difficulty initiating and performing activities of daily living, following and maintaining sleep routines, sustaining peer interactions
Jacob’s priorities are to feel more comfortable playing with other children and to dress without his grandmother’s assistance.
Email alerts.
Sign In or Create an Account
Select the pediatric case for study, review child's diagnosis and medical history, set up an initial meeting with the child and parents or guardians, prepare a detailed initial assessment plan, conduct initial assessment on physical, cognitive and emotional capabilities of the child, record observations during the initial assessment, evaluate child's clinical reports, develop an occupational therapy treatment plan based on findings, approval: treatment plan.
Conduct therapy sessions.
Provide feedback and recommendations to parents or guardians, regularly update the treatment plan based on child's progress, re-evaluate the child's capabilities periodically, prepare a comprehensive final report based on case study, approval: final report.
Final Report and Future Recommendations - {{form.Meeting_Date}}
We are pleased to share the comprehensive final report on {{form.Child_Name}} 's occupational therapy case study. The report highlights the assessment findings, progress, and specific recommendations for future interventions.
We kindly request your presence at a scheduled meeting on {{form.Meeting_Date}} to discuss the report and address any questions or concerns you may have. Your active participation is essential in shaping the child's therapy journey.
We look forward to fruitful and collaborative discussions.
Best regards,
The Occupational Therapy Team
Take control of your workflows today., more templates like this.
Interoception, often referred to as the “eighth sense,” plays a crucial role in how individuals perceive and respond to their internal bodily signals. This sense is essential for self-regulation, emotional awareness, and overall well-being. For occupational therapy practitioners, understanding interoception and its impact on daily functioning is vital for providing effective interventions, particularly in pediatric populations. This comprehensive guide delves into the science of interoception, its relevance in occupational therapy, and evidence-based strategies to support individuals with interoceptive challenges.
Interoception is the sensory process that allows individuals to perceive internal bodily sensations, such as hunger, thirst, heart rate, respiration, and the need to use the bathroom. These internal signals are conveyed to the brain via the autonomic nervous system and the insular cortex, which then interprets them and triggers appropriate responses (Craig, 2015). Interoception is fundamental for maintaining homeostasis and is linked to emotional experiences and self-regulation (Critchley & Garfinkel, 2018).
Interoceptive awareness allows individuals to recognize and respond to bodily needs, which is essential for survival and well-being. It also plays a significant role in emotional regulation, as bodily sensations often inform emotional states. For instance, an increased heart rate may signal anxiety, while a relaxed breathing pattern may indicate calmness (Schulz & Vögele, 2015).
Emotional regulation relies heavily on the ability to accurately perceive and interpret internal signals. Research suggests that individuals with better interoceptive awareness have more effective emotional regulation skills (Mehling et al., 2012). This connection highlights the importance of interoception in managing stress, anxiety, and other emotional responses.
Self-regulation involves the ability to manage one’s behavior, emotions, and thoughts in response to external demands. Interoceptive signals provide critical feedback that informs self-regulatory actions. For example, recognizing the physical signs of hunger can prompt an individual to eat, thus preventing irritability and maintaining focus (Füstös et al., 2013).
Interoception is intricately linked to several brain regions, including the insular cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and the somatosensory cortex. The insular cortex is particularly important as it integrates internal bodily signals and contributes to emotional awareness and self-regulation. Studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have shown that individuals with heightened interoceptive awareness exhibit increased activation in these brain areas when processing internal stimuli (Craig, 2015).
Interoception is not only crucial for physical and emotional regulation but also has significant implications for mental health. Poor interoceptive awareness is associated with various mental health conditions, including anxiety, depression, and eating disorders. For instance, individuals with anxiety disorders may misinterpret normal bodily sensations, such as an increased heart rate, as signs of impending danger, exacerbating their anxiety symptoms (Khalsa et al., 2018). Enhancing interoceptive awareness through therapeutic interventions can therefore play a critical role in mental health treatment.
Children with learning disabilities often face challenges beyond academic skills, including difficulties with interoceptive awareness. These children may struggle with recognizing when they are tired, hungry, or need a break, which can impact their ability to focus and learn effectively. Addressing interoceptive awareness in occupational therapy can help these children better understand their bodily needs, leading to improved attention and learning outcomes (Mahler, 2017).
Interoception also plays a significant role in maintaining physical health. For example, accurate interoceptive awareness is essential for managing chronic conditions such as diabetes, where individuals need to recognize signs of low or high blood sugar levels. Improving interoceptive skills can help individuals with chronic illnesses better monitor and manage their health, leading to more effective disease management and better overall health outcomes (Herbert et al., 2012).
Adolescence is a critical period for the development of interoceptive awareness. As the body undergoes significant changes during puberty, adolescents must learn to navigate new and sometimes confusing bodily signals. Enhancing interoceptive awareness during this stage can support better emotional regulation and mental health, helping adolescents manage stress and anxiety more effectively (Price & Hooven, 2018). Occupational therapists can play a key role in supporting adolescents through targeted interventions that promote body awareness and emotional resilience.
Interoceptive awareness significantly impacts occupational performance in various daily activities, including eating, sleeping, and engaging in physical activities. For instance, children with poor interoceptive awareness might have difficulty recognizing when they are full, leading to overeating, or might struggle with sleep hygiene because they cannot identify when they are tired. Occupational therapy interventions that enhance interoceptive awareness can improve these daily routines, contributing to better health and well-being (Miller et al., 2012).
Involving families and caregivers in interventions for interoceptive awareness is crucial. Educating parents about interoception and its impact can help them understand their child’s behaviors and provide appropriate support. Caregivers can be trained to use specific strategies at home, such as creating consistent routines and using visual aids, to reinforce the skills being developed in therapy. Collaborative efforts between therapists and families can enhance the effectiveness of interventions and support the child’s overall development (Schaaf et al., 2014).
The integration of technology in occupational therapy offers new opportunities for enhancing interoceptive awareness. Wearable devices that monitor physiological signals, such as heart rate and skin conductance, can provide real-time feedback to individuals and therapists. Biofeedback and virtual reality (VR) are emerging tools that can help individuals visualize and understand their internal bodily signals, making interoceptive training more engaging and effective (Khalsa et al., 2018).
Interoceptive awareness is important at all stages of life, not just in childhood. Adults and older adults can also benefit from interventions aimed at improving interoception. For instance, older adults may experience diminished interoceptive awareness due to aging, which can impact their ability to manage chronic conditions and maintain overall health. Occupational therapists can tailor interventions to support interoceptive awareness across the lifespan, ensuring that individuals can continue to respond effectively to their bodily needs (Herbert et al., 2012).
Ongoing research in the field of interoception continues to uncover its complexities and implications for health and well-being. Future studies are needed to explore the most effective interventions for enhancing interoceptive awareness and to understand the neural mechanisms underlying interoceptive processing. As our knowledge expands, occupational therapy practitioners will be better equipped to develop innovative and evidence-based strategies to support individuals with interoceptive challenges (Critchley & Garfinkel, 2018).
In pediatric populations, particularly those with developmental conditions such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and sensory processing disorder (SPD), interoceptive awareness can be significantly impaired. These impairments can lead to challenges in recognizing and responding to bodily needs, contributing to difficulties in self-regulation and emotional management (Mahler, 2017).
Children with ASD often exhibit atypical interoceptive processing, which can manifest as challenges in recognizing hunger, thirst, or the need to use the bathroom. These difficulties can exacerbate behavioral issues and impact overall functioning. Studies indicate that interventions targeting interoceptive awareness can improve self-regulation and reduce anxiety in children with ASD (Schaaf et al., 2014).
SPD is characterized by difficulties in processing sensory information, including interoceptive signals. Children with SPD may struggle to interpret bodily sensations, leading to issues such as overeating, dehydration, or poor toileting habits. Addressing interoceptive awareness in therapy can help these children develop better self-regulation and body awareness (Miller et al., 2012).
Assessing interoceptive awareness is a critical step in developing effective interventions. Various tools and methods can be used to evaluate interoceptive processing in children.
Self-report measures, such as the Body Perception Questionnaire (BPQ) and the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA), can provide insights into an individual’s interoceptive awareness. These tools are useful for older children and adults who can articulate their internal experiences (Mehling et al., 2012).
For younger children or those with limited communication skills, behavioral observations can be an effective assessment method. Observing how a child responds to internal cues, such as hunger or the need to use the bathroom, can provide valuable information about their interoceptive awareness (Mahler, 2017).
Physiological measures, such as heart rate variability and skin conductance, can also be used to assess interoceptive processing. These measures provide objective data on how the body responds to internal signals and can be particularly useful in research settings (Critchley & Garfinkel, 2018).
Occupational therapy practitioners can employ various evidence-based interventions to support interoceptive awareness in children. These interventions aim to enhance the ability to recognize and respond to internal bodily signals, thereby improving self-regulation and emotional management.
Mindfulness practices, such as body scans and mindful breathing, can enhance interoceptive awareness by encouraging individuals to focus on internal sensations. Research indicates that mindfulness interventions can improve interoceptive accuracy and emotional regulation in children and adults (Fissler et al., 2016).
Body scan meditation involves focusing attention on different parts of the body, noticing sensations without judgment. This practice can help children become more aware of internal signals and improve their ability to interpret and respond to these signals appropriately (Mehling et al., 2012).
Mindful breathing exercises encourage individuals to focus on their breath, noticing the sensations of inhaling and exhaling. This practice can enhance awareness of respiratory sensations and promote relaxation and emotional regulation (Schulz & Vögele, 2015).
Sensory integration therapy (SIT) aims to improve the brain’s ability to process and integrate sensory information, including interoceptive signals. This approach involves providing controlled sensory experiences to help children develop more accurate sensory processing and regulation skills (Schaaf et al., 2014).
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
1 Cerebral Palsy Alliance, Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown North South Wales, Australia
Introduction.
Paediatric occupational therapy seeks to improve children's engagement and participation in life roles. A wide variety of intervention approaches exist. Our aim was to summarise the best‐available intervention evidence for children with disabilities, to assist families and therapists choose effective care.
We conducted a systematic review (SR) using the Cochrane methodology, and reported findings according to PRISMA. CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, OTSeeker, PEDro, PsycINFO were searched. Two independent reviewers: (i) determined whether studies met inclusion: SR or randomised controlled trial (RCT); an occupational therapy intervention for children with a disability; (ii) categorised interventions based on name, core components and diagnostic population; (iii) rated quality of evidence and determined the strength of recommendation using GRADE criteria; and (iv) made recommendations using the Evidence Alert Traffic Light System.
