COURSES
Detailed Syllabus here . Revised Syllabus Here
Form start date:.
05 Dec 2021
28 Feb 2023
Examination date (online):.
24 Feb 2023
Admissions open for, gd goenka university admission 2021.
22 Jan 2023-31 Jan 2023
08 Jan 2023-21 Jan 2023
06 Jan 2023-25 Jan 2023
01 Feb 2023-22 Feb 2023
01 Dec 2022-01 Jun 2023
17 May - 06 Jun 2027
Waqar Niyazi
Content Curator
PhD full form is Doctor of Philosophy. It is a doctorate level course for students who have completed their master’s degree and want to pursue a research-based course in any field they are interested in.
The eligibility criteria for the PhD Course is basically completion of a master’s degree with at least 50% marks from a recognized institute. PhD Admissions are done based on scores obtained in CSIR UGC NET and other PhD entrance examinations. Know More : PhD Admission
The syllabus for PhD entrance exams includes common topics from 10+2, graduation and postgraduation level i.e. technology, life sciences, mathematics, sciences, and general aptitude. The subjects and topics included in PhD Syllabus vary based on the PhD Specialization and sub-stream one chooses. The subjects included in PhD Syllabus focus on the research and practical aspects of the subject, with a little focus on theoretical knowledge. Check : PhD Scholarships
Table of Contents
List of top phd courses.
Given below are some doctorate level courses along with their sub-streams and specializations available:
Streams | PhD course |
---|---|
Science | |
Arts | |
Medical | |
Engineering | |
Management | |
Pharmacy | |
Commerce | |
Agriculture | |
Law | |
Mass communications | |
Architecture | PhD (architecture) |
Education | |
Veterinary sciences | |
Paramedical | |
Dental | |
Design | |
Computer applications | |
Hotel management |
Syllabus of top PhD courses is mentioned below:
The Syllabus of Doctor of Philosophy in science is mentioned below. The course is for 3 years to 5 years. The given syllabus is semester wise. Each year contains 2 semesters.
Semester I | Semester II |
---|---|
Component Object Model (COM) & interfaces in COM | Vector and array processor |
CORBA, JAVA, and object web | Multiprocessor architecture |
Computer architecture | Pipeline architecture |
Advanced computer algorithms | Computer system design |
Distributed COM | Advanced software engineering |
Dynamic programming | Testing |
Semester III | Semester IV |
Advanced database management systems | Telecommunications systems, satellite systems, broadcast systems |
Parallel and distributed databases, web databases | Web engineering and software quality metrics |
Backtracking, branch and bound | Frequencies for radio transmission |
Data mining | Wireless network and communication |
Data warehousing | Wireless LAN |
Semester V | Semester VI |
XML Primer, JSP, XLS, ASP | Distributed file system |
Distributed objects and remote innovation | Transactions and concurrency control, replication |
Advanced transaction processing | Distributed systems |
Building web agreement | Medium access control |
The Syllabus of Doctor of Philosophy in management studies course is mentioned below. The course is for 3 years. The given syllabus is semester wise. Each year contains 2 semesters. There are 6 semesters.
Semester I | Semester II |
---|---|
General management | Elective I |
- | Information technology management |
- | Financial management |
- | Human resource management |
- | Operations management |
Semester III | Semester IV |
Quantitative analysis | Logistics |
Research methodology | Retail merchandising |
Computer applications | Marketing |
Semester V | Semester VI |
Project work | Dissertation |
Review report | - |
Seminar | - |
The Syllabus of PhD in engineering and technology is given below. The course is for 5 years. The given syllabus is topic wise:
Foundations of computing |
Parallel and distributed systems |
Formal methods: Program correctness, Hoarier logic, Program semantics and model checking |
Software systems |
Final research |
The Syllabus of PhD in legal studies is given below. The course is for 3 years. The given syllabus is course wise:
Course I | Course II |
---|---|
Research processes | Jurisprudence |
Methods of investigations and tools for collection of data | Constitutional law |
Research methodology | - |
Course III | Course IV |
Seminars and presentation | Seminars and presentation |
The Syllabus of PhD in journalism and mass communication is given below. The course is for 3 years. The given syllabus is subject wise which includes core subjects, elective subjects and other subjects:
Subject’s type | Subjects Name |
---|---|
Core subjects | Communication theory |
Research Methodology I | |
Research Methodology II | |
Elective subjects | Specialized and analytical journalism |
Journalism studies | |
Other subjects | Seminars |
Theory and practices | |
Fieldwork |
The Syllabus of PhD in pharmaceutics is given below. The course is for 3 years. The given syllabus is year wise. Each year contains 2 semesters.
Year I | Year II | Year III |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry of Medicine | Phytopharmaceuticals and pharmacognosy | Project work |
Physiology and Human Anatomy | Pharmaceutical microbiology | - |
Pharmaceutics | Community pharmacy | - |
Pharmaceutical organic chemistry | Pharmacotherapeutics - I | - |
Biology / remedial mathematics | Pathophysiology | - |
Pharmaceutics | Pharmacology - I | - |
The Syllabus of PhD in Veterinary Surgery and Radiology is given below. The course is for 3 years. The given syllabus is year wise. Each year contains 2 semesters.
Year I | Year II | Year III |
---|---|---|
Anesthesia of wild and Laboratory Animal | Small animal soft tissue surgery (thoracic and cardiovascular) | PhD Thesis Research |
Advances in diagnostic imaging techniques | Neurosurgery | Doctoral Seminar I |
Advances in Anesthesiology | Body electrolyte and fluid therapy | Doctoral Seminar II |
Clinical surgical practice - I | Clinical surgical practice - II | Clinical surgical practice - III |
The Syllabus of Doctor of Philosophy in Economics course is given below. The course is for 3 years. The given syllabus is paper wise. There are 4 papers with the elective exam.
Paper I (Research) | Paper-II (Development Economics) | Paper III (Financial Studies) | Paper IV (mandatory) |
---|---|---|---|
Introduction to research methodology | Rural development | Overview of financial markets | Thesis presentation |
Data collection and organization | Poverty and inequality | Hedging strategies with financial markets | Comprehensive Viva-voce |
Econometric methods | Labour and migration | Modelling the behavior of asset prices | - |
Advanced econometric methods | Governance and the political economy of development | Trading strategies in financial markets | - |
Topics in mathematical economics | International trade and development | Role of financial intermediaries | - |
Advanced economic theory | Urbanization and development | Interest rate derivatives | - |
Probability distribution and testing of hypothesis | Economics of the computer and information science | Macroeconomics consequences of financial imperfections | - |
Advanced microeconomics theory | Health and education | - | - |
Advanced macroeconomics theory | Environment and development | - | - |
- | Industrial economics | - | - |
- | The political economy of development | - | - |
- | International macroeconomics | - | - |
Advanced economic theory |
Public finance |
Development of economics |
Theory of economic growth and technical progress |
Agrarian development |
Economics of education and development |
Economics of energy |
International trade and finance |
Economics of planning |
Welfare economics |
The Syllabus of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy course is given below. The course is for 3 years to 6 years. The given syllabus is paper-wise. There are 4 papers including elective exams.
