integrity in nursing essay

10 Ways to Demonstrate Integrity in Nursing Practice

Are you a nurse with a strong desire to improve relationships between patients, families, and your team members? Do you have what it takes to step up and be the change you want to see in nursing? If so, one of the best ways to accomplish positive outcomes, build strong nurse-patient and professional relationships, and improve the delivery of healthcare is to act with the highest levels of integrity. Perhaps you are wondering, "How can nurses demonstrate integrity in nursing practice?” There are many characteristics associated with nursing integrity, and in this article, I will share 10 ways to demonstrate integrity in nursing practice. As you continue reading, you will learn what integrity in nursing means, why it is important, and how a lack of integrity can impact patients, nurses, and the healthcare industry.

What Does Integrity in Nursing Practice Mean Exactly?

4 reasons why is it important to have integrity in nursing practice, 1. like your reputation, your integrity in nursing practice precedes you., 2. your efforts to demonstrate integrity have a positive impact on patient outcomes., 3. when you practice integrity in nursing, it inspires others to be better., 4. you help create a better work environment., 8 key traits that a nurse with integrity has, 1. nurses with integrity value other people’s time., 2. they are kind and considerate., 3. nurses with integrity look for ways to do good deeds., 4. they look for the positive side in every situation and try to help others see the good, as well., 5. nurses with integrity are trustworthy., 6. authenticity is another trait of people with integrity., 7. not afraid to admit mistakes:, 8. integrity in nursing practice means keeping your emotions in check., how can nurses demonstrate integrity in nursing practice, 1. be honest., 2. be dependable., 3. treat other people with respect., 4. hold yourself accountable., 5. give credit to others for their efforts., 6. follow company policies and rules., 7. be a positive example for others to follow., 8. respect property and equipment., 9. lend a helping hand., 10. address conflict and stress at work with respect., 4 consequences of lack of integrity in nursing practice, 1. poor nurse-patient relationships:, 2. increased stress at work:, 3. unfavorable patient outcomes:, 4. loss of job security:, useful resources to develop integrity in nursing practice, youtube videos, • nursing talk: having integrity (the nomad nurse), • “integrity in nursing” (nicolas fullmer speaking to the nsna ethics and governance committee), • preserving integrity in response to ethical challenges in nursing (dr. cynda rushton, professor of clinical ethics at the johns hopkins school of nursing), • johns hopkins nursing magazine podcast, • art of emergency nursing, • daily nurse- nursecasts, • channeling florence nightingale: integrity, insight, innovation, • work and integrity: the crisis and promise of professionalism in america, • think like a nurse (five character traits every nurse needs to possess), my final thoughts.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Int J Environ Res Public Health

Nurses’ Adherence to Patient Safety Principles: A Systematic Review

Mojtaba vaismoradi.

1 Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8049 Bodø, Norway

Susanna Tella

2 Faculty of Health and Social Care, LAB University of Applied Sciences, 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland; [email protected]

Patricia A. Logan

3 Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, 2795 Bathurst, Australia; ua.ude.usc@nagolp

Jayden Khakurel

4 Research Centre for Child Psychiatry, Department of Child Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland; [email protected]

Flores Vizcaya-Moreno

5 Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain; [email protected]

Background: Quality-of-care improvement and prevention of practice errors is dependent on nurses’ adherence to the principles of patient safety. Aims: This paper aims to provide a systematic review of the international literature, to synthesise knowledge and explore factors that influence nurses’ adherence to patient-safety principles. Methods: Electronic databases in English, Norwegian, and Finnish languages were searched, using appropriate keywords to retrieve empirical articles published from 2010–2019. Using the theoretical domains of the Vincent’s framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical practice, we synthesized our findings according to ‘patient’, ‘healthcare provider’, ‘task’, ‘work environment’, and ‘organisation and management’. Findings: Six articles were found that focused on adherence to patient-safety principles during clinical nursing interventions. They focused on the management of peripheral venous catheters, surgical hand rubbing instructions, double-checking policies of medicines management, nursing handover between wards, cardiac monitoring and surveillance, and care-associated infection precautions. Patients’ participation, healthcare providers’ knowledge and attitudes, collaboration by nurses, appropriate equipment and electronic systems, education and regular feedback, and standardization of the care process influenced nurses’ adherence to patient-safety principles. Conclusions: The revelation of individual and systemic factors has implications for nursing care practice, as both influence adherence to patient-safety principles. More studies using qualitative and quantitative methods are required to enhance our knowledge of measures needed to improve nurse’ adherence to patient-safety principles and their effects on patient-safety outcomes.

1. Introduction

The World Health Organization defines patient safety as the absence of preventable harm to patients and prevention of unnecessary harm by healthcare professionals [ 1 ]. It has been reported that unsafe care is responsible for the loss of 64 million disability-adjusted life years each year across the globe. Patient harm during the provision of healthcare is recognized as one of the top 10 causes of disability and death in the world [ 2 ]. Regarding the financial consequence of patient harm, a retrospective analysis of inpatient harm based on data collected from 24 hospitals in the USA showed that harm-reduction strategies could reduce total healthcare costs by $108 million U.S. and generate a saving of 60,000 inpatient care days [ 3 ]. Additionally, the loss of income and productivity due to other associated costs of patient harm are estimated to be trillions of dollars annually [ 4 ]. The burden of practice errors on patients, their family members, and the healthcare system can be reduced through implementing patient-safety principles based on preventive and quality-improvement strategies [ 5 ]. Patient-safety principles are scientific methods for achieving a reliable healthcare system that minimizes the incidence rate and impact of adverse events and maximizes recovery from such incidents [ 6 ]. These principles can be categorized as risk management, infection control, medicines management, safe environment and equipment [ 7 ], patient education and participation in own care, prevention of pressure ulcers, nutrition improvement [ 8 ], leadership, teamwork, knowledge development through research [ 9 ], feeling of responsibility and accountability, and reporting practice errors [ 10 ].