129 articles met inclusion ( n = 75 (58%) SRs; n = 54 (42%)) RCTs, measuring the effectiveness of 52 interventions, across 22 diagnoses, enabling analysis of 135 intervention indications. Thirty percent of the indications assessed ( n = 40/135) were graded ‘do it’ (Green Go); 56% (75/135) ‘probably do it’ (Yellow Measure); 10% ( n = 14/135) ‘probably don't do it’ (Yellow Measure); and 4% ( n = 6/135) ‘don't do it’ (Red Stop). Green lights were: Behavioural Interventions; Bimanual; Coaching; Cognitive Cog‐Fun & CAPS; CO‐OP; CIMT; CIMT plus Bimanual; Context‐Focused; Ditto; Early Intervention (ABA, Developmental Care); Family Centred Care; Feeding interventions; Goal Directed Training; Handwriting Task‐Specific Practice; Home Programs; Joint Attention; Mental Health Interventions; occupational therapy after toxin; Kinesiotape; Pain Management; Parent Education; PECS; Positioning; Pressure Care; Social Skills Training; Treadmill Training and Weight Loss ‘Mighty Moves’.
Evidence supports 40 intervention indications, with the greatest number at the activities‐level of the International Classification of Function. Yellow light interventions should be accompanied by a sensitive outcome measure to monitor progress and red light interventions could be discontinued because effective alternatives existed.
Occupational therapy intervention for children promotes engagement and participation in children's daily life roles (Mandich & Rodger, 2006 ). Children's roles include, developing personal independence, becoming productive and participating in play or leisure pursuits (Roger et al .). Inability to participate because of disease, disability or skill deficits, can cause marginalisation, social isolation and lowered self‐esteem (Mandich & Rodger, 2006 ). Occupational therapists select interventions for children based upon an analysis of the child's performance of daily life roles, how their performance is affected by their disability, and how their environment supports or constrains their performance (Mandich & Rodger, 2006 ).
The practices of paediatric occupational therapists have evolved and changed based on research and theory (Rodger, Brown & Brown, 2005 ), such as family centred care and the World Health Organisation's (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF; World Health Organisation, 2001 ). These frameworks have led many occupational therapists to move away from impairment‐based interventions at the body structures and functions level aimed at remediating the child's deficits (known as ‘bottom‐up’ interventions), and instead to focus on improving functional activity performance and participation (‘top‐down’ interventions) (Weinstock‐Zlotnick & Hinojosa, 2004 ), as well as partnering with parents to deliver therapy embedded within daily life.
Clinicians will always have different expertise and preferences, but there are financial and ethical ramifications of delivering interventions. Ensuring the latest research findings are easily accessible to families and clinicians is vital. Occupational therapists positively embrace evidence‐based practice, but on the ground, implementation can lag (Flores‐Mateo & Argimon, 2007 ; Upton, Stephens, Williams & Scurlock‐Evans, 2014 ). Systematic reviews (SR) indicate that the translation of the latest evidence into routine clinical care lags 10–20 years in all countries and specialities ( Flores‐Mateo & Argimon ), which for paediatric patients is an entire childhood. Multiple paediatric occupational therapy interventions exist to address children's specific goals. In partnership with parents, it is the therapist's role to choose and tailor the intervention choices to match the child and parent's goals, preferences and potential for improvement based upon their diagnosis. Staying up‐to‐date is time‐consuming. Furthermore, appraising evidence and up skilling in new interventions requires reallocation of time and resources.
The aim of this paper is to systematically describe current intervention options available to paediatric occupational therapists across different child diagnostic populations, rating the quality and recommendations for use of each intervention, using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system (Guyatt et al ., 2008 ) and the Evidence Alert Traffic Light System (Novak & McIntyre, 2010 ). The purpose of reviewing and rating the entire evidence‐base is to provide a ‘one‐stop’ access guide for clinicians and policy‐makers, allow for the easy comparison of interventions, encourage the uptake of evidence‐based interventions, to confer better outcomes for children. We sought to answer the following ‘PICOs’ question: What is the effectiveness of occupational therapy intervention for children with disabilities? P opulation = children with a disability (including arthrogyposis OR attention deficit hyperactivity disorder OR autism spectrum disorder OR behaviour disorders OR brachial plexus OR brain injury OR burns OR cerebral palsy OR cancer OR chronic pain OR developmental coordination disorder OR developmental disability OR down syndrome OR fetal alcohol spectrum disorder OR learning disability OR mental health OR muscle diseases; OR intellectual disability OR obesity OR preterm infants OR physical disability OR rheumatoid arthritis OR spina bifida); I ntervention = occupational therapy (including all specific named occupational therapy techniques); C omparison = none specified; O utcome = all outcomes accepted; and S tudy Design = SR OR randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
A SR of reviews was conducted, to provide an overview of the best available evidence. RCTs not included within the SRs were also appraised.
This review was carried out according to the Cochrane Collaboration methodology (Higgins & Green, 2011 ), incorporating the recommended quality features for conducting SRs of reviews (Smith, Devane, Begley & Clarke, 2011 ), and is reported according to the PRISMA statement (Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff & Altman, 2010 ). Relevant articles were identified by searching: CINAHL (1983–2016); Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews ( http://www.cochrane.org ); Database of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE); EMBASE (1980–2016); ERIC; Google Scholar; MEDLINE (1956–2014); OTSeeker ( http://www.otseeker.com ); and PsycINFO (1935–2016). Searches were supplemented by hand searching and retrieval of any additional articles meeting eligibility criteria that were cited in reference lists. The search of all published studies was performed in March 2014 and updated in August 2018. Interventions and keywords for investigation were identified using the contributing authors’ knowledge.
Published studies fulfilling the following criteria were included: (i) Type of study: All SRs and RCTs meeting inclusion criteria were appraised. SRs were preferentially sought since they provide a summary of large bodies of evidence and help to explain differences amongst studies. Plus, SRs limit bias. We also included RCTs not included within the SRs, because they are the gold standard design for measuring the effectiveness of interventions. Lower levels of evidence were only included if: the SR reviewed lower levels of evidence; (ii) Types of interventions: Studies that involved the provision of any type of occupational therapy intervention; and (iii) Types of participants: Studies that explicitly involved humans in which 100% of the participants were children of any childhood disability diagnosis.
(i) Studies about typically developing children or adults; (ii) diagnostic studies OR prognostic studies OR about outcome measure psychometrics OR about theoretical frameworks NOT intervention; (iii) interventions that primarily fall under the skillset of another profession, for example pharmacotherapies, psychotherapy, speech therapies, etc. (iv) a second publication of the same study (Note: RCTs that met inclusion criteria but were also cited within included SRs, were treated as duplicates and not reported on twice); (v) studies were unpublished or non‐peer reviewed; and (vi) full‐text was not available in English.
A data abstraction form was devised based on the Cochrane's recommendations (Higgins & Green, 2011 ). Abstracts identified from searches were screened by two independent raters. Both independent raters reviewed full‐text versions of the articles and articles were retained if they met inclusion criteria. Agreement on inclusion and exclusion assignment was unanimous. Data extracted from included studies comprised: authors and date of study; type of intervention (if named), core components and diagnostic population; who delivered the intervention; location of where the intervention was carried out; intensity of the intervention; study design and original authors’ conclusions about efficacy across study outcomes (Table S1 ). In addition, based on intervention description and ICF definitions, reviewers assigned an ICF domain to each intervention outcome sought by study authors (World Health Organisation, 2001 ). Where multiple SRs or RCTs existed, we noted when the older research was superseded by newer evidence. Interventions with the same name and/or similar core components, and that were administered to the same diagnostic populations, were grouped together. All data required to answer the study questions were published within the papers, so no contact with authors was necessary. All the supporting data are included with Table S1 .
Quality ratings were assigned by two independent raters for each publication using GRADE (Guyatt et al ., 2008 ), which is endorsed by the World Health Organization. Within GRADE randomised trials are initially rated high, observational studies low; and other levels of evidence very low. However, high quality evidence is downgraded if methodological flaws exist, and low quality evidence is upgraded when high rigor and large effect sizes exist ( Guyatt et al . ). Ultimately, a high score indicates ‘further research is unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect’; moderate scores indicate ‘further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate’; low scores indicate ‘further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate’; and very low scores indicate ‘any estimate of effect is very uncertain’ ( Guyatt et al . ).
Unlike SR frameworks, the GRADE framework does not solely examine effect size to determine efficacy of intervention. Instead, effect size makes up just one component when weighing up the benefits and harms of each intervention. In line with the GRADE framework, the following factors were considered by both independent raters when evaluating the body of evidence for the intervention and arriving at a strength of recommendation for each diagnostic group: (i) methodological quality regarding likely benefits vs. likely risks; (ii) inconvenience; (iii) importance of the outcome that the intervention prevents; (iv) magnitude of intervention effect (effect size); (v) precision of estimate of effect; (vi) burdens; (vii) costs; and (viii) varying clinician and family values (Guyatt et al ., 2008 ).
The Evidence Alert Traffic Light System (Novak & McIntyre, 2010 ) was then applied based on the strength of recommendations by both independent raters. The Evidence Alert Traffic Light System is a GRADE‐complementary knowledge translation tool designed to assist clinicians and families to obtain easily readable, clinically useful answers within minutes (Campbell, Novak, McIntyre & Lord, 2013 ), because the alert uses a simple, three‐level colour coding that recommends a course of action. Green signifies ‘go’ because high quality evidence indicates effectiveness; red signifies ‘stop’ because high quality evidence indicates harm or ineffectiveness; and yellow signifies ‘measure’ because insufficient evidence exists to be certain about whether the child will benefit. Yellow can be assigned in three scenarios: (i) promising evidence (weak positive), (ii) unknown effectiveness because no research exists, or (iii) evidence suggests possibly no effect (weak negative).
The study did not involve contact with humans, so the need for ethical approval was waived by the Cerebral Palsy Alliance's National Health and Medical Council Human Research Ethics Committee. This SR was not registered.
3138 citations were identified using the search strategy, of which 129 articles met the inclusion criteria for review. Of the 129 included articles, 58% ( n = 75/129) were SRs; 42% ( n = 54/129) were RCTs. Note, more than 54 RCTs exist in the paediatric occupational therapy evidence base, but we treated any RCT that was cited within an included SR as a duplicate. Flow of information is presented in the PRISMA diagram (Fig. 1 ).
