publish research papers in international journals

• PRO Courses Guides New Tech Help Pro Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Upgrade Sign In
• EDIT Edit this Article
• EXPLORE Tech Help Pro About Us Random Article Quizzes Request a New Article Community Dashboard This Or That Game Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
• Browse Articles
• Learn Something New
• Quizzes Hot
• This Or That Game
• Train Your Brain
• Explore More
• Support wikiHow
• About wikiHow
• Log in / Sign up
• Education and Communications
• College University and Postgraduate
• Academic Writing
• Research Papers

How to Write and Publish Your Research in a Journal

Last Updated: May 26, 2024 Fact Checked

Choosing a Journal

Writing the research paper, editing & revising your paper, submitting your paper, navigating the peer review process, research paper help.

This article was co-authored by Matthew Snipp, PhD and by wikiHow staff writer, Cheyenne Main . C. Matthew Snipp is the Burnet C. and Mildred Finley Wohlford Professor of Humanities and Sciences in the Department of Sociology at Stanford University. He is also the Director for the Institute for Research in the Social Science’s Secure Data Center. He has been a Research Fellow at the U.S. Bureau of the Census and a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences. He has published 3 books and over 70 articles and book chapters on demography, economic development, poverty and unemployment. He is also currently serving on the National Institute of Child Health and Development’s Population Science Subcommittee. He holds a Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of Wisconsin—Madison. There are 13 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. This article has been fact-checked, ensuring the accuracy of any cited facts and confirming the authority of its sources. This article has been viewed 701,081 times.

Publishing a research paper in a peer-reviewed journal allows you to network with other scholars, get your name and work into circulation, and further refine your ideas and research. Before submitting your paper, make sure it reflects all the work you’ve done and have several people read over it and make comments. Keep reading to learn how you can choose a journal, prepare your work for publication, submit it, and revise it after you get a response back.

Things You Should Know

• Create a list of journals you’d like to publish your work in and choose one that best aligns with your topic and your desired audience.
• Prepare your manuscript using the journal’s requirements and ask at least 2 professors or supervisors to review your paper.
• Write a cover letter that “sells” your manuscript, says how your research adds to your field and explains why you chose the specific journal you’re submitting to.

• Ask your professors or supervisors for well-respected journals that they’ve had good experiences publishing with and that they read regularly.
• Many journals also only accept specific formats, so by choosing a journal before you start, you can write your article to their specifications and increase your chances of being accepted.
• If you’ve already written a paper you’d like to publish, consider whether your research directly relates to a hot topic or area of research in the journals you’re looking into.

• Review the journal’s peer review policies and submission process to see if you’re comfortable creating or adjusting your work according to their standards.
• Open-access journals can increase your readership because anyone can access them.

• Scientific research papers: Instead of a “thesis,” you might write a “research objective” instead. This is where you state the purpose of your research.
• “This paper explores how George Washington’s experiences as a young officer may have shaped his views during difficult circumstances as a commanding officer.”
• “This paper contends that George Washington’s experiences as a young officer on the 1750s Pennsylvania frontier directly impacted his relationship with his Continental Army troops during the harsh winter at Valley Forge.”

• Scientific research papers: Include a “materials and methods” section with the step-by-step process you followed and the materials you used. [5] X Research source
• Read other research papers in your field to see how they’re written. Their format, writing style, subject matter, and vocabulary can help guide your own paper. [6] X Research source

• If you’re writing about George Washington’s experiences as a young officer, you might emphasize how this research changes our perspective of the first president of the U.S.
• Link this section to your thesis or research objective.
• If you’re writing a paper about ADHD, you might discuss other applications for your research.

• Scientific research papers: You might include your research and/or analytical methods, your main findings or results, and the significance or implications of your research.
• Try to get as many people as you can to read over your abstract and provide feedback before you submit your paper to a journal.

• They might also provide templates to help you structure your manuscript according to their specific guidelines. [11] X Research source

• Not all journal reviewers will be experts on your specific topic, so a non-expert “outsider’s perspective” can be valuable.

• If you have a paper on the purification of wastewater with fungi, you might use both the words “fungi” and “mushrooms.”
• Use software like iThenticate, Turnitin, or PlagScan to check for similarities between the submitted article and published material available online. [15] X Research source

• Header: Address the editor who will be reviewing your manuscript by their name, include the date of submission, and the journal you are submitting to.
• First paragraph: Include the title of your manuscript, the type of paper it is (like review, research, or case study), and the research question you wanted to answer and why.
• Second paragraph: Explain what was done in your research, your main findings, and why they are significant to your field.
• Third paragraph: Explain why the journal’s readers would be interested in your work and why your results are important to your field.
• Conclusion: State the author(s) and any journal requirements that your work complies with (like ethical standards”).
• “We confirm that this manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal.”
• “All authors have approved the manuscript and agree with its submission to [insert the name of the target journal].”

• Submit your article to only one journal at a time.
• When submitting online, use your university email account. This connects you with a scholarly institution, which can add credibility to your work.

• Accept: Only minor adjustments are needed, based on the provided feedback by the reviewers. A first submission will rarely be accepted without any changes needed.
• Revise and Resubmit: Changes are needed before publication can be considered, but the journal is still very interested in your work.
• Reject and Resubmit: Extensive revisions are needed. Your work may not be acceptable for this journal, but they might also accept it if significant changes are made.
• Reject: The paper isn’t and won’t be suitable for this publication, but that doesn’t mean it might not work for another journal.

• Try organizing the reviewer comments by how easy it is to address them. That way, you can break your revisions down into more manageable parts.
• If you disagree with a comment made by a reviewer, try to provide an evidence-based explanation when you resubmit your paper.

• If you’re resubmitting your paper to the same journal, include a point-by-point response paper that talks about how you addressed all of the reviewers’ comments in your revision. [22] X Research source
• If you’re not sure which journal to submit to next, you might be able to ask the journal editor which publications they recommend.

Expert Q&A

You might also like.

• If reviewers suspect that your submitted manuscript plagiarizes another work, they may refer to a Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) flowchart to see how to move forward. [23] X Research source Thanks Helpful 0 Not Helpful 0

• ↑ https://www.wiley.com/en-us/network/publishing/research-publishing/choosing-a-journal/6-steps-to-choosing-the-right-journal-for-your-research-infographic
• ↑ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13187-020-01751-z
• ↑ https://libguides.unomaha.edu/c.php?g=100510&p=651627
• ↑ https://www.canberra.edu.au/library/start-your-research/research_help/publishing-research
• ↑ https://writingcenter.fas.harvard.edu/conclusions
• ↑ https://writing.wisc.edu/handbook/assignments/writing-an-abstract-for-your-research-paper/
• ↑ https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/book-authors-editors/your-publication-journey/manuscript-preparation
• ↑ https://apus.libanswers.com/writing/faq/2391
• ↑ https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/search-strategy
• ↑ https://ifis.libguides.com/journal-publishing-guide/submitting-your-paper
• ↑ https://www.springer.com/kr/authors-editors/authorandreviewertutorials/submitting-to-a-journal-and-peer-review/cover-letters/10285574
• ↑ https://www.apa.org/monitor/sep02/publish.aspx
• ↑ Matthew Snipp, PhD. Research Fellow, U.S. Bureau of the Census. Expert Interview. 26 March 2020.

About This Article

To publish a research paper, ask a colleague or professor to review your paper and give you feedback. Once you've revised your work, familiarize yourself with different academic journals so that you can choose the publication that best suits your paper. Make sure to look at the "Author's Guide" so you can format your paper according to the guidelines for that publication. Then, submit your paper and don't get discouraged if it is not accepted right away. You may need to revise your paper and try again. To learn about the different responses you might get from journals, see our reviewer's explanation below. Did this summary help you? Yes No

• Send fan mail to authors

Reader Success Stories

RAMDEV GOHIL

Oct 16, 2017

Did this article help you?

David Okandeji

Oct 23, 2019

Revati Joshi

Feb 13, 2017

Shahzad Khan

Jul 1, 2017

Apr 7, 2017

Featured Articles

Trending Articles

Watch Articles

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Do Not Sell or Share My Info
• Not Selling Info

wikiHow Tech Help Pro:

Develop the tech skills you need for work and life

• Privacy Policy

Home » How to Publish a Research Paper – Step by Step Guide

How to Publish a Research Paper – Step by Step Guide

Table of Contents

Publishing a research paper is an important step for researchers to disseminate their findings to a wider audience and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in their field. Whether you are a graduate student, a postdoctoral fellow, or an established researcher, publishing a paper requires careful planning, rigorous research, and clear writing. In this process, you will need to identify a research question , conduct a thorough literature review , design a methodology, analyze data, and draw conclusions. Additionally, you will need to consider the appropriate journals or conferences to submit your work to and adhere to their guidelines for formatting and submission. In this article, we will discuss some ways to publish your Research Paper.

How to Publish a Research Paper

To Publish a Research Paper follow the guide below:

• Conduct original research : Conduct thorough research on a specific topic or problem. Collect data, analyze it, and draw conclusions based on your findings.
• Write the paper : Write a detailed paper describing your research. It should include an abstract, introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion.
• Choose a suitable journal or conference : Look for a journal or conference that specializes in your research area. You can check their submission guidelines to ensure your paper meets their requirements.
• Prepare your submission: Follow the guidelines and prepare your submission, including the paper, abstract, cover letter, and any other required documents.
• Submit the paper: Submit your paper online through the journal or conference website. Make sure you meet the submission deadline.
• Peer-review process : Your paper will be reviewed by experts in the field who will provide feedback on the quality of your research, methodology, and conclusions.
• Revisions : Based on the feedback you receive, revise your paper and resubmit it.
• Acceptance : Once your paper is accepted, you will receive a notification from the journal or conference. You may need to make final revisions before the paper is published.
• Publication : Your paper will be published online or in print. You can also promote your work through social media or other channels to increase its visibility.

How to Choose Journal for Research Paper Publication

Here are some steps to follow to help you select an appropriate journal:

• Identify your research topic and audience : Your research topic and intended audience should guide your choice of journal. Identify the key journals in your field of research and read the scope and aim of the journal to determine if your paper is a good fit.
• Analyze the journal’s impact and reputation : Check the impact factor and ranking of the journal, as well as its acceptance rate and citation frequency. A high-impact journal can give your paper more visibility and credibility.
• Consider the journal’s publication policies : Look for the journal’s publication policies such as the word count limit, formatting requirements, open access options, and submission fees. Make sure that you can comply with the requirements and that the journal is in line with your publication goals.
• Look at recent publications : Review recent issues of the journal to evaluate whether your paper would fit in with the journal’s current content and style.
• Seek advice from colleagues and mentors: Ask for recommendations and suggestions from your colleagues and mentors in your field, especially those who have experience publishing in the same or similar journals.
• Be prepared to make changes : Be prepared to revise your paper according to the requirements and guidelines of the chosen journal. It is also important to be open to feedback from the editor and reviewers.

List of Journals for Research Paper Publications

There are thousands of academic journals covering various fields of research. Here are some of the most popular ones, categorized by field:

General/Multidisciplinary

• Nature: https://www.nature.com/
• Science: https://www.sciencemag.org/
• PLOS ONE: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/
• Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS): https://www.pnas.org/
• The Lancet: https://www.thelancet.com/
• JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association): https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama

Social Sciences/Humanities

• Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/psp
• Journal of Consumer Research: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/journals/jcr
• Journal of Educational Psychology: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/edu
• Journal of Applied Psychology: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/apl
• Journal of Communication: https://academic.oup.com/joc
• American Journal of Political Science: https://ajps.org/
• Journal of International Business Studies: https://www.jibs.net/
• Journal of Marketing Research: https://www.ama.org/journal-of-marketing-research/

Natural Sciences

• Journal of Biological Chemistry: https://www.jbc.org/
• Cell: https://www.cell.com/
• Science Advances: https://advances.sciencemag.org/
• Chemical Reviews: https://pubs.acs.org/journal/chreay
• Angewandte Chemie: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15213765
• Physical Review Letters: https://journals.aps.org/prl/
• Journal of Geophysical Research: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/2156531X
• Journal of High Energy Physics: https://link.springer.com/journal/13130

Engineering/Technology

• IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=5962385
• IEEE Transactions on Power Systems: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=59
• IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=42
• IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=87
• Journal of Engineering Mechanics: https://ascelibrary.org/journal/jenmdt
• Journal of Materials Science: https://www.springer.com/journal/10853
• Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/jcej
• Journal of Mechanical Design: https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/mechanicaldesign

Medical/Health Sciences

• New England Journal of Medicine: https://www.nejm.org/
• The BMJ (formerly British Medical Journal): https://www.bmj.com/
• Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA): https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama
• Annals of Internal Medicine: https://www.acpjournals.org/journal/aim
• American Journal of Epidemiology: https://academic.oup.com/aje
• Journal of Clinical Oncology: https://ascopubs.org/journal/jco
• Journal of Infectious Diseases: https://academic.oup.com/jid

List of Conferences for Research Paper Publications

There are many conferences that accept research papers for publication. The specific conferences you should consider will depend on your field of research. Here are some suggestions for conferences in a few different fields:

Computer Science and Information Technology:

• IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM): https://www.ieee-infocom.org/
• ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Data Communication: https://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/
• IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP): https://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP/
• ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS): https://www.sigsac.org/ccs/
• ACM Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (CHI): https://chi2022.acm.org/

