employee intellectual property assignment

Employee’s Rights to Intellectual Property

Copyright – works created by an employee in the course of employment, copyright – works created by an independent contractor, patents – inventions made in the course of employment, steps to take when hiring an employee, steps to take when hiring a contractor.

If you would like our help with your particular situation or have general question regarding employee or employer ownership of intellectual property, please contact us for a complimentary and confidential initial telephone appointment with a member of our team.

Related resources:

Connect with Us

• Running the Business

Employee proprietary information and inventions assignment agreements: what they do, and what could happen without them

The typical onboarding process for a new employee at nearly all companies in most industries includes a requirement for the employee to sign an agreement regarding confidentiality and ownership of inventions, copyrights and other intellectual property.  This article explains the purpose of such an agreement and consequences that result from a failure to have such agreements signed by each employee.

What is a PIIA?

The agreement goes by many names, but tech-savvy companies often refer to them as PIIAs (or ''Pee-as'' for short). PIIA is the acronym for the most common name for these agreements, ''proprietary information and invention assignment'' agreements.  The typical form of agreement addresses two main areas: confidentiality and ownership of intellectual property. 

The agreement requires that an employee maintain the employer's non-public and proprietary information confidential and contains language similar to what you would see in a non-disclosure agreement ( see more about non-disclosure agreements ). 

The agreement also requires that the employee agree that whatever the employee creates, discovers, develops or invents while employed with the company is owned by the company. Companies that are in the business of developing products or technology that are protectable by copyright (as is the case with most software companies) can rely on the work for hire doctrine under US copyright law, which automatically gives the employer ownership of copyrights in works of authorship ( eg , software, manuals and documentations) written or prepared by an employee within the scope of his/her employment. The work for hire doctrine, however, does not apply and ownership is not automatically vested in the employer in the case of other intellectual property rights, most notably in the case of patents (see our article providing an overview of  intellectual property rights and a more detailed discussion about  copyrights and  patents ). 

Therefore, the PIIA is the employee's agreement that everything created by the employee for the employer is owned by the employer, and if the employer needs the employee to do anything or sign any document to confirm that the employer owns all the rights in the intellectual property developments, the employee agrees in the PIIA to do so.

PIIAs will also often include non-solicitation clauses and, for those employees working in states where non-competition clauses are enforced, the agreement may also include a non-compete clause (see our article discussing  non-solicitation and non-competition clauses ).

Does the company really own everything the employee creates?

If an employee can show that he or she created intellectual property on their own time and without the use of any of the employer's facilities, equipment, supplies or trade secret information and if the intellectual property did not relate at the time of development to the employer's business or actual or anticipated research or development, then the employee would continue to own such intellectual property. 

In some states, such as California, Washington, Texas and Illinois, this exception is expressed in a statute that requires that the PIIA include a notice of the exception.  Such statutes favor the employer in that the burden of showing the exception applies is typically on the employee.

What happens if I don't have my employees sign PIIAs or if the PIIAs don't include all the bells and whistles?

Whenever a company goes through a financing, whether it is a seed round or an institutional VC round, or if the company is going to be acquired, the investors or acquirer will conduct due diligence. One of the issues that they will review is whether or not all the employees have signed PIIAs and whether or not those PIIAs require employees to assign to the company ownership of all intellectual property rights to developments created by the employee. Investors and acquirers want to make sure that the company owns its intellectual property, products and technology. 

Depending on where the company is in its lifecycle, the due diligence may focus on all employees, former and current, or it may just focus on the former and current employees that have been involved in research and development or engineering activities. (The failure of the company to obtain a PIIA from an employee strictly in an administrative capacity will generally not create a material issue). If due diligence identifies a problem with the PIIAs, or reveals that PIIAs were not signed, investors and acquirers may require that the company obtain signed PIIAs (or the equivalent) after the fact, which may necessitate the company having to pay the employees something in exchange for signing the agreement so that it is binding or, worse yet, give a former employee leverage to ask for something more. Giving someone leverage on the cusp of a financing or an acquisition may not end well for the company.

While PIIAs may seem like a routine document that is available from numerous online sources, it is essential that an employer have a form of PIIA that includes provisions that is enforceable and current and will withstand scrutiny from investor and acquirer's counsel. If you have questions about your form of PIIA, or if you want to make sure that you have forms of PIIA that will be enforceable for your employees wherever they may be located, within or outside the United States, please contact a member of our Technology, Data and Commercial practice .

Drafting Employee Work Made For Hire and IP Assignment Clauses | Practical Law

Drafting Employee Work Made For Hire and IP Assignment Clauses

Practical law legal update 6-523-4246  (approx. 4 pages), work made for hire and assignment.

• Secure an actual conveyance of the employee's rights.
• Minimize the risk of a successful challenge to the employer's rights at a later date.
• A further assurances clause in the event the employer finds it necessary or desirable for the employee to execute additional documents or assist the employer in its efforts to enforce the IP rights against third parties.
• A grant of power of attorney to the employer for the purpose of executing any documents and undertaking appropriate actions, if, for example, the employee is unavailable or uncooperative.

State Law Limitations

• Relate to the employer's business.
• Result from any work performed by the employee for the employer.

Invention Assignment Agreements – How to Avoid Pitfalls

Related Insights

The basics: how quantum computers work and where the technology is heading, master of its choice of forum, new safe harbor for the domestic content bonus tax credit.

