such choices with their advisor before registering for an additional course. School Psychology Specialty Courses Category A: Required Doctoral School Psychology Specialty Courses (47 credit hours) PHLS 7193 - Internship and Practicum Credit Hours: 1.0 PHLS 7393 - Internship and Practicum Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8305 - Supervisn in Counseling Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8341 - Professional Seminar Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8346 - Pediatric Psychopharmacology Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8348 - Evidence-Based Practice Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8361 - Ecological-Behavioral Interventions Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8362 - Innovative Academic Assessment & Intervention: RTI Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8363 - Research in School Psychology Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8364 - Professional Practice in Psyc: Ethics, Law, & Professional Issues Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8193 - Internship in Psychology Credit Hours: 1.0 (2 terms, one credit hour each term) PHLS 8699 - Doctoral Dissertation Credit Hours: 6 (or two sections of EPSY 8399 - 6 hours total) PHLS 8393 - Doctoral Practicum in Psy Credit Hours: 3.0 Advanced Practicum 1, Advanced Practicum 2, Advanced Practicum 3, and Advanced Practicum 4 Department/College Required Courses Category B: Department/College Required Courses (15 credit hours) PHLS 8300 - Advanced Educational & Psychological Measurement Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8322 - Intermediate Statistical Analysis in Psychological and Educational Research Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8324 - Multivariate Analysis in Psychological and Educational Research Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8351 - Hist & Philosophy of Psyc Syst Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 7398 - Candidacy Research Credit Hours: 3.0 Category C: Additional Courses (39 credit hours) This list identifies additional required courses that also may be eligible for transfer credit. 33 required hours PSYC 6304 - Fndtns-Dev Psy Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8319 - Inferential Statistics in Psychological and Educational Research Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8337 - Multicul Iss Coun Psych Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8347 - Assessment of Cognitive Abilities Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8366 - Assessment of Child & Adolescent Affect, Behavior, and Personality Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 8367 - Behavioral Consultation Credit Hours: 3.0 PHLS 6397 - Selected Topics Credit Hours: 3 Child Psychopathology PHLS 8397 - Selected Topics Credit Hours: 3.0 Cognitive  and Affective  Bases of Behaviour 6 elective hours Biological Bases of Behavior  (3 credit hours) PSYC 6308 - Foundations of Neuropsychology Credit Hours: 3.0 PSYC 7342 - Bio Bases of Behav Credit Hours: 3.0 Social Psychological Processes (3 credit hours) PSYC 6338 - Fndtns of Social Psyc Credit Hours: 3.0 PSYC 6380 - Pers Relationships:Theory Res Credit Hours: 3.0 Academic Policies University of Houston Academic Policies   College Academic Policies Ongoing and Annual Review During the summer, or no later than the first week of classes in the fall term, the student’s academic advisor formally conducts an annual review of each advisee’s progress (first-year students may also complete a preliminary review at the end of their first term). However, to ensure that emerging issues and concerns are addressed in a timely fashion, any or all of the following may also occur at any time. At this review meeting, the student must submit proof of current membership in two professional organizations and proof of attendance at two professionally relevant continuing education activities during the prior year. Coronavirus Crisis World round-up Transformative Leadership Academic Freedom Special Reports Student View Subscribe Newsletter Africa News Coronavirus Africa Africa Commentary Africa Features Africa Student View Global Special Reports Africa Special Reports Creative Services Advertising Advanced Search Articles by Country Global Newsletter Archives Africa Newsletter Archives Sponsorship Terms & Conditions Follow us on INDIA GLOBAL INDIA INDIA   17 November 2022 As part of far-reaching changes in eligibility criteria, admissions and evaluation methods for doctoral degrees, India’s higher education regulator has scrapped a rule that requires PhD students to publish an article in a peer-reviewed journal to qualify for a doctoral degree. The University Grants Commission (UGC) had previously required PhD students to publish at least one article and present two papers at conferences or seminars before they submit their research thesis. Under the latest regulations governing minimum standards and procedures for the award of PhD degrees, announced on 7 November, scholars will no longer be required to do this. The UGC expects that the withdrawal of the publishing requirement will mean a less challenging research environment for students and universities, as seen in the prestigious Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), where there has been no such requirement for PhDs. UGC Chairperson Mamidala Jagadesh Kumar has attempted to allay fears that an end to the rule would affect research quality. “Focusing on high-quality research