Engineering:

• IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA): https://www.ieee-icra.org/
• International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE): http://www.icmae.org/
• International Conference on Civil and Environmental Engineering (ICCEE): http://www.iccee.org/
• International Conference on Materials Science and Engineering (ICMSE): http://www.icmse.org/
• International Conference on Energy and Power Engineering (ICEPE): http://www.icepe.org/

Natural Sciences:

• American Chemical Society National Meeting & Exposition: https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/meetings/national-meeting.html
• American Physical Society March Meeting: https://www.aps.org/meetings/march/
• International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology (ICEST): http://www.icest.org/
• International Conference on Natural Science and Environment (ICNSE): http://www.icnse.org/
• International Conference on Life Science and Biological Engineering (LSBE): http://www.lsbe.org/

Social Sciences:

• Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association (ASA): https://www.asanet.org/annual-meeting-2022
• International Conference on Social Science and Humanities (ICSSH): http://www.icssh.org/
• International Conference on Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (ICPBS): http://www.icpbs.org/
• International Conference on Education and Social Science (ICESS): http://www.icess.org/
• International Conference on Management and Information Science (ICMIS): http://www.icmis.org/

How to Publish a Research Paper in Journal

Publishing a research paper in a journal is a crucial step in disseminating scientific knowledge and contributing to the field. Here are the general steps to follow:

• Choose a research topic : Select a topic of your interest and identify a research question or problem that you want to investigate. Conduct a literature review to identify the gaps in the existing knowledge that your research will address.
• Conduct research : Develop a research plan and methodology to collect data and conduct experiments. Collect and analyze data to draw conclusions that address the research question.
• Write a paper: Organize your findings into a well-structured paper with clear and concise language. Your paper should include an introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. Use academic language and provide references for your sources.
• Choose a journal: Choose a journal that is relevant to your research topic and audience. Consider factors such as impact factor, acceptance rate, and the reputation of the journal.
• Follow journal guidelines : Review the submission guidelines and formatting requirements of the journal. Follow the guidelines carefully to ensure that your paper meets the journal’s requirements.
• Submit your paper : Submit your paper to the journal through the online submission system or by email. Include a cover letter that briefly explains the significance of your research and why it is suitable for the journal.
• Wait for reviews: Your paper will be reviewed by experts in the field. Be prepared to address their comments and make revisions to your paper.
• Revise and resubmit: Make revisions to your paper based on the reviewers’ comments and resubmit it to the journal. If your paper is accepted, congratulations! If not, consider revising and submitting it to another journal.
• Address reviewer comments : Reviewers may provide comments and suggestions for revisions to your paper. Address these comments carefully and thoughtfully to improve the quality of your paper.
• Submit the final version: Once your revisions are complete, submit the final version of your paper to the journal. Be sure to follow any additional formatting guidelines and requirements provided by the journal.
• Publication : If your paper is accepted, it will be published in the journal. Some journals provide online publication while others may publish a print version. Be sure to cite your published paper in future research and communicate your findings to the scientific community.

How to Publish a Research Paper for Students

Here are some steps you can follow to publish a research paper as an Under Graduate or a High School Student:

• Select a topic: Choose a topic that is relevant and interesting to you, and that you have a good understanding of.
• Conduct research : Gather information and data on your chosen topic through research, experiments, surveys, or other means.
• Write the paper : Start with an outline, then write the introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion sections of the paper. Be sure to follow any guidelines provided by your instructor or the journal you plan to submit to.
• Edit and revise: Review your paper for errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Ask a peer or mentor to review your paper and provide feedback for improvement.
• Choose a journal : Look for journals that publish papers in your field of study and that are appropriate for your level of research. Some popular journals for students include PLOS ONE, Nature, and Science.
• Submit the paper: Follow the submission guidelines for the journal you choose, which typically include a cover letter, abstract, and formatting requirements. Be prepared to wait several weeks to months for a response.
• Address feedback : If your paper is accepted with revisions, address the feedback from the reviewers and resubmit your paper. If your paper is rejected, review the feedback and consider revising and resubmitting to a different journal.

How to Publish a Research Paper for Free

Publishing a research paper for free can be challenging, but it is possible. Here are some steps you can take to publish your research paper for free:

• Choose a suitable open-access journal: Look for open-access journals that are relevant to your research area. Open-access journals allow readers to access your paper without charge, so your work will be more widely available.
• Check the journal’s reputation : Before submitting your paper, ensure that the journal is reputable by checking its impact factor, publication history, and editorial board.
• Follow the submission guidelines : Every journal has specific guidelines for submitting papers. Make sure to follow these guidelines carefully to increase the chances of acceptance.
• Submit your paper : Once you have completed your research paper, submit it to the journal following their submission guidelines.
• Wait for the review process: Your paper will undergo a peer-review process, where experts in your field will evaluate your work. Be patient during this process, as it can take several weeks or even months.
• Revise your paper : If your paper is rejected, don’t be discouraged. Revise your paper based on the feedback you receive from the reviewers and submit it to another open-access journal.
• Promote your research: Once your paper is published, promote it on social media and other online platforms. This will increase the visibility of your work and help it reach a wider audience.

Journals and Conferences for Free Research Paper publications

Here are the websites of the open-access journals and conferences mentioned:

Open-Access Journals:

• PLOS ONE – https://journals.plos.org/plosone/
• BMC Research Notes – https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/
• Frontiers in… – https://www.frontiersin.org/
• Journal of Open Research Software – https://openresearchsoftware.metajnl.com/
• PeerJ – https://peerj.com/

Conferences:

• IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) – https://globecom2022.ieee-globecom.org/
• IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) – https://infocom2022.ieee-infocom.org/
• IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) – https://www.ieee-icdm.org/
• ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Data Communication (SIGCOMM) – https://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/
• ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) – https://www.sigsac.org/ccs/CCS2022/

Importance of Research Paper Publication

Research paper publication is important for several reasons, both for individual researchers and for the scientific community as a whole. Here are some reasons why:

• Advancing scientific knowledge : Research papers provide a platform for researchers to present their findings and contribute to the body of knowledge in their field. These papers often contain novel ideas, experimental data, and analyses that can help to advance scientific understanding.
• Building a research career : Publishing research papers is an essential component of building a successful research career. Researchers are often evaluated based on the number and quality of their publications, and having a strong publication record can increase one’s chances of securing funding, tenure, or a promotion.
• Peer review and quality control: Publication in a peer-reviewed journal means that the research has been scrutinized by other experts in the field. This peer review process helps to ensure the quality and validity of the research findings.
• Recognition and visibility : Publishing a research paper can bring recognition and visibility to the researchers and their work. It can lead to invitations to speak at conferences, collaborations with other researchers, and media coverage.
• Impact on society : Research papers can have a significant impact on society by informing policy decisions, guiding clinical practice, and advancing technological innovation.

Advantages of Research Paper Publication

There are several advantages to publishing a research paper, including:

• Recognition: Publishing a research paper allows researchers to gain recognition for their work, both within their field and in the academic community as a whole. This can lead to new collaborations, invitations to conferences, and other opportunities to share their research with a wider audience.
• Career advancement : A strong publication record can be an important factor in career advancement, particularly in academia. Publishing research papers can help researchers secure funding, grants, and promotions.
• Dissemination of knowledge : Research papers are an important way to share new findings and ideas with the broader scientific community. By publishing their research, scientists can contribute to the collective body of knowledge in their field and help advance scientific understanding.
• Feedback and peer review : Publishing a research paper allows other experts in the field to provide feedback on the research, which can help improve the quality of the work and identify potential flaws or limitations. Peer review also helps ensure that research is accurate and reliable.
• Citation and impact : Published research papers can be cited by other researchers, which can help increase the impact and visibility of the research. High citation rates can also help establish a researcher’s reputation and credibility within their field.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

APA Table of Contents – Format and Example

Implications in Research – Types, Examples and...

Future Research – Thesis Guide

Research Paper Conclusion – Writing Guide and...

Research Contribution – Thesis Guide

Research Paper Abstract – Writing Guide and...

• Submit your COVID-19 Pandemic Research
• Research Leap Manual on Academic Writing
• Conduct Your Survey Easily
• Research Tools for Primary and Secondary Research
• Useful and Reliable Article Sources for Researchers
• Tips on writing a Research Paper
• Stuck on Your Thesis Statement?
• Out of the Box
• How to Organize the Format of Your Writing
• Argumentative Versus Persuasive. Comparing the 2 Types of Academic Writing Styles
• Very Quick Academic Writing Tips and Advices
• Top 4 Quick Useful Tips for Your Introduction
• Have You Chosen the Right Topic for Your Research Paper?
• Follow These Easy 8 Steps to Write an Effective Paper
• 7 Errors in your thesis statement
• How do I even Write an Academic Paper?
• Useful Tips for Successful Academic Writing
• Transformative Forces: Social Entrepreneurship as Key Competency
• Virtual Learning Experiences Among Postgraduate Students in Namibia
• Collaborative Governance in Government Administration in the Field of State Security Along the Republic of Indonesia (RI)-Malaysia Border Area
• IT Service Management System Practices in Kenya
• Introduction Economic and Psychological Well-Being During COVID-19 Pandemic in Albania, A Need for Sustainability
• Designing a Framework for Assessing Agripreneurship Action for the Green Scheme Irrigation Projects, Namibia
• The Potential Utilisation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Enterprises
• Case Study – Developing a National Research and Evidence Base for The Health and Wellbeing Chapter of The Welsh Government’s 2023 Innovation Strategy for Wales
• Slide Share

Guide for Authors

Authors-guidelines publish research paper in international journals

How to share your research article to increase the impact of your research

“ How to publish a paper in the Research Leap ”

Publishing guidelines for authors –  The International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration – ISSN 1849-5664 (ONLINE) – ISSN 1849-5419 (PRINT)

The journal is submitted by clicking on the SUBMIT YOUR PAPER icon

–  Click on the SUBMIT YOUR PAPER link which will take you through to the Journal Submission page

–  Prepare your paper according to the Guide for Authors

–  Submit your paper to our e-mail:  ijmsba@researchleap.com

Open access

International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration articles are open-access, available to subscribers and public alike with the permission to reuse. There is no subscription fee to access the articles. The funding comes from the authors themselves.

The articles of the International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration are available free of charge both to individual users and organizations. This means users can read, download, copy, share, print out, or reference to the texts of the journal without having to get permission from the authors or publishers.

The fee for the open-access publication is paid either by authors themselves or their funder.

Payment process

The publication charge of International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration is 115 USD for online publication only or 175 USD for online publication + 2 hard copies. For additional copies, the charge is 15 USD per issue.

Direct payment using Paypal and credit cards can be made through the website. The detailed information on the payment process, including the bank transfer option, will be sent to the corresponding author email.

Review process

In the reviewing process, a paper is initially reviewed either by an editor or a co-editor. Next, if the editor/co-editor finds it suitable for publication, they send it to two other referees for peer-review. The review is double-blind peer review. Provided the referees approve the paper, the editor eventually has the final say about whether the article should be published as it is, amended, or rejected altogether.

It is of utmost importance that the articles for the journal have not been published before in the present or almost the same form, or they are being considered for publication in another journal. The journal can publish papers that were previously published in conference proceedings under the condition that the publication does not infringe upon the rights of the conference proceedings publisher. The authors of the paper must make sure that their work does not go against existing copyright as well as ensuring the paper will compensate for the publisher in case of a warranty breach. Unless agreed differently, the papers, as well as contributions, become the legal copyright of the journal so that the dispersion and proper use of them are facilitated. Authors should refer to ideas and findings of other authors of by proper citing of literature, referencing, such as using clear indented text or quotation marks and using APA style formatting.

Permissions

The requirements of our platform are as follows:

• The availability to reproduce the content or the chapter of a book
• Possibility of printing and electronic rights
• Global rights for the English language
• Possibility of material use for the life of the work without time restrictions on the material reuse

While using tables, charts or excerpts, exceeding four hundred words, from a different source, the followings must be taken into account.:

• Authors must get written permission from a third party copyright owner prior to using their texts, graphs or illustrations in their journal. Also, the permission must be cleared for small adaptations of any work written by another person.
• In case an author adapts a major part of the content, they must notify the copyright holder of the original paper in advance.
• Authors must get consent statements proof.
• Authors must refer to the source both in figure captions and acknowledge it in the list of reference.

Before using the content (even freely available online), authors must check the website for more details of the copyright owners as well as getting their permission.

• Authors ought not to submit their work to more than one journal. In the same way, they ought not to submit previously published works to the journal to be considered.
• Authors ought to guarantee the originality of their work while submitting. When they use words of others, proper citations must be provided. Plagiarism of any kind is considered unethical and accepted under no circumstances.
• In their papers, authors ought to demonstrate all the sources they have used as well as declaring any conflicts of interest.
• Due acknowledgements to all the contributors ought to be given in the research.
• In case of noticeable errors in the issued work, authors ought to immediately notify the editor of the journal and collaborate in the elimination/correction of them. In case a different party than the author informs the editor about the error, the author is obliged to write a retraction or make a correction through the medium of issuance.

Final submission of the research paper

It should be noted that prior to the publication, the proofs are not supplied. It is the journal which considers the final version of the paper. However, it is the responsibility of the author to check the article for completeness, grammatical, spelling, and typographical errors. publish research paper in international journals

File formats

Microsoft Word (DOC, DOCX) is suitable for the final manuscript document.