Paper I (Research) | Paper-II (optional) |
---|---|
Literature survey | Theory of knowledge |
Data collection and organization | Advanced course in logic |
Introduction to research methodology | Advanced course in formal methods |
Principles of thesis preparation | Advanced course in philosophy of science |
Research tools and studies | Philosophy of statistics |
- | Philosophy of the computer and information science |
- | Decision theory |
- | Value theory |
- | Philosophy of mathematics |
- | Philosophical aesthetics |
- | Philosophy of language |
- | Art technology |
- | Political philosophy |
- | Environment philosophy |
- | Philosophy of social sciences |
- | Critical reading in philosophical texts |
Paper III Elective (Indian Philosophical studies) | Paper IV Elective (western Philosophical studies) |
Ishvara Krishna – Samkhya Karika | Plato |
Nagarjuna – Mulamadhyamakakarika | A treatise of Human Nature Book |
Carvaka – Lokayata | Logical Atomism |
Early Buddhism | Kant- Critique of Pure Reason |
Vaisesika Sutra | Wittgenstein – Philosophical investigations |
Sankara’s Commentary on first four Sutra | Freedom and resentment and other essays |
Jaina – Pancastikayasara | Some main problems of philosophy |
The first and last freedom | How to do things with words |
The Nyaya Theory of knowledge | Concept of minds |
A new perspective in Indian Philosophy Chapters | Being and nothingness |
Reason and tradition in Indian thought | Being and time |
Paper V (Mandatory) | |
Thesis presentation | |
Comprehensive viva voce |
The Syllabus of Doctor of Philosophy in commerce and management is given below. The course is for 3 years.
Creative thinking and design innovation |
Fundamentals of management in business |
Research methodology |
Organizational behaviour |
Human resource and business ethics |
Principles of management |
Marketing and operations management |
Project work |
Dissertation/ seminar |
The Syllabus of Doctor of Philosophy in English literature course is given below. The course is for 3 years to 5 years.
Medieval literature |
Women’s literature |
African – American literature |
Colonial and post-colonial literature |
English poetry |
Prose fiction |
Lesbians, Gay and bisexual literature |
Renaissance literature |
Literary criticism and theory |
Literature in the 12th century |
Dramatic literature |
Books recommended for PhD, along with their authors are mentioned below:
Books | Author |
---|---|
Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach | John W. Creswell |
Good work if you can get it | Jason Brennan |
The new PhD | Leonard Cassuto |
The elements of confusion Hm…. | YeoYs Exams |
The dissertation is loading please wait | YeoYs Exams |
I can’t come I am working on my dissertation | YeoYs Exams |
What stars are made of the life of Cecilia Payne- Gaposchkin | Donovan Moore |
The portable PhD | M. Patrick Gallagher PhD |
PhD in progress | Jauhar PhD Journals |
Miss Ms Mrs Doctor | Smitten Notebooks |
The entrance exams for PhD course depend on the PhD specialization chosen by the students. Admission for engineering PhD courses are based on GATE exam.
Subjects | Details |
---|---|
Emergence of Psychology | |
Research Methodology and Statistics | |
Psychological testing | |
Biological basis of behavior | |
Attention, Perception, Learning, Memory and Forgetting |
Subjects | Details |
---|---|
Sociological Theory | |
Research Methodology and Methods | |
Basic Concepts and Institutions | |
Rural and Urban Transformations | |
State, Politics and Development | |
Economy and Society | |
Environment and Society | |
Family, Marriage and Kinship | |
Science, Technology and Society | |
Culture and Symbolic Transformations |
Unit Number | Subjects |
---|---|
Unit-1 | |
Unit-2 | |
Unit-3 | |
Unit-4 | |
Unit-5 | |
Unit-6 | |
Unit-7 | |
Unit-8 | |
Unit-9 | |
Unit-10 |
Unit Number | Subjects |
---|---|
Unit-1 | |
Unit-2 | |
Unit-3 | |
Unit-4 | |
Unit-5 | |
Unit-6 | |
Unit-7 | |
Unit-8 | |
Unit-9 | |
Unit-10 | Concepts and Theories: |
Subjects | Details |
---|---|
Business Environment and International Business | |
Accounting and Auditing | |
Accounting and Auditing | |
Business Finance | |
Business Statistics and Research Methods | |
Business Management and Human Resource Management | |
Banking and Financial Institutions | |
Marketing Management | |
Legal Aspects of Business | |
Income-tax and Corporate Tax Planning |
The IGNOU PhD Entrance Exam determined the students who will get to do their PhD in IGNOU. The entrance exam syllabus depends on the specialization.
Subjects | Details |
---|---|
Anthropology and Methods of Research | |
Physical Anthropology | |
Social Anthropology | |
Archaeological Anthropology |
Subjects | Details |
---|---|
Research Methodology | |
Political Theory & Thought | |
India: State and Society | |
Globalization and International Relations |
Subjects | Details |
---|---|
Research Methodology | |
Inorganic Chemistry | |
Physical Chemistry | |
Organic Chemistry |
Subjects | Details |
---|---|
Research Methodology | |
Geology Courses |
Subjects | Details |
---|---|
Research Methodology | |
Life Sciences |
Algebra | |
Real Analysis | |
Topology | |
Functional Analysis | |
Differential Equations | |
Partial Differential Equations | |
Research Aptitude |
Research Methodology | |
Accounting & Taxation ACCOUNTING | |
Taxation | |
International Business | |
Banking and Finance | |
Marketing Management | |
Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management |
Methodology of Educational Research | |
Subject Specific Areas |
Research Methodology | Foundations of Research |
---|---|
Research Process | |
Management (Financial Management, Human Resource Management, Marketing Management Operations Management and General Management) |
Concepts And Theries In Women’s Studies | |
Feminist Research Methodologies |
Introduction to Interdisciplinary and Trans disciplinary Studies | |
Research Methods and Techniques |
Research Methodology | |
Subject Areas |
Research Methodology | |
Subject Specific |
Research Methodology | |
Computer Science |
Research Methodology | |
Law |
Research Methodology | |
Translation Studies |
Part-A: Research Methodology | |
Vocational Education and Training |
British literature: issues and debates, trends and movements | Diaspora Studies |
Subaltern Literary Perspectives | Folklore and Culture Studies |
Contemporary World Literature | American Literature |
Multiculturalism | Australian Literature |
English Language Teaching | Research Methodology |
New Literatures in English | Critical Theories |
Indian Writing in English | Canadian Literature |
: Research Methodology | |
Subject specific: Child Development |
Ques. when the application forms for a PhD or M. Phil available in 2024?