PRISMA Flow Diagram
The results are now presented using PICO question format headings.
Included studies were across the following childhood disability diagnoses: arthrogyposis; attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); autism spectrum disorder (ASD); behaviour disorders; brachial plexus injury; brain injury (BI); burns; cerebral palsy (CP); cancer; chronic pain; developmental coordination disorder (DCD); developmental disability (DD); Down syndrome; foetal alcohol spectrum disorder; learning disability (LD); mental health; intellectual disability (ID); obesity; preterm infants; physical disability; rheumatoid arthritis; and spina bifida. Some studies included samples from a variety of the aforementioned diagnoses. Consistent with childhood disability population incidence data, more research existed about ASD ( n = 32/135; 24%), ADHD ( n = 8/135; 6%), CP ( n = 38/135; 28%) and DCD ( n = 9/135; 7%), than other conditions.
Paediatric occupational therapy involves working with the child, the parent and the family unit: The child was the primary client for 87% ( n = 45/52) of the interventions, i.e. therapy focussed on improving the child outcomes (e.g. an orthotic worn by the child to improve hand function), whereas the parent was the primary client for 13% ( n = 7/52) for the interventions (e.g. parent education, aiming to improve knowledge, skills and confidence).
Included studies, researched the effectiveness of 52 occupational therapy intervention groups: (1) Acupuncture; (2) Assistive Devices; (3) Assistive Technology; (4) Behavioural Interventions including Applied Behavioural Analysis (ABA) and Positive Parenting Program (Triple P); (5) Bimanual Training; (6) Biofeedback; (7) Coaching; (8) Cognitive Interventions including CogFun, CogMed, (9) Cognitive Orientation to Occupational Performance (CO‐OP); (10) Conductive Education; (11) Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT); (12) CIMT &/or Bimanual; (13) Context Focused; (14) Ditto™ (hand held education & distraction device for burns patients); (15) Early Intervention, including a Developmental Approach, Neurodevelopmental Therapy (NDT) and Goals Activity and Motor Enrichment (GAME); (16) Electrical Stimulation (ES); (17) Family Centred Care; (18) Feeding Interventions; (19) Goal Directed Training, including Task Specific Training, Functional Training, Neuromotor Task Training (NTT) and Motor Imagery; (20) Handwriting Interventions; (21) Hippotherapy [Therapeutic Horse Riding]; (22) Home Programs; (23) Joint Attention; (24) Massage; (25) Meditation and/or Mindfulness; (26) Mental Health Interventions; (27) Neuro‐Developmental Therapy (NDT); (28) Occupational Therapy after BoNT; (29) Orthotics; (30) Pain Management; (31) Parent Counselling; (32) Parent Education/Parent Training; (33) Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS); (34) Play Therapy; (35) Positioning; (36) Pressure Care; (37) School Therapy; (38) Self‐Management; (39) Sensation Training; (40) Sensory Approach, including brushing, therapy balls, weighted vests, warm‐ups, sensory stimulation; (41) Sensory Integration, including sensory diets, swinging, brushing, therapy balls, weighted vests, body socks; (42) Skills Training via Mental Imagery; (43) Sleep Interventions; (44) Social Skills Training; (45) Stretching, including passive: self‐administered, therapist‐administered and device‐administered; (46) Treatment and Education of Autistic and Communication Handicapped Children (TEACCH); (47) Therapeutic Listening; (48) Treadmill Training; (49) Visual Motor Interventions; (50) Weight Loss; (51) Whole Body Vibration; and (52) Yoga.
Of the 12 included articles, authors measured the effectiveness of 52 occupational therapy interventions, across 22 diagnoses. From this, 136 intervention outcome indicators were identified, whereby an intervention, with an individual target outcome was administered to specific diagnostic groups. Insufficient data was available for analysis on one of these outcome indicators (number 74 in Table S1 , where the SR authors found no publish data examining the effectiveness of hand orthotics in children with brain injury and therefore no recommendations could be made), (Jackman, Novak & Lannin, 2014 ) resulting in 135/136 intervention outcome indicators available for analysis.
Of the 135 intervention outcome indications: 30% ( n = 40/135) were graded ‘do it’ (Green Go) (Arbesman, Bazyk & Nochajski, 2013 ; Bellows et al ., 2011 ; Bleyenheuft, Arnould, Brandao, Bleyenheuft & Gordon, 2015 ; Brown, Kimble, Rodger, Ware & Cuttle, 2014 ; Chang & Yu, 2014 ; Chen, Pope, Tyler & Warren, 2014c ; Chen et al ., 2014b ; Christmas, Sackley, Feltham & Cummins, 2018 ; Crompton et al ., 2007 ; Estes et al ., 2014 ; Fehlings et al ., 2010 ; Frolek Clark & Schlabach, 2013 ; Hechler et al ., 2014 ; Heinrichs, Kliem & Hahlweg, 2014 ; Hoare & Imms, 2004 ; Hoare, Imms, Carey & Wasiak, 2007 ; Hoare et al ., 2010 ; Hoy, Egan & Feder, 2011 ; Huang, Fetters, Hale & McBride, 2009 ; Inguaggiato, Sgandurra, Perazza, Guzzetta & Cioni, 2013 ; Kamps et al ., 2015 ; Kasari et al ., 2016 ; Kaya Kara et al ., 2015 ; Kurowski et al ., 2014 ; Lannin, Scheinberg & Clark, 2006 ; Lidman, Nachemson, Peny‐Dahlstrand & Himmelmann, 2015 ; Lin & Wuang, 2012 ; Madlinger‐Lewis et al ., 2014 ; Maeir et al ., 2014 ; Novak, 2014a ; Park, Maitra, Achon, Loyola & Rincón, 2014 ; Speth et al ., 2015 ; Spittle, Orton, Anderson, Boyd & Doyle, 2012 ; Spittle, Orton, Doyle & Boyd, 2007 ; Stavness, 2006 ; Stickles Goods, Ishijima, Chang & Kasari, 2013 ; Vroland‐Nordstrand, Eliasson, Jacobsson, Johansson & Krumlinde‐Sundholm, 2016 ; Zwaigenbaum et al ., 2015 ); 56% (75/135) were graded ‘probably do it’ (Yellow Measure) (Armstrong, 2012 ; Au et al ., 2014 ; Auld, Russo, Moseley & Johnston, 2014 ; Bialocerkowski, Kurlowicz, Vladusic & Grimmer, 2005 ; Bodison & Parham, 2018 ; Cameron et al ., 2017a , 2017b; Chacko et al ., 2014 ; Chantry & Dunford, 2010 ; Chen, Lee & Howard, 2014a ; Chiu, Ada & Lee, 2014 ; Cole, Harris, Eland & Mills, 1989 ; Copeland et al ., 2014 ; Dagenais et al ., 2009 ; De Vries, Beck, Stacey, Winslow & Meines, 2015 ; Duncan et al ., 2012 ; Fedewa, Davis & Ahn, 2015 ; Grynszpan, Weiss, Perez‐Diaz & Gal, 2014 ; Hahn‐Markowitz, Berger, Manor & Maeir, 2017 ; Hammond, Jones, Hill, Green & Male, 2014 ; Huang et al ., 2014 ; Jackman et al ., 2018 ; James, Ziviani, Ware & Boyd, 2015 ; Janeslätt, Kottorp & Granlund, 2014 ; Jones et al ., 2014 ; Krisanaprakornkit, Ngamjarus, Witoonchart & Piyavhatkul, 2010 ; Lannin, Novak & Cusick, 2007 ; Malow et al ., 2014 ; Maskell, Newcombe, Martin & Kimble, 2014 ; Mast et al ., 2014 ; Matute‐Llorente, González‐Agüero, Gómez‐Cabello, Vicente‐Rodríguez & Mallén, 2014 ; McLean et al ., 2017 ; Meany‐Walen, Bratton & Kottman, 2014 ; Miller‐Kuhaneck & Watling, 2018 ; Montero & Gómez‐Conesa, 2014 ; Morgan, Novak, Dale & Badawi, 2015 ; Morgan et al ., 2016a ; Morgan, Novak, Dale, Guzzetta & Badawi, 2016b ; Pfeiffer B & Arbesman, 2018 ; Polatajko & Cantin, 2010 ; Reeuwijk, van Schie, Becher & Kwakkel, 2006 ; Schaaf, Dumont, Arbesman & May‐Benson, 2018 ; Smith et al ., 2014 ; Snider, Majnemer & Darsaklis, 2010 ; Storebø et al ., 2011 ; Tatla et al ., 2013 ; Tatla, Sauve, Jarus, Virji‐Babul & Holsti, 2014 ; Vargas & Lucker, 2016 ; Westendorp et al ., 2014 ; Whalen & Case‐Smith, 2012 ; Xu, He, Mai, Yan & Chen, 2015 ; Zadnikar & Kastrin, 2011 ; Ziviani, Feeney, Rodger & Watter, 2010 ; Zwicker & Mayson, 2010 ); 10% ( n = 14/130) were graded ‘probably don't do it’ (Yellow Measure) (Wallen & Gillies, 2006 ; Wells, Marquez & Wakely, 2018 ); and 4% ( n = 6/135) were graded ‘don't do it’ (Red Stop) (Gringras et al ., 2014 ; Katalinic et al ., 2010 ).