Manuscript/Paper requirements

All the manuscripts submitted to Research Leap must be split into the sections in the following order: Make sure you use the following guidelines while preparing your manuscript for submission:

Research Leap Policy

The editor of journals of Research Leap platform is solely responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal shall be published. To reach this decision, the editor is guided by policies of the journal’s editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Published articles should remain extant, exact and unaltered as far as is possible. However, there may arise some occasional circumstances when published article must be later retracted or even removed. All these actions mentioned above can take place under exceptional circumstances.

Crossmark Policy

Crossmark is a multi-publisher initiative from Crossref to provide a standard way for readers to locate the current version of a piece of content. By applying the Crossmark logo, Research Leap is committing to maintaining the content it publishes, and to alerting readers to changes if and when they occur.

Clicking on the Crossmark logo will tell you the current status of a document, and may also give you additional publication record information about the document.

Article Withdrawal

Article withdrawal is only applicable for articles which were previously published in the other journals or accidently submitted twice. In most cases, articles may represent serious issues including infringements of professional ethical codes, such as multiple submission, plagiarism, and fraud usage of data. The withdrawal process is also applicable to articles which are in press (under consideration to be published in the other journals) that has different errors, or duplications of articles published in other journals are considered to be “withdrawn” from Research Leap. Withdrawn indicates that content of articles such as HTML and PDF is removed and replaced with HTML page and PDF simply mentioning that the article has been withdrawn according to Research Leap Policy on Article in Press Withdrawal with a link to the current policy document.

Article Retraction

Infringement of academic and professional ethical codes includes multiple submission, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data. The retraction will be mainly used to correct publication and submission errors. Retraction of an article will be done by the author or the editor based on the advice of members of the scholarly community. Number of scholarly bodies has developed the standards dealing with retractions, and best of these retractions are adopted for article retraction by Research Leap:

• A retraction note titled “Retraction: [article title]” signed by the authors and/or the editor is published in the paginated part of a subsequent issue of the journal and listed in the contents list.
• In the electronic version, a link is made to the original article.
• The online article is preceded by a screen containing the retraction note. It is to this screen that the link resolves; the reader can then proceed to the article itself.
• The original article is retained unchanged save for a watermark on the .pdf indicating on each page that it is “retracted.”
• The HTML version of the document is removed.

Article Removal: Legal limitations

It may be required to remove an article from the online database only in the extremely limited number of cases. This type of article removal will occur under the following circumstances:

• The article is clearly defamatory
• Infringes other’s legal rights
• The article poses serious health risk
• Breaking terms and conditions of publishing by the author

In these cases, the article will be removed due to the legal reasons where only the information on metadata such as Title and Authors will remain. publish research paper in international journals

Article Replacement

When the article poses a severe health risk, the authors of the original article will be obliged to retract the flawed content and replace it with the corrected version. In these cases, the procedures for retraction will be followed with the difference that the database retraction will publish a link to the corrected re-published article and a history of the document. publish research paper in international journals

publish research paper in international journals

• Call For Papers 2023
• Online Submission
• Authors GuideLines
• Publication Charge
• Registration
• Certificate Request
• Thesis Publication
• Journal Indexing
• How to publish research paper
• Research Paper Topics
• Editorial Board
• Peer Review & Publication Policy
• Ethics Policy
• Editorial Scope
• 2024- List of Thesis
• Online Thesis Submission
• Thesis Publication Detail
• January 2024 Edition
• February 2024 Edition
• March 2024 Edition
• April 2024 Edition
• May 2024 Edition
• June 2024 Edition
• January 2023 Edition
• February 2023 Edition
• March 2023 Edition
• April 2023 Edition
• May 2023 Edition
• June 2023 Edition
• July 2023 Edition
• August 2023 Edition
• September 2023 Edition
• October 2023 Edition
• November 2023 Edition
• December 2023 Edition
• January 2022 Edition
• February 2022 Edition
• March 2022 Edition
• April 2022 Edition
• May 2022 Edition
• June 2022 Edition
• July 2022 Edition
• August 2022 Edition
• September 2022 Edition
• October 2022 Edition
• November 2022 Edition
• December 2022 Edition
• January 2020 Edition
• February 2020 Edition
• March 2020 Edition
• April 2020 Edition
• May 2020 Edition
• June 2020 Edition
• July 2020 Edition
• August 2020 Edition
• September 2020 Edition
• October 2020 Edition
• November 2020 Edition
• December 2020 Edition
• January 2019 Edition
• February 2019 Edition
• March 2019 Edition
• April 2019 Edition
• May 2019 Edition
• June 2019 Edition
• July 2019 Edition
• August 2019 Edition
• September 2019 Edition
• October 2019 Edition
• November 2019 Edition
• December 2019 Edition
• January 2018 Edition
• February 2018 Edition
• March 2018 Edition
• April 2018 Edition
• May 2018 Edition
• June 2018 Edition
• July 2018 Edition
• August 2018 Edition
• September 2018 Edition
• October 2018 Edition
• November 2018 Edition
• December 2018 Edition
• January 2017 Edition
• February 2017 Edition
• March 2017 Edition
• April 2017 Edition
• May 2017 Edition
• June 2017 Edition
• July 2017 Edition
• August 2017 Edition
• September 2017 Edition
• October 2017 Edition
• November 2017 Edition
• December 2017 Edition
• Archives- All Editions
• Registration Form
• Copyright Transfer
• Scopus Indexing

JOURNAL CALL FOR PAPER

• Call for Paper 2023
• Publication Indexing

AUTHORHS & EDITORS

• Author Guidelines

THESIS PUBLICATION

• Submit Your Thesis
• Published Thesis List
• Thesis Guidelines

CONFERENCE SPONSERSHIP

• Conference Papers
• Sponsorship Guidelines

PUBLICATIONS

• January 2016 Edition
• February 2016 Edition
• March 2016 Edition
• April 2016 Edition
• May 2016 Edition
• June 2016 Edition
• July 2016 Edition
• August 2016 Edition

How to Publish a research paper

Copyright and Open Access to Scientific Publishing

• Open access
• Published: 27 May 2024

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

• Asunción Esteve   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3095-8669 1  

459 Accesses

4 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

The internet has broadened the communication of digitized journals and books among scholars and the perception that academic commercial publishers use copyright law to restrict the free circulation of scientific knowledge. Open access is changing the business model of academic publishing to the extent that copyright law is increasingly being viewed as needing to be balanced against the right to benefit from science. Some have called for copyright law to be revised to promote open access to academic publishing. The question of just how copyright law should be revised to achieve this is today more topical than ever. However, there is a need to clarify and question the role that copyright law should play and there is much to be gained from consideration of the role that competition law can play. Additionally, initiatives to implement open access have been taken by stakeholders (academic authors, publishers, universities, libraries, and research funding agencies) such as open access policies and the new “read and publish” agreements between publishers and universities’ libraries. But the transition towards sustainable universal open access will be a long, complex process since the interaction between these stakeholders can lead to conflicts of interest. This article also evaluates these initiatives and suggests the best approach.

Similar content being viewed by others

Open Access Publishing in the European Union: The Example of Scientific Works

Academic Freedom, Copyright, and Access to Scholarly Works: A Comparative Perspective

The evolving role of commercial publishers and the future of open access repositories: the potential of corporate social responsibility.

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Introduction

Progress in science benefits society; yet new findings in scientific research – published in books, articles, conference papers and presentations – are copyright protected. As such, copyright can be seen as the instrument publishers use to exercise control over the circulation of knowledge, enabling them to prevent access to scholarly publications. Indeed, it has been pointed out that, by limiting the ability to share published scientific knowledge, this prevailing restricted-access dissemination model inhibits the emergence of a truly global and collaborative scientific community. Footnote 1

The open access (OA) paradigm that has emerged with the advent of the internet is a reaction against this model. As one of the leading proponents of OA stresses, open access literature is “digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions”. Footnote 2 Nonetheless, OA is not antithetical to copyright: in fact, OA publishing is based on copyright licenses granted by scholars. The authors themselves lift the barriers imposed by copyright and agree to publish the output of their research and to disseminate their findings with the sole restriction that their authorship be mentioned and any commercial uses be impeded. Thus, OA is enabled by copyright. Footnote 3

Importantly, in the case of OA literature, authors are unpaid, yet publishers claim a fee to publish their articles and books in OA – the so-called “article processing charge” (APC) or “book processing charge” (BPC) that allows publishers to recoup the costs incurred in improving the quality of the article or book and processing it in a publishable form. In this sense, publishers address OA publishing as a new business model, in which APCs and BPCs are substitutes for subscription license payments and book sales. No remuneration of authors is contemplated in APCs or BPCs.

OA to scholarly publishing is also feasible without paying publishers’ processing charges if the pre-print version of paywall publications is made publicly available in institutional repositories (so-called green OA). Indeed, the EU and some national research bodies have implemented measures to ensure that scholarly publications resulting from their funding are made publicly available in public depositories immediately upon publication. Footnote 4 However, publishers claim that embargo-free green OA is not financially sustainable, since it threatens their subscription business model and undermines their potential support for OA journals based on APCs. Footnote 5 Hence, it is evident that publishers will only agree to OA publishing if they can find a sustainable business model to achieve it at scale. Therefore, any claim that copyright is the main obstacle to the implementation of OA is highly questionable. Despite this, many voices call for amendments to copyright law to facilitate OA to scholarly publishing.

This paper seeks to examine the implications of copyright for OA to scholarly publishing. First, it considers the extent to which copyright constitutes a barrier to scientific knowledge, and whether the right to benefit from science and culture justifies mandatory OA to scholarly publishing or rather requires an adjustment to copyright law. Second, this paper analyses the copyright issues and challenges associated with different initiatives to foster OA, including open access policies, amendments to copyright legislation, and the new read and publish agreements between publishers and research institutions. Finally, the economic and competition law issues that arise in relation to OA publishing are examined.

2 Copyright as a Barrier to Scientific Advancement

The shift from analog to digital publications has increased the perception that copyright protection of scientific works impedes access to knowledge that should be free. However, as stressed in the Introduction of this article, the OA movement does not oppose copyright protection of scientific publishing: what the leading voices of the OA movement claim is that copyright on research articles traditionally protected publishers, not authors, Footnote 6 and that copyright is being used by some publishers to keep their business profitable. Footnote 7

The academic publishing market has been characterized by a number of long-standing disruptions: many researchers agree to publish their contributions in journals (and even in books) without any remuneration. Academics view scholarly publishing as a means of facilitating the dissemination of their research and building a reputation, both by publishing in high impact factor journals and via the system of citations. Footnote 8 For this reason, it has been argued that conventional copyright rationale does not serve as an economic incentive for researchers and should be abolished for academic works. Footnote 9 However, such a view is open to debate. The fact that most academic authors do not share in the publishers’ profits does not justify depriving them of the right to claim copyright royalties from publishers. Nor does it affect the role and function of copyright. As discussed, the view that academic authors spurn the idea of making money from the use of copyright works for research and education, being satisfied with the enhancement to their reputation and funding opportunities, may be philosophically sound, but is contractually anomalous. Footnote 10

Criticism has also been expressed of the limited concern shown by copyright law for the scientific perspective, as well as the weak research exceptions to copyright exclusive rights and the general trend towards broadening copyright protection – all elements that conspire against freedom to access and exchange information, disseminate knowledge, and preserve research results. Footnote 11 The recent COVID-19 pandemic served to highlight the right to science together with the urgent need to address a new copyright regime. Footnote 12 Copyright laws are said to act like a lock on the open circulation of research and scholarship. They fail to serve their original purpose of promoting science in the digital era. Footnote 13 Some authors contend that reconceptualizing copyright in relation to research activities can provide powerful arguments for substantive changes in copyright law; Footnote 14 hence, the question of the most suitable copyright design for academic works is today more topical than ever. Footnote 15

Before assessing whether copyright law should be amended or even abolished in the case of scholarly publishing, so as to guarantee access to scientific knowledge, it is necessary, first, to consider the scope of the right “to benefit from science” and its legal implications for access to academic publishing and, second, to assess how copyright might act as a barrier to scientific knowledge.

2.1 The Right to Benefit from Science

To date, the right to benefit from science has been inadequately discussed, despite being recognized, with a variety of different wording, in instruments of human rights. In fact, some scientists describe this right as “obscure” and its interpretation as “neglected” to the point that few are aware of its existence. Footnote 16

The right to enjoy the benefits of science has traditionally been invoked as a counterweight to the expansion of intellectual property (above all patents), whereas the “right to participate in culture” is seen as articulating a series of values that limit copyright. Footnote 17 Yet, copyright protects scientific works and, as such, can impede access to research findings.