Ans. The application forms for the PhD or M. Phil course available in September 2024.
Ques. What are the requirements for PhD admission?
Ans. The documents required during the admission process of PhD are a bachelor’s degree with at least a second-class grade and a master’s degree with high academic grades.
Ques. What is the highest placement package of a PhD course?
Ans. The highest placement package of PhD course is INR 15 lakhs to INR 20 lakhs per annum.
Ques. Which college or university has the highest placement package in India?
Ans. Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani is an institute that has the highest placement package in India.
Ques. Which university is known as the best university in India?
Ans. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay University is known for best university and No. 1 University in India.
Ques. What is the maximum and minimum fee structure in government colleges of PhD in management studies?
Ans. The maximum and minimum fee structure in government colleges of PhD in management studies is INR 22.70 K to INR 10 lakhs.
Ques. What is the maximum and minimum fee structure in private colleges of PhD in management studies?
Ans . The maximum and minimum fee structure in private colleges of PhD in management studies is INR 6.56 K to INR 5 lakhs.
Ques. When the GATE 2024 registration will start?
Ans. The GATE 2024 registration will start in August 2024 to September 2024.
Ques. Can a candidate pursue a PhD without giving an entrance exam?
Ans . Yes, candidates can pursue PhD courses without giving entrance exams during the admission process.
Ques. Name the entrance exams taken by colleges for PhD in commerce and management?
Ans . The entrance exams for PhD in commerce and management are NET and DET.
Ques. are master's degrees from ignou acceptable for admission into ph.d courses in top universities.
● Top Answer By Anumita Mukharjee on 28 Apr 22
● Top Answer By Srabani Guha on 24 Jul 23
● Top Answer By Arati Sinha on 29 Mar 23
● Top Answer By Karuna Nair on 13 Mar 23
● Top Answer By Advait Joshi on 23 Mar 23
● Top Answer By Advait Joshi on 17 Mar 23
● Top Answer By Pankaj Kumar on 18 Oct 22
● Top Answer By Poornima Sahoo on 18 Mar 23
● Top Answer By Bidita Ghose on 14 Jul 23
● Top Answer By Advait Joshi on 27 Jun 23
Ph.d. (physics), ph.d. (mathematics), ph.d. (biotechnology), ph.d. (zoology), ph.d. (psychology), ph.d. (business management), ph.d. (management studies), master of science [ms], ph.d. (computer science), ph.d. colleges in india.
Subscribe to our news letter.
PhD Coursework gives students a thorough grasp of their subject topic and the ability to perform independent research. The University Grants Commission (UGC) of India has published new PhD coursework guidelines and syllabus to improve quality and relevance.
Meet Tanu Bhatnagar, an educational expert with extensive experience in teaching, research and mentoring.With a decade in education and research, Tanu combines academic expertise with engaging storytelling. Her research background ensures every article is well-researched and insightful. Beyond textbooks, Tanu's expertise spans writing, exam preparation, economic trends, and global education, delving into the realms of spiritual awakening. This diverse perspective shines through in his writing, offering a fresh take on education. Join Tanu and CollegeChalo for an enriching learning adventure, where his passion ignites yours, and his words light your way.
29 Aug, 2024
27 Aug, 2024
Dpee 2024 exam for pharmacists: dates, process & importance.
24 Aug, 2024
Pandit deendayal upadhyaya telecom excellence awards 2024: apply by september 30 at awards.gov.in.
12 Aug, 2024
Top 20 colleges for psychology in india.
11 Aug, 2024
Hindenburg research: a crucial study for commerce students.
10 Aug, 2024
Top 20 private colleges in delhi ncr.
30 Aug, 2024
Top 20 private colleges in west bengal, top 20 private colleges in telangana.
28 Aug, 2024
BMC Medical Education volume 24 , Article number: 927 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
123 Accesses
Metrics details
The disruption of health and medical education by the COVID-19 pandemic made educators question the effect of online setting on students’ learning, motivation, self-efficacy and preference. In light of the health care staff shortage online scalable education seemed relevant. Reviews on the effect of online medical education called for high quality RCTs, which are increasingly relevant with rapid technological development and widespread adaption of online learning in universities. The objective of this trial is to compare standardized and feasible outcomes of an online and an onsite setting of a research course regarding the efficacy for PhD students within health and medical sciences: Primarily on learning of research methodology and secondly on preference, motivation, self-efficacy on short term and academic achievements on long term. Based on the authors experience with conducting courses during the pandemic, the hypothesis is that student preferred onsite setting is different to online setting.
Cluster randomized trial with two parallel groups. Two PhD research training courses at the University of Copenhagen are randomized to online (Zoom) or onsite (The Parker Institute, Denmark) setting. Enrolled students are invited to participate in the study. Primary outcome is short term learning. Secondary outcomes are short term preference, motivation, self-efficacy, and long-term academic achievements. Standardized, reproducible and feasible outcomes will be measured by tailor made multiple choice questionnaires, evaluation survey, frequently used Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, Single Item Self-Efficacy Question, and Google Scholar publication data. Sample size is calculated to 20 clusters and courses are randomized by a computer random number generator. Statistical analyses will be performed blinded by an external statistical expert.
Primary outcome and secondary significant outcomes will be compared and contrasted with relevant literature. Limitations include geographical setting; bias include lack of blinding and strengths are robust assessment methods in a well-established conceptual framework. Generalizability to PhD education in other disciplines is high. Results of this study will both have implications for students and educators involved in research training courses in health and medical education and for the patients who ultimately benefits from this training.
Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05736627. SPIRIT guidelines are followed.
Peer Review reports
Medical education was utterly disrupted for two years by the COVID-19 pandemic. In the midst of rearranging courses and adapting to online platforms we, with lecturers and course managers around the globe, wondered what the conversion to online setting did to students’ learning, motivation and self-efficacy [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. What the long-term consequences would be [ 4 ] and if scalable online medical education should play a greater role in the future [ 5 ] seemed relevant and appealing questions in a time when health care professionals are in demand. Our experience of performing research training during the pandemic was that although PhD students were grateful for courses being available, they found it difficult to concentrate related to the long screen hours. We sensed that most students preferred an onsite setting and perceived online courses a temporary and inferior necessity. The question is if this impacted their learning?
