rigour in qualitative research meaning

Abstract. Attributes of rigor and quality and suggested best practices for qualitative research design as they relate to the steps of designing, conducting, and reporting qualitative research in health professions educational scholarship are presented. A research question must be clear and focused and supported by a strong conceptual framework ...

Rigor of qualitative research continues to be challenged even now in the 21st century—from the very idea that qualitative research alone is open to questions, ... Science is concerned with rigor, and by definition, good rigorous research must be reliable and valid. If qualitative research is unreliable and invalid, then it must not be science

Reflexive transparency refers to the qualitative researcher being clear about their position in the research. Photo by Timon Studler. Transparency in qualitative research is essential for maintaining rigor, trustworthiness, and ethical integrity. By being transparent, researchers allow their work to be scrutinized, critiqued, and improved upon ...

The definition and support of rigor in qualitative analysis will frame this mapping and alignment. This will be followed by an overview of the ongoing digital evolution where material tools, such as physical models, paper, and pens, are being replaced by computer-assisted tools and software in both sociological and design research and practice ...

concerns all qualitative scholars and anyone evaluating qualitative research. Scholars often assess rigor in qualitative research by examining qualitative analysts' descriptions of how they moved from data to theory (Bansal & Corley, 2011). To demonstrate rigor, then, qualitative scholars need to detail more effectively "the actual ...

Qualitative analysis is a central tool for developing new theory (Edmondson & McManus, 2007; Eisen-hardt, 1989). In recent years, there has been a call for increasing the rigor of qualitative research (Lamont & White,2008;Lubet,2017;Pratt,Kaplan,&Whittington, 2020; Small, 2013). This debate on rigor has led some

The differentiation does not imply a lack of rigor in qualitative research; rather, it reflects an adaptation of rigor to suit the type of data and the nature of inquiry. Qualitative research is equally rigorous as its quantitative counterpart, but it operationalizes this rigor differently to accommodate the complexities of textual or ...

Scholars have long debated how rigor can be achieved in qualitative analysis. To answer this question, we need to better understand how theory is generated from data. Qualitative analysis is, at its core, a categorization process. Nevertheless, despite a surge of interest in categorization within the social sciences, insights from categorization theory have not yet been applied to our ...

Rigor is a concept that reflects the quality of the process used in capturing, managing, and analyzing our data as we develop this rich understanding. Rigor helps to establish standards through which qualitative research is critiqued and judged, both by the scientific community and by the practitioner community.

This review aims to synthesize a published set of evaluative criteria for good qualitative research. The aim is to shed light on existing standards for assessing the rigor of qualitative research encompassing a range of epistemological and ontological standpoints. Using a systematic search strategy, published journal articles that deliberate criteria for rigorous research were identified. Then ...

Because the contribution of inductive qualitative research fundamentally hinges on the theoretical relevance of the units (e.g., individuals, cases, texts) selected for study, sampling is of paramount importance. Different approaches of qualitative analysis have specific guidance on sampling consistent with that approach.

In qualitative research, rigour, or trustworthiness, refers to how researchers demonstrate the quality of their research. 1, 2 Rigour is an umbrella term for several strategies and approaches that recognise the influence on qualitative research by multiple realities; for example, of the researcher during data collection and analysis, and of the ...

Abstract. Criteria for determining the trustworthiness of qualitative research were introduced by Guba and Lincoln in the 1980s when they replaced terminology for achieving rigor, reliability, validity, and generalizability with dependability, credibility, and transferability. Strategies for achieving trustworthiness were also introduced.

Criticisms of qualitative research. In the health field--with its strong tradition of biomedical research using conventional, quantitative, and often experimental methods--qualitative research is often criticised for lacking scientific rigour. To label an approach "unscientific" is peculiarly damning in an era when scientific knowledge is ...

Abstract. This article addresses issues relating to rigour within qualitative research, beginning with the need for rigour at all in such studies. The concept of reliability is then analysed, establishing the traditional understanding of the term, and evaluating alternative terms. A similar exploration of validity and proposed alternatives follows.

Qualitative research methods are enjoying unprecedented popularity. Although checklists have undoubtedly contributed to the wider acceptance of such methods, these can be counterproductive if used prescriptively. The uncritical adoption of a range of "technical fixes" (such as purposive sampling, grounded theory, multiple coding, triangulation, and respondent validation) does not, in ...

The use of such templates has sometimes been considered as automatically enhancing the rigor of qualitative research. In this article, we challenge the view that in the context of qualitative research, rigor is tied into the application of established protocols. ... Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage. Google Scholar. Einola K ...

has also been used to express attributes related to the qualitative research process. Per Morse et al (2002), without rigor, research is worthless, becomes fiction, and loses its use. The authors further defined rigor as the strength of the research design and the appropriateness of the method to answer the questions. It is expected that ...

What is qualitative research, and what do the editors at The Journal of Graduate Medical Education (JGME) wish authors knew about it?In its August issue, JGME published the second editorial in a two-part series entitled, "Common Pitfalls to Avoid in Qualitative Submissions to JGME."While the first editorial presents advice for each section of a qualitative research article, from ...

Attributes of rigor and quality and suggested best practices for qualitative research design as they relate to the steps of designing, conducting, and reporting qualitative research in health professions educational scholarship are presented. A research question must be clear and focused and supported by a strong conceptual framework, both of which contribute to the selection of appropriate ...

In this process, the data were divided into the smallest units of meaning. New data were compared for similarities and differences and classified through repeated reviews and merging of similar data. ... Johnson JL, Adkins D, Chauvin S. A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84(1):7120 ...

Qualitative research methods have traditionally been criticised for lacking rigor, and impressionistic and biased results. Subsequently, as qualitative methods have been increasingly used in social work inquiry, efforts to address these criticisms have also increased.

Quantitative research on money in politics has long relied on records from the Federal Election Commission. However, qualitative scholars can also use these records , particularly from a historical perspective. In this paper, I show that Federal Election Commission (FEC) records are beneficial for historical research by examining the consolidation of political speech and power structure ...