2.1.1 Scope of the Right to Benefit from Science

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted by the United Nations in 1948, was the first international legal instrument to recognize the fundamental right to “share in scientific advancement and its benefits”, along with cultural rights and the protection of authors’ rights (Art. 27 UDHR). Footnote 18 The drafting history of Art. 27 shows that the inclusion of individual author’s and inventor’s rights in an article on public rights of access to science was strongly debated, but that the primary concern was that the protection of these individual rights should not cut across the public good of facilitating access to knowledge, culture, and science, whether for liberal, utilitarian, or communitarian reasons. Footnote 19

Almost twenty years later, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), adopted by the United Nations in 1966, recognized the right of everyone to “enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its applications”, after recognizing the right to “take part in cultural life”, while guaranteeing the protection of intellectual property (Art. 15.1). Footnote 20 In the travaux préparatoires of the ICESCR, some countries objected to incorporating the provision on intellectual property on the grounds that everyone’s right to benefit from science and participate in culture should not be intermixed with property rights. Footnote 21 However, it was argued that the three rights were substantively interrelated, each being instrumental to the realization of the others. The rights of authors and scientists to prevent others from altering their creations were understood to be essential preconditions for cultural freedom and participation and scientific progress. Footnote 22

In the case of the UDHR, the wording of the right to benefit from science has been described as being more akin to that of a freedom than a positive right that states must enable. Footnote 23 In contrast, the ICESCR sets out specific obligations incumbent upon states for guaranteeing the right to benefit from science, such as taking the steps necessary for “the conservation, the development, and the diffusion of science” (Art. 15.2). Footnote 24 Indeed, today, there is a growing consensus that the core content of the right to benefit from science in the ICESCR includes an obligation on states to enable access to scientific information. Footnote 25

The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (1950) does not include any provision on the right to benefit from science; rather the right is understood as a form of collective freedom of expression: Art. 10 talks of the freedom to “receive and impart information and ideas without interference”. As such, the states’ obligations are negative and limited to not interfering with this freedom, rather than requiring a proactive realization of the right to benefit from science. Footnote 26

Regarding academic freedom, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2000) recognizes scientific research as the scientist’s autonomy to conduct research: Article 13 states that “[t]he arts and scientific research shall be free of constraint. Academic freedom shall be respected”. Accordingly, in the case of Commission v. Hungary , the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) declared that “academic freedom in research […] should guarantee freedom of expression and of action, freedom to disseminate information and freedom to conduct research and to distribute knowledge and truth without restriction”. Footnote 27

Thus, it seems that international recognition of the right to benefit from science and the right to conduct research free of any constraints contained in human rights instruments cannot be considered as granting researchers individual rights to access scientific output, but rather as obliging states to protect science as a public good. For instance, Art. 44 of the Spanish Constitution (1978) provides that culture and science and scientific research be promoted by public authorities. Yet, some authors argue that a new fundamental right to research is derived from the interplay between the right to benefit from science (as recognized under the UDHR and the ICESCR), freedom of expression and academic freedom, in combination with the European Union’s aims and objectives regarding sustainability and technological advancement. Footnote 28 According to these authors, the fundamental right to research enables access to information to conduct research . Footnote 29 This opinion is supported by those who believe that EU legislation is under an obligation to create a more favourable, enabling environment for scientific research. Footnote 30

But what are we supposed to understand by the argument that the right to benefit from science should enable access to information to facilitate research? Does this imply that access to scientific publications should be free and without copyright restrictions?

2.1.2 The Right to Benefit from Science, and Access to Scientific Publishing

The United Nations, in its legal instrument, appears to explicitly link science and technology with human rights, considering such ties beneficial to human lives. Footnote 31 As such, it could be argued that the right to benefit from science justifies mandatory OA only in the case of research publications that contribute to human well-being and better life conditions. But it might also be concluded that OA should be mandatory for scholarly publishing across the board, since all journal articles are scientific , regardless of their area of knowledge.

How can scientific publications be defined? Neither the UDHR nor the ICESCR chooses to define what science is. The Venice Statement on the Right to Enjoy the Benefits of Scientific Progress and its Applications , adopted by experts convened by UNESCO in 2009, declares that the right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress is applicable to all fields of science, Footnote 32 where science is deemed, among other things, an instrument for “advancing knowledge of a specific subject matter” and “procuring a set of data and testing hypotheses that may be useful for some practical purpose”. Footnote 33

Indeed, science can be distinguished from other domains of culture and knowledge by its progressive nature. Footnote 34 The natural sciences, as well as the human and social sciences, including history and economics, also advance thanks to research findings based on procuring sets of data and testing hypotheses. Since the first journals with a specific orientation emerged in 1870, scientific publications have been defined according to a methodology that meets the following conditions: identification of the problem tackled in the publication, sequential development of the argument, description of the methods used, presentation of empirical evidence, obligatory links – using citations – to earlier communications by other scientists, and admissibility of presenting speculative thought. Footnote 35 This methodology has been adopted by all academic journals regardless of their area of specialization (be it the natural sciences, philosophy, or even law). Thus, the right to benefit from science might be expanded to all scholarly publications, as all of them can be considered scientific.

Yet, to argue that the right to enjoy the benefits of science means states should be obliged to impose mandatory OA on scientific publishing does not seem entirely admissible. The UNESCO Draft Recommendation on Open Science (November 2021) Footnote 36 identifies a set of actions whereby Member States can promote OA infrastructure, including journals and OA publication platforms, repositories and archives. According to the Recommendation , mandatory OA is only required in the case of research promoted by public funding. Footnote 37 Thus, the right to benefit from science requires that states encourage , rather than actually impose, OA for all scientific publications.

2.2 Copyright Protection of Scientific Works

In 1907, Josef Kohler, the German jurist accredited with establishing the concept of rights to immaterial goods and laying the foundations for copyright in Germany and Europe, described scientific works protected by copyright as explanations of research findings and clarifications of their grounds. Footnote 38 For Kohler, scientific works were literary works that explained discoveries and research findings. But inasmuch as scientific works may also include figures, drawings, photographs and images describing these findings or elements of nature, they can also be considered plastic or artistic works, which – provided they are original – enjoy copyright protection. Other examples of scientific works protected by copyright include audiovisual works (such as documentaries explaining discoveries) and scientific databases.

Interestingly, participants at the 1883 conference organized by the Association Littéraire et Artistique International debated whether or not to include the term scientific in the title of the Berne Convention for Protection of Literary and Artistic Works adopted in 1886, Footnote 39 but deemed it irrelevant. Footnote 40 Nonetheless, Art. 2 of the Berne Convention states that the expression “literary and artistic” works shall include “every production in the literary, scientific and artistic domain, whatever may be the mode or form of its expression” . However, the term scientific production does not refer to such things as scientific discoveries. The use of “literary, scientific and artistic” to qualify the productions protected by the Berne Convention derives from earlier bilateral conventions on copyright between Member States; as some scholars point out, the term should not be taken at face value. Footnote 41

Indeed, most European national copyright laws hold that the object of copyright protection is literary and artistic works , and make no mention of scientific works, although the latter are included in their illustrative lists of copyrighted works. Footnote 42 However, both German and Spanish Copyright Acts explicitly hold that copyright protects literary, scientific, and artistic works. Footnote 43 German commentators point out that any difference between these three categories is irrelevant in terms of law, since scientific works may also be literary or artistic works; what defines the category of scientific works is the subject matter. Footnote 44 Meanwhile, Spanish commentators describe scientific works as those that deal with scientific discoveries, theories, methods, and ideas, and note that their content is free, but the wording, images or figures created by the author to explain the content is copyright protected. Footnote 45

In short, scientific works are defined by their science-related content. However, they have a hybrid character, as their form contains elements of personal expression, and they constitute non-substitutable building blocks of information. Footnote 46 Research publications are an example of scientific works that are protected by copyright if they “reflect the author’s personality”. Footnote 47 But how does a researcher make free and creative choices in a scientific work? What part of a scientific article or book results from the author’s original creativity, if it deals with research findings and scientific information?

2.2.1 Author’s Creation versus Research Findings

As Kohler noted, a research finding is not the creation of an author but a “scientific truth”. Footnote 48 The Scottish philosopher Dugald Stewart, in distinguishing discovery from invention, remarked that the object of the former was “to bring to light something which did exist, but which was concealed from common observation”. Footnote 49 Research findings are, or should be, free because they result from obtaining, contrasting, and verifying empirical evidence about facts or truths that were previously unknown. For instance, if an article reports the risk factors for COVID-19 in inflammatory bowel disease, or new findings about Russian exiles in Spain between 1914 and 1920, the respective authors did not create the results obtained, but rather found evidence to demonstrate them . Yet, research findings were considered a possible object of intellectual property (in addition to patents and copyright) in discussions conducted at international level between the First and Second World Wars, although interest eventually declined and then completely dropped away with the advent of the global crisis. Footnote 50

In the case of contributions that count as authorial from the standpoint of science – such as research publications – the focus for copyright is on verbal expression, on the choice and ordering of words, rather than on the generation of data or ideas. Footnote 51 Consequently, copyright prevents copying of the original explanations used by a researcher when clarifying hypotheses or describing the procedures used and difficulties encountered when conducting the study, as well as of the final conclusions drawn in the publication. Likewise, copyright prevents copying of any original images, graphics or photographs created by the author to illustrate the processes, data, formulae, or elements related to the study’s theories, findings or discoveries. Conversely, those elements of a research publication that are not created by the author (i.e. data, empirical evidence, research processes, experiment results, formulae, elements of nature, etc.) are not copyright protected. They can therefore be copied, distributed, and further communicated to the public. As Art 9.2 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) states: “Copyright protection shall extend to expressions and not to ideas, procedures, methods of operation or mathematical concepts as such”.

This leads to the conclusion that copyright does not protect the scientific information in research publications but rather the originality of the author in expounding the findings, data, hypotheses, or procedures. Originality is what authors give material form to and what justifies the granting of copyright, Footnote 52 whereas science is concerned with the empirical evidence. But creativity and science are not antithetical. The original explanations written by scientists, the conclusions they elaborate from the research conducted, or the images created to present their findings may also be relevant for scientific advancement, and help other researchers to understand their findings more fully, since they complement the information provided in the rest of the article or book. From this perspective, it can be argued that copyright does not put a lock on the scientific information contained in research publications but rather prevents copying of the content created by researchers when explaining or expounding their findings in their publications.

However, if scientific journals are included in databases, publishers may be entitled to prevent extraction of the scientific data contained in their journals under the sui generis right provided for in EU Directive 96/9/EC on the legal protection of databases. Footnote 53 This right is granted to a publisher if they can prove substantial investment in obtaining, verifying, or presenting the contents of a journal’s database. As a result, national legislators have limited the scope of copyright and the sui generis right by introducing certain exceptions, thereby allowing limited free use of scientific works and scientific data for research purposes.

2.2.2 The Adjustment of Copyright Law to Facilitate Research

To date, EU copyright law has recognized two main exceptions regarding science: the research exception , as introduced by the Information Society Directive (ISD) in 2001, Footnote 54 and the text and data mining exception for the purposes of scientific research , which was implemented by the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (DSMD) in 2019. Footnote 55 However, the scope of the ISD research exception is narrow, especially when applied to research publications, and the new text and data mining (TDM) exception of the DSMD raises a number of controversial legal questions.

Article 5(3)(a) ISD allows copyrighted content to be reproduced and communicated to the public for scientific research, solely for non-commercial purposes, as long as the source and the author’s name are indicated. Footnote 56 In the case of research publications, this exception is basically the equivalent of quotation. As has been noted, reproduction and extraction for scientific peer review and joint research are not necessarily exempt under national implementations of the somewhat vague Art. 5(3)(a) ISD; Footnote 57 indeed, some scholars argue that the scope of this exception should be broader. Footnote 58 Moreover, the ISD makes the research exception optional throughout the EU Member States when it ought to be mandatory and have the same scope to provide legal certainty to researchers across Europe. Footnote 59

By contrast, the new TDM exception for the purposes of scientific research, as laid down in Art. 3 DSMD, is mandatory throughout the EU. This new exception – where TDM is defined as “the automated processing […] of large volumes of text and data to uncover new knowledge or insights” Footnote 60 – can play an important role in research projects that require the extraction of data from protected literary and artistic works. Footnote 61 The exception allows universities and research institutes, acting on a not-for-profit basis, to reproduce and extract data from research publications to carry out TDM for scientific research; importantly, it requires that they have lawful access to content. Footnote 62 The EU Directive clarifies that “lawful access” to content may be provided by OA licenses or through contractual arrangements, such as subscriptions . Footnote 63

As noted, subscriptions to journal databases give publishers too much scope for limiting TDM initiatives by means of contracts or technical protection measures. Footnote 64 The TDM exception for scientific research implies that publishers should be unable to use their contractual powers and technical protection measures to limit researchers’ ability to engage in TDM by imposing restrictions on access and use of their database content in exchange for making this content available. Footnote 65

In conclusion, copyright law has already been adjusted to facilitate research but not to facilitate the transition to open access. Additionally, other legal initiatives to foster open access have been undertaken by the main stakeholders in scientific publishing.

3 Initiatives to Foster Open Access

Sustainable universal OA to scientific publishing would undoubtedly benefit the research community. However, the transition to OA is set to be long and complex, as the interests of research funders, authors, universities, and commercial publishers clash with each other. Indeed, the tensions between these different stakeholders are currently reflected in the opposing stances they adopt in relation to any transition to OA. Yet, various initiatives have been taken: funders, higher educational institutions (HEIs) and research centres are adopting OA policies; some European countries have recently recognized a new right for scholars to publish in OA; and publishers are transforming their subscription agreements with institutions and authors to facilitate OA publishing.

