history essays paper 2

IBDP History

Website by Andrew Jones, Jo Thomas & Keely Rogers

Updated 26 June 2024

InThinking Subject Sites

Subscription websites for IB teachers & their classes

Find out more

• thinkib.net
• IBDP Biology
• IBDP Business Management
• IBDP Chemistry
• IBDP Economics
• IBDP English A: Language & Literature
• IBDP English A: Literature
• IBDP English B
• IBDP French B
• IBDP Geography
• IBDP German A: Lang & Lit
• IBDP Maths: Analysis & Approaches
• IBDP Maths: Applications & Interpretations
• IBDP Physics
• IBDP Psychology
• IBDP Spanish A
• IBDP Spanish Ab Initio
• IBDP Spanish B
• IBDP Visual Arts
• IBMYP English Language & Literature
• IBMYP Resources
• IBMYP Spanish Language Acquisition
• IB Career-related Programme
• IB School Leadership

Disclaimer : InThinking subject sites are neither endorsed by nor connected with the International Baccalaureate Organisation.

InThinking Subject Sites for IB Teachers and their Classes

Supporting ib educators.

• Comprehensive help & advice on teaching the IB diploma.
• Written by experts with vast subject knowledge.
• Innovative ideas on ATL & pedagogy.
• Detailed guidance on all aspects of assessment.

Developing great materials

• More than 14 million words across 24 sites.
• Masses of ready-to-go resources for the classroom.
• Dynamic links to current affairs & real world issues.
• Updates every week 52 weeks a year.

Integrating student access

• Give your students direct access to relevant site pages.
• Single student login for all of your school’s subscriptions.
• Create reading, writing, discussion, and quiz tasks.
• Monitor student progress & collate in online gradebook.

Meeting schools' needs

• Global reach with more than 200,000 users worldwide.
• Use our materials to create compelling unit plans.
• Save time & effort which you can reinvest elsewhere.
• Consistently good feedback from subscribers.

For information about pricing, click here

Download brochure

See what users are saying about our Subject Sites:

Find out more about our Student Access feature:

Paper 2 is an essay paper for both Standard and Higher students.

This page gives an overview what is required; see the page Essay writing for Paper 2  to get hints for tackling Paper 2 essay questions and for suggestions for helping students develop their essay writing skills.

What is the nature of Paper 2?

Paper 2 is a one hour and 30 minutes essay paper in which students must answer two essay questions. Each question has to be chosen from a different topic.

What content has to be covered?

For each topic the IBO guide gives an introduction and prescribed themes that must be studied for each topic. However there are no prescribed examples or case studies and exam questions will not include named examples .

The examples that are listed in the guide are for suggestions only.

What is the structure of this paper?

The paper is divided into the different syllabus topics; there are two essay questions for each topic.

Thus it is essential that teachers choose case studies which will allow students to make comparisons across regions.

Students also need to be familiar with the command terms used for essay questions. A student friendly guide to command terms can be found on the page: Essay writing for Paper 2  

How will this paper be marked?

Questions are marked out of 15.

There are generic markbands for marking the essays. A student-friendly breakdown of the markbands can be found on the page Assessment for Paper 2 .

As there is no prescribed content with regards to case studies there is no indicative content as such for examiners - only guidance on how responses should approach the question and suggested content.

Selected Pages

Topic 12: The Cold War: Superpower tensions and rivalries Free

This topic is divided into three themes which are explained below.Each theme is divided into several pages of content and...

2. Theme 2 - Leaders and Nations (ATL) Free

This theme covers the following prescribed content:Note that the syllabus has changed between the 2017 and 2020 guide for...

1. Theme 1 - Rivalry, Mistrust and Accord (ATL) Free

This theme covers the key developments in the Cold War from 1945 with the emergence of superpower rivalry, through to the...

Topic 08: Independence Movements Free

Topic 8 focuses on the emergence of new states in the 19th and 20th Centuries.You will need to cover at least two Independence...

Topic 11: Causes and effects of 20th Century wars Free

This topic allows you study a range of 20th Century wars.The study of each war needs to follow the three areas of 'prescribed...

3. Theme 3 - Cold War Crises Free

Theme 3: Cold War crisesThis theme involves studying Cold War crises. A crisis is considered to be an event when there was...

IB History: Paper 2 Essay Writing and Analysis

The International Baccalaureate (IB) History program challenges students to develop a deep understanding of historical events, themes, and interpretations. One of the key assessment components is the Paper 2 essay, which requires students to analyze and write about historical sources. In this article, we will explore the structure of the IB History Paper 2 essay and provide you with valuable tips and strategies to excel in this challenging task.

 Understanding the IB History Paper 2 Essay

The Paper 2 essay in IB History is often referred to as the "Document-Based Question" (DBQ). It is a timed assessment in which you are provided with a set of historical sources and must craft an essay based on your analysis of these sources. The sources may include primary and secondary documents, images, maps, or texts.

The key components of the IB History Paper 2 essay include:

 1. Source Analysis:

- You are required to analyze the provided sources critically. Consider the origin, purpose, context, and content of each source. Pay attention to biases, perspectives, and limitations of the sources.

 2. Historical Context:

- Understanding the historical context is crucial. You need to place the sources within the broader historical narrative, identifying the events, themes, and time period relevant to the sources.

 3. Essay Prompt:

- The essay prompt will ask you to construct an argument or response based on your analysis of the sources and your knowledge of the historical context. You must address the specific question posed in the prompt.

 4. Essay Structure:

- Your essay should have a clear and organized structure. It typically includes an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.

 5. Use of Evidence:

- You should support your argument with evidence from the sources and your historical knowledge. Effective use of source evidence is essential.

 6. Historical Thinking Skills:

- Demonstrating historical thinking skills such as causation, continuity and change, comparison, and evaluation is essential for a successful essay.

 Essay Writing Tips and Strategies

Writing an effective Paper 2 essay requires a structured approach and attention to detail. Here are some tips and strategies to help you excel:

 1. Begin with Source Analysis:

- Start by thoroughly analyzing each source. Identify the author's perspective, any potential biases, and the context in which the source was created.

 2. Organize Your Thoughts:

- Before you begin writing, outline your essay. Organize your argument, main points, and supporting evidence. A clear structure will make your essay more coherent.

 3. Address the Prompt:

- Ensure that your essay directly responds to the essay prompt. Don't deviate from the question, and make it clear from the beginning how you intend to answer it.

 4. Use Source Evidence:

- Integrate source evidence into your essay. Cite the sources when referencing them. This not only supports your argument but also shows your ability to engage with historical documents.

 5. Provide Historical Context:

- Offer historical context for the sources. Explain how they relate to the broader historical events and themes of the time period.

 6. Develop a Clear Thesis:

- Your thesis statement should provide a concise overview of your argument. It should address the prompt and guide the reader on what to expect in the essay.

 7. Support with Specifics:

- Use specific examples and details from the sources and your historical knowledge. Avoid vague statements and generalizations.

 8. Compare and Contrast:

- If the prompt calls for it, compare and contrast the sources. Analyze similarities and differences among the sources to support your argument.

 9. Engage with Historiography:

- When relevant, engage with historical interpretations or the work of historians. Discuss different viewpoints and their implications for your argument.

 10. Conclude Effectively:

- Your conclusion should summarize your main points and restate your thesis. It's also an opportunity to provide a broader perspective on the topic.

 11. Edit and Proofread:

- After writing your essay, take time to edit and proofread. Check for clarity, grammar, and organization.

 Sample IB History Paper 2 Essay Prompt

Here is a sample Paper 2 essay prompt to give you an idea of what to expect:

"Evaluate the impact of World War I on the emergence of new nation-states in Europe. Using the provided sources and your own knowledge, assess the extent to which the war contributed to the dissolution of empires and the creation of new states."

In response to this prompt, you would need to analyze the provided sources and your historical knowledge to construct an essay that evaluates the impact of World War I on the emergence of new nation-states in Europe.

 Conclusion

The IB History Paper 2 essay is a challenging but rewarding assessment that tests your ability to analyze historical sources and construct well-argued essays. By developing strong source analysis skills, crafting clear and structured essays, and providing evidence to support your arguments, you can excel in this component of the IB History program. Remember to practice writing essays and seek feedback from your teachers or peers to further improve your skills. Good luck with your IB History studies and exams!

You Might Also Like

Sample College Essays

Sample Exemplar Essays to help you figure out on how to Write and Form your essay which stands out of the rest

Brainstorming for College Essays

This Article is intended to help you brainstorm and begin writing your personal statement essay and all the other college essays. This is a key step to write persuasive college essays

The Secret Behind Early Applications

If you are serious about taking admission to your dream university/college, early decision admission program is best option for you, have a look! - AP Guru

Free Resources

Choose Your Test

Sat / act prep online guides and tips, the best ib history notes and study guide for sl/hl.

International Baccalaureate (IB)

If you want to do well on the IB History exam, you'll need to have a solid set of notes to study from. This can be difficult though if you're missing notes or feel like some of your own notes don't cover certain topics in enough depth. Luckily, we're here to help! We've assembled the best FREE online IB History notes into this complete study guide.

feature image source: Mount Rushmore Monument America /Pixabay

What's the Format of the IB History Exam?

There are five prescribed subjects for IB History SL and HL:

• Military leaders
• Conquest and its impact
• The move to global war
• Rights and protest
• Conflict and intervention

Your teacher will choose one that you'll cover, and you'll be tested on this for paper 1 (one hour in length).

There is also a list of twelve world history topics. For paper 2 (1.5 hours), you'll cover two of these:

• Society and economy (750-1400)
• Causes and effects of wars (750-1500)
• Dynasties and rulers (750-1500)
• Societies in transition (1400-1700)
• Early Modern states (1450-1789)
• Causes and effects of Early Modern wars (1500-1750)
• Origins, development and impact of industrialization (1750-2005)
• Independence movements (1800-2000)
• Emergence and development of democratic states (1848-2000)
• Authoritarian states (20 th century)
• Causes and effects of 20 th -century wars
• The Cold War: superpower tensions and rivalries (20 th century)

If you're taking IB History HL, you'll also have a final paper (Paper 3) that is 2.5 hours and will cover one of the four Depth Studies:

• History of Africa and the Middle East
• History of the Americas
• History of Asia and Oceania
• History of Europe

If you're interested in taking a look at the entire IBO IB History Guide , you can find it as a .pdf here.

How to Use This IB History Study Guide

If you're hoping for help on one subject, use Command + F to search this guide for specific IB History notes about that subject. As an example, if you want to read about the Cold War, use Command + F to cue the search function. Then type "Cold War," and it'll bring up all of the study materials for the Cold War.

The resource is separated into:

• Quick reference: one-page summary of material if you just need a quick refresher.
• Longer notes: notes (generally 3-10 pages) if you need more of an in-depth explanation.
• Flashcards: online quizzes of key terms.

Common Study Mistakes for IB History SL/HL

Two common mistakes are:

• Trying to ignore the topics you didn't comprehend from your teacher's lesson. If you didn't understand it in class, you need to find additional assistance through this IB History study guide or tutoring. You're still going to be tested over this material whether you understood it in class or not!
• Only trying to learn the material a week or two before the IB papers. There is too much history to learn—one or two weeks will not be enough time to learn it (that's why IB History SL/HL is spread over a year or two). The best solution is keeping up in class and studying the material throughout the year.

Current IB History Guides

Because IB History was recently updated, there aren't that many current notes and study guides, but we've found the best available. These guides follow the syllabus of the current version of IB History. If you are studying the same topics these notes cover, they are a great resource to use because they hit all or most of the main topics you need to know to be well prepared for the IB History exam. There are guides that cover multiple topics as well as guides that cover a single topic.

Multi-Topic Guides and Overviews

IB History Duck covers similar topics. This guide focuses primarily on authoritarian leaders such as Hitler, Mao, and Stalin, as well as the Cold War, histories of China, the USSR, and Imperial Japan.

The Student Room has a plethora of resources for you. Just keep in mind that notes for the 2017 syllabus are mixed in with information from earlier exams , so make sure you're accessing and studying the correct material.

Single Topic Guides

These are notes on single topics that you'll cover on the IB syllabus.

Prescribed Topics: Military Leaders

• Military leaders overview
• Ghenghis Khan (c1200-1227) unit
• Richard I of England (1173-1199) unit

Prescribed Topics: Conquest and Its Impacts

• General overview of ideas you should know
• The final stages of Muslim rule in Spain 
• The conquest of Mexico and Peru (1519-1551)

  Prescribed Topics: Move to Global War

• Move to global war Prezi notes
• Move to global war longer notes
• Japanese expansion in East Asia (1931-1941)  
• German expansion (1933-1940) unit
• Italian expansion (1933-1940)

Prescribed Topics: Rights and Protest

• Rights and protest US Civil Rights overview
• Rights and protest Apartheid South Africa overview
• Rights and protest complete unit

Prescribed Topics: Conflict and Intervention

• Conflict and Intervention general overview
• Conflict and Intervention workbook
• Conflict and Intervention Rwanda flash cards

World History Topics: Society and Economy

• Standard level economics brief
• Higher level economics brief

World History Topics: Causes and Effects of Wars (750-1500)

• Causes and effects of Medieval wars unit

World History Topics: Dynasties and Rulers (750-1500)

Dynasties and rulers (750-1500) unit, world history topics: societies in transition.