• 617.395.7000
• Artificial Intelligence
• Chemical & Material Sciences
• Computer Technology & Software
• Consumer Products
• Electronics
• Life Sciences
• Mechanical & Industrial
• Medical Devices

Practice Areas

• Strategic Counseling
• Licensing & Transactions
• Trade Secret
• News & Events
• Knowledge Center
• Entrepreneurship Center
• Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
• Client Portal

T: 617.395.7000

E:  [email protected]

D. Mass. IP Litigation Blog

• Knowledge Center :
•   IP Insights

Patent Assignments in Employment Agreements – a Sometimes Overlooked, but Always Important Component

• November 16, 2021

By: Peter C. Lando and Thomas P. McNulty

With assistance from summer intern Tyler Gruttadauria

Businesses, of course, have a strong interest in owning intellectual property created by their employees. Intellectual property—patents, copyrights, and other confidential and proprietary information including trade secrets—is often the most valuable asset a business can own, so it is important to ensure that employee developments and inventions belong to the employer. In the United States, inventions presumptively belong to the inventor, and any transfer of ownership (“assignment”) must be in writing to be effective. Rather than requiring employees to sign assignment agreements for each patent application filing, employers sometimes rely on employment agreements and handbooks to establish ownership in intellectual property created by an employee. Employers often provide employment agreements with assignment clauses that are intended to give the employer rights in inventions made by the employee during the period of employment. These assignment clauses are often treated as mere boilerplate, yet the precise wording of these clauses can have major impacts on the effectiveness and limitations of any assignment.

Ensure that you have an Assignment and not a mere promise to assign

When drafting an agreement to have an employee assign future inventions, it is vital that the language used in an assignment clause states a present-tense, actual assignment. Phrases such as “hereby assign,” “agrees to grant and does hereby grant,” or that inventions “shall belong” to the employer and employee “hereby conveys, transfers and assigns” have been deemed by the courts to be effective to transfer ownership of a future invention without the need for any subsequent agreement. Ownership effectively transfers immediately, once the invention has been made. Assignment clauses that use future tense language, on the other hand, generally will require an additional agreement to result in a transfer of ownership of the invention, and any intellectual property (“IP”) covering the invention. Terms such as “will assign,” “agree to assign,” “will be assigned,” and the like, have been found by numerous courts to constitute nothing more than a promise or contract to assign an invention in the future, but not to serve as an actual assignment.

In addition to the wording used in the assignment clause, the language of any carve-outs should also be scrutinized. Agreements may contain a carve-out clause to exclude a new employee’s prior inventions from being assigned, or to prevent assignment of inventions unrelated to the employee’s work from being swept into the assignment provision. A broad, non-specific carve-out clause may prevent an employee agreement from automatically assigning inventions of that employee, even where the assignment clause includes the proper “hereby assign” type of language, because this leaves open the possibility that an invention is not subject to the assignment clause. This contrasting language may create an ambiguity in the employment agreement that subjects it to construction under state law, which in turn may allow for the employee to introduce extrinsic evidence, such as conversations that took place during employment negotiations, to defeat the automatic assignment. While patent assignment provisions are governed by Federal Circuit law, resolution of contractual ambiguities is governed by state law, which varies considerably regarding the admissibility of such extrinsic evidence.

Failure to obtain an automatic assignment can have negative consequences

An assignment clause that is deemed ineffective to automatically transfer ownership of an invention can create significant problems for an employer. In such circumstances, a business would not have standing to bring a patent infringement suit until it has taken the necessary steps to obtain a valid assignment. This may require the filing of a breach of contract claim against the employee to require fulfillment of the contractual obligations, including execution of assignment documents. In the interim, infringers could continue practicing the invention; and if the infringing activity has gone on long enough, the six-year statute of limitations may prohibit full recovery of damages. Further, if an inventor/employee has made only a promise to assign, and instead transfers ownership to a third party who lacks knowledge of the assignment obligation, that second transfer of ownership may well prevail, leaving the original employer with no exclusionary rights at all.

Ineffective assignment provisions can affect more than just litigation. Businesses and investors typically conduct IP due diligence when entering into transactions involving the investment in or sale of IP assets, company divisions or entire entities, and any weaknesses in assignment provisions may affect the perceived value of the IP assets and/or business being considered.

Do not count on the “Hired-to-Invent” doctrine to result in ownership of employee inventions

Some employers do not require employees to sign an agreement containing an assignment of inventions because they believe that they automatically own inventions that they paid someone to create. Under the “hired-to-invent” doctrine, this will only occasionally be correct. Employees or contractors hired (and paid) specifically to create a particular invention or to solve a particular problem may be deemed to have implicitly assigned their rights in the invention to the employer. This is a highly fact-based determination, however, and applies only to inventions created in response to the specific thing the employee was hired to do. A mere title of “researcher” or even “inventor” will not, standing alone, suffice to ensure ownership of inventions by the employer. Further, until a court has ruled one way or the other, an employer relying on this doctrine will not have any certainty in its rights to the invention. Should the court rule against the employer, it would lose the exclusionary rights it believed it possessed and may face an infringement lawsuit from the employee or anyone to whom the employee may have assigned the invention/patent rights.

Absent an effective assignment, an employer may obtain limited “shop rights” in inventions made using the employer’s time, materials, facilities or equipment. Shop rights take the form of an implied license to practice the invention, precluding the employee from obtaining damages or injunctive relief on a patented invention. Shop rights are limited, however, and do not allow the employer to prevent others from competing by practicing the invention. Further, shop rights cannot be transferred via license or assignment, effectively devaluing the IP assets and, perhaps, the company.

Other Considerations

In addition to having the proper “hereby assign” language, employment contracts should ensure that inventions , rather than just patents or patent applications, are subject to the assignment clause. Language stating that all inventions, improvements, discoveries, and the like, whether or not patentable or copyrightable, are subject to the assignment, ensures that information that could be protected through other regimes, such as trade secrets, automatically become the property of the employer.

Intellectual property has taken on an ever-increasing role in determining the value of a business. A company’s ability to develop and protect its intellectual property is a key factor in its future success. Given this, it is important that businesses recognize that assignment provisions of employment agreements are not mere boilerplate, but instead may be one of the most important legal provisions that ultimately can impact not only an employment arrangement, but the value of the business itself.

• Peter C. Lando
• Thomas P. McNulty

Professionals

SHARE THIS POST

How can we help you?

This intellectual property agreement  is between , an individual a(n) (the " Assignor ") and  , an individual a(n) (the " Assignee ").

The Assignor has full interest in the intellectual property listed in Exhibit A and described in section 1 below.