3.1 Open Access Policies of Funders and Research Institutions

National governments are under growing pressure to promote the OA of scientific publishing. In the UK, following publication of the Finch Report in 2012, OA has become government policy, Footnote 66 and UK research and innovation policy on OA has not permitted a publisher-requested delay or “embargo period” between the publication of an article and public access to that article in a public depository since 2022. Footnote 67 In the same year, the Spanish Science Law was amended, requiring researchers who benefit from public funding to deposit the manuscript version of their articles in a public repository at the time of publication . Footnote 68 The European Commission Footnote 69 and cOAlition S , an international consortium of research funding organizations, recommend or impose OA policies to ensure that the research work they support is shared fully and immediately. Footnote 70 Universities and research centres are also adopting policies that impose OA mandates or right retention practices to make their researchers’ academic work immediately and openly available for scholarly communication. Footnote 71 Such policies are considered private instruments that have legal effects Footnote 72 and raise certain legal issues.

3.1.1 OA Policies as “Mandates” to Researchers

Research funders make it compulsory for researchers who accept the terms and conditions of their funding to publish in OA. In such cases, OA is a legal duty for the researcher, and should they fail to comply with that obligation and publish articles in paywalled journals, the funder may take legal action against them.

In contrast, the OA policies adopted by certain universities and research centres can be considered more controversial. Some HEIs make OA mandatory, while others’ policies serve as mere recommendations or simply guidance for their academic staff. Footnote 73 It might be argued that OA mandates are justified if researchers are employees of public universities, and their research output is publicly funded. Footnote 74 Indeed, if researchers are employees of public or private HEIs, and publish works in the course of their employment, copyright may belong to their employers, which means these institutions may be legally entitled to impose OA mandates. However, universities and research centres do not usually claim copyright of their staff’s scientific scholarly work, given the nature of their employment and the freedom of research, a right that is constitutionally protected in some countries. Footnote 75

Some academics are critical of OA policies on the grounds that they threaten to inhibit scholarly publishing and, as a result, reduce an author’s academic freedom to publish in top journals. Footnote 76 Yet, as discussed, the right to decide on the commercial exploitation of research articles is not based on researchers’ academic freedom but rather on their intellectual property. Footnote 77 Copyright gives authors the freedom to decide whether or not they publish their scientific contributions, in which journal they wish to publish and whether or not they wish to make their work publicly available. For this reason, it has been noted that OA mandates imply appropriation of the researchers’ copyright. Footnote 78

Certainly, as long as HEIs and research centres are not copyright holders of their academic staff’s work, they are not entitled to impose OA mandates or right retention practices. They may, however, recommend that their staff comply with the funder’s OA mandates and encourage them to publish in OA or to make their pre-print publications available for scholarly communication.

3.1.2 Conflicts Between OA Policies and Authors’ Publishing Agreements

A relevant legal question arising in relation to OA policies is their effect on agreements entered into between researchers and publishers. Scholars complain that OA policies increase the administrative burden on them, as they are left to negotiate an increasingly complex copyright landscape with multiple interacting licenses. Footnote 79 Problems manifest themselves when a researcher assigns an exclusive license to a commercial publisher to use an article, but the same article is covered by a prior non-exclusive scholarly communications license granted by the author to the institution, resulting from the university’s OA policy. In such circumstances, is the publisher entitled to prevent the author from depositing the article in the repository and enforce an embargo?

The answer to this question is to be found in national legislation and needs to be considered from the perspectives of both copyright and contract law. According to some national copyright laws, a prior license granted by the author to the institution prevails over the exclusive license entered into later with the publisher. Section 33 of the German Copyright Act specifically regulates the effect of licenses granted subsequently on the same work. This provision is applied when there is conflict between subsequent licenses, Footnote 80 and implies that a prior non-exclusive license to use a work should prevail over an exclusive right on the same work granted later. Footnote 81 A similar rule is found in Art. 14.6 of the Spanish Copyright Act. Footnote 82 Indeed, various decisions of the Spanish Supreme Court have recognized that prior licenses should prevail if the author grants successive licenses on the same work. Footnote 83

Contract law is relevant for determining the liability of an author in such cases. By entering into an exclusive publishing license agreement, the author guarantees that the publisher retains the right to use the article, so the author does not come into conflict with the publisher’s business. Footnote 84 A prior non-exclusive license for scholarly communication will damage the publisher’s exploitation in the case of paywalled articles with an embargo. Clearly, publishers have no interest in publishing content that is already publicly available. Therefore, when entering into a publishing license agreement, the author has a legal duty to give notice to the publisher of any prior non-exclusive license with the institution.

Contract law protects the publisher that acts in good faith for valuable consideration and without having received notice of a prior non-exclusive license. According to UK legislation, in the case of exclusive copyright licenses, prior subsisting licenses are binding except for bona fide purchasers that did not receive notice. Footnote 85 In this case, UK legislation empowers the publisher with an exclusive right, which is deemed binding vis-à-vis any prior licenses. Therefore, if the publisher is not given notice of the prior license, it will be entitled to publish the article and expect the same outcome as if prior non-contractual licenses did not exist; thus, the publisher could prevent the university from using the article for scholarly communication until the embargo period expires. Moreover, the publisher could sue the author for breaking a warranty and claim the loss suffered as a result of not having been given notice of the prior license. Footnote 86 A breach of contract gives rise to action for damages, whether the term breached is a condition, a warranty, or an innominate term. Footnote 87 Thus, the publisher could claim the gain of which it had been deprived, Footnote 88 that is, the APC it would have charged if the article were published in OA.

For all these reasons, the publishers’ response to the growth and development of institutional OA polices based on rights retention has so far been limited and inconsistent. Footnote 89 Publishers see zero-embargo OA policies as undermining their gold OA business, and the largest commercial European publishers still impose embargoes on making self-archived publications openly available. Footnote 90

HEI and research centre policies may become an effective instrument for making academics aware of their responsibilities towards funders and of the advantages of making their research output publicly available. However, at the same time, HEIs and research centres need to respect the decisions that their academic staff make regarding OA publishing. The majority of academic authors still prefer to publish their articles in prestigious high-quality journals, regardless of the fact that they cannot make them publicly available. Footnote 91

3.2 Changes in Copyright Legislation

Some European countries recently adopted legislative initiatives to provide academic authors with a Secondary Publication Right (SPR), which enables them to make their published contributions publicly available on the condition that certain requirements are met. In 2013, Germany amended its copyright law, introducing the SPR in the section governing the transfer of author’s rights. Footnote 92 The same initiative was subsequently adopted by the Netherlands and Austria, which both amended their copyright laws in 2015. Footnote 93 In 2016, France recognized the SPR in its Code of Science Law, Footnote 94 and Belgium introduced it in its Code of Economic Law in 2018. Footnote 95 Despite marked differences between these five national iterations of the SPR, they all adhere to the same basic structure: (1) the secondary publishing right is only granted to authors of scientific contributions (published primarily in journals); (2) the research should be, at least partly, publicly funded; (3) the right only allows the author to make the “accepted manuscript” available to the public; and (4) an embargo period must be respected. Footnote 96 Finally, the SPR is unwaivable and inalienable, so the author retains this right, regardless of any transfer of rights to publishers, and cannot renounce it.

The SPR was first formulated by a German jurist as a moral right of academic authors; hence its inalienable nature. Footnote 97 However, it has been argued that the SPR is nothing more than a copyright limitation for publishers in disguise, with weak justifications, that would unduly prevent application of the three-step test to copyright limitations contained in Art. 13 TRIPS. Footnote 98 This article requires that copyright limitations or exceptions be limited to certain special cases that do not conflict with normal exploitation of the work and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the right holder.

The embargo requirement to be met for exercising an SPR certainly looks like a copyright limitation. As observed, the basic idea underlying embargoes in copyright limitations is to ensure normal exploitation of a work. Footnote 99 The same idea underpins restricting the SPR to the “accepted manuscript”, that is to say the manuscript approved by the author for publication following peer review as opposed to the final typeset published version(“Version of Record”). The SPR takes sufficient account of the interests of scientific publishing firms, Footnote 100 which is a sign that national legislators formulated the SPR with a view to balancing researchers’ interests in publishing in OA with publishers’ investments.

Recognition of the SPR has not proved to be especially effective for the expansion of OA in those European countries that have adopted it. According to a 2021 study entitled “Open Access in Europe: a National and Regional Comparison”, the most “open” areas in Europe are the UK and the Scandinavian countries, owing to strong incentives from public agencies and the fact that several universities have adopted effective OA policies with dedicated staff and funds. Footnote 101

Harmonizing the SPR as a copyright exception or limitation at EU level has also been suggested. Footnote 102 However, this would be problematic because any legislative initiative to foster OA needs to balance all the interests at stake. If the SPR is formulated in such a way that it can only be exercised after an embargo, and it continues to be limited to “accepted manuscripts” to assure the publishers’ investment, the SPR is doomed to fail as a mechanism for expanding OA to scientific publishing. Embargoes frustrate researchers in their efforts at keeping up to date with the latest publications in their field; and researchers are not especially enthused by the use of their “accepted manuscript”, Footnote 103 because actual publication in a journal is critical for achieving a reliable, final, typeset, scholarly record. Footnote 104 Additionally, accepted manuscripts are deposited in vast institutional repositories that contain all kinds of academic output from the scholarly community (e.g. unpublished articles, conference papers, thesis, dissertations), which are not systematically organized and do not differentiate publications according to quality, Footnote 105 as a journal would normally do.

In short, copyright law is not the best instrument for fostering universal OA. When amending copyright law, the legislator must consider all the interests at stake: not only the concern of funders and researchers to expand access to scientific knowledge in the interests of society, but also the legitimate interest of publishers in profiting from their investments. In contrast, agreements between publishers and research institutions might provide a negotiated solution for the implementation of universal OA.

3.3 New “Read and Publish” Agreements

OA is also remodelling publishing agreements and changing the business of academic publishing. Subscription licenses, traditionally offered by publishers to universities or research institutions, to grant access to scientific journals, are being transformed into new “Read and Publish” (R&P) agreements or “transformative agreements” (TAs). By means of these R&P agreements, publishers grant universities the right to access, copy and download paywalled articles from their journals, and the right to publish a certain number of articles in their commercial journals in OA.

R&P agreements emerged as a result of a report published by the Max Planck Society Digital Library in 2015, which demonstrated that expenditure on subscriptions to scientific journals could be redirected and re-invested into OA business models to pay for APCs. Footnote 106 As such, these new agreements are not supposed to add APCs to subscription fees, but rather to gradually replace subscription income with that generated by APCs for OA publishing. Footnote 107 According to the ESAC Initiative (Efficiency and Standards for Article Charges), these new agreements will allow former subscription expenditure to be repurposed to support the OA publishing of the negotiating institutions’ authors, thereby gradually and definitively transforming the business model that underpins scholarly journal publishing from one based on toll access (subscription) to one in which publishers are paid a fair price for their OA publishing services. Footnote 108

The first R&P agreements were entered into between commercial publishers and institutions in 2018, and there has been a gradual increase in the number of agreements implemented since 2020. Footnote 109 Most have been signed between the major publishers (Elsevier, Wiley, Springer, Taylor & Francis, Walter de Gruyter, Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, etc.) and the libraries or consortia libraries of HEIs and research centres.

The primary innovation of R&P agreements lies in the clause referring to subscription fees and in the number of APCs included in the contract. Publishing fees are amalgamated with subscription fees, and depend on the number of researchers employed by an institution and the total number of articles they seek to publish in OA journals. For instance, the R&P agreement entered into between the Spanish National Research Council and Oxford University Press (OUP) in 2020 shows that the former will pay OUP almost EUR 1 million over five years to secure access to their journals and to publish 358 OA articles (with 24% of the fee corresponding to reading and 76% to publishing, and an APC of EUR 2,123 per article). Footnote 110 Although R&P agreements are not supposed to increase the cost of subscription licenses, they are associated with higher costs than traditional read-only subscriptions. Footnote 111 Additionally, in some cases, R&P agreements can result in overpayment (if the number of articles accepted for publication falls short of the agreed number) or under-availability (if some of the articles accepted for publication fall outside the bulk-sum payment and have to be covered separately). Footnote 112

R&P agreements also oblige “eligible authors”, whose articles are accepted for OA publication, to transfer their exclusive rights to publishers. Authors’ agreements are separately negotiated with the publishers. Footnote 113 Under these OA publishing agreements, the author grants the publisher an exclusive license, and the publisher states the Creative Commons License under which the article will be made publicly available. Footnote 114 The author receives no payment from the publisher, but the exclusive transfer of rights is justified as the article will be publicly available; hence, authors’ rights retention for scholarly communication is pointless.

Agreements between commercial publishers and institutions may be the best mechanism for providing a sustainable business model for OA, provided they rely on principles of party autonomy and contractual freedom. However, R&P agreements present the typical anomalies of contracts entered into between commercial publishers and HEIs or research centres. Commercial publishers impose high fees on these institutions to read and publish in OA, bundle all their journals into one single R&P agreement, and typically impose their own legal jurisdiction as the applicable law governing their contracts. Footnote 115 Determining which law applies to these agreements is a key issue, as US and UK copyright law tend to favour publishers’ commercial interests and permit the assignment of exclusive transfers of rights, whereas in civil jurisdictions the transfer of author’s rights is construed in favour of the author. Footnote 116

More importantly, the future of R&P agreements remains uncertain for publishers. If more institutions shift towards OA embedded in transformative agreements, the share of OA will dramatically increase. As a result, fewer research-oriented institutions will be tempted to cancel their subscriptions, reducing the journals’ income in the process. Footnote 117 The highest ranked universities will overpay APCs Footnote 118 compared to institutions with a lower publication output. Footnote 119 In the case of consortia, this behaviour may unbalance internal agreements on cost distribution. Footnote 120 Moreover R&P agreements will prove extremely challenging for smaller publishers and a few isolated journals.