• Societies in transition Prezi

World History Topics: Early Modern States (1450-1789)

• Ferdinand/Isabella
• Charles I/Phillip II
• Henry VII (1485-1509)
• Henry VIII (1509-1529)
• Henry VIII (1529-1547)
• Edward VI (1547-1553)
• Mary I (1553-1558)
• Elizabeth I (1558-1603)

World History Topics: Causes and Effects of Modern Wars (1500-1750)

• Causes and effects of modern wars unit

World History Topics: Origins, Development and Impact of Industrialization (1750-2005)

• Origins, development, and impact of industrialization notes

World History Topics: Independence Movements   

• Independence movements longer notes
• Independence movements flashcards
• Independence movements  

World History Topics: Emergence and Development of Democratic States

• Evolution and development of democratic states overview

World History Topics: Authoritarian States (20th Century)

• Authoritarian states longer notes
• Authoritarian states (20th century)

World History Topics: Causes and Effects of 20th Century Wars

• Causes and effects of 20th Century wars general overview
• Causes and effects of 20th Century wars unit

World History Topics: The Cold War — Superpower Tensions and Rivalries (20th Century)

• Origins of the Cold War unit outline
• Origins of the Cold War event overview
• Origins of the Cold War longer notes

HL Depth Studies: History of Africa and the Middle East

• Africa and the Middle East unit

HL Depth Studies: History of the Americas

• History of the Americas longer notes
• History of the Americas unit

HL Depth Studies: History of Asia and Oceania

• History of China and Oceania longer notes
• History of China and Oceania unit

HL Depth Studies: History of Europe

• History of Europe longer notes
• History of Europe unit

Past IB History Guides

These notes are based on the older (pre-2017) version of IB History. They won't fit the syllabus you're currently following in class, but since the two versions cover many similar concepts, they can still be useful for learning more about a specific topic. Just be sure not to use them as your main study resource because they may not focus on the exact same areas you're expected to know.

Peacemaking, Peacekeeping - International Relations 1918-36

• 1.1 Aims of the participants and peacemakers: Wilson and the fourteen points
• 1.2 Terms of the Paris Peace Treaties 1919-20: Versailles, St Germain, Trianon, Neuilly, Sevre
• 1.3 The geopolitical and economic impact of the treaties on Europe and the mandate system
• 1.4 Enforcement of the provisions of the treaties: US isolationism, the retreat from the Anglo-American Guarantee, Disarmament-Washington, London and Geneva Conferences
• 1.5 The League of Nations: effects of the absence of major powers, the principles of collective responsibility, and early attempts at peacekeeping (1920-25)
• 1.6 The Ruhr Crisis (1923), Locarno and the Locarno Spring
• 1.7 Depression and threats to international peace and collective security, Manchuria (1931 to 1933) and Abyssinia (1935 to 1936)
• The Peace Treaties after World War One
• The League of Nations in the 1920s
• The Wall St. Crash / Depression
• The League of Nations in the 1930s

Communism in Crisis 1976–89

• 2.1 The struggle for power following the death of Mao Zedong, Hua Guofeng, the reemergence of Deng Xiaoping and the defeat of the Gang of Four
• 2.2 China under Deng Xiaoping, economic policies and the Four Modernizations
• 2.3 China Under Deng Xiaoping, Political Changes And Their Limits, Culminating In The Demonstrations In Tiananmen Square
• 2.4 Domestic and foreign problems of the Brezhnev era, economic and political stagnation, Afghanistan
• The Cold War c.1945-55
• The Cold War c.1955-91
• The Korean War c.1950-53

Causes, Practices and Effects of Wars

• World War One
• Causes of WW1
• Course / Effects WW1
• The Peace Treaties
• German Involvement in Spanish Civil War
• Causes of the Chinese Civil War
• Causes of WW2

The Cold War

Democratic states—challenges and responses.

• Weimar Germany

Origins and Development of Authoritarian and Single-Party States

• Tsarist / Revolutionary Russia
• Stalin's USSR
• Additional Stalin's USSR materials
• Hitler's Germany

• Cold War Origins 

Aspects of the History of the Americas

• United States Civil War: Causes, Course and Effects 1840-1877
• Emergence of the Americas in Global Affairs 1880-1929
• Political Developments in the Americas after the Second World War 1945-79
• The Cold War and the Americas
• Civil Rights and Social Movements in America

Aspects of the History of Europe and the Middle East

#1: The French Revolution and Napoleon

• Longer notes

#2: Unification and Consolidation of Germany and Italy

#3: The Ottoman Empire

#4: Western and Northern Europe 1848-1914

#5: Imperial Russia, Revolutions, Emergence of Soviet State 1853-1924

• Longer notes: Tsarist and Revolutionary Russia to 1924
• Longer notes: Alexander II
• Longer notes: Alexander III
• Longer notes: Nicholas II

#6: European Diplomacy and the First World War 1870-1923

• Longer notes: Causes of WW1 , Course / Effects WW1 , the Peace Treaties

#7: War and Change in the Middle East 1914-49

• Longer notes: The Peace Treaties after World War One
• Longer notes: The League of Nations in the 1920s
• Longer notes: The Wall St. Crash / Depression
• Longer notes: The League of Nations in the 1930s
• Khrushchev and Brezhnev
• Causes for the Collapse of Communism in Europe

#10: The Second World War and Post-War Western Europe 1939-2000

#11: Post-War Developments in the Middle East 1945-2000

• Longer notes: European Option

What's Next?

Looking for more practice material for IB History? Then you'll definitely want to delve into our complete collection of free and official past IB history papers .

Interested in brushing up on some of your historical knowledge? Read about the Platt Amendment , checks and balances in the US government (as well as how the executive branch checks the judicial branch ), and lighthouse keeper Ida Lewis .

Alternatively, boost your esoteric knowledge by learning about the history of the three-hole punch and the real story of David Ghantt and the Loomis Fargo heist .

Finally, you can get practice materials for other IB classes on our blog:

• Every IB Biology Past Paper Available: Free and Official
• Every IB Business and Management Past Paper Available: FREE and Official
• Where to Find IB Chemistry Past Papers - Free and Official
• Every IB Economics Past Paper Available: Free and Official
• Every IB English Past Paper: Free and Official
• The Complete IB Extended Essay Guide: Examples, Topics, and Ideas
• Every IB Geography Past Paper Available: Free and Official
• Every IB Math Past Paper: Free and Official
• Where to Find IB Physics Past Papers - Free and Official

As an SAT/ACT tutor, Dora has guided many students to test prep success. She loves watching students succeed and is committed to helping you get there. Dora received a full-tuition merit based scholarship to University of Southern California. She graduated magna cum laude and scored in the 99th percentile on the ACT. She is also passionate about acting, writing, and photography.

Ask a Question Below

Have any questions about this article or other topics? Ask below and we'll reply!

Improve With Our Famous Guides

• For All Students

The 5 Strategies You Must Be Using to Improve 160+ SAT Points

How to Get a Perfect 1600, by a Perfect Scorer

Series: How to Get 800 on Each SAT Section:

Score 800 on SAT Math

Score 800 on SAT Reading

Score 800 on SAT Writing

Series: How to Get to 600 on Each SAT Section:

Score 600 on SAT Math

Score 600 on SAT Reading

Score 600 on SAT Writing

Free Complete Official SAT Practice Tests

What SAT Target Score Should You Be Aiming For?

15 Strategies to Improve Your SAT Essay

The 5 Strategies You Must Be Using to Improve 4+ ACT Points

How to Get a Perfect 36 ACT, by a Perfect Scorer

Series: How to Get 36 on Each ACT Section:

36 on ACT English

36 on ACT Math

36 on ACT Reading

36 on ACT Science

Series: How to Get to 24 on Each ACT Section:

24 on ACT English

24 on ACT Math

24 on ACT Reading

24 on ACT Science

What ACT target score should you be aiming for?

ACT Vocabulary You Must Know

ACT Writing: 15 Tips to Raise Your Essay Score

How to Get Into Harvard and the Ivy League

How to Get a Perfect 4.0 GPA

How to Write an Amazing College Essay

What Exactly Are Colleges Looking For?

Is the ACT easier than the SAT? A Comprehensive Guide

Should you retake your SAT or ACT?

When should you take the SAT or ACT?

Stay Informed

Get the latest articles and test prep tips!

Looking for Graduate School Test Prep?

Check out our top-rated graduate blogs here:

GRE Online Prep Blog

GMAT Online Prep Blog

TOEFL Online Prep Blog

Holly R. "I am absolutely overjoyed and cannot thank you enough for helping me!”

Introduction

Step 1: learn the syllabus, step 2: study the past paper questions, step 3: read, write, and think, step 4: get more examples & ideas, step 5: know your time during the exam, historiography, what to aim for, how to write faster by hand, how much to write.

All historical arguments contained or referred to in this article are solely for exam preparation and do not necessarily reflect the view of the author.

This article includes:

• Steps for IB DP History paper 2 revision;
• Some extra tips (they can’t really fit into the steps);
• Study resources;
• My brief essay outlines,

which worked together to help me reach a 7 on paper 2 in my M21 history SL final exam.

This article works best for:

• Final exam prep;
• Short-term revision;
• Developing exam skills, not necessarily historical skills;
• SL students who need to know just enough for paper 2, not any more content for paper 3.

This article uses topic 10 authoritarian states (20th century) as an example.

In my blog article “ Short-Term Revision ”, I mentioned some of my experience preparing for the DP History final exam. I’ll try not to repeat too much of that here.

TL;DR is at the end of this article.

Learn the syllabus by heart.

For example, this is the IB syllabus for topic 10 authoritarian states:

Completing this revision step means that you can recall exactly what’s in the table. By that, I mean every single word in the table . Do make sure you read the description paragraph above, too, but you don’t need to learn it by heart.

Once you do this, every time when you come across a fact, a historical event, or a historiography, you can immediately identify the sub-topic you can use it for in an essay. Then, you can easily think about your arguments and try to structure your essays every time you revise factual information.

Look at the past paper questions to see what have already been asked, and when. The IB questions don’t tend to repeat a lot, especially not in successive exam sessions. This means you can guess the questions that are likely to come up on your exam paper, althugh officially, the IB discourages doing this.

Here are all the past paper questions summarized in one document, both organized by year and by syllabus theme:

You can download the document as an annotated PDF here , or access it here as a google doc without annotations.

This document doesn’t include the M21 questions, because I made it for my own revision before M21. The M21 TZ2 questions for topic 10 roughly stated:

Evaluate the impact of foreign policy on the maintenance of power in two authoritarian states. “Full control was not always achieved in authoritarian states.” Discuss with reference to two authoritarian states.

According to this thread on Reddit , treatment of opposition instead of foreign policy came up for TZ1.

What I found was that:

• Almost every sub-topic appeared fewer than twice in past papers.
• There’s usually a gap of around 2 exam sessions (e.g from M18 to N19) between the questions under the same sub-topic.
• The past paper questions (not counting the specimen papers here) never repeat exactly . They can be similar, but always with a slightly different emphasis.
• Usually, only 2 of the sub-topics (emergence, maintenance, and policy) appear in one exam session , except for once in N19 where question 2 was on both maintenance and policy.
• The appearance of sub-topics is quite balanced.
• It’s very rare that a question asks for only one authoritarian state— only happened twice . (Highlighted in yellow.)
• A few questions have appeared only once or never.

So I made guesses based on the findings and other information, and altered my revision plans:

I chose to ignore emergence and turned to focus on the other two sub-topics. My thinking process is outlined in a section of my blog article “Short-Term Revision”.

The things in pink are what I thought, when I was revising, that would be likely to come up. They were either questions that had never come up before under the current syllabus, or those that had only come up once. Most of them also fitted in the “2 exam session gap” time frame. Those were my priorities.

Apart from these, I was convinced that preparing for compare and contrast, or at least formulating arguments for two states , would be necessary.

Take concise, structured notes for every topic that you revise, especially those that are likely to come up based on what have been asked before. But only take notes if you know you can use them to support your arguments, or you’ll just waste time.

You can follow a textbook to save your time researching, which I found to be extremely helpful. I have talked about some history textbooks in this blog post: My Experience & Tips for IB Textbooks: History SL .

As you take notes, also write down thoughtful arguments . If you’re like me who wants to be safe, you can do that for every single possible essay question. Knowing the syllabus by heart helps a lot here, because that helps you formulate your own IB style questions quickly.

Try to come up with counter-arguments and then counter those counter-arguments to strengthen your original arguments. Add the “debates” into your essay, even if those are just your thoughts going back and forth.

I find it helpful to write out complete sentences when I work on my arguments. That helps me to clear up my own ideas and saves me time structuring my sentences during a tight essay exam. Then, I recommend that you condense the arguments so that you can remember them. I also prefer typing over writing on paper because I can write much faster by typing, and I can organize digital files better than physical ones.

As an example, I wrote a 3-line outline for every essay question I could think of. Each line (out of the 3 lines) summarizes a paragraph in my essay. Of course, this is after thinking about or writing out more detailed notes for my arguments and supporting evidence. This is a preview:

You can download the complete PDF document here . Unfortunately, I don’t have any detailed notes because I lost a lot of data on my laptop during a system update.

There’re a lot of my own short-hand notations in the document. So if you do use this to revise and find something confusing, don’t hesitate to ask me in the comments or via email (see the end of my “About” page). I’ll try my best to recall what I meant.

To emphasis, I repeat: all historical arguments contained or referred to in this article are solely for exam preparation and do not necessarily reflect my view.

This step can be done together with step 3. Sometimes you might run out of ideas or get confused about what kind of arguments the IB likes. Reading more essays can help. Especially, the good ones can give you some inspiration, as well as some excellent arguments to agree with or argue against in your own essay.

Some places to get example essays:

• Textbook appendices
• P2 Example 18 , scored 13/15
• P2 Example 19 , scored 13/15
• Your school teacher
• Your own paper 2 practices over the 2 years
• Your classmates' essays

I recommend that you get a physical copy of each example essay along with examiner’s comments (if any), so that you can read and annotate it carefully.

If you can’t find existing essays, write them yourself ! Write full essays, paragraphs, introduction, even just a short thesis, and kindly ask your teacher for feedback. Try out new writing approaches because you might find better ways to write. You don’t have to time yourself while writing these. At this point, getting feedback is the most important because it helps you improve and further develop your skills and arguments!

