Thesis evaluation automated beautifully.

With a beautiful software, scroll down, track theses.

Manage real-time records easily, with colour-coded tracking and reliable reporting for the most efficient administration of thesis evaluation in the world today.

Online Evaluation

Offer easier collaboration between your institution and internal and external examiners with secure communications, tracking and online submissions of evaluation reports.

One-click workflow approval. Automatic email notifications and automated reminders to evaluators for pending approval and dissertation requirements.

Integration

Enterprise-level software architecture facilitates easy integration with your institution’s existing systems, plagiarism checks and other third-party tools.

Easy-to-use interface

Visual tracking, simplified, enhanced administration, secure, fail-safe reporting, customization, online report forms, about examinater, 100,000+ emails sent each year, 65gb+ data managed to date, 83%+ increase in operational efficiency, 2.5 tonne+ of paper saved every year.

Unique, browser-based thesis evaluation software, developed and tested over 4 years by our expert software-solution architects with fully-acquainted academic domain knowledge.

A comprehensive end-to-end solution offering complete automation of thesis tracking and dissertation procedures.

Examinater supports unlimited theses submissions and tracking of thesis dissertation-status online. It replaces manual, time-consuming and costly requirements with secure, IT-enabled solutions. Examinater is customised precisely to your institution’s needs. Please contact us directly to know more about Examinater and for a demonstration of how it improves your operational efficiency.

In Use Since 2012

Visvesvaraya technological university (vtu) belagavi, karnataka, india, one of india’s largest and most prestigious technological universities..

The software system is started by your company is extremely good. The thesis evaluation and announcing the results is very fast. Also it does not take much time to finalize the examiners. All the work automatically happens through the software. It is very good.

Dr.Arun H.R. Govt. S.K.S.J. Technological Institute,Bangalore.

This software is new adavancement in examination system. Definately in future it will impact other universities also. I reccomend others to use this software for there examination work.

Manohar Koli, UBDT Colelge, Davangere

SrushtiSoft has been assigned with the supplying installation and commissioning of online Ph.D, M.Tech, MBA and MCA thesis evaluation software. The said company has supplied the software and it working satisfactorily.

Prof. H.G. Shekharappa, Registrar (Evaluation), VTU, Belgavi

The process has reduced drastically, the evaluation time/ problems. The system is primarily much beneficial for the students as in the earlier process they used to wait quite a long time for the Viva- Vice after the thesis submission. On the other hand it is value addition to the University. Absolutely it is to be appreciated.

Dr.Sreenivasa Reddy M, R.L. Jalappa Institute of Technology, Doddaballapura.

Theses Evaluated

Professors Registered

Colleges Enrolled

EXAMINATER IN THE NEWS

Detailed case study.

"In the first year, 200+ institutions and 2700+ professors enrolled, managing the evaluation of 7000+ theses with Examinater. This continues to grow."

For a free demonstration on the grounds of your university.

+34 623236138

[email protected]

Bo Alaberga 16,2D Errenteria Gipuzkoa Spain

+91 99 457 450 67

[email protected]

Teacher's Layout,Near Nagarbhavi circle,Nagarbhavi, Bangalore - 560072, Karnataka, India

looking forward to hearing from you!