4 Economic and Competition Law Issues Involved in Open Access Publishing

The journal publishing market is a complex, dynamic system, with journals constantly switching publishing houses, and publishing houses acquiring or merging with their competitors. Footnote 121 As a result of these dynamics, five big commercial publishers represent more than half the market for scholarly journals today. Footnote 122 These “big five” publish most of the high impact factor journals and, indeed, the majority of scientific papers. Footnote 123 This high degree of concentration of ownership of scientific journals has led to asymmetry in negotiating powers between research institutions and publishers. Thus, a publisher that owns a journal with a high impact factor enjoys a strong market position vis-à-vis not only researchers but also libraries. Footnote 124

The concentrated nature of the academic publishing market – including both OA and toll access journals – potentially offers top publishing companies a monopoly. Footnote 125 Indeed, in 2018, the European University Association (EUA) issued a statement expressing its concern about possible irregularities relating to pricing and market conditions in the research publishing sector. Their primary objections to the “big five” academic publishers were, first, their lack of transparency when pricing journal subscriptions and, second, their bundling of a large number of academic journals into one single agreement (a so-called “big deal”). Footnote 126

Academic publishers charge extremely high prices for subscriptions to individual journals, making it less attractive or nearly impossible to buy only the most interesting journals and skip the others. This means that libraries are left buying very large bundles, including journals that they might not actually be interested in. Additionally, the pricing structure for journal subscriptions and the fees for OA publishing remain quite obscure. The average APC for a journal article is, at present, USD 2,987, but there is tremendous variation in APCs across journals, which obviously cannot be explained by costs alone. Footnote 127 As OA publishing advances, subscriptions will gradually disappear, which suggests that APCs are being used by commercial publishers in lieu of subscription fees. If, eventually, universal OA is attained, subscriptions and book sales will cease and publishers will only charge once for publishing a scientific article or book in OA. However, as things currently stand, publishers’ income is based on thousands of subscriptions for the same journals and thousands of sales of the same book. Excessively high pricing of APCs and BPCs may become a potential risk in the OA publishing market.

Competition law may well have a key role to play in correcting the dominant practices of academic publishers in the publishing market. In the case of the EU market, Art. 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of European Union (TFEU) prohibits abuse by dominant firms, and Art. 102(a) TFEU lists as examples of abusive conduct “directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions”. Importantly, Art. 102 TFEU applies when one undertaking has a “dominant” position or where two or more undertakings are “collectively dominant”. Footnote 128 This could be considered the case of the “big five” commercial publishers that account for more than 50% of the market share for scholarly journals.

Difficulties may be encountered when seeking to determine whether the largest commercial academic publishers are indeed collectively abusing a dominant market position. According to the CJEU’s decision in the case of Compagnie Maritime Belge Transports and Others v. Commission , a finding that two or more undertakings hold a collective dominant position must, in principle, “proceed upon an economic assessment of the position on the relevant market of the undertakings concerned”. Footnote 129 Thus, the first step in ascertaining whether an undertaking or group of undertakings exercises a dominant position is to define the relevant market in which they compete. According to the EU Commission, obtaining this definition requires defining both the product market and the geographic markets , where the relevant product market comprises all products or services regarded as interchangeable or substitutable by the consumer by reason of their characteristics, prices and intended use. Footnote 130 In the case of academic publishers, the relevant market might be deemed to comprise the publishing market of academic journals and periodicals. However, this is highly controversial, because if the product market is drawn narrowly, with relatively few competing products, it is much more likely that an undertaking will be found to be dominant. Footnote 131 As for the geographic market, this is not readily defined for commercial scientific publishers, given that the large publishing houses have been transformed into digital platforms with multi-sided markets. Footnote 132

Yet, as discussed, an excessive pricing ruling is possible in any market, not only where firms abuse their dominant market positions. Footnote 133 Excessive pricing and bundling can also be considered a reflection of the publishers’ control over the agreements entered into with research institutions. Thus, at what point can a price be deemed excessive? There is no single adequate method for evaluating an excessive price, but cost-benefit balancing tests may help to chart the interface of competition and intellectual property for a particular commercial practice. Footnote 134 Furthermore, the CJEU has ruled that a price can be “objectively” determined excessive by “making a comparison between the selling price of the product in question and its cost of production, which would disclose the amount of the profit margin”. Footnote 135

However, the current lack of transparency on the part of publishers regarding their article publishing costs hinders any assessment as to whether their costs and profits are well balanced. In the past, publishers had to invest in technology to transform articles and books into publishable forms and guarantee the print distribution, but digital publishing technologies have reduced such costs, especially in the case of online journals. Footnote 136 Nevertheless, commercial publishers have raised journal prices over the last 30 years, placing substantial pressure on library budgets. Footnote 137 Publishers claim these price hikes are justified by their need to invest in journal management and development and in expensive digital technology so they can build their databases and implement new publishing platforms. Footnote 138 They also seek to justify them on the grounds of the expertise they provide in improving academic content, which ensures the product quality of their journals: manuscripts submitted to a journal are assessed and selected by the journals’ editors, revised by peer reviewers, and proofread to ensure the manuscript includes all revisions and complies with style guides.

Yet, journal editors and peer reviewers are qualified members of the academic community, who are not usually paid for their services by the publishing companies. Footnote 139 Today, the typical academic journal receives all its content for free; writing, editing, reviewing, and all other processes related to knowledge production are conducted by academics and researchers, and indirectly paid for by their respective institutions. Footnote 140 Publishers’ contributions, which include proofing amendments, typesetting, language editing and publishing, can be done with very little material investment. For this reason, it has been suggested that academia might give some consideration to bringing more scholarly publishing functions in-house, instead of paying high fees to allow their researchers to read the work they themselves have done. Footnote 141

Obviously, neither journal subscriptions nor APCs or BPCs address solely the recouping of the cost of editorial input: they also serve to make profit. Indeed, various authors criticize the “black box” of academic publishing costs for charging excessively and for the disproportionate profit margins of around 40%. Footnote 142 All the signs are that large academic publishers are imposing abusive fees and bundling practices on research institutions, and that the sector should be subject to greater scrutiny under competition law. OA publishing could be an opportunity to adjust publishers’ income by setting fair APCs and BPCs that strike a better balance between their costs and profits.

5 Conclusion

The conventional model of scholarly publishing uses the copyright system as a lever to ensure that commercial publishers profit from disseminating the results of scholarly research. This is achieved by imposing copyright licenses on every copy, distribution, or further communication of their publications. OA publishing represents a significant change to this system, as publishers only charge a fee for their services, that is to say they make scholarly articles and books freely available from their journals and databases with virtually no copyright restrictions. If universal OA is achieved, journal subscriptions and book sales will cease, and publishers’ income will be based solely on a fee charged for each article and book published in OA.

The role of copyright in the development of OA scholarly publishing is limited, given that the main issue is how an OA system can be implemented financially; above all, it remains to be seen who will pay the commercial publishers, university presses and learned societies for OA publishing, and how fair publishing fees will be fixed.

Publishers have contributed to organizing and improving research publications, producing highly specialized journals over the last two centuries. They continue to play a vital role in scientific publishing. The path towards OA clearly has to be negotiated with these publishers, rather than restricting publishers’ rights or imposing compulsory licenses on them. Agreements between commercial publishers and institutions would constitute the most appropriate legal instrument in the search for a sustainable business model for OA, provided that those agreements include principles of party autonomy and contractual freedom to set fair publishing fees. In this new publishing market, competition law can play a key role in developing a model for sustainable universal OA.

Shaheed ( 2014 ), p. 17.

Suber ( 2012 ), p. 4.

Bammel ( 2014 ), p. 339.

The EU Research and Innovation Program Horizon (2021–2027) does not cover APCs in the case of subscription journals; Commission Staff Working Document, Impact Assessment Accompanying the document Proposals for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon Europe , Brussels, 7-6-2018, SWD (2018) 307 final, part 2/3, p. 106.

See the statement made by STM Publishers (Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers) on embargo-free OA in repositories: https://www.stm-assoc.org/rightsretentionstrategy/ .

Suber ( 2012 ), p. 130.

Willinsky ( 2009 ), p. 47.

Guibault ( 2011 ), p. 160.

Shavell ( 2010 ), p. 302.

Suthersanen ( 2003 ), p. 602.

Moscon ( 2015 ), p. 116.

De la Cueva and Méndez ( 2022 ), p. 11.

Willinsky ( 2022 ), p. 3.

Geiger and Jütte ( 2023 ), p. 6.

Bellia and Moscon ( 2022 ), p. 61.

Chapman ( 2009 ), p. 1.

Helfer and Austin ( 2011 ), p. 234.

Art. 27 UDHR declares that “(1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits. (2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he [or she] is the author”.

Plomer ( 2013 ), p. 175.

Art. 15.1 ICESCR states that “[t]he States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone: (a) To take part in cultural life; (b) To enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its applications; (c) To benefit from the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he [or she] is the author”.

Chapman ( 2009 ), p. 6.

Yotova and Knoppers ( 2020 ), p. 668.

Article 15.2 ICESCR states that “[t]he steps to be taken by the States Parties to the present Covenant to achieve the full realization of this right shall include those necessary for the conservation, the development and the diffusion of science and culture”.

Yotova and Knoppers ( 2020 ), p. 682.

Yotova and Knoppers ( 2020 ), p. 671.

CJEU judgment of 6 October 2020 Commission v. Hungary ( Higher Education ), C-66/18 , EU:C:2020:792, para. 225.

Geiger and Jütte ( 2023 ), pp. 43–44.

Geiger and Jütte ( 2023 ), p. 44.

Senftleben ( 2022 ), p. 12.

Chapman ( 2009 ), p. 2.

See para. 12(a) of the Venice Statement “The Right to Enjoy the Benefits of Scientific Progress and its Applications”, UNESCO (Venice 2009).

Ibid para. 8.

Stichweh ( 2009 ), pp. 82–90.

“Draft Recommendation on Open Science”, adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO in November 2021, available at https://en.unesco.org/science-sustainable-future/open-science/recommendation

Ibid paras. 6 and 9.

Kohler ( 1907 ), p. 143.

See Bulletin de l’Association littéraire internationale (1883), No. 18, p. 5.

Gálvez-Behar ( 2011 ), p. 21.

Ricketson and Ginsburg ( 2006 ), p. 406.

The UK Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988 establishes in Art. 1 that “[c]opyright is a property right which subsists in accordance with this Part in the following descriptions of work – (a) original literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works”, the French Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle (Loi Nº 92-597 of July 1992) states in Art. L.111-1 that “[t]he author of a work of the mind shall enjoy in that work, by the sole fact of its creation, an exclusive intangible property right that is enforceable against all persons”, and Art L.112-2 considers “works of the mind within the meaning of this Code: 1. Books, pamphlets and other literary, artistic and scientific writings ”. [emphasis added]

The German Copyright Act of 9 September 1965 states in Sec. 1 that “[t]he authors of works in the literary, scientific and artistic domain enjoy protection for their works in accordance with this Act” and the Spanish Copyright Act of 1996 declares in Art. 1 “[t]he intellectual property in a literary, artistic or scientific work shall belong to the author thereof by virtue of the sole act of its creation”. [emphasis added]

Loewenheim and Leistner ( 2020 ), p.69.

Bercovitz Rodriguez-Cano ( 2017 ), p. 159.

Quaedvlieg ( 2016 ), p. 654.

CJEU judgment of 1 December 2011 Painer v. Standard Verlags GmbH , C-145/10, EU:C:2011:798, paras. 88-89.

Galvez-Behar ( 2011 ), p. 90.

Salitskaya ( 2019 ) , p. 464.

Bently and Biron ( 2014 ), p. 242.

Casas ( 2009 ), p. 102.

See Art. 7 of Directive 96/9/EC on the legal protection of databases.

Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society.

Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC.

See Art. 5(3).(a) ISD.

Strowel and Ducato ( 2021 ), p. 303.

Geiger and Jütte ( 2023 ), pp. 54–55.

Geiger and Jütte ( 2023 ), pp. 53–54, and Angelopoulos ( 2022 ), p. 55.

See European Commission (2016), Commission Staff Working Document , Impact Assessment on the modernisation of EU copyright rules, Part I, Brussels, 14.9.2016 SWD (2016) 301 final, p. 104.

Senftleben ( 2022 ), p. 37.

See Art. 3 DSMD.

See Recital 10 DSMD.

Strowel and Ducato ( 2021 ), p. 301.

Griffiths et al. ( 2022 ), p. 13.

The Finch Report was drafted by a committee set up by the UK government to expand access to research publications, especially as regards publicly funded research. Available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Finch_Group_report.pdf .

United Kingdom research and innovation OA policy 2022, 3 https://www.ukri.org/publications/ukri-open-access-policy/ .

Art. 37(2) of Ley 14/2011 de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación (Spanish Law 14/2011 on Science, Technology, and Innovation).