The 40 green light ‘do it’ interventions indications included: (1) Behavioural Intervention using ABA for children with ASD; (2) Behavioural Intervention using Triple P for children behaviour disorders; (3) Behavioural Intervention using token economy contracts for children with a brain injury; (4) Bimanual Training for children with hemiplegic CP; (5) Coaching for parents of children at risk of disability to promote development; (6) Coaching for parents of children with ASD to promote function and behaviour; (7) CAPS cognitive intervention for children with brain injury to improve long term executive function; (8) Cog‐Fun intervention for children with attention deficit disorder to improve executive function; (9) CO‐OP for children with DCD for functional motor task performance; (10) CIMT for children with CP to improve hand function; (11) CIMT plus Bimanual for children with CP to improve hand function; (12) Context Focused intervention for children with CP for functional motor task performance; (13) Ditto hand held devices for children with burns to provide procedural distraction and self‐management education; (14) Early Intervention using ABA for children with ASD; (15) Early Intervention using Developmental Care for preterm infants; (16) Family Centred Care for children with brain injury or CP, to improve children's function; (17) Parent education feeding intervention for children with disability to improve feeding competency and growth; (18) Physiological feeding intervention for children with disability; (19) Goal Directed Training for children with CP, to improve functional task performance; (20) Goal Directed Training for children with DCD, to improve functional task performance; (21) Handwriting Task‐Specific Practice for children with DCD; (22) Home Programs for children with CP, to improve functional task performance; (23) Home Programs for children with ID, to improve functional task performance; (24) Joint Attention for children with ASD to improve social interactions; (25) Mental Health interventions for children with ASD; (26) Mental Health interventions for children with developmental delay; (27) Mental Health interventions for children with mental health disorders; (28) Occupational therapy after botulinum toxin injections for children with CP to promote hand function; (29) Kinesiotape for children with CP to improve hand function; (30) Pain Management for children with chronic pain secondary to physical disability and or chronic health conditions; (31) Parent Education using mindfulness for parents of children with ASD to reduce parental stress; (32) Parent Education using problem solving for parents of children with ASD to reduce parental stress; (33) Parent Education for children with disabilities to promote parenting confidence; (34) Parent Education for children with behaviour disorders to improve parent well‐being; (35) PECS for children with ASD to promote communication; (36) Positioning in NICU for preterm infants to promote normal movement development; (37) Pressure Care for children with CP using mattresses and cushions; (38) Social Skills Training mediated by peers for children with ASD; (39) Treadmill training for children with Down Syndrome to accelerate the onset of independent walking; (40) Weight loss using a family education and activity program called ‘Mighty Moves’ for children with obesity.
We assigned an ICF category to the primary and secondary intervention outcome of each intervention. Using the primary ICF level code, we mapped the profile of the paediatric OT evidence base to the ICF framework (Fig. 2 ). Green light effective interventions existed at the body structures and function ICF level ( n = 14/74 indications (19%)), the activity level ( n = 14/27 indications (52%)) and the environment level ( n = 12/34 indications (35%)). When we compared the proportions of green light to yellow light to red light interventions by ICF levels, the activity level contained the largest number of green lights. At the activity level where there was 27 indications, green lights outweighed the number of yellow and red lights (Gree n = 14/27; Yellow = 13/27; Red = 0/27), meaning the most common traffic code at the activity level was green, which we illustrated by green shading in Figure 2 . At the body structures and function ICF level, the most common traffic code was yellow, which we illustrated by yellow shading in Figure 2 . All the red lights within the evidence base existed at the body structures and function level. At the environmental level, the most common traffic code was also yellow, which we illustrated by yellow shading in Figure 2 . Two intervention's primary ICF code was at the participation level (Willis et al., 2010 ) and none at the personal level, indicating gaps in the occupational therapy evidence base, which we illustrated using grey shading in Figure 2 . The two participation codes were weak positive, but these were based on trials that used activity‐based interventions and assumed an upstream participation gain, which was not well‐supported.
Occupational Therapy Interventions and the International Classification of Function
In the included papers, consistent with conventional beliefs about it being unethical to withhold early intervention from children, rarely did researchers design studies where the control group received no intervention. In most studies, the controlled comparison was usual care. Some researchers carried out short duration studies using a wait‐list control design, where the control group received the experimental intervention after study completion.
CIMT for children with CP, was the only intervention comprehensively and empirically compared to other intervention options, using head‐to‐head RCT comparisons identified in our search strategy. CIMT was: (i) compared head‐to‐head with Bimanual Training showing no difference between the approaches (Sakzewski et al ., 2015 ; Tervahauta, Girolami & Øberg, 2017 ); and (ii) combined with Bimanual Training and/or Botulinum toxin A, showing no additive benefits occurred from a combined intervention approach (Hoare et al ., 2013 ). These researcher's concluded ‘intensity’ of practice was the key ingredient of these effective CP approaches ( Sakzewski et al . ; Tervahauta et al ., 2017 ).
A meta‐analysis of intervention options for children with DCD compared the relative effect of DCD motor interventions by calculating and comparing effect sizes (Smits‐Engelsman et al ., 2013 ). The authors calculated that ‘top‐down’ approaches (effect size = 0.89) were more effective than ‘bottom‐up’ approaches (effect size = 0.12).
To assist with comparative clinical decision‐making across the paediatric occupational therapy evidence base, we created bubble charts. We mapped the 52 identified paediatric occupational therapy interventions, across 22 diagnoses, spanning 135 intervention indications, which sought to provide analogous outcomes, by diagnosis, into separate bubbles. In the bubble charts, the size of the bubble indicated the volume of published evidence, which was calculated by counting the number of published studies on the topic. The location of the bubble on the y ‐axis of the graph corresponded to the GRADE system rating. The colour of the bubble denoted the Traffic Light Evidence Alert System rating (Fig. 3 ).
Bubble Charts Comparing the Effectiveness of Different Occupational Therapy Indications for Different Diagnoses
We set out to systematically summarise the current intervention options available to paediatric occupational therapists across different childhood disability populations. We found 40 interventions that received a ‘strong’ recommendation for use, indicating a high‐quality evidence base with more benefits than harms. These ‘green light’ interventions included: Behavioural Interventions (including ABA, Triple P and Token Economies); Bimanual; Coaching; Cognitive Cog‐Fun and CAPS; CO‐OP; CIMT; CIMT plus Bimanual; Context‐Focused; Ditto; Early Intervention (including ABA and Developmental Care); Family Centred Care; Feeding interventions (including coaching and physiologic); Goal Directed Training; Handwriting Task‐Specific Practice; Home Programs; Joint Attention; Mental Health Interventions; occupational therapy after BoNT; Kinesiotape; Pain Management; Parent Education; PECS; Positioning in NICU; Pressure Care; Social Skills Training Peer Mediated; Treadmill training and Weight loss ‘Mighty Moves’.
The paediatric occupational therapy evidence base is under immense growth and expansion. The SRs and trials greater than 10 years old were predominantly about CP with one study about Brachial Plexus and DD. Almost always these older studies showed that the ‘bottom‐up’ interventions were ineffective with no difference between the experimental and control groups.
Occupational therapists working with children and their parents have several evidence based interventions to choose from. The strength of this paper is that it provides a systematic, clear and concise summary of all the available interventions by diagnosis with an easy to interpret summary of efficacy. There are some important learnings:
Occupational Therapists embrace the principles of family centred care (Hanna & Rodger, 2002 ) where the parent is the decision‐maker and the expert in knowing their child and the therapist is a technical resource to the family. We found that 13% of paediatric occupational therapy interventions are directed at the parent, so parents can deliver intervention at home within daily parenting. Evidence suggests that parent‐delivered intervention is equally effective to therapist‐delivered intervention (Baker et al ., 2012 ), which is not surprising given parent's knowledge of their children's preferences and engagement style, and the volume of caregiving they carryout (Smith, Cheater & Bekker, 2015 ). In the diagnoses studied (ADHD, ASD, At risk, Behavioural Disorders, BI, CP, DD, LD, obesity), it was very clear that parents respond well to parent education and training (Antonini et al ., 2014 ; Barlow, Smailagic, Huband, Roloff & Bennett, 2012 ; Case‐Smith & Arbesman, 2008 ; Dykens, Fisher, Taylor, Lambert & Miodrag, 2014 ; Feinberg et al ., 2014 ; Hanna & Rodger, 2002 ; Howe & Wang, 2013 ; Kuhaneck, Madonna, Novak & Pearson, 2015 ; Lawler, Taylor & Shields, 2013 ; Tanner, Hand, O'toole & Lane, 2015 ; Zwi, Jones, Thorgaard, York & Dennis, 2011 ), consistent with family centred philosophy about parents’ aspirations of parenting well, to help their children (Hanna & Rodger, 2002 ). Moreover, parents and children carry out intervention effectively at home, and therefore home programs (Novak & Berry, 2014b ; Novak et al ., 2013 ; Sakzewski, Ziviani & Boyd, 2013 ; Sakzewski et al ., 2015 ; Wuang, Ho & Su, 2013 ) and self‐management programs (Lindsay, Kingsnorth, Mcdougall & Keating, 2014 ; Moola, Faulkner, White & Kirsh, 2014 ) are an effective method for increasing the intensity of therapy.
When carrying out parent education, literature tells us that parents need and want: knowledge of the condition and intervention options; help accessing support services; and advice about coping strategies, via a collaborative partnership (Smith et al ., 2015 ). Even though family centred practice has existed since the 1990s, parents still experience some resistance to their input from health professionals ( Smith et al . ). Unclear expectations about roles further elevate parental stress (Coyne, 2015 ). Occupational therapists therefore need to be mindful of parent's experiences and aim to clearly communicate information and coach parents to guide care, to optimise family outcomes ( Coyne ).
Numerous occupational therapy interventions exist, aiming to improve motor, behavioural and functional outcomes (Fig. 3 ), affording a lot of choice to families and clinicians. The greatest number of effective green light interventions was at the activity level of the ICF, indicating that daily life skills training using a ‘top‐down’ approach is a strength of the occupational therapy profession. Examples include: Bimanual Training; CIMT; CO‐OP; GAME; Goal‐Directed Training; Handwriting Task Training; Home Programs using Goal‐Directed Training; Social Skills Training; and Task Training. Consistent with current knowledge about the conditions for inducing neuroplasticity (Kleim & Jones, 2008 ), the green light, ‘top‐down’, activity level interventions all have the following key ingredients in common: (i) begin with the child's goal, to optimise motivation and saliency of practice; (ii) practice of real‐life activities in natural environments to optimise the child's learning and the variability of the practice; (iii) intense repetitions to activate plasticity, including home‐based practice; and (iv) scaffolded practice to the ‘just right challenge’ to enable success under self‐generated problem‐solving conditions, to optimise enjoyment.