The Assignor wishes to transfer to the Assignee, and the Assignee wishes to purchase and receive from the Assignor, all of its interest in the Intellectual Property.

The parties therefore agree as follows:

1. ASSIGNMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.

The Assignor assigns to the Assignee, and the Assignee accepts the assignment of, all of the Assignor's interest in the following in the United States and its territories and throughout the world:

• (a) the intellectual property rights related to the intellectual property listed in Exhibit A ;
• (b) all precursors, portions, and works in progress with respect to that intellectual property and all inventions, works of authorship, mask works, technology, information, know-how, materials, and tools relating to those or to the development, support, or maintenance of those;
• (c) all copyrights, patent rights, trade dress, trade names, business names, other indicia of origin, trade secret rights, trademark rights, mask works rights, and all other intellectual property rights and all business, contract rights, and goodwill in, incorporated, or embodied in, used to develop, or related to any of those; and
• (d) the registrations and applications for registrations of the foregoing (collectively, the" Intellectual Property ").

2. PURCHASE PRICE.

The Assignee shall pay the Assignor a flat fee of $ as full payment for all rights granted under this agreement. The Assignee shall complete this payment no later than .

3. RECORDATION.  

In order to record this assignment with all relevant government agencies, within hours of the effective date of this assignment, the parties shall sign the form of intellectual property assignment agreement attached as Exhibit B . The is solely responsible for filing the assignment and paying any associated fees of the transfer.

4. NO EARLY ASSIGNMENT.

The Assignee shall not assign or otherwise encumber its interest in the Intellectual Property or any associated registrations until it has paid to the Assignor the full consideration provided for in this assignment. Any assignment or encumbrance contrary to this provision shall be void.

5. ASSIGNOR'S REPRESENTATIONS.

The Assignor hereby represents and warrants to the Assignee that it:

• (a) is the sole owner of all interest in the Intellectual Property;
• (b) has not transferred, exclusively licensed, or encumbered any Intellectual Property or agreed to do so;
• (c) is not aware of any violation, infringement, or misappropriation of any third party's rights (or any claim of those) by the Intellectual Property;
• (d) is not aware of any third-party consents, assignments, or licenses that are necessary to perform under this assignment;
• (e) was not acting within the scope of employment of any third party when conceiving, creating, or otherwise performing any activity with respect to any item of Intellectual Property.

The Assignor shall immediately notify the Assignee in writing if any facts or circumstances arise that would make any of the representations in this assignment inaccurate.

6. INDEMNIFICATION. The Assignor shall indemnify the Assignee against:

• (a) any claim by a third party that the Intellectual Property or its use, manufacture, sale, distribution, or reproduction infringes on or misappropriates any copyrights, trade secrets, patents, or other intellectual property;
• (b) any claim by a third party that this assignment conflicts with, violates, or breaches any contract, assignment, license, sublicense, security interest, encumbrance, or other obligation to which the Assignor is a party or of which it has knowledge;
• (c) any claim relating to any past, present, or future use, licensing, sublicensing, distribution, marketing, disclosure, or commercialization of any of the Intellectual Property by the Assignor; and
• (i) the Assignee promptly notifies the Assignor of that claim;
• (ii) the Assignor controls the defense and settlement of that claim;
• (iii) the Assignee fully cooperates with the Assignor in connection with its defense and settlement of that claim; and
• (iv) the Assignee stops all sales, distribution, and public use of the infringing Intellectual Property, if requested by the Assignor.
• (i) obtain the right for the Assignee to continue to use the infringing Intellectual Property;
• (ii) modify the infringing Intellectual Property to eliminate the infringement;
• (iii) provide substitute noninfringing intellectual property to the Assignee pursuant to this assignment; or
• (iv) refund to the Assignee the amount paid under this assignment for the infringing Intellectual Property.
• (c) No Other Obligations. The Assignor shall have no other obligations or liability if infringement occurs, and shall have no other obligation of indemnification or to defend relating to infringement. The Assignor shall not be liable for any costs or expenses incurred without its prior written authorization and shall have no obligation of indemnification or any liability if the infringement is based on (i) any modified form of the Intellectual Property not made by the Assignor, (ii) any finding or ruling after the effective date of this assignment, or (iii) the laws of any country other than the United States of America or its states.

7. GOVERNING LAW.

• (a) Choice of Law. The laws of the state of  govern this agreement (without giving effect to its conflicts of law principles).
• (b) Choice of Forum. Both parties consent to the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts in County, .

8. AMENDMENTS.

No amendment to this assignment will be effective unless it is in writing and signed by a party or its authorized representative.

9. ASSIGNMENT AND DELEGATION.

• (a) No Assignment. Neither party may assign any of its rights under this assignment, except with the prior written consent of the other party. All voluntary assignments of rights are limited by this subsection.
• (b) No Delegation. Neither party may delegate any performance under this assignment, except with the prior written consent of the other party.
• (c) Enforceability of an Assignment or Delegation. If a purported assignment or purported delegation is made in violation of this section, it is void.

10. COUNTERPARTS; ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES.

• (a) Counterparts. The parties may execute this assignment in any number of counterparts, each of which is an original but all of which constitute one and the same instrument.
• (b) Electronic Signatures. This assignment, agreements ancillary to this assignment, and related documents entered into in connection with this assignment are signed when a party's signature is delivered by facsimile, email, or other electronic medium. These signatures must be treated in all respects as having the same force and effect as original signatures.

11. SEVERABILITY.

If any one or more of the provisions contained in this assignment is, for any reason, held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, that invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability will not affect any other provisions of this assignment, but this assignment will be construed as if those invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provisions had never been contained in it, unless the deletion of those provisions would result in such a material change so as to cause completion of the transactions contemplated by this assignment to be unreasonable.