To get ideas for essays, you can also look at the indicative content in IB markschemes . The indicative content tends to be more detailed for papers testing the old syllabus (before first assessment 2017) but the new markschemes can also give you some hint.

Get used to the exam environment by practicing timed paper 2 exams. But it’s fine if you do it at the very end of your revision, because knowing what to write can help you write faster than doing anything else, including doing timed paper 2 exams.

However, it’s still important to plan your time prior to the exam and closely follow the plan. In this way, during the exam, you can stay calm so you don’t rush or forget about your arguments.

As an example, this is my plan, with all time and durations in minutes:

At the very beginning of my exam, I quickly calculated the exact time when I would need to finish each task. For example, if the reading time started at 8:33, I would calculate that I would need to finish my mental outline at 8:38, my written outline at 8:43, my intro at 8:48, etc. I wrote down the minute digits on a scratch paper so that during the exam, I could quickly check if my progress matched my plan.

It is possible to get to 12/15 with only a name-dropping of a historian and his/her argument. True personal story. I did that on my final exam.

Take a look at the example paper 2 essays in the Teacher Support Material , too, especially examples 18 and 19. (I’ve mentioned them above.) No historiography, no quoting of historians, but, bang—they both got 13/15 for the topic 10 question.

As long as there are decent original arguments in an essay, the lack of historians' views is fine , unless you’re aiming for 14 or 15 marks. This really alleviated a lot of stress for me.

You don’t need to have a 7 in every single component to get an overall 7 .

This is how I did my calculation before I took my M21 exams.

I used the IB M19 boundaries for SL TZ2, which was the most recent May exam-route session with available grade boundaries:

Using the modified marks and weightings in M21, I calculated that the number of marks needed to get a 7 for paper 2 was 12/15.

So I calculated that if I got:

• Paper 1: 17/24,
• Paper 2: 12/15,

then my total scaled score (out of 100) would be $\frac{20}{25} \times 25 + \frac{17}{24} \times 30 + \frac{12}{15} \times 45 \approx 77.3 %$, which is higher than 74, the boundary for getting an overall 7.

This is true for N20 and M18, too, and should be true for most exam sessions.

Let’s continue to use M19 as our example. The boundary for an overall 7 is slightly lower, so one can afford to lose one or more points. The following combination of marks can all give an overall 7.

Try calculating the overall result for different combinations and choose to work towards the one that seems the most realistic for you. Once you know what marks you need in each component, you have a more specific and a more accomplishable goal.

Notice that because paper 2 is weighted the more heavily (45%), getting a reasonably high mark on paper 2 is more important than on paper 1 or IA .

You don’t have to write prettily, or even clearly—as long as it’s legible in the context. This is my hand-writing at full speed:

Both my teacher and the examiner grading my final exam papers managed to recognize my writing.

Pick a pen in which the ink can flow smoothly and which you don’t need to press hard on the paper to write with.

If your pen has a cap, leave it off the end of the pen. It takes you more effort to move the pen when the cap is attached to the end, especially when you write a lot. I learned this from this YouTube video .

4 sides (on A4 size paper) should be enough. I even wrote only 3 sides several times and that was fine. Quality over quantity.

When we had timed, in-class summative assessments, I almost never managed to finish my essays.

And, although I usually wrote only a few sides, although I couldn’t really finish the essays, I could still get 10-12 marks out of 15. So, absolutely no worries if you can’t finish your essays or you only write 3 sides.

Feel free to ask me any questions in the comments or via email (see the end of my “About” page). I might share a few of my own history essay practices in the future but that’s not guaranteed 😅

• Learn by heart exactly what’s covered in the paper 2 topic you’re studying.
• Look for patterns in the past paper questions and prioritize the ones that you think are likely to come up.
• As you take notes for the possible essay questions, develop strong arguments that can stand counter-arguments.
• Read exemplar/example essays and indicative content in IB markschemes. Write your own essays/paragraphs and ask your teacher for feedback if you can’t find others' essays.
• Plan how much time you’ll use for each paragraph beforehand, so you don’t panic during an exam.
• You don’t need historiography to get to 12/15 (or you only need to name-drop one or two historians if that counts).
• You don’t need all 7s in all component to get an overall 7. Calculate how many marks you need to get the overall grade that you want to narrow down your goal.
• To write faster, use a smooth, light-weight pen. It’s alright to have messy (but legible) hand-writing.
• It’s fine if you write 3-4 sides on A4 size paper or you can’t finish your essays.

MacGregor Is History

The two topics I have focused on as an IB History teacher are: World history topic 10: Authoritarian states (20th century) World history topic 11: Causes and effects of 20th century wars A third possible topic is: World history topic 12: The Cold War: Superpower tensions and rivalries (20th century)

This essay paper is based on 12 world history topics. You need to answer two essay questions on two different topics. Paper Two gives 45% of the final grade for SL (Standard Level) and 25% of the final grade for HL (Higher Level). The IB Syllabus points out these specific parts to study: PAPER TWO Syllabus explanation on what to study Markscheme for Paper Two: PAPER 2 MARKSCHEME 2017

TUTOR COMMENT: This paper focuses on the ability to write history essays so essay skills are essential (if you have poor or no essay skills note that I offer a specific essay writing course). Paper Two has a time limit of 90 minutes. During this time you should be able to write two full essays from two different topics. In the tutoring session you will be given some samples and learn to focus on the question as well as practising organisering an essay answer within the time limit. If you study at SL (Standard Level) this is the Paper that gives you the most marks (45% of your final grade) so it’s important to know what to do.

Past IBDP History Paper 2 Questions and Responses

• To what extent should Germany be held responsible for causing both the First and Second World Wars?
• Why was there so much civil strife and civil war in China during the first half of the twentieth century?
• Compare and contrast the outcome and effects of two revolutionary wars, each chosen from a different region.
• Explain the impact of war on two of the following: women, the arts, the media.
• To what extent is it true to say that a successful economic policy is the most important factor for a single party ruler to remain in power? Examples should be given from two countries each chosen from a different region.
• Compare and contrast the foreign policies of two rulers of single party states, each chosen from a different region.
• To what extent was Hitler a) responsible for, and b) driven by ideological beliefs of Nazism?
• How far would you agree that single party states have been more interested in controlling the minds of young people than in providing genuine education?
• Examine the conflicting aims and policies of rival powers which caused the Cold War.
• Assess the importance of two of the following in influencing the development of the Cold War: Marshall Aid, Warsaw Pact, arms control, détente.
• Examine the impact of the Cold War on two countries (excluding the superpowers), each chosen from a different region.
• “The build up of missiles in Cuba in 1962 was a deliberate, provocative and unjustified action.” To what extent do you agree with this statement?
• What were the main social and cultural consequences of the Cold War?
• T o what extent can it be said that the First World War was caused by the alliance system?
• Evaluate the role of ideological differences in two civil wars each chosen from a different region.
• In what ways and for what reasons have tactics changed in twentieth century warfare?
• How valid is the claim that treaties are not necessary to end wars? Support your answer with evidence from at least two regions.
• “Single party states use education as propaganda to obtain support rather than to instil (increase) knowledge.” How far do you agree with this judgement?
• In what ways and for what reasons did China develop its own brand of Marxism/Communism under Mao Zedong?
• To what extent was Spain under Franco (1939 to 1975) a Fascist state?
• How far is it true to say that a successful foreign policy is the most important factor for a single party ruler to remain in power? Examples should be given from two countries each chosen from a different region.
• “In the twentieth century right-wing single party states have often been the result of a conservative reaction to change whilst the left-wing single party states have achieved power as the outcome of a revolutionary process against tradition.” Using examples from at least two regions explain how far you agree with this quotation.
• “Ideological differences played only a minor role in the origin and development of the Cold War.” How far do you agree with this statement?
• In what ways and for what reasons did the Cold War affect the Middle East?
• Analyse the importance of spheres of interest for one of the superpowers in the Cold War.
• Assess the importance in the development of the Cold War of two of the following: the Yalta Conference; Berlin; the arms race; non-alignment; South East Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO).
• Examine the impact of the Cold War on the social life and culture of two countries each chosen from a different region.
• Assess the importance of nationalism and selfish ambition as causes of twentieth century wars. Reference must be made to at least two wars.
• Examine critically two treaties and evaluate their success in resolving the armed conflicts which necessitated the treaties.
• Compare and contrast the effects for the country concerned of two of the following: the Chinese Civil War, the Nigerian Civil War, the Spanish Civil War.
• Assess the significance of either the Mexican Revolution (1910-1940) or the Vietnam War (1964-1975).
• In what ways and for what reasons did rulers of single party states play an important role in world affairs between 1917 and 1945?
• Identify the main principles of Communism and assess how far these principles were put into practice by one Communist rule between 1900 and 1990.
• Assess the contributions of organizational and leadership qualities in maintaining power two single party rulers, each chosen from a different region.
• Analyse the role and status of women in two of the following: Maoist China, Nazi Germany, Peronist Argentina.
• “Ideological differences played little part in the origin of the Cold War.” How far do you agree with this judgement?
• To what extent was Germany the cause of East/West disagreements between 1943 and 1963?
• Define “superpower rivalry” and assess its importance in international politics since 1945.
• Analyze the role of either Cuba or Vietnam in the development of the Cold War.
• Compare and contrast the economic and social impact of the Cold War on two countries, each chosen from a different region.
• Analyse the reasons for the outbreak of war either in Algeria in 1954, or in Korea in 1950.
• In what ways and for what reasons did foreign intervention play an important role in two civil war, each chosen from a different region?
• Evaluate the successes and failures of one twentieth century treaty in addressing the causes of conflict, and restoring peace and normality.
• “Promises of improved social and economic conditions win more support for would-be single party rulers than ideological pronouncements.” How far do you agree with this claim?
• Compare and contrast the organisation of one Communist state with one Fascist state.
• Analyze the methods by which either Castro or Stalin maintained his position as ruler of a single party state.
• Evaluate the attempts of two rulers of single party states, each chosen from a different region, to control and use the media.
• “The Cold War was caused by fear, not aggression.” To what extent does this view explain how the Cold War developed between 1945 and 1949?
• Examine the impact of the Cold War on educational developments in two countries, each chosen from a different region.
• Compare and contrast the aims and policies of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation and the Warsaw Pact up to 1970.
• For what reasons, and with what results, up to 1963, did the United States adopt the policy known as “containment”?
• To what extent has any twentieth century war changed the role of women?
• How far do you agree with the view of some recent historians that Chamberlain’s appeasement of Hitler at Munich was NOT a mistake?
• “The First and Second World Wars were European civil wars that required outside intervention to settle.” How far do you agree with this quotation?
• In what ways did Truman’s policy of “limited warfare” in Korea set the pattern of military conflict up to 1990?
• Analyse the conditions which led to the establishment of two single party states each chosen from a different region.
• How and why have religious groups a) opposed, and b) supported single party regimes?
• Assess the success and failure of two rulers of single party regimes, each chosen from a different region, in solving the social and economic problems of their countries.
• To what extent was the success of Stalin in retaining power in the USSR between 1929 and 1953 due to the appeal of Communism?
• Examine the impact outside their own countries of two of the following: Fidel Castro, Gamel Abdel Nasser, Julius Nyerere, Mao Zedong.
• Assess the significance for the development of the Cold War between 1945 and 1950 of three of the following:
• The Yalta Conference, 1945
• The Iron Curtain speech, 1946
• The Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan, 1947
• The expulsion of Yugoslavia from the Soviet block, 1948
• The Berlin Blockade and Airlift, 1948-1949
• The formation of NATO, 1949.
• “A different kind of Cold War.” To what extent is this a valid statement about the Cold War after 1953?
• Explain how East/West relations a) affected and b) how the were affected by one of the following areas: the Middle East, Latin America, Asia, Africa.
• Using specific examples, evaluate the successes and/or failures of “Détente”.
• What were the most frequent causes of twentieth century wars? Specific evidence from at least three wars should be used.
• In what ways, and to what extent, was the Second World War “total war”?
• How and why did technological developments play an important part in twentieth century wars?
• Analyze the causes and the results of one of the following: Chinese Civil War (1945-1949); Mexican Revolution (1910-1940); Spanish Civil War (1936-1939).
• “In order to achieve and retain power a leader of a single-party state needed to be ruthless, blind to human suffering, and yet charismatic.” To what extent do you agree with this assertion?
• Account for the rise to power of one of the following: Castro; Mussolini; Nasser.
• Compare and contrast the economic and social policies of Mao and Stalin.
• In what ways, and for what reasons, did the aims and policies of two or more right wing rulers of single party states differ?
• Examine the role of education and/or the arts in two single party states, each chosen from a different region.
• How, and to what extent, did the conferences at Yalta and Potsdam (1945) contribute to the origin of the Cold War?
• “Although it began in Europe the spread of the Cold War to other regions was a much more dangerous development.” To what extent do you agree with this judgment?
• How and why did the policies of either the USA or the USSR affect superpower rivalry between 1950 and 1970?
• In what ways were gender and social issues affected by the Cold War?
• Assess the importance of détente and internal opposition to Communist rule in Communist countries, in ending the Cold War.
• In what ways did the causes of the Second World War differ from the causes of the First World War?
• Evaluate the importance of naval warfare in twentieth century wars. Specific examples must be given from at least two wars.
• Why were there so many Arab-Israeli wars between 1948 and 1978?
• Analyse the results of two wars, each chosen from a different region.
• Assess the social and economic effects of one war on two of the countries involved, in the ten years following the end of the war.
• Analyse the methods used by one single party state ruler in his successful bid for power.
• Evaluate the importance of ideology in the policies of two of the following rulers of single party states: Castro; Hitler; Lenin; Nyerere.
• In what ways, and to what extent, did either Nasser or Peron improve social and economic conditions?
• Examine the global impact of one ruler of a single party state.
• To what extent did events in the final year of the Second World War turn wartime allies into Cold War enemies?
• Compare and contrast the policies of the USA and the USSR towards Korea between 1945 and 1955.
• Assess the impact of the Truman Doctrine and Marshall Plan on the development of the Cold War between 1945 and 1961.
• In what ways, and to what extent, did the Cold War become less confrontational after 1970?
• Assess the importance of social and economic issues in causing opposition to communist regimes.

