project innovation education journal

ISSN 0013-1172 (Print) Visit publication homepage

• Issues [43]
• Supplementary Data
• Number 3, 15 March 2023
• Number 2, 15 December 2022
• Number 1, 15 September 2022
• Number 4, 15 June 2022
• Number 3, 15 March 2022
• Number 2, 15 December 2021
• Number 1, 15 September 2021
• Number 4, 15 June 2021
• Number 3, 15 March 2021
• Number 2, 15 December 2020
• Number 1, 15 September 2020
• Number 4, 15 June 2020
• Number 3, 15 March 2020
• Number 2, 15 March 2020
• Number 1, September 2019
• Number 4, Summer 2019
• Number 3, March 2019
• Number 2, Winter 2018
• Number 1, September 2018
• Number 4, Summer 2018
• Number 3, Spring 2018
• Number 2, Winter 2017
• Number 1, Fall 2017
• Number 4, Summer 2017
• Number 3, Spring 2017
• Number 2, Winter 2016
• Number 1, Fall 2016
• Number 4, Spring 2016
• Number 3, Spring 2016
• Number 2, Winter 2015
• Number 1, Fall 2015
• Number 4, Summer 2015
• Number 3, Spring 2015
• Number 2, Winter 2014
• Number 1 / Fall 2014
• Number 4 / Summer 2014
• Number 3 / Spring 2014
• Number 2 / Winter 2013
• Number 1 / Fall 2013
• Number 4 / Summer 2013
• Number 3 / Spring 2013
• Number 2 / Winter 2012
• Number 1 / Fall 2012

More in this subject:

• Social Sciences

Related Information:

• Information for Authors
• Submit a Paper
• Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
• Activate personal subscription
• RSS for latest issue
• RSS for recent issues
• Ingenta Connect
• Ingenta Connect ISSN
• Accessibility

Share Content

• Free content
• Partial Free content
• New content
• Open access content
• Partial Open access content
• Subscribed content
• Partial Subscribed content
• Free trial content

Advertisement

Technology-supported innovations in mathematics education during the last 30 years: Russian perspective

• Original Paper
• Published: 24 May 2021
• Volume 53 , pages 1499–1513, ( 2021 )

Cite this article

• Sergei Pozdniakov 1 &
• Viktor Freiman 2  

905 Accesses

6 Citations

1 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

The political changes in the USSR and Russia almost coincided with the beginning of an unprecedented leap in the development of information technologies in the country (and to a certain extent spurred it). Gradually, many different initiatives emerged to apply these technologies in education in general, and in mathematics education. In the paper, we discuss several examples of didactical innovations in teaching and learning mathematics with technology, namely, LOGO-based microworlds, dynamic geometry and computer algebra systems, as well as verifiers. The examples we provide, along with the theoretical perspective of productive learning and thinking, seem to demonstrate the innovative potential of new tools to make learning more visual, dynamic, and interactive. However, the issues of aligning with curriculum and standard examinations, teacher professional development, and rapid changes in technologies, require more attention by mathematics educators. The presence of such opposite trends makes the task of analyzing the history of the development of mathematics teaching technologies and underlying pedagogies relevant and important for predicting the development of this field in the near (and far-extended) future, and eventually preventing the repetition of errors in this new direction for mathematics education. In the paper we focus primarily on problems and processes in Russia, but they are investigated in connection with and against the backdrop of global trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Technology in Primary and Secondary School to Teach and Learn Mathematics in the Last Decades

Uses of Technology in K–12 Mathematics Education: Concluding Remarks

Introduction: Innovative Spaces for Mathematics Education with Technology

Explore related subjects.

• Artificial Intelligence

Afinogenov, G. (2013). Andrei Ershov and the Soviet Information Age Kritika. Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 14 (3), 561–584.

Article   Google Scholar  

Alexandrov, A. D. (1980). O geometrii (On geometry). Matematika v Shkole, 3 , 56–62.

Google Scholar  

Artigue, M. (2010). The future of teaching and learning mathematics with digital technologies. In C. Hoyles & J. B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology—Rethinking the terrain The 17th ICMI Study (pp. 463–476). Springer.

Balacheff, N., & Kaput, J. (1996). Computer-based learning environment in mathematics. In A. Bischop (Ed.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 469–504). Kluwer.

Balk, M. B., & Polukhin, A. A. (1983). O nekotorykh osobennosyakh resheniya uravneniya s pomoshch’yu mikrokalculatorov (On some specific methods of solving equations with micro-calculator). Matematika v Shkole, 5 , 35–40.

Bashmakov, M. I. (2000, Ed.). Teoriya i praktika produktivnogo obucheniya (Theory and practice of productive teaching). Narodnoye obrazovaniye.

Bogdanov, M. S. (2006). Avtomatizaciya proverki resheniya zadach po formal’nomu opisaniyu ee usloviya (Automation of checking the solution of problems according to the formal description of its conditions). Computer Tools in Education, 4 , 51–57. (in Russian).

Bogdanov, M., Pozdnyakov, S., & Pukhov, A. (2009). Multiplicity of the knowledge representation forms as a base of using a computer for the studying of the discrete mathematics. Pedagogika, 96 , 136–142.

Böhm, I, & Schneider, J. (1996). Produktives Lernen—eine Bildungschance für Jugendliche in Europa . Berlin & Milow.

Clark-Wilson, A., Robutti, O., & Thomas, M. (2020). Teaching with digital technology. ZDM Mathematics Education . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01196-0

Chlopak, O. (2003). Computers in Russian schools: Current conditions, main problems, and prospects for the future. Computers and Education, 40 (1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00093-3

Chukhnov, A., Maytarrattanakhon, A., Posov, I., & Pozdniakov, S. (2020). Constructive graph tasks in distant contests. Informatics in Education, 19 (3), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2020.16

Dubrovsky, V. N. (2003). Stereometriya s kompjyuterom (3D geometry with computer). Computer Tools in Education, 6 , 3–11. (in Russian).

Entina, S. B. (2011). Itogi mezhdunarodnogo konkursa po primeneniyu IKT v yestestvennykh naukakh, tekhnologiyakh i matematike «Konstruiruy, Issleduy, Optimiziruy» (KIO–2011) (Results of the international competition on the application of ICT in natural sciences, technology and mathematics "Construct, Text, Explore" (CTE-2011) . Computer Tools in Education, 3 , 3–8. (in Russian).