12. NOTICES.

• (a) Writing; Permitted Delivery Methods. Each party giving or making any notice, request, demand, or other communication required or permitted by this agreement shall give that notice in writing and use one of the following types of delivery, each of which is a writing for purposes of this agreement: personal delivery, mail (registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return-receipt requested), nationally recognized overnight courier (fees prepaid), facsimile, or email.
• (b) Addresses. A party shall address notices under this section to a party at the following addresses:
• If to the Assignor: 
• If to the Assignee: 
• (c) Effectiveness. A notice is effective only if the party giving notice complies with subsections (a) and (b) and if the recipient receives the notice.

13. WAIVER.

No waiver of a breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this assignment will be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right, or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure, right, or remedy will be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right, or remedy, whether or not similar, and no waiver will constitute a continuing waiver, unless the writing so specifies.

14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.

This assignment constitutes the final agreement of the parties. It is the complete and exclusive expression of the parties' agreement about the subject matter of this assignment. All prior and contemporaneous communications, negotiations, and agreements between the parties relating to the subject matter of this assignment are expressly merged into and superseded by this assignment. The provisions of this assignment may not be explained, supplemented, or qualified by evidence of trade usage or a prior course of dealings. Neither party was induced to enter this assignment by, and neither party is relying on, any statement, representation, warranty, or agreement of the other party except those set forth expressly in this assignment. Except as set forth expressly in this assignment, there are no conditions precedent to this assignment's effectiveness.

15. HEADINGS.

The descriptive headings of the sections and subsections of this assignment are for convenience only, and do not affect this assignment's construction or interpretation.

16. EFFECTIVENESS.

This assignment will become effective when all parties have signed it. The date this assignment is signed by the last party to sign it (as indicated by the date associated with that party's signature) will be deemed the date of this assignment.

17. NECESSARY ACTS; FURTHER ASSURANCES.

Each party shall use all reasonable efforts to take, or cause to betaken, all actions necessary or desirable to consummate and make effective the transactions this assignment contemplates or to evidence or carry out the intent and purposes of this assignment.

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

Each party is signing this agreement on the date stated opposite that party's signature. 

[PAGE BREAK HERE] EXHIBIT A LIST OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

[PAGE BREAK HERE] EXHIBIT B FORM OF RECORDABLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ASSIGNMENT For good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, an individual a(n) (the " Assignor ") hereby assigns to an individual a(n) (the " Assignee ") all of the Assignor's interest in the Intellectual Property identified in Attachment A to this assignment, and the Assignee accepts this assignment.

Each party is signing this agreement on the date stated opposite that party's signature.

[PAGE BREAK HERE]

ATTACHMENT A INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Free Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement Template

Safeguard the sale or purchase of assets with an intellectual property assignment agreement. transfer the ownership of patents, trademarks, software, and other critical assets easily..

Complete your document with ease

How-to guides, articles, and any other content appearing on this page are for informational purposes only, do not constitute legal advice, and are no substitute for the advice of an attorney.

Intellectual property assignment agreement: How-to guide

In the dynamic realm of commerce and innovation, the notion of property extends far beyond physical boundaries. Just as one might transfer ownership of a house or a car, the exchange of intellectual property (IP) rights is a critical component of modern business transactions. For instance, if you're launching a startup, acquiring product rights, or even purchasing an entire company, in each scenario, the seamless transfer of intellectual property ownership is essential for ensuring a smooth transition and protecting your interests.

So what constitutes intellectual property? Intellectual property encompasses creations of the mind, such as inventions, software, and hardware programs, literary and artistic works, designs, symbols, names, and images. As businesses grow and evolve, the need to manage and protect these valuable assets becomes increasingly important. One crucial aspect of managing intellectual property is through intellectual property assignment agreement, otherwise known as IP assignment agreement. These agreements facilitate the transfer of IP rights from one part to another.

In this article, we’ll explore the nuances of intellectual property assignment agreements, including their definitions, benefits, types, and considerations.

What is an intellectual property assignment agreement?

An intellectual property assignment agreement, also known as an IP assignment agreement, is a written contract that transfers intellectual property rights from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). Intellectual property covers a broad spectrum of intangible assets, including patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, and more.

For instance, a software developer might have created a groundbreaking algorithm while employed at the company. Through an IP assignment agreement, the developer transfers the rights to this algorithm to the employer, ensuring that the company has exclusive ownership and control over its use and commercialization.

Benefits of IP assignment agreement

IP assignment agreements are crucial in a company’s business and provide multiple benefits for the assignor and assignee.

Clear ownership

By executing an IP assignment agreement, the assignor unequivocally transfers all rights and interests in the intellectual property to the assignee. This clarity of ownership and proprietary rights helps to avoid disputes and potential litigation over the ownership of the IP in the future.

Legal protection

By formally transferring the IP rights through a written agreement, both parties are legally protected. This protection can be essential in case of any infringement or misuse of intellectual property.

Assured compensation or price guarantee

When transferring IP ownership rights for patents, trademarks, copyrights, etc., the original owner gets compensated by the party buying the ownership. The buyer will also pay the IP owner an agreed-upon price for the IP, which will be paid on the date as decided by the involved parties. 

No future obligations

The party selling the IP won’t be responsible for meeting any future obligations. For instance, if there is an existing trademark that requires constant monitoring to know whether the trademark is used by any other competitors, the seller won't bear the charges incurred for  trademark monitoring . The buyer has to bear these and any future trademark maintenance costs.

Commercialization opportunities

Assigning intellectual property rights can enable businesses to commercialize the intellectual property more effectively. This could involve licensing the IP to third parties, selling it outright, or using it as collateral for financing.

Facilitates collaboration

In cases where multiple parties are involved in creating intellectual property, an assignment agreement can facilitate collaboration by clearly defining each party's rights and responsibilities.

Risk mitigation

For businesses acquiring ownership rights to intellectual property, an assignment agreement mitigates the risk of third parties claiming rights to the IP. It provides a legal basis for defending against infringement claims and protects the assignee's investment in the IP.

Enhanced value

Clear ownership of intellectual property assets can enhance the value of a business, especially during mergers, acquisitions, or fundraising activities. Investors and stakeholders are more likely to perceive a business positively when it has secure ownership of valuable IP assets. For example, let’s say your start-up company holds sole intellectual property rights to an automatic house-locking system. When your company gets acquired by another company, the new company will also evaluate the value of the IP owned.