Since the common use of the internet in medical education, systematic reviews have sought to answer if there is a difference in learning effect when taught online compared to onsite. Although authors conclude that online learning may be equivalent to onsite in effect, they agree that studies are heterogeneous and small [ 6 , 7 ], with low quality of the evidence [ 8 , 9 ]. They therefore call for more robust and adequately powered high-quality RCTs to confirm their findings and suggest that students’ preferences in online learning should be investigated [ 7 , 8 , 9 ].
This uncovers two knowledge gaps: I) High-quality RCTs on online versus onsite learning in health and medical education and II) Studies on students’ preferences in online learning.
Recently solid RCTs have been performed on the topic of web-based theoretical learning of research methods among health professionals [ 10 , 11 ]. However, these studies are on asynchronous courses among medical or master students with short term outcomes.
This uncovers three additional knowledge gaps: III) Studies on synchronous online learning IV) among PhD students of health and medical education V) with long term measurement of outcomes.
The rapid technological development including artificial intelligence (AI) and widespread adaption as well as application of online learning forced by the pandemic, has made online learning well-established. It represents high resolution live synchronic settings which is available on a variety of platforms with integrated AI and options for interaction with and among students, chat and break out rooms, and exterior digital tools for teachers [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Thus, investigating online learning today may be quite different than before the pandemic. On one hand, it could seem plausible that this technological development would make a difference in favour of online learning which could not be found in previous reviews of the evidence. On the other hand, the personal face-to-face interaction during onsite learning may still be more beneficial for the learning process and combined with our experience of students finding it difficult to concentrate when online during the pandemic we hypothesize that outcomes of the onsite setting are different from the online setting.
To support a robust study, we design it as a cluster randomized trial. Moreover, we use the well-established and widely used Kirkpatrick’s conceptual framework for evaluating learning as a lens to assess our outcomes [ 15 ]. Thus, to fill the above-mentioned knowledge gaps, the objective of this trial is to compare a synchronous online and an in-person onsite setting of a research course regarding the efficacy for PhD students within the health and medical sciences:
Primarily on theoretical learning of research methodology and
Secondly on
◦ Preference, motivation, self-efficacy on short term
◦ Academic achievements on long term
This study protocol covers synchronous online and in-person onsite setting of research courses testing the efficacy for PhD students. It is a two parallel arms cluster randomized trial (Fig. 1 ).
Consort flow diagram
The study measures baseline and post intervention. Baseline variables and knowledge scores are obtained at the first day of the course, post intervention measurement is obtained the last day of the course (short term) and monthly for 24 months (long term).
Randomization is stratified giving 1:1 allocation ratio of the courses. As the number of participants within each course might differ, the allocation ratio of participants in the study will not fully be equal and 1:1 balanced.
The study site is The Parker Institute at Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. From here the courses are organized and run online and onsite. The course programs and time schedules, the learning objective, the course management, the lecturers, and the delivery are identical in the two settings. The teachers use the same introductory presentations followed by training in break out groups, feed-back and discussions. For the online group, the setting is organized as meetings in the online collaboration tool Zoom® [ 16 ] using the basic available technicalities such as screen sharing, chat function for comments, and breakout rooms and other basics digital tools if preferred. The online version of the course is synchronous with live education and interaction. For the onsite group, the setting is the physical classroom at the learning facilities at the Parker Institute. Coffee and tea as well as simple sandwiches and bottles of water, which facilitate sociality, are available at the onsite setting. The participants in the online setting must get their food and drink by themselves, but online sociality is made possible by not closing down the online room during the breaks. The research methodology courses included in the study are “Practical Course in Systematic Review Technique in Clinical Research”, (see course programme in appendix 1) and “Getting started: Writing your first manuscript for publication” [ 17 ] (see course programme in appendix 2). The two courses both have 12 seats and last either three or three and a half days resulting in 2.2 and 2.6 ECTS credits, respectively. They are offered by the PhD School of the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen. Both courses are available and covered by the annual tuition fee for all PhD students enrolled at a Danish university.
Inclusion criteria for participants: All PhD students enrolled on the PhD courses participate after informed consent: “Practical Course in Systematic Review Technique in Clinical Research” and “Getting started: Writing your first manuscript for publication” at the PhD School of the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Exclusion criteria for participants: Declining to participate and withdrawal of informed consent.
The PhD students at the PhD School at the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen participate after informed consent, taken by the daily project leader, allowing evaluation data from the course to be used after pseudo-anonymization in the project. They are informed in a welcome letter approximately three weeks prior to the course and again in the introduction the first course day. They register their consent on the first course day (Appendix 3). Declining to participate in the project does not influence their participation in the course.
Online course settings will be compared to onsite course settings. We test if the onsite setting is different to online. Online learning is increasing but onsite learning is still the preferred educational setting in a medical context. In this case onsite learning represents “usual care”. The online course setting is meetings in Zoom using the technicalities available such as chat and breakout rooms. The onsite setting is the learning facilities, at the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, The Capital Region, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
The course settings are not expected to harm the participants, but should a request be made to discontinue the course or change setting this will be met, and the participant taken out of the study. Course participants are allowed to take part in relevant concomitant courses or other interventions during the trial.
Course participants are motivated to complete the course irrespectively of the setting because it bears ECTS-points for their PhD education and adds to the mandatory number of ECTS-points. Thus, we expect adherence to be the same in both groups. However, we monitor their presence in the course and allocate time during class for testing the short-term outcomes ( motivation, self-efficacy, preference and learning). We encourage and, if necessary, repeatedly remind them to register with Google Scholar for our testing of the long-term outcome (academic achievement).
Outcomes are related to the Kirkpatrick model for evaluating learning (Fig. 2 ) which divides outcomes into four different levels; Reaction which includes for example motivation, self-efficacy and preferences, Learning which includes knowledge acquisition, Behaviour for practical application of skills when back at the job (not included in our outcomes), and Results for impact for end-users which includes for example academic achievements in the form of scientific articles [ 18 , 19 , 20 ].
The Kirkpatrick model
The primary outcome is short term learning (Kirkpatrick level 2).
Learning is assessed by a Multiple-Choice Questionnaire (MCQ) developed prior to the RCT specifically for this setting (Appendix 4). First the lecturers of the two courses were contacted and asked to provide five multiple choice questions presented as a stem with three answer options; one correct answer and two distractors. The questions should be related to core elements of their teaching under the heading of research training. The questions were set up to test the cognition of the students at the levels of "Knows" or "Knows how" according to Miller's Pyramid of Competence and not their behaviour [ 21 ]. Six of the course lecturers responded and out of this material all the questions which covered curriculum of both courses were selected. It was tested on 10 PhD students and within the lecturer group, revised after an item analysis and English language revised. The MCQ ended up containing 25 questions. The MCQ is filled in at baseline and repeated at the end of the course. The primary outcomes based on the MCQ is estimated as the score of learning calculated as number of correct answers out of 25 after the course. A decrease of points of the MCQ in the intervention groups denotes a deterioration of learning. In the MCQ the minimum score is 0 and 25 is maximum, where 19 indicates passing the course.