will lead to publications in good journals, even if it is not mandatory. It will add value when [graduates] apply for employment or post-doctoral opportunities,” he said. Some academics have pointed out that withdrawal of the requirement is in line with global standards, because publishing a paper before obtaining a doctorate is not mandatory in most countries. However, doing so is considered essential for any good researcher. A recent UGC study featuring 2,573 research scholars across India’s centrally funded universities and IITs revealed that mandatory publication has not been helpful for maintaining research quality in universities because about three-quarters of the submissions are not in quality Scopus-indexed journals. According to some academics and students, the latest change will curb “cash for trash” – the practice of researchers paying to get their papers published in poor quality and so-called ‘predatory’ journals. India was recently found to be one of the largest users worldwide of predatory, or substandard, journals. In 2018 a study conducted by Bhushan Patwardhan, a professor at the University of Pune, found that 88% of a list of journals approved by the UGC and recommended by universities were substandard or ‘dubious’. Patwardhan, who is also a former vice-chairman of the UGC, has said the tendency to equate research quality with the number of citations and further connect it to the reputation of a scientist, was a matter of concern. In an in the newspaper, Patwardhan and K P Mohanan, the chairman of India’s National Accreditation and Assessment Council’s (NAAC) executive committee, said the UGC’s new PhD guidelines addressed only a small part of a bigger problem. “The real challenge is how to strengthen the research culture in Indian universities. It is expected that any good doctoral research should be a quest for truth, adding to the existing body of knowledge,” they said. “It should not be done just for the sake of a degree like a PhD to get a job, promotion, recognition, prestige, publications, patents, etc, although these may emerge as natural outcomes.” A psychology research scholar in New Delhi who requested anonymity told that scholars “often publish their papers in journals that are not adequately peer reviewed and this trend has affected the quality of research work in India”. She added: “The UGC's move is indeed a sound one. Studies have shown that most doctoral students, instead of sending their papers to reputed journals and waiting for review and revision, get them published in journals of dubious quality just to fulfil the requirement. Many students want to complete their doctoral degrees as soon as possible, rather than spending more time on quality research.” Some academics argue that the reputation of a researcher and a university depends on the papers published and cited. Funding is also based on publishing and citation indicators. Without the requirement, the responsibility of encouraging research scholars to publish papers in reputed journals now rests with the university research advisory councils and doctoral supervisors. However, Rajesh Jha, a former member of the Executive Council of Delhi University, questioned how the scrapping of publications of research papers would contribute to improved quality of the PhD. “At one stroke you had introduced [it] and at another stroke you had withdrawn publication of research papers,” he said, referring to the UGC. Referring to other moves that could arguably lower standards, he said the UGC is “allowing online classes for course work” and “has removed the residency period as well”. Partha Pratim Ray, a professor in the department of physics at Jadavpur University in Kolkata, said the UGC needed to conduct checks on substandard publications instead of doing away with the mandatory publication of research papers. He said the move, which will make it easier for researchers to complete their degree, would benefit private universities “who would be making money as the mandatory clause of publication has been scrapped”. Other changes to the doctorate announced by the UGC include the launch of part-time PhDs aimed at working professionals (IITs already allow such programmes) and changes to eligibility criteria for admissions. The UGC also amended the rules to allow students graduating with a four-year bachelor’s degree to register for a PhD. Alongside those students, “we have students having three years of graduation and two years of post-graduation, so there will be two categories of students, which will create another problem,” noted Ray. In terms of the new rules, anyone with a four-year/eight-semester bachelor’s programme degree with a minimum aggregate of 75% or an equivalent grade will be eligible to register for a PhD. Until now, a masters degree with at least a 55% aggregate was required for doctoral aspirants. The option to take up a PhD immediately after obtaining a four-year bachelors could lead to an increase in the number of research scholars needing supervision, academics said. Jha said there may be subjects which allow for doing a PhD part time, but many subjects need “the total presence and total involvement of the student. “Earlier, there were no UGC regulations for the PhD and universities used to frame their own rules and regulations. Every university has its own system and requirements so this policy of the UGC is not in sync with the basic philosophy of higher education [which] needs a lot of autonomy and much respect for diversity,” Jha