Understanding IP assignment agreements: Considerations for sellers

While intellectual property assignment agreements offer various benefits, as a seller of the IP you need to keep in mind what it entails for you when you sell your IP.

Choosing between an IP assignment and a licensing agreement

In an IP assignment agreement, the seller transfers all ownership rights to the intellectual property for a predetermined fee. Here the seller gets a fair market value for their IP as a one-time payment. However, if they had opted for an  IP licensing arrangement , they could have retained the ownership of their IP while giving certain usage rights to the interested party. For instance, let’s say you have written and composed a song. A music company wants your song under their label. Here you have two options. You can sell your song completely to the music label, where they’ll have the right to use or alter your song as they deem fit. Or you can license your creation for an agreed-upon fee or price and set the terms and conditions for using your song. Here you’re getting paid for your creation while retaining ownership of your creation. Whichever option works best for you can be opted and respective agreements can be drawn.  

Value uncertainty

The value of intellectual property can fluctuate over time due to changes in market demand, technological advancements, or legal developments. Sometimes an intellectual property’s future value can increase tremendously, impacting the fairness of the negotiated price. Hence, while deciding the price of such assets, the seller should calculate the future valuation and decide the price of IP.

Limited future opportunities

Once intellectual property rights are assigned, the assignor may be restricted from using or further developing the intellectual property in the future. This limitation could hinder the assignor's ability to explore new business ventures or pivot their existing strategies.

In conclusion, while an intellectual property assignment agreement offers significant benefits in terms of clarity, protection, and commercialization of intellectual property assets, parties must carefully weigh these advantages against the limitations. Consulting with legal professionals experienced in intellectual property law is essential to navigate these considerations effectively.

What are the types of IP assignment agreements?

Intellectual property assignment agreements are comprehensive in nature, outlining the terms and conditions under which the transfer of IP ownership occurs. Here's an overview of the types of IP assignment agreements:

Patent assignment agreement or assignment of patents

A  patent assignment agreement is a written agreement whereby the owner of a patent transfers or assigns their ownership rights to the other party. This agreement ensures that the assignee gains full legal rights to the patent, including the right to exclude others from making, using, or selling the patented invention, innovations, and processes. Patent assignment agreements typically include details about the patented invention, including patent numbers, descriptions, and any related rights or obligations. 

Copyright assignment agreement or assignment of copyrights

Copyright assignment agreements transfer ownership of creative works, such as literary works, music, art, and other creative expressions. By signing a copyright assignment agreement, the creator relinquishes their rights to reproduce, distribute, and display the copyrighted work to the assignee.

Trademark assignment agreement or assignment of trademarks

Trademark assignment agreements transfer ownership of trademarks, which are used to identify and distinguish goods or services in the marketplace. Through this agreement, the assignor relinquishes their exclusive rights to use the trademark in commerce, allowing the assignee to use and enforce the mark for their business or products.

Trade secret assignment agreement or assignment of trade secrets

Trade secret assignment agreements are used to transfer ownership of confidential information or trade secrets from one party to another. These agreements outline the specific trade secrets being transferred and impose obligations of confidentiality on the assignee to protect the secrecy of the information. 

By signing such an agreement, the assignee gains the rights to use and protect the trade secrets for their own benefit. It can be any proprietary information like formulas, processes, customer lists, and business strategies. These agreements typically include provisions to maintain confidentiality and prevent unauthorized disclosure or use of trade secrets.

Design assignment agreement or assignment of design

An assignment of design agreement involves the transfer of ownership rights related to industrial designs or product designs. It ensures that the assignee gains exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and modify the design according to their business needs. This agreement is crucial for companies involved in product development and manufacturing.

Employee or contractor IP assignment agreement

These agreements transfer ownership of intellectual property created by employees or contractors during their employment or engagement. They are essential for employers to secure ownership of IP developed by their personnel. They often include provisions related to confidentiality, non-competition, and non-disclosure, which are mostly included in an employment agreement. Sometimes, employers even ask employees to sign separate non-disclosure agreements whenever an employee comes up with an invention.  

Assignment of IP in a joint venture  

In cases where multiple parties jointly create intellectual property, a joint ownership agreement may establish each party's rights and responsibilities. These agreements detail the terms of joint ownership, including each party's share of the IP, decision-making authority, and rights to exploit the IP.

It's essential to choose the appropriate type of IP assignment agreement based on the specific intellectual property rights being transferred and the circumstances of the transaction. Consulting with legal professionals knowledgeable in intellectual property law can help ensure that the agreement adequately protects the interests of all parties involved.

Who uses intellectual property assignment agreements?

IP assignment agreements are utilized across a spectrum of industries and scenarios. These agreements are crucial tools for businesses and individuals seeking to define and transfer intellectual property rights.

Corporations and businesses

Employment agreement : Companies frequently incorporate IP assignment clauses into their employment contracts. This ensures that any intellectual property created by employees during the course of their employment is automatically assigned to the company.

Consulting agreement : Similar to employment agreements, consulting contracts may include provisions requiring consultants to transfer any intellectual property they develop while working for the company.

Transactions contemplated : In mergers, acquisitions, or other business transactions, IP assignment agreements are employed to transfer ownership of intellectual property assets between parties.

Joint ventures : Partners in joint ventures often use these agreements to clarify ownership rights and facilitate the sharing or licensing of intellectual property developed during the collaboration.

Individuals and inventors

Prior inventions : An individual with a prior invention may use IP assignment agreements to transfer ownership rights to a new employer or business partner.

Consultants and contractors : Freelancers, consultants, and independent contractors may be required to sign an IP or invention assignment agreement as part of their contractual arrangement with clients.

Startups : Startup founders commonly use these agreements to consolidate ownership of intellectual property created before or during the company's establishment.

In essence, assignment agreements are utilized by parties across various sectors and contexts to facilitate the transfer of valuable intellectual property rights, ensuring legal protection and compliance while fostering innovation and business growth.

