The Learner-Centered Psychological Principles
Beginning in 1990, the American Psychological Association (APA) appointed a special Task Force on Psychology in Education, one of whose purposes was to integrate research and theory from psychology and education in order to surface general principles that have stood the test of time and can provide a framework for school redesign and reform. The result was a document that originally specified twelve fundamental principles about learners and learning that, taken together, provide an integrated perspective on factors influencing learning for all learners (APA, 1993). This document was revised in 1997 (APA, 1997) and now includes 14 principles that are essentially the same as the original 12 principles with the exception that attention is now given to principles dealing with diversity and standards. [Note to readers: For those interested in research support for the Principles, several sources are relevant. The specific research and theory that was reviewed in developing the Principles is described in McCombs and Whisler (1997). Further research support is also provided in Alexander and Murphy (1998) and Lambert and McCombs (1998)].
The 14 learner-centered principles are categorized into four domains as shown in Table 1. These categories group the principles into research-validated domains important to learning: metacognitive and cognitive factors, affective and motivational factors, developmental and social factors, and individual difference factors. An understanding of these domains and the principles within them establishes a framework for designing learner-centered practices at all levels of schooling. It also helps define what "learner-centered" means from a research-validated perspective.
Defining "Learner-Centered"
From an integrated and holistic look at the Principles, the following definition emerges:
"Learner centered" is the perspective that couples a focus on individual learners - their heredity, experiences, perspectives, backgrounds, talents, interests, capacities, and needs - with a focus on leaning - the best available knowledge about learning and how it occurs and about teaching practices that are most effective in promoting the highest levels of motivation, learning, and achievement for all learners. This dual focus then informs and drives educational decision making. Learner-centered is a reflection in practice of the Learner-Centered Psychological Principles - in the programs, practices, policies, and people that support learning for all.
This definition of learner-centered is thus based on an understanding of the Learner-Centered Psychological Principles as a representation of the current knowledge base on learners and learning. The Principles apply to all learners, in and outside of school, young and old. Learner-centered is also related to the beliefs, characteristics, dispositions, and practices of teachers - practices primarily created by the teacher. When teachers and their practices function from an understanding of the knowledge base delineated in the Principles, they (a) include learners in decisions about how and what they learn and how that learning is assessed; (b) value each learner's unique perspectives; (c) respect and accommodate individual differences in learners' backgrounds, interests, abilities, and experiences; and (d) treat learners as co-creators and partners in the teaching and learning process.
COGNITIVE AND METACOGNITIVE FACTORS Principle 1: Nature of the learning process. Principle 2: Goals of the learning process. Principle 3: Construction of knowledge. Principle 4: Strategic thinking Principle 5: Thinking about thinking Principle 6: Context of learning MOTIVATIONAL AND AFFECTIVE FACTORS Principle 7: Motivational and emotional influences on learning Principle 8: Intrinsic motivation to learn | Intrinsic motivation is stimulated by tasks of optimal novelty and difficulty, relevant to personal interests, and providing for personal choice and control. Principle 9: Effects of motivation on effort DEVELOPMENTAL AND SOCIAL FACTORS Principle 10: Developmental influence on learning Principle 11: Social influences on learning INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES FACTORS Principle 12: Individual differences in learning Principle 13: Learning and diversity Principle 14: Standards and assessment |
Summarized from the APA Work Group of the Board of Educational Affairs (1997, November). Learner-centered psychological principles: Guidelines for school reform and redesign. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. |
Alexander, P.A., & Murphy, P. K. (1998). The research base for APA's Learner-Centered Psychological Principles. In N. Lambert & B.L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
APA Work Group of the Board of Educational Affairs (1997, November). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
APA Task Force on Psychology in Education (1993, January). Learner-centered psychological principles: Guidelines for school redesign and reform. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association and Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory.
Bartolome, L. I. (1994). Beyond the methods fetish: Toward a humanizing pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64(2), 173-194.
Bennett, D., McMillan-Culp, K., Honey, M., Tally, B., & Spielvogel, B. (March, 2000). It all depends: Strategies for designing technologies for education change. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning with Technology, "Does Technology Make a Difference?," Philadelphia, Temple University.