Entina, S. B. (2020). Konkurs «Кonstruiruj, Issleduj, Optimiziruj» i ego vliyaniye na razvitiye tvorcheskikh sposobnostej shkol’nikov (Competition "Construct, Text, Explore" ). Computer Tools in School, 2 , 18–31. (in Russian).

Ershov, A. P. (1988). School informatics in the USSR: From literacy to culture. In B. Sendov & I. Stanchev (Eds.), Children in the information age (pp. 37–56). Pergamon.

Ershov, A. P. (1989). Kompjuterizatsyja shkoly I matematicheskoje obrazovaniye. (Computerization of school and mathematics education). Matematika v Shkole, 1 , 14–30.

Feurzeig, W. (1984). The LOGO lineage . Digital Deli. Workman.

Filippov, S. A. (2010). Osnovy robototekhniki na baze konstruktora Lego Mindstorms NXT (Bases of robotics on the base of Lego Mindstorms NXT). Computer tools in education, 1–6 (Series of articles, in Russian).

Freiman, V. (2020). Types of technology in mathematics education . In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education . Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_158

Gorlitskaya, S. I., Kuznetsova, I. N., & Litvin, F. D. (1999). Obrazovatel’nyye sredy LOGO i LEGO (LOGO and LEGO learning environments). Computer Tools in Education, 5 , 65–70. (in Russian).

Gorsky, V. D., & Kravchuk, T. P. (1982). Pogrammirovaniye—profil trudovogo obucheniya (Programming—Profile of vocational training). Matematika v Shkole, 6 , 24–27.

Günster, S. M., & Weigand, H. (2020). Designing digital technology tasks for the development of functional thinking. ZDM Mathematics Education . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01179-1

Hoyles, C. (1987). Tools for learning—Insights for a mathematics educator from a Logo programming environment. For the Learning of Mathematics, 7 (2), 32–37.

Hoyles, C. (1993). Microworlds/schoolworlds: The transformation of an innovation. In C. Keitel & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Learning through computers: Mathematics and educational technology (pp. 1–17). Springer.

Hoyles, C., & Lagrange, J. B. (2010). Mathematics education and technology—Rethinking the terrain: The 17th ICMI Study . Springer.

Book   Google Scholar  

Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (1987). Synthesizing mathematical conceptions and their formalization through the construction of a Logo-based school mathematics curriculum. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 18 (4), 581–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739870180411

Ivanov, O. A. (2010). Maxima v obuchenii matematike v shkole. Urok 2. Komp’yuternyye eksperimenty s Maxima (Maxima in teaching mathematics. Lesson 2. Computer experiments with Maxima). Computer Tools in Education, 2 , 3–13. (in Russian).

Ivanov, O. A., & Pozdniakov, S. N. (2003). Kompyuter v produktivnom obuchenii matematike (Computer in productive mathematics teaching). Computer Tools in Education, 5 , 10–20. (in Russian).

Julie, C., Leung, A., Thanh, N., Posadas, L., Sacristán, A. I., & Semenov, A. (2010). Some regional developments in access and implementation of digital technologies and ICT. In C. Hoyles & J. B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology—Rethinking the terrain The 17th ICMI study (pp. 361–383). Springer.

Karp, A. (2020). Russian mathematics education after 1991. In A. Karp (Ed.), Eastern European mathematics education in the decades of change , Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38744-0_5

Karpova, G. M., Ivanov, S. G., & Pozdnyakov, S. N. (2006). Dinamicheskiye manipulyatory na uroke matematiki (Dynamic manipulators in mathematics lesson). Computer Tools in Education, 1 , 63–68. (in Russian).

Khrapovitskii, I. S. (2003). Evristicheskii poligon dlya geometrii. (Heuristic polygon for geometry). Computer Tools in Education, 1 , 15–26. (in Russian).

Kieran, C. (2008). Conceptualizing the learning of algebraic technique: Role of tasks and technology. In M. Santillan (Ed.), 11th International congress on mathematical education, selected lectures . ICME-11 Editorial Committee.

Kobel’sky, V. L., & Stepanova, E. V. (2001). Kompyuternaya obuchayushchaya sistema Planimetriya 7–9 (Computer-supported teaching system Plane Geometry 7–9). Computer Tools in Education, 2 , 58–67. (in Russian).

Koroteev, M., Kryukov, M., & Smirnov, A. (2019). APRiL: A close-to-natural language for geometric proofs. In Proceeding of the Polynomial Computer Algebra Conference , April 15–20, 2019, Euler International Mathematical Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia, https://pca-pdmi.ru/2019/files/74/april_pca2019.pdf

Kuznetsov, A. A., Beshenkov, S. A., & Smekalin, D. O. (1985). EVM na urokakh matematiki (Computer in mathematics lessons). Matematika v Shkole, 6 , 44–46.

Kuznetsova, I. N. (2004). Modelirovaniye v srede LOGO (Modelling in the LOGO environment). CTE, 1 , 53–62.

Laborde, J.-M. (1999). Quinze Ans de Cabri-Géomètre, un Bilan. Paper presented at CabriWorld, 1st International Congress about Cabri-Géomètre , São Paulo.

Leadbetter, P., & Thomas, P. (1989). A review of computer algebra and its educational implications in the teaching of mathematics. Education and Computing, 5 (4), 243–259.

Lednev, V. S., & Kuznetsov, A. A. (1975). Programma fakultativnogo kursa kibernetiki (Program for extracurricular course on Cybernetics). Matematika v Shkole, 1 , 51–55.

Lyublinskaya, I., & Ryzhik, V. (2020) Geometry investigations with GeoGebra. SMIO-Press

Mantserov, D. I. (2006). Sreda Verifier-KD: Verifikaciya reshenij zadach po matematike (Environment Verifier-KD: Verification of solutions of problems in mathematics). Computer Tools in Education, 4 , 36–41. (in Russian).

Maytarattanakhon, A. (2016). Tekhnologiya razrabotki eksperimental'no-issledovatel'skih zadach dlya distancionnyh konkursov (Technology for the development of experimental research tasks for distance competitions). Computer Tools in Education , 1 , 48–60. (in Russian).

Monakhov, V. M. (1990). Chto takoje novaya informatsionnaya tekhnologiya obucheniya? (What is a new technology of teaching?). Matematika v Shkole, 2 , 47–51.

Pantuyev, A. V. (2008). Printsip manpulativnoj nagljadnosti. (Principle of manipulative visualization). http://it-education.ru.mastertest.ru/2008/reports/Pantuev.htm

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas . Basic Books.