Key provisions of an intellectual property assignment agreement

Introduction.

Begin the agreement by formally introducing the parties involved to the agreement. In an intellectual property assignment agreement, the party selling the IP is called the “assignor,” and the other party who buys it is called the “assignee.” Here, along with providing the details of the intellectual property, the assignor explicitly agrees to transfer intellectual property rights to the assignee according to the agreed-upon terms of the agreement.

Assignment of IP

This section specifies the intellectual property being transferred. It identifies the specific patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, or other intellectual property referenced in the agreement. Additionally, it outlines the scope of the transfer and any limitations on the assigned IP rights.

Purchase price

The agreement details any monetary compensation involved in the transfer of intellectual property rights. In this section, clearly outline the payment terms of the agreement. Detail whether the parties hereto agree to pay the assignor as a lump sum or in installments. If the payment is made in installments, you must also provide the schedule for such payment.

Recordation

To formalize the transfer of intellectual property rights, recordation with relevant authorities may be necessary. This provision addresses the requirement and process for recording the assignment with the appropriate governmental authority, ensuring compliance with legal formalities. 

No early assignment

This clause states that the assignment of IP rights cannot occur before certain conditions are met, such as before the completion of a project or the fulfillment of payment obligations. This section prevents premature transfers of IP.

Assignor’s representations

In this part, the assignor provides assurance that they have the sole right to the IP created and it hasn’t been licensed to any third-parties. They also affirm that they have the legal authority to transfer ownership of the IP and there are no undisclosed encumbrances or infringements.

Indemnification

This provision outlines the parties' obligations to indemnify each other against any losses, damages, or liabilities arising from a breach of the agreement or the assertion of third-party claims related to the transferred IP.

Governing law

This section specifies the jurisdiction whose laws will govern and interpret the agreement. It provides clarity in the event of legal disputes.

This clause outlines the procedures for making changes or modifications to the intellectual property assignment agreement. To make any changes pertaining to the terms of the agreement requires written consent from both parties.

Assignment and delegation

This provision addresses the transferability of rights and obligations under the IP assignment agreement. They stipulate whether parties can assign their rights or delegate their duties to third parties.

Counterparts; electronic signatures

This section permits the IP assignment agreement to be executed in multiple counterparts, facilitating convenience in signing. It also recognizes the legal validity of electronic signatures, ensuring compliance with modern technological practices.

Severability

The severability clause states that if any provision of the agreement is found to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will remain in full force and effect. This ensures that the invalidity of one provision does not invalidate the entire agreement.

This provision details the methods and addresses for official communication between the parties regarding the intellectual property assignment agreement. They ensure that important correspondence is properly delivered and acknowledged.

Waiver provision addresses instances where a party chooses not to enforce its rights under the agreement. For instance, if certain provisions are waived off on a one-time basis regarding the agreement, this doesn’t mean that the provision is waived for the entire term of the agreement. Take the case where the assignee is paying for the IP in installments. If the assignee is not able to pay the installment for a month, then the assignor can waive that default and continue the agreement upon prior written consent.

Entire agreement

This part of an intellectual property assignment agreement explains that the parties agree to the specific terms and conditions mentioned in the agreement. Any verbal negotiations or other terms that are even stated via email or otherwise are not part of this agreement.

This section states that the headings used in the agreement are for convenience only and do not affect the interpretation of the provisions.

Effectiveness

The effectiveness provision specifies the date on which the agreement becomes effective. This ensures clarity regarding when the rights and obligations outlined in the agreement take effect.

Necessary acts; further assurances

Requires the parties to take any additional actions necessary to carry out the terms of the agreement fully. This may include signing additional documents or cooperating with each other as needed.

How does an online template facilitate drafting intellectual property assignment agreements?

There are various advantages of using an online template for IP such as.

Simplified drafting process

Online templates streamline the drafting process of IP assignment agreements. By providing a structured framework, these templates guide users through the essential elements required for such agreements. Users can efficiently input pertinent details specific to their arrangement, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the subject matter assigned.

Ease of customization

Some  online template providers, like LegalZoom , allow you to easily customize the templates to suit specific circumstances. With editing options available, users can modify clauses and provisions to reflect their agreed-upon terms and conditions of the arrangement

Clarity and consistency

These templates offer clear and standardized language, enhancing understanding and minimizing ambiguity. Consistent formatting and terminology throughout the agreement contribute to its readability and effectiveness.

Time and cost efficiency

Utilizing an online template can minimize the need for extensive document research and costly legal consultations. It allows parties to draft a comprehensive IP assignment agreement efficiently and affordably, saving valuable time and resources.

Accessibility and convenience

Online templates are readily accessible from anywhere with an internet connection, enabling parties to initiate and complete the drafting process conveniently. This accessibility promotes collaboration and facilitates the timely execution of agreements.

As you can see, using online templates provides numerous benefits. Since there are a multitude of templates available online, choosing the right template is key. To streamline this process, LegalZoom offers a comprehensive intellectual property assignment agreement template that is simple and easy to use. Just answer the guided questions, complete the form, and download the document for free.

Frequently asked questions

What's an intellectual property assignment agreement.

When your business needs to sell or buy intangible assets, use an intellectual property assignment agreement to protect both parties. It enables the transfer of ownership of intangible items legally. Intellectual property includes everything from patents to trademarks to software and more.

What key details are required to complete your assignment agreement?

Here's the information you'll need to complete your intellectual property assignment agreement:

• Who owns the intellectual property : Keep the information of the assignor ready while drafting your agreements 
• Who's buying the intellectual property : Have the name and contact details of the assignee ready
• How much it costs : Know what the buyer pays for the intellectual property

Related templates

Assignment of Agreement

Transfer work responsibilities efficiently with an assignment of agreement. Facilitate a smooth transition from one party to another.

Copyright Assignment

Protect your intellectual property with a copyright assignment form. Securely transfer your copyright to another party, clearly defining ownership terms while preserving your rights effectively.