  Topic 3 The rise and rule of single-party states  

May 2008: Paper II TZ1

May 2008: Paper II TZ2  

Topic 1 Causes, practices and effects of war  

1. Compare and contrast the causes of the Korean War and the Vietnam War. 2. Examine the role of warfare either at sea or in the air in two wars each chosen from a different region. 3. Why, and with what results, was the First World War not confined to Europe? 4. Analyse the results of one twentieth century treaty or peace settlement. 5. For what reasons, and in what ways, did one twentieth century war affect the social and economic conditions of two countries fighting in it?   Topic 3 The rise and rule of single-party states   11. Analyse the rise to power of either Hitler or Lenin. 12. Compare and contrast the regime of one right wing and one left wing single-party state. 13. With reference to at least two rulers, assess the importance of social and economic policies for rulers of single-party states. 14. In what ways, and with what results, did either Castro or Mussolini use foreign policy to support his regime? 15. To what extent was the ruler of one single-party state successful in achieving his aims?  Topic 4 Peace and cooperation: international organizations and multiparty states 16. How successful were international organisations in achieving peace in the second half of the twentieth century? 17 . Compare and contrast the social and economic policies of the League of Nations and the United Nations. 18. “Democratic government can only be achieved in a multiparty state.” To what extent do you agree with this assertion? 19. Discuss the domestic and foreign policies of the government of either the USA (1933 to 1945), or Spain (1975 to 1990). 20. Assess the successes and failures of the foreign policies of two multiparty states each chosen from a different region. May 2009: Paper II  

May 2009 TZ2/XX Topic 1 Causes, practices and effects of war   1. Analyse (a) the long-term causes and (b) the short-term causes, of the Second World War. 2. Define limited war and explain to what extent one twentieth century war was a limited war.     3. Compare and contrast the social and economic issues caused by two wars, each chosen from a different region.   4. To what extent did foreign involvement affect the outcome of either the Spanish Civil War, or the Vietnam War?     5. For what reasons, and with what results, did the nature of war at sea change between 1939 and 1990? Topic 3 The rise and rule of single-party states

Topic 1 Causes, practices and effects of wars  

Topic 3 Origins and development of authoritarian and single-party states    

May 2010    Topic 1 Causes, practices and effects of wars

May 2011 PAPER 2 Topic 1 Causes, practices and effects of wars  

Topic 3 Origins and development of authoritarian and single-party states  

13. Compare and contrast the methods used in the rise to power of two right-wing leaders of single-party states. 14. Analyse the domestic policies by which either Mao or Nyerere attempted to solve the problems that they faced when they rose to power. 15. “Strong economic policies are the key reason for a single-party state leader maintaining power.” With reference to either Hitler or Castro, to what extent do you agree with this statement? 16. “Totalitarianism has had a significant impact on the lives of ordinary people.” With reference to one right-wing regime, evaluate the validity of this statement. 17. To what extent did the policies of two rulers of single-party states, each chosen from a different region, affect the arts? 18. Evaluate the effects of the policies of two rulers of single-party states, each chosen from a different region, on the role and status of women.

• With reference to one war before 1945 and one war after 1945, assess the significance of either air power or naval power in deciding its outcome.
• “The contribution of outside intervention to victory in twentieth century civil wars was greatly exaggerated.” With reference to two civil wars, each chosen from a different region, to what extent do you agree with this statement?
• Analyse (a) the causes and (b) the short-term results of either the Algerian War (1954–1962) or the Gulf War (1991) .
• Compare and contrast the social and economic results of two wars fought in the second half of the twentieth century.
• To what extent did the peace settlements after the First World War (a) deal with the issues which caused the war and (b) produce new problems, hindering future peace?
• Assess the importance of religious and economic factors in the origins of either the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) or the Indo-Pakistan wars (1947–1949, 1965, 1971).
• “Weaknesses in the constitution and the failure of political parties to support democracy caused the failure of the multiparty state in Weimar Germany (1919–1933).” To what extent do you agree with this statement?
• In what ways, and with what success, did one democratic (multiparty) state deal with issues of either gender inequality or the inequitable distribution of wealth?
• To what extent were the problems faced by Nigeria between 1961 and 1966 successfully resolved?
• Analyse the methods used to attain civil rights in two democratic (multiparty) states, each chosen from a different region.
• Evaluate the domestic, social and economic policies of two of the following leaders of the United States between 1953 and 1969: Eisenhower; Kennedy; Johnson.
• Compare and contrast either social welfare systems or education systems in two democratic (multiparty) states.
• In what ways, and with what success, did either Sukarno or Nasser deal with domestic challenges after gaining power?
• In what ways, and with what success, did one authoritarian or single-party ruler deal with internal opposition?
• To what extent was the maintenance of power by either Mao or Castro a result of successful economic policies?
• “The rise to power of authoritarian or single-party leaders depended upon the use of force rather than popular support.” With reference to two leaders, each chosen from a different region, to what extent do you agree with this statement?
• Compare and contrast the status and treatment of women or minorities in two authoritarian or single-party states, each from a different region.
• Assess the role of each of the following in the rise to power of Stalin and Hitler: ideological appeal; underestimation by opponents; propaganda chosen from a different region.
• “The Potsdam Conference marked the end of the wartime alliance and laid the foundations for post-war hostility.” With reference to the period up to 1949, to what extent do you agree with this statement?
• With reference to two countries, each chosen from a different region (excluding the US or the USSR), assess the social and economic impact of the Cold War.
• In what ways, and with what success, did the US and the USSR attempt to reduce Cold War tensions between 1956 and 1979?
• For what reasons, and with what results, did the Cold War affect the Middle East between 1956 and 1979?
• Compare and contrast the impact of two of the following leaders on the Cold War: Mao; Castro; Kennedy.
• To what extent did (a) ideological and (b) economic factors contribute to the ending of the Cold War?
•   “The success of guerrilla movements depends on the leader’s ability to maintain discipline and the support of their followers.” With reference to two guerrilla wars, assess the validity of this statement.
• Analyse the social and economic effects of one war that occurred in the first half of the twentieth century. 
• Assess the reasons for either the Indo-Pakistan War (1947–1949) or the Gulf War (1991).
• For what reasons, and with what results, did foreign intervention occur in either the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) or the Nigerian Civil War (1967–1970)?
• “Technology is a key factor in winning wars.” With reference to two wars that took place in the second half of the twentieth century, explain to what extent you agree with this statement.
• Assess the importance of each of the following as causes of either the First World War or the Second World War: treaties; economic factors; ideology.
• With reference to one democratic state (excluding Weimar Germany), analyse (a) the challenges it faced and (b) how successfully these challenges were overcome.
• “Full democracy undermined the state.” To what extent do you agree with this statement with reference to Germany (1919–1933)?
• Analyse to what extent pressure (lobby/interest) groups may both strengthen and weaken a democratic state.
• Assess how effectively the governments of either Canada (1968–1984) or Argentina (1983–1995) dealt with political and economic challenges.
• With reference to two democratic states, analyse the causes of political extremism and how successful the states were in dealing with it.
• Analyse how democracy was established in either South Africa after 1991 or Japan after 1945.
• With reference to the leaders of two single-party states, each chosen from a different region, analyse to what extent internal conflict and weak governments contributed to their rise to power.
• Analyse the ways in which either Stalin or Nasser came to power.
• Assess the importance of the use of force for the establishment of totalitarian control.
• A ssess the importance of the cult of personality in the maintenance of power of one of the following: Mao; Castro; Perón.
• Compare and contrast the treatment of religious groups in two single-party states, each chosen from a different region.
• Assess the success of either Hitler or Nyerere in implementing their social and economic policies.
• Analyse the reasons for the growth of independence movements in one European colonial empire.
• “Pakistan owes its independence to the work of Jinnah.” To what extent do you agree withthis statement?
• Assess the factors which enabled one Eastern European state to gain independence from Soviet control.
• Analyse the importance of either Ho Chi Minh (Vietnam) or Nkrumah (Ghana) to the success of the independence movements in their respective countries.
• Why did post-colonial governments in Asia and Africa experience instability after gaining their independence?
• For what reasons, and with what results, did Yugoslavia dissolve?
• “Conflicting views about the treatment of Germany were a major cause of the Cold War.” To what extent do you agree with this statement?
• By what methods, and with what results, did the USSR impose control on Eastern Europe between 1945 and 1956?
• Analyse the reasons for, and the impact of, changes in US–Chinese relations in the 1970s.
• Assess the impact of the Cold War on the economies of two countries, each chosen from a different region.
• Analyse the impact of either Gorbachev or Reagan on the course of the Cold War in the 1980s.
• Assess the impact of the Cold War on two non-aligned states, each chosen from a different region.
• With reference to either the Central Powers in the First World War (1914–1918) or the Axis Powers in the Second World War (1939–1945), to what extent was their defeat the result of poor tactics and strategies?
• Assess the importance of economic causes in the origins of either the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) or the Iran–Iraq War (1980–1988).
• “Victory was the result of superior technological development.” With reference to either the Falklands War (1982) or the Gulf War (1991), to what extent do you agree with this statement?
• Examine the factors that hindered the successful establishment of collective security in either the period 1920–1930 or the period 1945–1955.
• Evaluate the contribution of external involvement to the outcome of two civil wars, each chosen from a different region.
• “The poor military strategy of governments is the principal reason for the success of guerrilla movements.” With reference to two guerrilla wars of the 20th century, how valid is this statement?
• Examine the obstacles to the success of democracy in Weimar Germany (1919–1933).
• For what reasons, and by what methods, did political and economic change occur in Japan between 1945 and 1952?
• With reference to one democratic state in the first half of the 20th century, examine how it coped with threats from either internal or external sources.
• Examine the methods used, and level of success achieved, in the struggle to gain gender equality in one 20th century democratic state.
• To what extent was Canada successful in dealing with the political and economic challenges it faced in the period 1968–1984?
• “Coalition government proved unworkable and unable to promote stability.” With reference to two 20th century democratic states, to what extent do you agree with this statement?
• “Widespread support for the ideology of authoritarian or single-party leaders was the most important factor in their rise to power.” With reference to two leaders, each chosen from a different region, to what extent do you agree with this statement?
• Assess the importance of the use of force and economic policies in the maintenance of power of one authoritarian or single-party ruler.
• “The domestic policies of Stalin were beneficial to the Soviet Union up to 1939.” How valid is this statement?
• With reference to one of the following leaders: Castro; Perón; Nyerere, assess the extent to which his economic policies were successful.
• Analyse the successes and failures of either Mao or Nasser as leader of a single-party state.
• Examine the status of women or the role of education in two single-party or authoritarian states, each chosen from a different region.
• With reference to one African or Asian nationalist movement, assess the reasons for its success in achieving independence from colonial rule.
• “Challenges to Soviet control of Central and Eastern European and Balkan states (1945–1968) were both rare and unsuccessful.” To what extent do you agree with this statement?
• Compare and contrast the methods used in the struggle for independence and the reasons why independence was finally granted to Algeria and the Belgian Congo.
• In what ways, and with what success, did Mugabe deal with the challenges faced by the newly independent state of Zimbabwe?
• How successful were the methods used to deal with the political challenges faced by one Central and Eastern European or Balkan state after it achieved independence?
• Assess the importance of the leadership of either Ho Chi Minh in the organisation of resistance to colonial control or Havel in the organisation of resistance to Soviet control.
• Evaluate the reasons for the change in East–West relations from the Yalta conference to the end of the Potsdam conference.
• To what extent did the US policy of containment prove effective in limiting Soviet expansion between 1947 and 1962?
• Examine the social and cultural impact of the Cold War on two states (excluding the US and the USSR), each chosen from a different region.
• Assess the significance of events in either Germany (1945–1961) or the Congo (1960–1964) to the development of the Cold War.
• Evaluate the causes of the change in US-Chinese relations after 1969.
• “The break-up of the Soviet Union was the unintended result of policies introduced by Gorbachev.” To what extent do you agree with this statement?
• With reference to one Allied power and one Central Power, examine the reasons for their involvement in the First World War in 1914.
• Examine the reasons for, and significance of, foreign intervention in two 20th century civil wars,each chosen from a different region.
• Compare and contrast the impact of naval and air power in two 20th century wars before 1945 or two 20th century wars after 1945.
• Examine the successes and failures of collective security in the 10 years after either the First World War or the Second World War.
• Evaluate the importance of religion and economic factors as causes of either the Indo–Pakistan wars (1947–1949; 1965; 1971) or the Nigerian Civil War (1967–1970).
• Examine the reasons for, and the consequences of, the war between Iran and Iraq (1980–1988).
• Examine the reasons for the establishment of democracy in Germany in 1919, and evaluate how effectively it dealt with the economic and political challenges it faced up to 1929.
• “The problems that arose from economic crises were the greatest challenge to democratic government in the first half of the 20th century.” With reference to two states, to what extent do you agree with this statement?
• Evaluate the reasons for, and methods used in, the post-war reconstruction of Japan between 1945 and 1952.
• Examine the extent to which South Africa was successful in addressing the political, social and economic challenges it faced between 1991 and 2000.
• Examine the methods used, and the level of success achieved, by two 20th century democratic states in their efforts to address gender inequality.
• Examine the methods used, and the level of success achieved, by one civil rights movement in a 20th century democratic state.
• Examine the importance of each of the following in the rise to power of either Stalin or Hitler: popular support for their aims; underestimation by opponents; economic conditions .
• Compare and contrast the economic and social policies of two of the following: Mao; Nasser; Castro.
• With reference to two authoritarian or single-party states, each chosen from a different region, evaluate the effectiveness of the methods used to deal with opposition.
• With reference to two authoritarian or single-party states, each chosen from a different region, evaluate the impact of domestic policies on the status of women.
• To what extent was Nyerere successful in achieving his domestic policy aims in Tanzania?
• “The use of force was the most important factor in the maintenance of power of the authoritarian or single-party leader.” With reference to two authoritarian or single-party leaders, to what extent do you agree with this statement?
• To what extent did decisions about post-war Germany contribute to the breakdown of East–West relations between 1945 and 1949?
• Evaluate the reasons for the adoption by the Soviet Union of peaceful coexistence and examine the impact of this policy on Cold War relations between 1956 and 1964.
• Evaluate the successes and failures of the policy of containment up to 1973 in either the Middle East or Asia.
• To what extent did the arms race influence the development of the Cold War after 1970?
• Compare and contrast the economic impact of the Cold War on two countries (excluding the USSR and the US), each chosen from a different region.
• To what extent were Reagan’s policies responsible for ending the Cold War?