Indian Institute of Science

  • From the Director
  • Vision and Mission
  • The Council
  • Board of Trustees
  • Finance Committee
  • Deans of Administration
  • Deans of Faculties
  • Deans of Divisions
  • Financial Controller
  • Vigilance Officers
  • Administrative Officers
  • Administrative Centres
  • Finance & Accounts
  • JRD Tata Memorial Library
  • Tackling Climate Change – 36% reduction of emissions by 2025
  • Jaya-Jayant Award
  • Alumni Award
  • Prof. Rustom Choksi Award
  • Amulya and Vimala Reddy Lecture Award
  • Prof. Priti Shankar Teaching Award
  • IISc Distinguished Alumnus/alumna Award
  • Prof. S. K. Chatterjee Award for Outstanding Woman Researcher or Industry Leader
  • Memorial Lectures
  • Golden Jubilee Memorial Lectures
  • Endowment Lectures
  • Centenary Lectures
  • Special Lectures / Institute Lectures
  • The Cell Press – TNQ India -IISc Distinguished Lectureship Series
  • Endowed Visiting Chair
  • Endowed chairs for the Faculty
  • Young Investigators
  • Scheme, Regulations, Bye-laws
  • Plan a visit to IISc
  • Getting around Campus
  • Telephone Directory
  • Holidays -2024
  • Medium of instruction in IISc
  • Status of IISc
  • CGPA to Percentage Conversion
  • Migration Certificate / TC
  • R​elabelling of MSc(Engg)
  • Campus Life
  • My Life@IISc: a student perspective
  • Hostels/Mess
  • Official transcripts
  • Campus Facilities
  • Health Centre
  • Auditoria and Seminar Halls
  • Internal Committee Against Sexual Harassment (ICASH)
  • Complaints related to caste-based discrimination
  • Fee Structure
  • IISc A/c for Tuition Fee
  • Students Affairs Committee
  • Ombudsperson

Online Ph D thesis processing with ScholarOne

  • Useful Forms
  • Academic Integrity
  • Students Council
  • PG students’ information handbook 2024
  • PG students’ information handbook 2024 – Updated
  • PG Students’ Scheme of Instruction 2024
  • UG Students’ Handbook & SOI 2024-25
  • Office of Laboratory Safety and Environmental Health
  • Student Code of Conduct – 2019
  • Opportunities for Current Students
  • Apply to IISc
  • Announcements
  • Campus Placement
  • Student Achievements
  • Faculty Information Handbook
  • Tenure-track Assessment
  • Faculty Association
  • Faculty Club
  • Funding Agencies
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Institute Support for Travel
  • Legal Agreements
  • Request for Tenders
  • Apply for Faculty Positions
  • Satish Dhawan Visiting Professor/Scientist
  • Honorary Fellows
  • Retired Faculty
  • Apply for Postdocs
  • Post Doctoral Researchers
  • Project Associates
  • campus facilities
  • Retired Staff
  • Main Guest House, IISc
  • Centenary Visitors’ House, IISc
  • Hoysala Guest House
  • Jawahar Visitors’ House
  • Division of Biological Sciences
  • Division of Chemical Sciences
  • Division of Electrical, Electronics, and Computer Sciences (EECS)
  • Division of Interdisciplinary Sciences
  • Division of Mechanical Sciences
  • Division of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
  • Centres under the Director
  • Autonomous Societies / Centres / Section 8 Companies
  • Departments
  • Faculty Positions
  • Four Year Bachelor of Science(Research)
  • B.Tech in Mathematics and Computing:
  • Continuing Education
  • UGC Video links
  • Student Information Handbook 2023
  • Graduate Programmes
  • Anti Ragging
  • Online Applications
  • Contact – Admissions Unit
  • Contact – Departments
  • Research Highlights
  • Featured Research
  • Institute Colloquia
  • Thematic Research Clusters
  • Research Publications
  • Patenting at IISc
  • Press Releases
  • Achievements
  • IISc in the news
  • Positions open
  • Research Collaboration
  • Industrial Consultancy and Research
  • Technology Transfer
  • Giving to IISc
  • Enterpreneurship
  • Positions Open
  • Accr. & Ranking

Click here for getting into the  thesis Processing portal

The Deans of the Faculties of Science and Engineering, on behalf of Director, IISc, are delighted to announce the launching of online Ph.D. thesis processing through a customized version of ScholarOne , a product of Clarivate Analytics Inc.  The ScholarOne tool has been customized to IISc’s requirements by the Clarivate team and tested by the DIGITS team and the Academic Section, and a pilot-run of the same has been successfully carried out.  The tool ScholarOne is now ready for use.

The tool covers all activities of PhD thesis processing commencing with the submission of thesis by a student up to the receipt of all thesis reports. The process that is involved after the receipt of all the reports will continue to follow the current manual process. The latter process will be eventually automated as well. A detailed workflow is sketched below.