added. According to the latest report of the All India Survey on Higher Education, PhD enrolment in India rose from 126,451 in 2015-16 to 202,550 in 2019-20. . Diversity and inclusivity in STEM courses and careers have never been more important. Creating safe spaces for LGBTQ2S+ students on college campuses is vital to fostering the diverse perspectives and problem-solving approaches that are crucial for innovation and social impact in STEM fields. The AU-EU Innovation Agenda underscores Africa’s critical role in advancing innovation and sustainable development and emphasises the collaboration between the African Union and the European Union to address common challenges and explore opportunities for mutual benefit. Researchers from United Arab Emirates University and the National University of Singapore have joined forces to spearhead the development of plant-based meat substitutes with the goal of establishing a sustainable food system in the UAE. Artificial intelligence research continues to advance, bringing with it both potential and pitfalls for a wide berth of industries. Read on for how this technology continues to influence the global technology market. With a record number of scientists displaced around the world, how can institutions offer better support during crisis and conflict? The International Science Council’s Centre for Science Futures pointed to Iraq and Ukraine as examples of why science institutions need to rethink support mechanisms for scientists. The University of the Free State in South Africa has excelled over recent years as a research-led, student-centred and regionally engaged university that contributes to development and social justice through the production of globally competitive graduates and knowledge. 100 IMAGES Fillable Online PhD Publication Requirement Form Fax Email Print PPT Guidelines for PhD Thesis Paper Publication [Reputed Journals Publish] 1: From admission to PhD completion: Basic requirement and program Publication Requirement for the Award of PhD Degree Current Student VIDEO What is a Research PhD Coursework exam New Program Start PHD Cartesian Systems Why Scientific Contributions are more important when you’re studying a PhD How many authors? COMMENTS Ph.D Students' Guide to Publishing: Expert Advice & Resources While a Ph.D. thesis is required for satisfactory completion of a degree, a published article is not. A Ph.D. also takes a much longer form than a published article, averaging approximately 90,000 words. Academic journal entries, conversely, are usually between 4,000 and 7,000 words. Publication should not be a prerequisite to obtaining a PhD There are several arguments, including among PhD students themselves, both for and against the publishing requirement for doctoral students. Although the publication requirement ensures that PhD ... Do all PhD programs have publishing requirements? 321 1 7. 3. Even among those programs that don't have formal publication requirements, there can be requirements on the level of the supervisor. The point is that a PhD thesis is a huge piece of work, and completing it becomes more manageable by splitting it into milestones/parts (which correspond to publications). - lighthouse keeper. Do You Need Publications for a PhD Application in 2024? 1. Formal Program Guidelines: Each Ph.D. program may have explicit guidelines outlining the expected publication requirements for candidates. These guidelines are often influenced by the program's mission, goals, and the academic ethos of the institution. PDF Guidelines for The PhD Dissertation Every PhD candidate in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences is required to successfully complete and submit a dissertation to qualify for degree conferral. This document provides information on how to submit your dissertation, requirements for dissertation formatting, and your dissertation publishing and distribution options. Publishing Requirements for a PhD: 6 Important Things to Know In summary, a PhD requires extensive study, research competency, and published work that advances the boundaries of a field. It confers the highest academic distinction on recipients and equips them for careers in academia, research, industry, and beyond. 2. Why Publishing Requirements for a PhD is Essential PDF PhD by Publication the Universitys approach to the PhD/MD by Publication. The document covers the regulatory requirements, guidance on writing publications, guidance on writing a thesis that incorporates publications and guidance on examining a thesis in publication format. 1. Key points from the regulations on PhD/MD by Publication Publishing During a PhD While not usually a strict PhD requirement, successfully submitting your work to an academic journal could help prepare you for postdoctoral opportunities or other early career roles. This page will give you an introduction to the options for publication during a PhD, explaining how it works differently in the Arts and Humanities, Social ... Application Requirements for All Doctoral Programs (PhD) All of our doctoral programs are designed to develop outstanding educational researchers who have a deep understanding of the scientific, practical and policy issues they study. All require full-time study, and we promise five years of full-time financial support for every student we admit. Our doctoral programs are small, typically ranging from about 25 to 35 new students a year. PDF University Grants Commission New Delhi 110002 research publications in peer-reviewed