Furthermore, as secondary outcome, this outcome measurement will be categorized as binary outcome to determine passed/failed of the course defined by 75% (19/25) correct answers.
The learning score will be computed on group and individual level and compared regarding continued outcomes by the Mann–Whitney test comparing the learning score of the online and onsite groups. Regarding the binomial outcome of learning (passed/failed) data will be analysed by the Fisher’s exact test on an intention-to-treat basis between the online and onsite. The results will be presented as median and range and as mean and standard deviations, for possible future use in meta-analyses.
Motivation assessment post course: Motivation level is measured by the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) Scale [ 22 ] (Appendix 5). The IMI items were randomized by random.org on the 4th of August 2022. It contains 12 items to be assessed by the students on a 7-point Likert scale where 1 is “Not at all true”, 4 is “Somewhat true” and 7 is “Very true”. The motivation score will be computed on group and individual level and will then be tested by the Mann–Whitney of the online and onsite group.
Self-efficacy assessment post course: Self-efficacy level is measured by a single-item measure developed and validated by Williams and Smith [ 23 ] (Appendix 6). It is assessed by the students on a scale from 1–10 where 1 is “Strongly disagree” and 10 is “Strongly agree”. The self-efficacy score will be computed on group and individual level and tested by a Mann–Whitney test to compare the self-efficacy score of the online and onsite group.
Preference assessment post course: Preference is measured as part of the general course satisfaction evaluation with the question “If you had the option to choose, which form would you prefer this course to have?” with the options “onsite form” and “online form”.
Academic achievement assessment is based on 24 monthly measurements post course of number of publications, number of citations, h-index, i10-index. This data is collected through the Google Scholar Profiles [ 24 ] of the students as this database covers most scientific journals. Associations between onsite/online and long-term academic will be examined with Kaplan Meyer and log rank test with a significance level of 0.05.
Enrolment for the course at the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, becomes available when it is published in the course catalogue. In the course description the course location is “To be announced”. Approximately 3–4 weeks before the course begins, the participant list is finalized, and students receive a welcome letter containing course details, including their allocation to either the online or onsite setting. On the first day of the course, oral information is provided, and participants provide informed consent, baseline variables, and base line knowledge scores.
The last day of scheduled activities the following scores are collected, knowledge, motivation, self-efficacy, setting preference, and academic achievement. To track students' long term academic achievements, follow-ups are conducted monthly for a period of 24 months, with assessments occurring within one week of the last course day (Table 1 ).
The power calculation is based on the main outcome, theoretical learning on short term. For the sample size determination, we considered 12 available seats for participants in each course. To achieve statistical power, we aimed for 8 clusters in both online and onsite arms (in total 16 clusters) to detect an increase in learning outcome of 20% (learning outcome increase of 5 points). We considered an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.02, a standard deviation of 10, a power of 80%, and a two-sided alpha level of 5%. The Allocation Ratio was set at 1, implying an equal number of subjects in both online and onsite group.
Considering a dropout up to 2 students per course, equivalent to 17%, we determined that a total of 112 participants would be needed. This calculation factored in 10 clusters of 12 participants per study arm, which we deemed sufficient to assess any changes in learning outcome.
The sample size was estimated using the function n4means from the R package CRTSize [ 25 ].
Participants are PhD students enrolled in 10 courses of “Practical Course in Systematic Review Technique in Clinical Research” and 10 courses of “Getting started: Writing your first manuscript for publication” at the PhD School of the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Randomization will be performed on course-level. The courses are randomized by a computer random number generator [ 26 ]. To get a balanced randomization per year, 2 sets with 2 unique random integers in each, taken from the 1–4 range is requested.
The setting is not included in the course catalogue of the PhD School and thus allocation to online or onsite is concealed until 3–4 weeks before course commencement when a welcome letter with course information including allocation to online or onsite setting is distributed to the students. The lecturers are also informed of the course setting at this time point. If students withdraw from the course after being informed of the setting, a letter is sent to them enquiring of the reason for withdrawal and reason is recorded (Appendix 7).
The allocation sequence is generated by a computer random number generator (random.org). The participants and the lecturers sign up for the course without knowing the course setting (online or onsite) until 3–4 weeks before the course.
Due to the nature of the study, it is not possible to blind trial participants or lecturers. The outcomes are reported by the participants directly in an online form, thus being blinded for the outcome assessor, but not for the individual participant. The data collection for the long-term follow-up regarding academic achievements is conducted without blinding. However, the external researcher analysing the data will be blinded.
Data will be collected by the project leader (Table 1 ). Baseline variables and post course knowledge, motivation, and self-efficacy are self-reported through questionnaires in SurveyXact® [ 27 ]. Academic achievements are collected through Google Scholar profiles of the participants.
Given that we are using participant assessments and evaluations for research purposes, all data collection – except for monthly follow-up of academic achievements after the course – takes place either in the immediate beginning or ending of the course and therefore we expect participant retention to be high.
Data will be downloaded from SurveyXact and stored in a locked and logged drive on a computer belonging to the Capital Region of Denmark. Only the project leader has access to the data.
This project conduct is following the Danish Data Protection Agency guidelines of the European GDPR throughout the trial. Following the end of the trial, data will be stored at the Danish National Data Archive which fulfil Danish and European guidelines for data protection and management.
Data is anonymized and blinded before the analyses. Analyses are performed by a researcher not otherwise involved in the inclusion or randomization, data collection or handling. All statistical tests will be testing the null hypotheses assuming the two arms of the trial being equal based on corresponding estimates. Analysis of primary outcome on short-term learning will be started once all data has been collected for all individuals in the last included course. Analyses of long-term academic achievement will be started at end of follow-up.
Baseline characteristics including both course- and individual level information will be presented. Table 2 presents the available data on baseline.
We will use multivariate analysis for identification of the most important predictors (motivation, self-efficacy, sex, educational background, and knowledge) for best effect on short and long term. The results will be presented as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The results will be considered significant if CI does not include the value one.
All data processing and analyses were conducted using R statistical software version 4.1.0, 2021–05-18 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
If possible, all analysis will be performed for “Practical Course in Systematic Review Technique in Clinical Research” and for “Getting started: Writing your first manuscript for publication” separately.
Primary analyses will be handled with the intention-to-treat approach. The analyses will include all individuals with valid data regardless of they did attend the complete course. Missing data will be handled with multiple imputation [ 28 ] .