Workflow for Online Ph D Thesis Processing with ScholarOne

  • Student – gives his/her colloquium
  • Guide – prepares the list of examiners
  • Dept . Office – (i) Gets the list of examiners signed by the members of the comprehensive examination board.(ii) Sends email to Academic Admin ( [email protected] ) about the student completing the colloquium, (iii) attaches (a) pdf version of the synopsis and(b) scanned (pdf) version of the list of approved examiners.“Academic Admin” and “Admin” are synonymous and used interchangeably throughout this document. In addition, the Department Office intimates the Admin about Co-Guide(s), if any. If the Co-Guide(s) wish to submit separate review reports, this is also indicated to the Admin.
  • Admin – Uploads the credentials of the above student to ScholarOne. Student will now receive an alert with his/her login credentials on ScholarOne.
  • Student – Logs into ScholarOne and uploads (i) the thesis, (ii) synopsis,(iii) pdf version of announcement of the colloquium, and(iv) pdf version of scanned receipt of fees paid. Once the uploading is done, the Admin gets an alert.
  • Admin – On receipt of the above alert, the Admin checks for the completeness of the uploaded documents, and selects and assigns the Guide and the Dean on ScholarOne. This will trigger an alert to the Guide and the Dean. If there is a Co-Guide, the Admin will have to include the Co-Guide as cc manually in the email alert sent to the Guide.
  • Guide –Following the above alert, the Guide logs in and approves the thesis submission after verifying the same. Approval happens only after the guide is convinced about the acceptability of the submitted thesis. This approval triggers an alert to the Admin.
  • Admin – On receipt of the above alert, Admin logs in and enters the examiners’ names as provided (many of them may already be in the ScholarOne database); also enters the Guide as first examiner on ScholarOne. Admin also sends an invitation to the Guide (with cc to the Co-Guide(s)) to examine the thesis. If each Co-Guide wants to submit a separate examiner report, then each Co-Guide will be assigned an examiner role by the Admin. Admin will revise the number of reviews required to two plus the number of guides and co-guides who want to submit separate reviews.
  • Dean –Once the Admin enters the names of all examiners in the above step, the Dean receives an email alert, logs in, and sets the order of priority of examiners.
  • Admin – sends an invitation to the examiners in the order set by the Dean, attaching in the email: (a) the synopsis (b) guidelines on research conferments.
  • Examiner – Receives invitation and either accepts or declines. ScholarOne will send reminders at predetermined intervals to remind the examiner to accept or decline.
  • Examiner accepts: When an examiner accepts, the thesis is made available to the examiner automatically and an email is also sent automatically stating that the report is to be sent within six weeks (the deadline of six weeks counts from the time the invitation is accepted).
  • Examiner declines: When an examiner declines, ScholarOne will send a “Thank You” message to the examiner who has declined. The Admin then sends an invitation to the alternative examiner in the order set by the Dean, attaching the synopsis. This step can be made manual if the Dean would like to dynamically change the order of priority.
  • Examiner submits report – Review report submitted is available instantly to the Admin and the Deanon submission by the examiner.
  • Reminders –ScholarOne will send reminders automatically as per predetermined schedule.
  • Admin and Dean – Once all the reports are received, the Dean and the Admin get an alert.
  • Dean – will go through the reports and forward them to the Guide with a suitable recommendation.

Advantages of Thesis Processing through ScholarOne

  • The uploaded thesis is securely stored in the cloud. This eliminates emailing the thesis. The files can be of any size.
  • Once an examiner agrees to examine the thesis, a softcopy of the thesis is automatically moved to the examiner’s workspace on ScholarOne. Similarly, once the examiner uploads the report, it is available to the Admin and the Dean. This saves time and avoids human errors.
  • The correspondence (about 15 different letters) which currently happens through manual emailing by the staff will now be automated, completely eliminating manual errors. This will reduce the cycle time for sending these letters.
  • All reminders are automatic. All “Thank you” , letters are automatic.
  • As soon as the required number of reports are available, the Dean can take a decision.
  • The Dean will have a dashboard which gives a big picture of all theses being processed
  • Many steps in the current process will now have negligible lead time:
  • sending email requests to examiners;
  • tracking whether an examiner has accepted or not and if necessary, checking with the Dean for an alternative examiner, and sending request to another examiner;
  • making copies of the synopsis and the thesis available to examiners;
  • sending email reminders;
  • eliminates an unnecessary step that was often encountered in the manual system, namely, the examiner sends the report but forgetsto send the checklist;
  • sending “Thank you” letters;
  • preparing the file after three reports are received and presenting it to the Dean;
  • preparing various statistics
  • The online process concludes once all the reports are received and presented to the Dean. The rest of the process will be as per the current manual process. Automation of the entire end-to-end process will happen over a period of time.