Papert, S. (1988). The conservation of piaget: The computer as grist. In G. Forman, & P. B. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 3–14). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Papert, S. (2001). Rossiya moget byt’ liderom v razvitii novykh idej v obrazovanii (Russia could be a leader in the development of new ideas in education). Computer Tools in Education, 2 , 83–91. (in Russian).

Papert, S. (2002). The turtle’s long slow trip: Macro-educological perspectives on microworlds. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1 , 7–27. https://doi.org/10.2190/XG11-B72E-JK04-K8TA

Pimm, D. (2014). Forward: Integrated circuits. In A. Clark-Wilson, N. Sinclair, & O. Robutti (Eds.), The mathematics teacher in the digital era: An international perspective on technology focused professional development (pp. i–xii). Springer.

Pólya, G. (1981). Mathematical discovery: On understanding, learning and teaching problem solving . Wiley.

Pozdniakov, S. (2019). Computer in productive learning of mathematics. In A. Shvarts (Ed.) Proceedings of the PME and Yandex Russian conference: Technology and Psychology for Mathematics Education (pp. 77–92). HSE Publishing House.

Pozdnyakov, S., & Ivanov, S. (2004). Computers in productive teaching of mathematics or how information technologies can support intellectual freedom of the learner. In The 10th international congress on mathematical education, national presentation: Russia, Selected materials (pp. 115–124), Copenhagen, Denmark, July 4–11, 2004.

Pozdniakov, S. N., Posov, I. A., & Entina. (2011). Razvitiye tvorcheskikh sposobnostey shkol’nikov: ot igry k ser’yeznomu issledovaniyu. (Development of the creative abilities of schoolchildren: From play to serious research). Computer Tools in Education, 6 , 49–53. (in Russian).

Ryzhik, V. I. (2000). Geometriya i komputer (Geometry and computer). Computer Tools in Education, 6 , 7–11. (in Russian).

Ryzhik, V. I. (2009). Strasti vokrug EGE (Debates around EGE). Nauka i zhizn’, https://www.nkj.ru/archive/articles/15367/

Schwartz, J. L. (1995). The right size byte: Reflections on educational software designer. In D. Persinks, J. Schwartz, M. West, & S. Wiske (Eds.), Software goes to school (pp. 172–182). New York: Oxford University Press.

Schwartz, J., & Yerushalmy, M. (1987). The Geometric Supposer: Using microcomputers to restore invention to the learning of mathematics. In D. Perkins, J. Lockhead, & P. Butler (Eds.), Contributors to thinking. Erlbaum.

Schwarzburd, S. I. (1961). O podgotvke programmistov v srednej obrazovatel’noj politekhnicheskoj shkole (On preparation of programmers in general polytechnical school). Matematika v Shkole, 2 , 19–26.

Semenov, A. (2003). National policies and practices on ICT in education: Russian Federation. In Plomp, T., Anderson R., Law N. & Quale A. (Eds.). Cross national information and communication technology policies and practices in education . Information Age.

Semenov, A. (2004). Sovremennyy kurs matematiki i informatiki v shkole (Modern course of mathematics and informatics in school). Voprosy Obrazovaniya, 1 , 103–118.

Sergeeva, T. F., Shabanova, M. V., & Grozdev, S. I. (2016) . Osnovy dinamicheskoj geometrii (Foundations of dynamic geometry: Monography). M: ASOU.

Sinclair, N., Healy, L., & Sales, C. O. R. (2009). Time for telling stories: Narrative thinking with dynamic geometry. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41 , 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0180-x

Shabat, G. B. (2005). «Zhivaya matematika» i matematicheskiy eksperiment ( Living mathematics and mathematical experiment). Voprosy Obrazovaniya, 3 , 156–165.

Sherpayev, N. V. (1988). Graficheskaya Sistema dlja geometricheskikh postrojenij. Matematika v Shkole, 5 , 44–48.

Soprunov, S., & Yakovleva, E. (n.d.). The Russian school system and the Logo approach: Two methods worlds apart, http://www.microworlds.com/support/logo-philosophy-russian-school.html

Sriraman, B., & Lande, D. (2018). Integrating creativity and technology through interpolation. In V. Freiman & J. Tassell (Eds.), Creativity and technology in mathematics education (pp. 399–412). Springer.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Stager, G. S. (2005). Papertian constructionism and the design of productive contexts for learning . In Plenary session paper presented at the Euro Logo X Conference , Warsaw, Poland.

Veraksa, V., & Veraksa A. (2018). Lev Vygotsky’s Cultural-Historical Theory of Development and the problem of mental tools. Papeles del Psicólogo, 39 (2). https://www.redalyc.org/jatsRepo/778/77855949010/html/index.html

Vygotsky L.S., & Luria A.R. (1934/1994). Tool and symbol in child development /ed. by R. Van der Veer, J. Valsiner. The Vygotsky Reader. Wiley-Blackwell.

Wertheimer, M. (1945).  Productive thinking.  Harper.

Yerushalmy, M. (1999). Making exploration visible: On software design and school algebra curriculum. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 4 (2–3), 169–189.

Zvenigorodskii, G. A. (1985). Pervyye uroki programmirovaniya (First lessons in programming) . Nauka.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was partially supported by the RFBR Grant no. 19-29-14141

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University LETI: Sankt-Peterburgskij Gosudarstvennyj Elektrotehniceskij Universitet LETI, St. Petersburg, Russia

Sergei Pozdniakov

Université de Moncton, Moncton, Canada

Viktor Freiman

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viktor Freiman .

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Pozdniakov, S., Freiman, V. Technology-supported innovations in mathematics education during the last 30 years: Russian perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education 53 , 1499–1513 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01279-6

Download citation

Accepted : 17 May 2021

Published : 24 May 2021

Issue Date : December 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01279-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Russian mathematics education
• Technology integration
• Productive learning
• Computer-supported investigations
• Dynamic geometry
• Computer algebra systems (CAS)
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

•  Sign into My Research
•  Create My Research Account
• Company Website
• Our Products
• About Dissertations
• Español (España)
• Support Center

Select language

• Bahasa Indonesia
• Português (Brasil)
• Português (Portugal)

Welcome to My Research!

You may have access to the free features available through My Research. You can save searches, save documents, create alerts and more. Please log in through your library or institution to check if you have access.

Translate this article into 20 different languages!

If you log in through your library or institution you might have access to this article in multiple languages.

Get access to 20+ different citations styles

Styles include MLA, APA, Chicago and many more. This feature may be available for free if you log in through your library or institution.