(Time Zone 2)

November 2015 Topic 1 Causes, practices and effects of wars  

May 2016 (Time Zone 1)

Topic 5 The Cold War  

Specimen Paper 2017 Topic 1: Society and economy (750–1400) –

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser or activate Google Chrome Frame to improve your experience.

Gr. 12 HISTORY T3 W5: PAPER 2 ESSAYS REVISION

PAPER 2 ESSAYS REVISION

Do you have an educational app, video, ebook, course or eResource?

Contribute to the Western Cape Education Department's ePortal to make a difference.

Home Contact us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Western Cape Government © 2024. All rights reserved.

HISTORY PAPER 2 GRADE 12 QUESTIONS - NSC EXAMS PAST PAPERS AND MEMOS MAY/JUNE 2021

HISTORY PAPER 2 GRADE 12 NATIONAL SENIOR CERTIFICATE EXAMINATIONS MAY/JUNE 2021

INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION

• This question paper consists of SECTION A and SECTION B based on the prescribed content framework in the CAPS document. SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS QUESTION 1: CIVIL RESISTANCE, 1970s TO 1980s: SOUTH AFRICA QUESTION 2: THE COMING OF DEMOCRACY TO SOUTH AFRICA AND COMING TO TERMS WITH THE PAST QUESTION 3: THE END OF THE COLD WAR AND A NEW WORLD ORDER, 1989 TO THE PRESENT SECTION B: ESSAY QUESTIONS QUESTION 4: CIVIL RESISTANCE, 1970s TO 1980s: SOUTH AFRICA: THE CRISIS OF APARTHEID IN THE 1980s QUESTION 5: THE COMING OF DEMOCRACY TO SOUTH AFRICA AND COMING TO TERMS WITH THE PAST QUESTION 6: THE END OF THE COLD WAR AND A NEW WORLD ORDER: THE EVENTS OF 1989
• SECTION A consists of THREE source-based questions. Source material that is required to answer these questions can be found in the ADDENDUM.
• SECTION B consists of THREE essay questions.
• Answer THREE questions as follows: 4.1 At least ONE must be a source-based question and at least ONE must be an essay question. 4.2 The THIRD question can be either a source-based question or an essay question.
• You are advised to spend ONE hour per question.
• When answering questions, candidates should apply their knowledge, skills and insight.
• You will be disadvantaged by merely rewriting the sources as answers.
• Number the answers correctly according to the numbering system used in this question paper.
• Write neatly and legibly.

SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS Answer at least ONE question, but not more than TWO questions, in this SECTION. Source material to be used to answer these questions is contained in the ADDENDUM. QUESTION 1: WHAT WERE THE RESPONSES TO THE COMPULSORY INTRODUCTION OF AFRIKAANS AS A MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTION IN BLACK SOUTH AFRICAN SCHOOLS IN 1976? Study Sources 1A, 1B, 1C and 1D and answer the questions that follow. 1.1 Refer to Source 1A. 1.1.1 What, according to the source, caused the 1976 Soweto Uprising? (1 x 1)(1) 1.1.2 Quote any TWO school boards from the source that comprised (made up) the Tswana School Board. (2 x 1)(2) 1.1.3 Explain to what extent you agree with the circuit inspector's justification that all subjects in black South African schools should be taught 'on a 50-50 basis'. (2 x 2)(4) 1.1.4 Comment on the School Board's response to the introduction of Afrikaans as a medium of instruction. (2 x 2) 1.2 Read Source 1B. 1.2.1 Name TWO organisations in the source that influenced the Soweto Uprising. (2 x 1)(2) 1.2.2 Explain why the SASM rejected the use of Afrikaans as a medium of instruction in black South African schools. (2 x 2)(4) 1.2.3 Define the term boycott in the context of the Soweto Uprising. (1 x 2)(2) 1.2.4 Comment on the usefulness of this source for a historian studying the causes of the 1976 Soweto Uprising. (2 x 2) 1.3 Study Source 1C. 1.3.1 Name TWO schools in the source where a massive crowd gathered. (2 x 1)(2) (2) 1.3.2 Write down any TWO slogans from the source that the students who gathered on Vilikazi Street chanted. (2 x 1)(2) (2) 1.3.3 Explain how the statement made by the black police officer contradicts (goes against) the action taken by the white police officer in the context of the events that unfolded in Soweto on 16 June 1976. (2 x 2) (4) 1.3.4 Identify any THREE places mentioned in the source where students sought refuge after the police opened fire. (3 x 1) (3) 1.4 Use Source 1D. 1.4.1 Explain why you think the editor of The World newspaper decided to publish this article on the front page. (1 x 2)(2) (2) 1.4.2 What message do the words, 'POLICE GUN DOWN OUR CHILDREN', convey in reference to the Soweto Uprising? (1 x 2)(2) (2) 1.5 Study Sources 1C and 1D. Explain how the information in Source 1C supports the evidence in Source 1D regarding how the apartheid police responded to students in Soweto on 16 June 1976. (2 x 2) (4) 1.6 Using the information in the relevant sources and your own knowledge, write a paragraph of about EIGHT lines (about 80 words) explaining the responses to the introduction of Afrikaans as a compulsory medium of instruction in black South African schools in 1976. (8) [50]

QUESTION 2: HOW DID THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION (TRC) DEAL WITH THE MURDER OF POLITICAL ACTIVISTS SUCH AS LENNY NAIDU? Study Sources 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D and answer the questions that follow. 2.1 Refer to Source 2A. 2.1.1 Why, according to Nelson Mandela, was there a need to establish the TRC? (2 x 1)(2) (2) 2.1.2 Define the term reconciliation in the context of the TRC. (1 x 2) (2) 2.1.3 Explain why you think De Klerk claimed that the TRC would result in a 'witch hunt'. (1 x 2) (2) 2.1.4 List THREE human rights violations in the source that the TRC had to investigate. (3 x 1) (3) 2.1.5 Explain to what extent you agree with the TRC's decision to investigate human rights violations that were committed by both the liberation movement and the apartheid regime. (2 x 2) (4) 2.2 Consult Source 2B. 2.2.1 Quote evidence from the source that states when and where Lenny Naidu was killed. (2 x 1) (2) 2.2.2 Using the information in the source and your own knowledge, comment on why Leslie Naidu used the words 'truth' and 'justice' several times during his testimony. (2 x 2) (4) 2.2.3 Explain why you would regard this source as useful when researching how the TRC undertook the process of hearing the testimonies of victims. (2 x 2) (4) 2.3 Use Source 2C. 2.3.1 Name any THREE MK operatives in the source that were ambushed by the security branch policemen in Mpumalanga on 8 June 1988. (3 x 1) (3) 2.3.2 Why, according to the source, did De Kock decide to ambush the MK operatives? (1 x 2) (2) 2.3.3 Comment on why you think De Kock 'planted a Makarov pistol on the body of Lenny Naidu and a hand grenade in one of the bags of the women'. (2 x 2) (4) 2.4 Refer to Sources 2B and 2C. Explain how the evidence in Source 2B supports the information in Source 2C regarding the murder of Lenny Naidu. (2 x 2) (4) 2.5 Study Source 2D. 2.5.1 Explain the messages that are conveyed in the cartoon. Use the visual clues in the source to support your answer. (2 x 2)(4) 2.5.2 Using the information in the source and your own knowledge, comment on why Tutu asks De Kock if he has 'LISTED THE CRIMES FOR WHICH YOU'LL BE APPLYING FOR AMNESTY'. (1 x 2)(2)  2.6 Using the information in the relevant sources and your own knowledge, write a paragraph of about EIGHT lines (about 80 words) explaining how the Truth and Reconciliation Commission dealt with the murder of political activists such as Lenny Naidu. (8) [50]

QUESTION 3: WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT VIEWS REGARDING THE IMPACT OF GLOBALISATION ON DEVELOPING COUNTRIES? Study Sources 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D and answer the questions that follow. 3.1 Refer to Source 3A. 3.1.1 Quote TWO pieces of evidence from the source that state that globalisation has helped developing countries. (2 x 1) (2) 3.1.2 Which TWO institutions, according to the source, encouraged developing countries to make radical changes? (2 x 1) (2) 3.1.3 Using the information in the source and your own knowledge, explain how India and China were able to decrease poverty levels in their respective countries. (2 x 2) (4) 3.1.4 Define the term globalisation in your own words. (1 x 2) (2) 3.2 Use Source 3B. 3.2.1 Name TWO outcomes that trade protection had on developing countries, as stated in the source. (2 x 1)(2) 3.2.2 Explain the impact that trade reforms had on the economies of India and Columbia. (2 x 2)(4) 3.2.3 Using the information in the source and your own knowledge, explain why poorer countries were not opposed to globalisation. (2 x 2)(4) 3.3 Study Sources 3A and 3B. Explain how the information in Source 3A supports the evidence in Source 3B regarding the influence that globalisation had on developing countries. (2 x 2) (4) 3.4 Consult Source 3C. 3.4.1 What, according to Pravin Gordhan, was one of the major drivers of inequality in South Africa? (1 x 1)(1) 3.4.2 Using the information in the source and your own knowledge, explain why you would regard this source as useful when researching the effects that globalisation had on developing countries. (2 x 2)(4) 3.4.3 Explain what you think Gordhan implied by the statement, 'globalisation has actually resulted in winners and losers' in the South African context. (2 x 2)(4) 3.4.4 Why, according to Gordhan, was the term 'radical economic transformation' often misrepresented? (1 x 2) 3.5 Study Source 3D. 3.5.1 Identify the country in the graph that shows the following:

• The greatest inequality gap (1 x 1)(1)
• The smallest inequality gap (1 x 1)(1)

3.5.2 According to the source, what is South Africa's score (%) on the Gini index? (1 x 1)(1) 3.5.3 Using the information in the source and your own knowledge, explain the various factors that you think contributed to the economic gap in developing countries. (2 x 2)(4) 3.6 Using the information in the relevant sources and your own knowledge, write a paragraph of about EIGHT lines (about 80 words), explaining the impact that globalisation had on developing countries. (8) [50]

SECTION B: ESSAY QUESTIONS Answer at least ONE question, but not more than TWO questions, in this section. Your essay should be about THREE pages long.

QUESTION 4: CIVIL RESISTANCE, 1970s TO 1980s: SOUTH AFRICA: THE CRISIS OF APARTHEID IN THE 1980s The call for sanctions by the anti-apartheid movements was the only form of international protest that significantly contributed to the eventual downfall of the apartheid regime in the 1980s. Do you agree with the statement? Support your line of argument with relevant evidence. [50]

QUESTION 5: THE COMING OF DEMOCRACY TO SOUTH AFRICA AND COMING TO TERMS WITH THE PAST The 30th anniversary of the unconditional release of Nelson Mandela from Victor Verster Prison was commemorated in 2020. He believed that 'negotiations and not war were the key ingredients' for the establishment of a democratic South Africa. Critically discuss this statement. Use relevant evidence from 1990 to 1994 to support your line of argument. [50]

QUESTION 6: THE END OF THE COLD WAR AND A NEW WORLD ORDER: THE EVENTS OF 1989 Explain to what extent the demise (downfall) of communism in the Soviet Union was largely responsible for political changes that occurred in South Africa after 1989. Support your line of argument with relevant evidence. [50] TOTAL: 150

Related items

• Mathematics Grade 12 Investigation 2023 Term 1
• HISTORY PAPER 2 GRADE 12 ADDENDUM - NSC PAST PAPERS AND MEMOS JUNE 2022
• TECHNICAL SCIENCES PAPER 2 GRADE 12 QUESTIONS - NSC PAST PAPERS AND MEMOS JUNE 2022
• TECHNICAL SCIENCES PAPER 1 GRADE 12 QUESTIONS - NSC PAST PAPERS AND MEMOS JUNE 2022
• MATHEMATICS LITERACY PAPER 2 GRADE 12 MEMORANDUM - NSC PAST PAPERS AND MEMOS JUNE 2022

Get the Reddit app

This is the unofficial subreddit for all things concerning the International Baccalaureate, an academic credential accorded to secondary students from around the world after two vigorous years of study, culminating in challenging exams. This subreddit encourages questions, constructive feedback, and the sharing of knowledge and resources among IB students, alumni, and teachers. Note that the subreddit is not run by the International Baccalaureate.