In contrast, some of the most established paediatric occupational therapy interventions NDT/Bobath and SI were originally developed as ‘bottom‐up’ interventions. NDT/Bobath and SI originated in an era of medicine when intervention aimed to remediate the child's body structural deficits, thinking function would emerge (Rodger et al ., 2005 ; Rodger et al ., 2006). However, over time the NDT/Bobath and SI approaches have been broadened to also accommodate use of ‘top‐down’ functional training approaches. Fidelity to the original NDT/Bobath and SI approach therefore varies greatly (Mayston, 2016 ), and as such, a leading Bobath expert has recently stated that Bobath ‘no longer stands for a valid universal therapy approach’ (Mayston, 2016 , p. 994). This means that interpreting the meaning of historical NDT/Bobath and SI research evidence about efficacy within the context of contemporaneous clinical practice is challenging. The efficacy of both NDT/Bobath and SI have been critiqued within SRs (Boyd & Hays, 2001 ; Brown & Burns, 2001 ; Case‐Smith & Arbesman, 2008 ; Case‐Smith, Clark & Schlabach, 2013 ; Case‐Smith, Weaver & Fristad, 2015 ; Lang et al ., 2012 ; May‐Benson & Koomar, 2010 ; Novak et al ., 2013 ; Sakzewski, Ziviani & Boyd, 2009 ; Sakzewski et al ., 2013 ; Steultjens et al ., 2004 ; Watling & Hauer, 2015 ; Weaver, 2015 ) and these data mostly relate to older trials. SR authors have concluded that NDT/Bobath and SI rarely confer motor gains superior to no intervention, but the RCTs contain so many methodological flaws that recommendations for use or discontinuation of use within practice cannot be made with certainty (Boyd & Hays, 2001 ; Brown & Burns, 2001 ; Case‐Smith & Arbesman, 2008 ; Case‐Smith et al ., 2013 ; Case‐Smith et al ., 2014; Lang et al ., 2012 ; May‐Benson & Koomar, 2010 ; Novak et al ., 2013 ; Sakzewski et al ., 2009 , 2013 ; Steultjens et al ., 2004 ; Watling & Hauer, 2015 ; Weaver, 2015 ). Some therapists have interpreted the uncertainty of the NDT/Bobath and SI systematic evidence as justification of continuance, whereas others in the profession recommend discontinuance because of the growing body of ‘top‐down’ evidence that offer effective alternatives (Rodger et al ., 2006). A Bobath expert has recommended that the common‐sense way forward for the profession is to choose interventions that promote activity and participation outcomes (Mayston, 2016 ) and to use consistent language to describe intervention options. For example, describing interventions by clear uniform terminology (i.e. ‘splitting’) might be more helpful than ‘clumping’ interventions into expanded NDT/Bobath umbrella terms.
We analysed the breakdown of the effectiveness of motor interventions, above and below the worth it line (Fig. 3 ), in terms of ‘bottom‐up’ vs. ‘top‐down’, and a trend favouring ‘top‐down’ emerged. Of the seven motor intervention indications below the ‘worth it line’, coded on GRADE as weak negative or strong negative (red), 7/7 (100%) were ‘bottom‐up’ approaches. Of the 22 motor intervention indications above the ‘worth it line’ eight were green and 14 were yellow: 8/8 (100%) green indications (strong positive) were ‘top‐down’. A similar trend emerged in the comparative effectiveness analysis of functional interventions. Of the seven functional intervention indications above the ‘worth it line’, coded on GRADE as strong positive (green), 4/4 (100%) were ‘top‐down’. There were a small number of studies using SI and the sensory approach to improve function coded on GRADE as weak positive, but the studies had a high risk of bias and SR authors recommended interpreting the positive results with caution (Case‐Smith et al ., 2014; Case‐Smith et al ., 2015 ; Watling & Hauer, 2015 ).
The following areas of the evidence‐base would benefit from more research: (i) Parent Education : None of the parent education approaches were ineffective. Thus, more research is worthwhile exploring parent's preferred learning styles and levels of support required to manage the stress of raising a child with a disability. There are potential financial gains to the health system by thoroughly understanding effective parent interventions, because parent‐delivered intervention is equally effective and less expensive; (ii) Head‐to‐head comparisons : Head‐to‐head comparisons of different interventions aiming to achieve the same outcomes, in well‐controlled trials with cost‐effectiveness data, would enable determinations about best practice to be made from good evidence, and thus inform parent and policy‐maker's decision‐making; (iii) ‘Dose’ comparison studies : ‘Dose’ comparison studies using well controlled intensity trials would enable occupational therapists to better inform parents about ‘how much’ intervention is enough; and (iv) Participation Interventions : There is a clear gap in the evidence‐base about interventions that directly improve a child's participation in life and should be the focus of future RCTs and other rigorous methodologies. CIMT, Bimanual and Home Program occupational therapy interventions were measured to confirm whether or not they conferred participation gains, and the clinical trials demonstrated no between group differences (Adair, Ullenhag, Keen, Granlund & Imms, 2015 ). These results indicate that there is a clear need to develop interventions that specifically target participation, rather than anticipating activities‐based interventions will confer upstream participation gains. Changes in participation are multifactorial and involve individual factors, contextual factors, the nature of the participation activity and the environment in which the activity is being performed (Imms et al ., 2017 ). Any new participation intervention invented, will need to address all of these factors to be successful.
Our review has several limitations. First, we only included SRs and RCTs because we aimed to analyse best‐available evidence, but means some intervention approaches will have been excluded and overlooked because no trials or reviews existed. Second, this was an analysis of secondary data sources and reporting bias and publication bias may be in operation, because positive findings have a higher chance of being published. This evidence may exist suggesting some interventions are ineffective which we were unable to review. Third, our search terms included ‘occupational therapy’ and thus will have excluded other effective interventions used by occupational therapists, but not invented or published by occupational therapists e.g. ‘Triple P’ for children with CP. Fourth, our paper was designed to provide an overview for clinicians indicating which interventions are effective, however, it does not provide enough detail about any one intervention to guide administration or training in any specific intervention. Clinicians need to refer directly to the cited article and more widely in the published literature for this information. Our findings must be interpreted within the context of our study limitations.
This review provides a high‐level summary of effective paediatric occupational therapy interventions. Thirty‐nine effective intervention indications exist, offering both families and clinicians many choices to match their preferences and expertise. The paediatric occupational therapy evidence base suggests a growing trend towards activities‐level, ‘top‐down’ approaches and parent education, over and above ‘bottom‐up’ approaches. There are important ethical implications of translating these effective evidence‐based occupational therapy intervention options into clinical practice to give children the best chance at achieving their goals.
All authors declare that this is original work and that they meet the criteria for authorship. Iona Novak designed the study, extracted the data, conducted the analyses and wrote the manuscript. Ingrid Honan conducted the analyses and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The study was unfunded and there are no competing financial disclosures.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Table S1. Main results table.
Sign Up for a FREE Physical Therapy / Occupational Therapy Documentation Cheat Sheet!!
Copyright © 2020 The Note Ninjas LLC - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.
For PTs, OTs, Assistants, and Students
Enhance Patient Outcomes, Streamline Documentation, and Prevent Burnout!
Show all / Hide all
Jimmy is 10 years old, he enjoys playing football and wants to do well at school. Jimmy has dyspraxia, or developmental co-ordination disorder. Dyspraxia is a well known condition, however the association between the condition and how it can affect a child at school is not so well understood. Dyspraxia affects a child's planning, processing, and motor co-ordination, which dramatically impacts upon a child's performance in school.
Jimmy struggles to ride a bike, he is never picked for the school football team, and the teachers at his school are expressing concerns regarding his writing. Jimmy tries very hard to keep up with the class when he is copying from the board, however he just can't keep up. He has to concentrate so hard on making his writing neat and legible, that he often misses the information being taught and the objectives for the lesson.
Jimmy came to our clinic and received an initial assessment and ongoing monthly treatment. Alongside his ongoing treatment, Jimmy and his parents worked through a home programme of activities to improve his skills, and Caroline, his Occupational Therapist, visited his school to improve his environment and increase his learning opportunities.
Over time, Jimmy's writing became legible and he was able to kick a football with good accuracy and he even managed to get his way onto the school football team! Both Jimmy and his parents were extremely pleased with the support, advice and expert help they received from OT for Kids in helping Jimmy achieve his goals.
All of our assessments and treatments are centred around the patient.
We believe that together we achieve more.
Why choose us.
We run a range of Groups for children aged 0-18 years.
We've put together a handy brochure that will cover everything you need to know!
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Email citation, add to collections.
Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.
Affiliation.
Occupational therapy in pediatric rehabilitation focuses on the effects of diseases and of the environment on a child's abilities to function successfully in daily life settings (home, school and playground) and roles (family member, student, etc.). In this paper, the process of pediatric occupational therapy, from assessment to discharge planning, is briefly described. Pediatric occupational therapy intervention strategies including treatment, environmental adaptation, and systems change are presented and illustrated. Three case studies highlighting occupational therapy intervention are discussed.
PubMed Disclaimer
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
BMC Medical Education volume 24 , Article number: 705 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
174 Accesses
Metrics details
Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA)-based assessment is easily and intuitively used in evaluating the learning outcomes of competency-based medical education (CBME). This study aimed to develop an EPA for occupational therapy focused on providing health education and consultation (TP-EPA3) and examine its validity.
Nineteen occupational therapists who had completed online training on the EQual rubric evaluation participated in this study. An expert committee identified six core EPAs for pediatric occupational therapy. TP-EPA3 was developed following the EPA template and refined through consensus meetings. The EQual rubric, a 14-item, five-point criterion-based anchor system, encompassing discrete units of work (DU), entrustable, essential, and important tasks of the profession (EEIT), and curricular role (CR), was used to evaluate the quality of TP-EPA3. Overall scores below 4.07, or scores for DU, EEIT, and CR domains below 4.17. 4.00, and 4.00, respectively, indicate the need for modifications.
The TP-EPA3 demonstrated good validity, surpassing the required cut-off score with an average overall EQual score of 4.21 ( SD = 0.41). Specific domain scores for DU, EEIT, and CR were 3.90 ( SD = 0.69), 4.46 ( SD = 0.44), and 4.42 ( SD = 0.45), respectively. Subsequent revisions clarified observation contexts, enhancing specificity and focus. Further validation of the revised TP-EPA3 and a thorough examination of its reliability and validity are needed.
The successful validation of TP-EPA3 suggests its potential as a valid assessment tool in occupational therapy education, offering a structured approach for developing competency in providing health education and consultation. This process model for EPA development and validation can guide occupational therapists in creating tailored EPAs for diverse specialties and settings.
Peer Review reports
Competency-based medical education (CBME) represents a strategic evolution in the methodology of medical training, emphasizing the development of specific competencies essential for effective clinical practice [ 1 , 2 ]. Although competency frameworks have been developed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists (CanMEDS), their implementation in clinical practice has been limited. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) and milestones have emerged to bridge the gap between competency frameworks and assessment and training in clinical practices [ 3 , 4 , 5 ].