The nurses’ role is to preserve patient safety and prevent harm during the provision of care in both short-term and long-term care settings [ 11 , 12 ]. Nurses are expected to adhere to organizational strategies for identifying harms and risks through assessing the patient, planning for care, monitoring and surveillance activities, double-checking, offering assistance, and communicating with other healthcare providers [ 13 , 14 ]. In addition to clear policies, leadership, research driven safety initiatives, training of healthcare staff, and patient participation [ 1 , 15 ], nurses’ adherence to the principles of patient safety [ 16 , 17 ] is required for the success of interventions aimed at the prevention of practice errors and to achieve sustainable and safer healthcare systems.

Adherence to and compliance with guidelines and recommendations are influenced by personal willingness, culture, economic and social conditions, and levels of knowledge [ 18 , 19 ]. On the other hand, lack of adherence and compliance contravenes professional beliefs, norms, and expectations of the healthcare professional’s role [ 20 ].

Institutional systemic factors influencing nurses’ adherence to and compliance with patient-safety principles are as follows: the organizational patient-safety climate [ 21 ], workload, time pressure, encouragement by leaders and colleagues [ 22 , 23 , 24 ], level of ward performance [ 25 ], provision of education for the improvement of knowledge and skills [ 11 , 18 ], institutional procedures or protocols, and also communication between healthcare staff and patients [ 11 ]. In addition, personal motivation, resistance to change, feelings of autonomy, attitude toward innovation, and empowerment are personal factors that impact on the nurses’ adherence to patient-safety principles [ 26 ].

A theoretical framework for analysing risk and safety in healthcare practice has been devised by Vincent et al. (1998) [ 27 ] based on the Reason’s model of organizational accidents [ 28 ]. It combines ‘person-centred’ approaches, where the focus is on individual responsibility for the preservation of patients’ safety and prevention of their harm, and the ‘system-centred’ approach, which considers organizational factors as precursors for endangering patient safety [ 29 ]. According to this theoretical framework, initiatives aimed at the improvement of patient safety require systematic assessments and integrative interventions to target different elements in the hierarchy of the healthcare system, including patient, healthcare provider, task, work environment, and organization and management. This framework, and similar models for risk and safety management, can help with the analysis of patient harm, to identify probable pitfalls, as well as explore how to prevent future similar incidents [ 30 ].

Adherence to the principles of patient safety and the prevention and reduction of practice errors have been facilitated by technological solutions in recent years [ 31 , 32 ]; however, suboptimal quality and safety of care remain evident, indicating the need for improved understandings of the various factors and conditions that increase adherence in daily nursing practice [ 33 ]. Consequently, this review aimed to retrieve, explore, and synthesise factors evident in the international literature that influenced nurses’ adherence to patient-safety principles. Vincent’s framework was used for the classification of findings, in order to systematically present the findings and inform clinical practice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. design.

A systematic review was conducted. It is an explicit and clear method of data collection, systematic description, and synthesis of findings, to reach the study goal [ 34 , 35 , 36 ]. The review findings are presented narratively since heterogeneities in the methods, objectives, and results of studies that met the inclusion criteria did not lend themselves to meta-analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement (2009) was applied to inform this systematic review [ 36 ].

2.2. Search Methods

Search keywords were determined after team discussions, performing a pilot search in general and specialized databases, and consultation with a librarian. Key search terms relating to adherence to patient-safety principles by nurses were used to conduct a Boolean search. For operationalising the study concept, the definition of adherence as a behaviour carried out actively by people according to orders or advice was used [ 37 ]. The word adherence is used interchangeably with, and sometimes at the same time as, the word compliance, since both can indicate the outcome of care interactions between the healthcare provider and the caregiver [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. However, adherence indicates responsibility and empowerment on the healthcare professional’s part to actively perform the expected behaviour compared to compliance that shows responsibility on the patient’s part to follow up the therapeutic regimen [ 43 , 44 ].

The search was limited to the time period of January 2010 to August 2019, in English scientific journals available through the following online databases: PubMed (including Medline), CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ProQuest, and EBSCO. In addition, the authors performed searches in Nordic and Finnish databases to improve the search coverage. To find relevant studies for inclusion in the data analysis and synthesis, inclusion criteria for selection were articles with a focus on adherence to patient-safety principles in clinical nursing interventions published in online peer-reviewed scientific journals. Articles on patients and other healthcare providers, or on non-clinical initiatives, or that had no exact relevance to adherence to patient-safety principles were excluded.

2.3. Search Outcome and Data Extraction

The authors (M.V., S.T., J.K., and F.V.M.) independently performed each step of the systematic review, holding frequent online discussions and making collective agreements on how to proceed through the review steps. Gray literature, such as unpublished dissertations and policy documents and cross-referencing from bibliographies, were assessed, to improve the search coverage. Guidance and support with the search process were obtained from the librarian, when needed. All authors independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts of the studies retrieved during the search process. In the cases where disagreements about the inclusion of selected studies occurred, discussions were held until a consensus was reached.

A data extraction table was used to collect data on the characteristics of studies. The table included the lead author’s name, publication year, country, design, sample size and setting, and information relating to adherence to patient-safety principles. Prior to the full data extraction, this table was pilot-tested with a few selected studies, to ensure that data relevant to the review aim and analysis would be appropriately gathered.