Roles and Responsibilities

  • Gets the thesis cleared by the Guide(s) when it is ready for submission, logs into ScholarOne and uploads: (i) the thesis,  (ii)synopsis,  (iii) pdf version of announcement of the colloquium, and (iv) pdf version of scanned receipt of fees paid.  Once the uploading is done, the Admin gets an alert.
  • May have to upload some of the documents again if they are not found acceptable; this is indicated by an alert message from the Admin

Guide                                                                                                                                                               

  • Prepares the list of examiners and emails the list to the Department Office.
  • When the Admin assigns the Guide after the uploading  of a thesis by a student, the Guide gets an alert. The Guide logs in and approves the thesis submission after verifying the same.   This approval triggers an alert to the Admin.
  • Gets access to the reports after all the reports are received and receives an appropriate recommendation from the Dean after all the reports are received

Department Office

  • Receives list of examiners from the Guide and gets the list signed by the members of the comprehensive exam board.
  • Sends an email to Academic Admin about the student completing the colloquium, and attaches (a)pdf version of  the synopsis and (b) scanned (pdf) version of the list of approved examiners. In addition, the Department Office intimates the Admin about Co-Guides, if any. If the Co-Guide(s) wish to submit separate review reports, this is also indicated to the Admin.

Admin (same as Academic Admin)

  • On receipt of an email from the Department Office (with a student’s synopsis attached), the Admin uploads the credentials of the above student to ScholarOne. Student will receive an alert with his/her login credentials on ScholarOne.
  • Checks for the completeness of the uploaded documents and assigns the Guide and the Dean in ScholarOne, immediately on the receipt of the above alert. This will trigger an alert to the Guide. If there is a Co-Guide, the Admin will have to keep the Co-Guide manually in cc list of the email alert, sent to the Guide.
  • On receipt of the above alert, Adminlogs in and enters the examiners’names as provided (many of the names may already be in the ScholarOne database); also enters the Guide as first examiner on ScholarOne.Admin also sends an invitation to the Guide (with cc to the Co-Guide(s)) for examining the thesis. ScholarOne generates an alert to the Dean. If each Co-Guide wants to submit a separate examiner report, then he/she will be assigned an examiner role by the Admin to get approved by the Dean.
  • Sends an invitation to the examiners in the order set by the Dean, attaching in the email: (a) the synopsis (b) guidelines on research conferments.
  • When an examiner declines, ScholarOne sends a “Thank you” message. The Admin then sends an invitation to the alternative examiner in the order set by the Dean, attaching the synopsis. This step can be made manual if the Dean likes to dynamically change the order of priority.
  • When an examiner submits the review report, it is instantly available to the Admin and the Dean
  • Once all the reports are received in ScholarOne, both the Dean and Admin get alerts.
  • Once the Admin enters the names of all examiners in the above step, the Dean receives the same, logs in and sets the order of priority of examiners if required.
  • When an examiner declines, ScholarOne sends a “Thank you” message to the declining examiner. The Admin then sends an invitation to the alternative examiner in the order set by the Dean, attaching the synopsis. This step can be made manual if the Dean wants to dynamically change the order of priority.
  • When an examiner submits the review report, it is instantly available to the Admin and the Dean.
  • Once all the reports are received, both the Dean and Admin get alerts. The Dean will go through the reports and forward them to the Guide with a suitable recommendation.
  • From time to time, the Dean may view the Dashboard all the thesis under processing and can take suitable action.