Looking for a PDF of this document?

You may have access to it for free by logging in through your library or institution.

Want to save this document?

You may have access to different export options including Google Drive and Microsoft OneDrive and citation management tools like RefWorks and EasyBib. Try logging in through your library or institution to get access to these tools.

• More like this
• Preview Available
• Scholarly Journal

Innovation education programs: a review of definitions, pedagogy, frameworks and evaluation measures

No items selected

Please select one or more items.

Select results items first to use the cite, email, save, and export options

You might have access to the full article...

Try and log in through your institution to see if they have access to the full text.

Content area

1. Introduction

As countries and organizations seek to flourish in a complex and rapidly changing world, they increasingly look to innovation as a means to flourish. There are several policy levers that governments and organizations can pull to enhance innovation. These include tax incentives, grants and investment, including increasing the standards of education. One aspect that has not been widely studied is the role of innovative educational programs that are specifically teaching students the process of innovation so that they will be able to translate their skills better into practical solutions. In this article, we review the literature of this emerging field. Our aim is to help consolidate research in the field to date, and to understand which are the most important aspects of innovation education and how it could potentially be made more effective. To achieve this, we present a systematic review of existing scholarship in the field of innovation education. Based on this review, the article identifies the definitions of innovation education, its pedagogy, emerging frameworks and methodologies to measure the effectiveness of educational programs. Through this process, the article also highlights gaps in the literature, with the aim to provide a foundation for further research in this area. The findings of this literature review would help understand how to teach the process of translating ideas into viable opportunities, so that the technological and creative successes of universities and other institutions may have stronger societal and economic impacts.

The remainder of the article comprises six sections. First, we define the terms innovation and entrepreneurship as used within the context of this article. Building on these definitions, we highlight the role of innovation for organizations, governments and the economy more broadly. We then outline the methodology employed in our literature review, setting up the main section of the article – an account of the findings from our literature review. This is followed by a discussion of the findings, which highlights gaps in the existing literature as potential avenues for future research. The final section synthesizes the main findings and takeaways of the article in the form of a conclusion.

2. Defining innovation

The term “innovation” has been used in a variety of ways over the past few decades (Godin, 2008; Taylor, 2017b). The term...

You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer

Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer

Suggested sources

• About ProQuest
• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy

Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

The purpose of this article is to determine project-based learning (PjBL) from the characteristics, effectiveness and implementation aspects of science and science, technology, engineering, art and mathematics (STEAM) education. Eric database was used in order to investigate key words. Thus, this mini review reviewed 36 articles on PjBL for science and STEAM education based on the available Eric database reference. The data obtained were analyzed using content analysis methods. The results showed that on average PjBL can be categorized as a learning model that can improve student learning outcomes in science learning and train students in problem solving (critical thinking). The review reveals that PjBL has an influence on student learning, especially in science and STEAM education. From this article, it can be concluded and can be recommended three recommendations related to the essential success of PjBL in schools.

• project-based learning
• science education
• STEAM education
• learning outcomes
• critical thinking

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Review Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 19, Issue 5, May 2023, Article No: em2256