Exam Discussion: History HL/SL paper 2

The official r/IBO discussion thread for History HL/SL paper 2

Schoolshistory.org.uk

History resources, stories and news. Author: Dan Moorhouse

StateOfWriting’s Expert Provides Great Essay Writing Tips

Ask any student what they like least about student life, and one of the most popular answers is likely to be “essay writing”. But, for better or worse, academic success basically equals essay-writing success, so we’d better crack on and learn some of the tricks – and there’s no time like the present to learn new things! The experts of StateOfWriting have already cracked the code, and they’re happy to share some of their secrets of paper-writing success with us. Let’s take a look at six golden rules that can transform your essay from “meh” to “magnificent” overnight.

1. Understand the Prompt

Do you know what an essay prompt is? It’s a statement or question that provides a topic or issue for you to discuss in an essay. It sets the direction and focus for your writing, guiding you on what to explore and analyze in your response. It’s important to chew on the question several times before typing in order to really consider what your topic is about. To write without good purpose — say, by answering the wrong question — is like baking a cake with the wrong ingredients: sure, it might look great, but it won’t be the best. Practice breaking down the question into key points. What terms can you identify? What exactly is your instructor asking for? This is the brick upon which everything else in your essay is built. If you have difficulty with dissecting your prompt, you can get essay writing help online from StateOfWriting expert UK writers. They can break down your prompt and help you write a great paper.

2. Plan Before You Write

Jumpstarting writing without any forethought is like taking a vacation in a new city without a map. Spend some time outlining first. Think through your main points. This map will help you keep writing focused, on-task and ultimately make it better organized. Remember that brainstorming and planning your essay a little will take you a long way ahead in your writing process.

3. Craft a Strong Thesis Statement

Make your thesis statement as precise, stark, and assertive as you can. It’s your flag planted in the land of your ideas, around which the rest of your essay will gather.

• Be Specific . To make your thesis statement clear and focused, narrow it down to a specific idea or argument.
• Take a Stand : State your position or viewpoint on the topic, showing your readers exactly what you intend to argue or prove.
• Supportable : Ensure your thesis is something you can back up with evidence throughout your essay. It should be debatable, with potential for discussion.
• Concise : Keep your thesis statement brief and to the point, typically one to two sentences, so it’s easy for readers to grasp your main idea quickly.
• Placement : Place your thesis statement at the end of your introductory paragraph to introduce the main idea of your essay right from the start, guiding the rest of your writing.

4. Support Your Points with Evidence

A well-known author Christopher Hitchens once said: “What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” Take this to heart when writing academic papers. As you write, you’ll want to reinforce every point you make with strong evidence:

Here’s what you can use as evidence when writing your essay:

The people you’re citing should be people worth listening to, and you should identify them properly. They should also be experts in their respective fields. For example, if you are writing about Wars of the Roses , you should quote someone like Alison Weir. Good evidence makes people believe what you’re saying and shows that your work is serious and well-informed.

5. Write Clearly and Concisely

There’s often a tendency to think that the best essays will be those rich in big words and fancy phrases. That’s not entirely untrue. The idea of using overblown and labyrinthine sentences is totally wrong. Avoid sentences that go on forever. For an essay writer, clarity is key. You’re not trying to dazzle with wordiness; you’re trying to make your arguments as clear and understandable as possible.

First drafts of anything are rarely perfect. When you’ve written your essay, the real work begins: revising. The process of revising should take about 10% of the time you spend writing your paper, so don’t rush it. 

Here’s a quick guide on your revision process:

Read your essay again and aim for clarity and coherence. Replace awkward sentences with grammatically correct ones. Check for run-on sentences and garbled paragraphs. Look at your evidence: is it relevant to your arguments? Is everything in the right order so that your points build upon one another? Are you speculating where you shouldn’t be? More than editing for spelling and grammatical errors, revising is about bringing out the best in your ideas.

With these six tips from StateOfWriting educational experts, essay writing can be an enjoyable rather than a dreaded task. Writing takes practice and patience, just like any other skill. Be not afraid to put your thoughts down and defend them passionately. Each essay is your platform to say what you want. Enjoy the challenge. Let each essay lead you to becoming a better and more confident essay writer.

Image from unsplash

• ← Yorkshire Castles

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

• 37715 Share on Facebook
• 2474 Share on Twitter
• 7095 Share on Pinterest
• 3094 Share on LinkedIn
• 5661 Share on Email

Subscribe to our Free Newsletter, Complete with Exclusive History Content

Thanks, I’m not interested

More From Forbes

How not to write your college essay.

• Share to Facebook
• Share to Twitter
• Share to Linkedin

If you are looking for the “secret formula” for writing a “winning” college essay, you have come to the wrong place. The reality is there is no silver bullet or strategy to write your way to an acceptance. There is not one topic or approach that will guarantee a favorable outcome.

At the end of the day, every admission office just wants to know more about you, what you value, and what excites you. They want to hear about your experiences through your own words and in your own voice. As you set out to write your essay, you will no doubt get input (both sought-after and unsolicited) on what to write. But how about what NOT Notcoin to write? There are avoidable blunders that applicants frequently make in drafting their essays. I asked college admission leaders, who have read thousands of submissions, to share their thoughts.

Don’t Go In There

There is wide consensus on this first one, so before you call on your Jedi mind tricks or predictive analytics, listen to the voices of a diverse range of admission deans. Peter Hagan, executive director of admissions at Syracuse University, sums it up best, saying, “I would recommend that students try not to get inside of our heads. He adds, “Too often the focus is on what they think we want.”

Andy Strickler, dean of admission and financial aid at Connecticut College agrees, warning, “Do NOT get caught in the trap of trying to figure out what is going to impress the admission committee. You have NO idea who is going to read your essay and what is going to connect with them. So, don't try to guess that.” Victoria Romero, vice president for enrollment, at Scripps College adds, “Do not write about something you don’t care about.” She says, “I think students try to figure out what an admission officer wants to read, and the reality is the reader begins every next essay with no expectations about the content THEY want to read.” Chrystal Russell, dean of admission at Hampden-Sydney College, agrees, saying, “If you're not interested in writing it, we will not be interested when reading it.” Jay Jacobs, vice provost for enrollment management at the University of Vermont elaborates, advising. “Don’t try to make yourself sound any different than you are.” He says, “The number one goal for admission officers is to better understand the applicant, what they like to do, what they want to do, where they spend the majority of their time, and what makes them tick. If a student stays genuine to that, it will shine through and make an engaging and successful essay.”

Best High-Yield Savings Accounts Of 2024

Best 5% interest savings accounts of 2024.

Don’t Be Artificial

The headlines about college admission are dominated by stories about artificial intelligence and the college essay. Let’s set some ground rules–to allow ChatGPT or some other tool to do your work is not only unethical, it is also unintelligent. The only worse mistake you could make is to let another human write your essay for you. Instead of preoccupying yourself with whether or not colleges are using AI detection software (most are not), spend your time focused on how best to express yourself authentically. Rick Clark is the executive director of strategic student success at Georgia Institute of Technology, one of the first institutions to clearly outline their AI policy for applicants. He says, “Much of a college application is devoted to lines, boxes, and numbers. Essays and supplements are the one place to establish connection, personality, and distinction. AI, in its current state, is terrible at all three.” He adds, “My hope is that students will use ChatGPT or other tools for brainstorming and to get started, but then move quickly into crafting an essay that will provide insight and value.”

Don’t Overdo It

Michael Stefanowicz, vice president for enrollment management at Landmark College says, “You can only cover so much detail about yourself in an admission essay, and a lot of students feel pressure to tell their life story or choose their most defining experience to date as an essay topic. Admission professionals know that you’re sharing just one part of your lived experience in the essay.” He adds, “Some of the favorite essays I’ve read have been episodic, reflecting on the way you’ve found meaning in a seemingly ordinary experience, advice you’ve lived out, a mistake you’ve learned from, or a special tradition in your life.” Gary Ross, vice president for admission and financial aid at Colgate University adds, “More than a few applicants each year craft essays that talk about the frustration and struggles they have experienced in identifying a topic for their college application essay. Presenting your college application essay as a smorgasbord of topics that ultimately landed on the cutting room floor does not give us much insight into an applicant.”

Don’t Believe In Magic

Jason Nevinger, senior director of admission at the University of Rochester warns, “Be skeptical of anyone or any company telling you, ‘This is the essay that got me into _____.’ There is no magic topic, approach, sentence structure, or prose that got any student into any institution ever.” Social media is littered with advertisements promising strategic essay help. Don’t waste your time, energy, or money trying to emulate a certain style, topic, or tone. Liz Cheron is chief executive officer for the Coalition for College and former assistant vice president of enrollment & dean of admissions at Northeastern University. She agrees with Nevinger, saying “Don't put pressure on yourself to find the perfect, slam dunk topic. The vast majority of college essays do exactly what they're supposed to do–they are well-written and tell the admission officer more about the student in that student's voice–and that can take many different forms.”

Don’t Over Recycle

Beatrice Atkinson-Myers, associate director of global recruitment at the University of California at Santa Cruz tells students, “Do not use the same response for each university; research and craft your essay to match the program at the university you are interested in studying. Don't waste time telling me things I can read elsewhere in your application. Use your essay to give the admissions officer insights into your motivations, interests, and thinking. Don't make your essay the kitchen sink, focus on one or two examples which demonstrate your depth and creativity.” Her UC colleague, Jim Rawlins, associate vice chancellor of enrollment management at the University of California at San Diego agrees, saying “Answer the question. Not doing so is the surest way we can tell you are simply giving us a snippet of something you actually wrote for a different purpose.”

Don’t Overedit

Emily Roper-Doten, vice president for undergraduate admissions and financial assistance at Clark University warns against “Too many editors!” She says, “Pick a couple of trusted folks to be your sounding board when considering topics and as readers once you have drafts. You don’t want too many voices in your essay to drown you out!” Scripps’ Romero agrees, suggesting, “Ask a good friend, someone you trust and knows you well, to read your essays.” She adds, “The goal is for the admission committee to get to know a little about you and who better to help you create that framework, than a good friend. This may not work for all students because of content but helps them understand it’s important to be themselves.” Whitney Soule, vice provost and dean of admissions at The University of Pennsylvania adds, “Avoid well-meaning editorial interference that might seem to polish your writing but actually takes your own personal ‘shine’ right out of the message.” She says, “As readers, we connect to applicants through their genuine tone and style. Considering editorial advice for flow and message is OK but hold on to the 'you' for what you want to say and how you want to say it.”

Don’t Get Showy

Palmer Muntz, senior regional admissions counselor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks cautions applicants, “Don’t be fancier than you are. You don’t need to put on airs.” He adds, “Yes, proofread your work for grammar and spelling, but be natural. Craft something you’d want to read yourself, which probably means keeping your paragraphs short, using familiar words, and writing in an active voice.” Connecticut College’s Strickler agrees, warning, “Don't try to be someone you are not. If you are not funny, don't try to write a funny essay. If you are not an intellectual, trying to write an intellectual essay is a bad idea.”

Anthony Jones, the vice president of enrollment management at Loyola University New Orleans offers a unique metaphor for thinking about the essay. He says, “In the new world of the hyper-fast college admission process, it's become easy to overlook the essential meaning of the college application. It's meant to reveal Y...O...U, the real you, not some phony digital avatar. Think of the essay as the essence of that voice but in analog. Like the completeness and authenticity captured in a vinyl record, the few lines you're given to explain your view should be a slow walk through unrestrained expression chock full of unapologetic nuances, crevices of emotion, and exactness about how you feel in the moment. Then, and only then, can you give the admissions officer an experience that makes them want to tune in and listen for more.”

Don’t Be A Downer

James Nondorf, vice president and dean of admissions and financial aid at The University of Chicago says, “Don’t be negative about other people, be appreciative of those who have supported you, and be excited about who you are and what you will bring to our campus!” He adds, “While admissions offices want smart students for our classrooms, we also want kind-hearted, caring, and joyous students who will add to our campus communities too.”

Don’t Pattern Match

Alan Ramirez is the dean of admission and financial aid at Sewanee, The University of the South. He explains, “A big concern I have is when students find themselves comparing their writing to other students or past applicants and transform their writing to be more like those individuals as a way to better their chances of offering a more-compelling essay.” He emphasizes that the result is that the “essay is no longer authentic nor the best representation of themselves and the whole point of the essay is lost. Their distinctive voice and viewpoint contribute to the range of voices in the incoming class, enhancing the diversity of perspectives we aim to achieve.” Ramirez simple tells students, “Be yourself, that’s what we want to see, plus there's no one else who can do it better than you!”

Don’t Feel Tied To A Topic

Jessica Ricker is the vice president for enrollment and dean of admissions and financial aid at Skidmore College. She says, “Sometimes students feel they must tell a story of grief or hardship, and then end up reliving that during the essay-writing process in ways that are emotionally detrimental. I encourage students to choose a topic they can reflect upon positively but recommend that if they choose a more challenging experience to write about, they avoid belaboring the details and instead focus on the outcome of that journey.” She adds, "They simply need to name it, frame its impact, and then help us as the reader understand how it has shaped their lens on life and their approach moving forward.”

Landmark College’s Stefanowicz adds, “A lot of students worry about how personal to get in sharing a part of their identity like your race or heritage (recalling last year’s Supreme Court case about race-conscious admissions), a learning difference or other disability, your religious values, LGBTQ identity…the list goes on.” He emphasizes, “This is always your choice, and your essay doesn’t have to be about a defining identity. But I encourage you to be fully yourself as you present yourself to colleges—because the college admission process is about finding a school where your whole self is welcome and you find a setting to flourish!”

Don’t Be Redundant

Hillen Grason Jr., dean of admission at Franklin & Marshall College, advises, “Don't repeat academic or co-curricular information that is easily identifiable within other parts of your application unless the topic is a core tenant of you as an individual.” He adds, “Use your essay, and other parts of your application, wisely. Your essay is the best way to convey who your authentic self is to the schools you apply. If you navigated a situation that led to a dip in your grades or co-curricular involvement, leverage the ‘additional information’ section of the application.