Facebook

University of Delhi
(Examination Branch - PhD Thesis Evaluation System)
 
Student Login
 
Department Name
Student Id *
Student Name *
Date of Birth *
DD MM YYYY
: Mandatory Fields *  
(University of Delhi)

logo

  • Cover Story
  • Cover story
  • South Masala
  • Entertainment
  • Ask the Sexpert
  • Sunday Read
  • Teen Spirit
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Trending Today
  • Lit.Mus 2014

Now, VTU to verify theses online to check plagiarism

Now, VTU to verify theses online to check plagiarism

  • Most commented

BDA takes charge of Rs 27,000-cr PRR project

Pick your favorite and click vote

  • Mumbai Mirror
  • Ahmedabad Mirror
  • Pune Mirror
  • Times of India
  • Economic Times
  • Bombay Times
  • Marathi News
  • Order Newspaper
  • Weekend Getaways from Mumbai
  • Advertise with us
  • Terms of Use and Grievance Redressal Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. For reprint rights:Times Syndication Service

VTU adopts online evaluation of PhD thesis

Follow Us :

The Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU) has become the first varsity in the country to utilise technological advancements in sending doctoral thesis (PhD) for evaluation to jurists, foreign as well as Indian, and give results in two to three months.

The VTU Vice Chancellor H Maheshappa told Deccan Herald that evaluating thesis and awarding doctorates to research scholars had always been a cumbersome job. But lately, the varsity has been using advanced technology to evaluate thesis of scholars. Thesis submitted by research scholars are judged by their guide, Indian jury and foreign jury. Now, soft copies of thesis are uploaded and sent to jury directly. It has put an end to the age-old and time consuming practice of sending the hardcopies for evaluation, he said. “To ensure quality of research works, the VTU is getting thesis evaluated by foreign jury. It is the first varsity in the country to go for evaluation of thesis by foreign jury. Their concurrence is taken before awarding doctorate to the scholars,” Dr Maheshappa stated. The new system has brought down the time required to complete the evaluation process. Results of doctorates are now being declared in two to three months, he said. Along with doctorates, VTU has also adopted online evaluation for the thesis of Master of Technology (MTech) and Master of Science (Engineering) courses, he said. “VTU is the first to adopt digital evaluation system of answer scripts for undergraduate and postgraduate courses and online question paper delivery to all 194 engineering colleges across the state. It has adopted end-to-end solution in its examination process,” he said. Automation would be adopted from the stage of admission of the candidate to the announcement of results. Attendance and internal assessment marks could be obtained online. Eligible candidates will get hall tickets printed online in the college itself, Dr Maheshappa said.

Follow us on :

Examinater - Sign in to Electronic Thesis Tracking System

Safety status

Server location

Latest check

2 weeks ago

examinator online phd thesis evaluation system

Child safety

Trustworthiness

MALICIOUS CONTENT INDICATORS

Phdthesis.vtu.ac.in most likely does not offer any malicious content.

Siteadvisor

SAFEBROWSING

Secure connection support

Phdthesis.vtu.ac.in provides SSL-encrypted connection.

ADULT CONTENT INDICATORS

Phdthesis.vtu.ac.in most likely does not offer any adult content.

Popular pages

Examinater User name

4 things you should know about choosing examiners for your thesis

Yesterday on Twitter ‏ @ kikidotca   asked “do you have some advice about making a list of possible examiners for a PhD?”. I contemplated answering in 140 characters or less, but I wanted to avoid writing a journal article, so I volunteered a blog post instead.

examinator online phd thesis evaluation system

In the USA research students are lucky enough to be examined by their supervisors (or maybe not so lucky, as this piece from My Grad School suggests), but in other places examination is a peer review process. In Australia the viva (an oral presentation to examiners who have already read the text) is rare. We are a long way from anywhere and flying examiners in is prohibitively expensive. At RMIT we send the text to two or three examiners who are expected to write a report and recommend a ‘grade’. It’s not really a grade, but an indication of how much work needs to be done; from not very much to rather a lot. Although examiners can recommend a ‘fail’ grade , this only happens to about 2% of students each year (I suspect they are not the kind of students who are reading the Thesis Whisperer, so take a deep breath).