2.4. Quality Appraisal

The selected articles were appraised based on the appropriateness of the research structure using the evaluation tools provided by the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency of health Research (EQUATOR) website [ 45 ] and criteria outlined by Hawker et al. (2002) [ 46 ], addressing the study aim, research structure, theoretical/conceptual research framework, conclusion, and references. The appraisal tool appropriate to cross-sectional, observational and cohort studies such as the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) was used to evaluate the suitability of selected studies for inclusion in the final data synthesis and analysis. The researchers believed that the quality appraisal items for determining the inclusion of a study in the final dataset did not align to a scoring system; therefore, they used a yes/no system to answer the appraisal-tool items during the quality appraisal and held frequent discussions on the importance and quality of each article before making the final decision on the selection of studies for data analysis and synthesis.

2.5. Data Abstraction and Synthesis

The Vincent’s framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical practice [ 27 , 47 ] was used to organize and connect the review findings to the wider theoretical perspective of patient safety. This framework was developed based on the Reason’s organisational accident model [ 28 ]. Accordingly, issues in patient safety originate in various systemic features at different categories of patient, healthcare provider, task, work environment, and organisation and management [ 27 , 47 ]. The use of this framework helped with the description and categorisation of data retrieved and accommodated heterogeneities in the studies retrieved, with respect to method, samples, settings, and findings, facilitating the integrative presentation of the review findings. The authors (M.V., S.T., P.A.L., J.K., and F.V.M.) reviewed the included studies, to allocate the studies’ findings to each category, and used frequent discussions to reach a consensus.

3.1. Search Results and Study Selections

The thorough literature search using the key terms led to the retrieval of 10,855 articles. After deleting irrelevant and duplicate titles, 382 entered the abstract-reading phase. Each abstract was assessed by using the inclusion criteria, resulting in 84 possibly relevant articles. The full texts were obtained from Finnish and Norwegian libraries and were carefully read to select only those articles that had a precise focus on adherence to patient-safety principles during clinical nursing interventions by nurses. This resulted in the final six articles chosen for data analysis. Excluded studies were on adherence by other healthcare providers, rather than nurses, or had no exact relevance to patient-safety principles. The methodological quality of the selected articles was assessed during the full-text appraisal, and no article was excluded. In general, they had acceptable qualities with respect to study research structure, theoretical and conceptual research frameworks, and relevant findings to the review aim. Grey literature and the manual search in the reference lists of the selected studies led to no more articles being discovered for inclusion. Appendix A presents the search results, giving the number of articles located in each database. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart is shown in Figure 1 .

The study flow diagram according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

3.2. General Characteristics of the Selected Studies

The general characteristics of the selected studies ( n = 6) are presented in Table 1 . The studies were published from 2014 to 2019 and were conducted in Australia [ 48 ], Finland [ 49 ], Norway [ 50 ], South Korea [ 51 ], Sweden [ 52 ], and the UK [ 53 ].

Characteristics of selected studies for data analysis and synthesis.

PICU: paediatric intensive care unit; NICU: neonatal intensive care unit; ICU: intensive care unit.

Three studies used a survey design [ 50 , 51 , 52 ]; one study used an observational method [ 53 ]; one applied an observational intervention design [ 49 ]; and another one was a three-stage pre-post time-series study [ 48 ]. Except for one study [ 49 ] that was published in the Finnish language, all other articles were written in English.

Diverse foci were evident in the studies: adherence to patient-safety principles on the management of peripheral venous catheters [ 52 ], surgical hand rubbing instructions [ 49 ], double-checking policies of medicines’ preparation and administration [ 53 ], handover from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the cardiac ward [ 48 ], cardiac monitoring and surveillance standards [ 50 ], and care-associated infection precautions [ 51 ].

3.3. Findings of Studies with Connection to the Vincent’s Framework

The findings were classified based on the theoretical framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical practice developed by Vincent (1998, 2010) [ 27 , 47 ] and grouped by factors related to the patient, healthcare provider, task, work environment, and organisation and management. Variations in the findings within the selected studies related to the type of patient-safety principles or different clinical settings facilitated the description and synthesis of findings under the above-mentioned categories ( Figure 2 ).

Schematic model of nurses’ adherence to patient-safety principles based on the Vincent’s framework.

3.3.1. Patient

This category was about the role of patients and how they could impact nurses’ adherence to patient-safety principles. For instance, errors made during medicines’ preparation and administration, and a deviation from medication safety principles by nurses were reported. The deviation with a high possibility of endangering patient safety happened where the parents of patients or their companions were left unobserved and unsupervised by nurses to administer medicines to patients. Unobserved or unsupervised administration contravenes the medicines management principle, which requires a nurse’s direct supervision; a crucial consideration for the prevention of abuse and patient avoidance of taking medicines as prescribed [ 53 ]. Moreover, in spite of the emphasis on patient participation in patient-safety activities, nursing handovers were delivered mainly outside the patient’s room [ 48 ], or no information was provided to patients regarding the purpose and process of cardiac monitoring [ 50 ]. These deviations could hinder patients’ active involvement in their own safe care. Additionally, the only communication line between patients and nurses was the call bell, and nurses rarely questioned patients about their pain or comfort. These identified issues represent missed opportunities for the nurses’ continuous observation role for early detection and prevention of harm during handovers from the ICU to the cardiac ward [ 48 ].