Recital 5 of Commission Recommendation (EU) 2018/790 of 25 April 2018 on access to and preservation of scientific information, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018H0790

See https://www.coalition-s.org/addendum-to-the-coalition-s-guidance-on-the-implementation-of-plan-s/principles-and-implementation/ .

See SPARC Europe, “Opening Knowledge, Retaining Rights and Open Licensing in Europe in 2023”, p. 2. Available at https://sparceurope.org/opening-knowledge/ .

Bellia and Moscon ( 2022 ), p. 72.

In the UK, a growing number of HEIs have adopted the Scholarly Communications Licence, which allows authors to grant the university a non-exclusive license to make their accepted manuscript available without delay through the university’s OA repositories under the terms of a Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC). Cf . Baldwin and Pinfield ( 2018 ) p. 3 for a more detailed discussion of UK HEIs.

Angelopoulos ( 2022 ), p. 33.

Bellia and Moscon ( 2022 ), pp. 64–67.

Baldwin and Pinfield ( 2018 ) p.7 refer to UK academics. In Germany, Roland Reuß, professor of literary studies at the University of Heidelberg, criticized the German government proposal to make OA mandatory for all publicly funded research, ( see http://www.textkritik.de/digitalia/con_crema.htm ), and Jeffrey Beall, in the US, considers that a social movement that needs mandates to work is doomed to fail, Beall ( 2013 ), p. 594.

Moscon ( 2015 ), p. 107.

See , e.g. , Anderson, “cOAlition S’s Rights Confiscation Strategy Continues”, The Scholarly Kitchen, 20 July 2020, https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/07/20/coalition-ss-rights-confiscation-strategy-continues/ .

Khoo ( 2021 ), p. 6.

Peifer and Ohly ( 2020 ), p. 835.

Wandtke ( 2010 ), p. 185.

Rodríguez Tapia ( 1992 ), p. 294.

Cavanillas ( 2017 ), p. 930.

Owen ( 2013 ), p. 247.

Caddick et al. ( 2021 ), p. 488.

According to Art. 1:201(1) Principles of European Contract Law (PECL), “[e]ach party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing”; according to Art. 1:301(4) PECL “‘non-performance’ denotes any failure to perform an obligation under the contract, whether or not excused, and includes delayed performance, defective performance, and failure to co-operate in order to give full effect to the contract ”. [emphasis added]

McKendrick ( 2021 ), p. 392.

Art 9: 502 PECL states that “[t]he general measure of damages is such sum as will put the aggrieved party as nearly as possible into the position in which it would have been if the contract had been duly performed. Such damages cover the loss which the aggrieved party has suffered and the gain of which it has been deprived”.

Cf. SPARC Europe, “Opening Knowledge: Retaining Rights and Open Licensing in Europe in 2023” (Note 71) p. 17.

Cf. SPARC Europe, “Opening Knowledge: Retaining Rights and Open Licensing in Europe in 2023” (Note 71), p. 80.

De Castro ( 2020 ), p. 4.

See Sec. 38(4) German Copyright Act ( Bundesgesetzblatt 2013 Teil I , p. 3346).

See Art. 25fa Dutch Copyright Act ( Staatsblad 2015, p. 258), Art. 37(a) Austrian Federal Law on Copyright in Literary and Artistic Works and Related Rights ( Bundesgesetzblatt Teil I , No. 99/2015).

Art. 30 of Loi, n. 2016-1321 du 7 octobre 2016 pour une République numérique [Law No. 2016-1321 of 7 October 2016 for a Digital France] ( JORF , Journal officiel «Lois et Décrets», No. 0235 of 8 October 2016).

Art. 29 of the Law on Miscellaneous Economic Provisions of 30 July 2018] ( Belgisch Staatsblad No. 209, p. 68691)

Angelopoulos ( 2022 ), pp. 33–35.

Hansen ( 2005 ), pp. 378–388, p. 379.

Quaedvlieg ( 2016 ), p. 655.

Senftleben ( 2014 ), p. 10.

Visser ( 2015 ), p. 878.

Maddi et al. ( 2021 ), p. 3137.

On the difficulties of adopting SPR as an EU copyright exception, cf . Angelopolus (2022), pp. 37–53.

May ( 2020 ), p. 126.

Cf. SPARC Europe, “Opening Knowledge: Retaining Rights and Open Licensing in Europe in 2023”, (Note 71), p. 80.

Bell ( 2014 ), p. 144.

Schimmer et al. ( 2015 ), p. 5.

Szprot et al. (2021), p. 10.

See https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/ . The ESAC initiative was established in 2014 to promote workflow efficiencies and library-driven standards in the management of OA article processing charges.

See the registry of TAs at https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/agreement-registry/ .

The Spanish National Research Council comprises some 100 research institutes in disciplines that include medicine, chemistry, physics, and biology. The R&P agreement with OUP can be consulted at https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/agreement-registry/oxf2020csic/ . At present, the average APC per article is EUR 2,300. Cf . Borrego et al. ( 2021 ), p. 225.

Anders et al. ( 2021 ), p. 132.

Szprot et al. ( 2021 ), p. 51.

See clause 5.2.e of the Wiley “Read and Publish” framework agreement with the Spanish Conference of University Chancellors (CRUE) available at https://www.crue.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MoU-WILEY.pdf .

See , for Elsevier’s copyright overview and authors rights on exclusive license for publishing in OA https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/copyright#0-overview .

English law is recognized as the governing law in the R&P agreement between the Spanish National Research Council and Oxford University Press (available at https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/agreement-registry/oxf2020csic/ ) and in the R&P agreement between the University of Barcelona and Cambridge Law Review. In contrast, the general collaboration agreement between Springer and CRUE covering R&P agreements between Springer and Spanish Universities recognizes Spanish law as the governing law, available at https://www.crue.org/proyecto/acuerdos-con-editoriales/ .

Westkamp ( 2022 ), p. 1044.

Bently ( 2021 ), p. 30.

Asai ( 2021 ) p. 32.

Mueller-Langer and Scheufen ( 2013 ), p. 365.

Borrego et al. ( 2021 ), p. 219.

Larivière et al. ( 2015 ), p. 3.

The “big five” are Elsevier (2,928 journals), Springer (2,920 journals), Taylor & Francis (2,508 journals), Wiley (1,607 journals) and SAGE (1,151 journals). See https://wordsrated.com/academic-publishers-statistics/ .

Eger and Scheufen ( 2018 ), p. 121.

Eger and Scheufen ( 2018 ), p. 17.

Puehringer et al. ( 2021 ), p. 2.

The EUA represents 800 universities across Europe and 33 National Rectors’ Conferences. The EUA’s statement entitled “The lack of transparency and competition in the academic publishing market in Europe and beyond” is available at https://eua.eu/news/188:scholarly-publishing-eua-asks-european-commission-to-investigate-lack-of-competition.html .

Budzinski et al. ( 2020 ), pp. 2185 and 2203.

Whish and Bailey ( 2015 ), p. 187.

CJEU judgment of 16 March 2000 Compagnie Maritime Belge Transports and Others v. Commission, Case C-395/96 ECLI:EU:2000:132, para. 38.

See EU Commission Draft of the “Communication from the Commission: Commission Notice on the definition of the relevant market for the purposes of Union competition law”, pp. 10–11, available at https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_6528 .

Macculloch and Rodger ( 2021 ), p. 228.

Business Models and Market Structure within the Scholarly Communications Sector, International Science Council, p. 6. Available at https://council.science/publications/business-models/ .

McMahon ( 2023 ), p. 139.

Flynn ( 2010 ), p.150.

CJEU judgment of 14 February 1978 United Brands Co v. Commission , Case C-27/76, ECLI:EU:C:1978:22, para. 251.

May ( 2020 ), p. 122.

See , Business Models and Market Structure within the Scholarly Communications Sector, International Science Council, September 2020, pp. 10–16, available at https://council.science/publications/business-models/ .

Michael et al. (2016), p. 1404.

Litman ( 2006 ), p. 794.

Smith ( 2018 ), p. 1186; Budzinski et al. ( 2020 ), p. 2185.

Anders A, Chesler A, Webster K, Rotjan S, Balduff D (2021) Read and publish – what it takes to implement a seamless model. Ser Libr 80:1–4

Google Scholar  

Angelopoulos C (2022) Study on the EU copyright and related rights and access to and reuse of scientific publications, including OA. Exceptions and limitations, rights retention strategies and the secondary publication right. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.2777/891665

Asai S (2021) Author choice of journal type based on income level of country. J Sch Publ 53(1):24–34

Article   Google Scholar  

Baldwin J, Pinfield S (2018) The UK Scholarly Communication Licence: attempting to cut through the gordian knot of the complexities of funder mandates, publisher embargoes and researcher caution in achieving OA. Publications 6(3)31:1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6030031

Bammel J (2014) The impact of copyright on the enjoyment of right to science and culture. Pub Res Q 30:335–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-014-9382-3

Beall J (2013) The open access movement is not really about open access. TripleC 11(2):589–597

Bell J (2014) OA: the journal is not dead. Leg Inf Manag 14:143–145

Bellia M, Moscon V (2022) Academic authors, copyright, and dissemination of knowledge: a comparative overview. In: Bonadio E, Sappa C (eds) The subjects of literary and artistic copyright. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 58–78

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Bently L, Biron L (2014) Discontinuities between legal conceptions of authorship and legal practices. In: Van Eechoud M (ed) The work of authorship. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, pp 237–276

Bently L (2021) The past, present and future of the Cambridge Law Journal. Cambridge Law Journal 80, September pp 8–32

Bercovitz Rodríguez-Cano R (2017) Comentarios al art. 10. In: Bercovitz Rodríguez-Cano R (ed) Comentarios a la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual, 4th edn. Tecnos, Madrid, pp 159–193

Borrego A, Anglada L, Abadal E (2021) Transformative agreements: do they pave the way to OA? Learned Publishing 34(2):216–232

Budzinski O, Grebel T, Wolling J, Zhang X (2020) Drivers of article processing charges in open access. Scientometrics 14:2185–2206

Caddick N, Harbottle G, Suthersanen U (2021) Copinger and Skone James on copyright. Sweet and Maxell, United Kingdom, 18th edn

Casas R (2009) The requirement of originality. In: Derclaye E (ed) Research handbook on the future of EU copyright. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 102–133

Cavanillas S (2017) Comentarios al art. 48. In: Bercovit Rodríguez-Cano R (ed) Comentarios a la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual, 4th edn. Tecnos, Madrid, pp 918–939

Chapman AR (2009) Towards an understanding of the right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its application. Journal of Human Rights 8:1–36

De Castro P (2020) Acuerdos transformativos con los editores: un controvertido paso adelante en la implantación del acceso abierto. Anuario ThinkEPI 14(1):1–9

De la Cueva J, Méndez E (2022) Open science and intellectual property rights. How can they better interact? State of the art and reflections. Report of Study. European Commission. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.2777/347305

Eger T, Scheufen M (2018) The economics of open access. On the future of academic publishing (New Horizons in Law and Economics series), Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

Flynn SM (2010), Using competition law to promote access to knowledge. Washington College of Law Research Paper No. 2010-24

Gálvez-Behar G (2011) The propertisation of science: suggestions for an historical investigation. Zeitschrift für Globalgeschichte und vergleichende Gesellschaftsforschung 21(2):89–97

Geiger C, Jütte B (2023) Conceptualizing a ‘right to research’ and its implications for copyright law: an international and European perspective. American University International Law Review 38:1–60

Griffiths J, Synodinou T, Xalabarder R (2022) Comment of the European Copyright Society addressing selected aspects of the implementation of articles 3 to 7 of Directive (EU) 2019/790 on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. European Copyright Society opinion. https://europeancopyrightsociety.org/2022

Guibault L (2011) Owning the right to open up access to scientific publications. In: Guibault L, Angelopoulos C (eds) Open content licensing: from theory to practice. Amsterdam University Press, pp 137–169. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789089643070

Hansen G (2005) Zugang zu wissentschaftlicher Information – alternative urheberrechtliche Ansätze. GRUR Int: pp. 378–388

Helfer L, Austin G (2011) Human rights and intellectual property: mapping the global interface. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Book   Google Scholar  

Kohler J (1907) Urheberrecht an Schriftwerken und Verlagsrecht. Verlag von Ferdinand Enke, Stuttgart

Khoo SY (2021) The Plan S Rights Retention Strategy is an administrative and legal burden, not a sustainable OA solution. Insights 34:1–6

Larivière V, Haustein S, Mongeon P (2015) The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE 10(6):1–15

Litman J (2006) The economics of open access law publishing. Lewis & Clark Law Review 10(4):779–795

Loewenheim U, Leistner M (2020) § 2 Geschütze Werke. In: Schricker G, Loewenheim U (eds) Urheberrecht Kommentar, 6th edn Beck, Munich

Maddi A, Lardreau E, Sapinho D (2021) OA in Europe: a national and regional comparison. Scientometrics 126(5):3131–3152

May C (2020) Academic publishing and OA: costs, benefits, and options for publishing research. Politics 40(I):120–135

MacCulloch A, Rodger BJ (2021) Competition law and policy in the EU and UK, 6th edn. Routledge, Abingdon

McKendrick E (2021) Contract law, 14th edn. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, London

McMahon K (2023) A re-evaluation of the abuse of excessive pricing. In: Akman P (ed) Research handbook on abuse of dominance and monopolization. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