Boyle, A., & Rigg, P. (March, 2000). Technology and problem-based learning: The virtual benefits of the processes of critical thinking and collaborative writing. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning with Technology, "Does Technology Make a Difference?," Philadelphia, Temple University.
Bransford, John D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brown, D. B. (2000). Convention highlights: Third general session on successful reform and change strategies that work (Michael Fullan). Tech Trends, 44(3), 14-15.
Burnham, L., Miller, A., & Ray. L. (March, 2000). Putting the pieces together. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning with Technology, "Does Technology Make a Difference?," Philadelphia, Temple University.
Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1997). Education on the edge of possibility. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Carroll, T. (2000, July). Preparing tomorrow's teachers to use technology. Keynote presentation at the U.S. Department of Education's Regional Conferences on "Evaluating Technology in Education," Atlanta.
Combs, A. W. (1962). A perceptual view of the adequate personality. 1962 ASCD Yearbook: Perceiving, behaving, becoming: A new focus for education. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Pp. 50-64.
Combs, A. W. (1986). What makes a good helper? A person-centered approach. Person-Centered Review, l(l), 51-61.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The quiet revolution: Rethinking teacher development. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 4-10.
Diamond, M., & Hopson, J. (1998). Magic trees of the mind. New York: Dutton.
Ellsworth, J. B. (2000). An in-depth look at the 2000 CHANGE council keynote address. Tech Trends, 44(3), 28-30.
Fullan, M. (2000, February). Change forces: The sequel. 2000 CHANGE Council Keynote Address presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Long Beach, CA.
Fullan, M. (1997). Emotion and hope: Constructive concepts for complex times (pp. 216-233). In A. Hargreaves (Ed.), Rethinking educational change with heart and mind: 1997 ASCD Yearbook. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Fullan, M. G. (1995). The limits and the potential of professional development. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices. New York: Teachers College Press. Pp. 253-267.
Fullan, M. (1992-93). Managing change. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto.
Fulton, K., & Torney-Purta, J. (March, 2000). How teachers beliefs about teaching and learning are reflected in their use of technology: Case studies from urban middle schools. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning with Technology, "Does Technology Make a Difference?," Philadelphia, Temple University.
Green, D. A., & Staley, A. (March, 2000). Using information technology in traditionally "soft" subjects. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning with Technology, "Does Technology Make a Difference?," Philadelphia, Temple University.
Hannafin, M. (1999). Learning in open-ended environments: Tools and technologies for the next millennium. (ITFORUM Paper 34) http://itech1.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper34/paper34.html
Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Joyce, B., & Calhoun, E. (1995). School renewal: An inquiry, not a formula. Educational Leadership, 52(&), 51-55.
Kanfer, R., & McCombs, B. L. (in press). Motivation: Applying current theory to critical issues in training. In S. Tobias & D. T. Fletcher (Eds.), Handbook of Training. New York: Macmillan.
Lambert, N. & McCombs, B. L. (Eds.) (1998). How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education. Washington, DC: APA Books.
McCombs, B. L. (in press). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-Regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, Research, and Practice (2nd. Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
McCombs, B. L. (2000, July). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for technology evaluation. Invited paper presented at the U.S. Department of Education's Regional Conferences on "Evaluating Technology in Education," Atlanta.
McCombs, B. L., & Lauer, P. A. (1997). Development and validation of the Learner-Centered Battery: Self-Assessment tools for teacher reflection and professional development. The Professional Educator, 20(1), 1-21.
McCombs, B. L., & Whisler, J. S. (1997). The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
McKeachie, W. J. (1995, August). What makes a good teacher great! Invited address at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
McMillan-Culp, K., Hawkins, J., & Honey, M. (1999, January). Review paper on educational technology research and development. New York: Center for Children and Technology.
McNabb, M., Hawkes, M., & Rouk, U. (1999, July). Critical issues in evaluating the effectiveness of technology. Paper presented at the National Conference on Educational Technology, Washington, DC.