or refereed journals after obtaining PhD and any regular Assistant Professor of the university/ college with a minimum of five years teaching/research experience with a Ph.D. degree and at least three research publications in peer-reviewed or refereed journals may be recognized as Research Do you have to publish papers to obtain a PhD? As much as PIs may want to impose a publication requirement, because it benefits them, 2 they cannot require the students to do something that is entirely outside of the control of both student and PI. A PhD is defined as an independent body of research, performed by the student and assessed by the PhD committee. ... PhD Student Publication Requirement PhD Student Publication Requirement Basic Science PhD programs All students are required to be the primary author on a peer-reviewed journal article submitted for publication prior to defending their PhD research. Epidemiology, Health Services Research and Policy, and Statistics PhD programs ... Do You Need Publications to Apply for a PhD Program? The short answer is no. Publications are not required to apply for a PhD. The longer answer is that the admissions committee wants to see that you have the potential to become an excellent researcher. While publications are one indication of this, they are not the only way to show that you have strong research skills. PhD Student Publication Requirement List PhD Student Publication Requirement List. PhD Student Publication Requirement List As of Fall 2019, all PhD students must have one accepted paper in the below list of venues before their preliminary exam and two accepted papers (at least one in a journal) before they can schedule their PhD defense. Not mandatory to publish in journals before final PhD thesis: UGC According to the latest available report of the All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE), the enrolment at PhD level rose from 1,26,451 to 2,02,550 (0.5 per cent of total enrolment in higher education) between 2015-16 and 2019-20. ... UGC, said by scrapping the mandatory publication requirement, the higher education regulator has recognised ... Publish and flourish: investigating publication requirements for PhD This study analyzes the publication requirements of PhD programs in China. It is based on a representative sample of PhD programs from 164 Chinese universities from all fields of science. Our results show that Chinese PhD student significant pressures to publish in order to obtain their degree, with papers indexed in the Science Citation Index often a mandatory requirement for students to ... Publication Requirement Publication Requirement >> PUBLICATION REQUIREMENT. Based on Postgraduate Regulation (Revised 2022), all Ph.D. students are required to meet the standard criteria of publication at all Centres of Studies, based on the Publication Equivalence (PE) as follows: ... All PhD students are required to have at least one (1) paper accepted in a journal ... PhD by Publication A PhD by publication is a degree awarded in recognition of an extensive amount of research published in numerous formats or journals. Unlike a conventional doctorate, you are not expected to undertake a new research project. This page will give a simple overview of what a PhD by publication is, and how to get one. UGC withdraws mandatory research publication before PhD thesis UGC has done away with mandatory publication of a research paper before the final submission of PhD thesis by scholars. Another major reform is allowing students to join PhD programmes upon ... PDF Guidelines for Publication in Fulfilment of Graduation Requirements for /dissertation must fulfil the publication requirement as set by the University before the expiry of their maximum period of candidature. If the candidates fail to fulfil the publication requirement within the approved period, they will be terminated from the program of study and considered as failed. Updated Senate: 25.02.2021 PhD By Publication The minimum University academic requirement for a PhD by Publication degree is the same as that required for a PhD: you need the equivalent of a 2:1 in a UK Bachelor's degree or a Master's degree in a relevant field of study. However, depending on which School you are studying in, some may set a higher or more specific entry requirement. Requirement Of Publication In Journal For PhD And Masters By ... Requirement of Publication In Journal For PhD and Masters by Research Students. Guidelines for Submission of Thesis After Viva Voce. Final Bound Copy of Thesis (Master's & PhD) SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES. Universiti Putra Malaysia 43400 UPM Serdang Selangor Darul Ehsan 03-9769 4225- Program: School Psychology, PhD The GRE requirement is waived for applicants to the PhD in School Psychology program who have at least one of the following from an institution accredited by one of the six regional accrediting associations: an overall undergraduate grade point average of 3.00 or higher (on a 4‐point scale), or; a master's or terminal degree. Regulator scraps publication requirement for PhD hopefuls Regulator scraps publication requirement for PhD hopefuls. As part of far-reaching changes in eligibility criteria, admissions and evaluation methods for doctoral degrees, India's higher education regulator has scrapped a rule that requires PhD students to publish an article in a peer-reviewed journal to qualify for a doctoral degree. assignment essay homework paper phd report resume review speech thesis