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13128

Publication date: 01 May 2023

Online publication date: 29 Mar 2023

Article Views: 4024

Article Downloads: 4422

• Arce, M. E., Cacabelos, A., Granada, E., Míguez-Tabarés, J. L., & Míguez, C. (2013). Project-based learning: Application to a research master subject of thermal engineering. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 3 (3), 132-138. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.81
• Baran, M., Karakoyun, F., & Maskan, A. (2021). The influence of project-based STEM (PjbL-STEM) applications on the development of 21st century skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18 (4), 798-815. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.104
• Belayneh, A. S. (2021). Science teachers’ integrative practices in teaching, research, and community services: The case of three universities in Ethiopia. Education and Self Development, 16 (2), 10-26. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.16.2.02
• Chen, J., Kolmos, A., & Du, X. (2021). Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: a review of literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46 (1), 90-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615
• Chen, Y.-L., & Tippett, C. D. (2022). Project-based inquiry in STEM teaching for preschool children. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18 (4), em2093. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11899
• Cook, N. D., & Weaver, G. C. (2015). Teachers’ implementation of project-based learning: Lessons from the research goes to school program. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 19 (6), 1-45.
• Cumhur, M., Masalimova, A. R., Rostovtseva, P. P., Shindryaev, N. N., & Kryukova, N. I. (2021). Content analysis of studies conducted on STEM education from 2010 to 2020: Perspective of emerging technologies in learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16 (19), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i19.26053
• Domenici, V. (2022). STEAM project-based learning activities at the science museum as an effective training for future chemistry teachers. Education Sciences, 12 (1), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010030
• Doppelt, Y. (2005). Assessment of project-based learning in a mechatronics context. Journal of Technology Education, 16 (2), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v16i2.a.1
• Giang, N. N. (2021). Project-based learning on the topic of aromatic wax production. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research , 8 (4), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.84.395.407
• González, A. J., Fortunato, M. S., Korol, S. E., & Gallego, A. (2020). Nitrate contamination of bottled water: Description of a project-based learning experience. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16 (3), e2218. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8337
• Haatainen, O., & Aksela, M. (2021). Project-based learning in integrated science education: Active teachers’ perceptions and practices. International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 9 (1), 149-173. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1392
• Hanif, S., Wijaya, A. F. C., & Winarno, N. (2019). Enhancing students’ creativity through STEM project-based learning. Journal of Science Learning, 2 (2), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i2.13271
• Hawari, A. D. M., & Noor, A. I. M. (2020). Project based learning pedagogical design in STEAM art education. Asian Journal of University Education, 16 (3), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.11072
• Huysken, K., Olivey, H., McElmurry, K., Gao, M., & Avis, P. (2019). Assessing collaborative, project-based learning models in introductory science courses. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 19 (1), 6-28. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v19i1.26777
• Ibragimov, G. I. (2021). Project- and research-based learning as a technology for developing master students’ methodological culture development . Education and Self Development, 16 (3), 310-321. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.16.3.26
• Imaduddin, M., Praptaningrum, D. N. W., & Safitri, D. A. (2021). Students’ attitude toward STEM project-based learning in the fun cooking activity to learn about the colloid system. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research , 8(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.820898
• Intykbekov, A. (2017). Teacher perceptions of project-based learning in a Kazakh-Turkish Lyceum in the northern part of Kazakhstan [Unpublished Master Thesis, Nazarbayev University Graduate School of Education, Kazakhstan].
• Jirana, M. A., Suarsini, E., & Lukiati, B. (2020). Implementation of project based learning (Pbl) model for critical thinking skills and creativity stimulation as a prospective biology teacher. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy , 11 (6), 1290-1301.
• Kartini, F. S., Widodo, A., Winarno, N., & Astuti, L. (2021). Promoting student’s problem-solving skills through STEM project-based learning in Earth layer and disasters topic. Journal of Science Learning, 4 (3), 257-266. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i3.27555
• Kılınç, A. (2010). Can project-based learning close the gap? Turkish student teachers and pro environmental behaviours. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5 (4), 495-509.
• Kim, H. W., & Kim, M. K. (2021). A case study of children’s interaction types and learning motivation in small group project-based learning activities in a mathematics classroom . Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17( 12), em2051. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11415
• Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. M. (2018). Teaching science in elementary and middle school: A project-based learning approach (Fifth Edn.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315205014
• Li, B., Jia, X., Chi, Y., Liu, X., & Jia, B. (2020). Project-based learning in a collaborative group can enhance student skill and ability in the biochemical laboratory: a case study. Journal of Biological Education, 54 (4), 404-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1600570
• Lukitasari, M., Hasan, R., Sukri, A., & Handhika, J. (2021). Developing student’s metacognitive ability in science through project-based learning with e-portfolio. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10 (3), 948-955. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21370
• McKibben, J. D., & Murphy, T. H. (2021). The effect of authenticity on project-based learning: A quasi-experimental study of STEM integration in agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Education, 62 (1), 144-155. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.01144
• Muzana, S. R., Wilujeng, I., Yanto, B. E., & Mustamin, A. A. (2021). E-STEM project-based learning in teaching science to increase ICT literacy and problem solving. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10 (4), 1386-1394. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21942
• Novak, E., & Wisdom, S. (2018). Effects of 3D printing project-based learning on preservice elementary teachers’ science attitudes, science content knowledge, and anxiety about teaching science. Journal of Science Education and Technology , 27(5), 412-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9733-5
• Parnis, K., & Hendry, A. L. (2021). GeoSTEM:” The Urban Mess” interdisciplinary learning in a project-based learning high school environment. Geographical Education, 34 , 14-21.
• Patrick, P. G., Bryan, W., & Matteson, S. M. (2020). Applying the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) framework during a community college chemistry project-based learning activity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 50 (2), 6-13.
• Putra, A. K., Deffinika, I., & Islam, M. N. (2021). The effect of blended project-based learning with STEM approach to spatial thinking ability and geographic skill. International Journal of Instruction, 14 (3), 685-704. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14340a
• Rahmawati, Y., Afrizal, A., Dwi Astari, D., Mardiah, A., Budi Utami, D., & Muhab, S. (2021). The integration of dilemmas stories with STEM-project-based learning: Analyzing students’ thinking skills using Hess’ cognitive rigor matrix. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11 (2), 419-439. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1292
• Ralph, R. A. (2016). Post secondary project-based learning in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6 (1), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.155
• Rusmini, R., Suyono, S., & Agustini, R. (2021). Analysis of science process skills of chemical education students through self project-based learning (SjBL) in the pandemic COVID 19 era. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11 (2), 371-387. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1288
• Samsudin, M. A., Jamali, S. M., Md Zain, A. N., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2020). The effect of STEM project-based learning on self-efficacy among high-school physics students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16 (1), 94-108. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.15
• Siew, N. M., & Ambo, N. (2018). Development and evaluation of an integrated project-based and STEM teaching and learning module on enhancing scientific creativity among fifth graders. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17 (6), 1017-1033. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.1017
• Siew, N. M., & Ambo, N. (2020). The scientific creativity of fifth graders in a STEM project-based cooperative learning approach. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78 (4), 627-643. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.627
• Sulisworo, D., & Santyasa, I. W. (2018). Maximize the mobile learning interaction through project-based learning activities. Educational Research and Reviews, 13 (5), 144-149. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2018.3463
• Suryandari, K. C. (2021). The effect of scientific reading based project model in empowering creative thinking skills of preservice teacher in elementary school . European Journal of Educational Research, 10 (3), 1329-1340. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1329
• Torío, H. (2019). Teaching as coaching: Experiences with a video-based flipped classroom combined with project-based approach in technology and physics higher education. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9 (3), 404-419. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.554
• Tsybulsky, D., & Oz, A. (2019). From frustration to insights: Experiences, attitudes, and pedagogical practices of preservice science teachers implementing PBL in elementary school. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30 (3), 259-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1559560
• Usak, M., Masalimova, A. R., Cherdymova, E. I., & Shaidullina, A. R. (2020). New playmaker in science education: COVID-19. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19 (2), 180-185. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.180
• Viro, E., Lehtonen, D., Joutsenlahti, J., & Tahvanainen, V. (2020). Teachers’ perspectives on project-based learning in mathematics and science. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8 (1), 12-31. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9544
• Widyaningsih, S. W., & Yusuf, I. (2020). Implementation of project-based learning (PjBL) assisted by e-learning through lesson study activities to improve the quality of learning in physics learning planning courses. International Journal of Higher Education, 9 (1), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p60
• Zakeri, N. N. B., Hidayat, R., Sabri, N. A. B. M., Yaakub, N. F. B., Balachandran, K. S., & Azizan, N. I. B. (2023). Creative methods in STEM for secondary school students: Systematic literature review. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 4 (1), ep23003. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/12601

How to cite this article

Chistyakov, A. A., Zhdanov, S. P., Avdeeva, E. L., Dyadichenko, E. A., Kunitsyna, M. L., & Yagudina, R. I. (2023). Exploring the characteristics and effectiveness of project-based learning for science and STEAM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19 (5), em2256. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13128

Chistyakov AA, Zhdanov SP, Avdeeva EL, Dyadichenko EA, Kunitsyna ML, Yagudina RI. Exploring the characteristics and effectiveness of project-based learning for science and STEAM education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(5):em2256. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13128

Chistyakov AA, Zhdanov SP, Avdeeva EL, Dyadichenko EA, Kunitsyna ML, Yagudina RI. Exploring the characteristics and effectiveness of project-based learning for science and STEAM education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed . 2023;19(5), em2256. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13128

Chistyakov, Alexey A., Sergei P. Zhdanov, Elena L. Avdeeva, Elena A. Dyadichenko, Maria L. Kunitsyna, and Roza I. Yagudina. "Exploring the characteristics and effectiveness of project-based learning for science and STEAM education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 5 (2023): em2256. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13128