Upon reasonable request, public assess will be granted to protocol, datasets analysed during the current study, and statistical code Table 3 .
This project is coordinated in collaboration between the WHO CC (DEN-62) at the Parker Institute, CAMES, and the PhD School at the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen. The project leader runs the day-to-day support of the trial. The steering committee of the trial includes principal investigators from WHO CC (DEN-62) and CAMES and the project leader and meets approximately three times a year.
Data monitoring is done on a daily basis by the project leader and controlled by an external independent researcher.
An adverse event is “a harmful and negative outcome that happens when a patient has been provided with medical care” [ 29 ]. Since this trial does not involve patients in medical care, we do not expect adverse events. If participants decline taking part in the course after receiving the information of the course setting, information on reason for declining is sought obtained. If the reason is the setting this can be considered an unintended effect. Information of unintended effects of the online setting (the intervention) will be recorded. Participants are encouraged to contact the project leader with any response to the course in general both during and after the course.
The trial description has been sent to the Scientific Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (VEK) (21041907), which assessed it as not necessary to notify and that it could proceed without permission from VEK according to the Danish law and regulation of scientific research. The trial is registered with the Danish Data Protection Agency (Privacy) (P-2022–158). Important protocol modification will be communicated to relevant parties as well as VEK, the Joint Regional Information Security and Clinicaltrials.gov within an as short timeframe as possible.
The results (positive, negative, or inconclusive) will be disseminated in educational, scientific, and clinical fora, in international scientific peer-reviewed journals, and clinicaltrials.gov will be updated upon completion of the trial. After scientific publication, the results will be disseminated to the public by the press, social media including the website of the hospital and other organizations – as well as internationally via WHO CC (DEN-62) at the Parker Institute and WHO Europe.
All authors will fulfil the ICMJE recommendations for authorship, and RR will be first author of the articles as a part of her PhD dissertation. Contributors who do not fulfil these recommendations will be offered acknowledgement in the article.
This cluster randomized trial investigates if an onsite setting of a research course for PhD students within the health and medical sciences is different from an online setting. The outcomes measured are learning of research methodology (primary), preference, motivation, and self-efficacy (secondary) on short term and academic achievements (secondary) on long term.
The results of this study will be discussed as follows:
Discussion of primary outcome
Primary outcome will be compared and contrasted with similar studies including recent RCTs and mixed-method studies on online and onsite research methodology courses within health and medical education [ 10 , 11 , 30 ] and for inspiration outside the field [ 31 , 32 ]: Tokalic finds similar outcomes for online and onsite, Martinic finds that the web-based educational intervention improves knowledge, Cheung concludes that the evidence is insufficient to say that the two modes have different learning outcomes, Kofoed finds online setting to have negative impact on learning and Rahimi-Ardabili presents positive self-reported student knowledge. These conflicting results will be discussed in the context of the result on the learning outcome of this study. The literature may change if more relevant studies are published.
Discussion of secondary outcomes
Secondary significant outcomes are compared and contrasted with similar studies.
It is a limitation to this study, that an onsite curriculum for a full day is delivered identically online, as this may favour the onsite course due to screen fatigue [ 33 ]. At the same time, it is also a strength that the time schedules are similar in both settings. The offer of coffee, tea, water, and a plain sandwich in the onsite course may better facilitate the possibility for socializing. Another limitation is that the study is performed in Denmark within a specific educational culture, with institutional policies and resources which might affect the outcome and limit generalization to other geographical settings. However, international students are welcome in the class.
In educational interventions it is generally difficult to blind participants and this inherent limitation also applies to this trial [ 11 ]. Thus, the participants are not blinded to their assigned intervention, and neither are the lecturers in the courses. However, the external statistical expert will be blinded when doing the analyses.
We chose to compare in-person onsite setting with a synchronous online setting. Therefore, the online setting cannot be expected to generalize to asynchronous online setting. Asynchronous delivery has in some cases showed positive results and it might be because students could go back and forth through the modules in the interface without time limit [ 11 ].
We will report on all the outcomes defined prior to conducting the study to avoid selective reporting bias.
It is a strength of the study that it seeks to report outcomes within the 1, 2 and 4 levels of the Kirkpatrick conceptual framework, and not solely on level 1. It is also a strength that the study is cluster randomized which will reduce “infections” between the two settings and has an adequate power calculated sample size and looks for a relevant educational difference of 20% between the online and onsite setting.
The results of this study may have implications for the students for which educational setting they choose. Learning and preference results has implications for lecturers, course managers and curriculum developers which setting they should plan for the health and medical education. It may also be of inspiration for teaching and training in other disciplines. From a societal perspective it also has implications because we will know the effect and preferences of online learning in case of a future lock down.
Future research could investigate academic achievements in online and onsite research training on the long run (Kirkpatrick 4); the effect of blended learning versus online or onsite (Kirkpatrick 2); lecturers’ preferences for online and onsite setting within health and medical education (Kirkpatrick 1) and resource use in synchronous and asynchronous online learning (Kirkpatrick 5).
This trial collected pilot data from August to September 2021 and opened for inclusion in January 2022. Completion of recruitment is expected in April 2024 and long-term follow-up in April 2026. Protocol version number 1 03.06.2022 with amendments 30.11.2023.
The project leader will have access to the final trial dataset which will be available upon reasonable request. Exception to this is the qualitative raw data that might contain information leading to personal identification.
Artificial Intelligence
Copenhagen academy for medical education and simulation
Confidence interval
Coronavirus disease
European credit transfer and accumulation system
International committee of medical journal editors
Intrinsic motivation inventory
Multiple choice questionnaire
Doctor of medicine
Masters of sciences
Randomized controlled trial
Scientific ethical committee of the Capital Region of Denmark
WHO Collaborating centre for evidence-based clinical health promotion
Samara M, Algdah A, Nassar Y, Zahra SA, Halim M, Barsom RMM. How did online learning impact the academic. J Technol Sci Educ. 2023;13(3):869–85.
Article Google Scholar
Nejadghaderi SA, Khoshgoftar Z, Fazlollahi A, Nasiri MJ. Medical education during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: an umbrella review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1358084. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1358084 .
Madi M, Hamzeh H, Abujaber S, Nawasreh ZH. Have we failed them? Online learning self-efficacy of physiotherapy students during COVID-19 pandemic. Physiother Res Int. 2023;5:e1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1992 .
Torda A. How COVID-19 has pushed us into a medical education revolution. Intern Med J. 2020;50(9):1150–3.
Alhat S. Virtual Classroom: A Future of Education Post-COVID-19. Shanlax Int J Educ. 2020;8(4):101–4.
Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300(10):1181–96. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.10.1181 .
Pei L, Wu H. Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ Online. 2019;24(1):1666538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538 .