EPAs are discrete clinical activities that require the integration of various competencies and represent an activity associated with a specific clinical event [ 6 , 7 ], whereas milestones refer to observable markers along a continuum of progress [ 8 ]. However, the application of milestones as evaluative tools for trainees’ competency faces challenges due to their sheer number, the extensive and complex training required, and the necessity for full participation in the learning process [ 9 ]. Therefore, EPA-based assessment is easier and more intuitive to use in evaluating the learning outcomes of the CBME [ 10 , 11 ].
EPAs have been well developed in many medical professions, such as medicine of various specialties [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], dentistry [ 19 ], nursing [ 20 ], pharmacy [ 21 , 22 ], radiology [ 23 , 24 , 25 ], physical therapy [ 26 ], and occupational therapy [ 27 , 28 ]. While EPAs tailored to occupational therapy have been established in Singapore, they primarily focus on undergraduate education during the earlier years of study, emphasizing fundamental professional activities crucial for early-stage clinical education. However, it is crucial to develop EPAs specific to the final year of undergraduate clinical training and post-graduate clinical training. During this phase, occupational therapy students are exposed to four major domains: physical, mental, pediatric, and community. Each domain encompasses unique core competencies and professional activities. Thus, developing EPAs tailored to each domain of occupational therapy is essential. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to delineate the process of developing an EPA in pediatric occupational therapy, using the EPA3 Providing Health Education and Consultation in occupational therapy (TP-EPA3) serving as an example, and to examine its validity. While we developed six EPAs in pediatric occupational therapy, this study focuses exclusively on TP-EPA3 as a representative example due to its broad applicability across the four major domains of occupational therapy: physical, mental, pediatric, and community.
This study was approved by the institutional review boards of Fu Jen Catholic University (C110093) and Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare (TH-IRB-0022–0027).
Nineteen occupational therapists (11 females, 8 males), who had completed online training on the EQual rubric evaluation, rated the 6 core EPAs in pediatric occupational therapy on the EQual rubric. Their age distribution was as follows: 21.1% were aged 31–40 years; 63.2%, 41–50 years; and 15.8%, 51–60 years. Their workplaces were medical centers (42.1%), regional teaching hospitals (47.4%), and district teaching hospitals (5.3%). Their positions were chiefs of occupational therapy (26.3%), chiefs of pediatric occupational therapy (15.8%), teaching directors of occupational therapy (26.3%), clinical teachers (57.9%), and university teachers. The average duration of their work experience was 20.2 years ( SD = 6.7), whereas that as clinical teachers was 15.6 years ( SD = 7.8).
This study comprised two stages: the development of TP-EPA3, and an examination of the structure and quality of TP-EPA3.
In the first stage, six topics for the core EPAs were identified by expert committee using the nominal group technique and survey questionnaires distributed to 131 teaching hospitals in Taiwan [ 29 ]. The expert committee included two university teachers from departments of occupational therapy, 24 clinical teachers of pediatric occupational therapy in teaching hospitals, and one external expert developing EPAs in family medicine in Taiwan. The nominal group technique and survey questionnaires were chosen to ensure a comprehensive and systematic collection of expert opinions and have been detailed in previous studies [ 30 , 31 ]. The survey was distributed to 131 teaching hospitals in Taiwan, providing a broad basis for the identification of core EPAs [ 29 ].
The Taiwan Occupational Therapy Association made only minor textual refinements to the titles of the six core EPAs: EPA1, “Providing evaluations in occupational therapy”; EPA2, “Providing interventions in occupational therapy”; EPA3, “Providing health education and consultation” (TP-EPA3); EPA4, “Writing occupational therapy medical records”; EPA5, “Providing transdisciplinary collaboration healthcare”; and EPA6, “Providing services of splints or assistive devices”, without altering the core competencies or the content of the EPAs themselves. The draft of TP-EPA3 was written by two pediatric occupational therapy clinical teachers (corresponding and co-corresponding authors) from two teaching hospitals within the expert committee, based on the EPA template [ 11 ]. Following three rounds of consensus meetings, the expert committee finalized the description of TP-EPA3, as shown in Appendix 1.
In the second stage, 16 committee members from the stage one expert committee, along with 3 non-committee occupational therapy experts with EPA experience, rated TP-EPA3. All raters had completed the online training of the EQual rubric evaluation and assessed TP-EPA3 according to the EQual rubric.
The EQual rubric is a 14-item evaluation utilized to assess the quality of EPAs [ 32 ]. This rubric measures the constructs of EPAs across 3 domains, including discrete units of work (DU) (items 1–6), entrustable, essential, and important tasks of the profession (EEIT)(items 7–10), and curricular role (CR) (items 11–14) [ 32 ]. Each item is scored using a five-point criterion-based anchor system [ 32 ], and an online training video is available for scoring [ 33 ]. A cut-off score of 4.07 determines whether a given EPA requires modification, with an average overall EQual score below 4.07 indicating that it does [ 32 ]. Moreover, the cutoff scores for the DU, EEIT, and CR domains are 4.17, 4.00, and 4.00, respectively [ 34 ]. The EQual rubric evaluation has been found to be reliable, valid and useful in EPA development [ 32 , 34 , 35 ].
Data analyses were performed in Microsoft Excel 16.75 for Mac. We calculated mean and standard deviation for the EQual rubric score and three domain scores to determine whether the EPA needs modification. The EQual rubric score represented the average of all 14 items, and domain scores for DU, EEIT, and CR were calculated from items 1–6, 7–10, and 11–14, respectively [ 32 , 34 , 35 ]. Additionally, the scatter plot was used to examine the dispersion of scores across the three domains.
The description of TP-EPA3 is shown in Appendix 1. The EPA comprises 8 parts: title; specifications and limitations; potential risks in case of failure; most relevant competency domains; required knowledge, skills, attitude and experiences; assessment information sources to assess progress and ground a summative entrustment decision; entrustment for which level of supervision is to be reached at which stage of training; and expiration date.
The entrustment and supervision scale for TP-EPA3 adopted Chen’s entrustment and supervision scale [ 36 ]. Specifically, clinical teachers were asked to assess the trainee's level of entrustment using the following question: "If you were to supervise this trainee again in a similar professional task and situation, which of the following statements aligns with how you would assign the task?" This question was used to guide the clinical teachers' entrustment decisions. The entrustment and supervision scale comprised 5 levels, with level 1 and level 2 being further divided into two sublevels, and level 3 being divided into three sublevels (Appendix 2). The definition of level 1a was “Not allowed to observe practicing the EPA”. Level 1b was “Not allowed to practice the EPA; allowed to observe”. Level 2a was "Allowed to practice the EPA only under proactive, full supervision as co-activity with supervisor”. Level 2b was “Allowed to practice the EPA only under proactive, full supervision with supervision in room ready to step in as needed”. Level 3a was “Allowed to practice the EPA only under reactive/on-demand supervision with supervisor immediately available, all findings double-checked”. Level 3b was “Allowed to practice the EPA only under reactive/on-demand supervision with supervision immediately available, key findings double-checked”. Level 3c was “Allowed to practice the EPA only under reactive/on-demand supervision with supervisor distantly available, findings reviewed”. Level 4 was “Allowed to practice the EPA unsupervised”. Level 5 was “Allowed to supervise others in practice of the EPA”.
Eighteen occupational therapists rated the TP-EPA3 according to the EQual rubric. The response rate was 94.7%. The EQual item, domain, and overall scores for the TP-EPA3 are listed in Table 1 . The average scores of the individual items on the Equal rubric ranged from 3.17 to 4.83. The average overall EQual score was 4.21 ( SD = 0.41), which was higher than the cut-off score, 4.07. The domain scores for DU, EEIT, and CR were 3.90 ( SD = 0.69), 4.46 ( SD = 0.44), and 4.42 ( SD = 0.45), respectively. Only the domain score for DU (3.90) was lower than the domain cut-off score (4.17). The scatter plot of the three domain scores of the EQual is shown in Fig. 1 .
Scatter plot of the three EQual domain scores of TP-EPA3: Providing Health Education and Consultation in pediatric occupational therapy in Taiwan. Note: EPA = entrustable professional activity. DU = Discrete units of work. EEIR = Entrustable, essential, and important tasks of the profession. CR = Curricular role
To the best of our knowledge, this study was the first to illustrate the development process of EPAs in pediatric occupational therapy, specifically tailored for use in the final year of undergraduate clinical training and post-graduate clinical training in the pediatric domain. The EPAs developed in this study can complement those developed in Singapore [ 27 , 28 ], which are utilized during the earlier years of undergraduate education. Early exposure to EPAs in undergraduate education can enhance students' understanding of the EPA concept, increase clinical engagement, foster a stronger sense of professional identity, bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical practice, and facilitate comprehension of future practice expectations during conditional registration [ 28 , 37 , 38 ]. Using EPAs in pediatric occupational therapy during the final year of undergraduate clinical training and post-graduate clinical training can assess students' advanced clinical skills in pediatric occupational therapy domain, enable students to engage in self-directed learning to address their weakness, as well as determine their readiness to become independent pediatric occupational therapists [ 39 , 40 ].
The overall EQual score of TP-EPA3 (4.21), being higher than the cut-off score of 4.07, indicated good validity and quality. However, the EQual domain score for DU (3.90), below the cut-off score of 4.17, indicated a need for further revisions of the items within this domain. The scatter plot revealed greater variability in EQual domain scores for DU than for the other domains. Notably, the average scores for item 1 (“This EPA has a clearly defined beginning and end”) and item 3 (“This EPA is specific and focused”) were the lowest (Table 1 ). In pediatric occupational therapy, health education and consultations frequently occurred during various interactions with parents, such as following screenings, assessments, interventions, cessation of interventions, or even during casual conversations about the child's recent behaviors or challenges. Therapists often used these opportunities to recommend home program, activity adjustments, environmental modifications, or changes in parenting strategies. Due to the nature of these interactions, it would be challenging to identify a clear beginning and end for providing consultations and health education. This might explain why items 1 and 3 received lower scores. Consequently, the observation contexts of TP-EPA3 were refined to focus on four specific contexts: after screening, after evaluation, after intervention, and intervention discontinuation. These specifications were revised in alignment with the definitions, sequences, and crucial observation points related to providing health education and consultation. The revised version of the TP-EPA3 is provided in Appendix 3.