Patent Application Assignment

Transfer the ownership rights or interests in a patent application. A patent application agreement defines the terms of transfer, promotes collaboration, and mitigates risks.

Patent Assignment

Simplify the process of transferring patent rights for both buyers and sellers with a patent assignment agreement. Document the ownership transfer clearly and efficiently.

Trademark Assignment

Simplify the buying and selling of trademarks with a trademark assignment agreement. Transfer intellectual property rights and ensure a fair and smooth transaction.

Trademark License Agreement

Ensure fair use of intellectual property with a trademark license agreement. Outline the terms of usage and compensation.

• ACC Communities

The Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) is the world's largest organization serving the professional and business interests of attorneys who practice in the legal departments of corporations, associations, nonprofits and other private-sector organizations around the globe.

Employee Intellectual Property Assignment and Confidential Agreement

You may also be interested in.

This is a sample employee intellectual property assignment and confidentiality agreement, under which an employee, among other covenants, assigns to the company intellectual property such as designs, inventions, improvements, technical information, know-how, technology and suggestions relating in any way to the products or services of the company, which the employee conceives, develops, or contributes to or acquire during the employment period.

Members-only access

Not an acc member.

Trending News

Related Practices & Jurisdictions

• Intellectual Property
• Labor & Employment
• Administrative & Regulatory

On September 15, 2023, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed SB 5640 into law, adding New York to the growing list of states that restrict the enforcement of employee intellectual property assignment agreements.

SB 5640 creates a new Section 203-f under New York’s Labor Law, which the New York State Department of Labor (NYSDOL) is responsible for enforcing. The new law took effect immediately upon Governor Hochul’s signature, so it is vital that New York employers act now to understand the new legal landscape.

What SB 5640 Says

The new law generally makes unenforceable any provision in an employment agreement that requires an employee to assign to the employer (or offer to assign) an invention that the employee develops on their own time and without the employer’s equipment, supplies, facilities, or trade secret information (a “Non-Assignable Invention”). However, SB 5640 exempts from this carveout those inventions created on the employee’s own time/equipment that:

• at the time of conception or reduction to practice, relate to the employer’s business, actual research or development, or anticipated research or development, or
• result from work that the employee performs for the employer.

In other words, even if the invention was created on the employee’s own time and without the employer’s tools, etc., if it either relates to the business when it was developed or results from work that the employee is performing for the employer (an “Exempt and Assignable Invention”), it is not covered by the pro-employee protections of SB 5640; thus, the employer can enforce any relevant assignment provision.

Importantly, while SB 5640 invalidates overly broad invention assignment provisions, it does not create an express private right of action. However, employers should remember that New York Labor Law Section 213 generally provides that any person who violates a labor law, as well as any officers and agents of any corporation who knowingly permit the corporation to violate the law, are guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a series of fines.

While the text of SB 5640 refers only to the assignment of employee “inventions” (for which there is no definition), employers should be aware that the legislative commentary accompanying the law refers to the broader concept of “IP” as well as “inventions.” Although this commentary is not binding, it suggests that the legislature may intend for the law to apply to all forms of employee intellectual property. [1] It remains to be seen whether the NYDOL and courts will broadly interpret SB 5640 to align with this position.

How SB 5640 Relates to Other States’ Laws

With the addition of New York, more than 10 states now regulate employee assignment of intellectual property rights, including California, Illinois, Minnesota, and New Jersey. [2] Although these laws generally favor employee ownership and mobility, their specific scopes vary significantly.

One area of differentiation is the type of employee inventions that the laws exempt from the employee-favorable carveout. For example, both SB 5640 and Minnesota law exempt certain inventions that “relate” to an employer’s business. However, the laws are distinct in two important ways.

First, New York law includes a temporal qualifier that is absent from Minnesota law. Under SB 5640, an employee’s related invention only qualifies as an Exempt and Assignable Invention if it relates to the employer’s business or actual or anticipated research or development “at the time of conception or reduction to practice.” If the invention does not relate to the employer’s business at such time, it is not an Exempt and Assignable Invention, so the employer cannot require the employee to assign the invention. Under Minnesota law, all related inventions qualify as an Exempt and Assignable Invention regardless of timing. In this way, Minnesota allows employers to require employees to assign more inventions than under New York law.

In contrast, Minnesota law includes a relationship qualifier that is absent from SB 5640. Under Minnesota law, an employee’s related invention only qualifies as an Exempt and Assignable Invention if it “directly” relates to the employer’s business. Unless future NYSDOL guidance or court precedent requires otherwise, under New York law, inventions that are directly or indirectly related to an employer’s business qualify as Exempt and Assignable Inventions. In this way, New York law allows employers to require the assignment of a broader range of inventions than Minnesota law does.

Another way in which state laws differ is through the imposition of affirmative employer obligations. SB 5640 only limits the types of employee invention assignment agreements that are enforceable . It does not require an employer to take (or prohibit an employer from taking) any specific action. This is markedly different from California law, which, in addition to limiting enforcement, also requires employers to include specific notice in employee invention assignment agreements as to the inventions that employees may not assign. Other states, including Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, and Washington, impose similar notice obligations on employers as well.

Given this trend in legislation, although not required under SB 5640, including provisions that specifically identify and carve out Exempt and Assignable Inventions from New York employee invention assignment agreements not only makes it clear and unambiguous to employees what inventions they are and are not assigning but also may help reduce the risk of a court invalidating an assignment provision in its entirety.

What New York Employers Should Do Now

To comply with SB 5640, employers should do the following:

• Identify relevant employment agreements and handbooks, compliance manuals, or other policies that contain an employee invention or other intellectual property assignment provision (“Assignment Provisions”).
• Revise Assignment Provisions to (i) include a clear description of what constitutes an Exempt and Assignable Invention and (ii) exclude Non-Assignable Inventions from their scope.
• Maintain accurate records regarding business plans as well as actual or anticipated research or development to counter any employee claims that an invention is not an Exempt and Assignable Invention.
• Monitor the NYSDOL’s website for guidance relating to SB 5640.