McWhorter, P., Jarrard, B., Rhoades, B., Wiltcher. B. (1996, Summer). Student-generated curriculum: Lessons from our students. (Instructional Resource No. 30). University of Georgia and University of Maryland: National Reading Research Center.
Noddings, N. (1995). Teaching themes of care. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9), 675-679.
Nolen, S. B. (1994, April). Learning from students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Rein, D. (March, 2000). What is effective integration of technology, and does it make a difference? Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning with Technology, "Does Technology Make a Difference?," Philadelphia, Temple University.
Rudduck, J., Day, J., & Wallace, C. (1997). Student perspectives on school improvement (pp. 73-91). In A. Hargreaves (Ed.), Rethinking educational change with heart and mind: 1997 ASCD Yearbook. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Schank, R. C., & Jona, K. (1999, December). Extracurriculars as the curriculum: A vision of education for the 21st century. White paper commissioned for the Forum on Technology in Education: Envisioning the Future, Washington, DC.
Schaps, E., & Lewis, C. (1999). Perils on an essential journey: Building school community. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(3), 215-218.
Sparks, D., & Hirsh, S. (1997). A new vision for staff development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Sylwester, R. (1995). A celebration of neurons: An educator's guide to the brain. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Thornburg, D. D. (1999, December). Technology in K-12 education: Envisioning a new future. White paper commissioned for the Forum on Technology in Education: Envisioning the Future, Washington, DC.
Weinstein, R. S. (1998). Promoting positive expectations in schooling. In N. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education. New York: APA Books.
Wheatley, M. J. (1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Wolfe, P., & Sorgen, M. (1990). Mind, memory, and learning. Napa, CA: Author. Yakel, E., & Lamberski, R. J. (March, 2000). Searching for the differences technology makes. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning with Technology, "Does Technology Make a Difference?," Philadelphia, Temple University.
Zimmerman, B.J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education (pp. 3-21). In D. H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.) (in press). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (2nd Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Learner-Centered Teaching
- Reference work entry
- pp 1754–1757
- Cite this reference work entry
- Georgia C. Brooke 2 &
- Heidi L. Andrade 2
414 Accesses
Child-centered teaching ; Learner-centered education ; Learner-centered lesson planning ; Learner-centered principles ; Person-centered instruction ; Student-centered learning
A learner-centered perspective couples a focus on individual learners – their experiences, perspectives, backgrounds, talents, interests, capacities, and needs – with a focus on the best available knowledge about learning and teaching practices that promote motivation and achievement for all learners. Grounded in the Learner-Centered Psychological Principles (APA Work Group of the Board of Educational Affairs 1997 ), this dual focus is used to inform decision-making and drive educational reform.
Theoretical Background
In 1990, concern over national declines in student achievement prompted the American Psychological Association (APA) to charge the Presidential Task Force on Psychology in Education with producing a synthesis of research on human learning, development, and motivation in order to...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Durable hardcover edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
American Psychological Association Work Group of the Board of Educational Affairs. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Google Scholar
Donohue, K. M., Perry, K. E., & Weinstein, R. S. (2003). Teachers’ classroom practices and children’s rejection by their peers. Applied Developmental Psychology, 24 , 91–118.
McCombs, B. L., & Miller, L. (2007). Learner-centered classroom practices and assessments: Maximizing student motivation, learning and achievement . Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
McCombs, B. L., & Whisler, J. S. (1997). The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Perry, K. E., Donohue, K. M., & Weinstein, R. S. (2007). Teaching practices and the promotion of achievement and adjustment in first grade. Journal of School Psychology, 45 , 269–292.
Salinas, M. F., & Garr, J. (2009). Effect of learner-centered education on the outcomes of minority groups. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36 (3), 226–237.
Salinas, M. F., Kane-Johnson, S. E., & Vasil-Miller, M. A. (2008). Long-term learning, achievement tests, and learner centered instruction. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8 (3), 20–28.
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
University at Albany, State University of New York, 1400 Washington Avenue, ED 233, 12222, Albany, NY, USA
Georgia C. Brooke & Heidi L. Andrade ( Associate Professor )
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Heidi L. Andrade .