Thomas Marr is a regional manager of admissions for the Americas at The University of St Andrews in Scotland and points out that “Not all international schools use the main college essay as part of their assessment when reviewing student applications.” He says, “At the University of St Andrews, we focus on the supplemental essay and students should avoid the mistake of making the supplemental a repeat of their other essay. The supplemental (called the Personal Statement if using the UCAS application process) is to show the extent of their passion and enthusiasm for the subject/s to which they are applying and we expect about 75% of the content to cover this. They can use the remaining space to mention their interests outside of the classroom. Some students confuse passion for the school with passion for their subject; do not fall into that trap.”

A Few Final Don’ts

Don’t delay. Every college applicant I have ever worked with has wished they had started earlier. You can best avoid the pitfalls above if you give yourself the time and space to write a thoughtful essay and welcome feedback openly but cautiously. Don’t put too much pressure on yourself to be perfect . Do your best, share your voice, and stay true to who you are.

• Editorial Standards
• Reprints & Permissions

Join The Conversation

One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts. 

Forbes Community Guidelines

Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.

In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's  Terms of Service.   We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.

Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:

• False or intentionally out-of-context or misleading information
• Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language or threats of any kind
• Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author
• Content that otherwise violates our site's  terms.

User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:

• Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected
• Racist, sexist, homophobic or other discriminatory comments
• Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk
• Actions that otherwise violate our site's  terms.

So, how can you be a power user?

• Stay on topic and share your insights
• Feel free to be clear and thoughtful to get your point across
• ‘Like’ or ‘Dislike’ to show your point of view.
• Protect your community.
• Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules.

Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's  Terms of Service.

By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies and similar tracking technologies described in our privacy policy .

Supporting Educators & Students

Teaching & learning.

As part of its broad-based teaching mission, the AHA develops and shares resources for educators and students. From regional teaching conferences and online programs to pathbreaking research projects, AHA initiatives foster a community grounded in our shared commitment to understanding the past. We support and convene people who share a love of history and historical thinking.

Resources for Educators & Students

K–12 Education

The AHA strives to ensure that every K–12 student has access to high quality history instruction. We create resources for the classroom, advise on state and federal policy, and advocate for the vital importance of history in public education.

Undergraduate Education

Teaching and learning are at the foundation of the AHA’s mission to promote historical thinking in public life. What do students learn in undergraduate history courses? How and why are history majors so successful in a variety of careers?

Graduate Education

Many historians will pursue graduate training at some stage in their career. To meet the needs of both students and graduate programs, the AHA creates resources, provides platforms, and convenes conversations about student success from application to completion.

For Academic Departments

History department chairs are on the front lines of the discipline, defending historians’ work and supporting their professional lives at all stages of their academic careers. The AHA strives to strengthen this work and provide resources and opportunities that make chairs’ work easier and valued. The AHA provides resources and hosts a variety of events and opportunities to benefit department chairs and build community, including webinars, sessions at the annual meeting, and an in-person workshop.

Current Events in Historical Context

Essential, carefully researched resources by historians providing context for conversations about current events.

Regional Conferences on Introductory History Courses

What do students learn in introductory history courses? How can historical thinking support student learning and success across the curriculum? Our regional conferences endeavor to strengthen the community of practice focused on introductory history courses, both in secondary and higher education.

Standards & Guidelines

June 10, 2024

Guidelines for Academic Tenure-Track Job Offers in History

June 9, 2024

Statement on Age Discrimination

Aha historical collections.

The AHA has made primary sources available for research purposes, along with AHA archival reports and documents.

Vetted Resources

Vetted Resources compiles in a central location materials and tools that have been professionally vetted by historians, offering instructors access to high-quality materials that meet professional standards

AHA Resource Library

June 20, 2024

16 Months to Sumter: Newspaper Editorials on the Path to Secession

June 16, 2024

The History of Racism and Racist Violence: International Contexts and Comparisons

The history of racism and racist violence: monuments and museums, join the aha.

The AHA brings together historians from all specializations and all work contexts, embracing the breadth and variety of activity in history today.

• Newsletters
• Account Activating this button will toggle the display of additional content Account Sign out

This Clarence Thomas Dissent Reveals His Favorite Tactic for Constitutional Mayhem

This is part of  Opinionpalooza , Slate’s coverage of the major decisions from the Supreme Court this June. Alongside  Amicus , we kicked things off this year by explaining  How Originalism Ate the Law . The best way to support our work is by joining  Slate Plus . (If you are already a member, consider a  donation  or  merch !)

Justice Clarence Thomas is a master at the art of bogus history—rewriting the past to give the Constitution a new, dubious meaning that happens to align with the Republican Party platform. Even by his own lofty standards, the justice outdid himself in Moore v. U.S. , last week’s major tax case. Thomas’ dissent is a masterwork of partisan historical revisionism, manipulating reality so seamlessly that an unsuspecting reader might actually think he is telling the truth. He isn’t, not even close: Thomas’ goal in Moore is to eviscerate the 16 th Amendment, which legalized the federal income tax in 1913. And, as is so often the case, the justice marshals his argument by diminishing a progressive constitutional amendment as some illegitimate affront to the Framers’ original, divinely inspired design. At this point, it is unclear whether Thomas even acknowledges the full validity of the amendments that made this nation more equal and egalitarian. He is, at a minimum, committed to reading many hard-fought post–Civil War constitutional reforms out of the law altogether.

Conservative attorneys manufactured Moore as a preemptive challenge to a potential future “wealth tax” on affluent Americans’ net assets, including personal property. They seized upon an obscure 2017 provision of the Trump-era tax cuts that taxed shareholders of U.S.–owned corporations located overseas by collecting money on undistributed income. These lawyers argued that the tax was unconstitutional under the 16 th Amendment, which allows Congress “to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived.” The word income , they argued, has a “realization requirement”—meaning that the money must reach a taxpayer’s pockets before the government takes a cut of it. This theory would forestall a wealth tax, since Elon Musk, for instance, hasn’t yet made money on the tens of billions of dollars in Tesla stock he owns.

The Supreme Court wound up ducking the “realization” issue altogether, holding simply that a company’s undistributed income can be attributed to its shareholders. Thomas wrote an angry dissent chastising the majority for “ignoring” the larger question. He embarked upon a journey through a version of history that had not, in fact, occurred, to shrink the 16 th Amendment down to a “narrow meaning” that only “slightly altered” the original Constitution. In the process, he elevated a muddy accommodation for slavery over a signal triumph of the Progressive Era. That’s business as usual for our amateur historian in chief.

Thomas’ sleight of hand revolves around the direct tax clause of the original Constitution. This provision was part and parcel of the three-fifths compromise, which counted enslaved people as three-fifths of a person for purposes of representation and certain taxes. There was, at the time, a common form of taxation that imposed a “head tax” on each individual taxpayer. Delegates to the Constitutional Convention called this a “direct tax.” In exchange for counting slaves as three-fifths of a person with regard to representation—boosting its share of seats in Congress—the South agreed to count slaves as three-fifths of a person with regard to any future “direct tax.” The slave states demanded and received another safeguard: Any direct tax had to be “apportioned” among the states according to their population (with each slave counting as three-fifths of a person). This system would impose wildly disparate tax burdens on Americans and has always been seen as basically impossible.

Thus, as professor Bruce Ackerman has definitively shown , the direct tax emerged as a sordid trade-off with the slave states, giving “a fig-leaf for antislavery Northerners opposed to the explicit grant of extra representation for Southern slaves.” Yes, the South got extra representation because of its slaves, but it also had to pay more taxes—except that the delegates all knew that new direct taxes were highly unlikely, in part because of how this compromise was structured. In fact, they weren’t even sure what a direct tax might look like , beyond the head tax imposed on individuals. Famously, by James Madison’s account, when one delegate asked the convention “what was the precise meaning of direct taxation,” nobody answered . In 1796 the Supreme Court clarified that a head tax was “direct,” as would be an express tax on land. But nothing else qualified.

Pause here and turn to Thomas’ account, which elides almost all the above. According to the justice, the direct tax clause was part of a “delicate” constitutional balance carefully hammered out at the Constitutional Convention to protect states from an overbearing federal government. Dismissing the clause’s roots in slavery, Thomas claimed that it embodied “federalism principles” designed to give “state governments a fiscal safe haven against expanding federal authority.” The limitation, by his telling, was meant to temper “the destructive force of the federal taxing power,” preventing “unjust taxes” that intrude on state sovereignty. He totally whitewashes the real basis of the clause—a fierce dispute between North and South over the Constitution’s accommodations for slavery.

Somehow, it gets even worse. Turning back to actual history, the Supreme Court understood the direct tax clause in its accurate historical context until 1895, when it abruptly struck down the federal income tax in a notorious case called Pollock . As professors Joseph Fishkin and William Forbath illustrate in their book The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution , the court of this period was dead set upon enshrining the legal supremacy of wealthy individuals and corporations. To that end, it redefined the phrase direct tax to encompass income for the first time. And because it was functionally impossible to apportion a tax among the states, the decision essentially outlawed any federal income tax.

There was not much law in Pollock : Rather, the five justices in the majority based their decision on overt hostility toward a fairer tax system. Justice Stephen Field wrote that the income tax constituted “class legislation” that discriminated against rich people, indistinguishable from a special tax on Protestants or Jews. Field framed the tax as a violation of the equality principles enshrined in the post–Civil War amendments. This claim was especially perverse because, as Justice John Marshall Harlan pointed out in dissent, the direct tax clause was rooted in slavery, and the postwar amendments were designed to rid the Constitution of the institution’s stain.

Predictably, Thomas embraces Pollock as the correct reading of the original Constitution. But Americans of the era disagreed. Progressive reformers mobilized to ratify the 16 th Amendment, one of their most enduring victories, in 1913. The amendment marked a “ massive political repudiation ” of the court’s oligarchical constitutionalism, overruling Pollock and handing Congress the sweeping power to tax income “from whatever source derived.” To Thomas, however, the 16 th Amendment was barely a footnote, a “narrow” change that “left everything else in place, including the federalism principles bound up” in the direct tax clause. (These are “principles” that Thomas just made up.) In Thomas’ account, this groundswell of nationwide support for the income tax—culminating in a grueling and successful crusade to amend the Constitution—was a mere technical tweak with extremely limited effect.

Which leads to the justice’s final, most antidemocratic attempted move in his Moore dissent: transforming the 16 th Amendment from a populist expansion of Congress’ taxing power into a novel restriction on that power. Recall that the amendment allows taxation of income, “from whatever source derived.” There is a wealth of evidence that lawmakers included this phrase to ensure that courts would not artificially narrow the definition of income —a word that was, at the time , widely understood in broad terms , encompassing both realized and unrealized gains . Yet Thomas spurned the historical record in favor of some characteristic sophistry: The word derived , he wrote (without any evidence or support), is a “near-synonym” for realized . It therefore “points to the concept of realization” as an extratextual limitation on Congress’ taxing power.

Responding to Thomas’ opinion, the legal historian Fishkin derided this word game as “an absolute classic of the genre” in which Thomas excels: “to read language that is quite obviously on its face intended to be as broad as possible as instead narrowing language.” The purpose of that phrase, he told me, “was not the word derived . It was the word whatever . It meant—because this was a point of contention at the time—that even income from land could be taxed. It didn’t matter what source the income was derived from. That’s the straightforward and obvious meaning.” Fishkin added, “The word derived happens to be the one he’s playing games with, but really, the text doesn’t matter here. There’s always a word somewhere you can use. The point is that he wants to put in a realization requirement.” And Thomas, ostensibly a committed textualist and originalist, brazenly manipulated both text and history to do it.

There is a profound irony here. The Supreme Court’s 1895 decision in Pollock was obviously wrong , invalidating more than three decades of the income tax. The American people ratified the 16 th Amendment to overrule Pollock . Yet the court initially refused to accept the amendment: It defied the will of the people in 1920’s Eisner v. Macomber , elevating Pollock ’s repudiating interpretation of the vestigial direct tax clause over the 16 th Amendment to limit income taxes once again. Macomber was a hallmark of the court’s Lochner era , when it regularly rewrote the Constitution to favor moneyed interests. It abandoned that approach several years into the New Deal, in the face of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s court-packing threat. With Thomas’ Moore dissent, history is repeating itself. The justice wants to turbocharge the direct tax clause (like the Supreme Court did in 1895) and mutilate the 16 th Amendment (like the Supreme Court did in 1920) to reduce the tax burdens on the ultrawealthy. Why? Legal realists can debate the impact of his billionaire friends on Thomas’ jurisprudence.

But there’s another, more explicit bias at work: He simply does not grant constitutional amendments the same respect that he gives to the original Constitution. His jurisprudence is inspired by “natural law,” a theory that interprets the Constitution as, essentially, a divine revelation to the founders that codifies rights bestowed by a higher authority . Under this view, the product of the Constitutional Convention was nearly perfect, minus its accommodation for slavery—yet, as his Moore dissent illustrates, the justice is willing to downplay or write off this glaring defect when necessary.

Thomas will embrace the 14 th Amendment’s equal protection clause to outlaw affirmative action , but he otherwise gives remarkably short shrift to the Reconstruction amendments. These amendments fundamentally altered the balance of power between states and the federal government, giving Congress vastly more authority to enforce a panoply of civil rights. But Thomas routinely interprets them as marginalia at best— shooting down , for instance, Congress’ prerogative to stamp out race discrimination in voting. In these opinions, the justice insists on enforcing aspects of the original Constitution that, he claims, allow states to suppress civil rights and civil liberties without federal interference. The Reconstruction amendments, in his preferred narrative, fall away as an irrelevant relic rather than the radical transformation of the Constitution that they were meant to be.