3.3.2. Healthcare Provider

This category described how nurses’ knowledge and attitudes were associated with their adherence to patient-safety principles. Variations in nurses’ adherence to patient-safety principles could be attributed to their varied levels of knowledge and attitudes. Examples included nurses’ incomplete adherence to infection-control principles, which encompassed the daily inspection of peripheral venous catheter sites, surgical hand rubbing, disinfection of hands, and the use of disposable gloves and aprons when exposed to patient excretions [ 49 , 51 , 52 ]. Other examples were related to the principles of medicines’ management: inappropriate speed of intravenous bolus, incorrect medicines’ preparation, administration at incorrect times, problematic labelling of flush syringes and administration of intravenous antibiotics without flushing, not receiving the medicines’ complete dose by patients, and incorrect mixing of medicines with diluent [ 53 ]. Lack of sufficient knowledge and skills regarding cardiac monitoring and surveillance standards were also evident, with incorrect placement of cardiac electrodes and/or skin preparation before the procedure leading to inconsistent monitoring, which could endanger patient safety [ 50 ]. Interestingly, being a newly graduated nurse with less time having passed since obtaining the nursing certificate was associated with better adherence to the peripheral venous catheter-care principles, possibly due to having more informatics skills and updated knowledge of nursing care and following up of rules set by senior nurses [ 52 ]. Additionally, negative attitudes and perceptions toward the significance of care standards, individual aesthetic manicure preferences, and the presence of eczema and skin wounds hindered adherence to the surgical hand rubbing protocol, thus having negative implications for patient safety [ 49 ].

3.3.3. Task

In this category, the association between the identity and type of nursing task and adherence to patient-safety principles by nurses was considered. The lowest adherence rates were evident in ‘independent’ medicine management tasks such as dose calculation, rate of administering intravenous bolus drugs, and labelling of flush syringes. On the other hand, a higher rate of adherence was reported for ‘cooperative’ tasks with higher levels of complexity, such as the double-checking of drugs for the actual administration of medicine to the patient [ 53 ]. Similarly, a higher number of nurses working and collaborating together in the ward was associated with a higher rate of adherence to infection-control precautions, including putting sharp articles into appropriate boxes, covering both the mouth and nose, and disinfection of hands after glove removal [ 51 ].

3.3.4. Work Environment

The effect of equipment and the workplace condition on adherence to patient-safety principles was reported in this category. The availability of equipment and electronic resources and digitalization increased the likelihood of adherence to patient safety principles related to medicine management [ 53 ], peripheral venous catheter care [ 52 ], and cardiac monitoring and surveillance [ 50 ]. Accordingly, a telemetry cover on cardiac telemetry and monitoring units helped with the prevention of nosocomial infection by preventing contamination of shared equipment [ 50 ]. Electronic resources and digitalization helped with reminding the daily inspection and information-sharing between nurses regarding peripheral venous catheter insertion sites [ 52 ]. The existence of an environmental space for preparation of medicines without interruptions helped nurses adhere more closely to double-checking instructions of preparation and administration on weekends, as compared with weekdays [ 53 ].

3.3.5. Organisation and Management

This category focused on collaboration between nurses and the leadership role in motivating nurses’ adherence to patient-safety principles. As an example, adherence to the surgical hand rubbing principles, including properly drying hands after alcohol hand rubbing and washing with water and soap, and alcohol hand rubbing up to elbows, was improved after the provision of feedback by nurse leaders [ 49 ]. Regular practical feedback processes, interaction opportunities and observation of peers and senior colleagues, and leadership motivated nurses’ adherence to daily inspection of the peripheral venous catheter site and the use of disposable gloves when handling peripheral venous catheters insertion sites [ 52 ]. Adherence to patient-safety principles by cardiac nurses was improved through feedback provision and informing nurses in the ICU of the type of nursing interventions conducted in cases of serious dysrhythmias and their outcomes [ 50 ].

The provision of a standard process for handover, such as the introduction of a validated handover tool, improved nurses’ readiness to receive patients from the ICU. It informed the preparation of the required equipment for care, enabled performance of handovers at the patient bedside, and involved patients in their care, while also assisting with attending patients’ needs, checking patients’ identity, and collecting data of their medical history and allergies. Further, the standardising of the handover process helped with the continuity of care plan by formalising discussions between nurses and assisting with removal of any ambiguities, so increasing awareness of risks to patient safety [ 48 ]. The higher adherence rate to standard precautions for infection control were found when there was a higher nurse-to-patient ratio indicating the association between workload and patient-safety management [ 51 ]. Similarly, the development of a local practice standard for cardiac monitoring and surveillance, as well as for assessing the eligibility of patients for admission to critical and non-critical telemetry sections, would improve adherence to patient-safety principles for the cardiac patient [ 50 ].

4. Discussion

This systematic review integrated current international knowledge through the categorization of factors affecting adherence to patient-safety principles by nurses to the elements of the Vincent’s framework (1998 and 2010) for analysing risk and safety in clinical practice [ 27 , 47 ].

In this review, leaving patients’ companions unsupervised during medicines’ administration, performing handovers outside patients’ rooms, and lack of the provision of information and appropriate communication with patients hindered patient participation in their understandings of their own care. Lack of engagement of patients in safe-care initiatives contravenes nurses’ adherence to patient-safety principles. Benefiting from patients’ participation requires understanding of how to improve the patient’s willingness to act as an active member of the healthcare team, development of practical guidelines for such an engagement with the consideration of patients and their relatives’ knowledge and skills of the care process, as well as definition of the role and provision of supervision and guidance by nurses. The assigned participation task should be communicated appropriately to the patient, have congruity with patients’ knowledge of nursing routines and their own implementation capacity, as well as be incorporated into routine care with the consideration of infrastructures and healthcare missions [ 14 , 54 , 55 ]. It has been suggested that planning and performing nursing care at the patient’s bedside can improve patient participation, reduce work interruptions [ 56 ], and consequently improve nurses’ adherence to safe care guidelines [ 11 ].