Editor information
Editors and affiliations.
Faculty of Economics and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Education, University of Freiburg, 79085, Freiburg, Germany
Norbert M. Seel
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this entry
Cite this entry.
Brooke, G.C., Andrade, H.L. (2012). Learner-Centered Teaching. In: Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1510
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1510
Publisher Name : Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN : 978-1-4419-1427-9
Online ISBN : 978-1-4419-1428-6
eBook Packages : Humanities, Social Sciences and Law Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Education
Share this entry
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
LEARNER-CENTERED PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES: A Framework for School Reform & Redesign
Related Papers
Barbara L McCombs
The Elementary School Journal
Charles Reigeluth
This article, the third in a series of four installments, begins by discussing the need for paradigm change in education and for a critical systems approach to paradigm change, and examines current progress toward paradigm change. Then it explores what a learner-centered, Information-Age educational system should be like, including the APA learner-centered psychological principles, the National Research Council's findings on how people learn, the work of McCombs and colleagues on learner-centered schools and classrooms, personalized learning, differentiated instruction, and brain-based instruction. Finally, one possible vision of a learner-centered school is described. (Contains 3 tables.)
Daniel Fasko
Kevin Zayed
Dylan Wiliam
Kirmanj Gundi
Moises Salinas Fleitman
Andrew Johnson
What is educational psychology? It involves a bit of philosophy, psychology, research, and theories. This short overview explains.
Educational Horizons
This paper introduces learner-centered edu-cation from a research and theory base that inte-grates what we know about learners and learning both inside and outside formal school settings and describes the work of the author and col-leagues in developing self-...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
RELATED PAPERS
MARITZA LISSETH PONCE DE BENAVIDES
Rajendra Kumar Shah
Moises Salinas
Nancy Barry
Niño James Mericuelo
Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education
Jill Lindsey
International Journal of Arts …
Ukrainian journal of educational studies and information technology
Olena Olifer
Learning Environments Research
Miriam Alfassi
Kristen Neal
Christopher Sink
Arithi Janice
Communications of the ACM
Jim Spohrer
Professional School Counseling
Carmilla Nandlal
Cynthia Paris
The Daily Observer
Debproshad Halder
biju sukumar
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
Gina Ikemoto
Rochelle Brock
Lauren Resnicow
International Journal of Educational Research
International Journal of Instruction
burhan üzüm
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
- Find new research papers in:
- Health Sciences
- Earth Sciences
- Cognitive Science
- Mathematics
- Computer Science
- Academia ©2024
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Learner-Centered Principles Prepared by the Learner-Centered Principles Work Group of the American Psychological Association's Board of Educational Affairs (BEA), November 1997 BACKGROUND Throughout its history, psychology has provided vital information for the design of schooling based on theory and research on human learning, development, and ...
The Research Base for APA's Learner-Centered Psychological Principles. January 1994. DOI: 10.1037/10258-001. Authors: Patricia Alexander. University of Maryland, College Park. P. Karen Murphy.
This framework is based on the American Psychological Association's (1997) research-validated Learner-Centered Psychological Principles, developed from over a century of research. Read more Chapter
Distance Education 0158-7919 (print)/1475-0198 (online) Research Article 2008 Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia, Inc. 29 3 000000November 2008 WallaceHannum [email protected]. This ...
Learner centered is a reflection in practice of the Learner-Centered Psychological Principles—in the programs, practices, policies, and people that support learning for all (APA, 1997)." These learner—centered principles are also aligned to the beliefs, characteristics, dispositions and, in particular, the practices created by the instructor.
adequately in online instructional design. The American Psychological Associa-tion addressed this concern and developed 12 learner-centered principles in 1990, then revised the list into 14 learner-centered principles in 1995 (Alexan-der & Murphy, 1998). McCombs and Whisler (1997) defined the learner-cen-tered paradigm based on these principles:
Between 1990 and 1996, an impressive collection of educational researchers contributed their wisdom and years of well-honed insights to a set of 14 psychological principles that they hoped would guide the redesign and reform of American schools [e.g., %APA% Presidential Task Force on Psychology in Education and Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory (McREL), 1993]. The authors of this ...