Chistyakov, A. A., Zhdanov, S. P., Avdeeva, E. L., Dyadichenko, E. A., Kunitsyna, M. L., and Yagudina, R. I. (2023). Exploring the characteristics and effectiveness of project-based learning for science and STEAM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education , 19(5), em2256. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13128

Chistyakov, Alexey A. et al. "Exploring the characteristics and effectiveness of project-based learning for science and STEAM education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education , vol. 19, no. 5, 2023, em2256. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13128

Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it

• Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning 10(1):4-33

• National University (California)

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations
• Salim Salim
• Mohamad Aji Prasetia
• Muhammad Bagas F.
• Abdurrahman Abdurrahman
• Birsel Özkan

• Angela Marie Even
• Rachma Selviana
• Farid Ahmadi

• Leli Alhapip

• Daniel Román-Sánchez

• Veronika Novotná
• Štěpán Zítek

• Stéphan Vincent-Lancrin
• Kiira Kärkkäinen

• Georgi Lozanov
• Anita Cyngler

• David Kaplan

• Andy Hargreaves

• Michael Fullan
• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Instructions to Authors

Manuscript submission.

Manuscripts must be submitted electronically and should be prepared to conform to the style and procedures described in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. 

Manuscripts must be accompanied by an abstract of 100 to 200 words. The abstract should contain statements of (a) the problem, (b) method, (c) results, and (d) conclusions when appropriate. The abstract should provide the reader with an idea of the theme and scope of the article.   

Please use Times New Roman font, double spaced, in letter size format, and the length of the entire manuscript generally should not exceed 25 pages.​

Review Process

Normally, manuscripts are reviewed by two reviewers knowledgeable in the applicable field of study. An attempt is made to review manuscripts within four weeks of receipt when possible. 

The time frame from approval of a manuscript to publication is generally eight to ten months . 

Authors will edit their galley proofs online after manuscripts are typeset, generally six months after initial acceptance.  

At the time of acceptance, authors may consider their manuscripts In Press.

Copyright Policy

Copyright protects the author and the publisher for “original works of authorship.” While copyright does not protect facts, ideas, inventions, systems or methods of operation, it may protect the way in which such things are expressed.The transfer of ownership of a copyright to a publisher prevents the author from future use of the work except as defined below.  

Authors transfer copyright to the publisher as part of a journal publishing agreement, but authors have the right to:   

• Share their article for Personal Use, Internal Nondigital Instructional Use and Scholarly Sharing purposes,
• Retain patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights (including research data). 
• Proper attribution and credit for the published work.  

Concomitantly, Project Innovation retains the rights to: 

• Publish and distribute an article, 
• Grant rights to others, including for commercial purposes,  
• Provide the article in all forms and media so the article can be used on the latest technology (even after publication).
• Enforce the rights in the article on behalf of an author, and against various possible third parties (for example, in the case of plagiarism or copyright infringement).

Publication

The journals described on this web site are independent and supported by subscriptions and shared author fees. They are not supported by membership, association dues, or advertising. Authors or their institutions share the cost of publication (generally $38 per typed double spaced page). Except for invited articles, authors will be invoiced for their share of publication costs at the time the manuscript is accepted for publication. Agreement to the terms of this contract by payment of page charges transfers the copyright ownership of the article to the journal for purposes of providing abstracting and copying services for dissemination.  Information concerning additional reprints and reprint policy is disseminated with page proofs/galleys.

Copyright © 2020 Project Innovation Austin, LLC. - All Rights Reserved.

Project Innovation Austin, LLC.

PO Box 1074

Brenham, TX 77834

[email protected]

Powered by GoDaddy

An excellent researcher from many reputable universities to create Spring Water with the Grand Prize US$ 5.000 starting from 1 st April 2020 - 1 st November 2024. One of the requirements is the Spring Water can be brought anytime, anywhere, everywhere and by many people.

The copyright will belong to Bircu Publisher

Note: Seeking for partners

Contact person :

Email : [email protected]  

Mobile phone : +62 81375313465

Whatsapp : +62 82282201346

Editor In Chief

Muhammad Ridwan, Ph.D(Cand.)

Indexed by:

Please submit your articles to these emails below! [email protected] .or. [email protected]

Sponsoring Membership Partners

Supported By:

Congratulation to:

Prof.Dr. Mult. Mirosław Matyja receives a prestigious award for supporting democratic education in the world from the Companionship Hipolit Cegielski in Poznan in Poland

Profesor Mirosław Matyja znanym w świecie orędownikiem demokracji bezpośredniej

• Bircu Proofreading
• Subscription
• Sponsorship

The Effect of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) Continuing Learning Innovation on Learning Outcomes of English in Higher Education

The educational approach that emphasizes creative thinking, problem-solving, and interaction is one that is suitable for sustaining this project-based continuous learning. Participation in the current Process, Input, Output, and Outcome is requested of universities. The educational approach that emphasizes creative thinking, problem-solving, and interaction between students and peers in order to create and use knowledge is one that is suitable for sustaining this project-based learning. The aim of this study is to see how continuous learning technologies like PjBL influence the English learning outcomes of students enrolled in Brawijaya University's English Education study programs. The experimental design for this study was a Times-Series System with a Control Group. The one-way ANOVA test was used to analyze the data in this study. The findings showed that the treatment of the TOEFL 1 test, specifically the pre-and post-test, differed between the contro 1 and 1 experimental groups by using the Project-Based Learning (PjBL) learning model. The experimental class's average pre-test TOEFL score was 1 344.71, with 1 a 1 range of 300-397 1 and a standard deviation 1 of 1 29.386. The experimental class's average 1 post-test 1 TOEFL score 1 is 360.83, with a range of values from 303 to 400 and a standard deviation of 24.146. Project-based learning which has a p-value of 0.026, has been shown to improve student's learning outcomes.

Mahanal, S., Darmawan, E., Corebima, a. D., & Zubaidah, S. (2010). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Project Based Learning (PjBL) pada Materi Ekosistem terhadap Sikap dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMAN 2 Malang. Bioedukasi (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.24127/bioedukasi.v1i1.179

Mansur, N. (2015). Pencapaian Hasil Belajar Ditinjau Dari Sikap Belajar Mahasiswa Nurdin Mansur Fakultas Tarbiyah dan keguruan UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh. 3(2).

Montgomery, D., C. (2013). Statistical Quality Control: A Modern Introduction 7 th Edition.