The findings of this review highlighted that nurses’ knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes influenced their adherence to patient-safety principles. Nurses have multiple roles and central responsibility to keep patients safe in the complex healthcare environment [ 57 , 58 ]. The effect of personal and professional values and attitudes on the consistency of adherence to patient safety by nurses has been shown to be more important than the effect of their workloads [ 22 ]. It is believed that individual factors such as nurses’ attitudes, perceptions, knowledge, and information seeking can facilitate or hinder the use of clinical practice guidelines by nurses and consequently endanger patient safety [ 11 , 26 ] through inconsistent adherence to patient-safety principles [ 59 ].

It was evident that collaborative tasks fostered nurses’ adherence to patient-safety principles. Improving nurses’ knowledge of tasks improves nurses’ adherence [ 60 ]. Moreover, the coordinated management approach and collaboration with team members enhance the effectiveness of patient-safety interventions due to the creation of a shared understanding of changes that should be made by all healthcare staff to improve the quality of care [ 61 , 62 ].

With regard to the work environment, the findings of this review highlighted how equipment and electronic systems could assist with sharing information between healthcare providers and enhance adherence to patient-safety principles. One part of the healthcare system’s commitment to patient safety is the preparation of appropriate work equipment [ 63 , 64 ]. Technology can support data security and facilitate nursing care through the provision of real-time and ubiquitous documentation, which is needed for professional interactions and collaboration [ 65 ]. Digital systems can reduce the time needed to perform nursing care and limit errors in drug administration, as well as improve nurses’ and patients’ satisfaction with care [ 66 , 67 ].

An appropriate work environment was characterised as one where nurses were less interrupted, and lower workloads improved adherence to patient-safety principles. An appropriate work environment is associated with better patient safety and less burnout. Workload and burnout act as negative mediators of safe care [ 68 , 69 ]. A work environment characterised by a heavy workload and mental pressure [ 23 , 24 , 70 ] and frequent disruptions [ 71 ] has been implicated in reducing nurses’ adherence to safety-related principles. There is an association between patient safety and the nurses’ work environment [ 39 , 72 , 73 ] and implementation of patient-safety principles to prevent errors and adverse events [ 26 , 74 ].

The findings of this review emphasized the role of regular education and provision of feedback to nurses. Taking responsibility for actions and behaviours through education and feedback is a crucial aspect of professional practice [ 75 ]. The empowerment of nurses to intervene based on care standards is an expectation of healthcare leaders which can be achieved through the development of the culture of patient safety [ 33 , 76 , 77 , 78 ], the implementation of educational programs, and timely feedback and reminders [ 79 , 80 , 81 ]. Further, the use of standard processes, supported by validated tools, guided nurses and facilitated their adherence to patient-safety principles. Usability, format, easy access of the contents of guidelines, and consideration of time, staffing, chain of communication, accuracy of practice, supplies of equipment, and logistics are the main advantages of guidelines that facilitate the implementation of safe care [ 26 , 82 ].

Limitations and Suggestions for Future Studies

In spite of the emphasis on adherence to patient-safety principles and patient-care outcomes, this study has directly focused on nurses’ adherence to patient-safety principles, which can impact our understandings of the variation of factors influencing this important concept. However, the wide nature of the search in the electronic databases and in various languages convinced the researchers that the study topic has been addressed appropriately and an answer based on the current knowledge can be provided. However, the limited number of studies that met the inclusion criteria for this review hinders the full exploration of the relationship between individual and systemic factors that impact on nurses’ adherence to patient-safety principles in inpatient and outpatient settings.

5. Conclusions

This review has shown that adherence to patient-safety principles was affected by numerous intersecting and complex factors. Variations in the studies’ aims, methods, and results hinder the formation of a determinant conclusion on how adherence to patient-safety principles can be improved. However, based on the review results, general indications are that improvement of nurses’ knowledge about patient safety, collaboration in performing tasks, reduction of workloads, provision of appropriate equipment and electronic systems for communication and sharing information, regular feedback in the workplace, and standardization of the care processes can help with enhancing nurses’ adherence to patient-safety principles. Future qualitative and quantitative studies are needed to better understand how to promote and mitigate adherence to safe-care principles by clinical nurses.

Acknowledgments

Nord University, Bodø, Norway has supported the publication of this manuscript through coverage of publication charges.

Search strategy and results based on each database.

Author Contributions

The authors contributed to the design and implementation of the research, to the analysis of the results and to the writing of the manuscript as follows; M.V., S.T., J.K., F.V.-M.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software; M.V., S.T., J.K., F.V.-M., P.A.L.: Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethics and Integrity in Nursing Research

• Living reference work entry
• First Online: 25 February 2019
• Cite this living reference work entry

• Edie West 2  

1335 Accesses

2 Citations

Most ethical issues that arise in the field of nursing tend to focus on human rights or direct client care issues, while the existing ethical frameworks and “nursing codes of ethics” put forth by leading nursing organizations tend to focus on increasing the ethical sensitivity or competence of nurses. Professional nursing, in its position as “art” and “science,” conducts cutting-edge research spanning a cornucopia of topics in the natural, social, formal, and applied sciences. However, the nature of nursing, which focuses on caring, preventing harm, protecting dignity, and advocacy roles in defense of patient rights, is sometimes at odds with the ethics of what can be considered more purely scientific research. This is primarily due to ambiguity or outright conflict with nursing standards (i.e., existing guidance frameworks or nursing ethics codes) and current research standards. This chapter will briefly explore the history of ethics development within the discipline of nursing. It will then explore the dichotomy between nursing and current research ethics via a comprehensive review and analysis of current relevant nursing literature. Identification of key ethical issues faced by nurse-researchers and how these issues were addressed can help to provide clarity and shed some light on the key issues identified in this chapter. In addition, it can help to formulate a framework that other nurse-researchers can use to maintain ethics and scientific integrity while investigating issues and proposing viable solutions to problems yet to be addressed in the field of nursing research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Research on Human Subjects: Nurses Roles and Responsibilities