Thesis examination is an object of study and researchers agree that the choice of thesis examiners needs to be handled with extreme care . Examiners are human and will bring their own pet likes and dislikes into the process of reading your work. At RMIT, and many other places, the student does not choose the examiners – the supervisor does. However it’s a bit of a grey area and many students are actively involved in the decision making process. Some supervisors are very open about discussing potential examiners with the student; others take the rules very seriously and refuse to even discuss it. If the latter is the case for you I recommend taking the initiative and broaching the subject anyway as you do have the right to say who should not be examining.

Here’s four things to think about including in such a discussion:

1) Student knows best (usually)

You have been immersed in this study for years. Only those who have been immersed in similar topics will be qualified to judge your work.  It’s likely you have already ‘met’ your examiner somewhere in the literature. Your supervisor may not be reading the same sorts of literature and may be unaware of who is out there – so help them out.

The easiest way is to make an examiners profile. Make a list of your five favourite academic writers within your topic domain and Google stalk them. Use this information to write a short (2 or 3 page) document for your supervisor. Include names and short profiles of each person you have chosen as well as your rationale for why they would be a good examiner. Include contact details including university affiliation, address, phone number and email details.

Give this examiner profile document to your supervisor at least six months before you plan to submit (which should coincide with the first full draft of your thesis). Along with this include a short statement about the kind of person who shouldn’t examine your thesis and give a few examples, just to be clear. Finally please – listen to Aunty Thesis Whisperer now – keep a copy of the email with the date stamp. If there are dramas later you can point at this document and say “I told you not to send it to them!”

2) Beware of conflict of interest

It stands to reason that you can’t have your mum, dad, aunt, uncle, cousin or best friend judge your thesis. Such people have what we call a ‘conflict of interest’: their love for you might corrupt their ability to make a clear judgment and, even if they could put these feelings aside, there would still be the appearance of a conflict of interest.

It’s unlikely that a relative or close friend will be asked to judge your thesis, but you may have become friendly with people in your field at for example conferences, workshops and via Twitter. You shouldn’t avoid making friends with people in your field, but do avoid sending them any drafts to comment on as this is usually the reason why such people will be excluded from examining you. You must make your supervisor aware of these existing friendships and connections – it’s up to the supervisor to decide if the relationship constitutes a conflict of interest or not.

3) Methodology wars

The examiner profile I sent to my supervisor stated “no positivists allowed”. I was using qualitative methods and I didn’t want an examiner who thought that truth could only be found by numbers. They just wouldn’t have believed my findings. You may have entirely the opposite criteria, but either way it’s vitality important the examiner understands, and is sympathetic to, the way you are attempting to make knowledge. The best way to tell if a potential examiner is well placed to give your thesis a fair reading is to read their papers – so why not send some to your supervisor along with your examiner’s profile?

4) Shooting for the stars

If you’ve not yet read the seminal paper “It’s a PhD, not a Nobel Prize” , you must (and share the love while you’re at it by printing it out and leaving it in the research student tearoom). In this accessible paper Mullins and Kiley talk about examiners having firm opinions on “what a thesis looks like”. So – despite the fact that RMIT, like most other universities, sends a ‘marking guide’ with your thesis, the examiner is likely to just ignore it. Here’s the thing to take away from that statement: the more experienced your examiner is, the more theses they have read and the more likely it becomes they have read ones worse than yours. Experienced examiners are more forgiving, so don’t be afraid to put ‘stars’ on your list.

So that’s my four main tips for choosing examiners – what are yours? Is there something that should be number five on the list? Alternatively, do you have any questions about examination? Pop them in the comments!

Related Posts

5 ways to fail your PhD

5 rookie researcher mistakes

Love the Thesis whisperer and want it to continue? Consider becoming a $1 a month Patreon and get special, Patreon only, extra Thesiswhisperer content every two weeks!

Share this:

The Thesis Whisperer is written by Professor Inger Mewburn, director of researcher development at The Australian National University . New posts on the first Wednesday of the month. Subscribe by email below. Visit the About page to find out more about me, my podcasts and books. I'm on most social media platforms as @thesiswhisperer. The best places to talk to me are LinkedIn , Mastodon and Threads.