United States: Jhon Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Rangkuti, A. N., and Hasibuan, W. S. (2019). Learning of Spatial Operations in 1st Grade of Junior High School (MTs.S NU Paringgonan) Ulu Barumun Sub-district Padang Lawas Regency. Budapest International Research in Linguistics and Education Sciences (BirLE) Journal. 2(1): 181-193.

Rizky, B. P., Asri, A. N., & Purwoko Aji, D. K. (2017). Aplikasi Toefl Preparation Berbasis Ibt (Internet Based Test). Jurnal Informatika Polinema, 1(3), 13. https://doi.org/10.33795/jip.v1i3.107

• There are currently no refbacks.

A business journal from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania

Skolkovo: A Case Study in Government-supported Innovation

December 20, 2013 • 12 min read.

Acknowledging insufficient innovation and development spending, Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev established the Skolkovo Innovation Center three years ago as a way to wean Russia off natural-resource commodities and nurture a knowledge-based economy. Its track record has been mixed.

• Public Policy

Entrepreneurial activity and innovation are imperative for sustained development and growth in any economy. Despite its nascent status as a capitalist nation,Russia’s economy by many measures is fairly advanced. In 2012, the country’s GDP was eighth in the world, at just over US$2.0 trillion. Its population of 143 million is well-educated, with a literacy rate of 99% and nearly 70% enrolled in post-secondary education. Russia also boasts the largest Internet market in Europe, with 59.7 million users, and an astounding 230.5 million mobile phones, or 1.6 mobile phone numbers per person.

Despite these figures, however, private investment in early-stage business projects in Russia is still about US$300 million per year, roughly 1/70 th that of similar investment in the U.S. According to the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, only about 5% of the Russian adult population is engaged in early-stage entrepreneurship, the lowest level among countries with a comparable GDP per capita. The abundance of natural resources — such as oil, gas, coal, and timber — and the economy’s resulting dependence on these commodities for export earnings have led to a natural resource curse, whereby most public and private capital is funneled to support those industries, at the expense of nearly all other sectors of the economy.

In Russia, this is exacerbated by the fact that state ownership is present in 81% of the top firms, which places the country third in the category behind only China and the UAE. To sustain short-term economic growth and satisfy the country’s recent fast-growing consumer market, where GDP per capita has grown about 13% annually from 1999 through 2010, politicians continue to funnel outsized portions of capital to these natural-resource-related industries.

Moreover, with very little foreign or domestic competition, Russian manufacturers do not see a reason to innovate, further increasing inefficiency and putting a strain on long-term economic development. For example, in 2011, overall R&D expenditures by businesses in Russia represented just over 1% of GDP, compared to expenditures of about 3% in the U.S. Furthermore, the number of researchers in Russia has decreased nearly three-fold since the late Soviet period. In addition, due in large part to its geographic vastness, isolation and political and economic barriers with other nations, very few industrial products (outside those used for natural resources) enter Russia’s borders. As a result, with no internal demand for innovation, much of the nation’s industrial technology has become dangerously outdated and inefficient. In fact, many industries continue to use legacy Soviet-era equipment and machinery. Finally, political instability, the economic crash in the 1990s, and a general lack of opportunity caused a “brain drain.” It is estimated that 1.25 million people emigrated from Russia in the first decade of the twenty-first century alone.

A Startup Incubator Is Born

In 2010, recognizing this overall void in innovation and development spending, former President and current Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev established the Skolkovo Innovation Center just outside Moscow. Billed as Russia’s version of Silicon Valley, Skolkovo calls for a 400-hectare (1,000-acre) site with 25,000 permanent residents, business and engineering schools, housing, a Technopark, and mass-transit connections, all to be completed by 2020. This complex is a hallmark of Medvedev’s efforts as president to wean Russia off natural-resource commodities and nurture a knowledge-based economy. The Technopark, in particular, serves as a startup incubator that supports its residents in developing products with the end goal of establishing them in the Russian and global markets.

In 2011, overall R&D expenditures by businesses in Russia represented just over 1% of GDP compared to expenditures of about 3% in the U.S.

Today each startup at Skolkovo falls into one of five clusters that the state deems essential to innovation: information technologies, energy-efficient technologies, nuclear technologies, biomedical technologies, and space technologies and telecommunications. According to the Skolkovo Foundation, which oversees the Innovation Center and Technopark, during the first half of 2013 resident companies generated about 4.6 billion rubles (US$145 million) in revenues and submitted 204 applications to register intellectual property.

Once admitted through an application process, residents enjoy benefits such as highly subsidized rent and reductions in payroll and value-added taxes. They also have the opportunity to apply for monetary grants from the Skolkovo Foundation, but many choose not to because of the significant additional reporting requirements. International participants in Skolkovo Technopark are also afforded easier access to work visas.

In reality, the residents’ incentives go beyond mere finances. Vladimir Bernstein, CEO of Board Maps, in the IT cluster, came upon Sberbank, which he hopes will become an important client, through a Skolkovo contact. Pavel Smirnoff, CEO of Optogard, in the nuclear-technology sector, hopes to gain access to Russian railroads through another Skolkovo connection. Optogard, which uses a unique laser-plasma system to increase the strength and durability of metal surfaces, also utilizes Skolkovo’s vast array of hardware technology and the advanced testing center — both of which are freely available to all residents — to analyze various metal surfaces. Another founder, in the Energy cluster, who prefers to remain anonymous, wound up at Skolkovo by accident, but loves the culture of innovation, frequently attending meet-and-greet events to network and share best practices.

Residents of Skolkovo can retain their benefits for either 10 years or until they exceed an annual revenue of 1 billion rubles (US$31 million) — whichever comes first. This allows time for proper R&D to build and test the product but may also serve as a moral hazard.

Another concern is how Skolkovo Technopark plans to reconcile the need for innovation with commercial viability. Skolkovo recently hosted StartupVillage, an Entrepreneurship and Innovation Conference, whose goal was to connect startups with investors, tech companies, and experts in their respective fields. The first-place winner was the eTrike from Bravo Motors, a business in the energy-efficiency cluster that focuses on research to extend the life of rechargeable batteries in electric cars. It received a 900,000 rubles (US$30,000) prize and was named best Russian startup by Forbes. Bravo Motors’ main challenge now is to raise 42 million rubles (US$1.4 million) for field testing and initiating production. As an anonymous source close to the matter says, the success of Skolkovo will not be measured by companies like Bravo Motors. Rather, “the success of Skolkovo should be assessed on the basis of whether it manages to create a huge and successful business like Yandex [Russia’s largest search engine] and Mail.ru [Russian email].”