Nursing Research

Banner D, Zimmer L (2012) Informed consent in research: an overview for nurses. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs 22(1):26–30

Google Scholar  

Barrett R (2010) Strategies for promoting the scientific integrity of nursing research in clinical settings. J Nurses Staff Dev 26(5):200–205

Article   Google Scholar  

Behi R, Nolan M (1995) Ethical issues in research. Br J Nurs 4(12):712–716

Berg B (1995) Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 2nd edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston

Cabral IE, Egry EY, Barbosa DA (2015) Integrity and ethics in research and scientific communication: issues for nursing considerations. Rev Escola Enfermagem USP 49(5):710–715. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000500710&lng=en&tlng=en

Casey D (2006) Choosing an appropriate method of data collection. Nurse Res 13:75–93

Cate O, Brewster D, Cruess R, Calman K, Rogers W, Supe A, Gruppen L (2013) Research fraud and its combat: what can a journal do? Med Educ 47:638–640

Cole C (2012) Implied consent and nursing practice: ethical or convenient? Nurs Ethics 19(4):550–557

Colling J (2004) Procedures, ethics and funding sources. Urol Nurs 24(2):130–133

Czimbal B (2006) Excerpt from ‘skills for success: personal skills for professional excellence’. http://www.abundancecompany.com/index.htm

Davies S, Ellis L, Laker S (2000) Promoting autonomy and independence for older people within nursing practice: an observational study. J Clin Nurs 9(1):127–136

Devine C, Chin E (2018) Integrity in nursing students: a concept analysis. Nurs Educ Today 60:133–138

Doody O, Noonan M (2016) Br J Nurs 25(14):803–807

DuBois J, Chibnall J, Tait R, Vander J (2018) The professionalism and integrity in research program: description and preliminary outcomes. Acad Med 23(4):586–592

Ellenberg S (2012) Protecting clinical trial participants and protecting data integrity: are we meeting the challenges? Acad Med 9(6):1–4

Elliott R, Wright L (1999) Verbal communication: what do critical care nurses say to their unconscious or sedated patients? J Adv Nurs 29(6, 1):412–1420

Ensign J (2003) Ethical issues in qualitative health research with homeless youths. J Adv Nurs 43(1):43–50

Epstein B, Turner M (2015) The nursing code of ethics: its value, its history. ANA’s OJIN 20(2):4. http://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-20-2015/No2-May-2015/The-Nursing-Code-of-Ethics-Its-Value-Its-History.html#History

Fang FC, Steen RG, Casadevall A (2012) Misconduct account for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(42):17028–17033. [Internet] 2012 [cited 2015 June 16]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3479492/

Fierz K, Gennaro S, Dierickx K, Van Achterberg T, Morin KH, De Geest S (2014) Scientific misconduct: also an issue in nursing science? J Nurs Scholarsh 46(4):271–280

Fouka G, Mantzorou M (2011) What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? Is there a conflict between the research ethics and the nature of nursing? Health Sci J 5(1):3–14

Grout G (2004) Using negotiated consent in research and practice. Nurs Older People 16(4):18–20

Gunsalus CK, Marcus AR, Oransky I (2018) Institutional research misconduct reports need more credibility. J Am Med Assoc 319(13):1315–1316

Habermann B, Broome M, Pryor ER, Ziner KW (2010) Research coordinators’ experiences with scientific misconduct and research integrity. Nurs Res 59(1):51–57

Holloway I, Wheeler S (2002) Qualitative researching, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

Hurst K (1985) A real debate by two imaginary people. Nurs Mirror 160(24):34–35

Ingham-Broomfield J (2017) A nurses’ guide to ethical considerations and the process for ethical approval of nursing research. Aust J Adv Nurs 35(1):40–46

Jokinen P, Lappalainen M, Meriläinen M, Pelkonen M (2002) Ethical issues in ethnographic nursing research with children and elderly people. Scand J Caring Sci 16:165–170

Jones C, Jack B (1999) Dilemmas in the ethics of health-care research. Prof Nurse 14(7):452–455

Judkins-Cohn T, Kielwasser-Withrow K, Owen M, Ward J (2014) J Contin Educ Nurs 45(1):35–42

Karlberg J, Speers M (2010) Reviewing clinical trials: a guide for the ethics committee. https://www.pfizer.com/files/research/research_clinical_trials/ethics_committee_guide.pdf

Khaki I, Abbasi M, Khalajinia Z, Momenyan S (2018) Barriers to observance of the codes of professional ethics in clinical care: perspectives of nurses and midwifery of hospitals affiliated with Qom University of Medical Sciences in 2016. Health Spiritual Med Ethics 5(1):33–39

Lachman V, Swanson E, Winland-Brown J (2015) The new ‘code of ethics for nurses with interpretative statements’ (2015): practical clinical application, part II. Medsurg Nurs 24(5):363–368

Mahon P (2014) Internet research and ethics: transformative issues in nursing education research. J Prof Nurs 30(2):124–129

Mcguire Dunn C, Chadwick G (1999) Protecting study volunteers in research: a manual for investigative sites. CenterWatch: University of Rochester Medical, Rochester, pp 2–4

Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E (2014) Evidence based practice in nursing and health care: a guide to best practice, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia

Mitchell J (2018) Ethics in clinical research: the ongoing effort for higher standards. Res Pract 19(4):63–69

Moody HR (1992) Ethics in an aging society. The John Hopkins Press Ltd., London

Moore L, Savage J (2002) Participant observation, informed consent and ethical approval. Nurse Res 9(4):58–69

Munhall PL (1988) Ethical considerations in qualitative research. West J Nurs Res 10(2):150–162

National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Intramural (2016) ‘Responsible conduct of research training’. https://oir.nih.gov/sourcebook/ethical-conduct/responsible-conduct-research-training

Nieswiadomy R (2007) Foundations of nursing research, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

Nobel-Adams R (1999) Ethics and nursing research 1: development, theories and principles. Br J Nurs 8(13):1–5

Putnam J (2015) Giving research an online presence. Kans Nurse 90(1):12

Rachmawaty R (2017) Ethical issues in action-oriented research in Indonesia. Nurs Ethics 24(6):686–693

Raudonis BM (1992) Ethical considerations in qualitative research with hospice patients. Qual Health Res 2(2):238–249

Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS (2000) Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

Sellman D (2016) The practice of nursing research: getting ready for ‘ethics’ and the matter of character. Nurs Inq 23(1):24–31

Teitcher J, Bockting W, Bauermeister J, Hoefer, Miner M, Klitzman R (2015) Detecting, preventing, and responding to “fraudsters” in internet research: ethics and tradeoffs. J Law Med Ethics 43(1):116–133

Thorne S, Sawatzky R (2014) Particularizing the general sustaining theoretical integrity in the context of an evidence-based practice agenda. Adv Nurs Sci 37(1):5–18

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1998) Informed consent. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/informed-consent/index.html

Ulrich M, Wallen G, Cui N, Chittams J, Sweet M, Plemmons D (2015) Establishing good collaborative research practices in the responsible conduct of research in nursing science. Nurs Outlook 63:171–180

Wager E, Tooley PJH (1995) Get patients’ consent to enter clinical trials. Br Med J 311:734–737

Ward-Smith P (2016) Evidence-based nursing: when the evidence is fraudulent. Urol Nurs 36(2):98–99

Woodfield K (2017) The Ethics of online research, Volume 2 in the series: advances in research ethics and integrity. Emerald Publishing, Bingley

Book   Google Scholar  

Worthington E, Miller A, Talley J (2011) Action-oriented research: a primer and examples. J Psychol Theol 39(3):211–221

Wynia M, Kishore S, Belar C (2014) A unified code of ethics for health professionals Insights from an IOM Workshop. J Am Med Assoc 311(8):799–800

Zeng W, Resnik D (2010) Research integrity in China: problems and prospects. Dev World Bioeth 10(3):164–171

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Nursing and Allied Health Department, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA, USA

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edie West .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Chatelaillon Plage, France

Ron Iphofen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Cite this entry.

West, E. (2019). Ethics and Integrity in Nursing Research. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_46-1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_46-1

Received : 17 November 2018

Accepted : 18 November 2018

Published : 25 February 2019

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-76040-7

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-76040-7

eBook Packages : Springer Reference Religion and Philosophy Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Humanities

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Home — Essay Samples — Philosophy — Deontology — Deontology and Utilitarianism in Nursing

Deontology and Utilitarianism in Nursing

• Categories: Deontology Utilitarianism

About this sample

Words: 732 |

Published: Jun 6, 2024

Words: 732 | Pages: 2 | 4 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Verified writer

• Expert in: Philosophy

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

3 pages / 1307 words

3 pages / 1290 words

2 pages / 1012 words

2 pages / 919 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Deontology

At what point does it become ethically sanctioned to take an innocent person’s life? To what extent do people’s moral institutions compose their apprehension of what is right or wrong? This paper will evaluate how the “trolley [...]

Everyday, people make decisions on what they believe is the best choice that will produce the best outcome. However, too many people do not image of the consequences nor do they think about the principles of morals when carrying [...]

The issue of abortion has been a heated topic of debate for decades. The argument is usually between those who are pro-life and those who are pro-choice. The pro-life camp argues that abortion is morally wrong because it [...]

A man by the name of John was a technician at a nuclear power plant in the state of Ohio in the USA. During his time working at this power plant, a catastrophic freak accident occurred. During this accident John was present at [...]

Imagine that you are a police officer that is off-duty in a crowded marketplace and you spot the friendly man you conversed with earlier near the merchandise. He suddenly declares to you “Leave now. Run! I have a powerful bomb [...]

Immanuel Kant is one of the greatest moral theorists of the eighteenth century. He is the mastermind behind the moral theory, which is aptly named after him, Kantian Deontology. His moral theory "is widely considered the most [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Academic integrity in nursing education: Policy review

Affiliations.

• 1 Mount Carmel College of Nursing, United States of America. Electronic address: [email protected].
• 2 Mount Carmel College of Nursing, United States of America.
• PMID: 33867079
• DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.12.006

Background: Academic integrity is a matter of concern in nursing education. While cases of academic dishonesty are not public record, policies used to promote integrity in nursing education programs are widely available. A review of integrity policies in nursing programs explores common grounds in practices to promote integrity.

Method: Integrity policies were collected from leading United States nursing programs. Using publicly posted academic integrity statements identified through internet search engines, policies were reviewed to identify common approaches.

Results: Nursing programs articulate a variety of approaches to academic integrity. Most programs display honor codes, although requirements for student affirmation vary. Hearings are required for all accusations in only a handful of institutions. A majority of the policies include formal references to nursing values and integrity standards.