The TP-EPA3 presented in this paper may not be universally applicable to all occupational therapy fields, such as physical, mental, and community settings, or at different levels of hospitals or community agencies, or in all countries. However, occupational therapists can employ the EPA topic development process [ 29 ] and EPA content development process in this paper to develop their core EPAs tailored to their respective fields, hospitals or community agencies, or countries. In cases where occupational therapy units provide specialized services or interventions, specialized EPAs may also be developed by following this EPA development process. For instance, if an occupational therapy unit specializes in telemedicine or screening, specialized EPAs can be developed. Moreover, if only certain components of the professional tasks of the EPAs can be performed due to the size or other constraints, nested EPAs [ 11 ], which are smaller units of the original EPA, can be considered.
The assessment information sources utilized in evaluating progress and grounding a summative entrustment decision for the TP-EPA3, as presented in this study, encompass all the assessment methods typically employed to evaluate trainees’ capabilities. Occupational therapy clinical teachers can select the assessment methods they already utilize from those provided in the TP-EPA3. The key point in determining the summative entrustment and supervision levels for EPAs is to thoroughly consider the outcomes of multiple assessment methods and assessments. This approach prevents trainees from being unfairly labeled as “under proactive” based solely on one performance or poor performance on severe patients [ 41 ].
Since our EPAs were designed to evaluate both UGY and PGY trainees, Chen’s prospective entrustment and supervision scale [ 36 ] was adopted for two main reasons. First, the prospective nature of Chen’s scale could reduce the influence of contextual factors such as time of observation and work load, as well as task factors such as complexity of patient’s conditions [ 41 ]. Second, Chen’s scale expands the lower levels of the scale to include finer gradation of supervision, making it more suitable for assessing the performances of UGY trainees [ 36 ]. Thus, the scale offers a more comprehensive framework for evaluating the trainees’ performances at different stages of training, allowing more detailed analysis of their progress.
This study had four major limitations. First, although the overall EQual score of the initial TP-EPA3 indicated acceptable content validity, the revised TP-EPA3 still needs to be examined to determine whether the DU domain score has been improved. Second, since only the content validity of TP-EPA3 was examined, its inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and responsiveness should be further investigated. Third, the target entrustment and supervision levels of UGY and PGY trainees were recommended by the expert committee. Future studies should investigate the perspectives of occupational therapy clinical teachers on these target levels. Fourth, a potential limitation of our study is the overlap of committee members across the development and evaluation phases of TP-EPA3. Sixteen of the nineteen experts who assessed TP-EPA3 using the EQual rubric evaluation were involved in the initial development. Despite all raters being trained using the EQual rubric, their prior involvement could introduce unintentional rater bias, potentially influencing the impartiality of their assessments.
EPAs provide a time-efficient, feedback-oriented, and workplace-based assessment for evaluating whether trainees can perform clinical professional tasks competently without supervision. The EPA development process outlined in this study can help occupational therapists develop core EPAs, specialized EPAs, or nested EPAs tailored to their specific fields, hospitals or community agencies, or countries. In conclusion, EPAs are not only easy and intuitive for assessing the learning outcomes of CBME but also support clinical teachers in evaluating trainee independence in significant clinical professional activities and in curriculum design. Furthermore, EPAs help trainees prepare for clinical professional activities. Specifically, the TP-EPA3, which focus on providing health education and consultation in pediatric occupational therapy in Taiwan, has been validated using the EQual rubric, paving the way for the development of additional core EPAs using the process described.
Data is available upon reasonable request from corresponding author. The e-mail of the corresponding author is [email protected] and [email protected] .
EPA3 for occupational therapy focused on providing health education and consultation
Discrete units of work
Entrustable, essential, and important tasks of the profession
Curricular role
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education
Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists
Undergraduate year
Post-graduate year
Association of American Medical Colleges. Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME). Available from: https://www.aamc.org/about-us/mission-areas/medical-education/cbme .
Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, Holmboe ES, Carraccio C, Swing SR, et al. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):638–45.
Article Google Scholar
Carraccio C, Burke AE. Beyond competencies and milestones: adding meaning through context. J Grad Med Educ. 2010;2(3):419–22.
Jones MD Jr, Rosenberg AA, Gilhooly JT, Carraccio CL. Perspective: competencies, outcomes, and controversy–linking professional activities to competencies to improve resident education and practice. Acad Med. 2011;86(2):161–5.
van Loon KA, Driessen EW, Teunissen PW, Scheele F. Experiences with EPAs, potential benefits and pitfalls. Med Teach. 2014;36(8):698–702.
ten Cate O. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Med Educ. 2005;39(12):1176–7.
ten Cate O, Scheele F. Competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Acad Med. 2007;82(6):542–7.
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. EPAs and Milestones 2017. 2017. Available from: http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/cbd/implementation/cbd-milestones-epas-e .
Lin HJ, Wu JH, Chen CY. Competency-based medical education and milestones assessment. J Int Med Taiwan. 2020;31(2):115–21.
Google Scholar
Shorey S, Lau TC, Lau ST, Ang E. Entrustable professional activities in health care education: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2019;53(8):766–77.
Ten Cate O, Chen HC, Hoff RG, Peters H, Bok H, van der Schaaf M. Curriculum development for the workplace using Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99. Med Teach. 2015;37(11):983–1002.
Hauer KE, Kohlwes J, Cornett P, Hollander H, Ten Cate O, Ranji SR, et al. Identifying entrustable professional activities in internal medicine training. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(1):54–9.
Kearse LE, Schmiederer IS, Anderson TN, Dent DL, Payne DH, Korndorffer JR Jr. American board of surgery entrustable professional activities (EPAs): assessing graduating residents’ perception of preoperative entrustment. J Surg Educ. 2021;78(6):e183–8.
McCloskey CB, Domen RE, Conran RM, Hoffman RD, Post MD, Brissette MD, et al. Entrustable professional activities for pathology: recommendations from the college of american pathologists graduate medical education committee. Acad Pathol. 2017;4:2374289517714283.
Mallow M, Baer H, Moroz A, Nguyen VQ. Entrustable professional activities for residency training in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(10):762–4.
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Entrustable professional activities for internal medicine. 2019.
Shaughnessy AF, Sparks J, Cohen-Osher M, Goodell KH, Sawin GL, Gravel J Jr. Entrustable professional activities in family medicine. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(1):112–8.
Young JQ, Hasser C, Hung EK, Kusz M, O’Sullivan PS, Stewart C, et al. Developing end-of-training entrustable professional activities for psychiatry: results and methodological lessons. Acad Med. 2018;93(7):1048–54.
Ramaswamy V, Fitzgerald M, Danciu T, Nalliah R, de Peralta T, Munz SM, Murdoch-Kinch CA. Entrustable professional activities framework for assessment in predoctoral dental education, developed using a modified Delphi process. J Dent Educ. 2021;85(8):1349–61.
Zhou W, Poh CL, Chan HL, Shorey S. Development of entrustable professional activities for advanced practice nurses education. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;116:105462.
Lockman K, Lowry MF, DiScala S, Lovell AG, Uritsky TJ, Kematick BS, et al. Development of entrustable professional activities for specialist hospice and palliative care pharmacists. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022;64(1):37–48.
Pittenger AL, Chapman SA, Frail CK, Moon JY, Undeberg MR, Orzoff JH. Entrustable professional activities for pharmacy practice. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016;80(4):57.
Deitte LA, Gordon LL, Zimmerman RD, Stern EJ, McLoud TC, Diaz-Marchan PJ, Mullins ME. Entrustable professional activities: ten things radiologists do. Acad Radiol. 2016;23(3):374–81.
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Entrustable professional activities for diagnostic radiology 2022. Available from: https://Users/medot/Downloads/epa-diagnostic-radiology-v1-e.pdf .
Tu CY, Huang KM, Cheng CH, Lin WJ, Liu CH, Yang CW. Development, implementation, and evaluation of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for medical radiation technologists in Taiwan: a nationwide experience. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):95.
Zainuldin R, Tan HY. Development of entrustable professional activities for a physiotherapy undergraduate programme in Singapore. Physiotherapy. 2021;112:64–71.
Zainuldin R, Tan HY. Entrustable professional activities developed for allied health entry-level programs across a national level training standards framework in Singapore. J Allied Health. 2023;52(2):104–12.
Zainuldin R, Tan HSK. Entrustable professional activities implementation in undergraduate allied health therapy programs. Asia Pac Schol. 2024;9(1):42–8.
Fu CP, Chiang FM, Lee CY, Chi HY, Wu CL, Lin YJ, et al. Developing the topics of entrustable professional activities in pediatric occupational therapy in Taiwan: a pilot study. Taiwan J Occup Ther. 2023;41(2):1–20.
Tsai SL, Chang SC, Ho MJ. Defining the core competencies of medical humanities education through the nominal group technique. J Med Educ. 2008;12(2):70–6.
Chiu HY. Survey research methods. Taipei: San Min Book Co., Ltd.; 2007.
Taylor DR, Park YS, Egan R, Chan MK, Karpinski J, Touchie C, et al. EQual, a novel rubric to evaluate entrustable professional activities for quality and structure. Acad Med. 2017;92((11S association of American medical colleges learn serve lead: proceedings of the 56th annual research in medical education sessions)):S110–7.
Department of Medicine Queen’s University. EQual rubric training video for EPA evaluation. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQZuWdzkQKM .
Meyer EG, Taylor DR, Uijtdehaage S, Durning SJ. EQual rubric evaluation of the association of american medical colleges’ core entrustable professional activities for entering residency. Acad Med. 2020;95(11):1755–62.
Chen JW, Hsu WC. Developing a competency-based medical education for Taiwan otolaryngology-head and neck surgery resident physician training-an integrated entrustable professional activities model. J Taiwan Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;57(2):110–22.
Chen HC, van den Broek WE, ten Cate O. The case for use of entrustable professional activities in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90(4):431–6.
Kuehl SE, Spicer JO. Using entrustable professional activities to better prepare students for their postgraduate medical training: a medical student’s perspective. Perspect Med Educ. 2022;11(6):359–64.
Bramley AL, McKenna L. Entrustable professional activities in entry-level health professional education: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2021;55(9):1011–32.