Operating within the current Russian investment climate presents another challenge. The current legal system is still developing and lacks important elements, such as fundamental protection for minority shareholders. As a result, many companies choose to incorporate in Luxembourg or Cyprus and hold overseas bank accounts. Businesses also seek to partner with international firms to share expertise, which is often lacking within Russia; and many seek international clients. Consequently, the benefit to Russia and its economy is diluted, and these startups are effectively Russian only in name. Outside of adequate access to capital and legal uncertainty, the lack of concrete corporate governance and the dearth of qualified people echo over and over as the main problems these startups face.

Since 2012, Skolkovo’s name has been mired in a number of widely publicized criminal cases involving its executives.

Sergei Sedyh, who has been involved in three startups at Skolkovo, questions whether companies in Russia can truly innovate and create a disruptive breakthrough. He describes the investors’ general sentiment as, “if they haven’t already done it in America, it probably won’t work,” and adds that “Russia is an investment desert.” He also worries that the government is using Skolkovo as a political puppet for its own ends.

Misspending and Illegal Payment Allegations

Since 2012, Skolkovo’s name has been mired in a number of widely publicized criminal cases involving its executives. In February 2012, the Investigative Committee, a top law-enforcement body, said it was investigating the misspending of 3.18 billion rubles (US$106 million) the government had provided to Skolkovo. The committee also announced that it had opened one criminal case against two Skolkovo managers over the alleged theft of 21.6 million rubles (US$720,000), and a second case, accusing Skolkovo vice president Alexei Beltyukov of allegedly making illegal payments of 22.5 million rubles (US$750,000) to opposition lawmaker Ilya Ponomarev for preparing a series of lectures about Skolkovo. In total, three ministers in Medvedev’s cabinet have been fired or forced out since October 2012, most recently Deputy Prime Minister Vladislav Surkov, the government’s chief of staff. Announcement of his resignation in May 2013 came after he publicly criticized the criminal investigations into the use of state funds at Skolkovo, which he had overseen.

Skolkovo is widely regarded as an endeavor of former president Medvedev. While current President Vladimir Putin’s public comments about the project have been largely supportive, his enacted policies have been mixed, and his administration recently reversed certain preferential treatments for the center. Gleb Pavlovsky, an ex-Kremlin adviser who heads the Moscow-based Effective Policy Foundation, says that “the idea of the project itself is anathema to the leadership because of its special status and independence. Without Medvedev able to protect it, it can’t survive.”

Beyond the shameful publicity that highlights the country’s political instability, these events have led to hesitation among multinational corporations looking to invest in Russia. Many prominent global corporations — including Alstom, Intel, Microsoft, Samsung Electronics, and Siemens — originally backed Skolkovo and pledged nearly 15 billion rubles (US$500 million) in investments. Conor Lenihan, a former Irish science minister tasked with attracting foreign companies to Skolkovo, notes that the center offers “alignment with a flagship project and a safe harbor where [the corporations] can locate R&D and receive protection for their intellectual property.” However, with the current instability, many investors can still withdraw their financial support, especially if the projected state funding does not materialize.

Direct government involvement creates a number of questions about conflicts of interest regarding independence and financial control, as well as interpretation of the law.

The environment of political uncertainty compounds Skolkovo’s fragility. The Technopark and innovation center are almost exclusively government-funded and are administered through Federal Law No. 244-FZ. The Skolkovo Foundation, whose board of directors oversees the Technopark, claims to be independent of the government. However, this direct government involvement creates a number of questions about conflicts of interest regarding independence and financial control, as well as interpretation of the law. Article 10, for example, states that, as of January 2014, all business residents must be physically present in Skolkovo. However, construction of the facilities is not complete. As a result, some of the startups are worried about their logistical ability to comply with the law.

Gleb Daviduk, managing partner of iTech capital, a private equity firm that invests primarily in technology companies in Russia, is optimistic about Skolkovo, noting, “the Russian startup scene seems largely to have been spared by corruption. In the digital sphere, greedy civil servants don’t know what to look for — or where. This helps the industry to stay below various radar screens.” He believes all attempts at innovation are good and that Russia needs Skolkovo, no matter how inefficiently it is run. Skolkovo does not need to work for results specifically, he adds, but for the sake of being there to promote innovation.

Viktor Vekselberg, the Russian oligarch who heads the innovation center, points out that government involvement is unavoidable. He notes, “When it comes to innovation,Silicon Valley appeared thanks to the government…. Let’s not have illusions about this. It appeared in the first instance thanks to serious contracts from the military-industrial complex. And to this day,Silicon Valley — don’t try to twist things around — still relies heavily on the state…. Wherever you look, if we take other examples, the state always plays a dominant role. Singapore: The state plays a dominant role in an analogous project. India: huge involvement of the state.”

For at least the near term, the Russian government has reaffirmed its commitment to Skolkovo. In August 2013, the Duma allocated 502 billion rubles (about US$15.5 million) through 2020. According to Vekselberg, this action demonstrates the government’s “faith in the future of the Skolkovo project.” According to the foundation’s estimates, by 2020, the Skolkovo project will help establish 1,000 startups in Russia, which will contribute 213 billion rubles (US$7.1 billion) to the Russian economy. Vekselberg notes that “In total, efficiency from investment in the project needs to be calculated by 2030, when it reaches full operating capacity. According to preliminary calculations, the project will contribute up to 1.5 trillion rubles to GDP.”

By virtue of a rotund bureaucracy and the large role state-owned enterprises play, every Skolkovo resident relies on the foundation for access to one branch of government or another — be it Russian railways, state-owned Sberbank (Russia’s largest commercial bank), or a regional government office. It is the magic ingredient in Russian entrepreneurship and is ubiquitously termed the “administrative resource.” As Vekselberg notes, “It is true that in Russia it is difficult to get anything done without state support.” It remains to be seen how the state will follow through on its commitment to Skolkovo and innovation in general, but Russia needs its continued development in order to avoid the Dutch disease of overreliance on natural resources.

This article was written by Eugene Bord and Natalya Guseva, members of the Lauder Class of 2015.

More From Knowledge at Wharton

How Much Will a Harris or Trump Presidency Cost?

How AI Analytics Spurs Innovation at Newly Public Firms

How Low-income Households Can Secure Their Retirement Finances

Looking for more insights.

Sign up to stay informed about our latest article releases.