Conclusion: The academic integrity policies of nursing programs are shaped by systemic features of host institutions. An exploration of the range in approaches provides insights to faculty and administrators who provide ongoing leadership in policy development. The exploration provides an opportunity to pose probing questions as they shape approaches to preserve and promote integrity in nursing students and graduates.

Keywords: Integrity policy; Nursing education.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Publication types

• Education, Nursing*
• Students, Nursing*
• United States

• UNM Hospital
• UNM Children's Hospital
• Carrie Tingley Hospital
• Comprehensive Cancer Center
• College of Nursing
• College of Population Health
• College of Pharmacy
• School of Medicine
• News You Can Use
• Project ECHO
• Community Engagement
• Communities to Careers
• HSC Newsroom

UNM College of Nursing Awards Outstanding Spring 2024 Graduates

As the Spring 2024 semester comes to an end, The University of New Mexico College of Nursing is celebrating the achievements of its students across various nursing degrees. Among the highlights of this year’s commencement was the recognition of outstanding students from the College who have demonstrated exceptional leadership, dedication and innovation in nursing education and scholarship.

The College of Nursing has long been known for its commitment to excellence in health care education, practice and research. As the demand for skilled and compassionate nurses continues to rise, these awards serve as a testament to the hard work and talent within the College, and its commitment to making a difference in the health care of communities, both locally and beyond.

Nursing Leadership Award Recipients: Calissa Emmert & Jalynn Montoya

This award is presented to a graduating student from any nursing program who has cultivated leadership skills and exercises leadership qualities. The awardee involves themselves in the educational and professional sides of nursing by having a presence in department activities, professional organizations and community committees.

I would like to personally say ‘thank you’ to the faculty who nominated me for the award and for believing in me when I did not believe in myself. I could not have completed this program without the constant support and guidance you guys gave. My time at the College of Nursing has ignited a passion to continue to serve my patients and the people within my community. Thank you for this opportunity and for everything you guys did for me.

I am filled with gratitude, as my time at the College of Nursing comes to an end, for the invaluable lessons learned, friendships with my cohort formed, and plenty of challenges overcome. I’m honored to receive this reward and hope that I was able to make even the slightest impact on both my patients and peers. I’m excited to begin my nursing career in my passion of pediatrics and hope to continue being a leader by example in the field of nursing!

Pre-Licensure Academic Achievement Award Recipient: Quinlyn McBrayer

Students receive this award for their achievements and growth as a student during their time as a pre-licensure student. The student can stand out for their leadership, commitment to inclusion, innovation and/or integrity for their studies, peers and patients.

My mom has been a nurse for over 30 years and watching how hard she worked as I grew up (and how hard she is still working), I thought that I could NEVER be a nurse. Now, having gone through nursing school and making it out on the other side, I cannot imagine myself doing anything else.

RN to BSN Academic Achievement Award Recipient: Aimiede Egharevba

The RN to BSN program is great. It is very organized, and the teachers truly want you to succeed. Thank you everyone for your contributions to the success of every student at UNM. I sincerely appreciate this award and I am very excited about it.

Outstanding NMNEC Dual Degree Award Recipient: Kaiwen Xue, Central New Mexico Community College

Students receive this award for their achievements and growth as a student during their time as New Mexico Nursing Education Consortium (NMNEC) Community College student.  A student can stand out for their leadership, commitment to inclusion, and innovation or integrity for their studies, peers, and patients.

I am deeply grateful for the assistance and encouragement from my professors, classmates, and family in nursing schools. The NMNEC Dual Degree Award inspires me to continue striving for excellence in my future nursing career.

Robin Armell Memorial Award Recipient: Craig B Houston

This award is given to students with exemplary character and a strong ability for communication and leadership.

To all the graduates of the College of Nursing: congratulations on your accomplishment. Your advancement into nursing signals the birth of something profound and exciting. While you’re beginning your new role in a new setting, I’m confident that your consideration for the worth and dignity of every patient, a quality that each of you have been gifted with throughout this program, will not fade or be lost.

Professional   Graduate Academic Achievement Award Recipients: Courtney Grassham & Cynthia Johnson

I have truly enjoyed my time at the CON. The faculty have been encouraging and so many opportunities were available across the health sciences campus. Through the IPE honors program I was able to learn with other health care disciplines to be a better team member and provide the complete care to patients across the state. Even before I finished my program, I was already a better practitioner for my current patients because of skills and knowledge I learned at the College of Nursing.

I am deeply honored to receive this year’s Graduate Academic Achievement Award. The journey towards obtaining my DNP has equipped me with invaluable tools to provide high-quality care for the children of our state. My two years at the College of Nursing have been incredibly enriching, and I am profoundly grateful for the opportunity to learn and grow during this time.

Professional   Graduate Nursing Leadership Award Recipient: Kymm Ann Wallin

Graduate students receive this award for their distinctive leadership qualities evident during their scholarly and clinical work. Recipients of this award are innovative, collaborative and dedicated to leading themselves and their peers with passion and clarity.

It is such an honor to graduate in Nurse-Midwifery from the University of New Mexico, under the wisdom and guidance of amazing faculty, and alongside such special fellow students who I adore.

Related Stories

UNM Hospital Stroke Team Delivering Life-Saving Care Around the Clock

UNM College of Nursing Receives Gift to Fund Scholarships

New UNM Nursing Mentorship Program Pairs Nursing Students with High School Students

Mental Health Awareness: Maternal Mental Health

Contact for Members of the Press

Chris Ramirez (505) 313-3429 [email protected]