Moscon V (2015) Academic freedom, copyright, and access to scholarly works: a comparative perspective. In: Caso R, Giovanella F (eds) Balancing copyright law in the digital age. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp 99–135

Mueller-Langer F, Scheufen M (2013) Academic publishing and OA. In: Handke C, Towse R (eds) Handbook of the digital creative economy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 365–378

Owen L (2013) Clark’s publishing agreements: a book of precedents. 9th edn Bloomsbury Professional, West Sussex

Peifer K-N, Ohly A (2020) §33 Weiterwirkung von Nutzungrechten. In: Schricker G, Loewenheim U (eds) Urheberrecht Kommentar. Beck, 6th edn Munich

Peters MA et al (2016) Towards a philosophy of academic publishing. Educ Philos Theory 48(14):1401–1425

Plomer A (2013) The human rights paradox: intellectual property rights and rights of access to science. Hum Rights Q 35:143–175. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2013.0015

Puehringer S, Rath J, Griesebner T (2021) The political economy of academic publishing: on the commodification of a public good. PLoS ONE 16(6):1–21

Quaedvlieg A (2016) The nature of the scholar’s right to publish in open access. In: Karnell G, Nordell P J, Kur A, Westman D, Axhamn DJ, Carlsson S (eds) Liber Amicorum, Jan Rosén, Eddy.se ab, Visby

Ricketson S, Ginsburg J (2006) International copyright and neighbouring rights, the Berne Convention and beyond, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Rodríguez Tapia JM (1992) La cesión en exclusiva de derechos de autor. Editorial Centro de Estudios Ramón Areces, Madrid

Salitskaya EA (2019) The problem of unprotected content of scientific work, do we need a ‘copyright’ on ideas? Her Russ Acad Sci 82:460–467

Schimmer R, Geschuhn K, Vogler A (2015) Disrupting the subscription journals business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to OA. Max Planck Gesellschaft PuRe. https://doi.org/10.17617/1.3

Schricker G, Loewenheim U (2020) §33 Weiterwirkung von Nutzungrechten. In: Schricker G, Loewenheim U (eds) Urheberrecht Kommentar. Beck, 6th edn Munich

Senftleben MRF (2014) How to overcome the normal exploitation obstacle: opt-out formalities, embargo periods, and the international three-step test. Berkeley Technology Law Journal Commentaries 1:1–19. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2331688

Senftleben MRF (2022) Study on EU copyright and related rights and access to and reuse of data. European Commission. Independent Expert Report. https://doi.org/10.2777/78973

Shaheed F (2014) Copyright policy and the right to science and culture. Report of the Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights, United Nations, General Assembly.

Shavell S (2010) Should copyright of academic works be abolished? Journal of Legal Analysis 2(1):301–358

Smith R (2018) The business of academic publishing: ‘a catastrophe.’ The Lancet 392(10154):1186–1187

SPARC Europe (2023) Opening knowledge, retaining rights and open licensing in Europe in 2023. https://sparceurope.org/opening-knowledge/

Stichweh R (2009) Differentiation of scientific disciples: causes and consequences. In: Hirsch Hadorn G (ed) Unity of knowledge in transdisciplinary research for sustainability. Eolss Publishers, Oxford, pp 82–91

Strowel A, Ducato R (2021) Artificial intelligence and text and data mining. In: Rosati E (ed) The Routledge handbook of EU copyright law. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 299–316

Szprot J et al. (2021) Transformative agreements: overview, case studies, and legal analysis. Open Science Platform , Wydawnictwa ICM, Warsaw. https://depot.ceon.pl/handle/123456789/19672

Suber P (2012 ) Open access. the MIT Press, Massachusetts-London

Suthersanen U (2003) Copyright and educational policies: a stakeholder analysis. Oxf J Leg Stud 23:585–609

UNESCO (2021) Draft Recommendation on Open Science, adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO in November 2021. https://en.unesco.org/science-sustainable-future/open-science/recommendation

Visser D (2015) The OA provision in Dutch copyright contract law. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 10(11):872–878

Wandtke A (2010) Urheberrecht, 2nd. De Gruyter, Berlin, p 2010

Westkamp G (2022) In it for the money? Academic publishing, OA, and the authors claim to self-determination in private international law. GRUR Int 7(11):1034–1047

Whish R, Bailey D (2015) Competition law, 8th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Willinsky J (2009) The access principle: the case of OA to research and scholarship. the MIT Press, Massachusetts-London

Willinsky J (2022) Copyright’s broken promise: how to restore the law’s ability to promote the progress of science. the MIT Press, Massachusetts-London

Yotova R, Knoppers BM (2020) The right to benefit from science and its implications for genomic data sharing. Eur J Int Law 31:665–691

Download references

Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Associate Professor, Department of Private Law, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Asunción Esteve

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asunción Esteve .

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

I am grateful to Prof. Uma Suthersanen for hosting me as Visiting Scholar at Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute in 2021. I would like to thank Prof. Suthersanen and Prof. Lionel Bently for their comments and feedback on an earlier version of this article. I would also like to thank Paul Aris, Pro-Vice-Provost (University College London Library Services), and Matthew Day, Head of Open and Data Publishing at Cambridge University Press, for sharing their expertise in open access publishing.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Esteve, A. Copyright and Open Access to Scientific Publishing. IIC (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01479-z

Download citation

Accepted : 24 April 2024

Published : 27 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01479-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Right to benefit from science
• Read and publish agreements
• Academic publishing market
• Competition law
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• Current Issues
• Past Issues
• Call for Papers
• Research Topics

Publication Procedure

• Processing Fees
• Editorial Board

Submit Research Paper Online

SUBMIT RESEARCH PAPER – Submission Form

Drag and Drop (or) Choose Files

What is DOI

Frequently asked questions.

A DOI will help Author(s) easily locate a document from your citation. Think of it like a Social Security number for the article you're citing — it will always refer to that article, and only that one. While a web address (URL) might change, the DOI will never change.

Where can i find DOI:

• In IJSREM journal articles, the DOI will be printed with the article itself, usually on the footer of the page
• If the DOI isn't included in the article, look it up on the website  CrossRef.org  (use the "Search Metadata" option) to check for an assigned DOI.
• Allows for a quick and precise search.
• Article can always be located.
• Persistent link to its location on the Internet.
• Easier identification of published articles even if the metadata URL is changed.
• Aid in citation tracking, ensuring a researcher has accurate metrics on how and where their research outputs are being used or referenced.

What type of papers does International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM) publish?

Research Paper, Survey Paper, Informative Article, Case Studies, Review Papers, Comparative Studies

How long does it take for an accepted paper to be actually published?

Approximate will inform within 24 hours via email and sms.

What is the procedure to submit my paper?

Please Submit your Research Paper here Submit Research Paper Online - IJSREM

What is a Paper ID?

Paper ID is an Unique Identification Code provided to your submitted Manuscript. You should always mention the Paper ID during any communication with us.

How long my published paper will stay online?

May I submit more than one article?

We will accept multiple submissions across multiple communities, as long as the author joins each community.

Why IJSREM?

IJSREM is one of the world's leading and fastest-growing research publications with the paramount objective of discovering advances by publishing insightful, double-blind, peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Publication Time Period

The Submitted Article/Paper will accept within 12-24 Hours, and it can publish within 24 Hours

Manuscript Submission - Check Manuscript Plagiarism - Send for Editorial Review - Final Decission to Author - Payment of Publication Fee - Re-screening - Final Publication

Processing Fee's

For Management, Hosting & Office Expenditure IJSREM Journal may charge some amount to publish the paper.

To Publish a Paper ₹: 800/- INR (without DOI)

₹:1000/- INR (with DOI)

To the extent possible under, Indospace Publications has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to Journal. This work is published from India.

Disclaimar                                                     Privacy Policy                                   Terms and Conditions

• Submit Paper
• Check Paper Status
• Download Certificate
• Join as an Editor-Reviewer

Indexing Partner

• Architecture & Civil Engineering (11)
• Arts Literature & Linguistics (15)
• Biology and Life Sciences (52)
• Business Studies (33)
• Chemistry & Chemical Engineering (34)
• Computer Science & Electrical (55)
• Earth, Energy & Environment (38)
• Education (14)
• Engineering & Technology (34)
• Materials Science (19)
• Mathematics & Statistics (29)
• Medicine, Health & Food (80)
• Physics (33)
• Social Sciences & Psychology (26)
• Transportation & Logistics (6)

Welcome To IJRP

International Journal of Research Publications (IJRP) is having ISSN (2708-3578) (online), and DOI:  10.47119/27083578 , bimonthly international journal, being published since the year 2017. IJRP is an active member of Crossref and all published papers are issued DOI number.

International Journal of Research Publications (IJRP) is a quality publication of peer-reviewed and refereed international journals from diverse fields in sciences, engineering and technologies, Business, and many more that emphasize new research, development, and their applications.

IJRP is entirely not-for-profit and depends solely on contributions. Your  DONATION and Support are greatly appreciated. Help us to continue contributing to the visibility and dissemination of Open Access research and to make it the default for academic and scholarly publishing. We greatly welcome any type of cooperation like to receive investments and financial support. Please don't hesitate to contact us for more details. 

Send paper registration fees to any of our Paypal account:  [email protected]  or   [email protected]  ​

Email for General Query:  [email protected]

Chief Editor:

1. Sadekur Rahman

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Call for Papers - Volume 150 Issue 1

• ISSN number : 2708-3578 (Online)
• Submission Start From : 01 Jun 2024
• Initial Submission Accepted upto : 15 Jun 2024
• Acceptance Notification : 18 Jun 2024
• Camera Ready Paper Submission : 21 Jun 2024
• Copyright Transfer : 21 Jun 2024
• Payment & Final Submission Accepted : 21 Jun 2024
• E-Publication : 23 Jun 2024
• Print Edition Release : 23 Jun 2024
• Publication Fee : 40 USD
• Open Access Fee : FREE

Years Experience

Editor & reviewer, papers published, most viewed / downloaded papers.

Last Papers

All Editor:

TIJER - INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNALS

ISSN Approved Journal | ESTD Year: 2014 Follow UGC CARE Journal Norms and Guidelines

Scholarly open access journals, Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor 8.57 (Calculate by google scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool) , Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Indexing in all major database & Metadata, Citation Generator, Digital Object Identifier(DOI) Paper Submission Till : 29 th of this Current Month

Indexing In Google Scholar, SSRN, ResearcherID-Publons, Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Microsoft Academic, Academia.edu, arXiv.org, Research Gate, CiteSeerX, ResearcherID Thomson Reuters, Mendeley : reference manager, DocStoc, ISSUU, Scribd, and many more

Refereed Journal

Scholarly open access journals, Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor - Calculate by google scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool , Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Indexing in all major database & Metadata, Citation Generator, Digital Object Identifier(DOI)

Check Paper Status

Author can Check Paper Status of Submitted Paper and Download Certificate of Paper after Publication Check Paper Status

Publication Procedure

Follow Step by Step Process for Research Paper Publication Guidelines Submit Paper Online

TIJER-International Research Journals(TIJER) | ISSN Approved

TIJER, following the UGC CARE Journal Norms and Guidelines, stands as a beacon of scholarly open access publishing, Impact Factor of 8.57 by Google Scholar. our rigorous multidisciplinary peer-review process, extensive indexing across major databases, the convenience of a citation generator, and the assignment of Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs). TIJER envisions a future where knowledge is freely accessible, and research is a driving force for global progress. Join us in this journey of discovery and collaboration. TIJER-International Research Journal (TIJER) aims to explore advances in research pertaining to applied, theoretical and experimental Technological studies. The goal is to promote scientific information interchange between researchers, developers, engineers, students, and practitioners working in and around the world.

Subject Category

Multidisciplinary, Monthly and Multilanguage (Regional language supported)

Low Publication Charges

Low cost research journal, online international research journal, Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, scholarly open access journals. Publication fees: ₹1500 INR for Indian author & 50$ for foreign International author

Publication Guidelines

Follow COPE Guidelines. Follow UGC CARE Journal Norms and Guidelines. Valid as per new UGC Gazette regulations.

FOLLOW THIS STEP AND PUBLISH YOUR RESEARCH PAPER WITHIN 1 TO 2 DAY

Submit Paper Online

Step 1 : Submission of Manuscript/Paper through Submit Paper online to anyone of our journals. Follow the Journal's specific instruction

Peer Review Process

Step 2 : Peer Review of Your Paper within 2 Days You will get your Acceptance OR Rejection Notification through Email and SMS.

Pay Fees Online

Step 3 : Pay Publication charges. Download and Filling Copyright Form and Undertaking Form available in Author Home.

Paper Published

Step 4 : After Submission of necessary Documents paper will be publish within 1 to 2 Days. For Download Certificate, Confirmation letter

Call For Paper

Scholarly open access journals, Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor 8.57 (Calculate by google scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool), Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Online, Print Journal, Indexing in all major database & Metadata, Citation Generator, Digital Object Identifier(DOI)

Quick Links

Voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident

Call for Paper

Publication charges, for indian authors, ₹ 1500 / paper, for foreign authors, $ 55 / paper, licence and indexing.

• Submit Paper
• Check Paper Status
• Download Certificate/Paper

• --> --> --> --> --> E-mail [email protected] --> -->