In Moore , the 16 th Amendment gets the Thomas treatment. His (misleading) account of the amendment’s enactment largely erases the progressive reformers who pushed it over the finish line—as if, to his mind, they have no legitimate role to play in the story of our founding charter. They are written off as interlopers who foolishly tinkered with our God-given Constitution, inserting errors that must be corrected by black-robed rulers who just know better. It’s a frighteningly arrogant approach to judging, one that effectively closes off amendments as a way to fix the court’s mistakes. The Constitution begins with the declaration “We the People” and invites future generations to help build a “more perfect union.” But to Thomas, the wealthy white men who wrote those words got almost everything right the first time, and the people must never be trusted to build upon their flawed work.

• The exponential growth of solar power will change the world

An energy-rich future is within reach

Your browser does not support the <audio> element.

I t is 70 years since AT&T ’s Bell Labs unveiled a new technology for turning sunlight into power. The phone company hoped it could replace the batteries that run equipment in out-of-the-way places. It also realised that powering devices with light alone showed how science could make the future seem wonderful; hence a press event at which sunshine kept a toy Ferris wheel spinning round and round.

Today solar power is long past the toy phase. Panels now occupy an area around half that of Wales, and this year they will provide the world with about 6% of its electricity—which is almost three times as much electrical energy as America consumed back in 1954. Yet this historic growth is only the second-most-remarkable thing about the rise of solar power. The most remarkable is that it is nowhere near over.

To call solar power’s rise exponential is not hyperbole, but a statement of fact. Installed solar capacity doubles roughly every three years, and so grows ten-fold each decade. Such sustained growth is seldom seen in anything that matters. That makes it hard for people to get their heads round what is going on. When it was a tenth of its current size ten years ago, solar power was still seen as marginal even by experts who knew how fast it had grown. The next ten-fold increase will be equivalent to multiplying the world’s entire fleet of nuclear reactors by eight in less than the time it typically takes to build just a single one of them.

Solar cells will in all likelihood be the single biggest source of electrical power on the planet by the mid 2030s. By the 2040s they may be the largest source not just of electricity but of all energy. On current trends, the all-in cost of the electricity they produce promises to be less than half as expensive as the cheapest available today. This will not stop climate change, but could slow it a lot faster. Much of the world—including Africa , where 600m people still cannot light their homes—will begin to feel energy-rich. That feeling will be a new and transformational one for humankind.

To grasp that this is not some environmentalist fever dream, consider solar economics. As the cumulative production of a manufactured good increases, costs go down. As costs go down, demand goes up. As demand goes up, production increases—and costs go down further. This cannot go on for ever; production, demand or both always become constrained. In earlier energy transitions—from wood to coal, coal to oil or oil to gas—the efficiency of extraction grew, but it was eventually offset by the cost of finding ever more fuel.

As our essay this week explains, solar power faces no such constraint. The resources needed to produce solar cells and plant them on solar farms are silicon-rich sand, sunny places and human ingenuity, all three of which are abundant. Making cells also takes energy, but solar power is fast making that abundant, too. As for demand, it is both huge and elastic—if you make electricity cheaper, people will find uses for it. The result is that, in contrast to earlier energy sources, solar power has routinely become cheaper and will continue to do so.

Other constraints do exist. Given people’s proclivity for living outside daylight hours, solar power needs to be complemented with storage and supplemented by other technologies. Heavy industry and aviation and freight have been hard to electrify. Fortunately, these problems may be solved as batteries and fuels created by electrolysis gradually become cheaper.

Another worry is that the vast majority of the world’s solar panels, and almost all the purified silicon from which they are made, come from China. Its solar industry is highly competitive, heavily subsidised and is outstripping current demand—quite an achievement given all the solar capacity China is installing within its own borders. This means that Chinese capacity is big enough to keep the expansion going for years to come, even if some of the companies involved go to the wall and some investment dries up.

In the long run, a world in which more energy is generated without the oil and gas that come from unstable or unfriendly parts of the world will be more dependable. Still, although the Chinese Communist Party cannot rig the price of sunlight as OPEC tries to rig that of oil, the fact that a vital industry resides in a single hostile country is worrying.

It is a concern that America feels keenly, which is why it has put tariffs on Chinese solar equipment. However, because almost all the demand for solar panels still lies in the future, the rest of the world will have plenty of scope to get into the market. America’s adoption of solar energy could be frustrated by a pro-fossil-fuel Trump presidency, but only temporarily and painfully. It could equally be enhanced if America released pent up demand, by making it easier to install panels on homes and to join the grid—the country has a terawatt of new solar capacity waiting to be connected. Carbon prices would help, just as they did in the switch from coal to gas in the European Union.

The aim should be for the virtuous circle of solar-power production to turn as fast as possible. That is because it offers the prize of cheaper energy. The benefits start with a boost to productivity. Anything that people use energy for today will cost less—and that includes pretty much everything. Then come the things cheap energy will make possible. People who could never afford to will start lighting their houses or driving a car. Cheap energy can purify water, and even desalinate it. It can drive the hungry machinery of artificial intelligence. It can make billions of homes and offices more bearable in summers that will, for decades to come, be getting hotter.

But it is the things that nobody has yet thought of that will be most consequential. In its radical abundance, cheaper energy will free the imagination, setting tiny Ferris wheels of the mind spinning with excitement and new possibilities.

This week marks the summer solstice in the northern hemisphere. The Sun rising to its highest point in the sky will in decades to come shine down on a world where nobody need go without the blessings of electricity and where the access to energy invigorates all those it touches. ■

For subscribers only: to see how we design each week’s cover, sign up to our weekly  Cover Story newsletter .

This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “The solar age”

Leaders June 22nd 2024

• AI will transform the character of warfare
• Emmanuel Macron’s project of reform is at risk
• How to tax billionaires—and how not to
• Javier Milei’s next move could make his presidency—or break it
• India should liberate its cities and create more states

From the June 22nd 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

More from Leaders

What to make of Joe Biden’s plans for a second term

His domestic agenda is underwhelming, unrealistic and better than the alternative

A pivotal moment for China’s Communist Party

Will Xi Jinping keep ignoring good advice at the party’s third plenum?

LLMs now write lots of science. Good

Easier and more lucid writing will make science faster and better

Macron has done well by France. But he risks throwing it all away

After the election, populists of the right and left could hobble a centrist president

Keir Starmer should be Britain’s next prime minister

Why Labour must form the next government

Simple steps to stop people dying from heatwaves

As much of the world roasts, don’t despair

‘Confessions of a Good Samaritan’ Review: Penny Lane Delivers a Documentary Essay on Altruism and Its Discontents

An exploration of the science, history and ethics of organ donation in the context of the filmmaker's kidney donation.

By Alissa Simon

Alissa Simon

Film Critic

• ‘Confessions of a Good Samaritan’ Review: Penny Lane Delivers a Documentary Essay on Altruism and Its Discontents 2 days ago
• ‘Bad Shabbos’ Review: An Interfaith Couple Survive a Sabbath Meal They Will Never Forget 1 week ago
• ‘Longing’ Review: Richard Gere Flounders as a Businessman Who Discovers He Fathered a Son 19 Years Ago 3 weeks ago

Related Stories

Movies are dead wait, they’re back the delusional phase of hollywood’s frantic summer, ina garten signs new multiyear food network deal, sets julia louis-dreyfus, stephen colbert and bobby flay for 'be my guest' season 5 (exclusive), popular on variety.

The statistics are shocking. In the United States, nearly 100,000 people are listed on a national database for kidney transplantation, but perhaps three-quarters of them will die before an appropriate match is found. Yet the choice to make a live, non-directed donation is relatively rare. As Lane hears from others and experiences for herself, many friends and relatives regard the would-be donor as crazy.

Among the interesting interviewees is psychology professor Abigail Marsh, whose personal history prompted her interest in understanding the neural and cognitive basis of empathy, altruism, aggression and psychopathy. When studying brain scans of people diagnosed with psychopathy, Marsh hypothesized that perhaps they represented one end of a continuum, and that the brains of people expressing more empathy than the average joe would also be differently wired. 

Marsh explains that the brain’s amygdala is linked to all of our sensory processing systems and gives a corresponding emotional response to the information processed. Psychopathic brains have amygdalas that on average are up to 20% smaller than normal people. Altruistic people have amygdalas which are around 8% larger than average. The scan she performs on Lane proves that the filmmaker’s amygdala is quite large.

Meanwhile, advocate and author Dr. Sally Satel, a recipient of a donated kidney, makes a compelling argument for government legislated rewards for altruistic organ donation, since it is against the law for a recipient to offer cash or other financial benefits to a donor and for a donor to accept them. Given that non-directed donations comprise only 2% of all the kidney transplants performed and black-market organs comprise 10%, the title of her book neatly sums up the problem: “Altruism Is Not Enough.” Archival footage showing a 1984 Senate inquiry (chaired by a young Al Gore) into an organs-for-money scheme shows that doctors have been thinking about this issue for some time.

Bio-ethicist and psychiatrist Dr. Jacob Appel helps Lane understand the history of progress in kidney transplantation, which came rapidly after the discovery of cyclosporine, an immunosuppressive agent used to treat organ rejection post-transplant. And he describes to her a possible future of organs being grown inside genetically modified pigs.

In contrast to the theoretical issues that Appel puts forward, the ebullient surgeon Dr. Keith Melancon is literally hands-on. He describes his pleasure at seeing a donated organ “pink-up” inside the body of the recipient.

The film makes a virtue of its small budget through incorporating a digital esthetic throughout.

Reviewed online, June 24, 2024. In SXSW, Hot Docs film festivals. Running time: 103 MIN. 

• Production: (Documentary) A Spinning Nancy presentation of a Sandbox Films production, in association with Olive Hill Media, Impact Partners. (World sales: Submarine Entertainment, NY.) Producer: Gabriel Sedgwick. Executive producers: Greg Boustead, Jessica Harrop, Tim Lee, Michael Cho, Mimi Rode.
• Crew: Director, writer: Penny Lane. Camera: Naiti Gámez. Editor: Hannah Buck. Music: Carolina Eyck. 
• With: Penny Lane, Professor Abigail Marsh, Keith Melancon, Sally Satel, Jacob Appel.

More from Variety

From post-apocalyptic wastelands to underground silos: composers for ‘fallout,’ ‘silo’ and more sci-fi series on taking cues from otherworldly settings, peak tv: here’s how deep streamers cut originals output in 1h 2024, making a scene: ‘baby reindeer’ stars richard gadd and jessica gunning break down the first time donny met martha, gunning’s audition tapes and that laugh, xbox games showcase reveals ‘call of duty: black ops 6’ release date, ‘gears of war: e-day,’ ‘doom’ prequel, ‘fable’ reboot and more, the state of generative ai in hollywood: a special report, as ‘fallout 76′ crosses 20 million players amid success of amazon tv series, bethesda game studios’ todd howard talks franchise’s future (exclusive), more from our brands, new johnny cash album ‘songwriter’ asks, what if the man in black never met rick rubin, bmw’s new m5 is now a plug-in hybrid—and over 1,000 pounds heavier, ncaa reports $61.5m in legal fees in fy23, emmert gets $3.3m, the best loofahs and body scrubbers, according to dermatologists, frasier: harriet sansom harris to return as bebe glazer in season 2 — plus, who’s playing her daughter, verify it's you, please log in.

• Share full article

Advertisement

Thou Shalt Not Post the Ten Commandments in the Classroom

By David French

Opinion Columnist

There is a certain irony in the bravado about the Ten Commandments from Gov. Jeff Landry of Louisiana. On Saturday he told attendees at a Republican fund-raiser, “I can’t wait to be sued.” Clearly, he knows that the Supreme Court previously ruled against mandatory displays of the Ten Commandments in the classroom. In a 1980 case, Stone v. Graham , the Supreme Court struck down a Kentucky law that required the posting of the Ten Commandments, purchased through private donations, in every public school classroom in the state.

A Louisiana law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in every public classroom in the state defies this precedent, so, yes, the state will be sued .

But Landry’s comments didn’t stop with bravado. He also said something else. “If you want to respect the rule of law,” he told the guests, “you’ve got to start from the original lawgiver, which was Moses.” To teach respect for the rule of law, he’s defying the Supreme Court? That’s an interesting message to send to students.

It’s consistent with an emerging Republican approach to constitutional law. Just as many Republicans view their constituency as composed of the “real” Americans, they tend to believe their interpretation of the Constitution represents the “real” Constitution. So we’re seeing a flurry of culture-war-motivated state laws , many of them aimed at the First Amendment, that confront precedent.

The Dobbs decision gave some Republicans hope for radical change, but reversing Roe has not signaled open season on the court’s rulings. Republicans’ challenges to the Voting Rights Act failed , the independent state legislature theory foundered , and efforts to expand the standing doctrine to limit access to the abortion pill faltered. Even so, it’s premature to declare that the Supreme Court is frustrating the MAGA right.

Altering constitutional law is not the only motivation here; a version of Christian mysticism is also in play. There is a real belief that the Ten Commandments have a form of spiritual power over the hearts and minds of students and that posting the displays can change their lives.

I’m an evangelical Christian who believes in God and the divine inspiration of Scripture, but I do not believe that documents radiate powers of personal virtue. I happened to grow up in Kentucky and went to classes before the Ten Commandments were ordered removed, and I can testify that the displays had no impact on our lives. My classmates and I were not better people because of the faded posters on the walls.

David French is an Opinion columnist, writing about law, culture, religion and armed conflict. He is a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom and a former constitutional litigator. His most recent book is “Divided We Fall: America’s Secession Threat and How to Restore Our Nation .” You can follow him on Threads ( @davidfrenchjag ).