[1] Employers should be aware that notwithstanding SB 5640 and similar state laws, federal law may conflict with these laws’ protections. For example, where work product is capable of both copyright and trade secret protection, if the work product is not a work made for hire, the employer cannot claim ownership of the work as a trade secret.

[2] Other states with such laws include Delaware, Kansas, Nevada, North Carolina, Utah, and Washington.

Current Legal Analysis

More from epstein becker & green, p.c., upcoming legal education events.

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins

New York Restricts Assignment of Employee Intellectual Property

On September 15, 2023, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed SB 5640 into law, adding New York to the growing list of states that restrict the enforcement of employee intellectual property assignment agreements.

SB 5640 creates a new Section 203-f under New York’s Labor Law, which the New York State Department of Labor (NYSDOL) is responsible for enforcing. The new law took effect immediately upon Governor Hochul’s signature, so it is vital that New York employers act now to understand the new legal landscape.

What SB 5640 Says

The new law generally makes unenforceable any provision in an employment agreement that requires an employee to assign to the employer (or offer to assign) an invention that the employee develops on their own time and without the employer’s equipment, supplies, facilities, or trade secret information (a “Non-Assignable Invention”). However, SB 5640 exempts from this carveout those inventions created on the employee’s own time/equipment that:

• at the time of conception or reduction to practice, relate to the employer’s business, actual research or development, or anticipated research or development, or
• result from work that the employee performs for the employer.

In other words, even if the invention was created on the employee’s own time and without the employer’s tools, etc., if it either relates to the business when it was developed or results from work that the employee is performing for the employer (an “Exempt and Assignable Invention”), it is not covered by the pro-employee protections of SB 5640; thus, the employer can enforce any relevant assignment provision.

Importantly, while SB 5640 invalidates overly broad invention assignment provisions, it does not create an express private right of action. However, employers should remember that New York Labor Law Section 213 generally provides that any person who violates a labor law, as well as any officers and agents of any corporation who knowingly permit the corporation to violate the law, are guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a series of fines.

While the text of SB 5640 refers only to the assignment of employee “inventions” (for which there is no definition), employers should be aware that the legislative commentary accompanying the law refers to the broader concept of “IP” as well as “inventions.” Although this commentary is not binding, it suggests that the legislature may intend for the law to apply to all forms of employee intellectual property. [1] It remains to be seen whether the NYDOL and courts will broadly interpret SB 5640 to align with this position.

How SB 5640 Relates to Other States’ Laws

With the addition of New York, more than 10 states now regulate employee assignment of intellectual property rights, including California, Illinois, Minnesota, and New Jersey. [2] Although these laws generally favor employee ownership and mobility, their specific scopes vary significantly.

One area of differentiation is the type of employee inventions that the laws exempt from the employee-favorable carveout. For example, both SB 5640 and Minnesota law exempt certain inventions that “relate” to an employer’s business. However, the laws are distinct in two important ways.

First, New York law includes a temporal qualifier that is absent from Minnesota law. Under SB 5640, an employee’s related invention only qualifies as an Exempt and Assignable Invention if it relates to the employer’s business or actual or anticipated research or development “at the time of conception or reduction to practice.” If the invention does not relate to the employer’s business at such time, it is not an Exempt and Assignable Invention, so the employer cannot require the employee to assign the invention. Under Minnesota law, all related inventions qualify as an Exempt and Assignable Invention regardless of timing. In this way, Minnesota allows employers to require employees to assign more inventions than under New York law.

In contrast, Minnesota law includes a relationship qualifier that is absent from SB 5640. Under Minnesota law, an employee’s related invention only qualifies as an Exempt and Assignable Invention if it “directly” relates to the employer’s business. Unless future NYSDOL guidance or court precedent requires otherwise, under New York law, inventions that are directly or indirectly related to an employer’s business qualify as Exempt and Assignable Inventions. In this way, New York law allows employers to require the assignment of a broader range of inventions than Minnesota law does.

Another way in which state laws differ is through the imposition of affirmative employer obligations. SB 5640 only limits the types of employee invention assignment agreements that are enforceable . It does not require an employer to take (or prohibit an employer from taking) any specific action. This is markedly different from California law, which, in addition to limiting enforcement, also requires employers to include specific notice in employee invention assignment agreements as to the inventions that employees may not assign. Other states, including Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, and Washington, impose similar notice obligations on employers as well.

Given this trend in legislation, although not required under SB 5640, including provisions that specifically identify and carve out Exempt and Assignable Inventions from New York employee invention assignment agreements not only makes it clear and unambiguous to employees what inventions they are and are not assigning but also may help reduce the risk of a court invalidating an assignment provision in its entirety.

What New York Employers Should Do Now

To comply with SB 5640, employers should do the following:

• Identify relevant employment agreements and handbooks, compliance manuals, or other policies that contain an employee invention or other intellectual property assignment provision (“Assignment Provisions”).
• Revise Assignment Provisions to (i) include a clear description of what constitutes an Exempt and Assignable Invention and (ii) exclude Non-Assignable Inventions from their scope.
• Maintain accurate records regarding business plans as well as actual or anticipated research or development to counter any employee claims that an invention is not an Exempt and Assignable Invention.
• Monitor the NYSDOL’s website for guidance relating to SB 5640.

For more information about this  Insight , please contact:

[1] Employers should be aware that notwithstanding SB 5640 and similar state laws, federal law may conflict with these laws’ protections. For example, where work product is capable of both copyright and trade secret protection, if the work product is not a work made for hire, the employer cannot claim ownership of the work as a trade secret.

[2] Other states with such laws include Delaware, Kansas, Nevada, North Carolina, Utah, and Washington.

More Like This

• Corporate & Transactional
• Employment, Labor & Workforce Management
• Intellectual Property
• Financial Services
• Health Care Industry
• Hospitality
• Life Sciences Industry
• Go to the privacy settings
• Download PDF
• Download Word

By clicking “Accept All Cookies,” you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.