  • Post (609)
  • Page (16)
  • Product (6)
  • Getting things done (259)
  • Miscellany (139)
  • On Writing (139)
  • Your Career (113)
  • You and your supervisor (66)
  • Writing (48)
  • productivity (23)
  • consulting (13)
  • TWC (13)
  • supervision (12)
  • 2024 (8)
  • 2023 (12)
  • 2022 (11)
  • 2021 (15)
  • 2020 (22)

Whisper to me....

Enter your email address to get posts by email.

Email Address

Sign me up!

  • On the reg: a podcast with @jasondowns
  • Thesis Whisperer on Facebook
  • Thesis Whisperer on Instagram
  • Thesis Whisperer on Soundcloud
  • Thesis Whisperer on Youtube
  • Thesiswhisperer on Mastodon
  • Thesiswhisperer page on LinkedIn
  • Thesiswhisperer Podcast
  • 12,237,351 hits

Discover more from The Thesis Whisperer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Type your email…

Continue reading

Main navigation

  • Graduate Students
  • Faculty & Staff
  • General requirements
  • Preparation of a thesis
  • Initial Thesis Submission
  • Thesis examiners
  • Evaluation of written thesis
  • Thesis examination failures
  • Doctoral oral defence
  • Final Thesis Submission
  • Thesis Writing and Support Resources
  • Letters of Completion/PGWP

Thesis Examination

General information.

  • A Master’s thesis must be evaluated by a single examiner
  • A Doctoral thesis must be evaluated by two examiners - one internal and one external
  • Supervisors may not serve as examiners of their own Master’s or Doctoral students
  • For Doctoral theses, following the successful (written) examination, there is an oral defence

Please read the other pages in this section for detailed information on:

  • selecting and nominating thesis examiners ; 
  • the evaluation of a written thesis ; and
  • thesis examination failures .
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License . Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, McGill University .

Department and University Information

Graduate and postdoctoral studies.

IMAGES

  1. FREE 10+ Thesis Evaluation Samples [ Master, Defense, Project ]

    examinator online phd thesis evaluation system

  2. FREE 10+ Dissertation Evaluation Samples [ Critical, Service, Self ]

    examinator online phd thesis evaluation system

  3. Examinator-Pro STDF Test Data Analysis for Product and Test engineers

    examinator online phd thesis evaluation system

  4. STEPS IN MASTER'S AND PHD THESIS EVALUATION PROCESS

    examinator online phd thesis evaluation system

  5. Online Examination System

    examinator online phd thesis evaluation system

  6. Examinator tool report after modifications

    examinator online phd thesis evaluation system

VIDEO

  1. DR SUCH-MAN ONLINE PHD

  2. QUALITIES OF GOOD THESIS EXAMINERS

  3. PhD

  4. GOOD QUALITY THESES EVALUATION: What, Why, How?

  5. Waar ga jij rijden wanneer de examinator niets zegt?

  6. Online Reviewer System Using PHP/PDO with Source Code Demo

COMMENTS

  1. Examinater

    Online Ph.D Thesis Evaluation System . Log On Need help? Call: 0831 2498142. User name

  2. Online Thesis Evaluation for M.Tech, MBA, MCA & Ph.D Courses

    SrushtiSoft has been assigned with the supplying installation and commissioning of online Ph.D, M.Tech, MBA and MCA thesis evaluation software. The said company has supplied the software and it working satisfactorily. The process has reduced drastically, the evaluation time/ problems. The system is primarily much beneficial for the students as ...

  3. Examinater

    Online Ph.D Thesis Evaluation System . Log On. User name. Password. Help. For Professor: How to Upload and Manage Thesis. User Accounts. Examinater ...

  4. Examinater

    Online MBA Thesis Evaluation System . Log On Need help? Call: 08312-498140. User name

  5. CIRCULAR

    CIRCULAR - Online Ph.D Thesis Evaluation process and Tracking System . admin Ph.D and M.Sc.( Engg) No Comment. 05. Oct 2015. Share. Attachments. thesis. Size: 326 kB. Previous CIRCULAR - Ph.D Plagiarism Awareness Program. June 20, 2015. Next THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING / TECHNOLOGY (With effect from 2006-2007)

  6. Renumerations Tracker

    Renumerations Tracker - Examinater. Examinater. Online Ph.D Thesis Evaluation System. Log OnNeed help? Call: 0831 2498142. Payment Details.