Richmond H, Copsey B, Hall AM, Davies D, Lamb SE. A systematic review and meta-analysis of online versus alternative methods for training licensed health care professionals to deliver clinical interventions. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):227. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1047-4 .
George PP, Zhabenko O, Kyaw BM, Antoniou P, Posadzki P, Saxena N, Semwal M, Tudor Car L, Zary N, Lockwood C, Car J. Online Digital Education for Postregistration Training of Medical Doctors: Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(2):e13269. https://doi.org/10.2196/13269 .
Tokalić R, Poklepović Peričić T, Marušić A. Similar Outcomes of Web-Based and Face-to-Face Training of the GRADE Approach for the Certainty of Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e43928. https://doi.org/10.2196/43928 .
Krnic Martinic M, Čivljak M, Marušić A, Sapunar D, Poklepović Peričić T, Buljan I, et al. Web-Based Educational Intervention to Improve Knowledge of Systematic Reviews Among Health Science Professionals: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(8): e37000.
https://www.mentimeter.com/ . Accessed 4 Dec 2023.
https://www.sendsteps.com/en/ . Accessed 4 Dec 2023.
https://da.padlet.com/ . Accessed 4 Dec 2023.
Zackoff MW, Real FJ, Abramson EL, Li STT, Klein MD, Gusic ME. Enhancing Educational Scholarship Through Conceptual Frameworks: A Challenge and Roadmap for Medical Educators. Acad Pediatr. 2019;19(2):135–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2018.08.003 .
https://zoom.us/ . Accessed 20 Aug 2024.
Raffing R, Larsen S, Konge L, Tønnesen H. From Targeted Needs Assessment to Course Ready for Implementation-A Model for Curriculum Development and the Course Results. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(3):2529. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032529 .
https://www.kirkpatrickpartners.com/the-kirkpatrick-model/ . Accessed 12 Dec 2023.
Smidt A, Balandin S, Sigafoos J, Reed VA. The Kirkpatrick model: A useful tool for evaluating training outcomes. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2009;34(3):266–74.
Campbell K, Taylor V, Douglas S. Effectiveness of online cancer education for nurses and allied health professionals; a systematic review using kirkpatrick evaluation framework. J Cancer Educ. 2019;34(2):339–56.
Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(9 Suppl):S63–7.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68 .
Williams GM, Smith AP. Using single-item measures to examine the relationships between work, personality, and well-being in the workplace. Psychology. 2016;07(06):753–67.
https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/citations.html . Accessed 4 Dec 2023.
Rotondi MA. CRTSize: sample size estimation functions for cluster randomized trials. R package version 1.0. 2015. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=CRTSize .
Random.org. Available from: https://www.random.org/
https://rambollxact.dk/surveyxact . Accessed 4 Dec 2023.
Sterne JAC, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls. BMJ (Online). 2009;339:157–60.
Google Scholar
Skelly C, Cassagnol M, Munakomi S. Adverse Events. StatPearls Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing. 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558963/ .
Rahimi-Ardabili H, Spooner C, Harris MF, Magin P, Tam CWM, Liaw ST, et al. Online training in evidence-based medicine and research methods for GP registrars: a mixed-methods evaluation of engagement and impact. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):1–14. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439372/pdf/12909_2021_Article_2916.pdf .
Cheung YYH, Lam KF, Zhang H, Kwan CW, Wat KP, Zhang Z, et al. A randomized controlled experiment for comparing face-to-face and online teaching during COVID-19 pandemic. Front Educ. 2023;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1160430 .
Kofoed M, Gebhart L, Gilmore D, Moschitto R. Zooming to Class?: Experimental Evidence on College Students' Online Learning During Covid-19. SSRN Electron J. 2021;IZA Discussion Paper No. 14356.
Mutlu Aİ, Yüksel M. Listening effort, fatigue, and streamed voice quality during online university courses. Logop Phoniatr Vocol :1–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2024.2317789
Download references
We thank the students who make their evaluations available for this trial and MSc (Public Health) Mie Sylow Liljendahl for statistical support.
Open access funding provided by Copenhagen University The Parker Institute, which hosts the WHO CC (DEN-62), receives a core grant from the Oak Foundation (OCAY-18–774-OFIL). The Oak Foundation had no role in the design of the study or in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data or in writing the manuscript.
Authors and affiliations.
WHO Collaborating Centre (DEN-62), Clinical Health Promotion Centre, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 2400, Denmark
Rie Raffing & Hanne Tønnesen
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Centre for HR and Education, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
RR, LK and HT have made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work; RR to the acquisition of data, and RR, LK and HT to the interpretation of data; RR has drafted the work and RR, LK, and HT have substantively revised it AND approved the submitted version AND agreed to be personally accountable for their own contributions as well as ensuring that any questions which relates to the accuracy or integrity of the work are adequately investigated, resolved and documented.
Correspondence to Rie Raffing .
Ethics approval and consent to participate.
The Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics has assessed the study Journal-nr.:21041907 (Date: 21–09-2021) without objections or comments. The study has been approved by The Danish Data Protection Agency Journal-nr.: P-2022–158 (Date: 04.05.2022).
All PhD students participate after informed consent. They can withdraw from the study at any time without explanations or consequences for their education. They will be offered information of the results at study completion. There are no risks for the course participants as the measurements in the course follow routine procedure and they are not affected by the follow up in Google Scholar. However, the 15 min of filling in the forms may be considered inconvenient.
The project will follow the GDPR and the Joint Regional Information Security Policy. Names and ID numbers are stored on a secure and logged server at the Capital Region Denmark to avoid risk of data leak. All outcomes are part of the routine evaluation at the courses, except the follow up for academic achievement by publications and related indexes. However, the publications are publicly available per se.
The authors declare no competing interests
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary material 1., supplementary material 2., supplementary material 3., supplementary material 4., supplementary material 5., supplementary material 6., supplementary material 7., rights and permissions.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Raffing, R., Konge, L. & Tønnesen, H. Learning effect of online versus onsite education in health and medical scholarship – protocol for a cluster randomized trial. BMC Med Educ 24 , 927 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05915-z
Download citation
Received : 25 March 2024
Accepted : 14 August 2024
Published : 26 August 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05915-z
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
ISSN: 1472-6920
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Syllabus/Schedule Subject to Change EDCI 695 - Page 1 of 19 . EDCI 695.410 . Doctoral Research Methodology . COURSE SYLLABUS: FALL 2019 . INSTRUCTOR INFORMATION . Instructor: David L. Brown, PhD . Office Location: Education South, 229 . Office Hours: By Appointment . Office Phone: 903-886-5536. Office Fax: 903- 886-5581
ics andSyllabus for Ph.D. Entrance Examination Research Methodolog. (50%) A. he literature review: Writing a survey and identifying the problem. Pla. iting a research proposal: Research projects, Major funding agencies.Ethics andrelated issues in research: Concepts in ethics, Intellectual Property Rights,
Guang, Jiu Zhao, John Wiley Sons, 2011.PAPER - IV d AREA OF SPECIALIZATION - ULTRASONICSObjective This paper aims at providing the fundamentals of production and propagation of ultrasonic waves in liquids and solids in order to underst. sonics in various fields.UNIT-I Characteristics, Production and Detection of Ultrasonic ...