Stephan A, Cheung G, van der Vleuten C. Entrustable professional activities and learning: the postgraduate trainee perspective. Acad Psychiatry. 2023;47(2):134-42.
de Graaf J, Bolk M, Dijkstra A, van der Horst M, Hoff RG, Ten Cate O. The implementation of entrustable professional activities in postgraduate medical education in the netherlands: rationale, process, and current status. Acad Med. 2021;96(7S):S29–35.
Hauer KE, Ten Cate O, Boscardin C, Irby DM, Iobst W, O’Sullivan PS. Understanding trust as an essential element of trainee supervision and learning in the workplace. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014;19(3):435–56.
Download references
We gratefully appreciate the Taiwan Occupational Therapy Association, the President, Dr. Ching-Yi Wu, the Chair of the Professional Quality Committee, Dr. I-Ping Hsueh, and Yi-Fang Wu for their support of our research. We also acknowledge the non-committee occupational therapy experts for their help in examining the validity of the EPAs.
This study was supported by research grants from the Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare (Project No. 202315).
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
Chung-Pei Fu & Chia-Ting Su
Department of Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, Linkuo Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Ching-Kai Huang
Department of Rehabilitation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan
Yi-Chiun Yang
Department of Rehabilitation, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Wei-Sheng Liao
Department of Rehabilitation, Sijhih Cathay General Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
Shih-Min Huang, Ming-Wei Li & Hsin-Yu Chi
Department of Rehabilitation, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Wei-Di Chang
Department of Rehabilitation, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Department of Rehabilitation, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
Yi-Ju Lin & Chin-Lung Wu
Department of Rehabilitation, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Chia-Yi Lee & Ching-Fen Tsou
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Fu-Mei Chiang
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Yu-Lan Chen
Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
Tzu-Hung Liu
School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien City, Taiwan
Institute of Sports Sciences, University of Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan
Ai-Lun Yang
Department of Occupational Therapy, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare,, No. 1492, Zhongshan Rd.,Taoyuan Dist., Taoyuan, 330, Taiwan
Nung-Chen Kuo
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, No. 127, Su-Yuan Rd., Hsin-Chung Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan
Wan-Ying Chang
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
C.P.F: co-principal investigator, wrote manuscript, designed research, collected and analyzed data, one of the expert committee members. C.K.H., Y.C.Y., W.S.L., S.M.H., W.D.C., Y.J.C., M.W.L., YJ.L., C.L.W., H.Y.C., C.Y.L., F.M.C., Y.L.C., C.F.T.: expert committee members, assisted in research execution, EPAs lead authors. T.H.L.: Taught the concepts and framework of competency-based medical education and entrustable professional activities to the expert committee, guided the occupational therapy expert committee to develop EPAs, assisted in designing research, assisted in writing manuscripts, shared EPAs developmental experiences in family medicine. C.T.S.: edited manuscripts, one of the expert committee members. A.L.Y.: shared EPAs development experiences in physical therapy, external experts, edited manuscripts. Corresponding author N.C.K.: lead author of the TP-EPA3 for providing health education and consultation in occupational therapy, which is presented in this manuscript, one of the expert committee members, assisted in research execution. Co-corresponing author W.Y.C.: principal investigator, lead author of the TP-EPA3 which is presented in this manuscript, one of the expert committee members, assisted in research execution.
Correspondence to Nung-Chen Kuo or Wan-Ying Chang .
Ethics approval and consent to participate.
This study was approved by the institutional review boards of Fu Jen Catholic University (C110093) and Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare (TH-IRB-0022–0027). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Not applicable.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary material 1., supplementary material 2., supplementary material 3., rights and permissions.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Fu, CP., Huang, CK., Yang, YC. et al. Developing an entrustable professional activity for providing health education and consultation in occupational therapy and examining its validity. BMC Med Educ 24 , 705 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05670-1
Download citation
Received : 03 February 2024
Accepted : 18 June 2024
Published : 28 June 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05670-1
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
ISSN: 1472-6920
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
List initial occupational theories or models that might guide the occupational therapy process: Person-Environment-Occupation (PEO) (Case-Smith & O'Brien, 2015, p. 31): Focus on child's performance and the environmental influences that enable a child's engagement and participation in activities. Health is supported and maintained when ...
Utilizing developmental approaches and the Skeffington model, participants will learn both remediative and adaptive strategies to promote occupational performance. auditory, textual, visual 129 USD Subscription Unlimited COURSE Access for $129/year OnlineOnly OccupationalTherapy.com www.occupationaltherapy.com Pediatric Case Study: Child with ...
xviii, 183 pages : 28 cm "Cases in Pediatric Occupational Therapy: Assessment and Intervention is designed to provide a comprehensive collection of case studies that reflects the scope of current pediatric occupational therapy practice."--Publisher's website
The first article described a case report of occupational therapy provided to a child with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and challenges in sensory integration in a clinic setting (Parham et al., 2019). This article describes the same child's occupational therapy service delivery by the occupational therapist working in the school ...
Today, I am doing a case study format. I want to give you a conceptual way to think about how to intervene with a child who has visual challenges that are affecting school performance, ADL performance, or play performance. Patrick is a seven-year-old male in second grade. He has difficulties with reading, completing his homework, and following ...
Cases in Pediatric Occupational Therapy: Assessment and Intervention is designed to provide a comprehensive collection of case studies that reflects the scope of current pediatric occupational therapy practice. Drs. Susan Cahill and Patricia Bowyer, along with more than 50 contributors, begin each section with an introduction to the practice setting and direct instructors and students to ...
For this case report, we focus on identifying and highlighting the distinct value of occupational therapy in the treatment of a pediatric patient with COVID-19 and MIS-C in an acute care hospital setting. This case study was completed in accordance with our institution's policy and did not require institutional review board review.
Pediatric OT Scenarios. Occupational therapy is a form of physical and mental rehabilitation that focuses on performing activities required in daily life. In the case of pediatric occupational therapy, this generally focuses on getting children to engage in play, school, and peer interactions. Pediatric occupational therapy helps children ...
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY CASE STUDY Situation: Sam began occupational therapy to address oral motor challenges at age 2. He ingested all of his calories from formula bottle feedings. His weight was very low for his age. Sam demonstrated oral defensiveness and rejected, spit out and pushed away food when it was o˜ered to him. Sam demonstrated high ...
Cases in pediatric occupational therapy : assessment and intervention Authors : Susan M. Cahill ( Editor ) , Patricia Bowyer ( Editor ) Summary : "Cases in Pediatric Occupational Therapy: Assessment and Intervention is designed to provide a comprehensive collection of case studies that reflects the scope of current pediatric occupational ...
The occupational therapist used the Occupational Therapy Practice Guidelines for Children and Youth Ages 5-21 Years (Cahill & Beisbier, 2020) as a tool to guide decision making and considered Jacob's presentation in relation to the diagnoses addressed in the practice guidelines. The occupational therapist then reviewed the practice ...
In pediatric occupational therapy, there is insufficient evidence examining assessment tool selection by occupational therapists and how assessment tools contribute to occupation-based practice. To examine the perceptions of occupation-based assessment tool selection by pediatric occupational therapists, a phenomenological research study was ...
1. Select the pediatric case for study. Review child's diagnosis and medical history. Set up an initial meeting with the child and parents or guardians. Prepare a detailed initial assessment plan. Conduct initial assessment on physical, cognitive and emotional capabilities of the child. Record observations during the initial assessment.
Introduction. Occupational therapy intervention for children promotes engagement and participation in children's daily life roles (Mandich & Rodger, 2006).Children's roles include, developing personal independence, becoming productive and participating in play or leisure pursuits (Roger et al.).Inability to participate because of disease, disability or skill deficits, can cause marginalisation ...
Schaaf RC, Nightlinger KM. Occupational therapy using a sensory integrative approach: A case study of effectiveness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2007; 61:239-246. [Google Scholar] Shoener RF, Kinnealey M, Koenig KP. You can know me now if you listen: Sensory, motor, and communication issues in a nonverbal person with autism.
For occupational therapy practitioners, understanding interoception and its impact on daily functioning is vital for providing effective interventions, particularly in pediatric populations. This comprehensive guide delves into the science of interoception, its relevance in occupational therapy, and evidence-based strategies to support ...
Pediatric occupational therapy practitioners frequently provide interventions for children with differences in sensory processing and integration. ... position sense, and endurance. For example, two case studies have demonstrated the benefits of a supervised strength-training intervention for children with DCD (Kaufman & Schilling, 2007; Menz ...
Including a relationship-focus in pediatric occupational therapy interventions requires practitioners to modify the way in which initial appointments, case history taking, and interventions occur. ... and that this translated across activities without a direct focus on these activities during therapy sessions. While this case study demonstrates ...
The client will be able to exhibit receptive and expressive communication skills - alert and responding to simple questions, at the end of 15 sessions. The client will be able to perform all ADL task with 1-2 verbal prompts and cues per task, after 5 sessions. The client will have established a daily routine for self-care, after 10 sessions.
Introduction. Occupational therapy intervention for children promotes engagement and participation in children's daily life roles (Mandich & Rodger, 2006).Children's roles include, developing personal independence, becoming productive and participating in play or leisure pursuits (Roger et al.).Inability to participate because of disease, disability or skill deficits, can cause marginalisation ...
A physical and occupational therapist providing you with evidence-based treatments and examples of documentation to show your skill. Case Study for Pediatric Occupational Therapy. Sign Up for a FREE Physical Therapy / Occupational Therapy Documentation Cheat Sheet!! The Note Ninjas
Abstract. The purpose of this qualitative constructivist grounded theory study was to develop a model to explain potential mechanisms of change in the nature-based pediatric occupational therapy process, based on analysis of the perspectives of occupational therapy practitioners currently engaging in nature-based practice with children.
Case Studies Meet Jimmy. Jimmy is 10 years old, he enjoys playing football and wants to do well at school. Jimmy has dyspraxia, or developmental co-ordination disorder. Dyspraxia is a well known condition, however the association between the condition and how it can affect a child at school is not so well understood.
Rehabilitation / methods*. Occupational therapy in pediatric rehabilitation focuses on the effects of diseases and of the environment on a child's abilities to function successfully in daily life settings (home, school and playground) and roles (family member, student, etc.). In this paper, the process of pediatric occupation ….
Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA)-based assessment is easily and intuitively used in evaluating the learning outcomes of competency-based medical education (CBME). This study aimed to develop an EPA for occupational therapy focused on providing health education and consultation (TP-EPA3) and examine its validity. Nineteen occupational therapists who had completed online training on the ...