  7. Online Ph D thesis processing with ScholarOne

    The tool covers all activities of PhD thesis processing commencing with the submission of thesis by a student up to the receipt of all thesis reports. The process that is involved after the receipt of all the reports will continue to follow the current manual process. The latter process will be eventually automated as well.

  8. PDF Login Accounts of Online Ph.D. Thesis Evaluation System

    Login Accounts of Online Ph.D. Thesis Evaluation System There are 3 important accounts in the system, (1) The Principal Account (2) H.O.D account (3) Professor / Supervisor account. Their roles and usage explained below. Step-1 University provides a "Principal" account and share the credentials in a secured form to the college "Principal"

  9. Student Login

    Registered Email-id *. Download Various PhD Thesis Submission Forms. : Mandatory Fields *. Ph.D & DM/M.Ch Seating Plan (Annual Convocation-2023) (Click Here) Ph.D. Rules & Results (Click Here) Instructions & Identity-Cum-Entry-Slip for the Scholar Awarded in 100th Annual Convocation.

  10. Now, VTU to verify theses online to check plagiarism

    In order to speed up thesis evaluation process of PhD scholars, the Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU) has introduced an online evaluation and tracking system.All research scholars ...

  11. PDF Visvesvaraya Technological University

    with doctoral committee members signature and also Supervisor signature required on each page. Softcopy of consolidated and corrected thesis with seal and signature should be uploaded in online Ph.D. Thesis evaluation system. Two hard copy of the corrected thesis along with consolidated report should be sent to the office of the undersigned.

  12. Evaluation of a Written Thesis

    Examiners are asked to evaluate the thesis in myThesis, according to the criteria in the respective thesis examiner report for a Master's or Doctoral thesis. For an example of the criteria, please see the forms: see: Master's Examiner report form; Doctoral Examiner report form (note these forms are now integrated in myThesis). Examiners provide an overall judgment of 'passed' or 'not passed ...

  13. VTU adopts online evaluation of PhD thesis

    "VTU is the first to adopt digital evaluation system of answer scripts for undergraduate and postgraduate courses and online question paper delivery to all 194 engineering colleges across the state.

  14. PDF After you login, Choose New Thesis from the

    Thesis guide need to perform above said procedures to upload students synopsis and thesis. Please note, Only after thesis submission by Guide, student thesis will be considered for evaluation until then system consider it as in 'draft' state. Gray - status with gray color means "Guide has not submitted thesis for the examination".

  15. PDF Guidelines for Ph.D. thesis Evaluation

    3.Thesis submission. Within 30 days of submission of synopsis the students submits soft copy (pdf) of the thesis for evaluation. A student can be asked to submit the hard copy of the thesis if required by the examiner. The format for preparation of Ph.D. thesis is placed at Annexure-II.

  16. phdthesis.vtu.ac.in

    Phdthesis.vtu.ac.in provides SSL-encrypted connection. ADULT CONTENT INDICATORS. Phdthesis.vtu.ac.in most likely does not offer any adult content. Popular pages. Examinater - Sign in to Electronic Thesis Tracking System. Examinater User name. Check. Open neighbouring websites list. phdthesis.vtu.ac.in.

  17. The Thesis Whisperer

    Thesis examination is an object of study and researchers agree that the choice of thesis examiners needs to be handled with extreme care. Examiners are human and will bring their own pet likes and dislikes into the process of reading your work. At RMIT, and many other places, the student does not choose the examiners - the supervisor does.

  18. Thesis Examination

    General Information. A Master's thesis must be evaluated by a single examiner. A Doctoral thesis must be evaluated by two examiners - one internal and one external. Supervisors may not serve as examiners of their own Master's or Doctoral students. For Doctoral theses, following the successful (written) examination, there is an oral defence.

  19. CIRCULAR

    CIRCULAR - Submission of Examiners Panel for Thesis Evaluation and opting for NPTEL Course to fulfill the Course work requirement - reg