Doctor of Philosophy Degree. Degree Requirements: The PhD degree requires a minimum of 90 credits and a dissertation. A redesigned Doctor of Philosophy degree starts Fall 2014. For additional degree information, refer to the introductory school section on Doctoral Degree. PSYED 2001 - INTRO TO RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY SYLLABUS (M.Phil/M.Tech/Ph.D) Foundations of Research: Meaning, Objectives, Motivation, Utility. Concept of theory, empiricism, deductive and inductive theory. Characteristics of scientific method - Understanding the language of research - Concept, Construct, Definition, Variable.
This course introduces research methods as they apply to the higher education (HIED) field of study. HIED 695 provides a macro- perspective of the methods associated with conducting scholarly research in all follow-on core, elective, quantitative and qualitative courses; and the doctoral dissertation. Completion of HIED 695 is a prerequisite ...
Syllabus for Research Methodology and IPR, a mandatory course of PhD coursework - 2018. 16PHDRM RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND IPR (Mandatory Ph.D Coursework) Course objectives: • To give an overview of the research methodology and explain the technique of defining a research problem • To explain the functions of the literature review in research.
Mandatory PhD course in methodology, 22,5 credits. The course syllabus below in PDF Pdf, 82 kB. Course Syllabus Aims. The course aims to give a general and advanced training for quantitative research that deals with research design and data analysis for behavioral data. Contents. The course is divided into two seperate parts:
SYLLABUS - Ph.D. ENTRANCE EXAMINATION 1 | P a g e RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Research Aptitude: Research- Meaning, characteristics and types; Steps of research; Methods of research; Research Ethics; Paper, article, workshop, seminar, conference and symposium; Thesis writing; its characteristics and format.
Week 1: Philosophy of Science (subjective versus objective, materialism versus idealism, causality, etc.) Week 2: Logical Reasoning (inductive logic, deductive logix, syllogistic logic) Week 3: History of development of science and the influence of philosophy. Week 4: What Scientists Actually Do. Week 5: Forming a Hypothesis.
View All Courses. This course addresses the fundamentals of research in the social sciences: theory, research design, methods, and critique. It is designed for Ph.D. students who wish to undertake research publishable in scholarly social science journals. We will discuss a variety of research methods with a specific focus on experiments and ...
PDF | Research Methodology syllabus for PhD course work Exam | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate ... RESEARCH METHODOLOGY-PhD Course work. January 2019; DOI:10.13140/RG ...
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY SYLLABUS (M.Phil/M.Tech/Ph.D) 1. Foundations of Research: Meaning, Objectives, Motivation, Utility. Concept of theory, empiricism, deductive and inductive theory. Characteristics of scientific method - Understanding the language of ... Use of tools / techniques for Research: methods to search required information ...
Syllabus for Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) Subject: Research Methodology and Technical and Scientific Applications Credits: 4, L+T+P: (3+0+1) Maximum Marks: 100 Introduction and Design of research: Meaning, objectives and significance of research, types and
MGMT9701 - Quant Research Methods in MGMT (Course Syllabus) This PhD course exposes students to a range of methodologies and techniques in applied econometrics as seen in latest research papers. The approach is to take a detailed look at 1-2 papers per week for a thorough understanding of each topic.
Total Marks for PhD Entrance Test: 100 Marks The Syllabus for Research Methodology is common to all branches of Science SYLLABUS Part I: Research Methodology (50 Marks) 1) Foundation of Research: Meaning, Objectives, Motivation, Utility. Concept of theory, Empiricism, deductive and inductive theory. ...
Methods of research • Concept and formulation of hypothesis • Survey method • Experimental ... Syllabus for PhD in the field of Structural, water Resources and Geotechnical Engineering Unit 1: Structural Engineering Engineering Mechanics: System of forces, free-body diagrams, equilibrium equations; Internal ...
In this video we have discussed the entire syllabus of research methodology specifically what is problem and how to write research Proposal topics which wi...
The course MATH19-R01 Research Methodology is compulsory. Apart from this a research scholar is required to study any of the three courses from the nine courses MATH19-R02 to MATH19-R10. Total credits of the course work is 16 and credits for each course is 4. Total Marks in Each Course: 100, Duration of Examination for Each Course: 3 Hrs.
*Sample syllabus is subject to change each semester. Research Methods, Data Analysis, and Reporting to Support DoD Security Programs (CDSE ED 508) ... and essays on research methods, and examples of effective and ineffective presentation of statistical information. Students are expected to familiarize themselves with the assigned topic and ...
PhD Course introduces students to concepts of Research Methodology, Research Ethics, ... Semester Wise PhD Syllabus. The subjects in the PhD course depend on the specialization that students decide to pursue, as, with every specialization, different subjects would be considered core subjects. PhD syllabus despite being different from each other ...
The syllabus of the Entrance Test is as per the 'University Grants Commission (Minimum Standards and Procedures for Award of M.Phil. /Ph.D. Degrees) Regulations, 2016 comprising 50% on research methodology and 50% on specific subject. The question paper shall have total 100 questions consisting of 50% on research methodology and 50% on ...
The syllabus for PhD entrance exams includes common topics from 10+2, graduation and postgraduation level i.e. technology, life sciences, mathematics, sciences, and general aptitude. ... Introduction to research methodology: Advanced course in formal methods: Principles of thesis preparation: Advanced course in philosophy of science: Research ...
Comparative Politics & Political Theory. View / Download PDF. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Track - 1 (TROH) View / Download PDF. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Track - 2 (TRTH) View / Download PDF. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Track - 3 (TRDH) View / Download PDF. Computer Science and Engineering.
These new guidelines and syllabus are designed to enhance PhD coursework in India and develop better researchers with the ability to succeed. This article will examine the latest UGC guidelines and syllabus for PhD coursework and how they are projected to affect Indian research. Also, read Top 10 PhD admission exams in India Latest List 2023.
The objective of this trial is to compare standardized and feasible outcomes of an online and an onsite setting of a research course regarding the efficacy for PhD students within health and medical sciences: Primarily on learning of research methodology and secondly on preference, motivation, self-efficacy on short term and academic ...