The Learner-Centered Psychological Principles (LCP) were developed through the efforts of an American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Psychology in Education and McREL in order to contribute to current educational reform endeavors regarding the learner and the learning process and thus to help the nation meet its ...
Table 1: The Learner-Centered Psychological Principles. COGNITIVE AND METACOGNITIVE FACTORS. Principle 1: Nature of the learning process. The learning of complex subject matter is most effective when it is an intentional process of constructing meaning from information and experience. Principle 2: Goals of the learning process.
Focuses on five important themes contained in the learner-centered principles. It is argued that parsed down to their fundamental roots, the principles relate to five essential dimensions of meaningful learning. These dimensions, extensively investigated in psychology and related disciplines, fall under the following headings: (1) the knowledge base, (2) motivation or affect, (3) strategic ...
This review of research on learning, motivation, development, and individual differences led to the development and dissemination of the learner-centered psychological principles (LCPs). Originally, the task force identified 12 principles (APA 1993 ) and later added two principles in response to rising interests in understanding cultural ...
Task Force identified twelve basic principles, called the Learner-Centered Psychological Principles (LCPPs) (see Appendix A), about learners and learning that provided a new perspective on factors that influence learning for all learners (APA, 1993). The APA revised this document in 1997, and it now includes 14 principles with the addition of
This chapter begins with an introduction of issues regarding children with special needs, followed by a description of the learner-centered psychological principles (LCPs) currently disseminated by the American Psychological Association (APA, 1997). The implications of the LCPs for instructional practices are then discussed, with a particular focus on practices that meet the motivational and ...
Learner-centered psychological principles provide a framework for developing and incorporating the components of new designs for schooling. These principles emphasize the active and reflective nature of learning and learners. From this perspective, educational practice will be most likely to improve when the educational system is redesigned with the primary focus on the learner. Psychologists ...
Since the introduction of APA's Learner-Centered Psychological Principles, a large number of studies and educational programs have provided evidence to suggest that learner-centered systems are more effective than traditional, teacher-centered approaches in terms of an array of indicators of school performance including academic achievement, knowledge retention, closing the minority ...
ESM (English for Students of Medicine), learner-centered education, and continues by presenting relevant studies in the field of medical English courses. The first chapter concludes by addressing the research questions and significance that guided the entire research study. 1.1. Background to the Study English language is one of the most ...
Facilitatingl Learning - LEARNER-CENTERED PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. This article reviews research on classroom management and finds that approaches have shifted from a purely behavioral focus on discipline to recognizing the classroom as a social system.
Then it explores what a learner-centered, Information-Age educational system should be like, including the APA learner-centered psychological principles, the National Research Council's findings on how people learn, the work of McCombs and colleagues on learner-centered schools and classrooms, personalized learning, differentiated ...
This chapter begins with an introduction of issues regarding children with special needs, followed by a description of the learner-centered psychological principles (LCPs) currently disseminated ...
This article summarises the findings of a systematic review of 62 journal articles reporting the outcomes of LCP implementation in low- to middle-income countries. The review found relatively few studies that provided objective evidence of LCP effectiveness. A higher number of studies identified non-objective perspectives of LCP effectiveness ...
Five General Statements Related t o the Learner-Centered Principles. The knowledge base One's existing knowledge serves as the foundation of all future learning by guiding organization and ...
ACTIVITY 1: Learner-centered Psychological Principles. Direction. Read a research or study related to Learner-centered Psychological Principles. Fill out the matrix below_. 20pts._ Research Title: The Impact of Learner-Centered Teaching on Students' Learning Skills and Strategies
Learner-Centered Psychological Principles (LCP) Focus on psychological factors internal to the learner; acknowledge external environment that interacts with internal factors Deal holistically with learners in the context of real-world learning situations Intended to apply to all learners o Children o Teachers o Administrators o Parents o Community members Cognitive and Metacognitive Factors